Loading...
R111881 City Council Meeting: July 23, 2019 Santa Monica, California RESOLUTION NUMBER 11188 (CCS) (City Council Series) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA ADOPTING THE UPDATED LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM LAND USE PLAN WHEREAS, the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Coastal Act) (Public Resources Code sections 30000 et seq.) provides that each local government lying, in whole or part, within the coastal zone shall prepare a local coastal program (LCP) for that portion of the coastal zone within its jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, LCPs consist of a Land Use Plan (LUP) and Implementation Plan (IP); and WHEREAS, an LCP becomes fully certified only after the California Coastal Commission certifies conformity of the LUP and IP with the policies of the Coastal Act; and WHEREAS, the Final Draft LUP describes the planning area’s land use and environmental conditions, identifies issues, and contains land use policies and maps that complement adopted City policies and satisfy the intent of the Coastal Act; and DocuSign Envelope ID: B7EBFE6B-FCEA-497D-8B84-7D978ACA2E9A 2 WHEREAS, upon certification, the LUP policies will form the standard of review for issuance of coastal development permits (CDPs) within the coastal zone; and WHEREAS, upon certification of the IP, the authority to issue CDPs would be transferred from the Coastal Commission to the City, except within the area of “original jurisdiction” as set forth in the Coastal Act; and WHEREAS, the City adopted its current LUP in 1992, however, the Coastal Commission only certified the LUP in part and never certified an LCP; and WHEREAS, because the LCP was never certified by the Coastal Commission, all development proposed in Santa Monica’s Coastal Zone still requires Coastal Commission approval of any CDP once all City entitlements are obtained; and WHEREAS, the City obtained a grant from the State of California to update the City’s LUP (“Draft LUP”) for full certification; and WHEREAS, the Draft LUP includes a new section of policies that will guide coastal adaptation for anticipated climate change-induced sea level rise that is already measurable along California’s coast; and WHEREAS, on January 6, 2016, the Planning Commission held a study session to launch the first public outreach effort on the Draft LUP; and WHEREAS, the meeting on January 6, 2016, was followed by presentations to task forces, boards and commissions, two community workshops and outreach at the beach DocuSign Envelope ID: B7EBFE6B-FCEA-497D-8B84-7D978ACA2E9A 3 and pier, including a virtual reality installation on sea level rise (the Owl on the Pier), an intercept survey on the Pier, and a Walk with Snowy Plovers with the Audubon Society; and WHEREAS, the Council discussed the LUP Update at a study session on November 22, 2016, which included a complete summary of the outreach process; and WHEREAS, the first Draft LUP was released in February 2018; and WHEREAS, since the release, staff has made presentations to the Recreation and Parks Commission, the Task Force on the Environment, the Landmarks Commission and the Pier Corporation and, by request, staff also attended meetings of the Chamber of Commerce Land Use Committee and the Downtown Santa Monica, Inc. Board; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a study session on the Draft LUP on March 21, 2018, and the Commissioners and public speakers provided comments on a variety of policy areas; and WHEREAS, the Final Public Hearing Draft LUP was released on July 3, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on July 18, 2018, to consider the Draft LUP, and recommended approval of Draft LUP, as modified by certain changes attached as an addendum to the Commission’s resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on October 9, 2018, to consider the Draft LUP, as modified by the changes listed in the addendum sheet attached hereto DocuSign Envelope ID: B7EBFE6B-FCEA-497D-8B84-7D978ACA2E9A 4 as Exhibit 1, and found that the modified Draft LUP is consistent with the General Plan and Coastal Act policies; and WHEREAS, pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15265, CEQA does not apply to activities and approvals pursuant to the California Coastal Act (commencing with Section 30000 of the Public Resources Code) by any local government, as defined in Section 30109 of the Public Resources Code, necessary for the preparation and adoption of a local coastal program. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council has reviewed, considered, and hereby adopts the Draft Land Use Plan (Draft LUP), as modified with the changes listed in the addendum sheet attached hereto as Exhibit 1. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby certifies that the local coastal program is intended to be carried out in a manner fully consistent with the California Coastal Act. SECTION 3. The City Manager is directed to submit the Draft LUP, as modified with the changes listed in the addendum sheet attached hereto as Exhibit 1, to the Coastal Commission for certification in accordance with the Coastal Act. SECTION 4. This resolution shall take effect automatically upon Coastal Commission approval of the Draft LUP in whole and without any proposed modifications; DocuSign Envelope ID: B7EBFE6B-FCEA-497D-8B84-7D978ACA2E9A 5 alternatively, this resolution shall take effect upon adoption by the City Council upon Coastal Commission approval of the Draft LUP in part or with proposed modifications. APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________ LANE DILG City Attorney DocuSign Envelope ID: B7EBFE6B-FCEA-497D-8B84-7D978ACA2E9A Exhibit 1 Addenda to Final Draft LUP DocuSign Envelope ID: B7EBFE6B-FCEA-497D-8B84-7D978ACA2E9A ATTACHMENT C Addendum to Final Draft LUP City Council Hearing, October 9, 2018 Page Explanation of Proposed Change (note: Differences from Planning Commission recommendations are highlighted in gray). Revision to Final Draft LUP 1 16 Add a short section describing outreach since the first public draft was released. Before the last header in the left column, add: (Title: Public Draft Release and Outreach) Following the January 2018 release of the Public Review Draft LUP, staff made presentations to the Recreation and Parks Commission, the Task Force on the Environment, the Landmarks Commission, the Pier Corporation, and some neighborhood and business organizations. A panel presentation on sea level rise adaptation and resilience policies was held on March 15, 2018 and recorded for continued availability at the LUP project website. City Planning staff also hosted a ClimateFest table with LUP information on May 19, 2018. The formal adoption process included a Planning Commission study session on March 21, 2018, and recommendation hearing on July 18, 2018, followed by a Council adoption hearing on October 9, 2018. 2 24 Update Subarea 2 existing conditions and expand upon the description of Carousel Park to include steps to Pier, pavilions, and other elements of project. Revise in first paragraph: To the east, there is a small children’s play area, sometimes referred to as Carousel Park. To the east lies Carousel Park, which the City constructed in 1986, with a children's play area, steps and ramp to the Pier, metal frame pavilions and seating areas. Carousel Park was recently designated as a City Landmark. The seaward end of the Pier is a popular location for fishing. 3 25 In Subarea 2 description, include all landmarks within subarea boundaries. After the first paragraph in column 2, add the following paragraph: "In addition to the designated landmarks on the Pier, Subarea 2 includes one additional landmark property, the Vernacular Commercial Buildings at 1601-1613 Ocean Front Walk." 4 25 For consistent removal of discussion of pending projects, remove language discussing the Pier Bridge project in Subarea 2. Remove the last paragraph of the second column: The study suggests a two-bridge approach, which would provide pedestrians and bicyclists with several options for accessing the Pier, including an elevator, escalator, stairs, and bike ramp directly down to the beach bike path. The bridge enhancements are conceptualized as reactivating the western edge of the Pier by highlighting the carousel building as the Pier entrance. A second bridge as preliminarily proposed would meet the Pier from Moss Avenue, granting cars direct access and reducing vehicle-pedestrian conflict points on the main, historic Pier bridge. 5 31 For consistent removal of discussion of pending projects, remove first paragraph on pending DAs for established large sites. On both sites, there are pending Development Agreement applications for mixed-use projects that include significant hotel components. 6 38 Accept Planning Commission supplemental staff report edit #1 regarding Subarea 8 description. Add to Ocean Park description: “Subarea 8 also includes the south side of Pico Boulevard, where the properties are generally in commercial use and are designated Mixed Use Boulevard Low.” DocuSign Envelope ID: B7EBFE6B-FCEA-497D-8B84-7D978ACA2E9A ATTACHMENT C Addendum to Final Draft LUP City Council Hearing, October 9, 2018 Page Explanation of Proposed Change (note: Differences from Planning Commission recommendations are highlighted in gray). Revision to Final Draft LUP 7 44 Update parking table with most recent parking numbers from Parking Operations. Revise the following numbers in Figure 1: Coastal Zone Parking Inventory North Beach: 10 lots, 2,538 2,537 spaces South Beach: 9 lots, 3,055 2,853 spaces Pier: 1 lot, 277 spaces Ocean Park: 2 lots, 213 208 spaces Ocean Avenue: 7 lots, 105 spaces Civic Center/The Village: 5 3 lots, 2,393 2,319 spaces Main Street: 7 lots, 121 146 spaces Downtown: 27 lots, 6,569 6,308 spaces N Side Residential: 0 lots, 0 spaces Total: 68 66 lots, 15,271 14,753 spaces 8 44 Update number of beach parking spaces to reflect most recent parking numbers from Parking Operations. In the first paragraph in the first column, revise to say, "Of these, close to 6.000 just over 5,500 spaces are located adjacent to Santa Monica State Beach." 9 45 Update number of parking spaces at the Annenberg Community Beach house to reflect most recent parking numbers from Parking Operations. In the second paragraph in the first column, revise to say, "The 277 276 public parking spaces at the Annenberg Community Beach House are highly utilized in peak seasons and during events." 10 45 Update number of beach parking spaces in the S Beach area to reflect most recent parking numbers from Parking Operations. At the end of the third paragraph in the first column, revise to say, "The wayfinding signage points visitors and residents to over 3,000 2,800 parking spaces in the South Beach lots." 11 45 Updated Map #7 to reflect most recent parking numbers from Parking Operations. Replace Map #7 with the Map attached below in this Addendum. 12 46 Update number of parking spaces at the Civic Center parking structure to reflect most recent parking numbers from Parking Operations. In the first full paragraph in column one, revise to say, "The Civic Center's parking capacity increased substantially with the construction of the 770 735-space Civic Center Parking Structure, which also provides a separate facility for public safety vehicle parking." 13 47 Revise Planning Commission supplemental staff report edit to remove end phrase "than market rate housing." After “This LUP requires that new development continue to provide adequate parking either on-site or through payments that support shared parking facilities to mitigate their impacts on the surrounding area.” add “Standards are based on analysis of a use’s needs. For example, deed-restricted affordable housing has fewer parking requirements.” 14 53 Refer to originally published name (Pier Access and Use Study), not Pier Use Study. Revise box title and references within box from Pier Use Study to Pier Access and Use Study 15 68 Add paragraph under “Palisades Bluff”, discussing the planting of bougainvillea and eucalyptus on the bluffs in 1934. Amend the third sentence of the first paragraph to say, "Non-native species can also be found in Palisades Park, such as the Canary Island palm, blue gum, tumbleweed, Mexican fan palm, and pampas grass and the extensive presence of bougainvillea and eucalyptus that were planted on the bluffs in 1934." DocuSign Envelope ID: B7EBFE6B-FCEA-497D-8B84-7D978ACA2E9A ATTACHMENT C Addendum to Final Draft LUP City Council Hearing, October 9, 2018 16 68 Clarify that the beach dune project is creation of dunes, not restoration, since dunes did not exist here before. Revise the first paragraph on the right column to say, "To improve the biodiversity and resiliency of Santa Monica’s beaches, and to address potential impacts of sea level rise, the City is looking at adaptation measures that would re-introduce a more natural beach environment. One such measure is dune creation restoration." Page Explanation of Proposed Change (note: Differences from Planning Commission recommendations are highlighted in gray). Revision to Final Draft LUP 17 69 Spell out Santa Monica Urban Runoff Recycling Facility before "SMURRF". Right column, first paragraph, 4th line, change to say, "… the Santa Monica Urban Runoff Recycling Facility (SMURRF) was completed,…" 18 70 In right column, 5th line from bottom, change stormwater to rainwater. Last paragraph, change to "…results overall in greater stormrainwater capture citywide." 19 71 On left column, 8th line from bottom, add rainwater with stormwater. Last line change early to late summer. Revise last paragraph: "Through these projects, millions of gallons of rainwater and stormwater are harvested…" In right column, change last line to read, "The project is anticipated to be completed by early in 2018." 20 72 Add sentence about bacterial waters around the Pier, prohibiting swimming. In the top right paragraph, add sentence at end, Because bacterial concentration levels remain high at times, swimmers and bathers are prohibited from entering waters around the Pier. 21 78 Accept Planning Commission supplemental staff report edit #3 regarding View Corridor study. Revise sentence to say, “Ocean views for drivers and pedestrians from public rights of way intersecting Ocean Avenue from the east;" 22 74 Clarify that the arrows on the View Corridor maps do not indicate the view to be preserved, but rather the view from which the photos above were taken. Add a notation below each View Corridor map (pages 74-80): "See red arrows for photo location. Photos provide examples of views along the corridor." 23 88 Note that the total number of landmarks in the City may change in the future. Add to sentence, "The City of Santa Monica currently has 122 individually designated City Landmarks, a list that expands continuously as more historic resources are evaluated and considered for designation." 24 88 On pages 88 and 89, update HRI and Landmarks maps to reflect all potential and designated landmarks in the Coastal Zone as of date of LUP adoption. Maps 21 and 22 to be updated. 25 99 Policy #18: Revise per Planning Commission recommendation to add City policy to explore opportunities to remove parking from the Pier. The City shall explore opportunities for converting the existing Pier parking to visitor- serving uses in conjunction with ensuring Tthe Pier shall continue to be served by automobile parking within a 0.25-mile radius of the Pier, which may include any combination of parking on the beach lots, including the Deauville site above the planned underground Sustainable Water Infrastructure Project (SWIP) facility, as well as parking on the Pier itself. Multimodal access points and services shall be provided to adequately meet the demand for public access to the Pier. Page Explanation of Proposed Change (note: Differences from Planning Commission recommendations are highlighted in gray). Revision to Final Draft LUP DocuSign Envelope ID: B7EBFE6B-FCEA-497D-8B84-7D978ACA2E9A ATTACHMENT C Addendum to Final Draft LUP City Council Hearing, October 9, 2018 26 99 Policy #19: Revise to reflect discussions with Coastal Commission staff to reference multimodal access and to require a CDP if City Director of Planning & Community Development determines that parking pricing adjustment may impact coastal access. Revise Policy #19 with the following: Parking for the beach area, as shown on Map 24 below, is provided in several parking lots along the coast and on-street in locations along or near the first public road inland from the beach which shall be maintained for public access. From time-to-time, Tthe City may adjust parking pricing in order to maintain the ability to provide low-cost recreation opportunities and manage occupancy by encouraging distribution of use distribution to maintain access to coastal recreation and encourage alternative modes of transportation. A CDP shall be required for parking pricing changes in the beach area price changes at lots west of the first public road, as shown on Map 24. Notwithstanding, if the Director of Planning & Community Development determines that a pricing adjustment in any other location in the coastal zone may affect coastal access, a CDP shall be required. As a general rule, the cost of daily parking should be equivalent to or less than the daily parking rates charged in nearby County beach parking lots. The City may allow temporary closure of portions of public beach lots for events outside of peak use times through a coastal development permit unless exempt consistent with Policy 42. 27 100 Accept Planning Commission supplemental staff report edit #5 regarding Policy #22(a). Revise Policy #20(a): to say, ‘is located in the Downtown Community Plan area where new development projects may provide on-site parking up to a maximum amount to be specified in the IP that is equivalent to the previous minimum parking requirement. 28 Following discussions with Coastal Commission staff, add a new policy to require monitoring of coastal access as part of the regular Downtown Community Plan monitoring. (Renumber policies to follow) Add the following (new policy to be inserted) Policy #21: In order to ensure that the City’s Downtown mobility strategy does not adversely affect coastal access, the City shall regularly evaluate coastal access in conjunction with Downtown mobility monitoring reports. Such monitoring shall be conducted every five years and shall be submitted to the Coastal Commission. If reports indicate that the mobility balance is such that the ability to access the coast by any of the modes being monitored (transit, driving, active transportation or other) is insufficient, the City shall take steps to ensure a balance so that all modes of travel are accommodated and coastal access is ensured. DocuSign Envelope ID: B7EBFE6B-FCEA-497D-8B84-7D978ACA2E9A ATTACHMENT C Addendum to Final Draft LUP City Council Hearing, October 9, 2018 29 100 Following discussions with Coastal Commission staff, make minor corrections to the first paragraph of Policy 21 (now renumbered as 22). Policy 21: Revise to say, "If providing additional required on-site parking for new development or an intensification of site use(s) at the parking ratio required within the specific subarea is determined to be infeasible given the site conditions and/or site use(s), the applicant may instead request a modification to substitute access alternatives in lieu of providing some or all of the required parking spaces, subject to a finding that the parking modification will not result in any significant adverse public access impacts and is the minimum necessary for project feasibility. The applicant shall provide at a minimum as many of the items from the following list as deemed appropriate and feasible by the Planning & Community Development Director: Page Explanation of Proposed Change (note: Differences from Planning Commission recommendations are highlighted in gray). Revision to Final Draft LUP 30 101 Policy #22 (now #23): Fix the technical error that removed policy language that had been in the public draft and misstated the change on Planning Commission supplemental staff report Attachment C. Revise Policy #22 to say, "Subject to approval of a variance, reduced parking may be permitted for developments in residential districts if the findings are made that providing the amount of parking required is infeasible due to physical conditions, traffic safety, or conflict with other Municipal Code provisions, and that there are no adverse impacts on coastal access. A CDP may be issued for a development for which the City has granted a variance, modification, waiver or other entitlement that allows reduced parking provided that the reduction of parking permitted is the minimum necessary for project feasibility." 31 102 Edit Policy #31.a(v) to protect and improve views of Palisades Bluff and the coast by reducing and preventing visual clutter created by utilitarian objects and requiring thoughtful placement and compatible design. Revise Policy 31.a(v) to read, "(v) Maximize ocean views, scenic coastal vistas, and views of the Palisades Bluffs. Development in close proximity to the CCT should avoid visual clutter that may be created by utilitarian objects or rooftop structures above height limits through thoughtful placement and compatible design." DocuSign Envelope ID: B7EBFE6B-FCEA-497D-8B84-7D978ACA2E9A ATTACHMENT C Addendum to Final Draft LUP City Council Hearing, October 9, 2018 32 106 Following discussions with Coastal Commission staff, revise Policy #46, which requires a Low Cost Lodging fee or provision of lower cost accomodations for projects that replace existing hotel units with new visitor accommodations. (Note: this policy language was extensively revised and rearranged so is not shown here in strikeout/underline) Replace Policy #46 language "Lower cost visitor and recreational facilities shall be protected, encouraged, and where feasible, provided. The feasibility of retaining lower cost overnight visitor accommodations shall be considered when new development is proposed. The defining factors of what qualifies as lower cost, moderate cost, and high cost accommodations shall be contained in the IP. This policy shall not be interpreted to apply to the demolition of any residential unit in which lawfully established home-sharing or similar uses existed, or to the termination of any home-sharing or similar uses. A. Where new development proposes to replace existing lower-cost overnight visitor accommodations with moderate or high cost overnight visitor accommodations or to otherwise eliminate lower-cost overnight visitor accommodations, replacing the lower cost overnight visitor accommodations at a one-to-one ratio or payment of an equivalent Low Cost Lodging fee shall be required. B. Where new development proposes to eliminate existing moderate cost or market rate overnight visitor accommodations and replace with new overnight visitor accommodations, payment of the Low Cost Lodging fee shall be required in an amount to be determined in the Implementation Plan, based on a feasibility analysis. C. As an alternative, the new development may provide low-cost overnight visitor accommodations within or in conjunction with the new development in an amount to be determined in the Implementation Plan, based upon a feasibility analysis. If on-site low- cost accommodations are provided, the Low Cost Lodging fee shall be waived. The manner of compliance with this requirement shall be made a condition of the coastal development permit." Page Explanation of Proposed Change (note: Differences from Planning Commission recommendations are highlighted in gray) . Revision to Final Draft LUP Any fee payment shall be deposited into a fund established by the City which shall be in an interest bearing account and shall only be used for the provision of new lower-cost overnight visitor accommodations. Funds may be used for activities including land acquisition, construction, and/or renovation that will result in new or expanded lower cost overnight visitor accommodations. The accommodations funded by the Low Cost Lodging fee program shall be offered to the general public at lower-cost rates and shall be protected by the City as lower cost overnight visitor accommodations for a period to DocuSign Envelope ID: B7EBFE6B-FCEA-497D-8B84-7D978ACA2E9A ATTACHMENT C Addendum to Final Draft LUP City Council Hearing, October 9, 2018 be determined in the Implementation Plan." 33 106 Following discussions with the Coastal Commission, replace Policy #47 regarding homesharing. Replace the Draft LUP language for Policy #47 to say, "Consistent with existing law, the City authorizes home-sharing in all Coastal Zone sub-areas that permit residential use as a form of visitor-serving accommodation. The City is committed to implementing its existing policies to preserve residential housing stock and meet State Coastal Act intent to protect, encourage and, where feasible, provide lower cost visitor accommodations." 34 116 Accept Planning Commission supplemental staff report edit to Policy #67, but change "buildings" to "structures". In Policy 67: After, “Additions and improvements to such structures may be permitted provided that such additions or improvements themselves comply with all current policies and standards of the LCP. Existing legal non-conforming structures that are damaged or destroyed by a non-voluntary fire or explosion, earthquake, or other natural disaster may also be rebuilt/restored/ replaced as long as the replacement does not increase the size or degree of non-conformity. This includes the density (including square footage and number of rooms), parking, building footprint and building envelope that existed prior to the damage/destruction, unless subject to compliance with Mid or Long- term Sea Level Rise policies per Policies 80- 85.Additionally, the following shall apply to any improvements or repairs to nonconforming structures:” 35 129 Revise Policy #109.d to reflect 2017 changes to SMMC Chapter 7.10 (Runoff-Conservation and Sustainable Management) Revise 109.d.: adds, or replaces at least twenty-five hundred (2,500) five thousand (5,000) sq. ft. of existing…" 36 130 Generalize compliance date in Policy #122 Revise Policy #122, second sentence: "All structural BMPs shall be annually inspected, cleaned, and repaired when necessary prior to September 30th of each year. 37 132 Correct Policy 128.c to 15,000 square fee (not 15,000 feet). Revise 128.c as follows: If a proposed development will add a net total of more than 15,000 square feet ft. of impervious surface are…" Page Explanation of Proposed Change (note: Differences from Planning Commission recommendations are highlighted in gray) . Revision to Final Draft LUP 38 134 Policy 143: Adjust policy language to clarify that there is a public review component and process for public works projects within a view corridor or vantage point. Revise the beginning of Policy 143 to say, "New development located within the viewshed area identified for view preservation in connection with a designated scenic corridor or vantage point (see Map 20, Chapter 3) shall be designed and sited to be visually compatible with the character of the surrounding area, to restore and enhance visual quality in visually degraded areas, and to protect public views to the coast and scenic coastal areas. , provided that pPublic works projects required for public health and safety shall be accommodated with opportunities for public review to address issues related to scenic views." DocuSign Envelope ID: B7EBFE6B-FCEA-497D-8B84-7D978ACA2E9A ATTACHMENT C Addendum to Final Draft LUP City Council Hearing, October 9, 2018 39 146 Update Single Family Housing Purpose and Allowable Uses column to include Childcare and Early Education Facilities. Amend Single Family Housing Purpose and Allowable Uses: To conserve the character of existing single-family neighborhoods, allowing new structures that are compatible with existing scale and character. Allowable uses: single-family homes, parks, and family daycare centers, and childcare and early education Facilities. 40 150 Accept Planning Commission supplemental staff report edit #7 regarding Policy #178, but change "buildings" to "structures." Policy #178: Add to the end, “Notwithstanding the foregoing, existing legal nonconforming structures that are damaged or destroyed by a non-voluntary fire or explosion, earthquake, or other natural disaster may be rebuilt/restored/replaced as long as the replacement does not increase the size or degree of non-conformity. This includes the density (including square footage and number of rooms), parking, building footprint and building envelope that existed prior to the damage/destruction except as limited by Policy #67.” 41 150 Accept Planning Commission supplemental staff report edit #8 to add policy clarifying status of non-conforming structures, with small language adjustments for clarification. After Policy #178, add as a new policy, “Non-Conforming Uses. The uses existing in a structure that have been restored pursuant to Policies #67 and #178 may be continued/reinstated in the reconstructed/replacement structure so long as such nonconforming uses are not expanded or intensified.” 42 150 Policy 183: Change Accessory Dwelling Unit policy language from “allow” to “encourage.” Policy 183: Consistent with State Law, the City shall encourage allow the development of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) on residential properties. 43 151 Add a footnote to say that maximum allowable heights and FARs in Table 3 may only be applicable for specific development circumstances. Add Table 3 footnote: "Above heights and FAR limits apply only to certain projects as specified in the Zoning Code." 44 151 Accept Planning Commission supplemental staff report edit #9 correcting the Land Use Designations table. In Table 3, fourth column on the row for Subarea 8 (Ocean Park), add, “General Commercial and Mixed Use Boulevard Low” to the list of land use designations. 45 151 Accept Planning Commission supplemental staff report edit #10 correcting the Subarea Development Standards table. In place of the information provided for “DC” in Subarea 5, the following information will be entered into the appropriate columns for allowable height and FAR/density limits: DC: 84 ft, 4.0 FAR BC (Bayside Conservation, Promenade): 70 ft, 3.25 FAR BC (Bayside Conservation, 2nd and 4th Streets): 70 ft, 4.0 FAR TA (Transit Adjacent): 84 ft, 4.0 FAR DocuSign Envelope ID: B7EBFE6B-FCEA-497D-8B84-7D978ACA2E9A ATTACHMENT C Addendum to Final Draft LUP City Council Hearing, October 9, 2018 Page Explanation of Proposed Change (note: Differences from Planning Commission recommendations are highlighted in gray) . Revision to Final Draft LUP WT (Wilshire Transition): 60 ft, 2.75 FAR OT (Ocean Transition): 60 ft, 3.25 FAR The third column will be revised as follows: Applicable Land Use Designations: Lincoln Transition, Bayside Conservation, Neighborhood Village, Transit Adjacent, Wilshire Transition, Ocean Transition Mixed Use Boulevard. Mixed Use boulevard, Downtown Core 46 84 Clarify the viewshed of the Wilshire Blvd. Vantage Point by removing references to adjacent private properties that are not included in the view. Remove the last paragraph of the second column: The existing high-rise on the southeast corner of Ocean Avenue is a major obstruction to this view. The property on the northeast corner is a designated ELS site (see Map 26 on page 149). A development agreement at this site should consider whether the vantage point view is affected. 47 Various Non-substantive grammatical, spelling and small typo and graphical errors that may not be listed above will be corrected in the final document. DocuSign Envelope ID: B7EBFE6B-FCEA-497D-8B84-7D978ACA2E9A DocuSign Envelope ID: B7EBFE6B-FCEA-497D-8B84-7D978ACA2E9A REVISED MAP #7 (LUP, Page 45) REVISED MAP #22 (LUP, Page 89) DocuSign Envelope ID: B7EBFE6B-FCEA-497D-8B84-7D978ACA2E9A Adopted and approved this 23rd day of July 2019. __________________________ G l e a m D a v i s , M a y o r I, Nikima Newsome, Assistant City Clerk of the City of Santa Monica, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 11188 (CCS) was duly adopted at a meeting of the Santa Monica City Council held on the 23rd day of July 2019, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Himmelrich, Jara, Morena, Winterer Mayor Davis, Mayor Pro Tem O’Day NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember McKeown A T T E S T : _____________________________________ N i k i m a N e w s o m e , A s s i s t a n t C i t y C l e r k DocuSign Envelope ID: B7EBFE6B-FCEA-497D-8B84-7D978ACA2E9A