Loading...
SR-09-08-2015-7A City Council Report City Council Regular Meeting: September 8, 2015 Agenda Item: 7.A 1 of 2 To: Mayor and City Council From: Marsha Moutrie, City Attorney, City Attorney's Office Subject: Second Reading and Adoption of Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Santa Monica Updating Articles I and III of the Santa Monica Municipal Code Clarifying Enforcement Responsibilities of Law Enforcement Personnel Recommended Action Staff recommends that City Council adopt the attached Ordinance updating Articles I and III of the Santa Monica Municipal Code clarifying enforcement responsibilities of law enforcement personnel. Executive Summary At its meeting on August 25, 2015, the City Council introduced for first reading an ordinance updating Articles I and III of the Santa Monica Municipal Code clarifying enforcement responsibilities of law enforcement personnel. The ordinance is now presented to the City Council for adoption. Prepared By: Elsa Kapsinow, Executive Assistant to the City Attorney Approved Forwarded to Council Attachments: 2 of 2 A. Ord. 1351 - Clarifying Enforcement Responsibilities of Law Enforement Personnel - Second Reading B. Ordinance City Council Report City Council Regular Meeting: September 8, 2015 Agenda Item: 7.B 1 of 4 To: Mayor and City Council From: Marsha Moutrie, City Attorney, City Attorney's Office, Municipal Law Subject: Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance Regarding Procedures for the Administration of Employer-Employee Relations Recommended Action Staff recommends that the City Council ("Council") introduce for first reading the attached ordinance to repeal Ordinance No. 801 (CCS) and add Chapter 2.05 to the Santa Monica Municipal Code regarding procedures for the administration of employer- employee relations. Executive Summary Ordinance No. 801 (CCS) sets forth the local rules for the administration of employer- employee relations between the City and its recognized employee organizations. These local rules were adopted in 1969 and have since remained unchanged. Meanwhile, state law and regulations regarding public sector employer-employee labor relations have changed substantially over the last several decades. Consequently, it is necessary to update the local rules in order to comply with current public sector labor relations law. It is also essential to codify the local rules into the Santa Monica Municipal Code, where the rules will be more readily available to employees, employee organizations, and members of the public. Staff has met with and received comments from representatives of its recognized employee organizations on the proposed updates to the local rules, and recommends adoption of an ordinance that repeals Ordinance No. 801 (CCS) and adds Chapter 2.05 to the Santa Monica Municipal Code establishing procedures for the administration of employer-employee relations. Background The Meyers-Milias Brown Act ("MMBA"), codified at Government Code Section 3500 et seq., authorizes local government agencies to adopt reasonable rules and regulations for the administration of employer-employee relations. In accordance with the MMBA, on February 25, 1969, Council adopted Ordinance No. 801 (CCS), "An Ordinance Establishing Orderly Procedures For The Administration Of Employer-Employee Relations." These local rules include procedures for the recognition of employee organizations in the City, the withdrawal of recognition, the establishment of bargaining 2 of 4 units, elections, appeals, access to City work locations and use of bulletin boards, and resolving disputes regarding wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment. Petitions for recognition that have been filed in the City within the last few years prompted a thorough legal review of the continued validity of Ordinance No. 801 (CCS) in light of current public sector labor relations law, which revealed the need for extensive updates. Discussion The City has not updated its local employer-employee relations rules since their inception in 1969. As a result of changes to the MMBA, and rulings of the Public Employment Relations Board ("PERB") and California courts, over the last 46 years, several provisions of Ordinance No. 801 (CCS) are outdated and no longer consistent with current applicable law. In updating the local rules, staff followed several of the recommendations provided in model rules prepared by its outside legal counsel, Liebert Cassidy Whitmore (LCW). LCW’s legal practice focuses on public sector employment and labor relations law, and their attorneys routinely advise public agencies on local employer-employee relations rules. The main updates to the local rules include the following: 1. Definitions and provisions that are duplicative of state law have been deleted. 2. Provisions that conflict with the MMBA, administrative decisions by PERB, or case law, have been deleted or revised. 3. Provisions that are negotiated and set forth in the Memoranda of Understanding between the City and its recognized employee organizations, including grievances and the peaceful performance of City services, have been deleted. 4. The criteria for making an appropriate unit determination have been clarified and revised. 5. Procedures regarding petitions for recognition, unit modification, severance of a bargaining unit, and decertification of a recognized emp loyee organization have been added, clarified, or revised. 6. The appeal process has been revised for appeals to be conducted through mediation or by the Office of Administrative hearings, instead of before the City 3 of 4 Council. 7. The election process has been clarified and revised for consistency with state law. 8. A provision to address impasse proceedings and fact-finding has been added. Attachment B provides a cross-reference of the changes between Ordinance No. 801 (CCS) and the new sections proposed to be included in Santa Monica Municipal Code Chapter 2.05. Government Code Section 3505.7 requires that the City meet and consult in good faith with representatives of its recognized employee organizations before implementing local rules for the administration of employer-employee relations. Accordingly, the City Attorney's Office notified all bargaining unit representatives of the proposed ordinance and provided them an opportunity to meet and to provide comments. Additionally, the City Attorney's Office and Human Resources Department staff met with representatives of the Coalition of Santa Monica City Employees to discuss the proposed updates to the local rules. Alternatives If Council decides not to adopt the proposed ordinance, then the rules set forth in Ordinance No. 801 (CCS) would continue to govern labor relations between the City and employee organizations. And, any processes that are not addressed in Ordinance No. 801 (CCS), would be governed by applicable PERB regulations. This alternative is not recommended, given that several provisions of Ordinance No. 801 (CCS) are inconsistent with current law and negotiated provisions in various Memoranda of Understanding between the City and its recognized employee organizations. Furthermore, the City has met and consulted with bargaining unit representatives, received comments, and reached an understanding and agreement on the updates to the local rules as set forth in the attached ordinance. 4 of 4 Financial Impacts and Budget Actions There is no immediate financial impact or budget action necessary as a result of the recommended action. Prepared By: Meishya Yang, Deputy City Attorney Approved Forwarded to Council Attachments: A. Employer Employee Relations Ordinance 09.08.2015 B. SMMC Chapter 2.05 Cross-Reference with Ord. 801 1 SMMC 2.05 Section Ordinance 801 Section Section 2.05.010 Sections 1.02, 2.04 Section 2.05.020 Sections 1.03, 1.04 Section 2.05.030 Section 3.01 Section 2.05.040 None Section 2.05.050 None Section 2.05.060 None Section 2.05.070 Section 3.04 Section 2.05.080 Section 3.05 Section 2.05.090 Section 3.02 Section 2.05.100 Section 3.05 Section 2.05.110 Section 3.05 Section 2.05.120 Section 3.03 Section 2.05.130 Sections 4.03, 4.05, 4.06 Section 2.05.140 Section 4.01 Section 2.05.150 Section 4.02 Section 2.05.160 None Section 2.05.170 None 2 Ordinance 801 Section Update Section 1.01 Deleted Section 1.02 SMMC Section 2.05.010 Section 1.03 SMMC Section 2.05.020 Section 1.04 SMMC Section 2.05.020 Section 2.01 Deleted (see Gov. Code, §§ 3502-3507.5) Section 2.02 Deleted (see Gov. Code, § 3508) Section 2.03 Deleted (see Gov. Code, §§ 3503-3504) Section 2.04 SMMC Section 2.05.010 Section 2.05 Deleted (see Gov. Code, § 3505) Section 2.06 Deleted (see Gov. Code, § 3505.1) Section 2.07 Deleted (see Gov. Code, § 3505.2) Section 3.01 SMMC Section 2.05.030 Section 3.02 SMMC Section 2.05.090 Section 3.03 SMMC Section 2.05.120 Section 3.04 SMMC Sections 2.05.040, 2.05.050, 2.05.060, 2.05.070 Section 3.05 SMMC Sections 2.05.080, 2.05.100, 2.05.110 Section 4.01 SMMC Section 2.05.140 Section 4.02 SMMC Section 2.05.150 Section 4.03 SMMC Section 2.05.130 Section 4.04 Deleted (see MOUs) Section 4.05 SMMC Section 2.05.130 Section 4.06 SMMC Section 2.05.130 Section 4.07 Deleted based on case law Section 4.08 Deleted (see MOUs) Section 5.01 Draft Ordinance Sections 2, 3 Section 5.02 Deleted Section 5.03 Draft Ordinance Section 4, 5 Section 5.04 Draft Ordinance Section 6 Reference: Ordinance No. 2493 (CCS)