SR 02-28-2023 5C
City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: February 28, 2023
Agenda Item: 5.C
1 of 7
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Rick Valte, Public Works Director, Public Works, Architecture Services
Subject: Award Bid SP2486 to Swinerton Builders for the 3200 Airport Ave Renovation
Project
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Award Bid #SP2486 to Swinerton Builders for the construction of the 3200 Airport
Avenue building renovation for the Public Works Department;
2. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a contract with Swinerton
Builders, in an amount not to exceed $9,084,792 (including a $1,184,973
contingency);
3. Authorize the Director of Public Works to issue any necessary change orders to
complete additional work within contract authority.
4. Award Bid #SP2486 to Totum Corporation for construction management services
for the Public Works Department;
5. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with Totum
Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $653,793.
6. Adopt a finding of Categorical Exemption pursuant to Sections 15301 (Existing
Facilities) and 15302 (Replacement/Reconstruction), of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.
Summary
The Santa Monica Airport seeks to renovate the 3200 Airport Avenue building to comply
with current code regulations, address deferred maintenance issues, minimize ongoing
maintenance costs, and maximize the building’s revenue potential. The building is the
location of the original administration building at the Santa Monica Airport. It is a 16,966
sq. ft single-story wood frame building with a wooden truss gable roof. Renovation
would bring the structure into compliance with current building codes and achieve LEED
Gold certification while preserving the historic character of the building’s exterior
5.C
Packet Pg. 75
2 of 7
aesthetic. If approved, staff anticipates construction would commence as soon as spring
of 2023 and be completed in the spring of 2024. Staff recommends awarding the
construction services contract to Swinerton Builders to renovate and structurally retrofit
3200 Airport Avenue, and the construction management services contract to Totum
Corporation to maintain contractor oversight and ensure that the project design intent
and milestones are met.
Discussion
Built between 1940-1947, the building’s exterior features offer a demonstration of
historic character unique to the region. Over decades, the building has been subdivided
into multiple small and medium sized offices and leased to several commercial tenants.
The building was part of a Property Condition Assessment (Attachment A) that included
a Tier 1 Seismic analysis and a comprehensive building assessment. The analysis and
assessment identified numerous deficiencies of the building envelope, interior finishes,
and building systems resulting in water intrusion, deterioration of building materials, and
lack of thermal comfort within the building. Despite its current condition, the space
maintains a 4% vacancy rate. However, as maintenance requests become more and
more frequent, staff has determined that a renovation would not only minimize ongoing
maintenance costs but would also maximize the building’s revenue potential.
The proposed building improvements have led to lease negotiations with Clover
Restaurants, Inc. (Clover) for half of the building. Clover would lease approximately
8,500 square feet of building, outdoor patio, and parking space for restaurant use. The
negotiations include stipulations that require a stringent timeline for the completion of
the City’s renovations in order for the tenant to begin their tenant improvements. Any
delays in construction would both jeopardize securing a lease with the tenant and
increase the loss of revenue due to vacancies during construction and immediately
thereafter. Therefore, the project schedules requested within the Request for Bids
(RFB) and experience in completing similar projects on time were critical in the
evaluation and recommendation of award for this project.
5.C
Packet Pg. 76
3 of 7
The evaluation committee and interview panel consisted of Architecture Services staff,
Airport staff, and the design consultant for the 3200 Airport Avenue building renovation.
Swinerton Builders was recognized in the evaluation and interview process for their in-
depth understanding of the project, their experience in completing similar projects within
similar timelines, and their comprehensive and thoughtful project schedule.
The lowest bidder submitted a very generalized schedule that did not present sufficient
information and detail to demonstrate a satisfactory understanding of the scope of work
activities and critical elements necessary to build the project as defined in the plans and
specifications provided. Staff also reviewed three projects the lowest bidder completed
for the City of Santa Monica with contract amounts of $3.9 million, $1 million, and
$406,000. The construction durations extended fourteen, twelve and eight months past
their original projected completion dates, respectively.
Prior to contemplating a recommendation, staff requested three qualified construction
management firms to review and critique the sample project schedules submitted by
each contractor. They indicated that Swinerton Builders’ schedule is substantially more
thought out and planned, while the lowest bidder’s schedule as submitted is insufficient
and unacceptable.
As previously mentioned, any delay to the renovation schedule jeopardizes the
execution of a multimillion-dollar lease agreement and would result in additional losses
ranging from $34,000 to $58,000 per month due to prolonged vacancies.
The final consideration that informed staff’s recommendation involves the contractors’
relationship and proposed agreement with their subcontractors. During their interview,
Swinerton demonstrated a long history of working with their subcontractors as well as
the ability to self-perform certain work should their subcontractor for some reason not be
able to perform. In addition, their proposed subcontractor agreement stipulates that
subcontractor failure to remain on schedule renders them liable for liquidated damages,
as well as all costs associated with accelerating the work in order to get back on
schedule. In contrast, the low bidder’s sample agreement assesses liquidated damages
5.C
Packet Pg. 77
4 of 7
against the subcontractor but remains silent on accelerating the work to meet the
original schedule. For these reasons, staff recommends awarding the agreement to
Swinerton Builders.
In addition to staff’s recommendation for construction services, staff requests Council
approval for construction management services. This would provide contractor oversight
to ensure project design intent and milestones are being met.
Vendor Selection
Bidder Recommendation (Contractor)
Best Bidder Swinerton Builders
Evaluation
Criteria
The ability, capacity and skill of the bidder to perform or provide
the services; the capacity of the bidder to perform the contract or
provide the service promptly, within the time specified, and without
delay or interference; the sufficiency of the bidder’s financial
resources; the character, integrity, reputation, judgment, training,
experience and efficiency of the bidder. The City shall have
absolute discretion in determining the applicability and weight of
the criteria listed above.
The City is not required to select the bid with the lowest price.
Municipal Code SMMC 2.24.180
RFQual Data
Date
Posted Posted On
Advertised In
(City Charter &
SMMC)
Vendors
Downloaded
Submittals
Received
Date
Publicly
Opened
04/25/22 City's Online
Bidding Site
Santa Monica
Daily Press 96 5 06/01/2022
Bid Data
Date Posted Posted On
Vendors
Downloaded
Date Publicly
Opened
09/29/2022 City's Online Bidding Site 3 11/23/2022
Submittals Received
West Valley Investment
Group, Inc. $6,771,500 Olympos Painting,
Inc. $12,141,000
Swinerton Builders $7,899,818 Engineer’s Estimate $7,222,535
5.C
Packet Pg. 78
5 of 7
Best Bidder Justification
The decision was made based on the experience and the quality of the firm’s proposed
team, their in-depth knowledge of the 3200 Airport Avenue project plans, their long-
standing relationships with subcontractors, and the results of their interview with the
City.
Bid Protest
On January 23, 2023, West Valley Investment Group, Inc. submitted a bid protest
alleging that West Valley was the lowest responsive and best bidder. Although
responsive, staff does not believe they are the best bidder. It is critical for the 3200
Airport Avenue Renovation Project to be completed expeditiously to mitigate a potential
loss of a $5.3 million lease revenue due to project delays. The second lowest bidder can
meet the City’s aggressive schedule and more than justify the difference in cost by
minimizing vacancy losses and ensuring the negotiated $5.3 million lease is executed.
In accordance with the appeals procedure set forth in the Notice Inviting Bids, the Public
Works Director evaluated the bid protest and issued a final determination
recommending Swinerton Builders as the best bidder. A copy of the bid protest and the
Public Works Director’s Bid Protest Determination letter are available in Attachments B
and C, respectively. In addition, the proposed lease agreement for 3200 Airport Avenue
is included in tonight’s agenda for Council consideration.
Bidder Recommendation (Construction Manager)
Best Bidder Totum Corporation
Evaluation Criteria
Price; the quality of the services offered; the ability, capacity
and skill of the bidder to perform or provide the materials or
services; the capacity of the bidder to perform the contract or
provide the service promptly, within the time specified, and
without delay or interference; the character, integrity,
reputation, judgment, training, experience and efficiency of
the bidder. The City shall have absolute discretion in
determining the applicability and weight of the criteria listed
above.
The City is not required to select the bid with the lowest price.
Municipal Code SMMC 2.24.180
5.C
Packet Pg. 79
6 of 7
Bid Data
Date Posted Posted On
Advertise In
(City Charter & SMMC)
Vendors
Downloaded
Date Publicly
Opened
12/09/2022 City's Online
Bidding Site
Santa Monica Daily
Press
60 01/06/2023
Best Bidder Justification
Totum Corporation demonstrated competence, capacity, and the skill in providing
construction management services. While all firms who submitted provided
experience in managing projects similar to the 3200 Airport Ave Renovation, Totum
Corporation’s proposal included a construction manager and construction
administration staff into their cost for only 3% more than the lowest bidder. Combined
with the positive feedback from previous clients, Totum Corporation is, in staff’s
opinion, the best bidder.
Past Council Actions
Meeting Date Description
04/10/18 (Attachment A) Airport’s Property Condition Assessment of nine Airport
properties.
Environmental Review
The project is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15301 and Section
15302 of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 15301 exempts Class 1 (Existing Facilities)
projects from CEQA, which include the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting,
leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities,
mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion
of existing or former use. Section 15302 exempts Class 2 (Replacement or
Reconstruction) projects which include the replacement or reconstruction of existing
structures and facilities where the new structure will be located in the same site as the
structure replaced and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity as the
Submittals Received
Simpson & Simpson $632,000 Cumming Management
Group $1,154,800
Totum Corporation $653,793
5.C
Packet Pg. 80
7 of 7
structure replaced. The project would renovate the existing city facility at 3200 Airport
Avenue, and therefore, it has been determined that the project would fall within the
Class 1 and Class 2 categorical exemptions. Furthermore, staff has determined that
none of the exceptions to Categorical Exemptions set forth in the CEQA Guidelines,
section 15300.2 apply to this project.
Financial Impacts and Budget Actions
Staff seeks authority to approve available funding from the Airport Fund to award a
contract to Swinerton Builders for construction services and Totum Corporation for
construction management services.
Contract/Agreement
Vendor FY 2022-23 CIP Account # Total Contract
Amount
Swinerton Builders C5704690.689000 $7,899,818
Totum Corporation C5704690.689000 $653,793
Total $8,553,611
Prepared By: Phillip Ticun, CIP Project Manager
Approved
Forwarded to Council
Attachments:
A. Staff Report 20180410
B. Bid Protest
C. Bid Protest Response
D. Totum_Oaks_Initiative_Disclosure_Form
E. Swinerton_Oaks_Initiative_Disclosure_Form
F. Rendering_1_Office_Space_Exterior
G. Rendering_2_Office_Space_Interior
H. Rendering_3_Office_Space_Interior
5.C
Packet Pg. 81
City Council
Report
City Council Meeting: April 10, 2018
Agenda Item: 3.C
1 of 4
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Susan Cline, Acting Assistant City Manager, Public Works, Architecture
Services
Subject: Award Agreement for Santa Monica Airport Buildings Property Condition
Assessment
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Award RFP# 2508 to Omgivning Architects, a California-based company, to
provide a comprehensive building assessment at nine building locations at the
Santa Monica Airport;
2. Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with
Omgivning Architects, in an amount not to exceed $756,140 (including a $68,740
contingency) for a total amount not to exceed $756,140 over a two-year period,
with future year funding contingent on Council budget approval.
Executive Summary
The City of Santa Monica (City) is the owner/operator of the Santa Monica Airport
(Airport) and has leased Airport property and tenant spaces along both sides of Airport
Avenue since the 1940s. The Airport is an important municipal asset, maintaining
leases with approximately 397 tenants and generating approximately 70% of its
revenues from leasing. Due to deferred maintenance, many of the tenant spaces and
buildings are showing signs of aging with both structural and non-structural deficiencies.
It is critical for the City to address tenant building issues and deficiencies in a timely
manner. Staff recommends an agreement to be awarded to Omgivning Architects in an
amount not to exceed $756,140 to provide a comprehensive building assessment at
nine building locations at the Santa Monica Airport.
5.C.a
Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Staff Report 20180410 (5397 : 3200 Airport Ave Renovation Project)
2 of 4
Discussion
Due to the ongoing wear and tear of weather and use over the decades, the frequency
of repairs occurring on leased Airport building properties has increased substantially
compared to previous years. To extend the life of these buildings, staff is recommending
a Property Condition Assessment, which would entail investigating the life expectancy
of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems, as well as the current structural
integrity of the buildings. In-house staff does not have the design expertise for each of
these trades required to perform a thorough building assessment. Any issues brought to
light by the assessment would be addressed in a future construction project which
would make repairs and bring the buildings as a whole to current building codes and
standards in the most cost-effective manner. The consultant would also provide the City
with an estimated operational budget for each of the properties to better account for
their post construction maintenance costs. The Property Condition Assessment would
evaluate the following nine Airport locations.
• 2501 Airport Ave.
• 2701 Airport Av
• 2900 Airport Ave.
• 3000 Airport Ave.
• 3011 Airport Ave.
• 3026 Airport Ave.
• 3050 Airport Ave.
• 3200 Airport Ave.
• 3300 Airport Ave.
The scope of the proposed project includes the completion of a comprehensive
assessment and initial design drawings on how to address the needed repairs for each of
the nine buildings. For each building, an assessment report would be prepared which
would include a summary of the overall condition of the buildings with itemized
deficiencies to be addressed, schematic designs for the repairs, cost estimates for
repairs and annual maintenance/operation costs, and usable square footage totals with a
5.C.a
Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Staff Report 20180410 (5397 : 3200 Airport Ave Renovation Project)
3 of 4
recommendation for the City to proceed with either refurbishment or replacement. Staff
would return to Council at a future date with a recommendation to award construction
services to complete the building upgrades as funding becomes available.
Consultant Selection
On January 8, 2018, the City issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) #SP2508 to provide
a Property Condition Assessment report, schematic design services and cost estimation
services for nine building locations at the Airport. The RFP was posted on the City’s on-
line bidding site, and notices were advertised in the Santa Monica Daily Press in
accordance with the City Charter and Municipal Code Section 2.24.075(a). A total of
106 vendors downloaded the RFP. Three firms responded. Responses to the RFP
were reviewed by a selection panel of staff from the Public Works Department.
• AE3 Partners Architects
• Nonzero \ Architecture
• Omgivning Architects
Evaluation was based on the following selection criteria: experience with similar scopes
of work, project approach, project team and references, and prime and sub-consultant
past projects. Omgivning Architects was recognized in the evaluation process for their
effective project management, completeness, and client responsiveness. Based on this
criteria and criteria in SMMC 2.24.073, staff recommends Omgivning Architects as the
best qualified firm to provide a comprehensive building assessment at nine building
locations at the Santa Monica Airport.
Financial Impacts and Budget Actions
The agreement to be awarded to Omgivning Architects is for an amount not to exceed
$756,140. Funds are available in the FY 2017-18 Capital Improvement Program budget
in account M339088.589000.
5.C.a
Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Staff Report 20180410 (5397 : 3200 Airport Ave Renovation Project)
4 of 4
Prepared By: Phillip Ticun, CIP Project Manager
Approved
Forwarded to Council
Attachments:
A. Omgivning Architects Oaks Initiative Form
5.C.a
Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Staff Report 20180410 (5397 : 3200 Airport Ave Renovation Project)
5.C.b
Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Bid Protest (5397 : 3200 Airport Ave Renovation Project)
5.C.b
Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Bid Protest (5397 : 3200 Airport Ave Renovation Project)
5.C.b
Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Bid Protest (5397 : 3200 Airport Ave Renovation Project)
Page 1 of 3
1685 Main Street, MS#18, Santa Monica, CA 90401 • www.santamonica.gov •
@cityofsantamonica • @santamonicacity
Public Works Department
February 1, 2023
Willie Tarazi, President
West Valley Investment Group, Inc.
18750 Oxnard Street, Suite #405
Tarzana, CA 91356
Subject: Final Determination for Request for Bids (RFB) 3200 Airport Avenue
Renovation (SP2486)
Dear Mr. Tarazi,
I have received West Valley Investment Group’s (WVIG) protest letter, dated
January 23, 2023, for SP2486 RFB 3200 Airport Ave Renovation (Project).
I reviewed your concerns and provided my findings below:
1. “… under no circumstances were we not awarded a contract whenever we
came in lowest…”
The Santa Monica Municipal Code requires the City to award contracts to the
best bidder. In doing so, it may evaluate the capacity of the bidder to perform the
contract or provide the service promptly, within the time specified based on prior
experience. As an example, WVIG offered the Parking Structure #5 Project in its
selection of prior projects. The project duration was 274 days and completed in
441 days.
2. “… we were invited to bid on the 3200 Airport Avenue one-story building
renovation project and were prequalified for that bid, which implies that we
were vetted and deemed capable of taking care of such a project…”
The solicitation was broken down into two steps. The first step was the Request
for Qualifications which identified four contractors who were capable of
5.C.c
Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Bid Protest Response [Revision 1] (5397 : 3200 Airport Ave Renovation Project)
Page 2 of 3
constructing the Project, including WVIG. The second step requested additional
information and helped determine which of the prequalified contractors had the
most experience with similar projects, the best project understanding/schedule,
and the best subcontractor support. WVIG did not emerge as the best bidder
during this phase.
3. “… the only reason why it was recommended that the project be awarded to
Swinerton is because their timeline was favored to ours. With a highly daily
liquidated damages rate, we have every reason to complete the project within
the allocated period of time. We have also informed the City that we will not be
involved in any other project while working on this one to make sure that all our
available resources will be allocated here.”
The best bidder was not based solely on the duration of the contractor’s provided
schedule. As mentioned previously the best bidder selection was based on having the
most experience with similar projects, the best project understanding/schedule, and
the best subcontractor support. While WVIG indicated during the interview that they
would focus solely on this project, the proposed 2-3 staff management team
represented a fraction of management teams proposed by other bidders to meet the
aggressive timeline. In addition, it was identified that the sub-contractor recommended
by WVIG for the glazing portion of the Project, had repeated issues in measuring and
fabricating glass on a previous city project. Having such issues on the Project could
heavily impact the schedule since the procurement of the windows is a critical path
item.
4. Per Public Contract Code (PCC) Division 2, General Provisions, any solicitation
for bids shall include a section identifying and describing the criteria that will be
used in evaluation bids, the methodology or weighting system that will be used
in the evaluation, and the relative importance or weight assigned to the criteria
identified in the request for bids.
The City is subject to the provisions of the Santa Monica Municipal Code for contracts
involving the construction of public works projects. The Instruction to Bidders of the
Request for Bids includes a section titled “Best Bidder” which reads:
The award, if any, will be made to the best bidder. In evaluating whether a bidder is the
best bidder pursuant to the Santa Monica Municipal Code, City may utilize some or all of
the following criteria:
(1) Price.
(2) The quality of the material or services offered.
(3) The ability, capacity, and skill of the bidder(s) to perform the contract or provide the
materials or services.
(4) The capacity of the bidder(s) to perform the contract or provide the service
5.C.c
Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Bid Protest Response [Revision 1] (5397 : 3200 Airport Ave Renovation Project)
Page 3 of 3
promptly, within the time specified, and without delay or interference.
(5) The sufficiency of the bidder’s financial resources.
(6) The character, integrity, reputation, judgment, training, experience, and efficiency
of the bidder.
(7) The ability of the bidder(s) to provide such future maintenance or service as may be
needed.
(8) Any other factor which will further the intent set forth in Section 608 of the City
Charter.
The City of Santa Monica (the “City”) shall have absolute discretion in determining the
applicability and weight or relative weight of some or all of the criteria listed above and
is not required to select the lowest monetary bidder.
At this time, I find no reason to alter the RFB scores and will proceed with awarding
this project as noted in the Award Notification for 3200 Airport Ave Renovation
Project. This constitutes a final decision on this protest. Thank you for your continued
interest in our City’s projects.
Respectfully,
Rick Valte, P.E.
Public Works Director
5.C.c
Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Bid Protest Response [Revision 1] (5397 : 3200 Airport Ave Renovation Project)
CITY OF SANTA MONICA OAKS INITIATIVE DISCLOSURE FORM
In order to facilitate compliance with the requirements of the Oaks Initiative, the City compiles and maintains
certain information. That information includes the name of any person or persons who is seeking a “public
benefit.” If the “public benefit” is sought by an entity, rather than an individual person, the information includes
the name of every person who is: (a) trustee, (b) director, (c) partner, (d) officer, or has (e) more than a ten
percent interest in the entity.
Public benefits include:
1.Personal services contracts in excess of $25,000 over any 12-month period;
2.Sale of material, equipment or supplies to the City in excess of $25,000 over a 12- month period;
3.Purchase, sale or lease of real property to or from the City in excess of $25,000 over a 12- month
period;
4.Non-competitive franchise awards with gross revenue of $50,000 or more in any 12-month period;
5. Land use variance, special use permit, or other exception to an established land use plan, where the
decision has a value in excess of $25,000;
6. Tax “abatement, exception, or benefit” of a value in excess of $5,000 in any 12- month period; or
7. Payment of “cash or specie” of a net value to the recipient of $10,000 in any 12- month period.
Name(s) of persons or entities receiving public benefit:
Name(s) of trustees, directors, partners, and officers:
Name(s) of persons with more than a 10% equity, participation, or revenue interest:
Prepared by: Title:
Signature: Date:
Email: Phone:
FOR CITY USE ONLY:
Bid/PO/Contract # Permit #
Danny Kaye President
Danny@totumconsulting.com 3103510138
1/5/23
Totum Corp
Giulio Zavolta
Danny Kaye
As above
5.C.d
Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Totum_Oaks_Initiative_Disclosure_Form (5397 : 3200 Airport Ave Renovation Project)
CITY OF SANTA MONICA OAKS INITIATIVE DISCLOSURE FORM
In order to facilitate compliance with the requirements of the Oaks Initiative, the City compiles and maintains
certain information. That information includes the name of any person or persons who is seeking a “public
benefit.” If the “public benefit” is sought by an entity, rather than an individual person, the information includes
the name of every person who is: (a) trustee, (b) director, (c) partner, (d) officer, or has (e) more than a ten
percent interest in the entity.
Public benefits include:
1. Personal services contracts in excess of $25,000 over any 12-month period;
2. Sale of material, equipment or supplies to the City in excess of $25,000 over a 12- month period;
3. Purchase, sale or lease of real property to or from the City in excess of $25,000 over a 12- month
period;
4. Non-competitive franchise awards with gross revenue of $50,000 or more in any 12-month period;
5. Land use variance, special use permit, or other exception to an established land use plan, where the
decision has a value in excess of $25,000;
6. Tax “abatement, exception, or benefit” of a value in excess of $5,000 in any 12- month period; or
7. Payment of “cash or specie” of a net value to the recipient of $10,000 in any 12- month period.
Name(s) of persons or entities receiving public benefit:
Name(s) of trustees, directors, partners, and officers:
Name(s) of persons with more than a 10% equity, participation, or revenue interest:
Prepared by: Title:
Signature: Date:
Email: Phone:
FOR CITY USE ONLY:
Bid/PO/Contract # Permit #
Swinerton Builders, a California Corporation
See attached list of officers
None
Kyle Burnham Sr. Preconstruction Manager
1/20/2023
kburnham@swinerton.com 213-896-3400
5.C.e
Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Swinerton_Oaks_Initiative_Disclosure_Form (5397 : 3200 Airport Ave Renovation Project)
Test Cell, Buildings 203/204 | 1. General Contractor Information
OWNERSHIP INFORMATION
NAME POSITION YEARS WITH COMPANY
Eric M. Foster CEO 40
David C. Callis President, COO 21
Donald D. Adair Exec. Vice President 34
Scott V. Conrad Exec. Vice President 11
Frank Foellmer Exec. Vice President 28
Bradley K. Peterson Exec. Vice President/CFO 22
Jason R. Chupp Sr. Vice President 10
Ray A. Haj Sr. Vice President 21
Timothy J. Kretzschmar Sr. Vice President 8
Terry M. McKellips Sr. Vice President 22
SheriAnn Murphy Sr. Vice President/Secretary 16
Lauren T. Nunnally Sr. Vice President/CAO 8
David K. White Sr. Vice President 13
Michael M. Berryhill Vice President 7
Ciaran Creighton Vice President 6
Keith Dancey Vice President 19
Christopher A. Evans Vice President 14
Jeffrey S. Gee Vice President 20
Jeffrey F. Good Vice President 14
D. Scott Grubb Vice President 36
Lori D. Guion Vice President 24
Peter Hau Vice President 18
Paul Hinz Vice President 22
Jared W. Hoeflich Vice President 11
Robert "Bobby" Jennings Vice President 12
Curtis F. Johnson Vice President 36
Brian J. McCarthy Vice President 12
Gerald E. Mejia Vice President 21
Derek D. Mosiman Vice President 12
Andrew D. Pearl Vice President 15
Brenda A. Reimche Vice President 29
Pedro "Pete" Ruiz Vice President 20
Alison Satt Vice President 6
Carrie L. Shaeffer Vice President 8
John S. Spight Vice President 10
Lia Tatevosian Vice President 26
Myrna E. Wagner Vice President 23
James T. Watson Vice President 7
Tyler Whittaker Vice President 4
David R. Worley Vice President 20
Aaron J. Yamasaki Vice President 10
Darlene S. Cho Asst. Secretary 19
Lisa M. Telles Asst. Secretary 18
Swinerton Builders is a wholly-
owned subsidiary of Swinerton
Incorporated.
Swinerton Incorporated is 100%
employee-owned. Approximately
45% is held by the Swinerton
401(k) & Savings Plan, and the
balance is split among 800 plus
employees. No single individual
employee owns 4% or more of the
stock of the Corporation.
5.C.e
Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Swinerton_Oaks_Initiative_Disclosure_Form (5397 : 3200 Airport Ave Renovation Project)
5.C.f
Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Rendering_1_Office_Space_Exterior (5397 : 3200 Airport Ave Renovation Project)
5.C.g
Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Rendering_2_Office_Space_Interior (5397 : 3200
5.C.h
Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Rendering_3_Office_Space_Interior (5397 : 3200