Loading...
SR 04-18-2017 3E Ci ty Council Report City Council Meeting : April 18, 2017 Agenda Item: 3.E 1 of 8 To: Mayor and City Council From: Susan Cline, Director , Public Works, Street & Fleet Services Subject: Bid Award for the Purchase of 17 Good Earth FireFly Electric Vehicles Recommended Action Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Award Bid #425 9 to ev Transportation Services, Inc., a Massachusetts -based company, for the purchase and delivery of 17 Good Earth Fire F ly Electric Vehicles ; 2. Authorize the Purchasing Services Manager to issue a purchase order with ev Transportation Services, Inc. for the purch ase and delivery of 17 Good Earth Fire F ly Electric Vehicles in an amount not to exceed $837,747 for one year . Executive Summary This purchase would replace 17 vehicles that have reached the end of their cost - effective useful lives in the Park Maintenance and Promenade section s of the Public Landscape Division through the Vehicle Replacement Program. In January 2017 , the City solicited bids for the purchase of 13 Good Earth FireF ly Electric Vehicles with the option to purchase up to five additional vehicle s at the same price, terms, and conditions . Since the bid, staff identified four other vehicles used by the Public Landscape Division that had reached the end of their cost effective life. Staff recommends ev Transportation Service s , Inc., as the best and only bidder for the purchase and delivery of 1 7 Good Earth FireF ly Electric Vehicles with customized dump bed for a total amount not to exceed $837,747 for one year . This purchase meets the goals of the City’s Reduced -Emissions Fuels Policy by utilizing vehicles powered by electricity . Discussion The City replaces vehicles that have reached the end of their cost -effective useful life based on age, mileage, and repair history in accordance with the Vehicle Replacement Program. This purchase would replace 1 7 vehicles in the Park Maintenance and Promenade Maintenance section s of the Public Landscape Division with three -wheeled Good Earth FireFly Electric Utility Vehicles with dump beds . The existing vehicles have a cost -effective useful life span of six yea rs based on industry standards , utilization , and 2 of 8 the environment in which they are operated , with the exception of one electric Ford Ranger pickup truck . The existing vehicles which would be replaced are four -wheeled Miles Electric Utility Vehicles which w ere purchased in 2008 and are 9 years old , with the exception of one electric Ford Ranger pickup truck . A total of 13 vehicles were approved for replacement and included in the original formal bid solicitation. Additional Purchases language for up to fiv e additional vehicles was included in case additional vehicles of the same type were approved for replacement during the formal bid process. Since the bid, f our additional vehicles used by the Public Landscape Division , to maintain various parks throughout the city and to maintain the Downtown District, reached the end of their cost -effective useful life and were approved for replacement on March 7, 2017 by the Director of Public Works. Vehicle Data The vehicle data table below shows the vehicle unit numb er, model year, cost -effective useful life, age, replacement fiscal year, original cost, total maintenance cost over the life of the vehicle, and the percentage of the original cost that the maintenance cost has reached. Replacing Unit(s) Year Cost - Effect ive Useful Life Age Replacement F iscal Y ear Original Cost Total Maintenance Cost % 16210 2008 6 9 FY14/15 $24,504 $18,100 74% 16211 2008 6 9 FY14/15 $25,327 $30,520 121% 16212 2008 6 9 FY14/15 $24,504 $19,963 81% 16213 2008 6 9 FY14/15 $24,504 $21,611 88% 16214 2008 6 9 FY14/15 $25,327 $31,202 123% 16215 2008 6 9 FY14/15 $24,504 $42,845 175% 16216 2008 6 9 FY14/15 $24,504 $44,914 183% 16217 2008 6 9 FY14/15 $24,504 $30,419 124% 16218 2008 6 9 FY14/15 $25,327 $24,372 96% 16219 200 8 6 9 FY14/15 $24,504 $15,617 64% 16220 2008 6 9 FY14/15 $24,504 $27,645 113% 16221 2008 6 9 FY14/15 $25,327 $30,590 121% 16222 2008 6 9 FY14/15 $25,327 $25,143 99% 20185 2009 6 8 FY14/15 $12,920 $22,353 173% 3 of 8 20186 2009 6 8 FY14/15 $12,920 $21,099 163% 20187 2009 6 8 FY14/15 $12,920 $48,279 374% *16297 2009 12 8 FY20/21 $98,812 $11,847 12% *Unit 16297 is a 2009 Electric Ford Ranger Pickup Truck. High original cost is due to the cost to retrofit an unleaded Ford Ranger to an electric Ford Ranger. The unit will no longer hold a charge long enough to transport staff from one location to another and is almost never used. This has negatively affected the efficiency of Park Maintenance’s day -to -day operations. In addition, Ford and the subc ontractor no longer provide repair and part support for this unit. Example of a Good Earth FireFly Three -Wheel ed Electric Utility Vehicle with Dump Body Of the 17 vehicles that would be replaced through this purchase, 14 w ould be used by 14 Groundskeepers in Park Maintenance to transport staff , equ ipment , and materials to maintain 9 parks throughout the City as assigned below: 1. Marine Park – 1 Groundskeeper 2. Crescent Bay Park & Barnard Linear Park – 1 Groundskeeper 3. South Beach Park & Beach Park I – 1 Groundskeeper 4. Ocean View Park – 1 Groundskeeper 5. Ree d Park – 1 Groundskeeper 6. Douglas Park – 1 Groundskeeper 7. Virginia Ave Park – 1 Groundskeeper 8. Memorial Park – 1 Groundskeeper 9. Hotchkiss Park & Joslyn Park – 1 Groundskeeper 10. 5 sections of Palisades Park – 5 Groundskeepers The remaining three vehicles would b e used in the Downtown district by Promenade Maintenance staff. The vehicles would be used by various m aintenance w orkers and e quipment o perators and are not assigned to any one individual. The vehicles would be 4 of 8 used during two shifts, seven days per week, all year . They would be used to transport staff and equipment to various locations in the downtown area. Tasks performed by staff utilizing these vehicles include emptying trashcans, picking up litter, cleaning amenities in the district, weed abatement, a nd cleaning trash bin rooms in the parking structures. This purchase would replace Miles Electric Vehicles with dump beds and one electric Ford Ranger pickup truck with Good Earth FireFly Electric Vehicles with dump beds. The custom -built, modified Fire Fly with dump bed specifications were developed considering the City’s Sustainable Fleet Administrative Instruction and Sustainability Plan, as well as, the operational requirements of Park Maintenance and Promenade Maintenance. Various electric vehicles were tested for extended battery life, reliability, reduced maintenance costs, and safety , by Park Maintenance and Promenade Maintenance including Miles, E -Rides, GEM, Mighty Truck, Advantage, and FireF ly (please see table below). Pros Cons Other Remarks Miles  Obsolete.  Obsolete . Maintenance issues. E -Ride  None .  Costly to maintain.  Lead acid batteries have many maintenance issues.  Weak turning radius.  Weak differentials.  Limited to 25 mph max. Dump bed restricts rear view of operator.  Two units caug ht fire and burned two feet around due to wiring malfunction.  Being limited to 25 mph on surface streets can be a hazard. GEM  None .  Weak suspension parts.  No dump bed.  Limited to 25 mph max.  Weak turning radius.  Lead acid batteries have many maintenanc e issues.  Obsolete. Bought out by Polaris. Hard to get parts.  Not built for a rugged application.  Being limited to 25 mph on surface streets can be a hazard. 5 of 8 Mighty Truck  Well - built . Sturdy.  Limited to 25 mph max.  Takes time to get parts through Cust oms.  Being limited to 25 mph on surface streets can be a hazard. Advantage  None.  Limited to 25 mph max.  No dump bed.  Being limited to 25 mph on surface streets can be a hazard. FireFly  Great turning radius. Very maneuverable.  Good range per charge. (3 -4) days.  Can go over 25 mph on surface streets because it is classified as a motorcycle.  Some parts are not readily available.  In comparison to other equivalent vehicles, the FireFly has the least amount of repair costs and can be operated without having to be plugged in after every days use. Convention al Fuel Options  None.  Fossil fuels. More waste is created.  Contradicts the Sustainability Plan and the Sustainable Fleet AI. The Good Earth Fire F ly Electric Vehicle i s able to provide the perfor mance, battery life, and payload necessary to support the Park Maintenance and Promenade Maintenance sections of the Public Landscape Division and adheres to the guidelines set forth in the City’s Sustainable Fleet Administrative Instruction and Sustainabi lity Plan . The bid specifications included language requesting bids for the Good Earth FireFly, or an equivalent vehicle, giving vendors the option to take exception to or propose an alternative vehicle that meets the minimum requirements in order to mee t operational needs. This solicitation was not considered a sole source as there were multiple distributors who could have potentially bid. Furthermore, given electric vehicles, especially for commercial use, are an emerging technology, staff felt it impo rtant for 6 of 8 vendors to provide vendors the opportunity to propose other vehicle models that met City specifications. T here are many standard features which factor into the overall price of the Good Earth FireFly electric vehicle. The battery technology th e Good Earth FireFly vehicles has improved over the last few years , making the vehicles safe r , more sustainable and efficient. The FireFly vehicles were also the best fit because of their road -worthiness. Many competing vehicles in this market are also safe up to 25 miles per hour on surface streets. This is important because these vehicles would be housed at the Colorado Yards, would be charged overnight, and then would be driven out to each park location on a daily basis. This requires that the vehicl e is street legal and can hold a charge for an extended period of time traveling over diverse terrain. The FireFly is classified as a motorcycle and has the ability to go over 25 miles per hour on surface streets. The fact that FireFly vehicles are certifi ed for surface street use while also satisfying the City’s sustainability requirements as defined by the Sustainable Fleet Administrative Instruction make them the best fit for Santa Monica. This purchase meets the goals of the City’s Reduced -Emissions Fu els Policy by utilizing vehicles powered electricity, which reduces emissions. Vendor Selection In January 2017 , the City published Notices Inviting Bids to furnish and deliver 13 Good Earth FireF ly Electric Vehicles or an equivalent type vehicle , with th e option to purchase up to five additional vehicles at the same price, terms, and conditions, in accordance with City specifications. The bid was posted on the City’s on -line bidding site, and notices were advertised in the Santa Monica Daily Press in acc ordance with City Charter and Municipal Code provisions. A total of 134 City of Santa Monica local vendors and 250 external vendors were notified . T here were 15 prospective bidders, and 12 vendors downloaded the bid. One bid was received and publicly open ed on February 1, 2017 , per Attachment A. Staff conducted additional outreach to vendors who downloaded the bid to see why they did not submit a bid; two no -bid responses were received. One vendor could not meet the design changes in the specifications 7 of 8 wit hin the delivery timeframe requirement. Adherence to the delivery requirement is crucial in order to prevent spending more and more money to maintain the existing vehicles. Another vendor stated the bid was being submitted by the national distributor, ev T ransportation Services, Inc., directly in its stead. In other words, the regional distributor did not submit a bid, the national distributor took the lead. The average cost of maintenance per year per vehicle is $3,050. It takes approximately one year to go through the formal bid process and award the bid. If staff reject ed this bid and went back out to bid, approximately $51,8 50 in additional maintenance costs would be incurred and we would run the risk that some units would fail beyond repair. Staff re commends ev Transportation Service s , Inc. as the best bidder for the purchase and delivery of 1 7 new and unused Good Earth Fire F ly Electric Vehicles as required by Fleet Management . The bid w as evaluated based on the criteria in SMMC 2.24.072, including pr ice, ability to deliver, quality of product, and compliance with City specifications. Financial Impacts and Budget Actions The purchase order to be awarded to ev Transportation Service s , Inc. is for an amount not to exceed $837,747 . Funds are available in the FY 2016 -17 Capital Improvement Program budget in account C540167.589200. Prepared By: Heidi Duran, Administrative Analyst Approved Forwarded to Council 8 of 8 Attachments: A. Attachment A - Bid Summary B. EV Transportation Services, Inc._revised 3E C. Wr itten Comments AT T A C H M E N T  A Bi d  Re s u l t s  fo r  Pr o j e c t  GO O D  EA R T H  FI R E F L Y  VE H I C L E S  (4 2 5 9 ) Is s u e d  on  01 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 7 Bi d  Du e  on  Fe b r u a r y  1,  20 1 7    3: 0 0  PM  (P a c i f i c ) It e m   Nu m S e c t i o n I t e m  De s c r i p t i o n Un i t  Of   Me a s u r e Q u a n t i t y U n i t P r i c e T o t a l  Pr i c e C o m m e n t   Ma k e / M o d e l / Y e a r Fi r e F l y  / ES V  / 2017 1 P r i c i n g Ne w  an d  un u s e d ,  cu r r e n t  mo d e l  ye a r  or  ne w e r ,  go o d  ea r t h  fi r e f l y ,  or  eq u a l ,   co m p l e t e  wi t h  al l  co m p o n e n t s  as  sp e c i f i e d E A 1 3 $                           43 , 4 5 9 . 0 0   $                     56 4 , 9 6 7 . 0 0   2 P r i c i n g S c a n  To o l  fo r  Di a g n o s t i c s E A 1 In c l u d e d   $                                                         ‐       Su b t o t a l $                     56 4 , 9 6 7 . 0 0   Sa l e s  Ta x  (9 . 5 % ) $                         53 , 6 7 1 . 8 7   3 P r i c i n g W a r r a n t y E A 1 3 In c l u d e d   $                                                         ‐       4 P r i c i n g T i r e  fe e E A 1 3 $                                                 5. 2 5   $                                           68 . 2 5   5 P r i c i n g D e l i v e r y E A 1 3 $                                 1, 2 0 0 . 0 0   $                           15 , 6 0 0 . 0 0   Sh i p p i n g  co s t s  are  estimates  and   ma y  va r y  sl i g h t l y  based  on   nu m b e r  of  vehicles  per   sh i p m e n t 6 P r i c i n g T r a i n i n g E A 6 In c l u d e d   $                                                         ‐       7 P r i c i n g O t h e r  (p l e a s e  de s c r i b e ) E A 1 3 $                                       59 5 . 0 0   $                               7, 7 3 5 . 0 0   Ot h e r :  11 0 V  Charge  Cables Gr a n d  To t a l   $                     64 2 , 0 4 2 . 1 2   8 R e q u i r e m e n t s Pa y m e n t  Te r m s  (E n t e r  pa y m e n t  di s c o u n t  te r m s ;  ot h e r w i s e  ne t  th i r t y  (3 0 )  da y s  wi l l   ap p l y . Qu e s t i o n 0 0 N e t  30 9 R e q u i r e m e n t s Pe r c e n t  di s c o u n t  of f  of  ma n u f a c t u r e r ' s  pr i c e  li s t  fo r  re l a t e d  mi s c e l l a n e o u s  it e m s :                    % to                          %. Qu e s t i o n 0 0 0 %  to  0% 10 R e q u i r e m e n t s If  an  in c e n t i v e  di s c o u n t  pr o g r a m  ha s  be e n  in c l u d e d  in  th e  qu o t e d  pr i c e ,  pl e a s e   de s c r i b e . Q u e s t i o n 0 0 N o n e 11 R e q u i r e m e n t s D e s c r i b e  an y  ad d i t i o n a l  fe e s  an d  ch a r g e s  no t  li s t e d  ab o v e . Q u e s t i o n 0 0 N o n e 12 Ad d i t i o n a l   Pu r c h a s e  of   Ve h i c l e s Th e  Ci t y  re s e r v e s  th e  ri g h t  to  pu r c h a s e  up  to  fi v e  (5 )  ad d i t i o n a l  un i t ( s )  as  sp e c i f i e d   he r e i n  be y o n d  th e  qu a n t i t i e s  in d i c a t e d  (1 )  fo r  a  pe r i o d  of  on e  ye a r  fr o m  th e  da t e  of   th i s  bi d  aw a r d ,  or  (2 )  pr i o r  to  th e  ma n u f a c t u r e r ’ s  or d e r  cu t ‐of f  da t e  fo r  th e  de s i r e d   un i t ( s ) ,  wh i c h e v e r  da t e  oc c u r s  fi r s t  (t h e  “O p t i o n  Pe r i o d ” ) .    If  th e  Ci t y  ex e r c i s e s  th i s   ri g h t ,  th e  in i t i a l  bi d  pr i c e s  sh a l l  re m a i n  fi r m ,  un l e s s  du r i n g  th e  Op t i o n  Pe r i o d  th e r e  is   a  de c r e a s e  in  ge n e r a l  pu b l i s h e d  ma n u f a c t u r e r ’ s  pr i c e  ch a n g e  OR  a  ge n e r a l  ma r k e t   ch a n g e ,  as  ev i d e n c e d  by  pr i c e s  pa i d  by  ot h e r  go v e r n m e n t a l  en t i t i e s  or  pr i v a t e   or g a n i z a t i o n s .    Wi t h i n  th i r t y  (3 0 )  ca l e n d a r  da y s  of  su c h  a  de c r e a s e  in  pr i c e ,  a   No t e 0 0 13 Ad d i t i o n a l   Pu r c h a s e  of   Ve h i c l e s P l e a s e  in i t i a l  to  co n f i r m  ac k n o w l e d g e m e n t  of  th i s  cl a u s e . Q u e s t i o n 0 0 I n i t i a l e d St a t e  th e  gu a r a n t e e d  de l i v e r y  da t e  __ _ _  da y s  (a f t e r  re c e i p t  of  or d e r ) 60  da y s In d i c a t e  al l  wa r r a n t i e s  ap p l i c a b l e  to  th i s  pu r c h a s e 12  mo n t h  bu m p e r  to  bumper   ve h i c l e  wa r r a n t y ,  36  month   ba t t e r y  wa r r a n t y   ev  Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n    Se r v i c e s ,  Inc