Loading...
SR 09-26-2023 8K City Council Report City Council Meeting: September 26, 2023 Agenda Item: 8.K 1 of 1 To: Mayor and City Council From: Denise Anderson Warren, City Clerk, Records and Election Services Department Subject: Request of Councilmember Zwick, Councilmember Torosis, and Mayor Davis that the City Manager study and prioritize timely and effective solutions to prevent dangerous motor vehicle incursions into Santa Monica’s protected and unprotected bike lanes. Specifically, the City Manager should consider enhanced enforcement by parking and traffic officers, photo enforcement to the extent allowable by law, a targeted curb management evaluation and space reallocation to reduce double parking in bike lanes, and the deployment of quick-build infrastructure to protect bike lanes and reorient parking on streets in the City’s existing and planned protected bikeway network whenever feasible. Prepared By: Esterlina Lugo, Deputy City Clerk Approved Forwarded to Council Attachments: A. Written Comments 8.K Packet Pg. 1661 1 Vernice Hankins From:Barbara Filet <barrie.filet@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 9:09 AM To:Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; Jesse Zwick Cc:councilmtgitems Subject:Support for 16E: Make Santa Monica's Streets Safer! EXTERNAL  Councilmembers,  I support the moƟon by Councilmembers Zwick and Torosis and Mayor Davis to keep our city’s bike lanes safe with a  combinaƟon of enhanced parking and traffic enforcement, reducing double parking, and quickly building safer bicycle  infrastructure.  Please vote to make Santa Monica's Streets safer for me and my family!  Item 16.E 09/12/23 1 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1662 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 2 Vernice Hankins From:Alejandro Hernández R <alejandrohernandez00@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 8:58 AM To:Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; Jesse Zwick Cc:councilmtgitems Subject:Support for 16E: Make Santa Monica's Streets Safer! EXTERNAL    Councilmembers,    I support the motion by Councilmembers Zwick and Torosis and Mayor Davis to keep our city’s bike lanes safe with a  combination of enhanced parking and traffic enforcement, reducing double parking, and quickly building safer bicycle  infrastructure.    Please vote to make Santa Monica's Streets safer for me and my family!         Item 16.E 09/12/23 2 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1663 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 3 Vernice Hankins From:Jacob Wasserman <jacoblwasserman@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 9:25 AM To:Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; Jesse Zwick Cc:councilmtgitems Subject:Support for 16E: Make Santa Monica's Streets Safer EXTERNAL    Councilmembers, As a resident, parent of a young child, biker, and driver, I support the motion by Councilmembers Zwick and Torosis and Mayor Davis to keep our city’s bike lanes safe with a combination of enhanced parking and traffic enforcement, reducing double parking, and quickly building safer bicycle infrastructure. Please vote to make Santa Monica's Streets safer for me and my family! Jacob Wasserman  90403  Item 16.E 09/12/23 3 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1664 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 4 Vernice Hankins From:Stephanie Manglaras <stephmanglaras@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 9:31 AM To:Caroline Torosis; Christine Parra; Gleam Davis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Oscar de la Torre; Phil Brock Cc:councilmtgitems Subject:Support for 16E: Make Santa Monica's Streets Safer! EXTERNAL    Councilmembers,    I support the motion by Councilmembers Zwick and Torosis and Mayor Davis to keep our city’s bike lanes safe with a  combination of enhanced parking and traffic enforcement, reducing double parking, and quickly building safer bicycle  infrastructure.    Please vote to make Santa Monica's Streets safer for me and my family!    My son is in 11th grade at SaMoHi and rides his bike up 11th Street to school everyday.  I wish the route was safer for  him and other kids to ride to school.  As a resident I support this motion.    Stephanie Manglaras    Item 16.E 09/12/23 4 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1665 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 5 Vernice Hankins From:M Hunt <m.hunt9900@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 9:37 AM To:Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; Jesse Zwick Cc:councilmtgitems Subject:Support for 16E: Make Santa Monica's Streets Safer! EXTERNAL    Councilmembers,    I support the motion by Councilmembers Zwick and Torosis and Mayor Davis to keep our city’s bike lanes safe with a  combination of enhanced parking and traffic enforcement, reducing double parking, and quickly building safer bicycle  infrastructure.    Please vote to make Santa Monica's Streets safer! I use them every weekend and it's a huge annoyance to have to ride  into the road when there is a dedicated bike lane.    Item 16.E 09/12/23 5 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1666 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 6 Vernice Hankins From:Michelle Black <shellimonkey@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 9:39 AM To:Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; Jesse Zwick Cc:councilmtgitems Subject:Support for 16E: Make Santa Monica's Streets Safer! EXTERNAL    Councilmembers,    I write today in support of the motion by Councilmembers Zwick and Torosis and Mayor Davis to ensure that our city's  bike lanes provide their intended benefits. Enhanced parking and traffic enforcement that reduces double parking will  allow our children (and all of us) to actually use our bike lanes, increasing the safety of all, encouraging more active  transportation, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the city.      We love living in Santa Monica, largely because we can do so much as a family without getting in the car.  My family  bikes to and from our children's schools and sports practices and all over the city on weekends.  While we plan our  routes around the city's bike infrastructure, there are some connectivity gaps I hope we continue to  address.  Unfortunately, even some of our best bike lanes are often blocked, leading to terrifying moments for my 7‐ year‐old (and me) as he must leave the bike lane drivers expect to contain him.  We appreciate all that the city has done  to encourage active transportation.  The 17th street bikeway is my son's favorite place to bike, and he is beyond excited  that he can take it to Little League events at Memorial Park.  We all look forward to the quick implementation of safe  streets projects in Santa Monica.       Please vote to make Santa Monica's Streets safer for families!    ‐ Michelle Black    Item 16.E 09/12/23 6 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1667 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 7 Vernice Hankins From:Trevor Jones <trevor.jones22@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 9:48 AM To:Caroline Torosis; Christine Parra; Gleam Davis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Oscar de la Torre; Phil Brock Cc:councilmtgitems Subject:Support for 16E: Make Santa Monica's Streets Safer! EXTERNAL    Councilmembers,    I support the motion by Councilmembers Zwick and Torosis and Mayor Davis to keep our city’s bike lanes safe with a  combination of enhanced parking and traffic enforcement, reducing double parking, and quickly building safer bicycle  infrastructure.    Please vote to make Santa Monica's Streets safer for me and my family!    I commute to my office at 1299 Ocean by bike every day and I HIGHLY appreciate good bike infrastructure. I hope Santa  Monica continues to be a leader in this space. Reduce traffic, reduce emissions and promote healthily living by riding a  bike!!!!!    Thanks  Trevor     Item 16.E 09/12/23 7 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1668 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Caro Vilain <carovilain20@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 1:50 PM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:I support Item 16E! EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council,    I am wriƟng in support of item 16E. While Santa Monica is making great progress on its bike infrastructure, a lot of the  bike lanes are regularly obstructed by motor vehicles, which defeats the purpose of a bike lane, as it forces its users into  dangerous and scary situaƟons. This makes our bike lane network much less safe and welcoming than it could be.    We cannot afford to keep leƫng these occurrences put more lives at risk while we wait for more permanent  infrastructure.    I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all.    Thank you,    Caro plain  1410 15th St, 90404  Item 16.E 09/12/23 8 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1669 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 2 Vernice Hankins From:Stacia Vinar <svinar@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 10:46 AM To:Caroline Torosis; Christine Parra; Gleam Davis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Oscar de la Torre; Phil Brock Cc:councilmtgitems Subject:Support for 16E: Make Santa Monica's Streets Safer! EXTERNAL    Councilmembers,    I support the motion by Councilmembers Zwick and Torosis and Mayor Davis to keep our city’s bike lanes safe with a  combination of enhanced parking and traffic enforcement, reducing double parking, and quickly building safer bicycle  infrastructure.    Please vote to make Santa Monica's Streets safer for me and my family!  Thanks,  Stacia Vinar   Item 16.E 09/12/23 9 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1670 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 3 Vernice Hankins From:Michael Etzel <metzel74@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 10:07 AM To:Caroline Torosis; Christine Parra; Gleam Davis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Oscar de la Torre; Phil Brock Cc:councilmtgitems Subject:Support for 16E: Make Santa Monica's Streets Safer! EXTERNAL    Councilmembers,    I support the motion by Councilmembers Zwick and Torosis and Mayor Davis to keep our city’s bike lanes safe with a  combination of enhanced parking and traffic enforcement, reducing double parking, and quickly building safer bicycle  infrastructure.    Please vote to make Santa Monica's Streets safer for me and my family!    Best,    Mike Etzel, MD    Item 16.E 09/12/23 10 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1671 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 4 Vernice Hankins From:Brian Sweeney <bsweeney429@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 10:03 AM To:Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; Jesse Zwick Cc:councilmtgitems; Devon Porter Subject:Support for 16E: Make Santa Monica's Streets Safer! EXTERNAL    Councilmembers,    I support the motion by Councilmembers Zwick and Torosis and Mayor Davis to keep our city’s bike lanes safe with a  combination of enhanced parking and traffic enforcement, reducing double parking, and quickly building safer bicycle  infrastructure.    Please vote to make Santa Monica's Streets safer for me and my family!    Best wishes, Brian Sweeney and Devon Porter     Item 16.E 09/12/23 11 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1672 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Jason DeVita <jason@wx13.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 2:18 PM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:I support Item 16E EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council,    I am writing in support of item 16E. I have lived in Santa Monica for 17 years, and I have seen the great progress we've  made with bicycle infrastructure. And while I hope to see more protected bike lanes in the future, most of the bike lanes  are currently unprotected. One of the issues with unprotected bike lanes is that they are often blocked by vehicles  (among other things). When this happens, it forces me (and my kids) to swerve into the car lane or switch to the  sidewalk. Neither of these choices are good!     I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all.    Thank you,  Jason DeVita  1544 12th St.  Item 16.E 09/12/23 12 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1673 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 2 Vernice Hankins From:gerda newbold <gnewbold@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 1:51 PM To:Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; Jesse Zwick Cc:councilmtgitems Subject:Support for 16E: Make Santa Monica's Streets Safer! EXTERNAL    Councilmembers,    I support the motion by Councilmembers Zwick and Torosis and Mayor Davis to keep our city’s bike lanes safe with a  combination of enhanced parking and traffic enforcement, reducing double parking, and quickly building safer bicycle  infrastructure.    Please vote to make Santa Monica's Streets safer for me and my family!    Thanks for your work on behalf of our City.    Gerda Newbold    Item 16.E 09/12/23 13 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1674 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 3 Vernice Hankins From:John Farren <farrenj@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 2:40 PM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:I support Item 16E! EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council,    I am writing in support of item 16E. While Santa Monica is making great progress on its bike infrastructure, a lot of the  bike lanes are regularly obstructed by motor vehicles, which defeats the purpose of a bike lane, as it forces its users into  dangerous and scary situations. This makes our bike lane network much less safe and welcoming than it could be.    We cannot afford to keep letting these occurrences put more lives at risk while we wait for more permanent  infrastructure.    I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all.    Thank you,    John Farren  3117 6th St, Santa Monica, CA 90405  Item 16.E 09/12/23 14 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1675 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 4 Vernice Hankins From:Sarah-Doe Osborne <sarahdoe.osborne@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 2:46 PM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:I support Item 16E! EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council,    I am wriƟng in support of item 16E. While Santa Monica is making great progress on its bike infrastructure, a lot of the  bike lanes are regularly obstructed by motor vehicles, which defeats the purpose of a bike lane, as it forces its users into  dangerous and scary situaƟons. This makes our bike lane network much less safe and welcoming than it could be.    We cannot afford to keep leƫng these occurrences put more lives at risk while we wait for more permanent  infrastructure.    I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all.    Thank you,  Sarah‐Doe Osborne  3117 6th Street, Santa Monica, CA 90405      Sent by my carrier pigeon  Item 16.E 09/12/23 15 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1676 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 5 Vernice Hankins From:Lucy Mannall <lucymmannall@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 2:47 PM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:I support Item 16E! EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council,    I am wriƟng in support of item 16E. While Santa Monica is making great progress on its bike infrastructure, a lot of the  bike lanes are regularly obstructed by motor vehicles, which defeats the purpose of a bike lane, as it forces its users into  dangerous and scary situaƟons. This makes our bike lane network much less safe and welcoming than it could be.    We cannot afford to keep leƫng these occurrences put more lives at risk while we wait for more permanent  infrastructure.    I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all.    Thank you,      Lucy Mannall  3008 3rd street, Santa Monica, 90405    Sent from my iPhone  Item 16.E 09/12/23 16 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1677 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 6 Vernice Hankins From:Gwynne Pugh <gwynne@gwynnepugh.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 2:51 PM To:Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; Jesse Zwick Cc:councilmtgitems Subject:Support for 16E: Make Santa Monica's Streets Safer! EXTERNAL    Councilmembers,    I support the motion by Councilmembers Zwick and Torosis and Mayor Davis to keep our city’s bike lanes safe with a  combination of enhanced parking and traffic enforcement, reducing double parking, and quickly building safer bicycle  infrastructure.    Please vote to make Santa Monica's Streets safer for me and my family!    Regards,   Gwynne     Gwynne Pugh, FAIA ASCE LEEDap   GWYNNE PUGH URBAN STUDIO   8758 Venice Blvd. Ste 200   Los Angeles, CA 90034   t: 310-396-4540   c: 310-505-9671     gwynne@gwynnepugh.com   www.gwynnepugh.com   Item 16.E 09/12/23 17 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1678 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Michael Karric <michaelghinrichs@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 3:10 PM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:Item 16E, Safter bike lanes now please!!! EXTERNAL    SM City Council,  I'm writing to support item 16E.     Santa Monica is doing a good job with bike lanes, but there's a big issue: cars keep blocking them. This totally defeats  the purpose of having bike lanes and puts riders in dangerous situations. Additionally, it makes our bike lanes less safe  and inviting.    We can't just wait around for better infrastructure while more people are at risk when there are viable options right  now.    So, I'm asking you to support this item and help us make our streets safer for everyone.    Thank you,  Michael Hinrichs‐Karric  1700 Centinela Ave  Item 16.E 09/12/23 18 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1679 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 2 Vernice Hankins From:mitchell.dipanni@uconn.edu Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 2:55 PM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:I support Item 16E! EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council,    I am wriƟng in support of item 16E. While Santa Monica is making great progress on its bike infrastructure, a lot of the  bike lanes are regularly obstructed by motor vehicles, which defeats the purpose of a bike lane, as it forces its users into  dangerous and scary situaƟons. This makes our bike lane network much less safe and welcoming than it could be.    We cannot afford to keep leƫng these occurrences put more lives at risk while we wait for more permanent  infrastructure.    I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all.     Thank you,  Mitchell DiPanni  11929 Kiowa Ave, Apt 8, Los Angeles CA 90049 ‐Daily visitor in Santa Monica. Seriously. I spend all of my Ɵme and money  there…   Item 16.E 09/12/23 19 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1680 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Susie Dantzig <mssusie82@hotmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 4:37 PM To:Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; councilmtgitems; David White Subject:I Support Item 16E to Prioritize Safer Streets for everyone in Santa Monica EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica Mayor Davis and City Council,  I support item 16E by Council Members Zwick, Torosis, and Mayor Davis to direct the City Manager to study and  prioritize timely and effective solutions to improve street safety and prevent the dangerous motor vehicle incursions  into Santa Monica’s protected and unprotected bike lanes. Specifically, the City Manager should consider enhanced  enforcement by parking and traffic officers, photo enforcement to the extent allowable by law, a targeted curb  management evaluation and space reallocation to reduce double parking in bike lanes, and the deployment of quick‐ build infrastructure to protect bike lanes and reorient parking on streets in the City’s existing and planned protected  bikeway network whenever feasible.

Research and experience show again and again the same thing: protected bike  lanes are good for everyone and reduce collisions and injuries for all road users (including drivers) by 30‐50� Item 16E  prioritizes measures to improve the efficacy of these road safety investments for both current and future projects. The  City’s investments in Protected Bike Lanes encourage healthier active transportation options, provide a choice to move  around Santa Monica without driving a car and reduce GHG emissions helping move us toward our climate  goals.
Please unanimously support Item 16E.           Item 16.E 09/12/23 20 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1681 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 2 Vernice Hankins From:Allon Percus <Allon.Percus@cgu.edu> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 4:33 PM To:Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; councilmtgitems; David White Subject:I Support Item 16E to Prioritize Safer Streets for everyone in Santa Monica EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica Mayor Davis and City Council,   I support item 16E by Council Members Zwick, Torosis, and Mayor Davis to direct the City Manager to study and  prioritize timely and effective solutions to improve street safety and prevent the dangerous motor vehicle incursions  into Santa Monica’s protected and unprotected bike lanes. Specifically, the City Manager should consider enhanced  enforcement by parking and traffic officers, photo enforcement to the extent allowable by law, a targeted curb  management evaluation and space reallocation to reduce double parking in bike lanes, and the deployment of quick‐ build infrastructure to protect bike lanes and reorient parking on streets in the City’s existing and planned protected  bikeway network whenever feasible.    Research and experience show again and again the same thing: protected bike lanes are good for everyone and reduce  collisions and injuries for all road users (including drivers) by 30‐50%. Item 16E prioritizes measures to improve the  efficacy of these road safety investments for both current and future projects. The City’s investments in Protected Bike  Lanes encourage healthier active transportation options, provide a choice to move around Santa Monica without driving  a car and reduce GHG emissions helping move us toward our climate goals.    Please unanimously support Item 16E.   Allon Percus  1105 Centinela Ave.  Santa Monica, CA 90403  Item 16.E 09/12/23 21 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1682 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 3 Vernice Hankins From:Diana Williams <williams.diana@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 4:40 PM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:I support Item 16E! EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council,    I am writing in support of item 16E. This city doesn't have many protected bike lanes but motorists regularly obstruct the  ones we do have with impunity, forcing cyclists to endanger themselves more than they already do. For our authorities  to tolerate this defeats the purpose of a bike lane.     We cannot afford to keep letting these occurrences put more lives at risk while we wait for more permanent  infrastructure.    I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all.    Thank you,  Diana Williams  1000 block 25th st.  Item 16.E 09/12/23 22 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1683 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 4 Vernice Hankins From:Steve Greenberg <radman@alumni.ucla.edu> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 4:46 PM To:Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; councilmtgitems; David White Subject:I Support Item 16E to Prioritize Safer Streets for everyone in Santa Monica EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica Mayor Davis and City Council,     I support item 16E by Council Members Zwick, Torosis, and Mayor Davis to direct the City Manager to study and  prioritize timely and effective solutions to improve street safety and prevent the dangerous motor vehicle incursions  into Santa Monica’s protected and unprotected bike lanes. Specifically, the City Manager should consider enhanced  enforcement by parking and traffic officers, photo enforcement to the extent allowable by law, a targeted curb  management evaluation and space reallocation to reduce double parking in bike lanes, and the deployment of quick‐ build infrastructure to protect bike lanes and reorient parking on streets in the City’s existing and planned protected  bikeway network whenever feasible.

Research and experience show again and again the same thing: protected bike  lanes are good for everyone and reduce collisions and injuries for all road users (including drivers) by 30‐50%. Item 16E  prioritizes measures to improve the efficacy of these road safety investments for both current and future projects. The  City’s investments in Protected Bike Lanes encourage healthier active transportation options, provide a choice to move  around Santa Monica without driving a car and reduce GHG emissions helping move us toward our climate  goals.
Please unanimously support Item 16E.  Item 16.E 09/12/23 23 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1684 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 5 Vernice Hankins From:Nancy Matson <nancyloum@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 4:58 PM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:I support Item 16E! EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council,    As a person who has worked and commuted to Santa Monica since 2005, I am writing in support of item 16E. I have  been very pleased by the progress on bike/scooter lanes since I have worked in this city. To get to the next level of  safety, we need enforcement so the lanes aren't blocked, for both efficiency and increased safety.    Thank you so much for your continued innovations in low‐emissions transportation! I have seen a dramatic increase in  scooter/bike/train use at my organization in the years I've been working in this city. I personally used to drive alone to  work every day for many years and now happily take other modes of transit to work. I appreciate any efforts to make my  commute safer and help me recruit additional co‐workers to alternatives to cars for commuting.    Thanks!  Nancy Matson  (she/her)    Neighborhood Council Sustainability Alliance Transportation Committee  WRAC Transportation & Mobility Committee  Del Rey Green Committee    "You don't need a car ‐‐ you need a ride!"  Item 16.E 09/12/23 24 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1685 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:joni yung <ayogist@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 8:18 PM To:Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; councilmtgitems; David White Subject:I Support Item 16E to Prioritize Safer Streets for everyone in Santa Monica EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica Mayor Davis and City Council,    I support item 16E by Council Members Zwick, Torosis, and Mayor Davis to direct the City Manager to study and  prioritize timely and effective solutions to improve street safety and prevent the dangerous motor vehicle incursions  into Santa Monica’s protected and unprotected bike lanes. Specifically, the City Manager should consider enhanced  enforcement by parking and traffic officers, photo enforcement to the extent allowable by law, a targeted curb  management evaluation and space reallocation to reduce double parking in bike lanes, and the deployment of quick‐ build infrastructure to protect bike lanes and reorient parking on streets in the City’s existing and planned protected  bikeway network whenever feasible.

Research and experience show again and again the same thing: protected bike  lanes are good for everyone and reduce collisions and injuries for all road users (including drivers) by 30‐50%. Item 16E  prioritizes measures to improve the efficacy of these road safety investments for both current and future projects. The  City’s investments in Protected Bike Lanes encourage healthier active transportation options, provide a choice to move  around Santa Monica without driving a car and reduce GHG emissions helping move us toward our climate  goals.
Please unanimously support Item 16E.    ** i consider myself fortunate to live in a city that has been working hard to make the streets safer for cyclists and  pedestrians. but it angers me to no end when drivers knowingly block bike lanes (or worse yet, drive through them),  cross bike lanes to enter driveways without watching for cyclists, or honk at cyclists sharing the road because they insist  we should stay out of their way.     i'm attaching photos taken on broadway near 17th where cars are clearly blocking the bike lane. and this isn't the first  time i've encountered this, mind you. they might not be the same cars, but it's an ongoing thing in front of the BEACH  MOMS CDC.    thank you for you time if you read this far!    joni yung  sm resident since 1981  Item 16.E 09/12/23 25 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1686 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 2   Item 16.E 09/12/23 26 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1687 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 3     ~~ autocorrect is turned off, so any typos are all mine ~~  Item 16.E 09/12/23 27 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1688 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 4 Vernice Hankins From:Juan Bustamante <bustamante.j@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 8:13 PM To:Caroline Torosis; Christine Parra; Gleam Davis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Oscar de la Torre; Phil Brock Cc:councilmtgitems Subject:Support for 16E: Make Santa Monica's Streets Safer! EXTERNAL    Councilmembers,    I support the motion by Councilmembers Zwick and Torosis and Mayor Davis to keep our city’s bike lanes safe with a  combination of enhanced parking and traffic enforcement, reducing double parking, and quickly building safer bicycle  infrastructure.    Please vote to make Santa Monica's Streets safer for me and my family!    Item 16.E 09/12/23 28 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1689 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 5 Vernice Hankins From:Kush Mittal <kushi.mittal@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 10:24 PM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:I support Item 16E! EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council,    I am wriƟng in support of item 16E. While Santa Monica is making great progress on its bike infrastructure, a lot of the  bike lanes are regularly obstructed by motor vehicles, which defeats the purpose of a bike lane, as it forces its users into  dangerous and scary situaƟons. This makes our bike lane network much less safe and welcoming than it could be.    We cannot afford to keep leƫng these occurrences put more lives at risk while we wait for more permanent  infrastructure.    I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all.    Thank you,  Kush MiƩal  Arizona Street.  Item 16.E 09/12/23 29 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1690 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 6 Vernice Hankins From:Hannah Gray <hannahkatharineg@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, September 8, 2023 10:26 PM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:I support Item 16E! EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council,    I am writing in support of item 16E. While Santa Monica is making great progress on its bike infrastructure, a lot of the  bike lanes are regularly obstructed by motor vehicles, which defeats the purpose of a bike lane, as it forces its users into  dangerous and scary situations. This makes our bike lane network much less safe and welcoming than it could be.    We cannot afford to keep letting these occurrences put more lives at risk while we wait for more permanent  infrastructure.    I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all.    Thank you,  Dr. Hannah Gray   Item 16.E 09/12/23 30 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1691 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:JoWanda Dziesinski <jowanda.dz@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, September 9, 2023 11:37 AM To:Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; councilmtgitems; David White Cc:Cynthia.Rose@smspoke.org; Justin Baltz; John Baltz Subject:16E Safter Streets EXTERNAL    Dear Council,    I'm a resident in Santa Monica now  for 12 years and have been a bike commuter for all of those years, fortunate to find  work here as well.  My partner is the same, my teenage children have ridden their bikes to Grant, Jams, Samohi and now  SMC and we ride our baby around in a bike as well.  So safe biking and safe biking lanes are a daily experience for us.  I  LOVE the bright green lanes and the courteous culture in Santa Monica‐I feel local drivers are 99% on board with  creating safe biking experiences for the community.  Recently I attended the screening of "The Engine Inside", a bicycle documentary and it was great to hear a panel of  Santa Monica employees and community members helping us know what we can do‐it may seem very simple, but I  really was not aware of how I could voice my perspective and they mentioned City Council emails and 311 so I am really  grateful for that.More than one of them said that often there is the impression in the CIty that they don't hear from the  community and there's no issues, so now I'm glad to understand what to do because safe bike lanes are ESSENTIAL to  my personal life and to me one of the TOP BENEFITS of SANTA MONICA.  So now that we have covered the positive, here's the negative report.  It is quite common for Ubers, :Lyfts, food delivery  services like Uber Eats and delivery trucks like Amazon to be in the bike lane, which of course requires a cyclist to make a  dangerous move into the car lane to go around.  I have often wondered, why does a mammoth private company like  Amazon, get to freely use our beautiful bike lane system, to the benefit of...Jeff Bezos? While an un‐armored, body‐ exposed local cyclist must make a risky move into traffic to cede to their agenda? In any case, I would like to title this  nuisance/menace as "Outside non‐Santa Monica Businesses".because it never feels like locals are doing this sort of  thing‐it has the taste and feel of outsiders who are only concerned with their immediate priority and have no concern or  interest in our shared community values or culture.  So I think it's a fair question‐why are these businesses getting to  take up this space while local cyclists, "doing what we are supposed to do" which is taking a bicycle instead of a car, to  save the environment, create a peaceful culture and get exercise and teach our children the same, must get out of our  designated bike lane and take personal risk (which I don't think Amazon, or Uber are invested in personally being  worried about our safety).  And I'm not trying to be picky or possessive of the bike lane; anyone who is a bike commuter  knows it's a real and genuine danger to go around these vehicles‐it's a more unexpected move for the traffic flow behind  us and we often have to make a quick decision as the vehicle is parked in our lane coming up fast.  Specifically, I have  OFTEN experienced a a Lyft?Uber etc car that Suddenly pulls in front of me and parks within feet of me‐I really wonder if  they even saw me, and I have to do a dead stop or make a quick decision to go into the oncoming traffic to get out of  their way.  They have no bike culture awareness whatsoever or even the awareness that they are putting someone's life  in danger.  Can you imagine the outrage and Road Rage if a motorist encountered a stopped, parked vehicle in their  lane?  It wouldn't be stood for! But cyclists are expected to just deal with these sort of things on a daily basis. I don't  know if we are big complainers usually and it's nice to have a live and let live attitude, but maybe we should pick and  choose when to have an easygoing attitude and maybe these outside companies don't deserve it.  I don't enjoy the risk  myself, but I really get stirred up thinking of my teenage kids taking that risk as well as they go about their student and  work life in Santa Monica‐or what if I'm taking my baby?  So one last thing, upon leaving the screening of "The Engine Inside" a few days ago and hearing that I should take a  picture and report any incidents, I immediately came upon an SUV Limo (Lyft) parked in the bike lane on Main Street.  I  thought, well here we go, I will do as they suggested.  I pulled out my phone and took a picture of the license  Item 16.E 09/12/23 31 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1692 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 2 plate.  Immediately the driver came out, started aggressively confronting me and my partner, calling me names, the  passengers getting in the Lyft aggressively heckled us, and then a restaurant worker on main street ALSO started yelling,  saying move along, stop looking for a conflict, just go around, etc.  All I did was say "I'm taking a picture of you being in  the bike lane".  So this is how my first experience went of taking pictures/reporting and I think what it shows is the  Aggression that cyclists face and the expectation that we should just Cede to the Almighty Motor Vehicle at all  times...even in our own special lane! Perhaps not every attempt to record what goes on in the streets would be this  dramatic, but I thought it was pretty ironic that it happened Right After the Cycling Screening and Panel put on by the  SMC Sustainability, and really affects whether I'm willing to report in the future‐do I feel like getting confronted/yelled  at?  In the least it shows that we do need MORE support out there.  Compared to the rest of LA, Santa Monica is a  cycling haven, but..."Los Angeles" does come IN to Santa Monica,specifically by way of these CAR_CENTRIC people and  goods transport businesses, and they haven't heard the news, that cycling is the way of the future and all that.  They  haven't the heard the news, and they maintain an ENTITLED CAR DRIVER attitude that is so common in other areas, and  is not just a nuisance, interfering with the cycling friendly culture here, but also a scary real danger to those of us using  the BIKE LANES EVERY DAY for our personal business, the "people on the ground" who actually are living out this lifestyle  of home/work/school/groceries/entertainment, All on a bike. We need your help out there to stay safe.    Thank you  JoWanda Dziesinski  90405  Item 16.E 09/12/23 32 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1693 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 3 Vernice Hankins From:Jasper Kok <jasperfkok@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, September 9, 2023 10:28 AM To:Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; councilmtgitems; David White Subject:I Support Item 16E to Prioritize Safer Streets for everyone in Santa Monica EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica Mayor Davis and City Council,     I support item 16E by Council Members Zwick, Torosis, and Mayor Davis to direct the City Manager to study and  prioritize timely and effective solutions to improve street safety and prevent the dangerous motor vehicle incursions  into Santa Monica’s protected and unprotected bike lanes. Specifically, the City Manager should consider enhanced  enforcement by parking and traffic officers, photo enforcement to the extent allowable by law, a targeted curb  management evaluation and space reallocation to reduce double parking in bike lanes, and the deployment of quick‐ build infrastructure to protect bike lanes and reorient parking on streets in the City’s existing and planned protected  bikeway network whenever feasible.

Research and experience show again and again the same thing: protected bike  lanes are good for everyone and reduce collisions and injuries for all road users (including drivers) by 30‐50%. Item 16E  prioritizes measures to improve the efficacy of these road safety investments for both current and future projects. The  City’s investments in Protected Bike Lanes encourage healthier active transportation options, provide a choice to move  around Santa Monica without driving a car and reduce GHG emissions helping move us toward our climate  goals.
Please unanimously support Item 16E.  Item 16.E 09/12/23 33 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1694 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 4 Vernice Hankins From:Andy Liberman <teachins1@yahoo.com> Sent:Saturday, September 9, 2023 2:45 AM To:Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; Jesse Zwick Cc:councilmtgitems Subject:Support for 16E: Make Santa Monica's Streets Safer! EXTERNAL    Councilmembers,    I ride a bike regularly, and disdain the vehicles that park in my path while riding in Santa Monica!    I support the moƟon by Councilmembers Zwick and Torosis and Mayor Davis to keep our city’s bike lanes safe with a  combinaƟon of enhanced parking and traffic enforcement, reducing double parking, and quickly building safer bicycle  infrastructure.    Please vote to make Santa Monica's Streets safer for me and my family!    Sincerely,    Andrew Liberman      Item 16.E 09/12/23 34 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1695 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Rowan Sullivan <rowans126@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, September 9, 2023 5:07 PM To:Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; councilmtgitems; David White Subject:I Support Item 16E to Prioritize Safer Streets for everyone in Santa Monica EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica Mayor Davis and City Council,    I support item 16E by Council Members Zwick, Torosis, and Mayor Davis to direct the City Manager to study and prioriƟze  Ɵmely and effecƟve soluƟons to improve street safety and prevent the dangerous motor vehicle incursions into Santa  Monica’s protected and unprotected bike lanes. Specifically, the City Manager should consider enhanced enforcement by  parking and traffic officers, photo enforcement to the extent allowable by law, a targeted curb management evaluaƟon  and space reallocaƟon to reduce double parking in bike lanes, and the deployment of quick‐build infrastructure to  protect bike lanes and reorient parking on streets in the City’s exisƟng and planned protected bikeway network  whenever feasible.

Research and experience show again and again the same thing: protected bike lanes are good for  everyone and reduce collisions and injuries for all road users (including drivers) by 30‐50%. Item 16E prioriƟzes measures  to improve the efficacy of these road safety investments for both current and future projects. The City’s investments in  Protected Bike Lanes encourage healthier acƟve transportaƟon opƟons, provide a choice to move around Santa Monica  without driving a car and reduce GHG emissions helping move us toward our climate goals.
Please unanimously  support Item 16E.    My wife and I ride 11th street daily and are extremely excited for the planned separated bike Lane along the street.  We’ve been recently going out of our way to ride the new 17th street bike lanes, but having these lanes on 11th will be  amazing! We oŌen have to leave the current bike lanes due to cars parked and double parked around intersecƟons  (parƟcularly by the Starbucks on 11th and Wilshire) and are made to feel uncomfortable at intersecƟons whenever we  cannot avoid blocking cars wanƟng to make right turns (and have been honked at for not moving into less safe areas of  the road for their right turns).    We’re looking forward to seeing the planned infrastructure as soon as it’s possible!    Many thanks,  Rowan and family  Item 16.E 09/12/23 35 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1696 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 2 Vernice Hankins From:April DS <april.destefano@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, September 9, 2023 4:53 PM To:Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; Jesse Zwick Cc:councilmtgitems Subject:Support for 16E: Make Santa Monica's Streets Safer! EXTERNAL    Councilmembers,    I support the motion by Councilmembers Zwick and Torosis and Mayor Davis to keep our city’s bike lanes safe with a  combination of enhanced parking and traffic enforcement, reduced double parking, and more protected bicycle  infrastructure.  Please vote to make Santa Monica's streets safer for me and my family!    Sincerely,  April De Stefano    Resident, Voter, Bicycle Rider    Item 16.E 09/12/23 36 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1697 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 3 Vernice Hankins From:JOHN BALTZ <johnnybaltz@yahoo.com> Sent:Saturday, September 9, 2023 12:36 PM To:JoWanda Dziesinski; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; councilmtgitems; David White Cc:Cynthia.Rose@smspoke.org; Justin Baltz; John Baltz Subject:Re: 16E Safter Streets EXTERNAL    Very nice!  I’m on board with that    Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone    On Saturday, September 9, 2023, 11:37 AM, JoWanda Dziesinski <jowanda.dz@gmail.com> wrote:  Dear Council,    I'm a resident in Santa Monica now  for 12 years and have been a bike commuter for all of those years,  fortunate to find work here as well.  My partner is the same, my teenage children have ridden their  bikes to Grant, Jams, Samohi and now SMC and we ride our baby around in a bike as well.  So safe biking  and safe biking lanes are a daily experience for us.  I LOVE the bright green lanes and the courteous  culture in Santa Monica‐I feel local drivers are 99% on board with creating safe biking experiences for  the community.  Recently I attended the screening of "The Engine Inside", a bicycle documentary and it was great to hear  a panel of Santa Monica employees and community members helping us know what we can do‐it may  seem very simple, but I really was not aware of how I could voice my perspective and they mentioned  City Council emails and 311 so I am really grateful for that.More than one of them said that often there  is the impression in the CIty that they don't hear from the community and there's no issues, so now I'm  glad to understand what to do because safe bike lanes are ESSENTIAL to my personal life and to me one  of the TOP BENEFITS of SANTA MONICA.  So now that we have covered the positive, here's the negative report.  It is quite common for Ubers,  :Lyfts, food delivery services like Uber Eats and delivery trucks like Amazon to be in the bike lane, which  of course requires a cyclist to make a dangerous move into the car lane to go around.  I have often  wondered, why does a mammoth private company like Amazon, get to freely use our beautiful bike lane  system, to the benefit of...Jeff Bezos? While an un‐armored, body‐exposed local cyclist must make a  risky move into traffic to cede to their agenda? In any case, I would like to title this nuisance/menace as  "Outside non‐Santa Monica Businesses".because it never feels like locals are doing this sort of thing‐it  has the taste and feel of outsiders who are only concerned with their immediate priority and have no  concern or interest in our shared community values or culture.  So I think it's a fair question‐why are  these businesses getting to take up this space while local cyclists, "doing what we are supposed to do"  which is taking a bicycle instead of a car, to save the environment, create a peaceful culture and get  exercise and teach our children the same, must get out of our designated bike lane and take personal  risk (which I don't think Amazon, or Uber are invested in personally being worried about our  safety).  And I'm not trying to be picky or possessive of the bike lane; anyone who is a bike commuter  knows it's a real and genuine danger to go around these vehicles‐it's a more unexpected move for the  traffic flow behind us and we often have to make a quick decision as the vehicle is parked in our lane  Item 16.E 09/12/23 37 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1698 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 4 coming up fast.  Specifically, I have OFTEN experienced a a Lyft?Uber etc car that Suddenly pulls in front  of me and parks within feet of me‐I really wonder if they even saw me, and I have to do a dead stop or  make a quick decision to go into the oncoming traffic to get out of their way.  They have no bike culture  awareness whatsoever or even the awareness that they are putting someone's life in danger.  Can you  imagine the outrage and Road Rage if a motorist encountered a stopped, parked vehicle in their lane?  It  wouldn't be stood for! But cyclists are expected to just deal with these sort of things on a daily basis. I  don't know if we are big complainers usually and it's nice to have a live and let live attitude, but maybe  we should pick and choose when to have an easygoing attitude and maybe these outside companies  don't deserve it.  I don't enjoy the risk myself, but I really get stirred up thinking of my teenage kids  taking that risk as well as they go about their student and work life in Santa Monica‐or what if I'm taking  my baby?  So one last thing, upon leaving the screening of "The Engine Inside" a few days ago and hearing that I  should take a picture and report any incidents, I immediately came upon an SUV Limo (Lyft) parked in  the bike lane on Main Street.  I thought, well here we go, I will do as they suggested.  I pulled out my  phone and took a picture of the license plate.  Immediately the driver came out, started aggressively  confronting me and my partner, calling me names, the passengers getting in the Lyft aggressively  heckled us, and then a restaurant worker on main street ALSO started yelling, saying move along, stop  looking for a conflict, just go around, etc.  All I did was say "I'm taking a picture of you being in the bike  lane".  So this is how my first experience went of taking pictures/reporting and I think what it shows is  the Aggression that cyclists face and the expectation that we should just Cede to the Almighty Motor  Vehicle at all times...even in our own special lane! Perhaps not every attempt to record what goes on in  the streets would be this dramatic, but I thought it was pretty ironic that it happened Right After the  Cycling Screening and Panel put on by the SMC Sustainability, and really affects whether I'm willing to  report in the future‐do I feel like getting confronted/yelled at?  In the least it shows that we do need  MORE support out there.  Compared to the rest of LA, Santa Monica is a cycling haven, but..."Los  Angeles" does come IN to Santa Monica,specifically by way of these CAR_CENTRIC people and goods  transport businesses, and they haven't heard the news, that cycling is the way of the future and all  that.  They haven't the heard the news, and they maintain an ENTITLED CAR DRIVER attitude that is so  common in other areas, and is not just a nuisance, interfering with the cycling friendly culture here, but  also a scary real danger to those of us using the BIKE LANES EVERY DAY for our personal business, the  "people on the ground" who actually are living out this lifestyle of  home/work/school/groceries/entertainment, All on a bike. We need your help out there to stay safe.    Thank you  JoWanda Dziesinski  90405  Item 16.E 09/12/23 38 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1699 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Auguste Miller <augustemiller@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, September 9, 2023 11:58 PM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:I support Item 16E! EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council,    I am wriƟng in support of item 16E. While Santa Monica is making great progress on its bike infrastructure, a lot of the  bike lanes are regularly obstructed by motor vehicles, which defeats the purpose of a bike lane, as it forces its users into  dangerous and scary situaƟons. This makes our bike lane network much less safe and welcoming than it could be.    We cannot afford to keep leƫng these occurrences put more lives at risk while we wait for more permanent  infrastructure.    I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all.    Thank you,  Auguste Miller       Sent from my iPhone  Item 16.E 09/12/23 39 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1700 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 2 Vernice Hankins From:Dan Hall <daniel.stephen.hall@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, September 9, 2023 10:22 PM To:councilmtgitems; Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick Subject:Item 16E - Support EXTERNAL    Mayor Davis, Mayor Pro Tempore Negrete, Councilmembers Brock, Parra, de la Torre, Torosis, and Zwick,    I am writing in support of item 16E. While Santa Monica is making great progress on its bike infrastructure - I use the new 17th Street and Ocean Avenue protected bike lanes weekly! - a lot of the unprotected bike lanes are regularly obstructed by motor vehicles such as delivery trucks who do not follow the law, which defeats the purpose of a bike lane. This activity forces bike lane users such as myself into dangerous situations where we must enter traffic outside of our green lane. This makes our bike lane network much less safe and welcoming than it could be. We cannot afford to keep letting these occurrences put more lives at risk while we wait for more permanent infrastructure like we have on 17th and Ocean. I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all. Thank you,  Dan Hall  Item 16.E 09/12/23 40 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1701 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 3 Vernice Hankins From:samantha karim <samkarim919@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, September 10, 2023 8:12 AM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:I support Item 16E! EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council,    I am writing in support of item 16E. While Santa Monica is making great progress on its bike infrastructure, a lot of the  bike lanes are regularly obstructed by motor vehicles, which defeats the purpose of a bike lane, as it forces its users into  dangerous and scary situations    This makes our bike lane network much less safe and welcoming than it could be.    We cannot afford to keep letting these occurrences put more lives at risk while we wait for more permanent  infrastructure.    I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all.    When you make bike lanes safe for 8 year olds you make them safe for everyone and you will see a huge increase in  cycling which has many health benefits to Santa Monica residents    Item 16.E 09/12/23 41 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1702 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 4     Thank you,  Samantha Karim  14th and California Ave       Sent from my iPhone   Item 16.E 09/12/23 42 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1703 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 5 Vernice Hankins From:Leah Ho <leahmho13@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, September 10, 2023 9:09 AM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:I support Item 16E! EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council,    I am wriƟng in support of item 16E. While Santa Monica is making great progress on its bike infrastructure, a lot of the  bike lanes are regularly obstructed by motor vehicles, which defeats the purpose of a bike lane, as it forces its users into  dangerous and scary situaƟons. This makes our bike lane network much less safe and welcoming than it could be.    We cannot afford to keep leƫng these occurrences put more lives at risk while we wait for more permanent  infrastructure.    I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all.    Thank you,  Leo  3400 Beethoven Street  Item 16.E 09/12/23 43 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1704 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Ferris Kawar <ferrisk2@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, September 10, 2023 1:49 PM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox Subject:Agenda item 16E EXTERNAL Dear Mayor and Council Members, I'm writing in support of agenda item 16E, which will prioritize timely and effective solutions to make our streets safer. The proposed measures will help parents, like my wife and I, to feel confident riding our young daughters to Edison and JAMS and around town...and to eventually allow the girls to ride themselves around. Knowing the bike paths are protected and that our laws are working to enforce the lanes from reckless automobile drivers, residents and visitors to Santa Monica will be more likely to ride more frequently, thus relieving congestion and reducing air pollution. Thank you, Ferris Kawar 90405 (Sunset Park neighborhood) Item 16.E 09/12/23 44 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1705 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:April DS <april.destefano@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, September 10, 2023 4:10 PM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:I support item 16E EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council,   I am writing in support of item 16E. While Santa Monica is making great progress on its bike infrastructure, a lot of the  bike lanes are regularly obstructed by motor vehicles, which defeats the purpose of a bike lane, as it forces its users into  dangerous and scary situations. This makes our bike lane network much less safe and welcoming than it could be.  We cannot afford to keep letting these occurrences put more lives at risk while we wait for more permanent  infrastructure.  I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all.   Thank you,   April De Stefano  1400 block of Franklin Street  Item 16.E 09/12/23 45 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1706 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Tina <tina.grossman@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, September 10, 2023 1:22 PM To:Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; councilmtgitems; David White Subject:I DO NOT Support Item 16E to Prioritize Safer Streets for everyone in SM - ALL transportation means need safety - ask the voters EXTERNAL  Dear Santa Monica Mayor Davis and City Council,  I DO NOT support item 16E by Council Members Zwick, Torosis, and Mayor Davis to direct City manager White to conduct  another study. Stop spending tax dollars on studies! If you want to know how to proceed, put the changes being  proposed on the ballot and let people vote!   Item 16.E 09/12/23 46 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1707 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 2 Vernice Hankins From:Brandon Curran <brandonecurran@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, September 10, 2023 3:33 PM To:Caroline Torosis; Christine Parra; Council Mailbox; councilmtgitems; Gleam Davis; Jesse Zwick; Lana Negrete; Oscar de la Torre; Phil Brock Subject:I support Item 16E! EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council, I am writing in support of item 16E. While Santa Monica is making great progress on its  bike infrastructure, a lot of the bike lanes are regularly obstructed by motor vehicles, which defeats the purpose of a  bike lane, as it forces its users into dangerous and scary situations. This makes our bike lane network much less safe and  welcoming than it could be. We cannot afford to keep letting these occurrences put more lives at risk while we wait for  more permanent infrastructure. I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all.      Thank you, Brandon Curran  Item 16.E 09/12/23 47 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1708 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Kevin Cheng <kcheng6000@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, September 10, 2023 9:25 PM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:I support Item 16E! EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council,    I am wriƟng in support of item 16E. While Santa Monica is making great progress on its bike infrastructure, a lot of the  bike lanes are regularly obstructed by motor vehicles, which defeats the purpose of a bike lane, as it forces its users into  dangerous and scary situaƟons. This makes our bike lane network much less safe and welcoming than it could be.    We cannot afford to keep leƫng these occurrences put more lives at risk while we wait for more permanent  infrastructure.    I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all.    Thank you,  Kevin Cheng  Item 16.E 09/12/23 48 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1709 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 2 Vernice Hankins From:Jim Kennedy <kennedyjim@hotmail.com> Sent:Sunday, September 10, 2023 9:02 PM To:Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; councilmtgitems; David White Subject:Davis, Brock, Parra, Negrete , Zwick: Please Support Council Item 16E for Safer Streets: Council Agenda Tuesday, September 12th EXTERNAL    Dear Honorable Davis, Brock, Parra, Negrete , Zwick:     I would like to sincerely add my voice to Santa Monica Safe Streets Alliance partners to support Santa Monica City  Council Members Zwick, Torosis, and Mayor Davis’ Item 16E that proposes we prioritize timely and effective solutions to  make our streets safe for everyone.    I live and work in Santa Monica.  Riding my bicycle is my preferred mode of transportation to get around on a daily  basis.  I constantly have to be on my guard.  Bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure saves lives and encourages alternative  modes of transportation.      As I am riding my bicycle, I continuously say to myself, "how am I going to die?" This keeps my situational awareness  level high.  Nevertheless, I have had several close calls.  Please make this thoughtful call and support Council Item 16E  for Safer Streets on September 12th.    Respectfully,  Jim Kennedy  Santa Monica 90405  cell: 310‐220‐9329     Item 16.E 09/12/23 49 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1710 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 3 Vernice Hankins From:Aaron H <contactaaronh@gmail.com> Sent:Sunday, September 10, 2023 9:01 PM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:Support for Item 16E EXTERNAL    Dear SMCC,    I support item 16E proposed at thu upcoming city council meeting. Well, Santa Monica has made great strides in  improving its bike infrastructure, much of that progress is being forestalled as many motorists still regularly drive  through, stop, or park their vehicles in the bike lane. I regularly cycle through Santa Monica and unfortunately have had  to dart into traffic in order to avoid colliding with these vehicles in the bike lane. This makes the roads less safe for all  especially as it makes bike riders less predictable.     I'm personally hugely in favor of solutions that can be implemented today with existing low‐cost options rather than  waiting years for "perfect" when the goal is to save lives on our roadways.    Please support this item and help make our streets safer for all!    Regards  Aaron Harris  1835 7th St  Item 16.E 09/12/23 50 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1711 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Brodsky, Michael <mbrodsky@lmu.edu> Sent:Sunday, September 10, 2023 9:44 PM To:Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; councilmtgitems; David White Subject:Support for Council Item 16E for Safer Streets EXTERNAL    Item 16.E 09/12/23 51 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1712 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 2 Item 16.E 09/12/23 52 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1713 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 3 Dear City Council, Every single day in Santa Monica, I find that my commute to work, meetings, and errands are blocked by motorists who have either stopped or parked in a bike lane. This is not only illegal, it places me in a very precarious and dangerous situation where my personal safety on the road is at risk. This illegal behavior of motorists’ incursions into bike lanes in Santa Monica has become endemic. These traffic violations are rarely if ever enforced by the SMPD. Please direct the staff and City Manager to come up with solutions that will provide for safer streets for all. Enclosed is documentation of just a few of these bike lane incursions.  If you want more, I am sure I can come up with  another HUNDRED or more.  Sincerely, Michael Brodsky Santa Monica Item 16.E 09/12/23 53 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1714 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Alex Kargher <akargher@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, September 11, 2023 5:55 AM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:I support Item 16E! EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council,    I am wriƟng in support of item 16E. While Santa Monica is making great progress on its bike infrastructure, a lot of the  bike lanes are regularly obstructed by motor vehicles, which defeats the purpose of a bike lane. Those blocked lanes  force users into dangerous and scary situaƟons, including forcing them to suddenly merge into traffic. This makes our  bike lane network much less safe and welcoming than it could be.    We cannot afford to keep leƫng these occurrences put more lives at risk while we wait for more permanent  infrastructure.    I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all.    Thank you,  Alex Kargher    This message and any aƩached documents may contain informaƟon that is confidenƟal and/or privileged. If you are not  the intended recipient, you may not read, copy, distribute or use this informaƟon. If you have received this transmission  in error, please noƟfy the sender immediately by reply e‐mail and then delete this message.      Item 16.E 09/12/23 54 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1715 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Chasen Daniels <chasend11@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, September 11, 2023 10:00 AM To:councilmtgitems Subject:Agenda Item 16E EXTERNAL    Dear Council,    I am writing to express my wholehearted support for Agenda Item 16E, focusing on the expansion of protected bike  lanes in our city.    The existing protected bike lanes have been a tremendous asset, making non‐vehicular travel safer and more  convenient. I believe that these lanes have contributed positively to our city's sustainability and health goals.    I strongly encourage the prompt adoption of our Bicycle Action Plan, with a focus on adding protected bike lanes.  Leveraging major road work, like the ongoing water main project on Broadway between 5th and 10th streets, as  opportunities to introduce these lanes is a practical and efficient approach.    Expanding our network of protected bike lanes aligns with global sustainability trends and enhances our city's appeal for  cyclists. It's a crucial step toward reducing emissions and creating a safer, greener community.    I urge your support for Agenda Item 16E and the continued development of our cycling infrastructure.    Thank you for your dedication to our city's well‐being.    Sincerely,    Chasen Daniels  1535 6th Street  Item 16.E 09/12/23 55 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1716 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 2 Vernice Hankins From:Johanna Kracke <jokracke@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, September 11, 2023 9:42 AM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:I support Item 16E! EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council,    I am writing in support of item 16E. My husband and I are avid cyclists and we cargo bike our children to school at Will  Rogers, and to work in Santa Monica, daily. Our 8 year old is proficient on a bike, but we are still hesitant to let him ride  in the roads on his own bike with us due to how often the bike lanes fall short of keeping us truly safe.     We have been very proud to live in such a bikeable city and we think Santa Monica is making great progress on its bike  infrastructure. However, a lot of the bike lanes are regularly obstructed by motor vehicles, which defeats the purpose of  a bike lane, as it forces its users into dangerous and scary situations. This makes our bike lane network much less safe  and welcoming than it could be. Also the frequent use of sharrows is an inadequate solution. As my kids get older, I want  to feel like they can safely ride their bikes to meet their friends or get around town ‐ and currently this is not something I  would let them do.    We cannot afford to keep letting these occurrences put more lives at risk while we wait for more permanent  infrastructure. We can do better!!    I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all.    Thank you,    Johanna Kracke  Santa Monica resident ‐ Franklin St 90404  Item 16.E 09/12/23 56 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1717 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:stephan corbel <stephancorbel@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, September 11, 2023 3:39 PM To:Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; councilmtgitems; David White Subject:I Support Item 16E to Prioritize Safer Streets for everyone in Santa Monica Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica Mayor Davis and City Council,  I support item 16E by Council Members Zwick, Torosis, and Mayor Davis to direct the City Manager to study and  prioritize timely and effective solutions to improve street safety and prevent the dangerous motor vehicle incursions  into Santa Monica’s protected and unprotected bike lanes.    Specifically, the City Manager should consider enhanced enforcement by parking and traffic officers, photo enforcement  to the extent allowable by law, a targeted curb management evaluation and space reallocation to reduce double parking  in bike lanes, and the deployment of quick‐build infrastructure to protect bike lanes and reorient parking on streets in  the City’s existing and planned protected bikeway network whenever feasible.

Research and experience show again  and again the same thing: protected bike lanes are good for everyone and reduce collisions and injuries for all road users  (including drivers) by 30‐50%.     Item 16E prioritizes measures to improve the efficacy of these road safety investments for both current and future  projects.     The City’s investments in Protected Bike Lanes encourage healthier active transportation options, provide a choice to  move around Santa Monica without driving a car and reduce GHG emissions helping move us toward our climate  goals.
Please unanimously support Item 16E.    Sincerely,  Stephan Corbel  Item 16.E 09/12/23 57 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1718 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Ted Dubrawski <teddubrawski@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, September 11, 2023 4:43 PM To:councilmtgitems; Council Mailbox; Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre Subject:I support Item 16E! EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica City Council,    I am wriƟng in support of item 16E. While Santa Monica is making great progress on its bike infrastructure, a lot of the  bike lanes are regularly obstructed by motor vehicles, which defeats the purpose of a bike lane, as it forces its users into  dangerous and scary situaƟons. This makes our bike lane network much less safe and welcoming than it could be.    We cannot afford to keep leƫng these occurrences put more lives at risk while we wait for more permanent  infrastructure.    I urge you to support this item and help make our streets safer for all.    Thank you,  Ted Dubrawski  2221 ocean park Blvd. #5  Santa Monica Ca 90405  Item 16.E 09/12/23 58 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1719 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Guy Cheney <guyisindc@me.com> Sent:Monday, September 11, 2023 10:09 PM To:Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; councilmtgitems; David White Subject:I Support Item 16E to Prioritize Safer Streets for everyone in Santa Monica EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica Mayor Davis and City Council,    I support item 16E by Council Members Zwick, Torosis, and Mayor Davis to direct the City Manager to study and prioriƟze  Ɵmely and effecƟve soluƟons to improve street safety and prevent the dangerous motor vehicle incursions into Santa  Monica’s protected and unprotected bike lanes. Specifically, the City Manager should consider enhanced enforcement by  parking and traffic officers, photo enforcement to the extent allowable by law, a targeted curb management evaluaƟon  and space reallocaƟon to reduce double parking in bike lanes, and the deployment of quick‐build infrastructure to  protect bike lanes and reorient parking on streets in the City’s exisƟng and planned protected bikeway network  whenever feasible.

Research and experience show again and again the same thing: protected bike lanes are good for  everyone and reduce collisions and injuries for all road users (including drivers) by 30‐50%. Item 16E prioriƟzes measures  to improve the efficacy of these road safety investments for both current and future projects. The City’s investments in  Protected Bike Lanes encourage healthier acƟve transportaƟon opƟons, provide a choice to move around Santa Monica  without driving a car and reduce GHG emissions helping move us toward our climate goals.
Please unanimously  support Item 16E.      Guy Cheney     90404  Item 16.E 09/12/23 59 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1720 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) A community group dedicated to biking and walking in Santa Monica. Working to make the City of Santa Monica a more sustainable, bikeable & walkable place to live, work and play. Support: Agenda Item 16-E September 12, 2023 
 Dear Mayor Davis and City Council Members, Santa Monica Spoke and the Santa Monica Safe Streets Alliance express our full support of item 16E. Santa Monica is a leader in sustainability as well as active and climate-resilient transportation that enhances community well-being. Additionally, Santa Monica’s public safety inevitably extends to safeguarding people riding bikes. Our community and visitors love our bike infrastructure and our city’s commitment to invest in safer, protected and high visibility green bike lanes. Such safe bike infrastructure encourages healthier active transportation options, provides a choice and freedom to move around Santa Monica without driving a car and reduces GHG emissions helping to move us toward our climate goals in an efficient manner. Resoundingly, research and experience show again and again the same thing: protected bike lanes are good for everyone and reduce collisions and injuries for all road users–including drivers–by 30-50%.
 
 Unfortunately, Santa Monica’s daily reality currently involves illegal blockages and incursions in our city’s bike lanes that undermine our safety investments and cause conflicts, subjecting people on bikes to less safe and outright dangerous conditions, jeopardizing our community residents, students, workers and neighbors as well as our visitors on bicycles. Our community and visitors – particularly our most vulnerable– seniors and youth– are put at undue risk.  We applaud councilmembers Zwick and Torosis and Mayor Davis’s motion of item 16E that instructs staff to take necessary actions that will make our streets safer.  We support this motion to study and prioritize timely implementation of measures to prevent dangerous motor vehicle incursions into our current and future bike infrastructure. 
 
 We support the efforts to consider all options allowable to improve safety from motorized incursion in our bike infrastructure investments.  Those efforts should include but are not limited to: – making sure we are leveraging ample, significant signage;  – the deployment of quick-build infrastructure to protect bike lanes;   – reorient street parking in the City’s existing and planned protected bikeway network whenever feasible; – targeted curb management evaluation;
 – space reallocation to reduce double parking in bike lanes; 
 – photo enforcement to the extent allowable by law;
 – enhanced enforcement by parking and traffic officers; and – identifying options for delivery and rideshare providers to educate drivers not to double park in bike lanes. Santa Monica Spoke and the Santa Monica Safe Streets Alliance, a collaboration of local advocacy organizations and community members that advocate for safe, livable and sustainable streets that are welcoming to everyone, urge you to unanimously support item 16E for a safer Santa Monica! Sincerely, Cynthia Rose Director, Santa Monica Spoke Cris Gutierrez
 Co-Chair, Santa Monica Safe Street Alliance Co-Chair, Santa Monica Safe Streets Alliance SMSpoke.org
 SaMoSafeStreets.org Item 16.E 09/12/23 60 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1721 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Juan Matute <jmatute@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 7:43 AM To:Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; Jesse Zwick Cc:councilmtgitems Subject:Support for 16E: Make Santa Monica's Streets Safer! Attachments:TRB Poster Matute Curb Management (3).pdf; Matute, Dasmalchi - TR.A Paper.pdf EXTERNAL    Councilmembers,    I support the motion by Councilmembers Zwick and Torosis and Mayor Davis to keep our city’s bike lanes safe with a  combination of enhanced parking and traffic enforcement, reducing double parking, and quickly building safer bicycle  infrastructure.    City Clerk, I've attached two PDFs of academic studies for inclusion in the public record.  Both are from a paper that  was presented at the 2019 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, part of the National Academies on  Science, Engineering, and Medicine, an organization chartered by the US Congress that serves as the collective scientific  national academy of the US.  This research paper demonstrates that the combination of too few curb space allocations  to loading activity and enforcement negligence constitutes an unsafe condition for users of the city's 2nd street bike  lane, which was blocked for 17% of the time between 6pm and 10pm during the observational study period.  25.7  bikeway users per hour needed to enter mixed flow traffic during dusk or nighttime hours and pass a vehicle that was  double parked.  This study demonstrates the city's curb space allocations and high rates of loading zone violations create  an unsafe condition for bicycle lane users.    Measure 16E is a step forward towards addressing these unsafe conditions through a proactive approach rather than  waiting for a fatality or severe injury to act.    Please support 16E as a step to make Santa Monica's Streets safer for me and my family!    Item 16.E 09/12/23 61 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1722 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Jane Stuecken <jane@streetsareforeveryone.org> Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 9:30 AM To:Gleam Davis; Phil Brock; Christine Parra; Lana Negrete; Jesse Zwick; Caroline Torosis; Oscar de la Torre; councilmtgitems; David White Subject:I Support Item 16E to Prioritize Safer Streets for everyone in Santa Monica EXTERNAL    Dear Santa Monica Mayor Davis and City Council,     We here at SAFE, Streets Are For Everyone, support item 16E by Council Members Zwick, Torosis, and Mayor Davis to  direct the City Manager to study and prioritize timely and effective solutions to improve street safety and prevent the  dangerous motor vehicle incursions into Santa Monica’s protected and unprotected bike lanes.     Specifically, the City Manager should consider enhanced enforcement by parking and traffic officers, photo enforcement  to the extent allowable by law, a targeted curb management evaluation and space reallocation to reduce double parking  in bike lanes, and the deployment of quick‐build infrastructure to protect bike lanes and reorient parking on streets in  the City’s existing and planned protected bikeway network whenever feasible.

    Research and experience show again and again the same thing: protected bike lanes are good for everyone and reduce  collisions and injuries for all road users (including drivers) by 30‐50%. Item 16E prioritizes measures to improve the  efficacy of these road safety investments for both current and future projects. The City’s investments in Protected Bike  Lanes encourage healthier active transportation options, provide a choice to move around Santa Monica without driving  a car and reduce GHG emissions helping move us toward our climate goals.
Please unanimously support Item 16E.    Best, Jane Stuecken  Policy, Legislative and Advocacy Coordinator  Streets Are For Everyone  StreetsAreForEveryone.org  Item 16.E 09/12/23 62 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1723 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Peter DiChellis <pdichellis@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 10:35 AM To:councilmtgitems Subject:Item 16E - Bicycle Safety EXTERNAL    The 17th Street bike lane configuraƟon is unsafe for residents, pedestrians, emergency vehicles, elderly residents in  senior homes, and motorists, especially where 17th St. intersects with Arizona and/or Broadway. More of the same is  only more dangerous.    Furthermore, seemingly lost in these discussions is why unsafe bike riding does not receive the same enforcement  aƩenƟon as dangerous acts by other vehicles. We do not tolerate any class of vehicle except bicycles rouƟnely running  through stop signs and red lights, making unsafe turns, traveling against traffic, and endangering pedestrians. SƟff fines  and vehicle impoundment seem appropriate.    And who is paying for the design and construcƟon of these lanes?  Licensing fees and a tax or fee on bicycle sales and  repairs should be key to this discussion.    Please make sure the organized efforts of outside special interest groups, such as out‐of‐town bloggers and social media  antagonists do not push aside residents’ concerns again.    Sincerely,    Peter DiChellis  Santa Monica 90403  Item 16.E 09/12/23 63 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1724 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Jason Mastbaum <jason.mastbaum@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 11:40 AM To:councilmtgitems Subject:9/12/2023 item 16E Attachments:20230708_143501.jpg; 20230511_130315.jpg; 20230712_120559.jpg; 20230622_123933.jpg EXTERNAL    Councilmembers, I'm writing to urge you to pass this agenda item. Keeping bike lanes clear is crucially important.  Blocked bike lanes aren't just a momentary inconvenience; telling cyclists to "just go around" frequently leads to severe  injury and even death. https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/2022/6/9/23161361/uptown‐child‐bicycle‐crash‐semi    Right now, blocked bike lanes is a daily occurrence all over Santa Monica; the attached pictures are a tiny tiny fraction of  the pictures I have of bike lane violations. We're undermining our bike infrastructure efforts and putting people in  danger (which could also put the city on the hook for more big settlements!) when we just paint a bike lane and then let  it be commandeered as a valet lane, delivery loading zone, Uber dropoff, or whatever else motorists happen to feel  justifies placing bike lane users at risk. Best practice from around both the country and the world shows that by far the  most effective way to keep bike lanes safe and clear is to make it physically impossible for motorists to enter the bike  lane. In spots where access needs to be maintained for specific uses, such as staff entry into Palisades Park or  emergency service access, we should be placing automated retractable bollards that can be remote controlled by staff  and emergency services instead of just leaving big gaping gaps in our bike lane protection and simply trusting motorists  to do the right thing.    I also hope that should AB 361 be signed into law, that Santa Monica extends its pilot camera enforcement of bus lanes  to bike lanes. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB361   Item 16.E 09/12/23 64 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1725 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) September 12, 2023 Santa Monica City Council c/o City Clerk 1685 Main St., Room 250 Santa Monica, CA 90401 RE: Agenda Item 16-E (Request of Councilmember Zwick, Councilmember Torosis, and Mayor Davis that the City Manager study and prioritize timely and effective solutions to prevent dangerous motor vehicle incursions into Santa Monica’s protected and unprotected bike lanes.) Dear Hon. Councilmembers, I urge you to support these common sense safety measures. A January 2023 report from the LA Times documents the fact that “[l]ast year in Los Angeles, more people were killed by someone driving a car than by someone wielding a gun” (see: https://www.latimes.com/california/newsletter/2023-01-19/essential-california-2022-traffic- violence-essential-california.) We need to do everything in our power to protect residents from traffic violence. Accordingly, I urge you to support Item 16-E. Best, Ellis Raskin Item 16.E 09/12/23 65 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1726 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:greg chasen <gchasen@chasenarc.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 11:58 AM To:councilmtgitems Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged EXTERNAL    16D‐ Vehicles exhaust noise has significant health impacts on those near blvds and downtown ‐ please continue efforts  to cite excessively noisy vehicles.    16E‐ Please make additional efforts to stop vehicle incursions into all bike lanes. Not one ride go by without  encountering dangerous double parking in these lanes.    Greg Chasen  1318 10th St    Item 16.E 09/12/23 66 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1727 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) Item 16.E 09/12/23 67 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1728 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) Item 16.E 09/12/23 68 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1729 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) Item 16.E 09/12/23 69 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1730 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) Item 16.E 09/12/23 70 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1731 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) Effectively Violated? Empirical Evidence from a Curb Management Pilot in Santa Monica Business District Authors: Juan Matute1 (jmatute@ucla.edu) (corresponding author) Eric Dasmalchi 1,2 Tianxing Dai 1,3 1 UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies 2 Masters of Urban and Regional Planning, UCLA 3 Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, UCLA Address: UCLA Institute of Transportation Studies BOX 951656, 3320 Public Affairs Building Los Angeles, CA 90095-1656 Abstract: New services for food delivery concentrate demand for pickup near restaurants which market on these platforms. In urban areas, these restaurants may be located in areas of high existing demand for streets and curbs by multimodal roadway users. The purpose of this paper is to inform the objectives and design of curb management projects that address both emerging and existing demand for curb space in business districts. The authors first review the literature to define objectives by which to measure the effectiveness of curb management. The authors then present an empirical study with micro-scale observations of a curb management pilot in an area of high Courier Network Service (CNS) activity in downtown Santa Monica, California. We find that length-of-stay violations significantly limit the effectiveness of the zone in eliminating double-parked vehicles and mitigating flow and safety impacts to users of an adjacent bikeway. Additionally, we find that due to short lengths of stay and somewhat complementary arrival times, curb management zones in business districts can be designed to accommodate both passenger dropoff/pickup activity and goods pickup. Keywords: curbs, pilot project, courier network services, transportation network companies Acknowledgements: This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1736582. The National Science Foundation had no involvement in study design or execution. We are grateful to the Natural Resources Defense Council’s Urban Solutions program for logistical support to place an observational camera in an office window. This group had no further involvement in study design, analysis, or other components of the research. Disclosure: Declaration of interest: Corresponding author is on the board of DTSM Inc., an unpaid civic service position. Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. worked with the city to launch the 1 Item 16.E 09/12/23 71 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1732 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) curb pilot zone studied herein. Neither the City of Santa Monica nor Downtown Santa Monica Inc. had any involvement over study design or execution. Notes to publishers: The paper is designed for online publication. If accepted for publication, we can substitute B&W-friendly graphics for some existing charts and figures. 1. Introduction Curbs are the interface between the transportation and land use systems and can provide the means by which transportation system users access adjacent land uses. New technology and business models have added to demand for curb space in urban business districts, where curb demand is often high. Curbspace is supply-constrained in a way that off-street parking is not. The supply of off-street parking can expand in three dimensions through the construction of multi-story parking structures, which are common in some business districts. Curbs are also part of the public right-of-way and controlled by the government, which makes them subject to political decision-making. Reallocating curb space in business districts combines policy and politics: balancing efficient curb use and the political challenges of making changes to the public right of way, especially adjacent to retail businesses that depend on customers storing automobiles in that right of way. Given the inherent supply constraints and new technology-enabled demand for curb use, and politically-influenced public decision-making process, city planners and engineers are wanting for new approaches to curb space management in locations where new demand is particularly acute, such as business districts with concentrations of retail, restaurants, and/or nightlife. But prior to implementing such approaches, they must consider the objectives for curb management and how they will define the success of a curb management project. To the existing literature, this observational study of a curb management pilot project in Santa Monica adds a review and discussion of objectives for curb management and a micro-scale data collection and analysis of a curb management pilot in an area with high Courier Network Service (CNS) activity. The analysis can be used to set assumptions in micro-simulation models of curb activity and offer data-driven insight into trade-offs present in curb space management decision-making for other jurisdictions. 1.1. Historical Perspectives on Curb Management A review of foundational literature on street traffic engineering finds the basis of curb regulation is to balance the need for access to adjacent land uses while mitigating impacts to safety and traffic flow. According to this foundational literature, the primary purpose of public streets is to facilitate movement. The need to facilitate the public's movement provides legal justification for 2 Item 16.E 09/12/23 72 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1733 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) the government to acquire private property rights or easements, sometimes through eminent domain, in order to establish a network of rights-of- way for public use. Citing John Dillon’s (1912) seminal work on the legal authorities for municipal governments’ actions, foundational traffic engineer Miller McClintock (1925) contends curb regulations should firstly prioritize transactions more connected to transportation than storage, and secondly seek to eliminate double-parking and impacts to traffic flow: “While the streets are primarily for the purpose of travel and not for storage of vehicles or commodities, it must be remembered that the loading and unloading of vehicles is an integral part of transportation. It is just as essential to load and unload persons and commodities as it is to transport them, for little can be gained by mere movement over the street. Both the movement and the loading and unloading are equally important links in the chain of transportation. The storage of vehicles, when not in use, is not a primary function of the city streets.” To aid cities in prioritizing transactions more connected to transportation than storage, McClintock (1925) makes a distinction between three classes of standing vehicles: 1) In-progress loading or unloading of merchandise or passengers. 2) “Live parking” - an attended vehicle waiting for the loading or unloading of passengers or merchandise 3) “Dead parking” - an unattended vehicle whose driver has left the vehicle. McClintock (1925) writes that when dead parking “can be exercised only at the expense of other users of the street, it creates a nuisance and should be abated by public officials.” He finds that those late-comers who have been shut out of curb space, but have “actual business to transact,” as required by in-progress loading or live parking, “stop in the second lane, and create an evil which is generally known as double parking.” McClintock’s foundational work has led to the designation of passenger loading zones, commercial loading zones, short-term parking zones, and other curb parking zones to differentiate between various stopping, standing, and parking activities. And McClintock provides guidance for when cities should use such zones: “As a general rule it may be taken that when use of a street for standing vehicles impairs the use of the street by moving vehicles, the privilege should be limited.” 1.2. Contemporary Research on Curb Management Contemporary research research investigates the use of pricing to implement policy considerations for curb management: balancing curb pricing versus off-street pricing, either to reduce search time (cruising) or to allocate short-term parking demand to on-street spaces and longer-term demand to off-street spaces (Hensher and King 2001) (Shoup 2006). 3 Item 16.E 09/12/23 73 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1734 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) A more limited set of research documents the political challenges in reallocating curb parking space from long-term parking to other uses. This limited research indicates that 1 potential opposition to such reallocation considers both the loss of the prior use and possible benefits of the future use. On Polk Street in San Francisco, adjacent business owners who had not previously opposed the conversion of metered parking to a parklet, which can attract and serve retail customers, (Littke 2016), opposed loss of metered parking to a bicycle lane (Stehlin 2015). Recent research considers new mobility’s impacts on demand for curb space and adjacent travel lanes. Lu (2018) found that 44% of all vehicles engaged in pickup or dropoff activities stopped in the street, rather than at the curb, during evening hours in a bustling Los Angeles area entertainment district. He found that 82.8% of vehicles blocking a travel lane were ride hailing vehicles, which stayed for an average of 0.7 minutes per transaction. Lu’s study informed the City of West Hollywood’s (2018) decision to extend hours of passenger loading zones in 12 areas of the city. Two recent studies from Seattle focus on commercial vehicles activity in the central business district. One study of full-block observations found that many commercial park outside of loading zones, that many drivers indiscriminately use available passenger loading or commercial loading regardless of their vehicle type (Girón-Valderrama, Machado-León, and Goodchild 2019). Another study of vehicle GPS data from throughout Seattle’s downtown found that cruising activity decreased as more curb space was allocated to commercial vehicle parking (Dalla Chiara and Goodchild 2020). Recent practitioner guidance suggest changes to street design (Mitman et al. 2018; Roe and Toocheck 2017) and the use of technology (Crist, Martinez, and Grosso 2018) to manage curb space. 1.3. New Mobility Trends and Curb Impacts The combination of ubiquitous connected mobile computing devices, powerful cloud computing, and venture capital investment in new business models has led to a proliferation of new mobility services in the past decade. Table 1 summarizes existing and new mobility business models, vehicle types, and curb uses in business districts. This study focuses on CNS use of curb space, but also includes observations of ridehail activity. TABLE 1: Existing and New Business Models for Curb Using Vehicles Business Model Brand Names Vehicle Type Typical Curb Uses Ridehail (TNC)Lyft, Uber Personal automobiles and light duty vehicles Passenger pickup/dropoff Short-term parking Courier Network Services (CNS) Grubhub, Doordash, Personal automobiles and light duty vehicles Goods pickup/dropoff Short-term parking 1 Parking sessions greater than 30 minutes in length. City code reviewed below defines short-term parking as sessions below 30 or 15 minutes in length. 4 Item 16.E 09/12/23 74 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1735 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) Ubereats Micromobility Service Provider Bird, Jump, Lime Fleet bike Fleet scooter Micromobility drop zone Employer-provided commuter shuttles Bauer Transportation Services, WeDriveU Private coach bus Passenger loading Long-distance passenger buses Flix Bus Private coach bus Passenger loading Public transit Muni, AC Transit Public bus Passenger loading Commercial delivery FedEx, UPS Commercial vehicle, truck Food truck Kogi,Loncheras Mobile vending Vending Courier Network Services Business Models A Courier Network Service Company (CNS) platform makes arrangements with restaurants to sell menu items for delivery, recruits individual independent contractors to conduct deliveries on foot, bicycle, or by vehicle, and has a mobile application and web site to market menu items to end consumers. To earn revenue, the CNS platform charges the end consumer a fee and/or takes a percentage of sale from the restaurant. Restaurants can obtain a higher placement in search results by paying CNS platforms a greater share of their revenues and/or electing to provide delivery services exclusively through a single app. Some restaurants may choose to provide free delivery by increasing the share of revenue held by the CNS platform. Aggressive marketing practice or high popularity can concentrate pickup demand at just a few restaurants, intensifying demand for nearby curbs. Non-employee couriers performing pick-up and delivery bear the cost of any delivery mishaps, including extended wait time at the restaurant, parking tickets, traffic congestion or roadway closures, an inability to locate the recipient party. Couriers are paid a fixed amount per order and have an economic incentive to minimize the time taken to pickup and deliver orders. As of June 2019, there were four major CNS platform companies providing prepared food delivery, none with more than 35% market share (see Table 2). TABLE 2: U.S. Courier Network Service Providers Provider Primary Markets Estimated Market Share (Rieck 2019) Amazon Flex General goods Amazon Fresh Perishable goods, general goods 18% of online grocery sales Instacart 68.6% of online grocery sales 5 Item 16.E 09/12/23 75 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1736 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) Postmates Perishable foods, prepared foods, general goods 10.8% of prepared food delivery Amazon Restaurants Prepared food 0% - shut down in June 2019 (Porter 2019) Caviar <6% of prepared food delivery Grubhub 32.7% of prepared food delivery DoorDash 33.8% of prepared food delivery UberEats 16.7% of prepared food delivery This study does not distinguish between Curb Network Service providers. 1.4. City of Santa Monica 2nd Street Pilot Santa Monica, California, United States is a coastal community between the City of Los Angeles and the Pacific Ocean. The Los Angeles region is a dispersed metropolis (Gordon and Richardson 1996) of 13 million in the metropolitan statistical area. Santa Monica is one of the top employment and population sub centers identified by Guiliano and Small (1991), and Downtown Santa Monica concentrates employment in the finance, real estate, information technology, retail, restaurant, and hospitality industries. In addition to the daytime employment population, Downtown Santa Monica is a popular regional beach-adjacent destination for shopping, recreation, and entertainment Second Street is a collector street with a general purpose lane and bike lane in each direction with a combination of metered parking and turn lanes adjacent to the curb (see figure 1). The southwestern side of the street, the subject of the curb pilot, is faced with zero lot-line buildings without surface parking. The block is a part of the downtown Santa Monica parking district, which has not required on-site parking during the period in which most extant buildings were developed. Figure 1: Traffic diagram of block with two-space pilot zone (yellow), traffic lanes (white), bike lanes (green), metered parking spaces (white boxes), significant buildings, curb cuts (darker grey), bus layover zone (red), sidewalks (light gray), and mid-block pedestrian crossing. The observational time-lapse camera was placed in the blue-shaded building. 6 Item 16.E 09/12/23 76 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1737 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) The City of Santa Monica’s Second Street curb management pilot is a conversion of two metered parking spaces to an evening short-term loading zone.The two curb spaces are adjacent to a mixed-use residential building with ground floor retail including three eat-in restaurants that also offer delivery. This building has an off-street underground parking garage for residents, but not retail customers, which accessed via the alleyway. Directly across Second Street from this building is a 698-space, 9-story, above-ground public parking structure owned by the City of Santa Monica. The City offered all automobiles 90 minutes of free parking in this structure and nine other downtown structures at the time of the study. On April 19, 2019, the City of Santa Monica changed parking restrictions for two parking spaces from 3 hour metered parking to a 15-minute loading zone from 6 pm to 10 pm (Pauker 2019). The Downtown Santa Monica Business Improvement District placed an informational sign next to the formal posted signage that read “Mobile Delivery Parking Only” and “10 Minute Maximum” (see Figure 2). The city’s stated objectives for this pilot were to reduce blocking of the bike lane and double parking in the pilot area, improve active transportation convenience and safety, and to provide dedicated curb space for CNS and transportation network company (TNC, ridehail) activity (Pauker 2019). Figure 2: Mobile Delivery Parking Zone, City of Santa Monica (photo by Juan Matute) 7 Item 16.E 09/12/23 77 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1738 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) For parking enforcement officers to have authority to issue citations to automobiles violating use or time limits, Santa Monica’s curb management pilot needed to be consistent with state law and local code. California state law restricts the use of shorter-term white curb markings to the loading and unloading of passengers or depositing mail in a mailbox. Pickup of prepared foods for delivery meets neither criteria, and is classified as “loading or unloading of freight” under California Vehicle Code § 21458(a)(2), requiring a yellow curb zone with a time limit specified by the local jurisdiction. Santa Monica’s existing loading zone ordinance specifies that vehicles should park in yellow zones no longer than is “necessary to load or unload materials, freight, or passengers, and in no event longer than 15 minutes” (SMMC 3.12.740 1980). The City did not amend this ordinance for the curb management pilot. 2. Methods The research team placed an observational camera, collected video of the pilot zone and adjacent roadway operation, manually coded this video, and then analyzed the results. 2.1.1. Video Collection To investigate driver’s usage of the pilot loading zones, a time-lapse video camera was placed to observe the zone and capture video at one frame per second. This camera obtained 29 hours of 5x-speed videos, which covers 145 realtime hours of live actions. The video was collected in late August and early September of 2019, including two complete weekends and three observations for each weekday. The first full week of observations included video from 12:00 pm to 10:30 pm. The final two weeks of observation included video from 5:00 pm to 10:30 pm. 2.1.2. Video Coding A research assistant then manually reviewed the video and coded timestamped movements, including the time of arrival and departure of every automobile that stopped or parked in the two pilot loading zone spaces (space 1 & 2), the downstreet parking space that retained the pre-pilot 3-hour time limit (space 3), the southbound bike lane and travel lane, as well as the northbound right turn pocket (into a parking structure), as shown in figure 3.The research team recorded both when an automobile stopped in the bike lane and the number of bikeway users who exited the bike lane to pass the stopped automobile. Bikeway users may be on bicycles, electric scooters, skateboards, or other similar rolling devices and automobiles. 8 Item 16.E 09/12/23 78 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1739 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) Figure 3: Automobile parking/stopping locations The research team also coded certain behaviors demonstrated by each automobile’s occupants. These behaviors included an occupant’s interaction with a parking meter, apparent CNS activity, and apparent TNC (ridehail) activity. A recorded meter interaction means an automobile occupant faces the meter within approximately arm’s-length for at least 5 seconds to observe meter restrictions and payment options. The city removed the inner payment equipment from the two pilot zone meters (space 1 & 2) before the observed period, which disallowed any credit card or coin payment during all times of the day. A recorded apparent CNS activity occurred when researchers observed a driver or other occupant exiting the automobile, cross the nearside curb, and the same individual returning to the automobile with a bag or container. When a passenger entered with a bag, researchers would review if this person earlier exited the automobile to code the activity as CNS and not ridehail activity. A recorded apparent ridehail activity occurred when researchers observed one or more passengers entering or exiting an automobile, typically without the driver exiting the automobile. TNC drop-off activities typically last for less than one minute. The research team also recorded when any stopping activity occurred in the adjacent bike lane. Figure 4 shows a CNS activity in the bike lane. 9 Item 16.E 09/12/23 79 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1740 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) Figure 5: Typical CNS activity. A driver returns to their automobile with a package typical of a prepared food order. In this case, the automobile was double parked in the bike lane adjacent to the curb management pilot zone. Researchers also noted when a marked police or traffic enforcement vehicle or traffic enforcement stops in frame for a minimum of one minute and whether enforcement activity is apparent from an officer inputting information and placing an item on an unattended automobile or otherwise interacting with a driver. A total of 2,258 automobile stopping operations were observed and coded. 2.1.3. Analysis The research team imported a spreadsheet of vehicle-based observations into a data analysis software environment using the Python programming language (Python Software Foundation 2020), Pandas data analysis library (2020), and a Jupyter notebook (Perez and Granger 2007). The data was then reconstructed as a time and activity-based dataset. First, a member of the research team classified each activity as a violator or likely non-violator by comparing the time and duration of the activity to the loading zone rules. This time-based approach somewhat undercounts violators as it doesn’t qualify the required loading activity authorized for use in a commercial loading zone, but it was the most consistent method using the data available. The research team then processed that data into a time-indexed format with one-second resolution. This enables us to calculate various summary statistics and examine conditional relationships between violators and bike lane blocking with varying levels of granularity. 10 Item 16.E 09/12/23 80 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1741 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) The research team next expanded and re-indexed each activity. For each activity, the script converted the string-formatted start and end times to Numpy (Walt, Colbert, and Varoquaux 2011) datetime64 objects, and generated a datetime64 object for every second contained within that range. Using that datetime64 range as the new index, a dataframe was created with the rest of the activity data duplicated at every second that the activity continued. This process was then repeated for each activity, merging the results into one final, expanded Pandas dataframe. Using this format, it’s possible to select any range of time and filter to all activities within that interval, with one entry per activity per second. For purpose of illustration, the below figures show a one-minute resolution and a single “Activity Details” column– the actual dataset has a one-second resolution and several columns for the individual activity parameters. Table 3: Raw Data Structure from Manual Classification Start Time End Time Activity Details Activity A 5:00PM 5:02PM Car, Space 2, CNS, … Activity B 5:01PM 5:03PM Delivery Van, Space 3,… Table 4: Time-indexed and Expanded Data for Analysis, With Violator Classification Timestamp Activity Start Time End Time Activity Details Violator? 5:00PM Activity A 5:00PM 5:02PM Delivery Van, Space 3, …No 5:01PM Activity A 5:00PM 5:02PM Delivery Van, Space 3, …No 5:01PM Activity B 5:01PM 6:03PM Car, Space 2, …Yes 5:02PM Activity A 5:00PM 5:02PM Delivery Van, Space 3, …No 5:02PM Activity B 5:01PM 6:03PM Car, Space 2, …Yes 5:03PM Activity B 5:01PM 6:03PM Delivery Van, Space 3, …Yes 3. Results 3.1. Courier Network Services and Transportation Network Company Activity are Complimentary 11 Item 16.E 09/12/23 81 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1742 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) The resulting analysis observed CNS activity peaking earlier than TNC (ridehail) activity (Figures 6 & 7). This could mean that CNS activity peaks at the beginning of dinnertime, whereas Transportation Network Service activity peaks after dinnertime. Figure 6: CNS activity duration & time distribution before, during, and after curb management pilot loading zone restriction (6pm to 10pm) 12 Item 16.E 09/12/23 82 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1743 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) Figure 7: CNS activity count by time distribution before, during, and after curb management pilot loading zone restriction (6pm to 10pm) Additionally, the observed duration of stay for TNC automobiles is low, with the median automobile staying for 24 seconds. The median observed length of stay for a CNS activity was 3 minutes, 3 seconds. Four percent of CNS automobiles stayed longer than the posted 15 minute limit. Table 5 below displays summary statistics and figure 8 shows the distribution of length of stay by activity type. Table 5: Duration of Stay for Transportation Network Company and Courier Network Service Vehicles Transportation Network Company Courier Network Service Number of observations 527 772 Percentile observation Duration (mm:ss)Duration (mm:ss) 50th percentile 00:24 03:03 75th percentile 00:45 05:29 90th percentile 01:36 09:29 95th percentile 02:10 12:55 Standard Deviation 1:03 4:20 13 Item 16.E 09/12/23 83 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1744 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) Figure 8: Distribution of TNC and CNS activity duration 3.2. A Few Violators Have an Outsized Impact on the Zone The two-space zone was vacant 4.8% of the time. Compliance rates, the percentage of all automobiles stopping in the two-space zone that stayed less than the posted 15-minute limit, was 90%. However, because each non-compliant automobile stays for a longer duration, non-compliant vehicles were present 60% of the time! Observed enforcement rates, as a percentage of non-compliant activity that resulted in enforcement action were low, at 1.1%. Table 6 and Figure 9 below display these statistics by automobile activity and violation status. Table 6: Percentage of Time and Automobiles By Activity and Violation Status During Loading Zone Active Hours % of time % of automobiles All violators 60.19%10.05% Non violator, non CNS/TNC 14.38%34.16% Non violator, TNC 1.43%13.73% 14 Item 16.E 09/12/23 84 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1745 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) Non violator, CNS 19.14%42.05% Vacant 4.86%N/A Figure 9: Percent Time and Percent of Automobiles by Activity and Violation Status 3.3. Violators Cause Double Parking and Displace Bikeway Users The bike lane was blocked for 17% of the observed period in which the pilot was active. This led to 308 bike lane users being displaced from the bike lane, at a rate of 25.7 bikeway users per hour of bike lane blockage. Out of the 717 minutes the bike lane was blocked, a violator was present in the loading zone for 646 minutes (90% of the time!).At a finer scale, bike lane blocking appears to vary dramatically day to day and hour to hour in relation to the number of violators. Figure 10 below shows a visualization of these effects. A two-space loading zone could accommodate observed demand and substantially reduce bike lane blockage under a perfect-compliance scenario. A full 96% of the time that the bike lane was blocked during our study period, there would have been room for the blocking automobiles at the curb if no violators were present in the two-space curb pilot zone. The loading zone could be expanded as a strategy to ensure space availability and reduce double-parking and bike lane blocking. A maximum of 4 vehicles blocked the bike lane at the same time during the observation period. However, assuming that the same compliance rate observed in existing spaces would apply to any number of new loading zone spaces, the authors modeled that it would actually require 9 additional spaces to meet 100% of observed maximum demand. Alternatively, it would require 3 additional spaces at observed compliance rates, for a total of 5 spaces, to meet the observed 95th percentile demand. 15 Item 16.E 09/12/23 85 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1746 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) Figure 10: Displaced bikeway users on two dates of observations Figure 11. Example of double parked automobile displacing a bike way user 16 Item 16.E 09/12/23 86 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1747 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 4. Discussion and Conclusions The City’s motivation for the curb management pilot project was the constant presence of cars engaging in CNS and TNC activity double-parked in the southbound bike lane (Pauker 2019). This is consistent with McClintock’s (1925) view that an effective curb management zone is one with the ordered objectives of 1) safety, 2) traffic flow, and 3) access to adjacent uses, which minimizes double parking activity while maximizing space utilization for “live parking”. This study did not systematically observe a control period prior to implementation of the pilot, and can make no inference on the pilot’s effectiveness versus the status quo. However, the study shows that the actions of a relatively small number of drivers made the loading zone pilot ineffective. In the Santa Monica pilot, the combination of low rate of enforcement (percentage of non-compliant activity that resulted in enforcement action) and confusion with an inability to pay the meter may have led to lower rates of compliance (percentage of all activity that was compliant) for this pilot versus others under consideration. The effectiveness of such a zone is a function of the compliance rate, number of automobiles the zone accommodates, and the demand for the zone, both the number of automobiles and the distribution of their lengths of stay. For lower rates of compliance, the zone capacity must be increased to remain effective. In the Santa Monica 2nd Street pilot with a 90% compliance rate vehicles violating posted time limits occupied the space 60% of the time. While the 2 spaces in the pilot zone would have satisfied 96% of observed demand with perfect (100%) compliance, at the observed 90% compliance rate the required zone capacity to meet the 95th percentile demand would have been 5 spaces. Prior research suggests that conversion of curb metered parking spaces to short-term loading zones may be justified if adjacent businesses perceive benefit from high-turnover curb activity. This dynamic may lead more jurisdictions to consider such changes. Those implementing curb management zones must be aware of demand and prospective compliance rates when designing zones. Whether local planners and engineers plan to use curb paint and posted signs for static curb zone management, or a technology-based tool to dynamically manage high-turnover curb zones, minimizing the length of occupancy by non-compliant vehicles is a prerequisite to effective curb-zone management. If compliance is low because enforcement is low, then new technology to dynamically reserve, assign, and pay for curb space will be rendered less effective by violators. Those designing zones should also emphasize the type of vehicle and length of stay over the permitted activities (passenger loading versus goods loading). Based on the short duration of stay and the somewhat complementary arrival times of CNS and TNCs, the authors find that the zone can be used for both. Finally, further research is needed to understand how to increase compliance rates. This may include future studies of pilot zones in areas where compliance rates are higher, or intercept surveys of compliant and non-compliant drivers to understand factors that drive 17 Item 16.E 09/12/23 87 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1748 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) non-compliance. Future research may also be needed to increase enforcement rates and the effectiveness of enforcement activities. 5. Author contributions The authors confirm contributions to the paper as follows: study conception, research design, project management, and data collection: JM; review and input of video data: TD; data analysis and interpretation of results: ED; draft manuscript preparation: JM, ED. All authors reviewed the results and approved of the final version of the manuscript. 6. Reference City of West Hollywood. 2018. “The Drop.” 2018. https://www.weho.org/city-government/city-departments/facilities-and-recreation-services/pa rking-services/the-drop. Crist, Phillippe, Luis Martinez, and Sergio Grosso. 2018. “The Shared-Use City: Managing the Curb.” Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development/International Transport Forum. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/shared-use-city-managing-curb_3.pdf. Dalla Chiara, Giacomo, and Anne Goodchild. 2020. “Do Commercial Vehicles Cruise for Parking? Empirical Evidence from Seattle.”Transport Policy 97 (October): 26–36. Dillon, John F. 1912.Commentaries on the Law of Municipal Corporations. Vol. 10. Boston, MA: Little, Brown, and Company. Girón-Valderrama, Gabriela del Carmen, José Luis Machado-León, and Anne Goodchild. 2019. “Commercial Vehicle Parking in Downtown Seattle: Insights on the Battle for the Curb.” Transportation Research Record, June, 0361198119849062. Giuliano, G., and K. A. Small. 1991. “Subcenters in the Los Angeles Region.” https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6ts0t95w. Gordon, Peter, and Harry W. Richardson. 1996. “Beyond Polycentricity: The Dispersed Metropolis, Los Angeles, 1970-1990.”Journal of the American Planning Association 62 (3): 289–95. Hensher, David A., and Jenny King. 2001. “Parking Demand and Responsiveness to Supply, Pricing and Location in the Sydney Central Business District.”Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 35 (3): 177–96. Littke, Hélène. 2016. “Revisiting the San Francisco Parklets Problematizing Publicness, Parks, and Transferability.”Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 15 (January): 165–73. Lu, Ryland. 2018. “Pushed from the Curb: Optimizing the Use of Curb Space by Ride-Sourcing Vehicles.” UCLA. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/25p966dh. McClintock, Miller. 1925.Street Traffic Control. McGraw-Hill Book Company. Mitman, Meghan, Steve Davis, Ingrid Ballús-Armet, and Evan Knopf. 2018. “Curbside Management Practitioners Guide.” Institute of Transportation Engineers. https://www.ite.org/technical-resources/topics/complete-streets/curbside-management-reso urces/. Pandas Development Team. 2020. “Pandas.”Zenodo 21: 1–9. Pauker, Madeleine. 2019. “Downtown to Establish Delivery-Only Parking - Santa Monica Daily 18 Item 16.E 09/12/23 88 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1749 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) Press.” Santa Monica Daily Press. April 19, 2019. https://www.smdp.com/downtown-to-establish-delivery-only-parking/174411. Perez, F., and B. E. Granger. 2007. “IPython: A System for Interactive Scientific Computing.” Computing in Science Engineering 9 (3): 21–29. Porter, Jon. 2019. “Amazon’s Restaurants Delivery Service Is Shutting down.” The Verge. The Verge. June 11, 2019. https://www.theverge.com/2019/6/11/18661240/amazon-restaurants-discontinued-usa-uber- eats-deliveroo-food-delivery. Python Software Foundation. 2020.Python (version 3.8.0). https://www.python.org. Rieck, Kathryn Roethel. 2019. “Which Company Is Winning the Food Delivery War? - Second Measure.” Second Measure. July 19, 2019. https://secondmeasure.com/datapoints/food-delivery-services-grubhub-uber-eats-doordash- postmates/. Roe, Matthew, and Craig Toocheck. 2017. “Curb Appeal: Curbside Management Strategies for Improving Transit Reliability.” National Association of City Transportation Officials. https://nacto.org/tsdg/curb-appeal-whitepaper/. Shoup, Donald C. 2006. “Cruising for Parking.”Transport Policy 13 (6): 479–86. SMMC 3.12.740. 1980.Santa Monica Municipal Code. Vol. 3.12.740. https://www.qcode.us/codes/santamonica/view.php?topic=3-3_12-3_12_740&frames=off. Stehlin, John. 2015. “Cycles of Investment: Bicycle Infrastructure, Gentrification, and the Restructuring of the San Francisco Bay Area.”Environment & Planning A 47 (1): 121–37. Walt, Stéfan van der, S. Chris Colbert, and Gaël Varoquaux. 2011. “The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation.”Computing in Science & Engineering 13 (2): 22–30. 19 Item 16.E 09/12/23 89 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1750 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes)         Public Right-of-Way Zones in City of Seattle (City of Seattle, 2018) Google Maps. 2019. TNC and CNS Stop Duration      Curb Management Pilot Space Occupancy by Vehicle Type Curb Management Pilot Space Usage by Vehicle Type Item 16.E 09/12/23 90 of 90 Item 16.E 09/12/23 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1751 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) September 12,2023 Subject:Item 16 C -Oppose,16 D -Amend,16 E -Support Dear Santa Monica City Council, We urge the council to support,rather than oppose,the passage of SB423. California is in the midst of a severe housing shortage driving high rents and homelessness;we can only solve these problems with a glut of more affordable housing.SB423 expands on SB35,which has streamlined over 18,000 affordable homes.This bill will massively increase the number of affordable homes across the state. At its core SB423 is a good governance bill;it prevents cities from delaying or denying projects that already comply with local zoning and design standards determined through local governments.SB423 does not upzone or rezone new land; furthermore,the bill only applies to cities that don't have a compliant housing element or are behind on their housing goals.It is in Santa Monica’s best interest to ensure that our neighboring cities are held accountable to build their fair share of housing. The bill has passed both legislative chambers and is on its way to the Governor’s desk,supported by a broad coalition of labor,environmentalists,pro-housing groups and civic organizations.We think Santa Monica should be a part of that coalition too. Other Items Item 16 D (Amend)-Proposed Noise Ordinance Changes In light of recent studies that demonstrate the negative impact of traffic noise on health,Santa Monica should take proactive steps to enforce vehicle noise limits.Item 16-D needs to be amended to ensure any Noise Ordinance changes do not restrict the right of workers to organize and protest,and should be balanced with concerns 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1752 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) that night-time noise restrictions will delay economic recovery,where nightlife activities have been important in boosting visits to Downtown Santa Monica by locals and tourists. Item 16 E (Support)Preventing Motor Vehicle Incursions into Bike Lanes Santa Monica Forward also strongly supports the request of Councilmember Zwick, Councilmember Torosis,and Mayor Davis for the city to study and prioritize timely and effective solutions to prevent dangerous vehicle incursions into bike lanes.Every day we see vehicles parked blocking bike lanes which not only puts peoples’lives unnecessarily at risk,it also discourages people from riding bikes or letting their children do so,which ironically leads to more traffic and demand for car parking.A city that prioritizes bicycle and pedestrian safety,is a better city for all–even including those who need to drive. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Bradley Ewing and Carl Hansen Co-Chairs,Santa Monica Forward 8.K.a Packet Pg. 1753 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes) 1 Vernice Hankins From:Natalya Zernitskaya <nzernitskaya@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 12:02 PM To:councilmtgitems Cc:Gleam Davis; Lana Negrete; Christine Parra; Oscar de la Torre; Phil Brock; Caroline Torosis; Jesse Zwick; David White Subject:Item 16E-9/12/2023 City Council Agenda- Public Comments EXTERNAL    Re: Santa Monica City Council Agenda 9/12/2023- Item 16E    Dear Mayor Davis, Mayor Pro Tem Negrete, and City Councilmembers,     I urge you to support item 16E, requesting that the City Manager study and prioritize timely and effective solutions to prevent dangerous motor vehicle incursions into Santa Monica’s protected and unprotected bike lanes. Specifically, the City Manager should consider enhanced enforcement by parking and traffic officers, photo enforcement to the extent allowable by law, a targeted curb management evaluation and space reallocation to reduce double parking in bike lanes, and the deployment of quick-build infrastructure to protect bike lanes and reorient parking on streets in the City’s existing and planned protected bikeway network whenever feasible.    Reducing our dependence on cars and making alternative methods of mobility safer & easier to access improves our air quality and the health of our community, and has the added benefit of mitigating the drivers of climate change (pun intended).     In addition to the myriad benefits of different mobility options, studying and enforcing our traffic and parking laws shows that we take the issues of public safety and accessibility seriously.     Please vote “yes” on item 16E.     Sincerely, Natalya Zernitskaya    Natalya Zernitskaya (she/her)  nzernitskaya@gmail.com    8.K.a Packet Pg. 1754 Attachment: Written Comments (6023 : Protected bike lanes)