The URL can be used to link to this page

Supplemental Sample Ballot and Voter Information Pamphlet for November 8, 2022 General Municipal ElectionALL REGISTERED VOTERS WILL RECEIVE A VOTE BY MAIL BALLOT Official Sample Ballot Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk Dean C. Logan Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk General Election November 8, 2022 Vote in the safety of your home by returning your Vote by Mail ballot VOTE CENTERS OPEN: October 29th – November 7th: 10 AM – 7 PM Election Day, November 8th: 7 AM – 8 PM LAVOTE.GOV 233 Important Election Information Visit LAVOTE.GOV or call (800) 815-2666 for more information Mailing starts on October 6th and continues through October 10th WHEN TO EXPECT YOUR BALLOT Official Ballot 1 of 2 Marking your votesInstructions Write-In Candidates Contests Return Envelope U.S. Postage Paid OFFICIAL VOTE BY MAIL BALLOTING MATERIAL FIRST -CLASS MAIL 17 days You will receive a ballot in the mail for the November 8, 2022 General Election To ensure you have convenient, accessible, and safe voting options, we are mailing every registered voter a Vote by Mail ballot. What You Need to Know THE VOTE BY MAIL PACKET CONTAINS • United States Postal Service - no postage necessary • Drop off at any participating Ballot Drop Box • Drop off at any participating Vote Center RETURN OPTIONS • Your ballot cards • A Return Envelope • A list of Ballot Drop Box locations • Your “I Voted” sticker We offer ballots and election materials in up to 18 additional languages. Request your materials in a language other than English by returning the Language Request Form on the back of this book or call (800) 815-2666, option 3 MULTILINGUAL MATERIALS Information for Voters There are two U.S. Senate contests on the November 8, 2022, General Election ballot. The first contest is the regular election for the full 6-year term ending January 3, 2029. The second contest is a special vacancy election (the current officeholder is temporarily filling a vacancy) for the remainder of the current term ending January 3, 2023. You may vote for both contests. All voters can participate in this election regardless of party preference. About this General Election: 1. Candidates are not nominated by the political party 2. If a candidate has a preferred political party, that party name will appear on the ballot as a reference 3. Any voter can vote for the candidate of their choice Do you need assistance voting? If a voter declares under oath that they are unable to mark a ballot, that voter may receive assistance marking their ballot by two (2) persons of their selection. (E.C. §14282) Offices on the ballot The November 8, 2022 General Election is being held to vote on local offices, local measures, and voter-nominated offices: Voter-nominated offices: Governor Lieutenant Governor Secretary of State Controller Treasurer Attorney General Insurance Commissioner Board of Equalization United States Representative United States Senator State Senator State Assembly Member Local offices: County Board of Supervisors Sheriff Superior Court Judge Local Districts or City Contests State nonpartisan office: Superintendent of Public Instruction State Supreme Court Justices State Courts of Appeal Justices FP-TP01-EN LA 233-001 Check Your Material X BT: BT: If ballot group numbers do not match, please call (800) 815-2666, option 2. Example: Ballot Group 000 2 Ballot Return Envelope1 3 Official Ballot Card Vote by Mail Ballot Wrap Ballot group numbers on materials must match. Your Vote by Mail package will contain: FP-TP02-EN LA 233-002 Marking Your Ballot • Use only black or blue ink pen to mark your choice on your ballot. • Fill the entire oval matching your vote choice. • Do not vote for more choices than indicated. • Do not punch a hole through the ballot card. Misplaced or damaged ballot Request your ballot in a different language • Mark your choice on the Official Sample Ballot page. Insert into Ballot Return Envelope and return. • Visit LAVOTE.GOV/ReplaceBallot or call (800) 815-2666, option 2 before Election Day. • Los Angeles County provides language services in up to 18 languages. • Fill out and return the Language Request Form on the back cover of this book (no postage required). • Call the Multilingual Services Section at (800) 815-2666, option 3. FP-TP03-EN LA 233-003 Vote by Mail Return Options Before you return your Vote by Mail Ballot make sure: Recommended options for returning your Vote by Mail ballot 1. Your ballot is securely placed inside the Vote by Mail envelope. 2. You sign the back of the Vote by Mail envelope. 3. Remember no postage is necessary. Return by mail Must be postmarked by Election Day. No postage required. Return at a Ballot Drop Box Location List of drop box locations available at LAVOTE.GOV prior to each election. Drop-off at any Vote Center leading up to and on Election Day List of Vote Centers available at LAVOTE.GOV prior to each election. Signature Verification Voters must sign the eligibility oath and date the Vote by Mail Return Envelope before submitting their ballot. Every signature is verified before the ballot is cleared for counting. If a signature is missing or if the signature does not match the one on file, the County will notify the impacted voter to allow the voter an opportunity to provide a valid signature. For more information, visit LAVOTE.GOV FP-TP04-EN LA 233-004 Vote Center Information Voters in Los Angeles County have the option to cast their ballot in-person at any participating Vote Center. Vote Centers provide modern features to make voting safe, easy, and convenient. Vote Centers also serve as Vote by Mail Ballot Drop Box locations – no need to wait, simply drop off your voted ballot at the front. Register to vote at any Vote Center Los Angeles County residents who are U.S. Citizens and at least 18 years of age are eligible to register to vote and cast a ballot in this election. Any eligible voter that missed the registration deadline can go to any Vote Center to register and cast a ballot through Conditional Voter Registration. Fully accessible voting equipment available at every Vote Center Early in-person voting is available 10 days before Election Day – avoid long lines and vote early Vote at any participating Vote Center in this election with full language services and expanded accessibility Electronic Pollbooks can look up your voter registration information in real time at any Vote Center FP-TP05-EN LA 233-005 Vote Center Information and Guidance Relating to COVID-19 The Los Angeles County “Safe Election Plan” aligns with California’s “Election Administration Guidance under COVID-19.” Each was developed in consultation with relevant health authorities using the best public health information available, including guidance provided by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and California public health officials. The Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk (RR/CC) will: • Develop a voting location-specific protection plan. • Train workers on measures to limit the spread of COVID-19, including screening themselves for symptoms and staying home when necessary. • Establish prevention and self-screenings measures for workers. • Establish and communicate physical distancing guidelines. • Implement hand-washing, mask and disinfection protocols. FOR VOTERS All registered voters were mailed a Vote by Mail ballot. Los Angeles County will encourage voters to stay home and vote using their mail-in ballot. However, for some individuals it will still be preferable to vote in person. Wherever in-person voting is offered, we will follow the State and County’s public health and safety guidance to provide a safe voting environment. COVID-19 Information for Voting In-Person: • Masks are strongly encouraged at the Vote Center. • Masks and gloves will be available for voters if requested. • Hand sanitizer will be provided upon entry and exit of the Vote Center. Hand sanitizer will also be available at key stations during the voting process. • Social distancing will be encouraged while waiting in line and throughout the check-in and voting process. • ePollbooks and Ballot Marking devices will be sanitized after every voter. • Voters will be encouraged to take measures to speed up their election process to limit their time in the Vote Center. This includes verifying voter registration in advance, using the Interactive Sample Ballot (ISB) to pre-mark selections, and bringing their Sample Ballot to speed up the voter check-in. • Voters will be encouraged to take advantage of early voting and vote at off-peak times if possible. • Curbside voting will continue to be available for voters who are unable to enter the Vote Center. FP-TP06-EN LA 233-006 Voting Instructions for Ballot Marking Device How to vote on the Ballot Marking Device (BMD) Customizable Touch DisplayTactile Keypad with Audio New Ballot Design Integrated Ballot Box Tap to start1.Select language2.Insert ballot3. Review selections5.Cast ballot6. Remember to re-insert your ballot back into the BMD. Make selections4. Use the MORE button to review all choices when making your selections. FP-TP07-EN LA 233-007 Interactive Sample Ballot The Interactive Sample Ballot (ISB) is a convenient and optional application to speed up the voting experience. Voters can review and mark their selections on a computer or mobile device. Once the voter reviews and confirms their selections, the ISB will generate a Poll Pass. The Poll Pass is then taken to the Vote Center, where the voter will scan their Poll Pass to transfer their selections onto the Ballot Marking Device. How to use the Interactive Sample Ballot Visit LAVOTE.GOV/ISB1.Make your selections3. Scan onto the BMD6. Enter your information2. Take to any Vote Center5.Generate a Poll Pass4. Poll Pass Poll Pass LAvote.net/ISBLAVOTE.GOV/ISB FP-TP08-EN LA 233-008 Accessible Voting Options Accessible Vote by Mail Ballot Marking Device Los Angeles County is committed to providing all voters a positive, private and independent voting experience. To view the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk’s accessibility services, go to LAVOTE.GOV. Voters who need assistance reviewing and marking their Vote by Mail ballot may use the Accessible Vote by Mail application. Learn more at LAVOTE.GOV/ravbm. All Ballot Marking Devices are fully accessible and available in all eligible languages. Curbside Voting Important Telephone Numbers General information: (800) 815-2666 Vote Center accessibility: (800) 815-2666, option 7 CD/Cassette recordings: (800) 815-2666, option 3 TDD: (562) 462-2259 Curbside voting is available at all Vote Centers in Los Angeles County. Disability Rights California’s Voting Hotline: (888) 569-7955 FP-TP09-EN LA 233-009 WHERE: • Within the immediate vicinity of a person in line to cast their ballot or within 100 feet of the entrance of a polling place, curbside voting or drop box the following activities are prohibited. WHAT ACTIVITIES ARE PROHIBITED: • DO NOT ask a person to vote for or against any candidate or ballot measure. • DO NOT display a candidate’s name, image, or logo. • DO NOT block access to or loiter near any ballot drop boxes. • DO NOT provide any material or audible information for or against any candidate or ballot measure near any polling place, vote center, or ballot drop box. • DO NOT circulate any petitions, including for initiatives, referenda, recall, or candidate nominations. • DO NOT distribute, display, or wear any clothing (hats, shirts, signs, buttons, stickers) that include a candidate’s name, image, logo, and/or support or oppose any candidate or ballot measure. • DO NOT display information or speak to a voter about the voter’s eligibility to vote. The electioneering prohibitions summarized above are set forth in Article 7 of Chapter 4 of Division 18 of the California Elections Code. Electioneering Prohibited! VIOLATIONS CAN LEAD TO FINES AND/OR IMPRISONMENT. FP-TP10-EN LA 233-010 WHAT ACTIVITIES ARE PROHIBITED: • DO NOT commit or attempt to commit election fraud. • DO NOT provide any sort of compensation or bribery to, in any fashion or by any means induce or attempt to induce, a person to vote or refrain from voting. • DO NOT illegally vote. • DO NOT attempt to vote or aid another to vote when not entitled to vote. • DO NOT engage in electioneering; photograph or record a voter entering or exiting a polling place; or obstruct ingress, egress, or parking. • DO NOT challenge a person’s right to vote or prevent voters from voting; delay the process of voting; or fraudulently advise any person that he or she is not eligible to vote or is not registered to vote. • DO NOT attempt to ascertain how a voter voted their ballot. • DO NOT possess or arrange for someone to possess a firearm in the immediate vicinity of a polling place, with some exceptions. • DO NOT appear or arrange for someone to appear in the uniform of a peace officer, guard, or security personnel in the immediate vicinity of a polling place, with some exceptions. • DO NOT tamper or interfere with any component of a voting system. • DO NOT forge, counterfeit, or tamper with the returns of an election. • DO NOT alter the returns of an election. • DO NOT tamper with, destroy, or alter any polling list, official ballot, or ballot container. • DO NOT display any unofficial ballot collection container that may deceive a voter into believing it is an official collection box. • DO NOT tamper or interfere with copy of the results of votes cast. • DO NOT coerce or deceive a person who cannot read or an elder into voting for or against a candidate or measure contrary to their intent. • DO NOT act as an election officer when you are not one. Corrupting the Voting Process is Prohibited! VIOLATIONS SUBJECT TO FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT. EMPLOYERS cannot require or ask their employee to bring their vote by mail ballot to work or ask their employee to vote their ballot at work. At the time of payment of salary or wages, employers cannot enclose materials that attempt to influence the political opinions or actions of their employee. PRECINCT BOARD MEMBERS cannot attempt to determine how a voter voted their ballot or, if that information is discovered, disclose how a voter voted their ballot. The prohibitions on activity related to corruption of the voting process summarized above are set forth in Chapter 6 of Division 18 of the California Elections Code. FP-TP11-EN LA 233-011 Trusted Election Resources #TrustedInfo2022 #TrustedInfo2022 is more than a hashtag. Elections officials across the country are using #TrustedInfo2022 to ensure voters know where they can find and receive official and secure election information. The Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk is the trusted source for all election information and resources. Scan the QR Code or visit LAVOTE.GOV to make your plan today! MAKE A PLAN TO VOTE IN THE UPCOMING ELECTION Below are all the trusted resources and tools you need to make your plan to vote. • Register to Vote • Check Your Registration Status • Access Your Interactive Sample Ballot • How to Vote by Mail • Track Your Vote by Mail Ballot • Find a Ballot Drop Box • In-Person Voting Information • Find a Vote Center • Access Your Quick Check-in Code • Mobile Vote Center FP-TP12-EN LA 233-012 Voter Bill of Rights YOU HAVE THE FOLLOWING RIGHTS: The right to get help casting your ballot from anyone you choose, except from your employer or union representative. The right to drop off your completed vote-by-mail ballot at any Vote Center in California. The right to get election materials in a language other than English if enough people in your voting precinct speak that language. The right to ask questions to elections officials about election procedures and watch the election process. If the person you ask cannot answer your questions, they must send you to the right person for an answer. If you are disruptive, they can stop answering you. The right to report any illegal or fraudulent election activity to an elections official or the Secretary of State’s office. If you believe you have been denied any of these rights, call the Secretary of State’s confidential toll-free Voter Hotline at (800) 345-VOTE (8683). On the web at www.sos.ca.gov By phone at (800) 345-VOTE (8683) By email at elections@sos.ca.gov IF YOU BELIEVE YOU HAVE BEEN DENIED ANY OF THESE RIGHTS, CALL THE SECRETARY OF STATE’S CONFIDENTIAL TOLL-FREE VOTER HOTLINE AT (800) 345-VOTE (8683). The right to vote if you are a registered voter. You are eligible to vote if you are: • a U.S. citizen living in California • at least 18 years old • registered where you currently live • not currently serving a state or federal prison term for the conviction of a felony • not currently found mentally incompetent to vote by a court The right to vote if you are a registered voter even if your name is not on the list. You will vote using a provisional ballot. Your vote will be counted if elections officials determine that you are eligible to vote. The right to vote if you are still in line when the polls close. The right to cast a secret ballot without anyone bothering you or telling you how to vote. The right to get a new ballot if you have made a mistake, if you have not already cast your ballot. You can: Ask an elections official at a Vote Center for a new ballot, Exchange your vote-by-mail ballot for a new one at an elections office, or at your Vote Center, or Vote using a provisional ballot. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FP-TP13-EN LA 233-013 Translated Election Material (800) 815-2666 option 3 The Federal Voting Rights Act requires voter information, including a Sample Ballot booklet to be available in English as well as Chinese, Khmer, Korean, Spanish, Tagalog/Filipino and Vietnamese. Additional Languages we support are: Armenian, Bengali, Burmese, Gujarati, Farsi, Hindi, Indonesian, Japanese, Mongolian, Russian, Telugu and Thai. FP-TP14-EN LA 233-014 Official Ballot GENERAL ELECTION, November 08, 2022 • County of Los Angeles Page 1/ 8 Voter-Nominated and Nonpartisan Offices All voters, regardless of the party preference they disclosed upon registration, or refusal to disclose a party preference, may vote for any candidate for a voter-nominated or nonpartisan office. The party preference, if any, designated by a candidate for a voter-nominated office is selected by the candidate and is shown for the information of the voters only. It does not imply that the candidate is nominated or endorsed by the party or that the party approves of the candidate. The party preference, if any, of a candidate for a nonpartisan office does not appear on the ballot. There are two U.S. Senate contests on this ballot. • One for the regular 6-year term ending January 3, 2029 • One for the remainder of the current term ending January 3, 2023 You may vote for both contests. NATIONAL ELECTION UNITED STATES SENATOR - Full Term Vote For ONE ALEX PADILLA Party Preference: Democratic Appointed United States Senator MARK P. MEUSER Party Preference: Republican Constitutional Attorney UNITED STATES SENATOR - Short Term (Unexpired term ending January 3, 2023) Vote For ONE ALEX PADILLA Party Preference: Democratic Appointed United States Senator MARK P. MEUSER Party Preference: Republican Constitutional Attorney CITY/LOCAL SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION Member of the City Council Vote For No More Than THREE WHITNEY BAIN Journalist ELLIS RASKIN Environmental Attorney/Commissioner LANA NEGRETE Appointed Councilmember/ Businesswoman CAROLINE M. TOROSIS Rent Control Commissioner/Attorney JONATHAN MANN Retired Parole Agent SAMANTHA MOTA Barista ARMEN MELKONIANS Civil/Environmental Engineer NATALYA ZERNITSKAYA Financial Analyst JESSE ZWICK Public Policy Advisor TROY HARRIS Small Business Owner ARTHUR JEON Tech Executive/Author ALBIN GIELICZ Business Advisor/Commissioner Write-In Candidate Write-In Candidate Write-In Candidate Continue voting on other side 29B33 - NP - EN / 8233 / 1 EN-NP-0233-1-1 LA 233-015 Official Ballot GENERAL ELECTION, November 08, 2022 • County of Los Angeles Page 2/ 8 CITY/LOCAL SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Member of the Board of Education Vote For No More Than FOUR ANGELA DIGAETANO Parent/Business Owner STACY ROUSE Educator/Conflict Specialist KEITH COLEMAN Appointed Incumbent RICHARD TAHVILDARAN-JESSWEIN Professor/Board Member ALICIA MIGNANO Businesswoman/Parent ESTHER HICKMAN Parent/Community Volunteer MILES WARNER Parent/Business Owner LAURIE LIEBERMAN School Board Member Write-In Candidate Write-In Candidate Write-In Candidate Write-In Candidate SANTA MONICA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Member of the Board of Trustees Vote For No More Than FOUR PATRICK ACOSTA II Santa Monica City Employee SION ROY Santa Monica College Trustee, Physician TOM PETERS Retired Professor BARRY SNELL CPA/Santa Monica College Trustee NANCY GREENSTEIN Santa Monica College Trustee Write-In Candidate Write-In Candidate Write-In Candidate Write-In Candidate SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION Member of the Rent Control Board Vote For No More Than THREE DANIEL S. IVANOV Attorney ERICKA LESLEY Appointed Rent Control Board Member KURT GONSKA Entertainment Marketing Write-In Candidate Write-In Candidate Write-In Candidate STATE SENATOR, 24th District Vote For ONE KRISTINA IRWIN Party Preference: Republican BEN ALLEN Party Preference: Democratic California State Senator MEMBER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY, 51st District Vote For ONE LOUIS ABRAMSON Party Preference: Democratic Scientist/Community Organizer RICK CHAVEZ ZBUR Party Preference: Democratic Civil Rights Attorney UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE, 36th District Vote For ONE JOE E. COLLINS III Party Preference: Republican Retired Navy Sailor TED W. LIEU Party Preference: Democratic Congressman Continue voting on next page Do not mark within lines Ballot style 29B33 - NP - EN Generation ID 27 Serial # Precinct # Group # 8233 9990233A NP_0233 29B33 - NP - EN / 8233 / 2 EN-NP-0233-1-2 LA 233-016 Official Ballot GENERAL ELECTION, November 08, 2022 • County of Los Angeles Page 3/ 8 CITY/LOCAL CS SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - MEASURE CS Vote YES or NO MEASURE CS: To address homelessness, improve 911 emergency response times and neighborhood police protection, make public areas safer and cleaner, including streets, sidewalks, parks, and the beach, and provide other vital City services, shall the City of Santa Monica increase the transient occupancy tax - which is paid entirely by overnight visitors - by 1% for hotels and motels, and by 3% for home-shares, providing approximately $4.1 million annually, until ended by voters, with all funds benefitting Santa Monica? YES on Measure CS NO on Measure CS GS SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - MEASURE GS Vote YES or NO MEASURE GS: Shall the measure adding Santa Monica Municipal Code Chapter 4.90 to establish designated funds for schools, homelessness prevention, and affordable housing, and an eleven-member resident oversight committee, and amending Chapter 6.96 to provide a third tier transfer tax rate of $56.000 per $1,000 of value for property transfers of $8,000,000 or more, providing an estimated $50,000,000 annually for homelessness prevention, affordable housing, and schools, until repealed, be adopted? YES on Measure GS NO on Measure GS PB SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - MEASURE PB Vote YES or NO MEASURE PB: Shall the City Charter be amended to: (a) expand eligibility requirements for service on the City's Personnel Board to include, in addition to City of Santa Monica ("City") residents, residents of Los Angeles County that are employed full-time within the City, or own real property in the City, or have been issued a business license by the City; and (b) reduce the term of service for Personnel Board members from five to four years? YES on Measure PB NO on Measure PB DT SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - MEASURE DT Vote YES or NO MEASURE DT: Shall the measure to enhance the City of Santa Monica's general governmental services by increasing the one-time tax on real property sales over $8 million, and establishing an additional incremental tax of $25.00 per $1000 of the value in excess of $8 million, excepting transfers: per State law, involving tax-exempt charitable organizations, and certain ground leases; providing an estimated $12-25 million annually through February 28, 2033, subject to a five-year extension by Council supermajority vote, be adopted? YES on Measure DT NO on Measure DT DTS SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - MEASURE DTS Vote YES or NO MEASURE DTS: ADVISORY VOTE ONLY: If the "Comprehensive Real Property Transfer Tax Measure" is enacted, should at least 30% of its additional revenue be used for housing assistance to protect seniors and low-income families from housing displacement, with the remainder of the additional revenue to be used for homelessness services; behavioral health services; public safety and emergency response teams for City streets and parks; reopening public libraries; after-school programs; and crossing guards near public schools? YES on Measure DTS NO on Measure DTS HMP SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - MEASURE HMP Vote YES or NO Measure HMP: Shall the measure to establish a business tax on every licensed cannabis business (including adult-use nonmedicinal cannabis retailers, distribution, manufacturing, cultivation, laboratory testing, or any other licensed cannabis business) and retailers of products containing psychoactive cannabinoids, including cannabinoids derived from industrial hemp, up to 10% of gross receipts on cannabis and/or hemp-derived psychoactive products sold in the City, which all together could generate an estimated $3-5 million annually until repealed, be adopted? YES on Measure HMP NO on Measure HMP Continue voting on other side 29B34 - NP - EN / 8233 / 1 EN-NP-0233-2-3 LA 233-017 Official Ballot GENERAL ELECTION, November 08, 2022 • County of Los Angeles Page 4/ 8 CITY/LOCAL RC SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - MEASURE RC Vote YES or NO PROPOSITION RC: Shall the City Charter be amended to require intended owner occupancy of rent-controlled units for two years before tenant eviction; require owner occupancy within 60 days of vacancy; reduce the maximum Annual General Adjustment from 6% to 0.8% from 2/1/23 through 8/31/23, or average not to exceed 3%, with a 3% maximum Annual General Adjustment thereafter; and require elections only if the number of qualified candidates exceeds the number of open Board positions? YES on Measure RC NO on Measure RC EM SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - MEASURE EM Vote YES or NO PROPOSITION EM: Shall the City Charter be amended to allow the Rent Control Board to disallow or modify annual general rent adjustments for rent controlled units during a declared state of emergency by the President of the United States, the Governor, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Officer, or the City Council or Director of Emergency Services while maintaining the landlord's ability to petition for a rent adjustment per Section 1805 of the City Charter? YES on Measure EM NO on Measure EM SMC SANTA MONICA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT SPECIAL ELECTION - MEASURE SMC Vote YES or NO SANTA MONICA COLLEGE AFFORDABLE HIGHER EDUCATION, CAREER TRAINING, CLASSROOM UPGRADES. To improve access to affordable education for local students, veterans, first-generation college students; provide affordable housing for homeless students; modernize instructional labs for nursing, healthcare, sustainability, media, science career training; repair/upgrade obsolete vocational classrooms/aging facilities, shall Santa Monica Community College District authorize $375,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2.5 cents per $100 assessed valuation, raising $23,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizens oversight, public spending disclosure? YES on Measure SMC NO on Measure SMC COUNTY SUPERVISOR 3RD DISTRICT Vote For ONE LINDSEY HORVATH Councilwoman/Small Businessowner BOB HERTZBERG California State Senator Write-In Candidate SHERIFF Vote For ONE ALEX VILLANUEVA Sheriff, Los Angeles County ROBERT LUNA Long Beach Police Chief Write-In Candidate JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Office No. 60 Vote For ONE ABBY BARON Deputy District Attorney, County of Los Angeles ANNA SLOTKY REITANO Deputy Public Defender, County of Los Angeles Write-In Candidate JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Office No. 67 Vote For ONE FERNANDA MARIA BARRETO Deputy District Attorney, County of Los Angeles ELIZABETH LASHLEY-HAYNES Deputy Public Defender, County of Los Angeles Write-In Candidate Continue voting on next page Do not mark within lines Ballot style 29B34 - NP - EN Generation ID 27 Serial # Precinct # Group # 8233 9990233A NP_0233 29B34 - NP - EN / 8233 / 2 EN-NP-0233-2-4 LA 233-018 Official Ballot GENERAL ELECTION, November 08, 2022 • County of Los Angeles Page 5/ 8 COUNTY JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Office No. 70 Vote For ONE RENEE YOLANDE CHANG Deputy District Attorney, County of Los Angeles HOLLY L. HANCOCK Deputy Public Defender, Los Angeles County Write-In Candidate JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Office No. 90 Vote For ONE MELISSA LYONS Deputy District Attorney, County of Los Angeles LESLIE GUTIERREZ Deputy District Attorney, County of Los Angeles Write-In Candidate JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Office No. 118 Vote For ONE CAROLYN "JIYOUNG" PARK Attorney at Law MELISSA HAMMOND Deputy District Attorney, County of Los Angeles Write-In Candidate JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Office No. 151 Vote For ONE KAREN A. BRAKO Deputy District Attorney IV, Los Angeles County PATRICK HARE Deputy Public Defender, County of Los Angeles Write-In Candidate A COUNTY MEASURE A Vote YES or NO CHARTER AMENDMENT - PROVIDING AUTHORITY TO REMOVE AN ELECTED SHERIFF FOR CAUSE. Shall the measure amending the County of Los Angeles Charter to grant the Board of Supervisors authority to remove an elected Sheriff from office for cause, including a violation of law related to a Sheriff's duties, flagrant or repeated neglect of duties, misappropriation of funds, willful falsification of documents, or obstructing an investigation, by a four-fifths vote of the Board of Supervisors, after written notice and an opportunity to be heard, be adopted? YES on Measure A NO on Measure A C COUNTY MEASURE C Vote YES or NO Los Angeles County Cannabis Business Tax Measure. Shall the measure enacting a tax in the unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County on cannabis businesses at annual rates not to exceed $10 per square foot for cultivation (adjusted for inflation) and a percentage of gross receipts for various cannabis businesses, including retail (6 percent), testing laboratory (2 percent), distribution (3 percent), manufacturing and for all other cannabis businesses (4 percent), generating approximately $10,360,000 to $15,170,000 annually, until ended by voters, be adopted? YES on Measure C NO on Measure C STATE GOVERNOR Vote For ONE BRIAN DAHLE Party Preference: Republican Senator/Farmer GAVIN NEWSOM Party Preference: Democratic Governor of California LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR Vote For ONE ANGELA E. UNDERWOOD JACOBS Party Preference: Republican Businesswoman/Deputy Mayor ELENI KOUNALAKIS Party Preference: Democratic Lieutenant Governor SECRETARY OF STATE Vote For ONE ROB BERNOSKY Party Preference: Republican Chief Financial Officer SHIRLEY N. WEBER Party Preference: Democratic Appointed California Secretary of State CONTROLLER Vote For ONE MALIA M. COHEN Party Preference: Democratic California State Board of Equalization Member LANHEE J. CHEN Party Preference: Republican Fiscal Advisor/Educator TREASURER Vote For ONE FIONA MA Party Preference: Democratic State Treasurer/CPA JACK M. GUERRERO Party Preference: Republican Councilmember/CPA/Economist ATTORNEY GENERAL Vote For ONE ROB BONTA Party Preference: Democratic Appointed Attorney General of the State of California NATHAN HOCHMAN Party Preference: Republican General Counsel INSURANCE COMMISSIONER Vote For ONE ROBERT HOWELL Party Preference: Republican Cybersecurity Equipment Manufacturer RICARDO LARA Party Preference: Democratic Insurance Commissioner MEMBER STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 3rd District Vote For ONE TONY VAZQUEZ Party Preference: Democratic Board of Equalization, Member Y. MARIE MANVEL Party Preference: None Social Services Commissioner Continue voting on other side 29B35 - NP - EN / 8233 / 1 EN-NP-0233-3-5 LA 233-019 Official Ballot GENERAL ELECTION, November 08, 2022 • County of Los Angeles Page 6/ 8 STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Vote For ONE LANCE RAY CHRISTENSEN Education Policy Executive TONY K. THURMOND Superintendent of Public Instruction Write-In Candidate 1 STATE MEASURE 1 Vote YES or NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM. LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Amends California Constitution to expressly include an individual's fundamental right to reproductive freedom, which includes the fundamental right to choose to have an abortion and the fundamental right to choose or refuse contraceptives. This amendment does not narrow or limit the existing rights to privacy and equal protection under the California Constitution. Fiscal Impact : No direct fiscal effect because reproductive rights already are protected by state law. YES on Measure 1 NO on Measure 1 26 STATE MEASURE 26 Vote YES or NO ALLOWS IN-PERSON ROULETTE, DICE GAMES, SPORTS WAGERING ON TRIBAL LANDS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE. Also allows: sports wagering at certain horseracing tracks; private lawsuits to enforce certain gambling laws. Directs revenues to General Fund, problem-gambling programs, enforcement. Fiscal Impact : Increased state revenues, possibly reaching tens of millions of dollars annually. Some of these revenues would support increased state regulatory and enforcement costs that could reach the low tens of millions of dollars annually. YES on Measure 26 NO on Measure 26 27 STATE MEASURE 27 Vote YES or NO ALLOWS ONLINE AND MOBILE SPORTS WAGERING OUTSIDE TRIBAL LANDS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE. Allows Indian tribes and affiliated businesses to operate online/mobile sports wagering outside tribal lands. Directs revenues to regulatory costs, homelessness programs, nonparticipating tribes. Fiscal Impact : Increased state revenues, possibly in the hundreds of millions of dollars but not likely to exceed $500 million annually. Some revenues would support state regulatory costs, possibly reaching the mid-tens of millions of dollars annually. YES on Measure 27 NO on Measure 27 28 STATE MEASURE 28 Vote YES or NO PROVIDES ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR ARTS AND MUSIC EDUCATION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Provides additional funding from state General Fund for arts and music education in all K-12 public schools (including charter schools). Fiscal Impact : Increased state costs of about $1 billion annually, beginning next year, for arts education in public schools. YES on Measure 28 NO on Measure 28 29 STATE MEASURE 29 Vote YES or NO REQUIRES ON-SITE LICENSED MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL AT KIDNEY DIALYSIS CLINICS AND ESTABLISHES OTHER STATE REQUIREMENTS. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Requires physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant on site during treatment. Requires clinics to: disclose physicians' ownership interests; report infection data. Fiscal Impact : Increased state and local government costs likely in the tens of millions of dollars annually. YES on Measure 29 NO on Measure 29 30 STATE MEASURE 30 Vote YES or NO PROVIDES FUNDING FOR PROGRAMS TO REDUCE AIR POLLUTION AND PREVENT WILDFIRES BY INCREASING TAX ON PERSONAL INCOME OVER $2 MILLION. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Allocates tax revenues to zero-emission vehicle purchase incentives, vehicle charging stations, and wildfire prevention. Fiscal Impact : Increased state tax revenue ranging from $3.5 billion to $5 billion annually, with the new funding used to support zero-emission vehicle programs and wildfire response and prevention activities. YES on Measure 30 NO on Measure 30 31 STATE MEASURE 31 Vote YES or NO REFERENDUM ON 2020 LAW THAT WOULD PROHIBIT THE RETAIL SALE OF CERTAIN FLAVORED TOBACCO PRODUCTS. A "Yes" vote approves, and a "No" vote rejects, a 2020 law prohibiting retail sale of certain flavored tobacco products. Fiscal Impact : Decreased state tobacco tax revenues ranging from tens of millions of dollars annually to around $100 million annually. YES on Measure 31 NO on Measure 31 Continue voting on next page Do not mark within lines Ballot style 29B35 - NP - EN Generation ID 27 Serial # Precinct # Group # 8233 9990233A NP_0233 29B35 - NP - EN / 8233 / 2 EN-NP-0233-3-6 LA 233-020 Official Ballot GENERAL ELECTION, November 08, 2022 • County of Los Angeles Page 7/ 8 STATE JUDICIAL For Chief Justice of California Vote YES or NO Shall Associate Justice of the Supreme Court PATRICIA GUERRERO be elected to the office for the term provided by law? YES NO For Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Vote YES or NO Shall Associate Justice of the Supreme Court GOODWIN LIU be elected to the office for the term provided by law? YES NO For Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Vote YES or NO Shall Associate Justice of the Supreme Court MARTIN J. JENKINS be elected to the office for the term provided by law? YES NO For Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Vote YES or NO Shall Associate Justice of the Supreme Court JOSHUA P. GROBAN be elected to the office for the term provided by law? YES NO For Presiding Justice, Court of Appeal, Second District, Division One Vote YES or NO Shall Presiding Justice FRANCES ROTHSCHILD be elected to the office for the term provided by law? YES NO For Presiding Justice, Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Five Vote YES or NO Shall Presiding Justice LAURENCE D. RUBIN be elected to the office for the term provided by law? YES NO For Presiding Justice, Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Eight Vote YES or NO Shall Presiding Justice MARIA E. STRATTON be elected to the office for the term provided by law? YES NO For Associate Justice, Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Two Vote YES or NO Shall Associate Justice JUDITH M. ASHMANN be elected to the office for the term provided by law? YES NO For Associate Justice, Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Three Vote YES or NO Shall Associate Justice LUIS A. LAVIN be elected to the office for the term provided by law? YES NO For Associate Justice, Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Four Vote YES or NO Shall Associate Justice AUDREY B. COLLINS be elected to the office for the term provided by law? YES NO For Associate Justice, Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Four Vote YES or NO Shall Associate Justice BRIAN S. CURREY be elected to the office for the term provided by law? YES NO For Associate Justice, Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Five Vote YES or NO Shall Associate Justice LAMAR W. BAKER be elected to the office for the term provided by law? YES NO Continue voting on other side 29B36 - NP - EN / 8233 / 1 EN-NP-0233-4-7 LA 233-021 Official Ballot GENERAL ELECTION, November 08, 2022 • County of Los Angeles Page 8/ 8 STATE JUDICIAL For Associate Justice, Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Six Vote YES or NO Shall Associate Justice HERNALDO J. BALTODANO be elected to the office for the term provided by law? YES NO For Associate Justice, Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Seven Vote YES or NO Shall Associate Justice JOHN L. SEGAL be elected to the office for the term provided by law? YES NO For Associate Justice, Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Eight Vote YES or NO Shall Associate Justice JOHN SHEPARD WILEY JR. be elected to the office for the term provided by law? YES NO For Associate Justice, Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Eight Vote YES or NO Shall Associate Justice ELIZABETH ANNETTE GRIMES be elected to the office for the term provided by law? YES NO End of Ballot Do not mark within lines Ballot style 29B36 - NP - EN Generation ID 27 Serial # Precinct # Group # 8233 9990233A NP_0233 29B36 - NP - EN / 8233 / 2 EN-NP-0233-4-8 LA 233-022 Governor Republican Brian Dahle Lieutenant Governor Republican Angela E. Underwood Jacobs Democratic Gavin Newsom Democratic Eleni Kounalakis The American Independent, Green, Libertarian and Peace and Freedom parties did not submit any endorsements for this office. The American Independent, Green, Libertarian and Peace and Freedom parties did not submit any endorsements for this office. The American Independent, Green, Libertarian and Peace and Freedom parties did not submit any endorsements for this office. Secretary of State Republican Rob Bernosky Democratic Shirley N. Weber The American Independent, Green, Libertarian and Peace and Freedom parties did not submit any endorsements for this office. State Controller Republican Lanhee J. Chen Democratic Malia M. Cohen The American Independent, Green, Libertarian and Peace and Freedom parties did not submit any endorsements for this office. State Treasurer Republican Jack M. Guerrero Democratic Fiona Ma FP-DS01-EN LA 233-023 Insurance Commissioner The American Independent, Green, Libertarian and Peace and Freedom parties did not submit any endorsements for this office. Attorney General Republican Robert Howell Republican Nathan Hochman Democratic Rob Bonta Democratic Ricardo Lara The American Independent, Green, Libertarian and Peace and Freedom parties did not submit any endorsements for this office. State Board of Equalization Democratic District Candidate Name 3 Tony Vazquez The American Independent, Green, Libertarian, Peace and Freedom and Republican parties did not submit any endorsements for this office. United States Senator - Full Term Republican Mark P. Meuser Democratic Alex Padilla The American Independent, Green, Libertarian and Peace and Freedom parties did not submit any endorsements for this office. United States Senator - Short Term Republican Mark P. Meuser Democratic Alex Padilla The American Independent, Green, Libertarian and Peace and Freedom parties did not submit any endorsements for this office. FP-DS02-EN LA 233-024 United States Representative Democratic District Candidate Name 23 Derek Marshall 26 Julia Brownley 27 Christy Smith 28 Judy Chu 29 Tony Cardenas 30 Adam B. Schiff 31 Grace F. Napolitano 32 Brad Sherman 34 Jimmy Gomez 35 Norma J. Torres 36 Ted W. Lieu 37 Sydney Kamlager 38 Linda T. Sánchez 42 Robert Garcia 43 Maxine Waters 44 Nanette Diaz Barragan 45 Jay F. Chen Republican District Candidate Name 23 Jay Obernolte 26 Matt Jacobs 27 Mike Garcia 28 Wes Hallman 32 Lucie Lapointe Volotzky 36 Joe E. Collins III 38 Eric J. Ching 42 John Briscoe 44 Paul Jones 45 Michelle Steel The American Independent, Green, Libertarian and Peace and Freedom parties did not submit any endorsements for these offices. FP-DS03-EN LA 233-025 The American Independent, Green, Libertarian and Peace and Freedom parties did not submit any endorsements for these offices. Republican District Candidate Name 22 Vincent Tsai 24 Kristina Irwin 26 Claudia Agraz 30 Mitch Clemmons 34 Rhonda Shader 36 Janet Nguyen Member of the State Assembly Democratic District Candidate Name 39 Juan Carrillo 40 Pilar Schiavo 41 Chris Holden 42 Jacqui Irwin 43 Luz Maria Rivas 44 Laura Friedman 46 Jesse Gabriel 48 Blanca Rubio 49 Mike Fong 51 Rick Chavez Zbur 52 Wendy Carrillo 53 Freddie Rodriguez 54 Miguel Santiago 55 Isaac G. Bryan 56 Lisa Calderon 57 Reggie Jones-Sawyer 61 Robert Pullen-Miles State Senator Democratic District Candidate Name 20 Daniel Hertzberg 22 Susan Rubio 24 Ben Allen 26 Maria Elena Durazo 28 Lola Smallwood-Cuevas 30 Bob Archuleta 34 Tom Umberg 36 Kim Carr FP-DS04-EN LA 233-026 Member of the State Assembly (Cont) Republican District Candidate Name 39 Paul Andre Marsh 41 Michael McMahon 42 Lori Mills 46 Dana Caruso 49 Burton Brink 53 Toni Holle 54 Elaine Alaniz 55 Keith Girolamo Cascio 56 Jessica Martinez 64 Raul Ortiz, Jr. 66 George Barks The American Independent, Green, Libertarian and Peace and Freedom parties did not submit any endorsements for these offices. Pursuant to Elections Code 13302(b) any qualified political party may submit to the county elections official a list of all candidates for voter-nominated office who will appear on any ballot in the county, and who have been endorsed by the party. SS Democratic District Candidate Name 62 Anthony Rendon 64 Blanca Pacheco 65 Mike Anthony Gipson 66 Al Muratsuchi 67 Sharon Quirk-Silva 69 Josh Lowenthal FP-DS05-EN LA 233-027 List of legislative candidates who agreed to voluntary spending limits. Only candidates who voluntarily limit their campaign expenditures may submit a statement for inclusion in this booklet. STATE SENATOR District Candidate Name 20 Daniel Hertzberg 22 Susan Rubio 24 Ben Allen 28 Lola Smallwood-Cuevas 28 Cheryl C. Turner 34 Tom Umberg 36 Kim Carr Party Preference: Democratic District Candidate Name 22 Vincent Tsai 24 Kristina Irwin 26 Claudia Agraz 30 Mitch Clemmons 34 Rhonda Shader 36 Janet Nguyen Party Preference: Republican FP-DS06-EN LA 233-028 List of legislative candidates who agreed to voluntary spending limits. Only candidates who voluntarily limit their campaign expenditures may submit a statement for inclusion in this booklet. MEMBER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY District Candidate Name 39 Juan Carrillo 43 Luz Maria Rivas 46 Jesse Gabriel 49 Mike Fong 51 Louis Abramson 52 Mia Livas Porter 61 Tina Simone McKinnor 61 Robert Pullen-Miles 64 Blanca Pacheco 65 Fatima Iqbal-Zubair 69 Al Austin II Party Preference: Democratic District Candidate Name 34 Tom Lackey 34 Thurston “Smitty” Smith 40 Suzette Martinez Valladares 41 Michael McMahon 42 Lori Mills 43 Siaka Massaquoi 46 Dana Caruso 49 Burton Brink 53 Toni Holle 54 Elaine Alaniz 55 Keith Girolamo Cascio 56 Jessica Martinez 64 Raul Ortiz, Jr. 66 George Barks 67 Soo Yoo Party Preference: Republican FP-DS07-EN LA 233-029 Candidate Statements & Measures The following pages may contain Candidate Statements, and/or Ballot Measure Analyses, Arguments or Rebuttals. Candidates for local offices have the option of including a statement, for which they pay a fee, unless the governing body pays the fee. In compliance with the law, only English and Spanish language Candidate Statements are included in this booklet. Each candidate that submitted a Spanish language Candidate Statement has paid an additional fee. Candidate Statements, Arguments or Rebuttals In Favor, or/and Against Ballot Measures are not edited or verified for accuracy by any elections officials. Arguments and/or Rebuttals are the opinions of the authors. Information about voter-nominated, state nonpartisan offices, and state measures are included in the 8.5” X 11” Official Voter Information Guide, which is mailed separately to registered voters by the Office of the Secretary of State. FP-DS08-EN LA 233-030 STATEMENT OF WHITNEY BAIN CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION Age: 63 Occupation: Journalist The soul of Santa Monica has diminished through calumny and deceit for what was once a shining star now we are in the gutter looking up. Crime, homelessness and rampant drug use are at an all time high. Overdevelopment has exceeded our limits choking us with canyons of steel and cement. I have a economic recovery plan. I ask you to join me in making it “our” recovery plan. Together we can embark on this road. Support and hire police officers. Restore our City Wi-Fi to the Sunset Park, Pico Corridor and Montana Avenue areas for not is City Wi-Fi for all? A 5% remittance tax on all households. Refurbish existing buildings instead of overdevelopment. Create a permanent ice rink in the post office on 5 and Arizona with the investment of the L.A. Kings. Re-open the Fairview library. Because of city neglect, we have lost businesses on the Third Street Promenade. The people have had enough. It’s time for a change in leadership where the position of public servant means serving the public, not special interests that have dominated our city council. Together, we can rebuild and have a new beginning. STATEMENT OF ALBIN GIELICZ CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION I believe in a bright future for Santa Monica. The past few years have been tough, but I am determined post-Covid to get us to a place where residents feel safe, where businesses thrive, and where climate-friendly practices flourish. Throughout my 15 years of real community leadership, I’ve been committed to improving the quality of life for all residents. I demonstrated this when appointed to the Social Services Commission, Recreation and Parks Commission, Santa Monica Travel and Tourism Board, and others. As a council member, I will champion: Public Safety – I will advocate for more resources so that everyone in our city feels safe and supported. We need to amplify our compassionate and collaborative approach to reduce homelessness, which includes more affordable housing and supportive services. Economic Recovery – As demonstrated over the past 10+ years, I will continue to promote and nurture the essential symbiotic relationship between residents and neighborhood- serving businesses for a strong and resilient economy. Sustainability – I will ensure that we remain leaders in sustainability by advocating for more uses of clean energy so that we reach carbon neutrality long before our goal of 2050. To learn more about me, check out my site www.voteforalbin.com. th 4300-EN-05128 LA 233-031 STATEMENT OF TROY HARRIS CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION Troy Harris believes in the goodness of people to do what’s right when it matters most which is why he’s running for City Council. It was right here in Santa Monica where Troy’s health and wellness journey showed him how to use justice to go from failure to success and he wants to help his community do the same. Troy views problems optimistically, so he knows crime and homelessness are solvable—they just require a concerted effort to bring positive change including: a commercial vacancy tax to revive business, funding police and public service officers, building rehabilitation centers, lobbying for the repeal of Prop 47 and seeking federal and state funding. A community that helps those in need leads to them helping themselves, but first they must believe. Therefore, more housing is critical to fight our current diversity crisis, achieved by a freeway cap with housing atop for families affected by eminent domain, upzoning, rezoning and deregulating for more efficient land use without the need for tall buildings. Troy believes in safe schools, abundant parks, government accountability and a refocus to provide for our core needs. Troy stands for residents of modest means. Troy stands for you. Vote Troy Harris for City Council. STATEMENT OF ARTHUR JEON CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION Age: 62 Occupation: Tech Executive/Author I’m not a politician, though I’ve been a creative and professional problem solver my whole career. I first came to Santa Monica while working as a management consultant specializing in organizational change for Fortune 500 companies. I fell in love with this city. I’ve now lived and worked in Santa Monica for 30 years – I completed an MFA at USC while bartending on Abbot Kinney, wrote books about mindfulness from a rent-controlled apartment, met my spouse in yoga, launched a media company, purchased a townhome near downtown, and co- founded two non-profits – Compassion Prison Project, an inmate rehabilitation program, and Global Animal, an animal advocacy and emergency rescue. I’m currently the Head of Special Projects at a tech company where I turn ideas into reality. I’m alarmed by the empty storefronts, transient addicts, vagrancy, mental illness, littered spaces, and crime. Like too many, I’ve been harassed and attacked (in my case, by a transient with a pipe). I believe it’s unacceptable that our neighborhoods – parks, beaches, stores, libraries and streets – are becoming unusable for residents. The problems facing Santa Monica are solvable. Solutions require a new action-oriented leadership where success is measured by results. Councilmembers must be responsive to residents. 4300-EN-05129 LA 233-032 STATEMENT OF JONATHAN MANN CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION Age: 76 Occupation: US Navy Ret./Parole Agent/Flight Attendant Supv/Teacher I'm running for City Council because of OUT-OF-CONTROL CRIME, RENT GOUGING and CONFLICT OF INTEREST! I offer an alternative to the pro-development establishmentarian status quo of POLITICS AS USUAL. I will speak TRUTH TO POWER, audit and streamline the city budget to eliminate waste and excessive salaries. I have long advocated for a VIRTUAL TOWN HALL on the CITY WEBSITE, with moderated FORUMS for grassroots participatory democracy to EMPOWER RESIDENTS and for TRANSPARENCY and ACCOUNTABILITY at City Hall. GENTRIFICATION has resulted in severe rent gouging by the corporate landlords and developers who have taken over the city. It is almost impossible to be elected without support from SPECIAL INTERESTS. However, in 2020 the residents succeeded in electing a PRO- RESIDENT slate, a real game changer. The playing field is even more in this election as two councilmembers dropped out. Santa Monica "Renters Rights" (SMRR) has been a powerful player since the halcyon days of REAL rent control. Since then, despite so-called slow, smart and responsible growth, we are experiencing an explosion of so-called “affordable” housing and the worst rent gouging in the history of this city. I'M JON MANN, A MANN FOR THE PEOPLE, AND I SUPPORT THIS MESSAGE! STATEMENT OF ARMEN MELKONIANS CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION My wife, four-year-old, and I live and experience the day-to-day concerns that you do living in Santa Monica. That is my “Why?” Crime is up. Homelessness up. Our streets, parks, homes - less safe every day. Much of the Promenade vacant since the fallout of May 31, 2020. Over-development, traffic, high rents, tenant displacement - major concerns. More than ever, Santa Monica needs a no-nonsense leader. Someone with the strength, history, and courage to put residents first, provide solutions, and revitalize our downtown - the economic engine necessary to keep our neighborhoods healthy. We don’t need another politician, policy wonk, or density advocate who wants to spend, build, or doubletalk away our problems. That never works. As a civil/ environmental engineer (UCLA 1993) and a community leader (Residocracy founder) I know how to bring people together and provide real world solutions to complex problems. We can reduce crime by increasing neighborhood patrol dramatically. If we see police, criminals will too, sending a message that Santa Monica is no longer an easy target. Reimagine Homeless Services – Santa Monica pays out over $18,500 per year, per homeless person, to intown service providers with seemingly zero results. We need an audit, tracking, and accountability. www.VoteArmen.com 4300-EN-05130 LA 233-033 STATEMENT OF SAMANTHA MOTA CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION Age: 24 Occupation: Barista and Community Volunteer To the people of Santa Monica: it's time for real change. My name is Samantha Mota: I'm a proud third-generation, lifelong resident of Santa Monica. I'm no stranger to serving this community: I got my start with Climate Action Santa Monica empowering youth to take the reins of the fight against climate change. I also served with the Public Safety Reform & Oversight Commission of Santa Monica: working alongside fellow residents to review and propose new law enforcement policies and reforms to City Council. I was humbled to receive the 2021 Premio de Orgullo Award for Hispanic Heritage Month from the Hispanic Heritage Month Committee, for my advocacy to expand community access to urban gardening opportunities. I hope to enact new policies, such as, AB 551, a program that aims to incentivize urban agriculture; Through a set of comprehensive goals and policies, these plots could be purchased and put back into the hands of the community. Santa Monica raised me— and gave me the passion and pride to declare my candidacy for City Council of Santa Monica to serve this city as your advocate and ally would be an honor, a privilege, and a dream come true. STATEMENT OF LANA NEGRETE CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION I'm Lana Negrete. I'm a native, SAMO alum, renter, small business owner and mother. I have a bachelor's degree in business management, a non-profit Outreach Through the Arts which provides music education to underserved youth and I run my family local business. I have served the community in many capacities such as PTA, public safety commission, elected Board Member for the National Association for Music Merchants, and advocate in D.C. for increased public school funding and most recently city council. Like many residents, my concerns for public safety, economic recovery, and the diverse homelessness crisis have become urgent. I've worked with stakeholders to address these issues with effective solutions. I've helped establish and maintain the Pier Task Force, created forums to promote dialogue between residents and officers and worked with neighboring jurisdictions to fight for increased access to substance abuse treatment and psychiatric beds. As a liaison between City Hall and Santa Monica's small business community, I've worked to bolster economic recovery. I'm running to continue fighting for common sense solutions that strengthen our community. Santa Monica should be a safe affordable place to live and raise a family. If you agree, I humbly ask for your vote. 4300-EN-05131 LA 233-034 STATEMENT OF ELLIS RASKIN CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION Santa Monica needs bold, progressive leadership to address our ongoing challenges. I have a proven track record of success: • I serve as counsel for a range of public agencies, where I advise on matters involving land use, community development, and long-range planning. • I serve as a member of the Santa Monica Planning Commission, and I am a former member of the Santa Monica Urban Forest Task Force. • As an environmental attorney, I have helped save open space, preserve parkland, and protect public access to the coast. As your next City Councilmember, I will: • Implement common-sense programs to address homelessness and to ensure that our first responders have the resources they need to provide services to individuals experiencing mental health crises. • Fight for the strongest possible protections for renters, including new rent subsidies and emergency rent relief programs. • Ensure that our City is prepared to address climate change and our ongoing drought. • Continue to support local businesses as we recover from the ongoing effects of the COVID pandemic. • Work with regional partners to strengthen our ability to respond to earthquakes and other emergencies. Together, we can build a stronger Santa Monica! STATEMENT OF CAROLINE M. TOROSIS CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION My name is Caroline Torosis, and I am running for City Council to stand up for those in need and to ensure a thriving, inclusive, and welcoming city for all. As Senior Deputy of Workforce Development & Economic Opportunity for the Chair of the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, I’ve led the County’s economic and jobs recovery response to the pandemic by directing millions in financial relief to small businesses and enacting innovative policies that protect the rights of our front-line workers, consumers, and tenants. As an elected Commissioner on the Santa Monica Rent Control Board, I've increased public transparency and worked with both tenants and landlords to minimize operating expenses normally passed onto tenants, keeping Santa Monicans in their homes. On the Council, I will tackle: (1) Affordability and Housing by reducing bureaucratic barriers to make it easier to build housing Santa Monicans can afford while allowing our residents to age in place. (2) Homelessness by fighting for outreach, mental health services, and crisis response street teams. (3) Public Safety by fully funding our first responders to reduce emergency response times. I would be honored to earn your vote for election to the Santa Monica City Council. 4300-EN-05132 LA 233-035 STATEMENT OF NATALYA ZERNITSKAYA CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION As a refugee from the former Soviet Union, Natalya Zernitskaya learned firsthand the vital role government plays in helping families achieve a better life. As a Pico neighborhood renter and community leader with a decade of service and activism in our city, Natalya served as President of the League of Women Voters of Santa Monica, and serves as a Board Member of the Human Relations Council of the Santa Monica Bay Area, and as an Advisory Board Member of Climate Action Santa Monica. Natalya was one of two resident appointees to the City Council's 2019 Audit Subcommittee and is a professional Financial Analyst and Senior Due Diligence Analyst. This work has taught Natalya how to analyze and shape policy, resolve neighborhood issues, and make out city more fiscally responsible and transparent. It has given her the skills and expertise to tackle the challenges facing our city – so every family can thrive. As a new voice on the City Council, Natalya's priorities will include: solving homelessness with proven approaches, protecting renters; investing in our first responders to keep us safer; and creating a better climate for economic recovery from the impacts of COVID-19. Her broad coalition of supporters include: Supervisor Sheila Kuehl Mayor Pro Tem Kristin McCowan Councilmember Gleam Davis School Board Member Laurie Lieberman. www.natalyaforcitycouncil.com STATEMENT OF JESSE ZWICK CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION I grew up in Santa Monica and now I’m starting a family of my own here. I love our city and the values of inclusion, compassion, and environmental stewardship it has taught me. But we are falling short of those values. And our most urgent issues – homelessness, traffic, and safety – are getting worse by the day. I am a public policy advisor, writer, renter, and father. I have worked in city government and on the front lines of homeless outreach, with direct experience getting people housed. And I advocate for affordable housing in my role as chair of Inclusive Santa Monica. To get our city back on track, we must: • Protect rent control • Build more affordable housing • Add mental health outreach teams to address chronic homelessness • Reopen our libraries • Expand support for child care and after-school programming • Make our streets and parks safer for all • Cut red tape for local businesses • Make our police department more effective and just I am endorsed by: • Los Angeles County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl • Santa Monica City Councilmember Gleam Davis • Santa Monica Planning Commissioner Leslie Lambert • Santa Monica Library Board Member Abby Arnold I look forward to earning your support as well. 4300-EN-05133 LA 233-036 STATEMENT OF KEITH COLEMAN CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER, BOARD OF EDUCATION SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT As a parent whose children have attended our schools, a Visiting Scholar at Stanford University's mediaX think tank, and a California School Board Association Delegate, few people are better qualified than Keith Coleman to nurture education excellence in our schools. Since appointed to the School Board two-years ago, Keith has been a proven voice for education innovation and excellence, democratizing our schools, so every child is uplifted. Keith's achievements include: -further closing the achievement/opportunity gap - expanding Project Based learning - expanding mental health and well-being programs Using his experience with technology start-ups and a M.A. Degree in Applied Positive Psychology, and a B.A. in economics, Keith's priorities for the next four years include: - introducing new technology-based opportunities to empower students, helping them embrace positive, collaborative learning -continuing to improve the District's safety protocols -ensuring a comprehensive "whole child" approach to student well-being -maintaining the District's record of fiscal responsibility Keith is endorsed by: State Senator Henry Stern Santa Monica College Trustee Barry Snell School Board Vice President Richard Tahvildaran-Jesswein School Board Member Laurie Lieberman Democratic Club President Jon Katz Please vote for an extraordinary School Board Member on November 8, – vote for Keith Coleman. Electschoolboardmemberkeithcoleman2022.com STATEMENT OF ANGELA DIGAETANO CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER, BOARD OF EDUCATION SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT My name is Angela DiGaetano; a businesswoman and a concerned SMMUSD parent. I am passionate and driven to serve my community and advocate for students and parents who are unheard in our school district. After seeing political entrenchment in our school district, I felt a calling to step up. I will never engage in pay-to-play politics. I will be more concerned with toxic PCBs, mold and infested schools than offering contracts to family members or political cronies. That is why I am running for the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School Board. Change is imperative for greater good of the district. It's time to say enough and VOTE for someone who will put our kids and parents first! Whether your children attend Roosevelt, Grant, Olympic, or Webster, you deserve an advocate at your side who will listen and speak for you. I pledge to: • Maintain parental input and be a voice for the parents and students • Bring transparency and fiscal responsibility to our construction/bond program • Ensure equity, diversity, and inclusion in the allocation of public resources and hiring practices I invite you to contact me any time. It's time for Change! Vote for Angela DiGaetano! 4300-EN-05134 LA 233-037 STATEMENT OF ESTHER HICKMAN CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER, BOARD OF EDUCATION SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT I'm a parent of a child in the district, and an Alum of the former Juan Cabrillo (K-5), Malibu Park (6-8), Santa Monica High School (91') and UCLA. I believe in the promise of our public schools because a world class education benefits both students and the quality of our communities. When elected I will remain laser focused on: Small Class Sizes and Quality Education As one of the most well-funded districts in the state, we must reduce class sizes, increase enrollment, and challenge all students to perform at their very best. A Culture that brings people together Whether or not we have kids in the district, we love our kids and care about their safety, health, happiness and educational outcomes. I want to increase parent and community involvement so that our schools reflect OUR values and goals. Fiscal Transparency and Accountability It's time to change the way our district does business at the expense of our students. We must put an end to costly lawsuits, pricey consultants, vanity construction, real estate transactions, bloated administrative costs, and never-ending bonds. It's time to restore our schools to their world-class status by committing to student centered leadership! Vote Esther Hickman for SMMUSD School Board. www.vote4estherhickman.org STATEMENT OF LAURIE LIEBERMAN CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER, BOARD OF EDUCATION SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT As a School Board member, I've relied on my experience as a lawyer and education activist to make significant improvements in the education of our students. I'm proud to have provided leadership as our school district ensured that students and staff were safe and healthy and that learning continued during the worst of the pandemic. Public schools are more important than ever to preserving democracy. In pursuit of excellence and equity in our schools, I will continue to promote: -Curriculum that prepares students for success in college and careers, with the academic skills and ability to think critically, collaborate and contribute positively to an increasingly complicated world; -Initiatives and innovative instruction that engages all students, with urgent attention on closing the achievement/opportunity gap; -Expansion and improvement of preschools to ensure students are kindergarten-ready; -Implementation of pre-K-12 social justice standards and an American cultures/ethnic studies graduation requirement; -Enhancement of our revered music and fine arts programs; -Modernization of school facilities to ensure student and staff safety and access to state-of-the-art programming and technology; -Fortification of our financial reserves, balancing our budget, and maintaining our strong credit rating. My endorsements include: Community for Excellent Public Schools Congressmember Ted Lieu State Senator Ben Allen State Assemblymember Richard Bloom LA County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl laurielieberman4schoolboard.com 4300-EN-05135 LA 233-038 STATEMENT OF ALICIA MIGNANO CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER, BOARD OF EDUCATION SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Dear Santa Monica and Malibu Residents: I'm running for the Santa Monica-Malibu School Board to offer the District a fresh perspective. I live and work in Santa Monica with my husband and our son, an Edison student. I am a proud parent, District and community volunteer, union supporter, business owner, and Pico neighborhood renter. My experience in building a successful, family-Mexican restaurant chain from scratch gives me the working knowledge of budgets, timelines, and understanding construction plans from design to completion. I've managed conflicts and come to satisfactory resolutions in all of these areas. SMMUSD schools are high achieving and I hope to continue this trend by giving our students the best opportunities for their future success. To prepare them further, I hope to be involved in: • Supporting our Excellence through Equity Plan • Strengthening students' mental health support • Promoting Fiscal and Environmental Sustainability • Restoring Muir and SMASH as community schools • Supporting SMEF's District-wide fundraising efforts • Completing all ES projects and District maintenance plans Our students deserve the best, and I ask for your vote in working together for excellent 21st century schools! ELECT ALICIA MIGNANO FOR SCHOOL BOARD November 8, 2022! Read more at AliciaForSMMUSD.com STATEMENT OF STACY ROUSE CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER, BOARD OF EDUCATION SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT I'm a 20 year Malibu resident and mother of 2 kids who attended Malibu Public Schools from K-12th grade. I have worked tirelessly throughout my career to bring people together, empower the agency of individuals, and improve and change established systems to better fit the people they serve. I did that as PTA president, SAC representative, and as Malibu Schools Leadership Council President, and I will continue that work as a school board member. The year I served as Webster Elementary's PTA president was a year of instability - a school leadership change, and contention that confused, angered, and frightened the community. I found my footing by listening and effectively communicating the needs of parents and caregivers to successfully bring our school together. I've participated in bringing connection and collaboration to a community beset by the Woolsey Fire and months of COVID lockdowns. By engaging the community, listening to its needs, and addressing issues together, we can move forward even when we disagree. I look forward to bringing new energy and new ideas to the school board. vote4stacyrouse.org 4300-EN-05136 LA 233-039 STATEMENT OF RICHARD TAHVILDARAN-JESSWEIN CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER, BOARD OF EDUCATION SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT As the Board of Education Vice-President and a fulltime professor at Santa Monica College, Richard Tahvildaran- Jesswein works everyday to make the joy of learning a reality so that every child can thrive. Over the past eight years, Tahvildaran-Jesswein's skills in collaboration, innovation, and professionalism have resulted in: An American Cultures graduation requirement; the establishment of district-wide social justice learning standards; the expansion of project-based learning opportunities (PBL); and, a 9 – 12 grade PBL experience. Further testaments to his effectiveness on the Board are the District's re-imagining the Malibu pathway, the many improvements to our classrooms and school facilities, and his commitment to fiscal responsibility. As the District's liaison to CEPS (Community for Excellent Public Schools), Tahvildaran-Jesswein works with community stake-holders to ensure access and equity for all children. Tahvildaran-Jesswein knows our community, shares our values, and understands that an excellent education makes the world of difference for our kids. His unique qualifications and demonstrated leadership warrant his reelection to the Board of Education. His endorsements for re-election include Congressman Ted Lieu, Senator Ben Allen, Assemblyman Richard Bloom, Supervisor Sheila Kuehl and all members of the Board of Education and Trustees of SMC. For more information go to: www.rtjforschoolboard2022.com STATEMENT OF MILES WARNER CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER, BOARD OF EDUCATION SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT I am a Santa Monica native and SMMUSD alum, with two young children in our schools, including one with special needs. I am called to action by the serious concerns I see in our schools every day. My accountability as an elected member of Roosevelt Elementary's School Site Council, and background as a small business owner and budget management specialist lends me the experience to serve our community as a school board member. I will bring integrity, transparency, and accountability to: • Always lead with what's best for our kids • Champion smaller class sizes • Ensure a SERIOUS PLAN to tackle learning loss and the mental health effects of COVID • Facilitate a culture of collaboration and communication between parents and educators • Make ALL school board meetings open and accessible • Put money into classrooms and teachers—not $200M real estate adventures • Work in tandem with public safety officials to develop a coordinated safety plan • Prioritize safe classrooms that are mold, PCB and pest-free with clean bathrooms • Disrupt the entrenched bureaucracy and cronyism • Properly audit bond funds and hold management accountable for it's wild spending It's time for new voices. It's time for change. Vote for MILES WARNER! mileswarnerSMMUSD.com th th 4300-EN-05137 LA 233-040 STATEMENT OF PATRICK ACOSTA II CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, SANTA MONICA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Age: 29 Occupation: Santa Monica Municipal Employee Born and raised in Santa Monica, I am a proud product of our public education system. After graduating from Samohi, I enrolled at Santa Monica College and experienced how Santa Monica residents compete for class space and resources even though local residents pay for the debt from a growing number of College bonds. Residents, who make up less than 4% of SMC's student population should receive priority admission and free tuition at Santa Monica College. I will fight to make that a reality. After graduating from the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), I returned to serve my City. As I continue building my career with the City of Santa Monica, I look forward to bringing "community" back into Santa Monica College, ensuring more access and opportunity for residents of all needs and ages. Putting Our Residents First: - I will bring firsthand experience as a successful product of Santa Monica College. - Increase PRIORITY ENROLLMENT and provide TUITION ASSISTANCE for all Santa Monica and Malibu Residents. - Strengthen partnerships between Santa Monica College and Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District. - Establish improved community relations with surrounding neighborhoods. - Fiscal Transparency and Accountability. - Reduce Parking Issues. - Support Emeritus College. Join me in building upon the success of Santa Monica College's tradition of excellence, and vote for me, a homegrown product & Santa Monica College Alumnus, Patrick Acosta II. STATEMENT OF NANCY GREENSTEIN CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, SANTA MONICA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I am dedicated to upholding Santa Monica College's tradition of excellence – outstanding teachers, valuable community programs, and mission of students success. As your Trustee, I have consistently provided successful leadership by: • Continuing high-quality education and workforce development • Advocating for equitable State funding, including for SMC Emeritus • Recruiting and retaining excellent faculty • Providing strong fiscal management • Promoting equity and programs responsive to local communities and environment • Encouraging effective collaboration especially with Santa Monica and Malibu schools. I am proud of SMC's resilience and resourcefulness throughout the COVID-19 crisis. Our work included a systematic pivot to online classes and support while maintaining our position as number one in transfers to UC, UCLA, and USC. We increased student financial aid. We created new services, including Chromebook lending, campus pantry, home food delivery, and mental health counseling. SMC continues to be innovative, launching hundreds of new courses in health sciences, business, computer science, art, humanities, STEM and the trades. My extensive community experience includes serving on the boards of the Malibu SMC Public Facilities Authority, UCLA Santa Monica Medical Center Board of Advisors, Southern California ACLU, Broad Stage, Social Justice Learning Institute, Students4Students Shelter, and the Los Angeles County West Vector Control District. I will maintain Santa Monica College's commitment to education while strengthening partnerships with neighbors and serving our community. I am endorsed by Congressman Ted Lieu, Supervisor Sheila Kuehl, Senator Ben Allen, and Assemblymember Richard Bloom. 4300-EN-05180 LA 233-041 STATEMENT OF TOM PETERS CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, SANTA MONICA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT I'm running for the Santa Monica College Board at a time of UNPRECEDENTED CHANGE. The college now offers on campus, online, and hybrid classes due to the pandemic. My experience ensured these educational delivery models were ACCESSIBLE to ALL STUDENTS will prove an asset to Santa Monica College. Tom Peters Accomplishments • Former tenured faculty Santa Monica College Center for Students with Disabilities • Helped secure over $50,000 in donations to the SANTA MONICA-MALIBU EDUCATION FOUNDATION through the SMC FACULTY ASSOCIATION to help local students • Former member of Student Affairs Committee, Faculty Association Executive Board, and Center for Students with Disabilities' Scholarship Committee • Developed the DEPARTMENTAL ACCESSIBILITY TEAM of faculty members to support colleagues to ensure all classroom and online materials was accessible & usable for all students • Served on CITY of SANTA MONICA DISABILITIES COMMISSION • Volunteered on FOOD PANTRY DRIVE to feed SMC students during pandemic and RENTERS' HOTLINE to help distressed tenants My goals: • Full support for ALL SMC STUDENTS & EMPLOYEES • Work with organizations to ensure Santa Monica College is a key partner in racial equity and social justice • Establish PARTNERSHIPS to meet the employment needs of California • Support upgrading the SANTA MONICA COLLEGE VETERANS SUCESS CENTER • Obtain additional resources to provide mental health, food, and housing for students and community • Support SMC EMERITUS PROGRAM and lifelong learning oppotunities for seniors and the SMC SATELITE CAMPUS / MALIBU I humbly ask for your VOTE to serve on the SMC Board of Trustees STATEMENT OF SION ROY CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, SANTA MONICA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Thank you for considering my candidacy for re-election to the Santa Monica College Board of Trustees. I am a physician at Harbor UCLA, a safety net public hospital, and past President of the Los Angeles County Medical Association. Healthcare related issues have been a top priority for me during my first term as an SMC trustee. Over the past 4 years, I have been proud to help lead our SMC community through the pandemic, where we've put the health and safety of our students, faculty, and staff first while maintaining our educational programs. Additionally, I helped start our Allied Health Taskforce to increase healthcare related curriculum at our college. This lead to the development of a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) program, which will not only benefit our students, but help LA County fill critical healthcare employment needs. Finally, in conjunction with LA County Medical Association and SMC's Black Collegians and Adelante counseling programs, I have helped the college develop an annual lecture series bringing healthcare workers of color to speak to our students of color about their experience getting into healthcare fields. Thank you for considering my candidacy, and I look forward to the opportunity to continue this work. 4300-EN-05181 LA 233-042 STATEMENT OF BARRY SNELL CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, SANTA MONICA COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Age: 67 Occupation: CPA/Santa Monica College Trustee E-Mail Address: Snell4smctrustee@gmail.com Website Address: Http://www.barrysnell.org Please Re-elect Barry A. Snell for Santa Monica College Board of Trustees. Barry A. Snell is a passionate voice for public education and a proven leader for the community, serving on the Downtown Santa Monica Inc Board and the Santa Monica Education Foundation Finance Committee. During the past eight years, Barry A. Snell has aided in the following successes of SMC: • Remaining the #1 community college in transferring to UCs • Continuing to receive a clean audit for the 15th consecutive year • Advocating on the State and Federal level to increase and stabilize funding • Expanding on-line instruction and providing basic needs for students Barry A. Snell plans to continue SMC's successful endeavors by: • Continuing the clean audit streak & preserving fiscal stability • Safely increasing the number of on-ground courses and hybrid operations • Broadening professional development by embedding anti- racist, equity-minded academic and non-academic support in all student services • Developing a satellite campus in. Malibu Barry A. Snell's endorsements include: Senator Ben Allen, Assemblymember Richard Bloom, County Supervisor Sheila Kuehl and School Board President Maria Vasquez On November 8, help ensure that SMC's mission of student success for everyone continues: re-elect Barry A. Snell STATEMENT OF KURT GONSKA CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER OF THE RENT CONTROL BOARD SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION Kurt Gonska is a Santa Monica resident who lives in a rent- controlled apartment. He is a strong supporter of rent control and will fight to protect and strengthen it, as it has enabled thousands of middle-class and low-income people to live in and contribute to Santa Monica over many decades. Kurt believes that Santa Monica is a thriving community because of the people who live here, including many who would not be able to afford to stay without strong rent control protections. Kurt strongly supports reducing the maximum annual rent increase from 6% to 3% for rent-controlled units. He is a firm believer in helping low-income residents, and he believes we need to do more to help the middle-class. Both groups need relief from high inflation draining family budgets for everyday necessities like rent, groceries, and gas. Professionally, Kurt works in marketing and talent partnerships at Dick Clark Productions. Previously, he managed political campaigns for federal, state, and local offices. Kurt stands on the shoulders of the activists who delivered rent control to Santa Monica in 1979 and have fought to protect it for decades. He will fight to ensure residents can afford to stay and remain vital parts of our neighborhoods. 4300-EN-05182 LA 233-043 STATEMENT OF DANIEL S. IVANOV CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER OF THE RENT CONTROL BOARD SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION My name is Danny Ivanov and I am running for the Rent Control Board to protect tenants during these uncertain times and to serve as a bulwark against any effort to undermine rent control in Santa Monica. I am an attorney and renter living in a rent control unit. Without rent control, seniors on fixed incomes, middle class folks, and those striving to break into the middle class would be priced out of our City. As someone who would not be able to call our community home without rent control, I understand the critical importance of these issues firsthand. As an employment attorney with a diverse background including litigation, advice & counsel, and negotiations, I have the experience and skillset necessary to address the complex issues facing the RCB. Santa Monicans are already feeling the squeeze with rising prices on groceries, gas, and many other services due to inflation with no end in sight. The last thing our renters need at this time is an exorbitant rent increase without precedent as was proposed earlier this year. Renters in Santa Monica need a champion and I want to be that champion. I would be honored to earn your vote this November. STATEMENT OF ERICKA LESLEY CANDIDATE FOR MEMBER OF THE RENT CONTROL BOARD SANTA MONICA CITY GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION I am running for Rent Control Board because, as a community Health Worker & community/renters rights advocate, I realize that keeping rent affordable is a Health issue. Without stable quality housing our rent burdened community members can plunge into the despair of homelessness. Housing is Key for a healthy and diverse community. For the long term sustainability of our community's rent control is the lifeline for keeping our communities intact. In these times of economic recovery it is imperative that you elect someone who keeps abreast of the programs and policies that will keep residents in their homes to maintain our diverse communities. Elect me Ericka Lesley the woman with the heart for our community and the strength to go the distance. Erickalesley4smrentcontrol@gmail.com 4300-EN-05183 LA 233-044 STATEMENT OF LOUIS ABRAMSON PARTY PREFERENCE: DEMOCRATIC MEMBER OF THE STATE ASSEMBLY, 51st DISTRICT California can do better on everything from homelessness to housing to mental healthcare to climate change. Getting there will take leaders with vision, insight, and understanding. As an organizer, scientist, and renter, that's what I have. City Councils and County Supervisors have failed to solve our problems because their decision making is too fragmented. Progress can only come from the state level. It's time for Sacramento to step up. Now more than ever, our State Assembly representatives need to do more than talk about high rents—they need to pay rent. They can't just say our homelessness response is broken— they need to know what "fixed" means. They can't just believe in science—they need to understand it. I'm the candidate who checks those boxes. I'm asking you to check the box next to my name. I planned to become an astrophysics professor, not a politician. I entered public life because my community is hurting—and my skills can help. I've led programs to feed senior citizens, helped mothers with babies get off the street and into a home, and helped my neighbors pay rent. I've seen policies fail and I've built solutions. We need change, so we must change who we elect. I follow the facts. I'm driven by data. I make up my own mind. I'm different from the legislators who created the status quo. When the status quo isn't working, different is what we need. To learn more about me and my vision visit https://LouisForCA.com. CITY ATTORNEY'S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURE CS The City of Santa Monica currently imposes a Transient Occupancy Tax (“TOT”) on overnight visitors who enjoy lodging within the City. The City’s current TOT rate is 14% of room rental charges. This measure would increase the City’s TOT rate from 14% to: (a) 15% for hotels, and (b) 17% for home-shares. The proposed increase is comparable with neighboring cities and other destination cities. The TOT is calculated by multiplying the applicable tax rate by the total charges for room rental. It is estimated the proposed increases to the TOT would yield additional general fund revenue of more than $4,000,000 annually that could be utilized for any governmental purpose. The measure would require the City Council to establish an Advisory Committee by resolution no later than February 28, 2023. The Advisory Committee would provide non-binding recommendations on the use of the additional TOT revenue generated by increasing the TOT rate above 14%. The Santa Monica City Council placed this measure on the ballot. A “yes” vote supports the passage of the amendment to the Santa Monica Municipal Code; and a “no” vote opposes passage of the amendment. A majority vote (i.e., more than 50% of the votes cast) is required to pass the measure. DOUGLAS T. SLOAN City Attorney The above statement is an impartial analysis of Measure CS. If you desire a copy of the Measure, please visit santamonica.gov/elections/2022-11-08 or call the Santa Monica City Clerk's Office at 310-458-8211 and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you. 4300-EN-05184 LA 233-045 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE CS Vote YES on Measure CS to help address crime and homelessness, support Santa Monica’s high quality of life, and protect local property values – without increasing taxes on local residents. People live in Santa Monica because it offers an exceptional quality of life and great local services. Property values here are stronger than many other cities because of the investment the City makes to ensure safe neighborhoods, clean beaches, and parks. That’s why we need Measure CS. It provides a locally controlled source of funding for increased public safety, to keep Santa Monica one of the safest cities in California. In addition, while some progress has been made, more needs to be done to help individuals experiencing homelessness move off Santa Monica streets and into housing. Measure CS will: - Improve 911 emergency response times - Expand Santa Monica Police presence in downtown Santa Monica, the Pier, and beach areas, freeing up resources to increase neighborhood patrols and improve public safety in residential areas - Expand the City’s Homeless Liaison Program to 7 days a week - Expand outreach and provide 24/7 intake services for people experiencing homelessness and behavioral health issues - Help prevent crime and enhance safety in Santa Monica neighborhoods Measure CS Does Not Increase Taxes for Santa Monica Residents - Measure CS ensures that visitors to our city pay their fair share to support a clean, safe community - Annual financial audits, citizens oversight and public review of expenditures will ensure all funds are spent as promised - Legally, all Measure CS funds must stay in Santa Monica. The state and federal government cannot take one penny Safe neighborhoods and high-quality services help make Santa Monica a desirable place to live, do business and raise families. Please join public safety, business, community leaders, and long-time residents in voting YES on CS to keep Santa Monica safe and strong. REV. JIM CONN Founding Minister of Church in Ocean Park and Founding Member of Santa Monicans for Renters Rights TED WINTERER Co-Chair of Community for Excellent Public Schools and Former Santa Monica Mayor GLEAM DAVIS Santa Monica City Councilmember MANJU RAMAN General Manager of the Huntley Hotel and SM Public Safety Reform and Oversight Commissioner NO ARGUMENT AGAINST THIS MEASURE WAS SUBMITTED 4300-EN-05185 LA 233-046 CITY ATTORNEY'S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURE GS The Santa Monica Municipal Code (SMMC) imposes a one- time tax on each transfer of real property in Santa Monica. The City’s real property transfer tax currently has two tiers. The first tier tax rate is $3.00 per $1,000 of consideration (generally the sale price) or property value transferred for properties valued at less than $5,000,000. The second tier tax rate is $6.00 per $1,000 of consideration or property value transferred for properties valued at, or more than, $5,000,000. This measure amends the SMMC to establish a new third tier tax rate for transfers of $8,000,000 or more. The proposed third tier tax rate would be $56.00 per $1000 of value transferred. This measure establishes and funds: (1) a Homelessness Prevention and Affordable Housing (HPAH) Fund; and (2) a new School Fund. Out of the third tier tax rate of 5.6%, 5% would be allocated to the School Fund and the HPAH Fund (Allocated Funds) and the remaining .6% would go to the General Fund. The measure contains a specific annual distribution of the Allocated Funds. The first $10,000,000 of annual Allocated Funds must be deposited into the School Fund. The next $40,000,000 of annual Allocated Funds must be deposited into the HPAH Fund. Any Allocated Funds collected above $50,000,000 yearly would be deposited 20% into the School Fund and 80% into the HPAH Fund. The measure would require the City to provide the Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District the Allocated Funds in the School Fund each year. In the event of a de-unification of Malibu schools, the school district serving residents of Santa Monica would be entitled to receive the School Funds. The measure allows the HPAH Fund to be used to provide ongoing or emergency income assistance, acquire and rehabilitate existing rental properties as deed-restricted affordable housing, create new deed-restricted housing, and fund programs and services designed to preserve and improve affordable housing for lower income households. The measure establishes an eleven-member committee that will recommend to the City Council guidelines for eligible expenditures, local priorities and preferences, award procedures, budgeting, program evaluation, and public reporting procedures. The City’s auditors will audit the HPAH Fund annually and publicly provide the results to the eleven- member committee and the City Council’s Audit Subcommittee. The School Fund and the HPAH Fund are intended to provide additional support and not replace any existing funding under current agreements or prior advisory measures. According to a financial report requested by the City Council, based on historic sales trends the measure is estimated to generate new annual tax revenues of about $49 million. The City would be permitted to use the tax revenue only for purposes specified in the measure. The measure was placed on the ballot by a petition signed by the requisite number of voters. A “yes” vote supports the passage of the amendment to the SMMC; a “no” vote opposes passage of the amendment. A majority vote (more than 50% of the votes cast) is required to pass the measure. DOUGLAS T. SLOAN City Attorney The above statement is an impartial analysis of Measure GS. If you desire a copy of the Measure, please visit santamonica.gov/elections/2022-11-08 or call the Santa Monica City Clerk's Office at 310-458-8211 and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you. 4300-EN-05186 LA 233-047 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE GS If you value our children and public schools, helping severely rent burdened seniors age in place with dignity, and keeping Santa Monica economically diverse rather than a community where only the wealthy live, vote for Measure GS. It could raise close to $50 million per year on average that must be spent to accomplish these goals, and will do so by taxing sales of real estate worth $8 million or more. Here is why we need these funds. HUD estimates that over 6000 Santa Monica renter households are lower income and pay more than half their limited income for rent and utilities; many are long-term senior residents and families with children. Many are one financial shock away from homelessness. Measure GS will provide subsidies to these seniors and families with children so they stay secure in their homes and live with dignity. Excellent public schools are critical to our children’s success and Santa Monicans have consistently supported funding for our schools. Measure GS will enhance our schools by providing at least $10 million annually to support educational and afterschool programs. The state sets affordable housing targets and cities face state usurpation of their authority over development if they fail to comply. This measure will fund good faith efforts by Santa Monica to provide our fair share of affordable housing, and will help avoid Sacramento mismanagement of our future. This new wealth tax is fair. A city funded study indicated that, on average, it might have raised about $49 million annually over the past decade by taxing less than 30 property sales per year, more than 80% of which were multifamily apartment buildings and commercial properties. Santa Monica provides an ideal environment for real estate profits, and we deserve to recoup a small portion of their gains. VOTE YES ON MEASURE GS. SUE HIMMELRICH Mayor, City of Santa Monica MICHAEL SOLOFF Co-Chair Santa Monicans for Renters’ Rights MARIA LEON-VAZQUEZ President, SMMUSD DENNIS ZANE Former Mayor, City of Santa Monica, Co-founder of SMRR JON KATZ President, Santa Monica Democratic Club ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE GS Vote NO on Measure GS - It is too flawed for Santa Monica: • Santa Monica already has one of the highest property tax rates in the country and this new tax could make it the highest. However, NONE of this tax revenue goes to important programs and services, such as public safety, homelessness or the restoration of critical services like the reopening of libraries and after-school programs for our kids. • Measure GS will never end. Eventually, almost every small business owner and multi-family apartment building will be forced to pay this extremely large tax increase. • Measure GS will force local small businesses to raise their costs to residents to pay their increased rents due to this extreme increase in tax. Anyone who has been Downtown recently knows that we need to protect our small businesses, not tax them out of existence. • Measure GS will hurt local churches and charitable organizations by forcing them to pay hundreds of thousands in new taxes instead of using funds for programs providing assistance to those in need. • The funds for Measure GS will only go to costly government- built housing (with some possibly costing over $800,000 per unit). Who benefits? Those developers who get these lucrative government contracts. • Measure GS will create a brand-new bureaucracy with no public oversight, costing Millions of Tax Dollars in new City employee salaries and benefits - who will continue to get paid even if no new revenue is collected! It is not surprising that Measure GS is seriously flawed - it was drafted by the Mayor, her husband, and others - instead of engaging with the community and with other members of the City Council. We urge you to Vote "NO" on Measure GS to protect residents and small businesses! PHIL BROCK City Councilmember MARK L. VERVILLE Vice Chair, Audit Subcommittee NEIL CARREY Former Chair, Recreation & Parks Commission PATRICIA M. CRANE Chair, Northeast Neighbors D. PETER BORRESEN Housing Commissioner 4300-EN-05187 LA 233-048 REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE GS Facts matter. Truth matters. HERE IS THE TRUTH: • Measure GS is a one-time tax on property sales over $8 million. Only the very wealthy will ever pay this tax. • Measure GS will raise on average roughly $50 million per year to assist lower income Santa Monica seniors and families at risk of becoming homeless, to create new affordable housing for lower and moderate-income Santa Monicans, and to support our top-ranked public schools. • Over 6000 Santa Monica renter households are lower income and pay more than half their limited income for rent and utilities. They need help now. • YOU the Santa Monica voters put Measure GS on the ballot with your signatures. • Measure GS will provide Santa Monica the resources to say YES to great schools, YES to assisting seniors and families to remain in their Santa Monica homes, and YES to more affordable housing. HERE ARE RESPONSES TO OUR OPPONENTS' FALSE STATEMENTS: • Measure GS DOES NOT INCREASE PROPERTY TAXES! The California Supreme Court says so. • Very wealthy property owners will pay this one-time tax when they sell property for over $8 million. • Small businesses, local churches and charities, and residents who do not sell property for over $8 million will never pay this tax. • All expenditures under Measure GS must be audited, reviewed by a committee of residents, and approved by the City Council. • YOU the voters of Santa Monica can end Measure GS at any general election. Vote your Santa Monica Values with a YES on Measure GS. SUE HIMMELRICH Mayor, City of Santa Monica MICHAEL SOLOFF Co-Chair, Santa Monicans for Renters' Rights MARIA LEON-VAZQUEZ SMMUSD President DENNIS ZANE Co-Founder, Santa Monicans for Renters' Rights JON KATZ President, Santa Monica Democratic Club CITY ATTORNEY'S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURE PB This proposed measure would amend Section 1011 of the City Charter by expanding the current criteria for eligibility for City Council appointment to the Santa Monica Personnel Board to include, in addition to City residents, non-residents who are natural persons who reside within Los Angeles County and who either: a) work full-time for an employer located in the City and primarily perform their job functions within the City; or b) own real property located in the City; or c) have been issued a business license by the City. The proposed measure would also change the current term for Personnel Board members’ service on the Board from five years to four years. At present City Charter Section 1011 requires that any appointment to the Personnel Board made by the City Council be someone who at the time of appointment is a resident of the City. The appointee is prohibited from holding or being a candidate for public office or public employment, and the appointee may not be an officer of any partisan political club or organization. Section 1011 also provides that Personnel Board members serve a five year term. Currently, there are several City boards and commissions that do not have a residency requirement and whose members serve a four year term, which is the standard term for service under the City Charter for boards and commissions other than the Personnel Board. If the proposed measure passes, the City Council would be able to appoint non-City residents who reside within Los Angeles County to the Personnel Board. Expanding the eligibility requirements to include non-City residents may result in more applications to vacant Board positions and an applicant pool that is more diverse than current demographics for City residents. Under this measure all non-City resident applicants would need to reside in Los Angeles County and would need to have a material financial interest (full-time employment, ownership interest in real property, or business proprietorship) located within the City of Santa Monica to be eligible for appointment to the Personnel Board. Although an expanded pool of applicants may include non-City residents, the City Council’s discretion to select amongst applicants and to make an appointment will not change should the proposed measure pass. Furthermore, reducing Personnel Board members’ term from five years to four years would align Board members’ terms with the terms of other City board members and commissioners, and may also result in the City Council making appointments to the Board on a more frequent basis. This change may make it less likely that Personnel Board meetings get canceled for lack of a quorum, so that Board business may be timely completed. There is no financial consequence to the proposed changes. The above statement is an impartial analysis of Measure PB. If you desire a copy of the Measure, please visit santamonica.gov/elections/2022-11-08 or call the Santa Monica City Clerk's Office at 310-458-8211 and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you. 4300-EN-05188 LA 233-049 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE PB Please Vote YES on Measure PB to amend the City Charter ’s requirements for the term limits and service on the Personnel Board. This measure would bring the Personnel Board in line with other Boards and Commissions, which require that members either be residents of the City or residents of Los Angeles County who are employed full-time within the City, own real property in the City or have a business license by the City. Outdated language in the City Charter for the Personnel Board requires that members be residents of Santa Monica in order to serve, which excludes qualified citizens with a vested interest in Santa Monica from volunteer service and makes it difficult to fill the volunteer positions when they become vacant. Amending the Charter reflects our City’s commitment to expand opportunities for civic engagement and participation for all of our residents and nearby residents with a stake in the Santa Monica community and reduces the term limit to 4 years. This measure is a straightforward, simple expansion of service and term requirements to create alignment with other City Boards and Commissions. We urge you to Vote Yes on Measure PB. KRISTIN MCCOWAN Mayor Pro Tem ELLIOT GORDON Personnel Board Chair JASON BROWN Personnel Board Member NO ARGUMENT AGAINST THIS MEASURE WAS SUBMITTED CITY ATTORNEY'S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURE DT The Santa Monica Municipal Code imposes a one-time tax on each transfer of real property in Santa Monica. The City's real property transfer tax currently has two tiers. The first tier tax rate is $3.00 per $1,000 of consideration (generally the sale price) or property value transferred for properties valued at less than $5,000,000. The second tier tax rate is $6.00 per $1,000 of consideration or property value transferred for properties valued at, or more than, $5,000,000. This measure would establish a new third tier tax rate of an additional $25.00 per $1,000 of consideration or property value transferred, which would apply solely to the amount of consideration or value in excess of $8,000,000. The proposed third tier tax on the increment above $8,000,000 would be collected in addition to the existing second tier tax of $6.00 per $1,000 of consideration or property value transferred. The second tier tax would continue to apply to the entire transaction value. If this measure passes, the proposed third tier tax would be effective March 1, 2023. The proposed third tier tax would expire on February 28, 2033, unless five or more members of the City Council vote to extend the third tier tax for an additional five years to February 28, 2038. This measure includes exemptions consistent with state law. The measure also includes partial exemptions to the proposed third tier tax for: corrective deeds, corporate transfers that maintain the same beneficial ownership, transfers involving tax- exempt charitable organizations, and certain ground leases. Qualified affordable housing transfers are currently exempt from the City's second tier tax and are taxed at the City's first tier tax rate. This measure would exempt qualified affordable housing transfers from both the second tier tax and third tier tax. This measure includes a CPI adjustment every five years to the $8,000,000 threshold for when the third tier tax applies. The measure authorizes upward and downward CPI adjustments to the threshold, but prohibits lowering the threshold below $8,000,000. This measure includes changes to reflect that the County of Los Angeles and the City previously entered into an agreement for the County to administer the City's second tier tax. This measure codifies the County's existing practice of applying the City's transfer tax to unrecorded corporate transfers that trigger a change of ownership under Revenue and Taxation Code § 64. The City would be permitted to use the tax revenue for any governmental purpose. The Santa Monica City Council placed this measure on the ballot. A "yes" vote supports the passage of the amendment to the Santa Monica Municipal Code; a "no" vote opposes passage of the amendment. A majority vote (i.e., more than 50% of the votes cast) is required to pass the measure. DOUGLAS T. SLOAN City Attorney 4300-EN-05189 LA 233-050 The above statement is an impartial analysis of Measure DT. If you desire a copy of the Measure, please visit santamonica.gov/elections/2022-11-08 or call the Santa Monica City Clerk's Office at 310-458-8211 and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you. ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE DT The COVID pandemic hit Santa Monica hard as it did many cities. Faced with unprecedented challenges, and a loss of over $110,000,000 in general fund revenue, the City was forced to make the difficult decision to cut programs and services that protect our children, families, and low-income residents. Despite Santa Monica’s careful budgetary planning, the recession has further negatively impacted the city’s COVID-related economic recovery – leaving next year’s projected city revenues $35,000,000 below pre- pandemic levels. Because Santa Monicans have always come together to take care of each other, the City Council placed Measure DT on the ballot to generate revenue to enhance public safety, address homelessness, reopen our libraries, restore afterschool programs, and provide rental assistance for low-income renters who have been hit hardest by the pandemic and inflation. Measure DT will generate these funds by: - Enacting a new, temporary tax of 2.5% applicable only to sales of commercial and multi-family properties, and luxury homes above $8,000,000 when they cash out – the tax will be applied only when the property is sold and is projected to raise between $10,000,000 and $25,000,000 annually; - Calculating the tax only on that portion of the sales price above $8,000,000 – there will be no new tax on any sale below $8,000,000 or on any portion of the sale price below $8,000,000; and - Providing for an adjustment of the $8,000,000 threshold for inflation; Measure DT will be in effect for 10 years, with one 5-year extension if approved by a super-majority vote of the City Council. Measure DT will exempt sales to or by churches and other charitable organizations.. Let’s keep Santa Monica a community that puts the safety and wellbeing of its residents first – Vote YES on Measure DT. PHIL BROCK City Councilmember GLEAM DAVIS City Councilmember MARYANNE LAGUARDIA Chair, Recreation and Park Commission FRANCISCO FRANCO Board Member, Santa Monica Police Officer’s Association ANN GREENSPUN Past Board Member, Santa Monica Malibu Education Foundation 4300-EN-05190 LA 233-051 REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE DT Measure DT was brought forward by certain Councilmembers and their real estate mogul backers only after thousands of Santa Monica voters signed petitions to place Measure GS on the ballot. Both measures tax sales of properties worth $8 million or more, and ONLY ONE can become the law. What are the differences between the politicians' Measure DT and the voters' initiative Measure GS? First, and foremost, the politicians' Measure DT charges less when the very wealthy few sell properties worth $8 million or more, and ends in ten years. There have been on average only 30 such $8 million sales a year—overwhelmingly sales of commercial and apartment buildings. DO YOU THINK THAT HELPING THE VERY WEALTHY FEW IS GOOD PUBLIC POLICY? If not, vote NO on Measure DT. Second, the politicians' Measure DT provides no legally binding limits on how they can spend the monies raised. By contrast, the voters' initiative Measure GS requires that the monies raised go to critical long-term community investments: Our schools. Our lower income seniors and families struggling to make the rent. Our fair share of affordable housing. But these investments will not happen at the needed scale or for the long term if the politicians' Measure DT passes. DO YOU BELIEVE THE WEALTHY FEW SHOULD PROVIDE LONG TERM SUPPORT FOR OUR SCHOOLS, OUR SENIORS AND FAMILIES, AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING? If so, vote NO on Measure DT. And vote YES on Measure GS. SUE HIMMELRICH Mayor, City of Santa Monica MICHAEL SOLOFF Co-Chair, Santa Monicans for Renters' Rights MARIA LEON-VAZQUEZ SMMUSD President DENNIS ZANE Co-Founder, Santa Monicans for Renters' Rights JON KATZ President, Santa Monica Democratic Club ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE DT VOTE NO ON MEASURE DT and YES on Measure GS. Measure DT originated because wealthy real estate interests are afraid they cannot win an honest Yes/No election vote on Measure GS. Measure DT's real purpose is to undermine Measure GS. Even if both measures get a majority vote, only the measure with more votes becomes law. What is Measure GS and why are real estate moguls and developers so concerned? Measure GS is a measure placed on the ballot by thousands of Santa Monicans. Measure GS is a larger, ongoing and targeted wealth tax on sales of real estate worth $8 million or more that could raise some $50 million per year on average. These funds are needed to: assist lower income rent burdened Santa Monica seniors to avoid homelessness and to age in place with dignity, and to assist lower income rent burdened Santa Monica families with children; help ensure that we produce a fair share of affordable housing and do not lose control over local land use decisions to Sacramento; and help ensure that our local schools have the resources to provide excellent public education. Voters across California embrace the idea of taxing luxury real estate sales to raise funds, including to prevent people from losing their homes and to provide affordable housing. Wealthy real estate interests may make huge campaign contributions to try to convince you that Measure DT, a shorter- term feel-good measure with no guarantee how funds are spent, is better than delivering targeted, real and lasting help to our school children and our lower income neighbors through Measure GS. But the truth is Measure GS will help preserve the Santa Monica and Santa Monicans we love. Measure DT will not. Vote NO on Measure DT and Yes on Measure GS. SUE HIMMELRICH Mayor City of Santa Monica MICHAEL SOLOFF Co-Chair, Santa Monicans for Renters' Rights MARIA LEON-VAZQUEZ President, SMMUSD DENNIS ZANE Former Mayor, City of Santa Monica, Co-Founder of SMRR JON KATZ President, Santa Monica Democratic Club 4300-EN-05191 LA 233-052 REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE DT Proponents of Measure GS are misleading voters. They want you to believe that Measure GS addresses our City's most critical needs. However, it provides no funding for public safety and homeless services, including emergency response and mental health teams, or for the full reopening of our libraries. Measures DT and DTS were placed on the ballot by six of seven Councilmembers to provide funding to restore and improve these vital services while the City's economy recovers. Proponents imply that without Measure GS, low-income renters and our public schools will suffer. This is false. Measures DT and DTS are projected to provide $5,000,000 to $8,000,000 annually for rent subsidies. Our outstanding public schools already receive millions in City funding through existing measures. Santa Monica homeowners and other property owners are opposed to Measure GS's 800%+ increase in the applicable property sales tax. And, because Measure GS is permanent and doesn't adjust its $8,000,000 threshold for inflation, it will apply to a steadily increasing number of homeowners forever. Unlike Measure GS, Measure DT establishes a reasonable rate applied only to the amount in excess of $8,000,000, adjusts the $8,000,000 threshold for inflation and is temporary. Because Measure GS was drafted by a small group with narrow interests without collaborating with stakeholders, other Councilmembers and School Board Members, it is seriously flawed. Most importantly it FAILS to address our most pressing issue; public safety amidst a worsening homeless crisis. Please vote "YES" on Measures DT and DTS and "NO" on Measure GS. PHIL BROCK City Councilmember FRANCISCO FRANCO Santa Monica Police Officers Association WALTER PATTON Vice President, Santa Monica Firefighters Local 1109 MARYANNE LAGUARDIA Chair, Recreation and Parks Commission GLEAM DAVIS City Councilmember CITY ATTORNEY'S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURE DTS Measure DTS is an advisory measure placed on the ballot by the Santa Monica City Council ("City Council"). It relates to, but is separate from, the "Comprehensive Real Property Transfer Tax Measure" that is on the same ballot (the "Transfer Tax Measure"). If passed, the Transfer Tax Measure would create an additional third tier real property transfer tax rate of $25 per thousand dollars of consideration or property value transferred, which would apply solely to the amount of consideration or value in excess of $8 million, subject to certain exemptions. The proposed third tier tax on the increment above $8,000,000 would be collected in addition to the existing second tier tax of $6.00 per $1,000 of consideration or property value transferred, which would continue to apply to the entire transaction value. A separate impartial analysis has been prepared for the Transfer Tax Measure. Measure DTS is an advisory vote that allows voters to provide advice to the City Council on how voters prefer the additional real property transfer tax revenues to be used if the voters approve the Transfer Tax Measure. Specifically, this advisory measure asks whether at least 30% of any increased real property transfer tax revenue from the Transfer Tax Measure should be used to provide housing assistance to protect seniors and low-income families from housing displacement, with the remainder of the additional revenue to be used to provide services to address homelessness, behavioral health services, public safety and emergency response teams to address safety on City streets and in parks, the reopening and staffing of all public libraries, after-school programs for public school children, and traffic safety improvements around schools, including crossing guards. It is anticipated the Transfer Tax Measure, if approved by the voters, would raise additional tax revenue ranging from $12 to $25 Million annually. Because Measure DTS is an advisory vote, its passage would not legally require the City Council to expend the revenues in any particular way. Instead, the advisory measure would supply information to the City Council about how the voters prefer any additional transfer tax revenues are to be spent. DOUGLAS T. SLOAN City Attorney The above statement is an impartial analysis of Measure DTS. If you desire a copy of the Measure, please visit santamonica.gov/elections/2022-11-08 or call the Santa Monica City Clerk's Office at 310-458-8211 and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you. 4300-EN-05192 LA 233-053 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE DTS We all take pride in the wonderful programs and services our city has offered over the years. But the sudden and persistent drop in City revenues resulting from the COVID pandemic and the recession has challenged its ability to maintain and enhance many vital programs and services. Measures DT and DTS were placed on the ballot by the City Council to address those challenges while our city recovers from the recent devastation. The two measures go hand in hand. Measure DT will generate new tax revenue and Measure DTS tells our City Council – and future City Councils – how we want this revenue to be spent: - Services to address homelessness, protect seniors and low- income residents from housing displacement; - Public safety and emergency response teams to address safety and mental health issues - The reopening and staffing of public libraries; - After-school programs for public school children; and - Crossing guards near public schools. Together, Measure DT and Measure DTS provide locally- controlled funding for these vital programs and services of utmost importance to all Santa Monicans – including renters and homeowners, young families and older adults, and local business owners. Money to address these concerns will come from a modest tax imposed only on the sales price of commercial and residential property valued at $8,000,000 or more – and only on the portion of the sales price in excess of $8,000,000. The affected sales are projected to constitute a small percentage of all sales of property in the City. There are exemptions for sales by churches and other charitable organizations. We must pass both measures to address the very real problems associated with homelessness, public safety and our quality of life. Please join us in voting YES on both Measures DT and DTS to keep our community a special place to live. PHIL BROCK City Councilmember GLEAM DAVIS City Councilmember MARYANNE LAGUARDIA Chair, Santa Monica Recreation & Parks Commission FRANCISCO FRANCO Board Member, Santa Monica Police Officers Association ANN GREENSPUN Past Board Member, Santa Monica Malibu Education Foundation NO ARGUMENT AGAINST THIS MEASURE WAS SUBMITTED 4300-EN-05193 LA 233-054 CITY ATTORNEY'S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURE HMP Adult-use recreational cannabis is not legal in the City of Santa Monica and this proposed measure would not change that. However, it is expected that there will be licensed medicinal cannabis businesses operating in the City in 2022 that would not be subject to a cannabis specific tax. Instead, these businesses would only be subject to the City's standard business license tax and other generally applicable municipal taxes. This measure would impose a general tax of up to 10% of gross receipts on all licensed cannabis businesses operating within the City of Santa Monica with the revenue from the tax to be used for general municipal purposes. The measure would establish a tax on gross receipts of various types of licensed cannabis businesses at the following initial rates: (a) 3% for adult-use non-medicinal cannabis retailers; (b) 2% for medicinal cannabis retailers; and (c) 1% for other types of licensed cannabis businesses such as those primarily involved in distribution, manufacturing, cultivation, or laboratory testing. These initial cannabis business tax rates would take effect should the measure be passed by Santa Monica voters. These initial rates, however, can be subsequently decreased or increased by the City Council, but can never exceed a maximum rate of 10% without voter approval. It is estimated that the proposed cannabis tax could yield $3-5 million annually in general fund revenue, if and when, adult-use recreational cannabis becomes legal in the City. However this revenue would not be realized by the City in the near term, instead it is estimated that the City would receive this revenue in the next 12-18 months as more cannabis businesses become licensed to operate in the City. This measure does not authorize or legalize commercial nonmedicinal cannabis activities in the City of Santa Monica. Nor does it authorize the conduct or continuance of any unlawful business currently operating in the City. Furthermore, personal uses of cannabis not subject to state licensing requirements and for which an individual receives no compensation related to their personal use are exempted from this measure. The Santa Monica City Council placed this measure on the ballot. A "yes" vote supports the addition of Chapter 6.204 to the Santa Monica Municipal Code to establish a commercial cannabis business tax; and a "no" vote opposes the addition of Chapter 6.204 to the Santa Monica Municipal Code. A majority vote (i.e., more than 50% of the votes cast) is required to pass the measure. DOUGLAS T. SLOAN City Attorney The above statement is an impartial analysis of Measure HMP. If you desire a copy of the Measure, please visit santamonica.gov/elections/2022-11-08 or call the Santa Monica City Clerk's Office at 310-458-8211 and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you. ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE HMP VOTE YES on Measure HMP to keep cannabis tax dollars here in Santa Monica! YES on Measure HMP ensures that future cannabis businesses pay their fair share to secure a safe and clean environment, making Santa Monica a great place to live, work, and visit. Measure HMP is paid ONLY by cannabis businesses to help maintain essential services including: • Public safety initiatives to support our Santa Monica police and fire departments • New effective direct intervention services for people experiencing homelessness • Youth drug prevention programs • All basic City services We need Measure HMP! Currently, Santa Monica is a decade behind our neighboring cities in permitting and regulating cannabis-related businesses. Passage of Measure HMP will establish a framework for allowing cannabis-related businesses to operate legally and responsibly in Santa Monica. Upon passage, Council will implement a rigorous selection process to ensure that only the safest, most compliant, and proven cannabis operators are selected to operate in our city. Santa Monica loses millions of dollars in cannabis taxes to dispensaries in Los Angeles at the borders of our city. Once approved, this measure is estimated to generate $3.5 million to $5 million dollars annually in tax revenue that will support services for residents in Santa Monica. By voting Yes on Measure HMP, Santa Monica residents will have convenient access to tested, organic and regulated legal cannabis here in our City where taxes generated will benefit Santa Monica residents. Santa Monica's non-partisan City Council authored and supports measure HMP. OSCAR DE LA TORRE Santa Monica City Councilmember FRANCISCO FRANCO Santa Monica Police Officers Association ARMEN MELKONIANS Civil and Environmental Engineer PHIL BROCK City Councilmember DOMINICK BEI President, Santa Monica Firefighters Local 1109 NO ARGUMENT AGAINST THIS MEASURE WAS SUBMITTED 4300-EN-05194 LA 233-055 CITY ATTORNEY'S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURE RC Measure RC amends the City’s Rental Control Law, Article XVIII of the Santa Monica City Charter, “RCCA,” by (i) revising requirements for owners to evict tenants; (ii) revising certain election procedures; and (iii) rolling back rent increases for rent-controlled units, as explained below. Measure RC was placed on the ballot by the Santa Monica City Council. The RCCA prohibits evictions except as provided by law. Owners or qualified relatives who wish to reside in their units permanently may evict current tenants to do so if they meet certain requirements. One requirement is the owner or qualified relative “intend in good faith to move into the unit within thirty (30) days after the tenant vacates and to occupy the unit as a primary residence for at least one year”. Measure RC would require the owner or relative intend occupancy for at least two years unless exigent circumstances warrant a shorter period. This measure would require occupancy within sixty days of tenant vacancy. The RCCA requires an election to be held even if there are only as many candidates as open Board positions. Measure RC would amend the RCCA to state an election is not necessary when the number of qualified candidates does not exceed the open positions. The RCCA allows for an Annual General Adjustment to the maximum allowable rent (MAR) for rent-controlled units based upon seventy-five percent of the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index for a twelve month period, with a maximum increase of 6% of the MAR (the “Cap”) or a maximum dollar cap of $140 per month. Measure RC would reduce the Cap to 3% and reduce the maximum dollar cap to $70 per month, except from February 1, 2023, through August 31, 2023, Measure RC reduces the Cap to 0.8% of the MAR in effect as of August 31, 2022, with a maximum dollar cap of $19 per month (the “Adjusted GA”), providing an approximate 3% average increase over the 12 month period. The MAR during this seven month transition period is the MAR in effect as of August 31, 2022, plus the Adjusted GA. The MAR for any period after August 31, 2023, is calculated as if the General Adjustment for the entire period from September 1, 2022, through August 31, 2023, had been 3%, with a maximum dollar cap of $70. Measure RC allows individual adjustments by the Rent Control Board to increase the rent to the Adjusted GA for landlords who did not increase their rents by the full 6% prior to February 1, 2023, so long as the average rent increase for the period from September 1, 2022, through August 31, 2023, does not exceed the lower of 3% or $70 per month. Measure RC allows an owner of a rent-controlled unit to petition the Rent Control Board for an individual rent increase to enable the owner to obtain a fair and reasonable return. DOUGLAS T. SLOAN City Attorney The above statement is an impartial analysis of Measure RC. If you desire a copy of the Measure, please visit santamonica.gov/elections/2022-11-08 or call the Santa Monica City Clerk's Office at 310-458-8211 and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you. ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE RC SIX PERCENT IS TOO MUCH FOR MANY RENTERS! Your neighbors, especially fixed-income seniors and low- income working families, need protection. Rent inflation could force thousands of renters out of Santa Monica. Vote YES on Measure RC to help Santa Monica remain the inclusive, diverse community that rent control has preserved for more than 40 years. Measure RC provides stability for tenants in rent-controlled units by limiting annual rent increases to a maximum of 3% for 2022 and all future years. Inflation’s at a 40-year high, due to unusual circumstances caused by the global pandemic. Our current Rent Control Law, voter-approved in 2012, pegs the annual allowed rent increase to inflation, but with a 6% maximum. This is the first time the increase hit that 6% cap. YOU HAVE THE POWER TO ROLL BACK THE DANGEROUS INFLATIONARY 6% INCREASE. A YES vote on Measure RC requires landlords to reduce the 6% increase to under 1% in February 2023. That will average out the increase for the current year to 3%. In future years, annual increases will vary with inflation, but will NEVER be more than 3%. Measure RC also prevents tenants from being evicted for owner-occupancy unless the owner intends to live in the unit for at least two years, instead of just one. If the owner moves out before two years, they must re-offer the unit to the evicted tenant. Finally, Measure RC is a good-government measure, saving money by not requiring an election if the number of candidates for the Rent Control Board doesn’t exceed the number of seats to be filled. The Santa Monica Rent Control Board proposed these enhanced protections and the Santa Monica City Council voted UNANIMOUSLY to place them on the ballot. VOTE YES ON MEASURE RC. Help keep your neighbors in their homes. BEN ALLEN State Senator KRISTIN MCCOWAN Mayor Pro Tempore, Santa Monica PATRICIA HOFFMAN Executive Committee & Former Co-Chair, Santa Monicans for Renters’ Rights JANET GOLLERY MCKEITHEN Co-Founder, Committee for Racial Justice STEPHEN DURON Chair, Rent Control Board 4300-EN-05195 LA 233-056 REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE RC VOTE NO Measure RC #1 Under the guise of a lower rent cap the Rent Control advocates have hatched Measure RC, a scheme that will ultimately fracture and destroy Rent Control. This Measure creates an atmosphere for current landlords to sell their buildings to developers. If costs exceeds the ability to recoup those costs, it pays to sell. Santa Monica has been losing approximately 150 rental units per year because costs have exceeded income on those units. They are selling out to developers. Tenants are losing their homes. This Measure will result in an increase of that loss. For that past 10 years allowable rent increases have been less than 3%. This year’s increase is an aberration that has not happened in 32 years! #2 The Santa Monica Rent Control Board and the City Council rejected a proposal that would have eliminated this year’s entire increase for half the tenants in the city. Yes! That’s right! No increase at all! That half are the deserving low income tenants that we all want to protect. They chose to increase everyone’s rent in a scheme where the rich will pay the lowest percentage increase and the poor will pay the highest percentage increase. A NO vote on this Measure RC would tell the Rent Control Board to create an equitable policy that actually helps those in need and reflects the City’s often discussed, but rarely enacted, values. SAVE RENT CONTROL VOTE NO MONICA SANTANA Pico Neighborhood Renter CLARA BENREY Retired School Teacher LORI BROWN Parks and Recreation Commissioner JAY P. JOHNSON Former Rent Control Board Commissioner GIACOMO VALENTINI North of Wilshire Resident ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE RC Measure RC fails to address the root problems with Santa Monica rent control and rising rents. It attempts to tackle a temporary problem with a permanent but inadequate patch. It postpones the much needed deeper reforms to make rent control work in the context of ever rising rents. Rejecting this proposal will force the city government to confront true reforms. This measure is a cynical ploy to buy the votes of renters. Under Measure RC, lower income renters will pay more of their hard earned income than upper income renters. This is a regressive policy. In our allegedly progressive city, this is the ultimate irony. Its negative impacts on mom and pop landlords of rent controlled units will only make such units more scarce as small landlords will sell their properties to developers. In the July 14, 2022 Rent Control Board meeting, Board members stated that Rent Control is not for "poor people." This demonstrates their unwillingness to tackle the inequalities in the system. The Rent Control Board and its allies chose to maintain an outdated and therefore highly flawed system, despite it being inequitable. They only pretend to be the champions of renters. Be smart vote NO. A NO vote on this Measure RC would force the Rent Control Board to actually create an equitable policy that reflects the City's often discussed, but rarely enacted, values. VOTE NO MONICA SANTANA Pico Neighborhood Renter CLARA BENREY Retired School Teacher JAY P. JOHNSON Former Rent Control Board Commissioner GIACOMO VALENTINI North of Wilshire Resident LORI BROWN Parks and Recreation Commissioner 4300-EN-05196 LA 233-057 REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASUE RC YOU SHOULD VOTE YES ON MEASURE RC. Right now, while you’re studying how to vote, many Santa Monica families are being forced to slash household budgets to cover a sudden inflationary 6% rent increase. Who’d want rent-burdened Santa Monicans to keep paying unfairly high rent, and keep struggling? These landlords, who argue against timely rent relief. If you’re a renter — or you care about your fellow Santa Monicans who are renters — you should VOTE YES ON MEASURE RC! Your YES vote on Measure RC cuts IN HALF the inflated rent increases for EVERYONE in rent-controlled housing, and does it now. Measure RC is fair to rent-burdened working families and limited-income seniors. Meanwhile, landlords continue, by law, to be guaranteed a fair return. Our City Council has ALREADY voted to conduct a community study of rent control next year. These landlords want to delay Measure RC’s timely rent reductions, so they can keep their unfair windfall: a 6% unearned rent increase. The “deeper reforms” these landlords promise won’t lower high rents. What these landlords really want is “means-testing,” the power to examine tenants’ paychecks to see if renters can be made to pay more. There’s no reason to delay getting rent inflation under control. SIX PERCENT IS TOO MUCH FOR MANY RENTERS! Please don’t leave many of your neighbors at risk, including rent-burdened working families and limited-income seniors. VOTE YES ON MEASURE RC. KRISTIN MCCOWAN Mayor Pro Tem, Santa Monica City Council PATRICIA HOFFMAN Member, Executive Committee Santa Monicans for Renters’ Rights STEVE DURON Chair, Rent Control Board CITY ATTORNEY'S IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURE EM Measure EM amends the City's Rental Control Law, Article XVIII of the Santa Monica City Charter, by providing the Rent Control Board authority to disallow or modify otherwise-allowed annual general adjustments to the maximum allowable rent for rent-controlled units during a state of emergency declared by the President of the United States, the Governor, the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health Officer, or upon the declaration of a local emergency by the City Council or Director of Emergency Services. Measure EM still allows an owner of a rent-controlled unit to petition the Rent Control Board for an individual rent increase to enable the owner to obtain a fair and reasonable return. Measure EM was placed on the ballot by the City Council. The Rent Control Board derives its authority solely from the City Charter. Administrative bodies, such as the Rent Control Board, do not have general police powers and can only act pursuant to the laws that created them. The Rent Control Board has no emergency powers, absent a Charter amendment as proposed. DOUGLAS SLOAN City Attorney The above statement is an impartial analysis of Measure EM. If you desire a copy of the Measure, please visit santamonica.gov/elections/2022-11-08 or call the Santa Monica City Clerk's office at 310-458-8211 and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you. 4300-EN-05197 LA 233-058 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE EM Vote YES on Measure EM to protect Santa Monica residents in rent-controlled units from unreasonable rent increases in times of declared emergencies. The global pandemic affected people in ways that were never imagined. Some of our neighboring cities with rent control laws were able to freeze rents to protect renters during the emergency. In Santa Monica, the rent control law specifies how annual rent increases are determined and does not currently give the Rent Control Board discretion to modify or suspend annual rent increases — even during a declared emergency. Vote YES on Measure EM to change that for the future. If a state of emergency is declared by the President, Governor, Los Angeles County, or the City of Santa Monica, the Rent Control Board will be able to modify or suspend annual rent increases to protect renters and keep them in their homes. This power is not a blank check. The Board will be required to justify why the suspension or modification of rent increases is required to protect the health and safety of renters. And, landlords will be able to implement rent increases for their properties if they prove they are not making a fair return, as required by the rent control law. No one saw the Covid-19 pandemic coming. No one has a crystal ball to see what other types of emergencies could occur. Let’s be prepared for the future and give the Board the power to protect renters in times of declared emergencies. Your YES vote on Measure EM will make that happen. Protect your neighbors from unreasonable rent increases during declared emergencies by voting YES on Measure EM. CAROLINE M. TOROSIS Elected Santa Monica Rent Control Board Commissioner TONY VAZQUEZ Board of Equalization Member DENNIS ZANE Co-founder, Santa Monicans for Renters’ Rights ABBY H. ARNOLD Co-Chair, Santa Monica Forward NICOLE FARIES Education Activist REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE EM Contrary to what supporters claim, this Charter Amendment is a "blank check" granting drastic new police powers to Santa Monica's government. Even Santa Monica's own "Impartial Analysis" admits it. This measure will incentivize Santa Monica to constantly keep some form of local "state of emergency" in place in order to have greater power over residents and businesses. They can proclaim any state of emergency they wish (e.g. homeless crisis, Chinese submarines off the coast, energy/water crisis) and then obtain the power to dramatically alter rents up or down on a case by case basis. Do you even know who your unelected Director of Emergency Services is who has the right to declare a state of emergency whenever (s)he personally wishes? Anyone questioning if there really is an emergency can be fined or imprisoned for six months under Santa Monica Municipal Code 2.16.100 for "disinformation." Such a situation is ripe for bribery from landlords and land speculators (for example, to get rents raised for earthquake repairs). This measure, combined with Santa Monica's Municipal Code 2.16.060(f)2, will even give Santa Monica's government the right to confiscate property (e.g. taking a homeowner's garage for housing the homeless) without any eminent domain proceedings. If you don't want to encourage the declation of constant states of emergency in this City, Vote "No" on this measure. MARION GOLDFARB Resident 4300-EN-05198 LA 233-059 ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE EM This measure gives an only one-person majority in the City Council and the highly political Rent Control Board the right to decrease rents at will and to discriminate between landlords. It also gives power to an unelected Director of Emergency Services. Just days ago, the Santa Monica City Council voted on whether they should let big landlords have six percent raises on their rental units while forbidding long term mom and pop Santa Monica landlords from raising rents for four years. Also, know that almost no small landlord in the history of Santa Monica Rent Control has been allowed a rent increase under Section 1805. This is the reason landlords no longer bring rent increase petitions when they are losing money on their rent- controlled units. Instead, they sell their rental property to developers who kick out the tenants and build high end homes. MARION GOLDFARB Resident REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE EM VOTE YES ON MEASURE EM. The argument against is factually incorrect. Measure EM allows renter-protective action to be taken by the elected Rent Control Board only in a declared state of emergency, not at will. Decisions must be made with full democratic process, including public hearings. The Director of Emergency Services works at the direction of the elected City Council, with full public accountability. The City Council wisely did NOT zero out mom-and-pop landlord rent increases. They rejected that unfair proposal, which also would have imposed the very highest rent increases on already-burdened renters paying the most to corporate landlords. Instead, the Council put on the ballot Measure RC, protecting all rent-controlled tenants from rent inflation while treating landlords fairly and equitably. Please VOTE YES on BOTH Measure RC and this companion, Measure EM. The real reason for so few successful landlord petitions for rent increases? Rents have already rocketed on the majority of Santa Monica's rent-controlled housing, due to state-imposed vacancy decontrol. Most landlords are now enjoying far beyond the "fair return" guaranteed by law. Your Santa Monica neighbors, particularly rent-burdened working families and limited-income seniors, deserve the housing stability of effective rent control even when unforeseen emergencies threaten our community. VOTE YES ON MEASURE EM. It provides that needed protection in emergencies. NICOLE FARIES Education Advocate TONY VAZQUEZ State Board of Equalization DENNIS ZANE Co-Founder, Santa Monicans for Renter' Rights ABBY ARNOLD Co-Chair, Santa Monica Forward 4300-EN-05199 LA 233-060 FULL TEXT OF BALLOT MEASURE SMC SANTA MONICA COLLEGE AFFORDABLE HIGHER EDUCATION, CAREER TRAINING, CLASSROOM UPGRADES. To improve access to affordable education for local students, veterans, first-generation college students; provide affordable housing for homeless students; modernize instructional labs for nursing, healthcare, sustainability, media, science career training; repair/upgrade obsolete vocational classrooms/aging facilities, shall Santa Monica Community College District authorize $375,000,000 in bonds at legal rates, levying 2.5 cents per $100 assessed valuation, raising $23,000,000 annually while bonds are outstanding, with citizens oversight, public spending disclosure? PROJECT LIST The Board of Trustees of the Santa Monica Community College District (the "District") certifies that it has evaluated the District's urgent and critical capital needs, including District and student safety issues, enrollment trends, energy efficiency and computer technology, seismic safety requirements, and aging, outdated or deteriorating District buildings in developing the scope of projects to be funded. In developing the scope of projects, the District has prioritized the key health and safety and sustainability needs so that the most critical school site needs are addressed. The Board conducted an evaluation at all District sites and received input in developing the scope of projects to be funded. In approving this Project List, the Board of Trustees determines that the District should: Adhere to specific COMMUNITY ACCOUNTABILITY safeguards such as these: (a) All bond expenditures are subject to review by a Citizens Oversight Committee which reports to the public, as provided in Education Code Section 15278 et seq. (b) The District will involve faculty, staff and students in curriculum development at financed facilities throughout the life of the bond construction program. (c) The District will provide an opportunity for input from community and neighborhood residents during the development of projects to be funded by this bond measure. (d) The District will apply energy-saving and sustainability standards to all repairs and improvements. (e) The District will enter into or extend Cooperative Use Agreements with the City of Santa Monica, the City of Malibu and the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District in order to make the most efficient use of bond funds whenever feasible. The Project List includes the following types of projects: All $375 million of bond proceeds will be spent within the Cities of Santa Monica and Malibu or at sites that share a boundary and are contiguous with the Cities of Santa Monica or Malibu. None of the bond proceeds can be taken away by the State of California. All projects funded by bond proceeds will be available for educational and public uses authorized in this Project List. Replacement safety and modernization projects were identified by means of an independent facilities assessment. Replacement projects and projects to meet new educational needs have been presented to and approved by the District Board of Trustees and are included as priority items in the District's Capital Improvement Plan on file with the State Chancellor's Office. The items proposed for financing in whole or in part with the proceeds of the District's general obligation bonds include the following capital projects at any or all District facilities: • provide facilities, classrooms and/or equipment for career education programs in such fields as nursing, respiratory therapy, computer technology, computer science, new media, early childhood education, business, graphic design, photography, film, and other occupations in more than 80 fields of study; • development and implementation of facilities master plans and related requirements such as environmental impact reports and soils testing, architectural, engineering and similar planning costs; • demolition of temporary and/or obsolete and unsafe facilities; • installation and/or upgrading of emergency lighting, fire alarm and security systems; • installation, upgrade or repair of roadways, walkways, grounds, parking lots and garages; • entrance improvements; upgrade facilities to comply with Federal mandated Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) handicap accessibility requirements and State of California seismic standards; • signage for safety and public information; • upgrade and/or construction of new and existing restrooms; • installation, repair and/or replacement of heating, air conditioning and ventilation systems; upgrade of facilities for energy efficiency and to reduce fire risks; • repair and replacement of worn-out and leaky roofs, windows, walls, doors and drinking fountains; • installation of wiring and electrical systems to safely accommodate computers, technology and other electrical devices and needs; • resurfacing or replacing hard courts, turf and irrigation systems and campus landscaping; • building new and/or renovating existing athletic facilities and lockers; • upgrading or replacing inadequate libraries, and administrative spaces; • installing interior and exterior painting and floor covering; installing covered walkways; construction of various forms of storage and support spaces; • replacing water and sewer lines and other plumbing systems; • financing/refinancing of real property leases; financing/refinancing of previously approved bond-financed projects; 4300-EN-05200 LA 233-061 • acquiring related furnishings and equipment for all renovation, improvement and/or new and existing construction project components; • the relocation and/or acquisition of temporary facilities during the renovation, improvement and/or new construction of project components as necessary to maintain education programs in operation during construction; • the construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, or replacement of District facilities, including the furnishing and equipping of District facilities, or the acquisition or lease of real property for District facilities; • acquiring, refinancing and/or entering into arrangements for the use and/or joint use of real property for existing and future classrooms, student services, child care and/or other uses; making site improvements, building infrastructure and/or constructing additional facilities for the purpose of expanding instructional programs to meet future educational demands of District students. SAFETY AND MODERNIZATION PROJECTS Replacement of a shop-lab building designed to train students for obsolete industrial jobs in the 1950s and 1960s with modern classrooms where students can learn today's career skills. The State has identified the former Technology Building (Drescher Hall) as needing replacement and has placed it in line to receive partial State funding. Replacement facilities will benefit accounting, administration of justice, business, computer science, computer information systems (CIS), cosmetology, photography, fashion design, media studies, and STEM. Replacement of the Student Activities Building. This 1952 building lacks fire sprinklers and is in poor condition, subject to flooding and utility outages. A replacement building will provide improved and additional resources for the Student Health Center and for student basic needs programs, including food resources and mental health. Upgrading the Veterans Success Center. SMC's Veterans Success Center provides support to a student's transition from the military to college. The program is currently in temporary quarters. Expanding the overcrowded Respiratory Therapy program. Additional facilities will also support new pathway programs in Health and in Home Health. Constructing a Santa Monica College Police Department sub-station. The current police facility is antiquated and undersized. A new facility will improve public and campus safety. Student Housing. Bond funds will provide a local match to State funds for constructing student housing for full-time students who are homeless or at risk of homelessness. Bond funds may also be used to provide a match to public and private funds for purposes of student housing. Replacement of Temporary Classrooms. Built in the 1950s, 1970s, and 1990s, these facilities are past their time of usable service. Landscaping/ Water Conservation Improvements and Completing Pico Boulevard Frontage Improvements. Applying bond proceeds for landscaping improvements, including landscaping improvements to complete the main campus Pico Boulevard frontage, will improve water conservation through water reclamation and installation of drought resistant landscaping. Converting Library Interiors. Conversion of existing Library floor space used for book stacks to construct and install additional student study areas, tutoring and collaborative learning spaces that will support student success. Making Environmental Performance Improvements. Bond funds will be used to upgrade District facilities to achieve energy or resource use efficiency and water conservation and achieve sustainability for District operations. Upgrading Technology Infrastructure. Bond proceeds will be applied to renovate, replace, upgrade, acquire, install and integrate major site, building and utility systems, equipment and related infrastructure, including lighting, electrical, wiring and related infrastructure for modern technology, classroom instructional technology, communications and security technology (including security cameras and monitoring systems), data, voice, public address and audio-visual communication, energy efficiency, management monitoring systems, networks, fixtures, controls and equipment, cable infrastructure, network expansion, wireless access points, enterprise resource planning systems, student information systems, and other communications systems. COMMUNITY JOINT USE PROJECTS Providing for a Joint Use Project in the City of Malibu. The Malibu High School Auditorium no longer meets the instructional needs of its students, or the public use needs of the Malibu community. The District will make available bond funds as needed to assist the school district in replacing the auditorium and expanding its use to support media studies and public programs. Pearl Street Improvements. The District will contribute funding for Pearl Street upgrades to improve public access and public safety, particularly for users of the John Adams Performing Arts Center, the SMC Planetarium, and the SMC Observatory. ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS The allocation of bond proceeds may be affected by the District's receipt of State matching funds and the final costs of each project. In the absence of State matching funds, which the District will aggressively pursue to reduce the District's share of the costs of the projects, the District may undertake fewer than all of the projects listed above. Some projects may be undertaken as joint use projects in cooperation with other local public or non-profit agencies. Necessary site preparation/ restoration may occur in connection with new construction, renovation or remodeling, including ingress and egress, removing, replacing or installing irrigation, storm drain, and utility lines, trees and landscaping, relocating fire access roads, and acquiring any necessary easements, licenses, or rights of way to the property. Proceeds of the bonds may be used to pay or reimburse the District for the costs of District staff when performing work on or necessary and incidental to bond projects. Bond proceeds shall only be expended for the specific purposes identified herein. NO ADMINISTRATOR SALARIES. PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF THE BONDS AUTHORIZED BY THIS PROPOSITION SHALL BE USED ONLY FOR THE 4300-EN-05201 LA 233-062 ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, RECONSTRUCTION, REHABILITATION, OR REPLACEMENT OF DISTRICT FACILITIES, INCLUDING THE FURNISHING AND EQUIPPING OF FACILITIES, AND NOT FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE, INCLUDING TEACHER AND ADMINISTRATOR SALARIES OR PENSIONS OR OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES. FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY. THE EXPENDITURE OF BOND MONEY ON THESE PROJECTS IS SUBJECT TO STRINGENT FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY REQUIREMENTS. BY LAW, PERFORMANCE AND FINANCIAL AUDITS WILL BE PERFORMED ANNUALLY, AND ALL BOND EXPENDITURES WILL BE MONITORED BY AN INDEPENDENT CITIZENS' OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (EDUCATION CODE SECTION 15278 ET SEQ.) TO ENSURE THAT FUNDS ARE SPENT AS PROMISED AND SPECIFIED. THE CITIZENS' OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MUST INCLUDE, AMONG OTHERS, REPRESENTATIVES OF A BONA FIDE TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION, A BUSINESS ORGANIZATION AND A SENIOR CITIZENS ORGANIZATION. NO DISTRICT EMPLOYEES OR VENDORS ARE ALLOWED TO SERVE ON THE CITIZENS' OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE. BOND AUTHORIZATION By approval of Measure SMC by at least 55 percent of the registered voters voting on the measure, the District will be authorized to issue and sell bonds of up to $375,000,000 in aggregate principal amount at interest rates not in excess of the legal limit and to provide financing for the specific District facilities projects listed in the Project List as set forth above, subject to the accountability requirements specified below.The Bonds may be issued under the provisions of the California Education Code (starting at Section 15100), under the provisions of the California Government Code (starting at Section 53506), or under any other provision of law authorizing the issuance of general obligation bonds by community college districts. The Bonds may be issued in series by the District from time to time, and each series of Bonds shall mature within the legal limitations set forth in the applicable law under which the Bonds are issued. FUNDS PROTECTED FOR LOCAL USE Proceeds from the sale of bonds authorized by Measure SMC will be used solely on local projects and will not be subject to appropriation by agencies outside of the District. ACCOUNTABILITY REQUIREMENTS The provisions in this section are specifically included in Measure SMC in order that the voters and taxpayers in the District may be assured that their money will be spent wisely. Expenditures to address specific facilities needs of the District will be in compliance with the requirements of Article XIII A, Section l(b)(3), of the State Constitution and the Strict Accountability in Local School Construction Bonds Act of 2000 (codified at Education Code Sections 15264 and following). The proceeds from the sale of the bonds will be deposited into a Building Fund to be held by the Los Angeles County Treasurer, as required by the California Education Code, and will be used only for the purposes specified in Measure SMC and not for any other purpose. Evaluation of Needs: The Board has identified detailed facilities needs of the District and has determined which projects to finance from a local bond at this time. The Board hereby certifies that it has evaluated enrollment growth, student safety, class size accommodation, repairs/upgrades to older facilities, and information technology needs in developing the Project List as set forth above. Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee: The Board shall establish an Independent Citizens' Oversight Committee under Education Code Section 15278 to ensure bond proceeds are expended only on the college facilities projects listed above. The Committee will be established within 60 days of the date when the results of the election appear in the minutes of the Board. Performance Audits: The Board shall conduct an annual, independent performance audit to ensure that the bond proceeds have been expended only on the college facilities projects listed as set forth above. Financial Audits: The Board shall conduct an annual, independent financial audit of the bond proceeds until all of those proceeds have been spent for the college facilities projects listed above. Annual Report: The Superintendent/President of the District is required to cause an annual report to be filed with the Board, the first report to be filed not later than one year after the issuance of the first series of the Bonds, which report shall contain pertinent information regarding the amount of funds collected and expended, as well as the status of the projects listed in Measure SMC as required by Sections 53410 and 53411 of the Government Code. COMPLETION OF PROJECTS Completion of the bond projects listed above is subject to the availability of adequate funding to the District. Approval of the Bond Measure does not guarantee that the proposed projects in the District that are the subject of Bonds under the measure will be funded beyond the local revenues generated by the Bond Measure. The District's proposal for the projects may assume the receipt of matching State funds, which could be subject to appropriation by the Legislature or approval of a Statewide bond measure or additional measures. The proceeds from the sale of the Bonds will be used only for the purposes specified in Measure SMC, and not for any other purpose. SCOPE OF PROJECTS Bond proceeds will be expended to update, repair, replace, renovate, construct, acquire, equip, furnish, rebuild and otherwise improve educational and support facilities within the District. Projects which are described above include all related and incidental costs, including their share of the costs of the election and bond issuance and costs of design, engineering, architectural and other professional services, inspections, site preparation, utilities, landscaping, construction management and other planning, legal, accounting and similar costs, independent annual financial and performance audits, a customary construction contingency, and other costs incidental to and necessary for completion of the listed projects. Bond proceeds may also be expended to acquire real property (or any interest in real property) for future educational and support facilities and to acquire and install furniture, fixtures and equipment at any classrooms and other educational facilities within the District. The District may alter the scope and 4300-EN-05202 LA 233-063 nature of any of the specific projects which are described above as required by conditions that arise during the course of design and construction. Whenever specific items are included in the above list, they are presented to provide examples and are not intended to limit the generality of the broader description of authorized projects. The order in which particular projects are listed is not intended to indicate priority for funding or completion. IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURE SMC By Dawyn Harrison, Acting County Counsel Approval of Measure SMC ("Measure") would authorize the Board of Trustees ("Board") of the Santa Monica Community College District ("District") to issue general obligation bonds in an amount not to exceed $375,000,000. The District placed the Measure on the ballot by Resolution No. 2022-06-07.31, "Resolution of the Board of Trustees of the Santa Monica Community College District of the County of Los Angeles, California Ordering an Election to Authorize the Issuance of General Obligation Bonds, Establishing Specifications of the Election Order, and Requesting Consolidation with Other Elections Occurring on November 8, 2022," adopted by the Board on June 7, 2022. Proceeds from the sale of the bonds authorized by the Measure will be used only for the purposes specified in the Measure, including repairing, acquiring, constructing and upgrading classrooms and other school facilities; removing hazardous materials; repairing and replacing gas, electrical, sewer, plumbing, heating and air systems, windows, walls, doors, and roofs; upgrading for energy efficiency and to comply with water, sustainability, accessibility, earthquake and fire safety regulations and standards; and improving roads and pedestrian paths, lighting, and technology infrastructure. A complete list of the allowed project expenditures is included in the full text of the Measure. Bond proceeds may not be expended on teacher and administrator salaries and other operating expenses. The Board will cause independent performance and financial audits to be conducted annually to ensure that bond proceeds are spent only for projects identified in the Measure. The Board will appoint an independent Citizens' Oversight Committee in compliance with Education Code section 15278 no later than 60 days after the Board enters the election results in its minutes. Bond proceeds will be deposited into a Building Fund held by the County Treasurer as required by the California Education Code, and the District will comply with the reporting requirements of Government Code section 53410. Approval of the Measure does not guarantee that projects described in the Measure will be funded beyond the local revenues generated by the Measure. The District's proposal for certain projects may assume receipt of matching State funds that are subject to appropriation by the Legislature or approval of a Statewide bond measure. The bonds will not exceed the maximum interest rate as allowed by law. According to the District's Tax Rate Statement, the best estimate of the average tax rate required to fund the bonds, based on assessed valuations available when the District filed the statement, is $21 per $100,000 of assessed valuation. The best estimate of the highest tax rate required to fund the bonds is $25 per $100,000 of assessed valuation in fiscal year 2029-2030. The final fiscal year in which the tax to be levied to fund this bond is anticipated to be fiscal year 2051- 2052. The estimate of debt service, including principal and interest, is $629,504,320. This Measure requires approval by fifty-five percent (55%) of the qualified voters voting in the election for passage. 4300-EN-05203 LA 233-064 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE SMC Vote Yes on Measure SMC! Help Santa Monica College continue to build great futures for local students. Measure SMC provides these important educational benefits to Santa Monica and Malibu: –Replacing and upgrading obsolete classroom and instructional labs. –Improving access to new career training programs including respiratory therapy, fashion design and photography. –Providing technology and facilities for hybrid in-person and online learning. –Upgrading the college's Veterans Success Center. –Housing for SMC's homeless and qualified low-income students. –A state-of-the-art language learning center. –Replacing Malibu High School's auditorium to support college and high school media studies. –Modernizing energy systems and achieving energy savings. –Providing fire safety and environmental upgrades. Santa Monica College is recognized as one of the very best community colleges in the nation. Tens of thousands of Santa Monica and Malibu students have used SMC to affordably complete their first two years of college. Santa Monica College has the highest number of transfers to the University of California, UCLA, and USC in the state. Many more have learned valuable job skills in over 100 fields of study and professions, including medical, information technology, communications and media, science, engineering, business, and accounting. Today, SMC faces new challenges and an urgent need to replace or upgrade outdated classrooms and instructional labs, provide technology for effective hybrid in-person and online learning, enhance opportunities for veterans and first- generation college students, and expand career training programs. Measure SMC will provide funding to help Santa Monica College give our local students the bright future they deserve. All funds must be used locally. None of the bond proceeds can be taken away by the State. Independent audits are required. Measure SMC is supported by educators, parents, and local business and community leaders throughout our community. Vote Yes on Measure SMC! DR. LOUISE JAFFE Chair, Santa Monica College Board of Trustees DENNIS ZANE Co-founder, Santa Monicans for Renters' Rights TED WINTERER Co-Chair, Community for Excellent Public Schools CHRIS WIZNER President & Chairman, Malibu Pacific Palisades Chamber of Commerce RICHARD BLOOM Member of the California State Assembly 4300-EN-05204 LA 233-065 REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE SMC Santa Monica "Community" College is now a Cal State LA- sized regional institution, migrating to 4-year degrees, with a growing international student population. They don't want us to know that the number of local students attending is minimal. Yet they want us to pay. With Measure SMC, all SMCC bonds since 2022 would total $1.3 billion. That's $2.6 billion (with interest) coming essentially from additions to our mortgage payments and rents, just to SUBSIDIZE THE STUDENTS FROM OTHER CITIES AND COUNTRIES WHO BENEFIT. The funding requests demonstrate the unending growth: 2002 -- Measure U $160 million 2004 -- Measure S $135 million 2008 -- Measure AA $295 million 2016 -- Measure V $345 million + 2022 -- Measure SMC $375 million There is NO END to their requests. More $$ for more buildings while SMC is now leasing its unused facilities to our school district! So why build more? HOW DOES IT MAKE ANY SENSE FOR SANTA MONICA AND MALIBU RESIDENTS TO FOOT THE BILL? SMCC officials never discuss with residents their overall expansion plans and how they will impact our neighborhoods and family budgets. Vague lists of repairs and improvements appear on every SMC bond measure, but the result is huge development projects with big impacts. The College has been fiscally irresponsible and not transparent. It throws out crumbs about improving our parks and schools in order to entice us to vote yes, but it rarely delivers. No more bleeding local residents for little return. VOTE NO! MARC L. VERVILLE City of Santa Monica Audit Subcommittee Vice Chair NANCY COLEMAN North of Montana Association Chair ROBERT H. TAYLOR Ocean Park Association Co-Founder ARMEN MELKONIANS Wilshire Montana Neighborhood Coalition Board Member GERALDINE KENNEDY Former Santa Monica Planning Commissioner ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE SMC Santa Monica Community College wants more of OUR money. Again! In the last 20 years, local residents gave SMC nearly $1 BILLION in bonds that will cost us (with interest) $2 BILLION in taxes! And yet they still have a whopping $230 Million of our money that has not even been spent! THEY WANT MORE???...Yes, $375 Million more for their regional and international plans that do not directly benefit us. This development scheme calls for more buildings, higher density, more traffic, more commuters in an area already gridlocked. YOU WILL HAVE NO SAY in how any of this money is spent! SMC is exempt from local land-use laws. It can build more buildings and generate more traffic without any public review. The SMC 2010 Facilities Master Plan estimated 5,600 new daily car trips, increasing traffic congestion at 36 intersections. An overwhelming majority of SMC students live outside Santa Monica and Malibu, yet we get stuck paying. The taxes on our homes and apartments should not go to their already bloated piggy bank. And to add insult to injury, we suffer all the consequences. Students who live in wealthy Beverly Hills, Brentwood, Pacific Palisades, Marina del Rey come here. Yet taxpayers from those communities don't contribute one dime for SMC facilities. Is that fair? Let's not forget that SMC promised us $20 million to renovate Memorial Park with the last bond. That was 6 years ago. Despite massive funds in their bank account, they have yet to pay! Would you give more money to someone who owes you? They've taken in excess and hoarded what's yours. Vote NO. ZINA JOSEPHS Friends of Sunset Park President BRIAN O'NEIL Pico Neighborhood Association Co-Chair PATRICIA (TRICIA) CRANE Chair, Northeast Neighbors PETER TIGLER Former Santa Monica City Charter Review Commissioner MARIO FONDA-BONARDI City of Santa Monica Planning Commissioner 4300-EN-05205 LA 233-066 REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE SMC Yes on Measure SMC. Opponents' claims against Measure SMC are simply false. Supporting education is the issue here. Neighbor communities are committing to the same level of support for their community colleges as proposed by Measure SMC. Repairing and modernizing SMC classrooms protects our community's investment in SMC and gives our local residents facilities designed for a 21st Century education. SMC has the State's best faculty. Failing to repair our classrooms risks losing great teachers in future years. Measure SMC helps fund much-needed updates to existing SMC career training facilities and provides technology upgrades to meet emerging needs in the post-pandemic world. SMC has kept its promises: FACT: SMC's award-winning public transit program, in place since 2008, reduced car trips 40% and is now the County of Los Angeles model for schools. FACT: SMC's increase in online education will reduce its footprint and reduce car trips. FACT: 50% of Santa Monica High School students attend SMC. FACT: More than 27,500 Santa Monica and Malibu residents have attended Santa Monica College in the past decade. FACT: SMC has safeguarded funds for Memorial Park and is pleased that the City has restarted the project. FACT: SMC housing for homeless and qualified low-income students will prioritize local families and individuals. SMC remains number one in transfers to the University of California, UCLA, and USC. Measure SMC is supported by educators, parents, and local business and community leaders. Have more questions? Call Dr. Kathryn Jeffery, SMC President, 310-434-4200 or visit VoteYESforSMC.com. Vote Yes for Measure SMC. MARIA LEON-VASQUEZ Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District Board of Education, President GREG MORENA Chairman, Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce IAN ROVEN, ESQ. Malibu Chamber of Commerce past Chair; Malibu High School and SMC alumnus JENNIFER FERRO KCRW President BEN ALLEN California State Senator TAX RATE STATEMENT - MEASURE SMC An election will be held in Santa Monica Community College District (the "District") on November 8, 2022 for the purpose of submitting to the electors of the District the question of incurring bonded indebtedness of the District in the principal amount of $375 million. If such bonds are authorized and sold, the principal thereof and interest thereon will be payable from the proceeds of taxes levied on the taxable property in the District. The following information regarding tax rates is given in compliance with Section 9401 of the California Elections Code. This information is based upon the best estimates and projections presently available from official sources, upon experience within the District and other demonstrable factors. Based upon the foregoing and projections of the assessed valuations of taxable property in the District, and assuming the entire debt service on the bonds will be paid through property taxation: 1. The best estimate of the average annual tax rate that would be required to be levied to fund the bond issue over the entire duration of the bond debt service, based on assessed valuations available at the time of the filing of this statement, or a projection based on experience within the same jurisdiction or other demonstrable factors is 2.1 cents per $100 of assessed valuation of all property to be taxed. It is estimated that the final fiscal year in which the tax is anticipated to be collected is 2051-52. 2. The best estimate of the highest tax rate that would be required to be levied to fund the bond issue, and an estimate of the year in which that rate will apply, based on estimated assessed valuations available at the time of the filing of this statement, or a projection based on experience within the same jurisdiction or other demonstrable factors, is 2.5 cents per $100 of assessed valuation of all property to be taxed and the year is 2029-2030. 3. The best estimate of the total debt service, including the principal and interest, that would be required to be repaid if all the bonds are issued and sold is approximately $629,504,320. Attention of voters is directed to the fact that the foregoing information is based upon projections and estimates only. The actual timing of sales of the bonds and the amount to be sold at any time will be governed by the needs of the District and other factors. The actual interest rates at which the bonds will be sold, which will not exceed the maximum permitted by law, will depend upon the bond market at the time of sale. The actual assessed valuations in future years will depend upon the value of property within the District as determined in the assessment and the equalization process. Assessed valuation is not the same as market price of real property. Therefore, the actual tax rates and the years in which those tax rates will be applicable may vary from those presently estimated and stated above. Voters should note that estimated tax rates are based on the ASSESSED VALUE of taxable property on the County's official tax rolls, not on the property's market value. Property owners should consult their own property tax bills to determine their property's assessed value and any applicable tax exemptions. Dated: June 7, 2022 4300-EN-05206 LA 233-067 DR. KATHRYN E. JEFFERY Superintendent/President Santa Monica Community College District STATEMENT OF BOB HERTZBERG CANDIDATE FOR SUPERVISOR, 3RD DISTRICT EVERYONE DESERVES REAL SOLUTIONS TO HOMELESSNESS - Bob will demand accountability from local governments for providing shelter and housing - Will direct $2 billion of unallocated county funds towards expanding mental health services - Will establish a single governing authority for homelessness that coordinates the work of all 88 cities EVERYONE DESERVES SAFER NEIGHBORHOODS - Bob is endorsed by every police organization in the Valley and Westside - Has the support of LA County firefighters and nurses - Fought to get assault weapons and ghost guns off our streets and eliminated the rape kit backlog by creating the largest DNA Crime Lab in the country EVERYONE DESERVES A CLEANER ENVIRONMENT - Was named "50 people to save the Planet" by the Guardian - Bob opened the first solar company in Los Angeles - Established the first long-term plan to save water and fight droughts BOB IS A RESPONSIBLE PROBLEM SOLVER - A clean energy entrepreneur, job creator and now a Senator – Bob will get things done for you at the county - Bob passed the largest public-school investment in state history to help our kids - He received an 100% Rating from Planned Parenthood and wrote law increasing access to contraception www.hertzbergforsupervisor.com 4300-EN-05207 LA 233-068 STATEMENT OF ROBERT LUNA CANDIDATE FOR SHERIFF I'm running for Los Angeles County Sheriff to reduce crime and bring new leadership and accountability to the Sheriff's Department. The current Sheriff's Department is mismanaged, which has put our public safety at risk. We can do much better. My priorities as your next Sheriff: 1. Reduce Violent Crime 2. Address Homelessness 3. Restore Public Trust and Eradicate Deputy Gangs 4. Reform and Modernize the Sheriff's Department and Jails 5. Improve Employee Wellness As Police Chief of Long Beach for the last seven years, I have a proven track record of success making more than 100 policy changes that resulted in reduced violent crime, property crime, officer-involved shootings and citizen complaints. I have been promoted through every rank of the Long Beach Police Department, and have worked with law enforcement agencies across the nation on the Executive Board of the Major Cities Chiefs Association. The Democratic Party, Los Angeles Times, Daily News and Southern California News Group, Los Angeles County Federation of Labor, Los Angeles County Business Federation and all five County Supervisors have endorsed my candidacy. Growing up in East Los Angeles, patrolled by the Sheriff's Department, opened my eyes to examples of both good and bad policing, and inspired my 36-year career in law enforcement. My bottom line: as Sheriff, our service always needs to be effective, respectful and constitutional. I would be honored to earn your vote. www.LunaForSheriff.com FULL TEXT OF BALLOT MEASURE A An ordinance calling a special election to be held on November 8, 2022, throughout the County of Los Angeles for the purpose of voting upon an amendment to the Charter of the County of Los Angeles and directing the consolidation of the election with the Statewide general election to be held on the same day. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles ordains as follows: SECTION 1. Call of Election and Purpose. A special election is hereby called, proclaimed, and ordered to be held on November 8, 2022, for the purpose of voting upon a proposed amendment to the Charter of the County of Los Angeles. SECTION 2. Form of Measure. The exact form of the measure as it is to appear on the ballot and the complete text of the proposed Charter amendment is as follows: PROPOSED COUNTY CHARTER AMENDMENT. CHARTER AMENDMENT – PROVIDING AUTHORITY TO REMOVE AN ELECTED SHERIFF FOR CAUSE. Shall the measure amending the County of Los Angeles Charter to grant the Board of Supervisors authority to remove an elected Sheriff from office for cause, including violation of law related to a Sheriff's duties, flagrant or repeated neglect of duties, misappropriation of funds, willful falsification of documents, or obstructing an investigation, by a four-fifths vote of the Board of Supervisors, after written notice and an opportunity to be heard, be adopted? YES NO This measure will become effective only if submitted to the voters at the election held on November 8, 2022, and only after approval by a majority of qualified voters voting in the election on the issue. The Charter amendment will take effect as provided for in sections 23713 and 23714 of the Government Code. Section 13.5 of Article IV of the Charter of Los Angeles County is added to read as follows: Section 13.5 A. The Board of Supervisors may remove a Sheriff from office for cause, by a four-fifths vote, after a Sheriff has been: (1) Served with a written statement of alleged grounds for removal; and (2) Provided a reasonable opportunity to be heard regarding any explanation or defense. 4300-EN-05208 LA 233-069 B. For the purposes of this Section, "cause" means: (1) Violation of any law related to the performance of a Sheriff's duties; (2) Flagrant or repeated neglect of a Sheriff's duties as defined by law; (3) Misappropriation of public funds or property as defined in California law; (4) Willful falsification of a relevant official statement or document; or (5) Obstruction, as defined in federal, State, or local law applicable to a Sheriff, of any investigation into the conduct of a Sheriff and/or the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department by any government agency, office, or commission with jurisdiction to conduct such an investigation. C. The Board of Supervisors may provide for procedures by which a removal proceeding pursuant to this Section shall be conducted. D. This Section shall not be applied to interfere with the independent and constitutionally and statutorily designated investigative function of a Sheriff. SECTION 3 Legal Effect of Inoperative Provisions. In the event that the amendment to the County of Los Angeles ("County") Charter contained in this measure is rendered inoperative because of the actions of any court, legislative or other body, or for any other reason, the provisions of the County Charter in effect on November 8, 2022, will remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4 Legal Effect of Invalid Provisions. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this proposition is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability will not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words of section 13.5 of Article IV of the County Charter. The voters of the County declare that they would have independently adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Proposition irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, phrases, or words of section 13.5 of Article IV is declared invalid or unenforceable. SECTION 5 Consolidation. The special election will be consolidated with the Statewide general election to be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022. The measure will be placed on the same ballot as that provided for the general election. The precincts, polling places or vote centers, and precinct board members will be the same as provided for the Statewide general election. SECTION 6 Proclamation. Pursuant to section 12001 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County hereby PROCLAIMS that a special Countywide election will be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, to vote upon the Charter amendment described in Section 2 of this ordinance. SECTION 7 Effective Date. Pursuant to section 9141 of the Elections Code and section 25123 of the Government Code, this ordinance will take effect upon the adoption thereof. SECTION 8 Authority. This ordinance is adopted pursuant to sections 23720, 23730, and 23731 of the Government Code, and sections 9141, 10402, 10403, and 12001 of the Elections Code. SECTION 9 Publication. This ordinance must be published once before the expiration of fifteen (15) days after its passage in a daily newspaper of general circulation, printed, published, and circulated in the County pursuant to section 25124 of the Government Code. The Executive Officer of the Board of Supervisors is ordered to file a copy of this ordinance with the County Registrar-Recorder at least 88 days prior to the day of the election. 4300-EN-05209 LA 233-070 IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURE A By Dawyn R. Harrison, Acting County Counsel Approval of Measure A ("Measure") would amend the Charter of the County of Los Angeles ("Charter") to grant the Board of Supervisors ("Board") authority to remove an elected Sheriff from office for cause, by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the Board. This Measure was placed on the ballot by ordinance and resolution passed by a majority vote of the Board. The Charter currently does not give the Board authority to remove an elected Sheriff. This Measure would grant the Board with the authority to remove an elected Sheriff from office for cause after a Sheriff has been served with a written statement of the alleged grounds for removal and provided with a reasonable opportunity to be heard regarding any explanation or defense. The Measure further provides the following grounds as cause to remove an elected Sheriff: (1) Violation of any law related to the performance of a Sheriff's duties; (2) Flagrant or repeated neglect of a Sheriff's duties as defined by law; (3) Misappropriation of public funds or property as defined in California law; (4) Willful falsification of a relevant official statement or document; or (5) Obstruction, as defined in federal, State, or local law applicable to a Sheriff, of any investigation into the conduct of a Sheriff and/or the Los Angeles Sheriff's Department by any government agency, office, or commission with jurisdiction to conduct such investigation. The Board may provide procedures for how to conduct the removal proceedings. If approved by the voters, the removal for cause provisions in Section 13.5 of Article IV of the Charter shall not be applied to interfere with the independent and constitutionally and statutorily designated investigative function of a Sheriff. This Measure requires approval by a majority of the qualified voters voting in the election. ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE A Vote Yes on Measure A for SHERIFF ACCOUNTABILITY. Vote Yes on Measure A to create necessary safeguards to protect against a Sheriff who abuses power and violates our rights. Vote Yes on Measure A to authorize the removal of a Sheriff if they commit serious violations of the public trust, such as breaking the law, stealing county funds, or obstructing investigations into deputy misconduct. Measure A establishes long-overdue checks and balances and essential civilian oversight over the official that operates the largest jail system in the country, controls as budget of more than $3.5 billion, and employs over 10,000 deputies. With this law in place, future Sheriffs will know that they cannot violate the law and people's rights without consequence. Los Angeles County has a history of Sheriffs who disregard the law and cause great harm to the public as a result. Former Sheriff Lee Baca oversaw extreme violence in the jails and was recently released from federal prison after lying to FBI agents and federal prosecutors and obstructing a federal investigation. Sheriffs have ignored or concealed deputy gang violence in allegations, in violation of department policy; defied lawful subpoenas and court orders; and violated laws on transparency and oversight. More than 120 community and labor organizations — including Asian Americans Advancing Justice Southern California, ACLU of Southern California, Bend the Arc: Jewish Action, California Poor People's Campaign, Central American Resource Center (CARECEN) - Los Angeles, Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice (CLUE), Dignity and Power Now, Disability Rights California, Homeboy Industries, Immigrant Resource Center of San Gabriel Valley, LA Voice, NAACP San Fernando Valley Branch, SEIU 2015, Southern Christian Leadership Conference of Southern California, and Women's March Action — urged the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors to place this measure on the ballot, so that voters could amend the county charter to establish a process to hold accountable any Sheriff who abuses power. Vote Yes on Measure A to create accountability and common-sense checks and balances. No official, especially as Sheriff, should be above the law. www.sheriffaccountability.la DOLORES C. HUERTA President, Dolores Huerta Foundation MELINA ABDULLAH Co-Founder BLMLA EUNISSES HERNANDEZ Co-Founder of La Defensa KURT PETERSEN Co-President, Unite Here Local 11 MANJUSHA P. KULKARNI Executive Director, AAPI Equity Alliance 4300-EN-05210 LA 233-071 REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE A Let's cut through the nonsense and the smokescreens. Measure A is nothing but a power grab by the County Board of Supervisors to let them overturn your vote. They want to take away your power. In November, you, the voters, will elect a Sheriff. Over a million people will vote for the winner, whoever it is. But the very next day, Measure A would allow just four members of the Board of Supervisors to overturn your votes, and hire anyone else as Sheriff. That's the definition of undemocratic. Why would you allow the Board of Supervisors to replace the Sheriff after he or she was properly and legally elected by you? If you don't like the Sheriff, you can vote him or her out of office on Election Day. If he or she did something wrong while in office, you can vote to recall the Sheriff whenever you want. But in both of those situations, you are in charge. Measure A would take away your vote, and give it to four politicians who were elected into office by voters in their individual districts, not by the greater electorate of Los Angeles County. DEFEND DEMOCRACY. Vote No on Measure A! CHAD BIANCO California State Sheriffs Assn. HONOR "MIMI" ROBSON Libertarian Party of California Chair DANIEL WELBY Libertarian Party of Los Angeles County Chair DAVID HERNANDEZ Chair LA Hispanic Republican Club DAVID BOWERS Chair, Region 65 of LPLAC ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE A Measure A deserves the contempt of every voter in the county. It's called a bill of attainder. It's also an ex post facto law. If you've read your constitutions, you know that these are unconstitutional in every sense of the word. County counsel and her entire staff should be forced to resign in shame. They wrote it. They took two oaths -- one as lawyers and one as public employees. They are a disgrace to the county, the state, and the nation. Disbarment would be well deserved. Instead of standing up for the law, they acted like henchmen for a vindictive political campaign against a sheriff that you voted into office. This amendment singles out and punishes (attainder) an elected sheriff for conduct that the corrupt board of supervisors will determine, after the fact (ex post facto). If any official commits a crime, he should be prosecuted. That's what the Public Integrity Division of the District Attorney does. Are they corrupt too? The supes want to be judge, judge, and executioner. That's not due process. That's hubris! Not only should this measure go down in flames, if it ever reaches the ballot, it should be a rallying cry to throw out each of the four queens who voted for it. County counsel and each supervisor should be sued to reimburse, out of their own pocket, the county (that's you) for the entire cost of this hot mess. It's a travesty. By putting a bill of attainder on the ballot, the supervisors are telling you that they are queens, gods, above the law. There's no other way to put it. Vote NO on Measure A, as many times as the county registrar allows. Join us: http://bit.ly/NoSheriffAttainder HONOR "MIMI" ROBSON Libertarian Party of California Chair DANIEL WELBY Libertarian Party of Los Angeles County Chair 4300-EN-05211 LA 233-072 REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE A Vote Yes on Measure A: END DEPUTY GANGS Multiple investigations have uncovered over a dozen deputy gangs within the L.A. Sheriff's Department, who have abused county residents for decades. These include the Compton "Executioners," whose tattoos depict a skull with an alleged Nazi-style helmet, the East L.A. "Banditos," and the white supremacist Lynwood "Vikings." Sheriffs have resisted meaningful actions to stop deputy gang violence, instead denying their existence and shielding deputies from discipline. Settlements related to deputy gangs have cost taxpayers about $55 million. YES ON MEASURE A means Sheriffs who condone deputy gangs and their abuses could be removed. Vote Yes on Measure A: END SHERIFF ABUSE OF POWER "With [Sheriff] Baca's knowledge and ... involvement, [Undersheriff] Tanaka oversaw a group of deputies and mid- level commanders who worked to derail the FBI investigation [into corruption and civil rights abuses]." – L.A. Times, May 12, 2017. "[Sheriff] Villanueva through his subordinates ordered the deputies involved [in taking and sharing pictures of the tragic Kobe Bryant crash] to delete the crash photos instead of opening an investigation into the alleged misconduct." – L.A. Times, June 17, 2022. "The Sheriff's Department's handling of the case [in which a deputy knelt on the head of a handcuffed individual] is the subject of a criminal grand jury investigation." – L.A. Times, August 24, 2022. If found liable for cause, Sheriffs who cover up serious misconduct, lie in official statements, or obstruct investigations should face real consequences. We need a direct way to keep them in check. YES ON MEASURE A means adopting common-sense checks and balances to hold any Sheriff accountable. www.sheriffaccountability.la DOLORES C. HUERTA President Dolores Huerta Foundation MELINA ABDULLAH Co-founder BLMLA EUNISSES HERNANDEZ Cofounder of LA Defense KURT PETERSEN Co-President, Unite Here Local 11 MANJUSHA P. KULKARNI Executive Director, AAPI Equity Alliance FULL TEXT OF BALLOT MEASURE C An ordinance amending Title 4 – Revenue and Finance of the Los Angeles County Code to add Chapter 4.71 Cannabis Business Tax to tax Cannabis Businesses in the unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County. The ordinance also establishes enforcement, collection, and appeals of taxes levied under this Chapter. The people of the County of Los Angeles ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 4.71 is hereby added to read as follows: CHAPTER 4.71 CANNABIS BUSINESS TAX 4.71.010 Authority and Purpose. 4.71.020 Intent. 4.71.030 Applicability. 4.71.040 Definitions. 4.71.050 No Effect on Other Taxes, Fees or Charges, or Other Permits of Licenses. 4.71.060 Payment of Tax Does Not Authorize Unlawful Business. 4.71.070 Tax Imposed. 4.71.080 Tax Registration. 4.71.090 Payment and Tax Statement Required Monthly. 4.71.100 Payments and Communications Made by Mail—Proof of Timely Submittal. 4.71.110 Payment—When Taxes Deemed Delinquent. 4.71.120 Notice Not Required by County. 4.71.130 Payment—Penalties and Interest for Delinquency. 4.71.140 Cancellation of Penalties and Interest. 4.71.150 Refunds—Procedures. 4.71.160 Refunds—Credits. 4.71.170 Exemptions—Personal Cultivation and Use. 4.71.180 Rules and Regulations. 4.71.190 Enforcement—Duties of Tax Administrator and Sheriff. 4.71.200 Constitutionality and Legality. 4.71.210 Apportionment. 4.71.220 Audit and Examination of Premises and Records. 4.71.230 Tax Deemed Debt to County—Lien Procedure. 4.71.240 Deficiency Determinations. 4.71.250 Tax Assessment—Authorized When— Nonpayment— Fraud. 4.71.260 Tax Assessment—Notice Requirements. 4.71.270 Tax Assessment—Hearing—Application — Determination—Appeal. 4.71.280 Violation Deemed Misdemeanor–Civil Penalty– Administrative Fines. 4.71.290 Conviction or Civil Judgment for Chapter Violation— Taxes Not Waived. 4.71.300 Severability. 4.71.310 Effect of State and Federal Reference/Authorization. 4300-EN-05212 LA 233-073 4.71.320 Remedies Cumulative. 4.71.330 Amendment or Repeal. 4.71.340 Execution. 4.71.010 Authority and Purpose. This Chapter will be known as the "Cannabis Business Tax Ordinance" and is enacted to raise revenue, pursuant to sections 7284, 7284.4, and 34021.5 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, for general governmental purposes of the County. All of the proceeds from the Tax imposed by this Chapter must be deposited to the County's general fund. The Cannabis Business Tax is levied based upon a Business's Gross Receipts except for Commercial Cannabis Cultivation, which will be taxed based on square footage, as specified in this Chapter. The Cannabis Business Tax is not a sales and use tax, a tax upon income, or a tax upon real property and must not be calculated or assessed as such. The Cannabis Business Tax must not be separately identified or otherwise specifically assessed or charged by any person to a customer, patient, or caretaker. 4.71.020 Intent. The intent of this Chapter is to levy a Tax on all Cannabis Businesses in the unincorporated areas of the County, regardless of whether such Cannabis Business would have been legal at the time this Chapter was adopted. Nothing in this Chapter will be interpreted to authorize or permit any Cannabis Business that would not otherwise be legal or permissible under State and local laws applicable to Cannabis Business. 4.71.030 Applicability. The provisions of this Chapter apply to the unincorporated areas of the County. 4.71.040 Definitions. The terms below have the following meanings: A. "Arm's Length Transaction" means a Sale entered into in good faith and for valuable consideration at a sales price that reflects the fair market value in the open market between informed and willing parties, neither under any compulsion to participate in the transaction. B. "Board of Supervisors" means the County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors. C. "Business" means all activities engaged in or caused to be engaged in within the County, including any commercial or industrial enterprise, trade, profession, occupation, vocation, calling, or livelihood, whether or not carried on for gain or profit, excluding services rendered by an employee to their employer. D. "Cannabis" means: 1. All parts of the plant cannabis sativa linnaeus, cannabis indica, or cannabis ruderalis, whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin, whether crude or purified, extracted from any part of the plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the plant, its seeds, or resin; and 2. The separated resin, whether crude or purified, obtained from cannabis. Cannabis does not include Industrial Hemp, unless otherwise specified. E. "Cannabis Business" means any Business requiring a Commercial Cannabis Permit, including but not limited to cultivating, transporting, distributing, Manufacturing, compounding, converting, Processing, preparing, storing, packaging, transporting, delivering, testing, dispensing, retailing, or any other Business requiring a Commercial Cannabis Permit, and wholesaling of Cannabis, Cannabis Products, or of ancillary products and accessories, whether or not carried on for gain or profit. F. "Cannabis Business Tax" means the Tax due pursuant to this Chapter for a Cannabis Business in the unincorporated areas of the County. G. "Cannabis Product" means the same as the definition in section 11018.1 of the California Health and Safety Code, and is not limited to medicinal Cannabis Products. H. "Canopy" means all areas occupied by any portion of a Cannabis plant whether contiguous or noncontiguous on any one site. When plants occupy multiple horizontal planes (as when plants are placed on shelving above other plants) each plane must be counted as a separate Canopy area. I. "Chapter" means a Chapter of this Title. J. "Code" means the Los Angeles County Code. K. "Commercial Cannabis Cultivation" means cultivation of Cannabis undertaken in the course of conducting a Cannabis Business. L. "Commercial Cannabis Permit" means a permit, certificate, or other approval issued by the County to a Person authorizing that Person to operate a Cannabis Business or engage in Business as a Cannabis Business within the unincorporated areas of the County. M. "County" means the County of Los Angeles. N. "Cultivation" means any activity involving the planting, growing, harvesting, drying, curing, grading, or trimming of Cannabis and includes, but is not limited to, the operation of a Nursery. O. "Days" means calendar days, which is all days including Saturdays, Sundays, and County holidays, unless otherwise specified. P. "Distribution" means the procurement, Sale, transport, or delivery of Cannabis and Cannabis Products between Businesses or Persons in the unincorporated areas of the County in accordance with Section 4.71.210. Q. "Gross Receipts," except as otherwise specifically provided, means: 1. The total amount (including all receipts, cash, credits, services and property of any kind or nature) received or payable for the Sale of goods, or for the performance of any act or service of any nature for which a charge is made or credit allowed (whether such service, act or for employment done as part of or in connection with the Sale of goods, wares, merchandise or not) related to Cannabis Business, without any deduction therefrom on account of the cost of the property sold, the cost of materials used, labor or service costs, interest paid or payable, losses or any other expense whatsoever. 4300-EN-05213 LA 233-074 2. Gross Receipts include the total amount received or payable related to Cannabis Business whether designated as a sales price, royalty, rent, membership fee, automated teller machine (ATM) service fee, delivery fee, slotting fee, any other fee, vaping room service charge, commission, dividend, or other designation. 3. In the event the Business is involved in a Non-Arm's Length Transaction, the Gross Receipts will be the fair market value using a methodology approved by the Tax Administrator. 4. The following are excluded from Gross Receipts: a. Cash discounts where allowed and taken on Sales. b. Any tax required by law to be included in or added to the purchase price and collected from the consumer or purchaser. c. Such part of the sale price of any property returned by purchasers to the seller as refunded by the seller by way of cash or credit allowances or return of refundable deposits previously included in Gross Receipts. d. Receipts derived from the occasional Sale of used, obsolete or surplus trade fixtures, machinery or other equipment used by the taxpayer in the regular course of the taxpayer's Business. e. Cash value of Sales, trades or transactions between departments or units of the same Business located in the unincorporated areas of the County if authorized by the Tax Administrator in writing in accordance with Section 4.71.210. f. Receipts of refundable deposits, except forfeited deposits calculated as income for the Business. g. Retail Sales of non-Cannabis Products, such as t-shirts, sweaters, hats, stickers, key chains, bags, books, posters, rolling papers, Cannabis accessories such as pipes, pipe screens, vape pen batteries (without Cannabis) or other personal tangible property. h. Payments made by the Tax-reporting Cannabis Business to a Cannabis customer for the difference in the original price and subsequent renegotiated or finalized price of products or services sold. This type of transaction is referred to as a "Billback." The Tax-reporting Cannabis Business must provide supporting documentation to the Tax Administrator to substantiate the transaction in order to be eligible for a Gross Receipts exclusion. i. Whenever there are included within the Gross Receipts amounts which reflect Sales for which credit was extended and such amount proved uncollectible in a subsequent year, those amounts may be excluded from the Gross Receipts in the year they prove to be uncollectible; provided, however, if the whole or portion of such amounts excluded as uncollectible are subsequently collected, they must be included in the amount of Gross Receipts for the period when they are recovered. R. "Hearing Officer" means the person qualified to conduct a fair and impartial hearing, including but not limited to the Office of the County Hearing Officer if one has been created. S. "Industrial Hemp" means a fiber or oilseed crop, or both, that is limited to types of the plant Cannabis sativa L. having no more than three-tenths (3/10) of one percent (1%) tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) contained in the dried flowering tops, whether growing or not, the seeds of the plant, the resin extracted from any part of the plant, and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the plant, its seeds or resin produced therefrom. T. "Lighting" means a source of light that is primarily used for promoting the biological process of plant growth. Lighting does not include sources of light that primarily exist for the safety or convenience of staff or visitors to the facility, such as emergency lighting, walkway lighting, or light admitted via small skylights, windows, or ventilation openings. U. "Manufacturing" means the Processing, production, preparation, propagation, or compounding of Cannabis or Cannabis Products either directly or indirectly or by extraction and/or infusion and chemical synthesis methods, at a fixed location that packages or repackages Cannabis or Cannabis Products, and includes the preparing, holding, or storing of components and ingredients of Cannabis and Cannabis Products. V. "May" means permissive. W. "Must" means mandatory. X. "Nursery" means a facility or part of a facility that is used only for producing clones, immature plants, seeds, and other agricultural products used specifically for the planting, propagation, and cultivation of Cannabis. Y. "Non-Arm's Length Transaction" means a Sale not entered in good faith or that does not reflect fair market value in the open market. Z. "Person" means an individual, firm, partnership, joint venture, association, corporation, limited liability company, estate, trust, or Business trust, or any other entity or association conducting or representing a Business for purposes of this Chapter. AA. "Processing" means a cultivation site that conducts only trimming, drying, curing, grading, packaging, or labeling of Cannabis and non-manufactured Cannabis Products. AB. "Retailer" means a Person who Sells Cannabis or Cannabis Products at their place of business or by delivery to an end user or customer for use or consumption rather than to another Person or business for resale. AC. "Sale" or "Sell" means and includes any sale, exchange, or barter either as a retailer or wholesaler by a Person. "Sale" or "Sell" also means any transaction whereby, for any consideration, title to Cannabis or Cannabis Products are transferred from one Person to another and includes the delivery of Cannabis or Cannabis Products pursuant to an order placed for the purchase of the same, but does not include the return of Cannabis or Cannabis Products to the Commercial Cannabis permittee from whom the Cannabis or Cannabis Product was purchased. AD. "State" means the State of California. AE. "State License" means a license issued pursuant to California Business and Professions Code section 26050, and all other applicable State laws, required for operating a Cannabis Business. AF. "Tax" means the Cannabis Business Tax levied under this Chapter. 4300-EN-05214 LA 233-075 AG. "Tax Administrator" means the Treasurer and Tax Collector of the County of Los Angeles or their designee(s). AH. "Testing Laboratory" means a Cannabis Business that: (i) offers or performs tests of Cannabis or Cannabis Products, (ii) Sells no products, excepting only testing supplies and materials, (iii) is accredited by an accrediting body that is independent from all other Persons involved in the Cannabis industry in the State, and (iv) is registered with the Department of Cannabis Control or other State agency. 4.71.050 No Effect on Other Taxes, Fees or Charges, or Other Permits or Licenses. A. The Cannabis Business Tax is additional to all other taxes. This Chapter shall not be deemed to repeal, amend, be in lieu of, replace or in any way affect any Tax, fee or other charge imposed, assessed or required by, under or by virtue of any other Title or Chapter of this Code, any other ordinance or resolution of the County or any city within the County, or as required by law. B. Nothing contained in this Chapter will be deemed to repeal, amend, be in lieu of, replace or in any way affect any requirements for any Commercial Cannabis Permit, or any other permit, license, or other certificate required by, under or by virtue of any provision of any other Title or Chapter of this Code, any other ordinance or resolution of the County or any city within the County, or as required by law. C. A Commercial Cannabis Permit issued by the County may be revoked, suspended, or not renewed in the event that the Person holding that permit has failed to: 1. Register or renew such Tax registration with the Tax Administrator; or 2. Timely pay all taxes, interest, penalties, and fees owed under this Chapter. 4.71.060 Payment of Tax Does Not Authorize Unlawful Business. A. The payment of the Cannabis Business Tax required by this Chapter, and its acceptance by the County, does not entitle any Person to carry on any Cannabis Business unless the Person has complied with all of the requirements of this Code and all other applicable State and local laws. B. No Tax paid under the provisions of this Chapter will be construed as authorizing the conduct or continuance of any illegal or unlawful Business, or any Business in violation of any local or State law. 4.71.070 Tax Imposed. A. Beginning July 1, 2023, there will be a Cannabis Business Tax imposed upon each Person who is engaged in Business as a Cannabis Business in the unincorporated areas of the County. Such Tax is payable regardless of whether the Person has been issued a Commercial Cannabis Permit to operate lawfully in the unincorporated areas of the County or is operating unlawfully. The County's acceptance of a Tax payment from a Cannabis Business operating illegally does not constitute the County's approval or consent to such illegal operations. B. The rate of the Tax will be as follows: 1. Every Person engaged in retail Sales of Cannabis and Cannabis Products, including as a retailer, dispensary, non- storefront retailer, retail delivery, or microbusiness, as defined in Government Code section 14837, must pay a Tax at the rates specified below: a. Beginning July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2026, the Tax rate on retail Sales of Cannabis and Cannabis Products will be four percent (4%) of Gross Receipts. After June 30, 2026, the Tax rate will remain at four percent (4%) of Gross Receipts, unless the Board of Supervisors adjusts the rate. b. Beginning July 1, 2026, the Tax rate of the Cannabis Business Tax on retail Sales of Cannabis and Cannabis Products may be adjusted by resolution of the Board of Supervisors to a rate less than or equal to the maximum rate, which is six percent (6%) of Gross Receipts. 2. Every Person engaged in Manufacturing or Processing of Cannabis and Cannabis Products must pay a Tax at the rates specified below: a. Beginning July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2026, the Tax rate on Manufacturing or Processing of Cannabis and Cannabis Products will be three percent (3%) of Gross Receipts. After June 30, 2026, the Tax rate will remain at three percent (3%) of Gross Receipts, unless the Board of Supervisors adjusts the rate. b . Beginning July 1, 2026, the Tax rate of the Cannabis Business Tax on Manufacturing or Processing of Cannabis and Cannabis Products may be adjusted by resolution of the Board of Supervisors to a rate less than or equal to the maximum rate, which is four percent (4%) of Gross Receipts. 3. Every Person engaged in Distribution of Cannabis and Cannabis Products must pay a Tax at the rate specified below: a. Beginning July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2026, the Tax rate on Distribution of Cannabis and Cannabis Products will be three percent (3%) of Gross Receipts. After June 30, 2026, the Tax rate will remain at three percent (3%) of Gross Receipts, unless the Board of Supervisors adjusts the rate. b. Beginning July 1, 2026, the Tax rate of the Cannabis Business Tax on Distribution of Cannabis and Cannabis Products may be adjusted by resolution of the Board of Supervisors to a rate less than or equal to the maximum rate, which is three percent (3%) of Gross Receipts. 4. Every Person engaged in operating a Testing Laboratory for Cannabis and Cannabis Products must pay a Tax at the rates specified below: a. Beginning July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2026, the Tax rate on operating a Testing Laboratory for Cannabis and Cannabis Products will be one percent (1%) of Gross Receipts. After June 30, 2026, the Tax rate will remain at one percent (1%) of Gross Receipts, unless the Board of Supervisors adjusts the rate. 4300-EN-05215 LA 233-076 b. Beginning July 1, 2026, the Tax rate of the Cannabis Business Tax on operating a Testing Laboratory for Cannabis and Cannabis Products may be adjusted by resolution of the Board of Supervisors to a rate less than or equal to the maximum rate, which is two percent (2%) of Gross Receipts. 5. Every Person engaged in Commercial Cannabis Cultivation must pay a Tax at the annual rates specified below: a. Beginning July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2026, the Tax rate for Commercial Cannabis Cultivation will be: i. Seven dollars ($7) per square foot of Canopy space in a facility that uses exclusively artificial Lighting. ii. Four dollars ($4) per square foot of Canopy space in a facility that uses a combination of natural and artificial Lighting. iii. Four dollars ($4) per square foot of Canopy space in a facility that uses no artificial Lighting. iv. Two dollars ($2) per square foot of Canopy space for any Nursery. b. After June 30, 2026, the Tax rates for Commercial Cannabis Cultivation will remain as specified in Section 4.71.070(B)(5)(a), unless the Board of Supervisors adjusts the rates. c. Beginning July 1, 2026, the Tax rates of the Cannabis Business Tax on Commercial Cannabis Cultivation may be adjusted by resolution of the Board of Supervisors to rates less than or equal to the maximum annual rates, which are: i. Ten dollars ($10) per square foot of Canopy space in a facility that uses exclusively artificial Lighting. ii. Seven dollars ($7) per square foot of Canopy space in a facility that uses a combination of natural and artificial Lighting. iii. Four dollars ($4) per square foot of Canopy space in a facility that uses no artificial Lighting. iv. Two dollars ($2) per square foot of Canopy space for any Nursery. d. Beginning July 1, 2027 and on each July 1 thereafter, the maximum annual Tax rates for Commercial Cannabis Cultivation specified in Section 4.71.070(B)(5)(c) will increase annually for inflation based on the average Consumer Price Index ("CPI") for the Los Angeles County area for the preceding year as published by the United States Government Bureau of Labor Statistics. However, no CPI adjustment resulting in a decrease of any Tax imposed may be made. e. For purposes of determining the Tax imposed under this Section, the square footage of Canopy space is the maximum square footage of Canopy space allowed by the Commercial Cannabis Permit authorizing the Commercial Cannabis Cultivation. If a Person engaged in Commercial Cannabis Cultivation does not have a Commercial Cannabis Permit issued by the County, then the square footage of Canopy space is determined by the Tax Administrator. 6. Every Person engaged in any type of Cannabis Business not described in Sections 4.71.070(B)(1) through 4.71.070(B) (5) must pay a Tax at the rates specified below: a. Beginning July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2026, the Tax rate on any type of Cannabis Business not described in Sections 4.71.070(B)(1) through 4.71.070(B)(5) will be four percent (4%) of Gross Receipts. After June 30, 2026, the Tax rate will remain at four percent (4%) of Gross Receipts, unless the Board of Supervisors adjusts the rate. b. Beginning July 1, 2026, the Tax rate of the Cannabis Business Tax on any type of Cannabis Business not described in Sections 4.71.070(B)(1) through 4.71.070(B)(5) may be adjusted by resolution of the Board of Supervisors to a rate less than or equal to the maximum rate, which is four percent (4%) of Gross Receipts. 4.71.080 Tax Registration. Any Person who engages in Business as a Cannabis Business, whether an existing, newly established, or acquired Business, must register with the Tax Administrator within thirty (30) Days of commencing operation or within thirty (30) Days after the effective date of the ordinance codified in this Chapter, and must annually renew such tax registration within thirty (30) Days of the Cannabis Business Tax registration anniversary date of each year thereafter. Registration requires each Person to furnish to the Tax Administrator affirmation under penalty of perjury, on a form or electronic submission determined by the Tax Administrator that may set forth the following information: A. General Information. 1. The name of the Business, the street address where such Business is to be carried on, and a telephone number and email address for the Business; 2. The registrant's name, address, telephone number and email address; 3. A description of the exact nature or kind of Business; 4. If a Business is conducted at a specific location, information for the property owner or lessor of record, including but not limited to, the name, address, telephone number, and email address of the property owner or lessor of record; and 5. Any additional information that the Tax Administrator may require. B. Business Entity Information. 1. The registrant must provide the name, address, telephone number, and email address of each owner of the Business. If applicable, the registrant must also provide the following information: a. Proof of the Business' active status and the entity number assigned by the California Secretary of State; b. An email address, telephone number, address of corporate headquarters, and website address for the Business; c. For a partnership, the name, address, telephone number, website address and email address of each partner of the Business. If one or more of the partners is a corporation, the provisions of this Chapter as to a corporate registrant apply; d. For a corporation, the name that appears in the articles of incorporation as filed with the California Secretary of State; the name, address, telephone number, website address, and email address of each officer; the name, address, telephone number, and email address of each shareholder owning shares equal to 4300-EN-05216 LA 233-077 or greater than ten percent (10%) of the total shares issued by the corporation; and the name and address of an officer duly authorized to accept legal service of process; e. For a limited liability company, the name, address, telephone number, and email address of each member and every Person having any right, title, or interest in the premises. If applicable, the name of each managing member, or the name, address, telephone number, website address, and email address of the manager if the limited liability company is not managed by any of its members; f. For an estate, trust, or business trust, the name, address, telephone number, website address, and email address of the trustee(s); or g. For any Business organizational structure not referenced in Subsections c through f above, the Tax Administrator may require additional ownership information as needed. 2. If the Business is advertised to the public and known by a name or designation other than the name on the Tax registration, the registrant must provide the other name(s) or designation(s) for the Business, also referred to as a "Fictitious Business Name Statement." C. The Business must notify the Tax Administrator in writing or by an electronic submission method determined by the Tax Administrator within thirty (30) Days of any changed information provided in a Tax registration. Following review of the notice of change, the Tax Administrator will determine whether a new Tax registration is required and will notify the Business. Failure to provide the required notice of change constitutes a violation of this Chapter. D. In the event there is a change in ownership of any Cannabis Business: 1. The new owner is required to submit an updated Tax registration to the Tax Administrator with thirty (30) Days; and 2. Unless otherwise provided by law, it is the joint and several liability of both the seller and buyer to remit any taxes, interest, penalties, and fees due up until the date of Sale; otherwise, a certificate of lien may be recorded against both the seller and/or buyer in an amount determined by the Tax Administrator. 4.71.090 Payment and Tax Statement Required Monthly. The Tax imposed by this Chapter will be due and payable as follows: A. On or before the last day of each calendar month, every Person owing a Tax under this Chapter must provide a tax statement to the Tax Administrator of the amount of Tax owed for the preceding calendar month. Payment for the full amount of Tax owed for the preceding calendar month must be remitted to the Tax Administrator with the tax statement each calendar month. B. All tax statements must be completed on forms or a website determined by the Tax Administrator. C. Tax statements and payments for all outstanding taxes owed to the County are immediately due to the Tax Administrator upon cessation of a Cannabis Business for any reason. D. The Tax Administrator may, at their discretion, establish alternative reporting and payment periods for any taxpayer as the Tax Administrator deems necessary to ensure effective collection of the Cannabis Business Tax. The Tax Administrator may require that a taxpayer make payments via a cashier's check, money order, wire transfer, or similar instrument. 4.71.100 Payments and Communications Made by Mail— Proof of Timely Submittal. Whenever any payment, statement, report, request, or other communication received by the Tax Administrator is received after the time prescribed by this Chapter for the receipt thereof, but is in an envelope bearing a postmark showing that it was mailed on or prior to the date prescribed in this Chapter for the receipt thereof, or whenever the Tax Administrator is furnished substantial proof, as determined by the Tax Administrator, that the payment, statement, report, request, or other communication was in fact deposited in the United States mail on or prior to the date prescribed for receipt thereof, the Tax Administrator may regard such payment, statement, report, request, or other communication as having been timely received. If the due date is a Saturday, Sunday, or a County holiday, the due date will be the next regular business day. 4.71.110 Payment—When Taxes Deemed Delinquent. Unless otherwise specifically provided under other provisions of this Chapter, any Tax, interest, or penalty due under the provisions of this Chapter must be deemed delinquent if not paid on or before the due date specified in Section 4.71.090. 4.71.120 Notice Not Required by County. The Tax Administrator is not required to send a delinquency or other notice or bill to any Person subject to the provisions of this Chapter and failure to send such notice or bill will not affect the validity of any Tax, interest, or penalty due under the provisions of this Chapter. 4.71.130 Payment—Penalties and Interest for Delinquency. A. Any Person who fails to pay any Tax required to be paid pursuant to this Chapter on or before the due date must pay penalties and interest as follows: 1. A penalty equal to ten percent (10%) of the unpaid Tax. 2. An additional penalty equal to ten percent (10%) of the unpaid Tax if the Tax remains unpaid for a period exceeding one (1) calendar month beyond the due date. 3. Interest at the rate of one and one-half percent (1.5%) per month on the amount of the unpaid Tax. Interest will be applied at the monthly rate from the date on which the remittance first became delinquent and will continue to accrue monthly on the Tax, exclusive of penalties, until the balance is paid in full. 4. Whenever a check, whether paper or electronic, is submitted to the Tax Administrator as payment of the Tax and the check is subsequently returned unpaid by the bank upon which the check is drawn, the taxpayer is responsible for the Tax amount due plus the returned check fee, penalties, interest as provided for in this Section, and any amount allowed under State law. 4.71.140 Cancellation of Penalties and Interest. 4300-EN-05217 LA 233-078 The Tax Administrator may cancel the penalties and interest imposed upon any Person pursuant to Section 4.71.130 if the Person provides evidence satisfactory to the Tax Administrator that the delinquency was due to circumstances beyond the control of the Person and occurred notwithstanding the exercise of ordinary care and the absence of willful neglect, and the Person paid the delinquent Tax owed the County, prior to applying to the Tax Administrator for a cancellation. 4.71.150 Refunds—Procedures. A. Whenever the amount of any Tax, penalty, or interest has been overpaid, paid more than once, or has been erroneously collected or received by the County under this Chapter, it may be refunded to the claimant who paid the Tax, provided that a written or electronic submission claim for Tax refund is signed under penalty of perjury and filed with the Tax Administrator within three (3) years of the date the Tax was originally due and payable. B. The Tax Administrator or the Tax Administrator's authorized agent has the right to examine and audit all the books and business records of the claimant and any other information deemed necessary by the Tax Administrator in order to determine the eligibility of the claimant to the claimed refund. A claim for refund may not be granted if the claimant refuses to allow such examination of claimant's books, business records, and other information after a request by the Tax Administrator. C. In the event that the Tax was erroneously paid and it is determined by the Tax Administrator to be an error on its part, the entire amount of the Tax erroneously paid will be refunded to the claimant. D. No refund will be made of any Tax collected pursuant to this Chapter, except as provided in Section 4.71.160. E. No refund of any Tax collected pursuant to this Chapter will be made because of the discontinuation, dissolution, or other termination of a Business. 4.71.160 Refunds—Credits. Any Person entitled to a refund of Taxes paid pursuant to this Chapter may elect in writing to have such refund applied as a credit against such Person’s subsequent Taxes. 4.71.170 Exemption—Personal Cultivation and Use. The provisions of this Chapter do not apply to personal Cannabis cultivation or personal use of Cannabis, to the extent those activities are authorized in the "Medicinal and Adult Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act," as may be amended. This Chapter does not apply to personal use of Cannabis that is specifically exempted from State licensing requirements, that meets the definition of personal use or equivalent terminology under State law, and provided that the individual receives no compensation whatsoever related to that personal cultivation or use. 4.71.180 Rules and Regulations. A. The Tax Administrator has the power and duty to enforce each and all of the provisions of this Chapter. B. The Tax Administrator may adopt administrative rules and regulations consistent with provisions of this Chapter for the purpose of interpreting, clarifying, carrying out, and enforcing the payment, collection, and remittance of the Tax imposed by this Chapter, as well as developing rules and procedures for appeals and selecting the appropriate administrative hearing process that provides a fair and impartial hearing. A copy of such administrative rules and regulations may be on file in the Tax Administrator's office. To the extent the Tax Administrator determines that the Tax imposed under this Chapter may not be collected in full for any period of time from any particular Business, such determination is an exercise of the Tax Administrator's discretion to settle disputes and must not constitute a change in taxing methodology, nor is such determination a waiver of the County's ability to impose the Tax in full. C. Upon a proper showing of good cause, the Tax Administrator may make administrative agreements, with appropriate conditions, to vary from the strict requirements of this Chapter and thereby (1) conform to the billing procedures of a particular Cannabis Business so long as said agreements result in the collection of the Tax in conformance with the general purpose and scope of this Chapter; or (2) to avoid a hardship where the administrative costs of collection and remittance greatly outweigh the Tax benefit. A copy of each such agreement must be on file in the Tax Administrator's office and is voidable by the Tax Administrator at any time. D. Upon receipt of a written or electronic submission request of a Cannabis Business, and for good cause, the Tax Administrator may extend the time for filing any Tax statement required pursuant Section 4.71.090 for a period of not to exceed forty-five (45) Days, provided that the time for filing the required Tax statement has not already passed when the request is received. No penalty for delinquent payment will accrue by reason of such extension. Interest will accrue during said extension at the rate of one and one-half percent (1.5%) per month, prorated for any portion thereof. 4.71.190 Enforcement—Duties of Tax Administrator and Sheriff. It is the duty of the Tax Administrator to enforce each and every provision of this Chapter, and the Sheriff must render such assistance in the enforcement of this Chapter as may from time to time be required by the Tax Administrator. The Tax Administrator may also request assistance from other County departments, or from local, State, or federal authorities, for the civil or criminal enforcement of the Chapter. 4.71.200 Constitutionality and Legality. The terms of this Chapter must not be deemed or construed to apply to any Person when imposition of the Tax upon that Person would violate the Constitution of the United States or that of the State of California or preemptive State or federal law. The Tax provided for by this Chapter must not be applied so as to cause an undue burden upon interstate commerce or be violative of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Constitutions of the United States or the State of California. If a Person believes that the Tax, as applied to them, is impermissible under applicable law, that Person may request that the Tax Administrator release them from the obligation to pay the impermissible portion of the Tax. 4.71.210 Apportionment. A. If a Person subject to the Tax is operating both within the unincorporated areas of the County and outside the unincorporated areas of the County, it is the intent of the 4300-EN-05218 LA 233-079 County to apply the Cannabis Business Tax so that the measure of the Tax fairly reflects the proportion of the taxed activity carried on in the unincorporated areas of the County. B. To the extent a Person subject to the Tax seeks an apportionment that Person may apply to the Tax Administrator for an adjustment of the Tax. It is that Person's burden to provide the Tax Administrator a written or electronic request under penalty of perjury for an adjustment within one (1) year after the date of payment of the Tax. If that Person does not request an adjustment in writing or by an electronic submission, within one (1) year from the date of payment, then that Person must be conclusively deemed to have waived any adjustment for that Tax year and all prior Tax years. C. The Person seeking the adjustment must, by sworn statement and supporting testimony, show the method and volume of Business, the Gross Receipts, and such other information as the Tax Administrator may deem necessary. The Tax Administrator may conduct an investigation, and may adjust the Tax for that Person to an amount that is reasonable and nondiscriminatory, or if the Tax has already been paid, may order a refund of the amount over and above the Tax adjustment. The Tax Administrator has the authority to base the Tax on a percentage of Gross Receipts or any other measure which will assure that the Tax assessed is uniform with Businesses of like nature, so long as the amount assessed does not exceed the Tax as prescribed by this Chapter. D. The Tax Administrator may promulgate administrative procedures for apportionment as deemed useful or necessary. 4.71.220 Audit and Examination of Premises and Records. A. For purpose of ascertaining the amount of Cannabis Business Tax owed or verifying the representations made by any Person engaged in a Cannabis Business in support of their tax calculation, the Tax Administrator or the Tax Administrator's authorized agent has the power to inspect any location where Cannabis Business occurs. The Tax Administrator or the Tax Administrator's authorized agent has the authority to audit and examine, or cause to be audited and examined, all books and records of Persons engaged in a Cannabis Business including both State and federal income tax returns, to the extent not preempted by State and federal privacy laws, California sales tax returns, other evidence documenting the Gross Receipts, all equipment of any Person engaged in Cannabis Business in the unincorporated areas of the County, and such other information the Tax Administrator deems necessary for the purpose of ascertaining the amount of Tax, if any, required to be paid by the provisions of this Chapter, and for the purpose of verifying any statements or any item thereof when filed by any Person pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter. If such Person, after written demand by the Tax Administrator, refuses to make available for audit, examination or verification such books, records, equipment, or other information as the Tax Administrator requests, the Tax Administrator may, after full consideration of all information within their knowledge concerning the Cannabis Business and activities of the Person so refusing, make an assessment in the manner provided in Sections 4.71.230 through 4.71.250 of any Taxes, penalties, and interest estimated to be due. B. It is the duty of every Person liable for the collection and payment to the County of any Tax imposed by this Chapter to keep and preserve, for a period of at least four (4) years, all records as may be necessary to determine the amount of such Tax as they may have been liable for the collection of and payment to the County, of which records the Tax Administrator has the authority to inspect. 4.71.230 Tax Deemed Debt to County—Lien Procedure. A. The amount of any Tax, penalties, and interest imposed by the provisions of this Chapter on any Person engaged in any Business will be deemed a debt to the County. The Tax Administrator, in the name of the County, may bring suit for the recovery of any Tax, penalties, interest, and fees due to the County pursuant to this Chapter. B. In addition to any other method of collection authorized by law, the County may collect the Tax imposed pursuant to this Chapter by way of a lien in the same manner as other liens as prescribed in sections 2191.3 through 2191.6 of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. 4.71.240 Deficiency Determinations. If the Tax Administrator is not satisfied that a Tax statement as required under Section 4.71.090 is correct, or that the Tax payment remitted to the Tax Administrator is correctly computed, the Tax Administrator may compute and determine the amount to be paid and make a deficiency determination upon the basis of the facts contained in the Tax statement or upon the basis of any information in their possession or that may come into their possession within three (3) years of the date the Tax was originally due and payable. One or more deficiency determinations of the amount of Tax due for a period or periods may be made. When a Person discontinues, dissolves, or terminates a Business, a deficiency determination may be made by the Tax Administrator at any time within three (3) years thereafter as to any Tax liability of such Business whether or not a deficiency determination is issued prior to the date the Tax would otherwise be due. Notice of a deficiency determination by the Tax Administrator will be given to the Person in the same manner as notices of assessment are given under Section 4.71.260. 4.71.250 Tax Assessment—Authorized When— Nonpayment—Fraud. A. At any time under one or more of the following circumstances, the Tax Administrator may make and give notice to a Person of a Tax assessment amount due under this Chapter: 1. If the Person has not filed any Tax statement required under the provisions of this Chapter including Section 4.71.090; 2. If the Person has not paid any Tax due under the provisions of this Chapter; or 3. If the Person has not, after demand by the Tax Administrator, filed a corrected Tax statement, or furnished to the Tax Administrator adequate substantiation of the information contained in a Tax statement already filed, or paid any additional amount of Tax due under the provisions of this Chapter. B. If the Tax Administrator determines that the nonpayment of any Tax due under this Chapter is due to fraud, a penalty of twenty-five percent (25%) of the Tax amount due may be added to the assessment, in addition to penalties and interest otherwise stated in this Chapter. 4300-EN-05219 LA 233-080 C. The notice of assessment must separately set forth the amount of any Tax known by the Tax Administrator to be due or estimated to be due under this Chapter, after consideration of all information within the Tax Administrator's knowledge concerning the assessment, and must include the amount of any penalties and interest accrued on each amount due or estimated to be due under this Chapter. 4.71.260 Tax Assessment—Notice Requirements. The notice of assessment may be served upon the Person either by serving such notice personally, or by a deposit of the notice in the United States mail addressed to the Person, the Business address, or to such other address as they may file with the Tax Administrator for the purpose of receiving notices provided under this Chapter; or, should the Person have no current address registered with the Tax Administrator for such purpose, then to such Person’s last known address. For the purposes of this Section, service by mail is complete on the date of deposit in the United States mail. 4.71.270 Tax Assessment—Hearing—Application— Determination—Appeal. A. The Tax Administrator will advise in the notice of assessment that a Person or Business may appeal a Tax assessment. An appeal may be requested by a notice of appeal in writing, by an electronic submission, or other method established by the Tax Administrator, for an appeal hearing on the Tax assessment. A notice of appeal must be received by the Tax Administrator within thirty (30) Days following the date of service of the notice of assessment. B. A notice of appeal must state all bases for an appeal, including a detailed statement of defense to the Tax assessment, any supporting evidence, and the appellant's signature under penalty of perjury. C. If a timely notice of appeal is not received by the Tax Administrator within thirty (30) Days from the date of service of the notice of assessment, the Tax assessment by the Tax Administrator will be a final decision of the County, and any Tax, penalties, and interest imposed will be due. D. Within thirty (30) Days of receipt of a timely and complete notice of appeal a Hearing Officer will be appointed, and once appointed the Tax Administrator will forward the notice of appeal and all relevant Tax documents to the Hearing Officer. E. Within thirty (30) Days of receipt of an appellant's notice of appeal, the Hearing Officer may schedule the matter for hearing. The Hearing Officer must send notice of the hearing to the appellant, Tax Administrator, and any applicable County department fifteen (15) Days prior to the hearing by registered or certified mail, or by email if requested by the appellant on the notice of appeal. F. The Hearing Officer notice will be entitled, "Hearing Officer Notice of Cannabis Business Tax Appeal Hearing" and must include, at a minimum: the name and address of the Person or Business assessed by the Tax Administrator; the date, time and place of the hearing; and the following statement: "Any interested individual may at any time prior to the date above named, file with the Hearing Officer written testimony and/or documentary evidence, and may appear at the time and place of the hearing to offer their testimony." G. The Hearing Officer may consider all competent evidence if such evidence is relevant to the Tax assessment being appealed. The Hearing Officer may at their option hear and consider additional argument and points and authorities of law. At such hearing an appellant may appear, which may include a remote appearance at the discretion of the Hearing Officer, and offer oral evidence under oath to explain why the assessment by the Tax Administrator should not be confirmed and fixed as the Tax, penalties, and interest due. The burden of proof rests with the appellant to show why an amount assessed by the Tax Administrator is not due. H. Applicable rules of evidence may be applied by the Hearing Officer to the same extent that they are now or hereafter recognized in civil actions; such as witness testimony may be subject to cross-examination, privileged information or privileged documents may be protected from disclosure, and irrelevant and unduly repetitious evidence may be excluded. I. At any time prior to a final decision by the Hearing Officer, a notice of assessment may be amended or supplemented by the Tax Administrator. Notice must be given by the Tax Administrator of all amended Tax assessments in the manner prescribed in Section 4.71.260 for giving notice of assessment, and the notice must disclose how to file an appeal or amend a notice of appeal previously filed. J. The Hearing Officer will issue a notice of order containing the final decision of the County on the appeal, and send such notice to the appellant, Tax Administrator, and any applicable County department in the manner prescribed in Section 4.71.260 for giving notice of assessment. The notice of order from the Hearing Officer must contain the amount of Tax, interest, and penalties, if any, due to the County by the appellant. This order will be final and conclusive. Any amount due is immediately payable upon the service of the said notice of order. 4.71.280 Violation Deemed Misdemeanor–Civil Penalty– Administrative Fine. A. Misdemeanor. Any Person violating any of the provisions of this Chapter may be guilty of a misdemeanor in Superior Court, and upon conviction thereof may be punished by a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500), imprisonment for a period of not more than six (6) months, or by both fine and imprisonment. B. Civil Penalty. The Tax Administrator in the name of the County may bring a civil action to seek imposition of civil penalties of up to one thousand dollars ($1,000) per violation, including the recovery of any Tax, interest, or penalty due to the County pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter, and any other appropriate legal or equitable relief in any court of competent jurisdiction for violations of this Chapter. C. Administrative Fine. Any Person violating any of the provisions of this Chapter will be subject to an administrative fine, issued by the Tax Administrator pursuant to Chapter 1.25 of this Code, not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000) per violation. 4.71.290 Conviction or Civil Judgment for Chapter Violation—Taxes Not Waived. The conviction and punishment or civil judgment against any Person for failure to pay the required Tax will not excuse or exempt such Person from any civil action for the Tax, penalty, 4300-EN-05220 LA 233-081 and interest debt unpaid at the time of such conviction. No civil action will prevent a criminal prosecution for any violation of the provisions of this Chapter or of any State law requiring the payment of all taxes. 4.71.300 Severability. Should any provision of this Chapter, or its application to any Person or circumstance, be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unlawful, unenforceable, or otherwise void, that determination will not affect any other provision of this Chapter or the application of this Chapter to any other Person or circumstance and, to that end, the provisions hereof are severable. 4.71.310 Effect of State and Federal Reference/Authorization. A. Any reference to a State or federal statute in this Chapter means such statute as it may be amended from time to time; provided, that such reference to a statute herein may not include any amendment thereto, or to any change of interpretation thereto by a State or federal agency or court of law with the duty to interpret such law, to the extent that such amendment or change of interpretation would, under California law, require voter approval of such amendment or interpretation, or to the extent that such change would result in a Tax decrease. To the extent voter approval would otherwise be required or a Tax decrease would result, the prior version of the statute (or interpretation) will remain applicable; for any application or situation that would not require voter approval or result in a decrease of a Tax, provisions of the amended statute (or new interpretation) will be applicable to the maximum extent possible. B. To the extent that the County's authorization to collect or impose any Tax imposed under this Chapter is expanded as a result of changes in State or federal law, no amendment or modification of this Chapter may be required to conform the Tax to those changes, and the Tax must be imposed and collected to the full extent of the authorization up to the full amount of the Tax imposed under this Chapter. 4.71.320 Remedies Cumulative. All remedies and penalties prescribed by this Chapter or which are available under any other provision of law or equity, including but not limited to the California False Claims Act (California Government Code section 12650 et seq.) and the California Unfair Practices Act (California Business and Professions Code section 17070 et seq.), are cumulative. The use of one or more remedies by the County will not bar the use of any other remedy for the purpose of enforcing the provisions of this Chapter. 4.71.330 Amendment or Repeal. This Chapter of the Los Angeles County Code may be repealed or amended, by resolution or ordinance, by a majority vote of the members of the Board of Supervisors and without a vote of the people. However, pursuant to California Constitution, Article XIII C, voter approval is required for any amendment provision that would expand, extend, or increase the rate of any Tax levied pursuant to this Chapter. The people of the County of Los Angeles affirm that the following actions will not constitute an increase of the rate of a Tax: A. The restoration of the rate of the Tax to the maximum rate that is no higher than that set by this Chapter, if the Board of Supervisors has acted to reduce the rate of the Tax; B. An action that interprets or clarifies the methodology of the Tax, or any definition applicable to the Tax, so long as interpretation or clarification (even if contrary to some prior interpretation or clarification) is not inconsistent with the language of this Chapter; C. The establishment of a class of Person that is exempt or excepted from the Tax or the discontinuation of any such exemption or exception (other than the discontinuation of an exemption or exception specifically set forth in this Chapter); or D. The collection of the Tax imposed by this Chapter, even if the County had, for some period of time, failed to collect the Tax. 4.71.340 Execution. The Chair of the Board of Supervisors is authorized to attest to the adoption of this ordinance by the voters of the County at the Election. 4300-EN-05221 LA 233-082 IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF MEASURE C By Dawyn Harrison, Acting County Counsel Approval of Measure C ("Measure") would authorize the County of Los Angeles ("County") to impose a general tax on cannabis business activities within the unincorporated area of the County. This Measure was placed on the ballot by a resolution approved by a four-fifths (4/5) vote of the members of the County Board of Supervisors ("Board"). If approved by the voters, the County Code will be amended to authorize a tax on cannabis businesses engaged in activities defined in the ordinance such as cultivating, selling, processing, distributing, or testing cannabis or cannabis products in the unincorporated areas of the County. Personal cannabis cultivation or use would be exempt from this tax. From July 1, 2023 until June 30, 2026, the Measure authorizes initial tax rates of: • $7 per square foot of canopy space for cultivation using exclusively artificial lighting; • $4 per square foot of canopy space for cultivation using combination lighting; • $4 per square foot of canopy space for cultivation using no artificial lighting; • $2 per square foot of canopy space for cultivation in any nursery; • 4 percent of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses; • 3 percent of gross receipts for manufacturing and processing cannabis businesses; • 3 percent of gross receipts for distribution cannabis businesses; • 1 percent of gross receipts for testing laboratory cannabis businesses; and • 4 percent of gross receipts for any other type of cannabis business. Beginning July 1, 2026, until repealed by the voters, the Measure authorizes the Board to adjust the tax to a rate less than or equal to the maximum annual rates not to exceed: • $10 per square foot of canopy space for cultivation using exclusively artificial lighting; • $7 per square foot of canopy space for cultivation using combination lighting; • $4 per square foot of canopy space for cultivation using no artificial lighting; • $2 per square foot of canopy space for cultivation in any nursery; • 6 percent of gross receipts for retail cannabis businesses; • 4 percent of gross receipts for manufacturing and processing cannabis businesses; • 3 percent of gross receipts for distribution cannabis businesses; • 2 percent of gross receipts for testing laboratory cannabis businesses; and • 4 percent of gross receipts for any other type of cannabis business. Beginning in July 2027, the maximum annual tax rate for cultivation will be adjusted for inflation. The ordinance also establishes processes for registration, collection, enforcement, and tax appeals. Payment of the tax does not authorize illegal or unlawful cannabis business activities, nor does it entitle a person to engage in illegal or unlawful cannabis business activities in violation of any local or State law. If approved, revenue derived from the tax will be deposited into the County's general fund and may be used for any County governmental purpose. This measure requires a majority vote of the qualified voters in the County of Los Angeles who cast votes in the election. 4300-EN-05222 LA 233-083 ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE C Measure C will allow the County to impose a general business tax on cannabis businesses located in the unincorporated areas of Los Angeles County ("County"). Currently, the County is developing a cannabis business permitting process that is expected to launch in late 2023. The proposed initial tax rates in the measure are low compared to many other jurisdictions in order to better support the regulated cannabis market and incentivize consumers to buy legal, tested products, while generating revenue for County programs and services. Mindful of the dynamic nature of the cannabis market, Measure C allows the Board of Supervisors to either decrease or increase these tax rates up to the maximum rate provided by the measure after the first three years the initial rates are in effect. If approved, this measure is projected to generate approximately $10 million in annual revenue that will be deposited into the County's General Fund, with the potential to grow with a maturing market. Revenue may be used to fund a broad array of programs or services that can benefit all residents of the County. The needs and impact of the legal cannabis industry will continue to shift in the coming years, and the tax revenue can help support the County's development of a health and social equity-led cannabis program. The support includes workforce and economic development programs, reinvestment in communities disproportionately impacted by historical and current cannabis policies, enforcement and compliance programs to combat the proliferation of untested and unsafe cannabis, mitigation of adverse environmental impacts and more. Approval of Measure C is a critical step towards the full implementation of an equitable, legal, commercial cannabis market in Los Angeles County. RAFAEL CARBAJAL Director, Department of Consumer and Business Affairs OPHELIA CHONG Founder, Asian Americans for Cannabis Education JONATAN CVETKO Executive Director, United Cannabis Business Association CHERYL A. BRANCH Executive Director, Los Angeles Metropolitan Churches Founder, Green Believers Project LINDSAY ROBINSON Executive Director, California Cannabis Industry Association REBUTTAL TO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE C Do you feel that medicinal use cannabis should be exempt? Think again. Government greed knows no bounds. You've been tricked before. Measure M (2016), the forever metro transportation tax. Measure W (2018), the forever rain tax. Forever taxes are the new trend. Why continue to pretend that it needs your money for an unexpected short fall? It wants your money now. It wants your money later. Its glutinous appetite doesn't care whether you can afford it. it craves your money to feed itself to keep growing fatter and fatter every day. How many billions have you already paid to the homeless industrial complex? Do you see progress? Or do you see new permanent bureaucracies? That's what forever taxes fund -- forever bureaucracies. Let's face it, local governments are desperate. Bloated numbers of paper pushers, outrageously high salaries, 24 karat gold pensions and medical benefits, along with all the same increasing costs (all caused by government policy) for food, utilities, health care, and inflation are driving them to bankruptcy. The gloves have come off. Government doesn't want future voters to have a choice. And when it runs out of familiar things to tax, it invents new ways to tax. Universal law of taxes: Businesses don't pay taxes, people (like you) do in the increased prices you pay for everything. The wealthy hire people to find loopholes to avoid taxes or simply relocate. Vote NO on Measure C ($758,500,000 forever increasing, forever tax) and every measure on your ballot. Join us: http://bit.ly/NoForeverCannabisTax HONOR "MIMI" ROBSON Libertarian Party of California Chair DANIEL WELBY Libertarian Party of Los Angeles County Chair DAVID BOWERS Chair, Region 65 of LPLAC MARK REYNOLDS Director of Operations - Digital Glue 4300-EN-05223 LA 233-084 ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE C Whether you personally agree with the sale of recreational marijuana or not, Los Angeles County allows it. Why? Because, over and above the regular sales tax, the county can gouge these local, small businesses by forcing them to pay additional taxes. If you see this on your ballot, it's because you live outside of a city boundary. These taxes are the precise reason that the black market for marijuana is estimated to be twice the legal market. Do you really think the buyers will be gouged with these taxes? Would you overpay when a cheaper alternative is available? Some say, "I don't use it, so I don't pay the tax." True. It's just like the hotel tax. Someone else paying is one of the main arguments. You heard about the failed district attorney recall? Don't count on the registrar of voters to be on the side of the people, even if they can raise enough money and spend enough time and energy to get a petition to repeal this monstrosity. The county bureaucracy will fight them every step of the way and write a ballot label that favors its defeat. Remember Measure W? The Rain Tax? That's a FOREVER TAX too. You will never end the $300,000,000 a year that the county steals from you. The county will get its pound of flesh. By making it forever, the corrupt supervisors are saying that they own you. They know better than the voters. Don't fall for it. This tax is PERMANENT. It's FOREVER. It INCREASES every year FOREVER. On that basis alone, you should vote against it. There's no other way to put it. Vote NO, as many times as the county registrar allows. Join us: http://bit.ly/NoForeverCannabisTax HONOR "MIMI" ROBSON Libertarian Party of California Chair DANIEL WELBY Libertarian Party of Los Angeles County Chair 4300-EN-05224 LA 233-085 The page would have been blank due to printing layouts. The Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk has used this page to provide additional information. Election Information You may obtain information about specific election services by calling toll free and selecting the option number shown for the service requested. (800) 815-2666 Option 1 Vote Center information Option 2 Voter registration Request a Sample Ballot Request a Replacement Vote by Mail ballot Option 3 Multilingual services Sample Ballot translations Option 4 Election Information Option 5 Voter fraud/report illegal activity Option 7 To become an Election Worker Campaign Financial Disclosure: (562) 462-2339 Campaign financial statement filing requirements for candidates, committees and office holders. TDD (Hearing Impaired): (562) 462-2259 FP-OPT1-EN LA 233-086 The page would have been blank due to printing layouts. The Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk has used this page to provide additional information. FP-OPT2-EN LA 233-087 The page would have been blank due to printing layouts. The Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk has used this page to provide additional information. Online Services Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk has Chatbot Ron to assist you. • Check your information • Purchase vital records • Assistance with voter registration LAVOTE.GOV Hi, my name is Ron. How can I help you? Quick Links: • Register to Vote • Voter Registration Status • Vote by Mail Status • Ballot Drop Box Locations • Locate a Vote Center • View and Mark Your Interactive Sample Ballot • Election Results • Apply to be an Election Worker • Campaign Finance Information • Voting Solutions for All People (VSAP) Fast, Easy & Convenient! For all LAVOTE.GOV inquiries, use Chatbot Ron. Follow us online LAVOTE.GOV @lacountyrrcc FP-OPT3-EN LA 233-088 VOTE BY MAIL REGISTRAR-RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK PO BOX 30450 LOS ANGELES CA 90030-9908 NO POSTAGE NECESSARY IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES BUSINESS REPLY MAIL FIRST-CLASS MAIL LOS ANGELES CAPERMIT NO. 31128 POSTAGE WILL BE PAID BY ADDRESSEE Artwork for User Defined (4" x 6") Layout: 4 x 6 BRM.LYT July 13, 2021 Produced by DAZzle 2012, Version 12.2.02 (c) 1993-2012, DYMO Endicia, www.Endicia.com Unknown, Serial # IMPORTANT: DO NOT ENLARGE, REDUCE OR MOVE the FIM and barcodes. They are only valid as printed! Special care must be taken to ensure FIM and barcode are actual size AND placed properly on the mail piece to meet both USPS regulations and automation compatibility standards. 00,708,900001394,000000,900309908 Quick Check-in at a Vote Center Detach DetachQuick Check-in Code on the back cover! Quick Tips to Speed Up In-Person Voting • Use the Interactive Sample Ballot. Easily access and fill out your Sample Ballot online with your phone or computer and take your Poll Pass (QR Code) with you to the Vote Center. Access your Interactive Sample Ballot at LAVOTE.GOV/ISB • Take the Quick Check-in Code on your Sample Ballot to any Vote Center. This allows the Election Workers to quickly find and print your official ballot. You can also access your Quick Check-in Code at LAVOTE.GOV To receive election materials in a language other than English, mark your preference below and drop this card in the mail. Visit LAVOTE.GOV for the full list of Vote Center locations and voting resources DetachDetach Take your Quick Check-In Code with you to any participating Vote Center in L.A. County NONPROFIT ORG. U.S. POSTAGE PAID COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES REGISTRAR RECORDER COUNTY CLERK County of Los Angeles Registrar Recorder County Clerk P.O. Box 30450 Los Angeles, CA 90030-0450 ELECTRONIC SERVICE REQUESTED Please send me a ballot in the language I have checked below: A separate Vote Center postcard listing the closest Vote Centers to your home will be mailed to you October 29th – November 7th: 10 AM – 7 PM Election Day, November 8th: 7 AM – 8 PM VOTE CENTERS OPEN:233