The URL can be used to link to this page

SR-02-11-2014-8B -1000-005-01City Council Meeting: February 11, 2014 Agenda Item: IF 5_5 To: Mayor and City Council From: David Martin, Planning and Community Development Director Subject: Review and Approve the Conceptual Design of the Samohi Safe Routes to School Project Recommended Action Staff recommends that the City Council: 1) Approve the conceptual design for the Samohi Safe Routes to School project; 2) Direct staff to complete construction drawings and release bids for construction for the Michigan Avenue /7th Street portion of the project. Executive Summary This staff report summarizes the work to date on the grant- funded Santa Monica High School Safe Routes to School (Samohi SRTS) project, $880,000 grant funds and $100,000 match. Staff is seeking review and approval of final concepts for school improvements, and direction to complete construction drawings and release bids for construction for a specific phase of improvements which include Michigan Avenue and 7th Streets adjacent to the school. During a year of outreach, planning and conceptual design, the Samohi SRTS project identified improvements to streets and intersections around Samohi that could improve pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle access and encourage more active travel to and from school consistent with Citywide goals for sustainability, public health, traffic management and wellbeing. The improvements identified were developed through an extensive public outreach process that has involved nearby residents, the School District, Samohi administration, Samohi parents and students, and community bicycle and pedestrian advocates. A range of improvements were identified and documented for Michigan Avenue, 7th Street, Pico Boulevard, 4th Street and Olympic Drive that included physical and operational intersection improvements, roadway reconfiguration, and off - street. facilities. Outreach identified a priority for improvements at the main campus entry at Michigan Avenue and 7th Streets. Concept plans for improvements to be funded by the existing Safe Routes to School grant have been developed for this area. Later phases could be pursued as part of future grant funds or capital projects. 1 The project proposed for construction includes road reconfiguration to make Michigan Avenue one -way westbound west of Lincoln Boulevard connecting to one -way southbound on 71h Street to Pico Boulevard. A new signalized intersection would be created at 7th Street and Pico Boulevard intersection. This would reduce conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles during drop -off and allow space for buffered and protected green bike lanes and a wider sidewalk. The project also proposes reconfiguration of the Pico median for a two -way cycle track that would connect students to the south and remove a crucial gap in the bike network. This would also link the Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway being developed to the beach. The improvements have been designed and selected to create a safer environment that will encourage students to bicycle and walk to and from school, while also considering the needs of vehicle access to the school and adjacent commercial. The next steps for this �roject would be to complete the final construction drawings for the Michigan Avenue /7t Street area, and release bids for construction with the goal of completing construction during Samohi summer break in 2014. Staff would return to Council once a contractor has been selected for award of contract. The original budget for the grant is $980,000. The initial phase of the project for design and construction drawings is $159,944 awarded July 24 2012. The current three year CIP includes $820,000 for construction of this project. In addition to these funds the project will include a new signal paid for through another project budget. Background The City was awarded a State of California Safe Routes to School Program grant in the amount of $880,000 with a local match of $100,000 to complete planning, outreach, design and construction of intersection, crosswalk, street, signage and bike storage improvements at Santa Monica High School ( Samohi). The project is intended to create better access for students so they will feel safer walking and biking to school. Active transportation, public health and managing vehicle traffic in neighborhoods are goals of the City's Land Use and Circulation Element and Bicycle Action Plan. The Samohi project proposed to implement City policy with physical improvements to crosswalks, traffic flow, bike lanes and intersections to facilitate active bicycling and walking to school. 2 There are currently no marked /painted bicycle facilities on any of the streets that surround the school. The Bike Action Plan identified Olympic Drive on the north side of campus for a two -way bike and pedestrian path to create a key connection through and around the school to the Civic Center. The plan identified closing a network gap between 7th and 6th Streets on Pico Boulevard and prioritized implementation of the Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway in the 5 -year Plan. The Samohi improvements have continually been coordinated with the Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway project, and both are being considered as part of the February 11, 2014 Council agenda. In addition to improving access to the school, the Samohi project would also close a key network gap between the Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway and the beach, as well as to the Ocean Park neighborhood. Bikeway Recommendations 5 Year Implementation Plan Recommendations Bicycle Action Plan Proposed Bikeway Type film Bike Ba wwitrosetrali Nelghborhood Greenway s�•xFd�w.a� :wm'�'mmm.ayr am aaoe�sareew,msaw.m. Cydetsack o.e.am arn.x ha«,aya gyeay aaoxxtl w. y.�.� o-,.a m.a q a Buffered bike lane/ Double bike lane (where noted) Bikelane 4Y.k$e> = ;,J33 CBmbingbikelane m... seem. examp„• a, .nwNnylsn,�mu.a„ans,�nwrmmaaaw. - - -- Shared lane markings (both dbecdons) Local Streets SvMabMltlaneAartlopxxtlaaamwgsaMUhanapm ,poc On July 24, 2012 a professional services agreement with Ryan Snyder Associates for project planning, outreach and design was authorized. Subconsultants from Melendrez Design and Stantec Consulting provided roadway design and traffic engineering support. Outreach began in January 2013 and concluded with the final of three public workshops on October 23, 2013. Staff also worked in small groups with stakeholders to develop concept options and final recommendations. Outreach steps are detailed later in the 3 staff report. The Santa Monica - Malibu Unified School District and Samohi administration actively participated in the interdisciplinary project team along with staff from Planning and Community Development, Public Works, Community and Cultural Services, Big Blue Bus, and the Police Department. Discussion Samohi currently has four entrances to serve its 3,300 students. Two entrances are located near each other on 7th Street, one entrance is on Olympic Drive on the north side of campus, and one on 4th Street near the track field. The 6th Street gate closed for student access in 2011 and a second gate will open on Olympic Drive later this year as part of the Science and Technology building project. Surveys over the years estimate that just over 100 students bike to school, 150 take a bus and 100 walk on an average day and funnel through one of these four gates. The highest number of arrivals occur at the Michigan Avenue /7th Street entrances. The number of students walking and biking almost double during the annual Bike It/Walk It days which occur one day each Fall and one day each Spring at Samohi. The remaining Samohi students are dropped off at one of the four entrances. The majority of pick -up and drop -off now occurs at the entrances on 7th Street and Michigan Avenue and along Olympic Drive. The 4th Street entrance near the Civic Center is more modestly used, despite the availability of 30 a minutes of free parking available across the street at the Civic Center parking facilities. Students indicated a preference to enter on the east side of the campus because classroom buildings are clustered at the east end of campus. The concentrated campus access points contribute to morning congestion in a small area that is already congested due to its proximity to on- and off -ramps that serve the 1 -10 freeway. Data gathered just to the south of the main entrance to the school at Michigan Avenue /7th Street show significant peaks in daily vehicle trips on this segment occurring between 7 and 9 AM and 3 and 4 PM. This presents challenges for students traveling on foot, by bike, as well as for residents that live across from the school. This area is also where most collisions involving pedestrians and cyclists of high school age are occurring, including the intersection of Lincoln Boulevard and Michigan Avenue. Students, parents, and school administrators have expressed support for increased bicycling and walking to Santa Monica - Malibu Unified School District (District) schools. The grant application for this project grew from a movement within the school that encouraged walking, taking transit and biking by the student group Santa Monica High School Solar Alliance which first initiated Walk It Bike It Day in 2007. Since that time, "Bike or Walk to School Days" have grown to include the middle and elementary schools. These events are generally run by the students and encourage other students to ride and walk. Student participation has been steadily increasing. The City participates in Bike it Day at Samohi by setting up a temporary bike lane in the existing curb /parking lane on the north side of Michigan starting just east of Lincoln and continuing to the main entrance gate. Project Development The project began with site documentation and stakeholder 5 meetings and workshops to better understand current barriers to biking and walking. Issues identified during public outreach included lack of campus bike parking, conflicts between vehicles and students walking, biking or skateboarding to school, lack of safer pedestrian crossings, and gaps or upgrade needs to street segments and intersections. Below is a summary of issues identified through site observation and evaluation during the project's first phase. 1. Lincoln Boulevard at Michigan Avenue • Heavy drop -off activity creates challenges for biking into school without dedicated bike lanes. • Volume and speed of vehicles on Lincoln Boulevard not conducive to walking and biking. • Intersection is popular for access to Interstate 10, creating conflicts between vehicles turning and students biking and walking. 2. 7th Street at Michigan Avenue • Conflicts between vehicles dropping off students with those trying to enter the main gate by bike and on foot. • Illegal U -turns occur at the 7th Street Crosswalk which leads directly into the school. • Vehicles stop randomly in the travel lane when they are halted due to the crosswalk is blocked by crossing students. • Students are dropped off in both directions on 7th Street; northbound vehicles stop while students cross midblock creating conflicts with southbound vehicles. 3. 7th Street and Pico Boulevard • Conflicts between pedestrians and right- turning vehicles due to large number of students that disembark at the bus stop and walk west via an unsignalized crosswalk on 7th Street. • No legal crossing from the south side of Pico Boulevard to the north side at this location although students and bus riders still cross. (The Pico Youth and Family Center has recently advocated for a signalized crossing here.) 4. Pico Boulevard ( #3 and #4) • No bike lanes on Pico between 6th and 7th Streets N • No means for cyclists, even advanced cyclists utilizing travel lanes, to gain access to 6th and 7th Street without permitted left turns ® Volume and speed of vehicles deter walking and biking here 5. Pico Boulevard and 4th Street • Volumes and traffic speed at this intersection deter walking and biking • No designated bike facility • Heavy right -turn traffic conflicts with students using crosswalks 6. 4th Street near Civic Center Drive • Heavy traffic adjacent to sidewalk with no landscape or parking lane buffer. • The curb lane on northbound 4th Street adjacent to the campus is a travel lane only and drivers queue up for access to 1 -10 freeway. 7. 4th Street and Olympic Drive • Heavy traffic adjacent to sidewalk with no landscape or parking lane buffer • At intersection, a crosswalk is missing on the north leg and conflicts occur between pedestrians in the crosswalk and distracted drivers turning right onto I- 10 ramps 8. Olympic Drive • The sideway is very narrow, with no landscape or parking lane buffer in some sections and obstructions (poles, etc.) that reduce width below ADA requirements. • Poor lighting at night for pedestrians and bicyclists • Driver speed coming off the 1 -10 and /or approaching Lincoln Boulevard deters walking and biking 9. Lincoln and Olympic Drive • Heavy traffic adjacent to sidewalk with no landscape or parking lane buffer • A crosswalk is missing on the north leg and conflicts occur between pedestrians in the crosswalk and distracted drivers rushing to get on to 1 -10 ramps • Right turn conflicts with pedestrians as drivers merge onto southbound Lincoln Working with students, parents and the project team, a range of site specific countermeasures were identified. The countermeasures address issues specific to each location, improve access, and seek to encourage walking and biking to and around the 7 school campus (Attachment 1). Improvements range in cost and complexity and include the following major components: • Physical intersection improvements such as crosswalk upgrades and curb extensions (bulbouts) to shorten crossing distance and improve visibility. • Operational intersection improvements such as lead pedestrian brossings and restricted turn phases (no right on red, etc.) to reduce conflicting movements. • Street segment reconfiguration such as creating dedicated bike lanes, and adjusting vehicle flow to improve operations and reduce conflicts between drivers, crossing pedestrians and bicyclists in the roadway. • Creation of additional off - street or protected pedestrian and bicycle space such as a cycle track or wider sidewalks to eliminate the most severe gaps in the walking and biking network. This inventory of potential improvements was thorough and identified more work than could be funded by the existing Safe Routes to School project grant at this time. So the project team engaged the community to prioritize and narrow in on the improvements that could be funded with the grant funds available. This process identified the area around the main entrance to the school and Pico Boulevard as the highest priority for the first phase of improvements. This was based on consensus that the area at 7th Street and Michigan Ave had the most barriers to walking and biking and is the most highly used entrance to the school. The first phase of the project focuses on the main entrance to the school around 7th Street and Michigan Avenue as well as the segment between 6th and 7th Streets on Pico because this is the most congested area and the only street with good bike access. The majority of vehicle E pick -up and drop -off as well as bicycle access occurs on these streets. Project Refinement and Recommendations After identifying the first priority area around the school, options were refined for various intersection and segment treatments for Michigan Avenue (Lincoln to 7th Street), along 7th Street (Michigan to Pico) and from 6th to 7th Streets on Pico Boulevard. The options included two -way traffic, one -way traffic, bike lanes on one side of the streets and bike lanes on both sides of the streets, and other options. These were then filtered down weighing all neighborhood characteristics such as peak vehicle traffic, parking turnover, loading for nearby businesses, school bus drop off, typical pick -up and drop -off behavior, street priorities, as well as neighborhood concerns and the overall LUCE goals. Based on feedback from the community, staff is recommending that the first phase of the Samohi Safe Routes to School project, Michigan Avenue and 7th Street, include the following: • Reconfigure vehicle flow for a small segment of Michigan Avenue and 7th Street to one -way westbound on Michigan Avenue west of Lincoln Boulevard, connecting to one -way southbound on 7th Street to Pico Boulevard. A change in the flow of vehicles would allow continuation of the existing drop -off and pick -up locations here, while reducing the number of students crossing midblock in front of vehicles and across on- coming traffic (since the majority of students arriving exit the passenger side of the vehicles). This configuration would allow for new protected Class 2 green bike lanes in both directions on Michigan between Lincoln Boulevard and 7th Street. • A new fully signalized intersection at 7th and Pico (including a crosswalk to improve access to major Pico bus stops) that would enable one -way southbound traffic on 7th Street to turn left onto Pico Boulevard. The signal includes phasing for cyclists and lag timing, to create a lead pedestrian interval. • New protected Class 2 green bike lanes on Michigan Avenue and 7th Street in both directions. One bicycle lane would run contra -flow to vehicle traffic, with a buffer on both sides and clear striping. All bicycle lanes would be painted green to maximize visibility and legibility. 7th Street southbound lanes would be typical between the parked car and travel lane. The northbound contra flow bike lane would be set back five feet from the residential perpendicular parked vehicles. This bike lane will also have a buffer from the center line and opposing traffic. 9 ® Reconfiguration of the existing median in Pico Boulevard between 6th and 7th Streets to create protected green bike lanes in both directions in the center median area. The Pico Boulevard bike lanes would close a crucial gap in the bike network and provide better access to school. The bike lanes cannot be accommodated without either removal of the median or reduction of travel lanes. An inspection concluded that three of the eight existing trees are candidates for relocation due to poor structural condition with limited potential useful life expectency. Three Jacaranda Mimosifolia trees in the median would be relocated with first priority adjacent to the school along 7th Street and secondly within the Pico median just west of 6th Street. A Removal Plan per the Urban Forestry Master Plan is included as Attachment 4. 10 Samohl Safe Routes to School Pico Boulevard — 711 St. to 6'h St. Proposed • Sidewalk widening on the south side of Michigan Avenue and bulb -outs on the north side of 7th Street and Pico Boulevard to facilitate better pedestrian access. The pedestrian improvements would help provide a better walking environment on Michigan and reduce the roadway width so it takes less time to cross 7th Street at Pico Boulevard. • Michigan & Lincoln — Morning peak hour restrictions for southbound right on red are proposed to help reduce the conflicts between vehicles and students. A westbound bike lane will be added on the east side of Michigan. Yellow continental crosswalks and advanced stop bars to all crossings are proposed to keep cars from encroaching into the crosswalk. • A north -south crosswalk on Michigan is proposed for removal so that pedestrian crossing activity can be channelized into one crossing on 7th Street. This allows the existing crossing guard to focus on one crossing and it will help reduce pedestrian vehicle conflicts as well as help the flow of vehicles. • Staff would continue working with the PTSA and school administration to improve the existing vehicle drop off areas by extending and promoting new places for pick- up and drop -off. The improvements have been designed and selected to create a safer environment that would encourage students to bicycle and walk to and from school, while also considering the needs of vehicle access to the school and adjacent commercial 11 businesses. The configuration has optimized the use of the roadway by finding a balance between smooth vehicle flow, visible bike facilities, and pedestrian safety. It closes crucial gaps in the bike network — particularly to the Samohi main entrance — and would reduce pedestrian and vehicle conflicts. This project would create better connections and infrastructure that encourages more active transportation, public health and management of neighborhood vehicle flow. Future Safe Routes to School grants or other sources should investigate opportunities to improve segments on 4th Street between Pico and Olympic Drive and on Olympic Drive between Lincoln Boulevard and 4th Street. Intersection improvements including high visibility crosswalks, and off - street improvements such as creating a two -way bike way and sidewalk widening would improve pedestrian and bike access to the north and west sides of the school. As discussed below the Olympic Drive two -way bike way would also complete a segment of the Michigan Avenue Greenway. Coordination with the Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway The first phase of the Samohi project overlaps slightly with the Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway project, along Michigan Avenue between Lincoln Boulevard and 7th Court. Future phases also overlap along 7th Court, and along Olympic Drive between Lincoln and 4th Street. These projects, both being considered on the February 11, 2014 Council agenda, have been coordinated in design and phasing. The Greenway project would support Safe Routes to School by creating a safe and comfortable path for pedestrians and cyclists coming to campus from all neighborhoods to the east. The proposed Samohi first phase project would close an important gap in the bike network between the Greenway and the beach by creating a protected bike facility to 6th Street which then connects to Bay Street and the beach. Coordination with Big Blue Bus Recent Big Blue Bus ridership data shows that a few hundred Samohi students are using Santa Monica's bus service to get to and from school, with additional students also using Metro buses. Big Blue Bus runs frequent service along Lincoln Boulevard, 12 Pico Boulevard and 4th Street that provide direct access to Samohi, with heavily -used stops at Pico /Lincoln and at Pico /4th Street. The proposed signalization of the intersection at Pico and 7th Street would improve pedestrian crossing to bus stops, with a new signal, more visible crosswalks, and improved curbs. Similarly improvements to the intersection of Lincoln and Michigan Avenue would improve the safety of students crossing to and from bus stops. Currently, Big Blue Bus offers a discounted monthly student pass that allows access to the entire BBB network seven days a week. A rider relief program is also available for income - qualifying students that provides a $6 per month fare subsidy which riders can apply toward the purchase of a BBB pass. Information and education about available bus routes and existing programs for discounted passes could help increase student bus ridership. Increases in bus use also help to mitigate the safety and capacity issues around the school, together with increased walking and biking. Public Outreach The recommended project resulted from a year of outreach and collaboration. An interdepartmental team met regularly including Samohi administrators and staff and representatives from Planning and Community Development, Public Works, Police, and Community and Cultural Services Departments. An inclusive public outreach process was also under taken to engage Samohi, students and parents, neighbors and community stakeholders. The process included: • Jan 16, 2013 - a half day charrette with high school students, teachers, administrators, facilities staff, campus security, city staff and two representatives from Santa Monica Police Department completed field observations of pick -up/ drop -off, presented back ground of Safe Routes to Schools programs and engineering treatments, and completed a map exercise with attendees to identify barriers to biking and walking around the school. • Regular Team Meetings - In addition to public outreach there were five ongoing Team Meetings that included staff from Police Department, Public Works, Transportation Engineering, Public Landscape, Big Blue Bus, school district and high school administration throughout the year. • March 11, 2013 Workshop #1 -The first of three public meetings with a presentation and map activity like that given at the school meeting. Invitations were mailed to over 2,000 nearby residents, Parent Teacher Student Association 13 (PISA), neighborhood liaisons, student groups, school administrators shared details with student email lists and email blasts went out to bicycle and pedestrian interest groups. • May 23, 2013 Workshop #2 -Draft Alternatives were presented to the public in late May. The May meeting gathered detailed feedback on the draft concepts and had the public prioritize the specific improvements for 7th Street, Michigan and Pico Boulevards. Invitations were mailed to over 2,000 nearby residents, Parent Teacher Student Association (PISA), neighborhood liaisons, student groups, school administrators shared details with student email lists, email blasts went out to bicycle and pedestrian interest groups and staff handed out post cards to parents during afternoon pick up and placed large posters at the main vehicle and pedestrian entrances to the school. • June 4, 2013 Samohi Facilities Group - Staff met with Samohi facilities group. The meeting included project team members from facility improvement projects as well as local facilities management staff to discuss the proposed improvements for Samohi, future school facility plans and proposed access for the new Science and Technology Building at the corner of 7th Court and Olympic Drive. • June 20, 2013 Recreation and Parks Commission - The Safe Routes to School program including the bicycle and pedestrian training and education along with Samohi draft improvement recommendations was presented to the Recreation and Parks Commission. The Recreation and Parks Commission continues to support biking and walking in Santa Monica and has participated in many of the training and education projects to date. There was not a formal recommendation by the Commission. • September 21, 2013 Michigan Avenue Greenway Event - Staff set up a station at the Michigan Avenue Greenway Workshop at 9th Street and Michigan Avenue. The station contained the detailed draft concepts and public outreach process to date. Additional feedback was collected from nearby residents. • October 23, 2013 Workshop #3 - Final concepts were presented at two meetings. Outreach included post cards mailed to over 2,000 nearby residents, email notifications to Parent Teacher Student Association, neighborhood liaisons andstudent groups. School administrators shared details with student email lists and email blasts went out to bicycle and pedestrian interest groups. The first of the two meetings occurred on campus after school in an effort to reach more students and parents. The second meeting the same day was at the Ken Edward Center in the evening. • November 19, 2013 Pico Youth and Family Center (PYFC) -Staff participated in a PYFC organized action meeting regarding the safety of the intersection of Pico Boulevard and 7th Street. Members had initiated a petition to have a crosswalk 14 installed at the intersection to serve high school students and bus riders who cross the street directly in front of their facility. Information was shared regarding the Samohi Safe Routes project and how a crosswalk might be accommodated. Participants expressed a desire to have a crosswalk installed quickly, preferably in the first half of 2014. ® December 10, 2013 -The Samohi PTSA held a special meeting in early December to discuss the Samohi recommended project. Parents shared their support for Safe Routes to Schools programs but had some concerns about traffic congestion. Students in attendance shared their concerns regarding the difficulties of biking and walking to school and full support for the project. Members of the PTSA have continually supported the project but wanted to wait for the transportation analysis not yet completed at that time before providing a letter of project support. ® December 2013 PTSA - Staff was invited to present the final recommendation at a Santa Monica Spoke meeting and then shortly thereafter to over 70 students from the Associate Student Body and Journalism classes at Samohi. The attendees and students had an opportunity to ask questions and provide feedback. Shortly thereafter the PTSA held a special meeting to discuss the project. ® January 21 2014 PTSA — Staff presented and discussed the project, final recommendations and preliminary results of the transportation anaylsis to the PTSA board, parents, and students. A motion was called "To have PTSA endorse the Safe Routes To School' and plan passed with19 Yes, 3 No and 5 abstentions. ® January 22, 2014 Urban Forest Task Force — Staff presented the final recommendations and details on the redesign of the Pico Boulevard median between 7th and 6th Streets. The Task Force recommended that the three viable trees be relocated if possible to the west side of 7th Street along the school site. If this is determined to be a nonviable site the trees will be relocated further west within the Pico Boulevard median between 6th and 4th Streets. Community feedback has been supportive of creating safer routes to school for students. Support for adding bikeways was echoed by most of the community. Students feel that bike lanes are needed and the green paint makes them feel safer. Nearby neighbors had concerns with the one -way configuration proposed since it would limit their access to on- street parking spaces on 7th Street. Concepts that eliminated resident parking did not move forward. The proposal to add a signal at 7th and Pico was supported by residents as it would increase access options from the neighborhood. The Pico Youth and Family Center is very supportive of a signal.at 7th and Pico. Some 15 parents who drop off their students are concerned that the one -way configuration will cause more frustration for them with added delays if further drop -off locations are not pursued. The PTSA has continually supported the project. Environmental Analysis The project is statutorily exempt from the provisions of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to 21080.20.5 of the State Implementation Guidelines in that the project consists of a bicycle project consistent with a bicycle plan prepared pursuant to Section 891.2 of the Streets and Highways Code. The project consists of the restriping of three streets for new and highly visible bike lanes, streetscape enhancements such as wider sidewalks, landscaping, and enhanced crosswalks. To accommodate these changes the project includes a change in vehicular circulation. A traffic study was prepared to analyze the traffic pattern created by changing 7th Street and Michigan Avenue from two -way to one -way streets, as required by the exemption provision. Traffic conditions were evaluated using based on redistributed vehicles through the street network based on both the reconfiguration of 7th Street and Michigan Avenue to one -way streets and the peak -hour turn restrictions proposed with the Michigan Avenue Greenway project at 11th Street and Michigan Avenue. Traffic analysis was undertaken for the surrounding signalized intersections: ® 11th Street and Michigan Avenue, ® Lincoln Boulevard and Michigan Avenue, ® Lincoln Boulevard and Pico Boulevard, • Pico Boulevard and 7th Street (new signalized intersection), Pico Boulevard and 6th Street, and ® Lincoln Boulevard and the eastbound 1 -10 Freeway On -Ramp. Analysis indicates that the existing five intersections would operate at their current or better levels of service (LOS), and would not exceed the City's adopted significance criteria after the project is implemented. The addition of the new signal at the intersection of Pico Boulevard and 7th Street was analyzed to determine any potential delay that would be encountered by vehicles at this location. The intersection is anticipated to operate at LOS C or better, above the City's acceptable LOS of D. Signal 16 synchronization with Pico Boulevard signals at 6th Street and Lincoln Boulevard will be coordinated through Traffic Engineering utilizing the Traffic Management Center and field observations. The full traffic study is available as Attachment 3. Public meetings for the project serve as notification to the community regarding the project, as also required by the exemption. Next Steps Staff would release requests for proposals to complete the construction of the improvements during the summer of 2014. Next step for Council would be contract approval for construction. Staff would continue to seek grant funding to begin design development for other phases of the Safe Routes to School project that includes 4th Street segment and Olympic Drive between Lincoln Boulevard and 4th Street. 17 Financial Impacts & Budget Actions There is no immediate budget/financial impact to conceptual approval of the Samohi Safe Routes to School project. The initial design and construction drawings for the project are covered within the existing Ryan Snyder contract $159,944; construction of the project is anticipated to cost $980,000, for a grand total project cost of $1,139,944. Remaining funds in the amount of $980,000 have been included in the FY 2013 -14 Capital Improvement Program along with $160,000 from ATMS Phase 4 for the new signal. Funding has been programed in the FY13/14 budget for this project located in the following accounts: 0207042.589000, SR2SP Grant $740,000 C01 7042.589100, SR2SP Samohi $40,000 0207042.589100, SR2SP PCLR $40,000 C017024.589000, ATMS Phase 4 $160,000 TOTAL $980,000 Existing grant funding would construct the first phase of improvements at Samohi, including Michigan Avenue and 7th Street. Additional funding would be needed to complete subsequent phases. Prepared by: Michelle Glickert, Senior Transportation Planner Approved: Forwarded to Council: avQ id Martin, Director Rod Gould Planning and Community Development City Manager Attachments 1) Final Safe Routes to School Recommendations for Safe Routes to Santa Monica High School 2) Concept Plans for Phase 1 3) Transportation Analysis 4) Tree Relocation Plan in Final Safe Routes to School Recommendations for Safe Routes to Santa Monica High School � �� , ••` �� r �, �� , �� f This report summarizes recommendations developed through a one -year public outreach process about Safe Routes to School that engaged students, school district staff and administration, design experts and City staff in a collaborative process. Recommendations contained in this report aim to remove barriers to walking, biking, skateboarding and taking transit to Santa Monica High School (Samohi) to promote student safety and health. Intersection, roadway and operational changes are identified that improve conditions for active transportation while also improving the function and roadway safety for all users. The report is divided into 3 sections: 2 Priority Projects: describes the highest priority project focused on streets closest to the school entrance at 7th St. and Michigan Ave. proposed for construction with Safe Routes to School grant funds in 2014, EXISTING CONDITIONS ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT] S TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT a Next Recommended Projects -Near Term: describes the next priority projects identified during outreach for remainder of streets and intersections around the school, and ® Additional Future Projects - Long Term: describes future projects on the critical biking and walking paths that lead to Samohi. The graphic and text in the report describe recommended intersection and roadway improvements at a conceptual level. This information is provided for planning and prioritization, and will need additional schematic design before advancing to construction. The priority project, if approved by Council, will move 3 into construction drawings and final design for a target to construct in summer 2014. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SCHOOL ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL P ,tns,�' Idth St F .: .... X 11th St 4 3 OI /m1,,Lta, Lmco1n6l4d ;amohi ; St. > :c •••tih ¢ 9 ul .. Zd V O "In' a� wa fl' y c,"I NG 111M1.1 SAVIO lAoE MECD`.'.MENDED IAIRMO EN TNANSIi UNDER.,1Sr VCr11 WE Bikepath M Bike path Inm Type Bsharrow d. Expo line and station Colored bikelane M Cycletrack _ nI Neighborhood Buffered bikelane Colored buffered bike lane greenway ® Study intersection _ -- ••••• Bike route r� Bike lane — Buffered bike lane ...... Add lighting - -- Bike route Bikelane' a ,t IIL DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL 4 • Mic Z I MCI ilk W1 PRIORITY PROJECTS A. SEGMENTS ................. - ........ ................... --- ...... .._....................................._......_................................. ..............................5 1. Michigan Avenue -7th Street ................... -.1 ..................................... ................ ............................... -- .............................. 5 -6 2. Pico Boulevard ....................................................................................................................................... ............................... 7 316th Street ..................... .- ..................................... ---- ... ........... ..... ......... ....... .... .................................................................... 7 B. INTERSECTIONS .................................................................................................................................... ............................... 8 1. Michigan Avenue and Lincoln Boulevard ....................... .--- .................................. .- ............ ........... ............................... 8 2. Michigan Avenue and 7th Street .......................................................................................................... ..............................9 3. Pico Boulevard and Lincoln Boulevard... .......................................... .......... ............. . ..... ...... ........... .. . ............... 10 4. Pico Boulevard and 7th Street .................................. --- ............................................................................................. ...... 11 5. Pico Boulevard and 6th Street ............................................................................................................... .............................12 6. Sign Installation .................................................................................................................................... ............................... 13 C. BICYCLE AND SKATEBOARD PARKING ......... -- ........... ............ ....................... -'- ...... ............................................. 13 -15 NEXT RECOMMENDED PROJECTS - NEAR TERM A. SEGMENTS ............... ............................... ........11....1...1............ ......111...1................., 1. Olympic Drive— ........................... .......... .. . .... ... .... ... . .. ... .... .. ... .. . ..... 2. 7th Alley ................................................................................ ............................... B. INTERSECTIONS .......... ........................... --- ...... _................. .............................., 1. Olympic Drive and 4th Street ............................................................... -- ...... .... , 2. Olympic Drive and Sth Street ................ ............................... ......1.........1...1.1........ 3. Olympic Drive and Lincoln Boulevard ................................ ............................... 4. Pico Boulevard and Lincoln Boulevard .............................. ............................... 5. Pico Boulevard and 4th Street .............. ............................... ...................1.......1.11 6. Civic Center Drive and 4th Street ........ ............................... ....1111....................... 7. Crosswalk Installation ............................ ............................... ........1....1............1.1.. ADDITIONAL FUTURE PROJECTS - LONG TERM ........23 ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAPJ IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT SEGMENTS Michigan Ave. Lincoln Blvd. 7th St. • Two lanes with on- street parking • Pick -up and drop -off area at7th St. and Michigan Ave. • 40' wide • Convert to one Zane WB, WB 5' curbside colored hike lane with 2' buffer on the passenger side of on- street parking, and EB 4' colored contraflow bike lane with 2' buffer on the parking side and a 3' buffer next to the travel lanes • Add double yellow line between WB travel lane and contraflow bike lane • Add dashed green lnteisection crossing treatment across Lincoln Blvd. • Widen sidewalk into parkway with permeable concrete on both sides • Proposed concept will not interfere with truck loading operations at Coffee Bean e< Tea Leaf DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL 5 M 7th St. r Michigan Ave. Pico Blvd. -- .. - - -- - - - - -- ® Two lanes with on- street parking and parking on the east side is perpendicular ® 52' wide ® Convert to one la tie southhound, southhound 6' colored hike lane, and 6' coloied northbound contraflow hike lane with a 3' travel Zane buffer and a 5' parking buffer Add double yellow Ilne hetween southbound travel lane and cot thlow hike lane Move forward perpe ndicular parking stalls; Utilize parking curb overhang by 2' • Option: Angle perpendicular stalls by 10 -15° and convert to back -in angled parking See Intersection i "reatments7th and Michigan Add landscaping to sidewalk parkway on west side ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT a 6th St. 7th St. • Four lanes and median • 60' wide curt) to curb • 24' wide curb to median Pico Blvd. i. Pico PL • 7 lane vrth on- street parking on the west side only and sharrows • 40' aide • Modify 12'two -way median cycletrack with 2' painted buffer with rolled mountable curb with white reflectors on north side and 4' landscaped buffer on south side • Reduce lane widths to '10' (inside) and I V (outside) to create icon) for cycletiack • Add directional signage at Pico Blvd. and 7th St. to connect with Al St. bikeway • Add wafinding signage DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL 7 8 B) INTERSECTIONS • Michigan Ave. has two lanes and on-- street parking • Lincoln Blvd- has four lanes, center -left turn lane, a third northbound lane north of Michigan Ave, a southbound rig t -turn lane, and on- street parking south of Michigan Ave • Signaf-,ed intersection with protected lefts southbound to eastbound • Countdown signals on all crossings • Add yellow continental crosswalks to all crossings (4) • .Add audio signals to all crossings (B) • Add advanced stop bars to all crossings (4) • Set the walk phase to automatic (school hours only) • Add leading pedestrian interval to all crossings (school hours only) • Add hike boxes to both approaches on Michigan Ave. • ,Add bulk -outs to all corners to cross Michigan Ave. on SE and SW Corners (4) • Add 1',Io Turn on Red to southhound right - tum lane on Lincoln Ave Add hike boxes to both approaches on Michigan Ave. e • Coordinate with Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway project • Coordinate with future Lincoln Blvd. improvements ACCESS AND BICYCLUPEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMERITS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT • kichigan Ave. has two lanes with on-street parking • 7th St, has two lanes with on- street parking, and parking on the east side is perpendicular • Unslgnalilzed intersection with all -way stop control • Yellow lateral -line crosswalks • High volume pick -up and drop -off area currently due to this being the main entrance to the school • Pick -up and drop -off volumes expected to decrease with the relocation of bike parking and the addition of a new entance on Olympic Dr. • Remove stop sign, crosswalk, and advanced stop bar to cross Michigan Ave. • Add raised intersection /speed table Add yellow continental markings to crosswalk to cross 7th St • Add advanced stop bar to crossing of 7th St. (1) • Add State Law Yield to Pedestrian sign to crossing of 7th St. • Add perpendicular curh ramps with truncated domes to southeast comer • Continue hike lanes through the intersection DRAFT ACCESS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL 9 10 Pico Blvd has four lanes, two center left -turn lanes at the intersection, and on-street parking • Lincoln Blvd. has four lanes, a center -turn lane, and on- street parking • Signallzed intersection with protected lefts in all directions m Countdown signals on all crossings Crosswalk texture is very faded Add yellow continental crosswalks to all crossings (4) Set walk phase to automatic (school hours only) a Add leading pedestrian inteivai to all crossings (school hours only) • Dwell in walk phase during Lincoln Blvd green phase ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT • Plco Blvd has four lane and a median • 7th St. has two lanes and on- street parking, with perpendicular parking on the east side • Unsignalized intersection, stop - controlled on 7th St. • Yellow continental crosswalk and advanced stop bar to cross 7th St. • BUlh-OUton the northeast comer to cross 7th St Signalize intoisection with countdown and audio signals (4) as well as bikes -only signal heads (2) and a separate phase for turning Cyclists Add advanced stop bars (2) and yellow continental crosswalks (2) to cross Pico Blvd. on east and west sides Future Improvement - raised crosswalk to cross All St. Add hit lh -out, on the northwest and northeast corners to cross 7th St (2) e Add colored dashed bike lanes to connect 7th St. to cycletrack on Pico Blvd Add directional signage DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL 11 -YI51 I'd r • Pico Blvd has four lanes and a median • 6th St. is one -way northbound with a left -turn lane and a right -turn lane atthe intersection • Signalized intersection • Bulb -out on the southwest corner to cross 6th St. • Countdown signals to cross Pico Blvd 12 • Advanced stop bars on all crossings • Add yellow continental crosswalks to all crossings (3) • Add advanced stop bars (3) • Add colored dashed bike lanes to connect 6th St, to cycletrack on Pico Blvd. • On 6th St. approach to intersection, add S northbound hike Zane and 6' southbound hikes -only lane • Add short double yellow lines on 6th St- to separate SB cyclists from LIB traffic • Add bikes -only signal heads (2) and signal phase for westbound and northbound turning cyclists • Add signage to indicate that cycle tracks connect with 7th St. only • Shorten curb extension on SW corner to allow bicyclists to proceed SIB on 6th St. • Reduce median nose on the east leg of the Intersection where it intersects with bicyclist; path of travel through the intersection • Add long median nose to west leg of the intersection ACCESS AND BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT Install the following signs: ® 2 "School" signs and 15 in ph speed limit signs on Michigan Ave. /7th St. from Lincoln Blvd. to Pico Blvd. 6 2 "School" signs on Pico Blvd. WBjustwestof7th St Alley a 2 "School'% signs on Pico Blvd EBjust east of 4th St.; also "25 MPH Speed Limit When Children Are Present" signs in the same locations I 'School" sign on Pico Blvd. EBjust west of 4th St; also "25 MPH Speed Limit When Children Are Present" 13 ® 1 'School" sign on 4th St. NBjustsouth of Pico Blvd. Q BICYCLE AND SKATEBOARD PARKING Improving conditions for students to bicycle to school will increase the demand for bicycle parking Ideally, hicycle parking should be placed near school entrances so that students, faculty, and staff can park conveniently The significant number of students vvho skateboard to school also need safe storage for their skateboards Parking Location and capacity The following locations have been identified as the most suitable for bicycle and skateboard parking on the Samohi campus. 1 _ An area near the 7th Street entrance to the south of the east -west vialkway could host bicycle and skateboard parking. Today landscaping exists in an area roughly 70' by 20'thatcould accommodate two rows of bike lacks. These racks could accommodate approximately 48 racks for 96 bicycles (2 each). The area could also hold lockable parking for48 skateboards_ The parking will need a new concrete pad and some light grading. Fencing can protect the bicycle parking in appropriate locations. 2- Northwest of the Science Building the school district plans to install paiking for 125 bicycles, funding by the existing constmction honcl. People that enter at Olympic Blvd_ can use this parking. 3. Bicycle and skateboard parking can be placed along the south side of the walkway between the Science Building and what is now the technology Building- (The Technology Building will soon be torn down and replaced by a softball field ) The aiea is about 170' long and can accornmoclate one row. Altogether, this area would hold approximately 60 racks for 120 bikes and 24 skateboard racks.The area currently has concrete, so no new pad would he needed. This parking wVould be convenient for people entering at 7th Street. 4. 1',lorth of the track the school has 21 hike lacks for 42 bicycles_ The area is fenced off and locked during all hours except when students need access_ ItcOUld accommodate approximately 21 more rack -for 42 more bicycles. The area could also hold a rack for 24 skateboards- It has a decomposed granite surface, so no new concrete pad vaould be needed. This parking can wive bicyclists that enter from 4th A eet DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL 5. On the south side of the school adjacent to Pico Boulevard a lawn area could be converted to bicycle and skateboard parking The inegular shaped area is divided into two sections. One of these is it the southeast corner of the school and consists of about 3,500 to 4,000 square feet of useable land. This area is recommended to be used first because it is convenient to the school entrance at the corner of Pico Boulevard and 7th Street It could accommodate approximately three rows of "I6 bike racks (for 96 hikes) and a skateboard rack holding 24 skateboards. It could also hold another row further west for abent 24 racks holding 48 bicycles Afterthis area is used, another area of about 1,500 square feet located to the vvest could be used. This area could hold approximately 32 racks for 64 bicycles. Both of these areas would need a new concrete pad. 14 Figure 1 displays the location of each of these proposed par -ing areas. Funds currently exist for racks to hold 360 bikes. The totals above show the potential to add hike parking on campus with capacity for well over 360 bikes. If for some reason not all rack. ks can be placed on campus hike parking amenities such as tool stands that contain repair kits and air should he pursued and distributed around the cam pus. Spacing Bike racks shoulcl be spaced at least 30 inches apart on center to allow for access. At least two feet of clearance should be left on the sides of the parking racks. Access rows should be at least four feet between six feet of space for the length of each bicycle. At least four feet of clear area should he allowed to access each unit of skateboard racks. Rack Type Bicycle racks should support bicycles on at least two points, and allow a user to easily attach a lock. Inverted "U" racks work well, as do others that meetthese criteria _They should be placed so as not to create atripping hazard and should not have sharp protruding objects. Skateboard racks should be lockable. They come as units that hold various quantities of skateboads- ACCESS AND BICYCLUPEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT FIGURE 1. LOCATION Of- PROPOSED BIQ'O FAND SKAI EBOAKD PARYING DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMEf\ITS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL 15 ilk MATIN-04163 IVA I MIA ilk 101 A. SEGMENTS • One lane easthound with on- street pick -up • Add 8' to sidewalk for multipurpose path (12' and drop -off area wide total) • 26' with 4' sidewalk • Add signage to delineate shared path • Reduce travel lane /pick -up and drop -off area to 18 . Merge point with Highway 1 off - :ramps, east of 6th St. v c 7th Allev i • Two lams eastbound — • 34' wide with 5' sidewalk • On- stieet pick -up and drop -off area planned here with new entrance on Olympic Dr west of 7th ,Alley • Add 7' to sidewalkfor multipurpose path(12' wide total) • Add signage and pavement markings to delineate pedestrian and bicyclist spaces • Reduce northern travel lane to 11' and southern travel lane /planned pick -rip and drop -off area to 16' ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAhd IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT Avenida Mazatlan 4th St. • Three lanes easthound, one lane westhound, • Coordinate improvements with Downtown 16 and on- street parking on the north side only Specific Plan in • 52' wide Pursue shared path connection east and west 4th St. - -- -- i. Stir St. • One lane eastbound • Add 9 -10'to sidewalk for multipurpose path • 22 -23' wide (12 -'13' wide total) • 3' sidewalk • Add signage to delineate shared path • Reduce travel lane to 12 -13' s Stir St. i Merge point with Highway 1 off - ramps, east of 6th St. Ti.;. . -. -- • One lane easthound with on- street pick -up • Add 8' to sidewalk for multipurpose path (12' and drop -off area wide total) • 26' with 4' sidewalk • Add signage to delineate shared path • Reduce travel lane /pick -up and drop -off area to 18 . Merge point with Highway 1 off - :ramps, east of 6th St. v c 7th Allev i • Two lams eastbound — • 34' wide with 5' sidewalk • On- stieet pick -up and drop -off area planned here with new entrance on Olympic Dr west of 7th ,Alley • Add 7' to sidewalkfor multipurpose path(12' wide total) • Add signage and pavement markings to delineate pedestrian and bicyclist spaces • Reduce northern travel lane to 11' and southern travel lane /planned pick -rip and drop -off area to 16' ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAhd IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT 7th Alley Lincoln Blvd. • hhree lanes at the intersection • Add 4' intersection bike lane for eastbound • 35' wide cyclists • Wider sidewalk here • At intersection, ieduce north and south travel lanes to 10'; reduce center lane to 1 P • Add signage orienting cyclists to multipurpose path • Pull the fence back to in visibility on the -- NW corner of Olympic Dc and Lincoln Blvd - Lincoln Blvd. 10th St. • 3 lanes one-way eastbound Add T bike lane - • 40' wide • Reduce travel lanes to 1 I' - - 10th St.- - 11th St. • 2 lanes one way eastbound --- — • Add 7' bike lane • "8' wide • Peduce one travel lane to 10' and one to 'I 1' Olympic Dr. Michigan Blvd. N, • 20' wide • Add street lighting • Add sharrows (as vvayfinding) DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL 17 18 B) INTERSECTIONS • Olympic Dr. west of 4th St- has one westbound lane and three eastbound lanes, including a left /through lane and a right/ through lane • Olympic Di . east of 4th St., is one -way eastbound with three lanes • 4th St north of Olympic Di . has two through lanes, one right -trim lane, and two left -turn lanes • 4th St. south of Olympic Dr. has three through lanes, a left -turn lane, and a right -turn lane • Signalized intersection with protected lefts • Crossing of the north leg prohibited • Countdown signals and advanced stop bar- on all crossings • Permit crossing of north leg (coordinate with Caltrans) • ,Add ramps (2), ped -heads with countdown signal (2), and advanced stop bar (1) to cross north leg • Add yellow continental crosswalks to all crossings (4) • Option: Add audio signals to all crossings (8) • Add red arrow for northbound vehicles on 4th Street (school hours only) • Add leading pedestrian interval to walk phase on crossing of Olympic Dr. (school hours only) • Coordinate improvments with Downtown Specific Plan • Pursue connection west of 4th Street to linl: multi - purpose paths ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT • Olympic Di has one lane eastbound ^ ,Acid yellow continental crosswalk to cross 5th • 5th St, has two lanes with on- street parking St. (1) permitted on the south side only a Add advanced stop bar to crossing of 5th St • UnsignahzedT-intersection (1) • Sidewalk and ramp on the southwest corner 6 Acid bulb -outs on the southwest and are not; DA compliant southeast corners to cross 5th St. (2) 19 e Add B' to south sidewalk of Olympic Dr. to create 12' widened sidewalk /multipurpose path ® Add crossing island to cross 5th St. DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLUPEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL 20 a Olympic Dr. has three lanes and is one -way eastbou n d ® Lincoln Blvd. has four lanes, two southbound left -turn lanes, and two northhound right -turn lanes • Signalized intersection vvith protected lefts southbound to easthound ® Countdown signals on all crossings Advanced stop bar for northbound traffic on Lincoln Blvd_ a Add yellow continental crosswalks to all crossings (option coordinated with Caltrans) a Add audio signals to all crossings (8) Add advanced stop bars to all remaining crossings (3) • Add red arrow and extingushahle no right - turn on red (RTOR) sign active (Ailing school commute hours for easthound vehicles on Olympic Dr. • Reduce curb return and add perpendicular ramps on the SW and SE corners (2) Add leading pedestrian interval to walk phase on south crossing of Lincoln Blvd. (school hours only) Truncate median, acid median nose, and straighten crosswalk on the south leg Option. Add red arrow and prohibit RTOR (with extinguishable no RTOR sign) during school commute hours for northbound vehicles on Lincoln Blvd. ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESI RIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT • Pico Blvd has four lanes two center IeR -turn lanes at the intersection, and on-street parking Lincoln Blvd. has four lanes, a center -tuin lane, and on- street parking a Signalized intersection with protected lefts in all directions Couniclown signals on all crossings Crosswalk texture Is very faced Add audio signals to all crossings (8) ® Add advanced stop bars to all crossings (4) • Consider bulb -outs on all corners to cross Lincoln Blvd., contingent on future Lincoln Blvd. Street-cape visioning process (4) ® Add bulb -outs on the southeast corner to cross Pico Blvd. ('I ) a Coordinate with Big Blue Bus Future Improvements DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL 21 ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT • Pico Blvd has four lanes and a madian /center- • Add yellow continental crosswalks to all turn lane crossings (4) • 4th St. has four lanes and a median /center- Make northbound left turn protected Win lane north of Pico Blvd , and thieee lanes • Acid 4' landscaped buffer to sidewalk on the with a median /center -turn lane and on- street east side of 4th St. north of Pico Blvd. parking on the east side south of Pico Blvd_ • Signalized intersection with protected/ 22 permissive lefts in all directions • Countdown signals and advanced stop bars on all crossings • Yellow lateial line crosswalks • Advanced stop bars on all crossings ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT e e Civic Center Dr, has two westbound lanes, an easthound left turn lane, and an eastbound through /right lane 4th St. has four lanes and a median./center- turn lane Signalized intersection with protected/ permissive lefts from 4th Sc Pedestrian crossing prohibited on the north leg Yellow continental aosswalks on the west and south legs _ Advanced stop hars on the west and south legs e Open crossing of the north leg ® Add yellow continental crosswalks to the north and east legs (2) Add advanced stop bars to the north and east legs (2) e Add hulb -outs on the northeast and southeast comers to cross Civic Center Dr_ (2) ® Acid 4' landscaped buffertosidewalkonthe east side of 4th St. • Add "keep clear" markings in intersection Install the following crosswalks and advanced stop bars (all crosswalks ale yellow)- • 4 continental crosswalks at Olympic Dr_ and 4th St., with advanced stop bar on north crosswalk e 1 continental crossnalI, at Olympic Dr. and 5th St with advanced stop bar e 4 continental crosswalks at Olympic Dr. and Lincoln Blvd_ vvith advanced stop bars on all legs except east crossing of Olympic Di 4 continental crosswalks at Pico Blvd. and 4th St with advanced stop bars on all 4legs e 2 new continental crosswalks over north and east legs of Civic Center Dr and 4th St. with advanced stop bars on same legs DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS 10 SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL 23 24 Neighborhood Bikeways • Consider through neighborhood outreach process replacing stop signs along neighborhood bikeways with urhan roundabouts B. SEGMENTS stn St. 14th St. Pearl Street • 1 1 th and '14th Street south of Pico Boulevard • 6th Street Neighboihood Greenway • Consider 17th Street - Coordinate �.vith Michigan Avenue Greenway and Memorial Park kleighborhood Plan • lanes with on- street parking and 5 -wide • Widen hike lanes to' with 2' buffer bike lanes • Color the bike lanes • 56' wide -..:. Lincoln Blvd. r; 17th St. • _lanes with on street parking 0 40' wide • Add hike boulevard treatments • Coonclinate Mid igan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway Plan and Memorial Park kdeighborhood Plan ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT 6th St. - Lincoln Blvd. ® lanes with on street parking and shanows Add 6' wide bike lane on south side 0 40' wide 0: Lincoln Blvd 14th St. 6 2 lanes with on- street parking and S -wide • Widen hike lanes to 6` bike lanes - o -Add parking stripe 0 50' wide Colorado Ave Olympic Blvd • 2 lanes with T -wide hike lanes a Add huffeis to the bike lanes V 40' wide • Color the bike lanes r Olympic Blvd. South city limit 2 lanes with center turn lane, on -street • Add huffersto the bike lanes parking, and 5' -wide bike lanes e Colorthe bike lanes 0 59' -60' wide 0 Arizona Ave. Santa Monica Blvd. • 4 lanes with on- street parking • 5T wide 2 lanes with on- street parking Add 6 hike lanes with buffer 3.7 DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL EMEM i Santa Monica Blvd. Broadway 1rj- a 4 lanes with on- street parking 52' wide ty -i.._ Broadway Colorado Ave. 26 • - -- - -- rl lanes with T -wide hie lanes • 60' wide Colorado Ave. ! i Olympic Dr. • Three lanes and two center turn lanes • 55' wide I Olympic Dr. e Bay Street i rrs Four lane with center turn lane 56' wide curb- to -curh • B' wide east sides -valk • 2 lanes faith on- street parking Add 6' hike lanes with buffer • Road dietto 2 1anes,centerturn lane, and on- street parking Widen bike lanes to 6' and add buffer Add Green Back sharrows - coordinate with California Transportation Commission Add Type B harrows • Add 4' landscaped buffer to sidewalk on the east side: total sidewalk width becomes 12' ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS ROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT Pico Blvd Pico PI. • 2 lanes with on-street parking on the west side a Widen sidewalk on the east side; widening only and sharrows should taper from 8' on the south end to 2' 40' wide on the noith end a r::: Pico PI. Bay St. lanes with on- street parking and sharrows • . 35' wide 0-F ,;; Bay St. Ocean Park Blvd. 2 lanes with on- street parking and sharrows 6 40' wide • Add wairfindmg signage Arid 6 -wide hike lane on east side • Add wayfinding signage Pursue neighhorhood areenway as identified in the Bike Action Plan DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLEIPEDESTRIAkd IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL 27 28 Ocean Park Blvd. 0 6th St. west leg i 6th St. east leg -- • 2lanes with colored hike lanes • 50' wide • Northhound cyclists and vehicles on 6th St south of Ocean Park Blvd are required to turn right • Southbound cyclists and vehicles on 6th St. north of Ocean Park Blvd- can turn left at the traffic signal and right back onto 6th St. ---- • Add 12' 2-way cycletrack on the south side of Ocean Park Blvd. with 2' landscaped huger • Modify traffic signal for northbound cyclists at 6th St. west leg • Add dashed green bikeway markings to cros. Ocean Park Blvd. on the east and west sides of the west leg of 6th St. Add clashed green hikeway mar I ings to cross the east leg of 6th St- along the south side of Ocean Park Blvd. • Sign and mark street to direct bicyclists • ,Add 6' northbound intersection bike lane on east leg of 6th St. • f Northbound cyclists on 6th St. coming from south of Ocean Park Blvd. tun left onto to the ercletrack, proceed west, and then turn north to continue on 6th St. using the eastern dashed green treatment to cross the Intersection • SoUthbound cyclists on 6th St coming from north of Ocean Park Blvd. cross Ocean Park Blvd. using the westernmost clashed cashed green treatment, proceed east along the cycletrack, and turn south onto the east leg of 6th St ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT i Ocean Park Blvd. i Ashland Ave. .�< 2 lanes with on- stieet parking and sharrows Arid wayfinding signage a 34' wide 29 e Arizona Ave. Colorado Ave. 2 lanes with on- street parking and 5'-wide o Add buffers to the bile lanes bike lanes • 51' -52' wide _ Colorado Ave. —. -- -- - -- 1 Olympic Blvd. -- - -- - -- - - -- a 2 lanes with perpenchodar parking on east - - -- - - --- - Coordinate with Expo Light Rail and USPS site side, 8' -wide cycletrack on east side, and 5'- changes wide bike lane on west side 59' -00' wide Broadway <. Colorado Ave. 2 lanes with on street parking and 5' -wide hike lanes a 52' wide • Add buffers tothe bike lanes • Color the hike lanes • Follow Expo Green Streets Plan DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL 30 Colorado Ave. Pico Blvd. ii • 2 lanes with on street parking: buffered bike lane on east side, and standard bike lane on the west side • 52' wide r Pico Blvd. _ �- Pearl St. • 2 lanes vnth on- street parking S wide hike lane on east side, and sharrows on west side • 40' wide • Add huller to the non - buffered bike lane • Follow Expo Green Streets Plan • Con- iderfutme removal of parking on one side pending neighborhood study to create a safet; buffering or additional hike lane Broadway Pico Blvd. rr. • 2 lanes with on- street parking and buffered bike lanes • 52' wide r:;a:- Pico Blvd. i.: Pearl St. • 2 lanes with on- street parking, 5' -wide bike lane on west side, sharrows on east side • 40' wide • Color the bike lanes • Follow Expo Green Streets Plan rr • Maintas is ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT 7th St. and Olympic Blvd., north of 1-10 0 T Olympic Dr., south of 1-10 • 7th St. ends at Olympic Blvd., north of 1 -10 • Some right -of -way exists between the north side of Olympic Di- and the 1 -10 which could be used for bridge landing • Add bicycle and pedestrian Midge • .Add signalized crossing of Olympic Dr. with yellow continental crosswalk and advanced stop hars 31 McClure Tunnel 19th St • The City should consider creating additional connections across 110 These might indude bridges or taping portions ovei the 1 -10 freeway, with specific attention to areas hetvaeen the McClure Tunnel and 1 Rh Street. Pending changestothe Caltrans leasing policy, the cap could have buildings on portions of it, as well as open space _This would allow for multiple bicycle and peclestrian crossings that would link the new Expo Line Station and downtown to the south side. DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL Phase I Concept Plans February 11, 2014 City Council Meeting 8 -13: Review and Approve the Conceptual Design of the Samohi Safe Routes to School Project — recommendation that the City Council: approve the conceptual design for the Samohi Safe Routes to School project; and, direct staff to complete construction drawings and release bids for construction for the Michigan Avenue /7th Street portion of the project. Revision to Attachment 3 Transportation Analysis — Updated 2/10/14 o Table 4 Future Volumes o Table 5 Impact Analysis o Appendix B - Future LOS Sheets Transportation Analysis FORTHE PROPOSED Santa Monica High School 'teanuaPy 2014 Revised February 11, 2014 Prepared by: City of Santa Monica Planning and Community Development 11 Page 2 1 P a g e Introduction This study presents the transportation analysis of the proposed circulation changes near Santa Monica High School ( Samohi) associated with a Safe Routes to School grant. The methodology and base assumptions used in the analysis were established in conjunction with the City of Santa Monica (the City). PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City was awarded a State of California Safe Routes to School Program grant in the amount of $880,000 to outreach, design and construction of intersection, crosswalk, street, signage and bike storage improvements at Santa Monica High School. The Project is intended to create better access for students so they will feel safer walking and biking to school. The proposed Samohi project will help to implement City policy with physical improvements to crosswalks, traffic flow, bike lanes and intersections to facilitate active bicycling and walking to school, furthering the City's Land Use and Circulation Element and Bicycle Action Plan goals of active transportation, public health and managing vehicle traffic in neighborhoods. A range of improvements was identified and documented for Michigan Avenue, 7th Street, Pico Boulevard, 4th Street and Olympic Drive that included physical and operational intersection improvements, roadway reconfiguration, and off - street facilities during the development of the project. Outreach identified a priority for improvements at the main campus entry at Michigan Avenue and 7th Streets (The Project). Concept plans for improvements to be funded by the existing Safe Routes to School grant have been developed for this area. The Project proposed for analysis includes road reconfiguration to make Michigan Avenue one - way west -bound west of Lincoln Boulevard to 7th Street, and 7th Street one -way south -bound from Michigan Avenue to Pico Boulevard. A new traffic signal would be added at 7th Street and Pico Boulevard allowing southbound vehicles to turn left or right on to Pico Boulevard, new crosswalks and contraflow bicycle access to 7'h Street. This would reduce conflicts between 31 Page improvements have been designed and selected to create a safer environment that will encourage students to bicycle and walk to and from school, while also considering the needs of vehicle access to the school and adjacent commercial. Figure 1 illustrates the Site (Samohi) and the signalized intersections analyzed as part of this study. STUDY AREA The Study Area includes a geographic including the following analyzed intersections: 1. 11th Street and Michigan Avenue 2. Lincoln Boulevard and Michigan Avenue 3. Lincoln Boulevard and Pico Boulevard 4. Pico Boulevard and 7 i Street 5. Pico Boulevard and 6th Street 6. Lincoln Boulevard and 1 -10 Freeway On -Ramp No changes are anticipated to street segment volumes; only a recirculation of existing vehicle movements, thus no analysis was conducted. Figure 2 illustrates the location of the boundaries of the school and all existing and future entrances. 4 1 P a g e pedestrians and vehicles during ,- drop -off and allow space for 'y" FY' r1 e buffered and protected green bike lanes and a wider sidewalk. The project also proposes reconfiguration of the Pico median for a two -way cycle track that would connect students cycling from the Cl south to the campus entrance and remove a crucial gap in the bike Santa Monica High School network. The signal and cycle track — would also link the proposed{,- %ng Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway to the beach. The h Figure 1 improvements have been designed and selected to create a safer environment that will encourage students to bicycle and walk to and from school, while also considering the needs of vehicle access to the school and adjacent commercial. Figure 1 illustrates the Site (Samohi) and the signalized intersections analyzed as part of this study. STUDY AREA The Study Area includes a geographic including the following analyzed intersections: 1. 11th Street and Michigan Avenue 2. Lincoln Boulevard and Michigan Avenue 3. Lincoln Boulevard and Pico Boulevard 4. Pico Boulevard and 7 i Street 5. Pico Boulevard and 6th Street 6. Lincoln Boulevard and 1 -10 Freeway On -Ramp No changes are anticipated to street segment volumes; only a recirculation of existing vehicle movements, thus no analysis was conducted. Figure 2 illustrates the location of the boundaries of the school and all existing and future entrances. 4 1 P a g e Figure 2 STUDY SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY This transportation memo was prepared in accordance with City traffic study guidelines, which establish the appropriate analysis methodologies and significance thresholds for The Project. This analysis was conducted during a typical school day using the weekday commuter morning peak period (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) which overlaps school start times, and afternoon peak period (3:00 PM to 7:00 PM). For the purposes of this analysis there is an AM Peak hour, a 3:00 — 4:00 hour to capture the majority of student pick up and the typical PM Peak. The PM Peak is generally between 6 and 7 o'clock however the analysis will show that along Lincoln the peak hour is actually within the 3 to 4 o'clock range. Consistent with the City traffic study guidelines, the following analysis conditions were analyzed for the Project: 51 Page ® Existing Year (2013) Base Conditions — This condition provides a snapshot of operating conditions at the time of the City's most recent traffic count collection program- December of 2013. This forms the basis for all future year analyses. Counts were collected during either a Tuesday or Thursday when school was in session. ® Approval Year (2014) Plus Proiect Conditions — Consistent with the requirements for the Sunnyvale analysis (Sunnyvale West Neighborhood Association v. City of Sunnyvale City Council, Court of Appeals of California, 6th District, December 16, 2010). This analysis evaluates the potential Project - related traffic impacts from recirculation of trips as compared to Base Year (2013) base conditions since Base was conditions were assessed in December of 2013. INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE METHODOLOGY In accordance with the City's methodology for traffic analysis, the signalized study intersections were evaluated using the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) (Transportation Research Board, 2000) methodology, which determines operating characteristics of signalized intersections based on the average delay experienced by vehicles at the intersection (seconds /vehicle). TRAFFIX software was utilized to calculate the overall average delay of the study intersections. The overall intersection average delay is subsequently assigned a level of service (LOS) value to describe intersection operations. LOS is a qualitative measure used to describe the traffic flow conditions. Table 1 presents a description of the LOS. categories, which range from excellent, nearly free -flow traffic at LOS A to stop- and -go conditions at LOS F. The City has designated LOS D as the minimum desirable LOS at Boulevard intersections and LOS C as the minimum desirable LOS at Secondary Avenue intersections. 6 i Page City of Santa Monica Significance Criteria Boulevard and Secondary Avenue Intersections Future Base Scenario Future Plus Project Scenario If LOS = A, B, or C Significant Impact If: 4 and is a Secondary Avenue street intersection Average vehicle delay increase is ?15 seconds Or LOS becomes D, E, or F 4 and is a Boulevard intersection Average vehicle delay increase is ? 15 seconds Or LOS becomes E or F If LOS = D Significant Impact If: 4 and is a Secondary Avenue street intersection Any net increase in average seconds of delay per vehicle -i and is a Boulevard intersection Average vehicle delay increase is z 15 seconds Or LOS becomes E or F If LOS = E Significant Impact If: 4 and is a Secondary Avenue or Any net increase in average seconds of delay per a Boulevard intersection vehicle If LOS = F Significant Impact If: 4 and is a Secondary Avenue or HCM V/C ratio net increase is ? 0.005 a Boulevard intersection ORGANIZATION OF REPORT This report is divided into four chapters, including this introduction. Chapter 2 describes the existing circulation system, traffic volumes, and traffic conditions in the Study Area. Chapter 3 discusses the circulation for The Project and future network changes. Chapter 4 presents a summary of findings from this analysis. The appendices contain supporting documentation. 71 Page r� Existing Conditions A comprehensive data collection effort was undertaken to develop a detailed description of existing conditions in The Project Study Area. The existing conditions analysis relevant to this study includes an assessment of the existing street system, an analysis of traffic volumes and current operating conditions, and an analysis of the existing public transit service. EXISTING STREET SYSTEM The existing street system in the Study Area consists of a network of streets classified by the City's Land Use_ and Circulation Element (LUCE) as Boulevard, Major Avenue, Minor Avenue, and Neighborhood Street. Boulevards are regional transportation corridors with continuous mixed -use and commercial land uses. Major Avenues serve regional automobile trips and provides access for all modes of transportation. Major Avenues are designed to discourage regional auto traffic from using Secondary or Minor Avenues. Minor Avenues connect Neighborhood Streets with other avenues. Neighborhood Streets serve abutting buildings. These streets offer both sub - regional and local access, in addition to circulation opportunities in the Study Area. These transportation facilities generally provide two to four travel lanes and typically allow parking on either side of the street. Speed limits range between 25 and 35 miles per hour (mph) on the Boulevard, Secondary Avenue, Minor Avenue, and Neighborhood Streets. Roadway Descriptions The streets providing regional and sub - regional access to the Project vicinity include Lincoln and Pico Boulevards, Olympic Drive, 4th and 7th Streets and Michigan Avenue. The following is a brief description of streets in the Study Area: 81 Page • Lincoln Boulevard — Lincoln Boulevard is a designated Boulevard that runs in the north -south direction east of the Site. It provides four travel lanes, two in each direction, with left -turn lanes at major intersections. It provides regional access to the Site and to Interstate 10. Parking is available with some peak hour restrictions on both sides of the street within the Study Area. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. • Olympic Drive — Olympic Drive is a designated Major Avenue that runs east -west on the north side of the high school. It provides two travel lanes, eastbound only, with left -turn and right turn lanes at major intersections. It provides access to the Site. Parking is limited with peak hour restrictions for pick -up and drop -off within the Study Area. The posted speed limit is 35 mph. Pico Boulevard — Pico Boulevard is a designated Boulevard that runs in the east - west direction south of the Site. It provides four travel lanes, two in each direction, with left -turn lanes at major intersections. It provides regional access to the Site. Parking is generally not available near the high school with some meters available within one to two blocks in the west bound and east bound directions. The posted school zone speed limit is 25 mph when children are present with posted signs stating 35 mph. ® 4th Street — 4th Street is a designated Boulevard directly adjacent to the Project. It runs in the north -south direction on the west side of the high school. It provides four travel lanes, two in each direction with left turn lanes at intersections. It provides access to the Site and to Interstate 10. Parking is not available on 4th Street adjacent to the Site. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. ® 7th Street — 7th Street is a designated Neighborhood Street that runs in the north - south direction on the west side of the high school. It provides two travel lanes, one in each direction. It provides local access to the Site. Parking is generally available with peak hour restrictions on both sides of the street within the Study Area. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. ® Michigan Avenue — Michigan Avenue is a designated Neighborhood Street that runs in the east -west direction to the east of the high school. It provides two travel lanes, one in each direction. It provides local access to the Site. Parking is metered west of Lincoln Boulevard and is regulated by preferential parking adjacent to residences east of Lincoln Boulevard. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. The existing lane configurations at the analyzed intersections are provided in Appendix A. 91 Page EXISTING TRANSIT SYSTEM The Project area is served by the Santa Monica Big Blue Bus and Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) bus lines. Bus transit service in the Project vicinity is available along Pico Boulevard, Lincoln Boulevard, and 4th Street. The following list is the existing transit service in the Study Area. The following provides a description of the bus lines providing service within the City near The Project: ® Big Blue Bus Route 3/ Rapid 3 (Lincoln Boulevard) — Route 3 is a local and regional line that travels north -south on Lincoln Boulevard in the vicinity of the Project with average headways of 15 minutes during the morning and afternoon peak hours. This line travels from the Metro Green Line Aviation Station to the Hilgard Terminal and provides service to the LAX City Bus Center, Venice, and Santa Monica Place. Rapid 3 has limited stops and operates weekday 6 AM and 8 PM with 12 to 15 minute headways. The nearest bust stop is within one block of the school campus. o Big Blue Bus Line 7/ Rapid 7 (Pico Boulevard) — Line 7 runs from downtown Santa Monica to the Rimpau Transit Center via Pico Boulevard. In the study area, Line 7 operates on Pico Boulevard. The Super 7 offers limited -stop service along this route and runs eastbound in the morning and westbound in the evening. This route is accessible within a block of the campus. ® Big Blue Bus Line 8 (Ocean Park Boulevard) — Line 8 runs from downtown Santa Monica to the UCLA via Ocean Park Boulevard and Main Street within the City. In the study area, Line 8 operates on Main Street. The nearest stop is at Olympic Drive and Main Street about two blocks from entrances to the school. ® Big Blue Bus Line 2 (Wilshire Boulevard) — Line 2 runs from downtown Santa Monica circulating in the Civic Center via Main Street and 4th Street. The majority of the service is on along Wilshire Blvd. The nearest stop is at 4th Street and Civic Center Drive along the school site. ® Big Blue Bus Line 9 (Pacific Palisades) — Line 9 runs from downtown Santa Monica circulating in the Civic Center area via Main Street and 4th Street then into downtown via 7th Street into the Pacific Palisades. The majority of the service is on 6`h and 7'h Streets within the city. The nearest stop is at Olympic Drive just west of 4`h Street. 101 Page EXISTING BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES The Santa Monica Bike Action Plan (City of Santa Monica, November 2011) designates the following streets as bicycle facilities: a 11th Street, north of Pico Boulevard — bike lane 11th Street, south of Pico Boulevard — bike route ® 6'h Street, south of Pico Boulevard — bike route ® 7`h Street, north of Pico Boulevard — bike route Michigan Avenue, east of 7ih Street — bike route ® Olympic Drive, east of 41h Street — bike route There are currently sidewalks on all streets surrounding the school. Some streets such as 7th Street and Michigan must carry a high volume of pedestrians in a short period of time, with student demand exceeding available sidewalk and walking in the parkway. Olympic Drive sidewalks have obstructions such as fire hydrants and light poles that make travel on foot difficult. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LEVELS OF SERVICE This section presents the existing peak hour turning movement traffic volumes for the intersections analyzed in the study, describes the methodology used to assess the traffic conditions at each intersection, and analyzes the resulting operating conditions at each intersection indicating volume -to- capacity (V /C) ratios and LOS. Existing Year (2013) Traffic Volumes The City's TRAFFIX database includes the most current (December 2013) traffic volumes for signalized intersections in the City. Typical peak hour traffic volumes for the weekday morning (7:30 AM to 9:30 AM) and afternoon (5:00 PM to 7:00 PM) were obtained from the City's TRAFFIX database and an additional two hours from 3:00 PM to 5:00 were included due to school vicinity for the 6 study intersections. Counts were taken on either Tuesday or Thursday to ensure that the analysis captured a typical school day schedule. 111 P a g e The Existing Year 2013 counts for signalized intersections were provided by City staff and are illustrated in Table 2 These traffic volumes were analyzed to determine the existing year operating conditions at the analyzed intersections. Existing Traffic Volumes New 24 Hour counts were collected in December 2013 and are provided in Appendix. The counts were collected by direction of travel over a 24 -hour period. The combined directional traffic volume (i.e., northbound plus southbound) results in the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume. This data was important for the reassignments trips due to the creation of one -way streets on Michigan Avenue and 7th Street. 3sn 3W _ South Bound a Not th Bntind 1 a 4 0 4 O p P 4 4i 0 K� 6 SJ zJ i P 4 4 4 4 P to Ot Figure 3 - 7th Street 24 hour Volumes 121 Page Table 2 Existing Turning Movements 3 8 P 1. 11th i B vu Boflntl r pnd 72 a,IM1b""na R " onbbound P 1. 11th 9 a i i B vu Boflntl r pnd " a,IM1b""na " onbbound 9 a i i B vu r pnd " a,IM1b""na ]. Lincoln & Michigan ].Lincoln & Michigan (15:00) min min g mew 6 "d 2 3 3 oeM1bnuntl 3. Linm0i& Pico (15:010) 3. lincoln &Pim ncoln nml" ¢ 5"uthbaunJ 6 p : Wei " 8 8 Sou�M1bauntl IWS t t BaunJ 8 9 a i Existing Year (2013) Intersection Levels of Service Amin sl le i B vu r pnd " a,IM1b""na Existing Year (2013) Intersection Levels of Service Amin sl le a 8 II Table 3 summarizes the existing weekday AM and PM peak hour delay and V/C ratio and the corresponding LOS at each of the analyzed intersections. As summarized, all 6 study intersections operate at LOS D or better during both the AM, 3:00 and PM peak hours under existing conditions. The LOS calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix B. 13 1 P a g e i B vu pnd " a,IM1b""na a 8 II Table 3 summarizes the existing weekday AM and PM peak hour delay and V/C ratio and the corresponding LOS at each of the analyzed intersections. As summarized, all 6 study intersections operate at LOS D or better during both the AM, 3:00 and PM peak hours under existing conditions. The LOS calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix B. 13 1 P a g e Table 3 Existing Level Of Service Intersection Type Peak Hour 2013 EAsting Delay V/C LOS Michigan Collector AM 8.9 0.424 B 3:00 7.9 0.447 A PM 8.2 0.477 A 2. Lincoln & Michigan Boulevard AM 15.4 0.412 B 3:00 11.3 0.442 B PM 11.3 0.442 B 3. Lincoln & P i co Boulevard AM 30.3 0.606 C 3:00 30.5 0.636 C PM 30.5 0.636 C 4. 7"& Pico Boulevard AM 3:00 not currently signalized PM 5. 6"& Pico Boulevard AM 11.2 0.335 B 3:00 5.1 0.268 A PM 3.7 0.271 A 6. Lincoln & I -10 On -Ramp Boulevard AM 27.4 0.675 C 300 24 0.549 C PM 24 0.548 C 141Page ACCESS AND CIRCULATION Figure 4 Project Redistribution Figure 4 illustrates the nearby intersections and new one -way travel. Trips were redistributed and reassigned to the local street system based on a review of the street network, student zip codes, signed student drop- off /pick -up areas, and other observed areas utilized for drop - off /pick -up to create a future network with The Project. The Project proposes to make a two -way segment from Lincoln to 7th Street on Michigan Avenue and 7`h Street from Michigan Avenue to Pico Boulevard into one -way westbound and southbound. The Site traffic for vehicles heading northbound were reassigned to the local street system with the majority of trips assigned to northbound left at Michigan and Lincoln for the most conservative analysis. Some reassigned trips are assumed to utilize the northbound Lincoln Boulevard metered curb lane south of Michigan and some trips are assumed to continue to travel in on Michigan Avenue. 151 Page Table 4 - Future Volume / REVISED 2/10/14 u m ui fi B zd a e 1 1 Ildt 3 e e a wW�e 1 1 Ildt 3 e e a Approval Year (2014) Base Conditions As described in Chapter 2, the existing traffic volumes were derived from existing recent counts and entered into the City's TRAFFIX database. Consistent with Santa Monica's traffic study guidelines. TRAFFIX Database Counts. Counts were collected in December of 2013. These can be found in Appendix C. Counts were taken on a typical school day on a regular bell schedule day. 161Page T 5. P1W 61h (16:301 Approval Year (2014) Base Conditions As described in Chapter 2, the existing traffic volumes were derived from existing recent counts and entered into the City's TRAFFIX database. Consistent with Santa Monica's traffic study guidelines. TRAFFIX Database Counts. Counts were collected in December of 2013. These can be found in Appendix C. Counts were taken on a typical school day on a regular bell schedule day. 161Page Approval Year 120141 Base Condition with Project Traffic Volumes No adjustments to traffic volumes were made since the data was collected in December of 2013 and the project is expected to be complete during the summer of 2014. Adjustments only to trip distribution was assumed in future including new lane configurations on the westbound approach at Michigan and Lincoln, future southbound right turning movement restrictions at Lincoln and Michigan, future southbound and northbound turning movement restrictions ail 11h Street and Michigan, new signal at 71h Street and Pico, and a redistribution of trips with a new one -way configuration. INTERSECTION TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS The relative impact of The Project traffic volumes during the peak hours was evaluated based on analysis of Base Year (2014) with the Project. Intersection Impact Criteria and Significance Thresholds The significance of the potential impacts of Project - generated traffic at each study intersection was identified using criteria identified in the City's City of Santa Monica Significance Criteria. According to the City's sliding scale method for calculating the level of impact due to traffic generated by a proposed project, a significant transportation impact for a Boulevard or Secondary Avenue intersection is determined based on the criteria presented below: The Project's impacts were evaluated against the Base 2013 traffic conditions. The following discussion details the capacity analysis procedures utilized to evaluate the average delay, V/C relationships and LOS characteristics at each study intersection. 171 Page Future Plus Project Scenario Future Boulevard Secondary Avenue Base Scenario Average Average Level of Vehicle V/C Ratio Change in Vehicle V/C Ratio Change in Service Delay (sec) Increase LOS Delay (sec) Increase LOS Increase Increase A LOSEorF 215.0 LOS D, E, or B215.0 D > 0.0 E > 0.0 F - ? 0.005 - ? 0.005 The Project's impacts were evaluated against the Base 2013 traffic conditions. The following discussion details the capacity analysis procedures utilized to evaluate the average delay, V/C relationships and LOS characteristics at each study intersection. 171 Page Approval Year (2014) Plus Project Conditions. Also summarized in Table 3 are the results of the Approval Year (2014) Plus Project conditions intersections analysis. Even with the recirculation of The Project traffic, each study intersection is projected to continue to operate at the same LOS as the base conditions. Impact Analysis. As indicated in Table 3, the change in average vehicle delay at the 6 study intersections does not exceed the threshold for intersections operating at LOS C or better. Therefore, the Project would not significantly impact the study intersections based on the significance criteria identified above. TableZ 5 Inlersecfion sveel Type Peak H..r 2013 EUsfin9 Belay U/C LOS Year2014wiih Project Delay VlC LOS Oelay Inuease V/C Inuease Singnifica ntimpacl 1.11 " &MChigan Secondary Avenue AM 8.9 1 0.424 B 10.6 0.462 B 1.7 0.038 NO 3:00 7.9 0447 A 8.6 0.402 A 0.7 -0.045 NO PM 8.2 0.477 A 9.9 1 0.53 A 17 0.053 NO 2. Lincoln &MChigan Boulewrtl PM 15.4 0.412 B 10 0.436 B -5.4 0024 NO 390 113 0.442 B BA 0.48 A -3.2 0.038 NO PM 113 0.442 A 9.2 0.498 A -2.1 0.056 NO 3. Lincoln &Pico Boulevard AM 303 0.606 C 31.7 0.663 C 1.4 0.057 NO 3:00 30.5 0.636 C 31.1 0.619 C 0.6 -0.017 NO PM 30S 0.636 C 31.1 0.618 C 0.6 -0.017 NO 4.7" &Pico Boulevard PM 0 0 0 033 10.3 C NO 300 notcunentlyMgnalized 6.8 0.293 A - 0.293 NO PM 0 0 0 6.9 0.28 A - 0.28 NO 5.6 - &Pi. Boulevard AM 11.2 0335 1 B 11.2 0.335 8 0.0 0.000 NO 3:00 5.1 0,268 A 5.6 0.268 A 0.5 0.000 NO PM 1 3.7 0,271 A 3.7 0.271 A 0.0 0.000 NO 6. Lincoln and 1 -100n -Ramp Boulevard AM 27.4 0.675 C 273 1 0.679 C -0.1 04 0.004 3:00 24 0549 C 24 0.562 C 0.0 0003 NO R PM 24 0548 C 1 24 1 0.662 C 0.0 1 9.004 1 NO aaaea ns were remsea cryu7m The addition of a new signal at the intersection of Pico Boulevard and 77h Street was analyzed to determine any potential delay that would be encountered by vehicles at this new signal. There were no significant impacts identified. Signal synchronization with 61h Street and Lincoln Boulevard will be coordinated through Traffic Engineering utilizing the Traffic Management Center and field observations. 181Page CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY As analyzed, The Project is anticipated to result in no significant impacts on the local street system. This assessment is reached based on the overall conservative redistribution of trips. The project did not take credit for future reductions in vehicle trips due to students shifting to biking and busing or overall reductions anticipated with the Land Use and Circulation Element implementation. The following summarizes the findings of this study: • A total of 6 intersections were selected for analysis. • The Project consists of a change in circulation to the street network. o The Project will replace the northbound travel lane on 7th Street between Pico Boulevard and Michigan Avenue with dedicated bike lanes. o The Project will replace an eastbound travel lane on Michigan between Lincoln and 7`h Street and replace it with dedicated bike lanes. o The Project will have one westbound travel lane only on Michigan Avenue from Lincoln to 7th Street and one southbound travel lane on 7th Street from Michigan to Pico Boulevard. • The Project will add a signal at 7th Street and Pico Boulevard for pedestrians to cross all ways and only southbound automobile travel to turn east or west. • The Project will include future "no right on red" prohibitions to vehicles on Southbound Lincoln at Michigan for school peak hours; 8:00 to 9:00 and 3:00 to 4:00. • The Project included examined future turning restrictions on Michigan Avenue and 11th Street to prohibit northbound lefts and southbound rights onto Michigan per the Michigan Avenue Greenway project. • The impact analysis with the project: o No significant impacts are anticipated at the study intersections. 191 Page 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000. 2010 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 2010. City of Santa Monica Significance Criteria for Arterial and Collector Intersections, City of Santa Monica. Santa Monica Bike Action Plan, City of Santa Monica, November 2011. Santa Monica Municipal Code, City of Santa Monica, August 2013. Santa Monica Travel Demand Forecasting Model Trip Generation Rates, City of Santa Monica, October 2011, Sunnyvale West Neighborhood Association v. City of Sunnyvale City Council, Court of Appeals of California, 6`h District, December 16, 2010. Trip Generation, 9"' Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012. 201Page 0 07#1 M�� LANE CONFIGURATIONS Existing 2013 Future 2014 with Project 1. 11th & Michigan 11m & Michigan -4�� Michigan Ave. 4 �� * Lincoln Blvd. Lincoln Blvd. 3. Lincoln & Pico Lincoln & Pico Pico Blvd *Defacto Right Lincoln Blvd. LANE CONFIGURATIONS 7`h St. 7m St. 5. 6`h & Pico 6`h & Pico 11.. *Defacto Right Erfroy-Trolm MITIG8 - AM Peak Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:49:57 Page 1 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection N1 11th & Michigan Cycle (sec): 70 - Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.424 LOSS Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 8.9 Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 11th - Michigan Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II_----- __-- - - - - - Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Inc.l.ude Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0. 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 3. 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II_---- - - - - -- ---------- - - - - -I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 7:45 _ Base Vol: 38 567 27 41 354 135 72 191 68 6 132 31 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 38 567 27 41 359 135 72 191 68 6 132 31' User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 -..00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 38 567 27 41 354 135 72 191 68 6 132 31 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: '38 567 27 41 354 135. 72 191 66 6 132 31. PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1 FinalVolmne: 38 567 27 41 354 135 72 191 68 6 132 31 ---------- I --------------- II--- -- --------- il-- --- -- -------- il------ ---- - - - --I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.42 0.99 0.99' 0.36 0.96 0.96 D.B0 0.80 0.80 0.87 0.87 0.87 Lanes: 1.00 0.95 0.05 1.00 0.72 0.28 0.44 1.15 -0.41 0.07 3..56 0.37 Final Sat.: 796 1801 86 690 1319 503 661 1754 624 118 2587 600 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11 ---------------- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.31 0.31 0.06 0.27 0.27 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.05 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** Green /Cycle: 0.74 0.74 0.74. 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 Volume /Cap: 0.06 0.42 0.42 0.08 0.36 0.36 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.20 0.20. 0.20 - Uniform Del: 2.4, 3.4 3.4 2.5 3.2 3.2 21.7 21.7 21.7 20.4 20.4 20.4 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 InitQueuDel': 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 2.5 3.6 3.6 2.5 3.3 3.3 22.1 22.1 22.1 20.5 20.5 20.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 2.5 3.6 3.6 2.5 3.3 3.3 22.1 22.1 22.1 20.5 20.5 20.5 LOS by Move: A A A A A A C C C C C C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 5 5 0 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 ************************************************* * * * * * * # * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *w * * * * ** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - A14 Peak Fri Jan 24, 2014 13:49:00 Page 1-1 ------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 RCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection $2 Lincoln & Michigan Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.412 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 15.4 Optimal Cycle: 32 Level Of Service: B Street Name: Lincoln Michigan Approach: North Round South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R I. - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II---------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 1 Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include - Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ I --------------- 11_________.______ 11____ ____ _______11___-- _____ - -__ -I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 7:45 Base Vol: 46 1302 . 59 59 1003 139 57 115 8B 20 79 175 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 46 1302 59 59 1003 139 57 115 88 20 79 175 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 46 1302 59 59 1003 139 57 115 88 20 79 175 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 46 1302 59 59 1003 139 57 115 88 20 79 175 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 FinalVolume: 46 1302 59 59 1003 139 57 115 86 20 79 175 --------------- 11--------------- 11 --------------- II______-- __ -____ 'Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900.7.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900, 1.900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.B5 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.92 0.92 O.B5 Lanes: 1.00 2.87 0.13 1.00 2.00 1.00 .0.44 0.88 0.68 0.20 0.80 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 4932 224 1805 3610 1615 655 1321 1011 354 1399 1615 ------------ 1 ---------------- 11--------------- 11_- _______----- _11______-- _______1 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.26 0.26 0.03 0.28 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.11 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green /Cycle: 0.06 0.66 0.66 0.08 0.67 0.67 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 Volume /Cap: 0.41 0.40 6.40 0.40 0.41 0.13 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.21 0.21 0.41 Uniform Del: 54.2 9.7 9.7 52.4 8.8 6.9 35.7 35.7 35.7 34.5 34.5 36.5 IncremntDel: 2.5 0.1 0.1 1.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.7 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 010 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 56.6 9.7 9.7 54.2 B.9 7.0 35.9 35.9 35.9 34.8 34.8 37.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 56.6 9.7 9.7 54.2 8.9 7.0 35.9 35.9 35.9 34.8 34.8 37.2 LOS by Move: E A A D A A D ❑ D C C D HCM2kAvgQ: 2 8 8 3 9 2 4 4 4 3 3 6 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Deviling Assoc, Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - AM Peak Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:02:38 Page.1-1 ____ __ ______________ _______________ __________________- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Pico 6 Lincoln Cycle (sec): 120 critical Vol. /Cap.(R): 0.606 Loss Time (see): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 30.3 Optimal Cycle: 58 Level Of Service: .. C Street Name: Lincoln Pico Approach: North Bound South Bound Fast Bound West Sound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ___ --------- I --------------- II --------------- II __.__._.- _______- II ---------------- I Control: Protected .Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------- j .I_-- _- __________I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 8:00 Base Vol: 158 1199 155 101 889 114 187 466 99 201 416 90 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00" 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 158 1199 155 101 889 114 187 466 99 201 416 90 .User Adj: 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 158 1199 1.55 101 889 11:4 187 466 99 201 416 90 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 158 1199 155 101 889 7.14 187 466 99 201 416 90 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 158 1199 155 101 889 114 187 466 99 201 416 90 ------------ I --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- II_____- _________ Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0,B5 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1,00 2.00. 1.00 '2.00 1.65 0.35, 2.00 1.64 0.36 Final Sat.: 1.805 3610 1615 1.805 3610 1615 3502 2900 616 3502 2888 625 ------------ I-------------- ._ II--------------- il---------------- 11--------------- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.09 0.33 0.10 0.06 0.25 0.07 0.05 0.16 0.16 0.06 0.14. 0.14 Crit Moves: * * ** * # #* * * ** * * ** Green /Cycle; 0.17 0.55 0.55 0.09 0.47 0.47 0.10 0.27 0.27 0.09 0.26 0.26 Volume /Cap: 0.52 0.61 0.1B 0.61.0.52 0.15 0.55 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.55 0.55 Uniform Del: 45.5 18.4 13.6 52.4 22.2 18.0 51.7 38.6 38.6 52.2 38.1 38.1 IncremntTel: 1.6 0.5 0.1 6.3 0.3 6.1 1.9 1.2 1.2 3.2 0.,7 0.7 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 47.2 18.9 13.7 58.6 22.5 18.1 53.5 39.8 39.8 55.4 38.8 38.8 . User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 47.2 18.9 13.7 58.6 22.5, 18.1 53.5 39.8 39.B 55.4 38.8 38.8 LOS by Move: D B B E C B D D D E D D HCM2kAvgQ: 6 16 3 5 12 2 4 10 10 5 9 9 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc.-Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIGS - AM Peak Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:08:04 Page 1 -1 Level. Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) - Intersection #5 Pico & 6th Cycle (see): 90 - Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.335 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 see) Average Delay (sec /veh): 11.2 Optimal Cycle: 34 Level Of Service: B Street Name: 6th - Lincoln - Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound Movement: L- T - R L T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I -------- ------- II_.. ------------- II ---------------- II--------------- I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min, Green: 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 ------------- I --------------- IL--------__-___- II --------------- II--------------- I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 8:00 Base Vol:. 21 .0 230 0 0 0 0 502 0 0 695 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00` 1100 1.00 1.00' Initial Bse: 21 0 230 0 0 0 0 502 0 0 695 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 21 0. 230 0 '0 0 0 502 0 0 695 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 21 0 230 0 0 0 0 502 0 0 695 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.o0 1.00 FinalVolume: 21 0 230 0' 0 0 0- 502 0 0 695 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II- -_ - - -- I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane:. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9.900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0100 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 .0 3610 0 0 3610 0 ------------ I --------------- 11- - -- --------------- --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green /Cycle: 0.43 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 Volume /Cap: 0.03 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 Uniform Del: 15.0 0.0 17.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0 IncremutDel: 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 InitpueuDe).: 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay /Veh: 15.1 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0 User Del-Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 15.1 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0 LOS by Move: B A B A A A A A A A B A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. ** ww#* WWwWx**************************x**#****** x* * * *W * * *k ** * * *x * * * *x * * * * * * * * * * *# Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - AM Peak Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:31:51 Page 1 -1 _____ ____ ________ ______ _ _ _____ ______________ Level Of Service Computation Report. 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection 46 Lincoln & I -10 On Ramp Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.675 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R -5.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 27.4 Optimal Cycle: 57 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------- 11- __- __- _- ____ -_I Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 1. 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- 7 --------- ------- _____ -11__ --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 757 803 913 942 0 105 323 262 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Use: 0 757 803 913 942 0 105 323 262 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0o 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 757 803 913 942 0 105 323 262 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: D 757 8.03 913 942 0 105 323 262 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 757 603 913 942 0 105 323 262 0 0 0 ------------ 1 ---------------- I'I --------------- 11__ ________ _____II__- _-- ___- _____i Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.85- 1.00 1,00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.49 1.51 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3192 3192 3502 3610 0 065 2662 1615 0 , 0 . 0. ------------ I__ - -_ -_ II--------------- II___. ----------- II__________ -____I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** *WmW Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.39 0.76 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.24 -0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume /Cap:. 0.00 0.64 0.67 0.67 0.34 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 30.9 31.5 30.5 4.7 0.0 39.4 39.4 41.3 0.0 010 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.6' 0.8 1:4 0.1. 0.0 0.5 0.5 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay /Veh: 0.0 31.5 32.3 31.9 4.8 0.0 39:9 39.9 46.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 User De1Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 0.0 31.5 32.3 31.9 4.8 0.0 .39.9 39.9 46.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A C C C A A D D D A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 13 - 14 15 6 0 7 7 10 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - Peak 3:00pm- 4:00pmThu Jan 23, 2014 16:10:50 Page 1-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 llth & Michigan Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.447 Loss Time (sec): '0 (X +R -4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 7.9 Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 11th Michigan Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T.- R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ i --------------- ii--------------- II------------ -II---------- - - - - -i Control: Permitted Permitted Pei.'mitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 .0 1 0 1. 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ 1-------- -- -- - - -H --------------- II ---- ------ ----- II---------- - - - - - I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 15:00- 16:00 Base Vol: 52 421 27 46 594 76 . 79 142 43 11. 106 34 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 52 421 27 46 594 76 '79 142 43 11 106 34 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PH F Volume: 52 421 27 46' 594 76 79 192 93 11 106 34 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 52 421 27 46 594 76 79 142 43 11 106 34 PCG Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L DD 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 � FinalVolume: 152 421 27 46 594 76 79 142 43 11 106 34 ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II-- ----- ----- --- II---- ------ - - - -- I { Saturation Flow Module: i Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.35 0.99 0.99 0.46 0.98 0.98 0.78 0.78 0.78 0 -.85 0.65 0.85 Lanes :' 1.00 0.94 0.06 1.00 0.89 0.11 0.60 1.07 0.33 0.15 1.90 0.45 Final Sat.: 656 1769 113 874 1656 212 892 1603 486. 236 2277 730 ------------ I ----------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11 --------------- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.08 0.24 0.24 0.05 0.36 0.36 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.05 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** Green /Cycle: 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Volume /Cap: 0.10 0.30 0.30 0.07 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.24 0.24 0.24 Uniform Del: 1.5 1.8 1..8 1.4 2.1 2.1 24.7 24.7 24.7 23.6 23.6 23.6 IneremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.5 0:5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 ' InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 *0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 1.6 1.9 1.9 1.5 2.4 2.4 25.2 25.2 25.2 23.8 23.8 23.8 User DelAdi: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1400 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 1.6 1.9 1.9 1.5 2.4 2.4 25.2 25.2 25.2 23.8 23.B 23.8, LOS by Move: A A' A A A A C C C C C C HCM2kAvgQ.: 0 3 3 0 5 5 3 3 3 2 2 2 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix. 7.8.0115 (e) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - Peak 3:00pm- 4:00pmFri Jan 24, 2014 13:55 :49 Page 1 -1. Level Of.Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) . Intersection #2 Lincoln & Michigan' Cycle (sec): 120 critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.442 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 11.3 Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: R Street Name: Lincoln Michigan Approach: North Bound South Bound East. Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II________ _______II__--- _- ______-- 11____. --------------- Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include . Include - Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ I ---------------- 11--------------- II ----------- ____II--------------- I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 15:00 -16:00 - Base Vol.: 32 1202 59 69 1278 95 31 80 35 30 92 101. Growth Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 32 1202 59 69 1278 95 31 80 35 30 92 101 user Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 32 1202 59 69 1278 95 31 00 35 30 92 101 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 32 1202 59. 69 1278 95. 31 00 35 -30 92 101 ICE Adj: 1.00 1.00' 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 32 1202 59 69 1278 95 31 80 35 30 92 101 ____________I___ ______ _ ____II_______ -___ ._-_ II__ ___- _- ______- 11_-- ___- _______ -I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.91 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 2.86 0.14 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.42 1.10 0.48 0.25 0.75 1.00 Final Sat.; 1805 4910 241 1.805 3610 1615 629 1623 710 425 1304 1615 ------------ I --------------- 11 ------------ II--------------- 11--------------- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.24 0.24 0.04 0.35 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.06 brit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green /Cycle; 0.04 0.73 .0.'73 0.11 0.80 0.80 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Volume /Cap: 0.44 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.44 0.07 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.44 0.44 0.39 Uniform Del: 56.3 5.9 5.9 49.0 3.7 2.5 44.6 44.6 44.6 45.6 45.6 45.2 IncremntDel: 4.3 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.1 1.1 1.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1;00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 60.6 6.0 6.0 50.0 318 2.6 45.0 45.0 45.0 46.7 46.7 46.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 60.6 6.0 6.0 50.0 3.8 2.6 45.0 45.0 45.0 46.7 46.7 LOS by Move: E A A D A A D D D D D D HCM2kAvgQ: 2 6 6 3 8 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix '7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - Peak. 3:00pm- 4:00pmThu Jan 23, 2014 16:12:31 Page 1 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection $3 Pico & Lincoln Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.636 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 30.5 Optimal Cycle: 63 Level Of Service: C Street Name: Lincoln Pico Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R _- ---------- I ---------------- il--------------- II --------------- 11 ------- - _ ------- I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green:. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 '2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II------- _ ------- II --------------- II--------------- I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 15:00- 16:00 Base Vol: 124 1051, 116 101 1149 119 158 535 109 233 412 85 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial B5e: 124 1051 116 101 1149 119 158 535 109 233 412 85 User Ad'j: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 124 1051 116 101 1149 119 158 535 109 233 412 85 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 124 1051 116 101 1149 .119 1.58 535 109 233 412 85 LICE Adj:, 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 124 1051 116 101 3149 119 158 535 109 233 412 85 ------------ I --------------- II----------- ____ II ------ ... -------- II--------------- I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 19bo 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0..95 .0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 C.93 0.93 Lanes: 1.00 2,00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.66 0.34 2.00 1.66 0.34 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502 2924 596 3502 2915 601 ------------ I ---------------- II--------------- II_____.--------- II---------------- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.29 0.07 0.06 0.32 0.07 0.05 0.18 .0.10 0.07 0.14 0.14 Crit Moves: * * ** Green /Cycle,: 0.11 0.51 0.51 0.10 0,50 0.50 0.09 0.29 0.29 -0.10 0.30 0.30 Volume /Cap: 0.64 0.57 0.14 0.57 0.64 0.15 0.48 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.48 0.48 Uniform Del: 51.3 20.3 15.5 51.7 22.0 16.2 51.5 37.3 37.3 51.5 34.5 34.5 IncremntDel: 6.8 0.4 0.1 4.4 '0.8 0.1 1.1 1.4 1.4 3.7 0.3 0.3 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 58.1 20.8 -15.6 56.1 22.8 16.3 52.6 38.6 38.6 55.2 34.9 34.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1;00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 58.1 20.8 15.6 56.1.22.0 16.3 52.6 38.6 38..6 55.2 34.9 34.9 LOS by Move: E C B E C B D D D E C C HCM2kAvgQ: 5 14 '2 4 16 2 3 11 11 5 8 8 Note: queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Tra£fix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - Peak 3:00pm- 4:00pmThu Jan 23, 201.4 16:12:57 Page 1 -'1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 RCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection N5 Pico & 6th - ,Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.268 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay. (sec /veh): 5.1 Optimal Cycle: 31 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 6th Lincoln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ---------- -- 1 --------------- II --------------- II ---------------- II-- _--- _____ -__ -i Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 ------------ I ---------------- 11 ---------------- II---- - - - - -- II---------- - - - - -1 Volume Module: » Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 15:00- 16:00 Base Vol: 14 0 102 0 0 0 0 673 0 0 739 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 14 0 102 0 0 0 0 673 0 0 739 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 14 0 102 0 0 - 0 0 673 0 0 739 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 14 0. 102 0 0. 0 0 673 0 0 739 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 FinalVolume: 14 0 102 0 0 0 0 673 0 0 739 0 ------------ I ---------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II--------------- I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: - 1900 1900 1900 1900 7.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 0.95. 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 U.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 0, 3610 0 0 3610 0 ------------- 1--- ------------ II --------------- II----- ---------- --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 Cr.it Moves: * * ** # * ** ** ** Green /Cycle: 0.24 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00 Volume /Cap: 0.03 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 -. Uniform Del: 26.5 0.0 '28.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 IRitQUeUDeI: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00. Delay /Veh: 26.5 0.0 28.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 26.5 0.0 28.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 LOS by Move: C A C A A A A A A A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 2 0 0 U 0 3 D 0 3 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - Peak 3!00pm- 4:00pmSat Jan 25, 2014 10:31:32 Page .1-1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Lincoln & I -10 On Ramp Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.547 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =5.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 24.0 Optimal Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound - Fast Bound Nest Bound Movement: L -. T- R L- T - R L - T - R L - T- R ------------ I--------------- II_______--___--_ 11_---- __________II___________ -___I Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0. 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I---------------- II--------------- II___ __ __________II- -. -_____ ______I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 922 419 721 1224 0 '123 308 222 U 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00'1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 922 419 721 1224 0 123 308 222 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 PHF Volume: - 0 922 419 721 1224 0 123 308 222 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 922 419 721 1224 0 123 308 222 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1100 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 922 419 721 1224 0 123 308 222 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- ) I_____---_....__--_ II___ __- _.________II__.- ___________I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2,75 1.25 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.57 1.43 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 4532 2059 3502 3610 0 1001 2508 1615 0 . 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II---------------- II--------------- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.34 0:00 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.38 0.75 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume /Cap:, 0.00 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.45 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.55' 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 29.7 29.7 29.4 5.7 0.0 38.3 38.3 39.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0. 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.4 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 '1.00 i.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay /Veh: 0.0 30.0 30.0 29.9 5.9 0.0 38.8 38.8 40.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 0.0 30.0 30.0 29.9 5.9 0.0 38.8 38.8 40.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A C C C A A D D D A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 11 11 11 9 0 7 7 8 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to,CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - PM.Peak Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:09:24 Page 1 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection 11 11th & Michigan Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.477 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 8.2 Optimal Cycle: 28 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 11th - Michigan Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L T - R L. - T - R L -• T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------- I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 11 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 15:15 Base Vol: 48 405 25 54 621 82 91 166 42 13 104 31 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 48 405 25 54 621 82 91 166 - 42 13 104 31 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PIIF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 48 405 25 54 621 82- 91 166 42 13 104 31 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 48 405 25 54 621 82 91 166 42 13 104 31 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 48 405 25 54 621 82 91 1.66 42 13 104 31 ------------- I.______-- __- __-.._II--------------- I____ ___________II______ Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1.900. 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment.: 0.32 0.99 0.99 0.47 0.98 0.98 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.85 0.85 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 0.94 0.06 1.00 0.88 0.12. 0.61 1.11 0.2,8 0.18 1.40 0.42 Final Sat.: 616 1773 109 887 1648 218 905 1650. 418 284 2269 676 ------------ I----------------- II---------------- II--------------- II--------------- 6 Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat:- 0.08 0.23 0.23 '0.06 0.38 0.38 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** Green /Cycle: 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21. 0.21 Volume /Cap:* 0.10 0.29 0.29 0.08 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.22 0.22 0.22 Uniform Del: 1.7 2.0 2.0 1.7 2.5 2.5 24.2 24.2 24.2 22.9 22.9 22.9 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 1.8 2.1, 2.1 1.7 2.7 2.7 24.8 24.8 24.8 23.0 23.0 23.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 1.8 2.1 2.1 1.7 2.7 2.7 24.8 24.8 24.8 23.0 23.0 23.0 ! LOS by Move: A. A A A A A C C C C C C ' HCM2kAvgQ: 0 3 3 0 6 6 4 4 4 2 2 2 I Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. I Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIGB - PM Peak Fri Jan 24, 2014 13:49:22 Page 1 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection $2 Lincoln 6 Michigan cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.442 Loss Time (sec):. 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 11.3 Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: B Street Name: Lincoln Michigan Approach: 'North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II --------------- I Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0. 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ I--------------- II---------------- II--------------- II------------- -I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 15:00 Base Vol: 32 1202 59 69 1278 95 31 80 35 30 92 101 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 32 1202 59 69 1278 95 31 80 35 30 92 101 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 -.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PAL' Volume: 32 1202 59 69 1278 95 31 60 35 30 92 101 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 32 1202 59 69 1278 95 31 80 35 30 92 101 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVoliune: 32 1202 59. 69 1278 95 31 80 35 30 92 101 - - ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 _ _----------- II--------------- I. Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.90 Q.90 0.95 0.95 0.85 .0.78 0.78 0.78 0.91. 0.91 0.85 Lanes:. 1.00 2.86 .0.14 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.42 1.10 0.48 0.25 0.75 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 4910 241 1805 3610 1615 629 1623 710 425 1304 1615 ------------ I ---- II - - ---- II ------------------- 11 --------------- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.24 0.24 0.04 0.35 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.06 Crit Moves: * * ** Green /Cycle; 0.04 0.73 0.73 0.11 0.80 0.80 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 Volume /Cap:' 0.44 0.34 0.34 .0.34 0.44 0.07 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.44 0.44 0.39 Uniform Del: 56.3 5.9 5.9 49.0 3.7 2.5 44.6 44.6 44.6 45.6 45.6 45.2 IncremntDel: 4.3 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.1 1.1 1.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 ;0 0.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 010 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 60.6 6.0 6.0 50.0 3.8 2.6 45.0 45.0' 45.0 46.7 46.7 46.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 60.6 6.0 6.0 50.0 3.8 2.6 45.0 45.0 45.0 46.7 46.7 46.2 LOS by Move: E A A D A A D D D D D D HCM2kAvgQ: 2 6 6 3 8 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIGB - PM_ Peak - Thn Jan 23, 2014 16:09:59 Page 1 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection $3 Pico & Lincoln Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.636 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 3015 Optimal Cycle: 63 Level Of Service: C Street Name: - Lincoln Pico Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - -R L T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- II ------- ________II_- _-- __..._- _____I Control: Protected- Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2. 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II__________..__....._ 11 ---------------- II--------------- I Volume Modulo: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 15:00 Base Vol: 124 1051 116 101 1149 119 158 535 109 233 412 85 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 124 1051 116 101 1149 119 158 535 109 233 412 85 User Adj: 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHI? Volume: 124 1051 116 101 1149 119 158 535 109 233 412 85 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 124 1051 116 101 1149 119 158 535 109 233 412 85 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 124 1051 116 101 1149 119 158 535 109 233 412 85 ------------ I --------- ......_.____ II--------------- II--------------- II--------------- k Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.93 0.93 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.66 0.34 2.00 1.66 0.34 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502, 2924 596 3502 2915 601 ------------ L ---------------- II--------------- 11--------------- .il --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.29 0.07 0.06 0.32 0.07 0.05 0.18 0.18 0.07 0.14 0.14 Crit Moves: * *' ** Green /Cycle; 0.11 0.51 0.51 0.10 0.50 0.50 0.09 0.29 0.29 0.10 0.30 0..30 Volume /Cap: 0.64 0.57 0.14 0.57 0.64 0.15 0.48.0.64 D.64 0.64 0.48 0.48 Uniform Del: 51.3 20.3 15.5* 51.7 22.0 16.2 51.5 37.3 37.3 51.5 34.5 34.5 IncremntDel: 6.0 0.4 .0.1 4.4 0.8 0.1 1.1 1.4 1.4 3.7 0.3 0.3 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 '0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 58.1. 20.8 15.6 56.1 22.8 16.3 52.6 38.6 38.6 55.2 34.9 34.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 58.1 20.8 1.5.6 56.1 22.8 16.3 52.6 30.6 38.6 55.2 34.9 34.9 LOS by Move: E C B E C B D D D E C C HCM2kAvgQ: 5 14 2 4 .16 2 3 11 11 5 8 8 *#**********# w*# ww************ w*** w****** w***** w* * * * *w * *w * *w * # # # * * * * * #w # *w # # # * *# Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - PM Peak Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:10:24 Page 1 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Pico & 6th -Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.271 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 3.7 Optimal Cycle: 31 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 6th - Lincoln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ i--------------- II-------------- _II--------------- II___---- ______ - - Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 ------------ I-------- __ --- __11 --------------- --------- II--------------- 1 Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 16:30 Base Vol: 5 0 83 0 0 0 0 722 0 D 793 0 Growth Adj: .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial.Bse: 5 0 83 0 0 0 0 722 D 0 793 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF volume: 5 0 83 0. 0 0 0 722 0 0 793 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 5 0 83 0 0 0 0 722 0 0 793 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 5 0 83 0 0 0 0 722 0 0 793 0 ------ - - - - -- ----------- -- --II - - - -- ---- --- --- ----- II- - - -- ---- - - - - -I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2.900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 .0.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 0 3610 0 0 3610 0. ------------ I...______________ II._.._._-._---______ il----------------- II--------------- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: � 0.00 0.00 0.05 '0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green /Cycle,: 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00 Volume /Cap: '0.01 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 Uniform Del: 29,6 0.0 31.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 TnctemntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 TnitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0" 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: .1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0100 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay /Veh: 29.7 0.0 31.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0, 2.1 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 29.7 0.0 31:6 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 LOS by Move: C A C A A A A A A A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 WWww# w*** w***** www* w*** W* W************ WwWWWw* x*** W *w * * * * * *W * * * * * * * # *w * * * # * * * * * ** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - PM Peak Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:32:03 Page 1-'1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ******* w * * * * *wwwwww ** *w * * * * * * * * * * * * *w ** www**** ww* * * * * * * * * * *w * * * *w * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Intersection 46 Lincoln & I -10 On Ramp Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.547 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =5.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 24.0 Optimal Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound Nast Bound West Bound 'Movement: L- - T - R L - T - R L- T - R L - T - R --- ------ I--- -------- -- - -II ------- II----------- -- -- 11----- ----- - - - - -I - Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I--------------- II-------`------- II-- --- --- ------- II_------ --- - - -- -I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 922 419 721 1224 0 123 306 222 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1._00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 922 419 721 1224 0 123 308 222 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 922 419 721 1224 0 123 308 222 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 922 419 721 1224, 0 9.23 308 222 _ 0 0 0 PCN Adj: 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 922 419 721 1224 0 123 308 222 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II--------------- I Saturation Plow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.87 0.07 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes:" 0.00 2.75 1.25 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.57 1.43 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 4532 2059 3502 3610, 0 1001'2508 1615 0 , 0 0 ------------ I --------------- il--------------- II--------------- II---------------- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.34 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.38 0.75 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume /Cap: 0.00 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.45. 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.55 0.00 0.00 0,00 Uniform Del: 0.0 29.7 29.7 29.4 5.7 0.0 38.3 38.3 39.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tncremn "t Del: 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.4 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0100 0.00 0.00 Delay /Veh: 0.0 30.0 30.0 29.9 5.9 0.0 38.8 38.8 40.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 0.0 30.0 30.0 29.9 5.9 0.0 38.8 38.8 '40.5, 0.0 0.0 -0.0 LOS by Move: A C C C A A D D D A A A .HCM2kAvgQ: 0 11 11 11 9 0 7 7 8 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIGS - AM Future Peak Fri Jan 24, 2014 13:46:58 Page 1 -1 _ ______ __ _____________ _ _ ___ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 RCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #1 llth & Michigan Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.462 Loss Time (sec): 0,(Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 10.6 Optimal Cycle; 27 Level Of Service: B Street Name: 11th Michigan Approach: North Bound South'Bound East. Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II__. ____II- ___- ____- _____I - Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II______- ___--- __II ---------------- il___________ -__..I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 ,Ian 2014 << 2014 AM Future Peak Base Vol: 0 567 27 41 354 0 72 249 126 6 180 31 Growth Adj:, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 567 27 41 354 0 72 249 126 6 180 31 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PRY Adj: 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1100 PHF Volume: 0 567 27 41 354 0 72 249 126 6 180 31 Redact Vol: 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 567 27 41 354 0 72 249 126 6 180 31 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVol.ume: 0 567 27 41 354 0 72 249 126 6 180. 31 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------- I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.99 0.99 0'.34 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.88 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 1.00 0.95 0.05 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.32 1.12 0.56 0.05 1.66 0.29 Final Sat.: 7.900 1801 86 638 1906 0 489 1691 85.6 92 2767 477 I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II -__ --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.06 0.19 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.07 0.07 0.07 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** Green /Cycle; 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 Volume /Cap: 0.00 0.46 0.46 0.09 0,27 0..00 0.46 0.46 .0.46 0.20 0:20 0.20 Uniform Del: 0.0 5.2 5.2 3.8 4.4 0.0 19.1 19.1 19.1 17.4 17.4 17.4 IncremntDel.: 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 6.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 TnitQuouDel: 0.'O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 010 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.o0 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 0.0 5.4 5.4 3.9 4.5 0.0 19.4 19.4 19.4 17.5 17.5 17.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 0.0 5.4 5.4 3.9 4.5 0.0 19.4 19.'4 19.4 17.5 17.5 17.5 _ LOS by Move: A A A A A A B B B B B B HCM2kAvgQ: 0 6 6 0 3 0 4 4 4 2 2 2 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7. 8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to, CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - AM Future Peak , Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:17:33 Page 1 -1 Level.Of Service Computation Report _ 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection V Lincoln & Michigan' Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.436 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R -4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 10.0 Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: B. Street Name: Lincoln Michigan Approach: North Bouhd South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L -. `1' - R L - `1' - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ 1--------------- 11 --------------- II--------------- II--------------- I Control: Prot+Perwit Prot+Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1' 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- 11_____- ___- -____ Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << 2014 AM Future Peak Base Vol: 169 1332 90 59 1003 166 0 0 0 47 71 94 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 169 1332 90 59 7.003 166 0 0 0 47 - 71 94 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 169 1332 90 59 1003 166 0 0 0 47 71 94 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 Reduced Vol: 169 1332 90 59 1003 166 0 0 0 47 71 94 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 169 1332 90 59 1003 166 0 0 0 47 71 94 ------------- I --------------- II ___ __ ________ __II_______________I Saturation Flow Module: - Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190.0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 2.61 0.19 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.60 1.00 final Sat.: 1805 4815 325 1805 3610 1615 0 0 0 732 1105 1615 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II____- ___-- ___-_ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.09 0.28 0.2B 0.03 0.28 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 Crit Moves: * * ** * # ** * * ** Green /Cycle; 0.85 0.76 0.76. 0.73 0,64 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.15 Volume/Cap: 0.27 0.36 0.36 0.15 0.44 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.39 Uniform Del: 3.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 10.9 B.B 0.0 0.0 0.0. 46.6 46.6 46.3 IncremntDel: 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 -0.l 6.1 0.0 0.0 0..0 1.1 1.1 7..1 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 3.9 4.7 4.7 4.8 11.0 8.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.7 47.7 47.4 User De)-Adj: 1 -00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 3.9 4.7 4.7 4.B 11.0 B.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.7 47.7 47.4 LOS by Move: A A' A A B A A A A D D D HCM2kAvgQ: 1 6 6 1 10 2 0 0 0 4 4 3 **** w** w# w* www****** www* wwaw** w***#*#*** wwwww#*** * * * * *xww * *www * * # # # * * * * * * * * * * * ** Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.6..0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - AM Future Peak Mon Feb 10, 2014 16:12:05 Page 1 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base.Volume Alternative) Intersection $3 Pico & Lincoln Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.663 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 31.7 Optimal Cycle: 68 Level Of Service: C *' k************ k************** k****** k*********' kk* * * * *** * * * * * * * * * * *wk * * * * *k * * * * ** Street Name: Lincoln Pico Approach: North Bound South Bound East. Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II ------- -------- II --------------- 11--------------- i Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green:' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0- 2 0 1 1 0 - - -- I ---------------- II --------------- II --------------- II--------------- I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 1.4 Jan 2014 << 2014 AM Future Peak Base Vol: . 134 1.227 159 101 689 114 224 558 169 205 312 213 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 134 1227 159 101 889 114 224 558 169 205. 312 213 user Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1,00 PHF Volume: 134 1227 159 .101 889 114 224 558 169 205 312' 213 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0. 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 134 1227 159 101 689 114 224 558 169 205 312 213 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 134 1227 159 101 889 114 224 558 169 205 312 213 ------ -- - - - - I - II--------------- II------- - ------- II--------------- I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: . 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 -1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95. 0.85 0.92 0.92.. 0.92 0..92 0.69 0.89 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.54 0,46 2.00 1.19 0.81 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502 2674 810 3502 2015 1375 ------------ I ------- =------- II --------------- II- '--- ------- II---------- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.34 0.10 0.06 0.25 0.07 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.06 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * *w * * ** Green /Cycle: 0.14 0.51 0.51 0.08 0.46 0.46 0.12 0.31 0.31 0.09 0.29 0.29 Volume /Cap :' 0.54 0.66 0.19 0.66 0.54 0.15 0.54 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.54 0.54 Uniform Del: 48.1 21.6 15.8 53.3 23.3 18.9 49.9 3566 ,35.6 53.0 36.3 36.3 IncremntDel: 2.3' 0.9 0.1 10.5 0.4 0.1 1.5 1.5 1.5 5.3 0.6 0.6 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 50.4 22.5 15.9 63.7 23.7 19.0 51.4 37.1 37.1 58.3 36.9 36.9 user De1Adj:, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 Adj Del. /Veh: 50.4 22.5 15.9 63.7 23,7 19.0 51.4 37.1 37.1 58.3 36.9 36.9 LOS by Move: D C B E C B D D D 'E D D HCM2kAvgQ: 5 18 3 5 12 2 5 13 13 5 9 9 Note: Queue reported j.s the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - AM Future Peak Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:17:50 Page 1 -1 ---------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method '(Base Volume Alternative) Intersection (t4 Pico k 7th Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.330 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 10.3 Optimal Cycle: 21 Level Of Service: .B Street Name: 7th Pico Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - _R L - T - R L - T - R --------- - --1 -- -- --- II----------- --- -11 - -- ---- II---------- - -- - -I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min.- Green: 0 0 0 0. 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3. 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 ------------ I ------- -- - - - -- I Volume Module: >> Count Date: Base Vol: 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 User Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00 PUP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0. Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finalvolume: 0 0 0 --- _ - -- -- I ----------------- Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1.900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.06 1.00 Lanes:. 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 14 Jan 20: 184 0 1.00 1.00 184 0 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 184 0 0 0 184 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 184 0 1900 1900 0.78 1.00 1.00 0.00 1490 0 - - - - -1 4 << 141 1..00 141 1.00 1.00 141 0 141 1.00 1.00 141 1900 0,85 1.00 1615 I--- - - - - -- 014 AM Futi 0 746 1.00 1.00 0 746 1.00 1.00 1.00'1.00 0 746 0 0 0 746 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 746 1--- - - - - -- 1900 1900 1.00 0.95 0.00 2.00 0 3610 - - - -- I re Pei 0 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 0 1900 1.00 0.00 0 I--------------- k 0 542 0 1.00 1,00 1,00 0 542 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 542 0 0 0 0 0 542 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 0 542 0 ----- ---- --- - -- 1900 1900 190C 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.00 2.00 O.00 0 .3610 C ------------ I ---------------- II ---------------- II --------------- i1 --------------- i Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00 Crit Moves: Green /Cycle.: 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00 Volume /Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0,00 0.23 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.1 0,0 19.3 0.0 7.9 0.0 0,0 7.4 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0,0 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 010 Delay Adj; 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0,00 0,00 1.00 0.00 Delay /Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.5 0.0 19.5 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 7.5 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.5 0.0 19.5 0.0 B4O 0.0 0.0 7.5 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A C A B A A A A A ,A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 0 3 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8:0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - AM Future Peak 'Phu Jan 23, 2014 16:18:01 Page 1 -1 -__________________________________________ ______ __ ________________ ___ ____ _______________ ____________ ___ ___ __ __ _____ _______ Level Of Service Computation Report - 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) - Intersection $5 Pico & 6th Cycle (sec): 90, Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): .0.335 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 11.2 Optimal Cycle: 22 Level Of Service: B Street Name: 6th Lincoln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound.. West Bound Movement: L - '1' - R L - T - R L - T - 'R L - T - R ------------- ,i --------------- II__. _- _- ____ - - -11_ _____11__- _-- ______ -__I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include. Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 2' 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 --- _ -------- I --------------- 11--------------- 11__ __-- ____- ____11- _____- ______ -_I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << 2014 AM Future Peak Base Vol: 21 0 230 0 0 0 0 502 0 0 695 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00 Initial Bse: 21 0 230 0 0 0 0 502 0 '0 695 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 PHF Volume: 21 0 230 - 0 0 0 0 502 0 0 695 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 21 0 230 ' 0 0 0, 0 502 0 0 695 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 21 0 230 0 0 0 0 502 0 0 695 0 ------- ---- - I -- -- ---- II--------------- 11------- -- ------ 11---------- - - ---I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.89 1.00 0.65 1.00 1.00 1.0o 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 .Final Sat.: 1687 0 1615 0 0 0 0 3610 0 .0 3610 0 ------------- 1-... -------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II____.------- -__I Capacity Analysis Module: .Vol /Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 -0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 Crit Moves: * * #* * * ** Green /Cycle, 0.43 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 '0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 Volume /Cap: 0.03 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 Uniform Del.: 15.1 0.0 17.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 0.0, 0.0 10.1 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0- 0.0 0.1' 0.0 0.0 0.7. 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0100 1.00 0.00' 0100 0100 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay /Veh: 15.1 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.5 O.Q 0.0 10.2 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I -Q0 1.00 1.00 Adjbel /Veh: 15.1 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0 LOS by Move: B- A B A A A A A A A B A HCM2kAVgQ: 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 Note.: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7..8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - AM Future Peak Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:31:00 Page 1 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection 146 Lincoln and 1 -10 On Ramp -Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.679 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 27.3 Optimal Cycle: 58 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound _ East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- 11 ----------------- II --------------- II_____ --------- Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Protected 1 Rights: Include Include Include include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- - - - - -II --------------- --------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 757 815 913 969 0 105 323 262 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00. Initial Bse: 0 757 815 913 969 0 105 323 262 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHI' Volume: 0 757 815 913 969 0 105 323 262 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 - 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 757 815 913 969 0 105 323 262 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 J -0o 1,06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 757 815 913 969 :0 105 323 262 0 0 0 ___-________ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II--------------- I Saturation Plow Module: - j' Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 j Lanes: 0:00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0,49 1.51 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 3188 3188 3502 3610 0 865 2662 1615 0 , 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II__ __----------- II--------------- I capacity Analysis Module; Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.27 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00' Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * *w* Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.76. 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00 0,00 Volxmie /Cap:, 0.00 0.63 0.68 0.68 0.35 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 30.6 31.3 30.8 4.7 0.0 39.5 39.5 41.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Inciemntbel: 0.0 0.5 0.8 1,4 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.5 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay /Veh: 0.0 31.1 32.1 32.2 4.8 0.0 40.0 40.0 46.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 0.0 31.1 32.1 32.2 4.8 0.0 •40.0 40.0 46.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A C C C A A D D D A. A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 13 14 15 6 0 7 7 10 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traf£ix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - Future Peak 3:00 -4Fri Jan 24, 2014 13 :47:42 Page 1 -1 _________ _____________ _____ ___ _______ _ ------ -- -- -------- ---------- -- - - - ____ -__ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) intersection 41 llth & Michigan Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.402 Loss Time (sec).: 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 8.6 optimal Cycle: 24 Level of Service: A Street Name: 11th Michigan Approach: North Bound - South Bound East Bound West Bound .. Movement: L -, T R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II --------------- i . Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted ' Rights: Include Include Include Include Min, Green: 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0- 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- il ------ : --------- II --------------- il ---------- Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << Future Peak 3:00- 4:OOPM Base Vol: '0 421 27 46 594 0 . 79 142 43 11 139 34 Growth Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 421 27 46 594 0 79 142 43 1.1 139 34 . User Adj: l.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' PHF Volume: 0 421 27 46 594 0 79 142 43 11 139 34 Reduct Vol: 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 421 27 46 594 0 79 142 43 11 139 34 PCE Adj:, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVol.umc: 0 '421. 27 '46 594 0 79 142 43 11 139 34 ------------ I--------------- II----------- ---- II-------------- II ---------------- E Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 •1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900" 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.45 1.00 1.00 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.66 0.86 0.66 Lanes: 1.00 0.94 0.06 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.60 1.07 0.33 0.12 1.51 0.37 - Final Sat.: 1900 1769 113 863 1900 0 866 1592 482 196 2476 606 ------- - ..... __ I ------------- . ---- II --------------- --------------- --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: '0.00 0:24 0.24 0.05 0.31 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.06 Grit Moves: *kwk * * ** Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22• 0.22 Volume /Cap: 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.07 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.25 0.25 0.25 Uniform Del: 0.0 2:3 2.3 1.8 2.5 0.0 23.3 23.3 23.3 22.4 22.4 22.4 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.1 0.1. -0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0. *0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 010 0.0 Q.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 0.0 2.4 2.4 1.9 2.7 0.0 23.7 23.7 23.7 22.6 22..6 22.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 'Adj Del /Veh: 0.0 '2.4 2.4 1.9 2.7 0.0 23.7 23.7 23.7 22.6 22.6 22.6 LOS by Move: A A A A A A C C C C C C HCM2kAvgQ: 0 3 3 0 4 0 3 3 3 2 2 2 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. - Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) intersection #2 Lincoln & Michigan - Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.480 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 8.1 Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: A . Street Name: Lincoln Michigan Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T- R L - T- R ' ------------ I ---------------- II_______________ il__ __- --------- - 11 --------------- I Control: Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: - Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II------- -------- II --------------- I Volume Module: >> Count .Date: 14 Jan 2014 << Future Peak 3:00- 4:OOPM Base Vol.: 102 1222 135 69 1278 110 0 0 0 45 82 56 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Ise: 102 1222 135 69 1278 110 0 0 0 45 82 56 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 3.02 1222 135 69 1278 110 0 0 0 45 82 56 _ Reduct Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 102 1222 135 69 1278 110 0 0 0 45 82 56 PCE 'Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 102 1222 135 69 1278 110 0 0 0 45 82 56 ------------- I --------------- II - - ------------- II_ _ ___ ___ ____ __il.___ ___I. Saturation Flow Module: - - Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 7.900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95.0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.85 Lanes: - 1.00 2.70 0.30 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.65 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 4601 508 1805 3610 1615 0 0 10 648 X181 1615 ------------- I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II--------------- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.27 0.27 0.04 0.35 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.03 Crit Moves: * * ** ** ** Green /Cycle: 0.86 0.75. 0.75 0.85 0.74 0.74 0.00 0,,00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.14 Volume /Cap:* 0.23 0.36 0.36 0.16 0.48 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.24 Uniform Del: 3.6 5.2 5.2 2.0 6.4 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 .47.2 47.2 45.5 IncremntDel.: 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.4 0.5 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0:00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 3.9 5.3 5.3 2.1 6.5 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.5 48.5 46.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 3.9 5.3 5.3 2.1 6.5 4.5 0.0 0.0 U.S. 48.5 48.5 46.0 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A D D D HCM2kAvgQ: 1 6 6 1 10 1 0 0 0 5 5 2 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - Future Peak 3:00 -414on Feb 10, 2014 18:23:38 Page 1 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) - intersection $3 Pico -& Lincoln Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.619 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 31.1 Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: C Street Name: Lincoln Pico Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound- West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T -- R L - T - R ------------ I--------------- II_______________ II_-- _____-- _-- __II______________ -I Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include- - Min. Green: - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 ------------- I ---------------- I ---------------- II --------------- 11 --------------- Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << Future Peak 3:00- 4:OOPM Base Vol: 3.06 1075 122 101 889 114 185. 590 136 205 312 213 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 Initial Bse: 106 1075 122 101 889 114 185 590 136 205 33.2 213 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 106 1075 122 101 889 114 185 590 136. 205 312 213 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 106 1075 122 101 889 1.14 185 590 136 205 312 213 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 106 1075 122 101 889 114 185 590 136 205 312 213 ------------ 1--------------- 11--------------- II__ _____________II_______________I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.89 0.89 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 X2.00 1.63 0.37 2.00 1.19 0.81 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615, 3502 2852 657. 3502 2015 1375 ------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.30 0.08 0.06 0.25: 0.07 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.06 0.15 0.1.5 Cri.t Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Green /Cycle.: 0.11 0.48 0.48 0.09 0.46 0.46 0.11 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.32 0.32 Volume /Cap:, 0.53 0.62 0.16 0.62 0.53 0.15 0.48 0.62 '0.62 0.62 0.48 0.48 Uniform Del: 50.5 23.0 17.5 52.6 23.1 18.7 50.3 33.5 33.5 '52.2 32.9 32.9 IncreamtDel: 2.8 0.7 0.1 7.1 0.3 .0.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.6 0.3 0.3 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . Delay /Veh: 53.3 23.7 17.6 59.7 23.4 18.8 51.3 34.6 34.6 55.8 33.2 33.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 "Do 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 53.3 23.7 17.6 59.7 23.4 18.8 51.3 34.6 34.6 55.8 33,2 33.2 LOS by Move: D C B E C B D C C E C C HCM2kAvgQ: 4 16 2 5 12 2 4 12 12 5 8 8 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA 1 MITIG8 - Future Peak 3:00 -4Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:23:40 Level Of Service Computation Report Page 1 -1 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base,Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Pico 6 7th Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0,293 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 6.8 Optimal Cycle: .20 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 7th Pico Approach: North.Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R _----------- 1--------------- 11___------------ 11____--- .- .._._____11_ -_ --------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted.' Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 10 0 ------------ I--------------- Volume Module: >> Count Date: Base Vol: 0 0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 - PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 - 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 ------------I--------------- Saturation Plow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 14 Jan 20 110 0 1.00 1.00 110 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 110 0 0 0 1,10 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 110 0 1900 1900 0.80 1.00 1.00 0.00 1520 0 - - - - -1 4 << I 110 1.00 110 1.00 1.00 110 0 110 1.00 1.00 110 1900 0.85 1.00 1615 I--------- 'uture Peak 0 798 1.00 1.00 0 798 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 798 0 0 0 798 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 798 1900 1900 1,00 0.95 0.00 2,00 0 3610 - - - - -1 3:00 -4 0 1.00 0 1.00 1.OD 0 0 D 1.00 1.00 0 1900 1.00 0.00 0 I-- ------ - - - - -- :OOPM 0 603 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 603 6 1.00 1.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0 603 0 0 0 0 0 603 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 0 603 0 1-------------- - 1900 1900 1900 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.00 2.00 O.00 0 3610 C ------------ 1 --------------- 11 --------------- 11---------------- 11 --------------- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.07 0.00 0.07 0.0o -0.22 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 Crit Moves: * * ** * * * *, Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.75 .0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00 Volume /Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0,22 0.00. Uniform Del: 0.0 O,0 0.0 27.5 0.0 27.4 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 IncrenntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 6.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0100 1.00 0.00 0.00 1,00 0.00 Delay /Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.0 0.0 27.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 User. DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.0 0.0 27.8 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A C A C A A A A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 4, 0 0 3 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. *** x** ww******** ww** w*******#* xxww*#** Axk**w**** k * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** *xx *rt * * * * * * *x Traffix 7,8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - Future Peak 3:00 -4Thur Jun -23, 2014 16:23:47 Page 1 -3. Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Pico & 6th Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.268 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R -4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 5.1 Optimal Cycle: 20 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 6th Lincoln Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L. _ T- R L- T- R L- T- -R L- T- R --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11__________ -___ -I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II --------- ______I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << Future Peak 3:00- 4:OOPM Base Vol: 14 0 102 0 0 0 0 673 .0 D 739 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 14 '0 lob 0 0 0 0 673 0 0 739 6 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 PHI' Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PBF Volume: 14 0 102 0 0 0 0 673 0 0 739 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 14 0 102 0 0 0 0 673 0 0 739 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00" 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 14 0 102 0 0 0 0 673 0 0 739 0 ------------ --------------- II---------------- II--------------- II_____- _________I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 -1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.891.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1697 0 1615 0 0 0 0 3610 . 0 0 3610 0 ------------ I ---------------- II---------- _____ II--------------- II--------------- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** Green /Cycle: 0.24 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00 Volume /Cap: 0.03 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 O -27 0.00 Uniform Del_ 26.5 0.0 28.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 '0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay /Veh: 26.5 0.0 28.4 0. -0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 3..00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 26.5 0.0 28.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 LOS by Move: C A C A A A A A A A A A RCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 2 0 0 6 0 3 0' 0' .3 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix. 7.8.0115.(c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - Future Peak 3:00 -4Mon Feb 10, 2014 19:00:47 � Page 1 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report _ 2000 RCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #6 Lincoln and I -10 On Ramp Cycle (sec): 120 - - Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.552 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 24.0 Optimal Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- 11 --------------- il--------------- I Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Protected Rights: include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 0 0 2 1, 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ _ 1 --------------- II ------------- _- II --------------- I1 --------------- I Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 949 425 721 1240 0 123 308 222. 0 .0 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Ban:. 0 949 425 721 1240 0 123 308 222 0 0 0 User Adj: . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PRF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 PHF Volume: 0 949 425 721 1240 0 123 308 222 0 0 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 949 425 721 1240 0 123 308 222 0 0 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 949 425 721 1.240 0 123 308 222 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II---------- ._____11--------------- I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 2.76 1.24 2.00 2.00 0 -.06 0.57 1.43 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 4557 2041 3502 3610 0 1001 2508 1615 0 0 0 ------------ I --------------- 11________----_-- II-_ _____-- ____- _II_______-- _____ -I Capacity Analysis Module: _ Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.34 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** - * * ** Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.37 0.75 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume /Cap:, 0.00 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.46 0.00 0..49 0.49 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 29.4 29.4 29.7 5.7 0.0 38.6 38.6 39.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Incremntbel: 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.4 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay /Veh: 0.0 29.6, 29.6 30.2 5.8 0.0 39.0 39.0 40.9 0:0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel. /Veh: 0.0 29.6 29.6 30.2 5.8 0.0 39.0 39.0 40.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A C C C A A D D D A A A RCM2kAvgQ: 0 11 ll 11 9 0 7 7 8 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane, Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - PM Future Peak Mon Feb 10, 2014 16:20:56 Page 1 -1 ------------------------------------------------------ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 RCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection $1 11th & Michigan Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol. /Cap.(%): 0.530 Loss Time (sec): - 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 9.9 optimal Cycle: - 31 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 11th Michigan Approach: North Bound South Bound Fast Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R- L- T - R L - T - R ------------ ---------------- II --------------- II ----------------- --------------- Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 ;1 O. 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 ------------ I--------------- II --------------- II --------------- II--- -------- - -- - - I Volume Module: » Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << PM Future Peak Base Vol: 0 405 25 54 621 82 197 166 42 13 138 30 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 405 25 54 621 82 197 166 42 13 138 30 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PEF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 405 25 54 621 82 197 166 42 13 138 30 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 405 25 54 621 82 197 166 42 13 138 30 PCE Adj: -1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 405 25 54 621 82 197 166 42 13 138 30 ------------ I ---------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II--------------- I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment.: 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.45 0.98 0.98 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.86 0.86 0.86 " Lanes: 1.00 0.94 0.06 1.00 0.86 0.12. 0.97 0.82 0.21 0.14 1.53 0.33 Final Sat.: 1900 117173 109 846 1648 218 1282 1080 273 234 2480 539 ------------ I ---------------- II--------------- II--------------- ii---------------- I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat; 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.38 0.38 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.06 0.06 0.06 Crit Moves: * * ** A * ** Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 Volume /Cap:' -0.00 0.32 0.32 0.09 0.53 0.53 0.53. 0.53 0.53 0.19 0.19. 0.19 Uniform Del: 0.0 3.8 3.8 3.1 4.7 4.7 20.9 20.9 20.9 18.7 18.7 18.7 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00'1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 0.0 3.9 3.9 3.2 5.1 5.1 21.6 21.6 21.6 1.8.8 18.8 18.8 User De1Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 0.0 3.9 3.9 3.2 5.1 5.1 21.6 21.6 21.6 18.8 18.8 18.8 JAS by Move: A A A A A A C C C B B B HCM2kAvgQ: 0 4 4 0 7 7 5 5 5 2 2 2 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIGB.- PM Future Peak Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:19:50 Page 1. -1 ----------------------------------- ----------- -------------- - - - --- ---- - - - - -- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection $2 Lincoln & Michigan Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.498 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 9.2 Optimal Cycle: 37 Level Of Service: A Street Name: Lincoln Michigan Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ .I ---------------- II--------------- II------ ---- -- -II.__---- ---- - - - - -I Control: Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q. 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II -------- - - - - -I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << PM Future Peak Base Vol: 142 1220 133 67 1278 111 0 0, 0 30 92 101 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 142 1220 133 67 1278 111 0 0 0 30 92 101 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PDT Volume: 142 1220 133 67 1278 111 0 0 0 30 92 101 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 142 1220 133 67 1278 111 0 0 - 0 30 92 101 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 142 1220 133 67 1278 111 0 0 0 30 92 101 ----------- - I - - -- ---------- II------------ --- II--------- ------ II- - - - --- i Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.85 Lanes: 1.00 2.71 0.29 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.75 1.00 Final Sat.: 1805 4607 502 1805 3610 1615 0 0 0 458 1404 161.5 --------- I --------------- II--------------- II ---------------- II----------- - -- - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.08 0.26 0.26 0.04 0.35 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.06 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** k * ** Green /Cycle; 0.87 0.76 0.76 0.82 0.71 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.13 Volume /Cap: 0.29 0.35 0.35 0.15 0.50 0.10. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.48 Uniform Del: 4.4 4.6 4.6 2.2 7.8 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.4 48.4 48.3 Incremntpel: 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.6 1.7 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 4.7 4.7 4.7 2.3 7.9 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 ,1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 4.7 4.7 4.7 2.3 7.9 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A D D- D HCM2kAvgQ: 1 6 6 1 11 1 0 0 0 5 5 4 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - PM Future Peak Mon Feb 10, 2014 18:23:05 Page 1-1 Level Of service Computation Report 2000 HCf4 Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #3 Pico & Lincoln Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.619 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y4-R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 31.1 Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: C Street Name: Lincoln Pico Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I ---------------- II --------------- II--------------- 11 ---------------- I. Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include . Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II-- ______- ______ Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << PM Future Peak Base Vol: 106 1074 121 101 889 114 185 590 136 205 31.2 213 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 106 1074 121 101 889 114 185 590 136 205 312 213 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 106 1074 121 101 889 114 185 590 136 205 312 213 ' Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 106 1074 121 101 689 114 185 590 136 205 312 213 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1100 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 106 1074 121 101 8B9 114 1.85 590 136 205 312 213 ------------ I --------------- II--------------- II__ ------------- II--------------- I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: . 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.89 0.89 Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1:00 2.00 1.63 0.37 2.00 1.19 0.61 Final Sat.: 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502 2852 657 3502 2015 1375 ------------- I --------------- il -__ -- _________II- ___---- _,__ -__i capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.30 0.07 0.06 0.25 0.07 0.05 0:21 0.21 0.06 0.15 0.15 Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * ** Green /Cycle; 0.11 0.48 0.48 0.09 0.46 0.46 0.11 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.32 0.32 Volume/Cap:' 0.53 0.62 0.16 0.62 0.53 0.15 0.48 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.48 0.48 Uniform Del: 50.5 23.0 17.5 52.6 23.1 18.7 50.3 33.5 33.5 52.2 32.8 32.8 IncremntDel: 2.8 0.7 0.1 1.1 0.3 0.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.5 0.3 0.3 InitQuoutel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Delay /Veh: 53.3 23.7 17.6 59.6 23.5 18.8 51.2 34.5 34.5 55.8 33.2 33.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 53.3 23.7 17.6 59.6 23.5 18.8 -51.2 34.5 34.5 55.8 33.2 33.2 -LOS by Move: D C B E C B D C C E C C HCM2kAvgQ: 4 15 2 5 12 2 4 12 12 5 8 8 w *w *w *ww * * * * * * ** wwww *w * *w * * +w *w *w *w* www* wwwwwww * * *W *w * *w * * * * * * *ww * *w * * * * * * ** *www Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.011.5 (c) 2007 Darling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA I MITIGS - PM Future Peak Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:20:26 Page 1 -1 ----------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 BCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #4 Pico & 7th Cycle '(sec): 90 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.280 Loss Time (sec):, 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 6.9 Optimal Cycle: 20 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 7th Pico Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: 'L - T - R L T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II--------------- I Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 ------------ I --------------- II- -------------- II--------------- II--------------- I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << PM Future Peak Base Vol: 0 0 0 110 0 110 .0 748 0 0 721 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: - 0 0 0 110 0 110 0 748 0 0 721 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PBF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.100 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 110 0 110 0 748 0 0 721 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 110 .0 110 0 '748 0 0 721 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Finalvolume: 0 0 - 0 110 0 110 0 748 0 0 721 0 ------------- . I --------------- 11--- ------------ il--------------- II--------------- I Saturation Flow Module: .Sat /Lane: 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 7.520 0 161.5 0 3610 0 0 3610 .0 --------- - - - I -- --- II---_----------- II------ _- _------ II----- ----- - - - - -I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat:- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0:20 0.00 Grit Moves: * * ** WWWW Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.00 Volume/Cap:' 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.26 0,00 0.28' 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.6 0.0 26.5 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 IncrematDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 . 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel; 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay /veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.0 0.0 26.9 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 User DelAdji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del /Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.0 0.0 26.9' 0.0 �3.9 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 LOS by Move: 'A A A C A C A A A A A A BC142kAvgQ:. 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 -0 3 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars.per lane. Traffix 7.0.0115 (c) 2007 . Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIGB - PM Future $eak - Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:20:37 Page 1 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM. Operations.Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection #5 Pico & 6th Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.271 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Yi -R -4.0 sec) , Average Delay (sec /veh): 3.7 Optimal Cycle: 20 Level Of Service: A Street Name: 6th Lincoln Approach: North Bound South Round East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11--------------- I Control.: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 ------------ I --------------- PI --------------- II --------------- II--------------- I Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << PM Future Peak Base Vol: 5 0 83 0 0 0 0 722 0 0 793 0 Growth Adj: -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 5 0 83 0 0 0. 0 722 0 0 793 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00 PHF Volume: 5 0 83 0 -0 0 0 722 0 0 793 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 5 0 83 0 0 0 0 722 0 0 793 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. Fi.nal.Volume: 5 0 83 0 0 0 0 722 0 0 793 0 ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11________ -_ ____I Saturation Flow Module: Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 .Adjustment: 0.91 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Lanes: 1.00 0.00' 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1.737 0 1615 0 0 0 Q 3610 0 0 X610 0 ------------- I --------------- II___-___________ 11--___ ____- _____II_---- _..._- _- ____,I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.00.0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00 Crit Moves: Green /Cycle: 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.0.81 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00 Volume /Cap: 0.02 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 '0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 Uniform Del: 2.9.6 0.0 31.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay /Veh: 29.7 0.0 31.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 211 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 29.7 0.0 31.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 211 0.0 LOS by Move: C A C A A A A A A A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.. Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA MITIG8 - PM Future Peak Mon Feb 10, 2014 19:01:32 Page 1 -1 Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) Intersection *6 Lincoln and I -10 On Ramp Cycle'(sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.552 Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R ='4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 24.0 optimal Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: C Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound {Vest Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------- I--------------- Control.: Permitted Rights: Include Min, Green: 0 0 .0 Lanes: 0 0 2 '1 1 ------------I--------------- Volume Module: Base Vol: 0 -949 425 Growth Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.100 Initial Boo: 0 949 425 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 PHF Volume: 0 949 425 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 949 425 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 0 949 425 ------------ I --- -- Saturation Flow Module: - Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 0.87 0.67 Lanes: 0.00 2.76 1.24 Final Sat.: '0 4557 2041 - --- -- ----- I ------ --- - - - - -- Protected Include 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 --------------- 721 1240 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 721 1240 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 721 1240 0 0 0 0 721 1240 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 721 1240 0 1900 1900 1900 0.92 0.95 1.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 3502 3610 0 -- ------- ---- II -- ------- - - - - -- Permitted Protected Include Include 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ------------ ---il --------------- 123 308 222 0 . 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 123 308 222 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 123 308 222 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 123 308 222 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 123 308 222 0 0 0 --------------II-----`--------- 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190C 0.92 0.92 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.57 1.43 1.00 0..00.0.00 O.00 1001 2508 1615 0 0 C --------------- II --------- - - - - -- Capacity Analysis Module: Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.34 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00' Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.37 0.75 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Volume /Cap:, 0.00 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.46 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 29.4 29.4 29.7 5.7 0.0 38.6 38.6 39.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.4 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 IRitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Delay /Veh: 0.0 29.6 29.6 30.2 5.8 0.0 39.0 39.0 40.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel /Veh: 0.0.29.6 29.6 30.2 5.8 0.0 39.0 39.0 40.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A C C C A A D D D A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 11 11 11 9 0 7 7 8 0 0 0 Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007.Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MOMICA' Uf•- h Z_ U u Z W W m f F W cOU LL Z H � u d Z m On aW K W d z H N 0 Qti Z V � b u, Or 0-1 X00 ul Z F£ z Z du ENE O C mw 0�3 0 0 O O Z 6 H W � OOOOO OO OOOOOOOO000000 O O O O O O OOO0000 00 0 00000 }U O°° O O O°° O O O O° o O O O Z N W X O O O O °° O O O O O° O O O 6 O ruNx 000000000000000000000 omoo000o 00000000 0000a d zx oo0000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 001000 NEU O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO O O O O OO O O O O Z >� > x O O O U a W n ZX O O JALF OOOOOOm01�/1P NbMOMtO N.-� -"000 OOOm yMj O O b m~OOOC MtiPtiVlnmO�HPtimNP d'p OMV,M PPPP�"nIM M(MrINOO� ti O b m O W O F IUk N {Z VIP 30 nll�M N�M�tI tO �Ta mW m mVIN nPN�Dn O�tivIPPNMm O�^ mO N N � Z om Nu0 �°\jO IhVb�.PiNtiti Nn NVNONNti.MyN Nltl .nnnbMO N� lam' Y i 3 O M N ti P H N H N N b d. N M M M P P VI P M P ti M M --- wo Mti.m Nnn�oP Imo e.°\ -� � n,N. .nnm,N. .M. rn m m,M.bm,".oti v°Jimm a.P+ ry .i ti ml`INMMNNNtiNN.yN 0��' Mv"in PNNtiti NN tiN0 .yPP O WO mMN tiNNm.y Orb .-i^ Mv1W NNP NN ^N M M mM+�Ntitirl C'hNV1 u1mPN +y .a .y ^O�a {/�N � oN NN^m o o mM m N �O �OMbtivl �ObH mory N M � ry LOOM NtiNNNMNNMNNNNN'IN MO COnnNmn ^m Nn N� mN n m ,y P y�N�y ,y .y .y �aNN � a. May N b Q F pp V1P NVM1 �O Vlb VinPnul P�nP b aDO Oo.nnb�.. N m�MtiPO O� � Po �p Nnn N \° T \M NNO� bm0 Pn�Tm�Onb bb MaD' O 'I .y.inti ...iN.i ...+rn Nn Snvl'" wry NbMntimtim �0�� Pam O Nm.Mi .�fNNNNNN1�lN H.N -�MiN ONN VPi I� M n ZO Mu1m TN�ONn yPN 0 NV' � n�P�O V�Prn NtONtiPPNMM nP(O Nvl N •a a IV Jn 0fF \ .�iti \M M�O� y�j0 �OV10J Pm `, nO��iNN tiMNaOP PyM VIPM O�O�W.Oa mO�M VSO U F ^ .OiUW�ObimmO�(On 0 _..b �Ny O�n�P nvl b O`NMamMnMbMMNMMNMN Q Zn SON mb q�OW POH ? vi K O K O aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa r� zLL�dddo.ddddaddddaddddad zQ� x a o NOMOinoMO�n o mPO..MPO.. °MVO o d w w bb lzmmmmTOOO; 0000W�a OeZO�YM fJfJMMMMPP d'P1(I V1 vI N�Obbb nn`�Mud.� Z �aZ Y O 0 OddwOd d OddwOdugd z >aaw >¢d¢ >a¢m >ad¢ Wtl Wd Z 0 S U E m PACIFIC TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS ME a Q O N � W c O SANTA MONICA CA13- 0920 -0924 ALL HOURS � O N v N O N N N A A O A -i O r Rm n D z M rN O lug 702 2,749 3,451 11TH 1,115 1,517 2,632 => L] 49 1,228 72 11,683 1 121 1 2,911 4,109 581 3,235 387 3,141 2,541 387 TOTAL 307 PM 1,870 I ' 874 194 600 1 AM LJ 1,290 u II \l'80,, ME a Q O N � W c O SANTA MONICA CA13- 0920 -0924 ALL HOURS � O N v N O N N N A A O A -i O r Rm n D z M rN O lug 702 2,749 3,451 LJ AM 64 PM 94 TOTAL 1 158 1,115 1,517 2,632 => L] 49 1,228 72 11,683 1 121 1 2,911 11TH 11TH 1,287 217 757 82 530 135 F11 < � = <�iD 975 621 354 -u 95 TOTAL 54 PM 41 AM [L* 526 I I 670 u m P r F] Z C7 S U 2 n--- N M a J Q p a F m n M \V O N � a �o IMD N tM") PEAK HOUR AM 7:45AM PM 3:15 PM I IN mill awe w N A m O � 3 D r (P A O tp to A p- 0 2 D z U, Z a Uw V W W � a W F w z H U Z F3 ad h Z m on LLI¢ W W m u Z w � � 00000010000000000010000 000000100010000 o0 of oo 000 �i �x 000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 z x 000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 Zyy� �u,mx 000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 0 a zx 000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 k 0° °01000000 °00010 °00000 000000 °° °0001° °00101 °000 u HIM o u w x o ° V m - k 00000000010 0000o0000o0 0010000000000000000000 Z u U ymj X O ° m X M p O w n ° Z X O m p m p�0 Q ONnbnNNn .+m �n000000o N P N m Py m0 OOtiPNti�O VlmmMmMNHtiMMOmbvIM NtiO�m vlb MbOOn W H 0 o0o0oen0.+P nnmmnmm� - m o mmm�b�nnnnbb�onnn M o p V /Z N� p'p mb�O '1 N t0m�O No mM Nb P N MN OWN N.y mtid'n +y Nf+ V1 �iNN .yNm ,y �O Nmn NNN atom iV Ob Nn OVl P O� N J � MMPVIPMNM M �D .a 1VNNn °PVl OPtimm�Mnt NNN N.y -.i Nip m' °n.tii N i j J ¢ Z 3 a Ou(-N o ON a qo O nNQ o \ �b 0 N° T Ty.O � �i .ti M°m i0 Nip nO�m bh�NPMMMMMO�MN �� MN N .� _ L �O MNPNU1 V10 V N � ik — Z J Op o M mm btiti-NMnPmNnN o M o m °N u° M�DNN.niemn NM�O M M mm frail PmMy- tir°in MN O¢� U aOJ OU MMnd"imtiN- mNMNON�000NPn�Nm tD OUt.y mx HVp £ .yP o ug _.M W° -�.biN n�O �D 1()ti �Nb bN N O��O�M PP.`iy l/�MmVMmPti� mNp (i�N �O rvrmnvv °..nom �mN m MN NNNNNtiNN1�1NMM m(�tNM oN d.nM Nn m ti N ti W ti Q Q m04- nnnvl d'N V� mip OQm MmYtinm(b�11N+IM.mimON�lm/�Ibl .bi28 Nm0 V VI M N M M N M M M M M M M M M M M M O m" _._ NfVmti�� _. tin •r � NNtiHtim'in bo. vlmbenO�OM .- �NNH.y Nei �Z6 F02 .Ni VI (V I(m)vl m \ °N NVIm \ bVl yN d' ZO m.miN�mtO O1 O� O�fh `� NP 111 HN.P Obd'O NMONd.ti M° pry em tml1N M M e 5 .. Q �u~N tmpo nb ¢OO iM/i MMMO� P O� ' qo PP BOO m pNPW ��yppNOMVlrnen aMMMMMMM eNeNObO� NO�vl pn.+�o 1"1NmNNMMNNNN(VNNNN �o .+nnM�O m.+OnbnbVlPnbN Minnn�o .+b zZ NN n P �ti-� w � z z-� timPMn mNm vm m,".Mmv�NmMPmmmmm�in �(°ym m�°-ry e N oon o �o mxWQ 2�n--��Q� ¢ a m°p o�n "''+w'¢�Qi ov�oM °w ofmm J6 OtQii pKY rv<+i rimmvcv vin vi iri vi Rio roe nn�mz��Ya JI-Z Io. n O dawOnuga Wtl Wd Z Q C7 x U m n mi J Q n a Q PACIFIC TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS m rn 1�A\ N V V M SANTA MONICA CA13- 0920.0924 ALL HOURS u 9 P w w m w W w 3 m � m n T 3 O n ^�> Z z 4mi W � uU u n 2,139 cl\/I� 5,392 7,531 N LINCOLN 2,763 4,493 7,256 91 2,919 208 1 4,817 299 7,736 8,154 610 5,858 416 7,143 5,164 1 401 TOTAL 278 PM 4,914 LINCOLN 2,296 194 1,979 123 AM u 3,170 1,202 59 1,293 2,454 Total 1 78 2,504 118 2,700 LINCOLN m rn 1�A\ N V V M SANTA MONICA CA13- 0920.0924 ALL HOURS u 9 P w w m w W w 3 m � m n T 3 O n ^�> Z z 4mi W � uU u n 2,139 cl\/I� 5,392 7,531 N AM PM 165 16 TOTAL 1 181 1 2,763 4,493 7,256 91 2,919 208 1 4,817 299 7,736 Fl AM PM LINCOLN 1,302 59 1 1,407 32 1,202 59 1,293 2,454 Total 1 78 2,504 118 2,700 LINCOLN LINCOLN 2,643 234 1,442 95 1,201 139 Fl <== 2,281 1,278 1,003 128 TOTAL 69 PM 59 AM a ,/fir u 2,868 1,334 1,534 u A W V V N N J Z Q p a l- PEAK HOUR AM 7:45 AM PM 3:00 PM V N LI 1,111 1,343 AM PM 46 1,302 59 1 1,407 32 1,202 59 1,293 2,454 Total 1 78 2,504 118 2,700 LINCOLN J o V o 0 o n O n' 3 3 Z z w w W O A F z a Uw U Z W w N W G Co R 6 Q� z R Zn-, d H 6 Zm on LU a nw W p H z m lJ) � oo 0000000000000000000 000 000 0000000 of 0000000 u m t7 z 3x 000000000000000000000 000000000000000000°00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 2 N W x O O O O U N X O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 6 Z X O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O k OO OO O OO OOOO OOOOOO0000 OOOOOOOOOOO0000000000 Z � 1n 3x o ° u W wx o ° y (J O mX N m (7 o OO O o 00 O O O O O oo 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O O o o O O O O o O O O O O O O O Z till � 0 3x Q wX N A Q PAD 1°p �mNA Z (n P IN� vN11�V1 VIPbMNtD 10PNNbP WMH NM n MNti NN n ik � _- Z J p Q me ~ N°r\j ry Pml�mm V1PN bI�MPO� \ paF n'O W Ml�m •i HNNNN.yN b b�N Nti N N MNNNM M�+IMMNMNMMMti pay �N N N boo _. .. pZ _.. p�DONNQm O� mM Oloobrvon..Pm MNNMMtiOtiOim N o �m aOOP NVl ° Mt�q �6�N _.. _... wN MMVYN1VPCtND y ONO y��j° ^ry n MfmI VPIMMMPIIN+Im yy MNM IN NWN Itm10 N O m INM NNNCNmNb O MNNMNNMMMNMMMMPM P VI° 'y OWN ti yNjtim yT p N NNMbOiO N H N MOfryry N Nb N PObO�N N NNmmmmmNbNN N N N O�NNbNmMtDMOOi N N N N N N�+INN Qa °m ?F g� �o nM mo b m.yq Ia pm yo VPj Nmm H Z ? z S N� N �y m W W Q N O bP Mf�bNNh O tiPMMM1�NO�hhNI�N NNNMMNMtiNN NN £ Z O � IJ/1 '"� M \ti N°q" ti \° °O1 mWp P �1� ,y a�J 1n�a 2 O M M M m Py oN O O � 10 N O h N 1� P W P P N N P G O O N no m eo P p F O N m M N N N h N N T N N N m N N N M T N M O ti N T N M a m o O N o m n N O b O S Z INN, N M N N N Om m N° M N 1N m m O rS� r Z Z J Z'1 pvM1�v01 'N+IN MM do NtiN p. Wo ti� Om1�N MMNN PMNONPPHONW m OOO� .a M Po ti0 p� N OO t'1]f P Gr£s£££££s£a££££££££££ ory oar a ££££ ory '�wanwwmn 1n� NoNOO do INONONON °Mawwa11�n `u�"Kd °MVOM .+MP °o oNO .Ni oNON 'iS � �O �O �Obnnnnm"m"m"m'O�TO�O�O OOO�OpH�OY�N (JoNON M MMPPPPNNNNbb 10 h-J n'p ZJmYp a r o OaawOal�ia OnnwO ni�Ja ugn Wy Wd PACIFIC TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS MIN J f O a Q h o M N' N W (D f0 O SANTA MONICA CAI 3-0920-0924 ALL HOURS � W W WA W � o � N � o m D 9 3 � D r RN LINCOLN 2,265 5,873 8,138 AM PM TOTAL 591 TOTAL 418 PM ,/fir 7,686 "/fir 4,791 306 2,995 497 4,931 1 803 7,926 7,540 716 6,233 5,424 520 4,486 2,116 196 1,7 173 AM u 2,895 u ,7114L,7 MIN J f O a Q h o M N' N W (D f0 O SANTA MONICA CAI 3-0920-0924 ALL HOURS � W W WA W � o � N � o m D 9 3 � D r RN U a N 0 M � M W N a O O V O O ro n dVS � W A 1 0 3 a n r N N v A 2,265 5,873 8,138 AM PM TOTAL 321 508 1 829 1 2,368 3,926 6,294 306 2,995 497 4,931 1 803 7,926 LINCOLN LINCOLN 2,473 233 1,369 119 1,104 114 2,038 1,149 889 202 101 101 TOTAL PM AM �J 1,294 1,476 u ILJI V O W 11 1 U a N 0 M � M W N a O O V O O ro n dVS � W A 1 0 3 a n r N N v A Z a Uw U Z W W m W pG °U L Q� (C M � as f Zm on LLIQ w W � {/j n 6F' Z M UO O O O p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 -------- ....... 0 0 0 0---- 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 3 X O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O ZQ O W X O O O O O O O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O �x oo°oop00000000pp00000 00000p0000000000b0000 ° a zX OOOOOO°0000000000°opo °000000000°000000000° koo °000p0000 °00000 0000 0 °0000000oo ° °o00°0000 m p z m o wx o u 0 Z y X O _ _ O Z X O Z � O O O O OO O o 0 0 o O O OO O O O p o p p o o O O O O O O o op o O O O O O O o 0 U Q w X O ° X o ° O Z X FNvIN OOOOOONNpM(^�I V10mtiP O°i m Vbt O VNj pJO OOMPPmmMMPMMPPIb'ICMMOON O.V PI(I aOWOVlmn pmp nVyyl Vln rymry�� p N O Ip p10 W 0 1�1 f~�INOOOOOOIp N N O ti O P m {Z NP K 2i0 NPn Nmn nom Po m m Pnn tifi n� W m M O d mm Nn.a .ati tin b ,ynNn,.tibNin ,yP ti _.bo T O m'a �N nbOPmOnT OOMNPPtiO OJW Na pI "m^ .+�PnMPm101O bnOMnMtiTV1 V11001 VINbN V1 N.N-�ti Nm do b M nOPio <� � ^ � I/PI O .y .i ti 'a ti ti .a �a .�a .-I .y .y N ik Z G° W ^ W b b moo y N ° n1�WO��Ib/I m..n DJ m.+mnro Ol�nOmm me�jN NO pI° py� N 11-n O •i .� .y ,.i N H Pp� .. fi .y n .-I O O N �.� U1 Mn.ynO N pOp p Nti ° tiNN tiPV)MNNNVPd'mVNNMM OIPO NNm nNn �Op MD ° 'nNnVttimmti NO NO O op o o� p 0 z S O £ zx° �X °oN u �Qilka Z X y o N z 2 O zk�rx a oa < 00 oog °o o 00 d °oo °o O u h O w Z UQ d.ar a ZX O Z W 3 QOIn mUdq�U ¢ Ii�NO ONMPOti NO VIm VIO�mM0v10 VO POHMP NONMVI P.W QWnWQME 97!MPO.yMpO.b- NOV10 VI0 IIMVOtiMP OVIO VI O'�W¢Wn QZW �S VI W IO tO �Obnnl�l�mmOJmNTO�N 00005 V1 V11A IO baON1�IhS °d'O rZi�°n'y° ~ ° d'p2J6'Y�NNmMMMVVVPVI Oa°'w0 °n OaawOnugn z u�nn Wtl Wd PACIFIC TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS 7TH 746 746 0 0 TOTAL r 381 "/fir 540 540 0 0 PM I 174 206 <206 1 / ^JI �InO 00 , AM u 207 u a V t0 �`- V M � ,. a O a 0 0 V [V Y O O O N T N < N r h � of f9 Q r � g n a Q v � V SANTA MONICA CA13- 0920 -0924 ALL HOURS u � V N J A � O N W O Obi A w a o 0 0 O 3 3 y r W n0 Nip W AM 0 0 0 0 PM 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 o0 7TH 278 278 0 --- F--0--j TOTAL 132 132 0 0 PM I 44 146 146 0 0 AM m m w il In 9mm � 11101 PEAK HOUR AM 8:00 AM PM 5:30 PM Total 0 0 0 0 FE 7TH A N a A A A W N � m w 0 0 0 3 3 D RE Z V Cz W LU 6 Q Wr >o Ou �LL U� Zr Z6N' U �a Zm Fmw U� yy °w K� W H m 0 N O Q M Z U-N s W F F HE 6 z 0 ° iu vQieu S.. 0�3 �Fd z pOG Z4 G N� l r?i F w k 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 k- -7- O 71010 0 0 0 010 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 V mz 3x 000000000000000000000 — 00000000°00°000°00000 000000000000000000000 v`�iwx 000000000000000000000 gz 000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 �a�U�x a 0 Z X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 010 0 0 0 0 o p o p p o o b p o o p o 0 0 0 0 0 o p p k00000000010000000100000 777 000000000po0000 0 ° m z k 000000000000000000000 0°000000°°00000101°10000 z 3x o U "' z wx o 0 0 w m `,.° o m O a0 O� til�l/m1O b1�000000M ^v mm ^ ^g000tiNTm(`IP minb p�mn�nrobanMb.+oM O�NNObNmtiMmOO�y W r OOOOOPm P I � Z M� F hMmOmOIMO NMN�MPtiN MOTOVbI 4bInNWO�N0�00 N.yNN NN �j z CJO` m° �!O MOM bOm OpW h 61N UwI ,y N.-�NH tiNti 00 ° -- .a ° N M z QOFN o N° N ° by ^pN bNmPI�MVl 1� MI�bIO I�OI�I�nV�bNNti m IIJ m�tiNti�tiN m° NOS Wx OOm p0 O OOtO p ry n mx N o° ° °moo° 0 000 00 0 op 007 op °oo 0 S��x � „x 000 00 0 o 00 ° og o NPhV1 N� POTOIO NMNti m(O .yNtiNN�w I�NNO�O VIN. -� Oo MAO a �� Z`� u, V)NMM mrn0 O Z f a uQ' m6rcx z 00 0oon °o °M OO u m w ° Zn MoN l+l NW N �+Iti� N� m 3 orQY �¢r y��Ef Q 6 6 Q �affffff Q 6 0 0 0 6 6 Q �f�f Q Q Q Q FafF Q Q or Q 6 Z oGrFfa�aaf d' 2 IQL 2' p d R 6 W h 6 FFEffa��f d d h 2 d d 6 6 Effa d h 6 d d m U Q W VI U W 6 otio�n 0�n ovIOM vlotiovl °Mao MP °p ,'^. !nMUM UwQtw Q WO °M,a MOB o.+ ,n v°.. ni Oi MOVlo Mpvlw aaw Ka w Iz ° �oen��rwbi rlg o.+Mao.+ vimmmo+,. .000£° Orvri ri ri m 44 inY a'V VUi iri Gl vi io ego �o n��ozV�y° �o cd .. ....ten �2 °¢mo¢ aut�Jn �6a¢mO6Q �¢ a O6¢ < Wtl Wd O U a m V M � PACIFIC TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS 6TH 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0� 0 0 0 0 PM 0 0 00Iy 0 AM 0 u a Q 0 0 N O O N N v 1O m N m w m m r n Q n a Q FOR v � V SANTA MONICA CA13- 0920 -0924 ALL HOURS ff alml�l� AM 31 0 366 397 PM 39 0 310 349 TOTAL 70 0 676 746 o o Iol O 3 3 j r 6TH 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0 0 0 0 PM ' =l I u 0 0 0 0 AM LJ 0 u <::D a a n uo� �—✓ 00 WE PEAK HOUR AM 8:00 AM PM 4:30 PM Nip w m m � 0 0 0 0 0 3 a r AM 2311 Total 26 0 313 339 6TH 14o H Z v w u Z� W W F iO OC U G LL Z� H U Z m 0 o pH. � Lu G w H N O N Z S N N C1 �Opwar X00 U Z 0 £ Fa Ow Z V O Z F N Nw O'� 3 K 00¢ Y .M+o J J k p O p p p OO p p pp O p p p p p O p p p O O O p p O O p p p p O O p p pp OO p p U �M3x oo0oo0000000000000000 000°°000000 0000000 00° o00000p00000000000000 000000000000000000000 z�wx ¢O N X O O O ...... O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O w m a zx 000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000 k000000100000000100001000 of oo oOOOOOOpO O Oo OOO Ooo m z z 0 TFU — u w u p mx z o c� k 000000000000000000000 00010000 poop 0100000000 z 0 3x a u p zx ¢ � yrh �N"n YOOOOOOq .N. N n � om °MMPmomrnPMnomo .+m O�OOm M rn X10 JAL W O OOOOOOCOOOOOP'M 01ti pm10000�OnnOHnM'aN001 O mma1 Q�001010101m O�mm V Al O HNTm n V 4z N� 3X o 00 0 o po 0 z ;F me'x o0 000 °o °oR tn ? w o o �:x 000 °\o° p ogo 0 0 w.. Iwev 1°n °am rvm Mo mrvlmi N In liOi11M�1 °°1i lomnel°nmrv�al"'�1 M N mMT `rNym dm M N d m "' e°1 n.+rvo MaD _ __ m m noPNPm .m NVM N z D �o oo �N m° °m Vp1 M ti IOPeM Na mvn 0 n�wloventiW. ,V W° hNOMOMmN N N N N ti °n N\O N N No N O � m�.M N M M +P M N IOn N N O'm P ti� mntO N tOPPN N N N ti fi Ino pn� CC '^ mo Np� Ip M M n 'a O ° N .a N fi Z NP VI'm1N00°M .. -_ �OmW10 O°i00timON O(�1NN mB�N PtiT Tb NMpVi F;� NNNNNNNN mN -vl 01M� MMMNNNMMMNMMMMMM pID ' .tim0 SS 0 JN OP OIb�)1�00f0 NoM 01N Mo VNj m m mT01M �O Ohm WmID 1ONMN10 tpNnmWmMOi V1 v1 VnjoM MmP nM N N tiPM 01P .n4 .M-i .1/iitititi N n �N µNNNNNN�NpN W0+0 Ma N NoNnO(�m'yN N NM ^V1M m0� N;Ob Oro 0 Z 000�ONi NNtiN'a 0°+mW tiPy Wvl W Np PM z � mo P ° °.°i u`Q Vl ln/I 01� ho IpP wN \W ON °m m _.. mnn M mN.N ryry -IN _. bNaOtiM10 ry�MMMMM°�NNNNNN V1N m01 OPNNfiti nm u h n _. K O - - zxo _. w z P 3 aaa¢¢a¢a¢¢aaaaa¢aa ¢ a in zLLUanwwwaawwwaaWwwwn ap . w ww rte¢ iwQ Vd.w VIO VI O°�OV10NM 1+10 pN °MNUa mPw¢WaWa=WMV'O.yMPOtiMPOtiMVO wNU Ov10N v10 V10 ON . y 1°�1 ON V'Oti Uaz ¢IjIW aSW �/W1 tiMP isnnnmmma MPOti POtiMV V1 V1b b10 tOhn Z=dY 1- tp 1p 1p �O +rnNNm000OO�pZ�OY�NNMMMMPPPPYIN �Jww(�Jp.Qp O °a ww w RM > ¢ a ¢ Wtl Wd = PACIFIC TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS 4-J Q 0 a Q r N O W d � v N {h N R- EH MW 6 0 i Q r N W M INp M tr1 W N fD SANTA MONICA CA13- 0920 -0924 ALL HOURS �vo , a°o e moo e O � 3 D n 1,204 LINCOLN AM PM 0 0 11,027 0 0 6,746 4,938 4,281 TOTAL 2,557 PM 4,063 A 7,495 1,679 AM 1,806 u N N W j 3,532 0 1,808 1,724 0 lu a o 0 0 4-J Q 0 a Q r N O W d � v N {h N R- EH MW 6 0 i Q r N W M INp M tr1 W N fD SANTA MONICA CA13- 0920 -0924 ALL HOURS �vo , a°o e moo e O � 3 D LINCOLN 3,800 0 2,166 1,634 TOTAL 1,945 0 1,224 721 PM 1 1,045 ,lur 1,855 0 942 1 913 1 AM u 862 l 0 0 0 woe e aee e 757 803 1 560 0 0 3 3 D UN n 1,204 n AM PM 0 0 922 419 1,341 2,650 A Total 0 1,679 1,222 2,901 N N W j LINCOLN 0 2285 n I/� AM 0 1,604 1,569 1,257 3,173 4,915 5,g7p JI\ PM 0 3,658 8,167 TOTAL 0 5,262 2,826 8,088 LINCOLN 3,800 0 2,166 1,634 TOTAL 1,945 0 1,224 721 PM 1 1,045 ,lur 1,855 0 942 1 913 1 AM u 862 l 0 0 0 woe e aee e 757 803 1 560 0 0 3 3 D UN n 1,204 n AM PM 0 0 922 419 1,341 2,650 Total 0 1,679 1,222 2,901 LINCOLN Transportation Studies, Inc. 2640 Walnut Avenue, Ste H Tustin, CA. 92780 Location: : 7TH STREET Segment: : N/O PICO BOULEVARD Client: : CITY ODE SANTA M Site: SANTA MONICA Date: 12/17/13 Interval Begin AM- NB PM- NB Day: Tuesday 12:00 0 4 10 89 12:15 0 31 12:30 3 36 12:45 1 12 1:00 0 0 it 34 1:15 0 10 1:30 0 5 1:45 0 8 2:00 3 4 9 33 2:15 0 4 2:30 0 8 2:45 1 12 3:00 0 1 10 28 3:15 0 8 3:30 1 6 3:45 0 4 4:00 0 0 7 15 4:15 0 6 4:30 0 2 4:45 0 0 5:00 0 1 2 17 5:15 0 3 5:30 1 8 5:45 0 4 6:00 1 6 4 14 6:15 0 3 6:30 1 5 6:45 4 2 7:00 7 131 8 20 7:15 13 6 7:30 34 2 7:45 77 4 8:00 84 135 5 11 8:15 41 2 8:30 7 2 8:45 3 2 9:00 9 20 1 5 9:15 1 0 9:30 8 2 9:45 2 2 10:00 6 22 4 4 10:15 10 0 10:30 4 0 10:45 2 0 11:00 14 38 2 8 11:15 14 0 11:30 5 6 11:45 5 0 Totals 362 _ -.. 278 Peak Hour 7:30 12:15 Volume 236 90 Factor 0.7 0.63 DayTmal 640 Location: : 7TH STREET Segment: : N/O PICO BOULEVARD Client: : CITY OF SANTA MO Interval Begin AM - SB 12:00 2 4 12:15 0 2,204 12:30 0 12:45 2 1:00 2 2 1:15 0 1:30 0 1:45 0 2:00 0 0 2:15 0 2:30 0 2:45 0 3:00 2 4 3:15 0 3:30 2 3:45 0 4:00 2 7 4:15 3 4:30 0 4:45 2 5:00 1 14 5:15 3 5:30 2 5:45 8 6:00 11 65 6:15 8 6:30 8 6:45 38 7:00 99 211 7:15 42 7:30 22 7:45 48 8:00 102 201 8:15 66 8:30 22 8:45 11 9:00 20 51 9:15 16 9:30 4 9:45 11 10:00 14 94 10:15 22 10:30 22 10:45 36 11:00 26 95 11:15 25 11:30 18 - 11:45 26 Totals 748 Peak Hour 7:30 Volume 238 Factor 0.58 DayTotal 2,204 Transportation Studies, Inc. 2640 Walnut Avenue, Ste H Tustin, CA. 92780 PM - SB 23 16 35 26 11 19 34 22 20 50 24 20 50 103 64 64 62 57 44 52 59 44 54 58 58 52 42 33 45 24 21 14 23 10 16 11 20 9 10 6 14 10 3 2 10 4 6 2 1,456 3:15 293 0.71 86 114 281 215 215 185 104 60 45 29 22 Site: SANTA MONICA Date: 12110/13 Day: Tuesday I Tree Relocation Plan Saam Planning & Community Development Department Strategic & Transportation Planning Division 1685 Main Street, Room 212 ,. P.O. BOX 2200 Santa Monica, CA 90407 -2200 M 9e11191k 1lfonfoa` Dear Mr. Rod Gould, Strategic and Transportation Planning staff along with an internal City team from Public Landscape, Public Works, Transportation Engineering, Police, and Big Blue Bus has been working on implementing a Safe Routes to School Grant to reduce barriers to walking and biking at Santa Monica High School. The final draft recommendations for improvements around the school include a redesign of the Pico Boulevard median between 7th and 6th Streets to accommodate a new traffic signal at 7th Street and a center running cycle track with a landscaped barrier. Eight trees were inspected by the Urban Forester in the median from 7th to 6th Streets. Three of the eight have been determined to be suitable candidates for transplanting to another location in the public right -of -way. The remaining five trees are of a poor structural condition with a limited potential useful life expectancy. Therefore these trees are recommended for removal. The Safe Routes project was discussed at the Santa Monica Urban Forest Task Force on January 22, 2014. The Task Force recommended that the three viable trees be relocated if possible to the west side of 7th Street along the school site. If this is determined to be a nonviable site the trees will be relocated further west within the Pico Boulevard median between 6th and 4th Streets. 1 Michelle Glickert Senior Transportation Planner Strategic and Transportation Planning Cc: Martin Pastucha, Director of Public Works Darrell Baker, Public Landscape Superintendent, Public Works Tel: 310- 458 -8341