SR 03-07-2017 3A
Ci ty Council
Report
City Council Meeting : March 7, 2017
Agenda Item: 3.A
1 of 8
To: Mayor and City Council
From: David Martin, Director , City Planning
Subject: Request to Approve Plans to Restore and Rehabilitate the Historic Interior
Lobby of the Former United States Post Office Building Located at 1248 5th
Street, in Accordance wi th a Preservation Covenant Administered by the City
Council
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that City Council :
1) A pprove the request to restore and rehabilitate the historic interior lobby of the
former Post Office building, located at 1248 5 th Street, a designated City
Landmark, as described in plans dated Dece mber 19, 2016; and
2) D esignate the Landmarks Commission Secretary as its designee to review and
approve certain future interior modifications to the historic lobby.
Executive Summary
The property owner is requesting approval to restore and rehabilitate the historic lobby
of the former United States Post Office located at 1248 5 th Street as part of an overall
plan to adaptively reuse the Landmark building as a headquarters for Skydance
Productions, a film/television production company. The applicant/property owner intends
to utilize the historic lobby as both a visitor reception area and a commissary to support
on -site employees and guests. Because the lobby is governed by a preservation
covenant tha t is administered by the City Council, permission to make any alterations,
including restoration and rehabilitation activities, must be granted by the City Council.
The property owner has retained the services of a preservation architect, Chattel,
Incor porated, who has achieved a sensitive design approach that balances corporate
prerequisites with historic sensitivity, and provides assurance that the project complies
with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties.
Overall, the scope of work maintains the integrity of the historic lobby and enhances the
historic character of the lobby in accordance with the Preservation Covenant and
Landmarks Ordinance.
Staff recommends that the City Council appoint the Landmarks C ommission Secretary
to act as its designee to approve certain minor modifications to the historic lobby based
on the recommendation of a qualified historic architect.
2 of 8
Background
On August 27, 2013, the Council approved a preservation covenant for the for mer
Downtown Post Office building in advance of its sale to a private party. The
preservation covenant, which was attached as a rider to the grant deed, ensures
protection of the property’s historic integrity, and that its distinct features and finishes
w ill be retained, including those found in the historic interior lobby space including:
the original hanging light fixtures,
marble wainscot,
horizontal wood walls and ceilings,
metal staircase rails, and
tall tables
Please note that furthe r research has since confirmed that the salmon -color marble
wainscot is not original to the building’s construction in 1938. The original wainscot
consisted of four -inch square terra cotta tiles. A tile believed to be from the original
wainscot was found in the janitor’s closet in the southern portion of the building. The tile
was examined by the applicant’s architectural conservator. It was beige in color, and
the material was identified as terra cotta.
On March 10, 2014, the Landmarks Commission desi gnated the former Post Office
building and the parcel on which it is situated as a Landmark and Landmark Parcel. In
doing so, the protection of any historic feature included in the designation would be
achieved pursuant to the Landmarks Ordinance, specif ically through the issuance of a
Certificate of Appropriateness. However, as the designation did not include any interior
portion or elements of the building, the protection of any of these identified features, as
specified in the historic covenant, can o nly be accomplished through Council approval.
A Certificate of Appropriateness is only relevant to those features specifically identified
in the Landmark designation.
On October 27, 2015, the City Council approved on its consent calendar a procedural
3 of 8
and testing protocol for analyzing material samples and finishes on interior portions of
the former United States Post Office building. The results of this analysis guided the
applicant in developing the plans currently under consideration.
On April 20, 20 16, the Planning Commission approved a rear building addition to the
former Post Office building and an associated parking variance to accommodate its
future adaptive reuse as creative office space. This decision was appealed, and
ultimately upheld by the City Council on August 9, 2016. The City Council decision
included a condition of approval that encouraged the applicant to present any proposed
alterations to the historic interior lobby to the Landmarks Commission for its
recommendation prior to formal review of the proposed alterations by the City Council.
On September 12, 2016, the Landmarks Commission approved a Certificate of
Appropriateness for the proposed building design, colors, materials, lighting and
landscaping for the approved expansion and for rehabilitation of the building’s exterior
and grounds.
On November 14, 2016, the Landmarks Commission received a courtesy presentation
describing the rehabilitation and restoration activities affecting the historic interior lobby
that are necessary in support of the building’s adaptive re -use. The Landmarks
Commission provided its unanimous recommendation in support of the request and
encouraged the applicant to celebrate the nuances of the building’s past as a former US
Post Office and reveal this history in the lobby design through retention of past repair
work. Commissioners also suggested aligning the wood intersections on the ceiling to
minimize the stepping and encouraged the use of light wood finishes. Any new
construction should be different iated through the use of diverse materials.
Commissioners raised safety concerns regarding the glass partitions.
Discussion
The historic lobby of the former Post Office building has undergone numerous
renovations since the date of its original constructio n in 1938. The applicant is
proposing a two -prong preservation approach in connection with the applicant’s
4 of 8
adaptive reuse of the building’s lobby to accommodate creative office space;
rehabilitation and restoration.
Rehabilitation is the act or proces s of making possible a compatible use for a
property through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions
or features which convey its historic, cultural, or architectural values.
Rehabilitation allows compatible new construction. Gen erally speaking, the
proposed rehabilitation work includes the removal of non -historic features and
materials and the installation of any replacement, and the construction of a new
partition walls to separate the reception lobby and commissary spaces.
Re storation is the process of accurately depicting the features and character of a
property as it appeared at a particular period of time, typically its period of
significance. This is accomplished by removing features from other periods in its
history and reconstructing missing features from its period of significance. The
restoration activities proposed will return the configuration, materials, and
finishes of the terrazzo flooring and wood board cladding to their original
appearance.
Specific details of t he proposed rehabilitation and restoration of the lobby is presented
below, specific to general building parameters. The plans were developed by the
applicant’s preservation architect, and represent the recommended treatment t o ensure
consistency with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic
Resources, as required by the Preservation Covenant.
Walls
The lobby walls and ceilings are partially clad in sugar pine (a type of white pine) which
would be retained in place. The wall s have experience d discoloration and are showing
signs of crazing (cracking) and separation. The proposed treatment of the historic wood
cladding would include removal of the layers of coating using a chemical application,
cleaning of the wood, and applica tion of a new clear coating. A reddish -brown oil based
stain will be applied, matched to the color of the trim . Following the removal of non -
historic alterations, any holes would be patched or wood boards would be replaced in -
kind, as necessary and where appropriate.
5 of 8
The existing non -historic marble wainscot would be removed and replaced with new
natural limestone slabs in a neutral grey color with a honed finish. This will result in an
appearance that would be more consistent with the appearance of the original tile
wainscot.
The historic , individual customer service windows along the west wall would be
reestablished with an interpretation that would generally utilize historic sizes and pattern
based on original drawings and early photographs. These new windows would be
comprised of clear glass with signage panels above and painted surrounds and sills.
For fire safety purposes, the sills and surrounds would be reimagined in steel (as
opposed to wood) and painted to match other features of the lobby. Gold leaf lettering
would be restored on the signage panels above each service window based on original
drawings, and individually would read as Parcel Post, Stamps, General Delivery,
Information, and Registry.
A non -historic roll -up metal door and cou nter at the south wall recess would be removed
and infilled with a new wood frame and glazed double -door. The janitor’s original wood
door would be fixed in place. The original stainless steel handrail would be reinstalled
in the same location on this wa ll, and the decorative stainless steel railing surrounding
the stair in this location will also be retained in place.
Ceiling and Lighting
The historic wood ceiling would remain in place and would be repaired and treated in
the same way as the historic wo od walls. The six historic pendant light fixtures would
be re -lamped and restored to original sizes (where previously truncated). Any canned
lighting will be removed.
Terrazzo Flooring
The existing terrazzo lobby floors will be retained, repaired, cle aned and treated with an
application of a new protective clear coating.
6 of 8
Partitioning
The non -historic wood and glass partition wall that separated the customer service area
from postal boxes area of the lobby will be removed. A new wood and glass parti tion
wall will be installed in a new location that aligns with the pilasters directly south of the
northern entrance. This new partition wall will serve to divide the historic lobby into a
reception lobby in the northern end from a commissary dining room in the center. A
secondary free standing partition wall would further divide the commissary space in the
center from an employee lounge area to the south. The partitions would include mill
work for storage. Per the recommendation of the Landmarks Commis sion, the millwork
aspect of these partitions would be clad in maple to differentiate the new additions from
the historic sugar pine clad walls. Also, the extensive use of glass maintains the spatial
relationships and feeling that the lobby is one long rec tilinear space.
Desk and Tables
The lobby consisted of five original tall maple tables with stainless steel feet and non -
original composite tops. They were originally bolted to the ground. These tables have
been identified as historic interior features. The tables would be retained as movable
furniture pieces used within the rehabilitated commissary. The table’s non -original
composite material topping would be replaced with glass, as they were historically.
Future Interior Modifications and Alterations
The approved preservation covenant for the former Downtown Post Office building was
approved by City Council in advance of its sale to a private party. The preservation
covenant, which was attached as a rider to the grant deed, ensures protection of the
property’s historic integrity, and that its distinct features and finishes will be retained, as
described in the Background section of this report including those found in the historic
interior lobby space. Because the lobby is governed by a preservation c ovenant that is
administered by the City Council, permission to make any alterations, including
restoration and rehabilitation activities, must be granted by the City Council. This
process could be time consuming to the property owner, particularly when a proposed
alteration is minor in nature and will not result in any compromised integrity. To remedy
this , staff recommends that the City Council direct any alterations of the historic lobby
7 of 8
proposed by the property owner be undertaken with the assistance of a historic architect
meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards in Historic
Architecture (36 CFR Part 61, Appendix A). Staff further recommends that the City
Council appoint the Landmarks Commission Secr etary to act as its designee to approve
any minor modifications to the historic lobby , such as refinements of approved colors,
materials , finishes, lighting, fixtures or partitions , provided that the work will not
negatively impact any of the identified character -definin g features of the lobby and the
work will be completed in compliance with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for
the Treatment of Historic Properties . The property owner’s historic architect shall affirm
this in written correspondence to the Landma rks Commission Secretary prior to any
approvals being granted . Staff further recommends that the City Council retain its
review and approval authority on s ignificant changes to the rehabilitation and restoration
of the historic lobby , including the removal of any of the identified character -defining
features.
Financial Impacts and Budget Actions
There is no immediate financial impact or budget action necessary as a result of the
recommended action.
Prepared By: Scott Albright, Senior Planner
Approved
Forwarded to Council
Attachments:
A. Conformance Review Report of Proposed Interior Lobby Rehabilitation
B. REVISED Restoration and Rehabilitation of Historic Lobby Plans
8 of 8
C. Written Comments
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
1
RE
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
N
D
R
E
H
A
B
I
L
I
T
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
L
O
B
B
Y
CI
T
Y
C
O
U
N
C
I
L
R
E
V
I
E
W
O
F
L
O
B
B
Y
P
E
R
P
R
E
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
V
E
N
A
N
T
PHOTO CREDIT: SANTA MONICA HISTORY MUSEUM, BEEBE COLLECTION 1949
PR
O
T
E
C
T
E
D
B
Y
P
R
E
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
V
E
N
A
N
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
:
12
4
8
5
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
A
N
T
A
M
O
N
I
C
A
,
C
A
9
0
4
0
1
PR
O
J
E
C
T
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
:
1
2
4
8
5
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
L
L
C
CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: MARCH 7, 2017
CL
I
E
N
T
:
12
4
8
5
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
L
L
C
DE
S
I
G
N
E
R
/
O
W
N
E
R
'
S
R
E
P
R
E
S
E
N
T
A
T
I
V
E
:
11
K
P
S
EM
A
I
L
:
a
n
d
y
@
1
1
k
p
s
.
c
o
m
AR
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
:
HL
W
I
N
T
E
R
N
A
T
I
O
N
A
L
L
L
P
CO
N
T
A
C
T
:
S
E
J
A
L
S
O
N
A
N
I
TE
L
:
3
1
0
-
5
8
6
-
6
7
9
3
EM
A
I
L
:
s
s
o
n
a
n
i
@
h
l
w
.
c
o
m
15
5
6
2
0
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
U
I
T
E
B
SA
N
T
A
M
O
N
I
C
A
,
C
A
9
0
4
0
4
ST
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
:
ST
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
F
O
C
U
S
CO
N
T
A
C
T
:
D
A
V
I
D
C
O
C
K
E
TE
L
:
3
1
0
-
3
2
3
-
9
1
1
3
x
1
6
EM
A
I
L
:
d
c
o
c
k
e
@
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
a
l
f
o
c
u
s
.
c
o
m
19
2
1
0
S
.
V
E
R
M
O
N
T
A
V
E
.
BU
I
L
D
I
N
G
B
,
S
U
I
T
E
2
1
0
GA
R
D
E
N
A
,
C
A
9
0
2
4
8
HI
S
T
O
R
I
C
P
R
E
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
S
:
CH
A
T
T
E
L
,
I
N
C
CO
N
T
A
C
T
:
R
O
B
E
R
T
C
H
A
T
T
E
L
EM
A
I
L
:
r
o
b
e
r
t
@
c
h
a
t
t
e
l
.
U
S
13
4
1
7
V
E
N
T
U
R
A
B
L
V
D
SH
E
R
M
A
N
O
A
K
S
,
C
A
9
1
4
2
3
-
3
9
3
8
ME
P
:
BU
R
O
H
A
P
P
O
L
D
C
O
N
S
U
L
TI
N
G
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
S
,
I
N
C
CO
N
T
A
C
T
:
C
H
R
I
S
T
O
P
H
E
R
M
C
C
L
E
A
N
TE
L
:
3
1
0
-
9
4
5
-
4
8
0
0
EM
A
I
L
:
C
H
R
I
S
T
O
P
H
E
R
.
M
C
C
L
E
A
N
@B
U
R
O
H
A
P
P
O
L
D
.
C
O
M
80
0
W
I
L
S
H
I
R
E
B
L
V
D
.
,
1
6
T
H
F
L
O
O
R
LO
S
A
N
G
E
L
E
S
C
A
9
0
0
1
7
CI
V
I
L
:
IN
C
L
E
D
O
N
C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
G
R
O
U
P
CO
N
T
A
C
T
:
M
I
C
H
A
E
L
I
N
C
L
E
D
O
N
TE
L
:
8
1
8
-
6
4
7
-
7
1
5
8
EM
A
I
L
:
m
i
n
c
l
e
d
o
n
@
i
c
g
c
i
v
i
l
.
c
o
m
15
3
0
0
V
E
N
T
U
R
A
B
L
V
D
.
,
S
U
I
T
E
2
0
0
SH
E
R
M
A
N
O
A
K
S
,
C
A
9
1
4
0
3
CL
I
E
N
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
M
A
N
A
G
E
R
:
AM
A
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
M
A
N
A
G
E
M
E
N
T
CO
N
T
A
C
T
:
A
N
T
O
N
Y
B
I
D
D
L
E
TE
L
:
3
1
0
-
2
1
2
-
6
6
0
3
EM
A
I
L
:
A
B
I
D
D
L
E
@
A
M
A
P
M
.
C
O
M
10
8
8
0
W
I
L
S
H
I
R
E
B
L
V
D
.
,
S
U
I
T
E
1
0
0
5
LO
S
A
N
G
E
L
E
S
,
C
A
9
0
0
2
4
LI
G
H
T
I
N
G
:
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
:
KS
A
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
R
E
CO
N
T
A
C
T
:
S
H
A
R
N
S
T
I
N
S
O
N
-
U
R
E
TE
L
:
3
1
0
-
5
7
4
-
4
4
6
0
EM
A
I
L
:
S
.
U
R
E
@
K
S
A
-
L
A
.
C
O
M
42
1
2
1
/
2
G
L
E
N
C
O
E
A
V
E
N
U
E
MA
R
N
I
A
D
E
L
R
E
Y
,
C
A
9
0
2
9
2
HL
B
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
D
E
S
I
G
N
CO
N
T
A
C
T
:
E
.
T
E
A
L
B
R
O
G
D
E
N
TE
L
:
3
1
0
-
8
3
7
-
0
9
2
9
EM
A
I
L
:
T
B
R
O
G
D
E
N
@
H
L
B
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
.
C
O
M
85
8
0
W
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
B
L
V
D
,
CU
L
V
E
R
C
I
T
Y
,
C
A
9
0
2
3
2
CO
D
E
C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
:
SI
M
P
S
O
N
G
U
M
P
E
R
T
Z
&
H
E
G
E
R
CO
N
T
A
C
T
:
N
A
T
E
W
I
T
T
A
S
E
K
TE
L
:
2
1
3
-
2
7
1
-
1
9
3
2
EM
A
I
L
:
N
B
W
I
T
T
A
S
E
K
@
S
G
H
.
C
O
M
10
5
5
W
E
S
T
7
T
H
S
T
R
E
E
T
S
U
I
T
E
#
2
5
0
0
LO
S
A
N
G
E
L
E
S
,
C
A
9
0
0
1
7
AC
O
U
S
T
I
C
C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
:
NE
W
S
O
N
B
R
O
W
N
CO
N
T
A
C
T
:
M
A
R
T
I
N
N
E
W
S
O
N
TE
L
:
3
1
0
-
8
2
9
-
6
3
4
3
EM
A
I
L
:
M
A
R
T
I
N
@
N
E
W
S
O
N
A
C
O
U
S
T
I
C
S
.
C
O
M
20
0
1
W
I
L
S
H
I
R
E
B
L
V
D
.
,
S
U
I
T
E
3
0
1
SA
N
T
A
M
O
N
I
C
A
,
C
A
9
0
4
0
3
IT
/
A
V
C
O
N
S
U
L
T
A
N
T
:
PL
A
N
N
E
T
C
O
N
S
U
L
T
I
N
G
CO
N
T
A
C
T
:
E
R
I
C
R
Y
K
E
TE
L
:
7
1
4
-
9
8
2
-
5
8
0
0
EM
A
I
L
:
E
R
Y
K
E
@
P
L
A
N
N
E
T
.
C
O
M
29
5
1
S
A
T
U
R
N
S
T
R
E
E
T
,
S
U
I
T
E
E
BR
E
A
,
C
A
9
2
8
2
1
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
2
PR
O
J
E
C
T
D
I
R
E
C
T
O
R
Y
DR
A
W
I
N
G
L
I
S
T
PR
O
J
E
C
T
U
S
E
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
I
Z
E
FU
T
U
R
E
U
S
E
:
R
E
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
,
C
O
M
I
S
S
A
R
Y
A
N
D
L
O
U
N
G
E
F
O
R
M
E
D
I
A
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
(S
A
N
T
A
M
O
N
I
C
A
B
U
S
I
N
E
S
S
L
I
C
E
N
S
E
N
O
.
2
1
0
1
5
6
)
CO
V
E
R
PR
O
J
E
C
T
D
A
T
A
PR
E
S
E
R
V
A
T
I
O
N
C
O
V
E
N
A
N
T
SE
L
E
C
T
E
D
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
A
M
E
R
I
C
A
N
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
U
R
V
E
Y
F
I
E
L
D
P
H
O
T
O
S
FL
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
RE
F
L
E
C
T
E
D
C
E
I
L
I
N
G
P
L
A
N
S
FL
O
O
R
F
I
N
I
S
H
P
L
A
N
IN
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
-
E
A
S
T
W
A
L
L
IN
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
-
W
E
S
T
W
A
L
L
SO
U
T
H
A
N
D
N
O
R
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
/
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
WO
O
D
T
R
E
A
T
M
E
N
T
F
I
E
L
D
T
R
I
A
L
S
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
P
A
R
T
I
T
I
O
N
W
A
L
L
R
E
N
D
E
R
I
N
G
S
GL
A
S
S
P
A
R
T
I
T
O
N
W
A
L
L
LO
B
B
Y
R
E
N
D
E
R
I
N
G
S
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
P
O
W
E
R
A
N
D
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
P
L
A
N
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
F
I
R
E
A
N
D
L
I
F
E
S
A
F
E
T
Y
D
E
V
I
C
E
P
L
A
N
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
M
E
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
V
E
N
T
I
L
A
T
I
O
N
P
L
A
N
S
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
M
E
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
V
E
N
T
I
L
A
T
I
O
N
P
L
A
N
S
NE
W
W
E
S
T
W
A
L
L
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
MI
L
L
W
O
R
K
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
DE
C
O
R
A
T
I
V
E
L
I
G
H
T
F
I
X
T
U
R
E
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
ST
A
I
R
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
FL
O
O
R
D
I
F
F
U
S
E
R
A
N
D
P
A
N
I
C
H
A
R
D
W
A
R
E
D
E
T
A
I
L
MA
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
HI
S
T
O
R
I
C
P
H
O
T
O
S
PAGE1 PAGE 2 PAGE3 PAGE 4 PAGE 5 PAGE 6 PAGE 7 PAGE 8 PAGE 9 PAGE 10 PAGE 11 PAGE 12 PAGE 13 PAGE 14 PAGE 15 PAGE 16 PAGE 17 PAGE 18 PAGE 19 PAGE 20 PAGE 21 PAGE 22 PAGE 23 PAGE 24 PAGE 25
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
L
O
B
B
Y
A
R
E
A
:
2
,
8
5
6
S
F
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
R
E
C
E
P
T
I
O
N
,
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
A
R
Y
A
N
D
L
O
U
N
G
E
A
R
E
A
:
2
,
5
6
4
S
F
PROJECT DATA
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
3 PRESERVATION COVENANT
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
4
SE
L
E
C
T
E
D
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
A
M
E
R
I
C
A
N
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
U
R
V
E
Y
F
I
E
L
D
P
H
O
T
O
G
R
A
P
H
S
A.
S
o
u
t
h
e
r
n
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
l
o
b
b
y
w
i
t
h
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
c
o
u
n
t
e
r
s
,
l
o
o
k
i
n
g
N
o
r
t
h
.
B.
S
o
u
t
h
e
r
n
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
l
o
b
b
y
,
l
o
o
k
i
n
g
S
o
u
t
h
.
C.
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
l
o
b
b
y
w
i
t
h
p
o
s
t
a
l
b
o
x
a
l
c
o
v
e
s
,
l
o
o
k
i
n
g
S
o
u
t
h
.
D.
H
i
s
t
o
r
i
c
l
o
b
b
y
t
a
b
l
e
a
n
d
b
u
l
l
e
t
i
n
b
o
a
r
d
E.
T
e
r
r
a
z
z
o
s
t
a
i
r
s
,
c
u
r
v
e
d
s
t
a
i
n
l
e
s
s
s
t
e
e
l
h
a
n
d
r
a
i
l
a
n
d
r
a
i
l
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
l
a
n
d
i
n
g
F.
D
e
t
a
i
l
o
f
L
o
b
b
y
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
c
o
u
n
t
e
r
b
a
y
A
B
C
D
E F
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
5
DN
LI
G
H
T
W
E
L
L
(N) WALL TO BE RECONSTRUCTED AT ORIGINAL LOCATION (N) GLASS PARTITION (N) ENTRY DOOR
(N
)
E
N
T
R
Y
D
O
O
R
(N
)
D
O
O
R
I
N
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
DO
O
R
T
O
B
E
R
E
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
E
D
TO
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
D
E
S
I
G
N
CO
M
M
I
S
S
A
R
Y
NO
T
I
N
S
C
O
P
E
NO
T
I
N
S
C
O
P
E
NOT IN SCOPE 20' - 6"10"
DI
F
F
U
S
E
R
S
DOOR TO BE RECONSTRUCTED TO ORIGINAL DESIGN RECEPTION AREA
MI
L
L
W
O
R
K
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
T
A
B
L
E
S
R
E
L
O
C
A
T
E
D
H
E
R
E
NO
T
I
N
SC
O
P
E
33' - 11 3/4"
93
'
-
2
7
/
8
"
LO
U
N
G
E
2'
-
3
1
/
2
"
LI
G
H
T
W
E
L
L
LI
G
H
T
W
E
L
L
LIGHT WELL LOCATION OF REMOVED RADIATOR
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
U
S
E
CR
E
A
T
I
V
E
O
F
F
I
C
E
LOCATION OF FIXED TABLE REPLACED TERRAZZO FROM REMOVED VESTIBULES
FI
X
E
D
T
A
B
L
E
A
N
D
R
A
D
I
A
T
O
R
AD
D
I
T
I
O
N
O
F
S
L
I
D
I
N
G
D
O
O
R
ADDITION OF MAILBOXES
RE
P
L
A
C
E
D
T
E
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
F
R
O
M
R
E
M
O
V
E
D
V
E
S
T
I
B
U
L
E
S
DI
S
C
O
L
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
A
R
O
U
N
D
E
D
G
E
S
O
F
T
H
I
S
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
.
MI
L
L
W
O
R
K
A
N
D
T
E
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
F
I
N
I
S
H
E
S
I
S
H
I
D
D
E
N
DA
M
A
G
E
D
R
E
P
L
A
C
I
N
G
R
A
I
L
I
N
G
HO
L
E
S
O
R
D
A
M
A
G
E
D
,
T
Y
P
.
FI
X
E
D
T
A
B
L
E
A
N
D
R
A
D
I
A
T
O
R
FI
X
E
D
T
A
B
L
E
A
N
D
R
A
D
I
A
T
O
R
FI
X
E
D
T
A
B
L
E
NO
T
I
N
S
C
O
P
E
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
R
E
S
T
O
R
E
D
A
N
D
R
E
H
A
B
I
L
I
T
A
T
E
D
L
O
B
B
Y
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
E
X
P
A
N
D
E
D
A
N
D
A
L
T
E
R
E
D
L
O
B
B
Y
OR
I
G
I
N
A
L
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
L
O
B
B
Y
1
9
3
7
AREAS ALTEREDEXISTING STRUCTUREAREAS NOT IN SCOPE FLOOR PLANS
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
6 (E) WALL TO BE RELOCATED TO ORIGINAL DESIGN NOT IN SCOPE
NO
T
I
N
S
C
O
P
E
OR
I
G
I
N
A
L
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
L
O
B
B
Y
1
9
3
7
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
E
X
P
A
N
D
E
D
A
N
D
A
L
T
E
R
E
D
L
O
B
B
Y
C
E
I
L
I
N
G
P
L
A
N
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
R
E
S
T
O
R
E
D
A
N
D
R
E
H
A
B
I
L
I
T
A
T
E
D
L
O
B
B
Y
C
E
I
L
I
N
G
P
L
A
N
(N) GLASS PARTITION
NO
T
I
N
S
C
O
P
E
NOT IN SCOPE
RE
L
O
C
A
T
E
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
L
I
G
H
T
F
I
X
T
U
R
E
NE
W
C
E
I
L
I
N
G
NE
W
C
E
I
L
I
N
G
NEW CEILING RELOCATE EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE (N) ADDED FIXTURE
(N
)
R
E
C
E
S
S
E
D
S
I
D
E
W
A
L
L
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
,
T
Y
P
CO
M
M
I
S
S
A
R
Y
RECEPTION
(N
)
R
E
C
E
S
S
E
D
S
I
D
E
W
A
L
L
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
,
T
Y
P
(N
)
R
E
C
E
S
S
E
D
S
I
D
E
W
A
L
L
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
,
T
Y
P
(N) RECESSED SIDEWALL SPRINKLER, TYP (N) RECESSED SIDEWALL SPRINKLER, TYP
NO
T
I
N
SC
O
P
E
(E
)
P
E
N
E
T
R
A
T
I
O
N
W
I
T
H
(N
)
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
F
I
X
T
U
R
E
,
TY
P
(E
)
L
I
G
H
T
F
I
X
T
U
R
E
T
O
B
E
R
E
L
A
M
P
E
D
(N) ADDED FIXTURE AREAS ALTEREDEXISTING STRUCTUREAREAS NOT IN SCOPE REFLECTED CEILING PLANS
LO
U
N
G
E
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
7
DN
NO
T
I
N
S
C
O
P
E
NO
T
I
N
S
C
O
P
E
NOT IN SCOPE
RE
P
A
I
R
T
E
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
FL
O
O
R
I
N
G
A
T
R
E
M
O
V
E
D
CH
A
N
N
E
L
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
RE
P
A
I
R
T
E
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
F
L
O
O
R
I
N
G
AT
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
F
I
X
E
D
T
A
B
L
E
&
PR
E
V
I
O
U
S
R
A
D
I
A
T
O
R
LO
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
REPAIR TERRAZZO FLOORING AT PREVIOUS MAIL BOX LOCATIONS REPAIR TERRAZZO FLOORING AT PREVIOUS MAIL BOX LOCATIONS REPAIR TERRAZZO FLOORING AT PREVIOUS MAIL BOX LOCATIONS
PO
S
S
I
B
L
E
R
E
P
A
I
R
O
F
T
E
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
FL
O
O
R
I
N
G
A
T
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
LO
C
A
T
I
O
N
RE
P
A
I
R
T
E
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
F
L
O
O
R
I
N
G
AT
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
F
I
X
E
D
T
A
B
L
E
&
PR
E
V
I
O
U
S
R
A
D
I
A
T
O
R
LO
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
RE
P
A
I
R
T
E
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
F
L
O
O
R
I
N
G
AT
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
F
I
X
E
D
T
A
B
L
E
&
PR
E
V
I
O
U
S
R
A
D
I
A
T
O
R
LO
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
RE
P
A
I
R
T
E
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
F
L
O
O
R
I
N
G
AT
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
F
I
X
E
D
T
A
B
L
E
&
PR
E
V
I
O
U
S
R
A
D
I
A
T
O
R
LO
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
RE
P
A
I
R
D
A
M
A
G
E
D
T
E
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
FL
O
O
R
I
N
G
RE
P
A
I
R
D
A
M
A
G
E
D
T
E
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
FL
O
O
R
I
N
G
RE
P
A
I
R
D
A
M
A
G
E
D
T
E
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
FL
O
O
R
I
N
G
,
T
Y
P
RE
P
A
I
R
D
A
M
A
G
E
D
TE
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
F
L
O
O
R
I
N
G
RE
P
A
I
R
T
E
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
F
L
O
O
R
I
N
G
AT
N
E
W
R
E
C
E
S
S
E
D
G
L
A
S
S
CH
A
N
N
E
L
RE
P
A
I
R
T
E
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
FL
O
O
R
I
N
G
A
T
N
E
W
RE
C
E
S
S
E
D
G
L
A
S
S
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
RE
P
A
I
R
T
E
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
F
L
O
O
R
I
N
G
AT
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
M
A
I
L
B
O
X
LO
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
RE
M
O
V
E
A
N
D
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
TE
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
F
L
O
O
R
I
N
G
A
T
PR
E
V
I
O
U
S
L
Y
P
A
T
C
H
E
D
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
OF
F
O
R
M
E
R
V
E
S
T
I
B
U
L
E
RE
M
O
V
E
A
N
D
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
TE
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
F
L
O
O
R
I
N
G
A
T
PR
E
V
I
O
U
S
L
Y
P
A
T
C
H
E
D
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
OF
F
O
R
M
E
R
V
E
S
T
I
B
U
L
E
NO
T
I
N
SC
O
P
E
AREAS ALTERED
NE
W
L
Y
M
O
D
I
F
I
E
D
T
E
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
A
R
E
A
S
N
O
T
I
N
S
C
O
P
E
PROPOSED FLOOR FINISH PLAN
Te
r
r
a
z
z
o
p
a
t
c
h
a
t
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
f
o
r
m
e
r
e
n
t
r
y
v
e
s
t
i
b
u
l
e
D
i
f
f
e
r
i
n
g
t
e
r
r
a
z
z
o
c
o
l
o
r
s
w
h
e
r
e
l
o
b
b
y
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
e
x
p
a
n
d
e
d
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
8
EA
S
T
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
-
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
L
O
B
B
Y
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
(
F
O
R
R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
)
EA
S
T
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
-
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
L
O
B
B
Y
EA
S
T
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
-
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
L
O
B
B
Y
SC
O
N
C
E
EM
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
L
I
G
H
T
S
SC
O
N
C
E
SC
O
N
C
E
SCONCE SCONCE SCONCE
EM
E
R
G
E
N
C
Y
L
I
G
H
T
S
EMERGENCY LIGHTS
EX
I
T
S
I
G
N
EXIT SIGN VESTIBULE FRAMINGVESTIBULE FRAMING SURFACE MOUNTED SPEAKERSURFACE MOUNTED SPEAKER SURFACE MOUNTED SPEAKER
SU
R
F
A
C
E
M
O
U
N
T
E
D
S
P
E
A
K
E
R
SE
C
U
R
I
T
Y
C
A
M
E
R
A
PO
W
E
R
PO
W
E
R
RE
P
L
A
C
E
D
RE
P
L
A
C
E
D
RE
P
L
A
C
E
D
RE
P
L
A
C
E
D
R
E
P
L
A
C
E
D
REPLACED
(N
)
W
A
L
L
T
O
B
E
M
O
V
E
D
T
O
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
EN
T
R
Y
D
O
O
R
S
A
N
D
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
R
E
S
T
O
R
E
D
T
O
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
SP
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
.
B
O
T
H
S
E
T
S
-
N
O
R
T
H
A
N
D
S
O
U
T
H
(V
E
S
T
I
B
U
L
E
S
N
O
T
B
E
I
N
G
R
E
S
T
O
R
E
D
)
(N
)
N
E
W
S
T
O
N
E
W
A
I
N
S
C
O
T
(N
)
S
P
E
A
K
E
R
/
S
T
R
O
B
E
(N
)
P
U
L
L
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
O
L
D
L
E
A
F
B
U
L
L
E
T
I
N
B
O
A
R
D
LE
T
T
E
R
I
N
G
T
O
B
E
R
E
S
T
O
R
E
D
,
T
Y
P
.
BU
L
L
E
T
I
N
B
O
A
R
D
T
O
R
E
A
D
"
B
U
L
L
E
T
I
N
"
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
O
L
D
L
E
A
F
B
U
L
L
E
T
I
N
BO
A
R
D
L
E
T
T
E
R
I
N
G
T
O
B
E
RE
S
T
O
R
E
D
,
T
Y
P
.
B
U
L
L
E
T
I
N
B
O
A
R
D
TO
R
E
A
D
"
B
U
L
L
E
T
I
N
"
EXISTING GOLD LEAF BULLETIN BOARD LETTERING TO BE RESTORED, TYP.BULLETIN BOARD TO READ "DIRECTORY"DIRECTORY
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
O
L
D
L
E
A
F
B
U
L
L
E
T
I
N
B
O
A
R
D
LE
T
T
E
R
I
N
G
T
O
B
E
R
E
S
T
O
R
E
D
,
T
Y
P
.
BU
L
L
E
T
I
N
B
O
A
R
D
T
O
R
E
A
D
"
U
N
I
T
E
D
ST
A
T
E
S
C
I
V
I
L
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
O
N
"
BU
L
L
E
T
I
N
BU
L
L
E
T
I
N
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
O
L
D
L
E
A
F
B
U
L
L
E
T
I
N
B
O
A
R
D
LE
T
T
E
R
I
N
G
T
O
B
E
R
E
S
T
O
R
E
D
,
T
Y
P
.
BU
L
L
E
T
I
N
B
O
A
R
D
T
O
R
E
A
D
"
B
U
L
L
E
T
I
N
"
BU
L
L
E
T
I
N
NE
W
F
I
R
E
S
T
R
O
B
E
"
NE
W
F
I
R
E
S
T
R
O
B
E
"
NEW FIRE STROBE"(N)PULL STATION
BU
L
L
E
T
I
N
BU
L
L
E
T
I
N
EXISTING GOLD LEAF BULLETIN BOARD LETTERING TO BE RESTORED, TYP.BULLETIN BOARD TO READ "UNITED STATES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSON" UNITED STATES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSON UNITED STATES CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSON
(N
)
N
E
W
F
L
U
S
H
S
T
O
N
E
B
A
S
E
TO
M
A
T
C
H
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
H
E
I
G
H
T
NE
W
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
OU
T
L
E
T
S
W
I
T
H
G
R
E
Y
F
A
C
E
PL
A
T
E
T
O
M
A
T
C
H
W
A
L
L
FI
N
I
S
H
AREAS ALTERED EAST INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
9
WE
S
T
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
-
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
L
O
B
B
Y
WE
S
T
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
-
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
L
O
B
B
Y
2' - 11 1/4"3"
(N) WALL TO BE RELOCATED TO ORIGINAL LOCATION (N) INTERPRETATION OF ORIGINAL WINDOWS, TYP.FILLED WITH CLEAR GLASS (N) STONE WALL CLADDING (N) GLASS PARTITION
(N
)
C
O
N
C
E
A
L
E
D
H
O
R
I
Z
O
N
T
A
L
S
I
D
E
W
A
L
L
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
,
F
I
N
S
H
T
O
BE
B
R
O
N
Z
E
,
T
Y
P
(N) STONE CHAIR RAIL (N) MILLWORK
(N
)
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
(N) STONE DOOR FRAME TO MATCH EXISTING PROFILE (N) METAL PANEL W/GOLD LEAF LETTERING
RE
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
E
D
D
O
O
R
T
O
MA
T
C
H
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
J
A
N
I
T
O
R
'
S
(N) NEW FLUSH STONE BASE TO MATCH EXISTING HEIGHT
3' - 2 1/4"
1 3/4" WOOD SILL TO MATCH PREVIOUS CONSTRUCTION (N) DOOR PAINTED DORIANGREYOR
CO
N
T
E
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y
D
R
Y
W
A
L
L
C
O
N
T
E
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y
D
R
Y
W
A
L
L
SW
I
T
C
H
E
S
AD
D
E
D
W
O
O
D
D
E
T
A
I
L
A
D
D
E
D
W
O
O
D
D
E
T
A
I
L
A
D
D
E
D
W
O
O
D
D
E
T
A
I
L
PO
W
E
R
SW
I
T
C
H
E
S
BL
O
C
K
I
N
G
PO
W
E
R
WA
L
L
R
E
M
O
V
E
D
F
O
R
P
O
S
T
B
O
X
P
O
P
-
O
U
T
W
A
L
L
R
E
M
O
V
E
D
F
O
R
P
O
S
T
B
O
X
P
O
P
-
O
U
T
W
A
L
L
R
E
M
O
V
E
D
F
O
R
P
O
S
T
B
O
X
P
O
P
-
O
U
T
WALL REMOVED FOR POST BOX POP-OUT
WO
O
D
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
(
D
A
M
A
G
E
D
)
WO
O
D
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
WE
S
T
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
-
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
L
O
B
B
Y
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
(
F
O
R
R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
)
AREAS ALTERED WEST INTERIOR ELEVATIONS
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
10 NORTH INTERIOR ELEVATION HISTORIC LOBBY ORIGINAL DRAWINGS (FOR REFERENCE )
SO
U
T
H
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
HI
S
T
O
R
I
C
L
O
B
B
Y
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
(F
O
R
R
E
F
E
R
E
N
C
E
)
SO
U
T
H
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
-
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
L
O
B
B
Y
NORTH INTERIOR ELEVATION - EXISTING HISTORIC LOBBY
SO
U
T
H
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
-
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
L
O
B
B
Y
NORTH INTERIOR ELEVATION - PROPOSED HISTORIC LOBBY RELOCATED WALL (WOOD APPEARS TO BE OLDER)OPENINGS IN MARBLE FR OM REMOVED POST BOXES MARBLE GRILL - TO BE USED AS HVAC RETURN (N) OPENINGS TO MATCH ORGINCAL FILLED W/ FROSTED GLASS (N) NEW STONE WAINSCOTING (N) METAL PANEL W/GOLD LEAF LETTERING (N) STONE FLUSH STONE BASE TO MATCH EXISTING HEIGHT 1 3/4" WOOD SILL TO MATCH PREVIOUS CONSTRUCTION
GR
I
L
L
-
T
O
B
E
U
S
E
D
A
S
HV
A
C
R
E
T
U
R
N
(N
)
W
O
O
D
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
T
O
MA
T
C
H
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
(N
)
N
E
W
S
T
O
N
E
W
A
I
N
S
C
O
T
I
N
G
(N
)
C
O
N
T
E
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y
D
O
O
R
S
-
WO
O
D
W
/
S
I
N
G
L
E
G
L
A
S
S
L
I
T
E
AN
D
(
N
)
S
T
O
N
E
D
O
O
R
FR
A
M
E
T
O
M
A
T
C
H
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
PR
O
F
I
L
E
(N
)
N
E
W
S
T
O
N
E
W
A
L
L
B
A
S
E
SC
O
N
C
E
PO
W
E
R
PO
W
E
R
OP
E
N
T
O
B
E
Y
O
N
D
AREAS ALTERED
8 '-1 1 "3 "1 0 1 /8 "
2
1
/
2
"
1 1 /8
(N
)
N
E
W
F
L
U
S
H
S
T
O
N
E
D
O
O
R
FR
A
M
E
T
O
M
A
T
C
H
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
PR
O
F
I
L
E
(N
)
S
T
O
N
E
C
H
A
I
R
R
A
I
L
BE
Y
O
N
D
T
O
M
E
E
T
D
O
O
R
FR
A
M
E
A
T
B
E
V
E
L
E
D
A
N
G
L
E
TO
M
A
T
C
H
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
DE
T
A
I
L
A
T
C
O
N
T
E
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y
DO
O
R
S
SOUTH AND NORTH INTERIOR ELEVATIONS/DETAILS
(N
)
N
E
W
F
L
U
S
H
ST
O
N
E
W
A
L
L
B
A
S
E
,
PO
L
I
S
H
E
D
F
I
N
I
S
H
1 /4 "R E V E A L DE
T
A
I
L
A
T
N
E
W
ST
O
N
E
W
A
L
L
B
A
S
E
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
11
PH
O
T
O
G
R
A
P
H
O
F
S
T
R
I
P
P
E
D
W
O
O
D
P
H
O
T
O
G
R
A
P
H
S
O
F
R
E
A
M
A
L
G
A
M
A
T
I
O
N
T
R
E
A
T
M
E
N
T
O
N
W
O
O
D
WOOD TREATMENT FIELD TRIALS
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
12
CO
M
M
I
S
S
A
R
Y
L
O
O
K
I
N
G
N
O
R
T
H
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
A
R
Y
L
O
O
K
I
N
G
N
O
R
T
H
RECEPTION LOOKING SOUTH RENDERINGS OF PROPOSED PARTITION WALL
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
13 BOTTOM CONNECTION OF HISTORIC LOBBY GLASS PARTITION TOP CONNECTION OF HISTORIC LOBBY GLASS PARTITION DETAIL AT RECESSED CHANNEL IN MILLWORK
IN
T
E
R
I
O
R
N
O
R
T
H
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
A
T
C
O
M
M
I
S
S
A
R
Y
GL
A
S
S
MI
L
L
W
O
R
K
CHANNEL RECESSED IN FLOOR RECESSED CHANNEL GLASS RECESSED CHANNEL GLASS BRUSHED STAINLESS STEEL CHANNEL 2"2"
DE
T
A
I
L
A
T
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
G
L
A
S
S
T
O
GL
A
S
S
GLASS PARTITION WALL
BR
U
S
H
E
D
S
T
A
I
N
L
E
S
S
ST
E
E
L
P
A
N
I
C
H
A
R
D
-
WA
R
E
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
14 LOBBY RENDERINGS
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
15 PROPOSED POWER AND COMMUNICATION PLAN
DN
MAIN ENTRY
EN
T
R
Y
LI
G
H
T
W
E
L
L
LI
G
H
T
W
E
L
L
LIGHT WELL
NO
T
I
N
S
C
O
P
E
NOT IN SCOPE
NO
T
I
N
SC
O
P
E
FL
U
S
H
F
L
O
O
R
O
U
T
L
E
T
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
16 PROPOSED FIRE LIFE SAFETY DEVICE PLAN
SP
E
A
K
E
R
/
S
T
R
O
B
E
(
C
O
L
O
R
T
O
B
E
B
R
O
N
Z
E
O
R
R
E
D
)
NO
T
T
O
S
C
A
L
E
PU
L
L
S
T
A
T
I
O
N
(
C
O
L
O
R
T
O
B
E
B
R
O
N
Z
E
O
R
R
E
D
)
NO
T
T
O
S
C
A
L
E
EXIT SIGN NOT TO SCALE SPRINKLER CAP NOT TO SCALE
9'
9'9'
9'
9'
9'
9'
9'
9'
9'
9
'
9'9'9'
9'
9'
9'
9'
9'9'9'
9'
9'
9'
9'9'9'
9'
7<
3
)
2
5
&
)
0
$&
%
/,1($5*5,//(66833/<72 /2%%<$%29(7<3,&$/)25[7<3)25&)0 $&%7<3)25&)0 $&%
9$
9
9$9
&
)
0
5'
7<
3
)
2
5
&
)
0
5'
&)0 5'7<3)25&)0 5'
¡
¡
¡
[
[
[23(12)),&(2)),&(2)),&(2)),&(
23
(
1
2
)
)
,
&
(
23
(
1
2
)
)
,
&
(
23
(
1
2
)
)
,
&
(
23
(
1
2
)
)
,
&
(
2)
)
,
&
(
:2
5
.
5
2
2
0
:2
5
.
5
2
2
0
67
2
5
$
*
(
+$
/
/
:
$
<
3$
7
,
2
23
(
1
2
)
)
,
&
(
67
$
,
5
+$
/
/
:
$
<
3$7,2 +$//:$<
&
)
0
/6
'
[
&
)
0
/6
'
&
)
0
5'
[
[
[
[[[[
[
&)0 ¡¡[[[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
¡
¡
¡
¡
¡
¡
¡
¡
¡
¡¡¡
¡
¡
[
¡
¡
¡
[
7<
3
)
2
5
&
)
0
$&
%
7<
3
)
2
5
&
)
0
5'
)6
'
),
5
(
6
0
2
.
(
'
$
0
3
(
5
$1
'
(
1
&
/
2
6
8
5
(
7
<
3
,
&
$
/
)2
5
$
/
/
/
(
9
(
/
6
/
$
%
3(
1
7
5
$
7
,
1
*
'
8
&
7
6
¡¡¡
[
¡
63
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
17
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
M
E
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
V
E
N
T
I
L
A
T
I
O
N
B
A
S
E
M
E
N
T
P
L
A
N
PROPOSED MECHANICAL PLAN
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
M
E
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
V
E
N
T
I
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
E
C
O
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
L O U N G E
LO
U
N
G
E
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
18
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
M
E
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
V
E
N
T
I
L
A
T
I
O
N
F
I
R
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
PROPOSED MECHANICAL PLAN
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
M
E
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
V
E
N
T
I
L
A
T
I
O
N
F
I
R
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
R E C E P T I O N RECEPTION
C O M M I S S A R Y
CO
M
M
I
S
S
A
R
Y
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
19
NE
W
W
E
S
T
W
A
L
L
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
(N
)
W
A
L
L
T
O
B
E
R
E
L
O
C
A
T
E
D
T
O
OR
I
G
I
N
A
L
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
(N
)
I
N
T
E
R
P
R
E
T
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
,
T
Y
P
.
FI
L
L
E
D
W
I
T
H
C
L
E
A
R
G
L
A
S
S
(N
)
S
T
O
N
E
W
A
I
N
S
C
O
T
I
N
G
(N
)
M
E
T
A
L
P
A
N
E
L
W
/
GO
L
D
L
E
A
F
L
E
T
T
E
R
I
N
G
(N
)
S
T
O
N
E
F
L
U
S
H
S
T
O
N
E
B
A
S
E
TO
M
A
T
C
H
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
H
E
I
G
H
T
1
3
/
4
"
W
O
O
D
S
I
L
L
T
O
M
A
T
C
H
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
CO
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
PA
I
N
T
E
D
S
T
E
E
L
F
R
A
M
E
45
M
I
N
F
I
R
E
R
A
T
E
D
G
L
A
Z
I
N
G
GR
E
Y
P
A
I
N
T
E
D
S
T
E
E
L
P
A
N
E
L
W
I
T
H
G
O
L
D
L
E
T
T
E
R
I
N
G
C
O
N
T
I
N
U
O
U
S
E
S
T
E
E
L
AN
G
L
E
S
7"
1
3
/
4
"
M
A
P
L
E
S
I
L
L
S
H
A
P
E
T
O
M
A
T
C
H
P
R
E
V
I
O
U
S
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
ST
O
N
E
P
R
O
F
I
L
E
T
O
M
A
T
C
H
OR
I
G
I
N
A
L
ST
O
N
E
W
A
I
N
S
C
O
T
I
N
G
1/
2
"
2' - 2"
1 3/4"
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
D
E
T
A
I
L
O
F
W
E
S
T
W
A
L
L
W
I
N
D
O
W
S
NO
T
T
O
S
C
A
L
E
ORIGINAL DETAIL AT THE WEST WALL WINDOWS NEW WEST WALL SERVICE WINDOWS
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
20
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
N
E
A
R
S
O
U
T
H
E
N
T
R
A
N
C
E
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
N
E
A
R
N
O
R
T
H
E
N
T
R
A
N
C
E
2' - 0"
H O L D
7 '-0 "
9 '-0 "
14
'
-
3
"
HO
L
D
5'
-
0
"
1 '-8 "1 0 1 /4 "6 '-0 3 /4 "3 "
4'
-
3
1
/
2
"
5'
-
4
"
4'
-
3
1
/
2
"
6 '-3 3 /4 "
14
'
-
3
"
1'
-
0
"
3'
-
0
"
1'
-
0
"
2 '-0 "7 '-0 "
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
EQ
9 '-0 "
1 "2 5 /8 "2 '-1 3 /4 "5 1 /4 "5 '-8 3 /4 "4 5 /8 "
2 3 /8 "
1
5
/
8
"
1"
2
5
/
8
"
2
5
/
8
"
1"
5
1
/
4
"
5
1
/
4
"
2'
-
4
"
9 '-0 "
3 "6 '-1 1 "1 '-8 "
1 "3 /4 "1 '-1 0 1 /4 "3 /4 "6 '-1 0 1 /2 "3 /4 "
2'
-
4
"
1 '-8 "7 '-2 "
1 "3 /4 "1 '-1 0 1 /4 "3 /4 "6 '-1 0 1 /2 "3 /4 "
9 '-0 "
2'
-
4
"
9 '-0 "
14
'
-
3
"
1"
3/
4
"
EQ
3/
4
"
EQ
3/
4
"
2'
-
4
7
/
8
"
3/
4
"
2'
-
4
7
/
8
"
3/
4
"
EQ
3/
4
"
EQ
3/
4
"
1"
5'
-
0
"
2 '-0 "7 '-0 "
1 "3 /4 "2 '-5 3 /4 "3 /4 "6 '-3 "3 /4 "
9 '-0 "
EQ
EQ
2'
-
4
"
9 '-0 "
EQ
EQ
2'
-
4
"
1 '-8 "6 '-1 1 "3 "
9 '-0 "
1 "3 /4 "1 '-1 0 1 /4 "3 /4 "6 '-1 0 1 /2 "3 /4 "
14' - 3"
1"
3/
4
"
2'
-
1
5
/
8
"
3/
4
"
2' - 3 3/8"3/4"2' - 4 7/8"3/4"2' - 4 7/8"3/4"2' - 3 3/8"3/4"2' - 1 5/8"3/4"1"7 '-0 "2 '-0 "HOLD 5' - 0"1' - 0"HOLD 3' - 0"1' - 0"
3 /4 "6 '-3 "3 /4 "2 '-5 3 /4 "3 /4 "1 "
9 '-0 "
1"
3/
4
"
EQ
3/
4
"
EQ 3/4"3' - 0"3/4"EQ 3/4"EQ 3/4"1"14' - 3"
1 "3 /4 "2 '-5 3 /4 "3 /4 "6 '-3 "3 /4 "
9 '-0 "E Q E Q
2 '-4 "
4'
-
7
1
/
2
"
1' - 0"HOLD 3' - 0"1' - 0"4' - 7 1/2"14' - 3"
1"
3/
4
"
EQ
3/
4
"
EQ 3/4"3' - 0 1/4"3/4"EQ 3/4"EQ 3/4"1"
14
'
-
3
"
2 '-4 "
2"
4'
-
3
1
/
2
"
5'
-
4
"
4'
-
3
1
/
2
"
2"
1"
3/
4
"
EQ
3/
4
"
EQ
3/
4
"
2'
-
5
5
/
8
"
3/
4
"
2'
-
5
5
/
8
"
3/
4
"
EQ
3/
4
"
EQ
3/
4
"
1"
14' - 3"HOLD 3' - 0"
1 '-8 "1 0 1 /4 "6 '-0 3 /4 "3 "
9 '-0 "
2 '-0 "H O L D 7 '-0 "
4'
-
3
1
/
2
"
1' - 0 3/8"3' - 3 3/8"1' - 0 3/8"4' - 3 1/2"
EQ
EQ
1 '-8 "6 '-1 1 "3 "
9 '-0 "
3 /4 "6 '-1 0 1 /2 "3 /4 "1 '-1 0 1 /4 "3 /4 "1 "
2'
-
4
"
3
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
6F
SE
C
T
I
O
N
D
E
T
A
I
L
@
L
O
B
B
Y
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
-
L
O
N
G
I
T
U
D
I
N
A
L
3
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
4F
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
D
E
T
A
I
L
@
L
O
B
B
Y
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
-
W
I
T
H
N
O
D
O
O
R
S
3
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
6D
SE
C
T
I
O
N
D
E
T
A
I
L
@
L
O
B
B
Y
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
3
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
4D
SE
C
T
I
O
N
D
E
T
A
I
L
@
L
O
B
B
Y
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
-
TH
R
E
S
H
O
L
D
3
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
2D
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
D
E
T
A
I
L
@
L
O
B
B
Y
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
-
SI
D
E
3
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
2F
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
D
E
T
A
I
L
@
L
O
B
B
Y
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
3
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
2C
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
D
E
T
A
I
L
@
L
O
B
B
Y
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
WI
T
H
G
L
A
S
S
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
-
S
I
D
E
3
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
4C
SE
C
T
I
O
N
D
E
T
A
I
L
@
L
O
B
B
Y
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
W
I
T
H
GL
A
S
S
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
-
T
H
R
E
S
H
O
L
D
3
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
2B
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
D
E
T
A
I
L
@
L
O
B
B
Y
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
W
I
T
H
E
G
R
E
S
S
D
O
O
R
3
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
4B
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
D
E
T
A
I
L
@
L
O
B
B
Y
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
W
I
T
H
C
O
N
C
E
A
L
E
D
D
O
O
R
3
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
1B
PL
A
N
D
E
T
A
I
L
@
L
O
B
B
Y
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
W
I
T
H
E
G
R
E
S
S
D
O
O
R
3/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
1F
PL
A
N
D
E
T
A
I
L
@
L
O
B
B
Y
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
3
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
6B
SE
C
T
I
O
N
D
E
T
A
I
L
@
L
O
B
B
Y
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
W
I
T
H
G
L
A
S
S
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
-
LO
N
G
I
T
U
D
I
N
A
L
3
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
6C
SE
C
T
I
O
N
D
E
T
A
I
L
@
L
O
B
B
Y
M
I
L
L
W
O
R
K
W
I
T
H
GL
A
S
S
C
H
A
N
N
E
L
GLASS PARTITION WALL MILLWORK
8"
CO
N
D
U
I
T
RE
M
O
V
A
B
L
E
CO
V
E
R
ON
E
-
H
A
L
F
E
N
D
EL
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
ON
E
-
H
A
L
F
SE
C
T
I
O
N
PL
A
N
O
F
ES
C
U
T
C
H
E
O
N
P
L
A
T
E
FI
N
I
S
H
CE
I
L
I
N
G
6 '-2 "
1
1
/
2
"
S
Q
U
A
R
E
T
U
B
I
N
G
3/
4
"
S
Q
U
A
R
E
T
U
B
I
N
G
1/
4
"
T
H
I
C
K
ST
A
I
N
L
E
S
S
S
T
E
E
L
FR
A
M
E
A
N
D
H
A
N
G
E
R
S
FL
A
S
H
E
D
OP
A
L
G
L
A
S
S
2'
-
0
"
2 '-2 "1 '-1 "
1
1
/
2
"
S
Q
U
A
R
E
T
U
B
I
N
G
FL
A
S
H
E
D
OP
A
L
G
L
A
S
S
CO
N
D
U
I
T
RE
M
O
V
A
B
L
E
C
O
V
E
R
FL
A
S
H
E
D
OP
A
L
G
L
A
S
S
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
21
ON
E
-
H
A
L
F
P
L
A
N
(
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
)
ON
E
-
H
A
L
F
E
N
D
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
/
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
(
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
)
HISTORIC PENDANT LIGHT FIXTURES
ON
E
-
H
A
L
F
P
L
A
N
(
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
D
E
T
A
I
L
)
ON
E
-
H
A
L
F
E
N
D
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
/
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
(
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
R
E
S
T
O
R
A
T
I
O
N
D
E
T
A
I
L
)
LOBBY STAIR
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
22
4'
-
0
"
6'
-
1
0
"
1 '-5 "5 '-6 "4 '-0 "1 '-0 1 /2 "
1 '-4 1 /2 "4 '-0 "8"4' - 0"10' - 1"9"8"4' - 0"8"9' - 6"8"4 '-0 5 /8 "6 '-1 1 3 /8 "1 1 '-0 "2"
6 '-4 "2 '-8 "
RO
U
G
H
C
O
N
C
.
L
I
N
E
(D
O
T
T
E
D
)
C L .B E T W .R A I L S
6 '-1 "1'
-
6
"
TERRAZZO STEPS STOP TILE AT THIS POINT TILE RETURN: HEAD, JAMBS AND SILL THIS WINDOW.ROUNDED NOSING UNFINISED CONC. FLOOR SLAB TERRAZZO NO BASE OR STINGER TILE, CUT TILE TO FIT STEPS 1"CONC. BEAM AND PILASTER RUBBERD CONC. PAINTED COLOR OF TILE TO THIS POINT TERRAZZO HGT. OF TOP RISER STAINLESS STEEL RAILING TERRAZZO
TE
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
R
O
U
N
D
E
D
N
O
S
I
N
G
S
ST
O
P
T
I
L
E
H
E
R
E
TE
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
WO
O
D
TH
R
E
E
ST
A
I
N
L
E
S
S
ST
E
E
L
B
A
R
S
CE
N
T
E
R
T
I
L
E
J
O
I
N
T
I
N
G
ON
W
I
N
D
O
W
A
S
CL
O
S
E
L
Y
A
S
P
O
S
S
I
B
L
E
6 ' - 6 " R A D . A P P R O X .
6' - 6" R A D . AP P R O X .TE
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
(N
)
W
O
O
D
(N
)
S
T
O
N
E
(N
)
S
T
O
N
E
C
H
A
I
R
R
A
I
L
EXISTING HANDRAIL TO BE REMOVED AND REINSTALLED AFTER NEW STONE INSTALLATION NEW STONE WALL CLADDING NEW STONE WALL BASE
ST
A
I
R
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
A
T
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
L
O
B
B
Y
ST
A
I
R
P
L
A
N
A
T
F
I
R
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
STAIR PLAN AT BASEMENT
GR
I
L
L
-
T
O
B
E
U
S
E
D
A
S
HV
A
C
R
E
T
U
R
N
(N
)
W
O
O
D
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
T
O
MA
T
C
H
O
R
I
G
I
N
A
L
(N
)
N
E
W
S
T
O
N
E
W
A
I
N
S
C
O
T
I
N
G
(N
)
C
O
N
T
E
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y
D
O
O
R
S
-
WO
O
D
W
/
S
I
N
G
L
E
G
L
A
S
S
L
I
T
E
AN
D
(
N
)
S
T
O
N
E
D
O
O
R
FR
A
M
E
T
O
M
A
T
C
H
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
PR
O
F
I
L
E
(N
)
N
E
W
S
T
O
N
E
W
A
L
L
B
A
S
E
SO
U
T
H
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
-
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
H
I
S
T
O
R
I
C
L
O
B
B
Y
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
23
NE
W
F
L
O
O
R
D
I
F
F
U
S
E
R
NE
W
P
A
N
I
C
H
A
R
D
W
A
R
E
A
T
E
A
S
T
A
N
D
W
E
S
T
D
O
O
R
S
55
S
e
r
i
e
s
Ex
i
t
d
e
v
i
c
e
BR
O
N
Z
E
F
L
U
S
H
F
L
O
O
R
D
I
F
F
U
S
E
R
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
2
1
/
4
"
T
E
R
R
A
Z
Z
O
F
L
O
O
R
I
N
G
6"
MATERIALS
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
24
MA
P
L
E
W
O
O
D
L
I
M
E
S
T
O
N
E
ST
A
R
F
I
R
E
G
L
A
S
S
(
S
E
E
P
H
Y
S
I
C
A
L
S
A
M
P
L
E
)
(N
O
T
S
H
O
W
N
)
PO
S
T
O
F
F
I
C
E
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
I
O
N
S
25
PH
O
T
O
C
R
E
D
I
T
:
S
A
N
T
A
M
O
N
I
C
A
H
I
S
T
O
R
Y
M
U
S
E
U
M
PH
O
T
O
C
R
E
D
I
T
:
S
A
N
T
A
M
O
N
I
C
A
H
I
S
T
O
R
Y
M
U
S
E
U
M
PH
O
T
O
C
R
E
D
I
T
:
S
A
N
T
A
M
O
N
I
C
A
H
I
S
T
O
R
Y
M
U
S
E
U
M
,
B
E
E
B
E
C
O
L
L
E
C
T
I
O
N
PH
O
T
O
C
R
E
D
I
T
:
R
A
C
H
L
I
N
P
A
R
T
N
E
R
S
HISTORIC PHOTOGRAPHS
(310) 451-3669
March 3, 2017
VIA E-MAIL
Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street, Room 212
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Re: Agenda Item 3.A (former US Post Office/Preservation Covenant)
Request to approve plans to restore and rehabilitate the historic lobby
Address: 1248 Fifth Street
Our client: 1248 5th Street, LLC
Our File No. 22200.001
Dear Councilmembers:
This letter is written on behalf of the owner of the former post office property.
This property is on your consent calendar for approval of plans to restore and
rehabilitate the historic lobby as part of an adaptive reuse of a designated City
Landmark. The estimated cost of the restoration/rehabilitation component of the project
is approximately $12,250,000. The project team has worked closely with the
Landmarks Commission and the Santa Monica Conservancy, including with respect to
the lobby. And the owner will continue doing so through the course of construction by
providing voluntary periodic updates to both the Commission and the Conservancy.
As the Staff Report indicates, the City Council has exclusive jurisdiction to
approve the work on the lobby under the Preservation Covenant.
I am writing to urge your support for the Staff recommendation that the City
Council:
1) Approve the request to restore and rehabilitate the historic interior lobby of
the former Post Office building, located at 1248 5 th Street, a designated City
Landmark, as described in plans dated December 19, 2016; and
2) Designate the Landmarks Commission Secretary as its designee to review
and approve certain future interior modifications to the historic lobby.
Consistent with the Preservation Covenant, all of the proposed work will be
completed in conformance with The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the
kutcher@hlkklaw.com
Item 3-A
03/07/17
1 Item 3-A
03/07/17
Santa Monica City Council
March 3, 2017
Page 2
Treatment of Historic Properties . This work will be guided and overseen by
preservation architect Robert Chattel of Chattel, Inc. (http://chattel.us/) Mr. Chattel
meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards in Historic
Architecture (36 CFR Part 61, App. A).
Both the LUCE and the City’s Historic Preservation Element (“HPE”) encourage
such projects. For example:
LUCE Goal HP1: Preserve and protect historic resources in Santa Monica
through the land use decision-making process.
HPE Objective 5.4: Continue to provide a streamlined approval process for
historic properties that use the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for
Rehabilitation and the California State Historical Building Code.
Very truly yours,
Kenneth L. Kutcher
KLK:sna
cc: Rick Cole
David Martin
Roxanne Tanemori
Scott Albright
Joe Lawrence
Heidi von Tongeln
Antony Biddle
Nancy Reid
Robert Chattel
Sejal Sonani
Laura O’Neill
F:\WPDATA\22200\Cor\CC.1004.KLK.docx
Item 3-A
03/07/17
2 Item 3-A
03/07/17
Landmarks Commission
1685 Main Street, Room 212
Santa Monica, CA 90401
March 5 , 2017
Santa M onica City Council
1685 Main Street, Room 212
Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE : M arch 7, 2017 Agenda Item 3A: Request to Approve Plans to Restore and Rehabilitate
the Historic Interior Lobby of the Former United States Post Office Building Located at 1248
5th Street, in Accordance with a Preservation Covenant Administered by the City Council
Dear E steemed Members of the Santa Monica City Council,
I am w riting on behalf of the Landmarks Commission regarding the proposed plans for the
lobby of the former U.S. Post Office located at 1248 5 th Street. As you know, in 2013 the City
Council agreed to serve as the Certified Local Government responsible for administering a
preservation covenant on the property that includes the building lobby. Although the
Landmarks Commission is not responsible for approving proposed alterations to the lobby,
the project team graciously presented the lobby plans to the Commission as a cou rtesy
discussion item (Item 10 -B) at the Commission’s November 14, 2016 meeting . The
presentation led to a robust discussion by the Commission during which Commissioners
made the following suggestions :
•Expl ore retaining some of the P.O. boxes on the west wall
•Reword some of the written description of the project for accuracy
•Consider compatible colors for new system features, such as bronze or red finishes for
sprinkler caps , fire boxes, and diffusers, instead of white
•Consider allowing the story of the bu ilding to be revealed through the patina of the
existing finishes, such as the wood walls and ceilings and the terrazzo floor, instead of
wholesale refinishing and repair of inconsistencies
•Consider refining the connection of the new glazed wall to the ce iling
•Consider using a consistent new wood type for all new wood features to clearly
differentiate original wood features from new wood features
•Consider a detail or treatment for the glass walls to make them evident and avoid
people walking into them
•Cons ider opening the lobby to the public a few times a year
•Consider reusing a historic writing desk in the new reception space
Foll owing the discussion, the project team requested that the Commission make a
recommendation to the City Council with conditions, rather than asking the project team to
Item 3-A
03/07/17
3 Item 3-A
03/07/17
come back to the Commission for an additional courtesy review. The Commission agreed
that moving forward would be preferable for all. The Commission reiterated the suggestions
regarding retaining the patina of the lo bby’s finishes, reusing the P.O. boxes, and thoughtfully
reusing the historic writing desks. The Commission then proceeded with the vote in favor of
formulating this recommendation to City Council regarding the proposed interior alterations to
the lobby of the former U .S. Post Office located at 1248 5th Street, a designated City
Landmark, as presented to the Commission with consideration of the recommendations that
were part of the Commission’s discussion . The consensus of the Landmarks Commission at
the ti me was that the project as presented at the November 14, 2016 was generally
appropriate and that the recommendations provided by Commissioners would serve to
strengthen it.
In anticipation of the March 7, 2017 meeting of City Council, I have reviewed the staff report
prepared for the project, along with the most recent project plans. While overall the project
still seems appropriate and very respectful of the historic interior and its character -defining
features, there are a few items that are not complete ly resolved, such as the exact finish for
the wood walls and ceilings and the exact location/reuse of the historic writing desks. The
staff report includes a recommendation that the review of minor changes t o the lobby plans
be delegated to the Landmarks Commission Secretary, rather than returning to City Council
for a full vote. While I agree that it would be unnecessary to bring minor changes to City
Council as the project is further refined, I do not fully agree that the minor reviews should be
the sole responsibility of the Landmarks Commission Secretary. Instead, I believe it would be
appropriate to form a subcommittee of Landmarks Commissioners to serve in an advisory
role and work in conjunction with the Landmarks Commission Secretary to consult on mi nor
changes. The members of the Landmarks Commission have certain expertise in the
rehabilitation of historic properties. Forming a subcommittee to consult on project changes
would provide the Commission the ability to offer this expertise without slowing down the
project by mandating City Council or Landmarks Commission hearings, which I believe is the
ultimate intent of staff’s recommendation.
On behalf of the Landmarks Commission , I would like to reiterate our gratitude to the project
team for their w illingness to include us in the development of the lobby plans to date. I would
also like to thank City Council for your consideration of this letter. I encourage you to review
the current application in light of the Commission’s recommendations to the app licant team
and our request to form a subcommittee for reviewing future, minor alterations to the plans .
Sincerely,
Laura O’Neill
Chair person, Santa Monica Landmarks Commission
Item 3-A
03/07/17
4 Item 3-A
03/07/17
Landmarks Commission
1685 Main Street, Room 212
Santa Monica, CA 90401
March 5 , 2017
Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street, Room 212
Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE : March 7, 2017 Agenda Item 3A: Request to Approve Plans to Restore and Rehabilitate
the Historic Interior Lobby of the Former United States Post Office Building Located at 1248
5th Street, in Accordance with a Preservation Covenant Administered by the City Council
Dear Esteemed Members of the Santa Monica City Council,
I am writing on behalf of the Landmarks Commission regarding the proposed plans for the
lobby of the former U.S. Post Office located at 1248 5 th Street. As you know, in 2013 the City
Council agreed to serve as the Certified Local Government responsible for administering a
preservation covenant on the property that includes the building lobby. Although the
Landmarks Commission is not responsible for approving proposed alterations to the lobby,
the project team graciously presented the lobby plans to the Commission as a cou rtesy
discussion item (Item 10 -B) at the Commission’s November 14, 2016 meeting . The
presentation led to a robust discussion by the Commission during which Commissioners
made the following suggestions :
• Explore retaining some of the P.O. boxes on the west wall
• Reword some of the written description of the project for accuracy
• Consider compatible colors for new system features, such as bronze or red finishes for
sprinkler caps , fire boxes, and diffusers, instead of white
• Consider allowing the story of the bu ilding to be revealed through the patina of the
existing finishes, such as the wood walls and ceilings and the terrazzo floor, instead of
wholesale refinishing and repair of inconsistencies
• Consider refining the connection of the new glazed wall to the ce iling
• Consider using a consistent new wood type for all new wood features to clearly
differentiate original wood features from new wood features
• Consider a detail or treatment for the glass walls to make them evident and avoid
people walking into them
• Cons ider opening the lobby to the public a few times a year
• Consider reusing a historic writing desk in the new reception space
Following the discussion, the project team requested that the Commission make a
recommendation to the City Council with conditions, rather than asking the project team to
Item 3-A
03/07/17
5 Item 3-A
03/07/17
come back to the Commission for an additional courtesy review. The Commission agreed
that moving forward would be preferable for all. The Commission reiterated the suggestions
regarding retaining the patina of the lo bby’s finishes, reusing the P.O. boxes, and thoughtfully
reusing the historic writing desks. The Commission then proceeded with the vote in favor of
formulating this recommendation to City Council regarding the proposed interior alterations to
the lobby of the former U .S. Post Office located at 1248 5th Street, a designated City
Landmark, as presented to the Commission with consideration of the recommendations that
were part of the Commission’s discussion . The consensus of the Landmarks Commission at
the ti me was that the project as presented at the November 14, 2016 was generally
appropriate and that the recommendations provided by Commissioners would serve to
strengthen it.
In anticipation of the March 7, 2017 meeting of City Council, I have reviewed the staff report
prepared for the project, along with the most recent project plans. While overall the project
still seems appropriate and very respectful of the historic interior and its character -defining
features, there are a few items that are not complete ly resolved, such as the exact finish for
the wood walls and ceilings and the exact location/reuse of the historic writing desks. The
staff report includes a recommendation that the review of minor changes t o the lobby plans
be delegated to the Landmarks Commission Secretary, rather than returning to City Council
for a full vote. While I agree that it would be unnecessary to bring minor changes to City
Council as the project is further refined, I do not fully agree that the minor reviews should be
the sole responsibility of the Landmarks Commission Secretary. Instead, I believe it would be
appropriate to form a subcommittee of Landmarks Commissioners to serve in an advisory
role and work in conjunction with the Landmarks Commission Secretary to consult on mi nor
changes. The members of the Landmarks Commission have certain expertise in the
rehabilitation of historic properties. Forming a subcommittee to consult on project changes
would provide the Commission the ability to offer this expertise without slowing down the
project by mandating City Council or Landmarks Commission hearings, which I believe is the
ultimate intent of staff’s recommendation.
On behalf of the Landmarks Commission , I would like to reiterate our gratitude to the project
team for their w illingness to include us in the development of the lobby plans to date. I would
also like to thank City Council for your consideration of this letter. I encourage you to review
the current application in light of the Commission’s recommendations to the app licant team
and our request to form a subcommittee for reviewing future, minor alterations to the plans .
Sincerely,
Laura O’Neill
Chair person, Santa Monica Landmarks Commission
Item 3-A
03/07/17
6 Item 3-A
03/07/17
1
Vernice Hankins
From:Carol Lemlein <lemlein@aol.com>
Sent:Tuesday, March 07, 2017 10:33 AM
To:councilmtgitems
Subject:Council Agenda Item 3.A Request to Approve Plans to Restore and Rehabilitate the
Historic Interior Lobby of the Former Unit ed States Post Office Building Located at
1248 5th Street, in Accordance with a Preser vation Covenant Administered by the City
C...
Mayor Winterer and Council Members,
The Board of the Santa Monica Conservancy su pports the proposal before you tonight to
restore and rehabilitate the historic interior lobby of the former Post Office at 1248 5th
Street.
Since Skydance was identified as the new ow ner, its team, which includes preservation
architect Robert Chattel, has been working closely with the Landmarks Commission and
members of our Advocacy Committee to review their research on the building and their
plans for the restorat ion/renovation.
With respect to the lobby, windows and ent ry doors, the development team has had the
benefit of havin g access to the ori g inal plans and other materials from the USPS archives
which were unavailable until the sale took plac e. In fact, you may be surprised to learn
just how much change has taken pl ace over the years. They have g one to g reat len g ths
to respect the original configuration of the lobby as they made pl ans for its use as a
lobby for Skydance Productions and a co mmissary area for thei r employees.
We respectfully request that you act on the staff recommendation to approve the plans
as presented and designate responsibility to review and approve cert ain future interior
modifications to the histor ic lobby to Landmarks Commission staff as described.
We look forward to continuing to work with the project team to review progress on the
rehabilitation periodically as their work proceeds.
Sincerely,
Carol Lemlein
President, Santa Monica Cons ervancy Board of Directors
www.smconservancy.org
Item 3-A
03/07/17
7 Item 3-A
03/07/17