SR-02-11-2014-8B - 301-001-01City Council Meeting: February 11, 2014
Agenda Item: IF 5_5
To: Mayor and City Council
From: David Martin, Planning and Community Development Director
Subject: Review and Approve the Conceptual Design of the Samohi Safe Routes to
School Project
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1) Approve the conceptual design for the Samohi Safe Routes to School project;
2) Direct staff to complete construction drawings and release bids for construction
for the Michigan Avenue /7th Street portion of the project.
Executive Summary
This staff report summarizes the work to date on the grant- funded Santa Monica High
School Safe Routes to School (Samohi SRTS) project, $880,000 grant funds and
$100,000 match. Staff is seeking review and approval of final concepts for school
improvements, and direction to complete construction drawings and release bids for
construction for a specific phase of improvements which include Michigan Avenue and
7th Streets adjacent to the school.
During a year of outreach, planning and conceptual design, the Samohi SRTS project
identified improvements to streets and intersections around Samohi that could improve
pedestrian, bicycle and vehicle access and encourage more active travel to and from
school consistent with Citywide goals for sustainability, public health, traffic
management and wellbeing. The improvements identified were developed through an
extensive public outreach process that has involved nearby residents, the School
District, Samohi administration, Samohi parents and students, and community bicycle
and pedestrian advocates.
A range of improvements were identified and documented for Michigan Avenue, 7th
Street, Pico Boulevard, 4th Street and Olympic Drive that included physical and
operational intersection improvements, roadway reconfiguration, and off - street. facilities.
Outreach identified a priority for improvements at the main campus entry at Michigan
Avenue and 7th Streets. Concept plans for improvements to be funded by the existing
Safe Routes to School grant have been developed for this area. Later phases could be
pursued as part of future grant funds or capital projects.
1
The project proposed for construction includes road reconfiguration to make Michigan
Avenue one -way westbound west of Lincoln Boulevard connecting to one -way
southbound on 71h Street to Pico Boulevard. A new signalized intersection would be
created at 7th Street and Pico Boulevard intersection. This would reduce conflicts
between pedestrians and vehicles during drop -off and allow space for buffered and
protected green bike lanes and a wider sidewalk. The project also proposes
reconfiguration of the Pico median for a two -way cycle track that would connect
students to the south and remove a crucial gap in the bike network. This would also link
the Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway being developed to the beach. The
improvements have been designed and selected to create a safer environment that will
encourage students to bicycle and walk to and from school, while also considering the
needs of vehicle access to the school and adjacent commercial.
The next steps for this �roject would be to complete the final construction drawings for
the Michigan Avenue /7t Street area, and release bids for construction with the goal of
completing construction during Samohi summer break in 2014. Staff would return to
Council once a contractor has been selected for award of contract. The original budget
for the grant is $980,000. The initial phase of the project for design and construction
drawings is $159,944 awarded July 24 2012. The current three year CIP includes
$820,000 for construction of this project. In addition to these funds the project will
include a new signal paid for through another project budget.
Background
The City was awarded a State of
California Safe Routes to School Program
grant in the amount of $880,000 with a
local match of $100,000 to complete
planning, outreach, design and
construction of intersection, crosswalk,
street, signage and bike storage
improvements at Santa Monica High
School ( Samohi). The project is intended
to create better access for students so
they will feel safer walking and biking to school. Active transportation, public health and
managing vehicle traffic in neighborhoods are goals of the City's Land Use and
Circulation Element and Bicycle Action Plan. The Samohi project proposed to
implement City policy with physical improvements to crosswalks, traffic flow, bike lanes
and intersections to facilitate active bicycling and walking to school.
2
There are currently no marked /painted bicycle facilities on any of the streets that
surround the school. The Bike Action Plan identified Olympic Drive on the north side of
campus for a two -way bike and pedestrian path to create a key connection through and
around the school to the Civic Center. The plan identified closing a network gap
between 7th and 6th Streets on Pico Boulevard and prioritized implementation of the
Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway in the 5 -year Plan. The Samohi
improvements have continually been coordinated with the Michigan Avenue
Neighborhood Greenway project, and both are being considered as part of the February
11, 2014 Council agenda. In addition to improving access to the school, the Samohi
project would also close a key network gap between the Michigan Avenue
Neighborhood Greenway and the beach, as well as to the Ocean Park neighborhood.
Bikeway Recommendations
5 Year Implementation Plan Recommendations
Bicycle Action Plan
Proposed Bikeway Type
film Bike Ba wwitrosetrali
Nelghborhood Greenway
s�•xFd�w.a� :wm'�'mmm.ayr am aaoe�sareew,msaw.m.
Cydetsack
o.e.am arn.x ha«,aya gyeay aaoxxtl w. y.�.� o-,.a m.a q a
Buffered bike lane/ Double bike lane (where noted)
Bikelane
4Y.k$e> = ;,J33 CBmbingbikelane
m... seem. examp„• a, .nwNnylsn,�mu.a„ans,�nwrmmaaaw.
- - -- Shared lane markings (both dbecdons)
Local Streets
SvMabMltlaneAartlopxxtlaaamwgsaMUhanapm ,poc
On July 24, 2012 a professional services agreement with Ryan Snyder Associates for
project planning, outreach and design was authorized. Subconsultants from Melendrez
Design and Stantec Consulting provided roadway design and traffic engineering
support.
Outreach began in January 2013 and concluded with the final of three public workshops
on October 23, 2013. Staff also worked in small groups with stakeholders to develop
concept options and final recommendations. Outreach steps are detailed later in the
3
staff report. The Santa Monica - Malibu Unified
School District and Samohi administration
actively participated in the interdisciplinary
project team along with staff from Planning
and Community Development, Public Works,
Community and Cultural Services, Big Blue
Bus, and the Police Department.
Discussion
Samohi currently has four entrances to serve its 3,300 students. Two entrances are
located near each other on 7th Street, one entrance is on Olympic Drive on the north
side of campus, and one on 4th Street near the track field. The 6th Street gate closed for
student access in 2011 and a second gate will open on Olympic Drive later this year as
part of the Science and Technology building project. Surveys over the years estimate
that just over 100 students
bike to school, 150 take a
bus and 100 walk on an
average day and funnel
through one of these four
gates. The highest number
of arrivals occur at the
Michigan Avenue /7th
Street entrances. The
number of students
walking and biking almost
double during the annual
Bike It/Walk It days which
occur one day each Fall
and one day each Spring at Samohi. The remaining Samohi students are dropped off
at one of the four entrances. The majority of pick -up and drop -off now occurs at the
entrances on 7th Street and Michigan Avenue and along Olympic Drive. The 4th Street
entrance near the Civic Center is more modestly used, despite the availability of 30
a
minutes of free parking available across the street at the Civic Center parking facilities.
Students indicated a preference to enter on the east side of the campus because
classroom buildings are clustered at the east end of campus. The concentrated campus
access points contribute to morning congestion in a small area that is already
congested due to its proximity to on- and off -ramps that serve the 1 -10 freeway. Data
gathered just to the south of the main entrance to the school at Michigan Avenue /7th
Street show significant peaks in daily vehicle trips on this segment occurring between 7
and 9 AM and 3 and 4 PM. This presents challenges for students traveling on foot, by
bike, as well as for residents that live across from the school. This area is also where
most collisions involving pedestrians and cyclists of high school age are occurring,
including the intersection of Lincoln Boulevard and Michigan Avenue.
Students, parents, and school administrators have expressed support for increased
bicycling and walking to Santa Monica - Malibu Unified School District (District) schools.
The grant application for this project grew from a movement within the school that
encouraged walking, taking transit and biking by the student group Santa Monica High
School Solar Alliance which first initiated Walk It Bike It Day in 2007. Since that time,
"Bike or Walk to School Days" have grown to include the middle and elementary
schools. These events are generally run by the students and encourage other students
to ride and walk. Student participation has been steadily increasing. The City
participates in Bike it Day at
Samohi by setting up a temporary
bike lane in the existing
curb /parking lane on the north
side of Michigan starting just east
of Lincoln and continuing to the
main entrance gate.
Project Development
The project began with site
documentation and stakeholder
5
meetings and workshops to better understand current barriers to biking and walking.
Issues identified during public outreach included lack of campus bike parking, conflicts
between vehicles and students walking, biking or skateboarding to school, lack of safer
pedestrian crossings, and gaps or upgrade needs to street segments and intersections.
Below is a summary of issues identified through site observation and evaluation during
the project's first phase.
1. Lincoln Boulevard at Michigan Avenue
• Heavy drop -off activity creates
challenges for biking into school
without dedicated bike lanes.
• Volume and speed of vehicles on
Lincoln Boulevard not conducive to
walking and biking.
• Intersection is popular for access
to Interstate 10, creating conflicts
between vehicles turning and
students biking and walking.
2. 7th Street at Michigan Avenue
• Conflicts between vehicles dropping off students with those trying to enter the
main gate by bike and on foot.
• Illegal U -turns occur at the 7th Street Crosswalk which leads directly into the
school.
• Vehicles stop randomly in the travel lane when they are halted due to the
crosswalk is blocked by crossing students.
• Students are dropped off in both directions on 7th Street; northbound vehicles
stop while students cross midblock creating conflicts with southbound vehicles.
3. 7th Street and Pico Boulevard
• Conflicts between pedestrians and right- turning vehicles due to large number of
students that disembark at the bus stop and walk west via an unsignalized
crosswalk on 7th Street.
• No legal crossing from the south side of Pico Boulevard to the north side at this
location although students and bus riders still cross. (The Pico Youth and Family
Center has recently advocated for a signalized crossing here.)
4. Pico Boulevard ( #3 and #4)
• No bike lanes on Pico between 6th and 7th Streets
N
• No means for cyclists, even advanced cyclists utilizing travel lanes, to gain
access to 6th and 7th Street without permitted left turns
® Volume and speed of vehicles deter walking and biking here
5. Pico Boulevard and 4th Street
• Volumes and traffic speed at this intersection deter walking and biking
• No designated bike facility
• Heavy right -turn traffic conflicts with students using crosswalks
6. 4th Street near Civic Center Drive
• Heavy traffic adjacent to sidewalk with no landscape or parking lane buffer.
• The curb lane on northbound 4th Street adjacent to the campus is a travel lane
only and drivers queue up for access to 1 -10 freeway.
7. 4th Street and Olympic Drive
• Heavy traffic adjacent to sidewalk with no landscape or parking lane buffer
• At intersection, a crosswalk is missing on the north leg and conflicts occur
between pedestrians in the crosswalk and distracted drivers turning right onto I-
10 ramps
8. Olympic Drive
• The sideway is very narrow, with no landscape or parking lane buffer in some
sections and obstructions (poles, etc.) that reduce width below ADA
requirements.
• Poor lighting at night for pedestrians and bicyclists
• Driver speed coming off the 1 -10 and /or approaching Lincoln Boulevard deters
walking and biking
9. Lincoln and Olympic Drive
• Heavy traffic adjacent to sidewalk with no landscape or parking lane buffer
• A crosswalk is missing on the north leg and conflicts occur between pedestrians
in the crosswalk and distracted drivers rushing to get on to 1 -10 ramps
• Right turn conflicts with pedestrians as drivers merge onto southbound Lincoln
Working with students, parents and the project team, a range of site specific
countermeasures were identified. The countermeasures address issues specific to each
location, improve access, and seek to encourage walking and biking to and around the
7
school campus (Attachment 1). Improvements range in cost and complexity and
include the following major components:
• Physical intersection improvements such as crosswalk upgrades and curb
extensions (bulbouts) to shorten crossing distance and improve visibility.
• Operational intersection improvements such as lead pedestrian brossings and
restricted turn phases (no right on red, etc.) to reduce conflicting movements.
• Street segment reconfiguration such as creating dedicated bike lanes, and
adjusting vehicle flow to improve operations and reduce conflicts between
drivers, crossing pedestrians and bicyclists in the roadway.
• Creation of additional off - street or protected pedestrian and bicycle space such
as a cycle track or wider sidewalks to eliminate the most severe gaps in the
walking and biking network.
This inventory of potential improvements was thorough and identified more work than
could be funded by the existing Safe Routes to School project grant at this time. So the
project team engaged the community to prioritize and narrow in on the improvements
that could be funded with the grant funds available. This process identified the area
around the main entrance to the school and Pico Boulevard as the highest priority for
the first phase of improvements. This was based on consensus that the area at 7th
Street and Michigan Ave had the most barriers to walking and biking and is the most
highly used entrance to the
school. The first phase of
the project focuses on the
main entrance to the
school around 7th Street
and Michigan Avenue as
well as the segment
between 6th and 7th
Streets on Pico because
this is the most congested
area and the only street
with good bike access.
The majority of vehicle
E
pick -up and drop -off as well as bicycle access occurs on these streets.
Project Refinement and Recommendations
After identifying the first priority area around the school, options were refined for various
intersection and segment treatments for Michigan Avenue (Lincoln to 7th Street), along
7th Street (Michigan to Pico) and from 6th to 7th Streets on Pico Boulevard. The options
included two -way traffic, one -way traffic, bike lanes on one side of the streets and bike
lanes on both sides of the streets, and other options. These were then filtered down
weighing all neighborhood characteristics such as peak vehicle traffic, parking turnover,
loading for nearby businesses, school bus drop off, typical pick -up and drop -off
behavior, street priorities, as well as neighborhood concerns and the overall LUCE
goals.
Based on feedback from the community, staff is recommending that the first phase of
the Samohi Safe Routes to School project, Michigan Avenue and 7th Street, include the
following:
• Reconfigure vehicle flow for a small segment of Michigan Avenue and 7th Street to
one -way westbound on Michigan Avenue west of Lincoln Boulevard, connecting to
one -way southbound on 7th Street to Pico Boulevard. A change in the flow of
vehicles would allow continuation of the existing drop -off and pick -up locations here,
while reducing the number of students crossing midblock in front of vehicles and
across on- coming traffic (since the majority of students arriving exit the passenger
side of the vehicles). This configuration would allow for new protected Class 2 green
bike lanes in both directions on Michigan between Lincoln Boulevard and 7th Street.
• A new fully signalized intersection at 7th and Pico (including a crosswalk to improve
access to major Pico bus stops) that would enable one -way southbound traffic on
7th Street to turn left onto Pico Boulevard. The signal includes phasing for cyclists
and lag timing, to create a lead pedestrian interval.
• New protected Class 2 green bike lanes on Michigan Avenue and 7th Street in both
directions. One bicycle lane would run contra -flow to vehicle traffic, with a buffer on
both sides and clear striping. All bicycle lanes would be painted green to maximize
visibility and legibility. 7th Street southbound lanes would be typical between the
parked car and travel lane. The northbound contra flow bike lane would be set back
five feet from the residential perpendicular parked vehicles. This bike lane will also
have a buffer from the center line and opposing traffic.
9
® Reconfiguration of the existing median in Pico Boulevard between 6th and 7th
Streets to create protected green bike lanes in both directions in the center median
area. The Pico Boulevard bike lanes would close a crucial gap in the bike network
and provide better access to school. The bike lanes cannot be accommodated
without either removal of the median or reduction of travel lanes. An inspection
concluded that three of the eight existing trees are candidates for relocation due to
poor structural condition with limited potential useful life expectency. Three
Jacaranda Mimosifolia trees in the median would be relocated with first priority
adjacent to the school along 7th Street and secondly within the Pico median just west
of 6th Street. A Removal Plan per the Urban Forestry Master Plan is included as
Attachment 4.
10
Samohl Safe Routes to School
Pico Boulevard — 711 St. to 6'h St. Proposed
• Sidewalk widening on the south side of Michigan Avenue and bulb -outs on the north
side of 7th Street and Pico Boulevard to facilitate better pedestrian access. The
pedestrian improvements would help provide a better walking environment on
Michigan and reduce the roadway width so it takes less time to cross 7th Street at
Pico Boulevard.
• Michigan & Lincoln — Morning peak hour restrictions for southbound right on red are
proposed to help reduce the conflicts between vehicles and students. A westbound
bike lane will be added on the east side of Michigan. Yellow continental crosswalks
and advanced stop bars to all crossings are proposed to keep cars from encroaching
into the crosswalk.
• A north -south crosswalk on Michigan is proposed for removal so that pedestrian
crossing activity can be channelized into one crossing on 7th Street. This allows the
existing crossing guard to focus on one crossing and it will help reduce pedestrian
vehicle conflicts as well as help the flow of vehicles.
• Staff would continue working with the PTSA and school administration to improve
the existing vehicle drop off areas by extending and promoting new places for pick-
up and drop -off.
The improvements have been designed and selected to create a safer environment that
would encourage students to bicycle and walk to and from school, while also
considering the needs of vehicle access to the school and adjacent commercial
11
businesses. The configuration has optimized the use of the roadway by finding a
balance between smooth vehicle flow, visible bike facilities, and pedestrian safety. It
closes crucial gaps in the bike network — particularly to the Samohi main entrance — and
would reduce pedestrian and vehicle conflicts. This project would create better
connections and infrastructure that encourages more active transportation, public health
and management of neighborhood vehicle flow.
Future Safe Routes to School grants or other sources should investigate opportunities
to improve segments on 4th Street between Pico and Olympic Drive and on Olympic
Drive between Lincoln Boulevard and 4th Street. Intersection improvements including
high visibility crosswalks, and off - street improvements such as creating a two -way bike
way and sidewalk widening would improve pedestrian and bike access to the north and
west sides of the school. As discussed below the Olympic Drive two -way bike way
would also complete a segment of the Michigan Avenue Greenway.
Coordination with the Michigan Avenue Neighborhood Greenway
The first phase of the Samohi project overlaps slightly with the Michigan Avenue
Neighborhood Greenway project, along Michigan Avenue between Lincoln Boulevard
and 7th Court. Future phases also overlap along 7th Court, and along Olympic Drive
between Lincoln and 4th Street. These projects, both being considered on the February
11, 2014 Council agenda, have been coordinated in design and phasing. The
Greenway project would support Safe Routes to School by creating a safe and
comfortable path for pedestrians and cyclists coming to campus from all neighborhoods
to the east. The proposed Samohi first phase project would close an important gap in
the bike network between the Greenway and the beach by creating a protected bike
facility to 6th Street which then connects to Bay Street and the beach.
Coordination with Big Blue Bus
Recent Big Blue Bus ridership data shows that a few hundred Samohi students are
using Santa Monica's bus service to get to and from school, with additional students
also using Metro buses. Big Blue Bus runs frequent service along Lincoln Boulevard,
12
Pico Boulevard and 4th Street that provide direct access to Samohi, with heavily -used
stops at Pico /Lincoln and at Pico /4th Street. The proposed signalization of the
intersection at Pico and 7th Street would improve pedestrian crossing to bus stops, with
a new signal, more visible crosswalks, and improved curbs. Similarly improvements to
the intersection of Lincoln and Michigan Avenue would improve the safety of students
crossing to and from bus stops. Currently, Big Blue Bus offers a discounted monthly
student pass that allows access to the entire BBB network seven days a week. A rider
relief program is also available for income - qualifying students that provides a $6 per
month fare subsidy which riders can apply toward the purchase of a BBB pass.
Information and education about available bus routes and existing programs for
discounted passes could help increase student bus ridership. Increases in bus use also
help to mitigate the safety and capacity issues around the school, together with
increased walking and biking.
Public Outreach
The recommended project resulted from a year of outreach and collaboration. An
interdepartmental team met regularly including Samohi administrators and staff and
representatives from Planning and Community Development, Public Works, Police, and
Community and Cultural Services Departments. An inclusive public outreach process
was also under taken to engage Samohi, students and parents, neighbors and
community stakeholders. The process included:
• Jan 16, 2013 - a half day charrette with high school students, teachers,
administrators, facilities staff, campus security, city staff and two representatives
from Santa Monica Police Department completed field observations of pick -up/
drop -off, presented back ground of Safe Routes to Schools programs and
engineering treatments, and completed a map exercise with attendees to identify
barriers to biking and walking around the school.
• Regular Team Meetings - In addition to public outreach there were five ongoing
Team Meetings that included staff from Police Department, Public Works,
Transportation Engineering, Public Landscape, Big Blue Bus, school district and
high school administration throughout the year.
• March 11, 2013 Workshop #1 -The first of three public meetings with a
presentation and map activity like that given at the school meeting. Invitations
were mailed to over 2,000 nearby residents, Parent Teacher Student Association
13
(PISA), neighborhood liaisons, student groups, school administrators shared
details with student email lists and email blasts went out to bicycle and
pedestrian interest groups.
• May 23, 2013 Workshop #2 -Draft Alternatives were presented to the public in
late May. The May meeting gathered detailed feedback on the draft concepts
and had the public prioritize the specific improvements for 7th Street, Michigan
and Pico Boulevards. Invitations were mailed to over 2,000 nearby residents,
Parent Teacher Student Association (PISA), neighborhood liaisons, student
groups, school administrators shared details with student email lists, email blasts
went out to bicycle and pedestrian interest groups and staff handed out post
cards to parents during afternoon pick up and placed large posters at the main
vehicle and pedestrian entrances to the school.
• June 4, 2013 Samohi Facilities Group - Staff met with Samohi facilities group.
The meeting included project team members from facility improvement projects
as well as local facilities management staff to discuss the proposed
improvements for Samohi, future school facility plans and proposed access for
the new Science and Technology Building at the corner of 7th Court and Olympic
Drive.
• June 20, 2013 Recreation and Parks Commission - The Safe Routes to School
program including the bicycle and pedestrian training and education along with
Samohi draft improvement recommendations was presented to the Recreation
and Parks Commission. The Recreation and Parks Commission continues to
support biking and walking in Santa Monica and has participated in many of the
training and education projects to date. There was not a formal recommendation
by the Commission.
• September 21, 2013 Michigan Avenue Greenway Event - Staff set up a station at
the Michigan Avenue Greenway Workshop at 9th Street and Michigan Avenue.
The station contained the detailed draft concepts and public outreach process to
date. Additional feedback was collected from nearby residents.
• October 23, 2013 Workshop #3 - Final concepts were presented at two meetings.
Outreach included post cards mailed to over 2,000 nearby residents, email
notifications to Parent Teacher Student Association, neighborhood liaisons
andstudent groups. School administrators shared details with student email lists
and email blasts went out to bicycle and pedestrian interest groups. The first of
the two meetings occurred on campus after school in an effort to reach more
students and parents. The second meeting the same day was at the Ken
Edward Center in the evening.
• November 19, 2013 Pico Youth and Family Center (PYFC) -Staff participated in a
PYFC organized action meeting regarding the safety of the intersection of Pico
Boulevard and 7th Street. Members had initiated a petition to have a crosswalk
14
installed at the intersection to serve high school students and bus riders who
cross the street directly in front of their facility. Information was shared regarding
the Samohi Safe Routes project and how a crosswalk might be accommodated.
Participants expressed a desire to have a crosswalk installed quickly, preferably
in the first half of 2014.
® December 10, 2013 -The Samohi PTSA held a special meeting in early
December to discuss the Samohi recommended project. Parents shared their
support for Safe Routes to Schools programs but had some concerns about
traffic congestion. Students in attendance shared their concerns regarding the
difficulties of biking and walking to school and full support for the project.
Members of the PTSA have continually supported the project but wanted to wait
for the transportation analysis not yet completed at that time before providing a
letter of project support.
® December 2013 PTSA - Staff was invited to present the final recommendation at
a Santa Monica Spoke meeting and then shortly thereafter to over 70 students
from the Associate Student Body and Journalism classes at Samohi. The
attendees and students had an opportunity to ask questions and provide
feedback. Shortly thereafter the PTSA held a special meeting to discuss the
project.
® January 21 2014 PTSA — Staff presented and discussed the project, final
recommendations and preliminary results of the transportation anaylsis to the
PTSA board, parents, and students. A motion was called "To have PTSA
endorse the Safe Routes To School' and plan passed with19 Yes, 3 No and 5
abstentions.
® January 22, 2014 Urban Forest Task Force — Staff presented the final
recommendations and details on the redesign of the Pico Boulevard median
between 7th and 6th Streets. The Task Force recommended that the three viable
trees be relocated if possible to the west side of 7th Street along the school site.
If this is determined to be a nonviable site the trees will be relocated further west
within the Pico Boulevard median between 6th and 4th Streets.
Community feedback has been supportive of creating safer routes to school for
students. Support for adding bikeways was echoed by most of the community.
Students feel that bike lanes are needed and the green paint makes them feel safer.
Nearby neighbors had concerns with the one -way configuration proposed since it would
limit their access to on- street parking spaces on 7th Street. Concepts that eliminated
resident parking did not move forward. The proposal to add a signal at 7th and Pico
was supported by residents as it would increase access options from the neighborhood.
The Pico Youth and Family Center is very supportive of a signal.at 7th and Pico. Some
15
parents who drop off their students are concerned that the one -way configuration will
cause more frustration for them with added delays if further drop -off locations are not
pursued. The PTSA has continually supported the project.
Environmental Analysis
The project is statutorily exempt from the provisions of California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) pursuant to 21080.20.5 of the State Implementation Guidelines in that the
project consists of a bicycle project consistent with a bicycle plan prepared pursuant to
Section 891.2 of the Streets and Highways Code. The project consists of the restriping
of three streets for new and highly visible bike lanes, streetscape enhancements such
as wider sidewalks, landscaping, and enhanced crosswalks. To accommodate these
changes the project includes a change in vehicular circulation.
A traffic study was prepared to analyze the traffic pattern created by changing 7th Street
and Michigan Avenue from two -way to one -way streets, as required by the exemption
provision. Traffic conditions were evaluated using based on redistributed vehicles
through the street network based on both the reconfiguration of 7th Street and Michigan
Avenue to one -way streets and the peak -hour turn restrictions proposed with the
Michigan Avenue Greenway project at 11th Street and Michigan Avenue. Traffic
analysis was undertaken for the surrounding signalized intersections:
® 11th Street and Michigan Avenue,
® Lincoln Boulevard and Michigan Avenue,
® Lincoln Boulevard and Pico Boulevard,
• Pico Boulevard and 7th Street (new signalized intersection),
Pico Boulevard and 6th Street, and
® Lincoln Boulevard and the eastbound 1 -10 Freeway On -Ramp.
Analysis indicates that the existing five intersections would operate at their current or
better levels of service (LOS), and would not exceed the City's adopted significance
criteria after the project is implemented. The addition of the new signal at the
intersection of Pico Boulevard and 7th Street was analyzed to determine any potential
delay that would be encountered by vehicles at this location. The intersection is
anticipated to operate at LOS C or better, above the City's acceptable LOS of D. Signal
16
synchronization with Pico Boulevard signals at 6th Street and Lincoln Boulevard will be
coordinated through Traffic Engineering utilizing the Traffic Management Center and
field observations. The full traffic study is available as Attachment 3. Public meetings
for the project serve as notification to the community regarding the project, as also
required by the exemption.
Next Steps
Staff would release requests for proposals to complete the construction of the
improvements during the summer of 2014. Next step for Council would be contract
approval for construction. Staff would continue to seek grant funding to begin design
development for other phases of the Safe Routes to School project that includes 4th
Street segment and Olympic Drive between Lincoln Boulevard and 4th Street.
17
Financial Impacts & Budget Actions
There is no immediate budget/financial impact to conceptual approval of the Samohi
Safe Routes to School project. The initial design and construction drawings for the
project are covered within the existing Ryan Snyder contract $159,944; construction of
the project is anticipated to cost $980,000, for a grand total project cost of $1,139,944.
Remaining funds in the amount of $980,000 have been included in the FY 2013 -14
Capital Improvement Program along with $160,000 from ATMS Phase 4 for the new
signal. Funding has been programed in the FY13/14 budget for this project located in
the following accounts:
0207042.589000, SR2SP Grant $740,000
C01 7042.589100, SR2SP Samohi $40,000
0207042.589100, SR2SP PCLR $40,000
C017024.589000, ATMS Phase 4 $160,000
TOTAL $980,000
Existing grant funding would construct the first phase of improvements at Samohi,
including Michigan Avenue and 7th Street. Additional funding would be needed to
complete subsequent phases.
Prepared by: Michelle Glickert, Senior Transportation Planner
Approved:
Forwarded to Council:
avQ id Martin, Director Rod Gould
Planning and Community Development City Manager
Attachments
1) Final Safe Routes to School Recommendations for Safe Routes to Santa Monica
High School
2) Concept Plans for Phase 1
3) Transportation Analysis
4) Tree Relocation Plan
in
Final Safe Routes to School Recommendations for
Safe Routes to Santa Monica High School
� �� , ••`
�� r �, ��
�, �� � f
This report summarizes recommendations developed through a one -year public outreach process about Safe
Routes to School that engaged students, school district staff and administration, design experts and City staff
in a collaborative process. Recommendations contained in this report aim to remove barriers to walking,
biking, skateboarding and taking transit to Santa Monica High School (Samohi) to promote student safety
and health. Intersection, roadway and operational changes are identified that improve conditions for active
transportation while also improving the function and roadway safety for all users. The report is divided into 3
sections:
2 Priority Projects: describes the highest priority project focused on streets closest to the school entrance
at 7th St. and Michigan Ave. proposed for construction with Safe Routes to School grant funds in 2014,
EXISTING CONDITIONS
ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT] S TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT
a Next Recommended Projects -Near Term: describes the next priority projects identified during
outreach for remainder of streets and intersections around the school, and
® Additional Future Projects - Long Term: describes future projects on the critical biking and walking
paths that lead to Samohi.
The graphic and text in the report describe recommended intersection and roadway improvements at a
conceptual level. This information is provided for planning and prioritization, and will need additional
schematic design before advancing to construction. The priority project, if approved by Council, will move
3
into construction drawings and final design for a target to construct in summer 2014.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SCHOOL ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS
DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL
P
,tns,�'
Idth St
F .:
....
X
11th St
4
3
OI /m1,,Lta,
Lmco1n6l4d
;amohi
;
St.
>
:c
•••tih
¢ 9
ul ..
Zd
V
O
"In'
a�
wa
fl'
y
c,"I NG 111M1.1
SAVIO lAoE MECD`.'.MENDED IAIRMO EN
TNANSIi UNDER.,1Sr VCr11
WE Bikepath
M Bike path Inm Type Bsharrow
d. Expo line and station
Colored bikelane
M Cycletrack _ nI Neighborhood
Buffered bikelane
Colored buffered bike lane greenway
® Study intersection
_ -- ••••• Bike route
r� Bike lane
— Buffered bike lane ...... Add lighting
- -- Bike route
Bikelane'
a ,t IIL
DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL
4
• Mic Z I MCI ilk W1
PRIORITY PROJECTS
A. SEGMENTS ................. - ........ ................... --- ...... .._....................................._......_.................................
..............................5
1. Michigan Avenue -7th Street ................... -.1 ..................................... ................ ...............................
-- .............................. 5 -6
2. Pico Boulevard .......................................................................................................................................
............................... 7
316th Street ..................... .- ..................................... ---- ... ........... ..... ......... ....... .... ....................................................................
7
B. INTERSECTIONS ....................................................................................................................................
............................... 8
1. Michigan Avenue and Lincoln Boulevard ....................... .--- ..................................
.- ............ ........... ............................... 8
2. Michigan Avenue and 7th Street ..........................................................................................................
..............................9
3. Pico Boulevard and Lincoln Boulevard... .......................................... .......... .............
. ..... ...... ........... .. . ............... 10
4. Pico Boulevard and 7th Street .................................. --- .............................................................................................
...... 11
5. Pico Boulevard and 6th Street ...............................................................................................................
.............................12
6. Sign Installation ....................................................................................................................................
............................... 13
C. BICYCLE AND SKATEBOARD PARKING ......... -- ........... ............ .......................
-'- ...... ............................................. 13 -15
NEXT RECOMMENDED PROJECTS - NEAR TERM
A. SEGMENTS ............... ............................... ........11....1...1............ ......111...1.................,
1. Olympic Drive— ........................... .......... .. . .... ... .... ... . .. ... .... .. ... .. . .....
2. 7th Alley ................................................................................ ...............................
B. INTERSECTIONS .......... ........................... --- ......
_................. ..............................,
1. Olympic Drive and 4th Street ............................................................... -- ...... ....
,
2. Olympic Drive and Sth Street ................ ............................... ......1.........1...1.1........
3. Olympic Drive and Lincoln Boulevard ................................ ...............................
4. Pico Boulevard and Lincoln Boulevard .............................. ...............................
5. Pico Boulevard and 4th Street .............. ............................... ...................1.......1.11
6. Civic Center Drive and 4th Street ........ ............................... ....1111.......................
7. Crosswalk Installation ............................ ............................... ........1....1............1.1..
ADDITIONAL FUTURE PROJECTS - LONG TERM
........23
ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAPJ IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT
SEGMENTS
Michigan Ave.
Lincoln Blvd.
7th St.
• Two lanes with on- street parking
• Pick -up and drop -off area at7th St. and
Michigan Ave.
• 40' wide
• Convert to one Zane WB, WB 5' curbside
colored hike lane with 2' buffer on the
passenger side of on- street parking, and EB
4' colored contraflow bike lane with 2' buffer
on the parking side and a 3' buffer next to the
travel lanes
• Add double yellow line between WB travel
lane and contraflow bike lane
• Add dashed green lnteisection crossing
treatment across Lincoln Blvd.
• Widen sidewalk into parkway with permeable
concrete on both sides
• Proposed concept will not interfere with truck
loading operations at Coffee Bean e< Tea Leaf
DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL
5
M
7th St.
r Michigan Ave.
Pico Blvd.
-- .. - - -- - - - - --
® Two lanes with on- street parking and parking
on the east side is perpendicular
® 52' wide
® Convert to one la tie southhound,
southhound 6' colored hike lane, and 6'
coloied northbound contraflow hike lane with
a 3' travel Zane buffer and a 5' parking buffer
Add double yellow Ilne hetween southbound
travel lane and cot thlow hike lane
Move forward perpe ndicular parking stalls;
Utilize parking curb overhang by 2'
• Option: Angle perpendicular stalls by 10 -15°
and convert to back -in angled parking
See Intersection i "reatments7th and Michigan
Add landscaping to sidewalk parkway on west
side
ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT
a 6th St.
7th St.
• Four lanes and median
• 60' wide curt) to curb
• 24' wide curb to median
Pico Blvd.
i. Pico PL
• 7 lane vrth on- street parking on the west side
only and sharrows
• 40' aide
• Modify 12'two -way median cycletrack with
2' painted buffer with rolled mountable curb
with white reflectors on north side and 4'
landscaped buffer on south side
• Reduce lane widths to '10' (inside) and I V
(outside) to create icon) for cycletiack
• Add directional signage at Pico Blvd. and 7th
St. to connect with Al St. bikeway
• Add wafinding signage
DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL
7
8
B) INTERSECTIONS
• Michigan Ave. has two lanes and on-- street
parking
• Lincoln Blvd- has four lanes, center -left
turn lane, a third northbound lane north of
Michigan Ave, a southbound rig t -turn lane,
and on- street parking south of Michigan Ave
• Signaf-,ed intersection with protected lefts
southbound to eastbound
• Countdown signals on all crossings
• Add yellow continental crosswalks to all
crossings (4)
• .Add audio signals to all crossings (B)
• Add advanced stop bars to all crossings (4)
• Set the walk phase to automatic (school hours
only)
• Add leading pedestrian interval to all
crossings (school hours only)
• Add hike boxes to both approaches on
Michigan Ave.
• ,Add bulk -outs to all corners to cross Michigan
Ave. on SE and SW Corners (4)
•
Add 1',Io Turn on Red to southhound right -
tum lane on Lincoln Ave Add hike boxes to
both approaches on Michigan Ave.
e
• Coordinate with Michigan Avenue
Neighborhood Greenway project
• Coordinate with future Lincoln Blvd.
improvements
ACCESS AND BICYCLUPEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMERITS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT
• kichigan Ave. has two lanes with on-street
parking
• 7th St, has two lanes with on- street parking,
and parking on the east side is perpendicular
• Unslgnalilzed intersection with all -way stop
control
• Yellow lateral -line crosswalks
• High volume pick -up and drop -off area
currently due to this being the main entrance
to the school
• Pick -up and drop -off volumes expected to
decrease with the relocation of bike parking
and the addition of a new entance on
Olympic Dr.
• Remove stop sign, crosswalk, and advanced
stop bar to cross Michigan Ave.
• Add raised intersection /speed table
Add yellow continental markings to crosswalk
to cross 7th St
• Add advanced stop bar to crossing of 7th St.
(1)
• Add State Law Yield to Pedestrian sign to
crossing of 7th St.
• Add perpendicular curh ramps with truncated
domes to southeast comer
• Continue hike lanes through the intersection
DRAFT ACCESS AND IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL
9
10
Pico Blvd has four lanes, two center left -turn
lanes at the intersection, and on-street parking
• Lincoln Blvd. has four lanes, a center -turn lane,
and on- street parking
• Signallzed intersection with protected lefts in
all directions
m Countdown signals on all crossings
Crosswalk texture is very faded
Add yellow continental crosswalks to all
crossings (4)
Set walk phase to automatic (school hours
only)
a Add leading pedestrian inteivai to all
crossings (school hours only)
• Dwell in walk phase during Lincoln Blvd
green phase
ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT
• Plco Blvd has four lane and a median
• 7th St. has two lanes and on- street parking,
with perpendicular parking on the east side
• Unsignalized intersection, stop - controlled on
7th St.
• Yellow continental crosswalk and advanced
stop bar to cross 7th St.
• BUlh-OUton the northeast comer to cross 7th
St
Signalize intoisection with countdown and
audio signals (4) as well as bikes -only signal
heads (2) and a separate phase for turning
Cyclists
Add advanced stop bars (2) and yellow
continental crosswalks (2) to cross Pico Blvd.
on east and west sides
Future Improvement - raised crosswalk to
cross All St.
Add hit lh -out, on the northwest and
northeast corners to cross 7th St (2)
e Add colored dashed bike lanes to connect
7th St. to cycletrack on Pico Blvd
Add directional signage
DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL
11
-YI51 I'd r
• Pico Blvd has four lanes and a median
• 6th St. is one -way northbound with a left -turn
lane and a right -turn lane atthe intersection
• Signalized intersection
• Bulb -out on the southwest corner to cross 6th
St.
• Countdown signals to cross Pico Blvd
12 • Advanced stop bars on all crossings
• Add yellow continental crosswalks to all
crossings (3)
• Add advanced stop bars (3)
• Add colored dashed bike lanes to connect
6th St, to cycletrack on Pico Blvd.
• On 6th St. approach to intersection, add S
northbound hike Zane and 6' southbound
hikes -only lane
• Add short double yellow lines on 6th St- to
separate SB cyclists from LIB traffic
• Add bikes -only signal heads (2) and signal
phase for westbound and northbound
turning cyclists
• Add signage to indicate that cycle tracks
connect with 7th St. only
• Shorten curb extension on SW corner to
allow bicyclists to proceed SIB on 6th St.
• Reduce median nose on the east leg of the
Intersection where it intersects with bicyclist;
path of travel through the intersection
• Add long median nose to west leg of the
intersection
ACCESS AND BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT
Install the following signs:
® 2 "School" signs and 15 in ph speed limit signs on Michigan Ave. /7th St. from Lincoln Blvd. to Pico
Blvd.
6 2 "School" signs on Pico Blvd. WBjustwestof7th St Alley
a 2 "School'% signs on Pico Blvd EBjust east of 4th St.; also "25 MPH Speed Limit When Children Are
Present" signs in the same locations
I 'School" sign on Pico Blvd. EBjust west of 4th St; also "25 MPH Speed Limit When Children Are
Present" 13
® 1 'School" sign on 4th St. NBjustsouth of Pico Blvd.
Q BICYCLE AND SKATEBOARD PARKING
Improving conditions for students to bicycle to school will increase the demand for bicycle parking Ideally,
hicycle parking should be placed near school entrances so that students, faculty, and staff can park conveniently
The significant number of students vvho skateboard to school also need safe storage for their skateboards
Parking Location and capacity
The following locations have been identified as the most suitable for bicycle and skateboard parking on the
Samohi campus.
1 _ An area near the 7th Street entrance to the south of the east -west vialkway could host bicycle and
skateboard parking. Today landscaping exists in an area roughly 70' by 20'thatcould accommodate
two rows of bike lacks. These racks could accommodate approximately 48 racks for 96 bicycles (2
each). The area could also hold lockable parking for48 skateboards_ The parking will need a new
concrete pad and some light grading. Fencing can protect the bicycle parking in appropriate locations.
2- Northwest of the Science Building the school district plans to install paiking for 125 bicycles, funding
by the existing constmction honcl. People that enter at Olympic Blvd_ can use this parking.
3. Bicycle and skateboard parking can be placed along the south side of the walkway between the
Science Building and what is now the technology Building- (The Technology Building will soon be torn
down and replaced by a softball field ) The aiea is about 170' long and can accornmoclate one row.
Altogether, this area would hold approximately 60 racks for 120 bikes and 24 skateboard racks.The
area currently has concrete, so no new pad would he needed. This parking wVould be convenient for
people entering at 7th Street.
4. 1',lorth of the track the school has 21 hike lacks for 42 bicycles_ The area is fenced off and locked during
all hours except when students need access_ ItcOUld accommodate approximately 21 more rack -for
42 more bicycles. The area could also hold a rack for 24 skateboards- It has a decomposed granite
surface, so no new concrete pad vaould be needed. This parking can wive bicyclists that enter from 4th
A eet
DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL
5. On the south side of the school adjacent to Pico Boulevard a lawn area could be converted to bicycle
and skateboard parking The inegular shaped area is divided into two sections. One of these is it the
southeast corner of the school and consists of about 3,500 to 4,000 square feet of useable land. This
area is recommended to be used first because it is convenient to the school entrance at the corner of
Pico Boulevard and 7th Street It could accommodate approximately three rows of "I6 bike racks (for
96 hikes) and a skateboard rack holding 24 skateboards. It could also hold another row further west
for abent 24 racks holding 48 bicycles Afterthis area is used, another area of about 1,500 square feet
located to the vvest could be used. This area could hold approximately 32 racks for 64 bicycles. Both
of these areas would need a new concrete pad.
14 Figure 1 displays the location of each of these proposed par -ing areas.
Funds currently exist for racks to hold 360 bikes. The totals above show the potential to add hike parking
on campus with capacity for well over 360 bikes. If for some reason not all rack. ks can be placed on campus
hike parking amenities such as tool stands that contain repair kits and air should he pursued and distributed
around the cam pus.
Spacing
Bike racks shoulcl be spaced at least 30 inches apart on center to allow for access. At least two feet of
clearance should be left on the sides of the parking racks. Access rows should be at least four feet between
six feet of space for the length of each bicycle.
At least four feet of clear area should he allowed to access each unit of skateboard racks.
Rack Type
Bicycle racks should support bicycles on at least two points, and allow a user to easily attach a lock. Inverted
"U" racks work well, as do others that meetthese criteria _They should be placed so as not to create atripping
hazard and should not have sharp protruding objects.
Skateboard racks should be lockable. They come as units that hold various quantities of skateboads-
ACCESS AND BICYCLUPEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT
FIGURE 1. LOCATION Of- PROPOSED BIQ'O FAND SKAI EBOAKD PARYING
DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMEf\ITS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL
15
ilk MATIN-04163 IVA I MIA ilk 101
A. SEGMENTS
• One lane easthound with on- street pick -up • Add 8' to sidewalk for multipurpose path (12'
and drop -off area wide total)
• 26' with 4' sidewalk • Add signage to delineate shared path
• Reduce travel lane /pick -up and drop -off area
to 18
. Merge point with Highway 1 off - :ramps, east of 6th St.
v c 7th Allev
i
• Two lams eastbound —
• 34' wide with 5' sidewalk
• On- stieet pick -up and drop -off area planned
here with new entrance on Olympic Dr west
of 7th ,Alley
• Add 7' to sidewalkfor multipurpose path(12'
wide total)
• Add signage and pavement markings to
delineate pedestrian and bicyclist spaces
• Reduce northern travel lane to 11' and
southern travel lane /planned pick -rip and
drop -off area to 16'
ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAhd IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT
Avenida Mazatlan
4th St.
•
Three lanes easthound, one lane westhound,
• Coordinate improvements with Downtown
16
and on- street parking on the north side only
Specific Plan in
•
52' wide
Pursue shared path connection east and west
4th St. -
-- --
i.
Stir St.
•
One lane eastbound
• Add 9 -10'to sidewalk for multipurpose path
•
22 -23' wide
(12 -'13' wide total)
•
3' sidewalk
• Add signage to delineate shared path
• Reduce travel lane to 12 -13'
s
Stir St.
i
Merge point with Highway 1 off - ramps, east of 6th St.
Ti.;. . -. --
• One lane easthound with on- street pick -up • Add 8' to sidewalk for multipurpose path (12'
and drop -off area wide total)
• 26' with 4' sidewalk • Add signage to delineate shared path
• Reduce travel lane /pick -up and drop -off area
to 18
. Merge point with Highway 1 off - :ramps, east of 6th St.
v c 7th Allev
i
• Two lams eastbound —
• 34' wide with 5' sidewalk
• On- stieet pick -up and drop -off area planned
here with new entrance on Olympic Dr west
of 7th ,Alley
• Add 7' to sidewalkfor multipurpose path(12'
wide total)
• Add signage and pavement markings to
delineate pedestrian and bicyclist spaces
• Reduce northern travel lane to 11' and
southern travel lane /planned pick -rip and
drop -off area to 16'
ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAhd IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT
7th Alley
Lincoln Blvd.
•
hhree lanes at the intersection
• Add 4' intersection bike lane for eastbound
•
35' wide
cyclists
•
Wider sidewalk here
• At intersection, ieduce north and south travel
lanes to 10'; reduce center lane to 1 P
• Add signage orienting cyclists to
multipurpose path
• Pull the fence back to in visibility on the
--
NW corner of Olympic Dc and Lincoln Blvd
-
Lincoln Blvd.
10th St.
•
3 lanes one-way eastbound
Add T bike lane -
•
40' wide
• Reduce travel lanes to 1 I'
- -
10th St.- -
11th St.
•
2 lanes one way eastbound
--- —
• Add 7' bike lane
•
"8' wide
• Peduce one travel lane to 10' and one to 'I 1'
Olympic Dr.
Michigan Blvd.
N,
• 20' wide
• Add street lighting
• Add sharrows (as vvayfinding)
DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL
17
18
B) INTERSECTIONS
• Olympic Dr. west of 4th St- has one
westbound lane and three eastbound lanes,
including a left /through lane and a right/
through lane
• Olympic Di . east of 4th St., is one -way
eastbound with three lanes
• 4th St north of Olympic Di . has two through
lanes, one right -trim lane, and two left -turn
lanes
• 4th St. south of Olympic Dr. has three through
lanes, a left -turn lane, and a right -turn lane
• Signalized intersection with protected lefts
• Crossing of the north leg prohibited
• Countdown signals and advanced stop bar-
on all crossings
• Permit crossing of north leg (coordinate with
Caltrans)
• ,Add ramps (2), ped -heads with countdown
signal (2), and advanced stop bar (1) to cross
north leg
• Add yellow continental crosswalks to all
crossings (4)
• Option: Add audio signals to all crossings (8)
• Add red arrow for northbound vehicles on 4th
Street (school hours only)
• Add leading pedestrian interval to walk phase
on crossing of Olympic Dr. (school hours only)
• Coordinate improvments with Downtown
Specific Plan
• Pursue connection west of 4th Street to linl:
multi - purpose paths
ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT
• Olympic Di has one lane eastbound ^ ,Acid yellow continental crosswalk to cross 5th
• 5th St, has two lanes with on- street parking St. (1)
permitted on the south side only a Add advanced stop bar to crossing of 5th St
• UnsignahzedT-intersection (1)
• Sidewalk and ramp on the southwest corner 6 Acid bulb -outs on the southwest and
are not; DA compliant southeast corners to cross 5th St. (2)
19
e Add B' to south sidewalk of Olympic Dr. to
create 12' widened sidewalk /multipurpose
path
® Add crossing island to cross 5th St.
DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLUPEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL
20
a Olympic Dr. has three lanes and is one -way
eastbou n d
® Lincoln Blvd. has four lanes, two southbound
left -turn lanes, and two northhound right -turn
lanes
• Signalized intersection vvith protected lefts
southbound to easthound
® Countdown signals on all crossings
Advanced stop bar for northbound traffic on
Lincoln Blvd_
a Add yellow continental crosswalks to all
crossings (option coordinated with Caltrans)
a Add audio signals to all crossings (8)
Add advanced stop bars to all remaining
crossings (3)
• Add red arrow and extingushahle no right -
turn on red (RTOR) sign active (Ailing school
commute hours for easthound vehicles on
Olympic Dr.
• Reduce curb return and add perpendicular
ramps on the SW and SE corners (2)
Add leading pedestrian interval to walk phase
on south crossing of Lincoln Blvd. (school
hours only)
Truncate median, acid median nose, and
straighten crosswalk on the south leg
Option. Add red arrow and prohibit RTOR
(with extinguishable no RTOR sign) during
school commute hours for northbound
vehicles on Lincoln Blvd.
ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESI RIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT
• Pico Blvd has four lanes two center IeR -turn
lanes at the intersection, and on-street parking
Lincoln Blvd. has four lanes, a center -tuin lane,
and on- street parking
a Signalized intersection with protected lefts in
all directions
Couniclown signals on all crossings
Crosswalk texture Is very faced
Add audio signals to all crossings (8)
® Add advanced stop bars to all crossings (4)
• Consider bulb -outs on all corners to cross
Lincoln Blvd., contingent on future Lincoln
Blvd. Street-cape visioning process (4)
® Add bulb -outs on the southeast corner to
cross Pico Blvd. ('I )
a Coordinate with Big Blue Bus Future
Improvements
DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL
21
ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT
• Pico Blvd has four lanes and a madian /center-
• Add yellow continental crosswalks to all
turn lane
crossings (4)
• 4th St. has four lanes and a median /center-
Make northbound left turn protected
Win lane north of Pico Blvd , and thieee lanes
• Acid 4' landscaped buffer to sidewalk on the
with a median /center -turn lane and on- street
east side of 4th St. north of Pico Blvd.
parking on the east side south of Pico Blvd_
• Signalized intersection with protected/
22 permissive lefts in all directions
• Countdown signals and advanced stop bars
on all crossings
• Yellow lateial line crosswalks
• Advanced stop bars on all crossings
ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT
e
e
Civic Center Dr, has two westbound lanes, an
easthound left turn lane, and an eastbound
through /right lane
4th St. has four lanes and a median./center-
turn lane
Signalized intersection with protected/
permissive lefts from 4th Sc
Pedestrian crossing prohibited on the north
leg
Yellow continental aosswalks on the west and
south legs _
Advanced stop hars on the west and south
legs
e Open crossing of the north leg
® Add yellow continental crosswalks to the north
and east legs (2)
Add advanced stop bars to the north and east
legs (2)
e Add hulb -outs on the northeast and
southeast comers to cross Civic Center Dr_ (2)
®
Acid 4' landscaped buffertosidewalkonthe
east side of 4th St.
• Add "keep clear" markings in intersection
Install the following crosswalks and advanced stop bars (all crosswalks ale yellow)-
• 4 continental crosswalks at Olympic Dr_ and 4th St., with advanced stop bar on north crosswalk
e 1 continental crossnalI, at Olympic Dr. and 5th St with advanced stop bar
e 4 continental crosswalks at Olympic Dr. and Lincoln Blvd_ vvith advanced stop bars on all legs except
east crossing of Olympic Di
4 continental crosswalks at Pico Blvd. and 4th St with advanced stop bars on all 4legs
e 2 new continental crosswalks over north and east legs of Civic Center Dr and 4th St. with advanced
stop bars on same legs
DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS 10 SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL
23
24
Neighborhood Bikeways
• Consider through neighborhood
outreach process replacing stop signs
along neighborhood bikeways with urhan
roundabouts
B. SEGMENTS
stn St.
14th St.
Pearl Street
• 1 1 th and '14th Street south of Pico Boulevard
• 6th Street Neighboihood Greenway
• Consider 17th Street - Coordinate �.vith
Michigan Avenue Greenway and Memorial
Park kleighborhood Plan
• lanes with on- street parking and 5 -wide • Widen hike lanes to' with 2' buffer
bike lanes • Color the bike lanes
• 56' wide
-..:. Lincoln Blvd.
r; 17th St.
• _lanes with on street parking
0 40' wide
• Add hike boulevard treatments
• Coonclinate Mid igan Avenue Neighborhood
Greenway Plan and Memorial Park
kdeighborhood Plan
ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT
6th St. -
Lincoln Blvd.
® lanes with on street parking and shanows Add 6' wide bike lane on south side
0 40' wide
0: Lincoln Blvd
14th St.
6 2 lanes with on- street parking and S -wide • Widen hike lanes to 6`
bike lanes - o -Add parking stripe
0 50' wide
Colorado Ave
Olympic Blvd
• 2 lanes with T -wide hike lanes a Add huffeis to the bike lanes
V 40' wide • Color the bike lanes
r Olympic Blvd.
South city limit
2 lanes with center turn lane, on -street • Add huffersto the bike lanes
parking, and 5' -wide bike lanes e Colorthe bike lanes
0 59' -60' wide
0 Arizona Ave.
Santa Monica Blvd.
• 4 lanes with on- street parking
• 5T wide
2 lanes with on- street parking
Add 6 hike lanes with buffer
3.7
DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL EMEM
i Santa Monica Blvd.
Broadway
1rj-
a 4 lanes with on- street parking
52' wide
ty -i.._ Broadway
Colorado Ave.
26
• - -- - --
rl lanes with T -wide hie lanes
• 60' wide
Colorado Ave.
! i Olympic Dr.
• Three lanes and two center turn lanes
• 55' wide
I Olympic Dr.
e Bay Street
i rrs
Four lane with center turn lane
56' wide curb- to -curh
• B' wide east sides -valk
• 2 lanes faith on- street parking
Add 6' hike lanes with buffer
• Road dietto 2 1anes,centerturn lane, and on-
street parking
Widen bike lanes to 6' and add buffer
Add Green Back sharrows - coordinate with
California Transportation Commission
Add Type B harrows
• Add 4' landscaped buffer to sidewalk on the
east side: total sidewalk width becomes 12'
ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS ROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT
Pico Blvd
Pico PI.
• 2 lanes with on-street parking on the west side a Widen sidewalk on the east side; widening
only and sharrows should taper from 8' on the south end to 2'
40' wide on the noith end
a r::: Pico PI.
Bay St.
lanes with on- street parking and sharrows
• . 35' wide
0-F ,;; Bay St.
Ocean Park Blvd.
2 lanes with on- street parking and sharrows
6 40' wide
• Add wairfindmg signage
Arid 6 -wide hike lane on east side
• Add wayfinding signage
Pursue neighhorhood areenway as identified
in the Bike Action Plan
DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLEIPEDESTRIAkd IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL
27
28
Ocean Park Blvd.
0 6th St. west leg
i 6th St. east leg
--
• 2lanes with colored hike lanes
• 50' wide
• Northhound cyclists and vehicles on 6th St
south of Ocean Park Blvd are required to turn
right
• Southbound cyclists and vehicles on 6th St.
north of Ocean Park Blvd- can turn left at the
traffic signal and right back onto 6th St.
----
• Add 12' 2-way cycletrack on the south side of
Ocean Park Blvd. with 2' landscaped huger
• Modify traffic signal for northbound cyclists at
6th St. west leg
• Add dashed green bikeway markings to cros.
Ocean Park Blvd. on the east and west sides
of the west leg of 6th St.
Add clashed green hikeway mar I ings to cross
the east leg of 6th St- along the south side of
Ocean Park Blvd.
• Sign and mark street to direct bicyclists
• ,Add 6' northbound intersection bike lane on
east leg of 6th St.
• f Northbound cyclists on 6th St. coming from
south of Ocean Park Blvd. tun left onto
to the ercletrack, proceed west, and then
turn north to continue on 6th St. using the
eastern dashed green treatment to cross the
Intersection
• SoUthbound cyclists on 6th St coming from
north of Ocean Park Blvd. cross Ocean Park
Blvd. using the westernmost clashed cashed
green treatment, proceed east along the
cycletrack, and turn south onto the east leg of
6th St
ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT
i Ocean Park Blvd.
i Ashland Ave.
.�<
2 lanes with on- stieet parking and sharrows Arid wayfinding signage
a 34' wide
29
e Arizona Ave.
Colorado Ave.
2 lanes with on- street parking and 5'-wide
o Add buffers to the bile lanes
bike lanes
• 51' -52' wide
_
Colorado Ave. —. -- --
- --
1 Olympic Blvd.
-- - -- - -- - - --
a 2 lanes with perpenchodar parking on east
- - -- - - --- -
Coordinate with Expo Light Rail and USPS site
side, 8' -wide cycletrack on east side, and 5'-
changes
wide bike lane on west side
59' -00' wide
Broadway
<. Colorado Ave.
2 lanes with on street parking and 5' -wide
hike lanes
a 52' wide
• Add buffers tothe bike lanes
• Color the hike lanes
• Follow Expo Green Streets Plan
DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL
30
Colorado Ave.
Pico Blvd.
ii
• 2 lanes with on street parking: buffered bike
lane on east side, and standard bike lane on
the west side
• 52' wide
r Pico Blvd. _ �-
Pearl St.
• 2 lanes vnth on- street parking S wide hike
lane on east side, and sharrows on west side
• 40' wide
• Add huller to the non - buffered bike lane
• Follow Expo Green Streets Plan
• Con- iderfutme removal of parking on one
side pending neighborhood study to create a
safet; buffering or additional hike lane
Broadway
Pico Blvd.
rr.
• 2 lanes with on- street parking and buffered
bike lanes
• 52' wide
r:;a:- Pico Blvd.
i.: Pearl St.
• 2 lanes with on- street parking, 5' -wide bike
lane on west side, sharrows on east side
• 40' wide
• Color the bike lanes
• Follow Expo Green Streets Plan
rr
• Maintas is
ACCESS AND BICYCLE /PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL DRAFT
7th St. and Olympic Blvd., north of 1-10
0 T Olympic Dr., south of 1-10
• 7th St. ends at Olympic Blvd., north of 1 -10
• Some right -of -way exists between the north
side of Olympic Di- and the 1 -10 which could
be used for bridge landing
• Add bicycle and pedestrian Midge
• .Add signalized crossing of Olympic Dr. with
yellow continental crosswalk and advanced
stop hars
31
McClure Tunnel
19th St
• The City should consider creating additional connections across 110 These might indude
bridges or taping portions ovei the 1 -10 freeway, with specific attention to areas hetvaeen the
McClure Tunnel and 1 Rh Street. Pending changestothe Caltrans leasing policy, the cap could
have buildings on portions of it, as well as open space _This would allow for multiple bicycle and
peclestrian crossings that would link the new Expo Line Station and downtown to the south side.
DRAFT ACCESS AND BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS TO SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL
Phase I Concept Plans
February 11, 2014 City Council Meeting
8 -13: Review and Approve the Conceptual Design of the Samohi Safe Routes to School Project —
recommendation that the City Council: approve the conceptual design for the Samohi Safe Routes to
School project; and, direct staff to complete construction drawings and release bids for construction for
the Michigan Avenue /7th Street portion of the project.
Revision to Attachment 3
Transportation Analysis — Updated 2/10/14
o Table 4 Future Volumes
o Table 5 Impact Analysis
o Appendix B - Future LOS Sheets
Transportation Analysis
FORTHE
PROPOSED
Santa Monica High School
'teanuaPy 2014
Revised February 11, 2014
Prepared by:
City of Santa Monica
Planning and Community Development
11 Page
2 1 P a g e
Introduction
This study presents the transportation analysis of the proposed circulation changes near Santa
Monica High School ( Samohi) associated with a Safe Routes to School grant. The methodology
and base assumptions used in the analysis were established in conjunction with the City of
Santa Monica (the City).
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City was awarded a State of California Safe Routes to School Program grant in the amount
of $880,000 to outreach, design and construction of intersection, crosswalk, street, signage and
bike storage improvements at Santa Monica High School. The Project is intended to create
better access for students so they will feel safer walking and biking to school. The proposed
Samohi project will help to implement City policy with physical improvements to crosswalks,
traffic flow, bike lanes and intersections to facilitate active bicycling and walking to school,
furthering the City's Land Use and Circulation Element and Bicycle Action Plan goals of active
transportation, public health and managing vehicle traffic in neighborhoods.
A range of improvements was identified and documented for Michigan Avenue, 7th Street, Pico
Boulevard, 4th Street and Olympic Drive that included physical and operational intersection
improvements, roadway reconfiguration, and off - street facilities during the development of the
project. Outreach identified a priority for improvements at the main campus entry at Michigan
Avenue and 7th Streets (The Project). Concept plans for improvements to be funded by the
existing Safe Routes to School grant have been developed for this area.
The Project proposed for analysis includes road reconfiguration to make Michigan Avenue one -
way west -bound west of Lincoln Boulevard to 7th Street, and 7th Street one -way south -bound
from Michigan Avenue to Pico Boulevard. A new traffic signal would be added at 7th Street
and Pico Boulevard allowing southbound vehicles to turn left or right on to Pico Boulevard, new
crosswalks and contraflow bicycle access to 7'h Street. This would reduce conflicts between
31 Page
improvements have been designed and selected to create a safer environment that will
encourage students to bicycle and walk to and from school, while also considering the needs of
vehicle access to the school and adjacent commercial. Figure 1 illustrates the Site (Samohi)
and the signalized intersections analyzed as part of this study.
STUDY AREA
The Study Area includes a geographic including the following analyzed intersections:
1. 11th Street and Michigan Avenue
2. Lincoln Boulevard and Michigan Avenue
3. Lincoln Boulevard and Pico Boulevard
4. Pico Boulevard and 7 i Street
5. Pico Boulevard and 6th Street
6. Lincoln Boulevard and 1 -10 Freeway On -Ramp
No changes are anticipated to street segment volumes; only a recirculation of existing vehicle
movements, thus no analysis was conducted.
Figure 2 illustrates the location of the boundaries of the school and all existing and future
entrances.
4 1 P a g e
pedestrians and vehicles during
,-
drop -off and allow space for
'y" FY'
r1 e
buffered and protected green bike
lanes and a wider sidewalk. The
project also proposes
reconfiguration of the Pico median
for a two -way cycle track that would
connect students cycling from the
Cl
south to the campus entrance and
remove a crucial gap in the bike
Santa Monica High School
network. The signal and cycle track
—
would also link the proposed{,-
%ng
Michigan Avenue Neighborhood
Greenway to the beach. The
h
Figure 1
improvements have been designed and selected to create a safer environment that will
encourage students to bicycle and walk to and from school, while also considering the needs of
vehicle access to the school and adjacent commercial. Figure 1 illustrates the Site (Samohi)
and the signalized intersections analyzed as part of this study.
STUDY AREA
The Study Area includes a geographic including the following analyzed intersections:
1. 11th Street and Michigan Avenue
2. Lincoln Boulevard and Michigan Avenue
3. Lincoln Boulevard and Pico Boulevard
4. Pico Boulevard and 7 i Street
5. Pico Boulevard and 6th Street
6. Lincoln Boulevard and 1 -10 Freeway On -Ramp
No changes are anticipated to street segment volumes; only a recirculation of existing vehicle
movements, thus no analysis was conducted.
Figure 2 illustrates the location of the boundaries of the school and all existing and future
entrances.
4 1 P a g e
Figure 2
STUDY SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY
This transportation memo was prepared in accordance with City traffic study guidelines, which
establish the appropriate analysis methodologies and significance thresholds for The Project. This
analysis was conducted during a typical school day using the weekday commuter morning peak
period (7:00 AM to 9:00 AM) which overlaps school start times, and afternoon peak period (3:00
PM to 7:00 PM). For the purposes of this analysis there is an AM Peak hour, a 3:00 — 4:00 hour to
capture the majority of student pick up and the typical PM Peak. The PM Peak is generally
between 6 and 7 o'clock however the analysis will show that along Lincoln the peak hour is
actually within the 3 to 4 o'clock range.
Consistent with the City traffic study guidelines, the following analysis conditions were analyzed
for the Project:
51 Page
® Existing Year (2013) Base Conditions — This condition provides a snapshot of operating
conditions at the time of the City's most recent traffic count collection program- December
of 2013. This forms the basis for all future year analyses. Counts were collected during
either a Tuesday or Thursday when school was in session.
® Approval Year (2014) Plus Proiect Conditions — Consistent with the requirements for the
Sunnyvale analysis (Sunnyvale West Neighborhood Association v. City of Sunnyvale City
Council, Court of Appeals of California, 6th District, December 16, 2010). This analysis
evaluates the potential Project - related traffic impacts from recirculation of trips as
compared to Base Year (2013) base conditions since Base was conditions were assessed
in December of 2013.
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE METHODOLOGY
In accordance with the City's methodology for traffic analysis, the signalized study intersections
were evaluated using the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) (Transportation Research
Board, 2000) methodology, which determines operating characteristics of signalized
intersections based on the average delay experienced by vehicles at the intersection
(seconds /vehicle).
TRAFFIX software was utilized to calculate the overall average delay of the study intersections.
The overall intersection average delay is subsequently assigned a level of service (LOS) value
to describe intersection operations. LOS is a qualitative measure used to describe the traffic
flow conditions. Table 1 presents a description of the LOS. categories, which range from
excellent, nearly free -flow traffic at LOS A to stop- and -go conditions at LOS F.
The City has designated LOS D as the minimum desirable LOS at Boulevard intersections and
LOS C as the minimum desirable LOS at Secondary Avenue intersections.
6 i Page
City of Santa Monica Significance Criteria
Boulevard and Secondary Avenue Intersections
Future Base Scenario
Future Plus Project Scenario
If LOS = A, B, or C
Significant Impact If:
4 and is a Secondary Avenue street intersection
Average vehicle delay increase is ?15 seconds
Or
LOS becomes D, E, or F
4 and is a Boulevard intersection
Average vehicle delay increase is ? 15 seconds
Or
LOS becomes E or F
If LOS = D
Significant Impact If:
4 and is a Secondary Avenue street intersection
Any net increase in average seconds of delay per
vehicle
-i and is a Boulevard intersection
Average vehicle delay increase is z 15 seconds
Or
LOS becomes E or F
If LOS = E
Significant Impact If:
4 and is a Secondary Avenue or
Any net increase in average seconds of delay per
a Boulevard intersection
vehicle
If LOS = F
Significant Impact If:
4 and is a Secondary Avenue or
HCM V/C ratio net increase is ? 0.005
a Boulevard intersection
ORGANIZATION OF REPORT
This report is divided into four chapters, including this introduction. Chapter 2 describes the
existing circulation system, traffic volumes, and traffic conditions in the Study Area. Chapter 3
discusses the circulation for The Project and future network changes. Chapter 4 presents a
summary of findings from this analysis. The appendices contain supporting documentation.
71 Page
r�
Existing Conditions
A comprehensive data collection effort was undertaken to develop a detailed description of
existing conditions in The Project Study Area. The existing conditions analysis relevant to this
study includes an assessment of the existing street system, an analysis of traffic volumes and
current operating conditions, and an analysis of the existing public transit service.
EXISTING STREET SYSTEM
The existing street system in the Study Area consists of a network of streets classified by the
City's Land Use_ and Circulation Element (LUCE) as Boulevard, Major Avenue, Minor Avenue,
and Neighborhood Street. Boulevards are regional transportation corridors with continuous
mixed -use and commercial land uses. Major Avenues serve regional automobile trips and
provides access for all modes of transportation. Major Avenues are designed to discourage
regional auto traffic from using Secondary or Minor Avenues. Minor Avenues connect
Neighborhood Streets with other avenues. Neighborhood Streets serve abutting buildings.
These streets offer both sub - regional and local access, in addition to circulation opportunities in
the Study Area. These transportation facilities generally provide two to four travel lanes and
typically allow parking on either side of the street. Speed limits range between 25 and 35 miles
per hour (mph) on the Boulevard, Secondary Avenue, Minor Avenue, and Neighborhood
Streets.
Roadway Descriptions
The streets providing regional and sub - regional access to the Project vicinity include Lincoln and
Pico Boulevards, Olympic Drive, 4th and 7th Streets and Michigan Avenue. The following is a brief
description of streets in the Study Area:
81 Page
• Lincoln Boulevard — Lincoln Boulevard is a designated Boulevard that runs in the
north -south direction east of the Site. It provides four travel lanes, two in each
direction, with left -turn lanes at major intersections. It provides regional access to
the Site and to Interstate 10. Parking is available with some peak hour restrictions
on both sides of the street within the Study Area. The posted speed limit is 35
mph.
• Olympic Drive — Olympic Drive is a designated Major Avenue that runs east -west
on the north side of the high school. It provides two travel lanes, eastbound only,
with left -turn and right turn lanes at major intersections. It provides access to the
Site. Parking is limited with peak hour restrictions for pick -up and drop -off within
the Study Area. The posted speed limit is 35 mph.
Pico Boulevard — Pico Boulevard is a designated Boulevard that runs in the east -
west direction south of the Site. It provides four travel lanes, two in each direction,
with left -turn lanes at major intersections. It provides regional access to the Site.
Parking is generally not available near the high school with some meters available
within one to two blocks in the west bound and east bound directions. The posted
school zone speed limit is 25 mph when children are present with posted signs
stating 35 mph.
® 4th Street — 4th Street is a designated Boulevard directly adjacent to the Project. It
runs in the north -south direction on the west side of the high school. It provides
four travel lanes, two in each direction with left turn lanes at intersections. It
provides access to the Site and to Interstate 10. Parking is not available on 4th
Street adjacent to the Site. The posted speed limit is 30 mph.
® 7th Street — 7th Street is a designated Neighborhood Street that runs in the north -
south direction on the west side of the high school. It provides two travel lanes,
one in each direction. It provides local access to the Site. Parking is generally
available with peak hour restrictions on both sides of the street within the Study
Area. The posted speed limit is 25 mph.
® Michigan Avenue — Michigan Avenue is a designated Neighborhood Street that
runs in the east -west direction to the east of the high school. It provides two travel
lanes, one in each direction. It provides local access to the Site. Parking is
metered west of Lincoln Boulevard and is regulated by preferential parking
adjacent to residences east of Lincoln Boulevard. The posted speed limit is 25
mph.
The existing lane configurations at the analyzed intersections are provided in Appendix A.
91 Page
EXISTING TRANSIT SYSTEM
The Project area is served by the Santa Monica Big Blue Bus and Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) bus lines. Bus transit service in the Project
vicinity is available along Pico Boulevard, Lincoln Boulevard, and 4th Street.
The following list is the existing transit service in the Study Area. The following provides a
description of the bus lines providing service within the City near The Project:
® Big Blue Bus Route 3/ Rapid 3 (Lincoln Boulevard) — Route 3 is a local and regional line
that travels north -south on Lincoln Boulevard in the vicinity of the Project with average
headways of 15 minutes during the morning and afternoon peak hours. This line travels
from the Metro Green Line Aviation Station to the Hilgard Terminal and provides service
to the LAX City Bus Center, Venice, and Santa Monica Place. Rapid 3 has limited stops
and operates weekday 6 AM and 8 PM with 12 to 15 minute headways. The nearest
bust stop is within one block of the school campus.
o Big Blue Bus Line 7/ Rapid 7 (Pico Boulevard) — Line 7 runs from downtown Santa
Monica to the Rimpau Transit Center via Pico Boulevard. In the study area, Line 7
operates on Pico Boulevard. The Super 7 offers limited -stop service along this route
and runs eastbound in the morning and westbound in the evening. This route is
accessible within a block of the campus.
® Big Blue Bus Line 8 (Ocean Park Boulevard) — Line 8 runs from downtown Santa
Monica to the UCLA via Ocean Park Boulevard and Main Street within the City. In the
study area, Line 8 operates on Main Street. The nearest stop is at Olympic Drive and
Main Street about two blocks from entrances to the school.
® Big Blue Bus Line 2 (Wilshire Boulevard) — Line 2 runs from downtown Santa Monica
circulating in the Civic Center via Main Street and 4th Street. The majority of the service
is on along Wilshire Blvd. The nearest stop is at 4th Street and Civic Center Drive along
the school site.
® Big Blue Bus Line 9 (Pacific Palisades) — Line 9 runs from downtown Santa Monica
circulating in the Civic Center area via Main Street and 4th Street then into downtown via
7th Street into the Pacific Palisades. The majority of the service is on 6`h and 7'h Streets
within the city. The nearest stop is at Olympic Drive just west of 4`h Street.
101 Page
EXISTING BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES
The Santa Monica Bike Action Plan (City of Santa Monica, November 2011) designates the
following streets as bicycle facilities:
a 11th Street, north of Pico Boulevard — bike lane
11th Street, south of Pico Boulevard — bike route
® 6'h Street, south of Pico Boulevard — bike route
® 7`h Street, north of Pico Boulevard — bike route
Michigan Avenue, east of 7ih Street — bike route
® Olympic Drive, east of 41h Street — bike route
There are currently sidewalks on all streets surrounding the school. Some streets such as 7th
Street and Michigan must carry a high volume of pedestrians in a short period of time, with
student demand exceeding available sidewalk and walking in the parkway. Olympic Drive
sidewalks have obstructions such as fire hydrants and light poles that make travel on foot
difficult.
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LEVELS OF SERVICE
This section presents the existing peak hour turning movement traffic volumes for the
intersections analyzed in the study, describes the methodology used to assess the traffic
conditions at each intersection, and analyzes the resulting operating conditions at each
intersection indicating volume -to- capacity (V /C) ratios and LOS.
Existing Year (2013) Traffic Volumes
The City's TRAFFIX database includes the most current (December 2013) traffic volumes for
signalized intersections in the City. Typical peak hour traffic volumes for the weekday morning
(7:30 AM to 9:30 AM) and afternoon (5:00 PM to 7:00 PM) were obtained from the City's
TRAFFIX database and an additional two hours from 3:00 PM to 5:00 were included due to
school vicinity for the 6 study intersections. Counts were taken on either Tuesday or Thursday
to ensure that the analysis captured a typical school day schedule.
111 P a g e
The Existing Year 2013 counts for signalized intersections were provided by City staff and are
illustrated in Table 2 These traffic volumes were analyzed to determine the existing year
operating conditions at the analyzed intersections.
Existing Traffic Volumes
New 24 Hour counts were collected in December 2013 and are provided in Appendix. The
counts were collected by direction of travel over a 24 -hour period. The combined directional
traffic volume (i.e., northbound plus southbound) results in the Average Daily Traffic (ADT)
volume. This data was important for the reassignments trips due to the creation of one -way
streets on Michigan Avenue and 7th Street.
3sn
3W
_
South Bound
a Not th Bntind
1
a 4 0
4
O p P 4 4i 0 K� 6 SJ zJ i P
4 4 4 4 P
to Ot
Figure 3 - 7th Street 24 hour Volumes
121 Page
Table 2 Existing Turning Movements
3
8
P
1. 11th
i
B vu
Boflntl
r
pnd
72
a,IM1b""na
R
"
onbbound
P
1. 11th
9
a
i
i
B vu
Boflntl
r
pnd
"
a,IM1b""na
"
onbbound
9
a
i
i
B vu
r
pnd
"
a,IM1b""na
]. Lincoln & Michigan
].Lincoln & Michigan (15:00)
min
min
g
mew
6
"d
2
3
3
oeM1bnuntl
3. Linm0i& Pico (15:010)
3. lincoln &Pim
ncoln
nml"
¢
5"uthbaunJ
6
p
:
Wei
"
8
8
Sou�M1bauntl
IWS t
t
BaunJ
8
9
a
i
Existing Year (2013) Intersection Levels of Service
Amin
sl le
i
B vu
r
pnd
"
a,IM1b""na
Existing Year (2013) Intersection Levels of Service
Amin
sl le
a
8
II
Table 3 summarizes the existing weekday AM and PM peak hour delay and V/C ratio and the
corresponding LOS at each of the analyzed intersections. As summarized, all 6 study
intersections operate at LOS D or better during both the AM, 3:00 and PM peak hours under
existing conditions. The LOS calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix B.
13 1
P a g e
i
B vu
pnd
"
a,IM1b""na
a
8
II
Table 3 summarizes the existing weekday AM and PM peak hour delay and V/C ratio and the
corresponding LOS at each of the analyzed intersections. As summarized, all 6 study
intersections operate at LOS D or better during both the AM, 3:00 and PM peak hours under
existing conditions. The LOS calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix B.
13 1
P a g e
Table 3 Existing Level Of Service
Intersection
Type
Peak Hour
2013 EAsting
Delay
V/C
LOS
Michigan
Collector
AM
8.9
0.424
B
3:00
7.9
0.447
A
PM
8.2
0.477
A
2. Lincoln
&
Michigan
Boulevard
AM
15.4
0.412
B
3:00
11.3
0.442
B
PM
11.3
0.442
B
3. Lincoln
& P i co
Boulevard
AM
30.3
0.606
C
3:00
30.5
0.636
C
PM
30.5
0.636
C
4. 7"&
Pico
Boulevard
AM
3:00
not currently signalized
PM
5. 6"&
Pico
Boulevard
AM
11.2
0.335
B
3:00
5.1
0.268
A
PM
3.7
0.271
A
6. Lincoln
& I -10
On -Ramp
Boulevard
AM
27.4
0.675
C
300
24
0.549
C
PM
24
0.548
C
141Page
ACCESS AND CIRCULATION
Figure 4
Project Redistribution
Figure 4 illustrates the nearby intersections and new one -way travel. Trips were redistributed
and reassigned to the local street system based on a review of the street network, student zip
codes, signed student drop- off /pick -up areas, and other observed areas utilized for drop -
off /pick -up to create a future network with The Project. The Project proposes to make a two -way
segment from Lincoln to 7th Street on Michigan Avenue and 7`h Street from Michigan Avenue to
Pico Boulevard into one -way westbound and southbound. The Site traffic for vehicles heading
northbound were reassigned to the local street system with the majority of trips assigned to
northbound left at Michigan and Lincoln for the most conservative analysis. Some reassigned
trips are assumed to utilize the northbound Lincoln Boulevard metered curb lane south of
Michigan and some trips are assumed to continue to travel in on Michigan Avenue.
151 Page
Table 4 - Future Volume / REVISED 2/10/14
u m ui
fi B
zd
a e
1 1 Ildt
3
e
e
a
wW�e
1 1 Ildt
3
e
e
a
Approval Year (2014) Base Conditions
As described in Chapter 2, the existing traffic volumes were derived from existing recent counts
and entered into the City's TRAFFIX database. Consistent with Santa Monica's traffic study
guidelines.
TRAFFIX Database Counts.
Counts were collected in December of 2013. These can be found in Appendix C. Counts were
taken on a typical school day on a regular bell schedule day.
161Page
T
5. P1W
61h (16:301
Approval Year (2014) Base Conditions
As described in Chapter 2, the existing traffic volumes were derived from existing recent counts
and entered into the City's TRAFFIX database. Consistent with Santa Monica's traffic study
guidelines.
TRAFFIX Database Counts.
Counts were collected in December of 2013. These can be found in Appendix C. Counts were
taken on a typical school day on a regular bell schedule day.
161Page
Approval Year 120141 Base Condition with Project Traffic Volumes
No adjustments to traffic volumes were made since the data was collected in December of 2013
and the project is expected to be complete during the summer of 2014. Adjustments only to trip
distribution was assumed in future including new lane configurations on the westbound
approach at Michigan and Lincoln, future southbound right turning movement restrictions at
Lincoln and Michigan, future southbound and northbound turning movement restrictions ail 11h
Street and Michigan, new signal at 71h Street and Pico, and a redistribution of trips with a new
one -way configuration.
INTERSECTION TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
The relative impact of The Project traffic volumes during the peak hours was evaluated based
on analysis of Base Year (2014) with the Project.
Intersection Impact Criteria and Significance Thresholds
The significance of the potential impacts of Project - generated traffic at each study intersection
was identified using criteria identified in the City's City of Santa Monica Significance Criteria.
According to the City's sliding scale method for calculating the level of impact due to traffic
generated by a proposed project, a significant transportation impact for a Boulevard or
Secondary Avenue intersection is determined based on the criteria presented below:
The Project's impacts were evaluated against the Base 2013 traffic conditions. The following
discussion details the capacity analysis procedures utilized to evaluate the average delay, V/C
relationships and LOS characteristics at each study intersection.
171 Page
Future Plus Project Scenario
Future
Boulevard
Secondary Avenue
Base
Scenario
Average
Average
Level of
Vehicle
V/C Ratio
Change in
Vehicle
V/C Ratio
Change in
Service
Delay (sec)
Increase
LOS
Delay (sec)
Increase
LOS
Increase
Increase
A
LOSEorF
215.0
LOS D, E,
or
B215.0
D
> 0.0
E
> 0.0
F
-
? 0.005
-
? 0.005
The Project's impacts were evaluated against the Base 2013 traffic conditions. The following
discussion details the capacity analysis procedures utilized to evaluate the average delay, V/C
relationships and LOS characteristics at each study intersection.
171 Page
Approval Year (2014) Plus Project Conditions.
Also summarized in Table 3 are the results of the Approval Year (2014) Plus Project conditions
intersections analysis. Even with the recirculation of The Project traffic, each study intersection is
projected to continue to operate at the same LOS as the base conditions.
Impact Analysis.
As indicated in Table 3, the change in average vehicle delay at the 6 study intersections does not
exceed the threshold for intersections operating at LOS C or better. Therefore, the Project would
not significantly impact the study intersections based on the significance criteria identified above.
TableZ 5
Inlersecfion
sveel Type
Peak H..r
2013 EUsfin9
Belay U/C LOS
Year2014wiih Project
Delay VlC LOS
Oelay
Inuease
V/C
Inuease
Singnifica
ntimpacl
1.11 " &MChigan
Secondary Avenue
AM
8.9 1
0.424
B
10.6
0.462
B
1.7
0.038
NO
3:00
7.9
0447
A
8.6
0.402
A
0.7
-0.045
NO
PM
8.2
0.477
A
9.9
1 0.53
A
17
0.053
NO
2. Lincoln &MChigan
Boulewrtl
PM
15.4
0.412
B
10
0.436
B
-5.4
0024
NO
390
113
0.442
B
BA
0.48
A
-3.2
0.038
NO
PM
113
0.442
A
9.2
0.498
A
-2.1
0.056
NO
3. Lincoln &Pico
Boulevard
AM
303
0.606
C
31.7
0.663
C
1.4
0.057
NO
3:00
30.5
0.636
C
31.1
0.619
C
0.6
-0.017
NO
PM
30S
0.636
C
31.1
0.618
C
0.6
-0.017
NO
4.7" &Pico
Boulevard
PM
0
0
0
033
10.3
C
NO
300
notcunentlyMgnalized
6.8
0.293
A
-
0.293
NO
PM
0 0 0
6.9
0.28
A
-
0.28
NO
5.6 - &Pi.
Boulevard
AM
11.2
0335
1 B
11.2
0.335
8
0.0
0.000
NO
3:00
5.1
0,268
A
5.6
0.268
A
0.5
0.000
NO
PM
1 3.7
0,271
A
3.7
0.271
A
0.0
0.000
NO
6. Lincoln and
1 -100n -Ramp
Boulevard
AM
27.4
0.675
C
273
1 0.679
C
-0.1
04
0.004
3:00
24
0549
C
24
0.562
C
0.0
0003
NO
R
PM
24
0548
C
1 24
1 0.662
C
0.0
1 9.004
1 NO
aaaea ns were remsea cryu7m
The addition of a new signal at the intersection of Pico Boulevard and 77h Street was analyzed to
determine any potential delay that would be encountered by vehicles at this new signal. There
were no significant impacts identified. Signal synchronization with 61h Street and Lincoln
Boulevard will be coordinated through Traffic Engineering utilizing the Traffic Management
Center and field observations.
181Page
CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY
As analyzed, The Project is anticipated to result in no significant impacts on the local street
system. This assessment is reached based on the overall conservative redistribution of trips.
The project did not take credit for future reductions in vehicle trips due to students shifting to
biking and busing or overall reductions anticipated with the Land Use and Circulation Element
implementation. The following summarizes the findings of this study:
• A total of 6 intersections were selected for analysis.
• The Project consists of a change in circulation to the street network.
o The Project will replace the northbound travel lane on 7th Street between Pico
Boulevard and Michigan Avenue with dedicated bike lanes.
o The Project will replace an eastbound travel lane on Michigan between Lincoln and
7`h Street and replace it with dedicated bike lanes.
o The Project will have one westbound travel lane only on Michigan Avenue from
Lincoln to 7th Street and one southbound travel lane on 7th Street from Michigan to
Pico Boulevard.
• The Project will add a signal at 7th Street and Pico Boulevard for pedestrians to cross all
ways and only southbound automobile travel to turn east or west.
• The Project will include future "no right on red" prohibitions to vehicles on Southbound
Lincoln at Michigan for school peak hours; 8:00 to 9:00 and 3:00 to 4:00.
• The Project included examined future turning restrictions on Michigan Avenue and 11th
Street to prohibit northbound lefts and southbound rights onto Michigan per the Michigan
Avenue Greenway project.
• The impact analysis with the project:
o No significant impacts are anticipated at the study intersections.
191 Page
2000 Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000.
2010 Congestion Management Program for Los Angeles County, Los Angeles County
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 2010.
City of Santa Monica Significance Criteria for Arterial and Collector Intersections, City of Santa
Monica.
Santa Monica Bike Action Plan, City of Santa Monica, November 2011.
Santa Monica Municipal Code, City of Santa Monica, August 2013.
Santa Monica Travel Demand Forecasting Model Trip Generation Rates, City of Santa Monica,
October 2011,
Sunnyvale West Neighborhood Association v. City of Sunnyvale City Council, Court of Appeals
of California, 6`h District, December 16, 2010.
Trip Generation, 9"' Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012.
201Page
0 07#1
M��
LANE CONFIGURATIONS
Existing 2013 Future 2014 with Project
1. 11th & Michigan 11m & Michigan
-4��
Michigan Ave. 4 ��
*
Lincoln Blvd. Lincoln Blvd.
3. Lincoln & Pico Lincoln & Pico
Pico Blvd
*Defacto Right
Lincoln Blvd.
LANE CONFIGURATIONS
7`h St. 7m St.
5. 6`h & Pico 6`h & Pico
11..
*Defacto Right
Erfroy-Trolm
MITIG8 - AM Peak Sat Jan 25, 2014 12:49:57 Page 1 -1
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection N1 11th & Michigan
Cycle (sec): 70 - Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.424
LOSS Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 8.9
Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Service: A
Street Name: 11th - Michigan
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II_----- __-- - - - - -
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Inc.l.ude
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0. 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 3. 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II_---- - - - - -- ---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 7:45
_ Base Vol: 38 567 27 41 354 135 72 191 68 6 132 31
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 38 567 27 41 359 135 72 191 68 6 132 31'
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 -..00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 38 567 27 41 354 135 72 191 68 6 132 31
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: '38 567 27 41 354 135. 72 191 66 6 132 31.
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00
1 FinalVolmne: 38 567 27 41 354 135 72 191 68 6 132 31
---------- I --------------- II--- -- --------- il-- --- -- -------- il------ ---- - - - --I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.42 0.99 0.99' 0.36 0.96 0.96 D.B0 0.80 0.80 0.87 0.87 0.87
Lanes: 1.00 0.95 0.05 1.00 0.72 0.28 0.44 1.15 -0.41 0.07 3..56 0.37
Final Sat.: 796 1801 86 690 1319 503 661 1754 624 118 2587 600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11 ----------------
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.31 0.31 0.06 0.27 0.27 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.05 0.05 0.05
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
Green /Cycle: 0.74 0.74 0.74. 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26
Volume /Cap: 0.06 0.42 0.42 0.08 0.36 0.36 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.20 0.20. 0.20 -
Uniform Del: 2.4, 3.4 3.4 2.5 3.2 3.2 21.7 21.7 21.7 20.4 20.4 20.4
IncremntDel: 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1
InitQueuDel': 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay /Veh: 2.5 3.6 3.6 2.5 3.3 3.3 22.1 22.1 22.1 20.5 20.5 20.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 2.5 3.6 3.6 2.5 3.3 3.3 22.1 22.1 22.1 20.5 20.5 20.5
LOS by Move: A A A A A A C C C C C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 5 5 0 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2
************************************************* * * * * * * # * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *w * * * * **
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - A14 Peak Fri Jan 24, 2014 13:49:00 Page 1-1
-------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 RCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection $2 Lincoln & Michigan
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.412
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 15.4
Optimal Cycle: 32 Level Of Service: B
Street Name: Lincoln Michigan
Approach: North Round South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R I. - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II---------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
1
Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include - Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1
------------ I --------------- 11_________.______ 11____ ____ _______11___-- _____ - -__ -I
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 7:45
Base Vol: 46 1302 . 59 59 1003 139 57 115 8B 20 79 175
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 46 1302 59 59 1003 139 57 115 88 20 79 175
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 46 1302 59 59 1003 139 57 115 88 20 79 175
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 46 1302 59 59 1003 139 57 115 88 20 79 175
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00
FinalVolume: 46 1302 59 59 1003 139 57 115 86 20 79 175
--------------- 11--------------- 11 --------------- II______-- __ -____
'Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900.7.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900, 1.900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.B5 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.92 0.92 O.B5
Lanes: 1.00 2.87 0.13 1.00 2.00 1.00 .0.44 0.88 0.68 0.20 0.80 1.00
Final Sat.: 1805 4932 224 1805 3610 1615 655 1321 1011 354 1399 1615
------------ 1 ---------------- 11--------------- 11_- _______----- _11______-- _______1
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.26 0.26 0.03 0.28 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.11
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Green /Cycle: 0.06 0.66 0.66 0.08 0.67 0.67 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26
Volume /Cap: 0.41 0.40 6.40 0.40 0.41 0.13 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.21 0.21 0.41
Uniform Del: 54.2 9.7 9.7 52.4 8.8 6.9 35.7 35.7 35.7 34.5 34.5 36.5
IncremntDel: 2.5 0.1 0.1 1.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.7
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 010
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay /Veh: 56.6 9.7 9.7 54.2 B.9 7.0 35.9 35.9 35.9 34.8 34.8 37.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 56.6 9.7 9.7 54.2 8.9 7.0 35.9 35.9 35.9 34.8 34.8 37.2
LOS by Move: E A A D A A D ❑ D C C D
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 8 8 3 9 2 4 4 4 3 3 6
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Deviling Assoc, Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - AM Peak Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:02:38 Page.1-1
____ __ ______________ _______________ __________________-
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 Pico 6 Lincoln
Cycle (sec): 120 critical Vol. /Cap.(R): 0.606
Loss Time (see): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 30.3
Optimal Cycle: 58 Level Of Service: .. C
Street Name: Lincoln Pico
Approach: North Bound South Bound Fast Bound West Sound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
___ --------- I --------------- II --------------- II __.__._.- _______- II ----------------
I
Control: Protected .Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------- j .I_-- _- __________I
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 8:00
Base Vol: 158 1199 155 101 889 114 187 466 99 201 416 90
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00" 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 158 1199 155 101 889 114 187 466 99 201 416 90
.User Adj: 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 158 1199 1.55 101 889 11:4 187 466 99 201 416 90
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 158 1199 155 101 889 7.14 187 466 99 201 416 90
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 158 1199 155 101 889 114 187 466 99 201 416 90
------------ I --------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- II_____- _________
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0,B5 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1,00 2.00. 1.00 '2.00 1.65 0.35, 2.00 1.64 0.36
Final Sat.: 1.805 3610 1615 1.805 3610 1615 3502 2900 616 3502 2888 625
------------ I-------------- ._ II--------------- il---------------- 11--------------- I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.09 0.33 0.10 0.06 0.25 0.07 0.05 0.16 0.16 0.06 0.14. 0.14
Crit Moves: * * ** * # #* * * ** * * **
Green /Cycle; 0.17 0.55 0.55 0.09 0.47 0.47 0.10 0.27 0.27 0.09 0.26 0.26
Volume /Cap: 0.52 0.61 0.1B 0.61.0.52 0.15 0.55 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.55 0.55
Uniform Del: 45.5 18.4 13.6 52.4 22.2 18.0 51.7 38.6 38.6 52.2 38.1 38.1
IncremntTel: 1.6 0.5 0.1 6.3 0.3 6.1 1.9 1.2 1.2 3.2 0.,7 0.7
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay /Veh: 47.2 18.9 13.7 58.6 22.5 18.1 53.5 39.8 39.8 55.4 38.8 38.8 .
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 47.2 18.9 13.7 58.6 22.5, 18.1 53.5 39.8 39.B 55.4 38.8 38.8
LOS by Move: D B B E C B D D D E D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 6 16 3 5 12 2 4 10 10 5 9 9
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc.-Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIGS - AM Peak Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:08:04 Page 1 -1
Level. Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
-
Intersection #5 Pico & 6th
Cycle (see): 90 - Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.335
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 see) Average Delay (sec /veh): 11.2
Optimal Cycle: 34 Level Of Service: B
Street Name: 6th - Lincoln -
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound
Movement: L- T - R L T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I -------- ------- II_.. ------------- II ---------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min, Green: 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
------------- I --------------- IL--------__-___- II --------------- II---------------
I
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 8:00
Base Vol:. 21 .0 230 0 0 0 0 502 0 0 695 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00` 1100 1.00 1.00'
Initial Bse: 21 0 230 0 0 0 0 502 0 0 695 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 21 0. 230 0 '0 0 0 502 0 0 695 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 21 0 230 0 0 0 0 502 0 0 695 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
.MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.o0 1.00
FinalVolume: 21 0 230 0' 0 0 0- 502 0 0 695 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II- -_ - - -- I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane:. 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9.900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0100 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 .0 3610 0 0 3610 0
------------ I --------------- 11- - -- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Green /Cycle: 0.43 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00
Volume /Cap: 0.03 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00
Uniform Del: 15.0 0.0 17.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 0.0 0.0 10.1 0.0
IncremutDel: 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
InitpueuDe).: 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Delay /Veh: 15.1 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0
User Del-Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel /Veh: 15.1 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0
LOS by Move: B A B A A A A A A A B A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
** ww#* WWwWx**************************x**#****** x* * * *W * * *k ** * * *x * * * *x * * * * * * * * * * *#
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - AM Peak Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:31:51 Page 1 -1
_____ ____ ________ ______ _ _ _____ ______________
Level Of Service Computation Report.
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection 46 Lincoln & I -10 On Ramp
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.675
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R -5.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 27.4
Optimal Cycle: 57 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------- 11- __- __- _- ____ -_I
Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 1. 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- 7 --------- ------- _____ -11__ ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 757 803 913 942 0 105 323 262 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Use: 0 757 803 913 942 0 105 323 262 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0o 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 757 803 913 942 0 105 323 262 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: D 757 8.03 913 942 0 105 323 262 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 757 603 913 942 0 105 323 262 0 0 0
------------ 1 ---------------- I'I --------------- 11__ ________ _____II__- _-- ___- _____i
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 1.00 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.85- 1.00 1,00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.49 1.51 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3192 3192 3502 3610 0 065 2662 1615 0 , 0 . 0.
------------ I__ - -_ -_ II--------------- II___. ----------- II__________ -____I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.24 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** *WmW
Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.39 0.76 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.24 -0.00 0.00 0.00
Volume /Cap:. 0.00 0.64 0.67 0.67 0.34 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Del: 0.0 30.9 31.5 30.5 4.7 0.0 39.4 39.4 41.3 0.0 010 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.0 0.6' 0.8 1:4 0.1. 0.0 0.5 0.5 4.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay /Veh: 0.0 31.5 32.3 31.9 4.8 0.0 39:9 39.9 46.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
User De1Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel /Veh: 0.0 31.5 32.3 31.9 4.8 0.0 .39.9 39.9 46.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A C C C A A D D D A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 13 - 14 15 6 0 7 7 10 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - Peak 3:00pm- 4:00pmThu Jan 23, 2014 16:10:50 Page 1-1
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 llth & Michigan
Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.447
Loss Time (sec): '0 (X +R -4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 7.9
Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: A
Street Name: 11th Michigan
Approach: North Bound South Bound Bast Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T.- R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ i --------------- ii--------------- II------------ -II---------- - - - - -i
Control: Permitted Permitted Pei.'mitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 .0 1 0 1. 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
------------ 1-------- -- -- - - -H --------------- II ---- ------ ----- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 15:00- 16:00
Base Vol: 52 421 27 46 594 76 . 79 142 43 11. 106 34
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 52 421 27 46 594 76 '79 142 43 11 106 34
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PH F Volume: 52 421 27 46' 594 76 79 192 93 11 106 34
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 52 421 27 46 594 76 79 142 43 11 106 34
PCG Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L DD 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00
� FinalVolume: 152 421 27 46 594 76 79 142 43 11 106 34
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II-- ----- ----- --- II---- ------ - - - --
I
{ Saturation Flow Module:
i Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.35 0.99 0.99 0.46 0.98 0.98 0.78 0.78 0.78 0 -.85 0.65 0.85
Lanes :' 1.00 0.94 0.06 1.00 0.89 0.11 0.60 1.07 0.33 0.15 1.90 0.45
Final Sat.: 656 1769 113 874 1656 212 892 1603 486. 236 2277 730
------------ I ----------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11 ---------------
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.08 0.24 0.24 0.05 0.36 0.36 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.05
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
Green /Cycle: 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
Volume /Cap: 0.10 0.30 0.30 0.07 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.24 0.24 0.24
Uniform Del: 1.5 1.8 1..8 1.4 2.1 2.1 24.7 24.7 24.7 23.6 23.6 23.6
IneremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.5 0:5 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 '
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 *0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay /Veh: 1.6 1.9 1.9 1.5 2.4 2.4 25.2 25.2 25.2 23.8 23.8 23.8
User DelAdi: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1400 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 1.6 1.9 1.9 1.5 2.4 2.4 25.2 25.2 25.2 23.8 23.B 23.8,
LOS by Move: A A' A A A A C C C C C C
HCM2kAvgQ.: 0 3 3 0 5 5 3 3 3 2 2 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix. 7.8.0115 (e) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - Peak 3:00pm- 4:00pmFri Jan 24, 2014 13:55 :49 Page 1 -1.
Level Of.Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) .
Intersection #2 Lincoln & Michigan'
Cycle (sec): 120 critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.442
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 11.3
Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: R
Street Name: Lincoln Michigan
Approach: North Bound South Bound East. Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- II________ _______II__--- _- ______-- 11____. ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include . Include - Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1
------------ I ---------------- 11--------------- II ----------- ____II---------------
I
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 15:00 -16:00 -
Base Vol.: 32 1202 59 69 1278 95 31 80 35 30 92 101.
Growth Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 32 1202 59 69 1278 95 31 80 35 30 92 101
user Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 32 1202 59 69 1278 95 31 00 35 30 92 101
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 32 1202 59. 69 1278 95. 31 00 35 -30 92 101
ICE Adj: 1.00 1.00' 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 32 1202 59 69 1278 95 31 80 35 30 92 101
____________I___ ______ _ ____II_______ -___ ._-_ II__ ___- _- ______- 11_-- ___- _______ -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.91 0.91 0.85
Lanes: 1.00 2.86 0.14 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.42 1.10 0.48 0.25 0.75 1.00
Final Sat.; 1805 4910 241 1.805 3610 1615 629 1623 710 425 1304 1615
------------ I --------------- 11 ------------ II--------------- 11---------------
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.24 0.24 0.04 0.35 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.06
brit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Green /Cycle; 0.04 0.73 .0.'73 0.11 0.80 0.80 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16
Volume /Cap: 0.44 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.44 0.07 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.44 0.44 0.39
Uniform Del: 56.3 5.9 5.9 49.0 3.7 2.5 44.6 44.6 44.6 45.6 45.6 45.2
IncremntDel: 4.3 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.1 1.1 1.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1;00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay /Veh: 60.6 6.0 6.0 50.0 318 2.6 45.0 45.0 45.0 46.7 46.7 46.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel /Veh: 60.6 6.0 6.0 50.0 3.8 2.6 45.0 45.0 45.0 46.7 46.7
LOS by Move: E A A D A A D D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 6 6 3 8 1 3 3 3 4 4 4
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix '7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - Peak. 3:00pm- 4:00pmThu Jan 23, 2014 16:12:31 Page 1 -1
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection $3 Pico & Lincoln
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.636
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 30.5
Optimal Cycle: 63 Level Of Service: C
Street Name: Lincoln Pico
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement; L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
_- ---------- I ---------------- il--------------- II --------------- 11 ------- - _ -------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green:. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 '2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
------------ I --------------- II------- _ ------- II --------------- II---------------
I
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 15:00- 16:00
Base Vol: 124 1051, 116 101 1149 119 158 535 109 233 412 85
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial B5e: 124 1051 116 101 1149 119 158 535 109 233 412 85
User Ad'j: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 124 1051 116 101 1149 119 158 535 109 233 412 85
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 124 1051 116 101 1149 .119 1.58 535 109 233 412 85
LICE Adj:, 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 124 1051 116 101 3149 119 158 535 109 233 412 85
------------ I --------------- II----------- ____ II ------ ... -------- II---------------
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 19bo 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0..95 .0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 C.93 0.93
Lanes: 1.00 2,00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.66 0.34 2.00 1.66 0.34
Final Sat.: 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502 2924 596 3502 2915 601
------------ I ---------------- II--------------- II_____.--------- II----------------
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.29 0.07 0.06 0.32 0.07 0.05 0.18 .0.10 0.07 0.14 0.14
Crit Moves: * * **
Green /Cycle,: 0.11 0.51 0.51 0.10 0,50 0.50 0.09 0.29 0.29 -0.10 0.30 0.30
Volume /Cap: 0.64 0.57 0.14 0.57 0.64 0.15 0.48 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.48 0.48
Uniform Del: 51.3 20.3 15.5 51.7 22.0 16.2 51.5 37.3 37.3 51.5 34.5 34.5
IncremntDel: 6.8 0.4 0.1 4.4 '0.8 0.1 1.1 1.4 1.4 3.7 0.3 0.3
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay /Veh: 58.1 20.8 -15.6 56.1 22.8 16.3 52.6 38.6 38.6 55.2 34.9 34.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1;00 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 58.1 20.8 15.6 56.1.22.0 16.3 52.6 38.6 38..6 55.2 34.9 34.9
LOS by Move: E C B E C B D D D E C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 14 '2 4 16 2 3 11 11 5 8 8
Note: queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Tra£fix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - Peak 3:00pm- 4:00pmThu Jan 23, 201.4 16:12:57 Page 1 -'1
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 RCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection N5 Pico & 6th -
,Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.268
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay. (sec /veh): 5.1
Optimal Cycle: 31 Level Of Service: A
Street Name: 6th Lincoln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
---------- -- 1 --------------- II --------------- II ---------------- II-- _--- _____ -__ -i
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
------------ I ---------------- 11 ---------------- II---- - - - - -- II---------- - - - - -1
Volume Module: » Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 15:00- 16:00
Base Vol: 14 0 102 0 0 0 0 673 0 0 739 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 14 0 102 0 0 0 0 673 0 0 739 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 14 0 102 0 0 - 0 0 673 0 0 739 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 14 0. 102 0 0. 0 0 673 0 0 739 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00
FinalVolume: 14 0 102 0 0 0 0 673 0 0 739 0
------------ I ---------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: - 1900 1900 1900 1900 7.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 0.95. 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 U.00 0.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 0, 3610 0 0 3610 0
------------- 1--- ------------ II --------------- II----- ---------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00
Cr.it Moves: * * ** # * ** ** **
Green /Cycle: 0.24 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00
Volume /Cap: 0.03 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00
-. Uniform Del: 26.5 0.0 '28.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
IRitQUeUDeI: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00.
Delay /Veh: 26.5 0.0 28.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 26.5 0.0 28.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0
LOS by Move: C A C A A A A A A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 2 0 0 U 0 3 D 0 3 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - Peak 3!00pm- 4:00pmSat Jan 25, 2014 10:31:32 Page .1-1
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #6 Lincoln & I -10 On Ramp
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.547
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =5.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 24.0
Optimal Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound - Fast Bound Nest Bound
Movement: L -. T- R L- T - R L - T - R L - T- R
------------ I--------------- II_______--___--_ 11_---- __________II___________ -___I
Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0. 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I---------------- II--------------- II___ __ __________II- -. -_____ ______I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 922 419 721 1224 0 '123 308 222 U 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00'1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 922 419 721 1224 0 123 308 222 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00
PHF Volume: - 0 922 419 721 1224 0 123 308 222 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 922 419 721 1224 0 123 308 222 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1100 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 922 419 721 1224 0 123 308 222 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- ) I_____---_....__--_ II___ __- _.________II__.- ___________I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 2,75 1.25 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.57 1.43 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 4532 2059 3502 3610 0 1001 2508 1615 0 . 0 0
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II---------------- II---------------
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.34 0:00 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves:
Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.38 0.75 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Volume /Cap:, 0.00 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.45 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.55' 0.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Del: 0.0 29.7 29.7 29.4 5.7 0.0 38.3 38.3 39.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.0. 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.4 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0, 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 '1.00 i.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay /Veh: 0.0 30.0 30.0 29.9 5.9 0.0 38.8 38.8 40.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 0.0 30.0 30.0 29.9 5.9 0.0 38.8 38.8 40.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A C C C A A D D D A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 11 11 11 9 0 7 7 8 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to,CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - PM.Peak Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:09:24 Page 1 -1
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection 11 11th & Michigan
Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.477
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 8.2
Optimal Cycle: 28 Level Of Service: A
Street Name: 11th - Michigan
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L T - R L. - T - R L -• T - R
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II----------------
I
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 11 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
------------ --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II----------
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 15:15
Base Vol: 48 405 25 54 621 82 91 166 42 13 104 31
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 48 405 25 54 621 82 91 166 - 42 13 104 31
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PIIF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 48 405 25 54 621 82- 91 166 42 13 104 31
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 48 405 25 54 621 82 91 166 42 13 104 31
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 48 405 25 54 621 82 91 1.66 42 13 104 31
------------- I.______-- __- __-.._II--------------- I____ ___________II______
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1.900. 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment.: 0.32 0.99 0.99 0.47 0.98 0.98 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.85 0.85 0.85
Lanes: 1.00 0.94 0.06 1.00 0.88 0.12. 0.61 1.11 0.2,8 0.18 1.40 0.42
Final Sat.: 616 1773 109 887 1648 218 905 1650. 418 284 2269 676
------------ I----------------- II---------------- II--------------- II---------------
6
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat:- 0.08 0.23 0.23 '0.06 0.38 0.38 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
Green /Cycle: 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21. 0.21
Volume /Cap:* 0.10 0.29 0.29 0.08 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.22 0.22 0.22
Uniform Del: 1.7 2.0 2.0 1.7 2.5 2.5 24.2 24.2 24.2 22.9 22.9 22.9
IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.2
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay /Veh: 1.8 2.1, 2.1 1.7 2.7 2.7 24.8 24.8 24.8 23.0 23.0 23.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel /Veh: 1.8 2.1 2.1 1.7 2.7 2.7 24.8 24.8 24.8 23.0 23.0 23.0
! LOS by Move: A. A A A A A C C C C C C
' HCM2kAvgQ: 0 3 3 0 6 6 4 4 4 2 2 2
I Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
I Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIGB - PM Peak Fri Jan 24, 2014 13:49:22 Page 1 -1
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection $2 Lincoln 6 Michigan
cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.442
Loss Time (sec):. 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 11.3
Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: B
Street Name: Lincoln Michigan
Approach: 'North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0. 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1
------------ I--------------- II---------------- II--------------- II------------- -I
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 15:00
Base Vol: 32 1202 59 69 1278 95 31 80 35 30 92 101
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 32 1202 59 69 1278 95 31 80 35 30 92 101
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 -.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PAL' Volume: 32 1202 59 69 1278 95 31 60 35 30 92 101
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 32 1202 59 69 1278 95 31 80 35 30 92 101
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVoliune: 32 1202 59. 69 1278 95 31 80 35 30 92 101
- - ------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 _ _----------- II---------------
I.
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.90 Q.90 0.95 0.95 0.85 .0.78 0.78 0.78 0.91. 0.91 0.85
Lanes:. 1.00 2.86 .0.14 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.42 1.10 0.48 0.25 0.75 1.00
Final Sat.: 1805 4910 241 1805 3610 1615 629 1623 710 425 1304 1615
------------ I ---- II - - ---- II ------------------- 11 ---------------
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.24 0.24 0.04 0.35 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.07 0.06
Crit Moves: * * **
Green /Cycle; 0.04 0.73 0.73 0.11 0.80 0.80 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.16
Volume /Cap:' 0.44 0.34 0.34 .0.34 0.44 0.07 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.44 0.44 0.39
Uniform Del: 56.3 5.9 5.9 49.0 3.7 2.5 44.6 44.6 44.6 45.6 45.6 45.2
IncremntDel: 4.3 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.1 1.1 1.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 ;0 0.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 010 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay /Veh: 60.6 6.0 6.0 50.0 3.8 2.6 45.0 45.0' 45.0 46.7 46.7 46.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel /Veh: 60.6 6.0 6.0 50.0 3.8 2.6 45.0 45.0 45.0 46.7 46.7 46.2
LOS by Move: E A A D A A D D D D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 2 6 6 3 8 1 3 3 3 4 4 4
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIGB - PM_ Peak - Thn Jan 23, 2014 16:09:59 Page 1 -1
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection $3 Pico & Lincoln
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.636
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 3015
Optimal Cycle: 63 Level Of Service: C
Street Name: - Lincoln Pico
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - -R L T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- II ------- ________II_- _-- __..._- _____I
Control: Protected- Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2. 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
------------ I --------------- II__________..__....._ 11 ---------------- II---------------
I
Volume Modulo: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 15:00
Base Vol: 124 1051 116 101 1149 119 158 535 109 233 412 85
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 124 1051 116 101 1149 119 158 535 109 233 412 85
User Adj: 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHI? Volume: 124 1051 116 101 1149 119 158 535 109 233 412 85
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 124 1051 116 101 1149 119 158 535 109 233 412 85
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 124 1051 116 101 1149 119 158 535 109 233 412 85
------------ I --------- ......_.____ II--------------- II--------------- II--------------- k
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.93 0.93
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.66 0.34 2.00 1.66 0.34
Final Sat.: 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502, 2924 596 3502 2915 601
------------ L ---------------- II--------------- 11--------------- .il ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.29 0.07 0.06 0.32 0.07 0.05 0.18 0.18 0.07 0.14 0.14
Crit Moves: * *' **
Green /Cycle; 0.11 0.51 0.51 0.10 0.50 0.50 0.09 0.29 0.29 0.10 0.30 0..30
Volume /Cap: 0.64 0.57 0.14 0.57 0.64 0.15 0.48.0.64 D.64 0.64 0.48 0.48
Uniform Del: 51.3 20.3 15.5* 51.7 22.0 16.2 51.5 37.3 37.3 51.5 34.5 34.5
IncremntDel: 6.0 0.4 .0.1 4.4 0.8 0.1 1.1 1.4 1.4 3.7 0.3 0.3
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 '0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay /Veh: 58.1. 20.8 15.6 56.1 22.8 16.3 52.6 38.6 38.6 55.2 34.9 34.9
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 58.1 20.8 1.5.6 56.1 22.8 16.3 52.6 30.6 38.6 55.2 34.9 34.9
LOS by Move: E C B E C B D D D E C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 14 2 4 .16 2 3 11 11 5 8 8
*#**********# w*# ww************ w*** w****** w***** w* * * * *w * *w * *w * # # # * * * * * #w # *w # # # * *#
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - PM Peak Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:10:24 Page 1 -1
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #5 Pico & 6th
-Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.271
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 3.7
Optimal Cycle: 31 Level Of Service: A
Street Name: 6th - Lincoln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ i--------------- II-------------- _II--------------- II___---- ______ - -
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 -0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
------------ I-------- __ --- __11 --------------- --------- II---------------
1
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 5 Dec 2013 << 16:30
Base Vol: 5 0 83 0 0 0 0 722 0 D 793 0
Growth Adj: .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial.Bse: 5 0 83 0 0 0 0 722 D 0 793 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF volume: 5 0 83 0. 0 0 0 722 0 0 793 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 5 0 83 0 0 0 0 722 0 0 793 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 5 0 83 0 0 0 0 722 0 0 793 0
------ - - - - -- ----------- -- --II - - - -- ---- --- --- ----- II- - - -- ---- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2.900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 .0.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1805 0 1615 0 0 0 0 3610 0 0 3610 0.
------------ I...______________ II._.._._-._---______ il----------------- II---------------
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: � 0.00 0.00 0.05 '0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Green /Cycle,: 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00
Volume /Cap: '0.01 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00
Uniform Del: 29,6 0.0 31.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0
TnctemntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
TnitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0" 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: .1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0100 0.00 1.00 0.00
Delay /Veh: 29.7 0.0 31.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0, 2.1 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 29.7 0.0 31:6 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0
LOS by Move: C A C A A A A A A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0
WWww# w*** w***** www* w*** W* W************ WwWWWw* x*** W *w * * * * * *W * * * * * * * # *w * * * # * * * * * **
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - PM Peak Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:32:03 Page 1-'1
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******* w * * * * *wwwwww ** *w * * * * * * * * * * * * *w ** www**** ww* * * * * * * * * * *w * * * *w * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Intersection 46 Lincoln & I -10 On Ramp
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.547
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =5.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 24.0
Optimal Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound Nast Bound West Bound
'Movement: L- - T - R L - T - R L- T - R L - T - R
--- ------ I--- -------- -- - -II ------- II----------- -- -- 11----- ----- - - - - -I
- Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- II-------`------- II-- --- --- ------- II_------ --- - - -- -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 922 419 721 1224 0 123 306 222 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1._00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 922 419 721 1224 0 123 308 222 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 922 419 721 1224 0 123 308 222 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 922 419 721 1224, 0 9.23 308 222 _ 0 0 0
PCN Adj: 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 922 419 721 1224 0 123 308 222 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Saturation Plow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 1.00 0.87 0.07 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes:" 0.00 2.75 1.25 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.57 1.43 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 4532 2059 3502 3610, 0 1001'2508 1615 0 , 0 0
------------ I --------------- il--------------- II--------------- II----------------
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.21 0.34 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.37 0.37 0.38 0.75 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Volume /Cap: 0.00 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.45. 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.55 0.00 0.00 0,00
Uniform Del: 0.0 29.7 29.7 29.4 5.7 0.0 38.3 38.3 39.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tncremn "t Del: 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.4 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0100 0.00 0.00
Delay /Veh: 0.0 30.0 30.0 29.9 5.9 0.0 38.8 38.8 40.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00- 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 0.0 30.0 30.0 29.9 5.9 0.0 38.8 38.8 '40.5, 0.0 0.0 -0.0
LOS by Move: A C C C A A D D D A A A
.HCM2kAvgQ: 0 11 11 11 9 0 7 7 8 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc, Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIGS - AM Future Peak Fri Jan 24, 2014 13:46:58 Page 1 -1
_ ______ __ _____________ _ _ ___
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 RCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 llth & Michigan
Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.462
Loss Time (sec): 0,(Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 10.6
Optimal Cycle; 27 Level Of Service: B
Street Name: 11th Michigan
Approach: North Bound South'Bound East. Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II__. ____II- ___- ____- _____I
- Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- II______- ___--- __II ---------------- il___________ -__..I
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 ,Ian 2014 << 2014 AM Future Peak
Base Vol: 0 567 27 41 354 0 72 249 126 6 180 31
Growth Adj:, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 567 27 41 354 0 72 249 126 6 180 31
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PRY Adj: 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1100
PHF Volume: 0 567 27 41 354 0 72 249 126 6 180 31
Redact Vol: 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 567 27 41 354 0 72 249 126 6 180 31
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVol.ume: 0 567 27 41 354 0 72 249 126 6 180. 31
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II----------------
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 1.00 0.99 0.99 0'.34 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.88 0.88 0.88
Lanes: 1.00 0.95 0.05 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.32 1.12 0.56 0.05 1.66 0.29
Final Sat.: 7.900 1801 86 638 1906 0 489 1691 85.6 92 2767 477
I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II -__ ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.06 0.19 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.07 0.07 0.07
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
Green /Cycle; 0.00 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32
Volume /Cap: 0.00 0.46 0.46 0.09 0,27 0..00 0.46 0.46 .0.46 0.20 0:20 0.20
Uniform Del: 0.0 5.2 5.2 3.8 4.4 0.0 19.1 19.1 19.1 17.4 17.4 17.4
IncremntDel.: 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 6.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1
TnitQuouDel: 0.'O 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 010 010 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.o0 1.00 1.00
Delay /Veh: 0.0 5.4 5.4 3.9 4.5 0.0 19.4 19.4 19.4 17.5 17.5 17.5
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 0.0 5.4 5.4 3.9 4.5 0.0 19.4 19.'4 19.4 17.5 17.5 17.5
_ LOS by Move: A A A A A A B B B B B B
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 6 6 0 3 0 4 4 4 2 2 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7. 8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to, CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - AM Future Peak , Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:17:33 Page 1 -1
Level.Of Service Computation Report _
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection V Lincoln & Michigan'
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.436
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R -4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 10.0
Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: B.
Street Name: Lincoln Michigan
Approach: North Bouhd South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L -. `1' - R L - `1' - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ 1--------------- 11 --------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Control: Prot+Perwit Prot+Permit Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1' 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- 11_____- ___- -____
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << 2014 AM Future Peak
Base Vol: 169 1332 90 59 1003 166 0 0 0 47 71 94
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 169 1332 90 59 7.003 166 0 0 0 47 - 71 94
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 169 1332 90 59 1003 166 0 0 0 47 71 94
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0
Reduced Vol: 169 1332 90 59 1003 166 0 0 0 47 71 94
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 169 1332 90 59 1003 166 0 0 0 47 71 94
------------- I --------------- II ___ __ ________ __II_______________I
Saturation Flow Module: -
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190.0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.97 0.85
Lanes: 1.00 2.61 0.19 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.60 1.00
final Sat.: 1805 4815 325 1805 3610 1615 0 0 0 732 1105 1615
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II____- ___-- ___-_
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.09 0.28 0.2B 0.03 0.28 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06
Crit Moves: * * ** * # ** * * **
Green /Cycle; 0.85 0.76 0.76. 0.73 0,64 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.15 0.15
Volume/Cap: 0.27 0.36 0.36 0.15 0.44 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.39
Uniform Del: 3.7 4.7 4.7 4.6 10.9 B.B 0.0 0.0 0.0. 46.6 46.6 46.3
IncremntDel: 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 -0.l 6.1 0.0 0.0 0..0 1.1 1.1 7..1
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay /Veh: 3.9 4.7 4.7 4.8 11.0 8.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.7 47.7 47.4
User De)-Adj: 1 -00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 3.9 4.7 4.7 4.B 11.0 B.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 47.7 47.7 47.4
LOS by Move: A A' A A B A A A A D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 6 6 1 10 2 0 0 0 4 4 3
**** w** w# w* www****** www* wwaw** w***#*#*** wwwww#*** * * * * *xww * *www * * # # # * * * * * * * * * * * **
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.6..0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - AM Future Peak Mon Feb 10, 2014 16:12:05 Page 1 -1
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base.Volume Alternative)
Intersection $3 Pico & Lincoln
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.663
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 31.7
Optimal Cycle: 68 Level Of Service: C
*' k************ k************** k****** k*********' kk* * * * *** * * * * * * * * * * *wk * * * * *k * * * * **
Street Name: Lincoln Pico
Approach: North Bound South Bound East. Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II ------- -------- II --------------- 11---------------
i
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green:' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0- 2 0 1 1 0
- - -- I ---------------- II --------------- II --------------- II---------------
I
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 1.4 Jan 2014 << 2014 AM Future Peak
Base Vol: . 134 1.227 159 101 689 114 224 558 169 205 312 213
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 134 1227 159 101 889 114 224 558 169 205. 312 213
user Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1,00
PHF Volume: 134 1227 159 .101 889 114 224 558 169 205 312' 213
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0. 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 134 1227 159 101 689 114 224 558 169 205 312 213
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 134 1227 159 101 889 114 224 558 169 205 312 213
------ -- - - - - I - II--------------- II------- - ------- II---------------
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: . 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900. 1900 -1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95. 0.85 0.92 0.92.. 0.92 0..92 0.69 0.89
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.54 0,46 2.00 1.19 0.81
Final Sat.: 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502 2674 810 3502 2015 1375
------------ I ------- =------- II --------------- II- '--- ------- II---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.34 0.10 0.06 0.25 0.07 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.06 0.15 0.15
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * *w * * **
Green /Cycle: 0.14 0.51 0.51 0.08 0.46 0.46 0.12 0.31 0.31 0.09 0.29 0.29
Volume /Cap :' 0.54 0.66 0.19 0.66 0.54 0.15 0.54 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.54 0.54
Uniform Del: 48.1 21.6 15.8 53.3 23.3 18.9 49.9 3566 ,35.6 53.0 36.3 36.3
IncremntDel: 2.3' 0.9 0.1 10.5 0.4 0.1 1.5 1.5 1.5 5.3 0.6 0.6
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay /Veh: 50.4 22.5 15.9 63.7 23.7 19.0 51.4 37.1 37.1 58.3 36.9 36.9
user De1Adj:, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00
Adj Del. /Veh: 50.4 22.5 15.9 63.7 23,7 19.0 51.4 37.1 37.1 58.3 36.9 36.9
LOS by Move: D C B E C B D D D 'E D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 5 18 3 5 12 2 5 13 13 5 9 9
Note: Queue reported j.s the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - AM Future Peak Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:17:50 Page 1 -1
----------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method '(Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection (t4 Pico k 7th
Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.330
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 10.3
Optimal Cycle: 21 Level Of Service: .B
Street Name: 7th Pico
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - _R L - T - R L - T - R
--------- - --1 -- -- --- II----------- --- -11 - -- ---- II---------- - -- - -I
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min.- Green: 0 0 0 0. 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3. 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
------------ I ------- -- - - - -- I
Volume Module: >> Count Date:
Base Vol: 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0
User Adj: 1,00 1.00 1.00
PUP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0.
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
Finalvolume: 0 0 0
--- _ - -- -- I -----------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1.900
Adjustment: 1.00 1.06 1.00
Lanes:. 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0
14 Jan 20:
184 0
1.00 1.00
184 0
1..00 1.00
1.00 1.00
184 0
0 0
184 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
184 0
1900 1900
0.78 1.00
1.00 0.00
1490 0
- - - - -1
4 <<
141
1..00
141
1.00
1.00
141
0
141
1.00
1.00
141
1900
0,85
1.00
1615
I--- - - - - --
014 AM Futi
0 746
1.00 1.00
0 746
1.00 1.00
1.00'1.00
0 746
0 0
0 746
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 746
1--- - - - - --
1900 1900
1.00 0.95
0.00 2.00
0 3610
- - - -- I
re Pei
0
1.00
0
1.00
1.00
0
0
0
1.00
1.00
0
1900
1.00
0.00
0
I---------------
k
0 542 0
1.00 1,00 1,00
0 542 0
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
0 542 0
0 0 0
0 542 0
1.00 1.00 1.00
1,00 1.00 1.00
0 542 0
----- ---- --- - --
1900 1900 190C
1.00 0.95 1.00
0.00 2.00 O.00
0 .3610 C
------------ I ---------------- II ---------------- II --------------- i1 ---------------
i
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.00
Crit Moves:
Green /Cycle.: 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.00
Volume /Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0,00 0.23 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00
Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.1 0,0 19.3 0.0 7.9 0.0 0,0 7.4 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0,0 0.1 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 010
Delay Adj; 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0,00 0,00 1.00 0.00
Delay /Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.5 0.0 19.5 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 7.5 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel /Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.5 0.0 19.5 0.0 B4O 0.0 0.0 7.5 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A C A B A A A A A ,A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 4 0 3 0 5 0 0 3 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8:0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - AM Future Peak 'Phu Jan 23, 2014 16:18:01 Page 1 -1
-__________________________________________ ______ __ ________________ ___ ____
_______________ ____________ ___ ___ __ __ _____ _______
Level Of Service Computation Report -
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) -
Intersection $5 Pico & 6th
Cycle (sec): 90, Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): .0.335
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 11.2
Optimal Cycle: 22 Level Of Service: B
Street Name: 6th Lincoln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound.. West Bound
Movement: L - '1' - R L - T - R L - T - 'R L - T - R
------------- ,i --------------- II__. _- _- ____ - - -11_ _____11__- _-- ______ -__I
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include.
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 2' 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
--- _ -------- I --------------- 11--------------- 11__ __-- ____- ____11- _____- ______ -_I
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << 2014 AM Future Peak
Base Vol: 21 0 230 0 0 0 0 502 0 0 695 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00
Initial Bse: 21 0 230 0 0 0 0 502 0 '0 695 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00
PHF Volume: 21 0 230 - 0 0 0 0 502 0 0 695 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 21 0 230 ' 0 0 0, 0 502 0 0 695 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 21 0 230 0 0 0 0 502 0 0 695 0
------- ---- - I -- -- ---- II--------------- 11------- -- ------ 11---------- - - ---I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.89 1.00 0.65 1.00 1.00 1.0o 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00
.Final Sat.: 1687 0 1615 0 0 0 0 3610 0 .0 3610 0
------------- 1-... -------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II____.------- -__I
Capacity Analysis Module:
.Vol /Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.14 -0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00
Crit Moves: * * #* * * **
Green /Cycle, 0.43 0.00 0.43 0.00 0.00 '0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00
Volume /Cap: 0.03 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00
Uniform Del.: 15.1 0.0 17.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.4 0.0, 0.0 10.1 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0- 0.0 0.1' 0.0 0.0 0.7. 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 0100 1.00 0.00' 0100 0100 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Delay /Veh: 15.1 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.5 O.Q 0.0 10.2 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I -Q0 1.00 1.00
Adjbel /Veh: 15.1 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.5 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0
LOS by Move: B- A B A A A A A A A B A
HCM2kAVgQ: 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 5 0
Note.: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7..8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - AM Future Peak Sat Jan 25, 2014 10:31:00
Page 1 -1
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection 146 Lincoln and 1 -10 On Ramp
-Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.679
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 27.3
Optimal Cycle: 58 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound _ East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- 11 ----------------- II --------------- II_____ ---------
Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Protected
1 Rights: Include Include Include include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- - - - - -II --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 757 815 913 969 0 105 323 262 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00.
Initial Bse: 0 757 815 913 969 0 105 323 262 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHI' Volume: 0 757 815 913 969 0 105 323 262 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 - 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 757 815 913 969 0 105 323 262 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 J -0o 1,06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 757 815 913 969 :0 105 323 262 0 0 0
___-________ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Saturation Plow Module: -
j' Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 1.00 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.93 0.93 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00
j Lanes: 0:00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0,49 1.51 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3188 3188 3502 3610 0 865 2662 1615 0 , 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II__ __----------- II---------------
I
capacity Analysis Module;
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.24 0.26 0.26 0.27 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00'
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * *w*
Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.76. 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.00 0,00
Volxmie /Cap:, 0.00 0.63 0.68 0.68 0.35 0.00 0.51 0.51 0.68 0.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Del: 0.0 30.6 31.3 30.8 4.7 0.0 39.5 39.5 41.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Inciemntbel: 0.0 0.5 0.8 1,4 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.5 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay /Veh: 0.0 31.1 32.1 32.2 4.8 0.0 40.0 40.0 46.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel /Veh: 0.0 31.1 32.1 32.2 4.8 0.0 •40.0 40.0 46.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A C C C A A D D D A. A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 13 14 15 6 0 7 7 10 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traf£ix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - Future Peak 3:00 -4Fri Jan 24, 2014 13 :47:42 Page 1 -1
_________ _____________ _____ ___ _______
_ ------ -- -- -------- ---------- -- - - - ____ -__
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
intersection 41 llth & Michigan
Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.402
Loss Time (sec).: 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 8.6
optimal Cycle: 24 Level of Service: A
Street Name: 11th Michigan
Approach: North Bound - South Bound East Bound West Bound ..
Movement: L -, T R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------
i .
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted '
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min, Green: 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0- 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
------------ I--------------- il ------ : --------- II --------------- il ----------
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << Future Peak 3:00- 4:OOPM
Base Vol: '0 421 27 46 594 0 . 79 142 43 11 139 34
Growth Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 421 27 46 594 0 79 142 43 1.1 139 34 .
User Adj: l.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '
PHF Volume: 0 421 27 46 594 0 79 142 43 11 139 34
Reduct Vol: 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 421 27 46 594 0 79 142 43 11 139 34
PCE Adj:, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVol.umc: 0 '421. 27 '46 594 0 79 142 43 11 139 34
------------ I--------------- II----------- ---- II-------------- II ----------------
E
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 •1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900" 1900
Adjustment: 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.45 1.00 1.00 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.66 0.86 0.66
Lanes: 1.00 0.94 0.06 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.60 1.07 0.33 0.12 1.51 0.37 -
Final Sat.: 1900 1769 113 863 1900 0 866 1592 482 196 2476 606
------- - ..... __ I ------------- . ---- II --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: '0.00 0:24 0.24 0.05 0.31 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.06 0.06
Grit Moves: *kwk * * **
Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22• 0.22
Volume /Cap: 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.07 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.25 0.25 0.25
Uniform Del: 0.0 2:3 2.3 1.8 2.5 0.0 23.3 23.3 23.3 22.4 22.4 22.4
IncremntDel: 0.0 0.1 0.1. -0.0 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0. *0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 010 0.0 Q.0
Delay Adj: 0.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay /Veh: 0.0 2.4 2.4 1.9 2.7 0.0 23.7 23.7 23.7 22.6 22..6 22.6
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
'Adj Del /Veh: 0.0 '2.4 2.4 1.9 2.7 0.0 23.7 23.7 23.7 22.6 22.6 22.6
LOS by Move: A A A A A A C C C C C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 3 3 0 4 0 3 3 3 2 2 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane. -
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
intersection #2 Lincoln & Michigan -
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.480
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 8.1
Optimal Cycle: 36 Level Of Service: A .
Street Name: Lincoln Michigan
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T- R L - T- R '
------------ I ---------------- II_______________ il__ __- --------- - 11 ---------------
I
Control: Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Permitted Permitted
Rights: - Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II------- -------- II ---------------
I
Volume Module: >> Count .Date: 14 Jan 2014 << Future Peak 3:00- 4:OOPM
Base Vol.: 102 1222 135 69 1278 110 0 0 0 45 82 56
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Ise: 102 1222 135 69 1278 110 0 0 0 45 82 56
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 3.02 1222 135 69 1278 110 0 0 0 45 82 56
_ Reduct Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 102 1222 135 69 1278 110 0 0 0 45 82 56
PCE 'Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 102 1222 135 69 1278 110 0 0 0 45 82 56
------------- I --------------- II - - ------------- II_ _ ___ ___ ____ __il.___ ___I.
Saturation Flow Module: - -
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 7.900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95.0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 0.96 0.85
Lanes: - 1.00 2.70 0.30 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.65 1.00
Final Sat.: 1805 4601 508 1805 3610 1615 0 0 10 648 X181 1615
------------- I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.27 0.27 0.04 0.35 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.03
Crit Moves: * * ** ** **
Green /Cycle: 0.86 0.75. 0.75 0.85 0.74 0.74 0.00 0,,00 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.14
Volume /Cap:* 0.23 0.36 0.36 0.16 0.48 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.48 0.24
Uniform Del: 3.6 5.2 5.2 2.0 6.4 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 .47.2 47.2 45.5
IncremntDel.: 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4 1.4 0.5
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0:00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay /Veh: 3.9 5.3 5.3 2.1 6.5 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.5 48.5 46.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 3.9 5.3 5.3 2.1 6.5 4.5 0.0 0.0 U.S. 48.5 48.5 46.0
LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A D D D
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 6 6 1 10 1 0 0 0 5 5 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - Future Peak 3:00 -414on Feb 10, 2014 18:23:38 Page 1 -1
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) -
intersection $3 Pico -& Lincoln
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.619
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 31.1
Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: C
Street Name: Lincoln Pico
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound- West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T -- R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- II_______________ II_-- _____-- _-- __II______________ -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include-
- Min. Green: - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
------------- I ---------------- I ---------------- II --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << Future Peak 3:00- 4:OOPM
Base Vol: 3.06 1075 122 101 889 114 185. 590 136 205 312 213
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00
Initial Bse: 106 1075 122 101 889 114 185 590 136 205 33.2 213
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 106 1075 122 101 889 114 185 590 136. 205 312 213
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 106 1075 122 101 889 1.14 185 590 136 205 312 213
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 106 1075 122 101 889 114 185 590 136 205 312 213
------------ 1--------------- 11--------------- II__ _____________II_______________I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.89 0.89
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 X2.00 1.63 0.37 2.00 1.19 0.81
Final Sat.: 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615, 3502 2852 657. 3502 2015 1375
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.30 0.08 0.06 0.25: 0.07 0.05 0.21 0.21 0.06 0.15 0.1.5
Cri.t Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Green /Cycle.: 0.11 0.48 0.48 0.09 0.46 0.46 0.11 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.32 0.32
Volume /Cap:, 0.53 0.62 0.16 0.62 0.53 0.15 0.48 0.62 '0.62 0.62 0.48 0.48
Uniform Del: 50.5 23.0 17.5 52.6 23.1 18.7 50.3 33.5 33.5 '52.2 32.9 32.9
IncreamtDel: 2.8 0.7 0.1 7.1 0.3 .0.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.6 0.3 0.3
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .
Delay /Veh: 53.3 23.7 17.6 59.7 23.4 18.8 51.3 34.6 34.6 55.8 33.2 33.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 "Do 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 53.3 23.7 17.6 59.7 23.4 18.8 51.3 34.6 34.6 55.8 33,2 33.2
LOS by Move: D C B E C B D C C E C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 16 2 5 12 2 4 12 12 5 8 8
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
1
MITIG8 - Future Peak 3:00 -4Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:23:40
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 1 -1
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base,Volume Alternative)
Intersection #4 Pico 6 7th
Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0,293
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 6.8
Optimal Cycle: .20 Level Of Service: A
Street Name: 7th Pico
Approach: North.Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
_----------- 1--------------- 11___------------ 11____--- .- .._._____11_ -_ ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted.'
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 10 0
------------ I---------------
Volume Module: >> Count Date:
Base Vol: 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 -
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 - 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 0
------------I---------------
Saturation Plow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0
14 Jan 20
110 0
1.00 1.00
110 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1,00
110 0
0 0
1,10 0
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
110 0
1900 1900
0.80 1.00
1.00 0.00
1520 0
- - - - -1
4 << I
110
1.00
110
1.00
1.00
110
0
110
1.00
1.00
110
1900
0.85
1.00
1615
I---------
'uture Peak
0 798
1.00 1.00
0 798
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 798
0 0
0 798
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
0 798
1900 1900
1,00 0.95
0.00 2,00
0 3610
- - - - -1
3:00 -4
0
1.00
0
1.00
1.OD
0
0
D
1.00
1.00
0
1900
1.00
0.00
0
I-- ------ - - - - --
:OOPM
0 603 0
1.00 1.00 1.00
0 603 6
1.00 1.00 11.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
0 603 0
0 0 0
0 603 0
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1,00
0 603 0
1-------------- -
1900 1900 1900
1.00 0.95 1.00
0.00 2.00 O.00
0 3610 C
------------ 1 --------------- 11 --------------- 11---------------- 11 ---------------
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.07 0.00 0.07 0.0o -0.22 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * * *,
Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.75 .0.00 0.00 0.75 0.00
Volume /Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0,22 0.00.
Uniform Del: 0.0 O,0 0.0 27.5 0.0 27.4 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0
IncrenntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 6.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0
Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0100 1.00 0.00 0.00 1,00 0.00
Delay /Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.0 0.0 27.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0
User. DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.0 0.0 27.8 0.0 3.6 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0
LOS by Move: A A A C A C A A A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 4, 0 0 3 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
*** x** ww******** ww** w*******#* xxww*#** Axk**w**** k * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** *xx *rt * * * * * * *x
Traffix 7,8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - Future Peak 3:00 -4Thur Jun -23, 2014 16:23:47 Page 1 -3.
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #5 Pico & 6th
Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.268
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R -4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 5.1
Optimal Cycle: 20 Level Of Service: A
Street Name: 6th Lincoln
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L. _ T- R L- T- R L- T- -R L- T- R
--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11__________ -___ -I
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------
______I
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << Future Peak 3:00- 4:OOPM
Base Vol: 14 0 102 0 0 0 0 673 .0 D 739 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 14 '0 lob 0 0 0 0 673 0 0 739 6
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00
PHI' Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PBF Volume: 14 0 102 0 0 0 0 673 0 0 739 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 14 0 102 0 0 0 0 673 0 0 739 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00" 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 14 0 102 0 0 0 0 673 0 0 739 0
------------ --------------- II---------------- II--------------- II_____- _________I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 -1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.891.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1697 0 1615 0 0 0 0 3610 . 0 0 3610 0
------------ I ---------------- II---------- _____ II--------------- II---------------
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
Green /Cycle: 0.24 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00
Volume /Cap: 0.03 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 O -27 0.00
Uniform Del_ 26.5 0.0 28.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 '0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Delay /Veh: 26.5 0.0 28.4 0. -0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 3..00 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 26.5 0.0 28.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0
LOS by Move: C A C A A A A A A A A A
RCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 2 0 0 6 0 3 0' 0' .3 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix. 7.8.0115.(c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - Future Peak 3:00 -4Mon Feb 10, 2014 19:00:47 � Page 1 -1
Level Of Service Computation Report _
2000 RCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #6 Lincoln and I -10 On Ramp
Cycle (sec): 120 - - Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.552
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 24.0
Optimal Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- 11 --------------- il---------------
I
Control: Permitted Protected Permitted Protected
Rights: include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 2 1, 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ _ 1 --------------- II ------------- _- II --------------- I1 ---------------
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 949 425 721 1240 0 123 308 222. 0 .0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Ban:. 0 949 425 721 1240 0 123 308 222 0 0 0
User Adj: . 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PRF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00
PHF Volume: 0 949 425 721 1240 0 123 308 222 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 949 425 721 1240 0 123 308 222 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 949 425 721 1.240 0 123 308 222 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II---------- ._____11---------------
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 1.00 0.87 0.87 0.92 0.95 1.00 0.92 0.92 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 2.76 1.24 2.00 2.00 0 -.06 0.57 1.43 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 4557 2041 3502 3610 0 1001 2508 1615 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- 11________----_-- II-_ _____-- ____- _II_______-- _____ -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
_ Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.34 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** - * * **
Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.37 0.75 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Volume /Cap:, 0.00 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.46 0.00 0..49 0.49 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Del: 0.0 29.4 29.4 29.7 5.7 0.0 38.6 38.6 39.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Incremntbel: 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.4 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay /Veh: 0.0 29.6, 29.6 30.2 5.8 0.0 39.0 39.0 40.9 0:0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel. /Veh: 0.0 29.6 29.6 30.2 5.8 0.0 39.0 39.0 40.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A C C C A A D D D A A A
RCM2kAvgQ: 0 11 ll 11 9 0 7 7 8 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane,
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - PM Future Peak Mon Feb 10, 2014 16:20:56 Page 1 -1
------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 RCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection $1 11th & Michigan
Cycle (sec): 70 Critical Vol. /Cap.(%): 0.530
Loss Time (sec): - 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 9.9
optimal Cycle: - 31 Level Of Service: A
Street Name: 11th Michigan
Approach: North Bound South Bound Fast Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R- L- T - R L - T - R
------------ ---------------- II --------------- II ----------------- ---------------
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0
Lanes: 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 ;1 O. 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
------------ I--------------- II --------------- II --------------- II--- -------- - -- - -
I
Volume Module: » Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << PM Future Peak
Base Vol: 0 405 25 54 621 82 197 166 42 13 138 30
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 405 25 54 621 82 197 166 42 13 138 30
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 405 25 54 621 82 197 166 42 13 138 30
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 405 25 54 621 82 197 166 42 13 138 30
PCE Adj: -1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 405 25 54 621 82 197 166 42 13 138 30
------------ I ---------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment.: 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.45 0.98 0.98 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.86 0.86 0.86 "
Lanes: 1.00 0.94 0.06 1.00 0.86 0.12. 0.97 0.82 0.21 0.14 1.53 0.33
Final Sat.: 1900 117173 109 846 1648 218 1282 1080 273 234 2480 539
------------ I ---------------- II--------------- II--------------- ii----------------
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat; 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.06 0.38 0.38 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.06 0.06 0.06
Crit Moves: * * ** A * **
Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29
Volume /Cap:' -0.00 0.32 0.32 0.09 0.53 0.53 0.53. 0.53 0.53 0.19 0.19. 0.19
Uniform Del: 0.0 3.8 3.8 3.1 4.7 4.7 20.9 20.9 20.9 18.7 18.7 18.7
IncremntDel: 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.1 0.1 0.1
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00'1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay /Veh: 0.0 3.9 3.9 3.2 5.1 5.1 21.6 21.6 21.6 1.8.8 18.8 18.8
User De1Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 0.0 3.9 3.9 3.2 5.1 5.1 21.6 21.6 21.6 18.8 18.8 18.8
JAS by Move: A A A A A A C C C B B B
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 4 4 0 7 7 5 5 5 2 2 2
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIGB.- PM Future Peak Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:19:50 Page 1. -1
----------------------------------- ----------- -------------- - - - --- ---- - - - - --
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection $2 Lincoln & Michigan
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.498
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 9.2
Optimal Cycle: 37 Level Of Service: A
Street Name: Lincoln Michigan
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ .I ---------------- II--------------- II------ ---- -- -II.__---- ---- - - - - -I
Control: Prot +Permit Prot +Permit Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q. 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II -------- - - - - -I
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << PM Future Peak
Base Vol: 142 1220 133 67 1278 111 0 0, 0 30 92 101
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 142 1220 133 67 1278 111 0 0 0 30 92 101
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PDT Volume: 142 1220 133 67 1278 111 0 0 0 30 92 101
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 142 1220 133 67 1278 111 0 0 - 0 30 92 101
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 142 1220 133 67 1278 111 0 0 0 30 92 101
----------- - I - - -- ---------- II------------ --- II--------- ------ II- - - - --- i
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.90 0.90 0.95 0.95 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.98 0.85
Lanes: 1.00 2.71 0.29 1.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.75 1.00
Final Sat.: 1805 4607 502 1805 3610 1615 0 0 0 458 1404 161.5
--------- I --------------- II--------------- II ---------------- II----------- - -- - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.08 0.26 0.26 0.04 0.35 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.06
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** k * **
Green /Cycle; 0.87 0.76 0.76 0.82 0.71 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.13
Volume /Cap: 0.29 0.35 0.35 0.15 0.50 0.10. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 0.48
Uniform Del: 4.4 4.6 4.6 2.2 7.8 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.4 48.4 48.3
Incremntpel: 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 1.6 1.7
InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay /Veh: 4.7 4.7 4.7 2.3 7.9 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 ,1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel /Veh: 4.7 4.7 4.7 2.3 7.9 5.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
LOS by Move: A A A A A A A A A D D- D
HCM2kAvgQ: 1 6 6 1 11 1 0 0 0 5 5 4
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - PM Future Peak Mon Feb 10, 2014 18:23:05 Page 1-1
Level Of service Computation Report
2000 HCf4 Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 Pico & Lincoln
Cycle (sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.619
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y4-R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 31.1
Optimal Cycle: 60 Level Of Service: C
Street Name: Lincoln Pico
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I ---------------- II --------------- II--------------- 11 ----------------
I.
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include .
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II-- ______- ______
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << PM Future Peak
Base Vol: 106 1074 121 101 889 114 185 590 136 205 31.2 213
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 106 1074 121 101 889 114 185 590 136 205 312 213
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 106 1074 121 101 889 114 185 590 136 205 312 213 '
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 106 1074 121 101 689 114 185 590 136 205 312 213
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1100 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 106 1074 121 101 8B9 114 1.85 590 136 205 312 213
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II__ ------------- II---------------
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: . 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.85 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.89 0.89
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1:00 2.00 1.63 0.37 2.00 1.19 0.61
Final Sat.: 1805 3610 1615 1805 3610 1615 3502 2852 657 3502 2015 1375
------------- I --------------- il -__ -- _________II- ___---- _,__ -__i
capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.30 0.07 0.06 0.25 0.07 0.05 0:21 0.21 0.06 0.15 0.15
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Green /Cycle; 0.11 0.48 0.48 0.09 0.46 0.46 0.11 0.33 0.33 0.09 0.32 0.32
Volume/Cap:' 0.53 0.62 0.16 0.62 0.53 0.15 0.48 0.62 0.62 0.62 0.48 0.48
Uniform Del: 50.5 23.0 17.5 52.6 23.1 18.7 50.3 33.5 33.5 52.2 32.8 32.8
IncremntDel: 2.8 0.7 0.1 1.1 0.3 0.1 1.0 1.0 1.0 3.5 0.3 0.3
InitQuoutel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Delay /Veh: 53.3 23.7 17.6 59.6 23.5 18.8 51.2 34.5 34.5 55.8 33.2 33.2
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 53.3 23.7 17.6 59.6 23.5 18.8 -51.2 34.5 34.5 55.8 33.2 33.2
-LOS by Move: D C B E C B D C C E C C
HCM2kAvgQ: 4 15 2 5 12 2 4 12 12 5 8 8
w *w *w *ww * * * * * * ** wwww *w * *w * * +w *w *w *w* www* wwwwwww * * *W *w * *w * * * * * * *ww * *w * * * * * * ** *www
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.011.5 (c) 2007 Darling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
I
MITIGS - PM Future Peak Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:20:26 Page 1 -1
-----------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 BCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #4 Pico & 7th
Cycle '(sec): 90 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.280
Loss Time (sec):, 0 (Y +R =4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 6.9
Optimal Cycle: 20 Level Of Service: A
Street Name: 7th Pico
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: 'L - T - R L T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Control: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 6 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
------------ I --------------- II- -------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << PM Future Peak
Base Vol: 0 0 0 110 0 110 .0 748 0 0 721 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: - 0 0 0 110 0 110 0 748 0 0 721 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PBF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.100 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 0 110 0 110 0 748 0 0 721 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 110 .0 110 0 '748 0 0 721 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Finalvolume: 0 0 - 0 110 0 110 0 748 0 0 721 0
------------- . I --------------- 11--- ------------ il--------------- II---------------
I
Saturation Flow Module:
.Sat /Lane: 1.900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 0 7.520 0 161.5 0 3610 0 0 3610 .0
--------- - - - I -- --- II---_----------- II------ _- _------ II----- ----- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat:- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0:20 0.00
Grit Moves: * * ** WWWW
Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.00
Volume/Cap:' 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.26 0,00 0.28' 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00
Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.6 0.0 26.5 0.0 3.8 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0
IncrematDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 . 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
InitQueuDel; 0.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Delay /veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.0 0.0 26.9 0.0 3.9 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0
User DelAdji 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Adj Del /Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.0 0.0 26.9' 0.0 �3.9 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0
LOS by Move: 'A A A C A C A A A A A A
BC142kAvgQ:. 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 4 0 -0 3 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars.per lane.
Traffix 7.0.0115 (c) 2007 . Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIGB - PM Future $eak - Thu Jan 23, 2014 16:20:37 Page 1 -1
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM. Operations.Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #5 Pico & 6th
Cycle (sec): 90 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.271
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Yi -R -4.0 sec) , Average Delay (sec /veh): 3.7
Optimal Cycle: 20 Level Of Service: A
Street Name: 6th Lincoln
Approach: North Bound South Round East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R I, - T - R L - T - R
--------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11---------------
I
Control.: Permitted Permitted Permitted Permitted
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
------------ I --------------- PI --------------- II --------------- II---------------
I
Volume Module: >> Count Date: 14 Jan 2014 << PM Future Peak
Base Vol: 5 0 83 0 0 0 0 722 0 0 793 0
Growth Adj: -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 5 0 83 0 0 0. 0 722 0 0 793 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00
PHF Volume: 5 0 83 0 -0 0 0 722 0 0 793 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 5 0 83 0 0 0 0 722 0 0 793 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.
Fi.nal.Volume: 5 0 83 0 0 0 0 722 0 0 793 0
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11________ -_ ____I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
.Adjustment: 0.91 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 0.00' 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1.737 0 1615 0 0 0 Q 3610 0 0 X610 0
------------- I --------------- II___-___________ 11--___ ____- _____II_---- _..._- _- ____,I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00.0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.00
Crit Moves:
Green /Cycle: 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.0.81 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00
Volume /Cap: 0.02 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 '0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00
Uniform Del: 2.9.6 0.0 31.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0
InitQueuDel: 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Delay /Veh: 29.7 0.0 31.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 211 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel /Veh: 29.7 0.0 31.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 211 0.0
LOS by Move: C A C A A A A A A A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane..
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MITIG8 - PM Future Peak Mon Feb 10, 2014 19:01:32 Page 1 -1
Level Of Service Computation Report
2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection *6 Lincoln and I -10 On Ramp
Cycle'(sec): 120 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.552
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R ='4.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): 24.0
optimal Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound {Vest Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------- I---------------
Control.: Permitted
Rights: Include
Min, Green: 0 0 .0
Lanes: 0 0 2 '1 1
------------I---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 -949 425
Growth Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.100
Initial Boo: 0 949 425
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1..00
PHF Volume: 0 949 425
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 949 425
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 949 425
------------ I --- --
Saturation Flow Module: -
Sat /Lane: 1900 1900 1900
Adjustment: 1.00 0.87 0.67
Lanes: 0.00 2.76 1.24
Final Sat.: '0 4557 2041
-
--- -- ----- I ------ --- - - - - --
Protected
Include
0 0 0
2 0 2 0 0
---------------
721 1240 0
1.00 1.00 1.00
721 1240 0
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
721 1240 0
0 0 0
721 1240 0
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
721 1240 0
1900 1900 1900
0.92 0.95 1.00
2.00 2.00 0.00
3502 3610 0
-- ------- ---- II -- ------- - - - - --
Permitted Protected
Include Include
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ ---il ---------------
123 308 222 0 . 0 0
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
123 308 222 0 0 0
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
123 308 222 0 0 0
0 0 0 C 0 0
123 308 222 0 0 0
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
123 308 222 0 0 0
--------------II-----`---------
1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190C
0.92 0.92 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00
0.57 1.43 1.00 0..00.0.00 O.00
1001 2508 1615 0 0 C
--------------- II --------- - - - - --
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.34 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00'
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Green /Cycle: 0.00 0.38 0.38 0.37 0.75 0.00 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Volume /Cap:, 0.00 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.46 0.00 0.49 0.49 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Del: 0.0 29.4 29.4 29.7 5.7 0.0 38.6 38.6 39.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
IncremntDel: 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.4 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
IRitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Delay Adj: 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Delay /Veh: 0.0 29.6 29.6 30.2 5.8 0.0 39.0 39.0 40.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
AdjDel /Veh: 0.0.29.6 29.6 30.2 5.8 0.0 39.0 39.0 40.9 0.0 0.0 0.0
LOS by Move: A C C C A A D D D A A A
HCM2kAvgQ: 0 11 11 11 9 0 7 7 8 0 0 0
Note: Queue reported is the number of cars per lane.
Traffix 7.8.0115 (c) 2007.Dowling Assoc. Licensed to CITY OF SANTA MOMICA'
Uf•-
h
Z_
U u
Z W
W m
f F
W
cOU
LL
Z
H �
u
d
Z m
On
aW
K
W
d
z
H
N
0
Qti Z
V �
b u,
Or 0-1
X00
ul
Z
F£ z
Z
du
ENE
O C
mw
0�3
0
0
O
O Z
6
H
W
�
OOOOO
OO
OOOOOOOO000000
O O
O O
O O
OOO0000
00
0
00000
}U
O°°
O
O O°°
O
O O O°
o
O O
O
Z N
W X
O
O O
O °°
O
O O
O
O° O
O O
6 O
ruNx
000000000000000000000
omoo000o
00000000
0000a
d
zx
oo0000000000000000000
000000000000000000000
001000
NEU
O
O
O
O O
OO
O O
O O
O
O O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 OO
O
O O
O OO
O
O O
O
Z
>�
> x
O
O
O
U
a
W
n
ZX
O
O
JALF
OOOOOOm01�/1P
NbMOMtO
N.-�
-"000
OOOm
yMj
O
O b m~OOOC
MtiPtiVlnmO�HPtimNP
d'p
OMV,M
PPPP�"nIM
M(MrINOO�
ti
O b m
O
W
O
F
IUk
N
{Z VIP
30
nll�M
N�M�tI
tO
�Ta
mW
m
mVIN
nPN�Dn
O�tivIPPNMm
O�^
mO
N
N
�
Z
om
Nu0
�°\jO
IhVb�.PiNtiti
Nn
NVNONNti.MyN
Nltl
.nnnbMO
N�
lam' Y i
3 O
M
N
ti P H
N
H N
N b d.
N
M M
M P
P VI
P M
P ti
M M
---
wo
Mti.m
Nnn�oP
Imo
e.°\ -�
�
n,N.
.nnm,N.
.M.
rn m
m,M.bm,".oti
v°Jimm
a.P+
ry
.i ti
ml`INMMNNNtiNN.yN
0��'
Mv"in
PNNtiti
NN
tiN0
.yPP
O
WO
mMN
tiNNm.y
Orb
.-i^
Mv1W
NNP
NN
^N
M
M
mM+�Ntitirl
C'hNV1
u1mPN
+y
.a .y
^O�a
{/�N
�
oN
NN^m
o
o
mM
m
N
�O
�OMbtivl
�ObH
mory
N M �
ry
LOOM
NtiNNNMNNMNNNNN'IN
MO
COnnNmn
^m Nn
N�
mN
n
m
,y
P y�N�y
,y .y
.y
�aNN
�
a.
May
N
b
Q
F
pp V1P
NVM1
�O
Vlb
VinPnul
P�nP
b
aDO
Oo.nnb�..
N
m�MtiPO
O�
�
Po �p
Nnn
N \°
T
\M
NNO�
bm0
Pn�Tm�Onb
bb
MaD'
O
'I
.y.inti
...iN.i
...+rn
Nn
Snvl'"
wry
NbMntimtim
�0��
Pam
O
Nm.Mi
.�fNNNNNN1�lN
H.N
-�MiN
ONN
VPi I�
M
n
ZO
Mu1m
TN�ONn
yPN
0
NV'
�
n�P�O
V�Prn
NtONtiPPNMM
nP(O
Nvl
N
•a
a
IV
Jn
0fF
\
.�iti
\M
M�O�
y�j0
�OV10J
Pm
`,
nO��iNN
tiMNaOP
PyM
VIPM
O�O�W.Oa
mO�M
VSO
U
F
^
.OiUW�ObimmO�(On
0
_..b
�Ny
O�n�P
nvl
b
O`NMamMnMbMMNMMNMN
Q
Zn
SON
mb
q�OW
POH
?
vi
K O
K O
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
r�
zLL�dddo.ddddaddddaddddad
zQ�
x
a
o NOMOinoMO�n
o
mPO..MPO..
°MVO
o
d
w
w
bb
lzmmmmTOOO;
0000W�a
OeZO�YM
fJfJMMMMPP
d'P1(I
V1 vI
N�Obbb
nn`�Mud.�
Z �aZ
Y
O
0
OddwOd
d
OddwOdugd
z
>aaw
>¢d¢
>a¢m
>ad¢
Wtl
Wd
Z
0
S
U
E
m
PACIFIC TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
ME
a Q
O
N
� W
c O
SANTA MONICA
CA13- 0920 -0924
ALL HOURS
� O N
v N O N
N N A
A O A
-i
O
r
Rm
n
D
z
M rN O
lug 702
2,749
3,451
11TH
1,115
1,517
2,632
=> L]
49 1,228
72 11,683
1 121 1 2,911
4,109 581
3,235 387
3,141
2,541
387 TOTAL
307 PM
1,870 I '
874 194
600
1 AM
LJ 1,290 u
II \l'80,,
ME
a Q
O
N
� W
c O
SANTA MONICA
CA13- 0920 -0924
ALL HOURS
� O N
v N O N
N N A
A O A
-i
O
r
Rm
n
D
z
M rN O
lug 702
2,749
3,451
LJ
AM 64
PM 94
TOTAL 1 158
1,115
1,517
2,632
=> L]
49 1,228
72 11,683
1 121 1 2,911
11TH
11TH
1,287 217
757 82
530 135
F11 < � = <�iD
975
621
354
-u
95 TOTAL
54 PM
41 AM
[L*
526 I I
670 u
m P r F]
Z
C7
S
U
2
n--- N M
a
J
Q
p a
F
m n
M \V
O N �
a �o
IMD N tM")
PEAK HOUR
AM 7:45AM
PM 3:15 PM
I IN mill
awe w
N A m
O
� 3 D
r
(P A O
tp to A
p-
0
2
D
z
U,
Z
a
Uw
V
W W
� a
W F
w
z
H U
Z F3
ad
h
Z m
on
LLI¢
W
W m
u
Z
w
�
�
00000010000000000010000
000000100010000
o0
of
oo
000
�i
�x
000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000
z
x
000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000
Zyy�
�u,mx
000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000
0
a
zx
000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000
k
0°
°01000000
°00010
°00000
000000
°°
°0001°
°00101
°000
u
HIM
o
u
w x
o
°
V
m
-
k
00000000010
0000o0000o0
0010000000000000000000
Z
u
U
ymj X
O
°
m X
M
p
O
w
n
°
Z X
O
m
p m
p�0
Q
ONnbnNNn
.+m
�n000000o
N
P
N m
Py m0
OOtiPNti�O
VlmmMmMNHtiMMOmbvIM
NtiO�m
vlb
MbOOn
W
H
0
o0o0oen0.+P
nnmmnmm�
-
m o
mmm�b�nnnnbb�onnn
M o
p
V
/Z N�
p'p
mb�O
'1 N
t0m�O
No
mM
Nb
P
N
MN
OWN
N.y
mtid'n
+y
Nf+
V1
�iNN
.yNm
,y �O
Nmn
NNN
atom
iV Ob
Nn
OVl
P
O�
N
J
�
MMPVIPMNM
M �D
.a
1VNNn
°PVl
OPtimm�Mnt
NNN
N.y
-.i
Nip
m' °n.tii
N
i
j J
¢
Z
3
a
Ou(-N
o
ON
a
qo O
nNQ
o
\
�b
0
N° T
Ty.O
�
�i
.ti
M°m
i0 Nip
nO�m
bh�NPMMMMMO�MN
���
MN
N
.�
_ L
�O
MNPNU1
V10
V
N
�
ik
—
Z J
Op
o
M mm
btiti-NMnPmNnN
o
M o
m
°N
u°
M�DNN.niemn
NM�O
M
M mm
frail
PmMy-
tir°in
MN
O¢�
U
aOJ OU
MMnd"imtiN-
mNMNON�000NPn�Nm
tD
OUt.y
mx
HVp
£
.yP
o
ug
_.M
W°
-�.biN
n�O
�D 1()ti
�Nb
bN
N
O��O�M
PP.`iy
l/�MmVMmPti�
mNp
(i�N
�O
rvrmnvv
°..nom
�mN
m
MN
NNNNNtiNN1�1NMM
m(�tNM
oN
d.nM
Nn
m
ti
N
ti
W
ti
Q
Q
m04-
nnnvl
d'N
V�
mip
OQm
MmYtinm(b�11N+IM.mimON�lm/�Ibl
.bi28
Nm0
V
VI
M
N M
M N
M M
M M
M M
M M
M M
M
M
O
m"
_._
NfVmti��
_.
tin
•r
�
NNtiHtim'in
bo.
vlmbenO�OM
.- �NNH.y
Nei
�Z6
F02
.Ni VI
(V I(m)vl
m \ °N
NVIm
\
bVl
yN
d'
ZO
m.miN�mtO
O1
O�
O�fh
`� NP
111
HN.P
Obd'O
NMONd.ti
M°
pry em
tml1N
M
M
e
5 ..
Q
�u~N
tmpo
nb
¢OO iM/i
MMMO�
P O� '
qo
PP
BOO m
pNPW
��yppNOMVlrnen
aMMMMMMM
eNeNObO�
NO�vl
pn.+�o
1"1NmNNMMNNNN(VNNNN
�o .+nnM�O
m.+OnbnbVlPnbN
Minnn�o
.+b
zZ
NN
n
P
�ti-�
w
�
z
z-�
timPMn
mNm
vm
m,".Mmv�NmMPmmmmm�in
�(°ym
m�°-ry
e
N
oon
o
�o
mxWQ
2�n--���Q�
¢
a
m°p
o�n
"''+w'¢�Qi
ov�oM
°w
ofmm
J6
OtQii
pKY
rv<+i
rimmvcv
vin
vi iri
vi
Rio roe
nn�mz��Ya
JI-Z
Io.
n
O dawOnuga
Wtl
Wd
Z
Q
C7
x
U
m
n mi
J
Q
n a Q
PACIFIC TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
m rn 1�A\
N V
V M
SANTA MONICA
CA13- 0920.0924
ALL HOURS
u
9 P w w m
w W w 3
m � m n
T
3 O n ^�> Z z
4mi W �
uU u
n 2,139
cl\/I� 5,392
7,531
N
LINCOLN
2,763
4,493
7,256
91 2,919
208 1 4,817
299 7,736
8,154 610
5,858 416
7,143
5,164
1 401 TOTAL
278 PM
4,914
LINCOLN
2,296 194
1,979
123 AM
u 3,170
1,202
59
1,293
2,454
Total 1 78
2,504
118 2,700
LINCOLN
m rn 1�A\
N V
V M
SANTA MONICA
CA13- 0920.0924
ALL HOURS
u
9 P w w m
w W w 3
m � m n
T
3 O n ^�> Z z
4mi W �
uU u
n 2,139
cl\/I� 5,392
7,531
N
AM
PM 165 16
TOTAL 1 181 1
2,763
4,493
7,256
91 2,919
208 1 4,817
299 7,736
Fl
AM
PM
LINCOLN
1,302
59
1
1,407
32
1,202
59
1,293
2,454
Total 1 78
2,504
118 2,700
LINCOLN
LINCOLN
2,643 234
1,442 95
1,201 139
Fl <==
2,281
1,278
1,003
128 TOTAL
69 PM
59 AM
a
,/fir
u
2,868
1,334
1,534 u
A W V
V N N
J
Z Q
p a
l-
PEAK HOUR
AM 7:45 AM
PM 3:00 PM
V
N
LI
1,111
1,343
AM
PM
46
1,302
59
1
1,407
32
1,202
59
1,293
2,454
Total 1 78
2,504
118 2,700
LINCOLN
J o V
o 0 o n
O n'
3 3 Z
z
w w
W O A
F
z
a
Uw
U
Z W
w
N
W G
Co R
6 Q�
z R
Zn-,
d
H 6
Zm
on
LU
a
nw
W p
H
z
m
lJ)
�
oo
0000000000000000000
000
000
0000000
of
0000000
u
m t7
z
3x
000000000000000000000
000000000000000000°00
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
2 N
W x
O
O O
O
U
N X
O
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
6
Z X
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
k
OO
OO
O
OO
OOOO
OOOOOO0000
OOOOOOOOOOO0000000000
Z
�
1n
3x
o
°
u
W
wx
o
°
y
(J
O
mX
N
m
(7
o OO
O
o 00
O
O O
O O
oo
0 0
0 0
0 0
o
O O
O O
o o
O O
O O
o O
O O
O O
O O
O
Z
till
�
0
3x
Q
wX
N
A
Q
PAD
1°p
�mNA
Z (n P
IN�
vN11�V1
VIPbMNtD
10PNNbP
WMH
NM
n
MNti
NN
n
ik
�
_-
Z J
p Q
me
~ N°r\j
ry
Pml�mm
V1PN
bI�MPO�
\
paF
n'O
W
Ml�m
•i
HNNNN.yN
b
b�N
Nti
N
N
MNNNM
M�+IMMNMNMMMti
pay
�N
N
N
boo
_.
..
pZ
_..
p�DONNQm
O�
mM
Oloobrvon..Pm
MNNMMtiOtiOim
N o
�m
aOOP
NVl
°
Mt�q
�6�N
_..
_...
wN
MMVYN1VPCtND
y
ONO
y��j°
^ry
n
MfmI
VPIMMMPIIN+Im
yy
MNM
IN
NWN
Itm10
N
O
m
INM
NNNCNmNb
O
MNNMNNMMMNMMMMPM
P
VI°
'y OWN
ti
yNjtim
yT
p
N
NNMbOiO
N
H N
MOfryry
N
Nb
N
PObO�N
N
NNmmmmmNbNN
N
N N
O�NNbNmMtDMOOi
N N
N N
N
N�+INN
Qa
°m ?F
g�
�o
nM
mo b
m.yq
Ia
pm
yo VPj
Nmm
H
Z
? z
S
N�
N
�y m
W W Q
N
O
bP
Mf�bNNh
O
tiPMMM1�NO�hhNI�N
NNNMMNMtiNN
NN
£ Z
O
�
IJ/1 '"�
M \ti
N°q"
ti \°
°O1
mWp
P
�1�
,y
a�J
1n�a
2 O
M
M M
m Py
oN
O O
�
10
N
O
h N
1� P
W P
P N
N P
G
O O
N
no
m eo
P
p
F
O
N
m M
N N
N h
N N
T N
N N
m N
N N
M T
N
M O
ti
N
T
N
M
a m o O
N o
m
n N O b
O
S
Z
INN,
N
M N
N
N
Om m N°
M
N
1N
m
m O
rS�
r
Z
Z
J
Z'1
pvM1�v01
'N+IN
MM
do
NtiN
p. Wo
ti�
Om1�N
MMNN
PMNONPPHONW
m
OOO�
.a
M Po
ti0
p�
N
OO t'1]f
P
Gr£s£££££s£a££££££££££
ory
oar
a
££££
ory
'�wanwwmn
1n�
NoNOO
do
INONONON
°Mawwa11�n
`u�"Kd
°MVOM
.+MP
°o
oNO
.Ni
oNON
'iS
�
�O
�O �Obnnnnm"m"m"m'O�TO�O�O
OOO�OpH�OY�N
(JoNON
M MMPPPPNNNNbb
10 h-J
n'p
ZJmYp
a
r
o
OaawOal�ia
OnnwO
ni�Ja
ugn
Wy
Wd
PACIFIC TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
MIN
J
f
O a Q
h
o
M
N'
N W (D
f0 O
SANTA MONICA
CAI 3-0920-0924
ALL HOURS
� W
W WA
W �
o �
N �
o m
D 9
3 � D
r
RN
LINCOLN
2,265
5,873
8,138
AM
PM
TOTAL
591 TOTAL
418 PM
,/fir 7,686 "/fir
4,791
306 2,995
497 4,931
1 803 7,926
7,540 716
6,233
5,424
520
4,486
2,116
196
1,7
173
AM
u 2,895 u
,7114L,7
MIN
J
f
O a Q
h
o
M
N'
N W (D
f0 O
SANTA MONICA
CAI 3-0920-0924
ALL HOURS
� W
W WA
W �
o �
N �
o m
D 9
3 � D
r
RN
U
a
N 0
M � M
W N
a
O O V
O O
ro n
dVS � W A
1
0
3 a n
r
N N v
A
2,265
5,873
8,138
AM
PM
TOTAL
321
508
1 829 1
2,368
3,926
6,294
306 2,995
497 4,931
1 803 7,926
LINCOLN
LINCOLN
2,473 233
1,369 119
1,104 114
2,038
1,149
889
202
101
101
TOTAL
PM
AM
�J
1,294
1,476 u
ILJI
V O W 11 1
U
a
N 0
M � M
W N
a
O O V
O O
ro n
dVS � W A
1
0
3 a n
r
N N v
A
Z
a
Uw
U
Z W
W m
W
pG °U
L Q�
(C
M �
as
f
Zm
on
LLIQ
w
W �
{/j n
6F'
Z
M
UO
O O
O p
O 0
0 0
0 0
0
--------
.......
0
0 0
0----
0
0 0
0 0
0
U
3 X
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
OO
O O
O O
O O
O
ZQ O
W X
O
O O
O O
O O
O OO
O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
�x
oo°oop00000000pp00000
00000p0000000000b0000
°
a
zX
OOOOOO°0000000000°opo
°000000000°000000000°
koo
°000p0000
°00000
0000
0 °0000000oo
°
°o00°0000
m
p
z
m
o
wx
o
u
0
Z
y X
O
_
_
O
Z X
O
Z
�
O
O O
O OO
O
o 0
0 o
O O
OO
O O
O p
o p
p o
o O
O O
O O
O o
op
o O
O O
O O
O o
0
U
Q
w X
O
°
X
o
°
O
Z X
FNvIN
OOOOOONNpM(^�I
V10mtiP
O°i
m Vbt
O VNj pJO
OOMPPmmMMPMMPPIb'ICMMOON
O.V
PI(I
aOWOVlmn
pmp
nVyyl
Vln
rymry��
p N
O Ip p10
W
0
1�1 f~�INOOOOOOIp
N
N O
ti O
P m
{Z NP
K
2i0
NPn
Nmn
nom
Po
m
m
Pnn
tifi
n�
W
m M
O d
mm
Nn.a
.ati
tin
b
,ynNn,.tibNin
,yP
ti
_.bo
T
O
m'a
�N
nbOPmOnT
OOMNPPtiO
OJW
Na pI
"m^
.+�PnMPm101O
bnOMnMtiTV1
V11001
VINbN
V1
N.N-�ti
Nm
do b
M
nOPio
<� �
^
�
I/PI
O
.y
.i
ti 'a
ti ti .a
�a
.�a .-I
.y .y
N
ik
Z
G°
W
^
W
b
b
moo
y
N
°
n1�WO��Ib/I
m..n
DJ
m.+mnro
Ol�nOmm
me�jN
NO
pI°
py� N
11-n
O
•i
.� .y
,.i
N
H
Pp�
..
fi
.y
n
.-I O
O
N
�.�
U1
Mn.ynO
N
pOp
p
Nti
°
tiNN
tiPV)MNNNVPd'mVNNMM
OIPO
NNm
nNn
�Op
MD
°
'nNnVttimmti
NO
NO
O
op
o
o�
p
0
z
S
O
£
zx°
�X
°oN
u
�Qilka
Z X
y
o
N
z
2
O
zk�rx
a
oa
< 00
oog °o
o
00
d
°oo °o
O
u
h
O
w
Z
UQ d.ar
a
ZX
O Z W
3
QOIn
mUdq�U
¢
Ii�NO
ONMPOti
NO
VIm
VIO�mM0v10
VO
POHMP
NONMVI
P.W QWnWQME
97!MPO.yMpO.b-
NOV10
VI0
IIMVOtiMP
OVIO
VI
O'�W¢Wn
QZW
�S
VI
W
IO
tO �Obnnl�l�mmOJmNTO�N
00005
V1 V11A
IO
baON1�IhS
°d'O
rZi�°n'y°
~
°
d'p2J6'Y�NNmMMMVVVPVI
Oa°'w0
°n
OaawOnugn
z
u�nn
Wtl
Wd
PACIFIC TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
7TH
746 746 0 0 TOTAL r 381 "/fir
540 540 0 0 PM I 174
206 <206
1 / ^JI �InO 00 , AM u 207 u
a V t0
�`-
V M �
,.
a
O a
0 0
V [V Y
O O O
N T N
< N r
h �
of f9
Q
r � g
n a Q
v � V
SANTA MONICA
CA13- 0920 -0924
ALL HOURS
u
� V N
J A �
O N W
O Obi A
w a
o 0 0
O
3 3 y
r
W n0 Nip
W
AM
0
0
0
0
PM
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
0
0
o0
7TH
278 278 0 --- F--0--j TOTAL
132 132 0 0 PM I 44
146 146 0 0 AM
m m w
il In 9mm �
11101
PEAK HOUR
AM 8:00 AM
PM 5:30 PM
Total 0 0 0 0
FE 7TH
A N
a A
A A W
N � m
w
0 0 0
3 3 D
RE
Z
V
Cz W
LU
6 Q
Wr
>o
Ou
�LL
U�
Zr
Z6N' U
�a
Zm
Fmw
U�
yy °w
K�
W
H
m
0
N
O Q
M Z
U-N
s
W F F
HE
6
z
0
°
iu
vQieu
S..
0�3
�Fd
z
pOG
Z4
G
N�
l
r?i
F
w k 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 k-
-7-
O
71010 0
0
0 010
0 O
O
O O
O 0
0 0
0 0
0 O
O O O
O O
0
0 0 0
V
mz
3x
000000000000000000000
—
00000000°00°000°00000
000000000000000000000
v`�iwx
000000000000000000000
gz
000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000
�a�U�x
a
0
Z X
0
0 0
0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0
0 0 010
0
0
0 0
o p
o p
p o
o b
p o
o p
o 0
0 0
0 0
o p p
k00000000010000000100000
777
000000000po0000
0
°
m
z
k
000000000000000000000
0°000000°°00000101°10000
z
3x
o
U
"'
z
wx
o
0
0
w
m
`,.°
o m
O a0 O�
til�l/m1O
b1�000000M
^v
mm ^
^g000tiNTm(`IP
minb
p�mn�nrobanMb.+oM
O�NNObNmtiMmOO�y
W
r
OOOOOPm
P
I
� Z M�
F
hMmOmOIMO
NMN�MPtiN
MOTOVbI
4bInNWO�N0�00
N.yNN
NN
�j
z
CJO`
m°
�!O
MOM
bOm
OpW
h
61N
UwI
,y
N.-�NH
tiNti
00
°
--
.a
°
N
M
z
QOFN
o
N°
N °
by
^pN
bNmPI�MVl
1�
MI�bIO
I�OI�I�nV�bNNti
m
IIJ
m�tiNti�tiN
m°
NOS
Wx
OOm
p0
O
OOtO
p
ry
n
mx
N
o°
°
°moo°
0
000
00
0
op
007
op
°oo
0
S��x
�
„x
000
00
0
o
00
°
og
o
NPhV1
N�
POTOIO
NMNti
m(O
.yNtiNN�w
I�NNO�O
VIN.
-�
Oo
MAO
a
��
Z`�
u,
V)NMM
mrn0
O
Z
f
a
uQ'
m6rcx
z
00
0oon
°o
°M OO
u
m
w
°
Zn
MoN
l+l NW
N
�+Iti�
N�
m
3
orQY
�¢r
y��Ef
Q 6
6 Q
�affffff
Q 6
0 0
0 6
6 Q
�f�f
Q Q
Q Q
FafF
Q Q
or
Q 6 Z
oGrFfa�aaf
d' 2 IQL
2' p
d
R
6 W
h 6
FFEffa��f
d d
h 2
d d
6 6
Effa
d h
6 d d
m U
Q W VI U W
6
otio�n
0�n
ovIOM
vlotiovl
°Mao
MP
°p ,'^.
!nMUM UwQtw
Q WO
°M,a
MOB
o.+
,n
v°..
ni
Oi
MOVlo
Mpvlw
aaw Ka
w
Iz
°
�oen��rwbi
rlg
o.+Mao.+
vimmmo+,.
.000£°
°rvri
ri ri
m
44
inY
a'V
VUi iri
Gl
vi io
ego
�o n���ozV�y°
�o
cd
..
....ten
�2
°¢mo¢
aut�Jn
�6a¢mO6Q
�¢
a
O6¢
<
Wtl
Wd
O
U
a
m
V M �
PACIFIC TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
6TH
0 0 0 0 TOTAL 0�
0 0 0 0 PM
0 0 00Iy 0 AM 0 u
a Q
0 0
N
O O
N N v
1O m
N
m
w m m
r n
Q
n a Q
FOR
v � V
SANTA MONICA
CA13- 0920 -0924
ALL HOURS
ff
alml�l�
AM
31
0
366
397
PM
39
0
310
349
TOTAL
70
0
676
746
o o Iol
O
3 3 j
r
6TH
0 0 0 0 TOTAL
0 0 0 0 PM ' =l I u
0 0 0 0 AM LJ 0 u
<::D a a
n uo� �—✓
00 WE
PEAK HOUR
AM 8:00 AM
PM 4:30 PM
Nip
w
m m �
0 0 0
0
0
3 a
r
AM 2311
Total 26 0 313 339
6TH
14o
H
Z
v
w
u
Z�
W
W
F
iO
OC U
G LL
Z�
H
U
Z m
0 o
pH. �
Lu
G
w
H
N
O
N
Z
S N
N C1
�Opwar
X00
U
Z
0
£
Fa Ow
Z V O
Z
F
N Nw
O'� 3
K
00¢
Y
.M+o
J
J
k
p
O p
p p
OO
p p
pp
O p
p p
p p
O p
p p
O O
O p
p O
O p
p p
p O
O p
p pp
OO
p
p
U
�M3x
oo0oo0000000000000000
000°°000000
0000000
00°
o00000p00000000000000
000000000000000000000
z�wx
¢O
N X
O
O O
......
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
w
m
a
zx
000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000
k000000100000000100001000
of oo
oOOOOOOpO
O Oo
OOO
Ooo
m
z
z
0
TFU
—
u
w
u
p
mx
z
o
c�
k
000000000000000000000
00010000
poop
0100000000
z
0
3x
a
u
p
zx
¢
�
yrh
�N"n
YOOOOOOq
.N.
N n
�
om
°MMPmomrnPMnomo
.+m
O�OOm
M
rn X10
JAL
W
O
OOOOOOCOOOOOP'M
01ti
pm10000�OnnOHnM'aN001
O
mma1
Q�001010101m
O�mm
V
Al O
HNTm
n
V
4z N�
3X
o 00
0
o po
0
z
;F
me'x
o0
000
°o
°oR
tn ?
w
o
o
�:x
000
°\o°
p
ogo
0
0
w..
Iwev
1°n
°am
rvm
Mo
mrvlmi
N
In
liOi11M�1
°°1i lomnel°nmrv�al"'�1
M N
mMT
`rNym
dm
M
N
d
m
"'
e°1
n.+rvo
MaD
_
__
m
m
noPNPm
.m
NVM
N
z
D
�o
oo
�N
m°
°m Vp1
M
ti
IOPeM
Na
mvn
0
n�wloventiW.
,V
W°
hNOMOMmN
N
N
N N
ti
°n
N\O
N N
No
N
O
�
m�.M
N
M M
+P
M N
IOn
N N
O'm
P ti�
mntO
N
tOPPN
N N
N ti
fi
Ino
pn�
CC
'^ mo
Np�
Ip
M
M
n 'a
O
°
N
.a
N
fi
Z
NP
VI'm1N00°M
..
-_
�OmW10
O°i00timON
O(�1NN
mB�N
PtiT
Tb
NMpVi
F;�
NNNNNNNN
mN
-vl
01M�
MMMNNNMMMNMMMMMM
pID
'
.tim0
SS
0
JN
OP
OIb�)1�00f0
NoM
01N
Mo
VNj
m
m
mT01M
�O Ohm
WmID
1ONMN10
tpNnmWmMOi
V1
v1
VnjoM
MmP
nM
N
N
tiPM
01P
.n4
.M-i .1/iitititi
N
n
�N
µNNNNNN�NpN
W0+0
Ma
N
NoNnO(�m'yN
N
NM ^V1M
m0�
N;Ob
Oro
0
Z
000�ONi
NNtiN'a
0°+mW
tiPy
Wvl
W
Np
PM
z
�
mo
P °
°.°i
u`Q
Vl ln/I 01�
ho
IpP
wN \W
ON °m
m
_..
mnn
M mN.N
ryry
-IN
_.
bNaOtiM10
ry�MMMMM°�NNNNNN
V1N
m01
OPNNfiti
nm
u
h
n
_.
K
O
-
-
zxo
_.
w
z
P
3
aaa¢¢a¢a¢¢aaaaa¢aa
¢
a in
zLLUanwwwaawwwaaWwwwn
ap
. w ww
rte¢
iwQ
Vd.w
VIO
VI O°�OV10NM
1+10
pN °MNUa
mPw¢WaWa=WMV'O.yMPOtiMPOtiMVO
wNU
Ov10N
v10
V10
ON
. y 1°�1
ON
V'Oti
Uaz
¢IjIW
aSW
�/W1
tiMP
isnnnmmma
MPOti
POtiMV
V1
V1b
b10
tOhn
Z=dY
1-
tp
1p 1p
�O
+rnNNm000OO�pZ�OY�NNMMMMPPPPYIN
�Jww(�Jp.Qp
O °a
ww w
RM
> ¢ a
¢
Wtl
Wd
=
PACIFIC TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
4-J
Q
0 a Q
r
N O W
d
� v N
{h N
R- EH
MW
6
0 i Q
r
N
W M
INp M tr1
W N fD
SANTA MONICA
CA13- 0920 -0924
ALL HOURS
�vo ,
a°o e
moo e
O
� 3 D
n 1,204
LINCOLN
AM
PM
0
0
11,027 0
0
6,746
4,938
4,281 TOTAL
2,557 PM
4,063
A
7,495
1,679
AM
1,806 u
N N W
j
3,532 0
1,808
1,724
0
lu
a
o 0 0
4-J
Q
0 a Q
r
N O W
d
� v N
{h N
R- EH
MW
6
0 i Q
r
N
W M
INp M tr1
W N fD
SANTA MONICA
CA13- 0920 -0924
ALL HOURS
�vo ,
a°o e
moo e
O
� 3 D
LINCOLN
3,800 0 2,166 1,634 TOTAL
1,945 0 1,224 721 PM 1 1,045 ,lur
1,855 0 942 1 913 1 AM u 862
l 0 0 0
woe e
aee e
757 803 1 560
0
0
3 3 D
UN
n 1,204
n
AM
PM
0
0
922
419
1,341
2,650
A
Total 0
1,679
1,222 2,901
N N W
j
LINCOLN
0
2285 n
I/�
AM 0
1,604
1,569
1,257
3,173
4,915
5,g7p JI\
PM 0
3,658
8,167
TOTAL 0
5,262
2,826
8,088
LINCOLN
3,800 0 2,166 1,634 TOTAL
1,945 0 1,224 721 PM 1 1,045 ,lur
1,855 0 942 1 913 1 AM u 862
l 0 0 0
woe e
aee e
757 803 1 560
0
0
3 3 D
UN
n 1,204
n
AM
PM
0
0
922
419
1,341
2,650
Total 0
1,679
1,222 2,901
LINCOLN
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2640 Walnut Avenue, Ste H
Tustin, CA. 92780
Location:
: 7TH STREET
Segment:
: N/O PICO BOULEVARD
Client:
: CITY ODE SANTA M
Site: SANTA MONICA
Date: 12/17/13
Interval
Begin
AM- NB
PM- NB
Day: Tuesday
12:00
0
4
10
89
12:15
0
31
12:30
3
36
12:45
1
12
1:00
0
0
it
34
1:15
0
10
1:30
0
5
1:45
0
8
2:00
3
4
9
33
2:15
0
4
2:30
0
8
2:45
1
12
3:00
0
1
10
28
3:15
0
8
3:30
1
6
3:45
0
4
4:00
0
0
7
15
4:15
0
6
4:30
0
2
4:45
0
0
5:00
0
1
2
17
5:15
0
3
5:30
1
8
5:45
0
4
6:00
1
6
4
14
6:15
0
3
6:30
1
5
6:45
4
2
7:00
7
131
8
20
7:15
13
6
7:30
34
2
7:45
77
4
8:00
84
135
5
11
8:15
41
2
8:30
7
2
8:45
3
2
9:00
9
20
1
5
9:15
1
0
9:30
8
2
9:45
2
2
10:00
6
22
4
4
10:15
10
0
10:30
4
0
10:45
2
0
11:00
14
38
2
8
11:15
14
0
11:30
5
6
11:45
5
0
Totals
362
_ -..
278
Peak Hour 7:30 12:15
Volume 236 90
Factor 0.7 0.63
DayTmal 640
Location: : 7TH STREET
Segment: : N/O PICO BOULEVARD
Client: : CITY OF SANTA MO
Interval
Begin AM - SB
12:00
2
4
12:15
0
2,204
12:30
0
12:45
2
1:00
2
2
1:15
0
1:30
0
1:45
0
2:00
0
0
2:15
0
2:30
0
2:45
0
3:00
2
4
3:15
0
3:30
2
3:45
0
4:00
2
7
4:15
3
4:30
0
4:45
2
5:00
1
14
5:15
3
5:30
2
5:45
8
6:00
11
65
6:15
8
6:30
8
6:45
38
7:00
99
211
7:15
42
7:30
22
7:45
48
8:00
102
201
8:15
66
8:30
22
8:45
11
9:00
20
51
9:15
16
9:30
4
9:45
11
10:00
14
94
10:15
22
10:30
22
10:45
36
11:00
26
95
11:15
25
11:30
18 -
11:45
26
Totals 748
Peak Hour 7:30
Volume
238
Factor
0.58
DayTotal
2,204
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2640 Walnut Avenue, Ste H
Tustin, CA. 92780
PM - SB
23
16
35
26
11
19
34
22
20
50
24
20
50
103
64
64
62
57
44
52
59
44
54
58
58
52
42
33
45
24
21
14
23
10
16
11
20
9
10
6
14
10
3
2
10
4
6
2
1,456
3:15
293
0.71
86
114
281
215
215
185
104
60
45
29
22
Site: SANTA MONICA
Date: 12110/13
Day: Tuesday
I
Tree Relocation Plan
Saam
Planning & Community Development Department
Strategic & Transportation Planning Division
1685 Main Street, Room 212 ,.
P.O. BOX 2200
Santa Monica, CA 90407 -2200
M
9e11191k 1lfonfoa`
Dear Mr. Rod Gould,
Strategic and Transportation Planning staff along with an internal City team from Public
Landscape, Public Works, Transportation Engineering, Police, and Big Blue Bus has
been working on implementing a Safe Routes to School Grant to reduce barriers to
walking and biking at Santa Monica High School. The final draft recommendations for
improvements around the school include a redesign of the Pico Boulevard median
between 7th and 6th Streets to accommodate a new traffic signal at 7th Street and a
center running cycle track with a landscaped barrier.
Eight trees were inspected by the Urban Forester in the median from 7th to 6th Streets.
Three of the eight have been determined to be suitable candidates for transplanting to
another location in the public right -of -way. The remaining five trees are of a poor
structural condition with a limited potential useful life expectancy. Therefore these trees
are recommended for removal.
The Safe Routes project was discussed at the Santa Monica Urban Forest Task Force
on January 22, 2014. The Task Force recommended that the three viable trees be
relocated if possible to the west side of 7th Street along the school site. If this is
determined to be a nonviable site the trees will be relocated further west within the Pico
Boulevard median between 6th and 4th Streets.
1
Michelle Glickert
Senior Transportation Planner
Strategic and Transportation Planning
Cc: Martin Pastucha, Director of Public Works
Darrell Baker, Public Landscape Superintendent, Public Works
Tel: 310- 458 -8341