R-6959
.~ . .
CA:RMM:tm Santa Monica, California
Council Meeting 01/08/85
RESOLUTION NO. 6959(ccS)
(City Council Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA APPROVING
THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS
TO DEVELOP A MOTORCYCLE TRAFFIC DIVISION
WHEREAS, the Santa Monica Pollce Department desires to
develop a Motorcycle Traffic Dlvision; and
WHEREAS, the Californla Offlce of Trafflc Safety has lnvited
the City of Santa Monlca to submit an app11cation for grant funds
to develop a Motorcycle Trafflc Divlsion,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA
DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Manager of the City of Santa Monica 15
authorlzed, on behalf of the City of Santa Monica, to submlt the
attached Trafflc Safety Project Agreement to the Office of Traf-
fic Safety.
SECTION 2. The City of Santa Monica agrees to provlde all
hard-matchlng funds required for the above described proJect
(lncludlng any extenslon or amendment thereof) under the National
Highway Safety Act and the rules and regulatlons of the Office of
Trafflc Safety and that cash will be approprlated as requlred
thereby.
- 6 -
. IJI , . e
SECTION 3. Grant funds recelved for the above-described
project shall not be used to supplant law enforcement expendi-
tures controlled by the City Council.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of
thlS Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be
in full force and effect.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~----t------"1" \.-t..--. ~.__
ROBERt'M. MYER~ -
Clty Attorney
- 7 -
. .. T . ~
Adopted and approved this 8th day of January, 1985.
01 _1-.~ k ~
/ - - Mayor
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 6959(CCS)
was duly adopted by the City Councll of the CIty of Santa Monica
at a meetIng thereof held on January 8, 1985 by the followIng
Council vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers: Conn, Edwards, Epstein, Jennings,
Katz, Zane and Mayor Reed
Noes: Councilmembers: None
Abstain: Councllmembers: None
Absent: Councllmembers: None
ATTEST:
tL7J;~~-
CIty Clerk
------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
~ ~ T .. a,
.... -
O'1'S USE ONLY
State of California PROJECT NlMBER
Business, Transportation & Housing Agency PSP 00.
OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY
REVISION NUMBER
DATE
CALIFORNIA TRAFFIC SAFETY PROJECT AGRF.F1<IENT
OFFICE OFTRAFF/C ~~I ;- PROJECT BUDGET ESTIMATE
Fiscal Yr. Amount
PAGE 1 (To be CORFleted by Applicant Agency-) $
l. PROJECT TITLE $
$
Motorcycle TrafflC Division $
2. NAME OF APPLICANT AGENCY
Total $
City of Santa Monica
4. PROJECT PERIOD
3. AGENCY UNIT TO HANDLE PROJECT Month - Day - Year
Fran: Jan 1 1985
Santa Monica Police Department t1ar 31 1987
To :
5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Sul!Illarize the proposed project plan covering the objectives, method
of procedure, evaluation and end product in approxillBtely 100 words)
The Santa ~1onica Police Department will develoo and imolement a Selective Traffic Enforcement
Program. A Traffic Division consisting of six motorcycle officers and a motorcycle sergeant
will review monthly traffic accident statistics and deploy accordingly. The unit will strive
to 1) increase hazardous citations; 2) reduce traffic accidents, and 3) to increase the
Traff1c EnforceMent Index (total hazardous citations a~d arrests divided hy total fatal and
injury accidents). The unlt will also conduct a public awareness comoaign at Santa t10nica Hiqh
School and in the media. Conti nuous monitori ng and quarterly reports wi 11 COJl1!Jare oro,;ect
obJectives with accomplishments.
6. FEDERAL FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED $ 751,8H
7. ACCEPTANCE OF CCNDITlOOS - The provisions on the reverse side hereof constitute a p3rt
of this a9reement
A. PROJECT DIRECTOR B. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL OF APPLICANT AGENCY
Name: James F. Keane Phone: Name: John Jalili Phone:
Address: 1685 I'lain Street (213) 458-8401 Address: 1685 Main Street (213) 458-8301)
Santa Monica, CA 90401 Santa ~1oni ca, CA Q0401
,
S~gnature
Title C1 ty l-1anaaer
C. FISCAL OR ACCOUNTING OFFICIAL D. OFFICE AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE PAYMENTS
Name : Mike Dennis Name: City of Santa t10nica
Title: Director of Finance Address:1685 Main Street
Santa t10ni ca, C,II, 9rWll
Phone: (213) 458-8281
ATTACHMENTS
Project Description Schedule A lnitial Evaluation Data Form Schedule C
Adm. Support & Contribution Schedule A-l Certification, California
Detailed Budget Estimate Schedule B Traffic Safety Program (OTS-33)
Budget Narrative Schedule B-1
O'1'S-38 (Rev 10/83)
. . -~ /
1. It is understood and agreed by the Project Director
and Authorizing Official that any grant received as
a result of this agreement is subject to all Federal
and State regulations governing grants and to those
controls expressed in the California Traffic Safety
'Grant Program Manuals which include, but are not
limited to:
a. Only verified participating costs resulting from
activities described in this Agreement will be
eligible for reimbursement:
b. Progress Reports must be submitted by the Project
Director to the Office of Traffic Safety on
January 15, April l5, July IS, and October 15,
during each year of project operation:
c. All project accounting records and supporting
documents must be retained for audit purposes for
at least three years after receipt of final
payment: audits will be in accordance with A-102
Attachment P.
d. A final project report must be submitted to the
Office of Traffic Safety within 60 days after
the termination date of the project.
2. No alteration or variation of the terms of this
contract shall be valid unless made in writing and
signed by the parties hereto, and no oral understand-
ing or agreement not incorporated herein shall be
binding on any of the parties hereto.
3. -The obligation of grant funds for successive fiscal
years of multi-year projects is SUbJect to the avail-
ability of Federal funds.
~ .. ~ . -
ADDENDUM
ProJect No.
This proJect is approved subJect to the following
conditions:
1. Personnel funded under this proJect shall be
dedicated in total to traff~c law enforcement.
EXCEPT:
a. In the case of a criminal offense committed
in the officer's presence.
b. In the case of response to an officer in
distress.
c. In the case of a riot where all available
personnel must be committed.
2. Equipment funded under this proJect is subject
to same requirements as #1 above.
3. Fiscal year funding will be at the level shown
under Project Budget Estimate and Schedule B,
Detailed Budget Estimate, provided that project
activities and personnel are maintained at the
same level during the total term of the project.
OTS-23 (Rev S/S2)
-
-. . SCHEDULE A -
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
BACKGROUND
A. General Characteristics
Santa Monica has a population of aporoximately 91,000 residents. The City's
8.1 square miles are bounded on three sides by the Clty of Los Angeles, and
on the west by the ocean. Over eleven million oeople visit Santa Monica
beaches each year. Santa Monica is a self-contained community enjoying an
excellent year-round climate, including an average temperature of 61.7 F.
It is basically a residential community with clean. high-technology
lndustrial areas. A large shopping mall and even larger shopoing business
and recreational development have been added in recent years.
B. Street and Hlghways
The roadway system in Santa Monica has a total of 150 miles of paved streets.
The Santa Monica Freeway (U.S. Interstate 10) runs east and west through
the center of the city, turning north at the beach into the Pacific Coast
Highway.
There are a total of 33 miles of arterial roads, conforming to a basic qrid
plan that connects with roadways of similar nature in bordering Los Angeles.
The remaining 117 miles of paved roadway is made up of collector and
residential streets.
C. Operating Departments
The Santa Monica Police Department employs 267 total nersonnel, including
121 non-sworn employees. There is presently no traffic unit.
D. Existing Systems
Operations Bureau patrol units enforce traffic laws on an as-time-available
basis. As manpower permits, one officer from day watch and one officer from
night watch are assigned to radar enforcement. Data pertalning to traffic
accidents, arrests, and cltations is processed in the City's central
automated data processing (ADP) system. A monthly traffic statistic orintout
is dlstributed to the Police Department by the Data Processing Deoartment.
There are indications that the ADP system is not comoatible with Statewide
Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and does not contaln all data
elements used by the California Highway Patrol.
OTS-38b (Rev 5/82)
--
~" .'
. . T . SCHEDULE A _
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROBLEM STATH'1ENT ...
The Santa Monica Police Department has no "formalized" traffic enforcement program.
This sltuation is due, in part, to increasing budgetary constralnts affecting ,
police service and deployment. Burgeoning community participation in the Police
Department's priority setting and decision-making processes has also impacted
serVlces and deDToyment. This trend has resulted in the gradual reduction and
ultimate elimlnatlon of the Pollce Deoartment's Motorcycle Traffic Division.
The Division, which began in 1913, with ~ne motorcycle officer, peaked during
the 1950's, with an elghteen-officer squad. By 1970, the unit had been reduced
to two motorcycle officers. The motorcycle unit was finally absorbed by the .
Patrol Division in 1972.
In June 1982, the Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of
Callfornia at Berkeley examined the City's traffic enforcement program. The
study suggested that the Police Department:
- -
- Re-evaluate thelr c~rrent Philosophies"ai'" they relate to traffic
acci dent enforcemenf. ,.- r_:r
- Emphasize traffic-related trainlng.
- Establlsh quantiflable written traffic related goals.
- Analyze the necessity of oreoaring two similar Traffic Statistic Reports.
- Implement the use of comparison taples - collision factors vs. citations.
- Re-evaluate accident policy and procedures.
- Develop an accident pin map.
- Utilize State summarles of City accidents.
Because of the aforementioned communlty orlorities, the Santa Monica Police
Department has been more reactive than proactive in terms of traffic enforcement.
Individual patrol offlcers assigned to Radar Enforcement generally determine
where and when speed laws are enforced. Due to manpower restrictions, radar
enforcement is limited to only one offlcer per shift, between the hours of
8 a m. and 3 a.m.
Beat officers enforce traffic laws as they encounter violations on routine oatrol.
Routine patrol, however, represents less than 10 percent of an average
Santa 110nica police officer's working day.
OTS-38b (Rev 5/82)
- - -- -- --- --
-- - --- - - -- ----
, ~
. SCHEDULE A -
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Traffic in many areas of the City is anproaching the saturation aoini. Several
factors contribute to the City's traffic oroblerns, 1ncluding:
- Each year the average number of vehicles using city streets increases ,
by 15,000 vehicles per d~.
- The Pacific Coast Highway in Santa Monica is the Western terminus of a
maJor eight-lane freeway (U.S. Interstate 10).
- U.S. Interstate 10 brings an average of 79,100 vehicles per day into the City.
,
- The new Santa Monica Place Shopping Mall attracts'-19,OOO vehicles on an
average day, and an additional 14,000 veh1cles are expected to ViS1t daily
the recently completed 496,000 square foot Colorado Place shooping business
and recreational develooment.
- Pacific Coast Highway is virtually impassable and local traffic enforcement
1S difficult if not lmPossible on warm weekend days due to ~ach area
congestion. r
- The same situation holds true in the areas surrounding Santa Monica Place
and Colorado Place during the holiday shoDDing season.
- The close proxiwity of the Los Angeles International Airoort, movina over
33 million passengers per year, contributes to the tremendous vehicle
traffic problem in the Santa Monica area.
- Major recreational and entertainment facilities, including the popular
Santa Monica Pier and beaches, 1nvite a preponderance of traffic problems.
- L1ncoln Boulevard, a State Highway and the major North-South surface
streets to Marina del Rey and the Los Angeles International Alrport carries
52,100 vehlcles per day in Santa Monlca. Development of Summa Corporation
nroperties adjacent to L1ncoln Boulevard in Marina del Rey, 3 miles sout~
of Santa Monica, is exnected to triple the area's traffic.
- Continuous h1gh r1se commercial development on Wllshire Boulevard ln
West Los Angeles, adJacent to our eastern boundary, w1ll further imoact
our trafflc congest1on.
- Pedestrians, presumably due to the unavoidable reduction in traffic
enforcement, regularly diSObey traffic laws with imounity, adding to
congestion and accldents.
OTS-38b (Rev 5/82)
'- "
. . SCHEDULE A ,
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
.,
Despite a steady ~ncrease in both number of vehicles and the number of injury
accidents on Santa Monlca streets, the Traffic Enforcement Index (hazardous arrests
and citations divided by fatal and injury accidents) has dronped dramatically in
the last ten years. These statistics are as follows: '
1973 1978 1981 1981 1983
Trafflc Volume
(est.) vehicles per day 406,100 445,700 493,200 509,000 524,850 .
Fatal Accidents 12 10 6 11 4
Injury Accidents 519 702 746 653 730
Hazardous Citations 22,8)4 18,441 16,03] 15,464 17,505
/ ~
.-
OUI Arrests < 1,546 1,051 1,303 1..4}4 1,369
Traffic Enforcement Index 44.0 27.4 23.1 25.5 25.7
ATTEMPTS TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM
The following is a summary of the various efforts that have been made to deal
with the problem:
..
1. Llne supervisors and watch commanders have conducted roll call training
encouraging field officers to actively enforce traffic laws. Watch
Commanders and supervisors post and review monthly recaos of individual
officer's traffic enforcement statlstics. Those with high hazardous
citation averages are praised at roll call; those with low averages are
counseled privately.
2. Officers and supervisors have been sent to speciallzed trafflc-related
tralning since 1982, lncluding Advanced Traffic Accident Investigation,
Skid Analysis, and Hazardous Material Spills.
3. The Pollce Department has discontinued using its own form to record
property damage only traffic accidents and now use State suoplied forms
to record all traffic accldents.
4. The Police Department has, on several summer weekends, requested the
assistance of Californla Highway Patrol motorcycle officers to enforce
unsafe turning violations on the Pacific Coast Highway. Traffic congestion
on the highway, often caused by unsafe turning movements, precludes
traffic law enforcement by patrol cars.
Despite continued efforts to increase traffic law enforcement and reduce traffic
-accidents, the problems continue. Given oresent capabllities and oast efforts of
enforcement, it is apparent that additlonal resources are necessary to develop an
effective Selective Traffic Enforcement Program.
OTS-38b (Rev 5/82)
~ ~
. . SCHEDULE A e
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT OBJECTIVES -,
-
The primary goal of the project is to reduce traffic accidents by selectively
enforcing specifically identified accident-caus1ng violatlons at high-accident t
locations throughout the City. The proJect object1ves are as follows:
1. To increase the number of hazardous citations issued by at least 50 oercent,
from an average of 1,459 hazardous citations a month in 1983 to an average
of 2,188 citatlons a month by July 1, 1985. (It is intended to ~aintain
the increase throughout the project).
,
To reduce the total number of traffic acc1dents--within the City by at
least 10 percent, from an average of 236 traffic accidents a ~onth
during 1983 to an average of 212 accidents a month by March 31, 1987.
To increase the Traffic Enforcement Index from 25.7 in 1983 to at least
38.0 by March 11, 1986.
~
METHOD OF PROCEDURE t
Phase I - Preparation State (January - March 1985)
Establish a written select10n process and job statement for the officer and
sergeant assigned to the Motorcycle Traffic Division.
Recruit and select SlX police officers and one police sergeant from the department
to staff the Motorcycle Traffic Division;
Explain project goals and objectives to, and seek support from, patrol officers.
Develop a training program for the division.
Analyze current traffic acc1dent and traffic offense reports. Take steps to make
the information in the reports more relevant and accurate Eliminate unnecessary
duplicat10n of effort 1n preparing accident and enforcement reports.
Implement a comparison of Pr1mary Collision Factors versus citations to determine
if enforcement efforts should be directed into areas of high accident-causinq
violations.
Develop an accident oin map that visually illustrates the locat1on and pr1mary
coll1sion factors 1nvolved in acc1dents that occur in the City.
Obtain motorcycles and other equipment necessary for the Division.
;
OTS-38b (Rev 5/82)
~. , .:;~':H'::DC:"'~ _.... e...
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
~h?se II - Prellminary Trainlng ( ,/il)rll, 1985)
Implement the division trainlng program as developed in Phase I.
Send the Traffic Division off1cers and sergeant to the Los Angeles Police
Department Motorcycle School. Supplement with in-service training with L.A. P.O.
motorcycle officers and in-service radar training.
Confer with the City Attorney's Office to exolain Traffic Divlsion goals and
objectives and obtain input.
Send the sergeant to Traffic Program Management Institute at Cal Poly, Pomona.
Phase III - Implement Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (April 1, 1985 -
April 1987)
Deploy the Motorcycle Traffic Dlvision 1) durlng the high accident hours,
2) at high accident locations to 3) enforce high accident orimary collision factors.
All members of the division w1ll work a five-day week (versus usual four-day week).
Three officers would be assigned to day watch and three to mid watch. \~l th days
off this wlll deploy at least two officers on each watch every day and cover the
time period when over 80 percent of accidents occur.
Phase IV - Public Awareness Campaign (throughout project duration)
Develoo a liaison with Santa Monica High School and provide traininq 1n Driver
Education classes on common goal of reducing accidents in the City.
Conduct a strong awareness campaign through newsoaoers and other available Media
informing the public of the efforts of the Motorcycle Traffic Division.
Phase V - Data Gathering and Analysis (throughout project duration)
Analyze program data monthly and incoroorate into timely reoorts. Ouarterly
proJect evaluation reports will be prepared by the prOJect team and revlewed and
submitted by the Project ~irector.
These reports will comoare actual proJect accomplishments with planned
accomolishments. They will include information concerning any changes Made by
the Project Director in planning or guiding h1S oroject efforts. These reoorts
w1ll also include budgetary 1nformat1on on the format specified by the Office of
Traff1c Safety. The following are some of the methods to be used in constant
monitoring and evaluation of the program:
A. Computer Printout Information
Statistical information concerning trafflc accidents and traffic
enforcement is made available through a monthly comouter orintout. The
information will be used for the purpose of personnel deoloyment and
continuing orogram evaluations.
"
OTS-38b (Rev 5/82)
J( . ."CHE:DULZ , .
>
-
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
B. Activity Logs
Each Traffic Division officer wilT be responsible for maintaining a
daily log of his/her activities. This log information will be co~oared
with the monthly traffic accident and enforcement orintout.
C. Supervision
Close supervision of the program will be maintained by the Traffic
Division supervisor, who will deploy project personnel in order to
maintain maximum effectiveness.
Phase VI
Prepare final report. (April 1987)
~lETHOD OF EVALUATION
Using the data compiled in Phase V, the project coordinator will evaluate ho'."
well the oroject objectives were accomplished. The following questions will be
addressed:
1. Were the number of hazardous citations increased by 50 oercent, from an
average of 1,459 citations a month in 1983 to an average of 2,188 citations
a month by July 1, 1985 and throughout the life of the project?
2. Were the total number of traff1c accidents in the City reduced by
10 oercent, from an average of 236 accidents a month during 1983 to an
average of 212 accidents a month by March 31, 1987?
3. Was the Traffic Enforcement Index increased from 25.7 in 1983 to
38.0 by Harch 31, 1986?
4. Were all activities in the "Method of Procedure" Derformed in accordance
with the oroject agreement?
STATEMENT OF INTENT
We have considered the continuing operational costs of implementing this program,
and it 1S the intent of this City to continue the Selective Traffic Enforcement
Program developed by thlS project as a part of the community's ongoing ooerational
activity. The City lntends to absorb the entire cost of the project after the
expiration date.
OTS-38b (Rev S/82)
~, . .
~:-=J-. ~
- SCHEDULE A-I
.-
~
ADMINISTRATIVE SUP~ORT STATEMENT - Explaln what type of prlorlty tnJ.s
proJect has In your ]urlsdl.ction.
The City Council of Santa Monica has endorsed this project by resolution and by
budgeting funds as shown below for supoort of the orogram. The Chlef of Police
and Operations Bureau Commander are dedicated to the goal of accident reduction
and fully intend to meet the objectives of this project.
AGENCY CONTRIBUTIO~ - Explain what serVlces or funds are being contrib-
uted by your agency In support of thlS prOJect.
The City of Santa Monica will provide all services and equipment necessary for
coordination, supervislon, administration and evaluatlon of this oroJect. The
three-year contribution will be as follows:
Motorcycle Traffic DlVision Salaries. . . . 100'~ . . . . S 37,705
during prelimlnary training (one month)
Project Coordinator - Police Lieutenant 15;1, 28,066
Staff Assistant III (B) . . . . . . . 50~; 26,876
Seven police-equipped motorcycles 100% 62,818
Safety equipment for personnel . . . . . 100% 4,494
Vehlcle operation and maintenance . . . . 100;{ 13,680
Motorcycle Trafflc Division Salaries 50% 258,819
Administratlve lndlrect cost of all . . . 126,389
salaries and overtime (21%)
TOTAL AGENCY CONTRIBUTION $558,847
Program income generated as a result of thlS project will revert to the City of
Santa Monica's general fund and is not available to the Santa ~1onica Police Deot.
OTS-38c (Rev 5/82)
- - - ---- -----
, '. , . -
SCHEDULE B
DETAILED BUDGET ESTIM~TE
Page 1
FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATES TOTAL COST
COST CATEGORY FY-l I FY-I I FY-3 I FY-4 TO PROJECT
A. PERSONNEL COSTS 4nm=01g5 lU6HE78~O ~/~~/8jO
Posit~ons
.- and Salaries
1 Sergeant
3 mo @ $3,188. @ 100% $ 9,564.
3 mo @ $3,347. @ 100% 10,041.
6 mo @ $3,347. @ 100% ~ 20,082.
3 me @ $3,347. @ 50% 5,021-
3 me @ S3,514. @ 50% 5,271.
6 mo @ 53,514. @ 50% S 10,542.
6 Police Offlcers
3 mo @ $2,723. @ 100% 49,014.
3 mo @ $2,859. @ 1000/, 51,462.
6 mo @ $2,859. @ 100% 102,924.
3 mo @ $2,859. @ 50% 25,73l.
3 mo @ $3,002. @ 50% 27,018.
6 mo @ $3,002. @ 50% 54,036.
SUB TOTAL S120,08l. $186,047. $ 64,578. S360,706
Overtlme 11,655. 18,058. 6,268. 35,981-
Employee Benefits $345,127.
93.1 % $111,795. $173,210. $ 60,122.
Total $377,315. 5751,814.
Personnel Costs 5243,531. $130,968.
B. TRAVEL EXPENSE
Total
Travel Expense ~
C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
Total Contractual
Services 0
""" pTS-38d (Rev 5/82)
~:;>;r~~ -~ ~- -
.~- . -
DETAILED BUDGET ESTIMATE
-
Paqe 2
" I FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATES I TOTAL COST
COST CATEGORY J FY-l I FY-2 I FY-3 I FY-4 1 TO PROJECT
D. EQUIPMENT
Total Equipment 0
E. OTHER DIRECT COST
Total 0
Other D1rect Costs
F. INDIRECT COSTS
I
Total 0
Ind~rect Costs
TOTAL BUDGET ESTI~ATE
All Cateqories $243,53!. $377,315. $130,968. $751,814.
OTS-3Be (Rev 2/83)
-' . f e .
SCHEDOLE B-1
;
i
BUDGET NARRATIVE
The City requires a total of $751,814 to lmplement the Selective Traffic Enforcement
Program. The funds will be used as follows:
PERSONNEL COSTS:
The Santa Monica Police Department will hire an additional seven officers. Six of the
new officers wlll reolace the six officers taken from the present department comnlement
to become part of the Motorcycle Traffic Division. The seventh new officer will replace
the officer promoted to sergeant to replace the sergeant taken from the present department
complement to supervise the ~lotorcycle Traffic Division. The funds will be used to Day
100% of the Motorcycle Traffic Division's salaries for the first ooerational year and
50% of the Division's salaries the second year. The salary category reoresents the
sergeant's and six officers' base salaries olus the established City benefit rate for
sworn personnel of 93.1% (includes estimated 3 hour per week court overtime for six
motorcycle officers).
j
OTS-38f (Rev 5{82) )
-
, . . . ---
r ~ ~ <:t .--t C
'"
<3 g 0\ N LO
0- .--t
0 M N
_ C> F ~ ~
... <'\
" gg M C1' C
'" r-- LO
~MI I"- <.0 .....
CIl lO N
",9j/ ~
,,- _ c I~ ~
:g ""
.... .--t CO 0
~ '"
" " 0- LO
"'oJ 0 <:t .....
.. '> <:r N
"" I F ~ r-- ..... 0
<:r LO
" l.D .--t .--t
'" "
'> :::J M N
,.., r ~ ~
'" CO C 0
u u 0'\ LO
o '"
0 M ..... .--t
M N
_0 r ~ ~
... ,.., LO (V") 0
g, g~ .--t .....; LO
.. CO .....
:'l~1 CIl M N
"'''' r ~ ~
'" - _ 0 I
>< ..,
.... N t-- 0
'" .... '" <;l- ed- LO
" " M .--t
"'oJ LO M
~ " '>
it r ~ ~ 0'\ N 0
'"
" C c r-.: Ln
.. '" " 0'\ .--t
~ .., '" N .--t
U ::t
z i ~ ~
., 0
,., H <'\ Ln t-- 0
'" .. '"
0 '" <3 ~ 0'\ Ln
.. '" N t-- .--t
'" ,., " (V") .....
~ ~
,., -0 I I~ f
,.., m o;t 0
" g, ... (V") Ln
.... ~f
.. ;1 o;t .--t .--t
.... <:t N
:z: CIl
....
"'''' r ~ ~
..- _ 0
>< ..,
,.., .... l"- t-- C
~ '" o;t Ln
" " ~
"'oJ 0 .--t
" .., o;t .....
" .., r ~ ~ <.0 <.0 0
Ln r-.: LO
'" " N .--t
., ~ o;t N
'"
'"
"
'"
"
~
c
'" 0
c "
~ ~ c
0
1::1 '" -.<
.. co " " :> '"
~ '" '" '" '" "
" '" '" ~ '" '" ::l
'" .... C <II '" U C ~ "
0 .5 c " '" ... ..
'" " " " '" co
0 '" " " " '" '" c
U ~ .... E ~ Ill.. " .. ,...
:;] '" '" H .. .. '" ....
'" 0"'''' .... '" '" E .... I
.. .. E .. coo '" '" '" 0 I
U ... a: " .. u " ~ i ~ !2 I tl "
'" " '" " '" '" .... " '" ;:;
.l: .l: U '" 0 0 <l
m ~ "'" t ~ 15 :;] ".... 0 " c " .... '" co
:l .. " c :;] .. ttI 0 H II' C ""'l '" " " " "'
~........ ~ e " '" E <l '" .... '"
~I " ....,... .... .. gH.-IE-t ".... ~ ,,'" 1; 0
iVro::;J....-IQ ::I ::;,..... 0 ::>....0 " <l " :-
"o"-'cccE-t 0.... o C I<l:: 8 " '" .. " CO '"
.. <l " " 0 " 0 " " '"
<Jl " .. .... '" '" " '" g .... ~
.. tl " " " ~
p. " ., .. '" " '" '"
'"
o ~ ..::! )-I ""
o :z;,...:J;...t I
p...., <Jl
0::>... '" "'..., CI o::.:r: z E-1 to C1C1::o:l:Z8 C> c::; .<<: Z E-i 8
0'" ... 0
0"'''' P.8<Jl
e . . ' . ,~
;3: i:'l ::0 :r- CI1 OH rt HI 1-" '1:! IllCl1'i;'!
H Z :r- () ::l Hl ro 0 ::l I-' rn III (I)
t"' "'J 1:'1 () 'i'iHl(l) Hl..a 1-"
[EJ 0 :r- H Illrt 'i o III '0(1) I: Ol
CI1 :;0 :;0 tj ::f 1-" 0. 'i OJ Illrtro
( "-'J W:;OH() Ill<:()tj I-'-Hi:'l ..a (I) rt'i:3Cl1 'i'<:tIlHl
1-"00 Ul (I) tIl i:'l ::l "'-1-"0 ::l::SZ I: o III III rt rtO
rt'i"'J .'0 ;3: P,Ortc: P,P,1-:3 111'0 'i:3rt(J l-'.tIl Ii
::f \l) 0 III i:'l I-'llJUl I-' 1-'- CI1 'i Ii '<: III 1-"0 o ::s :3
1-"III 'I:l . 'i'iZ 'Olllrt o 0 rtO - rtO:3 HI HI
::s ;r. rtli1-:3 III rt .... () llJ III I ro LI. 1-" ::s '0 :3 0 1-'-
(J 1-:3 OJ .... 'i 1-'-0 H rtrt 'i(l) (I) 0 I-' rt .... 'i tIl
IT 1-" :;0 <: H ;.;'0::l8 ro ro 1-'0 rt 'i 11l ::l'::s
::frtO ~l1lZ I-"::l rn :r- P, I'<rt (J(Jl1lrt ClI 1-" HI 0-
ro I'< t"' HlP,tj ::s rn 1-:3 tj ::T..a 11l :3 I: ro
- t"' III t':l u:l- HlH I'.)c: t1 1-" ---1lIt:: o.lll::lm
0 i:'l rtlll~ 00 WH I>> Ol .::I(I)rt 'i I-' 0. 1-"
1-" rt 0 III rt (jm'iZ I-' m u:lm::l' III I-'-I.Q
rt::l' I-' I ""1: CI1 01>> 1-"1>> ClI rt (I) HI(I)::l::l
'<:ID~ 0' rt(J:3 1-'0 m'O tIl ID rt < I.Q ID
III I'< III ::l' 0 I - (J Z ''0 0. HI llJ 0.
I-'S:r- ::l IT <: 1-" 0 'i 1-'.- 0 III I-' III
.... .... i! P,o. ""Ill .... 1'.)0. rt 0 ::s 'i 'Ot::::Srt
S I-' 1-" o rn ::s W(I) (I) < '0:3 '0 III 0.0
....(1) ;r. 1-"< ::s u:l I-'::S III ID 0...... I-'rt ..
rtOl"': ::s ,... en m art P, III ID III I-'.....~
III wo. '0 <: I'.)tIl rtlllOl (J 0 .....
o I I: ,... rt ID 1-" HI III tIl III ::l I-'
(HI 'i ::l ::T(I)O o 'i 0 ClI rt rt llJ---
::l' '<:u:l III 0.1-' 11 (I) 'i ~ ::l' "'-0 III
....'0 rt- III LQ III ill 0 o HI en III
o I>> 'i rt rt I'.) III HI . rt'i ::l ....en
::l'rt ID ::l' llJ 'i 1-'- W'i t:: u:l rt 0 .'OtIlm
1"1 '0 (l) '1 1-',0 1-'0. ::l . III I: 11 rt ....
llJ 0 0 (l)..a ::s 01-' 0. . (J\Q 0 m
1"1 I-' '1 > ::l'tIl U1(1) 1-" ::l'::l' LI. 0' rt
III I-' rtLQ ;:l rt m ::l (J I-' (I) 0 H
(I) OJ ClI 0 11'11 o tIl u:l ::l'1ll,<: Ort..... CI1 Z
'Op' ---::l rtOO ::l . I>> .....::l'::T 0 CI1
IlJ 0 H\'1 0 ::l I-' I>> tIl (l) ::l' 1-:3
rtl"l 001'< III I .....HI I'< u:llllrn rt III :;0
1"1 0 \0 (j ~ llJ ::s' 0 (I) rt HI::l'O 0. C
o I>> 00::0 (J I>> (I) tIl C rt'O I:lllHl t:: ()
1-'0. I>> ,...1'< (j III ... ClI 0 ::l Hl I-' 1-:3
1-':( ::O~ 0.- 1-" (j < :( ::s '1 rn 0. I>> 1-" III H
(I) III III I>> (I) rt o (I) .... {Jl (I) '0 (J 0
p,,<: ~ '1 ;:lClll'< .....1"1 I-' 'i 0 1-" P, '0 lD () Z
0. rtrt I-' .... I-' (I) HI 0- I-' tIl
0':( 0 I (J IlJ ........ '0 I-' .........0
'<:0 >1: (J . Ii en'<: rf o ClI (I) ::T(JHI
t:: '1 CIl III ClI ... III '1 :-; . 1"1 III
rtl-' '1 I: o .... rt'O 0::l1-:3
;:I'Q.. ~ ~ CIlt':lrt ::lHl III I-' I-' t:: rt .,
(I) 1-'.:-; ::l' >; ::l III H LQ llJ
C\I rt'1 ::l (J 0 '1rt '0 u:l ::s HI ::l'lllHl
()X OJ (I) u:l ..... m lll::l' III III LQHI
III 0 m t:: (I) '0(1) 0 I-'rtt:: 0(1) ....
.....1-' .1 rt 0. 0 ..... ClI ,..-::s I-:3;:lO
....t:: tIl ClI t: 11'0 ClI <: 0 III tIlO
HlP, ~ Ii .....'i 0. ClI::so- . '<: tIl
o ro UlO' 'i 1-'- . .... 1-'. I-' III
., I'< ro..... :3 ..... - (I) III HI
::S::l' HI LQrt III 0 H::I(1)
1-" .... ~~ ,..-(1) ., III >..... rtp,.....
IllLQ m ::s I'< '0 ::s "",0 '<:
::l' III ClI rt ., ::s {Jl ....0
::0:( ..... 'iH\ (J 0 ClIO'O III I'll ...
... IlJ :;0 III 0 0 < X 'i HI::S
.0'<: R"ClI ......, I-' I-' III (I) 0 ..... 1-"
;:I'm '0 1-'- I-' P, rt X <: OOID
t: ,...0 o III ,... ro ""'0 ,... ro <:
III III ::l '1 ;:l (j tIl O"",p, 0' III
'<:;:l w rt - 0 .... ..... ;:l III ro roO I-'
0. t:: III .... 0 ::T 1-" HIt::
'1:! ., 0' (ll P, ::s 1-" o ;:llll III III
IlJHI '<: ..... ..aro Ol HI ::l t::l-:3rt
.....'i (1) C ::s HI 1lI'<: 0' ., 1-"
., (I) :;0 1-'...... III 1-" III ::s S IlJ ::I
0(1) ClI () '0 I 0 ::s 0.'<: 0 .... HI .0
1-':( '0 0 :3 0 rt HI 0. Hl .....HI
. III . I-' (I) III 0 0 ,...'1 rt ....
'<: ""' ::l t:: ., '1 rt(l)..... III 0
m II I-' .....m :3 1-"III ::T P,
tIl I-' ~ III o {Jl ro
I-' ::s ..... ;:l 0
0 .0 en 1-" III ::s
::s 0 I-'m
::s
, . . ~ . .
C
lIJo-! 0 c:
C III ..... Ul 01 0
o c .... ~ C .....
ev 1IJ 0 ru ..... III
'0 ,c Ill..... S 00.... .~ II 00
U ev ....ev.... \.I \.I ::l C """ :>,
..... .... \.I..... 0 0 It! Cll .-I III .
........ .... '0 .... .... u E o 0.. :3;.-1
01..... ..... o :>, '0 C U I 0.. UQI ev 0
C III E C III 'M III ......... ~ ev I><
..... 1><.0 :>,It! ..... C ::l Cll 1><.jJ
....E-<::l C .... II) Clloo .-I:>" ....m
m 00 m C 0 ..... C '"0 CI) .0 I-t p..
::l.... .... .!: 0 ..... m ::l '0
~ 0 (l) Q) ltl s:: .... 'M U ......... s:::>..
ltl .0 'tl.-lO 00 U C I-t C ru III
:> Cll ...-I 0....... QI ..... III 0 0-.... )
CD U 0 >~.... '0 ..... ..... 0.. Ill.!:
-.... .... o QJ III ..... o-! 1><.... Q)<.!l :>..01
C.... I>< ~ > 0 o ltl 0:: III .....
'.-l"-l II) o,OQJ 0 U li-I .... .... :J::d
0-.... III l:: I-t .... Q) m ,c
:>.. 0.-1 l:: 0.. :>.. C 00 -B"li: 0"1ll
....'tl+l +l<11l \.; lV..... ..... ....4
QJl::1-! 0 III ....01 \1-4 ,cC
II-! .., QJ ~ .... E .jJCI) :>, I><
III .... 'M ..... ..-l .... .ol/'l Cll 0
Ul :>.. . ,ncev '0 I-t+l I>< N '0....
UUl III 0 :> ev 0...... :J; QJ CII ::l.....
UCE-< c..... QI .... 0 '0 .jJ oj< ......o-!
..... CD 0 ::l+l.... U (1)0.. Cll ::l . tn U ltl
"-101 I{l <1/ .!:(I) tJl ...... 01 <11 III ~U
....11J,c ....1:0"> 0.. +' I--< o U I: ....+l <11
ltl 0"> H III r: X ..c:: ~.,..{ ~~ <1/
\.I.... ::l ...... ..... <11 4-< r: +'lzJtJl 'O,c
E- C 0 0...... ..-1 0 ::l I--< .-I....
III I>< . X I--< QJ -M <11 III tJl I--< ::l
....U,c (I) <1/ 0 .c :>,(1) I>< . u ::l< o :>..
O'.-l +l .-I 0.. ......... ru U I 0 ).0
00 .-I ,nli-lQl .-I ..... .-I .....w 'lj .
Z U (l) c.. '0 ..... 0 I-< .-I 1-<.-1 >'CI)C ~ ~ >''0
0 U 0.. W tJl ..... Q) 0 +' Q) ru ltl III QI
I-! CII ..... ftl '0 III I-< C ) :> u ..-l ~'ti ~:I: ).-1
E- o-! ..... C o Q)..-l <lI U >,.... ~O) '0....
U ::l 4-< W ::l 0...... ::l III <lI r:l U ru 0
:J '0 0,c4-< +l (I) 0 ,.c III ~ U 0\ o I><
~ Q) .... tJlW01 >. ........ I rei >.C:O 1-<....
;.< ..c Q) Ul Ill.... C 0 \.14-< U III
Ul U ,c.c.... III ~ C 00.... C~ '00..
Z Ul +'-i-lU >.lll,r: 01 lIJ 0 li-I I 0 W 1IJ W
I-! o <1/ .-I U s::: tJl -i-l s::: 01.... ....<1/
....,a 'n ,.c,r: ..... QJIl1 eIl,.c: < I-< ...... I--<
ell 0 O1U ~ '0 .-10 C 0"> Cll 0 o III
......... I-t ::l ltl C 'ti...... 0'.-1 .... CII 0.. I--<
lIJlIlo... 0.... 01 ::l ....M ..-l I-t III .c CD ....,c
1Il'.-I C LloiJ \1-4 roN .... .... I>< III U
r:l Ulli-l 0 o III W 01 t'O ~+' 0.. .....
Ul 0-.... ,r: ~ I-< Ql l-i ......'On:I 01>. .c
~lll .w .... Cl) 0 .... 0 OCll,.c C I--< ....:3;
...... C III Ul 10 .... ..-l Q) .... ..-l ::l I 0
~ 0 U UlltloiJ UlN > c.. '1J-n III
N.......... ro (I.l III '0 ....0 lIJ ell .... C :><Ul+l
.. .......... ......'0 (I) Ul C.-I 01 C >-...4 < Q)..-l
0'0 III 0.. Eo.. > Q) Cl)M s::: O'l 0 ..-l ~""'E:
....:::::10.. I--< s::: 0 .... 'tiN ..-l ro..-I "O'ti O-"'-.-l
ctl.-r III 0 ~'.-l .... 0 .... :> +' l:: <e....
"C ltI li-I"C 0..' Z U ~ I o,.c ltI >.ltI 0
CI! 01 > .... Ql III c..Ul u.... e:U.... .0 ~<lI>,
s:::CW.... CD .... (I) 1Il..-I :>.. ctlO 00 ::l ... I .... ,.c:....
G..... It;! .cUlO' Ul I>< .-r Z \.I III U .... ltl 0......-1
-.-I '0.-1 I--< ....WC. lIJ III 0 I-!M 00 >::10.... w U
eIlCctl"C ::l'C..... ..-1.0 .... :IN 1-1.... ~01 lzJ III ..:l
CI! ::l e Cl) O'.c III Cl E- ell C C'tilj.: ..J >. ClJ
'C li-I..... Q) .... Cl) U U ....;:..., I: '0 < rJJ C..... ZI1l~ O.....c
:::,.c: IV I>< .j.J U.... III IV ClJ E-<S:::O~ H> l:l::..-I.j.J
O'l 1><........ ...... U III ClJ l-l .-r .j.J+, 1-10....1--< ..-1 ell E-<U
..-l 0 e 0.. l:: ..... -n 4l I ro III U......... III E-<I><.... < I:
4-< Ii-; eooiJ O+' U U .j.J1tl0.. Z I--< I--< . p.. n;j.....
E C 0 o..-l It! >. l-l l-l rJ) ..-1..-1 Ul/t!...r WlllOO'\ .c
l.l 00-.... U.we.... c..1ll E-<'O'O :J.j.JO'C ~ 0.. . l'z..1--<....
o~ .oJ rtl ctl 0 ... z c C 0..-1'.-1 s::: W ftl Wll'l 00.....
\l..l 00 >. l.l Cl)E.....j.J G.l& W 1-1..-1 o U:> III UH~M f1. ~
Q) ..... n;j Ull--<'O.... .c C ~ c:: Ul
(/) = ClJ c.. r.: 0 .... .... d:l H .:: 0 lzJ
..... tJ' 'H Cl)..... .... 5.; U N r... ..:l
,cWr.lUl .-I C 0 Q) li-'C U < Z t-I
~l-;Ullt! ~....\L..l.w HO 00 .:: :r: lzJ ~
"4 ' , . . .
CERTIFICATION
CALIFORNIA TRAFFIC SAFETY PROGRAM
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ASSURANCE
Pursuant to the requirements of Title VI provisions of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, the certifying applicant acting through its
chief administrative officer, desiring to avail itself of the
benefits of Chapter 1, Title 23, United States Code, and as a
condition to obtaining the approval of the Secretary of Transpor-
tatJ.on and Governor of California of any h1ghway safety projects
as provided for in Title 23, United States Code, Section l05{a) f
hereby gives its assurance that all provisions of Equal Oppor-
tunity Assurance with regard to the Highway Safety Program will
be comp11ed w1th fully.
MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE
(l ) "Policy. It is the policy of the Office of Traffic Safety
and the certifying applicant that minority business enter-
prises as defined in 49 CFR Part 23 sha11 have the maximum
opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts
financed in whole or in part with Federal funds under this
agreement. Consequently, the MBE requirements of 49 CFR
Part 23 apply to this agreement."
(2) "MBE Obli<]ation. The certifying applicant or its contractor
agrees to ensure that minority business enterprises as
defined in 49 CFR Part 23 have the maximum opportunity to
participate in the performance of contracts and subcontracts
financed in whole or in part with Federal funds provided
under this agreement. In this regard the certifying appli-
cant and all contractors shall take all necessary and
reasonable steps in accord~nce with 49 CFR Part 23 to ensure
that minority business enterprises have the maximum oppor-
tunity to compete for and perform contracts. The certifying
applicant and its contractors shall not discriminate on the
basis of racef co1orf national origin, or sex ln the award
and performance of DOT-assisted contracts. "
OTS-33 (Rev 5/82) (over)
---- -- - -- ------- --
. . , ' , .oc
SECTION 504, REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973
Pursuant to Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, no
qualified handicapped person shall, because a certifying appli-
cant's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by, handicapped
persons, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation
in, or otherwise be subjected to dJ.scrimination under any program
or activity funded under the Highway Safety Act of 1966 (u.S.
Code, Title 23, Section 402 et. seq.) .
HATCH ACT
All employees of this certifying applicant whose principal employ-
ment is in connection with any Highway Safety Project financed in
whole or in part by loans or grants under the Highway Safety Act
of 1966 have been made aware of the provisions of Section 12(a) of
the Hatch Act (S.U.S.C. 118k(a)) .
NON-DUPLICATION OF GRANT FUND EXPENDITURE
The certifying applicant has no ongoing or completed prOJects
under agreement with TOPICS, CCCJ (LEAA), HEWf or other Federal
fund sources, Which duplicate or overlap any work contemplated
or described in this Traffic Safety Project.
It is further agreed that any pending or proposed request for
other Federal grant funds which would duplicate or overlap work
under this Traffic safety Project, will be revised to exclude any
such duplication of grant fund expenditures.
It is understood that any such duplication of Federal fund expen-
ditures subsequently determined by audit will be subject to
recovery by the Office of Traffic Safety.
CERTIFIED
Signature Date
JOHN JALIlI - CITY MANAGER
Type Name and Title
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Certifying Applicant Agency
--- ---- -----
. ' .:. - . e
SECTION 504. REHABILITATION ACT OF 19i3
Pursuant to Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. no
qualified handicapped person shall, because a certifying appll.-
cant's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by, handl.capped
persons, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from partl.clpation
inf or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program
or activity funded under the Highway Safety Act of 1966 (U.S.
Code, Title 23, Section 402 et. seq.) .
HATCH ACT
All employees of this certifYJ.ng applicant whose principal employ-
ment is in connectJ.on with any Highway Safety ProJect financed in
whole or ln part by loans or grants under the HJ.ghway Safety Act
of 1966 have been made aware of the provisJ.ons of Section l2(a} of
the Hatch Act (S.U.S.C. 118k(a)} .
NON-DUPLICATION OF GRANT FUND EXPENDITURE
The certifying applicant has no ongoing or completed proJects
under agreement with TOPICS, CCCJ (LEM) , HEW, or other Federal
fund sources, which duplicate or overlap any work contemplated
or described In this Traffic safety Project.
It J.S further agreed that any pending or proposed request for
other Federal grant funds which would duplicate or overlap wo,
under this Traffic Safety ProJect, will be revised to exclude '-Y
such duplication of grant fund expenditures.
It is understood that any such duplication of Federal fund expen-
ditures subsequently determined by audit will be subject to
recovery by the Office of Traffic Safety.
CERTIFIED
Signature Date
JOHN JALILI - CITY MANAGER
Type Name and Tltle
CITY OF SANTA rlONICA
Certifying Applicant Agency
- ~ - ---- --- --- - --- ---
~ ,. .. ~ e .
SCHEDULE C
ADDENDUM
The Department 1 S unable to provi de "DUT as PCF" and "All Other (PCF) II for
each of the three categories of accidents (Fatal, Injury and Property Damaqe Only)
since such information is not provided by the City's traffic accident records.
Traffic accident and enforcement records will, however, be analyzed in Phase I
of the project and, if practicable, such shortcomlngs will be corrected.
SWITRS records do provide such a breakdown, but an average 31 oercent difference
between local and State trafflc accident statistics negates a valid comparison.
The disparity between local and State records will also be examined, and hooefully
corrected, in Phase I of the project.