Loading...
SR-03-19-2013-4ACity of City Council Report Santa Monlea City Council Meeting: March 19, 2013 Agenda Item: 4 To: Mayor and City Council From: Martin Pastucha, Director of Public Works Subject: Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan Recommended Action Staff recommends that the City Council review and comment on the draft Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan and direct staff to proceed with next steps. Executive Summary In 2009, the City began a Zero Waste Strategic Planning process to identify the new policies, programs and infrastructure that will enable the City to reach its Zero Waste goal of 95% diversion by 2030, or a per capita disposal rate of 1.1 pounds per person per day. The Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan will help the City strengthen its existing diversion operations while addressing significant fiscal challenges and emerging trends and technologies. The Plan will serve as a broad environmental and policy framework and guide the future development of the City's resource recovery and recycling policies, programs, and infrastructure. Staff, private partners and consultants have conducted analysis, research and public outreach while developing the draft of the Zero Waste Strategic Plan. The draft Plan includes guiding principles, programs, and identifies impacts to existing rate structures through the Year 2030. The goal in 2030 is to divert 95% of all waste generated within Santa Monica from landfills. Currently, 77% of all waste generated is diverted from landfills. The Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan lists diversion goals and programs necessary to achieve the 95% diversion goal in three planning categories: Short Term Goals (2013 — 2015); Medium Term Goals (2016 — 2022); Long Term Goals (2023 — 2030). Potential diversion programs, costs and effect on rate structure and greenhouse gas emissions impacts are all identified categories in the Plan. 1 Background The City of Santa Monica prides itself on being an environmental leader. The City's state -of- the -art waste diversion strategies contributed to the City reaching a 74% diversion rate in 2009. As another indicator of the City's diversion accomplishments, the City's calculated per capita disposal rate in 2010 was 3.6 pounds per person per day, well below the state targeted rate of 10.9 pounds per person per day. On June 23, 2009, Council directed staff to develop a Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan to strengthen and refine the City's current waste diversion operations. The City established the Zero Waste Planning Committee to effectively design and implement a zero waste program. This Committee was comprised of the Resource Recovery & Recycling Division (RRR), the Office of Sustainability and the Environment (OSE), Southern California Disposal and Allan Company. The committee recommended that a consultant would be needed to develop a long term Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan which would identify new and expanded operational programs, including producer responsibility, product stewardship, client responsibility, Council ordinances and resolutions as well as identifying impacts of all programs on future materials processing requirements and disposal rates. Council awarded a contract to HDR Engineering, Inc. on November 22, 2011 to develop a long term Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan. The Zero Waste Strategic Planning process included the following tasks: 1. Review and summary of current policies, programs, facilities, and rate structure. 2. Review and compilation of existing zero waste principles in the industry, and development of zero waste guiding principles relevant to the City. 3. Compilation of existing and projected waste generation and composition data. 4. Identification, evaluation, and selection of policy, program, and infrastructure options. 5. Calculation of potential diversion and greenhouse gas emission reductions. 6. Analysis of program costs and rate structure impacts. E Discussion I. What Is Zero Waste? Zero waste is a change of perspective. It requires rethinking what is traditionally regarded as trash and instead treating all materials as valued resources. Zero waste entails shifting consumption patterns, more carefully managing purchases, and maximizing the reuse of materials at the end of their intended use. Achieving zero waste entails encouraging the City, its residents, businesses, and visitors to reevaluate what is considered waste, and to maximize the recovery and reuse of the commodities to the maximum extent possible. The proposed Plan's Zero Waste goal is to achieve a 95% landfill diversion rate or a per capita disposal rate of 1.1 pounds per person per day by 2030. II. Guiding Principles The Santa Monica Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan (Plan) is based on ten Guiding Principles that provide a framework for the policies, programs and actions identified for implementation. These Zero Waste Guiding Principles are consistent with the Guiding Principles developed for the Santa Monica Sustainable City Plan. The Guiding Principles were presented to the public at the Santa Monica Festival in May 2012. Nearly 400 residents provided input during the event. The top three priorities identified by residents were: healthy communities; waste reduction; and education and outreach. These priorities are integrated in the Guiding Principles detailed below: 1. The Health of the Community and the Environment Guides all Policy Decisions 2. The Hierarchy for Managing Discarded Materials is to Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and then Recovery 3. Economic and Social Benefits are Integral to Zero Waste 4. The City Leads By Example 5. Brand Owners, Producers and Manufacturers Contribute to the Management of their Products and Packaging 6. Regional Partnerships Leverage the City's Efforts in Pursuing Zero Waste 3 7. Municipal Management of Local Collections and Processing Programs Ensures Local Control and Responsiveness 8. Education, Outreach and Marketing are Essential to Achieving Cultural Change 9. Research and Development of New Technologies, Collection Systems and Infrastructure are Needed to Maximize Diversion of Discarded Materials 10. Local Market Development for Reusable and Recyclable Materials Ensures Sustainability III. Goal Areas, Indicators and Targets The Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan is organized around six goal areas: 1. Waste Reduction 2. Environmental Benefits 3. Economic Benefits 4. City Leadership 5. Producer Responsibility 6. Zero Waste Culture Change Specific goals are established in each goal area representing what Santa Monica must achieve in order to become a Zero Waste community. For each goal, indicators have been developed to measure progress toward meeting the goals. The indicators will help determine the impact of a program, policy or action, and when tracked over time, will reflect the accomplishments and challenges of implementing the Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan. The indicators will measure the performance or effectiveness of specific policies or programs, and will be used to determine the need for future modifications to the Plan. For some goals, numeric targets have been established to further evaluate the accomplishments of the Plan. The goal areas, indicators and targets are listed in Table 1 -1. M Table 1 -1 1. Waste Reduction • 80% diversion by 2015 s Total citywide generation (also report per capita and by sector) • 95% diversion by 2030 • Amount landfilled • Amount diverted (recycled and • Per capita disposal rate of less than 3.6 composted, etc.) from landfill pounds /person /day by 2022 • Per capita disposal rate of less than 1.1 pounds /person /day by 2030 2. Environmental Benefits • 30% contribution to greenhouse gas • Greenhouse gas emissions reduction reduction goal through waste prevention through waste reduction and recycling and recycling by 2015 programs • 50% contribution to greenhouse gas • Conversion of City RRR fleets to clean reduction goal through waste prevention fuels /renewable and recycling by 2022 • 100% of all City RRR fleet vehicles to clean fuels by 2030 3. Economic Benefits • 20% increase in local jobs from waste • Creation of new jobs prevention and recycling • Local market development • Local market development 0 3 new local partnerships by 2015 0 5 new partnerships by 2022 4. City Leadership • Establish baseline • Zero waste at City offices and facilities • Recycling and composting at all City facilities by 2015 • 80% diversion rate at City facilities by 2015 • 95% diversion rate at City facilities by 2030 5. Producer Responsibility • State legislation or City ordinance to • Producer responsibility for problem address pharmaceuticals, sharps, products (advocacy at state level or batteries, fluorescent bulbs by 2022 implementation of City ordinances) • State legislation to address packing of products and additional disposal fees for packaging materials. 6. Zero Waste Culture Change • 80% participation for residents in City • Customer participation and reduced programs by 2015 contamination • 90% participation for all customers in [ • Zero waste awareness at home, at work, at school, at play City programs by 2022 • 100% participation for all customers in City programs by 2030 • Contamination reduced to 2% by 2015 • Contamination reduced to 1% by 2022 • 80% of residents and businesses aware of Zero Waste by 2015 • 90% of residents and businesses aware of Zero Waste by 2022 IV. Existing Waste Generation , Diversion and Disposal Analyzing the City's waste generation provides an understanding of which areas to target in the Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan. In 2011, the city's generation, as calculated by the California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle), was approximately 360,000 tons of materials. Out of the total tons generated, 77% was diverted through waste prevention, recycling, and composting, and 23% was disposed in landfills or waste -to- energy facilities. The total amount of materials generated is calculated using the city's average generation rate from the years 2003 through 2006. This methodology is consistent with the CalRecycle per capita disposal equivalent methodology (as set forth in state statute). The city's 2011 per capita disposal was 5.0 pounds per person per day (PPD). Compared to the state's per capita disposal target of 10.9 PPD, the City was well under the target goal. The city's overall 2011 generation is: 82,997 tons 275,355 tons 358,351 tons In 2011, 82,997 tons of materials were disposed in landfills or processed at waste -to- energy facilities. Commercial waste comprised approximately 50% of the disposed 0 waste, multi - family residential waste comprised almost 25 %, and single - family residential waste made up 8 %. The remaining disposal consisted of self -haul construction and demolition (C &D) debris. A summary of the disposed waste is provided in Table 1 -2. Table 1 -2 Understanding the types and quantities of materials that make up the discarded materials generated in the city is an important element of the Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan. The data helps guide the development and selection of policies, programs and facilities, and to target specific material types and /or products. Since discarded materials vary by user, it is important to analyze the materials generated by each sector. V. Disposal and Population Proiections Low and high population forecasts were provided in the City's 2010 Land Use and Circulation Element (LUCE). The forecasts used for the disposal projections are an average of the low and high population estimates from the LUCE. As shown in Table 1 -3, the average 5 -year percentage increase between 2010 and 2030 is 1.31 %, and the 20 year cumulative growth is 5.23 %. �i Table 1 -3 The disposal projection for the city was calculated based on population growth projections and waste composition data. Overall, it is anticipated that the waste disposal will increase by over 3,836 tons between 2013 and 2030, which represents an increase of approximately 226 tons per year. The commercial sector is expected to contribute an additional 109 tons per year to the disposal waste stream from 2013 to 2030. The multi - family residential sector disposal is expected to increase by 56 tons per year through 2030; the single - family residential sector disposal is expected to increase approximately 19 tons per year; and the self -haul sector by 42 tons per year. Utilizing this data the types and quantities of materials that potentially can be source reduced, recycled, and /or composted have been identified for each waste sector in the Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan. VI. List of Potential Options To meet its Zero Waste goal, the City would implement new and expanded policies, programs and infrastructure during the short term (2013- 2015), medium term (2016- 2022) and long term (2023- 2030). Policy, program, and facility options included opportunities to improve existing programs, as well as establish new programs to increase diversion. A list of 33 options was developed for review and evaluation and collapsed into six categories. The options are categorized as follows: 1. Mandatory - Policies or programs that are compulsory (such as meeting a diversion requirement) or prohibit an activity (such as a disposal or use ban). 2. Collection - Programs for the collection of residential and commercial food scraps, recyclables, and bulky items. 3. Rate Setting — Revised fee structures to account for basic and additional services, for single - family, multi - family, and commercial sectors. 4. Upstream — Policies and programs to support re- design strategies to reduce the volume and toxicity of discarded products and materials, and promote low- impact or reduced consumption lifestyles. 5. Downstream — Policies and programs to address reuse, recycling and composting of end -of -life products and materials to ensure their highest and best use. 6. Facilities — Local and regional, existing and new, resource recovery facilities for processing recyclables, residuals, and other materials for beneficial use and energy recovery. 1. Mandatory Mandatory requirements, new rules, and ordinances can be very effective strategies for achieving Zero Waste. The City would support these efforts through technical assistance, outreach and education, and reinforcement of desired behaviors. Descriptions of these strategies are: • Disposal bans on items such as plastic water bottles, cardboard, yard trimmings and construction and demolition debris as these items can be recycled, have available end -uses, and should not be disposed. • A revision of the C &D Ordinance to increase the diversion requirement from 70% to 95% by the year 2030. An amendment to the C &D ordinance would be required to implement the increased diversion requirements. • Adoption of mandatory diversion rates for single - family, multi - family, commercial, and government sectors by ordinance. The diversion mandates would be implemented in a phased approach. • Adoption of mandatory recycling in hotels /motels by ordinance would require all hotels and motels to implement a recycling program in guest rooms and common areas. 2. Collection The following is a list of potential collection initiatives to be implemented by the City. • Require Commercial Food Scraps Collection to motivate all commercial generators within the city to separate organic materials from the waste generated at a business, and place it in the appropriate organics collection container on a regular basis for collection. To effect this change, the City 9 would need to encourage behavioral change through education and outreach to assist waste generators to separate organics from other waste, and set the organics out for collection. • Require Residential Food Scraps and Other Organics Collection to motivate all residential generators within the city to separate organic materials from the waste they generate at home, and place these materials in the green collection container on a regular basis for collection. To effect this change, the City would need to encourage behavioral change through education and outreach to assist waste generators to separate organics from other waste, and set the organics out for collection. • Expand Mandatory Commercial Recycling based upon the existing requirements of AB 341. This is intended to motivate all commercial waste generators within the city to separate recyclable materials from the waste generated at a business, and place it in the appropriate blue bin or recycling collection container on a regular basis for collection. To effect this change, the City would need to develop and adopt a "Recycling" ordinance that requires waste generators to source separate recyclables from other waste, and set the recyclables out for collection. The recycling ordinance would need to be carefully developed based on consideration of potential impacts to business and customers, consistent with City policy directives. • Require Recycling of New Materials, which allows the City to establish collection programs for materials currently not collected in the blue bins from residential customers, including mattresses, carpet, and textiles. The City would work with processors and representatives of the recycling industry to identify market opportunities in the Southern California region for various materials that could be recycled. • Weekly Organics and Recycling Collection; Bi- weekly Refuse Collection would reduce the collection frequency of trash to every other week, while maintaining recycling and organics collection at once per week. The program would be implemented initially for single - family residences, and phased in later for multi - family residences. The City would need to ensure that there is sufficient processing capacity in the region to handle the increased organics tonnages that would be collected through the expanded green bin program. It is anticipated the program would result in an increase in waste diversion, as organics comprise 47% of the single - family disposed waste stream, and 43% of the multi - family disposed waste stream. Reduced operations costs are also anticipated based on results in other communities that have tested every other week refuse collection (e.g. Renton, Tacoma, and Seattle, Washington and Portland, Oregon). Other benefits of the program include fewer collection truck trips, which would reduce vehicle air, noise and greenhouse gas emissions, and increased collection efficiency in terms of labor time, and maintenance. • Wet/Dry Collection would transition from the every other week collection of trash to re -route existing residential and commercial collections to keep "wet" 10 discards (which include yard trimmings, food scraps and soiled paper, manure and other materials that decompose) separate from "dry' discards, such as paper, glass, etc. Wet discards would be collected for processing through composting or anaerobic digestion, and dry products and materials would be reused, repaired or recycled. This can also reduce disposal fees and increase revenues from the sale of recyclables due to the increase tons of materials recovered. It is anticipated the wet/dry collection would increase diversion by about 8% in the residential sector, and 6% in the commercial sector. Before this program could be implemented on a citywide basis, the City would need to ensure that there is sufficient processing capacity in the region to handle the increased recyclables and organics that would be collected. Bulky Item Collection: Move -in /Move -out Program would be implemented to provide excess waste pickup resources services for multi - family residents moving in /out of their homes. The City would collaborate with reuse entities (thrift stores, repair shops, and non - profits such as Goodwill Industries, Salvation Army, St. Joseph's Center, and American Cancer Society Discovery Shop) to repair, reuse, and resell appropriate bulky items that are currently being set out by residents for collection and landfilled. 3. Rate Setting The existing fees collected by the City pay for more than just refuse collections and disposal. Fees pay for collection and processing of recyclables, food scraps, yard debris and bulky items, as well as equipment, infrastructure, container replacements, support services, alternative technology studies. Changes to the rate structure can have a significant effect in motivating customers to participate in new programs, and to account for basic services and additional services. • Implement Single - Family Integrated Waste Management Fee Structure to more accurately account for basic services and additional services. The fee structure would be based on all of the commodities serviced: waste, recycling and organics. The fee structure would also provide further incentives for customers to increase recycling and reduce disposal. The advantages of this type of fee structure are increased diversion and decreased disposal, and a potential reduction in collections costs for the City collections operations. It is anticipated this type of fee structure would result in a 4% increase in diversion in the single - family sector. *Implement Multi - Family and Commercial Sector Integrated Waste Management Fee Structure to establish sufficient customer rate incentives for commercial and multi - family refuse customers to increase recycling and 11 decrease refuse service. The fee structure would be based on all of the commodities serviced: waste, recycling and organics. Refuse rate component: Commercial customer rates would be modified to reflect a uniform "per cubic yard" rate for the whole range of bin or container sizes and collection frequency offered to customers. The amount of the cubic yard (unit) rate would be established to ensure that sufficient revenues are generated to cover the City's costs. For example, the City would charge a rate of $100 for a one cubic -yard bin collected once per week, the rate would be $200 for the one cubic -yard bin collected two times per week, $400 for a four cubic -yard bin collected once per week, or $1,200 for a six cubic yard bin collected two times per week. Recycling rate component: A recycling rate would be established under this fee structure, as measured by the full service costs for recycling materials. Based upon the quantity of recycling, this rate could be less than the refuse rate. 4. Upstream • Extended Producer Responsibility calls for the City to take an active role and work with various federal, state and regional agencies and community groups in advocating for legislation that requires product manufacturers, retail establishments, wholesale distributors and other appropriate entities to take back certain products or packaging that currently are difficult to recycle, contain toxics or otherwise pose problems when they are discarded as waste. • Packaging Legislation advocates for packaging legislation making businesses responsible for their packages, including alternatives to expanded polystyrene containers, "peanuts" and "blocks" and plastic bags (statewide); and support for reusable shipping containers. • Behavior Change Marketing by undertaking a large scale media or social marketing campaign to significantly increase awareness of its existing and planned Zero Waste programs. 5. Downstream • Expand Single -use Carry -out Bag and Disposable Container Ordinance would set a goal date to expand the program to all retailers and restaurants. Expansion of the bans would further help to reduce the amount of plastic that ends up on the city's beaches, reduce materials that go to the landfill, and reduce the amount of natural resources used to manufacture and transport the disposable products. IN • Multi - family Recvclinq Educational Outreach would provide enhanced technical assistance to owners and managers of multi - family complexes in order to encourage them to initiate or expand recycling and waste reduction practices at their complexes, and to make tenants aware of the move - in /move -out program. • Self -haul Waste Origin Reporting is intended to establish regional cooperation between cities, counties, and facilities that are responsible for reporting the origin of waste. • Regional Sustainability Collaboration would form the basis for establishing regional Zero Waste goals throughout Southern California as well as identify opportunities for regional coordination and to undertake project- specific regional opportunities. • Environmental Directory On -line version would create an on -line only version of the Directory, eliminating the print version entirely. The on -line version would include new and/or updated resources, and would be made available and searchable on the City's website. • Rewards Program would expand the City's recognition by rewarding residents and businesses for developing programs in the city for reusing, repurposing, reducing, and recycling of waste. The program may stimulate local job growth and markets for recovered materials, creating a new reuse industry in the city. • Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Collection at Public Events would entail placement and servicing of HHW collection containers at public events, and City events such as the Santa Monica Festival. • Expand Items Collected In Recycling Cart would add new materials to the existing list of materials that can be placed in the recycling cart for collection by the City, including textile and other items. Adding new materials would reduce the quantity of materials being disposed. • Centralized Garage Sales would establish a program for residents to sell items in a centralized location, in lieu of the many garage sales that are typically held in the city. It is the intent of the program to encourage more residents to resell and reuse items before discarding them, and provide residents with limited space an opportunity to sell their items. • Business and Restaurant Food Donation would help businesses and restaurants to find resources that accept food donations. 6. Facilities • Regional Resource Recovery Center (RRCs) can be small centers for drop - off of hard to recycle items, including mattresses, large blocks of Styrofoam, and textiles, or much larger facilities that include a reuse yard for building materials, and provide repair and refurbishment for reusable bulk items and 13 other reusable materials delivered by the public. They can also handle HHW materials, brush, and other recoverable materials. Reduced tipping fees at RRCs can provide a significant incentive to users. Most provide drop -off or buyback options for revenue - generating recyclables. Some charge lower rates for certain items (e.g., yard trimmings, clean fill). Diversion levels and costs at RRCs can vary widely depending on the extent and type of the diversion activities. • Alternative Technology Facilities would allow the City alternative means of processing its wet and dry materials. A number of emerging technologies are currently under consideration or in development with the potential to provide substantial increases in diversion rates. Examples of these emerging technologies include thermal and biological processes, including anaerobic digestion, gasification, and pyrolysis. • Residual Processing would consist of transforming a portion of the City's waste into energy. It is estimated the City can achieve a 93% diversion rate with the implementation of the policies, programs and infrastructure described in the previous option. However, in the future, the City may continue to utilize transformation of residuals to achieve 95% diversion by 2030. VII. Diversion and Green House Gas Emissions Reductions Estimates Diversion estimates were prepared to identify the waste disposal reduction potential of each policy and program. Based on the city's 2012 diversion rate of 77 %, it is estimated the city can achieve 92% diversion by 2030 through implementation of all the policies, programs and facilities identified, and a 95% diversion with residual waste processing. The commercial sector programs with the greatest diversion potential include mandatory food scraps recycling, expanding the types of recycled materials collected, wet/dry collection, increasing the C &D ordinance diversion requirement, and behavior change marketing. For the residential sector, the options with the greatest diversion potential include mandatory food scraps recycling, mandatory diversion rate, behavior change marketing, and wet/dry collection. In the multi - family sector, the options with the highest diversion potential include implementing an integrated waste management fee structure, behavior change marketing, mandatory food scraps recycling, mandatory diversion rate, wet/dry IM, collection, and converting to bi- weekly refuse collection. Table 1 -4 shows the diversion estimates if the options listed in the plan are adopted and implemented. Table 1 -4 InSF I= Residential 1,819 1,249 130 926 736 4,860 1.3% 1,248 6,107 1.7% MF 4.032 4,686 1,244 3,098 1,970 15,031 4.1% 3,377 18,408 5.0% Residential Commercial 5,410 5,090 4,669 6,168 10,490 31,826 8.7% 4,919 36,745 10.0% Self -Haul 0 2,543 0 0 1,711 4,254 1.2% 0 4,254 1.2% C &D 0 0 0 0 976 976 0.3% 0 976 0.3% Diversion (tons) 11,261 13,568 6,043 10,192 15,883 56,946 9,543 66,490 Diversion (%) 3.1% 3.7% 1.6% 2.8% 4.3% 15.6% 18.2% Based on the estimated diversion rates in the Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan, the city's overall Green House Gas (GHG) emissions would be reduced by 17,629 metric tons of carbon equivalent (MTCE) by 2030. The GHG emissions reductions are calculated based on the program implementation timeline (i.e. short term, short-to- medium term, medium term, etc.). The long term programs include residual processing, modeled as combustion (waste -to- energy). The GHG emissions reductions are shown in Table 1 -5. 15 Table 1 -5 SF Residential (517) (255) (58) (307) (262) 98 (1,301) MF Residential (1,482) (1,438) (556) (1,094) (920) 189 (5,301) Commercial (1,935) (1,973) (1,249) (2,489) (3,037) 545 (10,138) Self -Haul - (467) - - (284) - (751) C &D - - - $ (138) - (138) TOTAL (3,934) (4,133) (1,863) (3,890) (4,641) 832 (17,629) Note: a negative value (i.e., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission reduction; a positive value indicates an emission increase VIII. Financial and Cost Analysis The first steps in determining the selected zero waste programs' costs and rate impacts involve developing an understanding of the operational and capital costs for existing programs and establishing a baseline. Table 1 -6 shows the costs associated with current operations: Table 1 -6 Labor $ $ 1,394,476 $ 2,243,936 $ 3,939,579 $ 7,577,991 Equipment 442,492 $ 1,242,954 $ 1,718,448 $ 3,201,892 $ 6,163,294 Other 1 $ $ 550,652 $ 786,368 $ 953,502 $ 2,290,522 Subtotal Direct Costs 1 $ 3,188,082 $ 4,748,752 $ 8,094,973 $ 16,031,808 Allocated Transfer Processing $ 234,074 $ (118,343) $ 137,734 $ 253,465 Disposal $ 442,492 $ 1,446,126 $ 2,682,622 $ 4,571,240 Subtotal Material Handling $ 955,442 1 $ 1,826,590 1 $ 3,801,625 $ 6,583,656 Subtotal Operations Costs $ 4,143,5241 $ 6,676,3421 $ 11,896,598 1 $ 22,615,464 Admin & Overhead $ 784,838 1 $ 923,740 1 $ 867,978 $ 2,576,556 Total Program Costs 1 $ 4,928,362 $ 7,499,082 $ 12,764,576 $ 25,192,020 The cost analysis is designed to assist the City in making planning -level decisions regarding the selection of appropriate programs for the Zero Waste Plan. The analysis considers two quantitative factors: 16 • Diversion potential (measured by tons per year); and, • Cost effectiveness (measured by the cost per diverted ton). For each selected program, the incremental change in the annual cost for the program and the cost per ton diverted was estimated. The cost estimates provide a reasonable basis for understanding the potential cost impacts and how costs between programs compare to one another. The estimates presented herein are not intended to calculate the precise results of each program. The tables present a "low" and "high" estimate of the incremental change in the costs associated with the implementation of these programs. The range of costs is reflective of the range experienced in other communities that have implemented these or similar programs. Table 1 -7 presents the incremental annual change in program costs, the estimated tons diverted by program, and the cost/(savings) per diverted ton for each of the selected programs. Table 1 -7 Resl?I•nHal ', Luw :High ' LourMidpoipt High Food Scraps Collection Short $ 90,346 $ 132,755 1,124 $ g0 $ 99 $ 118 Behavior Change Marketing Short $ 28,582 $ 60,418 410 $ 70 $ 109 $ 147 Weekly Organics and Recyclables Collection; Bi- Weekly Refuse Collection Short-Med $ (157,402) $ (137,671) 504 $ (312) $ (292) $ (273) Wet /Dry Collection Med -Long $ (295,135) $ (252,622) 562 $ (525) $ (487) $ (449) Residuals Processing Long $ 10,716 $ 13,211 1,248 $ 9 $ 10 $ 11 'Loa , k(igh Law Midpoint High Behavior Change Marketing Short $ 211,746 $ 375,609 1,549 $ 137 $ 190 $ 242 Bulky tem Cal lection ;Move -In /Move -Out Program Program Short-Med $ 160,896 $ 230,483 176 $ 916 $ 1,114 $ 1,312 Weekly Organics and Recyclables Collection; Bi- Weekly Refuse Collection Short-Med $ (229,434) $ (201,057) 2,694 $ (85) $ (80) $ (75) Food Scraps Collection - Cart Customers Medium $ 39,381 $ 58,132 476 1 $ 83 $ 102 $ 122 Food Scraps Collection - Bin Customers Medium $ 130,258 $ 300,681 463 $ 281 $ 465 $ 649 Wet /Dry Col lection Med -Long $ (94,878) $ (81,319) 1,615 $ (59) $ (55) $ (50) Residuals Processing $ 29,006 $ 35,760 3,377 $ 9 $ 10 $ 11 Gominerclal ", Low High Low 'Midpoint, High Behavior Change Marketing $ (101,132) $ (44,065) 2,831 $ (36) $ (26) $ (16Food Scraps Collection gShort $ 456,964 $ 615,261 3,975 $ 115 $ 135 $ 155 Wet /Dry Collection $ (210,325) $ (185,492) 2,620 $ (80) $ (76) $ (71) Expansion of Mandatory Commercial Recycling $ 214,645 $ 355,382 906 $ 237 $ 315 $ 392 Residuals Processing $ 41,976 $ 51,750 4,887 $ 9 $ 10 $ 11 17 Using the cost analysis data, the percentage impact on existing customer rates for each of the selected program options was calculated. The rate impacts for each selected program are cumulative. The rate impacts are based on fiscal year 2013 budget data and cumulative future tonnage diversion assumptions. An average change of the "Low" and "High" rate impacts are illustrated in Table 1 -8. Table 1 -8 The most cost effective programs are those that result in net cost savings. These programs are illustrated in Table 1 -9. M Table 1 -9 moll= Iies�den��ai „ Low High In Weekly Organics and Recyclables Collection; Bi- $ $ Weekly Refuse Collection (157,402) (137,671) 504 Wet /Dry Collection $ (295,135) $ (252,622) 562 Low High ' Weekly Organics and Recyclables Collection; Bi- Weekly Refuse Collection $ (229,434) $ (201,057) 2,694 Wet /Dry Collection $ (94,878) $ (81,319) 1,615 GdjnmerCral - owl' High Behavior Change Marketing $ (101,132) $ (44,065) 2,831 Wet /Dry Collection $ (210,325) $ (185,492) 2,620 An Integrated Waste Management System is essential to the infrastructure of trash collections. As a City that is leading the way in environmental initiatives and programs, reaching the goal of 95% diversion of all waste generated in the city by 2030 could be a reality. Implementation of the recommended strategies will be undertaken over an approximately 20 year period, from 2013 through 2030. During the implementation, staff will continue to evaluate the efficacy of each strategy, present updates to Council and recommend modifications of the Plan as necessary to meet the zero waste goals and objectives, and to adjust to the changing social, environmental, and economic conditions. Next Steps Based upon comments received from Council, staff will revise the Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan and begin outreach to the community for public comment. Upon completion of public comments, staff will return to Council with a revision of the Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan for final review and adoption. 19 Financial Impacts & Budget Actions There are no financial impacts associated with the recommendations in this report. Financial impacts of any and all program options in the Zero Waste Plan would be presented to Council during the five year financial forecasts, rate structure study and bi- annual budget process whenever a new program or program(s) are anticipated to be implemented to achieve our Zero Waste Goal. Prepared by: Kim Braun, Resource Recovery & Recycling Manager Approved: Attachments: 1 - Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan Forwarded to Council: Rod Gould City Manager 2 - Appendix A — Waste Characterization Analysis 3 - Appendix B — Population Projections 4 - Appendix C — Recommended Strategies 5 - Appendix D — Zero Waste Program & Diversion Details 6 - Appendix E — WARM Assumptions and Results 7 - Appendix F — Revenue and Expense Data from City 8 - Appendix G — Zero Waste Program Cost Analysis 9 - Appendix H — Report Contributors 20 0 it city of Santa monica zero waste strategic operations plan Zero Strategic 1 Operations ' c Prepared for: City of Santa Monica Public Works Department Resource Recovery & Recycling 2500 Michigan Avenue Santa Monica, CA 90404 Prepared by: IUR. 251 South Lake Avenue, Suite 1000 Pasadena, CA 91101 626- 584 -1700 19200 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 360 Irvine, California 92612 (949) 251 -8628 January 2013 1UR city of Santa monica zero waste strategic operations plan Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................. ............................... l -1 1.1 Background ......................................... ..................................................... ......... .................................... .... ........... .............. ___ ........ 1 -1 1.1.1 What Is Zero Waste? .......................................... ...... .... ................ ... ... ............................................................ ..... ................ 1 -2 1.2 Guiding Principles.. ................ ............... ............................................................ _ .... ............................ - .... ........ ....................... 1-2 1.3 Zero Waste Policy .............................................................................................................................................. ............................1 -4 1.4 Goal Areas, Goals, Indicators and Targets .............................................................................................. ............................1 -4 2.0 Current Conditions ..................................................................................................... ............................... 2 -7 2.1 Resource Recovery and Recycling Division ................................................. ............ ................................................ .......... 2 -7 2.1.1 Residential Collection Services ............................................. ............................. ..................................... ....................... 2 -7 2.1.2 Commercial Collection Services ....................................................................................................... ...........................2 -15 2.1.3 household Hazardous Waste .............................................. ........................................... .... ......................................... .2 -18 2.1.4 Zero Waste Events ................................... ........... ....................... ---- ...................... ........................................... ............ 2 -20 2.2 City Policies and Programs ...................................................................................................................... ............................... 2 -20 2.2.1 Santa Monica Municipal Code ( SMMC) ................................ ................................. ............ ....................................... 2 -20 2.2.2 Extended.Producer Responsibility .................................................................:....................--....... ...........................2 -24 2.2.3 Recycled Products Procurement Policy ....................................... ............ --- ......................... ---- .................... 2 -24 2.2.4 Sustainable City Plan ........................................................................................................................ ............................... 2 -25 2.2.5 Green Business Certification Program ........ .......................................... ...................................... ........................... -2 -26 2.2.6 Sustainable Quality Awards ....................... ................................................... ............................. .. ..... . ..... ...... ................ 2 -27 2.2.7 US Conference of Mayors /California Public Interest Research Group (CA6PIRG) Buy RecycledCampaign .......................................... .............................. ......................................................................................... ..... 2 -27 2.2.8 City's Purchase and Use of Tropical Forest Wood Products ........................................ .... .............................. 2 -27 2.2.9 Print Shop Purchasing Policy ............................................................... ............................... ......................................... 2 -27 2.2.10 Electronic Waste .............................................................................................................................. ............................... 2 -27 2.2.11 Used Oil and Filter Col lection ......................................................................................................... ...........................2 -27 2.2.12 Christmas Tree Recycling ................... ............................................. ........................... ... ............................................. 2 -27 2.2.13 Catalogue Choice .................................................................................................................................. ...........................2 -29 2.2.14 Scheduled Events ............................................................................................................................. ............................... 2 -29 2.3 Resource Recovery and Recycling Processing Facil ities .................................................. ................................ ......... 2 -29 2.3.1 Santa Monica Community Recycling Center ............................................................................-- ..........................2 -29 2.3.2 Southern California Disposal Transfer Station ......................................................................... ...........................2 -30 t it city of santa monica m zero waste strategic operations plan - 2.4 Educational Outreach ..................................................................................................................................... ...........................2 -30 2.4.1 Sustainable Works ................................................................................................................................. ...........................2 -30 2.4.2 Community Sustainability Liaison .............................................................................................. ............................... 2 -31 2.4.3 Educational Outreach Tools .............................................................................................................. ...........................2 -31 2.4.4 Educational Outreach Events .......... ................................. .... ........................... :............ .. ..... ___ .... .. .......... .................. 2 -32 3.0 Generation and Characterization ............................................................................. ............................3 -1 3.1 Existing Generation ........................................................................................................................................... ............................3 -1 3.2 Waste Diversion .............................................................................................................................................. ............................... 3 -1 3.3 Disposal .................................................................................................................................................................. ............................3 -3 3.4 Discarded Materials Characterization .......................................................... ....... ... ....................................................... ....... 3 -3 . 3.4.1 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................... ............................3 -3 3.4.2 Single- Family Residential Waste Composition ..........................................._........................... ............................... 3 -5 3.4.3 Multi - Family Residential ....................................................................................................................... ............................3 -6 3.4.4 Commercial ................................................................................................................................................. ............................3 -7 3.4.5 Self - Haul ....................................................................................................................................................... ............................3 -8 3.5 Disposal Projections ......................................................................................................................................... ............................3 -9 3.5.1 Population Projections ........................................................................................................................... ............................3 -9 3.5.2 Future Disposal ......................................................................................................................................... ....:.......................3 -9 4.0 Zero Waste Options ....................................................................................................... ............................4-1 4.1 Initial List of Potential Options .................................................................................................................... ............................4 -1 4.2 Recommended Strategies ........................................................................................................................... ............................... 4 -5 4.2.1 Mandatory ................... ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 -5 4.2.2 Collection ..................................................................................................................................................... ............................4 -6 4.2.3 Rate Setting ............................................................................................................................................... ........:..................4 -10 4.2.4 Upstream .................................................................................................................................................... ...........................4 -11 4.2.5 Downstream ............................................................................................................................................. ...........................4 -13 4.2.6 Facilities ..................................................................................................................................................... ...........................4 -16 5.0 Diversion and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Estimates ............... ............................... 5 -1 5.1 Diversion Estimates ................. - ........................................................... ........................................................................................ 5 -1 5.2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Estimates ................................................................................ ............................5 -3 6.0 Financial and Cost Analysis 6.1 Financial Analvsis ......................... 6 -1 6.2 Cost Analysis ........................................................................................................................................................ ............................6 -4 6.3 Customer Rate Impact Analysis ................................. ......................... ........... .... ... .... ........................... .................. .............. ...6 -5 city of santa monica —� zero waste strategic operations plan 6.4 Program Impact Observations ..................................................................................................................... ............................6 -7 7.0 Implementation ........................................................................................................... ............................... 7 -1 Exhibits Exhibit 2 -1. Map of SF Residences Participating in the Pilot Food Scraps Collection Program ...........................2 -12 Exhibit 2 -2. Used Oil and Oil Filter Collection Locations ...... ................................................................................................. 2 -28 Exhibit 3 -1. Single Family Residential Disposed Waste Composition .................................................... ............................3 -5 Exhibit 3 -2. Multi - Family Residential Disposed Waste Composition ..................................................... ............................3 -6 Exhibit 3 -3. Commercial Disposed Waste composition- Percentages ..................................................... ....... ......... .. ...... ..3 -7 Exhibit 3 -4. Self -Haul Disposed Waste Composition Percentages ........................................................... ............................3 -8 Exhibit7 -1. Implementation Schedule .............................................................................................................. ............................... 7 -2 Tables Table 1 -1. Goal Areas, Indicators and Targets .................................................................................................... ............................1 -5 Table 2 -1. Residential Tonnages ( 2011) .............................................................................................................. ............................2 -7 Table 2 -2. Items Accepted in the City's Recycling Program ...................................................................... ...........................2 -10 Table 2 -3. Bi- Monthly Single - Family Residential Collection Rates .................. ................................................................. 2 -11 Table 2 -4. Bi- Monthly Multi - Family Residential Collection Rates ........................................................ ...........................2 -14 Table 2 -S. Commercial Tonnages ( 2011) ...................................................................................................... ............................... 2 -15 Table 2 -6. Bi- Monthly Commercial Collection Rates (FY 2011 / 2012) ............................ .............................................. 2 -17 Table 2 -7. Materials accepted at the City's HHW Center ............................................................................ ...........................2 -19 Table 2 -8. Approved C &D Recycling Facilities ................................................ ..................... .................. ___ .... .... ...................... 2 -23 Table 2 -9. City - Approved Mixed C &D Recycling Facilities ............................................................ ....................................... 2 -24 Table 2-10. 2010 Sustainable Report Card Grades ....................................................................................... ...........................2 -26 Table 2 -11. Educational Outreach Media ................ ......................... ............................................. ........... ............. .. ............. .. ...... 2 -31 Table 2 -12. Citywide Environmental Events ................................................................................................... ...........................2 -32 Table 3 -1. Overall Generation 2011 (tons) ......................................................................................................... ............................3 -1 Table3 -2. 2011 Diversion Summary .................................................................................................................. ............................... 3 -2 Table 3 -3. 2011 Disposal Summary ( tons) ......................................................................................................... ............................3 -3 Table 3 -4. Composition by Material Category and Generator Sector ...................................................... ...........................3 -4 Table 3 -5. Population Forecasts ( 2010 - 2030) ................... .. ....................................................... .... .............. - .............................. 3 -9 ` \ iii -., % e it cit of santa monica v zero waste strategic operations plan Table 3 -6. Waste Disposal Projections (2013 - 2030), Tons ....................................................... ............ ............................... 3 -10 Table 5 -1, Diversion Estimates by Implementation Phase ... ................................................................................. .................. 5 -1 Table 5 -2. Zero Waste Strategic Plan Diversion Estimates ..................... ............................... Table 5 -3. Zero Waste Strategic Plan Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimates (MTCE) Table 6 -1. Solid Waste Program Baseline Analysis - All Sectors ................ ............................... Table 6 -2. Solid Waste Program Baseline Analysis - Single Family Sector Table 6 -3. Solid Waste Program Baseline Analysis - Multi- family Sector.. Table 6 -4. Solid Waste Program Baseline Analysis- Commercial Sector ................. ........................................................ 6 -3 Table 6 -S. Planning -Level Cost Estimates for Selected Zero Waste Programs ................................... ............................6 -5 Table 6 -6. Customer Rate Impacts for Selected Zero Waste Programs I Table 6 -7. Most Cost Effective Zero Waste Programs Based on Incremental Annual Program Savings .............6 -7 Table 6 -8. Programs with Net Cost Increases Sorted by Lowest to Highest Cost Per T on ............ ............................6 -8 Appendices A. Waste Characterization Analysis B. Population Projections C. Summary List of Recommended Strategies D. Diversion Potential by Option E. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Assumptions and Calculations F. City Solid Waste Revenue and Expense Data G. Planning Level Cost Estimates H. List of Plan Contributors and Preparers UR iv it NMI', city of santa monica 1.0 INTRODUCTION zero waste strategic operations plan - c..a tneor4Qaw,k�aets 1.1 Backgromtd The City of Santa Monica prides itself on being an environmental leader. It's Resource Recovery and Recycling Division (RRR) and Office of Sustainability and the Environment (OSE) have implemented many cutting edge environmental initiatives and programs. The City's state -of -the -art waste diversion strategies contributed to the City reaching a 74% diversion rate in 2009. As another indicator of the City's diversion accomplishments, the City's calculated per capita disposal rate in 2010 was 3.6 pounds per person per day, well below the targeted rate of 10.9 pounds per person per day. The per capita disposal target, as established by CalRecycle, is the amount of disposal that is approximately equivalent to the 50 percent diversion requirement, and represents an average of 50 percent of total waste generation in 2003 through 2006 expressed in terms of per capita disposal On June 23, 2009, the City Council directed staff to develop a Zero Waste Strategic Plan. The creation of the Plan would allow the City to strengthen and refine its current waste diversion operations while adding significant opportunities and emerging technologies. The City established the Zero Waste Planning Committee to effectively design and implement a zero waste program. This Committee was comprised of the Resource Recovery & Recycling Division (RRR), the Office of Sustainability and the Environment (OSE) and the City's private partners, Southern California Disposal and Allan Company. Numerous meetings were held between September 2009 and August 2010 to establish methodologies to develop a Zero Waste Strategic Plan. Out of this collaborative effort, several processes and programs were discussed and implemented including a pilot residential yard trimmings and food scraps program, expansion of the commercial food scraps program, and audits of landfills to determine diversion rates. In addition, the committee determined that a consultant would be needed to develop a long term Zero Waste Strategic Plan which would include identifying new and expanded operational programs, including producer responsibility, product stewardship, client responsibility, council ordinances and resolutions as well as identifying impacts of all programs on future materials processing requirements and disposal rates. A Request for Proposals for a consultant was issued in June 2011, and in December 2011, the City began a Zero Waste Strategic Planning process to identify the new policies, programs and infrastructure that will enable the City to reach its Zero Waste goal of 95% diversion by 2030, or a per capita disposal rate of 1.1 pounds per person per day. The Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan will help the City strengthen its existing diversion operations while addressing significant fiscal challenges and emerging trends and technologies. The Plan will serve as a broad environmental and policy framework and will guide the future development of the City's resource recovery and recycling policies, programs, and infrastructure. T1U 1 -1 it f�1 city of santa monica 1.0 INTRODUCTION zero waste strategic operations plan The Zero Waste Strategic Planning process included the following tasks: 1. Review and summary of existing policies, programs, facilities, and rate structure. 2. Review and compilation of existing zero waste guiding principles, and development of zero waste guiding principles relevant to the City. 3. Compilation of existing and projected waste generation and composition data. 4. Identification, evaluation, and selection of policy, program, and infrastructure options. 5. Calculation of potential diversion and greenhouse gas emission reductions. 6. Analysis of program costs and rate structure impacts. 1.1.1 What is zero Waste? Zero waste is a change of perspective. It requires rethinking what we have traditionally regarded as trash and instead treating all materials as valued resources. Zero waste entails shifting consumption patterns, more carefully managing purchases, and maximizing the reuse of materials at the end of their intended use. Zero waste takes into consideration the entire materials management system, from extraction of natural resources, to product design, manufacturing and distribution, to product use and reuse, to recycling, composting, energy recovery, or disposal. In developing policies, programs and infrastructure to achieve zero waste, the City can both maximize diversion from landfills and reduce generation of waste. Achieving zero waste entails encouraging the City, its residents, businesses, and visitors to reevaluate what we consider waste. Ultimately, zero waste contributes to the development of 'a greener local economy and a more sustainable community. In order to reach true sustainability, the strategies identified in the Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan must consider "People, Planet, and Profit' as the triple bottom line achieving social, environmental, and economic sustainability. The City has defined it Zero Waste goal to mean achieving 95% diversion or a per capita disposal rate of 1.1 pounds per person per day. L?_ Guiding Principles The Santa Monica Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan (Plan) is based on ten Guiding Principles that provide a framework for the policies, programs and actions identified for implementation. These Zero Waste Guiding Principles are consistent with the Guiding Principles developed for the Santa Monica Sustainable City Plan. The Guiding Principles were presented to the public at the Santa Monica festival in May 2012. Nearly 400 residents provided input during the event. The residents indicated their top three priorities are: healthy community; waste reduction; and education and outreach. The Guiding Principles are detailed below: 1 -2 city of Santa Monica zero waste strategic operations plan 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1. The Health of the Community and the Environment Guides all Policy Decisions Santa Monica is committed to protecting, preserving and restoring the natural environment and safeguarding the health of all members of the community. All program and policy decisions related to achieving our zero waste goals will be developed based on these commitments. 2. The Hierarchy for Managing Discarded Materials is to Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and then Recover The City has adopted an environmental hierarchy for `highest and best use' of discarded materials. It will follow this hierarchy by prioritizing waste prevention and reduction, then encouraging reuse prior to treatment through recycling and composting. The City will recover energy and economic value from residual materials that cannot be recycled or composted through environmentally sound treatment prior to disposal. 3. Economic and Social Benefits are Integral to Zero Waste The programs and policies in this Plan will promote economic benefits, including job creation, cost savings and business opportunities, and will ensure that inequitable burdens are not placed on any one geographic or socioeconomic sector of the population. 4. The City Leads By Example Santa Monica will model the behavior it seeks from its residents, businesses and institutions by incorporating zero waste principles into local policies and operations; through advocacy for zero waste policies and initiatives at the regional, state and federal level; and through support to the community in striving for zero waste. S. Brand Owners, Producers and Manufacturers Contribute to the Management of their Products and Packaging The City will pursue policies at all levels of government (State/ Regional/Local) for producers to take responsibility for the end of life management of products and packaging. Consumers need to be part of the solution and will be educated on alternative purchasing practices. 6. Regional Partnerships Leverage the City's Efforts in Pursuing Zero Waste Santa Monica recognizes that to be successful it must work with other cities in the region in order to promote a robust zero waste infrastructure and culture. The City will collaborate on programs, public outreach, legislation, infrastructure and new technologies that help to achieve zero waste goals throughout the region. _ ` 1 -3 city of santa monica 1.0 INTRODUCTION zero waste strategic operations plan 7. Municipal Management of Local Collections and Processing Programs Ensures Local Control and Responsiveness The City's operations are a model of materials management. New programs and infrastructure will be developed to ensure that residents, businesses and visitors become zero waste champions. 8. Education, Outreach and Marketing are Essential to Achieving Cultural Change Santa Monica recognizes the power of community -based social marketing, social networks, community organizing and grassroots support for its education and outreach programs. The City will empower the community by providing the tools and techniques for enabling the culture to achieve zero waste. 9. Research and Development of New Technologies, Collection Systems and Infrastructure are Needed to Maximize Diversion of Discarded Materials The City recognizes current approaches to managing materials are inadequate to maximize diversion from disposal. The City will closely monitor new developments and will invest in pilot programs and facilities for achieving zero waste. 10. Local Market Development for Reusable and Recyclable Materials Ensures Sustainability Santa Monica is part of the global economy, but recognizes that local business development is the key to a sustainable community. Wherever possible, the City will invest in local reuse and recycling markets and support local businesses in providing markets for discarded materials. 13 Leto VJase Policy The City will develop a zero waste policy to be adopted concurrent with the adoption of the zero waste strategic operations plan. The policy will establish the City's goal of reaching zero waste by 2030, and the strategies and actions the City will take to attain that goal. Other aspects of the policy may include the definition of zero waste, specific goals for the residential and commercial sectors, the roles and responsibilities of City departments and divisions, and references to relevant sections of the City's municipal code, ordinances, and resolutions. The policy will be drafted for review by City staff and legal counsel, and for consideration by the City Council. 1A Fieal (areas, finals, itidkwors and Ta €glets The Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan is organized around six goal areas: 1. Waste Reduction 2. Environmental Benefits 3. Economic Benefits 4. City Leadership 5. Producer Responsibility 6. Zero Waste Culture Change 1R 1 -4 city of santa monica zero waste strategic operations plan 1.0 INTRODUCTION Specific goals are established in each goal area representing what Santa Monica must achieve in order to become a zero waste community. For each goal, indicators have been developed to measure progress toward meeting the goals. The indicators will help determine the impact of a program, policy or action, and when tracked over time, will reflect the accomplishments and challenges of implementing the Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan. The indicators will measure the performance or effectiveness of specific policies or programs, and will be used to determine the need for future modifications to the Plan. For some goals, numeric targets have been established to further evaluate the accomplishments of the Plan. The goal areas, indicators and targets are listed in Table 1 -1. Table 1 -1. Goal Areas, Indicators and Targets Goal Area /Indrea[or = Targets 1. Waste Reduction • 80% diversion by 2015 • Total citywide generation (also report . 95% diversion by 2030 per capita and by sector) • Amount landfilled • Per capita disposal rate of less than 3.6 • Amount diverted (recycled and pounds /person /day by 2020 composted, etc.) from landfill • Per capita disposal rate of less than 1.1 pounds /person /day by 2030 2. Environmental Benefits • 30% contribution to greenhouse gas • Greenhouse gas emissions reduction reduction goal through waste through waste reduction and recycling prevention and recycling by 2015 programs • 50% contribution to greenhouse gas • Conversion of City fleets to clean reduction goal through waste fuels /renewable prevention and recycling by 2020 • 100% of all City fleet vehicles to clean fuels by 2030 3. Economic Benefits • 20% increase in local jobs from waste prevention and recycling • Creation of new jobs • Local market development • Local market development 0 3 new local partnerships by 2015 0 5 new partnerships by 2020 t_5 city of Santa monica EM ` - 1.0 INTRODUCTION iero waste strategic operations plan GoalAreajlndtcaro� - Targets s 4. City Leadership • Establish baseline • Recycling and composting at all City • Zero waste at City offices and facilities facilities by 2015 • 80% diversion rate at City facilities by 2015 • 95% diversion rate at City facilities by 2030 5. Producer Responsibility • State legislation or City ordinance to address pharmaceuticals, sharps, • Producer responsibility for problem batteries, fluorescent bulbs by 2020 products (advocacy at state level or implementation of City ordinances) 6. Zero Waste Culture Change • 80% participation in City programs by 2015 • Customer participation and reduced y 90% participation in City programs by contamination 2020 • Zero waste awareness at home, at y 100% participation in City programs work, at school, at play by 2025 • Contamination reduced to 2% by 2015 • Contamination reduced to 1% by 2020 • 80% of residents and businesses aware of Zero Waste by 2015 e 90% of residents and businesses aware of Zero Waste by 2020 1 -6 ��(°� city of Santa monica 'i� 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero waste strategic operations plan _0 clirumt Conditions An important step in the planning process is to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the existing policies, programs, and infrastructure in the City. This helps ensure the Zero Waste Plan is in line with the City's established goals and efforts. 2.1 ties onIce R- cove ty anal liecydinh Division This section provides a description of the existing services provided by the City's Resource Recovery and Recycling Division. 2.1.1 Resitlenlial collection services The City's Resource Recovery and Recycling Division provides collection services for all single - family (SF) and multi - family (MF) residences. There are approximately 50,000 total housing units in the City'. Approximately 77% of the housing units are designated by the City as MF, which is defined as more than 2 units. In 2011, the City collected an estimated 43,300 tons from residential customers, including approximately 27,600 tons of refuse, 8,500 tons of recyclables, and 7,000 tons of yard trimmings/ food scraps. A breakdown of the quantities and types of materials collected from single - family and multi - family residences.is shown in Table 2 -12. Table 2 -1. Residential Tonnages (2019) — _ �_ Refuse Smgle- Family 6,976 Mule Famty 20,692 7ntal 27,667 Recycling 4,099 4,479 8,578 Yard Trimmings /Food Scraps 6,428 613 7,041 TOTAL 17,503 25,783 43,287 US Census, 2010; http: / /factfinder2.census.gov /faces /tableser vices /jsf/ pages /productview.xhtmi ?src =bkmk z The City does not have separate collection routes by customer Type, and therefore percentage estimates have been calculated based on the 2009 container audit and weighted averages. . 1UR 2 -7 °i�1 city of Santa monica zero waste strategic operations plan 2.1.1.1 Single - Family Residences 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS Single- family residences are provided with refuse, recycling, and yard trimmings collection services on a weekly basis, that utilizes an automated, 3 -cart system. Residents can choose between 68- and 95- gallon sized black carts for refuse, and are provided 95- gallon blue carts for recyclables and 95- gallon green carts for yard trimmings. Items that are accepted in the blue recycling container are summarized in Table 2 -2. Yard trimmings are composted at Community Recycling, located in Lamont, California, for agricultural use. The materials accepted in the yard trimmings carts include grass, leaves, weeds, tree trimmings, and small branches not more than 3 feet long. Currently, there are no restrictions or fees on the number of recycling or yard trimmings carts available to residents. Residents may request as many containers as they need. Single - family residents pay for collection services bi- monthly, based on the frequency of service, the number of carts, and the size of the refuse cart(s). The current collection rates for single - family residences are included in Table 2 -3. Beginning in August 2010, the City began a pilot SF residential food scraps collection program for approximately 600 households. The program allowed residents to place food scraps in their yard trimmings cart(s). In late 2010, the City conducted a survey of 150 participants to collect feedback on the food scraps collection program. Of the responses received, 40% were participating in the program while 60% were not participating. Of the 60% of residents who were not participating in the program, 67% indicated they were not aware of the IM WHAT GOES IN THE GREEN BIN: DUE VA EN EL BDTE VERDE: ALLEOOD TODALACOMIDA YARDTRIMMINGS RECORTEDDEJARDIN 2 -8 p (�1 city of Santa monica zero waste strategic operations plan 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS program and stated they would begin to participate in the program now that they were aware. In August 2011, the pilot program expanded to 330 households, in February 2012 to an additional 370 households, and in April 2012, a total of 1,300 households were participating in the program. Beginning June 30, 2012, all single - family residences were eligible to participate in the program. A map of the pilot program areas is shown in Exhibit 2 -1. The co- collected food scraps and yard trimmings are taken to Southern California Disposal (SCD), where they are placed in transfer vehicles that are hauled to Community Recycling for composting. The City also offers home composting and vermicompost bins at a subsidized price as another measure to decrease the amount of organic materials that go to landfills. GREEN 2'i(nt 4'rbgrarn -.._ - IuoYx like }'ou lam u mnng FanAlr nn �m Pmpnmk xsdaatlnee. SAVE THE DATE c u=am= tG Compos(Give -A- W-Way rri:ilnn: ue.ussssf j �;, r137ut rr?rngrani [ocl5 Lh ysu �tWlll neztl nnnm help.' ^�T �hn ryalmnix :Nla4� rv� =rte SAVE THE DAT coinmo— �moho�aa,n a uensurn ��� IM 2 -9 city of santa monica 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero waste strategic operations plan _ I MOM <-6. rarnn /1"�yeru ur uir ucy > nv�yuois Office paper (white and Corrugated cardboard Cardboard boxes and paper Phone books Magazines and catalon Food /detergent boxes Mixed office paper (file folders, fax paper, envelopes, advedisements, Flyers, etc.) Junk mail, bulk mail, and scrap paper Paper bound with non -water soluble glue (paperback books, hardback books, overnight mail packages, etc.) Milk cartons (clean and rinsed) Plastics Numbered 1 -5, and 7 Waterijuicelsoda bottles Food containers Milk and water jugs Detergent/cleaning product bottles Personal care bottles Plastic bags (shopping bags, dry cleaner bags and other plastic bags) 2 -10 city of Santa monica `7 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero waste strategic operations plan Table 2 -3. Bi- Monthly Single - Family Residential Collection Rates (FY 201112012) Quantity,: we Retuse Cartreyuency = Rate 1 -68 gallon cart 1x weekly $64.85 2 -68 gallon cart 1x weekly $129.70 3 -68 gallon cart 1 x weekly $194.55 1 -95 gallon cart 1x weekly $83.76 2 -95 gallon cart 1x weekly $167.54 3 -95 gallon cart 1 x weekly $251.31 1 -68 & 1 -95 gallon cart 1x weekly $148.63 2 cubic yard bin 1x weekly $335.06 300 gallon container 1x weekly $252.33 Shared container service $25.67 A bulky item collection service is offered by the City. Bulky items include large objects that do not fit in a refuse container, such as refrigerators, stoves, and furniture. The service is available to residents for a fee, depending on the size and amount of items discarded. The fees can range from $25 for small items, to $250 for large items. IM 2 -11 it city of santa monica 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero waste strategic operations plan Exhibit 2 -f.. Map of SF Residences Participating in the Pilot Food Scraps Collection Program 330 Households August 2011 370 Households February 2012 R z -t 2 qty ,, Y' u „n r. 'S. v p p ' �4'l I'-r 55 � •'l � « R t M1.. {y jiT -'��Sry [+ �� SAC' L' v._E' n7 l." q. Jf 600 House4lds .4 August 2010 r` M` ,t �$ %Q - } r l pa a00 ��V r f 370 Households February 2012 R z -t 2 it NMI °j city of santa monica 3, 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero waste strategic operations plan 2.1.1.2 Multi- Family Residences The City collects refuse from an estimated 40,000 multi - family (MF) units. Multi - family buildings are provided with either 68- or 95- gallon carts; 300 - gallon containers; or 2 -, 3 -, or 4- cubic -yard bins for refuse collection. Residents of multiple unit dwellings and condominiums have a commingled recycling collection program. Blue 300 - gallon containers, or 2, 3, or 4 cubic yard bins are placed throughout the alley ways for the collection of commingled recyclables from MF complexes. The containers and bins are either designated to specific complexes, or are shared by neighboring complexes. In 2012, there were approximately 400 large (more than 5 units) buildings that did not have recycling services. The City has been working to address this issue, and during 2013, all 400 buildings will be provided with recycling opportunities. A list of recyclables accepted by the City was provided in Table 2 -2. The City also offers home composting and vermicompost bins at a subsidized price to multi- family residences as a measure to decrease the amount of organic materials that go to landfills. The current collection rates for multi- family residences are shown in Table 2 -4. 2 -13 city of Santa monica _ 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero .waste strategic operations plan Table 2 -4. Bi- Monthly Multi - Family Residential Collection Rates (FY 2011/2012) 68, 95 G_ allon Refuse'Carts Container _ - Quantity, Size Frequency Rate 1 -68 gallon can lxweekly $51.35 1 -95 gallon can 1xweekly $67.55 Gallon Refuse Container _ Quantity, Size Frequency Rate 300 gallon container lxweekly $147.27 300 gallon container 2x weekly $294.54 300 gallon container 3x weekly $441.82 300 gallon container 4x weekly $589.10 300 gallon container 5x weekly $736.38 _- = 2CubicYardRefuseBrn - = Quantity, Size Frequency Rate 2 cubic yard bin lxweekly $154.03 2 cubic yard bin 2x weekly $308.07 2 cubic yard bin 3x weekly $462.09 2 cubic yard bin 4x weekly $616.11 2 cubic yard bin 5x weekly $770.16 2 cubic yard bin 6x weekly $924.17 = = _Miscellaneous - - Quantity, Size Frequency Rate Livable Unit Charge $226.49 $8.11 No Charge /2nd Meter $453.02 $0.00 Lock Charge /Per Bin $679.52 $17.58 City bin on City Property Per Bin $86.47 Share Bin/Cart Service $1,132.54 $37.84 _. � 3 CuEc'Yard Refuse Bm =_ Quantity, Size Frequency Rate 3 cubic yard bin 1x weekly $226.49 3 cubic yard bin 2x weekly $453.02 3 cubic yard bin 3x weekly $679.52 3 cubic yard bin 4x weekly $906.03 3 cubic yard bin 5x weekly $1,132.54 3 cubic yard bin 6x weekly $1,358.97 4 CubreS_erd - Refuse Bin =_ _ Quantity, Size Frequency Rate 4 cubic yard bin 1x weekly $300.26 4 cubic yard bin - -2x weekly $600.51 4 cubic yard bin 3x weekly -. $900.77 4 cubic yard bin 4x weekly $1,201.03 4 cubic yard bin 5x weekly $1,501.28 4 cubic yard bin 6x weekly $1,801.54 _- RefuseBinTruckR611 ut = -_ Quantity, Size Frequency Rate Bin truck roll out lxweekly $47.38 Bin truck roll out 2x weekly $94.76 Bin truck roll out 3x weekly $144.44 Bin truck roll out 4x weekly $189.52 Bin truck roll out 5x weekly $236.91 Bin truck rollout 6x weekly $284.29 2 -14 kR city of Santa monica ' 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero waste strategic operations plan 112 commercial Collection Services The City provides collection services for all 3,000 commercial accounts, representing approximately 14,000 businesses. A breakdown of the quantities and types of materials collected from commercial accounts is shown in Table 2 -5. The container sizes available to _— __ -- commercial businesses for refuse include: 68- or 95- gallon carts; 300 - gallon containers; or 2, 3 or 4- cubic- yard bins. Extra refuse collection containers are available for an additional fee, depending on the size and number of containers requested. The summary of commercial rates for collection services is included in Table 2 -6. Commercial customers also pay for street sweeping services. In the future, street sweeping services may be incorporated into the City's overall rate structure. Table 2 -5. Commercial Tonnages (2011) The City provides commingled recycling collection services to all commercial customers at no additional charge. Approximately 820 businesses currently participate in recycling. Private haulers also provide recycling services to some commercial businesses. Table 2 -2 includes the list of items collected in the commercial recycling program. Food scraps recycling collection is available to restaurants, grocery stores and other establishments with food services. Presently, the service is offered at no additional charge. In the future, the program will be incorporated into the City's overall rate structure. Participants are required to source separate all food scraps and place them into designated containers provided by the City. Currently, 98 businesses are participating in the program and another 471 businesses are eligible to participate. The City takes the food scraps to SCD, where it is loaded into roll -off containers and picked up by Community Recycling for transport to their composting facility it Lamont, California. 2 -15 TOMS Refuse 38,199 Recycling 3,882 Food ScrapsNard Trimmings 2,316 TOTAL 44,398 The City provides commingled recycling collection services to all commercial customers at no additional charge. Approximately 820 businesses currently participate in recycling. Private haulers also provide recycling services to some commercial businesses. Table 2 -2 includes the list of items collected in the commercial recycling program. Food scraps recycling collection is available to restaurants, grocery stores and other establishments with food services. Presently, the service is offered at no additional charge. In the future, the program will be incorporated into the City's overall rate structure. Participants are required to source separate all food scraps and place them into designated containers provided by the City. Currently, 98 businesses are participating in the program and another 471 businesses are eligible to participate. The City takes the food scraps to SCD, where it is loaded into roll -off containers and picked up by Community Recycling for transport to their composting facility it Lamont, California. 2 -15 tn1 city f Santa monica Y 2.0 CURRENT fONDITIONS zero .waste strategic operations plan - Partnering with GeoGreen Biofuels, the City offers a fats, oil, and grease (FOG) collection program that is fi-ee of charge. Collection containers are located Downtown in parking structures 2 through 6. Restaurants that are not located Downtown can request a separate collection container by contacting the City. 2 -16 city of santa monica 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero waste strategic operations plan Table 2 -6. Bi- Monthly Commercial Collection Rates (FY 201112012) _ - fib Gallon Refuso Cart: -= . - - Quantity, Size Frequency Rate 1 -68 gallon cart 1x weekly $35.13 1 -68 gallon cart 2x weekly. $70.25 1 -68 gallon cart 3x weekly $105.39 1-68 gallon cart 4x weekly $140.52 1-68 gallon cart 5x weekly - $175.64 =- = 95 Gallon Refuse cart= - - Quantity, Size Frequency Rate 1 -95 gallon cart 1x weekly $50.00 1 -95 gallon cart 2x weekly $99.98 1 -95 gallon cart 3x weekly $149.98 1 -95 gallon cart 4x weekly $199.97 1 -95 gallon cart 5x weekly - $249.96 _` 380 Ga_II_o_sr<R_efu_se Container __ Quantity, Size Frequency Rate 300 gallon container Ix weekly $102.68 300 gallon container 2x weekly $205.36 300 gallon container 3x weekly $318.53 300 gallon container 4x weekly $424.71 300 gallon container 5x weekly $530.88 = Miscellaneous on water meter _ City bin on City property - Per Bin $59.45 Lock Charge Per Bin $17,58 Non -Semi Auto Service 2x/week $45.94 Sweeps Rates @ased on water meter stzeL ____ 0.75" Per Unit $74.32 1.00" Per Unit $101.34 1.5" Per Unit $148.63 2.00" Per Unit $198.61 3.00" Per Unit $297.24 4.00" Per Unit $397.24 6.0" Per Unit - $595.86. ` l 2 Cubic YM Refus Vj _ Quantity, Size Frequency Rate 2 cubic yard bin lx weekly $110.79 2 cubic yard bin 2x weekly $221.59 2 cubic yard bin 3x weekly $332.37 2 cubic yard bin 4x weekly $443.16 2 cubic yard bin 5x weekly $609.37 2 cubic yard bin 6x weekly $664.76 2 cubic yard bin 7x weekly $775.55 -3 Cubrc Yard Wow 6M ME Quantity, Size Frequency Rate 3 cubic yard bin Ix weekly $149.98 3 cubic yard bin 2x weekly $299.94 3 cubic yard bin 3x weekly $449.93 3 cubic yard bin 4x weekly $599.91 3 cubic yard bin 5x weekly $749.88 3 cubic yard bin 6x weekly $899.85 3cubicyardbin 7x weekly $1,049.83 -- _ Re�ilseBsa Roll Out== _ _ Quantity, Size Frequency Rate Bin roll out 1x weekly $24.32 Bin roll out 2x weekly $48.64 Bin roll out 3x weekly $72.96 Bin roll out 4x weekly $97.28 Bin roll out 5x weekly $121.59 Bin roll out 6x weekly $145.93 Bin roll out 7x weekly $170.23 Refuse iFrequency Bin Tnzck Roll Ouf _ -- Quantity, Size Rate Bin Truck roll out 1x weekly $35.13 Bin Truck roll out 2x weekly $7015 Bin Truck roll out 3x weekly $105.39 Bin Truck roll out 4x weekly $140.52 Bin Truck roll out 5x weekly $175.64 Bin Truck roll out 6x weekly $210.77 Bin Truck roll out 7x weekly $270.23 2 -17 �=` l city of Santa mania zero waste strategic operations plan U.i Household Na�ardous Haste 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS Residents have access to a free drop -off service for Household Hazardous Waste (1HW) at the City's HHW Collection Center, located at the City Yards on 2500 Michigan Avenue. The operating hours of the HHW Center are the I's Saturday of the month, between 9 am and 2 p.m. Small businesses, those that generate less than 27 gallons of hazardous waste per month can make an appointment to bring hazardous waste to the City's HHW Collection Center on the Friday before the I" Saturday of the month. There is a fee for small businesses to use the HHW Collection Center. A list of the HHW accepted is provided in Table 2 -7. To supplement the services provided at the drop -off center, the City began a HHW Home Collection Program in August 2011. The HHW Home Collection Program is provided on a free and unlimited basis to homeowners and tenants in the City. Participants in the program must contact the City's contractor to reserve the service and request a collection kit. On collection day, residents are instructed to leave their HHW at their doorstep where it is collected. Materials accepted in the HHW Home Collection Program include: • Aerosols • Art Supplies • Automotive Products • Batteries • Cleaners /Wax • Garden Chemicals • Lubricants • Mercury Containing Devices • Other Household Products • Paints • Personal Care Products • Pesticides • Sharps • Electronics • Pool Chemicals • Auto Batteries: Up to 4 • Fluorescent Light Tubes (Straight): Up to 10, tubes must be taped • Televisions:I • Computer Monitors: 1 • Empty paint cans and /or dried latex paint not hazardous Other Consumer Electronics with Circuit Boards • Desktop or laptop computers: 1 • Microwave ovens: Up to 2 • Desktop scanners, printers, copiers: Up to 2 • Fax machines: Up to 2 • Telephones, cell phones, portable phones, keyboards, mice, disc drives, cables: No limit VCR's, CD players, stereos 2 -18 city of Santa monica 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero waste strategic operations plan Table 2 -7. Materials accepted at the City's HHW Center Category, Aerosol Products Aerosol air fresheners, aerosol antibacterial sanitizers~ Art Supplies Adhesives, paint, cleaners, correction fluids, photography chemicals Automobile Batteries Automobile batteries Cleaners, lubricant, solvent, fuel, brake fluid, antifreeze, carburetor cleaner, metal conditioner, engine degreaser, fuel additives, refrigerants, Automotive Products transmission fluid, window washer fluid, used motor oil, used motor oil filters Batteries All household types Chemicals Garden chemicals, pesticides Palish, degreasers, rug /upholstery cleaners, oven cleaners, toilet bowl Cleaners/Wax cleaners E -waste Computer monitors, televisions, cell phones, DVD players Fats, Oil, and Grease Cooking oil Fluorescent Straight Light Fluorescent lamps Tubes Lubricants Automotive /household compressor oil, cutting oil Aerosols, hobby /automotive /household latex and oil- based, thinners, Paint strippers, wood preservatives, lacquers, linseed oil, primers, stains, varnishes Personal Care - nail polish, polish remover, rubbing alcohol, shoe polish, Personal Care spot remover Poisons Household /garden poisons, pesticides, insecticides, herbicides, fungicides, baits traps, fertilizers, pet care, pool chemicals Fluorescent tubes /bulbs, compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs), Other Household thermostats, thermometers, propane tanks, moth balls, rust remover, kerosene Sharps Medical Waste Needles, lancets Oil and Oil Filters Used motor oil, oil filters 2 -19 mas city of santa monica 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero waste strategic operations plan 2.1.4 Zero 111 w Events To promote and implement recycling, reuse and composting practices at special events, the Resource Recovery and Recycling Division offers assistance to help organizations implement Zero Waste events. The assistance includes a planning guide with information and recommendations on vendor involvement, food service, site planning, decorations and giveaways, education, volunteers, signage, and collection containers. 2.2 City Pcdicies and Programs The City has implemented numerous policies and programs that support the City's resource recovery and sustainability efforts. These policies and programs were incorporated into the Zero Waste Planning process to ensure the goals and visions were aligned. 2.2.i Sant, ilanica litnicipal Cole (S14111C) 2.2.1.1 Disposable Food Service Containers Chapter 5.44 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code (SMMC) prohibits the distribution of disposable food service containers made of nonrecyclable plastic or expanded polystyrene foam from all food providers and at City events. The ban applies to single -use disposable containers intended for serving or transporting prepared, ready -to -eat food or beverages. The ban helps reduce the amount of plastic that ends up on the City's beaches, reduces materials that go to the landfill, and also reduces the amount of natural resources used to manufacture and transport the disposable products. 2.2.1.2 Single -Use Carry Out Bags Chapter 5.45 of the SMMC prohibits retail establishments, grocery stores, convenience stores, mini - marts, liquor stores, pharmacies, and any City events, from distributing petroleum and bio- based single -use carryout plastic bags. The code imposes a $0.10 fee for each paper bag that is distributed, and requires paper bags to be 100% recycled content paper, with a minimum of 40% post- consumer, recycled content. 1UR - 2 -20 0:_0 city of santa monica zero waste strategic operations plan The City has implemented a Share a Bag Program. The program enables the community to donate extra, reusable bags at designated locations throughout the City for those who cannot afford reusable bags or for those who forget their reusable bags. There are 10 Share aBag Program locations citywide The locations are listed below and shown on Exhibit 2 -2. 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS fdg Bag dig tiag T. si E:_ n I{ Mg gag >_ H _ E t kei • Santa Monica City Hall Help Desk, 1685 Main Street • Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce, 1234 6th Street #100 Mg Bag PNYlt3 gag • Downtown Santa Monica Ambassador's Desk, Parking Structure 4, 1321 2nd St. ' a • Santa Monica Convention & Visitors Bureau, 1920 Main Street • Santa Monica Place, The Market on Level Three • Real Offices Center Santa Monica, 604 Arizona Ave • Sustainable Works, 1744 Pearl Street • Assistance League of Santa Monica Thrift Shop, 1453 15th Street • Cherry Picked Boutique, 2807 Pico Blvd. • Virginia Avenue Park, 2200 Virginia Ave. WA'h � ld941a n� S IM 2 -21 Exhibit 2 -2. Share a Bag Locations A� a} a4Y _ y �` nco- cQVah Na Qa'b life pica smiin (IIm s� � Suasal paf Ad l � �� 4 S-nle Mmvice µee+a i v, %IURIUyal Alpa 4 r 'ds. RCre.pve �Ra 4 - Oceen PerA Q° V+rma� E L� s5 u� P 4 Pwe y IM 2 -21 it ;tom city of Santa monica 1.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero waste strategic operations plan 2.2.1.3 Construction and Demolition Material Waste Management Plans Chapter 8.108, Subpart C, requires all City- sponsored construction and demolition (C &D) projects, as well as private C &D projects that are $50,000 or greater in value, or are 1,000 square feet or greater, to meet a minimum 70% diversion rate. Covered projects must submit a waste management plan (WMP) -for City approval that includes the tonnages of materials that are disposed and diverted, and the methods implemented to reuse and /or recycle the materials,. Applicants must provide a security deposit equal to 3% of the project value, or $30,000, whichever is less. Upon project completion, a final compliance report must be submitted for the security deposit to be refunded to the applicant. A number of methods can be used to comply with the C &D diversion requirements. On -site reuse is allowed on a case by case basis, as approved in the WMP. Materials that are source - seperated on site, such as wood, concrete, or asphalt, can be sent to an approved C &D facility for reuse or recycling. All mixed C &D materials are required to be sent to an approved mixed C &D recycling facility. A list of the City - approved C &D recycling facilities is included in Table 2 -8. FM — 2 -22 (% city of Santa monica EM 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero waste strategic operations plan Table 2 -8. Approved C &D Recycling Facilities (2010) METAL oopapzesllstedbe /ow accept M/XEb C8D RECYCLERS Process„' SALVAGED ITEMS (USED - _ - - bofh fenoas & Hord mus_metals, = mzxeTd 'Aa, fo extract;recyc(ables: � BUILDING MATERIALS) _ - -' —_ unless atheifvfse noted =- - = A &S Metal Recycling Community Recycling & Resource Freeway Building Materials 2261 E. 15th Street Recovery, Inc. 1124 S. Boyle Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90021 9189 DeGarmo Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90023 213- 623 -9443 Sun Valley, CA 91352 323 - 261 -8904 .818- 767 -0675 Alpert & Alpert Iron & Metal Direct Disposal Santa Fe Wrecking & Salvage 1815 Soto Street 3720 Noakes Street 720 E. 18th Street Los Angeles, CA 90023 Los Angeles, CA 90023 Los Angeles, CA 90021 323 - 265 -4040 323 - 262 -1604 213- 765 -8166 Atlas Iron & Metal East Valley Diversion Scavengers Paradise 10019 Alameda Street 11616 Sheldon Street 5453 Satsuma Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90002 Sun. Valley, CA 91352 N. Hollywood, CA 91601 323 - 566 -5184 818- 252 -0019 -323- 877 -7945 Kramer Metals Downtown Diversion 1760 E. Slauson Avenue 2424 E. Olympic Blvd North Hills Recycling Inc Los Angeles, CA 90058 Los Angeles, CA 90021 11700 Blucher Avenue 323 - 587 -2277 213- 612 -5005 Granada Hills, CA 91344 818- 831 -7980 A -1 Metals Recycling, Inc. California Waste Services Recycled Wood Products 8250 Tujunga Avenue 621 W. 152nd Street - 1313 E. Phillips Blvd Sun Valley, CA 91352 Gardena, CA 90247 Pomona, CA 91766 818- 767 -4388 310 -538 -5998 909 - 868 -6882 INERTMATER/AL -- _ Southern California Disposal CARPETPADD/NG_ - -= - -- 1908 Frank Street Santa Monica, CA. 90404 — Hanson Aggregates Carpet Pad Recycling 5625 Southern Avenue - 310 - 828 -6444 .1923 Rosemead Blvd South Gate, CA 90280 South El Monte, CA 91733 800 - 300 -6120 626- 444 -6048 Arcadia Reclamation, Inc. Interior Removal Specialist, Inc. .CARDBOARD -- 12321 Lower Azusa Road 9309 Rayo Avenue Allan Company Arcadia, CA. 91006 South Gate, CA 90280 2411 Delaware Avenue 909 - 392 -8510 323 - 357 -6900 Santa Monica CA 90404 310 -453 -9677 Vulcan Materials Company INERT MATERIAL.' -! _ __ -� - -_BRICK 8 ROOFING TILES= 11520 Sheldon Blvd Valley Base Materials Bourget Bros Building Materials Sun Valley, , CA 90052 2121 E. 25th Street 1636 11th Street 818 - 768 -4157 Los Angeles, CA 90058 Santa Monica, CA 90404 323 - 583 -7913 310 - 450 -6556 - Chandler's Sand Gravel 26311 Palos Verdes Drive East Nu -Way Arrow Reclamation Rolling Hills Estates, CA 90274 1270E. Arrow Highway - - 310 - 784 -2900 Irwindale, CA. 91706 626 - 305 -5308 - 2 -23 city of Santa monica � —� 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero waste strategic operations plan In 2010, the City conducted an audit of the mixed C &D recycling facilities. The results of the audit indicated a total of 35,308 tons of C &D materials originating in the City were processed at these facilities, with 31,116 diverted from landfilling, for an average of 88% diversion. Table 2- 9 includes the approved mixed C &D recycling facilties, along with the facility diversion rates, and tons of materials processed from the City in 2010. Table 2 -9. City - Approved Mixed CsD Recycling Facilities (2010) 212 Extended Producer Responsil;Bity Resolution 10412, signed on June 23, 2009, documents the City's support for an extended producer responsibility (EPR) framework in State legislation by way of urging the League of California Cities, the California State Association of Counties, and CalRecycle to advocate for more EPR policies. The resolution states that the City will encourage all manufacturers to take part in the responsibility of their products, from the processing, collection, recycling, and disposal of the materials. 2.2.1 Recyded hodoas Protmement rolicy The Recycled Products Procurement Policy was developed in 1991 to help the City make responsible decisions in purchasing products with recycled content. The main guidelines of the policy include the following: • The priority in which products should be purchased based on the highest content of post - consumer material, pre - consumer material, and minimum, recycled content. • The ability of a product and its packaging to be reused, reconditioned for reuse, or recycled, and the amount of waste the product and its packaging generates. F M 2 -24 Tons = - FaclhtyNameand --of Dnrersron -Tons �- mSanta =Race Diverted; California California Waste Services 5,922 87 % 5,152 Community Recycling 16,742 93% 15,570 Direct Disposal 311 73% 227 Downtown Diversion 10,087 j 83% 8,372 East Valley Diversion 62.6 85% 52.4 Interior Removal Specialists 1,190 78% 928 Southern California Disposal 994 82% 815 TOTAL r: 88% 31,16 212 Extended Producer Responsil;Bity Resolution 10412, signed on June 23, 2009, documents the City's support for an extended producer responsibility (EPR) framework in State legislation by way of urging the League of California Cities, the California State Association of Counties, and CalRecycle to advocate for more EPR policies. The resolution states that the City will encourage all manufacturers to take part in the responsibility of their products, from the processing, collection, recycling, and disposal of the materials. 2.2.1 Recyded hodoas Protmement rolicy The Recycled Products Procurement Policy was developed in 1991 to help the City make responsible decisions in purchasing products with recycled content. The main guidelines of the policy include the following: • The priority in which products should be purchased based on the highest content of post - consumer material, pre - consumer material, and minimum, recycled content. • The ability of a product and its packaging to be reused, reconditioned for reuse, or recycled, and the amount of waste the product and its packaging generates. F M 2 -24 city f Santa monica Y 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero waste strategic operations plan c Equipment purchased or rented by the City are to be compatible with the use of recycled-content products. o Product specifications, requisitions, and performance standards must not require the use of products made from virgin materials or exclude recycled- content products. 2.-H. sustainable City Plan In September 1994, the City Council took steps to address sustainability concerns in the community by adopting the City of Santa Monica Sustainable City Plan. The Sustainable City Plan provides a roadmap to ensure the City meets its environmental, economic, and social needs without compromising the quality of life for the community and for future generations. The plan has concrete goals and targets for tracking the City's progress in the following nine areas: 1. Resource Conservation 2. Environmental and Public Health 3. Transportation 4. Economic Development 5. Open Space and Land Use 6. Housing 7. Community Education and Civic Participation 8. Human Dignity 9. Arts and Culture The Sustainable City Plan includes goals and strategies, for the City government and all sectors of the community, to conserve and enhance local resources, safeguard human health and the environment, maintain a healthy and diverse economy, and improve the livability and quality of life for all community members in the City. Under the Resource Conservation area, the City established the following goals for solid waste generation: • Total eit} Guide generation to not exceed year 2000 levels by 2010 • Increase amount diverted to 70% of total by 2010. The goals of the Sustainable City Plan are tracked through a Sustainable City Progress Report and Report Card. In 2005, a Progress Report website was launched to provide updates on the status of the Plan as well as a letter grade that rates the City on its efforts in the initial eight target areas. In 2012, a ninth target area, Arts and Culture, was added to the Sustainable City Plan. 2 -25 city of santa monica zero waste strategic operations plan 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS The Sustainable City Report Card is a document that provides a summary of the grades that are also posted on the Progress Report website. The most recent Sustainable City Report Card was released in 2012, a summary of those grades are provided in Table 2 -10. The 2010 waste diversion goal was exceeded in 2009 with a diversion rate of 74 %. Table 2 -10, 2010 Sustainable City Report Card Grades # = Category _ Overall Effort 1 Resource Conservation B- A- 2 Environmental and Public Health C+ A- 3 Transportation C. A 4 Economic Development B A- 5 Open Space and Land Use A- A 6 Housing C 7 Community Education and Civic Participation A- 8 Human Dignity B LNIA 9 Arts and Culture' NIA 'The Arts and Culture category was added in 2012 and grades were not included in the 2012 report card. 2.2.5 Breen Eusinest {grill auan Frogrim The City, the Convention and Visitors Bureau, the Chamber of Commerce, and the Sustainable Works non - profit organization have joined together to certify and recognize green businesses in the community through the Green Business Certification Program. The Program recognizes and certifies businesses that have taken steps to incorporate sustainable practices into their operations. In order to apply for a green certification, businesses must have a physical location in the City, a minimum of five employees, and occupy a minimum of 500 square feet of commercial business space. Eligible businesses must fall under one of the following categories: • Office • Retail Store • Restaurant • Grocery • Hotel • Motel Businesses that successfully pass the verification process are green certified for a period of 2 years. A Is M : a GYLa' Ma 2 -26 -p= C� city of Santa monica 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero waste strategic operations plan total of 19 businesses were certified in the latest (2011 -2013) Business Certification Program. 216 Sustainable OuAdX Aunids The Sustainable Quality Awards (SQA) event was developed to identify and recognize businesses in the City that are successfully incorporating sustainable practices into their operations. The SQA is an annual event that promotes the efforts of local businesses that have made significant achievements in the areas of sustainable economic development, social responsibility, and stewardship of the natural environment. .2.1 US Conference of llayms /California Public Intense Research Gioup (CAVIRG� Buy Recycled Campaign In September 1995, the City adopted a resolution for the US Conference of Mayors /California Public Interest Research Group (CALPIRG) Buy Recycled Campaign. In the resolution, the City agreed to purchase paper that contains a minimum of 20% post- consumer recycled content, increasing the amount of post- consumer recycled content to 30% beginning in 1998. The City currently exceeds these standards by using paper containing a minimum of 50% post- consumer recycled content. 22.3 City's Purchase and Use of violin tonest Wood Products Ordinance 2.28 bans the purchase or use of any tropical hardwood product within the City, or at any City- sponsored events. The ordinance requires all contracts between the City and any supplier of wood products to include provisions that restrict the use of tropical wood. 1.1.9 Print Shop Pusdiising Policy The City's print shop has a policy to exclusively purchase and use recycled paper and vegetable - based printing inks, unless a printing request is submitted that cannot be completed using those products. It is estimated that 99% of all printing jobs are completed using recycled paper and vegetable -based inks. h2Pf1 Electronic Ityaste Electronic waste (E- waste), such as computers and televisions, is collected through a drop -off program for residents and businesses at the Santa Monica Community Recycling Center, located at 2411 Delaware Avenue. The drop -off program is free to residents and fee -based for businesses. 2111 Used Oil and Filter Collwion Collection centers are located throughout the City for residents to drop off used oil and oil filters. Exhibit 2 -3 provides a map of the drop off locations. 2212 Grr tmas Tice Recye6ng During the month of January each year, Christmas trees can be taken and recycled at four local parks or at the SCD Transfer Station in the City for free. The trees collected at the parks are turned into mulch and used throughout the City. 1R 2 -27 i� city of Santa monica 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero waste strategic operations plan Exhibit 2-3. Used Oil and Oil Filter Collection Locations 4 EZ Luhe 1Tn u�si� el,y Firestone 217 L.in wlrt EIS °anteh,kvl ,CAou =:- 4 Household Hazardous Waste Center ao rdic,id— I m Bents M1'cnlu�. 6A °.ie9c 4 Jiffy Lube E.Ma 6lcnlca, C4 K<l (?� O'Reilly Auto Pans - �11& L,--1,. al,..; _x111. d-r,ra, Ca ea40e 4 Santa Monica Communitg Recycling Center _411 Ave _sm, ra_m�.:, CA Caace -(} Volkswagen of Santa Monica i 2449 S =M, M-,i a 51,V W.I. Simonson, Inc T I 3 W114W.-Blvd _,M, I,ICm , cd 1--d04 1 R 2-28 Santa monica 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero waste strategic operations plan 2.2.15 Catalogue Choice City residents can sign up for a free account to opt -out of unwanted catalogs, phone books, coupons, circulars, credit card offers, and donation solicitations. The website is accessed through httns : / /santamonica.catalogchoice.or /Ig oein. 1.2.14 Sc,hetlulk Crem The City schedules a variety of waste reduction, re -use, recycling and composting events on a quarterly basis: • E -Waste collection • Textile recycling • Paper shredding • Compost give -away days and workshops • Re -use workshops • Annual Citywide yard sale 2.3 fesomte R'uwy ty and Recydiag Processing Fadhties There are two resource recovery and recycling processing facilities located within the City limits: the Santa Monica Community Recycling Center and the SCD Transfer Station. 2.3.1 Santa Idonica Community Recycling Center The Santa Monica Community Recycling and Buy -Back Center is located at 2411 Delaware Avenue. The property is owned by the City and leased to the Allan Company, who owns and operates the facility equipment. The Center is open Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and on Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. The Center may close earlier due to maximum daily tonnage restrictions. The Community Recycling Center accepts the following items: • Cans — aluminum, steel • Glass —bottles and jars • Plastic • Mixed Paper • Scrap Metal • Electronics • White goods - stoves, refrigerators and other appliances • Used motor oil and oil filters FM ! 2 -29 p it city of Santa monica zero waste strategic operations plan 3.� Southern California Olshasal Transfer Station The SCD Transfer Station is a privately owned facility that is open to the public. The transfer station is located at 1908 Frank Street, and is open Monday through Friday from 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., and on Saturdays from 6:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. Items that are accepted at the facility include: 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS • Refuse • Food scraps • Yard trimmings • C &D debris • Street sweeping collections In addition, SCD receives and transfers all refuse, yard trimmings, and food scraps that are collected by the City. SCD transfers refuse to a number of facilities, including Puente Hills landfill, Sunshine Canyon Landfill, Chiquita Canyon Landfill, Southeast Resource Recovery Facility (SERRF), and Commerce Refuse to Energy Facility. Yard trimmings, food scraps, and street sweepings are transferred to Community Recycling for composting at its compost facility in Lamont. Community Recycling receives the City's food scraps at the SCD transfer station, and transfers the material to its composting facility in Lamont, California. Construction and demolition debris generated from City projects is also transferred through SCD to Community Recycling for processing, recycling, and disposal. 7.4 hiucaiional Outreach 2A.1 Sustainahle YA11 s Sustainable Works, a project of Community Partners, is a non -profit environmental education organization within the City. The organization offers four different sustainability programs: Business Greening, Community Sustainability, Residential Greening, and Student Greening. The Business Greening Program is free to Santa Monica businesses through a subsidy provided by the City's Office of Sustainability and the Environment. The Program assists businesses in greening their bottom line by helping them save money and resources through increased efficiency and employee education. Sustainable Works performs on -site environmental assessments to evaluate current business practices and provides sustainable recommendations. The Community Sustainability Program facilitates the adoption of sustainable practices in the community and engages stakeholders to help meet sustainability goals. 2 -30 -> city of santa monica 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero waste strategic operations. plan The Residential Greening Program offers free Green Living Workshops for residents in the City, and to non - residents for a fee. The series features six workshops offered once a week, for six weeks, covering topics that include resource recovery and recycling, water, energy, transportation, chemicals, and responsible purchasing. A Sustainable Works book is provided to each participant, which includes comprehensive resources for sustainable living. The Student Sustainability Workshop is a program that provides educational, student leadership, and community building opportunities to its participants while shaping the next generation of environmental leaders. 2.4.? Community Sustainability Galson The role of the Community Sustainability Liaison is to provide Santa Monica residents and community organizations with information and resources needed to help meet the goals of the Santa Monica Sustainable City Plan. The Liaison also helps coordinate educational outreach events within the community and produces a monthly electronic newsletter that highlights local sustainable news and events. 2.4.3 Educational Outreach Tools The City provides updates and information on its programs, policies, and events through a variety of outreach tools. Information is dispersed online (City websites and emails), via mail, television programming, workshops, advertisements in public spaces, and through citywide events. A list of some of the media available to the City for public outreach and education is provided in Table 2 -11. The Environmental Directory includes a thorough list of local resources for topics that range from energy efficiency programs to environmentally preferred purchasing. The booklet also includes resources for refuse, recycling, composting, and hazardous waste. Table t -11. Educational Outreach Media Resource Recovery and Recycling Division Websiie Office of Sustainability and the Environment Websiie Sustainable Santa Monica Electronic Newsletters Sustainable Santa Monica Facebook Page Santa Monica Resource Recovery and Recycling Facebook Page and Twitter City Emails Press Releases /Media Lists (i.e., Santa Monica Daily Press, Santa Monica Mirror, Santa Monica Observer, the Argonaut, etc.) LityTV Programming Community Events/Workshops City Hall Public Information Desk - Libraries Farmers Markets Display Advertising (Big Blue Bus Advertising, etc.) City Collection Truck Advertising IM 2 -31 city of Santa monica —� �( 2.0 CURRENT CONDITIONS zero waste strategic operations plan 2.4.4 Educational Outreach Evmts The City hosts a variety of environmental events throughout the year. These events provide the City an opportunity to directly reach out to community members, support local businesses, and promote sustainability efforts. The Santa Monica Festival is the largest festival in the City, and is held each year in May at Clover Park. The City also dedicates the month of September as Sustainability Awareness Month, in which key messages are targeted to residents, businesses, and the City Council regarding sustainability topics. Events that take place during Sustainable Santa Monica Awareness Month include; Y Business Mixers • Residential Workshops • Film Screenings • A Sustainable Food Event Report Card Launch • Student Poster Contest • Green Prize for Sustainable Literature A summary of annual sustainability events hosted by the City is provided in Table 2 -12. Table 2 -92. Citywide Environmental Events Event Month - Buy Local Expo March Sustainable Industries Economic Forum April Santa Monica Festival May AIIBuildExpo May Sustainable Quality Awards May Main Street Festival June Solstice Festival June Sustainable Santa Monica Awareness Month September AltCar Expo October Pico Festival October . ! 2 -32 city of santa monica 3.0 GENERATION AND EHARA(TERIIATION zero waste strategic operations plan 4 (pA Gumraficin and Chanurccution 3.1 Existing 6- neration Analyzing the City's generation provides an understanding of which areas to target in the Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan. Utilizing both the generation data and the inventory of existing programs and infrastructure, zero waste options were developed that will provide the most significant impact on reducing waste and increasing diversion. In 2011, the City's generation, as calculated by CalRecycle, was approximately 360,000 tons of materials. Out of the total tons generated, 77% was diverted through waste prevention, recycling, and composting, and 23% was disposed in landfills or waste -to- energy facilities. The Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan prioritizes source reduce, reuse, recycling, and composting materials before landfilling or processing at waste -to- energy facilities. The total amount of materials generated is calculated using the City's average generation rate from the years 2003 through 2006. This methodology is consistent with the CalRecycle per capita disposal equivalent methodology (as set forth in state statute). The City's 2011 per capita disposal was 5.0 pounds per person per day (PPD). Compared to the per capita disposal target of 10.9 PPD, the City was well within the target goal. The City's overall 2011 generation is included in Table 3 -1. Table 3 -1. Overall Generation 2011 (tons) Disposal - Dmersson Total .: 82,997 275,355 358,351 3J k'Jasie Diversion In 2011, the City diverted approximately 275,355 tons of material, or 77% of the total materials generated. The diversion programs provided by the City, and waste prevention and recycling efforts undertaken by individual residents and businesses, all contribute to the City's diversion rate. A summary of the activities that contribute to diversion in the City is provided in Table 3- 2. 3 -t 1 11 it Bill a_\ city of Santa monica 3.0 GENERATION AND CHARACTERIZATION 11 zero waste strategic operations plan I able 3 -2. 2011 Diversion summary - SourceJPropzram —= = = Urverslon= SF Residential 10,527 Curbside Recycling 4,099' Yard Trimmings and Food Scraps 5,428'' MF Residential 5,092 Recycling 4,479' Yard Trimmings 613 Commercial 6,412 Recycling 3,882' Yard Trimmings and Food Scraps 2,530 Self -Haul 3,356 Recycling 3,248 Yard Trimmings and Food Scraps 108 C &D 41,919 Commercial 2,861- Self -Haul 7,945 Private C &D Recycling 1 31,113 Street Sweeping 2,627 Other City Programs3 17,790 Residential Drop -Off 164E Residential Buy -Back 17,484 Tires 133 White Goods 7' Scrap Metal 78 E waste 8s HHW 36' Diversion at Landfills (alternative daily cover, beneficial reuse, etc.) 12,601 Other Source Reduction & Recycling Programs" 175,031 Total 275,355 3 City of Santa Monica 2010 Annual Report to CalRecycle _ q This figure was estimated based on CalRecycle's calculation of citywide generation, and includes waste prevention and recycling efforts undertaken by individual residents and businesses in the City. 3 -2 city of santa monica 3.0 GENERATION AND LNARAtTERIlATION zero waste strategic operations plan 33 Disposal In 2011, 82,997 tons of materials were disposed in landfills or processed at waste -to- energy facilities. Commercial waste comprised approximately 50% of the disposed waste, MF residential waste comprised almost 25% of disposal, and SF residential waste made up 8 %. The remaining disposal consisted of self -haul construction and demolition (C &D) debris and additional materials that were disposed by private companies or individuals. A summary of the disposed waste is provided in Table 3 -3. Table 3 -3. 2011 Disposal Summary (tons) 3.4 Discavded HMiials (':tata ieri =atior Understanding the types and quantities of materials that make up the discarded materials generated in the City is an important element of the Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan. The data helps guide the development and selection of policies, programs and facilities, and to target specific material types and /or products. Since discarded materials vary by generator type, it is important to analyze the materials generated by each sector. 3.4.1 yetkicuolugy For this study, the waste composition percentages contained in the California 2008 Statewide Waste Characterization Study were applied to the City's discarded materials quantities to s Consists of disposal by private companies and individuals outside of the City's control. MR 3 -3 Bourse — -'tons SF Residential 6,976 MF Residential 20,692 Commercial 39,931 Self -Haul (City controlled) 7,494 Self -Haul (Not City controlled)5 7,905 Total 82,997 3.4 Discavded HMiials (':tata ieri =atior Understanding the types and quantities of materials that make up the discarded materials generated in the City is an important element of the Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan. The data helps guide the development and selection of policies, programs and facilities, and to target specific material types and /or products. Since discarded materials vary by generator type, it is important to analyze the materials generated by each sector. 3.4.1 yetkicuolugy For this study, the waste composition percentages contained in the California 2008 Statewide Waste Characterization Study were applied to the City's discarded materials quantities to s Consists of disposal by private companies and individuals outside of the City's control. MR 3 -3 city of santa monica 3.0 GENERATION AND CHARACTERIZATION zero waste strategic operations plan identify the types and quantities of materials disposed by sector6. The specific data used for Santa Monica was taken from the "Overall Disposed Waste Composition: Southern Region." The study characterizes the waste into 10 categories and 62 material types. Table 3 -4 shows the overall waste characterization by material category for each sector. The detailed data for all material categories and types for each sector is included in Appendix A. s -4. composmon oy matertat category ana venerator sector Paper 18.3% 22.2% 20.1% 5.1% Glass 2.2% 2.9% 1.2% 0.4% Metal 3.7% 3.4% 4.3% 4.4% Electronics 0.4% 0.0% 0.1% 0.3% Plastic 9.9% 7.0% 10.5% 5.7% Other Organic 47.0% 41.8% 31.9% 10.1% Inerts and Other 14.7% 17.7% 28.1% 62.9% Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% Special Waste 0.2% 3.8% 3.5% 11.0% Mixed Residue 3.5% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% Source: CalRecycle, 2008 State -wide Waste Characterization Study, Southern Region Cascadia Consulting Group, for the California Integrated Waste Management Board (now "CalRecycle "). IM 3.4 -`� city of Santa monica —� 3.0 GENERATION AND CHARACTERIZATION zero waste strategic operations plan 3.4.1 Single - Family Residential kthste Composition Within the single - family residential sector, the following key findings are identified: • Other Organic makes up 47% (3,280 tons) of the sector's total disposed wastestream. Food waste was the largest material type in this category, which made up 24% (1,687 tons) of the overall waste disposed within this sector; followed by leaves and grass at approximately 8% (540 tons); and remainder /composite organics at approximately 7% (484 tons). Paper makes up 18% (11273 tons) of the wastestream; remainder /composite paper was the largest material type and made up approximately 6% (401 tons). • Inerts and Other makeup approximately 15% (1,026 tons) of the wastestream; lumber was the largest material type in this category, which made up almost 8% (543 tons) of the disposed wastestream. A summary of the quantity of materials disposed in the SF residential sector is shown in Exhibit 3 -1. Exhibit 3.1. Single Family Residential Disposed Waste Composition Special Waste FM 3 -5 city of Santa monica 3.0 GENERATION AND CHARACTERIZATION zero waste strategic operations plan 3.4.3 Multi- fancily Aoi4ntial Within the multi - family residential sector, the following key findings are identified: Other Organic makes up the largest category of the materials, which was approximately 42% (8,639 tons) of the sector's total wastestream. Food waste was the largest material type in this category, which made up approximately 22% (4,460 tons) of the overall waste disposed within this sector; followed by remainder /composite organics at 9% (1,890 tons); and carpet which was 6% (1,300 tons). • Paper makes up 22% (4,590 tons) of the wastestream; uncoated corrugated cardboard, other miscellaneous paper, and remainder /composite paper were the largest material types in this category, each made up approximately 5% (1,000 tons) of the wastestream. Inerts and Other make up approximately 18% (3,668 tons) of the wastestream; lumber was the largest material type in the category, which made up 12% (2,568 tons) of the total disposed wastestream. A summary of the quantity of materials disposed in the MF residential sector is shown in Exhibit 3 -2. Exhibit 3 -2. Mufti - Family Residential Disposed Waste Composition Special Waste NI M P.dd11P iss :ons tals tons tonics ons MR 3 -6 city of santa monica — 3.0 GENERATION AND CHARACTERIZATION zero waste strategic operations plan 3.44 Comnncrciai Within the commercial sector, the following key findings are identified: • Other Organic makes up the largest category of the materials, at 32% (12,721 tons) of the sector's disposed wastestream. Food waste is the largest material type in this category, which makes upl5% (6,102 tons) of the overall waste disposed within this sector; followed by carpet at 5% (1,994 tons); and prunings and trimmings at 4% (1,683 tons). • Inerts and Other make up 28% (11,217 tons) of the wastestream; lumber is the largest material type in the category, which makes up approximately 17% (6,570 tons). • Paper made up 20% (8,807 tons) of the wastestream; cardboard was the largest material type and made up approximately 7.5% (2,981 tons) of the total disposed wastestream. A summary of the quantity of materials disposed in the commercial sector is shown in Exhibit 3- 3. Exhibit 3 -3. Commercial Disposed Waste composition- Percentages Special Waste 3 -7 °± city f Santa monica =t7 Y 3.0 GENERATION AND CHARACTERIZATION zero waste strategic operations plan 3.4.5 self -haul Within the self -haul sector, the following key findings are identified: • Inerts and Other makes up the largest category of materials, which is 63% (9,692 tons) of the sector's disposed wastestream. • Special Waste makes up 11% (1,689 tons) of the wastestream, which consists entirely of bulky items. • Other Organic makes up 10% (1,559 tons) of the wastestream; carpet is the largest material type and makes up approximately 4% (551 tons) of the total disposed wastestream. . A summary of the quantity of materials disposed in the self -haul sector is shown in Exhibit 3 -4. Exhibit 3 -4.. Self -Haul Disposed Waste Composition Percentages 1 Paper Glass FM 3 -8 city of santa monica zero waste strategic operations plan 3.5 Disposal Milectiotis 3.5,1 Fopnlatinn hojewma 3.0 GENERATION AND CHARACTERIZATION Low and high population forecasts were provided in the City's 2010 Land Use and Circulation Element (LUCE)7. The forecasts used for the disposal projections are an average of the low and high population estimates from the LUCE. As shown in Table 3 -5, the average 5 -year percentage increase between 2010 and 2030 is 1.31 %, and the 20 year cumulative growth is 5.23 %. Refer to Appendix B for the reference LUCE data. r ante s -�. ropmarron rorecasts Average Growth 191,578 191,820 192,063 193,275 194,488 195,700 % change -5 yr. ). 5.2 Future Disposal 1.33% 1 1.32% 1 1.30% 1 1.28% 1 5.23% The disposal projections for the City are calculated based on the population growth projections and waste composition data. Overall, it is anticipated the waste disposal will increase by over 3,756 tons between 2013 and 2030, which represents an increase of approximately 220 tons per year. A summary of the waste disposal tonnage projections for each sector is provided in Table 3 -6. The commercial sector is expected to contribute an additional 106 tons per year to the disposal waste stream from 2013 to 2030. The multi - family residential sector disposal is expected to increase by 55 tons per year through 2030; the single - family residential sector disposal is expected to increase approximately 19 tons per year; and the self -haul sector by 41 tons per year. Utilizing the data in Table 3 -6, the types and quantities of materials that can potentially be source reduced, recycled, and /or composted have been identified for each waste sector in the Zero Waste options in Section 4. ' City of Santa Monica Land Use and Circulation Element. 1R 3 -9 \�J city of Santa monica zero waste strategic operations plan I apses-0. Waste 7�T 3.0 GENERATION AND CHARACTERIZATION wro -Zusu SF Residential 7,013 7,032 7,050 7,143 7,236 7,329 MF Residential 20,801 20,857 20,912 21,187 21,462 21,738 Commercial 40,143 40,249 40,356 40,887 41,419 41,950 Self -Haul 15,481 15,522 15,563 15,768 15,973 16,178 Total* 83,438 83,659 83,880 84,985 86,090 87,195 I Values may not sum to total due to rounding MR . 3 -10 city of santa monica 4.0 ZERO WASTE OPTIONS zero waste strategic operations plan A 'Tero 't1Va''I M' Opticrfs 4.1 Ioifid list o? latomid 00nns To meet its Zero Waste goal, the City will implement expanded and new policies, programs and infrastructure during the short, medium and long terms. For purposes of this plan, the short term is considered years 2013 -2015, the medium term is years 2016 -2022, and the long term is years 2023 -2030. Using the information on current policies, programs and facilities (Section 2), and the waste generation and composition of discarded materials (Section 3), zero waste options were identified for potential implementation in the single- family, multi - family, and commercial sectors. Policy, program, and facility options included opportunities to improve existing programs, as well as new programs for reducing generation and discarded materials and increasing diversion. Initially, a list of 33 options was developed for review and evaluation. The options were categorized as follows: Mandatory - Policies or programs that are compulsory (such as meeting a diversion requirement) or prohibit an activity (such as a disposal or use ban). Collection - Programs for the collection of residential and commercial food scraps, recyclables, and bulky items. Rate Setting — Revised fee structures to account for basic and additional services, for single - family, multi - family, and commercial sectors. Upstream — Policies and programs to support re- design strategies to reduce the volume and toxicity of discarded products and materials, and promote low- impact or reduced consumption lifestyles. Downstream — Policies and programs to address reuse, recycling and composting of end -of -life products and materials to ensure their highest and best use. Facilities — Local and regional, existing and new, resource recovery facilities for processing recyclables, residuals, and other materials for beneficial use and energy recovery. The list included three mandatory policies /program options, seven collection program options, two rate setting options, three upstream options, fourteen downstream options, and four facility options. A description of each option was included, along with the affected waste sector (single - family, multi- family, government); relevant guiding principles; implementation opportunities and obstacles, portion of discarded materials, potential capture rate by material type, implementation time frame, and examples from other jurisdictions, as available. The initial list of options were considered and then reduced, based on the elimination of some options. A summary of the list of initial options, and resulting status, is included in Table 4 -1. f M 4 -1 Neill (!�� city of santa nionica 4.0 ZERO WASTE OPTIONS zero waste strategic operations plan Table 4-1. Initial List of Zero Waste Options ec Resulting --- Status MANDATORY 1. Disposal bans Restrict disposal of specific materials, such as 9 S-F Recommend plastic bottles and cardboard. a M-F • Commercial 2. C&D ordinance revision Revise C&D ordinance to increase diversion * S-F Recommend requirement from 70% to 90%. e M-F • Commercial 3. Mandatory diversion rate Require commercial, residential, and * S-F Recommend government sectors to meet specific diversion . M-F rates. o'Commercial COLLECTION 4. Mandatory food scraps Require food establishments to participate in the * Commercial Recommend — participation -commercial City's food scraps diversion program. 5. Mandatory food scraps Require residents to participate in the City's * S-F Recommend participation -residential food scraps diversion program. o M-F 6. Man—datoiycommercial Adopt an ordinance that expands on AB 341 to * Commercial Recommend reacting require all businesses to have recycling service. — 7. Mandatory recycling of Require recycling of carpets, textiles, mattresses, a S-F Recommend new materials and other items currently not collected in the reacling bins. 8. Wet/Dry collection Separate wet (food waste) and dry (non- a M-F Modified recyclable materials) waste by different color * Commercial ba s to be se arated at the MRK 9. Weekly organics collection Reduce the collection frequency of trash and o Phase 1: S-F Modified and bi-weekly collection recycling containers while maintaining organics &Phase 2: M-F of trash and recyclables collection at once per week. 10. Bulky item collection for Expand collection frequency with emphasis on 4 M-F Modified reuse and recycling reuse and recycling; partnership with reuse organizations RATE SETTING 11. Implement Integrated Revise fee structure to account for basic services a S-F Recommend Waste Management Fee and additional services Structure Eliminate "free recycling and organics" 12. Implement Integrated Revise rate structure eM-F Recommend Waste Management Fee • Commercial Structure IM 4-2 j City of Santa monica " ° '.> 4.0 ZERO WASTE OPTIONS zero waste strategic operations plan fq - 4 -3 Title = _ � ected Paste Itesnlhng = Aescrptron _ Status UPSTREAM POLICIES AND PROGRAMS 13. EPR for HH% Establish mandatory take back provisions for . S -F Recommend pharmaceuticals, and/or producers and/or businesses that sell batteries, . M -F difficult to recycle items fluorescent light bulbs, sharps and pharmaceuticals, or other difficult to recycle . Commercial products. Difficult to recycle items can include Styrofoam, packaging materials, and toys. 14. Packaging legislation Support legislation that requires manufacturers . S -F Recommend to reduce packaging and to incorporate recycled . M -F content materials in all packaging. . Commercial 15. Behavior change Large scale, sustained, social marketing and . S -F Recommend marketing media campaign . M -F • Commercial DOWNSTREAM POLICIES AND PROGRAMS 16. Expansion of the Single- Establish a date to review the progress of the . Commercial Recommend Use Carry Out Bag current ordinance and set a goal date to expand ordinance the program to all retailers and restaurants. 17. Multi- Family recycling Require multi - family building managers to . M -F Recommend educational outreach inform tenants about recycling resources upon move -in. 18. Move- in/Move -out Provides free excess waste pickup services for . M -F Modified program residents moving in/out of their homes 19. Self -haul waste origin Require more accurate reporting of self -haul . S -F Recommend reporting waste origin at transfer and disposal sites 20. Regional Sustainability Host regular meetings with local jurisdictions to . S -F Recommend Collaboration Meetings discuss opportunities, projects, and issues. . M -F • Commercial 21. Update Environmental Update the 2009 Environmental Directory. . S -F Modified Directory • M -F • Commercial 22. School recycling Hold competitions between schools to see who . Commercial Modified competitions can divert the most materials from their waste stream within a fixed time frame. Prizes, money, trophies, etc. can be awarded to the school that collects the most. 23. HHW collection bins at Collect used batteries, cell phones, etc. at public . S -F Recommend public events events. Events can include farmer's markets, . M -F Santa Monica Festival, street fairs, etc. fq - 4 -3 city of Santa monica 4.0 ZERO WASTE OPTIONS zero waste strategic operations plan - - - Affected Waste Resulting =�_ Tctle = - _._ _ Description _ =— _ = Status =- 24. Expand items collected in Materials could include clothing diapers, chip • S -F Recommend the recycling bins bags, and other specific materials. • M -F • Commercial • Government 25. Centralized "garage sales" Establish a program for residents to sell items in e S -F Recommend a centralized location, as opposed to the many • M -F garage sales typically held in the City. 26. Clothing drives Hold clothing drives to collect clothing, shoes, Y S -F Eliminated blankets, etc. to donate to thrift stores, reuse • M -F centers, homeless shelters, etc. . Commercial 27. Business & restaurant food Program to help businesses and restaurants find . Commercial Recommend donation resources that will accept food donations. 28. Diversion Recognition and Reward residents for participating in recycling. • M -F Modified Rewards Program 29. Product reuse /recycling Offer grants and /or subsidies to individuals and • S -F Modified grants businesses to develop businesses in the City that . M -F reuse or recycle materials. • Commercial FACILITIES 30. Transform residuals Send all residual waste to a waste -to- energy • S -F Modified facility. • M -F • Commercial • Government 31. MRF residual materials Send residual materials to mixed waste MRF for • S -F Eliminated further sorting prior to landfilling or • M -F transformation. • Commercial 32. Resource Recovery Facility that accepts materials that are difficult to • S -F Recommend Park/Hard to Recycle recycle (e -waste, Styrofoam blocks, textiles, • M -F Center etc.) and identifies reuse /recycle opportunities-, • Commercial also works with manufacturers on take -back programs. • Government 33. Alternative Technology Utilize regional facility for processing of • S -F Recommend Facility residual waste into energy or other beneficial a M -F use. • Commercial • Government IM 4 -4 it city of Santa monica __..._ 4.0 ZERO WASTE OPTIONS 'zero waste strategic operations plan U ,ecornntenrled Soo gies The initial list of options was reviewed and evaluated by the City project team, and a final list of strategies was developed, incorporating the comments from all of the team members. A description of each of the recommended strategies is included below, and a summary table is included in Appendix C. U2 I ;landatoq Mandatory requirements, new rules and ordinances can be the most effective strategies for achieving Zero Waste. The City will support these efforts through technical assistance, outreach and education, and reinforcement of desired behaviors. A description of these strategies is provided below. 4.2.1.1 Disposal Bans To reduce discards that currently have recycling markets or uses, the City will consider product and material bans. Plastic water bottles, cardboard, yard trimmings and construction and demolition debris can be recycled, have available end -uses, and should not be disposed. These materials impact the collection system and take up space in landfills. The ban will start with government facilities, such as elimination of single -use water bottles at City facilities and events, and improved recycling of cardboard and landscaping debris. 4.2.1.2 C &D Ordinance Revision Construction and demolition debris constitutes approximately 33% of the City's overall disposal. The existing ordinance requires all City- sponsored C &D projects, and all private C &D projects that are $50,000 or greater in value or 1,000 square feet or great to meet a minimum 70% diversion rate. This option will modify the existing Construction and Demolition Ordinance by increasing the diversion requirement from 70% to 90 %. An amendment to the C &D ordinance will be required to implement the increased diversion requirements. The increase will be implemented in a phased approach, as follows: • 75% in 2015 • 80% in 2020 85% in 2025 90% in 2030 4.2.1.3 Mandatory Diversion Rate The City will adopt an ordinance establishing diversion mandates for the single - family, multi- family, commercial, and government sectors. The diversion mandates will be implemented in a phased approach, as follows: • 75% in 2015 • 80% in 2020 • 85% in 2025 • 90% in 2030 4 -5 it city of Santa monica 4.0 ZERO WASTE OPTIONS zero waste strategic operations plan The effort will be supported by education and outreach and enforcement through tagging of bins with recyclables and/or stop service notices. 4.2.1.4 Mandatory Recycling in Hotels /Motels There are approximately 30 hotels /motels in the City, and an estimated 600,000 visitors stay in hotels /motels annually, with an average length of stay of three nights.8 These visitors generate waste during their stay, and may not be aware of or have opportunities to recycle their waste. This ordinance will require all hotels and motels to implement a recycling program in guest rooms and common areas. The City will support the effort with education and outreach and technical assistance. 411 Collection The Resource Recovery and Recycling Division is responsible for the collection of refuse, recycling, and yard trimmings from single - family, multi- family and commercial customers. Zero Waste collection initiatives that will be implemented by the Division include: mandatory food scraps participation for commercial and residential customers, mandatory commercial recycling, adding materials to the mandatory recycling of new materials, including mattresses, textiles, transitioning to bi- weekly collection of trash, wet /dry collection method, and bulky item collection. These initiatives are described below. 4.2.2.1 Require Commercial Food Scraps Collection This policy represents a major shift from voluntary to mandatory participation in organics collection programs. It is intended to motivate all commercial generators within the City to separate organic materials from the waste they generate at their business, and place it in the appropriate organics collection container on a regular basis for collection. To effect this change, the City will need to develop and adopt a separate ordinance that requires waste generators to source separate organics from other waste, and set the organics out for collection. The organics separation ordinance could be implemented in conjunction with or as a component of the mandatory commercial recycling ordinance (Option 7), or as a stand -alone ordinance. This ordinance will need to be carefully developed based on consideration of potential cost impacts on businesses and customers, and be consistent with City policy directives. The ordinance should be publicized adequately to inform all residents, businesses, and others of the intent and purpose of the ordinance. This program requires availability of permitted compost facilities within the region that will receive, process, and market yard trimmings commingled with food scraps and other organic materials suitable for conversion to compost products. Before this program could be implemented on a citywide basis, the City will need to ensure that there is sufficient processing 'Santa Monica 2011 Tourism and Economic Fiscal Impacts and Visitor Profile, Santa Monica Convention and Visitor's Bureau. 4 -6 it rte__ ( city of Santa monica 4.0 ZERO WASTE OPTIONS zero waste strategic operations plan capacity in the region to handle the increased organics tonnages that will be collected through the expanded brown bin program. 4.2.2.2 Require Residential Food Scraps Collection This policy represents a major shift from voluntary to mandatory participation inorganics collection programs. It is intended to motivate all residential generators within the City to separate organic materials from the waste they generate at their homes, and place it in the green collection container on a regular basis for collection. To effect this change, the City will need to develop and adopt a separate ordinance that requires waste generators to source separate organics from other waste, and set the organics out for collection. The City will modify and expand its current food scraps collection program to include not only yard trimmings and food scraps, but also food - contaminated paper, and similar compostable materials. This program is designed to increase residential waste diversion by requiring residents to place food scraps and other organic materials in their green bins. This program requires availability of permitted compost facilities within the region that will receive, process, and market yard trimmings commingled with food scraps and other organic materials suitable for conversion to compost products. Before this program could be implemented on a citywide basis, the City will need to ensure that there is sufficient processing capacity in the region to handle the increased organics tonnages that will be collected through the expanded green bin program. 4.2.2,3 Expand Mandatory Commercial Recycling Assembly Bill 341 (adopted by the California legislature in 2011) established a statewide goal of 75 percent by 2020 and requires commercial generators (with four or more cubic yards per week of solid waste) and multi- family complexes (with five units or more) to recycle. However, it does not specify the materials to be collected or the level of recycling services received. Many communities have adopted ordinances specifying recycling requirements for multi - family residential and commercial customers. This policy expands upon the requirements of AB 341, to mandatory participation in recycling collection programs. It is intended to motivate all commercial waste generators within the City to separate recyclable materials from the waste they generate at their business, and place it in the appropriate blue bin or recycling collection container on a regular basis for collection. To effect this change, the City will need to develop and adopt a "Mandatory Recycling" ordinance that requires waste generators to source separate recyclables from other waste, and set the recyclables out for collection. The recycling ordinance will need to be carefully developed based on consideration of potential impacts to business and customers, consistent with City policy directives, and publicized adequately to inform all residents, businesses, and others of the intent and purpose of the ordinance. R 4 -7 °® city of santa monica 4.0 ZERO WASTE OPTIONS zero waste strategic operations plan 4.2.2.4 Require Recycling of New Materials This program allows the City to require the recycling of materials currently not collected in the blue bins from residential customers, including mattresses, carpet, and textiles. The materials could be added to the blue bin program, or alternatively, the City could collaborate with non- profit or other private organizations to increase the availability of collection or drop -off centers for these materials in the City. Adding new materials to the recycling program will require the availability of viable long -term markets to ensure the materials are recovered to the maximum extent feasible and have a positive market value. Some items are more suited to recovery and processing, while others do not have viable markets or processors to accept them. The City will work with processors and representatives of the recycling industry to identify market opportunities in the Southern California region for various materials that could be recycled. Once appropriate program parameters are established, the City will need to provide appropriate public outreach so that residents can easily identify the acceptable items for recycling. 4.2.2.5 Weekly Organics and Recycling Collection; Bi- weekly Refuse Collection The City collects refuse, recycling and organics (yard trimmings and food scraps) from residential customers on a weekly basis. This option will reduce the collection frequency of trash to every other week, while maintaining recycling and organics collection at once per week. The program will be implemented initially for single - family residences, and phased in later for multi - family residences. The City will support the transition with outreach and education to residents. This program requires availability of permitted compost facilities within the region that will receive, process, and market yard trimmings commingled with food scraps and other organic materials suitable for conversion to compost products. Before this program could be implemented on a citywide basis, the City will need to ensure that there is sufficient processing capacity in the region to handle the increased organics tonnages that will be collected through the expanded green bin program. It is anticipated the program will result in an increase in waste diversion, as organics comprise 47% of the single - family disposed waste stream, and 43% of the multi - family disposed wastestream. Reduced operations costs are also anticipated, based on results in other communities that have tested every other week refuse collection (e.g. Renton, Tacoma, and Seattle, Washington and Portland, Oregon). Other benefits of the program include fewer collection truck trips, which will reduce vehicle air, noise and green house gas emissions, and increased collection efficiency in terms of labor time, and maintenance. 4.2.2.6 Wet/Dry Collection In a transition from the every other week collection, the City will re -route existing residential and commercial collections to keep "wet" discards (which include yard trimmings, food scraps and soiled paper, manure and other "putrescibles ") separate from "dry" discards, such as paper, glass, etc. Wet discards will be collected for processing through composting or anaerobic digestion, and dry products and materials will be reused, repaired or recycled. The dry waste routing and IM \ 4 -8 _6_1 it (�1 city of Santa monica 4.0 ZERO WASTE OPTIONS zero waste strategic operations plan processing takes advantage of the recyclables generated by residents and business, makes recycling less dependent on changing customer behavior and can dramatically increase diversion. It can also reduce disposal fees and increase revenues from the sale of recyclables due to the increase tons of materials recovered. It is anticipated the wet/dry collection will increase diversion by about 8% in the residential sector, and 6% in the commercial sector. This program requires the availability of processing capacity in the region that can handle greater quantities of recyclables for separation and processing. This program requires availability of permitted facilities within the region that will receive, process, and market the organic materials. Before this program could be implemented on a citywide basis, the City will need to ensure that there is sufficient processing capacity in the region to handle the increased recyclables and organics that will be collected. 4.2.2.7 Bulky Item Collection; Move-in/Move-out Program A significant source of trash is created when apartment dwellers move in and out of apartment buildings. Presently, the City provides bulky item collection Monday through Friday for a prearranged fee. The fee varies according to the size and weight of the item, and ranges from $50 for a small item to $250 or more for a major cleanup of debris and furniture pieces. Bulky items are limited to those large items that do not fit in a refuse container, such as: refrigerators, stoves, furniture and similar items. This service is available to both Residential and Commercial customers. A new program will be implemented to provide excess waste pickup services for multi- family residents moving in /out of their homes. The purpose of the program is to reduce the frequency of illegal dumping in alleys and on curbs, and provide more convenient opportunity for residents to donate their materials for reuse and recycling. The City will collaborate with reuse entities (thrift stores, repair shops, and non - profits such as Goodwill Industries, Salvation Army, St. Joseph's Center, and American Cancer Society Discovery Shop) to repair, reuse, and resell appropriate bulky items that are currently being set out by residents for collection by the Division and landfilled. The City recently entered into a service contract to establish Santa Monica SHARES, a program for the donation of items to non - profits and schools. The City will encourage residents to contact Santa Monica SHARES to donate useable items using the program's online service. Information on this program will be conveyed through annual mailers to multi - family residences, through the City's web page and City events. 1 .iJ. ! 4 -9 it city of santa monica 4.0 ZERO WASTE OPTIONS zero waste strategic operations plan 4.2.3 We Seth g Changes to the rate structure can have a significant effect in motivating customers to participate in new programs, and to account for basic services and additional services. The City's existing rate structure for single- family refuse collection is based on the number and size of carts (either 68 or 95 gallons). Unlimited carts are provided for recyclables and yard trimmings. For multi - family dwellings, a similar fee structure is established for refuse collection, based on the size, number, and frequency of collection of 68, 95 or 300 gallon carts, or 2, 3, or 4 cubic yard bins. In addition, a per unit charge is assessed for each unit in the complex. Commingled recyclables are collected in 300 - gallon carts or 2, 3, or 4 cubic yard bins, and are either designated to specific complexes or are shared. There is no separate charge for recycling. Commercial customers are also charged for refuse collection based on the size, number and frequency of collection (68, 95 or 300 gallon carts, or 2, 3, or 4 cubic yard bins), and are assessed street sweeping charges, based on the water meter size. There is no separate charge for recycling. The existing fees collected by the City pay for more than just refuse collections and disposal. The fees are used to pay for collection and processing of recyclables, food scraps, yard debris and bulky items, as well as street sweeping, equipment, infrastructure, container replacements, support services, alternative technology studies, etc. 4.2.3.1 Implement Single - Family Integrated Waste Management Fee Structure The intent of this option is to reduce the risk to the city of its existing disposal oriented rate structure, and more accurately account for basic services and additional services. The fee structure will also provide further incentives for customers to increase recycling and reduce disposal. Under this type of fee structure, a basic service fee will be assessed for each single - family residence, and will include one cart each for trash, recycling, and organics. An additional charge will be assessed for additional refuse carts, with a lower additional charge for recycling and organics carts. The advantages of this type of fee structure are increased diversion and decreased disposal, and a potential reduction in collections costs for the City collections operations. Although residents may be resistant to a change in their fee structure, the option aims to communicate the value of the services.to the customers. It is anticipated this type of fee structure will result; in a 4% increase in diversion in the single - family sector. 4.2.3.2 Implement Multi - Family and Commercial Sector Integrated Waste Management Fee Structure The goal of this option is to establish sufficient customer rate incentives for commercial and multi - family refuse customers to increase recycling and decrease refuse service. This policy will help to minimize the common industry practice of offering price incentives based on volume discounts to customers that subscribe for higher levels of refuse service, thereby creating pricing incentives for customers to shift to increased recycling services. It will also require full disclosure of the cost components of rates charged and eliminate the perception of "free recycling ". IM 4 -10 city of santa monica ' 4.0 ZERO WASTE OPTIONS zero waste strategic operations plan Refuse rate component: Commercial customer rates will be modified to reflect a uniform "per cubic yard" rate for the whole range of bin or container sizes and collection frequency offered to customers. The amount of the cubic yard (unit) rate will be established to ensure that sufficient revenues are generated to cover the City's costs. For example, the City would charge a rate of $100 for a one cubic -yard bin collected once per week, the rate would be $200 for the one cubic - yard bin collected two times per week, $400 for a four cubic -yard bin collected once per week, or $1,200 for a six cubic yard bin collected two times per week. Recycling rate component: A recycling rate will be established under this fee structure, for example that is, no higher than 75 percent of the refuse rate for service, as measured by the uniform "per cubic yard" rate for refuse service. If the City charges $100 for a one cubic yard bin of refuse, they would charge no more than $75 for a one cubic yard bin of commingled or source separated recyclables. 4.2,4 tlnstrearn 4.2.4.1 Extended Producer Responsibility Producer responsibility is a key strategy for achieving Zero Waste. Take -back requirements shift the costs of refuse from taxpayers to brand owners and producers. They also create a powerful economic incentive to redesign products and substantially reduce the use of toxic materials. The City will consider the following problem materials for producer take -back: • Materials that cannot be reused, recycled or composted and single -use items; and . Regulated materials (e.g., pharmaceuticals, sharps, batteries, fluorescent bulbs). The upstream extended producer responsibility (EPR) initiatives call for the City to take an active role in advocating-for legislation that requires product manufacturers, retail establishments, wholesale distributors and other appropriate entities to take back certain products or packaging that currently are difficult to recycle, contain toxics or otherwise pose problems when they are discarded as waste. The City will work with various federal, state and regional agencies and community groups to ensure that effective take -back programs are enacted into law, thereby enhancing the City's goals to reduce the volume and toxicity of the materials entering the City's waste stream. The following are the priorities the City will focus on under this program: • Advocate for legislation making businesses responsible for their products that contain toxics, such as pharmaceuticals, fluorescent lights, household batteries, treated wood, and other materials banned from disposal statewide • Advocate for legislation making businesses responsible for their products that are difficult to recycle materials, such as disposable diapers, composite materials, tires, white goods, durable goods, plastic, and food packaging. IU 4 -11 --I t city of Santa monica 4.0 ZERO WASTE OPTIONS zero waste strategic operations plan Advocate for legislation to incentivize manufacturers to use local reuse and recycling markets for the products they manufacture. 4.2.4.2 Packaging Legislation The City's Office of Sustainability and the Environment is presently working with Green Cities California to identify opportunities for packaging legislation. The option will further the City's efforts of leadership by example and work towards regionalization of programs to address packaging. The goal of packaging legislation is to prevent or reduce the impact of packaging and packaging waste on the environment. Legislation will contain provisions not only for preventing packaging waste, but also the reuse, recovery and recycling of packaging waste. Under this option, the City will advocate for packaging legislation making businesses responsible for their packages, including alternatives to expanded polystyrene containers, "peanuts" and "blocks" and plastic bags (statewide); and support for reusable shipping containers. The City will also support legislation to reduce packaging and to incorporate recycled content materials in all packaging. 4.2.4.3 Behavior Change Marketing To significantly increase awareness of its existing and planned Zero Waste programs, the City will undertake a large scale media or social marketing campaign. The City will work closely with electronic and print media to encourage their coverage of the City's goals, plans, and project implementation, and to challenge them to help engage the public in creative new ways. Funding programs on an on -going basis (over multiple five -year campaign periods) to educate target audiences about the new rules and changes is an important part of implementing Zero Waste. This program will greatly enhance public awareness about where to reuse, recycle, and compost materials to keep them out of landfills, and encourage residents, businesses, workers, and visitors to fully participate in achieving a Zero Waste future. A community -based social marketing program will be implemented to help change the culture and waste - related behavior in the City, with different messages targeted to different demographics using a wide assortment of tools. The City will work closely with electronic and print media to encourage their coverage of the City's goals, plans, and project implementation, and to challenge them to help engage the public in creative new ways. This program will greatly enhance public awareness about where to reuse, recycle, and compost materials to keep them out of landfills, and encourage residents, businesses, workers, and visitors to fully participate in achieving a Zero Waste future. Social marketing campaigns involve the systematic application of marketing alongside other techniques and tools to achieve specific social behavioral goals. Some of the best practices that have been developed include starting from a detailed understanding of the needs, desires and attitudes of the individuals concerned, researching the underlying reasons for certain behaviors and developing an `offer" that will be attractive given existing needs, values and other pressures such as peer group influences. IDR 4 -12 it i yt�J city of Santa monica 4.0 ZERO WASTE OPTIONS zero waste strategic operations plan There is also an important role for civic leaders and elected officials, to lead by example as exemplars of the new social norms. This requires clear and consistent messages from the City Council and City management and staff. Strategies for changing the norms of behavior include: • Leaders who visibly encourage and reward successful innovation; • Focusing financial resources on innovation, including both public and private sources; • Using incubator models for testing and piloting innovations; and • Establishing institutions to link small scale enterprises to larger organizations such as business and legislative bodies. 41S Doxnstrearn 4.2.5.1 Expand Single -use Carry Out Bag and Disposable Container Ordinance The City's existing ordinances prohibit the distribution of single -use carry out petroleum and bio -based plastic bags by retail establishments; grocery, convenience and liquor stores; mini - marts; pharmacies; and at City events. The City also prohibits the distribution of disposable food service containers made of nonrecyclable plastic or expanded polystyrene foam from all food providers and at City events. The ban applies to single -use disposable containers intended for serving or transporting prepared, ready -to -eat food or beverages. This policy will establish a date to review the progress of the existing ordinances, and to set a goal date to expand the program to all retailers and restaurants. Expansion of the bans will further help to reduce the amount of plastic that ends up on the City's beaches, reduce materials that go to the landfill, and reduce the amount of natural resources used to manufacture and transport the disposable products. 4.2.5.2 Multi- family Recycling Educational Outreach This program will provide enhanced technical assistance to owners and managers of multi - family complexes in order to encourage them to initiate or expand recycling and waste reduction practices at their complexes, and to make tenants aware of the move- in/move -out program. Technical assistance will include conducting on -site waste assessments to identify target materials for recycling and waste reduction, providing information on arranging for recycling services, and distributing appropriate outreach materials describing best practices for setting up or expanding recycling services. Technical assistance will help to minimize or overcome various obstacles to recycling faced by multi - family complexes (space constraints, labor and sorting requirements, lack of information or training, etc.). Technical assistance provided by the City will encourage more complexes to set up an effective recycling program that is suited to the complex's site. 4.2.5.3 Self -haul Waste Origin Reporting Misreported waste origin continues to be an ongoing problem for the City and throughout the region. The problem can impact a jurisdiction's ability to accurately monitor and report disposal, and to plan for new policies and programs. In Santa Monica, it is estimated that over 10,000 tons M 4 -13 city of santa monica 4.0 ZERO WASTE OPTIONS zero waste strategic operations plan per year of waste is misallocated to the City. The intent of this option is to establish regional cooperation between cities, counties, and facilities that are responsible for reporting the origin of waste. Through regional cooperation, a more efficient process should be established to track misreported waste, and reduce the time and resources spent by individual jurisdictions on this process. This option will be closely tied with the option for Regional Sustainability Collaboration described below. 4.2.5.4 Regional Sustainability Collaboration There are several approaches to regional cooperation, including the formation of a regional Zero Waste Task Force and the development of inter - agency or interlocal agreements between neighboring communities. The approach will form the basis for establishing regional Zero Waste goals throughout Southern California. The City will support regional efforts in Zero Waste planning and will engage in dialogues with other cities to identify opportunities for regional coordination and to undertake project - specific regional opportunities. The City will explore possibilities through this process of developing regional Resource Recovery Parks, regional reuse, recycling and composting, and conversion technology infrastructure, and regional funding for Zero Waste. 4.2.5.5 Environmental Directory On -line version The City provides an Environmental Directory booklet that includes a list of local resources for topics that range from energy efficiency programs to environmentally preferred purchasing. The booklet also includes resources for refuse, recycling, composting, and hazardous waste. The Directory was last updated in 2009, and has historically been provided in print form only. This option will create an on -line only version of the Directory, eliminating the print version entirely. The on -line version will include new and/or updated resources, and will be made available and searchable on the City's website. 4.2.5.6 Rewards Program The City's Sustainable Quality Awards (SQA) was developed to identify and recognize businesses in the City that are successfully incorporating sustainable practices into their operations. An annual event promotes the efforts of local businesses that have made significant achievements in the areas of sustainable economic development, social responsibility, and stewardship of the natural environment. This option will expand the City's recognition of businesses to reward residents and businesses for developing programs in the City for reusing, repurposing, reducing, and recycling of waste. As part of this option, the City will initiate school waste reduction competitions, with rewards in the form of prizes, money, grants, etc. The City will coordinate with other civic organizations, such as the Chamber of Commerce, to identify grants and other funding opportunities. This intent of this option is to encourage community involvement in zero waste solutions, including individuals, business, schools and other institutions. The program may stimulate local job growth and markets for recovered materials, creating a new reuse industry in the City. IUR 4 -14 , city of Santa monica 4.0 ZERO WASTE OPTIONS zero waste strategic operations plan 4.2.5.7 Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Collection at Public Events Presently, the RRR Division offers assistance to help organizations implement Zero Waste goals at their events. This program will entail placement and servicing of HHW collection containers at public events, and City events such as the Santa Monica Festival. This program will provide convenient opportunities for the general public to safely dispose of used batteries, mobile phones, and other HHW items. 4.2.5.8 Expand Items Collected In Recycling Cart This program allows the RRR Division the ability to add new materials to the existing list of materials that can be placed in the recycling cart for collection by the City, including textile and other items. Adding new materials to the recycling cart will require that the City's contracted recycling processor identify viable long -term markets to ensure that the materials are recovered to the maximum extent feasible and have a positive market value. The City will initiate discussions with its processor to identify market opportunities in the Southern California region for new materials that could be recycled. Once opportunities are identified and new materials are selected, the City will need to provide appropriate public outreach to residents and businesses. Adding new materials will reduce the quantity of materials being disposed, create a convenient program to donate clothing and other materials for reuse and /or recycling, and provide the ability to divert specific hard -to- recycle items. 4.2.5.9 Centralized Garage Sales The City presently schedules an annual citywide yard sale to promote waste reuse and repurposing. In addition, numerous yard sales are held privately throughout the City on a regular basis. The City has been considering and assessing the advantages and disadvantages of the citywide garage sales. This option will establish a program for residents to sell items in a centralized location, in lieu of the many garage sales that are typically held in the City. The program will be coordinated with the citywide yard sale event, and will be free and open to residents only. It is the intent of the program to encourage more residents to resell and reuse items before discarding them, and provide residents with limited space an opportunity to sell their items. 4.2.5.10 Business and Restaurant Food Donation The many large businesses and restaurants in the City generate uneaten prepared foods that are typically disposed.' Food comprises approximately 15% of the commercial waste stream. This program will help businesses and restaurants to find resources that will accept food donations. This program will reduce the amount of food scraps that is landfilled, and provide a source of food for persons in need. The City will publish resources in the environmental directory for businesses wishing to donate food, and will provide information on the program on its website. 4 -15 (° city of santa monica 4.0 ZERO WASTE OPTIONS zero waste strategic operations plan 4.2.4 Facilities 4.2.6.1 Regional Resource Recovery Center Resource Recovery Centers (RRCs) can be small centers for drop -off of hard to recycle items, including mattresses, large blocks of Styrofoam, and textiles, or much larger facilities that include a reuse yard for building materials, and provide repair and refurbishment for reusable bulk items and other reusable materials delivered by the public. They can also handle HHW materials, brush, and other recoverable materials. The materials typically are brought in self - hauled loads by residents or businesses to a solid waste facility. Thus RRCs are usually developed at landfills or transfer facilities. Local facilities can redesign their sites to provide for a separate drop -off and staging area where the public can drop off their recoverable materials before proceeding to the designated tipping area. At some facilities, the diversion activity takes place after the fee gate and the public is required to separate materials for recycling and reuse. If users decide to proceed directly to the disposal area, they are required to pay an extra fee. Reduced tipping fees at RRCs can provide a significant incentive to users. Most provide drop -off or buyback options for revenue - generating recyclables. Some charge lower rates for certain items (e.g., yard trimmings, clean fill). Diversion levels and costs at RRCs can vary widely depending on the extent and type of the diversion activities. These activities can include public area drop -off for traditional recyclables (cans, bottles, and paper), salvaging materials from the tipping area at a transfer station or landfill (large pieces of metal, cardboard or wood), diverting reusable items (furniture, building materials, and household goods), and providing retail sales on site. In some locations, RRCs could be combined in "clusters" of reusable, recyclables, compostable, and special discards (including regulated materials and C &D). Each of the clusters would utilize different approaches to collecting and processing, requiring different trucks, equipment and handling. The cluster approach requires that the combined categories of materials be sorted at other locations. Some activities may be co- located at a landfill, but others may be off -site. The City may support these efforts through helping apply for grants, recruiting businesses and industries to use materials generated by Zero Waste programs, and promoting the use of the RRC. 4.2.6.2 Alternative Technology Facility Based on Zero Waste research some type of future alternative technology is anticipated to be developed that will help meet Zero Waste goals. A number of emerging technologies are currently under consideration or in development with the potential to provide substantial increases in diversion rates. Examples of these emerging technologies include thermal and biological processes, including anaerobic digestion, gasification, and pyrolysis. In addition, although mixed material processing facilities are currently in operation throughout the U.S., developments and improvements in this technology over time should render increased efficiencies, better economical feasibility and higher diversion processing capabilities. A number of jurisdictions in Southern California are evaluating the feasibility of developing alternative technology facilities for processing the residual waste into energy or other beneficial use. The County of Los Angeles and cities of Los Angeles and Glendale are some of the local IM 4 -16 it city of Santa monica -_�_ ��� 4.0 ZERO WASTE OPTIONS zero waste strategic operations plan jurisdictions that are continuing to evaluate the potential for implementation of such a facility. It is reasonable to predict that within the planning horizon of the Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan, some current emerging technologies will be commercially viable to support the City in achieving its Zero Waste goals. The City will monitor and support the development of a regional alternative technology facility for the processing of the residual portion of the waste stream into waste or other beneficial use. 4.2.6.3 Residual Processing A portion of the City's waste is presently transformed into energy at one of two permitted waste to energy facilities in Southern California. The City's Zero Waste Strategic Plan includes policies and programs to reduce, reuse, recycle, and compost to the greatest extent possible the maximum amount of materials for beneficial reuse. It is estimated the City can achieve a 93% diversion rate with the implementation of the policies, programs and infrastructure described in the previous option. However, in the future, the City may continue to utilize transformation of residuals to achieve 95% diversion by 2030. 4-17 it (1 city of Santa monica 4,0 ZERO WASTE OPTIONS zero waste strategic operations plan IBIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FaR 4 -18 city of Santa monica it 5.0 DIVERSION AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS zero waste strategic operations plan 5.0 Dt° mlrfoli mad Gi-embilse Gas Enti ium RL-hr 6orl Eailruat s S.I OivErsioe `Stimat €s Diversion estimates were prepared to identify the waste disposal reduction potential of each policy and program. The diversion estimates are based on comparable policies and programs implemented in other jurisdictions, research, and educated estimates. Table 5 -1 summarizes the diversion by implementation phase. As indicated, based on the City's 2012 diversion rate of 77 %, it is estimated the City can achieve 94% diversion by 2030 through implementation of all the policies, programs and facilities identified; and 96% diversion with residual waste processing. Table 5 -1. Diversion Estimates by Implementation Phase _'ShoRto . 2D0_ .Mw n Mcdi ! Exrstmg i; Shott Tenn_ 'term= -Tgrm Long Term _ Lang Term (wdh Residual PhaselYear= _j20I2) (2013.2075) (2013 2Q20) 2 _ 5 (202] 2025) (_20212030) (2026 -2030) Processing) 11 Estimated 77% 80% 85% 86% 89% 94% 96� ° Diversion A breakdown of the zero waste plan diversion increases by sector and phase is included in Table 5 -2. As indicated, options to be implemented in the commercial sector will have the greatest impact on increasing diversion, followed by the multi - family and single - family sector programs. The commercial sector programs with the greatest diversion potential include mandatory food scraps recycling, expanding the types of recycled materials collected, wet /dry collection, increasing the C &D ordinance diversion requirement, and behavior change marketing. For the residential sector, the options with the greatest diversion potential include mandatory food scraps recycling, mandatory diversion rate, behavior change marketing, and wet /dry collection. In the multi - family sector, the options with the highest diversion potential include implementing an integrated waste management fee structure, behavior change marketing, mandatory food scraps recycling, mandatory diversion rate, wet/dry collection, and converting to bi- weekly refuse collection. The detailed calculations used for estimating the diversion potential of each of the policies, programs, and facilities considered by the City are included in Appendix D. The diversion estimates are presented in the presumed order of implementation. Each one builds on the program or policy preceding it, and assumes the available waste was reduced by the previous program. Several policies will require new ordinances and regulations which will require City Council action and time to implement. Zero waste is a design framework for reducing generation of waste and maximizing diversion, not a strict tonnage goal. By implementing the proposed policies, programs and facilities, the City will be striving towards zero waste, but there will still be some residual wastes that will be disposed. 5 -1 city of santa monica zero waste strategic operations plan Table 5-2. Zero Waste Strategic Plan Diversion Estimates 5.0 DIVERSION AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS R I I. . . . . li i it Shor,t,.o Mill IIII M R e th R!! dl u li �lTek m''I'jil Met! UMil V I'M Ili' .... ..... . Ij1IDiv66i6hjII0Ijil a 1 0 sin 1g dry eilrnl(2014., '12020) �$rn 2050) SF 11819 1,249 130 926 736 4,860 1.3% 1,248 Residential 6,107 1.7% M F 4,032 4,686 1,244 3,098 1,970 15,031 4.1% 3,377 Residential 18,407 5.0% Commercial 5,528 5,113 4,672 6,201 10,546 32,060 8.8% 4,913 36,973 10.1% Self-Haul 0 6,142 0 0 4,134 10,277 2.8% 0 10,277 2.8% Diversion 11,379 17,190 6,046 10,225 17,387 62,227 9,537 71,765 (tons) zi, 'PJ 0i Yl:1� Diversion 3.2% 4.7% 1.6% 2.8% ,I 11 111 4.7% 17% ... . . ..... . 19.6% N I J i I Jiji I 1UR 5-2 city of santa monica 5.0 DIVERSION AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS zero waste strategic operations plan . E.2 Giee®heese Gas Emissions Reduction Estimates The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) developed the Waste Reduction Model (WARM) to help planners and organizations track and voluntarily report greenhouse gas emissions reductions from several different waste management practices. WARM calculates and totals Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions for baseline and alternative waste management practices— source reduction, recycling, composting, and landfriling. The model calculates emissions in metric tons of carbon equivalent (MTCE), metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2E), and energy units (million BTU) across a wide range of material types commonly found in municipal solid waste. The WARM was used to estimate the amount of GHG emissions that can potentially be reduced through implementation of the programs and policies outlined in the Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan. The GHG emissions reductions are calculated based on the program implementation timeline (i.e. short term, short-to- medium term, medium term, etc.). The long term programs include residual processing, modeled as combustion (waste -to- energy) in WARM, therefore the GHG emissions reduction shown is the resulting net effect. Based on the estimated diversion rates in the Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan, the City's overall GHG emissions will be reduced by 18,573 MTCE by 2030. The GHG emissions reductions are shown in Table 5 -3. The model assumptions and results are included in Appendix E. Table 5 -3. Zero Waste Strategic Plan Greenhouse Gas Emissions Estimates (MTCE) source _ gg sfiort = Short _o — = Med Term Med to Long Term; Resttlual_ Total - Term= MedTem Processn_ SF Residential Re sidential (517) (255) (58) (307) (262) 98 (1,301) VIF Residential Re sidential (1,482) (1,438) (556) (1,094) (920) 189 (5,301) Commercial 1,935) (1,973) 1,249) (2,489) 3,037 545 (10,138 Self -Haul (1,153 ) (680) (1,833) TOTAL (3,934) (4,819) (1,863) (3,890) (4,899) 832 (18,573) Note: a negative value (i.e., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission reduction; a positive value indicates an emission increase FM 5 -3 city f Santa monica Y 5.0 DIVERSION AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS zero waste strategic operations plan THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK IM 5-4 city of Santa monica 6.0 FINANCIAL AND COST ANALYSIS zero waste strategic operations plan 6.0 FIGrarrcieE and Cn:;g ArtAysis AJ Financial Analysis The first steps in determining the selected zero waste programs' costs and rate impacts involved developing an understanding of the Division's operational and capital costs for existing programs and establishing a baseline. In order to develop the baseline data included in Tables 6 -1 through 6 -4, data was gathered from the City on solid waste related revenue and expense data, and shared cost allocation methodologies. (Appendix F). The expense data provided by the City was categorized within specific cost categories for Direct Costs (the direct labor, equipment and other costs required for the collection activity), Material Handling Costs (the transfer, processing, and disposal costs associated with the post - collection handling of the collected material), and Administration and Overhead (the management, administrative, and other indirect overhead costs of the Division that is allocated back to each line of service). In addition to these collection costs, there are costs for programs and services performed by the Division which have been allocated among sectors based on estimates provided by Division staff. These programs /services costs, and the sector allocations, are listed below. COST CATEGORY SECTOR ALLOCATION Events Single Family 100% Alley Crew Single Family 10 %; Multi - Family 90% Household Hazardous Waste Single Family 50 %; Multi- Family 50% Outreach Calculated among sectors based on number of accounts Street Sweeping Commercial 100% Public Litter Container Collection Commercial 100% Bus Stop Litter Collection Commercial 100% 6 -1 '(r city of Santa monica 6.0 FINANCIAL AND COST ANALYSIS zero waste strategic operations. plan Table 6 -t. Solid Waste Program Baseline Analysis -All Sectors Table 6 -2. Solid Waste Program Baseline Analysis - Single Family Sector TotaMySector - Y �- - _ =_ Stngle Family Molh- Family ? Commereal = Totat =_ - _. - Totat - Labor $ 1,394,476 $ 2,243,936 $ 3,939,579 $ 7,577,991 Equipment $ 1,242,954 $ 1,718,448 $ 3,201,892 $ 6,163,294 Other $ 550,652 $ 786,368 $ 953,502 $ 2,290,522 Subtotal Direct Costs $ 3,188,082 $ 4,748,752 $ 8,094,973 $ 16,031,808 $ 225,823 Allocated Transfer $ 27,610 $ - $ 25,443 $ $ 53,053 Processing Direct Transfer $ 225,823 $ 414,487 $ 821,128 $ 1,461,439 Allocated Transfer $ 53,053 $ 84,320 $ 160,140 $ 297,513 Processing $ 234,074 $ 118,343 $ 137,734 $ 253,465 Disposal $ 442,492 $ 1,446,126 $ 2,682,622 $ 4,571,240 Subtotal Material Handling $ 955,442 $ 1,826,590 $ 3,801 625 $ 6,583,656 Subtotal Operations Costs $ 4,143,5241 $ 6,575,342 1 $ 11,896,598 1 $ 22,615,464 Admin & Overhead $ 784,838 1 $ 923,7401 $ 867,978 1 $ 2,576,556 Total Program Costs $ 4,928,362 1 $ 7,499,082 1 $ 12,764,576 $ 25,192,020 Table 6 -2. Solid Waste Program Baseline Analysis - Single Family Sector * Includes expenses for Compost Bins /Giveaways, Events, Household Hazardous Waste, Alley Crew, and Outreach IM 62 Single Family SolidWasfe' Recycling Greenllyaste = Other* = Totat =_ - _. Labor $ 363,443 $ 402,854 $ 475,823 $ 152,356 $ 1,394,476 Equipment $ 349,026 $ 396,323 $ 450,381 $ 47,224 $ 1,242,954 Other $ 70,041 $ 346,561 $ 87,803 $ 46,247 $ 550,652 Subtotal Direct Costs $ 782,510 $ 1,145,738 $ 1,014,007 $ 245,827 $ 3,188,082 Direct Transfer $ 117,399 $ 4,079 $ 99,823 $ 4,522 $ 225,823 Allocated Transfer $ 27,610 $ - $ 25,443 $ $ 53,053 Processing $ - $ 134,934 $ 365,237 $ 3,771 $ 234,074 Disposal $ 428,105 $ - $ - $ 14,387 $ 442,492 Subtotal Material Handling $ 573,114 $ 130,855 $ 490,503 $ 22,680 $ 955,442 Subtotal Operations Costs $ 1,355,624 $ 1,014,883 $ 1,504,510 $ 268,5071 $ 4,143,524 Admin & Overhead $ 78,841 $ 131,558 $ 102,165 $ 472,274 1 $ 784,838 Total Program Costs $ 1,434,465 $ 1,146,441 $ 1,606,675 1 $ 740,78TI $ 4,928,362 * Includes expenses for Compost Bins /Giveaways, Events, Household Hazardous Waste, Alley Crew, and Outreach IM 62 k /o city of Santa monica 6.0 FINANCIAL AND LOST ANALYSIS zero waste strategic operations plan Table 6 -3. Solid Waste Program Baseline Analysis - Multi - (amity Sector _ - Solid Waste? - Recycling - Green Waste.Other* Cotnmerctal Total != Labor $ 1,327,221 $ '558,006 $ 63,915 $ 294,794 $ 2,243,936 Equipment $ 1,052,983 $ 480,484 $ 48,534 $ 136,447 $ 1,718,448 Other $ 242,340 $ 405,506 $ 10,883 $ 127,639 $ 786,368 Subtotal Direct Costs $ 2,622,544 $ 1,443,996 $ 123,332 $ 558,880 $ 4,748,752 Direct Transfer $ 387,629 $ 5,1951 $ 9,664 $ 11,999 $ 414,487 Allocated Transfer $ 81,894 $ - $ 2,426 $ - $ 84,320 Processing $ - $ 153,261 $ 34,918 $ - $ 118,343 Disposal $ 1,400,182 $ - $ - $ 45,944 $ 1,446,126 Subtotal Material Handling $ 1,869,705 $ 148,066 $ 47,008 $ 57,943 $ 1,826,590 Subtotal Operations Costs $ 4,492,249 1 $ 1,295,930 1 $ 170,340 $ 616,823 $ 6,575,342 Admin & Overhead Admin & Overhead $ 264,2321 $ 169,335 1 $ 12,426 $ 477,747 $ 923,740 Total Program Costs Tt m Costs $ 4,756,481 $ 1,465,265 $ 182,766 $ 1,094,570 $ 7,499,08 * Includes expenses for Household Hazardous Waste, Alley Crew, and Outreach Table 6 -4. Solid Waste Program Baseline Analysis - Commercial Sector * Includes expenses for Outreach, Street Sweeping, Public Litter Containers, and Bus Stop Refuse Collection 6-3 Cotnmerctal - -- - - -__ Labor Ji idWaste- - _ $ 1,918,374 $ Recycling - 649,706 $ Organics 169,882 - - $ 1,201,617 - $ 3,939,579 Equipment $ 1,392,244 $ 451,977 $ 136,189 $ 1,221,482 $ 3,201,892 Other $ 354,760 $ 377,236 $ 24,923 $ 196,583 $ - 953,502 Subtotal Direct Costs $ 3,665,378 $ 1,478,919 $ 330,994 $ 2,619,682 r $ 8,094,973 Direct Transfer $ 721,546 $ 4,812 $ 21,436 $ 73,334 $ 821,128 Allocated Transfer $ 151,187 $ - $ 8,953 $ - $ 160,140 Processing- $ $ 139,058 $ 182,266 $ 94,526 $ 137,734 Disposal $ 2,599,087 $ - $ - $ 83;535 $ 2,682,622 Subtotal Material Handling $ 3,471,820 $ 134,246 $ 212,655 $ 251,396 $ 3,801,625 Subtotal Operations Costs $ 7,137,198 $ 1,344,673 $ 543,649 $ 2,871,078 $ 11,896,598 Admin & Overhead $ 369,302 $ 188,190 $ 33,349 $ .277,137 $ 867,978 Total Program Costs $ 7,506,500 $ 1,532,863 $ 576,998 1 $ 3,148,215 $ 12,764,576 * Includes expenses for Outreach, Street Sweeping, Public Litter Containers, and Bus Stop Refuse Collection 6-3 ` : j •1 city of Santa monica 6.0 FINANCIAL AND COST ANALYSIS zero waste strategic operations plan — 6.2 Copt Analysis The cost analysis is designed to assist the City in making planning -level decisions regarding the selection of appropriate programs for the Zero Waste Plan. The analysis considers two quantitative factors: • Diversion potential (measured by tons per year); and, • Cost effectiveness (measured by the cost per diverted ton). The estimates presented herein are not intended to calculate the precise results of each program. The tables present a "low" and "high" estimate of the incremental change in the Division's cost associated with the implementation of these programs. The range of costs is reflective of the range experienced in other communities that have implemented these or similar programs. The actual costs of the program will be impacted by general economic conditions during the implementation period, management decisions regarding the operations of each program, and customer behaviors that are too numerous to model. Instead, we estimated a reasonable range (as represented in the "Low" and "High" cost estimates in the Incremental Annual Program Costs /(Savings) and Incremental Annual Program Cost/(Savings) Per Ton in tables 6 -1 through 6 -4) for each of these measurements based on data provided by the City, data gathered from other companies and communities who are operating similar programs, and in -house data from other zero waste /high- diversion engagements. These planning -level estimates are intended to provide enough information for the City to evaluate the relative merits of each program in the development of the Zero Waste Plan. For each selected program, the incremental change in the annual cost for the program and the cost per ton diverted was estimated. The cost estimates provide a reasonable basis for understanding the potential cost impacts and how costs between programs compare to one another. Cost estimates are not inclusive of any indirect implementation cost associated with the development of implementation plans, general plan amendments, conduct of feasibility studies, or the process of procuring and negotiating the contracts associated with each program (if necessary). These are anticipated to be one -time costs incurred by the City. More precise cost estimates can be prepared during the implementation planning phase once decisions are made on issues such as program scope, facility operations, education and outreach, roles and responsibilities, and other factors. Table 6 -5 presents the incremental annual change in program costs, the estimated tons diverted by program, and the cost /(savings) per diverted ton for each of the selected programs. Details of the planning level cost estimate calculations for each program are included in Appendix G. 6-4 city of Santa monica 6.0 FINANCIAL AND COST ANALYSIS zero waste strategic operations plan Table 6 -5. Planning -Level Cost Estimates for Selected Zero Waste Programs - -" - - - pROGRAM - _ - - PNASE = 'INCREMENTAL - PROGRAMEOS/I[SAViNGS) ANNUAL PROGRAM =TONS -7-6- IVERTED WCREMENTALANNUAL PROGMM - COSTJ(SAVINGS)PERTON_ - _ ' Residential _ tow High :Low Midpoint H_ igh Food Scraps Collection Short $ 90,346 $ 132,755 1,124$ 80 $ 99 $ 118 Behavior Change Marketing Short $ 28,582 $ 60,418 410 $ 70 $ 109 $ 147 Weekly Organics andRecyclabies Collection; Bi- Weekly Refuse Collection Short-Med $ (157,402) $ (137,671) 504 $ (312) $ (292) $ (273) Wet /Dry Collection Med -Long $ (295,135) $ (252,622) 562 $ (525) $ (487) $ (449) Residuals Processing Long $ 10,716 $ 13,211 1,248 $ 9 $ 30 $ 11 Mulct- Family _ _ Low High ___Low . __... M @_ point Hi_g_h_ Behavior Change Marketing Short $ 211,746 $ 375,609 1,549 $ 137 $ 190 $ 242 Bulky Item Collection; Move-In/Move-Out Program Short-Med $ 160,896 $ 230,483 176 $ 916 $ .1,114 $ 1,312 Weekly Organics and Recyclables Collection; BI-Weekly Refuse Collection Short-Med $ (229,434) $ (201,057) 2,694 $ (85) $ (80) 1 $ (75) Food Scraps Collection - Cart Customers Medium $ 39,381 $ 58,132 476 $ 83 $ 102 $ 122 Food Scraps Collection - Bin Customers Medium $ 130,2581$ 300,681 463 $ 281 $ 465 $ 649 Wet /Dry Collection Med -Long $ (94,878) $ (81,319) 1,615 $ (59) $ (55) $ (50) Residuals Processing Long $ 29,006 $ 35,760 3,377 $ 9 $ 10 $ 11 Commercial - - Low - High - - -Low Midpoint Behavior Change Marketing Short $ (101,132) $ (44,065) 2,831 $ (36) $ (26) $ (16) Food Scraps Collection Medium $ 456,964 $ 615,261 3,975 $ 115 $ 135 $ 155 Wet /Dry Collection Med -Long $ (210,325) $ (185,492) 2,620 $ (80) $ (76) $ (71) Expansion of Mandatory Commercial Recycling Long $ 214,645 $ 355,382 906 $ 237 $ 315 $ 392 Residuals Processing Long $ 41,976 1 $ 51,750 4,887 $ 9 $ 10 $ 11 Using the cost analysis data, the percentage impact on existing customer rates for each of the selected program options was calculated. The rate impacts for each selected program are cumulative. The rate impacts are based on fiscal year 2013 budget data provided by the City, and cumulative future tonnage diversion assumptions developed by HDR. The "Low" and "High" rate impacts are illustrated in Table 6 -6. Details of the rate impact calculations for each program are included in Appendix G. T U 6 -5 city of Santa monica 6.0 FINANCIAL AND COST ANALYSIS zero waste strategic operations plan � uu�r u-u. wxviuci nuie JUIHLLCO zero vvueie riugtwn> Food Scraps Collection Short 3.1% 4.5% Behavior Change Marketing Short 1.0% 2.1% Weekly Organics and Recyclables Collection; Bi- Weekly Refuse Collection Short-Med -5.4% -4.7% Wet /Dry Collection Med -Long -10.1% -8.6% Residuals Processing Long 0.4% 0.5% Behavior Change Marketing IShort 1 2.8%1 5.0% Bulky Item Collection; Move -In /Move -Out Short-Med 1 2.1% 3.1% Weekly Organics and Recyclables Collection; Bi- Weekly Refuse Collection Short-Med 7.8% -6.9% Food Scraps Collection - Cart Customers Medium 1.3% 2.0% Food Scraps Collection - Bin Customers Medium 1.5% 3.49/6 Wet /Dry Collection Med -Long -1.3% -1.19/0 Residuals Processing Long 0.4% 0.5% Behavior Change Marketing Short -1.2% -0.5% Food Scraps Collection Medium 5.2% 7.0% Wet /Dry Collection Med -Long -2.4% -2.1% Expansion of Mandatory Commercial Recycling Long 2.5% 4.1% Residuals Processing Long 0.5% 0.69/o FM 6 -6 IBM 1 city of santa monica zero waste strategic operations plan 6.0 FINANCIAL AND COST ANALYSIS 6.4 rhrograrn ingact Cbserwions The most cost effective programs are those that result in net cost savings. These programs are illustrated in Table 6 -7. I ❑oie o -i. most �osr LI)earve Lero rvosre Programs rsasea on incremental annual Program Savings Pro ram _ IncremQntal Annual Program AP Tonsm Residential - Low High , Weekly Organics and Recyclables Collection; Bi- $ (157,402) $ (137,671) 504 Weekly Refuse Collection Wet /Dry Collection $ (295,135) $ (252,622) 562 Weekly Organics and Recyclables Collection; Bi- $ (229434) $ (201,057) 2,694 Weekly Refuse Collection Wet /Dry Collection 1 $ (94,878) $ (81,319)1 1,615 Behavior Change Marketing 1 $ (101,132) $ (44,065) 2,831 Wet /Dry Collection 1 $ (210,325) $ (185,492) 2,620 The other programs result in net cost increases. The most cost effective of these programs are those with the lowest cost per ton diverted. The programs in Table 6 -8 are sorted from most to least cost effective based on the diversion achieved. 6-7 city of santa monica zero waste strategic operations plan 6.0 FINANCIAL AND COST ANALYSIS t ame o -a. Programs wirn Nei Losc increases )orrea oy Lowesr ro rtzgnesz Los[ Per ton Residuals Processing Commercial 4,887 $ 10 Residuals Processing Multi - Family 3,377 $ 10 Residuals Processing Residential 1,248 $ 10 Food Scraps Collection Residential 1,124. $ 99 Food Scraps Collection - Cart Multi- Family 476 $ 102 Behavior Change Marketing. Residential 410 $ 109 Food Scraps Collection Commercial 3,975 $ 135 Behavior Change Marketing Multi - Family 1,549 $ 190 Expansion of Mandatory Commercial Recycling Commercial 906 $ 315 Food Scraps Collection- Bin Multi - Family 463 $ 465 Bulky Item Collection; Move -In /Move -Out Program Multi - Family 176 $ 1,114 Z 68 (it of Santa roonica 7.0 IMPLEMENTATION zero waste strategic operations plan 7,11 [mkrArmtcimfa on Implementation of the recommended strategies will be undertaken over an approximately 20 year period, from 2013 through 2030. During the implementation, the City will continue to evaluate the efficacy of each strategy, and modify the Plan as necessary to meet the zero waste goals and objectives, and to adjust to the changing social, environmental, and economic conditions within the City. An implementation schedule is presented in Exhibit 7 -1. 7 -1 a` city of Santa monica 7:0 IMPLEMENTATION zero waste strategic operations plan Exhibit 7 -1, Implementation Schedule MR 7 -2 Require Food Scraps Collection Behavior Change Marketing Environmental Directory On -line Version — Integrated Waste Management Fee _- Structure Short Bulky Item Collection; Move - Term In /Move -Out Program _ Recycling Educational Outreach =_ Mandatory Recycling in Hotels /Motels = Business and Restaurant Food Donation _ - Santa Monica Shares /Bulky Item Reuse and Recycling Regional Sustainability Collaboration Rewards Program HHW Collection at Public Events Short to Centralized Garage Sales Medium- Disposal Bans Term Weekly Organics and Recyclables Collection; Bi- weekly Refuse Collection Self -Haul Waste Origin Reporting s Packaging Legislation Extended Producer Responsibility Medium Regional Resource Recovery Center Term Require Food Scraps Collection Expand Single -Use Carry Out Bag and Disposable Container Ordinance Medium ` =- Wet /Dry Collection to Long - Expand Items Collected in Recycling Term Cart MR 7 -2 ` city of santa monica 1.0 IMPLEMENTATION zero waste strategic operations plan 7 -3 4' city of santa monica �• — zero waste strategic operations plan appendix a Appendix A Waste Characterization Analysis f DR A -1 2/2212013 'e city of santa monica zero waste strategic op Table A -5. Detailed Waste Composition by Generator Type, Percentages appendix a Material Type .. - ResrdeattaL MF Ressdenyat- CommerciaF . -= Se11 Paper 18.3% % 22.2% 20.1% 5.1% Uncoated Corrugated Cardboard 2.0% 4.5% 7.5% 1.6% Paper Bags 0.4% 0.5% 0.2% 0.3% Newspaper 2.9% 3.0% 0.9% 0.1% White Ledger Paper 0.4% 0.4% 1.1% 0.2% Other Office Paper 1.1% 2.8% 1.3% 0.3% Magazines and Catalogs 1.2% 1.2% 0.6% 0.1% Phone Books and Directories 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - Other Miscellaneous Paper 4.5% 5.2% 2.3% 1.0% Remainder/CompositePaper -5.7% 4.6% 6.1% 1.5% Glass - 2.2% 2.9% 1.2% 0.40/6 Clear Glass Bottles and Containers 0.8% 1.2% 0.5% 0.0% Green Glass Bottles and Containers 0.4% 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% Brown Glass Bottles and Containers 0.4% 0.5% 0.3% 0.0% Other Glass Colored Bottles and Containers 0.1% 0.5% 0.0% 0.1% Flat Glass 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% Remainder /Composite Glass 0.5% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% Metal 3.7% 3.4% 4.3% 4.4% Tin /Steel Cans 0.9% 1.0% 0.6% 0.0% Major Appliances 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% Used Oil Filters 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Other Ferrous 1.2% 0.8% 1.5% 2.5% Aluminum Cans 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% Other Non- Ferrous 0.4% 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% Remainder /Composite Metal 0.9% 1.3% 1.7% 1.7% Electronics - - 0.4% 0.0% 0.1% 0.3% Brown Goods 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% Computer - related Electronics 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 03% Other Small Consumer Electronics 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Video Display Devices 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Plastic 9.9% 7.0% .. 10.5% 5.7% PETE Containers 0.8% 1.1% 0.5% 0.0% HDPE Containers 0.5 %° 1.0% 0.4% 0.0% Miscellaneous Plastic Containers 0.6% 0.6% 0.5% 0.0% Plastic Trash Bags 0.9% 0.8% 1.3% 0.3% Plastic Grocery and Other Merchandise Bags 0.7% 0.5% 0.3% 0.0% Non -Bag Commercial and Industrial Packaging Film 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.2% Z A -2 zrzznma o , city of santa monica appendix a zero waste strategic operations plan Material` Type - -.. :. Res tlantlal .Res'd heal _ Commerctal- Hat 1. Film Products 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 1.2% Other Film 1.4% 1.2% 1.6% 0.1% Durable Plastic Items 3.4% 0.5% 1.7% 2.2% RemainderlComposilePlastic 1.5% 1.1% 3.3% 1.6% Other Organic - - 47.0% 41.8% 31.9% 10.1% Food 24.2% 21.6% 15.3% 0.5% Leaves and Grass 7.7% 1.5% 2.5% 0.9% Pmnings and Trimmings 3.3% 0.1% 4.2% 2.1% Branches and Stumps 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 1.9% - Manures 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Textiles 3.5% 3.3% 1.1% 0.7% - Carpet 1.3% 6.2% 5.0% 3.6% Remainder /Composite Organic 6.9% 9.1% 3.1% 0.5% Ineds and Other - 14.7% 17.7% 28.1% 62.9% Concrete 1.5% 0.0% 0.7% 2.6% Asphalt Paving 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.2% Asphalt Roofing 0.2% 0.0% 2.3% 5.9% Lumber 7.8% 12.4% 16.5% 25.7% Gypsum Board 0.3% 0.0% 1.7% 4.1% Rock, Soil and Fines 1.6% 0.0% 1.6% 11.6% Remainder /Composite Inerts and Other 3.3% 53% 5.2% 10.8% Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) - - 0.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.1°% Paint - 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% Vehicle & Equipment Fluids 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Used Oil - 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Batteries 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% Remainder /Composite Household Hazardous 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% Special Waste 0.2% 3.8% 3.5% 11.0% Ash 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% Treated Medical Waste 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Bulky Items 0.0% 3.7% 3.1% 11.0% Tires 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% Remainder /Composite Special Waste 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% Mixed Residue 3.5% -1.1% 0.0% 0.0% Mixed Residue 3.5% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% Source: CalRecycle,2008 State -wide Waste Characterization Study, Southern Region FM A -3 znznon ar; city of Santa monica zero waste strategic operations plan Tattle A -1. Waste Composition By Generator Type, Tons aooendix a Matenal Type = SFRestdeential MFRestdenhah- Commercia_I Self Haut Paper 1,272.8 4,590.0 7,963.6 785 Uncoated Corrugated Cardboard 139.8 924.5 252 103.2 Paper Bags 28.5 102.1 44 17.9 Newspaper 200.3 629.7 17 7.0 White Ledger Paper 24.5 79.0 34 14.0 Other Office Paper 75.8 586.5 40 16.2 Magazines and Catalogs 83.7 238.0 18 7.2 Phone Books and Directories 8.0 2.1 0 - Other Miscellaneous Paper 311.5 1,067.7 ISO 61.6 Remainder /Composite Paper 400.8 960.3 230 94.4 Glass 149.9 596.0 474.4 58 Clear Glass Bottles and Containers 54.8 242.2 1 0.3 Green Glass Bottles and Containers 28.8 124.3 1 0.4 Brown Glass Bottles and Containers 25.0 106.4 3 1.4 Other Glass Colored Bottles and Containers 8.0 97.9 8 3.2 Flat Glass 0.7 - 35 14.3 Remainder /Composite Glass 32.6 25.3 io 4.1 A -4 IM zizzizma e city of Santa monica zero waste strategic operations plan appendix a Metal 255.8 692.4 1,720.7 675 Tin /Steel Cans 61.8 201.1 5 2.0 Major Appliances - - 0 - Used Oil Fillers 4.1 - 0 - Other Ferrous 86.3 173.7 393 160.8 Aluminum Cans 17.0 20.6 1 0.5 Other Non - Ferrous 25.4 33.7 17 6.8 Remainder /Composite Metal 61.2 263.2 259 106.3 Electronics 25.6 6.3 41.9 50 Brown Goods 13.5 0 - Computer - related Electronics 6.5 - 60 20.3 Other Small Consumer Electronics 5.6 6.3 0 - A -5 znvzma Video Display Devices - - 0 Plastic 690.6 1,442.6 4,174.9 872 PETE Containers 57.9 221.1 6 2.6 HDPE Containers 35.5 211.7 4 1.6 Miscellaneous Plastic Containers 41.3 116.9 2 0.8 Plastic Trash Bags 61.8 155.8 39 16.0 A -5 znvzma 0 city of santa monica appendix a �J zero waste strategic operations plan fM A -6 2/22/2013 Plastic Grocery and Other Merchandise Bags 47.3 108.5 4 1.5 Non -Bag Commercial and Industrial Packaging Film 3.0 3.2 34 13.8 Film Products 0.8 39.0 183 75.0 Other Film 101.0 247.5 21 8.4 Durable Plastic Items 234.0 1064 333 136.6 Remainder /Composite Plastic 107.9 232.7 246 100.9 Other Organic - 3,279.9 8,638.7 12,652.2 1,559 Food 1,686.9 4,460.5 78 31.8 Leaves and Grass 540.2 308.5 131 53.9 Pmnings and Trimmings 233.1 16.8 320 131.2 Branches and Stumps 0.4 - 289 118.3 Manures 5.2 - 0 - Textiles 241.2 684.4 115 47.0 Carpel 88.9 1,278.3 551 225.7 Remainder /ComposileOrganic 484.0 1,890.1 75 30.8 Inds and Other 1,026.2 3,667.6 11,156.3 9,692 Concrete 102.1 - 402 164.8 fM A -6 2/22/2013 ((�® city of Santa monica V_ zero waste strategic operations plan appendix a A -7 vzvzou Asphalt Paving - - 337 138.1 Asphalt Roofing 14.2 - 914 374.3 Lumber - 542.8 2,568.2 3,962 1,623.2 Gypsum Board 22.8 - 628 257.3 Rock, Soil and Fines 114.4 1,788 732.7 RemaindedComposile Inerts and Other 229.8 1,099.3 1,661 680.8 Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) .16.9 38.5 124.7 18 Paint 2.5 - 4 1.6 Vehicle & Equipment Fluids 1.6 16.8 1 0.6 Used Oil 5.7 - 0 Batteries 33 15.4 2 1.0 Remainder /Composite Household Hazardous 3.2 6.3 10 4.1 Special Waste - 15.0 794.0 1,405.5 1,689 Ash 1.2 24.2 0 - Treated Medical Waste - 0 - Bulky Items - 769.7 1,689 692.1 Tires- A -7 vzvzou city of Santa monica C/ zero waste strategic operations plan appendix a Ma[enal = � Type ; - SF Rcsidentlal MFResidential ` Commercial_ Self Naul Remainder /Composite Special Waste 12.6 - 0 - Mixed Residue 243.2 225.3 1.6 3 Mixed Residue 243.2 225.3 3 1.1 TOTAL 6,975.9 20,691.5 39,715.8 15,399.0 A -8 M, znvzma f`n city of Santa monica !� zero waste strategic operations Appendix B Population Projections R appendix b B -1 city of seats Detail ad population projections from the Santa Monica Land Use &Clrculelian Element, adapted July 6, 2010. appendix b Source 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 M25 2026 202] 2028 2029 2030 20 yr Cumularme% Change US Census 89735 LUCElow 88,900 89,132 89,384 89,596 B9,82B 90,050 90,292 90,524 90,756 90,988 91,220 91,452 91,684 91,916 92,148 92,380 92,612 92,844 93,076 93,308 .93,540 %changeb yr 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% 1.3% %ohan9e annual 0.3% D.3% 0.3% 03% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 03% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 03% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 03% 0.3% 02% 0.2% 02% 5.1% LUCE -High 92,800 93,053 93,3D6 93,559 93,812 94,065 94,316 94,571 91 95,077 95,330 95,583 95,836 96,089 96,342 96,595 95, MB 97,101 97,354 97,607 97,860 %oha ... 5 yr 1.4% 13% 1.3% 13% 5.3% %ohhangeannual D3% 03% 0.3% 0.3% 03% 0.3% D3% 0.3% D.3% 0.3% 03% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 03% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% D.3% 0.3% 5.3% 1 LL ! B -2 City of Santa Monica Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan Recommended Strategies i� 1p 14%, n ImplegIftrom Title 9, at 11 P U I !, rliflij 1 AND f J 1. Disposal bans Restrict disposal of spectric - S-F DSE 1.2,4,8 Education and outreach ,Enforcement - OCC=5% of Short-term -Alameda County materials, such as Plastic • M-F Business • Increased diversion • Landfill bans may be waste stream (yard waste) bottles, cardboard, yard waste, - Commercial Districts • Phased approach that can more effective • Plastic containers • Sonoma County metal, and C&D. - Government start at Government - 0.5% of waste (cardboard, facilities stream metal, C&D) 2. C&D ordinance revision Revise C&D ordinance to . S-F DSE, 1.2,4 Phased approach for --Impact to local 33% of overall Short-term • Tie in with LEED increase diversion requirement - M-F Building & increased diversion businesses; diversion waste stream - Require City from 70% to 90%. . Commercial Safety requirements: rates at approved mixed projects to meet • Government Commission . 75%-2015 waste C&D facilities LEED standards karchitectural c 80%-2020 range from 7B-93%; Review o 85%-2025 average is 88% o 90%-2030 • Higher diversion requirements may necessitate on-site source se aration 3. Mandatory diversion rate Require commercial, - S-F 1.4,8 Phased approach for .Enforcement - 25% of waste Ordinance: Short residential, and government • M-F increased diversion . Tracking and monitoring stream term sectors to meet specift • Commercial requirements: of individual generators • (Paper= 75%) Program: Long diversion rate.. • Government c 75%-2015 • (Metal, Glass = Term * 80%-2020 80%) * 85%-2025 • (Other Materials= * 90%-2030 569) • Education and outreach • Increased diversion, reduced disposal • Audit and "tag' recycling and greenwaste bins that have high levels of contamination Stop service or implement fees for repeat violators 4. Mandatory recycling Require all hotels and motels to Commercial OSE 1,2,4,8 Educational outreach to all • Added cost to hotels and Short-term program in hotels and implement a recycling program hotels and tenants motels for equipment and motels in all guest rooms and common maintenance areas. 4 [1 t ,1 iilin111 1Mit 11 e l , , , lIi R 1 l� III I l a . ...... ..... EDT N, ;Idj�, I , 5 Mandatory food scraps- Require food establishments to • Commercial 1,2,4,7, 8 • Increased diversion • Enforcement • 15% of Restaurants: City/County .1' San commercial participate in the City's food - Education and outreach • Equipment needs commercial Short (2 Fardsco scraps diversion program • Voluntary program in - 22% of M-F All others: place • (Organics = 40%) medium term 2015 -2016 6. Mandatory food scraps- Adopt an ordinance requiring • S-F 1,2,4,7,8 . Increased diversion • enforcement • 24% of S-F S-F: Short term San Francisco (S -F residential residents to participate in the - M-F • Education and outreach - Equipment needs - 22% of M-F M-F: medium and M-F) City's food scraps diversion • Voluntary program in • Mandatory participation • (Food scraps, term program place would have to be compostable presented to and voted paper = 27%) on by the City Council 7. Mandatory commercial Adopt an ordinance for Commercial 1,2,4,7,8 . Capture additional • Contamination • 35% of Long-term Chula Vista recycling mandatory recycling with recyclables • Space constraints commercial designated years for - Outreach and education • Equipment needs • (Paper= 68%) implementation. - (Glass = 86%) • (Metal = 60%) . (Plastic = 51%) 8, Mandatory recycling of Require recycling of carpets, • S-F 1,2,4,7,8 • Requires materials • Must ensure the - Textiles =3.5% Long-term (as new materials textiles, mattresses, and other common in the ..is infrastructure exists to - Carpet 1.3% markets develop) items currently not collected in stream to be diverted. handle these items. the recycling bins. - Availability of markets 9. Wel collection Implement a two-bin system: • S-F 1,7 - Less space required for • Residents may be Medium to long City of San Jose Wet materials -food, organics, ' M-F bins opposed to combining term (commercial sector residuals (for energy • Commercial recyclables and l in July 2012) conversion recyclables together in Dry materials- recyclables and one bin non-recyclables - Availability of infrastructure to process materials • Commercial: May not be applicable if food scraps program is fully implemented - Commercial: Will increase # of trucks and drivers 10. Weekly organics and Reduce the collection -Phase 1: 1,3 Reduced milections can - Residents may be Organics 47% of Short to medium • Renton, WA recycling collection and frequency of trash while S-F help decrease costs resistant to the change S-F; 43% of M-F term • King County, WA bi-weekly colledom of maintaining recycling and • Phase 2: in collection frequencies. • Get information trash organics collection at once per M-F - Bi-weekly recycling may on progress to week. not be feasible for large date for these programs IN I u if 1 f If r eii cr pill n !i q[H1t1TIi c. am if 11 iJ1Ijfi5ii f, V, fi ,,,6,1: if t !it i 11"ilf! I t i,f ij; 5fl M iiii, if f j 5 i I I H IRATE "ING!1jff1j:i;ji:1�]f :, 1 :11 i J 1 f 4 i i j i 1 ff if f if i i, :f 1 �f lif l�i 11 1 :i:�fj i j 11. Implement Integrated Revi.e fee structure to account • S-F 1.3 Increased diversion • Smaller bins at lower • (Recyclable Short term Waste Management Fee for basic services and Reduced disposal . costs may not provide materials =32 %) Structure additional services Communicate value of enough revenue for • (Compostable services to customers system materials = 18%) For example basic service fee • Education and outreach • Residents may be - (Othermatenals includes one cart for each Reduced collections may resistant to cost 6%) trash, recycling and organics decrease costs increases Charge for additional carts, with • Reduced risk in existing gradual increase in recycling disposal oriented rate and organics structure 12. Implement Integrated Revise rate structure - M-F 1,3 - Restructure rates so • Businesses and multi. • (Recyclable Short term Waste Management Fee • Commercial services are reasonably family complexes may be materials = 32%) Structure allocated for each sector resistant to cost . (Compostable • Opportunity to provide increases materials = 18%) tenants with a detailed Space constraints in M-F o (Offiermaterials cost-by-cost breakdown of and Commercial 6%) their waste and recycling establishments services Include cost for bulky item pickups for M-F sector i UPSTREAM ! :R ROG' POLICIES Al'�IDIP giric fl 1, �1, 1 ff :il4iji if :!;f li 1 fl� :1 ;f,,:Ii �f i j ff: f,I: 13- Local EPR for HHW, Establish, support and • S-F OSE 1,5,8 Share burden of waste • Cooperation from - HHW=I% Medium term • San Luis Obispo pharmaceuticals, and/or implement new and existing . M-F disposal with the producers - Packaging, other Integrated Waste difficult to recycle items mandatory take back provisions , Commercial producers and retailers • Cooperation from local plastics = 12% Management for Producers and/or .Government and encourage businesses - (HHW=81%) Authority businesses that sell batteries, environmentally • May increase cost of • (Stynoi mixed • Alameda County Fluorescent light bulbs, sharps sustainable purchasing products plastics, furniture Pharmaceuticals and pharmaceuticals, or other Reduce City's = 60%) (pending) difficult to recycle products. expenditures on programs Difficult to recycle items can Potentially reduces HFiW include Styrofoam, packaging in the environment materials, toys, etc. Additional OSE has been working materials to be determined in with CPSC to identify a future. o ortunitia. 14. Packaging legislation Support state and national • S-F OSE 1, 4.5 Regionalization of • Legislative process (Targeted packaging Medium term Example legislation that requires • M-F programs - Political infrastructure = 91%) legislations: AB manufacturers to reduce • Commercial • Leadership by example 1019, BE 589, Sa packaging and to incorporate . Government • OSE I. working with 1118 recycled content materials in all Green Cities California to packaging. identify opportunities Ill III li " +11 11: i I 3HI it ll:; � j VI' �i i if it It ft 1, ��l '113i f I it I. diji,l i i f q. a i iili!!Hii�ii� �V' 'ani It M,1�1Affe6b�dI1111111 �1111111RR 11,R i 1#1 01 10 Ili l�f it fillililillilliNiNi if U I ......... P OPIA Tit pponuni If lit 9 ii0c ill I rim P .:,I I t it I n.11 II MT�Iiii if if iiql�lnl ijlljlid�l�jl ill IjIll if N I if jili!! iii I7 1� fli il� I it 1.I P, iijtf�il it [iif if 15. Behavior change Large scale, sustained, social • S-F OSE I'S - Increased diversion Require sustained N/A Short term Pet iluma Social marketing marketing and media campaign , M-F • Education and outreach investment Marketing Pilot • Commercial - Culture change erway) • Government O414l tR­ liq POI ' 1 1 1 S POLICIES AND PROGRAMS if if: �:j, I lt� 1 :!�]d 11, 1 f 1: if 1 If 1: il il'j ti'i i! I 1 16. Expansion of the Single- Establish a date to review the • Commercial OSE 1.2,3,4 • increased diversion • Enforcement Medium term San Francisco Use Carry Out Bag and progress of the current • Decreased environmental - Business opposition Single Use Disposable ordinance and set a goal date impacts • Confusion resulting from Container ordinance to expand the program to all • Ban is planning to be plastic bag ban versions retailers antl restaurants. expanded to include all in neighboring cities. plastic bags (regardless of thickness) • Look into potential to ban produce bags as well • Single Use Disposable Container ordinance will be expanded to include lids and straws. • City participates in Green Cties, California Working group meetings to discuss the status of plastic bag bans and opportunities. • Encourage a consistent, regional approach on the bag ban • Restaurants are not included in the single-use bag ban 17. Multi-Family recycling Require multi - family ily building M-F OSE I'S • Direct outreach and , Turnover rate at M-F M-F - 25% of Short term Alameda County educational outreach managers to inform tenants accountability to property complexes disposed waste about recycling resources upon managers . Implementing an move -in. - Provide outreach ordinance will be a materials to M-F burden on property complexes management to provide • M-F educational outreach educational outreach starting in July 2012 materials to tenants due • OSE creating a welcome to turnover rates packet for new • Enforcement teriants/residents, that will • costs to design, include waste reduction implement and monitor and recycling resources :ret. 0"oh" 116 os"', EsAm,ple firocri t.ieitmtI jJur sdicii6iii i D {,I Y1 . i H IIIIun 1 1 fliHiii I'Wfl 18. Move-in/Move-out Provides free e.cess waste M-F 1,2,7,8 . Reduce illegal iI1 Cost Bulky 4% of Short term City of L A program for Bulky Waste pickup services for residents • Recover items to donate Partnerships with reuse M-F City of Davis moving in /out of their homes . Evaluate feasibility based organizations Santa claflo, Emphasize reuse and recycling on tonnages collected Central Contra of bulky items; partnership with • Education and outreach Costa County reuse organizations • Penner with muse City of Lakewood organization • City currently offers bulky item Pick ups 5 dws/week 19. Self-haul waste origin Require more accurate S-F 1,6 * Increase origin reporting Requires partnership and Self-haul Short term reporting reporfing of seff-haul waste accuracy on a regional cooperation with other misallocated waste origin at transfer and disposal basis cites, facilities, and 10,000 tons sites, • Regional cooperation with landfills other cities, facilities Staff time /resources 20. Regional Sustainability Host regular meetings with local • S-F 1,6,9 • Collaborate on ' • Participant availability N/A Short to medium Collaboration Meetings jurisdictions to discuss • M-F ideas /projects to increase * Build momentum to keep term opportunities, projects, and - Commercial efficiencies meetings effective and issues. • Government • Share lessons learned sustainable • Continue to build a rapport with other jurisdictions • Obtain updates from jurisdictions pursuing new, safe technology(les) - Resume meetings with nearby cities on the Westside 21. Create On-Line Version Update the 2009 Environmental . S-F 1,8 . Provide new and/or Resources to update and Short term of Environmental Directory for on-line only - M-F updated resources maintain Directory • Commercial * Ensure the Directory is • Government available and searchable on the City's website d I'M Mt D2 22. Innovative Ideas, Reward residents for diverting • S-F 1.2,3,7,8, • Encourages involvement • Availability of grant N/A Short to medium Recyclername Diversion Rewards and and recycling; offer grants • M-F 9 in Zero Waste solution. money term Cash for Cans School Rewards and/or subsidies to individuals • Commercial • May help create local jobs • Method to obtain weight Programs and businesses to develop • Schools and markets for recovered of materials collected at programs in the City that reuse materials. schools or recycle materials; Hold Grants would need to be competitions between schools coordinated with the to see who can divert the most Chamber of Commerce materials from their waste and the Buy Local stream within . feted time Campaign frame. Prizes, money, trophies, • Encourages students to .tc can be awarded to the identify ways to minimize school that collects the meet. their waste stream • Involves school -wide participation • See if businesses are interested in helping to sponsor the event/prizes • Some schools are already collecting materials via the Terra Cycle Program 23. HHW collection bins at Collect used batteries, cell • S-F OSE 1,7 • Provides a convenient • Resources available to HHW =1% Short to medium public events phones, etc. at public events. • M-F location for residents to collect and transport term Collection bins can be located drop off HHW HHW at the information booths to • Offer regular collection at provide people with more offices information about the environmental programs in the City. Events can include farmers markets, Santa Monica Festival, street fairs, etc. I I )w ;ij 1, r ji, �13 i 111 I'Wastell5l i ll, Rr" i 11i"'R i li t '�""j 1�1�' �111!il 0 li6 un .... ..... -?" t! -1,c l' ill! i fill be ra_i ill, m mbstI I � e lo Frame a r"i1j,�91ilIj L 1 Bxa 24. Expand items collected in Expand materials accepted in - S-F 1,2,4,5,8 - Reduces materials from - Items like clothing may Textiles = 3% of Medium to long the recycling bins blue bins to include clothing - M-F the landfill get more contaminated in residential term and specific items - Commercial • Creates a convenient a mixed bin. - Government program to donate , Availability of processors clothing for reuse and/or recycling - Ability to diver specific hard -to- recycle- items, since certain brand. specific items can be collected and sent back to the company or a 3"' party company 6 Some companies pay for shipping cost of materials collected 25, Centralized "garage Establish a program for - S-F 1,2,7 - Encourages more . May compete Wth local , Textiles 3% of Short to medium CftyyAde garage sales" residents to sell items in a - M-F ns,rdl to resell and Rea market events in the S-F and M-F term sales centralized location, as reuse items area. - Durable plastics = - Inglewood opposed to the many garage - Free and open to - Staffing requirements 4% of S-F and M-F - Livermore sales typically held in the City. residents only , Logistics - Bulky items = 4% - Half Moon Bay , Couple with the City -Wide v Locations of S-F and M-F . Morgan Hill Garage Sale Event , Cupertino . City considering and . Campbell assessing pros/cons With Chy-Wide garage sales I, 1 i U ."M M 30 AU64 i firm oril a a Z ess Jr, z 1,1pru sd OU 11 11 e ;RR 1 i u1jill Nr MiPiffl i� 1� II20Z@2030 a i "1,I FACIOTIE 26. Transform residuals Send up to 10% of residual • S-F 1,2 • Additional materials Cost $4,000 tons Short to medium Long Beach waste to a waste-to-energy • M-F diverted from the landfill disposed terms facility • Commercial • Increase VVI-E • Government percentage to maximum of 10% and landfill the remaining residuals 27. Regional Resource Support development Of • S-F 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, • Potential trash tax on Cooperating with haulers • Textiles =3% of Medium term • City of Boulder, Recovery Park/Hard to regional facility that accepts • M-F 7,8 manufacturers and manufacturers S-F and M-F Co Recycle Center materials that are difficult to • Commercial Finding resources to E-Waste = <l % • El Cerrito, CA recycle (e- waste, Styrofoam • Government divert materials Plastics = 5-10% block., textiles, etc.) and No space in the City for Bulky items = 4% identifies reuse /recycle potential facilities of S-F and M-F opportunities; also works with manufacturers on take-back programs. I- 28.1 Alternative Technology — Support development and • S-F 1,2S,4S.7, energy credits Cost 84,000 tons Medium to Long A number of Facility utilize regional facility for M-F 8 R.rew-"yp 0, some t • Availability of facility disposed term potential. processing of residual waste Commercial • Diversion from landfill or proposed, and planned facilities into energy or other beneficial P Government transformation use I I aj city of santa monica appendix d zero waste strategic operations plan Appendix D Diversion Potential by Option IERD -1 or Zero Well Program & Policy Diversion Estimates Single4ar ly Residential Sector brti=rm a41W6 SMmmM °e �m imm 301}2030 Iw Yvne ien= n. mm be tiH CV us.mlmP m.eDIM. ' We pa.,rN B.BB msPPa a.va c. xr%.P rl mr ^[. m.raYn< ..m.m.i mAraP3o�w.v.ma, ^mr..me r,.m M. r.. MamrYl Y. amiD,lv,v is p ^ ^v 4Pwee N¢ Pemm DNVrtetl FmnUrmr ian D rmtl w Beall n[ D,Pev nn° iv [v Uvmr^ v 0m Porcem DFVrteB hem 5ener I'm DNerteB Pnu oM' ONp nnr }e ry urmn Prm v^rant DNm=! m Iry 5°ner ien= DMnH B °wN ^[ DYPeu }^nnvpe T°^a 'r"tl nem Xaar iav DMntl p pr n[ i= qe nn r"c P P N I.. 4pmn 0¢ Ph DN° rmtl M1em X rmr im Olwrtee B=ry DrP eal ie 0e nnv 1 mtteeGmuOVreBOrtl6wrB x rvvprc0en °pm ONeeon anE 4ulv0v vhene Beevr°110revmrn 00% Ich, zun B 3135 40% >S P.c IT 3139. 385 DS D% ]W PV It II 6]S 113.6 PO% I. 3x5A 32-0% 33.E 3� 32 15.4% 35.w 25 Ss.U.t % 310% 115.3 659 3343 593 il>2 x3,9 Ai 0,1 00 11].1 N.1 116,0 mer 01ar11 mlm=a 3 ^Ynn a ^mnalners maln6er C^m PDM OG% Op. u> >.3 4M: oox 0,0% S59 nz 5E 4% PI 3z tS Dy 310 u. 30P IPoDy as 303 iln /Sorel 4n, mryor PpFl vn=n '-1 -I, ^r .em w 3.63% or _ SB 6L8 1P0% >> .1.1 00 3,3 s3 POY. ua 32016 qt 40x 00 0.0 _ SLS rar SLe 6 0013 1 0. x510 srt v men= ei ^in xs [oN nranlea 1e,5 6 s6 s% as% II tDP0 ]Door: 30P0 %. vD% ZSB% 35ssM: 1. a Pic c ]e XDIP[ Itl^ n ]0 Plevtk }m,F Oepyvna c^me nen ettry-I oAer MeraM1enClre Bay alvl me l^I-Pl 1,, 0,n0 Fllm ]a un=rrr1l, Phi 1­ ox 0,51% P6Bf: POV% 46 315 411 }1a.9 - 40% PO% 40% BB 00 big ID ,O% II P. 140% m 6sx1 61e 125 1411 mr a 1 . Bszv 63a va vz3 31.4% SS.U.3 it 3,v 519 39.3 11B 5 >.5 11. 101 10P0% mKK 40 Ol ax o-n.rn ,na aa„ 59 prunny.Ba nlmmlPy s..P= PIPI um 3 y9alo 33co x . 1r .-P ao,o v <6Qi xw. zx0% 11 ;05se ' xoo,B 249W3.1 lm ax iouon .7 .1 111 41ll eos erem n,pFvit Pe l", wmen , PW% ii S4 2B S.qi 10% IW ON x>3 »m .0 335 sss3 1oh� im.a wm i as 00 yii ssBt M .350% a,Dx v. v.� 900 Lai ius OS% o.ix O,a 0.0 ivs B, wnm�xxw� Bmme ^l Ii ^a 3�4lh O.O6f. PO% 3W. 45% mo,u 10 I. 21] 21. 3.3 - a. 33 SpeOtl WVm NF hPr 1 ee Meelwl W,,le 5 033% ]5.0 0.0% 0.0 1, L3 ]0.0% Iq Ir ]0 IPIm 0.0 1 I PO% 1.0 "11 41% 00 Ll Will P-ld. L33 1693 I6SB Zero Waste P]Ogmm & Policy Diversion Estimates Single - Family Residential Sector L DR Y3LN1] _ -- snen�mb+:ewml.rm m].x6xo �e w..hry4rtemnnk hewal.mm ollween; 96wa<up pM1pp arym n 'Ii NwN•pw[nm• Mxw [ellveYnN publk hmn tennllmtl 4•ne<LY• Ohp eml4m ImMeOelknbn yye lzOVl a•pMn[ wm rapnm • vox ouF«'I mamrl<I x cepwm Baw prpm p w ppw< a mid lwm en a MnH ',I iwm IF nna r ° nm •mr nne n a nn• • nna r •1 ]835% 3STxa <6.1 e>S.a el V&4 G G 1w'd Vnteretl CONUgam<Urtlpeard 139,e 311.3 4E% cc. I 131E c. cG 0.0 "i 150% IIGG E 13,i 3 0ed 0.%4 0,6% Ei] 10.0% Is 1631 „ap°r l> 1195 lI., 119,0 015% 105 c. W Be [k•e M 66a phene d0e nprn 4q: 4n BM huWn <eua Ill, 40% I10.Z 139 1.1 Nr 1-111-11- and ssi9 li G °n GY x Oenler end tenuln<r• Oqt Sp.Ub S.> v m6 COnminen 1040% 3A0 Ipretl 6ailles antl fpndln<rr 56% 100.0% 0.0% G. 50.6% 1.6 O.q: Filt Gill M, 15 PemalntlA1 Um viltr GW 336 303 0.6% 36.3 4q. 30.3 °n10 3.6TA 0.i xa]6 ZW.S i0].9 6 ]In]Smel om c. 09% 0% 00 0 0.0 .O% 0 ma ve npp0anen Go. 0% 00 O. O6 VFetl OlF hen 1W.6% 0.0 00 0- 40 0.0% OW 133 US >S.Orc 39 GIFer Nen Fearreu• 69 town Gapd O•e6 EletvoKKV 50.0% Gi Smell cl.- Iflnvenk• 50.0% 6.q[ L v vlmlw 3l5 3x03 h'9 �Gll O5I% 303 OOfd G,0% 00 ]SO% ]S W. 139 0.0% 130 emalnery MomltBae ]O si SA6 Sa6 Y6 yaa nG OrFerMntFantl m Oag SMC SO 19 326 00 3>6 336 �3> fpmme•ela vntl nd�nv el paM•gne v6m OM% 01 OG S,6 00 PA 89.i OG% 093 00 905 50% 00 19x, 916 N. 0 030]9 1005 L103 L6869 100,0x G6% 0191 6N] 3, W 111.1 cll n smmn 1. sa ]M.,,u s R 1fi3 so�"% 1ss 1us non 41c 9931 9961 OG M1avFaX pwing 00 c.4% 00% 0. GG P•pM1aX Np6y G.0 O.Of. 0.v% 1. q Wmber 4G cc. 0 % .01 coG •A ge<0.6ell and Mer I.W% 0.0% 0 ]G3.6 40 3033 a bon mwnm lxxwl em IIG pmen<Fluidv ff�llc 5�6 1W.OW 00% <tl q er Cem mhe "1 Sp<p56waama0 Oil% 0 91 0iF OM 00 3rm¢d Mvdkel wa•w 0.0v% G. 00% 01 G.0% 0.0 GO T- ccII 03 00 00% 00% 1.v LI YS,e L DR Y3LN1] f� Zero Waste Program & PoRty Diversion Estimates Single - Family Riesdential Sedor I-DR ..013 mmo63ramsl madmmml•rererm Renao3Dl cm lM 9-ri avdpmvee,hdvg n[glYatlenMNmWmlm /vrDkx MMmlPmruen i.il Dl Pmwry 4mrweVOryUeenx tebmin Miv 4rt v9.aossl k.mrl kn[ Uwme imrrt MvuWn[ Dbpeml Mxerbl % lrem p- lo mtl/rem 1 nv v ni° rm r D r eeree NenM nna r mm r nv ax env nm amr env �,I I. r perl 1.11 u 516.5 II ahh.,h U,11P.rA 3i3 90.0% 1.0 EE 40Y. 5).Z x p S.P.4 90,0% 45 0.0% I 0.9 19 48 111 00 11 114 urye�DiMe lap +e 0.oX 59 0.0% x and OVlem S.u.: 940n 16S Ph v Ox erM xelbnro us paper +, +At 311.5 0.- + 0,0% S.q. 0.0% 51 109 35,Pf .x1.9 BL6 g55 1A He n I PI 0mpin err 1a .m- amm 3.klx.etl m.xbrm PIP, oax aM�i a,z 4w, sM _ 35] 1656 ]gS6 iln /5 pelUmm 50"0 Mvl.r nppll. Attv AOf: 18 Ib Il op era I 1 00% 3.6 O.nfd 4 d FUm Zx Pemenneer .rlre wool 19.1 Ir, i3.5 AO 0% 11 or, Ph 41 vpnkv 56 5.3 35,On Op. b POP IEU.11 u onn D9E m.bmerr s ass oKK 0. nxlnem 059% +13 +45% 3.0 3A0% BS.Of: " 9im, 00 55 0.0% 55.4 AO% AD% 0. od.r M.rm..dsp mm aaz aaw nl AD% x1) x17 3z N.rrvB sUmmeeeul anE Intl urMellxM fog Fllm 4D% 40 17 oaw lsx 1010 xvx 350�1t Z%.PF 04 sx G. 517 'oN�'. w,ml.In .nalmm, l.e GrPI. uxv s 1.1 71i aaxo 5� wole - x +sn D.ar o.o% D,1% 100 G I, AO% IP +�a.,lmmbm 09 m z3a� Z 4 M.eurn 13 Il 5.0 40% OSOM 13 AO +3 Urpnr I. O.M. 36.0 AON G, G rdnr Ah% ZO.ppt 1I,5I 963.) 9114 6114 111` 90.0 9 r� 114 41 A%: 0.0% O.bfi 0.0 O.bF ZI.tt ge.Mg La.S 0.0% IS Om SOiS )S.ot 1.H% 11 +,1 109.3 ZN.6 uwAeltleXmMey Warm lxxWnv D.N% 3A Gilt _ loo l+ p .rllm d, s.m: u..e ao% 11 GG G I I 10 Orh 1. GGI 0 v] �'.• ,0. AO% 40% wa,m rn e�iwri�em.eb. a.6°w " a] zs ox laoa�% o n% mx i.s I-DR ..013 o� Zero Waste Program &Policy Diversion Estimates Single - Family Residential Sector FDRvEVUrx P.ne�. m y a. �a.mrvo .m P.q�mP.a9a �[ar x..M . .aava v,aa.m nr xmma„s.nm.ry Rami lvw lSOUI °m mvMe l rci m.mrlel % P.a r ers °r.l nv N0 em. °m nn. henetl °nna Paa` ON nM ham 5evo-, nna % ene nn T.- ° [ 1 [] enr '1 u.[m urz.. 3 3.1 3 zs vssa lsxs uaaaaaa m „oplM Gmeoa.a 1.1 o0 6p m9.o I +zA 12+ .11, �xo+ s.x m W32v7� el z1s wn.0 mega, papa.. Ao' nvx Jx 1+s 1]o 1 11 ,..a mma nm a 1. 0 1s3.1 a antl maeha,a o.mF 11 Ls omz xa mr-I....1 mMalm =,. x36 n as canalna,x a new me nxtl erx e°m °tlihe Ghsa 60 3L3 0.0 aml6 3Q3 aQ6 Pn /Aeel Gns 3L9 0.0% 00% 0�0 118 131% 685 10s 1E.E So.6 Mnl°, PppAamas 0.00fe 0 Ig Uaetl 08 Flhers 0.o 3l 35 19 19 33.1 II.s IL3 1L3 SO AID li0 l50% IQI ]3- OMernN°mFe.rauv E15 3.3 m.lntl er [um mhe M°ul Or On, 6.d 43 Om er Elee.TOVIn nO% >6nu aev v m 01 or Or Oere lame o9M 1.L6 on. 81.3 ri�maln $w 38 IiOp3 36 L6 29 nmma„ 41. z3 naKK% mz axe ma�.3 >s mom. ea ry >n M 10 xa ms3z n ox o. l asr -9aa< m -l- Im I.Usling rim ax x> oa a r% 33 R or 0.1 01 14 PM1ae ihm 0" 11 3)9 e. ne ryO.l Fwtli 1.696.9 900% 6Oa L699.6 36a 330 L)SF.O 11316 4935 Issr, 114 39 prvninB, antl lrimmmex - `- E3.x 33x.3 103 13.3 IW.q. ]6.0% >1 `m46eP 4>3% IL+6n 369A 364.3 ip plpia 1010 90.0 >6.Ox 319 +00 300 l�pvNng 00% 0.0 O.ry. 0.0 00 Op 0.0 pryah.,j, LO ll.] 0.0 3i1 33Q0 111.6 a3Q3 On, rli 010 O.33n 0.0f: 0 10 PnkY3°A9v ntl aae, 00% 3q0% 1- 68.1 3;6 >9 zox3 nze 1aQ6 ry is 33 Veryl[lee Equlpm ene Flu lax L6 0.0% Si wash 113 11 1. wme a 0.0 1 Li mal naer CUn MlneJl9erltlu. 35L3 .4 Mlaea aaae�a xsz3 Ca. O�nal ns FDRvEVUrx Zero Waste Program & Polity divERlOn Estimates Multi-Family Residential Sector IM RO5 il1]]3 dart .-I ed.d51 GILUand.d.lT M -fTypv Bul4y ttem Lelletllon]MewIMMOw<utpro {wm GAwlor CaneMCFkXIn{ Ralson Ww<bml outnvM EnWOnmeMal dntto,OMi.. Version I...,ad WeN Mm laas by .(s.,d) pereem asn"In[ P-1 Reaultln{ Pnmant RaauNlm pertem 0.m dn[ MneAal % 3011 Dliposel 4MUn pMrutl hem Ton[ D6pwl GpNn Olwrtetl hem Tpns 06paul Gptun MwrtMhom i¢rs Dlap¢ael 6plun dwemtl hem Tons Olap¢avl {^peon Rele. DInNEImm nnnv[ Beta Sttor Olwnvtl Ind-sa Pete a ar DIwM6 Tan Reb OIwMtl Tanro[e Bvm ..r Dlwrtetl T¢nnap paper 2s,. 4$90 O.n 435OA 459.0 O.131A 419.] 3,]1].9 OA 3,]1].9 1 Un[mtetl COlrvevletl GNb mrtl 4.4]% 915 0%6 D%6 9x9.5 Is 10G 0% 92s 832.1 SOD% I... 833 7nsas v.%6 DD% ]98.9 320% 2 Popvr Bap OA9% 102 0%6 0.%6 0.0 ]Ox.l ID Ox I.. ]p, 91.9 SO.pX ]W.. 92 82.] 0.%: 0%6 8E] 32.0% 25.M, 3 Newipa0er 334% 630 D%i a,,, OA 629.7 It SOD O% 63.0 366.] lO.DM ]W.. 36.7 330.0 0.. '0.0% Op 310.0 320% 1510% 4 Wb[te 1.11.1 paper G.s. 79 ObR Op 79.p Is. SOD O% ].9 71.1 SO.DM IW.O% 11 ... G. OM6 Op 840 320% 3 OMer OM1lte paper 283% 307 00% OA% OA 3.6.3 In SOD%, %.7 5$1.9 lop% ]WA% 320 47sA O.. 00% 0.0 4751 3x1% 6 Mssad,11 and G<t lo8i 1.13% UB G. OG% OA 230.0 lO pM Ind. G. 2143 10.% ]W.M6 213 192.0 G. OA% 0.0 1911. 3$, 0% 25.%: I P1-a I.s. vntl dnRarles 0 ➢3% 2 G. D.. 0.0 21 100% SOD O% D3 1.9 SO.. Sg1.0% G. 00% OA ]] 32.Gn 23.%: a near .1-11 ... da pa per 3.16% ],n6a GG% DpM I,o6 >.> 10036 IDD.Ox 3060 961.0 SO.DM ]W.D% 96.1 864.9 0.0% pP% 00 864.9 320% 23.0% maindar C.rnd.sa 9aa, 4.64% 960 00% 0%L OA ed1 ID O% Spas D Ox 96.0 SO.DX ]W ➢X 064 ]]].9 0.0% OP% 0.0 ]77,9 Glev9 2..8% 396 598.0 3].3 398.9 53.4 40].6 90].6 30 Clear Glass end, and Cnntalnnrs l.V% $9$ OD% O.DX Op 242.2 IO Ud SOD Uk E4I 23.0 100% 1W.0% 218 3963 0.0% 00% 'OA 1962 320% 350% ]S GreM GI an BOltlea an d CO Melneu D.W% 129 OWd p.G% OA 124.3 10.0% IOD(P.6 129 Me lO d,6 ]W.0% 112 1006 GGG 00% O.v iW.fi 320% 25.46 1 2 Is- Glass Bottled and Conine D53% .1 OA% 0%, 1063 IOG L% ]D6 95] SO.p% ]W.0% 9.6 86.1 00% DW, Op 061 3].0% 25.0% 13 Onor Glass World sondes and Canine-, DA]% as 0%6 DM, Op 9].9 10036 'm ens se 88.1 SO.. ]W.p% al ]9.3 '0.%6 O.OM OA ]9.3 320% ]5.0% 14 Fla <Glaii mx D.Ox D.az D.D Do% Dn% Dm: O.aX 00X 0p DD n,n% D.OX 3s RemalMer Comm11v Glen D.IE% ]5 p%6 0.0% oA 2s.3 00% G. o0 231 O.ox 0.%: G xs3 v.Oh G. 0.0 2.3 s2A% ss.PF Meula 3.,dsnj dadj OA ads. 429 ead, 0..6 6]0.9 OA 610.9 S6 11nMasi Gns D.97% NI OD% O. DO In,.1 SDg6 100%6 2G., 1010 IO.D% ]W.. I.1 1629 O.M: G. OA 162.9 320% I] Maj or Apollanws n.W% p%6 0.0% 0.0 SO OM SOD L% DO 00 SO M: ]N.0% v.0% OM6 OA 00 6A% iF.%: IB Used Dll Filters D.% 0 0.%6 'OA% 0.0 0.0 SO.P.6 100%6 D.0 00 10.%6 ]W.%e 00 OA G m G s" 0.0 00 00% 0.0% 19 ONer Fanous DG4% 174 Op 1]3.] Ids. SOD 036 1]4 1564 SO.D% ]W.W'v 15.6 160.2 DO% OA 140.7 32.D% x5%: 10 Alums n�m Gnd G.% 21 G. OL% OA 20.6 30%6 100.%6 x.l 1as IO.b% ]W.0% se 16.] 0D% d", O.v I6.) 323% 21 Ober Non- Ferrom 0.16% 3e 33.) 10136 SOD W6 34 303 SO.D% 1W.M, 3A E].3 ODX 0036 0.0 273 320% 26.%, R Remainder COm 0510. Me91 13]% $63 O0X OLM 0.0 263.2 DW6 DO% DO EQS 0.0% O.tlM Op $63.2 O.UA G OA. 263.2 320% M. flaRnnln 603% 6 0,7 33 0.3 11 5.0 23 a -Gpotls D,W% 15.0% ]S.DX 00 0.0 5'. .'sn' DO SCli6 ]P7.D% 00 OA 0.5% S0GGs' 0.0 6.0% zs 24 GmPUtanrtl9Cd Von-1. ddd% 15%6 ]50% SOd sW. DO 00 O.S% IOO M6 OA On 6A% x51%6 25.11.,s -11 COm mar E14ttwnla 003% 6 15 p% ]1%6 p] 5.6 I.. SW OA D3 53 5.tl% ]W.OM 0.3 Is SOO.W6 0.0 50 6A% x6 Vilsl pis la 0-1- DW% 0 150M ]5.%6 0.0 OA 5%6 lOD%6 0,0 DO 5.0% ]W.0% 00 OA 0.5% UIG nss Op 00 60% 2310% "add. .9]Ye 144s 1,4426 "I 1$]LS W.3 1j0)3 0.0 2,30].2 $] IUE LOnts-s 10]% 223 O. W6 OA% 0.0 221.] 10.%6 .1. 221 1990 S0.%: ]WA% 199 379.3 Gdna p.0% 0.0 110.1 320% 38 Ntat C¢Melners 103% 231 0%6 0%6 Op 2111) 10036 IOG O% 2]3 1905 SO.Me ]W.%'v 193 i>1.6 O. W6 0036 OA 1]1.4 32 G% 39 Mlscellanenus PlviO[GnNlnn rs DS6% 11) 0.G% O.U% OA 116.9 50.6% SOO.M, ]1] SD33 0.0% 94.] 30 Plastic Tradb said D.]3% 156 Op% 0.%6 0.0 ]55.0 G. Otld DO 1558 O.M'. OCIi'. 155.. 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 SSS.a 320% 31 plaid[ Gnttry and Man Membvndlde Baas n5E% NB 00% O.p% 00 108.5 100% SODOd SO.B 9].6 10.D% IW.OX 9A 829 0.0°h 00% 0.0 .].9 320% 32 Nan sag Cn -.1.11 and l ntlusMal paakaelne Fllm 002% 3 00% 0%6 OA 31 p.m6 D%6 32 O.D% O.p% 01 s3 0.6% v.OM 0.0 32 323% 25.0% 33 FIIm Prodund D39% 39 00% O.W: 39.0 00% DG% DO 390 O.M: 00% 0.0 39.0 O.Md 0%6 0.0 300 320% 34 Gn IIFllm 1]0% 29] O.. 0.0% 0.0 241.5 DO% MOM 24)5 O.Gn GM 00 24]5 O.U,6 ON6 Old 29)5 32A% 253% 35 Durable Plartlt Items D51% 106 0%6 106.9 50% SOD036 s3 1D10 3.%6 1W.%: 00% OA 980 3210% 25.%, mvindur Cam and pmtic ],,s% U3 00% OG% OA ]32.] DO% 00% DO 232] G. O.M6 0.0 23x.1 OAX 00% 0.0 ll27 323% L.n% Miler Or{enlc 4L]5% Bf39 d.d (630.] 674,9 ]$619 ),3565 7.9 ],340.6 3] Faatl 2156% 4,460 O.L% 0%F OA 4,460.3 300% 1W Ox 940.0 4,014,9 SO.U% ]W.D% 401.4 3,6150 O.n% OP,6 0.0 36130 SBA% ]5.0% 31 Leaved and Gr45s 1.99% - 309 0m6 pOti 00 300.5 100% SOD Ox 309 2]].] 10%6 1W.%6 2].B 2U.6 00% 0.0 299.9 SBph x5%6 39 PN nln6d and irlmminy OAfi% 1) 0%6 OG% OA Sfi.a lO PF SOD n% 1.] 25.x Id:. ]00.0% IS 0.036 00% 0.0 136 SB.O% 25%6 90 BnncM1 nx and 3Nmps OAO% 0 OG% DUd 0.0 00 10P,6 100,0% SO.P,, SOO.UA DA D.0% 0.0 00 10.%6 250% 41'Manu rei OAO% 0 d 0.0 DO% 00% 0.0 OA 0.%6 O.N'o 0.0 0.0 0036 00% 0.0 00 1.0% SS.M6 42 '.'[as 333% bad 0G% OGM 0D 689.4 300% Spn,O% 60.9 6163 10.M.6 100. M6 616 5544 0.5% 1vd,.. 2.8 s5].6 6. 25.GG 43 Glyn 618% 1218 0036 OG% O.D yx]B.3 J iD,O% 100,0% 32].8 1150.5 30 G% U10%6 S15A 1,0333 0.5% SO0.0% 53 10303 0D% 0.y6 44 Remalndsr.n, .a. 0a plc 1 9.13% 1090 p.PA 0.0X Op 1090.1 00% 00% OA 1396.1 0.P6 O.W'v OA S.BW.] 0.G% 00% 0.0 ]090.1 I. V% 256% InRivM OUVr 1].]3% .3,668 O.p 3,161.6 7833 9,480.: 1742 3,BIOA 16.3 3,291.4 O,s. 0 OG% D.Ud OD 50% 1000% 00 O.D S.U6 100.4% 00 05% 1000% 0.0 OD 6%6 250% 96 Wpbd[PwIM '=bI G.O. DA% D.04 G OD 50% 1W.0% OA 6A% 10D%6 OA 0.0 DS% "3W,0% DO G.. 25.6% 47 In. OAO% 0 0%6 0Pd 5.0% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 3.V.6 nad."s 0.0 05% 100.0% 0D 60% 25. 48 Lvmb<I 12.93% 1568 0036 DL% O.D 3$683 50% 1W,p% 31..4 s'l 50% lOD.O% 122. 2317.8 D.s% Po.0% 11.6 13063 101%6 25.%6 99 Gypsum a,.rd Onm 0 00% DG% 0D OA 5.0% 1000% 0.0 O.D 5%6 SOD. P,6 0.0 OD 05% SODA% 0p 00 6%, 25.%6 50 flxk, Spll antl Flno: 0100% 0 00% D.. OD 0.0 5.0% SW.O% Sp% lOD G% DS% W.0% 0.0 DO .G% sl Ramalntl6r/CUm mlu l parts antl OMea 5133% ]099 OP,, OG% O.D ]099.3 50% 100.0% 5510 1N4.4 s.OA 523 992.] DS% SD0.0% 50 98)] 6.OM 25.036 a webpltl Nevttlaus WVaIe (XINJ) 0.19% 99 30D LO 35& X19 OS 30.7 52 Point c.d% IS PM ss.OM O.D 3,0% 1W,0% OD 50% SOD O% 00 0.0 OS% SW A% 0.0 00 OD% D.p% 53 Ve blcle &Ep ulp meM Flultld 0.08% I] D.0% O.Ox 0.0 16.8 00% 00% 0.0 S6B D%6 0rM OA 16.8 DS% SW A% O1 16,8 OA36 DO% u udaa On n.Op% Dm, DM, O.D 0.0 5d.6 100.0% Do DD s.M, D. m 0.D 0s% xw O% Dm, D. ss nZIn 0.02% Is 1'.. 7s.M. 3.7 13.6 Sox vW,Dx p.] 1s.D s.%6 SvD G% os ss1 Ds% 3W.1% 11 123 0%L O.A[ [.. d,r /GT"iRRRw 0.03% G DW6 D%6 on s,p% IW.O% 0a s.D I.. loD.p% s.> Ds% IOO.a% to 5] 0%6 DD36 sMnel- Bw% 799 1131: 820.0 80D sad 557 5073 - ads.. s] In ..I. 24 D. D%4 2a.x D,D% DO% 24.2 D.. D.n% In x4z DA% op% OA 242 0%: D.%6 se Trmled MddI.Iwbs,, G.O. 0 00% DO% tG O.o GGX IW.O% O.0 0.0 1010% IM. oA O.D 0.3% 100D% ail 00 G. D. s9 Bulky Item: 3.T2% 30.0% ]10% 1751 596.5 ]n.0% SW.O% 59.7 536.9 1D036 1000% 33.] 483.2 DS% W.0% 24 41D.0 OM6 DA% FA TU¢i 0.00% 0 Gs 00 lD 0% 1DJ.0% 0.0 0D 1D 0% lODO% 0.0 G DS% IOOA% 0.0 00 0%6 DO% main tle r /Gmo05ihs <[ial Waiu OADM D.0% DO% 0.0 00 ]O A% 1W.0% 1D 0f6 1000% 00 00 n.3% 'do ld% D.0 0.%6 DUd Mlud Resltlue 109% 225 12..3 0.0 3253 OA x18.3 0.0 0.59 63 Meetl 0.eiltl ue lA9% 00% DO% 00 2253 OA% 0.0% 225.3 D036 D036 00 RS3 OU,6 Da4% ]W.OY. 20.691.5 O.BSY. 1]5.6 1D335.9 >.99% LS W.9 ]0,966.6 6.]ry 1oD19 s..3 1],662.] O.if% 2].1 I)$3s.6 9.i4Y. IM RO5 il1]]3 Zero Waste Program & Policy Diversion Estimates Multi-Family Residential Sector f1t12013 SMM1to.Metllure'dre(o l }2020) O W1w 1pl62mp3n1 tl kuMWaeen M n ....... garsel Wool 5usulds"k9 ONbrtbn Measures From. NMW Celleatlen at PUblle Ennb ]035 I., pwa >oni " ...... pm }tbtll opWw r.m.q rom Rn.... opWrt 1. or Tew imnn) Opww .-or RaanlNn4 maaa %' ]onnn D.md OI P I Dhpew,tlll., Re<e wweba Mm DMmd m.pewl I.b OlnMafiom Olwmd Do{aul I- Olv.rt.a M1Om Olwotl.a Obvwa I nns ,,. To p,l. Attar T�9,465.0 n • 7132925 Deus, iennan Peas, 2x.18% 4j90 29,14 3A203 3A6A3 5.5 1]3.3 re 9)9L5 ItedC -D-I Iardrd -d 4th% .1 la, 89,0 6988 D. ]00.6% I., 698.1 5 ➢% W.I% .G 6733 Op% O. on .,,I 2 I.... 080-' G. Spa M,1 JJ3 0.]% ]WL% 0.3 >)1 3➢% 3W.0% Go 1. D. 0.0 733 3 NewiOaper 3.W% 630 aG. 9692 4759 o.3% D.L. O$ 9133 5.0% 300.0% 23.8 4517 OA% on,, Do 453.1 4' Who, Ledger Paper 0.3 an, 79 5.1 SB9 597 0.]% Iol OS 59.6 5.0% 300 A% 3D It 0.0% 0.0% OA 56.] 5 other Ofllee Paper 2.83% I. 30.0 43'/.1 O3% I... OA 4429 SO% 1000% 22.] Oo% 00% 420.7 6 Magv[Inn Ond..'sGs 3115% x30 15.4 1Pd 1799 0.3% 3W,0% 0.2 179.7 SO% III. 9D 1]0] I .6 O.o% 00 DID, ) 11son GOe %antl Dlrecbrlex OD]% I 3.6 10 DI% IWD% OA 1.6 G. to DO% O3 3.5 0.0% OA% OA 15 O1h.r Mls..[Is...1,raper 5.36% 1.. 69.x 7917 801D 0.1% I.Ots 0.0 al SA% ...D% 903 7gle OA% 0.0% DA .1.9 9 Remalnder /LLnevaece Paper 469% 96D 62.2 ,1516 R3.9 p.l% IGDO% or 725.3 SO% 10G. 36,3 des, OA% 00% DA ..'I Gl.0 LB% 39,0 .1 1, 43L9 0.0 93L9 30 I.se.de, Bottles antl CO ntainers 1.IAh 243 ]5.) 3..5 183.1 p.l% 1000% DE ]82.9 S.O% 100.0% 1]87 DO% 0.0% I737 11 a-, Glass BOMei ontl fon0lners 0.60% ]24 B.3 91 0.1% 1000% O.1 93A 5.0% 100.6% a7 G.1 DO% 00% 0.0 89.1 12 Brown Glass Bottles o,I dontriners 0.53% .1 6.9 79.3 So I.A. sonoo 0.1' 00.3 S.Dei ]OO.O% 40 >6.3 DD% OA% 00 76.3 13 Other Glass Co Dread SONe: antl Conminefi 1.97% 93 63 730 74. 0,1% SPo.o% O.1 73.9 5.0% NO.Un' 37 AE OD% Op% on A2 14 lose,... DAB% 1 .0 OA 0.0 0.1% IOO P6 0.0 0,0% 00% DO 00 O.O% Doss 0.0 or ]5 Pemvintler fom Dike Gl45s 0.12% 25 20 233 x3.5 D,1% ]W.%6 00 235 0.0% 0.0% 00 235 O.Go 0.0% D D 215 MaYla 3.35% 69x 98.9 5620 569.0 0.6 56&8 16.2 SSY6 55L6 16 ¶n/51"I Cenx 0.9M x01 13,0 .1.1 1520 0.1% ]W.6% 02 SSL9 SA% ]W.O% ]6 1443 0.6% O.D% 0.1 Oq s I, Mmm Appleloa, o.co% o oA DO OD% iW.O% o.o Do 5A% Ioo.ox DD Do 0.0% O.CR 1 .0 Do 30 used 011 Filters O.00% o GO Do Do o.3% iW.O% 0.0 DO 5.0% orl Do 00 G. G. .. e.0 33 .tor Fenn nx 0184% v9 11.3 .1.1 1013 o.i% I... o.l 131.2 ID% !dose% s6 u4,6 0.0% o.Mi o.0 ss4.6 20 Aluminum Card 0.3M. 21 S,,a 15.6 OS% 3W.0% OA 156 SO 3000% 0.9 348 00% o,%: 140 21 her NOmFemvs Ol6% 39 2.2 25.1 25.5 0.1% IoO.o% 0.0 25.9 SA% 1000% 1.3 242 OD% 00% OA x42 EE ae malntler /COm oslh Metal 1.2fl6 263 23.1 1 295.0 0.1% 100.0% 01 $44.> 0,0% 0, h O.D 244] 0.0% Does OD Dg , ,,a- a d 0.03% 6 'o.l 5.0 0.0 5.0 OA se ll Brown Goods OAo% D 00 O.D 0.0 0:1% SOOD% OI 3D% 10o.P.5 OA 00 OD% I.. on 24 Cemputerrelttetl Ido enlc: OAO% on p.1% 1000% DO 0.0 1.D% SODpM DA% 00% DA 00 . 0.., 1.." Consume!Elettionki 1A3% 6 0] 5.0 S.D 0.1% 100,0% 0,0 Sp l.D% SOO.Vh 0.1 5.0 0,0% '0.D% OA BA 26 vmea oe la .oll- DO s6 0 0o SaDO% Do 0.0 l.ox loo.W: o.o Do 00 Plutic 6,97% 1449 100.6 130Y6 1336.0 ].2 1213) 60.0 1}93.9 11559 27 r.Conbiners 1.07% x21 �]43 169.8 ]67.] 0.1% Io1 OM 0.3 367.0 I.., G. 83 150.6 DO% OD% do 350.6 20 XDPCCen.Iners ].oM 212 ]3.) 157.] 1E0.0 0.1 °b 100036 02 ]59.0 5.0% ]00.0% B4O SSSB DD% OA% G.0 151.8 39 Mleeellaneays Ided' Lo,loner, - 0.56% 117 ].6 821 M.3 0.1% ND.Oi6 D.1 BB3 S.Mh ]00.0% 44 . D.0% OA% 83.0 30 plaiN[imsM1 BaR p.75% ]56 125 143A ]45.0 0.1% 300.0% 0.1 ]44.9 1%6 NO.UM ]2 13].6 0 C4 OD% 00 13]6 31 Plaitic Grocery and Other Me2M1an tllse BaQS 0.5x% 100 ].0 80.3 82.0 0.1% 1006% Ol 81.9 10% 100.0% 4,1 n're OUA DD% 00 7).9 32 Nom..IGmm..1.1 antl Intl uiblal Peske6ing Fllm 0.02% 3 03 2,9 2,9 0,1% SW.%6 OD 2.9 5.0% ]W.0% Ol 28 0%6 D,.6 0.0 LB 33 FIIM Ptnaysb 0119% 3.1 39,0 36.3 0.1% 1.Go 0 .0 363 5.0% LB 34.4 OP% 00% OD 344 34 Other Fllm 3.L9i 34 198 2227 2303 D. 02 23D.1 5.0% 1W.0% 115 3186 OD% 00% 0.0 -21R6 35 Dureble Plastic Items 0.51% B &3 89.4 0.1% 1W. Me o.1 893 So% ]W.0% 4.3 34,9 O.D% O.h.6 D 849 36 Remalntl ear /COm oilte Pl95tl[ l.11% 233 1 &6 314,1 2366 0.1% Do x16.9 SA% o... 108 I.I OD% 0.0% 0.0 2015 OIMroRenl[ 43.>SY. x67.0 79P0.0 7AR,] 7.2 7165.5 2q.1 6}98.4 OD 6,09BA 3> Fa ad 23.56% 9,460 162.6 3,450.4 3,4979 0.1% 3W..% 3.5 341 5A% IODO% 17 39396 0.0% 0I .. 3,3196 38 1,. ad and Gre, 1.49% 317 11.2 .1.1 243.9 03% IGO % 0.2 .11, 10% 100,0% ]$.1 1E9.6 DO% 0. OD i2S6 39 1=nes antl TrlmMnp 0.00% 0.6 13.0 13.2 0.3% 3W 0% e. 132 SA% SODA% 0.7 .135 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 12.5 40 BrencM1r. antl Stu mpx O.GUA 0 0.0 0.o D.0 D.1% IDo 0% DO D 5.0% 100.% I 0.0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 DO 41 Ma." G.O. 0 Do o.G 0.0 0.1% 3W.% OA 0.0 00% DO% 0.0 00 OD% o.% OD DO 42 Tentllex 3.31% 698 593A 550.6 p.1% 1000% 0.6 5..3 10% D. 225 5xx,6 0.0% 00% 0.0 5226 43 Grpec SIB% 1,218 0.0 3,030.3 D.3% 1000% 1,0 yo92.0 5.0% G. 52.3 990., 0.0% % 94 Remalnder /COm oi1R Ground 9.33% ] 90 05.] 11.., 382513 DIG 3000% 11 1823.3 G. G. OD 1023.3 GA% 0.0% OD 1823.3 rea and Other m45 17.73% Sr6N 3 337OD 9,3199 3.2 321016 93 .3,x.16 Lonveb D00% 0 OLD 00 0.l% 100.%6 00 0.0 O.O% 0.O% Do 0.0 00% OD% D.0 46 Asphalt Pavlm D00% 0 OD OD 0.0 0.1% 100 W6 0,0 OD OOM Gre DO DD DO% .D% DO 91 Axpholt Rae Mg DID% 0 0.0 00 D1% D. V.6 00, 0.0 O.O% OD% Do O.e DL% OA% no 0.0 . I-W 33.93% 1360 .3A 2.L5 2x29.8 0.1% soO.o% i,E 2,22, .6 0.%6 D. DO 2,x226 00% OA% 0.0 U27,I 49 Gypsum BOaM 000% 00 0.1% SOOtlf6 0.0 0. G. Do% OD D.O% DO% 00 DO 50 Rock, S011 and Fines DOD% DO 0.0 0.1% SW.O% 0.0 0.0 0.%. O. G'% D.%6 are 0.0 DO 51 Remalnder COm oske lnmeand Other 5.31% 1099 ]4,B 9R4 1. 0.1% .D W6 10 993.1 00% 01% DO 903.3 00°16 DO% 0.0 983.1 unMW XneKd.W.m 1X..91 152 0.19Yr 39 )OA 0.0 35.] 1.] gDG. Paint D.W% p.0 DO 0.1% ]W.M6 0.0 1.0% ]W.D% 0.0 no "a 1000% O.D 53 IahlonI F1.1dr, nt Flultlx Go. '1] DO 16,8 ]6.9 0.1% 1W.o% OD 169 1.0% ]Do 0.2 168 G. loo. 08 35,9 54 Lose." D.fiP.6 0 DO 00 OA 0.1% I... 1.0% 3.,I% DO I 1G% 500.0% 0.0 55 elderls, D. 35 0.0 1x.3 IY4 03% I.,. 0.0 12.4 SA% 100.0% 0.1 123 I. Don, 0.6 IS] 56 Ionnomtiv Cnmeilte I.. O..'s 6 0.0 17 5.7 0.m 30.0% 00 5.7 SA% 3000% 0.1 17 SD% IW.OM 0.3 SA SPod.IWe. 9.04% ]M SOSA SSSS 0.5 5129 4.9 .0.1 do Sp8.1 Y -F 0.]2% 34 0.0 ZO.G 30.0% x9.5 DO% 0,0% 345 0.0% DI 58 TreatM MIdfl.t Waso O.0. 0 OD 0.0 OS% IOodi 00 Do 1.0% 300.0% ,, 00 O.D% 0.0 D.0 59 Balky llemx 3,R% ]]D 0.0 480.6 9a 9.0 0.1% WO% 9001 3,0% lOG.O% 49 9016 OD% D. OA a83.6 W Tkex OD. 0 0.0 0.0 Do 01% 100.0% 1.%6 SOD.o% OA 00 � OA% O.GA DO 65 Remalnder /Com oslb Spend!Warte 0.00% D 00 OD OLD DS% loom D0 O.G LO% .O.W6 "0.0 00 OA% 0.0% DO Oo MkndR. d.. 109% 333 xx53 227.7 0.0 S2>.> .221.] .7.) 6E I. Reildve "225 2233 ll27 O.Vh OL% 00 33].7 D.M D. DO 32,11 O.q6 DO% TMAt Ia . .,6915 076.9 36,659.) 169,9.4 OOOM 16.] ]636Y3 D... 540.3 I6$]DS 0D3Y. L] 163587 f1t12013 gem Waste Program & Polley DivORion Estimates M.Ittlemnaly Residential Sett., 2013 snoxlrMedlJm Term Imlimml L.luh... of Toni mxrozea w..klrOrtenlo are R.wewYln enll.pkn; Bl -vn.kq by Ma. xai )vp.lmlll anmll[.a G.nn sl.x OlrsvialGrs P.... Cl r.r[.q R ... lute Pat... BnJUbq PneeM l.e., :.mm M.nx.l x pn Ol :P.ia Omu. mwMaMm ron mapui.l CeryJrt pinrtetlfivm Te,I Cl Gwwe DIUiM1M [Tote T..I Olrpasel VIDIM.e )ona n A.0 wwrda Pad ellnma Pm eve Ul-1 Tone. same, _ TOnx,919.5 Too.... II *ane..:.. Pope, R.1Mr 4,590 3,Mll - 3]3,0 2,R51 186.2 1 '-pled COlrveeletl ONhoara 9x5 0%6 6635 ]SpX ]SOM 3730 x90 1 ]50% 750% 1.1 1 12 ]36.9 Paper I Paper Ban dd] 099% lop a. I. R3 ]3.3 ]1. 75.0% 111 32.1 .1 llq 3 Newe 304% 630 p.. O.VM 00 11 q5L] 1. OA% 1. OA% Oa 45].] 00% DO a51) a60S Lec Pepef LM 0.38% 79 O.OM 1. O.V% OD $6] 0.0% 0.0% O.D 56.] DO% oo. 00% DD 567 3].) 1 the, the, Me, e, $W DD% O.D% 00 00% ooz 431.7 D.D. O,Ox qm.s 6 leaded : Ina Cen Sssx 1.. RB Do% 0a% 0.0 IMI nI., OU6 0..% Ia 1]0.] a0% DO% nm) I7DI I ] PA O Tee floets end on It- l,, oAl% x o.M6 0.0% ors l.E DO% oox ad o.0 3.3 Dm( o,ox to OA Ls ss is 9 Peter Peter 5.16% 1,068 0.0% 00 7659 DO% DO% O.D DO% 0A )65.9 '701.3 Rorernder /Cleneeez 9 Remalna ¢r /Cote oiltt Paper q.6q% 961 DO% a. D.0% D.0 680.9 1,0% p0% Oo 6869 EmI Ied DO% DO% O.D 688.9 ]OS) Glna 290% 596 p.0 432.9 l.4 330.5 3383 lD 11 .... a,, Bathes and LOMalners 1, 1J% E4 DO% 00% 00 l]3.) SD0% SD O% nId 1303 DUry D. 0.0 Ie ]31.3 1335 een Glaii Bottles Intl COnWners O.6M. SE4 Dm6 DO 89.1 SD O% SD O% R3 66.0 O.M D.M O.D 66.8 665 lI Brown Glans added Intl .,.I'd. 153% m6 DM6 DL% 0.0 ']6.3 W.. 51.1% 39,1 5],x 0.0% OD% OD 5].x 566 a 0her Glass Colored Battles and I.,.Ilers 04N 99 O.pM DW6 -DO .., SO mO RM - . 376 52.7 Ob% IN 00 ix .7 54.0 D DId OA 00% DOM D.0 O.V% 1$ Aem4lnae r /Wm eslls Gims DI3% 25 D0% 0.%6 00 "13.5 I. a.. D.0 RS 0.%: 0.%6 0. 23.6 x3.8 MaYk 9.95.. 69I 3516 6.3 "a's as 5463 553.5 i6 iln/sM1el are 0.9A.f x03 0m6 0.0% OD 104,3 O.M. OD% 1443 0.p6 O9% Da Igq.3 Sg69 17 Malor o,ollenevs DW% 0 5.%6 ]S%0 OD% o.D% Do Do o.0% 00% D.1 I I 161lsaaDnFilters D.OS.( 0 a:%f OM. ID D,o o.M. 0. 00 a..o d0% -o.o 191, e.6eno.i D.W% i)4 o.P.6 OVM o.o u<s o.0% o.%e D.o lza6 OM.6 OM. 00 ssaA lxs9 20 glJmlTeam fans 0.10% 21 O.M. O.M. 00 14A Mae ]S.D% e.3 6.5 O.OM Oa% 'DO II 6.9 R Other Nom FemOJ: 0.16% '1 1. O.M. OD Mx 0.01 OD% OD 14.1 O.OZ 0.0% x4.E 10.6 22 Aemalneee Lem ezlte Metal Ian. 263 OD% O.Do 'OA x40.] 0.0% I. OD x417 Oa% Oa% 00 200.] 208.2 DacVOnla OA3% 6 0.2 0.0 ai 4.9 E3 3fown Geetlz O.OYd 0 5.0% ]S- 0.0 DO% 00% O.D 0.0 DO% OA% 0.0 30.r,puler ralated Elettmnles 00%6 0 50% 71'. 00 0,0% 1.0% Op 00 DO% DO% 00 DA 0.0 25 mherSmall COn sJ mer Elettmnl¢ O.D3% 6 50% ]50X D2 0.B OM6 DW4 Op 9.8 DU,6 00% 00 4.6 n.9 36 VI0eo 01al Deriuz Oa D% 0 Sa% )50% DO% OA Oa D0% DO% 0.0 DO OD plMlez 69ry. ip49 3S L3.R7 I. 930.9 'd 963' 9R.3 x) PETE Ie,lalnere "P% poll DO% DO% as ]5 e.6 Is,036 '/s,0% 89.E 69.n III D.. 0 2e xDPE Cont, IM xR DC% OA% DC 151.8 75,P6 750% 856 66.0 0D% Om6 00 led .695 29 Mlsallaneous Plaztic Centlners 156% 17 00% DO% 6i.8 ]5.%6 ]50% ']S 36.7 DL% DG% DD 367 382 30 7rom Begs 0.]5% 156 DU£ DCR 1 0 Ms -D %6 00% 137.6 0.%6 DOd ID ll7.6 .133] Zetle R Pl polle.duryend Othelol- htneld Ban 05x% lOe Do% I. DO R.9 I 00% 00 R,6 0.%6 D.0% OD ]J[ 93x 3E Non Ba¢Cemmmadded lndusRiol pa[kaging Fllm. DO3% 3 OD% DW6 Is 0.%6 'DM DO 39 OD% OMd O.D 2.. 21 33111. Produtte 0,19% 39 0.%6 D%6 DO 3'n 0.8% 0.0% 00 34.0 0%6 0%6 OA 34.' .1 N OWe[F.an - 120% 20) p.%6 p.0 x]8.6 0196 0.0% DO i]8.6 O.D% OM. OD n 1 21 35 Ou d"Polc l..I D51% 106 SW6 ]S.p% 32 017 OW6 B1.] 0%: OD% Ca 81.] 83.1 36 Remalnaer Gm .:Ile Ploetle 112% R3 00% D.tta no I.., 0%6 OD% DC 2055 I. I. DO � 305.5 aped OMnoroanb It l' [,639 19.6 Ed. 6910 Ede33 LW9.] 3,695.6 3,810.6 3] Feetl 2156% 4,460 O.D% DD% 3,319.6 0.0X OOM 3,3]36 ]W.D% ]S.¢M 24897 829.9 889.3 3e La Pan and GrOS. SA9% 309 00% 0%6 0.0 21 ]S.D% ]S.M6 IE32 110.5 01X 00% ]N.5 N46 39 PN MnR Intl Trlmminex 008% 1] O.L% O.¢F 0.1 u5 750% ]SM 7.1 53 o .6 ors% DO 5.5 S.T n0 Bre,plez and 5tumpz 0%6 0%6 o.I D.1 750% ]s.D% O.D% ..de 01 Manure f OWA 0 O.D% I. O.D p.0 OpM a. 00 all O.D% 0.0% da j 0.0 O.D e3 Teedlex 331% 684 S.DM ]11th 19.6 503.0 P. D0% D h 503.0 00% 00% DO mea SSIS as target 610% LE7e I. 0.6% OD 990.] ]5.M. SS).3 433.4 1. OD% 00 N3.' oaad emalnae![em eilteO anl[ OeneOther 9.]3% IB90 0.0% O.D% 0.0 18x3.3 0.0% t,. 0.0 IEIII OA% I. DO 1.[x3.3 1800.5 • 1].).438 3,E69 121DI 3530.6 9,110.6 3.a9.S I' Lonearem d= Orh OE% oD em 0.D% D.I O.I 00 0.0 0D as AIW Pawn, 0.W% o%: I to Do Ia% /I.M rb.e o.o AO% o.Ox DO 0.0 0.0 Aipn.111 -1r, I. 1 Do% Do% DD p.o 1az OM o.D% 1D% 4B wmEer u.n1% 2,568 00% aox o.e 1.R >a 0.0% -0.M O.D x,RCS Dax ors% D0 .. 12276 1'1", 09 Gwwmeaara 9.DM, 0 0.0% Do 00% 0.0% 0D 11 Ioe' DD% Do 0.0 O.o sD 3oek sell end[I..s 1. A o.O% O.0% o.e 0.0 00% 9.0% 0.D p.o DO% 'o.p% 51 Aemalnan Com paneinensanadher '531% 1 99 Oa% ors% Oa 9831 00% 00% 00 983.1 n,0% 00% O.0 983.3 99].7 e Jdah,la weerdeu wand Mxwl 1.39% 39 OA 99.0 0.0 33.0 310 319 11 P CAM, o Da% 0az D.D% D.O% DO% o,o% II 01 0.0 53 VaMae6E4wpmene Fmlez ode% n 00% I. L.9 Do% DOX DD r.I. DO% I. I. ls3 161 50 uzea DU pa%: 0 Dox DO% DO a.0 DOx Dox p OO M PI 0,0% a.0 00 o.O s5 Barone: o0M6 ]s DW6 ool 17 0.P.6 Dox en Rl Tee% Do% Oo 1v '11.9 s6 aemam der fim aild xxw DO3% s Do% DO% DO s.4 0ou Do% 0.0 s.0 Do% Do% Oo S1 Ss Spe[Iel Wall. 3.n% )94 ],9 301.e 0.0 SOO.e 0.0 500.8 511.0 s7 gar n,lx% 34 DA% 0.036 DO 20.5 1036 DD% 00 24.5 OU6 n.U6 E4.5 EO.e SB irtekd Mealcal Waste O00% 0 O,rA( 0m6 ors 0.0 0.0% 0.%6 OD 0.0 em3 -0.m3 OD 0.0 D.D S9 8elky hems 3R% RO 2m6 75036 73 0)6.3 1w 0%6 am Dm6 O.N6 0.0 4)63 Oe56 W nrez DDOx o aDR DCM o,0 00 O.M. DM. I'6 DO D.0 b.m3 O.M. '0.D O.a 00 sI Ae man der LOm osPe$pldl wort[ I .0 D%6 I. b.o " Do ors 0.. a. o.D a.e do terra a -... Lpeo as 8.8 2x7) 0.0 ui] 7 , )30.] 6z Mleea Respire 109% ns DW6 D0% O.o z2» o.M6 117.7 Dm: Dm6 0.1 f ma 13Da TOTge 1D,0x N,6915 0.15% 3pS ]65865 6)M ]j99.0 ]O,PB).5 1A@% 1690.1 1 dpes4 1ip69 2013 Zero Waste Program & Policy Diversion Estimates Multi- Family Residential Sector .,,,..,.. Mem.m Tw Dessu dan TBlu D R <4dnlablXbn ReBWn Poatl Sn Lltl M1[Interest N plm ror Re"eI[ulue.r. kip<iM lGer povlWl tybLhm111 ry 01Xl[ulten R[rytla Rea l Resoum Re<Bvery.mer ID� 8 01] x,aau 4337.3 y33i 2,z2s5 1 Y emed COrwgareE .,11 ... d 4q >% 922 0.0% s,q.. se 3393 ODM o.D% O.D 133,2 D.0% ..I ed 395 I .m6 90.0% 25 130] 5 pare, BaR Dq9% T.'res. Fees 00% I., lenders o.ad sends, 0.0 Inse.up, s. 0.0 Image z.M.6 90A% 0.6 32.H ID� 8 01] x,aau 4337.3 y33i 2,z2s5 1 Y emed COrwgareE .,11 ... d 4q >% 922 0.0% 0.0% se 3393 ODM o.D% O.D 133,2 D.0% ..I ed 395 I .m6 90.0% 25 130] 5 pare, BaR Dq9% ]0$ 00% 00% ae 33.4 o.ad 0.%6 0.0 s. 0.0 33.6 z.M.6 90A% 0.6 32.H 3 Newzpape, 3.M% 630 0.0% 00% re 960.1 01 00% edl 960.1 00% 1 .1 0.0 .,j L,xsj 900% &3 4518 9 W1I1e Letlge, pope, p.3B% J9 OA% 0.0% D.0 5).] Ory% o. P,6 0.0 P.) 0%6 DMe 00 5].) i0% 900% LD filed Inners lw Pa pe. .H3% 5H) 41's Oo% O.o% 0.0 928.5 00% I stred 9585 j .m,j 17 9100 6 Magaalnes eptl Cp[e log; 1]5% $38 OA% OA% DO 173.9 00% 00% 0.0 1]3.9 OW6 OL% 00 1]3.9 $.%6 90.0% 3.1 SN,d ] 1Mne BOOle e D1mmemuez 001% 2 OA% 0.0% l,s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 1.5 00% 0.G% DO IS 2.0% 9n0% 12 8 sle, r.1...11 a...used , 5.1b% 1068 0,0% OA% 0.0 ]80.1 ]10% 730% g38d 341,3 Obb 00% DO 3913 $.Mh 900% fi.] 3353 9 Ae malntle, Umooslb Paper 4.69% 960 DO% DO% O.D ]o]J Do% 00% 0.0 ]..J 0.0% 0.0% d01] 90.436 ]z.fi 6090 61us Lea% 596 33e.s ev ]98.s 10 Clear Glass Bettlez antl Cennlners 11)% 2N Om6 0496 133.E edes DO% de 1335 0.0% 0.0% DO 1392 1.0% 900% La ]311 11 Gnen Glais BOMes antl COnbinen 0.60% 130 0.%6 O.M.'v 0.0 68.5 D036 D034 00 68.5 OPM 00% O.0 685 z.0% le. 13 6'].3 13 Brown Glass Bottles antl fonNlners D51% lob D. t.. 0.0 SB.6 D.0% DO% se,6 00% 00% 00 386 2.0% se. 1.] SJ,6 13 Othe, Gbsi COlontl eo[Jes antl COntalners O47% 98 O.O% ems o.0 III DL% DG% DO i9.0 OAX OA% 590 zA% 90.0% 1.0 53.0 1q Flat Gloss 0,00% 0 DO% 0.0 p.y6 p.0 OA% 00% 0.0 0.0 2.0-A tS rem.: erreem ezlle Glsss D.12Ye 25 O.Dx $3.6 OUd D 23.8 OA% 00% '0.0 23.a 0.0% OA% ll8 Metals 3.3i% an 0.0 Ss92 533.2 o.D i5].5 E.2 590.0 ]6 Tln/5¢el Cens 09]% 501 00% nIn, OA tes.9 v .6 DO% 0.0 106,9 DU.f 00 ]969 2AM 90.0% 3b 3W.3 ]] Ma o, Fp011en¢s OWX o 0.0% O.Ox 0p% 0%6 0.0 OA 110% 3000% O.D OD 20% ..d% ]8 used Oil Filters p.W% 0 0.0% 0.0% DO 0.0 00% Ob% 0.p OA Do% OU£ 00 0.0 2D% 90A% D.0 00 39 Mher Furr us O.PA% ]]0 O.d% 0.0% Do 126,9 0.0% OU.6 OD ]26.9 DD% DO% O.o 126.9 2036 9D, o% 2.3 159.] 20 gluminum Graz 0.]0% 21 0.0% 0.0% D.0 6.B OD% o.D% 00 6.B 0036 DW6 00 re 2.0% 90➢% 0.1 6,6 2] Mher NOmferto us 0.16% 30 O.o% 0.0% D0 246 ODM 0.0% 59.6 00% D%6 CA 246 2.0% 900% OR 243 22 Remainder /Com os ed Metal' ]9% $63 OA% OA% DO 2082 O.M. OA% 0.0 $0BS el 0.%6 Ise 2.,3 0036 DO% 0.0 iAB2 Elewvnl¢ 0.03% 0.0 0.9 $3 61swn Gestls O.00ry 0 OA% OA% OA p.0 Im, O.o% 0.0 0.0 25%6 SWA% DO o.0 do 20 CompNer- relwed Cl<ttnnln on" OA% DA% 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 55%6 IOD%6 DO Oo 2.0% 90.0% 0.0 00 S2 O<he,3mall Gnsumer Elestromes 0u3% 6 OA% DO% 0,0 99 DOX 11. OA 4.9 28M. SWO% 11 3,7 1.036 O,l 26 vdeo 0151 Devices O.Otl% 0 DO% D. 0.0 0.0 DO% 00% en en i(1n %: D.0 Do ED% 90 U4 0.0 DO PIaNZS O9]% L993 III 09]5 r. .11 51.9 H4 s.6 6.8 2] PE]E CDnbinen IOM ]31 0.m6 DL% O.D 7M 00% 00% DA R.3 v. OVM R3 z,%6 90O% 1.3 ]]0 $B HOPE sen4lners l.oz% 213 DW6 0.036 0,0 693 DOM DPM de 693 O.. 00% 00 692 2.%6 90.%'v SS 680 29 Mhsellonesus Plsed -telners 0.56% 11J 90 de ad. ].) 30.5 DO% 0,0% 0A 30.5 ES %'v ]W.M. ].6 229 2A% 90A% O.s 22.2 0 FunIti d1m eaR 0.]s% 156 DO% OOx 139.] 00% 00% DA 139.7 0%i O.MB OC t397 OA% 0.0% 0.0 139.> 31 PlanId G Is, and Other Mendhe n6lX bees D.'e' loa DO% DUF 0,0. >9.2 D%6 DC% de M3 OD% OD% 00 79z o.0% 0.0% 0.0 ]93 3z Nan'Baa Cemme must a nd l ntlus[Nel Pal,psn, Flm 042% 3 O.q6 O.P.6 0➢ 3.B DCM DO£ DA 2.8 0.0% 0.%6 00 S8 0.0% 06X Sd 33 FIIm Pmtluch 0.19% 39 0.0% o.%'v 0.0 30.9 D,. 00% 00 30.9 00% 00 - 349 00% 0.0% 00 39.9 39 Other Fllm IM% z0) 465% W%: 09.9 1769 O.M6 DG% De 1]6.9 580% udl 99.2 ]33.] 1- ee,M 2A unta 32 tureen Pbrtle Items 0.53% ]ob ODM o.D% 0.0 83,t D.CM O.o% 931 z.0% -90.0% 1.5 81.6 36 Remalntlel COm osite Fluids 112% i33 0.%6 O. W6 1086 OL% D. 0.0 208.6 OA% OA% co 3086 OA% - DO% de $OR6 gr.r;;; alt 9L7 i% 0699 0.0 3pt0.6 3.3]OA 115.6 319],6 9,2 3] Food 2136% 9.0� 0:.: Op% 989.3 ]5 %e ]S M6 500.2 369.1 00% Op% O.D 389.] Dl Y6 0.0% %ses 3a9.1 38 Leaves antl Gmiz 1.99% 309 00% 0.0% DA 100.6 O.Ox 0,%6 1➢Is 0,0% 0,0% OD ]09.6 Do% 00% DO IN.6 39 Pnnings.rd Timmins 0.06% id 0.0% 0.0% de 5.7 00% 0.%6 0.0 5.7 00% 0034 00 s.] DO% 0.0% 57 da dr. n 1 -entl11 o.o% Do% to Do O.DZ o.0% o.D DD% D,o% Idn" 0.0 0.0 li.co% o o ➢% o.DU o,o Dox op% o.p n D,p% Dox o.0 00 Dox DA% o.o DA 4z Teeoes 931x 6M o.ou Do% Do slu o.D% o.D% O.o su3 Do% Do% Do U. zox 9o.ox 9:z so2s 43 de,pet 6.10% Lz)0 0.0% 0.0 9rs smvv OOM oD 950.9 $5036 utem 1]26 33>B OoM 0,0% 3085 09 Aemalntle, COm oslte0 anlc 9.13% 1090 OA% 00% DO 09 &S 0.0% OA% 0.0 Sa. 00% DD% oe SeW.s 0.0% DO% 0.0 IneN entlder., 17.)3% er. O.o .]359.2 9.359.5 0.0 3389.5 O.o 03282 4s turned, 0.0036 0➢% re" 00 DO 00% OA% 0.0 0.0 DO% 00% 046 06 I b 11 Pd,lne 0.00% 0 OA% OA% Oo% O.o% 00 0.0 0%6 Des Do OA OUF DO% 0.0 de q] gsph alt AOOfing o,OM. 0 OA% Dpve OD 00 0.0% OA% 00 O.o 00% DD% to Oo 0 .U,6 D. 0.0 DO 98 Lumber 15.e1% 2568 OA% O.o% 0.0 5,2617 Oo% OA% 0.0 2361.] d.. O.L% 0.0 22811 ends S361d 49 GVpsum Beard O.0. 0 00% 00% 00 Oo% Odu 0.0 en 0D38 OG% 00 00 0.%6 D.0% 0.0 00 SO Rock Soil antl Fines 0.04: n,0% OA% 00 0.0 Oo% Oo% 0.0 OA o.UR 00X D.0 00 0.%: 0.0% 0.0 51 Aemalnder Comooilue IneN end Mhe, 2,31% 99 DO% DAX 0.0 99].i 0,0% 0.0% 0.0 97,7 Ode oA% DO 992] 0.0% 0.0% O.D 992] XausFhol6 Hsavre. -Wazn IXXWI ssurs 39 o.D 33.2 396 B,9 233 0.I 55.0 22 Pant 0.00% 0 D0% D.- OD 0.0 Da% Da% DA DA 25.%6 1W.VM 00% op36 0o DO 33 vehlne 69rmrment Fimas o.0eu v Is. DC% 0.0 lfia DOM 0.O% oA 301 ss.0% 1W.6% 40 l I aA% 0.P% 0.0 121 sa used Dn 0.00% D DM Dox 0 .0 0.0 DO% DP6 00% Do% 00% 0.0% o.o DO Ss Barb 11¢i D.OTF is 0.%6 O.nX 11.9 0P,6 DP,6 D.o ]].9 zB.tlM ]N.0% 3.0 8.9 2.0% 90.Me 0.2 B:7 56 Pemaln tler Cram .ilIe HHW 0%6 00 5.5 D. 04% - DO 52 22.0% iW.O% 0du 41 ipetlel Wayte ]b% M9 0.0 1 leis, 0.0 III BA SM.6 57 PsM1 0%6 298 DG% DG% Do 248 0.0% 0.0% DD 0.0% 0.0% 50.0 SB T,eeletl Metli ®I Waih D00% 0 0.0% O.b6 Op 0.0 O.L% 0m6 p.0 0.0 25A% 3W.0% OD OD 2p% 90.0% Op 29 awl,sltemi 9i5% >l0 0,0% 0A% OA 486.6 DM 0.036 0.0 486.6 DA% DA% 0.0 0066 60 Tim O.W% OUb o.Uh OA OA OpM 0D36 0.0 0.0 55.0% SW.O% OD o➢ $.0% 4a.0% 0➢ 0.0 ID� 8 01] Zero Waste Program & Poli6V Diversion Estimates Multl-Famlly Residential Set or 7r 9 Y�p` 1/112613 Mealumgo-bn[Ta -IGO 1anIt) '.:..:bNPm=a4ID01 Gmuletlpn of rplu Dl :pons 1,...n.lxiyp.lz3v11 Wm/Oryopo.mon T°bI2W 01w oleo &Olxpwel Npmd- In-NpItllnp.pIdem Ort MalMetory Olwrybn PSY 103101igx.I Gpful. Pemllt mm G... On, Eapt- PaluM Pz' Tanx IO p 13036 Pn1 Lea ... h-Il Tpm n Inns Tom nv IImuIDR Maun.l x mI.... B.b mwneawm mwn.a olxgrl R.. Dl oiw ma Dlivowl i, 'Obpewl,.. P.b mwneawm n.a ...I Blwmd Dliqul It.r mM.q Aber innn.n I.. Tnnlun ronmq or ]ulty 4$90 5151 1,7]38 0.0 .5,.111 1171.1 4"'N &OA 930.] 3A..I 1 Unma4d Certu6a4d Gltl be altl q4.]% 330% se PM SBA I019 OD% OOM 101.9 1258 900% )S A% ])1 3).1 931.9 084 S P - OA9% 10$ 3G. BS.t% 398 OFIi'. 900% 75,0% at 3 630 303% SISS 336a ODM 00 345.3 900% )50% 1.1 113.1 541.0 1 4 WMh ."p,I I 038% E. 79 3D L% 85.0% a'.. ]94. DM 0.0 422 93.3 90 A% )50% '3G 39.3 19.1 6).9 141 Wpe..... 5 Op'al'cp 203% 587 BSA% 10).3 3135 1SS D. D. 0.0 313.5 3323 9D A% 75.3% 193.9 SD3.9 U1.9 dIn nn9ntlt 135% 230 G. 3D0% 050% 9GA 1$7.S G. Gd 00% 00 ]S).$ 1308 900% ]50% B &0 SW.S d2.4 ] PFnne Oneb and Dlrtcb nex 7 11-1 DI-t 0.0]% 2 33036 85.0% DA 1.1 D. O.D% 0.%6 1.$ 93.0% )S D% D.B 1.0 D4 B OWel M bolls It -paper 536% 1a. 300% 050% 855 $49.] O.D% O.D% 00 599.7 263.9 93.0% ]50% 1]8.1 - BSB 1,.Il 05.8 9 po malntlol /COmnoslR I. ,.r 469% 963 3D. a D% 1]5.] SU.3 DAX o 5113 526.1 DA% OA% OA 536.1 98.0 5$61 'iy" 280Y. 696 ]a.e Lf0.0 0.0 E510 262E .1 ]014 SIGH 1014 30 Clear Olaix Bnttlesand Cnmdiners I.I. 242 3D M6 850% 339 9]] V. 0%6 91.> IW.9 9D 0% 750% as 33.8 E104 31.8 11 Grcen Glass B9Rl<s antl GOnbiners O.6D% 1S4 30 bd 85.0% ]]I 50.] O.DM OU6 00 50.1 53.8 90.0% )5.0% 39.9 1 &0 ]]3.1 16.8 s antl Cents l nerd 0.5]% 106 3D 196 85.0% 14] 4E.9 OD% ODM D 99.3 90.0% )5.0X 39.9 148 95.9 14A 13 O[M1e lnGlaseiC9loretl B9Nes and C9nbiners 04.]% 98 3D.0% 05.036 135 39.5 O.D% 0.036 00 395 40.8 93.0% )50% 2).5 133 as 13.3 14 RIM GIaae OA%: D036 0036 DO 0.0 O.D% 0%6 0.0 0.0% 00% 0.0 DO 0" IS Pe me[ntler /COmppslR Glass 0.33% SS DO% DO% 0 D.D% 0.%6 0.0 33.8 34.1 DA% 00% 0.0 24.$ 3.0 34.3 Meae3[ 3.33x )G4 4J16 4716 154.6 33G3 9921 R62 16 iln/Sttm fans D.9]% M] 33%6 BS.D% 36a 10].5 0.0% G. 0.0 .7,1 1103 908% 75,0% 744. 300 1R.8 358 1) MWprApplianc9a OAO% 0.%6 G. OA 0.0% 0.P% OA 00 DI 0 ➢% G. OA 0.0 30 U5ea 0112m 000% D DM6 D.0% DO 0.0 IIII O,OM 0.0 O.D DD DA% DO% OA 0.0 OA 00 19 Other Fermui Ga. 174 850% 310 92.9 , DR OU,6 00 929 953 90.0% ]S A% DID 3D.9 199.3 33.9 10 Aluminum Ca nx 0.10% 21 3D0% 85.0% 1,7 4.9 D. OC% 00 49 53 9DA% )SA% 35 L7 19) 1.7 21 Other N -Femux 0.36% 39 330% 358% 6S 188 OD% ODM 0.0 1 &0 10.5 9D A% ]5.0X ll5 60 $94. GO 23 Remainder Cpm.spy Metal 127% 263 D.036 DO% DO $90.$ G. OG% 00 293.8 'OA% 00% 0.0 2538 21.3 233.8 EI.Mmnla .03Y. 010 al 9.7 23 Up -..Dds OAO% DO% OA% 0.0 G. G. 00 00 0 ➢% OA% 00 D.0 OD D0 34 Ca mputerrelaetl ll,..nits OAO% D DOd DO% DO OA 0.D% 0%6 00 00 1 GO% OA% 0.0 DO $9 Otha rS mall Censumer Elettto nits 0 A3% 6 D 3.6 0.D% OM 00 3.6 3.7 0.0% D.0% 00 3.] $.9 11 26 VI@p015I Devlcex 000% D DM D.0% DO 00 OA% 0.0 D.0 00 OA% 0.0% 00 OA 00 Plsnln G9]% ]f43 614 'JT).9 0.0 ]]).4 ]96.6 RS.J 83.9 9$24 89.9 3] PSTt.nbin ers 221 3DO% 650% ] &1 53.9 G. D.%6 52.9 559 9D 0% )SA% 37.] 383 x11.3 20 XOPE Cen6lnera SA3% 313 G."' 50.7 O.D% OpM 00 $D] ..33.5 9DA% ]$A% 3G1 1]0 3033 1].9 E9 Mlxce Ilan anus Plextic Cnndlnen 0.56% 11] 3D0% 85.0% 5.] 16.] O.OM O.UF 16.] 1 &3 9DA% Ti.OX 3E.3 3.9 ]15.3 5.9 30 11.5111 r-1 Begs 0.]5% 156 DO% DN6 OA 139.) O.M: OUb 00 139] 143.0 9DA% 750% 05] 96,1 115.6 96.1 31 PIas11t G1otery and OMer Met[M1a ndlu Bast OSZ% Spa 3D V.6 85. P.6 302 598 D.0% C M 00 590 -W.5 9D A% 731% 438 19] %L8 19.] 33 N-.a mm41t�al antl l nft.I.1 Packa4ln[ Fllm OA3% Dy6 D.036 DO 2.0 O.DM 0% 00 20 $.9 OA% D.0% 0.0 29 0.4 29 33 FIIn, Pmdu2 0.39% 39 DG% DO% DO 39.9 0D% OOM 0.0 349 358 DO% 0.0% 0.0 368 SA 359 34 Other Fim 130% 34) DM D.0% D0 1303 0.6X G. 0.0 UO3 133.6 0.0% 00% 00 1336 ]33.1 ]33.6 35 parable"It lttmi O.SI% 136 0036 0036 DO 81.6 O.D% D0M 03.0 DA% 00% 00 03.0 1].3 030 36 pemalntler /Cemppiltt Fl9Mlt 113% $33 DN6 DO% 20a.6 G. G. 0.0 z0 &6 3113 D.0% 0 ➢% 0.0 23]] 39.) D[M1erO..t 41 ,,Y. 013 ] 2,3JG9 ..7 t,279.> 593.9 3.0).3 36st.5 37 Poed x156% 49GO 3DD% OS.P.6 993 E0.e G. 00% 00 1898 3493 9DA% 75.0% 235.] 1135 45]35 1135 30 Leaveiand Glaii 11Gy 309 300% 050% 3G] JID D M GD% T/.9 " 84.5 908% )SA% 55.4 1G] 26] 39 PNn].- I'rrlmminp G,G. 17 3D 0% 05.035 15 4.3 G. G. 00 43 90.0% >5 ➢% 3D I8 ]6.6 ]5 W amnlheiald"' mpi DD. 960% 05D% 00 G. D.%6 93.0% )50% DO 91 Manurr. 0.00% D 360% 85.0% 0.0 00 D.Ox G. 00 00 0.0 90.0% h4.% DO 6,0 O.D 00 4t TMllei 3.31% 6B4 30036 850% 13 &3 374fi ]5.%'v 75.W6 2100 163.9 1]3.0 964% 116.0 362 633.7 562 q3 [a 6.38% 13)3 30,0% 03,0% 063 E31.7 0.6% 00% ]51.] 3fi &] 508% 75 U.6 10144 823 1x30.6 8]3 43 pe malnder /Cpmppslte 0l.nl[ 9.13% 1 90 3D0% 85.0% 471.4 1.3]].3 OA% D.%6 D.0 l 7].1 IAGG O.p% 0.0% OA ]W13 5$03 ]4023 n• nx.M Dihr 17.>3% &60 3,ESA5 li>3.3 aspm.t 3,0 &0 10360 "10,2 2DOG0 45 Cp nt DAD% DD% ol% o4. 0.0 G. Got, D.0 Do o4.% DA6 oO Do 46 n:phi¢Pamna D.DO% 9 D0% D ➢% DG o0 0.0% 0.6% 0,0 00 DO 0.0% O.OM DO DA 0.6 Do 17 Aspha¢ppmnb o.00% D D. DA% D.0 0.D% OD% Oo D0 D.0 D.D% 0036 DD DA O.G D0 40 Lumber ]3.41% 250 00% OA% D.0 1x61.) 15.0% 75.0% 138.E 96D3 "0x37 0.0% 00% DO SA33.] 1,640.E 1023.] 49 Gypsum Board G= 0 DO% 04.% 0.0 0.0 0.D% 00% DO DO DO 0.0% O.pA OA 0.0 G.D DD 5G Potk. S011 antl Fines 0.00% D,O% D.0% 0.0 DNS O0% 0.0% D. D.0 51 Remainder /COm oolh l nemand DNer 531% 1099 00% 00% O.D 99].) D.OM GDG DO 99].] ] 123 O.0% G. 00 0123 ]2)9 123 a ua.M1eId Waeraeux Wax41XX154 3.19% 59 as 0 00 250 25 5 355 ]0.3 R.3 11 nIt 0.0%6 D,0% 00% OA 0.0 OG% OOF G,0 DO DO 0.0% D.. OA OD OA 53 Vehllle &E4ulpment pultl5 0.08% 3] DA% 0.0% DA 0.4d 00% 00 121 1E.3 OA% OD% DO 123 5] 123 54 Uietl 011 OAO% 00% DA% DA 00 O.D% DN6 D.0 OA% DU,6 DA 55 Battenas OOJ% IS DO% OA% DA 8.) 00% 00% 00 &] &9 .04.% OM. DO 8.9 74. 8.9 Sfi pemalntler COm o:Ite XXW 0.0% OA% DA 4l 0.0% 0.0 4.1 92 0.0% O0% OA L4 41 Sochi WaN 3.04% ]94 .5016 0.0 an. 513.3 OA 513.$ 310.4 .$0.2 57 P1I O3E% E4 D,0% D.0% 0.0 14.8 0.0% O0% DO 143 1DO G. O.V% DO 251 15.1 SB Treated Med tai Waite OA%6 0 DO% DO% D.0 0.0. 0.4% Obb 00 DO 0.0% OA% D.0 04 OD D,O 59 Bulky Items an% 7J0 G,0% OA% DA 47).8 0.036 O.P% 4174. 400.1 0.0% 0.0% DO 408.1 310.3 4B &1 60 ilrti OAUF 0 DO% D.0% OA O.D% 00% 00 DO DO O.OM D.D% OA D➢ 0.0 DA 61 Pemalnder/COm oilh5 mdt Wane ODD% 0 DO% OA% 0.0 0.0 O.R6 D.%6 00 DO DO 00% OD% DO DA 0.0 DA Mdatl."du. 1.Ory. 335 0.0 2303 0.0 230.] 2.3.] 233.1 00 3G.1 63 MIxM Rendue lA>.6 DO% 0 ➢% OA x30.) O.D% 0.%6 2307 233] 0.0% 0.%6 D.0 133.7 133.7 TOTAL 1W.pm 30,03.5 7AIY. 1.. 9,60.8 7.M "403.0 8,,D. B, WS ... G. U70A 68910 15330.6 6A318 7r 9 Y�p` 1/112613 O� Zero Waste Program & Policy Diversion Estimates snm<1-1an..Ss HER 10 1I11rz013 Ctlalatlon o/ las D6pDeed Sarre ManIce SM1Ves /Bul,ltam RausvaM6eryeling MsIkMryRerydingln.1 s /.& BeFevbrffia.. Merk ng ansonmentil drceMy On-llnse I= sy MCNrlels Type i3033i Percent nadpwag Perm[ Percent PesYl4ng Per<mt RaSUltln[ MMerkl % 30110bPVal OpWre DlvertaE - Tors P -1 OpNry psertotl TOnf pNre Mr. OMrtetl Tert< OISPasal Coture Diverted I,P -1 Tonnage Rate hom Bahr l'a. .raI TOnnege RMe Irwn sector Mmmtl M1om Yttor dierted Tomwga Rate Ins 4ttor Diverted TOrmaa .,r 20.05% 8.006,7 I.0 aassa 60.0 ] M4.6 ].15L3 00 ].153.1 1 unmated COrtugatetl Cardbaartl ]A]% 2.981.3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 2.981.3 1.0% )5% 324 .9 10.% 1000% 295.9 2.663.1 0.036 0.0% SS 0.25% 95 0.1✓6 0P% 00 985 1.0% ]5% V .0 ISM 1000% 9.8 8 &0 0.0% 0A% 00 stsu 3 N6weWPer 0.93% 9] OA% 0.0% 0.0 369.7 1.6% ]5% 2.8 .9 I 10.0% 1000% 36.) 330.E 0.0% OA% 0.0 330.2 4 WM1It<Led"d Paper 110% 437.6 0.1% 100 d% aa OA 43].3 1.0% ]5% as 3.9 10.0% 10003: 43A 39J.5 O.tlM OA% 0.0 390.5 5 Cd,',.rePaper 1.33% SZ9, 0.1% IW.PF 0.5 5290 1.0% ]5% 4.0 5.1 1SM 1000% 52.5 4726 OA% 00% 0.0 dr2s 6 agaxlna antl Catalo8s 056% 2229 OA% 00% 0.0 IId.d 1.0% ]5% 1.] 13 l0A% SOJO% ]3.1 1991 0.0% O.N6 SS 199.1 ] PM1one Soaks and Dlractorin 0.04% 163 0.% 00% 00 163 SA% )5% 0.1 6.3 10.P.6 IM. 1,6 14.fi t,.dYs 0.0% OP 34.6 8 IXM1er Mlsulla nex2.2]% 30].8 SM 00% 0.90].8 1.M6 )5% 68 0.9 SO.P.6 SODA% 901 010.8 Ours OA% SS 9 Rema[ asl[e Pa of 612% 2 3A 0.0M 00% 00 24430 Load )5% 10.3 .) 10,0% 300. 242.5 2182.2 S. OA% Sp 3162.2 L39% 4]).0 - 0.0 N).0 L7 3 35.8 430.5 0.0 438.5 SO C<ar Glas BOl[lei and Containers DAN. 1061 0.036 00% 0.0 106.1 S.D36 ]5% SA 384.) tom 100.05 SLS 1602 OA% 0.0% 0.0 1662 11 Green Glass Eottlesand0mralneR 012% 475 0.036 OA% 0.0 4]5 l.rs'a ]5% OR 4],1 10.0% 10],0% 4.] 424 O.A% 0.036 0.0 43q 12 Brown Casettes and Cantalners 0.29% 115.2 0.0% 00% 0.0 115.2 sum 7S 3163 30.0% 100.0% 114 1029 0.0% OA% OA 102.9 19 IXM1er Glass Galor<d 6attlesand Container, 003% 12.3 O.dM OA% 0.0 12.1 .1.0% 75% 0.1 12.0 IS. SODOM 1.2 10% OP% 0.0% 0.0 ]OB 14 Flat Glass 0.02% ]3 OM OA% 0.0 ].3 0.0X 0% 0.0 ].3 0.0Ye 0.0% 0.0 73 O.tl16 0AM 0.0 73 15 R<malnder Com osne Glass 02]% 1088 0.036 OA% 0.0 100.8 O,P.6 0% 0.0 108.8 OA% 00% 0.0 lOBB 0.0% 0.036 0.0 1068 Mebls 4.33% Lss.d, 100.0 L'M.3 )4 1623.6 1.5i9.a 1529.0 16 Tla /Sm,l Wn, 0.63% 3513 0.0% OA% 00 251.2 1.0% ]5% 1.9 249.3 10.0% 300.0% 24,9 2244 0.036 0.0% OA 2214 11 Mafar,,dsn- 0.13% 51.7 0,0% 0.1% ]03.0 -08.3 O.6,% G% Sp -0B.3 10.0% IOO.P.6 4, "s O.P.6 0.036 00 135 18 uud 011 Fillers 0.02% OA 0.3% 0.0% 0.0 0.0 0.0% OM 0.0 0.0 100% IOO.OM 0.0 Op 0.0% 0.S% 0.0 O.0 19 IXM1er Ferto US WJ.) 0.0% Op% 00 ..] 1.0% 75% 4.5 5 %.2 304% 300.0f'v 59.6 536,6 0.0% 0.0% 00 536,6 20 Plu minum CeN 0.10% 39.J 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 39.) 1.0% 75% 0.3 394 SOA% 300.OM 39 35.5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 355 21 OIF<r NDn- FertDU, 035% 1X.3 OA% OA% 0.0 SW.3 1.0% ]5% 0.8 93.5 30.0% 300.%6 10.0 89.6 0.0% 0.0% 00 0Is 22 RemalntlR@m site Metal 312% ams 00% DA% 0.0 606, 0.036 0% SS a., OA% 0.0"M 00 6964 CA% 0.0% 0.0 6864 ElttOanio Odd S 422 0.0 43.1 0.0 43.1 211 M.0 02 398 33 Brown GOOtl, 0.08% 30.0 0.1% 300.036 00 30.0 0.0% G% 0.0 30.0 50% 1X.0% 15 28.5 0.5X 1X.036 OS 28, 24 Cam, terrelat,d El,slmn,s O.X% 0.0 0.1% ]W.0% 0.0 00 0.0% 0% 0.0 0.0 5.0% 1X.0M 00 0.0 0.5X 1W Ok 0.0 OA ]3'tah Bmal ConxumR SI -,onla 0.03% 0.1% 3000% 00 ]2.1 0.0% 0% 0.0 12.1 5.0% ]OJ.OM O6 11.5 0.5% ]X.tlM 0.1 11, 26 Vltleo Olx la 0evlwz S.% OP 0.1% MoX 00 Sp 0.0% D% 0.0 S,s 50% ]0].OM OA 0.0 OS% 1... OA 0.0 Plestlo 1051% 4,19].5 0.7 4.196.8 Al 4.3928 9].5 4. %53 OA 40952 2]- PEIECantainers 0.50% 1978 0.0% O.O% 00 197.0 1.0X 15% 1.5 S. .0 % 1X.P16 19.6 1161 00% S .6 OA 376.7 38 HDPECOnbiners 0.39% SS4A 0.0% 0.%6 00 1X.4 14% ]5% 33 1532 SOA% 1X.036 153 13].9 O0. O.0% DA 13].9 29 Mlecellanvoap Plartic CantalneK OA8% 193.5 0.0% 0.0% 00 193.5 SO% 75% 1.5 192.0 IOA% ]..O% 192 1]28 OC% 0.0% OA 1]28 30 Plt,tl<TRSM1Bag, ].3fi% $05.0 0.0% 0.036 00 505.0 0.0X 0% 00 50.5.0 OA% 0.0% 00 5034 0.0% 00"b 0.0 505.0 31 Plex[ICGrocery and RM1e, MerAandlse Bap 0.35% 101.1 00% O.tlM OA 101.1 OA% 0% 00 101.1 104% 1X.66 10.1 91.0 00% 0.0% 0.0 91.0 32 Nom BagCDmmersual and lndunrlal PaIXaeing Fllm 0.86% 3434 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 WA 00% PM 0.0 Ss OP% O.tl% OA 343.4 OA% 0.0'M 0.0 3938 33 Ill.Protlutts 0,23% 93A 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 93A 0A% O% OA 939 00% 0.6,% 0.0 934 0.0% 0.6,% 0.0 93.4 M OIM1a Frn 1.61% .1.0 00% 0.0% 0.0 641.0 00% O% 00 E41.8 00% O.P.6 04 641.8 0.0% O.P.6 0.0 641.8 35 Oun ble Plastic Items 1.6]% 665.0 0.1% SXA% 0.] fi65.2 0.0% 0% 0.0 665.2 S.dM 1X.0% 33.3 631.9 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 631.9 36 Remalntler COm Ogle Plastic 3.25% 3 03.3 00% 0.0% O.0 1 01.3 OM 0% DA 3 01.3 0.0% 00% 0.0 1301.3 0.0% 0.0% ' 0.0 1301.3 IXM1er IXpnlc 33.88% 33.80.) 24 33,)18.3 0.0 33.]10.3 1,149.0 11569.3 10.9 11,550,4 37 'Sad 153gM 6,1023 OA% 0.09 OA "1 0.0% 0% OA 6 }023 MOs 1X4% 610.2 5.492.0 0.036 OA% 0.0 5.493.0 38 Leaves antl Gras, 3A%M 935.6 OA% 0.0% 0.0 995.6 0.036 - 0% OA 935.6 10.0% 101. 99,6 896.0 O.tlM 0.0% 0.0 0.0 39 PN n ln'sla"lmmin, 4.8% 1.683.5 OA% 0.0% OA 3,683.5 OA% 0% 0.0 ]..5 IS. IOOOM 1., 1.5]5.3 Op% 00% SO 1,51513 40 BrznTes and Stumps 0.]4% sl 2"3 0.0% 0.0% D.0 2943 O.OM 0% OA 2X.3 SOph 500.0% 29R 2646 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 2f-0.6 41 Manuras O.d. DA OA% 00% 0.0 OA 0.0% 0% 0.0 0.0 O.0% Op% 0.0 00 0.0% OAM 0.0 0.0 42 Tattles 1.06% 48.9 0.1% 1000% OA 432.0 O.Ps 0% 0.0 422.0 10.P.6 SODOM 42.2 3]9.8 0.5% 100m 1.9 38.9 43 Ci@[t 4.95% 1,939.3 0.1% lSdA 2.0 1,9923 0.0% 0% 0.0 19923 10.0% 1000% 193.2 1,]93.1 100.0% 9.0 S.J04.1 emaln de, COm asltt0 ant[ 308% 12284 O.OM 0.0X 0.0 3 84 O.tlA 0% 0.0 13284 0.6h 0 1 Z &4 O.Uk 0.0% 1 294 InmbaM ONer ]8.09% 11.316.7 71 13.3095 0.0 1123.05 5605 10.6 %1 53.2 10695.8 45 Contma, 0]5% 29].5 0.036 9A% OA 29].5 0.0% M6 00 29].6 5.1P.6 100 -M- 14.9 282] 0.5% 100.0% SA 201.3 46 A,psa Paving OOV% OA OM 00% 0.0 0.0 0.0% M6 0.0 OA 5.016 1000% 0.0 0.0 0.5% 1004% 00 OA 47 P,,h: Rwflng 233% 92]1 O.M6 00% 0.0 927.4 O.M6 M6 0.0 9114 5.0% 300.0% 46. 881.1 0.5% 1004% 4A 0]6,) 40 Lumber SaAS% fi.5)0.3 0.3% 3OSM 66 fi$fi3.J O.M6 0% Sp 6$53] '5.0% 300.0% 3262 6)35.5 0.5% 300.0% 31.2 49 Gypsum8oard 1.74% 6 %,6 0 :U 0.0% 0P 6 %,6 0.0% 0% 0.0 adds 5.0% 100.0% M.8 6fi3.8 0.5% IOOM 3.3 adad 50 R.,'Soll and Fines 15]% 628.8 0.1% SOD.OX 0.6 6283 0.0% O% 0.0 628.2 5.%6 3X.OM 314 596.8 0.5% 3X.0% 3.0 593.8 5] Remalntler Com DSR<I n<rtsantlttmer SSS% 2X60 0.0% OA% 0.0 2096.0 00% M6 O.O 20 %.0 5.0% 100.66 104.8 1933.2 0.5% IOO.M6 ]0.0 1981.E IbuseM1Oltl Xamrtlous Wash lXXWf 0.31% SSS3 0.0 3253 0.0 ]]5.3 6.3 119.1 0.6 1145 53 Paint 03)% 106.4 S. 0.0% 0.0 106.9 O.M6 0'M 0.0 .1 SS% l... 53 101.1 S.I. 300. OM OS 100.6 53 VeM1[,, &Epulpmdm Flu ldi O.W% 0.0 O.O% OAM 0.0 0.0 0.0% das 0.0 0.0 50% 1N.0% 0.0 010 0.5% 1X.OM OA 0.0 M uictl 011 O.X% 0.0 0.0% OA% 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0% 0.0 0.0 SA% ]N.66 00 0.0 0.5% 10].pM 00 0.0 55 Battale, 0.01% 3.9 0.0% 0.036 00 - 3.9 OP% M6 0.0 3.9 SA% 1X.66 03 3.> 0.5% 1. OA 3.7 56 Pemalnder COm osl[e HXW O.W% 351 0.0 %. OM6 00 IS, .0% 0% 0.0 35.1 SA% 1X.0% 0& 143 OS% 1X.M6 0.1 142 Sp Mel Waste AX% Ldda. 28.8 L335.9 0.0 1.135.0 - .4 3A280 - GB 1,02 57 Fsh O.15Ye 51.6 0.0% Sups 00 51.6 00% O% 00 61.6 0.0% 0.0% OA 61.6 0.0% CP% DA 63.6 58 Treated Medlol Waste O.N% 0.0 0.0% 0.0% OA 0.0 OA% 0% 00 00 10.0% 1X.0% DA 0.0 OS% SN.66 0.0 0.0 59 Bulky Items 3.03% 1%30.1 30.6,% ]5.0% 27].6 9569 0.0% O% OA 9569 IOA% IW.6i 95.7 861.2 OS% IX.6b 4.3 856.9 W ¶tt5 0.24% 960 00% 0.036 0A 960 DA% 0% OA 96P d..,% 1X.0% 9.6 SSA OS% 1X.P.6 OA 059 61 Remalntlp, LOmOOSIte SOeclal Waste 0.05% 20.8 00% O.M6 00 208 OA% 0% OA 208 SO.OM SX.M6 2.1 18.8 OS% 1X.M6 0.1 18.] MMed Re Icl a D.W% 1.6 OA 1.6 OA 18 00 1.6 0.0 1.6 62 MMed Raltlue 000% 1.6 d4% 00% S. IS 0.036 0% OA 3.6 O.M6 00% 0.0 1.6 0.0% O.0% 0.0 1.6 TOTAL saddna 39.933.0 0.0% 309.1 39$41.9 019% ]4.3 3916f.6 7.13% 2.846) 36.630.9 O.1m 69.] 36$4.3 HER 10 1I11rz013 Zero Waste Program & Poliry Diversion Estimates fD-lY Vf1R013 SM1¢t Teml xo3sz01sl Srut4uMeelum Termlx013 -xoxol - Oieposetl adand,auda monde FaMWdual- Inle®ettd Waste Men ardent Fad Bbleene sairo- alliattlneb111gCo1labarril a.&Propem b,har0noFTOns by MebNeB ]ype 13011) Percent nesultm$ Par6M Pe:,16 Q 30LS IPtOp4tetl ": Perzant PetultlnQ Par.R Pwltlns Matarivl % 2031 DISpodal CepWrt dw'tttl Tom Ohpnel Cuban dt'e'dtl Tors OlfPasel OpYre _ Tans (Yptun Covered To _ Tenna3e Pqd MmhMr OlwrteG "harse Beta *P...r Olwrtatl Tom 6 plfpatl ' „T Pate Setlor Mvmwtl Tanned H° P4a M1 m5e[Wr dwread T nnaga Pour 20.05% $076.] OA 7,-1 5]Ll 6,5]9.1 6.660.2 6.> k65].6 3329 63267 3 Uncoated Carnabeed G4Nbwk JAJ% 2.9933 Cm 0.0% 00 2,I.l ..0% Dom 213.0 2A50.0 2483.] C.1% 1000% 25 2479.2 5.0% 3p0AM S2a.0 23553 2 P"" ,o 0.25% 9 15 OOb OA% 00 ..0 32.0% 25.0% 710 81,0 028 0.]% 100.0% 0.1 8Is 5A% 100.0% 4.1 7" 3 Newepaptt D.. _ 369,7 0,0% OA% Do 1.2 32.0% 25836 26A 3N.0 30]] 0.1% 1000% Is 30]A 5.0% 3W.P.6 SSA 2921 4 WM1Ite Led, Per 1.30% 43).6 0.0% . OA% 0.0 350.5 32.0% 25A% 31.2 359.2 363.9 0.1% 1000% CA 363.5 5.0% 100.OM 182 3453 3 Other O%Ia Pape' 1.33% S.I D .6 OA% 00 anI 32.0% 25.. 3].0 434,8 4404 0.1% 1Co. OA 44do 5.0% 1... 220 4180 6 Malu1 -1antl Celedd, 0.1I% 222,5 0A% OA% 0.0 199.1 32.0% 35.0% 1519 181.2 loss 0.1% 1008% 02 l.A 50% 100.036 93 Vol ) Phon<BOaYS and DPectarl¢ C.." 16.3 0. OA% 0.0 14.6 Ill. 25836 1.1 138 13.6 0.1% 100 tlM 0.0 13.6 5.0% Im. 0.] 129 0 O[M1er Mliallarld-d Paper 23]% 9D].H D. OA% 0.0 8108 320% 25836 64.9 ]46.0 755.6 0.1% 100.0% 0.8 )54.9 5.0% 100.OM 3).] )1].I 9 Bemalntler Cona oslte Paper 6.12% 2443.0 CA% OA% 0.0 21825 P.O. 2s. 1]0.6 2007.) 2Dus Di% Ior. d% 2.0 203L8 5.0% 107,0% 301.6 L.D. Glev 3.39% 4>).0 Do 4N,5 30.5 404. 079.1 0.4 40&] .15.0 3966 SO Clear Gus Bottles antl Cantalners OA)% 1. B.OK OA% 0.0 166.2 320% 25.0% 13.3 152.9 1., 0.1% 100. 0.2 1. 5.0% IW,D% ].] 14).0 IS Gtten Goss 9.1111 -1 COntelners 0.32% 47.' 0.036 0.0 428 32.0% 25.036 31 39.0 393 0.1% 100 P.b 0.0 39,5 S.o% 10].0% 2.0 375 12 Brown Gla¢ Bottle and Cantelne5 0129% 115.2 0.0% Om 0.0 102.9 320% 25.%6 &2 94.) 95.9 011% 1000% 0.3 95.8 5.0% loop% 4d 91.0 13 Other Glass Colored Bottles and Contalnerd 0.03% 124 C.D% 0.0% 0C 10.8 32.0% 25.46 0.9 1Do 10.1 01% loom, O.o 1C.1 5.0% IOJ.O% OS 9.6 14 Flat Glasi 0.02% ].3 0.0% O.OM 00 J.3 Op% ID% 0.0 73 7.6 01% ICo OM OA 7.3 0.0% D.0% OA 7.3 15 Bemalntler Cam dhdd Ord. 0.2]% 103.9 0.6h 0.0-% 00 10 &0 320% 25.0% H.] 1..] 1013 0.1% 3000% 0.1 1013 0.0% 00% OC 101.2 M ,tad 633% L)30.1 0.0 L..0 12[1 IAbse CA . 1.4 'Ado. 16 ii,/St,,] Gdo 0.63% 251.2 066 OL% Op 2C4 25.0% / 1 &0 N6A 209.3 DC% 100.0% 02 2089 50% loo 1985 17 Malor Pppllarou 0.33% 51.7 0.0% 0.0% OC -03.5 60% x5.0% 0.7 A21 -02.3 0.1% Co. 3 0.0 -422 50% 303.o% -LS -00.1 18 Jud 011 ill[eR O.W% 0.0 0.6.6 0.0% 0.0 0,0 .0.0% O.q6 OA Do 0.0 0.1% 300.0% Do 0.0 5.0% 100.036 OA 0.0 19 Other FCrtous 1,50% 607.7 O.DY 0.0% 0.0 5366 620% 25.86 42.9 493.] 500.1 0,3% 100.0% 0.5 499.6 5.0% 101036 258 0]4.6 20 Plurnhum Cans C.ID% 397 0.6.6 C.,% OA 35.5 320% 21. 2,0 328 $3.1 01% I. .6 O.0 33.1 5.0% lm.%6 1.] 31.4 21 Other NOn-FPROUS D.% 107.3 0.0% op% OA 89.6 32A% 25.D% 72 RA 93.5 0.1% 300.0% 0.1 838 50% .. 43 ]9.2 22 Bemalntler Com hold, Mehl 1.71% 686A OA% 0.0% OA 6064 320% PI'm 54.9 631.5 630.0 0.1% 1008% 0,6 6392 OA% D .6 C ElecVant¢ o.il% 4E.2 0.0 99.8 - 0.6 39.2 39.] 0.0 39.6 - OA Is 2i BtownGmtl, 0,08% 30.0 Op% 0.01 OA 28A 60% 25,0% 04 2].9 20.3 04% 307.%0 0.0 203 1A% SW.%6 0.3 20.0 14 Camputer-leladed Eloo l¢ Dom 00 0.0% O.OM OA Do 6A% ]5.0% 00 00 0,0 01% IOO.OM 0.0 0.0 SA% I. Is 0.0 0.0 CI 0[FerSmall LOnsumtt ElMlvnl¢ 0.03% 121 0.0% 0.01 0A SSA 60% ]u.6F 0.2 ]I3 SSA 0.1% 3D0.0% 0,0 SSA SA% 1W.o% 0.1 113 x6 Vltleo 01510 pwlces C.C. 00 '00% 0.G% 04 D.0 6A% 25 .6.6 pA 00 0.0 0.1% 300.DM 0.0 C. IA% 1W.U.6 0.0 0.0 Added ..61% 619].5 OA 4.0962 32].6 3.]6).6 Axial 3.0 6800.5 190.4 .$61&0 27 PESECOntaln1. 0.50% 197.8 00% 0.01 OA 1]6] 32.0% Is. 14.1 1626 3CW.7 0.1% 100.%6 0S 1..5 SA% loom H.2 356.3 29 HOPECordiners 035% 1548 00% C. 0.0 137.9 3211% ... lCo 1268 128.5 O1% 1.ne 0.1 12 &4 SA% IWA% 6A 321.5 29 MBCellaneaus %anlc Cnntalners 0.48% 193.5 OC% C.0% OA 1]28 328% ]5.0% 13% 1...0 i6L1 01% 10].P6 OS 160.9 5.0% 10161 0.0 352.9 90 PI P*Irruh Oa es 1R6% 505.0 00% C.- 0.0 505.0 I'm :5.0% 4CA 4646 469.9 0,1% l.. 0.5 4695 SA% loom 23.5 x410 31 plastic 6raa,=dOther Meldmndls, Bads 015% 301.1 o" 0.0 910 32.0% 25.0% 13 03.7 H4 .H 0.1% ]W.P.6 p.l 84.) 5.036 SW.% 4.2 WA 32 NOn -Beg COmmPICl,I and lntlu9rla Patka81n8 Fllm 0.06% 3438 0.0% 0.0% OA 3, 32A'M 25.0% 2)5 315,9 319.6 0.1% 102.036 03 319.3 5.0% 100.036 16.0 3N.3 33 FIIl PratlVRS 033% 538 0A% no% 0.0 93.4 32.OM 25,0% 75 85.9 0Is 0.1% SN.o% 0.1 060 S.OM SM.O% 4.3 82.5 34 IXM1eralm I'M so DA% 0IN, 0.0 641. 32.0% 25.0% 513 5905 59).3 0.1% 100:. 0.6 596.] 5.036 loom 29.8 5669 35 Durable Ca Pin Items - I.fi)% 665.8 OA% 0,0% 0.0 .1.9 32.0% 25.0% 50.6 503,4 INA 0,1% lCOM 0.6 5028 "mi SODA% 29A 55 &5 36 Bemalntler LOm Dille Pla nlc 336% S 013 OA% DA% 0.0 1 III. 25.0% ]04.] ]197.2 1 11.0 0.1% SN.N6 13 1209.0 5.0% IoO dM E0.5 1149.3 Cre, or ..86% 32.720.] 9M.1 ]33389 4167 I0A..2 10,950.6 13.0 30.939.6 b].] IOA51.9 3] Pootl 153036 6,1022 BA% ]SA% 339.5 5,162.5 SBA% 25A% 232.3 4,930.2 4$951 0,1% 1... SA 4.9301 5.0% Ion. 349.5 4.440.6 Is A." add GRR 149% "Is OA% DA% 0.0 896.0 18.6% osm 403 .1..7 066.3 0.1% Isom 0.9 %54 5836 ICC. a3.3 823.1 39 Inuingsantl7rdenng, 4.1. 3,0735 OA% Op% 0.0 33153 SBA36 I.S,o% 692 IAa7o 1.464.5 01% 1..%.' IS 140.4 5.G% 1000% 73.2 13 m.2 a0 BAn,houruInurn, 0.]4% 294.3 OA% 00% O.D 354.8 10.0% 25.0% 11.9 2513 x56.0 01% loan C3 255.8 $.D% 'Cu. 12.1 x43.0 al Manur¢ CAD. 00 0.0% 00% Do CA li,c 258% on 0.0 00 0,1% 1..m OA . OA 0.0% OA% 00 0C 42 TMlles I.C. 4308 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 3]].9 6.0'.6 254% 5.) 3R.2 3767 0.1% lolo" OA 376A $A% 1000% I &H 351.5 43 Carpet 4.99% 1.994.3 0.036 OA% 0.0 ],]1, 0.0% 0.6M 0,0 1.)60.1 IA053 0.1% 300.% 1.a 1,9..5 SA% 100.0% .2 L1 a4 Pem der Lom O,IttO nit 340% lIIOp 0.01 00% 0.0 3 2.4 10.0% 25 A% 55.3 13]3.3 11862 OS% 1..0% 1.3 1165.0 0.6.6 O.OM 0.0 :4 1185.0 ne tts aMOtler ]8.09% 11.216] 010 10,5958 305.1 10.250.] %.'a.1 l0A 10359.] C.sh..] as Gamete 0.]5% 297.6 OA36 0.0% OA 281.3 6.0% 254% 4.2 2]].1 200.2 0,1% 1000"/0 0.3 Cass om 0.0/ 0C 279.9 46 A,IM1dl[Paving I.% D.0 O.m O.C. do 010 6.%6 25.0% 0.0 Do 04 A.1% IDD.P.6 0.0 0.0 00% 0.0% OA 04 47 PipM1 Rwflng 232% 52].4 OA% 00% O.D 0]6.7 fi.0% 25.0% 13.] 863.5 8]64 of loom 0.9 .7C.0 0.%6 OA 8]25 48 Lumber IfiAe% sI7C3 O,0% 04% 0.0 6.:1 1 &0% 25.36 2]9.2 5.925.1 5555.0 '0.1% loom fiD 5,989.0 0.0% 0.6% OA 5509.0 49 C,drl,urd 1.74% 69Is DM Dn% Co s. IDo, 25.0% 9.9 648.6 656.0 0.1% 1o06b 0.7 655.4 0,0% 0.0% 00 .14 50 Bock.Salland Flees 1.5]% 638.8 OA% 04% 0.0 593.0 60% 25.p% &9 I., 593.6 0.1% 1000"/. 0.6 591.0 D.0% 0.036 OA SILO 51 flemalnder COm 1[e lnerts antl Other 5.25% .6.0 3843 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 15812 6.o% 258% 29.7 1951.5 19]38 0.1% 1000% 2.0 19]1.8 00% 0.0% 0.0 ]9]1.8 HoueMltlHwMeus W4ee 19X071 031% 0.0 11815 0.0 ]38.5 1198 - 0.1 139.] 12 31fl5 52 Paint 0.27% 1.A D. 0.0% 0.0 107.6 00% Cm Co . SN.6 1012 0.1% IOO.OM Cl . SOS .6 SA% I.P.6 1.0 100.6 53 VeM1 tle &Eq ulpment Flu ltls 0..% 0.0 0.0% 0.0% Op 0.0 OA% O.D% 0.0 OA 0.0 0.3% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 1.0% I..OM 04 0.0 54 used Oil 0..% o.o O.C. 0.036 0.0 D,0 o.o% O.%6 0.0 0.0 O.0 aa% 100036 0.0 O.p l,a% 3..0% 0.0 0.0 55 Bart<Nes 0.01% 3.9 0.o% Cm OA 3.J 0.0% I.J. 0.0 3.J 3.> 0,1% 107.0% Co 3,) SA% 56 Remainder Conn mlde NNW o.. 35.1 0.0% 0.G% 14.2 00% OA% 0o 142 147 0.1% 100.0% .1 SA% 1m0M 0.1 14.2 Special Wage 3.50% IA33.1 0.0 Lo. - 0.0 L.3.1 IA3&2 1.0 L03).1 - 9.] S.C2]A 5] N$h O.IS% 61.6 0.0% O.fP.6 0A 61.6 Do % 0.0% 0.0 61,6 6L3 0.1% 1008% 0.1 622 00% D.0% 0.0 625 5H ireatetl Metllul Waite 0.00M do 0.0% 0.D% OA 0.0 OA% 00% 00 00 0.0 OS% 1..6F OA Do SA% 1N.o36 0.0 0.0 59 all Item, 3.09% 1.230.] OM OA% OA 8569 00% 10% 0.0 856.9 BIO1 0.1% 100.0% 0.9 969.2 10% 1..0% 8.) SaoI Tires O.X %0 0.0% 0.0% OA 8.9 00% 0.% 0.0 859 8].0 0.1 %00.0% OS 86.90 %..0K 0.9 86.0 61 Remainder GOm mltt3 eclat Wa tle 0.05% 20.0 0.0% 0.036 00 18.7 0.0% o.oK 0.0 1 &] 10.9 OS% 100.61 0.0 18.9 1.0% 1..� 02 10.] Mded Pesitla 0..% 1.6 C.0 1.6 - 0.0 1.6 1.6 0.0 L6 so u, PeSldVP 0.% 1.6 Op% 0.01 OA 1.6 OA% o.. OA 1.6 1.6 00Y. OA% 0.0 1,6 00% - TOTAL 1..0% 39.931.0 0.83% 329.5 7521.6 4.55% 1.810.] 3a.00E.9 34828 D..% 30.0 30.72.9 2.7%6 1.0]65 33,]168 fD-lY Vf1R013 D� Zero Waste Program & Policy Diversion Estimates �^ 1)1120) I2 -i 3 ..... MeammTerm lmn -mssl Calculation of mans dipos) Erwna SmtleASeUmolRBae . na 015pmeEle LyMehMlS Type loops) area Olspcel Een PxWtln[letlsletlon (pinmer Or.Lllarce AryWrt Fw3 Wapi tollettlen Perunt 8 Itl a $0m IPpfeRed Per.. Pasulnny Per-1 pesul rs, Percent pcultlne Mafedal % 1'.CSpesal GpWre Olwrt<tl Ten % i capture Olw� Tom Oepwl UpMa Wwha Tom disposal Upmre ONerhd .Tons Oliposel TarmaQe pace hom5x'br Ill d Tamupe !ryryWael T <. Patt fiom Yffor Olwrtetl InnaQ< RMe /mmitpr OIwKKtl ToumaQe Art< from YRm Pwrda Tonnage Paper m.DS% 8,006.] 1,320.8 4,999.8 5 }O6A 0.0 5,106.4 0.0 51064 - 52£0 4$814 1 Llmoated COnuOated Ukboaed 7.711 2,981.3 IN 75.0% 13248 1030A 1,W01 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 1,0)0.1 O.UI OA% 0.0 1.0]0.3 00% 00% 0.0 1,0]0.1 2 Paperal 0.25% 983 OA% C.G% OA "S 79.2 0,0% 0.0% CC .79.2 C.0X OA% 0.0 79.2 00% 0,0% 00 79.2 3 Newspaper 093% 369,] 0.0% 0.%6 .1 2021 2911 0.0% O.OM 0.0 197,1 0.0% D.0% 00 $9).O 00% 0.0X 0.0 29].0 4 WhhP Ledger Paper 1.10" 437.6 0.0% C.. 0A 3453 35L2 O,P.6 OA% 0.0 U .2 0.%6 OA% 0.0 351.2 OA% III 0.0 351.2 5 O[ryer Gfflce Paper 1.33% 529.5 00% C.. 0A 4.1 435.0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 4$5.0 OL% OA %, 0.0 4]3.0 00% OA% OA 425.1 6 lassones antl Uhlagi 0.56% R2.9 0.0% 0.0% OA 1]41 IJ9.1 C. OA"M 0.0 I]9.1 0.0% OA% 00 1)9.1 OA% U. 0.0 179.1 7 1hprd Pspoan4Dlrndmles - 0.04% 163 0.0% OA% OA 12.9 13.1 0.G% O.tlM 0.0 13.1 00% Op% 00 13.3 00% 0.0% 13.3 S ',a, Ml %fllenf0u5 PDptl $,27% 907,0 0,0% O.OM OA 71).1 7293 O.W6 OA"% on 729.$ OA% Carl OA 729.2 WO% 97,0% 52510 2M.2 9 A<malntlPr tom osl[e Pa Pr 6.1296 24438 0.0% 0.015 0C 15308 I9fi2.5 O.P.6 0.036 0.0 19625 OA% OA% 0.0 1962.5 00% 00% 0A 19625 Glas Il MO ]SS Gaul 338) 0.0 3E4> 0.0 3287 - 0.0 val 30 CINrGIa5500tt1<s antl CgnW N<rs OA7% 1841 SOA% SO.O% 368 1]0.3 1127 O.P.b 0.036 0.0 ll$.) O.q6 OA% 0.0 132.7 00% 0.0% OA 3127 11 Graph Glass B�Nlea antl COntalners C.12% 47.5 308% 50.0% 9A MI 28.8 0.0% _OA% 0.0 20.8 O.OM 0A% 00 2818 0.0% O,UE 0.0 28.8 12 BroWn Gldss&ttles antl Car hats 02936 115.2 50.0% SOA% 22S .3 69.8 O.G% 0.096 0.0 69.8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 ..e 00% 0.0% 0.0 698 13 Other Glass Colored Bottles and Containers 0.03% 32.1 $O A% Sol 24 ].2 ]3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 ].3 O.tlM OA% 0.0 ].3 00% 0.0% 0.0 ].3 14 Flat Glass 0.03% 7.3 0.0% 0.016 0.0 J.3 ]A 0.0% 0.tl% 0.0 7A 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 ]A 00% 0.0% OA 7A 15 Pemainav Cam vlte Glaii 0.2)% 1088 0.0% 0.036 0.0 101.$ 1026 0.0% OA% 0.0 102.6 0.0% OA% 00 1026 00% 0.0% OA 10$.6 Metl6 0.33% L)30.1 1].] 1.3 Gal 1.3 W.1 3,38).1 0,0 L38].1 - 0.0 L38).1 I6 Tin /sl Car, 0.63% $51.2 0.0% 0.0% OA 1985 201.8 0.0% DA% 0.0 201,8 0.036 OA% 0.0 201.8 0.0% 0.0% O.0 201.8 17 MDlor Ap plianeel 0.13% 51.] 0.0% O.OM OA -0C.I -39A O.P.S 0.,Yl 0.0 -99A 1. OA% 0.0 -39A OA% 0.0% 0.0 -398 10 Used OII 111U, O.W% 0.0 b.In 0.0% 00 0.0 00% OA% 0.0 O.D I. OA% 0.0 0.0 OA% 0.0% 0.0 0.0 19 O[M1tt Fertous 1.SO% 6W.] 0.0% 0.036 4705 402,6 0.U.I OA% 0.0 483.6 0.0M 00% 0.0 48$.6 00% 0.0% 0.0 412.6 $O AIUmInum Can 0.f0X 39.7 ]SA% )3.0%' 1].] 13.7 1<.3 O.d% 0. 0.0 14.3 0.0M OA% 0.0 14,3 0A% U. 0.0 143 21 IXM1er Non- Fertous 0.15% IW.3 0.0% 0.0'.6 00 ]9.2 005 C.0% OA% OA 80.5 0.0% O.o% 0.0 80.5 OA% 00% 0.0 10.5 22 Aemalnder fnm sate Metal 1.]2% al 0.0% 0.036 OA 6382 6473 0,0% OA% 0.0 Gets 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 6473 OA% 00% O.0 6473 Glossaries 0.31% 42.2 0.01 39.E 398 0.0 S. 01 "1 - 0.0 US 23 Broom Goods 0.08% 30.0 I. CuS 00 20.0 28R 0.0% 00% 0.0 288 W. OA% 0.0 20A OA% 00% O.0 28A 24 ComputerYelat<d M'smonia O.W% 0.0 0.0% Curl 00 0.0 0.0 OA% OAX 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0A% 00 � 0,0 OA% 00X 0.0 O.D $5 Gendsmall COwmer race -la OA3% 12.1 O. P.6 OA% 0.0 SL3 SIA 0.0% OA% CI Id, O.PM OS% 0.0 ",P 00% O.Ph 0.0 S1A 25 Video 01512 OeNm O.W% 01 0.0% 0.0% 00 0.0 0.0 C.. OA% 0.0 0,0 0.0% 0.0% 04 O.O 00% 0:0% 0.0 0.0 NoddC 1031% 419).3 Wz.S 3.3]5.5 "'GIA 130.6 33018 - 2.7 3,m81 0.0 3,2983 2] PETE"malners 0.50% 197.0 710% 75,66 179 "A 7 C. OA36 0.0 71.0 0.036 OA% 0.0 JI.O . 00% 0.0% 0.D 71.0 20 HOPE Censurers 0.39% . )54.4 758% ]5.66 686 53.3 358 O.P.6 OA% 0.0 SSA OA% OA% 0.0 538 OA% 0.0% OA _$SA 29 Nsdollaneous Plastic Cannot- OR3% 1935 75.0% 758% "0 56.9 698 40.5% 504% 14.1 55 0.0% 0.0 SSA 00% 0.0% 0.0 $SA 30 PI=Irad, Bags - 1.26% 50.5.0 G. O.OM 0A 4440 4521 O.� I O.0 4527 0.0% 00% 0.0 452] OA% 0.0% 31 Plastt Grocery antl Other Merchandlse Ba05 035% 101.1 111, 0.036 OA IA 818 O.GX I. 0.0 83.8 05% sol CA 81A 00% 0.0% OA 818 3$ Nan -Bag Commensal and lntlurthal Pahaging Fllm 0.86% 3438 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 303.3 30],9 0.%6 OA% 0.0 307.9 0.0% - OA% 0.0 30).9 0.0% 0.0% OA 33111. Products O.11% 93,4 0.0% 0.66 ad, 83.7 0.65 OA% 0.0 83.7 0.0% OA% 0.0 83.7 0.0% 0.0% OA H3.> 3e IXM1er Film 1.61% 341.0 0.0% 0036 0.0 S6G9 575.4 40.5% SD.O% 1165 458.9 Os% SW O% 23 4566 OA% O.Rh 0.0 456.6 35 Oura ble Plastic Items 16/% 6610 0,0% 0.0% 00 GUS SfiJ.3 O.O% OA% 0.0 567.3 -0.0% OA% OA 56/.3 0.0% 0.0% OA 56].3 36 Pemeintler (nm 1[e Plas[IC 3.26% 1301.3 0.0% O.OM OA 1]49.3 1164] 0.0% OA% 0.0 SIfi6.J O.tlM OA% 00 1]66.] OA% 0.0% 0.0 1166.7 OIM1er Wgenle 3186% ILRD.) 2,340.9 410].0 81763 0.0 82JF3 0.0 8176.3 3AJ1> 4800.6 37 Food 15.23% 6,103.2 0.0% 0.0% OA 4,]40.6 4,8218 0.66 SM 0.0 4,821.8 010% 0.00% 0.0 4,811.8 W,0% N.0% 38]1.] 1,350.3 30 Led and Grass 2A Y.6 995.6 758% 75.66 4625 359.7 3729 C.0% O.OM 0.0 372.9 0.66 0.00% 00 3]2.9 00% 00% 0.0 37$.9 39 M Mang and Tlmmings 4.12% I'S. 758% 75.0% 7020 6082 6306 O.P6 OOM 0.0 630.6 OA% 000% 0.0 630.fi 0A% 0.66 0.0 690.6 40 Brandin and Stumps 0.74% 394.3 JSA% JSA% 1347 1043 1102 0.0% O.OM 010 1103 S. O.1 .6 0.0 110.2 00% 0.0% 0.0 130.2 41 Manures O.W% 0.0 0.0% 1. OA 00 0.0 OA% 0A% 0.0 OA '0.0% O.OPM 0.0 0.0 OA% 0.0% 0.0 00 4$ Inadds 1.06% 422.4 0.0% 0.0% 00 357.5 3fi3.2 0.0% 0.0% 010 363.2 O.OM IOC% 00 363,2 0.0% Op% O.0 363.2 43 Urye[ 4.90% 1,000,3 I'm )5.0% 963.8 749.6 ]]61 C,66 IM 0.0 ])6.1 CA% GO. 0.0 7]41 Op% 0.0% 1.0 7763 44 Aemalnder COm nslteO nlc 301% 1 214 0.0% I. OA 11&£0 120L3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 1201.3 066 0066 00 1$01.3 OA% 00% 0.0 1GUG Inert and Mar 28.03% 3L216A 0.0 1011"' 10,503.0 11 10,503.0 OA 10,503.0 010 10$03.0 of Cannete 075% 207.6 00% C.68 OA 279.9 263.9 00% 0.66 0.0 283.9 0.0% O.00% 00 E.as am 0.0% 0.0 283.9 4fi Asphalt Paulng 0.00% 0.0 0.0% O.OM OA 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.0% Cl 0.0 Om% OA66 00 0.0 OA% - 0.0% O.1 0.0 47 d,11 [a-Fre 2.31% 9Ca' 0.0% 0.01 OA 872E BB4.8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 804.8 0.6h 00. 00 Uses 0.0% 0.0% O.D sm 48 Wmber MAC% 6$]0.3 0.0% 0.0% OA 5,9898 6,076,5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 6,076.5 OL% O00% 0.0 6,0]6.5 OA% OA% 0.0 6,0785 49 Gypsum Stand 1,]4% 6946 0.0% 1.W6 0.0 655.4 664.7 O.O% 0.0'.6 0.0 664.7 0.66 of. 0.0 al 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 664.] 50 U,k, SNO and Fred 1.57% 6288 0.0% 0,66 0.0 591.0 5998 O.0% SAM 0.0 599R 0.0% OAG% 0,0 5914 OA% 00% 010 "9A 51 Aemalnder COm Klte lneRS antl are, 535% 20960 00X 0.0% 0.0 1 )1.2 1999.7 0.0% C.W6 0.0 1959.7 0.0% 0,00% 00 1999.] 0.0% 0.0X IS .7 Nause nod Wmraws Waste lX 0.31% 1213 0.0 118.5 SE 02 0.0 1203 0.0 120.2 0.0 120.E 52 Faint 037% 1044 00% I.U.6 0.0 SOD.6 1020 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 ]03.0 C.. 0.0. 0.0 1020 0A% 00% 0.0 303.0 53 VeM1 ltle &Equipment Fluids 0066 OC 00% 1 C 0A 0.0 Oas 0.0% Sued 0.0 0.0 00% O.00% 0.0 00 OA% 00% OD 0.0 54 0ma ou Cup. 00 0a% 0.66 0.0 0.0 0 1 0 1. 1.. It CC 00% Cl 00 0.0 0.O% 00% 0.0 0.0 55 BDtted6 0.01% 3.9 00% 0.66 04 3.7 3.7 00% O.OM 00 3.7 00% OAO% 00 3.] 0.0% 00% 0.0 3,] 56 Aemordtt Com oslte HMW 0.04% 151 00% 0.0% OA 14.E 14R 0.0% O.Ma O.0 14A 00% 00C% 00 14A OAX 00% 1.0 148 SpandlWe4e 3.54% Sal - OA 1818 10462 0.0 LM63 0.0 1.046.2 O.D 18462 57 0.sM1 0.15% 61.6 00% 0.66 OA 63.2 63.0 0.0% OA% 0.0 63.0 00% 006.6 00 ",0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 63.0 SB TrcMed al ltal Waste - 0.066 IC 00% 0.0% 0.0 00 0.0 00% OA% 0.0 0.0 00% 'OAP.6 O.0 0.0 OA% 0.0% 0.0 0.0 59 Bulkyltems SM 1,234.] 00% 0.0% CA 0605 676.9 OA% 0.0% 0.0 876.9 O.OK OOOM 00 W69 0.0% 00% OI e)fi.I CA Pic I. 968 OA% 0.0% 0.0 86,0 8].3 0036 0.0% 0.0 81.3 00% 0.00% 0.0 873 0.0% 00% OA HJ3 61 Aemalnder COm oslte5 etlal Was[< OAS% m.8 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 18.] 19.0 00% 0.66 0.0 190 OA% OAO% OA 39.0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 19.0 MBUedpeilaue 0.00% 16 0.0 1.6 1.6 0.0 1.6 OA 1.6 62 vead Aesltlue OAO% I.6 0.6M 1.6 1.6 OA% 0.66 00 1.6 OA% OAO% 0.0 1.6 0.0% Op% TOTAL 100.136 39,9338 IfIN 4,COL2 79.7153 30,$47 0.33% 131.6 30.136.1 0.01% 27 30,1138 11.11% 3. "6.8 26.136.6 �^ 1)1120) I2 -i 3 f>� Zero Waste Program & Poliq Diversion Estimates pGMea Proau<er ReipomNllky (HHW, peglaal Resownll-I.I.r weVdY rene<ann EVwnaloo rc1 cadlnRrcyineCart PMrrompa ,-Wor Dlmmaee R.e/a. IhnC) raper 4,SSL4 - - 8$3 4,4969 - 1,142 3351T 0.0 3XL7 9oss 1 Vnwated Corrugated Cardboard ]A]% z9u d4p4n1 Gpwne Pertmt Ton. RervHne 2A% P.r<ena TO"i Ammtne GI>dre P..uirt ]o.. Ran.1ft gp[we PerrtrR row RmDltlne rveH4Ld:l. Mrta.i.l x manage Rxe drama Df' a ol: ml P se. olr:rtae dwrtaa de Copal Rata Dlvertad I dwme Cfb ml arde, dvertea Dlven.a d%Pwal dypaal .. 3 Newspaper 0 369.] 0.0% [rdm se<ror OA Tonn.ee Cr. Ram senor 53 ronn.ge 30.0% xomxmr J4A ronn.n OA% rmm 0a<LD. 0.0 romiaea 2222 raper 4,SSL4 - - 8$3 4,4969 - 1,142 3351T 0.0 3XL7 3A& 1 Vnwated Corrugated Cardboard ]A]% 2,90L3 00% 0.0% 00 1,0)0.1 2A% 910% 193 3.0509 30.036 85,d% 2660 7029 OOM 00% 0.0 762.9 ..6 2 Paper Bass 0.25% 985 0.0% 0A% OA 7S2 24% 9JG% 1.4 7],] 30A0 85.0% 193 57.9 OA% 00% OD Vs 59.2 3 Newspaper 0 369.] 0.0% O.OM OA 29)A Cr. 91036 53 291.6 30.0% 85.0% J4A zl].3 OA% 0.0% 0.0 217.3 2222 4 Whlte Led rPDper 1,10% 43),6 00X 010% OA 351,2 20% 90.0% G3" 344.9 30A% 85.036 879 2569 001 0.0% 0.0 256.9 262, 5 Other=Paper 1133% 529.6 0.0% 0.0% 00 425.0 2.0% 90.0% ],] 417A 300% BS.(t% 106.4 330,9 OA% 0.0% 0.0 310,3 3160 6 MagaziD<S antl GAlPro 0.56% 232.9 0.0% Op% 0.0 S73.1 2.0% 90.036 3,z 1]5.9 30A% 85.0% 40.8 131.0 O.M 00% 0.0 33L0 334, Pho ne BOOY5 antl 01MY4des O.W% Ida OA% OA% 0.0 13.1 20% 90.0% 0.2 ICE 30.0% 83.G% 33 as 00% 0.0% OA 9.6 68 6 gherM i<ella..oui Paper 3.10% EO7X O.fP,6 OA% Op Old 1 90.0% 3.> $W.5 .W..0% BS.b% 511 149.4 O.OY. O.PM OA 149.4 163.5 emalnder Com slte Pa er 6.13% $ 0.0% OA% 0.0 ] %2,5 2.0% 90A% 35.3 152].2 300% 85.66 491.4 1 35.0 0.0% 0,P.6 OA 3435.8 14663 GeOr a.. .,.0 0.0 3267 $.9 3228 60.8 2660 1, 2680 170.4 10 Clear Glass Eaters and COntalners OA]% 186.1 0.036 0.0% 0.0 112.7 2.0% 900% 2.0 110.) 30,36 BS.O% 20.2 825 O.CA 0.0% 0.0 825 850 11 Green Gb55 BDttles antl tan[alneR 0.12% 475 OA% 0.0% 010 283 2.0% NA% 03 .283 30.0% BSA% ]3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 211 21.1 1$ BNVm Gla59 gottl<sand Cantalners 039% 115.2 00% 0.0% 0.0 693 2.036 m0% ]3 683 30.W6 85.0% 1].5 ..'21.3 51.1 0.036 0.0% 0.0 51, 52.6 13 qh[f GIi5i C010fetl 00ttk5 dntl GOn[vlrrtrs 0.03% 12.1 OA% 0.0% 010 73 1.0% 900% 0.1 71 30.46 BSA% 1.8 SA 0.%a 010% 010 5.4 5,5 14 Flat Glab, 0. @% 73 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 )A 2.P% 90.0% O.1 73 0.016 Op% 0.0 ]3 0.0% a" 0.0 ],3 >A 15 Remalntler COm astte Glas 0.$]% 1068 00% 0.0% 0.0 1026 2A% 910% 13 too 00% 0.%6 0.0 1003 0.tl% oA% 0.0 ]W.0 ]02.1 McM1ls 4,99% 1,]90.1 - 1.396,9 ]3.1 1.303.8 1953 I,IJB> L176.) 1,199.] 16 )In /Steel Gne 0.63% 253.2 O.OYo O.L% Op 10 L8 2A% 9.0.66 3.6 1962 300% 85.0% 503 14].6 OP6 OA% 0.0 147.6 151.0 I] Mator Ap plian<ei 0.13% 51.] 21. tuod. -as -29.6 24% 90.0% OS -29.0 0.0% 0A% OA -29.0 C.d% OA% 0.0 -29.0 QBA I6 "ad Col Flters O, OD% 010 0.0% 0.0% OA 0.0 20% 9].66 00 0.0 0.0% O.CK DA 00% 0.0 0.0 0.0 19 ONef FeROUS 1.5036 603.] 0.0% 0.0% OA 4826 2.0% 90.P,6 &] 473.9 30A% as tty.. 1206 3560 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 353.0 361.0 30 Hlu minOm Gns 0,]036 '39.] 0.0% 0.66 UA 14.3 20% %.0% 03 14.0 30A% so 36 10.4 0.0% 0.0% 0A 10, 11.0 21 gher NOn- Fertoue 0.]3% IW,3 0.0% O.OM 00 80.5 2.0% 90.0% 1.4 79.1 30A% 83.0% 203 58.9 OA% 00% 0.0 58.9 60.3 31 Pemalntler [Dm ml[p MpGl 1.R% 686.4 0.0% 0.O% 00 63).3 20% 90.,% li 035.7 OA% O.tlM OA 635.7 00% 00% 0.0 635.7 664.8 Fle<kani6 0.31% 42.2 9.9 M3 0.5 29,3 0.0 293 0.0 M.3 Oda 33 Brown GOade O.OB% 30,0 25A% 100.% ]1 21.3 2.0% 90.OM OA 10.9 00% 0.0% 00 20.9 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0 $0,9 313 24 Cam1`111,leted Elettronla O.W% 0.0 25.0% 300.66 0.0 0.0 $.0% 90.036 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 0.0 00% C.C. OA 0.0 00 25 other Small CDneum<r IlooPen16 OA3% 1z,3 2,% 100.%6 2.9 86 2.0"/. 90M 0.2 ad 0.0% 00% 0C ar 0.0% '0.0% 0A BA a s 26 "Id. Oli la Oevl<es O.N% 0.0 25,0% 300.OM 00 0.0 2A% 90.0% 0.0 0.0 00% OA% 00 0.0 00% 00% 00 Pk NO 1031% 419].5 ]38.0 3,IM,1 30.2 ads., - 62.8 attar Op .3,0]).3 3,133.0 $] PFIE COnG IneR 0.50% 39].8 0.%6. Op% O.0 010 2.66 900% 1.3 69.0 30.0% 65.OM I].8 52.0 0.0% 0.0% OA 52p 51.6 38 HOPE CDnfeiner5 039% 354.4 0.016 04% 0.0 55.4 $.0% 90.66 1,0 'A 30.0% 05.66 13.9 40.5 0.C% Op% 0.0 403 42.6 19 MI<ttllan<ou5 PIaIll Cor IneR OABX Cass 35.0% 1000% Iss 413 2.66 90A% 0.7 408 300% 95.0% IOA 301 0.0% 0.G% 0.0 30A 33A 30 PlaAlc?nih Bo, 136% 505.0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 452.7 OL% OA% 0.0 '452) 0.0% OA% 0.0 45317 '0.0% 0,0% 00 4527 459.4 31 PlaIde Grop, and Cohen Mer<Fandla< aa& 035% 3CIC OA% 0.C% 0.0 81A O.OM OA% 0.0 SaA 30%. 850% 20,8 60.6 0.0% 0.66 0,0 60.6 62.0 32 Non -Bag Commercial and lndu<erlel Notes 6Ph, 036% 3454 0.0% 0.0% OA '307.9 0.0% 0,0% 0.0 307.9 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 30],9 9,66 0.66 0.0 307.9 .3323 33 FIIm Pratlu,o 023% 93A OA% d. 0.0 03] 't M 00% 0.0 93.] 0,P,6 OA% 0.D 83.7 0.0% 0.036 00 831 BEC 31 Caher Film 1.61% 34L8 25.46 SOD.OX 1142 342,5 2.O% W.0% 63 3363 0166 00% OA sate 0,0% 0.66 0.0 3363 3f 4.8 35 Du.... Pad l[emi 1.67,6 65,8 OA% 0.0% 0.0 5673 0.0% 00% OA 567.3 O.D% 0.0% 0.0 567.3 0.66 0.0%. 0.0 36].3 576.2 as .ore rtltt Com osae Pledo 336% 1 01.3 OA% 0.0% 0.0 1 60] 20% NOY. 3L0 3 45,] 0.0% 00% 0.0 L 45.] 0.66 0.0% D.0 1145.7 1163.0 gherce ric Ed." 1280) 190.0 4,630.5 63 0 0.0 3,3]4.0 "ex. 149. .62805 3,458 37 Food IS.zB% .6,1022 0,0% C.. 00 13501 0A% 0.0% 0.0 3350.1 30.66 850x . WE 3,005.8 Cum O.OM 0.0 LW5.0 Spe).1 38 kavp6 and G251 2,49% 995.6 0.0% X00% 00 3729 - OA% 0.0% OA 3729 30.036 $5.0% 95.1 2778 O.U,6 00% 0.0 271.8 291.3 39 Prularp antl T11hr, gs 4.Z 2X L683.5 00% 0.66 O,C 630.6 0.0% Op% 0.0 630.6 30.0% 85.0% 1608 d608 C M On 0.0 469,0 492.1 40 aRnNe5 a no stunt, 004% 2543 0.0% 0.as 0A 110.2 OC% OA% 0.0 110.2 30.0% 85.0% 38.1 83.1 OA% 00% 0.0 az.] 86.0 41 Manures 0.066 CO 0.0% O.P,6 0A CO OA% O.P6 00 00 300% 850% OA 0.0 0.0% .4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 42 Testlle5 1.06% 422.4 O.OY. 0.0% OA 363.2 2A% 90.66 65 356.6 30A% 65.0% 90.9 265.7 750% 75 A% 149. 116.1 321.9 43 Grye[ 4.9%M L.s 25A% SO].P,6 190.0 583.1 0.0% 0. 582.1 301% H5,0% 148a 433.7 00% OA% 0.0 433.7 40.1 44 Remalntler tam mlte Or anlc 3.08% 1864 0.0X 0.0% 00 1201.3 00% O.W6 0C 1 01.3 30A% fl5.0% 3003 '8950 OA% 00% 0.0 895.0 91L3 Inem and other ffi09% 1L216.] 0,0 10,593,0 0.0 10,503, - OA 105W,0 3,418,0 J,9L0 7,340.3 45 Convete 0,]5% Cars O, W, 0.0% 0.0 283,9 00% 0.0% 0,0 2659 OA% O.tlM O OA% 00% 0.0 283.9 28].9 46 AsPM1ah Porin. C.. 0.0 0.036 OAbs 00 0,0 0.0% 0-0% 0.0 0.0 OA% 0.C% OA 0.0 CO. 0.0X 00 0.0 0.0 47 a as Roaf g 2.32% 92]A 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 881,8 0.0% O.M 0,0 am:$ OA% 0.0% 00 884.8 OA% 0.0X 0.0 Baa.e 89],2 40 Lumber 16A5Po 6,5]03 0.66 OA% 0.0 6,076.5 .0. '0.0% C.0 00)6.5 010% OA% OA 00)6.5 ]SA% 75.0% 3,4180 2650.5 2,]459 49 Gypsum aoard 1.)a% 0 .66 0.0% 0.0 668.7 C.O. 0.0% 0.0 664.7 00% 00% 00 664,] 0.0% 00% 0.0 661.) 6]3.9 50 Rack, 5a11and 11. 1,5)% :% : : 2 OM 0.0% 0.0 5991 0.0% 0.0% 0,0 599A OA% OA% 0C 593.4 0.0% 00% CO 599, .17 51 Pemalntler Com oot<I nerts and Other 5.25% 20 %.0 OA% OA% 0.0 1989.7 0.0% 0.0% 00 1999.] 00% OA% 00 1999.7 00% 00% 00 1999) $02].6 Household Hemrtlw3Waite(HXWi 031% 125,3 30.0 9D.1 ba 90.1 - 0.0 90.1 - - 0.0 90.1 9L7 52 Palnt 0.2]% ]CCA 25.0% 100.0% 25.5 ]6.5 0.66 0.036 0.0 765 0.0X OA% 0,0 ]65 00% 0.0% 0.0 76.5 77.9 53 Veh lde Ea Equlpmenl F11 lds O.W% 0d 25.0% 300.0% 0.0 0.0 0.0% Op% 0.0 0.0 0.0% 04% 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0.0% OA 0.0 0.0 54 .d 0i O.W% 0.0 O.d6 OA% OA 0.0 0.0% 0.4% 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0p% 0.0 0.0 0.0% 00% 0.0 00 0.0 55 Batlef <s 0.01% 3.9 25.0% 100.0% 0,9 1.8 2.0% 90.OM 0.] $.J '0.0% OA% .0 2.] 0. 0.0% OP "2.T' 23 56 Pemalntler COm wlte HHW OA1% 15.3 25.66 loom 3.6 10.8 0.036 OA% 0.0 10.8 0,016 00% 0.0 10.0 0.0% O.O% OA 10.6 SIA Sper.lwam 334% 1,19.1 r ssa 1,20.4 1).0 1,007, 0,0 2,W7A o.0 1,00).4 LOMB 57 Ath 0.15% 61.6 Opfi 00% 0.0 63p 0.66 0.0% 0.0 63.0 0.66 O0% 0,0 Ed 0.0% 0,66 00 63.0 639 58 TreeI'd Medlgl Wart< 0.00% OA 25.0% 1000% 0.0 OA 2.fP,6 Ed, 0.0 0.0 0,0% 00% 0.0 0.0 0,0% 0.66 00 00 0.0 59 Bukyltems 3A9X LOX 00% Ode, 0.0 976.9 2.0M 9DA% 153 .1.1 O.db 00% 0.0 861.3 O.PW O.tlX 00 861.1 871.6 6D ]Ines 034% E 100.035 21.8 655 2.0% %.0% 13 643 0,0% 0.0% OA Ea3 0,66 OD36 0.0 E63 65.' L+�fi� 3 S ll � 1111120;, 3 4� Zero Waste Program & Policy Diversion Estimates 14 ID-71 11112013 i'.: ,. WITeam .031 Ca1a1a6- ofT- osaasad C&OOMlnenx PMibn 6yna MandetoryCOmmettlel Retyding McMetoryO KNOn Oah T.1MWnvvdn1Dkposal WMahslalsT,,:Dd.l Peamnt AcuMng PertMt R¢uleng Parse. RasulGng Be Whin. Metaslel % 3DI1Dispual OpNty 6w� Tans Dlspml cs t ova 7m Disposal oMs. Dluertatl Tem Olipem, Tool Tans Cobpmal Tannage PMV N.md Fate MI-d Art, fromYMS Charted Tannage pwma Tannage fr,d..r Tonnage hors R<tos Tonnage Paper 30.05% 8.006] 0.0 91583 - 648.4 3¢09.- 361520 1.657.8 %.1.2 1,65)1 1 Oncoated COnugatM CafdboaM 7A7% 3,981.3 0.0% 0C% co 83Is 2511 711 1X3 650.3 951% 71.. 4762 192,1 2$01.2 192.1 2 Pape, Ngs 0.25% 38.5 01 OA% 0.0 59.2 25.66 75.0% 1111 46.1 95,01 751 343 13,0 8 &4 13.8 3 Newspaper 0.93% 369,] cov 0.0% co 233.2 251% ]5.0% 41.1 180.5 95,01 ]SA% 12 &6 51.9 3316 51,90 4 Wh11a Ledge, Pape, 1.11 .1.1 OA% OA% no 2627 35.0% 76tl% 49.3 213.5 950% 751 152,1 611 3926 611 5 IXM1e, O%Itt Paptt 1.33% 529.6 OA% 0.0% co 31co 2566 75.01 59.6 7781 95.0% 71.= 184.1 741 4]5.0 ]4.3 6 Ma- sln,sand saalogs 0.56% 233.9 OA% Op% 0.0 SX.o 25.66 III III 100.9 950% III lc 31,3 1909 31.3 ] Iran, Us. and DI-1. O.M% 16.3 0.%6 0.0% oc 9.0 ]5.0% ]5.0% 1.8 950% ]5.0% 11 23 Id,] 3.3 0 Cme,Mlsselaneous., 2.27% 91].6 06.6 O.M 0.0 161.5 ..o% ]S.�M 303 1X.1 950% III 933 3).] 9 A,malntle, Cam w.Ite Pa e, 6.13% 34460 OI 0.0% 00 1 66.3 25.0% 751 2163 1193.0 00% 066 OA 11960 1X361 1193.0 Glm 1.19% 417.0 0.0 3)0.4 309 243.5 964 1663 Us., 148.1 SO Clear Glass bot[I<i and od.c:ers OR]% 106.1 O.P.6 o. 0.0 85.0 25.0% ]SA% 159 690 951% Is.. 493 100 1]33 190 11 Green Glass OOttlesand COntalne¢ 0.32% 4].5 O.o% 0.66 00 21.] 25.0X ]5.66 41 1].6 951% ]5.0% 12.5 s.l 443 i1 13 I-n Glass 0ot0¢ and COntaInPR 0.29% 1352 II O.V/ 00 53.6 25.0% 75.1 9.9 d3.] 951% Is. I. 301 133 30].2 123 13 Gthdr Glass COlaled Uda, nd COnhln<R O.o3% 321 0.0% 0.036 00 5.5 25,0% ]S.W6 SA 4.5 95.0% ]s.0% 33 13 113 1.3 34 Flat Glass O.o3% 7.3 0.0% 0.01 OA ]A OA% 0.0% 00 >A OA% 0.0% 0.0 ]A 0.3 7.4 SS A<malntltt Com o4lte Glass 0.2]% 1M 0.0% CLX OA 1022 0A% O.PM OA 102,2. 01% OA% 0.0 1022 IDJ 1022 Mewls 433% 36)30.1 36199.] 109A 1,-90.3 - 33T.6 )52) sld 1. T52) I6 iln/Sttel Cana 0.63% 251.2 OM O.o% 00 151.0 251% )5.036 28.3 s..7 IS M ]5.0% -]A .35.3 225.3 353 37 Malo,Appllan¢5 O..% 51.] 001 0.%a DA -2&4 o1 0.0% OA -304 0.0% OA% o.o -.A 02.0 -28A 30 DsM DII FIIte¢ O.o. 00 0.0% 0.0% - DA 0.0 0.0% 00% OA 0.0 0.0% 0.0% o.0 'O.0 010 OA 19 0dh,r Po,mus 1.50% 600,] 00% OA% OA 361,0 SSA% 750% 6].) 3963 95.0% 75.0% 2091 80.3 538.0 863 20 Aluminum Cans 0.103: 33] 00% 0.0% CA ]S.0 25M )5.01 2.1 8.9 95.66 754% 6.3 2.6 3 &7 2.6 21 IXM1,r N.n.1 -S 035% 1o1,3 0.0% OA% 0.0 W3 251% no. 11.3 49.0 95.0% ]5A% 349 14.1 89.9 16.1 23 R,.A,dP,COm oslte Mstal 1.]E% 6064 00% O.O% CA 644,0 O.V2 OA% 646.0 0.4% O.o% co W.0 6)3 6MI addhonl¢ 0.11% 623 OA ]99 - 0.0 m9 0.o 39.9 13.9 M.9 $3 B,ovm Gaods 000% 301 oI 0.0% 0.0 213 c. OA% 0.0 233 C.DM 0.0% 'C.0 21,3 9.9 21.3 24 CompV4PRated ElM,Onl¢ 000% OA OA% 0.0% 0.0 01 o.OM OM 0.0 OA O.O% A.0% o.0 0.0 0.0 O.o 25 Mhdr Small COnsumn EleRnnl¢ Oco% 121 OA% O1 0.0 0.6 cons OA% 0.0 0.6 .0 .096 0.0% 0.0 8.6 40 8,6 26 Yidd. Dls la DM,ei 006.6 OA 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 OA o.OM OA% 0.0 0.0 11 00% co o.0 00 I. pled¢ 103]% 0.19)5 OA 3.1360 ]323 60301 377.2 Sb366 LT30.3 26366 27 PETE fcntalners OS O% 19].8 0.66 Op% I. X.6 25.0% ]5A% 10.2 44.3 95.0% ]5.036 31.fi 1$.8 192s 12.8 28 RDPE Contalnen 099 Ye 1X1 om OA% 0.0 42.6 25,66 ]5A% 0.0 34.6 95,66 ]7136 Z. 14,] 9,9 1502 9.9 29 .'s.1 -11 rh1hC COntalneR OA:% 3935 OA1 OA% 0.0 33.0 251% ]5.0"% 63 268 9II 19.1 1.7 1910 7.7 30 PIa500T¢iM1 Id, 126% 507.0 0136 OA% 0.0 .1..4 2566 ]5A% 86.1 373.3 951% 71:M 2660 107.3 4165 107.3 31 Masts Gfo,ery and gFer Mendhadd lae BRCS 0125% 101.1 o.6M OA% 0.0 12.0 35.66 ]5.036 11.6 s0A 950% ]5.%6 311 14.5 90A 14.5 32 Nch-US CammeraM and lndu3aal Nckaging Inn IIMA 343A CA% OA% 00 3111 Oo% OI C.0 312.5 0A% 'DA% OA 3125 43.6 313.5 33 Ift Pmdusfs 0.23% 93A co% OA% O.c 05.0 00% 0.01 OA no 00% OA% OA 054 11.9 85.0 34 IXM1tt Fllm 1 1.61% 6418 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 314.8 O,M% OA36 D.0 X48 OA% 0.0% OA 349.8 320.9 X4.0 35 Ounble Plastl, Items 1.67% 665.8 0.6h DA% 00 5]6.1 0.0% 0.016 co 576.2 0.0% 0.0% OA 5763 114,5 516.2 36 Pemainde,C,,d mite PladdA 316% 1301.3 0.. oA% 0.0 1163.0 0.0% 06.6 0.0 1163.0 0.0% 0.0% OA 1 63.0 1060 1163.0 MarQpnle 33Aw Io,.7 0.0 3.449.- 0.0 9169.8 1,a.7 L6413 115533 L641.2 37 FBOd 15.1. 61022 Oo% 0.0% co S,o07.] 00% 0,66 OA i's. 954% ]S.tlM ]]45 3125 61017.1 3123 38 Leav6and GRss 219% 995.6 O. o% 0.4% 0.0 291.1 OA% 0.66 00 391.1 95.0% ]5.0% 20].4 83.] 949.0 83.] 39 m,"ngi and hlmrdal 4.22% 1,683.5 O.o% 0.66 0.0 4922 OA% 0.66 OA 4913 93.0% ]5,%6 350] 141.5 I,W43 141.5 40 BRnGl6 and Stumps 0,14% 2X.3 OA% O.O% 0.0 85.0 OA% 066 OA 060 95.01 ]SA% 61.3 243 no, 14.] 41 Manures O.W% 0.0 00% O.M6 00 0.0 OA% "OA 00 951% 711 0.0 DA 0.0 OA 43 Tex[Iles 1.06% 422.4 0.0% 0.0% OA 121.9 OA% 0.0% OA 133.9 951 ]SA% 86.8 UP 403.1 35.0 43 CaR<t 499% 1994.3 04% OA% oA 4603 0.0% OA% 0.0 403 951% ]SA% 32].9 132.3 1,936.3 1323 44 Remainder ComooaheD 3403% 1 20.4 00% Oo% 0.0 911.3 O.tlh 0.0% 913.3 O.OM 0.0% 911.3 362.0 911.3 M ,¢mtl Other 18.03% .136216.) SA60.6 1,31.7 O.o 117&7 - 0.0 Ins-.] ...303591 19)5.7 45 C.-at 0.75% 291.6 901% 900% 1337 X.] O.OM OA% 0.0 56.] 0.0% 040% 01 X.] 251.0 54.7 46 AapM1<[Paving OAO% OA 901% W.0% OA 'OA 0.036 0.0% 0.0 00 0.0% 00% 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA AipM1alt ROaFlng 232% 937,4 :'I W1 R6.) 1]05 OA% OA% 0.0 1]05 OA% 00% 0.0 110 310.5 40 Lumber 11.4. 63]03 90.77% 9],O% 2-4.2 321] 0.66 OA% 0.0 521] 0.0% OA% 0.0 521.] 6393.3. 531.7 09 Gy dudlo,rl 1.74% 696.6 90.0% WAX 50.5.9 1300 0.66 Op% O.c 120.0 0M OA% 0.0 1281 590.6 130.0 50 AoC S011end FlnC 137% 630.0 W,G% 90.0% 4323 115.5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 1155 0.0% 0.66 00 Ins .5360 115.5 It flemalnde,COm ,I. ntat.,d Mar 5.25.0 2096.0 9J.0% 90.0% 1642.4 305.2 0.6.6 o.66 co 38513 0.0% "OA% 00 305.2 I]0 &8 385.2 HeuseM1ald.., vhm. (Hh ) 031% IA3 0.0 91) 0.0 9367 - OA 9361 383 91.7 s2 Paint 0.37% 1%A O.O% cm 0,0 ]].9 O,0% cm 0.0 T].9 OA% 0.4% OA 77,9 331 77.9 s3 VeM11de &EPUlpment Fluids 0.%% 0.0 0.. OA% 0.0 0.0 0.0% o4% OA co 0A% 0.0% OA 0.0 OA o.0 I 4 us,d oil o.%% co 0.01 oI 0.0 0.0 0.0% 0136 0,0 co oI 0.G% 00 0.0 04 0.0 55.Uatt nes 0.01% 3.9 0.0% 0.036 0,0 2.8 00% O.U.6 040 2.8 1.o% 0.0% OA 2.0 1.2 2.8 56 Bemalnde,COm oslte HHW 014% Is,l 0,0% 0.036 0.0 Sl.o 00% O.W6 0.0 11.0 003b 0.6b 0.0 110 4.6 11.0 $peeiel Wastt 33M1% SA13.1 0.0 1.026E - - 0.0 10263 - OA 11161 439.6 1026.3 57 Ash 0.15% 01.6 0.0% 0.1 00 63.9 00% C.OX 0.0 63.9 OA% 0.0% Op 63.9 0.3 639 58 Trcakd MAdjo,1 Wass, 0,%% co CA% 0.0% OC 0.0 OA% 0,6.6 Oo 0.0 DA% OC% 0.0 oA co 040 59 fiur"I'ms 3AYfi 1334] 0.0% O1% OA 3]),6 coo, O.o% 00 8]],6 0.0% 0.01 0.0 8]].6 403.2 8776 W Irp 0,24% 960 0.0% 0.66 00 GS6 0A% 10% OA '65.6 OA% O.W6 0.0 65.6 34.0 65fi 61 R -Andel COmooslte 5 eelal Wash 005% 201 0.01 0.66 OA 19.2 0.0% 00% OA ]93 Op% O.fP.b o.0 193 2A 193 Wued Pesidue O.W% 1.6 OA 1.) OA 1.] O.o 1.7 62 MMM flPSldue 000% 1.6 0.0% 0.6'e o.0 1.] Op% OA% 0.0 3.7 o.tl5 OA% 0.0 TOTAL 100%6 39,931.0 ]6.69% Sd60.6 ]0.0403 338% 910.8 33.1b.5 914% 3.7)0.9 9358.6 3E.OW3 9.35&6 14 ID-71 11112013 0� Y 1.1 Zero Waste Program & Poliq Diversion Estimates orwoleradmmmy Pawl s -1° TenclxWdiiMm&00powl Mealumi CYmIWOmfTans Olzposetl ppltlul Prowaing Intlutling Prcaeu Rnitluals AI ByMmfalr T9xe 12oiv) bMTerm MnQ Term Proceed, x0ula[poni opture pertent Olwrled Tom Peorm, Obpowl T.ITOnz Rmulane tom al MNeAI z Toenen Rite Sve ieMr Olwrtea Tannage momma Tonnage Papr x0.05% B.GOi) IA 1918 WO 78].5 N17 )ed.S 1 Uncoated Committed cardboard ]A]% 2,981.3 700% 75.0% SW.9 913 31"1 91.3 2 Paper Bap, 0.25% 90.5 14, 7510% ]3 Is 93.6 6.6 3 Newspaper 0.91% 369.] ]OA% 75.0% 27S 2a1 350.0 24.1 a Wndam"cxer Pap¢ 1.10% 43].6 70N 75A% 3112 293 424.7 29.2 5 ot,MCa der Paper 133% 529.6 70A% 75A% 39.0 35.3 5140 MA 6 Mdaddr.z and Cal.1 5 056% 232.9 WIN ]SA% IGA 14.9 2164 1419 ] Phone III and Daedc.l¢ O.M% 16.3 700% 75.0% 1.2 1.1 15.9 1.1 B OIM1er Mlwellaneous Paper x127% 93].8 >OA% ]5.036 19A 17.9 923.7 17.9 9 Remalntler COm wlte Re per 6.12% 340.3.0 70A% 75L% 963 366.7 1967.4 5667 1.19% 477.o 50.2 153 nA m.a 42x4 Ja.a Olezz 10 Ckar Ips ecattoemdCOntalnez a,% 1861 ]0:0% ]5A% IOA 9A ISIS 9A 11.-1 Glas50ence and onRlnere '.0.11% 371 ]0A% 753% 3.7 24 46P 24 12 Brown Glau Bottles antl ConGlneR OAN 1152 70.0% 75.0% 6.5 5% 113.7 $8 13 other GlM% Colored sman and CDnWlm. OA3% 12.1 70.%6 75.0% 0.] 0.6 12.0 016 14 Fiat Glass DAri 7.3 70.0% 75.436 as IS 40 35 IS Remaintler Corn cute Glazs 0127% idea 700% JS.dl6 53.] 48.6 ..a 403 ..B 693% 1730.1 0.0 SIBA 357.1 ex") 357.5 36 TT /StM no 111 2512 ]0.0% 75.0% AS I. 243.0 360 ]] Maior Rppllanws OA3% 51.7 71t.ont 71N .14S -13.5 W1 135 da uscd 00 Flhe¢ A. OA ]O.tl% 75.0% 0.0 04 0.0 OA 19 oherF¢rous SA .6 600.] 703% 71.md 643 40.1 58.40 'Al 20 pluminum om 0.10% 39.7 ]OA% >SA% 1.3 1.2 403 IS 21 ohtt Non- Fertouz O.JS% 107.3 7110% 73.0% ].0 6.] W.3 6.7 i2 0.emalntltt Com oslte Metal S.R% 6964 70 A% )5.0% 3385 3063 405.] 309.3 0.11% 4x3 0.0 - IS, I0.A 39.5 14A SkNanlce 23 Brawntt -de OOB16 303 ]0.0% 75.0% 11.2 10.1 21.1 10.1 2a CompuM,Ml ed EleNOnl¢ 0.00% OA 70.0% ]S O% 0.0 OA OA OA 35 Cohen Small Consumer Maremnla OA3% 12.1 ]0A% ]5.0% 4.5 4.1 &3 4.1 26 Video 01516 0eI OA O% 0.0 ]0.0% ]5.0M 0.0 0.0 on 010 Plaatl¢ ]O S1% 4,19).5 - - 1.4027 1.x510 SAW 1EL0 17 PEIECOntalne¢ 0.50% 197.8 70A% 75.0% 6.] 6.1 193.1 641 28 HOPSCOnionere 033% 1544 70.0% 753% 53 4.7 195.4 4.7 29 MkcPllaneous Platte derm hers Be. 193.5 70.0% ]SA% 4.0 3.J 197.0 3.7 30 Planl:Tram Bag 1Am 505.0 70N 75.0% 56.3 .51.0 4]28 51.0 31 Ptnlc Gmmy4nd01her.- mmdlse9ais 035% 101.1 ]OA% ]S A% >.6 6.9 90.0 6.9 32 Nan- MgCammctlal antl lM1 tlusMe Pa haging FlT 0.%% 3a3A ]00% ]5.L% S6A0 S. .20].8 1464 33 FIIm PmduRS O.tN 933 ]0A% 75.0% 44.6 404 56.5 403 30 other Fllm 1.61% .1.8 7).0% 740% 161.0 163.8 .502.0 163.8 35 Durable Plat'd Items 1.6]% .,I ]O.OM ]SA% 302.5 173.] 417.0 1]4] 36 Ramelder COm aslte Plaotic 356% 1 01.3 70.0M ]SA% 610.6 532A ]9).4 SS2R 31.06% M7.1 0.0 - 661.6 P9.6 121615.1 dn"S camoiddai 37 Is N' S=.2 ]00% ]3.P.6 1641 N65 6161. acts' tot 30 Leaves and G2 do 239% SISS 700% 75.m6 43.9 39A 993.9 39.8 39 Pn ning antl Ttmminbo 4.0.% "Islas ]0.tl% 750% 74.3 672 S,Wso W.1 40 Bw ncM1eoan d Stumps 0.74% 2963 70.0% 750% 13.0 11.] 291.5 31.7 41 MaMtts 000% OA 703% 75.0% 0.0 OA 0.0 OA 42 Twilled IA6% 4324 ]O .P.6 ]5.0% SBA 111 4215 16.6 43 Dryer .6.99% 1994.3 WN 75.0% 6915 62.8 x,oAA 62b 44 pemaind'a Camwlte Creme 3.00% 1ll0A 70.0% ]3AM 4785 43x.9 041.3 432.9 Inemend III 7%0336 11n6.> - - J22x 653.0 10.9812 Rea a5 Concrte 0.75% 2 7A ]0.0% 753% 28.] 263 2..l 16.0 46 Asphah paving Dam OA ]O.OM )SA% 0.0 0.0 0.0 04 47 PspM1altRroFlng 132% 937.6 ]OA% ]S A% 69.5 81.0 883.0 B3A 48 Lumber 36.45% - 6,5]03 ]ONo ]5.036 273.9 247.8 616].3 29.8 49 Crypaum30ard 1.]4% 6 %.6 ]0.0% ]S.tlM 6)2 WA 6613 603 50 `ddU"ll antl Flnei 1.57% 6l&0 703% 753% W.6 513 557A 54.8 51 Remalndm COm odtelnMSana oM1er 5025% 20960 70.0% 7540% 103A 10340 1991.1 183.0 0.31% 1x59 - 40.2 43.6 %.a 43.6 Ib h.ld He"Iduo v...(Hrun 52 Pdnt 03]% 1064 70N 75.0% 40.9 3].0 71A 3)A 53. IdeBEqulpment Pluldz OAO% 0.D .70.0% ]5.0% 0.0 OA 0.0 OA Sa voted o0 o.DA% 0.0 mot% 75.0% 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 55 Bartels O.OI% 3.9 JO A% ],am 35 A3 x.J IS 56 Remalndel Cem eslMHHW C.M% 153 703% ]SOY, 5.8 52 103 5.2 850% 1.433.1 - - 5388 4Wa 978.3 407.4 $pedal Warta 51 adh 0.15% 63.6 ]0A% ]SA% 33.5 30.3 SAS 303 58 Twated Medical Wane 030% 0.0 70.0% ]5.0% 0.0 0.0 00 OA 59 Bulky Items 3.03% 1,234.7 70.0% ]5A% 4917 416.8 863.9 416.8 W TOn 0.$O% 96.0 ]0A% 75.0% 34.4 311 IsA 31.1 61 0.emalntltt Com KIt'S eclal WaM 005% 20.8 703% 750% 10.1 9.1 12.5 91 odd% 1.6 09 0.8 0.9 0.8 MSea Raddue 62 Mhetl Pesld ue DOOM I.6 ]0.0% 75.0% 019 0% 0.9 0A TOTAL 100.%6 39$31.0 113%1 [913.3 4845.3 %.9735 4,445.3 orwoleradmmmy Pawl s -1° Medium Mealumi seadd al ShM Tarm AI I- bMTerm MnQ Term Proceed, Tram i,4n.] AMl 601.5 11.,s S.WO.a gro.a 531.3 1,451.3 19.3 268.0 6304 100.9 17.6 4.2 IA 1918 45A 7.3 .A 15.7 5.3 74A 1703 272 7.A 10.5 63 W.9 2016 323 MA .1 ).] 1064 $43.1 393 391 9.5 32 44A 102.] Is, IS 0.] 0.2 33 7.3 1.2 161.0 383 520.7 51.1 123.] 19.8 3.6 353 491.4 2]5.3 626.3 6.1 5.9 XB 3263 T).8116 3.0 202 65.1 NA 13 03 12 16.6 2.] 7.6 13 175 40.3 6.5 2.9 0.1 3% 4A OP 0.0 0.1 OA 00 T41ldlaI 0.1 10 0.0 0A 537 50.2 153 195.1 44].0 395.2 30.] 3.6 50:5 315.7 i&5 -2.2 -104 0.0 0.0 -14.9 0.0 OA 00 00 OA 255 6.1 120.8 3)6.] 41.3 39.3 0.3 3.6 80. 13 SA 20.2 463 7A 0.6 11.7 0.0 0.0 3385 OA 303 0.0 0.0 15.7 0.3 75 0.0 0.0 113 CO OA 0" 00 0.0 0.1 3.0 0.0 OA 4.5 r.A43 00 000 0.0 OA 0.0 don. SaaA as 499.4 L .7 96.3 13 1].8 41.8 61 75.1 S4 3. 32.6 52 94.$ 28.] 104 25.3 4.0 23.9 0.0 0.0 352.1 563 4.3 OA 20.0 475 ].6 2. 163 0.0 0.0 CA a..0 715 40. 0.0 OA 0.0 44.6 .513 300. 239.1 OA 0.0 101.0 W.5 30.0 0.0 00 0.0 3025 SK.1 61.] 21.0 0A an 610.6 1905.5 2.843.6 3.6123 1}13.5 1.606.7 NL6 1,172.1 .2545 3,471.7 %4.3 ]]4.5 164.1 139.9 506.6 air 95.1 207.4 43.9 2365 856.6 00 160.8 350.) 743 41.3 149.7 OA 2 &1 61.3 13.0 00 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 503 19.2 615 .4 86a 10A 21012 1,0557 - 194.0 148A 321.9 69.5 55.3 12 OA 3%.3 OA 678.5 .966.4 IS. 0. 0 3 .4180 4860.6 1222 235 0.3 00 OA 2332 23+7 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 63.9 0.9 0.0 OA ]2 6] 09.5 MIJ 610 OA 44180 2224.2 2]3.9 40.0 01 0.0 0.0 545.9 67.2 43.9 0.6 0.0 : 0.0 592.3 W.6 144.5 2.0 OA 0.0 16a3R 2023 619 1.3 dea 0.0 0.0 483 51 1.] ISA OA 0.0 PID DA OA 0n 0A OA 0.0 0.0 oz o.o o.o o.0 0.0 0.2 oA 3.0 o.a o.0 IS 0.6 02 3.6 0.0 0.0 50 390.0 30.6 AA OA 0.0 SAB 00 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 335 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA 3T/.e IS 158 0.0 OA 4.7 SOD lA ll.0 OA 0.0 B4A 00 0.0 304 O.0 0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA 00 0.0 Its 09 55181 5.I1L5 0.S 6301.5 10546.4 ovIS -a ` 15 1/N12013 Zera Waste Program & Policy Diversion Estimates Self -Hau[ Sedor L. 1 L ` Zrz3rz0n snpn�mmwlnm T.rm lzol3�rozpl une nrm lxhzero3hl TT.I EI mwnbn 6' 41[ulNmol ivm Oh{eua 6y Mauaeh phpvu l0.nx' SeII�MUI W+ati O[Ipn RppeRbV 6p OSelmnn Reehlen :: Uhpeul ryP.lx6vy vIDu r I...... P.rem P.xnxlne I ross R-Id ...MnI m.n[w x o6Ptw1 1 ShPtan. irlies plwrma 0vm Tenx eP••• open plwrma 0vhe T.n. pepn.l .Pnl.me pm. Ulmvnl T. OhWnl T..d.n o6W.1! Tepn. III 1de 6.Me Olwma 1-Ise b.. s.M= IF�R.a Ten4.e• ohWUl y }epry •, hem z.Rma pMma mnp.e. 1 a Topp.ee I... 3.IDx )e5 1. 193.1 1.., 6WA 01 1 ..x 66].3 L vnmmea COSmeaea Epraev.N L6vx zsx zs46 >s.A: ]s.o% 432 1.t I O% d 3431 316.1 3 Popes Bay- 30% 45D 3 Nevrspnves 0.11% 11 1)2 00X 00% 0.0 1I3 D.0% 0.0% D.D 3]3 1]6 00% 0% 00 Its 0.0 17.6 4 White Ledge' depvs 0.33% 34 "..1 the 00% 0.0 36.1 0.0% OA% 0.0 36.3 3).D 00% 1 00 3]0 0.0 3]A 5 Os er ONlce Paper 6 MQ.. and""') 0.31% Is 1).) OMe 0.095 00 SI,] I . 0.0% 0.0 3I.] ]0.1 04% OY. 00 Is ,I 0.0 30.t phone ad.. and 0lnnv rin I I. Xer Mlv..III, us pe"r .99% 130 350.3 003: Ofi% .1303 0.0% 00% I . 1303 1503 Ofi% 0% 134 3 1343 9 0 mvintler /Cpm pede PO er LSO% 15D 256.0 Ode 330,4 230A 136.5 00% 2565 3365 44x1 vac% X) 56) I,., I I %i SO Clear Glas OOala vna COmaln=n 300% LI I I %: 11 Green Glms B.Flo end C4nVlnen 001% 11 .1 'I.1 SO M'v 0.3 OP O.. ONS 0.0 OB 00 p.M: 0% p.0 OB 03 e ]20 e., it... OVFles and [o n[aln =rs O.OE% 3 33 50.0% SO Md 0,0 Is OA% 0%3 0.0 L3 E.6 Op% 0% E,6 18 13 MXr G1455 Colored 0otlles ona GOne4lnen 0.05% 0 ].9 50.0% 500% 20 6.0 0.0% 00% 0.0 60 6.1 00% 0% 00 63 30 63 m fill Glass 0.33% 35 34.9 0.0% 00% 00 N9 0.0% OOf6 OD 3P9 35.9 0%6 0% 00 I, 00 35.9 15 P.- Iller /EVm exhe Glmx 0d6Ye 30 t00 00 %' 0b% O.v 1p,0 LI 0pf6 ItI 103 Ode OY. .1 l M .M14 0]5 v58 d50 d58 695.9 6919 0.6 6929 I6 TINSSee'Cam 0.03% 0.0% O.M. 00 O.A6 00% 0A 1.. 0% 0.0 59 00 39 13 M.or Ppplly n[n d0% 0.0 00% 00% 0,0 p.0 0.0% 00% O.p% Is wed DP Xrcm 0.00% OP.: 00 0.0% 0%5 00 0P.4 0% 00 O.o 00 00 19 pthe. Wrrous E55% 393 3936 00% p.0% DO 39E.6 OA% OD% 0.0 3936 403.0 OM I. L 9p05 1p05 ZO Pluminum G11 ]5.0% )S M. 0.5 00% p.%: 0.0% ONe 00 O6 31 Other NVm9envus 013% 11 161 0.0% 0.0% 00 16] Od: 00% 00 16] 1].1 00% 0% 00 1)3 00 1].3 32 Pemvintles /CVm osl[e Mehl L. 259 359.4 0.0% 00% 00 359A 00X 0.0X Oo 3504 1fi6.3 0.0% 0% 00 3fi63 0.0 366.3 EYNenln 0.41 5v 49.6 *4 0 ,I th. -GI., O A 0%: OX 00 00 00 00 N [em pose. -relatM Eltttsenln 0.33".F 50 496 1 00% 496 11 1. a00 30I 00% 900 35 MX=r5m411 Consumer Elettsonlo Oo0% 0 00 0.0% 00% 00 0.0 ooM 00% Oo D,. 0% OA tl 0% OO 00 p4ativ s.66% 6>I 6RA 69 66x.1 0.0 665.1 U6.3 v.0 9 68.3 6.9 9 eh3 Z] 1.e"Ittehen 6 63 ]30% 75.0% 35 3.] 003: 00% 00 3.) 29 00% 0% 00 39 35 3.9 30 HOpE fomalners 003% 4 39 ]5M ]5.0% 13 1.] se6 O.M. 00 1] SA 00% 0% 0.0 L9 z3 1.0 19 MIS[elb nevu pbil l[ Centvinen 003% E 1,0 ]5.0% 71.1% 11 0.9 0.0% 1. 0.0 11 0,9 00% L1 30 Plvstk Texh I... 1.1 39 39.1 0.0% OAYn 33.1 O.e: O.M. QII 01 0% 40.1 00 40 1 ry.te.IIIIMe.hanalsePoy lade 11 38 09% O% Id 3.0 00 38 3S Non fvm I. l vntl lntlustsla l Pa[9a61 ng I 1, 34 33.0 00% 0.0% 0.0 338 0.0% OU6 00 330 34.1 0.0% MS 11 343 33 FIIm Pmtlu[6 1.19% 103 ]83.1 0.0% 0.0% 103.1 00% 103.1 dis 131.1 131.1 Oeher Fllm 0.13% 306 00 Z0.6 0.0% 0.0 ZO6 111 00 OD 35 LI-11, leedc Items 1,16% 333 3334 OP% 00% 00 333.4 0.0% 0M 00 3334 3433 0.0% 0% Id 1413 d alntler tom Ito Plmtl= I.EM. 146.3 .1 0.11 246.3 ]32) 0.0% 0% 08 E51.7 00 15E7 '" 1v.]2x x,553 1356.6 ]36,3 723 Z'd' 3] Fovtl pie: ]8 009: 00% 00 ]]6 50.0% 100% 0.0% 0% Grvvs 0.0% 313 101> 323 39 pevntl unlnR 4ntl)rlmmin6s 3W% 330 330.3 ]5.0% ]30% 1903 140.1 100% N.1 0.0% 40 Bran['I, vntl a der," IV E39 ]S,V% ]5.0% ] @.e 1263 Sod% 100% 6aD 60.0 0.0 ]O8 R5.6 ]00 4 o.M: s0.o% IBax 00 00% o-% D.0 00 0.0 42 TMllesn 0741 113 1196 Otl% OD% 00 1146 50.0% 100% 57.3 5].3 60A 5].3 604 IIs Urpe[ 3,59% 551 9351 ]30% ]5.0% 3M8 Z]5.1 50.0% 100% 130.5 1105 1353 60% 3353 X37.5 135.3 44 Pemalntlet /Cam dShd 01 4n lc 0A9% ]5 00% 00% 00 SO.OYe 100L 3].5 3]5 395 0.0% 39.5 tl peM. nCO 6299% 9.693 96920 9.64.0 9101.1 930].1 9E318 at]1.6 9694 445 261% .ed 00% 00 4021 »d% 100% 90.0% 46 AiphakPrvin9 $, 19% 33) 33].0 Oq: 0.0% D. 33].0 Sod% 100% ]605 366.5 114 900% 90% 343.] 33] 312z 337 1e 11 PV rin0 4011 900% 90% 389] 924 465 914 48 LLI 1.)3% 3.96, 'AL6 00% OOY. 0.0 3.961.6 ]00% 1A80.B 1,9808 ZestI 90.0% 90% ;609.9 3964 36]0.] 396A 49 Gypsum BVaN 9,04% 50.0% 3)4.0 330.] 90.0% 90% E6].9 fiz.0 5019 628 50 Polk S011 ona= 1161% W. ;)063 IM6 00% 0.0 � 1]06.3 50.0% 100% 0941 094.4 941.] 90.0% 90% ]6EA I)8.9 1,656.9 51 Pamalntle. Ca mvvilre lneln dna 0[he. N,3% 1661 1.14 001 Od% 0.0 661.4 50.0% 01).5 910 7067 i663 1539A 1661 h17 Im.e.tl XxuNel¢W.e.1te ✓1 p d 0.11% t].5 I).5 53 le Om% 39' ObR 3.9 v =nml =a 3pelpm=m 6mlex B.pl% 1 14 om6 D.a% B.Bx s,4 - L. MS Bo 14 D.0 14 s4 Le. GU 00% pM6 pd% 0.0% 0.0% D.0 oG Bo% o% 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 35 shI 0.01% 2.3 0%6 z.3 0.0% 0.0% 0.0 zi 34 BPA 0% Bo 2A OB 24 vintler /G mverke XXW 9.9 g. 99 .2 00% 0% 00 102 00 IO2 speel.I W.N ]v.9>% Led L669.i 0.0 L699.x L6e9.x 1)942 1)343 1.734.3 57 deh I.,L 0 00 Op% 00% 0.0 0.0% sa u.m.e M.a¢alwyta .DD% 0 D.D% D.% o.D% D.o% D.o Bo o.I Box a: oo 00 00 0.0 39 Sultyltems N.93% 1639 ;67.3 Ld9.3 0.0% 16692 1]343 0036 0% 0,0 1.)34.3 Oo l.]34.E fio ilrr Dam: o o.o ow. oa: Bo ooa B.ow oox D.D aenr�m anra III o0 00 wow knlaa. 9.Dxx 3 x.6 p.0 a zc v z> zn 62 Mlvm enlape OozYe 3 zfi 00% Bo% 00 26 B.BYr 0.0% 0.0 a6 x.> 0O6 M. 21 OO x.> heTILL x99.91 u3 ».e ss,m46 5781 -75 SP262ol II III s9wo L. 1 L ` Zrz3rz0n e, city of Santa monica (ri zero waste strategic op rations plan Appendix E WARM Assumptions and Results appendix e fM E1 a city of Santa Monica zero waste strategic operations plan appendix e The following table provides a summary of how materials from the waste characterizations were classified in WARM. WARM Material Equivalent Waste Characterization Material Glass Clear Glass Bottles and Container; Green Glass Bottles and Containers; Brown Glass Bottles and Containers; Other Glass Colored Bottles and Containers; Flat Glass; Remainder /Composite Glass Office Paper White Ledger Paper; Other Office Paper Grass - Half of all tons from the Leaves and Grass material type . Leaves Half of all tons from the Leaves and Grass material type Mixed Paper Paper Bags; Other Miscellaneous Paper; Remainder /Composite Paper Mixed Plastic Miscellaneous Plastic Containers; Plastic Trash Bags; Plastic Grocery and Other Merchandise Bags; Non -Bag Commercial and Indushlal Packaging Film; Film Products; Other Film; Durable Plastic Items; Remainder /Composite Plastic Mixed Metals Major Appliances; Used Oil Filters; Other Ferrous; Other Non - Ferrous; R/C Metals Mixed Organics Manures; Textiles; RemainderlComposite Organic Mixed MSW Bulky Items; Mixed Residue Personal Computers Brown Goods; Computer - Related Electronics; Other Small Consumer Electronics; Video Display Devices Concrete Concrete; Rock, Soil and Fines; RemainderlComposite Inerts and Other Asphalt Shingles Asphalt Paving, Asphalt Roofing Drywall Gypsum Board Additional Notes: • All waste reduction activities were modeled as recycling for conservatism (less GHG emissions reduced) • The following household hazardous waste (HHW) material types were not included in the GHG emission estimates due to material category limitations in WARM: • Paint • Vehicle & Equipment Fluids • Used Oil • Batteries • Remainder /Composite HHW • The following special waste material types were not included in the GHG emission estimates due to material category limitations in WARM • Treated Medical Waste • Remainder /Composite Special Waste MR E -2 8-ek city of santa monica 151, zero waste strategic operations Single - Family Residential - Short Term Diversion Programs GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emissions from Baseline Waste Management (MTCE): (269) GHGEmissions from Alternative Waste Management Scenario (MTCE): Commodity Tons Recycletl Tons LanEtllled Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTCE Alulnnum Cans Alumnum Cans 17.0 3.0 pV. 0 Steel Ceps 6210 dys 1 Glass 6N 150.0 Glass N4 2 HOPE - 36C 0 N4 a PET 30,0 58.0 M4 N4 1 Corr, ated Containers 1000 140.0 t✓4 2 Ma .rmalthirodess treit 84.0 116.0 IJ4 1 bows a er Ma szinesahirdwclass.9 200.0 1410 N4 66 Office Noe, 26 101.0 t✓4 2 FToneboola r44 8C Otflce paper N4 3 Dlmanslonai Lumber 543A 12 bA 159 Food Scraps 144 1,687.0 N4 3 170 Yard TrlmNn s M4 233.0 N4 20 Grass N4 270,0 634.0 11 Leaves 144 270.0 200.0 50 n Mved paper reside 19 742.0 N4 139 Mxed Metals 36.0 175.0 Leaves 114 2 Mad Plastics $97.0 45 h14 6 Weed Or.nits hN 730.0 N4 350 a Mad MSW NA 243.0 t 4 Car at bN 89.0 530.0 1 Palsonal CO Ners Mxed Or amts 26.0 BW 0 Concrete 5 446.0 FN DN 5 Ash �N 1.0 bN Pt4 0 Tres 1.0 5 114 0 As aik Shin lee 24.0 14.0 N4 P14 0 D wal 31.0 23.0 N4 N4 1 Fly Ash nN 1.0 N4 0 0 Tres 1.0 0 N4 0 As haft Shingles 1.D 0 114 0 D wall 0 21.0 NA DN 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note: a negative value (i.e„ a value in parentheses) indicates an emission eduction; a positive value indicates an emission increase (769) Commodity Tons Source Reduced Tons rktycled Tons Landipled Tons Combusted Tons Com posted Total MTCE Alumnum Cans 3.0 14.0 N4 Staei Ceps 11.0 51.0 6N 5 Glass 23.0 127.0 t✓4 0 FoFE 610 30,0 M4 t F'c"r 1000 45.0 N4 3 Corrugated Containers 24.0 116.0 P14 Cl Ma szinesahirdwclass.9 1410 70,D tJ4 26 News a er 35,0 165.0 r44 e2 Otflce paper 17.0 84.0 N4 12 Fhonebdoks 7.0 N4 3 Cimmsionai Lumber 4900 N4 179 Food Scraps 634.0 1.053.0 7 Yard Trimmin s 200.0 33.0 19 Grass 232,0 36.0 7 Leaves 232.0 38.0 45 Mved Paper rineri tesltlent N4 M273.0 469.0 N4 350 Wood Metals PN 152.0 N4 24 Magid Raab® bN 530.0 N4 12 Mxed Or amts PN 679.0 51.0 5 Mved MSW N4 243A �N 4 Car et - 30.0 N4 5 personal Cornputers 2.0 24.0 N4 1 Concrete PN 31.0 415.0 DL4 N4 4 Fly Ash nN 1.0 N4 N4 0 Tres 1.0 N4 0 As haft Shingles 1.D 13.0 114 0 D wall 2C 21.0 NA DN 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D D 0 0 D Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): (520) appendix e E -3 city of santa monica zero waste strategic operations plan Single- Family Residential - Short- Medium Term Diversion Programs - GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emissions from Baseline Waste Management(MTCE): (2117) GHGFmisions from Altemative Waste Management Scenario (MTCE): Commodity Tons Recycled Tons Lantl_fllled Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTCE Aluminum Cans Alum'num Cme -14.o 8.0 N4 0 Steel Cans 19 52.0 N4 1 Glass N4 129.0 Goes N4 1 HOPE 300 1 N4 0 PET 13.0 49.0 N4 N4 1 Corm aced Containers 28.0 1170 N4 23 Ma azineslthirrbclass mad 70.0 21.0 N4 14 News a er Ma ezlne54Mtd -class roil 166.0 4.0 N4 5 Office Neer 16 65.0 aN 2 Phonebooei N4 7.0 Office paper N4 4.0 Dirrensional Lurp er 496.0 N4 1 Food Scraps N4 552.0 N4 65 Vartl Trimmn s hN 203.0 N4 17 Grass N9 250 154.0 9 Leaves N4 235.0 NA 640 43 Wed Po per rrirpril, resdent 14 476.0 N4 09 Mod Metals 137.5 154.0 Leaves l4k 2 Mod plastics 539.0 2 N4 6 Wed Or amts N4 607.0 NA 116 '6 Mned MSW N4 246.0 N4 4 Carpet N4 81.0 408.0 N4 1 personal CO afar. Men! Oranks 24.0 PN N4 0 Concrete 7 420.0 N4 N4 4 Ash N9 1.0 N4 N4 0 Tires 1.0 30 N4 D As had Shingles 23.0 13.0 N4 0 D all 220 N4 N4 1 Ash hN 1.0 N4 0 Tnes 1.0 0 As hfl Shingles 0 Dryw.l 0 220 IJA 0 Mel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note: a negative value (i.e., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission reduction; a positive value indicates an emission increase. (544) Commodity Tons Source Reduced Tons Recycled Tons Lan4n11e4 Tons Combusted Tans COm posted Total MTCE Alum'num Cme 8.0 6.0 N4 19 Steel Cans - 3.0 49.0 N4 1 Goes 26.0 101.0 N4 1 FDPE 17.0 13.0 N4 4 PEI' 28.0 21.0 N4 6 corrugated Containers 9600 21.0 NA 66 Ma ezlne54Mtd -class roil 4.0 66.0 N4 16 Naves a or 900 r 159.0 N4 61 Office paper 4.0 61.0 N4 Fhonebooks 7.0 N4 Dlrrensional Wmber - 1.0 495.0 N4 146 Food Scna s N4 154.0 498.0 11 Yard Trimnn s NA 640 119.0 14 Grass N4 9765 137.5 4 Leaves N4 97.5 137.5 2 Mad Naar proafli, re.Idpnt N4 37.0 439.0 NA 116 M6ed Metals N4 5.0 149.0 N4 0 Mad plastics N4 51.0 408.0 N4 8 Men! Oranks P14 PN 670.0 17.0 7 Mee! MW NA N4 246.0 N9 4 Carpet 47.0 34.0 N4 30 Parsonal CO users 1.0 23.0 Concrete N4 420.0 hW Ash hN 1.0 N4 Tnes 1.0 As hfl Shingles 13.0 Dryw.l 220 IJA Mel D D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): (258) Appendix e FDR E -4 o city of santa monica zero waste strategic operations Single - Family Residential - Medium Term Diversion Programs - GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emissions from Baseline Waste Management(MTCE): (283) GHG Emissionsfrom Alternative Waste Management Scenario (MTCE): Commodity Tons p.,Isd Tons Lanufilled Tons Combustetl Tons COmpoetetl Total MTCE Alum'num cons Alua num Cans 6.0 7 0 Steel Cans 0 50.0 NA 1 Glass IM 10340 Glass N4 1 ItJPe 1349 1 eW 0 PET 12.0 21.0 IA4 N4 0 Corrugated Containers 1.0 23.0 N4 5 Ne azlnestlhbbdess mail 68.0 Me N4 14 Newspaper Mo azlnesflhird -class not 162D 3.0 N4 55 Office P4 per 1 61.0 Pt4 1 Pnonebooks N4 719 Office Paper N4 2 Chrensional Lumber 503.0 N4 148 Food Scraps N4 177e 1a Yard Trimnn s N4 87.0 Grass NA 101.0 17].0 4 Leaves N4 101.0 NA 87.0 19 Mwetl Pa er (alro'll, reagent 448.0 t✓4 84 Mwetl Metals 153.9 Leaves NA 2 Mixed Rustics 495.0 N4 5 Mood Or arcs N4 681.0 8 Mwetl MW N4 249.0 NA 4 Car et N4 35.0 439.0 N4 0 Parsanal CO uters Mee! Or ,.nos 2440 N4 NA 0 Concrete 425.0 PN N4 4 Ash 1.0 bN eft 0 Toes 1.0 ea N4 0 As haft Shingles 17e 14.0 PN N4 0 C wan 22.0 NA N4 1 Azh N4 1.0 N4 9 0 Tres 1.0 0 PW 0 As haft Shingles 0 NA 0 wag 0 no aN N4 1 0 9 a 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 Note: a negative value (i.e., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission reduction; a positive value indicates an emission increase. (341) Commodity Tons Source Reduced Tons Retycletl Tons landfilled Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTCE Alua num Cans 6.0 N4 0 Steel Cans 2.0 4840 IM 9 Glass 3.0 100.0 N9 1 Ff] C 1.0 12.0 IA4 0 PET 1.0 20.0 NA 0 Corrugated Containers 1.0 Me NA Mo azlnesflhird -class not 3.0 65.0 tb4 1 Newspaper 700 155.0 N4 58 Office Paper 4.0 77.0 N4 Pnonebooks 1 7.0 O'JmnsiOnal Lumber 503.9 Food Scraps N4 17].0 Yard TrInnon s NA 87.0 Grass 144 101.0 Leaves N4 101.0 to Mood Paper rirreri resident NA 21.0 427A Mwetl Metals NA 4.0 149.0 Mwetl pasties N4 58.0 439.0 Mee! Or ,.nos N4 N4 6720 Mwetl MSW NA N4 249.0 Cat et 9.0 26.0 M ea Rerson.I Cerrpuo,s 7.0 17e PN 4 Concrete NA 425e M1N N4 4 Azh N4 1.0 N4 N4 0 Tres 1.0 PW 0 As haft Shingles 14.0 NA 0 wag no aN N4 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): (58) appendix e MR E -5 m` city of Santa monica zero waste strategic operations Single- Famity Residential - Medium -Long Term Diversion Programs - GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emissions from Baseline Waste Management(MTCE): (2771 GHG Emissmnsfmm Altemative Waste Management Scenario (MTCE): Commodity- Tons Recycled Tons Landfllled Tons Combusted Tons Composted Tota1MTOE Alulnnum Cans Aluminum Cans 6.0 2.0 Nq 0 Steel Cans 48.0 N4 1 Glass N4 100.0 Glass N4 1 HI%£ 1210 0 N4 0 PET 9.0 20.0 het N4 0 Corru ated Containers 5.0 22.0 N4 4 Ma azinesahbd -class ireil 65.0 16.0 N4 13 Newso.... 155.0 17.0 hA 53 IXr a paper 24 77.0 N4 1 Rfcnebo0l¢ N4 70 Otfrce P4 er N4 2 D roonslonal Lumber 503.0 flal rA 148 Food Scraps N4 177.0 N4 3 10 Yard Trirm n s Nq 07.0 N4 254 Grass N4 101.0 132.0 4 Leeves N4 101.0 114 65.0 1 Wed Paper (primr1l, resident 427.0 N4 BO Mxed Metak 2600 149.0 Leaves N4 2 Wood Mastics 439.0 15 N4 5 Maeo Or anios NA 672.0 114 165 0 homed MM N4 249.0 N4 4 Car et N4 26.0 428.0 N4 1 0 Personal c:orn,uhers Mned Oranics 17.0 N4 N4 0 Concrete 9 425.0 het N4 4 FlyAsh hA 1.0 N4 N4 0 Tres 1.0 4 N4 0 Aa has Shin les 17.0 14.0 N4 M 0 D aft 22.0 rX Nq 1 Fly Ash N4 1.0 N4 0 0 Tres 1.0 0 N4 0 As haft Shin les 0 114 0 all 0 22.0 N4 N4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note: a negative value (i.e., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission reduction, a positive value indicates an emission increase J (585) CommoEN Tons Source Reduced Tons Recycled Tons Landfllled Tons Combusted - Tons Com posted Total MTCE Aluminum Cans 2.0 4.0 N4 Sleet Cans 12.0 36.0 N4 6 Glass 17.0 83.0 N4 0 [iQ7 3.0 9.0 het 1 PET 5.0 15.0 NA 1 Covu ated Containers 6.0 16.0 is Vag. WhlrM1daae nail 17.0 48.0 N4 24 Newspaper 40.0 115.0 N4 59 Otfrce P4 er 20.0 57.0 flal Phoneboo4s 2.0 5.0 N4 3 D"nsional Lurber 203.0 220.0 N4 254 Food Scraps N4 132.0 4500 11 Yard Trim, s 114 65.0 22.0 Grass N4 75.0 2600 2 Leaves N4 75.0 26.0 15 V.,d Paper rimari resident N4 110.0 317.0 114 165 Mned.Metals N4 22.0 127.0 N4 22 Maed Mastics N4 11.0 428.0 N4 2 Mned Oranics 114 N4 420.0 252.0 9 Mrc d WSW N4 N4 249.0 hA 4 carpet 7.0 19.0 IA 4 PersonalCompuers 17.0 N4 0 Concrete N4 425.0 N4 het 4 Fly Ash N4 1.0 N4 N4 0 Tres 1.0 N4 0 As haft Shin les 14.0 114 0 all 22.0 N4 N4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): (308) appendix e E -6 s' city of santa monica X177 zero waste strategic op� an Single- Family Residential - Long Term Diversion Programs - GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emissionsfrom Baseline Waste Manage ment(MTCE): (162) GHG Emissions from Alternative Waste Management Scenario(MTCE): Commodity Tens recycled Tens Landfllled Tons Lendfilled Tons Combusted Total MTCE Alumnumcans AWninum03ns 5.0 3.0 20 0 Steel Cans 36.0 25.0 0 Glass 1A 84.0 Glass 1 FMFE 10.0 lim HO c 0 PET 3.0 16.0 1% a Corr. ated Containers lic 18.0 IAA 4 Ma atinanAhird -tbas mail 49.0 so 10 News a er Ma abinesAhl,d,Isss .9 118.0 33.0 1660 60 Office Paper 31 59.0 some 1 Phonebcoks 1A 5.0 Office Paper NA 2 Dhe,sIbnal Lumber 227.0 31 1A 6 Food Scraps NA 155.0 5N 3 16 Yard T'Imdn s MA 68.0 IA is Grass N4 79.0 5160 3 Leaves N4 79.0 N4 no 1 Mued Paps, o,muly resident 4 330.0 DW 62 b ed Metals 53.5 129.0 Leaves N4 1 Mxed Pasties 435.0 8 N4 5 Maed Organics NA 429.0 N4 110 5 Maed MW NA 252.0 IA 4 Car et N4 21.0 373.0 N4 0 (§,tonal OormNsrs Maed Or ants 17.0 NA N4 0 concrete 2 432.0 Nq N4 5 Ash N4 1.o N4 N4 0 Tres 1.0 IA 0 As hatt Shingles 17.0 14.0 N4 N4 0 D W a0 22.0 N4 N4 1 Ash IA4 1.0 N4 0 Tres 1.0 0 1,N As hatt Shln les 0 N4 Re 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note: a negative value (i.e., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission mtluction: a positive value indicates an emission increase. FDR (4241 commodity Tons Source Reduced Tons Pacycled Tons Lendfilled Tons Combusted Tons composted Total MTCE AWninum03ns 3.0 20 IA steel Cans 25.0 11.0 1A 1 Glass 35.0 49.0 NA HO c 7.0 3.0 1% PET lic 5.0 IAA 3 corrugated Containers 12A so 1A 11 Ma abinesAhl,d,Isss .9 33.0 1660 NA 31 Newspaper some 3860 1A 74 Office Paper 40.0 1960 IA 31 Phonebooks 3.0 2.0 5N 3 Olnsmional Wmber 227.0 IA is Food Scraps NA 5160 104.0 0 Vard Trimwn s N4 no 46.0 4 Grass IA 25.5 53.5 Leaves IA Fe 53.5 8 Wed Near odonvily ,tsid.M N4 63.0 267.0 N4 110 Wood wtols N4 44A 85.0 N4 4 Mzed nastics N4 62.0 373.0 it 3 Maed Or ants N4 NA 380.0 49.0 2 Wed MW NA NA 252.0 N4 Car el 14.0 7A N4 Personal CO Ners 17.0 N4 concrete N4 432.0 N4 N4 Ash IA4 1.0 N4 N4 Tres 1.0 1,N As hatt Shln les 14.0 N4 Re 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): (263) appendix e E -7 a city of santa monica ��J zero waste strategic operations Single- Family Residential - Residual Processing - GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emissions from Baseline Waste Management (MTCE): (115) GHG Emissions from Alternative Waste Management Scenario (MTCE): corr. oit Tons Recycled Tons Landtllled Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTCE ANmnum Cans Change (Alt - Base) MTCE 2.0 t04 0 Steel Cans NA 11.0 0 N4 0 Glass 5.0 49.0 N4 N4 1 FIDE 300 23.0 N4 0 I£ 0 5.o N 0 Conu ated Containers A 6.0 1 N4 1 Ma .inesnhird- classt ail 2.0 1640 N4 N4 3 News a er 36A 3.0 Nq 13 Office Pater 0 19.0 814 0 mmnebooks N4 2.0 1 N4 1 Dhnensional Lunber 18.0 22T.0 N4 N4 6 Food Scraps NA 51.0 8.0 11.0 5 Yard Trinnin s PA 22.0 2 Gress N4 25.5 0 PneutloneiL rnosr 1 Leaves NA 25.5 N9 4 5 Mued Paper rbmr resident 267.0 25.0 BM 50 Wed Was 3 65.0 N4 1 trued plastics 373.0 1 M 4 MaedG a ¢s N9 380.0 0 4 Mixed MW Na 252.0 12.0 W. 4 corner 2 7.0 N4 N4 0 Personal CO uters INA 17.0 13 l'A 0 Concrete '- 432.0 \A 3N 5 Fly Ash N4 1.0 N4 N4 0 Tres 82 1.0 bW A 0 Aa haft Shin les 14.0 N4 0 or,wall 120.0 22.0 NA N4 1 Car et 3.0 4.0 0 1 1 Personal CO uters 0 940 N4 0 0 Concrete 0 227.0 205.0 N4 NA 2 0 Ash N4 1.0 N4 0 D 0 Tres 0 N4 0 0 As haft Shln les 0 7.0 7.0 N4 1 0 0 wa1 12.0 10.0 sN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 Note: a negative value (i.e., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission reduction; a positive value indicates an emission increase. appendix e (17) commodity Tons Source Reduced Tons Recycled Tons Landnlled Tons Combusted Tons Conn posted Total MTCE Change (Alt - Base) MTCE Aluninum Cans 1.0 1.0 NA a 0 Steel Cans 5.0 6.0 N4 3 GLASS 23.0 26.0 N4 1 0 h ow 14.0 2.0 A 1 1 FET 2.0 3.0 N4 1 1 Conn ated Containers 3.0 3.0 M1N 1 0 Ma azmr/third -class nail 8.0 8.0 N4 2 1 News a er 18.0 20.0 N4 B 5 WcePo er 8.0 11.0 PN 1 1 moneboma 1.0 1.0 w. 0 0 PneutloneiL rnosr Soe.o 119.o N9 4 22 Rod Scm es NA 25.0 26.0 2 3 Yard Triomin s N4 - 10.0 12.0 1 1 Grass N4 12.0 13.5 0 1 Leaves N4 12.0 13.5 3 2 Moved paper drnuri resdent N4 12T.0 140.0 INA 3 13 Mixed Metals bW 4010 45.0 Id4 13 13 Med nestics N4 1P7.0 196.0 N4 86 82 M so Oi arks bW 1J4 179.0 20140 Mued NSW N4 NA 120.0 132.0 bN 4 0 Car et 3.0 4.0 N4 1 1 Personal CO uters 0.0 940 N4 0 0 Concrete N4 227.0 205.0 N4 NA 2 3 Ash N4 1.0 N4 NA D 0 Tres 1.0 N4 0 0 As haft Shln les 7.0 7.0 N4 1 1 0 wa1 12.0 10.0 sN NA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): 98 IM E -8 city of santa monica zero waste strategic operations Multi - Family Residential - Short Term Diversion Programs - GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emissions from Baseline Waste Management (MTCE): (1,055) GHG Emissions from AlWmative Waste Manage me nt5cenario(MTCE): Commodity Tons Recycled Tons Landfilled Tons Combusted Tons COmpostod Total MTCE Alummin Cans Alumanum Cans 21.0 5.0 N4 0 steel Cans 1 201.0 N4 2 Glass 144 596.0 Glass eN 6 HDFE 212. IA 2 PET 15640 mia IA 144 2 Corrugated Containers 5640 925.0 N4 161 Ma .ineslthir4.hss nail 230.0 869.0 N4 4 Nms a er Ma minesllhirbclass.9 63000 61.0 N4 213 Office Raper 665.0 N4 12 Fhonebools N4 2.0 Office Paper rA 1 Dlmensio .1 Lumber 2,566.0 123 N4 754 Food SCre ps PW 4.460.0 N4 1 450 Yard Trimrin s 514 17.0 N4 1 Grass N4 154.5 0. 6 Leaves N4 154.5 P14 0 29 Wed Po er (pdmadl, resider 1 2.130.0 IA 399 Mo-ed Metals 35.0 471.0 Waves 8N 5 Maed Rastks 11009.0 2Maed N4 11 MAed Oranics N4 2,574.0 rA 61Mue 29 M fy!MSW N4 995.0 N4 16 Oar st N4 1,278.0 0 N4 14 Porsanal CO uters Meed Or arcs 6. N4 N4 0 Concrete 15 1,099n N4 N4 12 Ash N4 24.0 N4 N4 0 .0 IA 149 PersomiCa Ners 0 1.0 5.0 IA 1 0 N4 127.0 972.0 N4 N4 0 Fly Ash NA 24.0 N4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 Note: a negative value (i.e., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission reduction; a positive value indicates an emission increase L (2,5Q) Commodity Tons Source Reduced Tons Recycle! Tons LanEnlled Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MICE Alumanum Cans 5.0 16.0 NA 1 steel Cans 51.0 150.0 144 23 Glass 147.0 449. 144 I10PE 5470 15640 IA 11 F£T 5640 16560 IA 1 Corm aced Containers 23600 869.0 N4 33 Ma minesllhirbclass.9 61.0 177.0 N4 e PCws a er 160.0 470.0 N4 281 Office Paper 169.0 497.0 N4 123 nlonebook 1.0 0 N4 1 dlreiraomlLumber 356.0 0 N4 602 FOOD scra s N4 0. 1010.0 - 294 Yard nimmn s P14 0 4.0 1 Gress N4 5 35.0 3 Waves N4 5 35.0 2Maed P4 er rimarl resident N4 543.0 P2,202.0 0 rA 61Mue wtt.S N4 74.0 0 PA 7 N&ad nBstlea N4 131.0 0 N4 2 Meed Or arcs N4 N4 MU 15 hbced NSW N4 N4 .0 289.0 N4 17 Car et - 248.0 .0 IA 149 PersomiCa Ners 1.0 5.0 IA 1 Concrete N4 127.0 972.0 N4 N4 10 Fly Ash NA 24.0 N4 N4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): (1,455) appendix e E -9 ,o_, city of Santa monica 11-37 zero waste strategic operations Multi- Family Residential - Short- Medium Term Diversion Programs - GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emissions from Baseline Waste Manage me nt(MTCE): (864) GHG Emissions from Alternative Waste Manage me ntscenario (MTCE): Comm oEky Tons Recycled Tons Landfl9ed Tons Combusted Tons Composted ToWIMTCE Alumbum Cans Change IAH - BBSe)MTC 16.0 N4 0 Steel Cans N4 152.0 22 N4 2 Go. 144.0 455.0 t✓4 N4 5 HOPE 160.0 331.0 FN 2 PET 11 157.0 N4 2 Conu aced Contalnea N4 699.0 23 N4 13 Ma azinesIthird -class mail 69.0 180.0 N4 N4 36 News a er 476.0 1270 N4 161 Office Paper 373 503.0 N4 9 Renebocks N4 2.0 6 PN 1 Dimensional LUdber 452.0 2.230.0 N4 N4 65 Food Scrap. NA 3098.0 477.0 353 Vard Trimming. N4 13.0 1 Grass N4 121,4 0 Dimensions! Lumber 5 Leaves kN 121.0 144 656 22 Mk.d Pd er nprimori residen t 1.610.0 830.0 hM 302 Mmed Metals 413 4020 N4 4 Maed naMicc 8.0 890.0 0 PM 9 Wed Or anlcs N4 2.376.0 71.0 27 Mod MSW N4 717.0 50.0 N4 12 Car et 9 1.044.0 N4 N4 11 F2rsonal Co Ners N4 6.0 95 N4 0 Concrete 394.0 904.0 N4 H4 10 Ash PW 25.0 kN N4 0 17 2 Meet Or amts to DL4 0 50.0 24 3 Maed MSW 0 DW 651.0 88.0 N4 12 0 Carpet 611.0 433.0 0 390 401 Fs,sonal CO wors 1.0 0 N4 t 1 Concrete 0 1.0 963.0 N4 N4 10 0 FY Ash N4 4.0 21.0 NA 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note: a negative value (i.e., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission reduction; a positive value indicates an emission increase. I appendix e (2,311) Commodity Tons Source Reduced Tons Peryclod Tons Landfilletl Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTCE Change IAH - BBSe)MTC Alumnum Cans 9.0 7.0 - N4 22 steel Gm 8.0 144.0 t✓4 4 Glass 124.0 331.0 N4 6 11 HOPE 94.0 66.0 N4 21 23 PET 9840. 69.0 N4 29 31 COmu ated Contahers 5mo 1270 N4 510 373 Ma azineslthird -class veil 940 171.0 N4 42 6 Newa a er 24.0 452.0 N4 171 10 Office Pew 26.0 477.0 N4 1 21 RmneboOks 2.0 N4 1 0 Dimensions! Lumber 20 2228.0 144 656 1 Food Scraps N4 830.0 2,668.0 60 413 Yard Trimnn s hN 5.0 8.0 1 0 Grass hN 50.0 71.0 Leaves hN 50.0 7100 13 9 Wed Paer rimed resltlent N4 123D 1,487.6 N4 39 95 Med Metals N4 0.0 394.0 N4 4 9 M ad Hastics PW 96.0 794.0 - kN 17 2 Meet Or amts to DL4 2,326.0 50.0 24 3 Maed MSW N4 DW 651.0 88.0 N4 12 0 Carpet 611.0 433.0 N4 390 401 Fs,sonal CO wors 1.0 5.0 N4 t 1 Concrete N4 1.0 963.0 N4 N4 10 0 FY Ash N4 4.0 21.0 NA N4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): (1,447) E -10 Fu; city of santa monica zero waste strategic operations plan Multi - Family Residential - Medium Term Diversion Programs - GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emissions from Baseline W ante Management (MTCE): (1,003( GHG Emissions from Alternative Waste Management Scenario (MTCE): commodity Tons .Recycled Tons Landfllled Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTCE Aluminum Cans AWINnum Cans 7.0 NA 0 Steel Cans 0 147.0 N4 2 Glass N4 339.0 Goss N4 4 HOPE 89A 3 N4 1 PEr 68.0 72.0 N4 N4 1 C rre aced Containers 1.0 139.0 N4 2 Ma azinesAhir0..lass Rep 174.0 136.0 N4 35 Newspaper Magazines/third-class mail 460.0 3.0 N4 156 Office Paper 3 487.0 N4 9 P- crabooks bN 2.0 Office P4 er N4 1 Dimensional Lumber 2.262.0 1 IA 664 Fmd Scrap. N4 Sam N4 - 90 Yard Ttlmtln s N4 6.0 IA 1 Gress N4 52.5 389.0 2 Leaves N4 525 N4 6.0 10 Wed Po er (primaril, resident -1 11515.0 N4 284 Maed Metals 400.0 Leaves N4 4 MueE nastics ease 10 N4 9 Wed Oranhs N4 2,361.0 N4 638 27 Muetl MM N4 ' 664.0 N4 11 Car et N4 450.0 699.0 N4 5 cars onal0o users Mketl 0r ants 5.0 N4 N4 0 Concrete 26 998.0 N4 N4 11 Ash hW 25.0 N4 M 0 337.0 hW 69 Fersonal Cor,uters 0 1.0 4.0 hW 1 0 hN 998.0 N4 N4 0 qsh hN 26.0 N4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 Note: a negative value (i.e., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission induction; a positive value indicates an emission increase. (1,560) Commodity Tons Source Reduced Tons Recycled Tons Landfulad Tons COmbuSled Tons composite! Total MTCE AWINnum Cans 7.0 hW 0 Steel Cans 3.0 144.0 N4 0 Goss 8.0 333.0 N4 3 HOPE le 68.0 N4 0 PET 1.0 71.0 MN 0 Carru ated Containers 3.0 136.0 PN 29 Magazines/third-class mail 3.0 171.0 bM 3 New . .r 8.0 452.0 bN 159 Office P4 er 9.0 478.0 PW 1 R.nebooka 2.0 N4 1 URensiun6l Lunsor 2,262.0 IA 664 Food Senlins N4 389.0 500.0 12 Yard Trimmn s N4 6.0 -1 Grass N4 52.5 2 Leaves N4 52.5 10 MuetlN er riraan residaM N4 459.0 1.056.0 N4 638 Mketl Meta6 Nq 2.0 398.0 Nq 2 Mketl Fastens N4 110.0 699.0 N4 22 Mketl 0r ants N4 N4 2,352.0 9.0 26 Mked NSW eN N4 656.0 8.0 hW 11 cartel 113.0 337.0 hW 69 Fersonal Cor,uters 1.0 4.0 hW 1 Controls hN 998.0 N4 N4 11 qsh hN 26.0 N4 N4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): (557) appendix e E -11 rn1" city of santa monica ,,57 zero waste strategic opt rations plan Multi - Family Residential - Medium -Long Term Diversion Programs - GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emissions from Baseline Waste Management (MTCE): (967) GHG Emissions from Alternative Waste Management Scenario (MTCE): Commotlltp Tons Ro,ded Tons Landfllled Tons Combusted Tons Oomposted T.W MTCE Aturnnum Cans Alumnum Cans 7.0 2.0 hN 0 Steel cans 5 144.0 N4 2 Glass N4 33$.0 Glass N4 4 HCPE 6860 3 to 1 PET 51.0 7160 - to 1 Corrugated CoMainers 18.0 136.0 - kN 2 Me azineslthird -class mar 171.0 101.0 NA 34 News a e, Ma azlnesrlhird -class nm4 452.0 44.0 aN 153 O MsN er 62 47B.0 N4 8 Phonebooks bl4 2.0 OHlce order to 1 Olmensional Linter - 2,252.0 68 N4 664 Food eora s N4 389.0 - 1 39 Yard Trimm'n s N4 6.0 N4 1 Grass PL4 52.5 290.0 2 Leaves IA 52.5 N4 4.0 ID Mbed Paper (,rimarey tesdent 1,056.0 N4 19 Mired Weis 13.5 390.0 N4 4 Mixed Pasties - 699.0 8 N4 7 Wed O,anics N4 2,35260 NA - 27 Mel NSW N4 655.0 11 Car et PN 33740 673.0 N4 4 Personal Co Ners Or anics 4.0 N4 N4 0 Concrete 2tASW 990.0 N4 1A 11 Ash - 2510 N4 tJ4 0 251.0 N4 53 Porsonal CO ulers 0 4.0 1'E` a 0 N4 990.0 to N4 0 My Ash to 25.0 IA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O Note: a negative value (l. e., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission reduction; a positive value indicates an emission increase. FDR (2,063) Commodity Tons Source Refaced Tons Recycled Tons Landfilled Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTCE Alumnum Cans 2.0 so 1'f4 5 Bteel Cans 37.0 107.0 N4 1 Glass 79.0 266.0 N4 3 HOFE 17.0 51.0 to 3 PST 18.0 - 53.0 - N4 Corru aced CoMainers 35.0 101.0 N4 49 Ma azlnesrlhird -class nm4 44.0 127.0 - kV. 62 News a er 115.0 337.0 bl4 201 OHlce order 121.0 357.0 - IA 68 OOks 2.0 N4 1 ional Lumber 1.2T2A 9900. N4 1,149 cra s N4 290.0 99.0 24 rimmin s N4 4.0 2.0 NA 39.0 - 13.5 BN 39.0 - 13.5 8 Po er rimer. resitlent PI N4 270.0 786.0 NA 406 Metals N4 38.0 360.0 nestios PN 26.0 673.0 N4 0 Or anics N4 N4 1.542.0 - 810.0 2tASW N4 N4 656.0 86.0 251.0 N4 53 Porsonal CO ulers 4.0 1'E` a Concrete N4 990.0 to N4 11 My Ash to 25.0 IA N4 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 9 0 9 Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): (1,096) appendix e E -12 city of santa monica J zero waste strategic operations plan Multi - Family Residential - Long Term Diversion Programs - GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emissionserom Baseline Waste Management (MTCE); (525) GHG Emissions from Alternative Waste Management Scenario (MTCE): - Com mainly Tons Rerycled Tons LandTilled Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTCE Aluminum Ceps Aluminum Cans 5.0 4.0 144 0 Sisal Cans 1 110.0 >W 1 Glass 614 2620 Glass H4 3 HOFE 54D 11 PN 1 FET 10.0 56.0 to ht4 1 Corm aced C raainers 38.0 114.0 o-N 22 Ma acheslthIrd -class mail 130.0 37A UV. 26 h c a er Ma athes/third -class =4 345.0 80.0 tJ4 11 Office Paper e2 364.0 t✓4 6 POOnebooka N4 1.0 Office Paper sl4 0 Oimenslonal Lumber 1,024.0 189 aN 301 Food Scraps FP 349.o PW 1 35 Yard Trimdn a rX 5.0 N4 0 Grass hW 41.0 113.0 2 Leaves 114 41.0 Nl4 2.0 6 Wed Po per (privarl, resident 0 616.0 N4 153 Wad Web 27.5 366.0 Leaves N4 4 M.ed Plastics 666.0 4 114 7 Mixed Organ ca PW 1.575.0 Pf4 303 18 Mc;ed WW bN 670.0 114 11 carpet 114 259.0 539.0 PN 3 Fbrsonal computers Maed Organ cu 4.0 P14 114 0 Concrete 10 1.012.0 PN F14 11 Ash 114 2500 AK Wa 0 88.0 PtA 116 farsonel CO Ners 0 4.0 eN 0 0 N4 1.012.0 PN FN 0 Ash IA 2$.0 AK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note: a negative value (i. e., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission reduction; a positive value indicates an emission increase. (1,445) commodity Tons Source Reduced Tons Recycled Tons Landfllled Tons Combusted Tons compassed Total MTCE Aluminum Cans 4.0 1.0 PW 1 Steel Cans 74.0 36.0 614 3 Glass 161.0 101.0 ra4 11 HOPE 36.0 10.0 to S FEr 38.0 1B.0 bN 11 Comu ated comalners 77.0 37A hl4 73 Ma athes/third -class =4 80.0 42.0 fdq e2 I sic.s, 233.0 1120 N4 215 Office Paper 246.0 118.0 Pu\ 189 Fhonebooks 1.0 PW 1 Wrenslonal Lumber 1,024.0 N4 301 Food Scraps 113.0 236.0 1 Yard Trirmr, s Nl4 2.0 3.0 0 Grass 114 13.5 27.5 t Leaves PN 13.5 27.5 4 Mkedcover (prImall, resident PW 195.0 621.0 Pf4 303 Maed Wtab bW 7.0 289.0 hW 00 Maed Pastics 114 149.0 539.0 DN 34 Maed Organ cu PN P14 1.4513.0 117.0 10 Moed MSVV 114 bN 670.0 114 11 Cat et 181.0 88.0 PtA 116 farsonel CO Ners 4.0 eN 0 Concrete N4 1.012.0 PN FN 11 Ash IA 2$.0 AK hN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): (920) appendix e IM E -13 v city of Santa monica zero waste strategic opt ns plan Multi - Family Residential - Residual Processing - GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emissions from Baseline Waste Management(MTCE): (409) GHGEmissions from Alternative Waste Management Scenario( MTCE): Comm salty Tons Recycled Tons Landfilled Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTCE - Aluminum Cans AlumwmCans 1.0 M9 0 Steel Cans 0 36.0 W+ 0 Glass M4 101.0N9 Glass 1 HO 53.0 18.0 1 N4 0 PET 9.0 10.0 FN N4 0 Corr, a.t.d Containers 37.0 10.0 M4 4 Ma solneslthin&closs mail 4200 19.0 N4 8 ISws a ¢r Va .lnesllhird,ass "a 112.0 UI4 36 Office Pa er 118.0 N4 2 Olmeaanal Lumber rA 1.024.0 Office Fa er N4 301 Food Scraps- N4 113.0 4 Umenslonal Lumber 11 Yard Trlmmin s N4 2.0 P14 202 to Grass Pk 13.5 60.0 1 Leaves N4 13.5 1.0 1.0 2 Mod er ,mari resident Grass 621.0 Pk 149 116 Mad Metals 0 209.0 N4 3 Med nastics - 539.0 Mxed Paper (primaRv resldenl N4 6 Mod Or anics MA 1,458.0 8 Mad Metals 17 mad Now N4 670.0 144 N4 11 Corset 58.0 - 283.0 N4 1 Personal CO ,lets M4 4.0 692.0 M4 0 Concrete Mxed NEW 1,012.0 FN M4 11 Ash 12 25.0 pN M4 0 46.0 N4 16 Personal Carsuters 0 2.0 2.0 Pt4 0 Concrete 0 $32.0 480.0 M4 iM 4 0 N4 13.0 12.0 144 M4 6 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note: a negative value (i.e., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission eduction; a positive value indicates an emission increase. (220) Commodity Tons source Reduced Tons Recycled Tons Lan0illed Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTCE AlumwmCans 1.0 aA 0 Steel Cans 9.0 19.0 M4 e Glass 46.0 53.0 FN 1 HOPE 9.0 9.0 FN 4 Pff 8.0 10.0 N4 4 Corr, aced Contelners 19.0 20.0 N4 Va .lnesllhird,ass "a 20.0 210 N4 b s a or 53.0 59.0 rA 24 Office Fa er 56.0 610 N4 4 Umenslonal Lumber 407.0 537.0 P14 202 Food SCre s bW 5300 60.0 4 Yard Trimmings ti4 1.0 1.0 0 Grass Pk 6.5 7.0 0 Leaves M4 6.5 7.0 - 1 Mxed Paper (primaRv resldenl M4 296.0 325A NA 8 Mad Metals N4 138.0 151.0 144 42 Mood MMics aN 256.0 - 283.0 N4 125 hued Oraniss M4 5N 692.0 766.0 9 Mxed NEW M4 M4 316.0 3510 M4 12 Carpet 42.0 46.0 N4 16 Personal Carsuters 2.0 2.0 Pt4 0 Concrete PW $32.0 480.0 M4 iM 4 Fly Ash N4 13.0 12.0 144 M4 3 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 a 0 0 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): 189 appendix e E -14 city of santa monica zero waste strategic opi ns plan Commercial - Short Term Diversion Programs - GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emissions from Base line Waste Management(MTCE7: (2,759) GHG Emissionsfrom Alternative Waste Manage me nt Scenario (MTCE): Commodity Tons Retydiol Tons Landfilled Tons Combusted Tons COm POSted Total MTCE Alwnnum Cans Cans 40.0 7.0 PIA 0 Steel Cans 1 25000 N4 3 Glass eN 474.0 N4 5 HDFE - 154.0 1 N4 2 PEr 127.0 197.0 N4 2 Corruated Containers 35.0 2,965.0 N4 581 Wa nsineslthirdclass moil 222.0 2.437.0 N, 44 News a er stthlyd -class .1 3680 40.0 N4 125 Office Pa er 70 962.0 1 N4 1 17 Phoneboob N4 16.0 er N4 1720 Drishronal Wmber 61535.0 120 144 1919 Food SCra ps N4 6,069.0 N4 Ml 612 Yard Tdmmn s N4 1,6]4.0 - IA 142 Grass N4 4950 4,903.0 19 Leaves N4 495.0 N4 1,439.0 91 Branches N4 293.0 N4 86 Maed Pa er enera 69.5 3.431.0 Leaves N4 609 Mkod Metal - 1.432.0 82 N9 15 MNed Pestles 252.0 3,624.0 41.0 N4 40 M'aed Or ants NA 1.542.0 144 19 used MSW N4 1,230.0 12460 N4 - 20 carrel 1 1,984.0 364.0 NA 21 Personal Carnput.ro 61 42.0 N4 N4 0 Concrete 105.0 3,007.0 N4 N4 32 Ash 378.0 61.0 NA N4 1 Tres 1,775.0 950 N4 NA 1 Asphalt Shingles - 3.0 922.0 PN 10 Drywall 144 693.0 N4 N4 24 29 Ash N4 61.0 0 hN 1 Tires 10.0 0 - N4 0 As haBShln les 0 858.0 - hA 7 0 wall 0 48.0 645.0 N4 N4 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 Note: a negative value (i.e., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission reduction; a positive value indicates an emission increase. IM (4,697) tl source Roduced Tons Recycletl Tons Lantlfilad Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTCE Cans 7.0 33.0 FN 1 �n. s 45.0 205.0 eN 2 73.0 401.0 - PN 1 WTons 27.0 127.0 35.0 152.0 N4 9 id Containers 528.0 2.437.0 - N4 92 stthlyd -class .1 40.0 182.0 N4 70 e, 66.0 302.0 N4 15 er 1720 790.0 N4 120 monehooks 3.0 13.0 - N4 Ml Oimenslonal Lumber 642.0 5,893.0 - IA 2.151 Footl Scra s N4 4,903.0 1,166.0 432 Vartl TriRetln s N4 1,439.0 235.0 13 Grass N4 425.5 69.5 13 Leaves N4 425.5 - 69.5 82 Branches hN 252.0 41.0 76 Mixed Paper enera N4 612.0 2.819.0 144 1,08 Mod Metals N4 186.0 12460 IA 168 Muetl Pastcs N4 364.0 3,450.0 144 61 Miand Oranics N4 N4 1.537.0 105.0 12 Med MSAI 8N N4 852.0 378.0 N4 21 Car et 209.0 1,775.0 N4 11 Personal CO uters 3.0 39.0 N4 2 Concrete 144 208.0 2.799.0 N4 NA 29 Ash N4 61.0 N4 hN 1 Tires 10.0 05.0 - N4 0 As haBShln les 540 858.0 - hA 7 0 wall 48.0 645.0 N4 N4 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): (1,938) appendix e E -15 f"°`I city of Santa monica 173 zero waste strategic operations Commercial - Short- Medium Term Diversion Programs - GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emissions from Baseline Waste Manage me nt(MTCE): (2,458) GHG Emissions from Alternative Waste Manage ment Scenario (MTCE): Commodity Tons Recycled Tons Landfilled Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTCE Alumnum Cans Aluminum Cans 33.6 19.0 NA 0 Steel Cans 46 208.0 N4 2 Glass N4 407.0 Glass r A 4 HO 120.0 3 NA 1 FEr 57 164.0 IJA NA 2 Corm ated Containers 96.0 2.466.0 PM 483 Ma axinesahbd -class not 185.0 1,024.0 NA 37 News a er Ma adinesAlud - class mall 306.0 9.0 N4 106 office Paer 43 800.0 CW 14 Fnoneboola N4 14.0 office Pa er 4N 40.0 Dimensional Lumber 5,963. 18 N4 1,751 Food Scre s N4 4,966.0 N4 5 501 Yard TrIamn s NA 1.457.0 N4 126 Grass hN 431.0 4.715.0 17 Leaves PN 431.0 NA 605.0 60 Sranches N4 255.0 N4 75 Maed Pan., (ganar.b 252.0 2,857.0 Leaves to 50 Mesa Metals 1.201.0 4 NA 13 Muetl naatics 106.0 3,500.0 149.0 N4 37 Mixed Or amts N4 1,555. N4 16 Mixed MW N4 865.0 1229.0 N4 10 Car et med Rastks 1,796.0 263.0 PW 19 in:rsonal co users 3 40.0 NA N4 0 Concrete 20.0 2,830.0 N4 N4 30 Fly Ash 10.0 62.0 rA N4 1 Tres 746.0 87.0 NA N4 1 As hen Shin les 869.0 NA 9 oryw all NA 65300 N4 NA 23 30 Fit Ash NA 1.0 61. 6 N4 0 Tres 0 N 1 As han Shin les 0 868.0 N4 9 Dr,, 0 1:0 652.0 NA N4 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Note: a negative value (i.a., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission reduction; a positive value indicates an emission increase FDR (4,435) Commodity Tons Source Reduced Tons Recycled Tons Landllled Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTCE Aluminum Cans 19.0 14.0 N4 46 Steel Cans 11.0 197.0 N4 3 Glass 86.0 321.0 N4 3 t1DPE 75.0 57 IJA 1 PET 96.0 66.0 N4 28 Corm ated COnlelners 1.444.0 1,024.0 hN 1,42 Ma adinesAlud - class mall 9.0 176PO hN 43 News a er 15.0 290.0 N4 110 office Pa er 40.0 760.0 N4 18 Poonebcoks 1.0 13.0 N4 5 Dinersiorel Lumber 6.0 5,957.0 N4 1.753 Food 6sas NA 4.715.0 253.0 462 Yard Trimnin s NA 605.0 652.0 9 Grass N4 179.0 252.0 Leaves N4 179.0 252.0 4 Branches N4 106.0 149.0 39 N6xed Paper (,cno,.4 NA 145.0 2 ,712. N4 620 Won Marets N4 32.0 1229.0 N4 2 med Rastks N4 263.0 3,237.0 N4 3 Mixed Orson c NA N4 1,535.0 20.0 16 W.ad NSW NA NA 855.0 10.0 eN 14 Car et 1050,0 746.0 NA 671 Fersonal CO utem 40.0 NA 0 Concrete NA 3,0 2,827.0 N4 NA 30 Fit Ash NA 1.0 61. N4 N4 0 Tres SU N 1 As han Shin les 1.0 868.0 N4 9 Dr,, 1:0 652.0 NA N4 23 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): (1,977) appendix e E -16 city of santa monica zero waste strategic operations Commercial - Medium Term Diversion Programs - GHG Emissions Estimates GHGEmissionsfmm Baseline Waste Management(MTCE): (2,D67) GHG Emissions from Altemative Waste Management Scenarlo(MTCE): Commodity Tons Recycled Tons Landfl0ed Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTCE Alumnum Cans Alumnum Cans 14.0 FN 0 Steel Cans' 0 201.0 A 2 Glass N4 327.0 Glass % 3 HOM 55.0 3 1% 1 F£T 54.0 71.0 N4 hN 1 Con, ated Containers 1.0 1.064.0 N4 208 Ma aainesdhirol.it 178.0 11M.0 PN 3 News pope, Me azmestlhirbdess mail 295.0 3.0 hN 100 Office Pd er is 772.0 N4 10 Moneboolo: 8N 13.0 Once P er N4 4 Dimensional Lumber 6.044.0 2 N4 1,A Food S,ta a N4 4.795.0 N4 4 404 Yard Trimrin s N4 62740 bA 53 Grass N4 18545 1,3430 7 Leaves PW 185.5 N4 527.0 34 Branches PW 110.0 N4 32 MkeCRa er (genera 2.756.0 IRa..a PN 409 Mod Ml 1,24840 34 PN 13 Mad Rastics 110.0 3,205.0 N4 35 M td Cr anks hN 1,556.0 10 Maed MSW N4 072.0 1,214.0 N4 14 Car et Wad Rastics 772.0 288. N4 8 Persona10o mers 4 40.0 1% N4 0 Concrete 7.0 2,867.0 N4 N4 30 Ash 16.0 63.0 N4 N4 1 Tres 579.0 07.0 N4 N4 1 As hap Shingles 10.0 880.0 N4 9 Dryad hW 981.0 N4 N4 23 30 Ash 814 63.0 0 % 1 Nes 23.0 0 N4 2 As haft Shingles 0 880.0 N4 - 9 Drywall 0 661.0 N4 1% 23 0 0 0 6 0 9 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note: a negative value p.e., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission reduction; a positive value indicates an emission increase. IM (3,326) Commodity Tons source Reduced Tons Recycled Tans Lan @IIIed Tons Combusted Tons composted Total MTCE Alumnum Cans 14.0 N4 0 Steel Cons 4.0 197.0 N4 0 Glass 5.0 321.0 N4 3 FOPS 1,0 54.0 N4 0 F£T 1.0 70.0 N4 0 Corru .lad CDMamers 19.0 11M.0 N4 221 Me azmestlhirbdess mail 3.0 175.0 is News a er 5.0 290.0 8N 102 Once P er 14. 750.0 bA 2 Hloneboots 13.0 N4 4 Olmensional WrNer 6,044.0 bA 1,775 Food Straps N9 1,3430 3,453.0 51 Yard Trirmdn s N4 527.0 53 Grass N4 185.5 7 IRa..a N4 185.5 34 Branches N4 110.0 3 Mixed R4 er (generaD 562.0 2,194. fG2 8 Wed Matals N4 34.0 1,214.0 N4 24 Wad Rastics 114 288. 2997.0 NA 4 Wed Or .nits 1% N4 1,549.0 7.0 17 Wed NSW 1% N4 856.0 16.0 N4 14 Car et 193.01 579.0 N4 11 Personal Com ulers 10.0 30.0 N4 Concrete hW 2,867.0 N4 N4 30 Ash 814 63.0 N4 % 1 Nes 23.0 64,0 N4 2 As haft Shingles 880.0 N4 - 9 Drywall 661.0 N4 1% 23 0 6 9 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): (1,258) appendix e E -17 ar city of santa monica zero waste strategic operations Commercial - Medium -Long Term Diversion Programs - GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emissionsfrom Baseline Waste Management(MTCE): (2,317) GHG Emissions from Alternative Waste Management Scenario(MTCE): Commodity Tons Recycled Tons Landfilled Tons 0ombusted Tons Composted TotaIMTCE AluMnum Cans Alun i,in Cana 14.0 4.0 N4 0 Steel Cars 10 197.0 N4 2 Goss N4 321.0 Glass N4 3 HDF 54.0 1 N4 1 FEi 40.0 70.0 N4 5W 1 Conn aced CAntelrers 18.0 1,045,0 N4 - 205 Vatuiclosaftlui reel 175.0 7840 N4 3 News a er Ma aaines8hlyd- class. 4 290.0 45.0 N4 98 Office leer 84 758.0 N4 13 Ptur oys N4 13.0 Office R4 er N4 d Dimensional amber 6,044.0 141 hN t7 Food Scraps N4 1,343.0 N4 6 135 Yard Trimmings 1% 627.0 N4 53 Gress PW 185.5 1,001.0 7 Leaves 1% 185.5 PW 467.0 34 Sranc0es N4 110.0 M 32 Mixed Paper (general) 47.5 2.194.0 Leaves DN 369 Mixed Mina 1.214.0 28 N4 13 Mixed Restic. 82.0 2.997.0 28.0 N9 32 Mixed Or anics N4 1.549.0 N4 18 Mixed WW N4 056.0 1,074.0 N4 14 carpet Maed Raatlne 579.0 31.0 PN 6 �crsonat Co Ners 23 30.0 M1N N4 0 Concrete 544,0 2.81 N4 NA 30 Ash 63+0 PN N4 1 Tres 431.0 64.0 PK NA 1 As halt Shin Ies 880.0 N4 9 0 wa8 N4 661.0 N4 N9 23 30 Ash N4 63.0 0 N4 1 Tres 0 1% 1 Asphalt $hin os 0 Sao,0 hK 9 D well 0 661.0 N4 tJ4 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 0 Note: a negative value (le, a value in parentheses) indicates an emission reduction; a positive value indicates an emission increase FDR (4,807) Commodity Tons source Reduced Tons Recycled Tons Larifllled ions Combusted Tens Composted Total MTCE Alun i,in Cana 4.0 10.0 N4 10 Steel Cans 50.0 14740 N4 23 Glass 55.0 26640 NA 1 F4%£ 14.0 40.0 N4 3 FEr 18.0 5.0 N4 Conis atea Como 267.0 7840 N4 379 Ma aaines8hlyd- class. 4 45.0 130.0 N4 84 Naves i e, 74.0 216.0 N4 129 Office R4 er 194.0 564.0 NA 141 Roneboohs 3.0 10.0 N4 6 Dbmnslonal Lumber 3,400.0 2,644.0 N4 3,05 Food Serena N4 1,001.0 342,0 83 Yard Trimmings PW 467.0 160,0 48 Grass M 130.0 47.5 3 Leaves N4 130.0 47.5 28 Branches PN 82.0 28.0 26 Wed Pr par a 1% 560.0 1,634.0 N4 62 Mtted Metals IJ4 140.0 1,074.0 N4 140 Maed Raatlne % 31.0 2,956.0 aW 23 Wed Organ a M1N N4 1,005.0 544,0 18 Mxed NEVI N4 N4 856.0 N4 14 Ca et 148.0 431.0 PK 91 Personal computers 30.0 AW 0 Concrete N4 2,867.0 M 1% 30 Ash N4 63.0 Nq N4 1 Tres 64.0 1% 1 Asphalt $hin os Sao,0 hK 9 D well 661.0 N4 tJ4 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): (2,499) appendix e E -18 city of santa monica •7� zero waste strategic operations Commercial - Long Term Diversion Programs - GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emissions from Baseline Waste Management (MTCE): (1,189) GHG Emissions from Alternative Waste Management 5cenario(MTCE): Commodity Tons Flo,dod Tons Landfilled T- ed Total MTCE Alulnnum Cans Aluonum Cans 11.0 ea N 0 Steel Cans 19 150.0 4 2 Glass PM 273.0 Glass 4 3 F9)Pe 42.0 B 4 0 PET 9. 54.0 hW 4 1 Conv oted Containers 42.0 618.0 M 160 Ma nlneslthirbchaa nail 133.0 191.0 4 26 Newspaper Na &nWhird,ass Tel 221.0 102.0 4 75 Ortke Pam 92 57.0 44 10 Pmnebooks N4 10.0 Oft, Paper 4 3 Olme clonal Lumber 2,731.0 342 4 802 Food Scraps 5N 11081.0 IA 109 Yard Trimnn s 5V 490.0 N4 42 Grass N4 145.0 311.0 6 Leaves N4 145.0 N4 14160 2 Branches N4 86.0 N4 25 Mired Paper enera 103.0 1,600.0 Leaves q 298 M&ed Metals 1,093.0 13 4 12 Maed Pastas 26.0 3.021.0 60.0 4 32 Wised 0 ants N4 1.027.0 to 12 Wad Maw N4 873.0 772.0 N 14 Car et Mad Pestics 458.0 422.0 NA 5 Personal CO ulers a 30.0 M N4 0 Concrete 56.0 2.9 0840 6N N4 31 Ash 1 64. 144 144 1 Tres 132.0 65.0 N4 NA 1 As hatt Shin Ies 892.0 144 9 0 wap N4 670.0 N4 144 23 1 Fti Ash N4 64.0 0 N4 1 Tres 0 PW 1 As haft Shln Ies 0 169.0 PN 1 Driwd 0 543.0 127.0 N4 eN 9 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note. a negative value (i.e., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission reduction; a positive value indicates an emission increase. FDR (4226) Cam modk Tons source Reduced Tons Recycled Tens Landfllled ions Combusted Tons composted Total MTCE Aluonum Cans ea 3.0 144 19 Steel Cans 11500 35.0 PM 56 Glass 126.0 147.0 N4 B 10F£ 33.0 9. hW 0 FET 42.0 12.0 5N 13 Corry ated Containers 627.0 191.0 to 569 Na &nWhird,ass Tel 102.0 31.0 PN 92 News a er 16900 52.0 N4 14 Oft, Paper 442.0 135.0 N4 342 Phonebooks 8+01 2.0 IA Clnensicnal Lumber 22120 519.0 N4 1.63 Food Scra s N4 311.0 710.0 10 Yardilinmin s N4 14160 349. 31 Grass N4 42.0 103.0 4 Leaves N4 42.0 103.0 13 Branches N4 26.0 60.0 11 Mired Paper (generaD 44240 11238.0 to 644 Mired Metals N4 32140 772.0 6N 340 Mad Pestics N4 422.0 2.599.0 PN a Mad Or ants M PN 941.0 56.0 6 Mired MSW N4 N4 8710 1 14 carpet 328. 132.0 N4 20 Personal computers 30.0 FN 0 Concrete N4 2.356.0 552.0 N4 N4 1 Fti Ash N4 64.0 aW N4 1 Tres 65.0 PW 1 As haft Shln Ies Tt3.0 169.0 PN 1 Driwd 543.0 127.0 N4 eN 9 e 0 0 6 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): (3,036) appendix e E -19 -off; city of santa monica Q zero waste strategic operations Commercial - Residual Processing - GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emisionsirom Baseline Waste Management(MTCE): (348) GHG Emissions from Altemative Waste Management Scenario (MTGE): Commodity Tons Recycled Tans Landnnea Tons Combusted Tons COm POSted Total MTGE Aluminum Cans Aluminum Cans 3A M1N 0 Steel Cans 0 35.0 PN 0 Glass N4 147.0 Glass hN 2 HDPE - 7.0 940 2 PL4 0 PET 4.0 12.0 N4 hW 0 COrru.ted COMainets 191.0 7.0 hN 3 ho azineslthirokclass noel - 31.0 91.0 114 6 Now s ar Ma azinestthirM1class mail 520 N4 18 Office Po er 4 135.0 M 2 R bm.booss NA 2.0 Office Paper bN 1 Dimensional Lumber 71.0 $19.0 IA 152 Food Scra s N4 311.0 K4 0 31 Yard Trimmings M 141.0 272.0 DL4 12 Gress hN 42.0 148.0 153.0 2 Leaves N4 42.0 N4 67.0 0 Branches N4 26.0 hN 0 Med Paper (lembleD 1,230.0 Leaves N4 220 Wood Metals 22.0 772.0 4 M 8 M'ned RbMics 13.0 2,599.0 N4 20 Med Or .nits M 941 o 650.0 N4 11 Wed MSW FN 673.0 366.0 N4 14 Carpet Med pasties 132.0 N4 1 Personal CO uters 601 30.0 NA N4 0 Concrete 552.0 N4 N4 6 Ash 458.0 64.0 PW N4 1 Tres 63.0 66.0 N4 hN 1 As haft Shingles 169A 16.0 N4 2 all NA 127.0 N4 N4 4 2 Ry Ash NA 33.0 31.0 0 N4 Tres 0 34.0 BN 5 As hae shin les 0 80.0 89.0 N4 all 0 arc 60.0 5N N4 3 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 a 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 Note: a negative value (i.e., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission reduction, a positive value indicates an emission increase 197 Commodity Tons source Reduced Tons Recycled Tons Landfllled Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTGE Aluminum Cans 2.0 1.0 N4 0 Steel Cons 17.0 18.0 N4 Glass 70.0 7.0 N4 2 HDPE 4.0 5.0 N4 2 PET 5.0 7.0 114 3 COrru .tee demurrers 91.0 100.0 N4 2 Ma azinestthirM1class mail 15.0 16.0 M 4 News p 25.0 27.0 NA 11 Office Paper 64.0 71.0 hN 9honeW.0 - 10 1.0 K4 0 Olrensianal Lumber 247.0 272.0 DL4 103 Food Scra s N4 148.0 153.0 12 Yard Trlm'rin s N4 67.0 74.0 8 Gress hN 20.0 22.0 0 Leaves PA 20.0 22.0 4 Branches N4 13.0 13.0 4 Med Pape, enera tN 536.0 650.0 N4 164 Med Metals N4 366.0 406.0 nN 114 Med pasties N4 1,235.0 1.363.0 hk 601 Med Oranics NA N4 447.0 494.0 Med MEW to 54s 415.0 458.0 N4 15 Car et 63.0 69.0 N4 24 Personal CO ulem 14.0 16.0 hN 0 Concrete NA 290.0 262.0 N4 N4 2 Ry Ash NA 33.0 31.0 N4 N4 Tres 31.0 34.0 BN 5 As hae shin les 80.0 89.0 N4 all arc 60.0 5N N4 3 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): 545 appendix e E -20 M a, city of santa monica 1.'. zero waste strategic operations Self -Haul - Short Term Diversion Programs - GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emissionsfrom Baseline Waste Management(MTCE): (524) GHG Emissions from Altemative Waste Management Scenari0(MTCE): ControodRy Tens Re Wled Tons Landfilted Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MINCE Steel Cans Steel Cans 2.0 hN 0 Glass 0 24.0 hN 0 HDoE 5N 20 r1CFE hv. 0 FE 3.0 f 0 NA 0 corrugated contained 20 103.0 N4 N4 20 Na azmesttM1irLLdass nol 58.0 7.0 NA 1 Ne\vs a er ]0 70 NA 2 Office Paper hlewspareer 30.0 NA 1 Wrensional Lumber 2 1,623.0 N4 4 Food Scraps NA 3200 Cinensional Lumber 3 Yard Trimm, s N4 131c 47 Food Scraps 11 Grass N4 27.0 1 Leaves NA 27.0 Branches M 110.0 120 3 Mired Paper (genemo Leaves 174.0 HA N4 31 eked Metals 274.0 NA 3 Mixed Ractics 354.0 Mxed Fa er enera NA 4 Wed Or epics N4 70.0 M od Metals 1 Mxed MSW NA 693.0 N4 11 Car et 1.0 M6.0 hN 2 Personal co uters At4 20.0 76.0 hN 0 Concrete Mxed NSW 1.579.0 hN M 17 As heft Shin led 5120 NA 5 Dr,wol 25760 hu. NA 9 20.0 Concrete 0 1,579.0 t4A M 17 0 512.0 NA 0 wall 257.0 hW 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Note: a negative value ti. a., a value in parentheses) indicates an emission reduction, a positive value indicates an emission increase. I LZ: (627) Commodity Tons Source Reduced Tons Recycled Tons Landfllled Tons Combusted Tons Compostetl Total MTCE Steel Cans 200 N4 0 Glass 10 23.0 5N 0 r1CFE 10 - 1.0 NA f 0 . F£r 1.0 20 N4 f 0 Corm ated Containers 58.0 45.0 N4 58 Ha azlnestthirtl -loss nee 70 NA 1 hlewspareer T.0 H4 2 Office Pa er 30.0 PN 1 Cinensional Lumber 1,623.0 N4 47 Food Scraps N4 32.0 Yartl Trlmmin s N4 57.0 Grass N4 120 Leaves HA 120 Branches NA 51.0 Mxed Fa er enera NA 1]4.0 M od Metals H4 2]4.0 U74.0 Mxed Plastics NA 1.0 353.0 tidied Oranics At4 PN 76.0 Mxed NSW NA NA 5370 155.0 12]0 99.0 Ranadr lco ulers 20.0 Concrete NA 1,579.0 t4A M 17 As haft Shin led 512.0 NA 5 wall 257.0 hW NA 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Change in GHG Emissions (MTCE): (103) appendix e E -21 a city of santa monica zero waste strategic operations Self -Haul - Short- Medium Term Diversion Programs - GHG Emissions Estimates appendix e vow E -22 0 city of santa monica zero waste strategic operations Self -Haul - Long Term Diversion Programs - GHG Emissions Estimates GHG Emissions from Baseline Waste Mana gem ent(MTCE): (654) GHG Emisslonsfmm Alternative Waste ManagemeMSeenado(MTCE): commodity Tons Recycled Tons landfilled Tons Combusted Tons Composted Total MTCE Steel Cans meeicans 6.o N4 0 Glass 0 56.0 N4 1 Ffl� N4 1.8 HOpE b14 0 £ 2.9 0 W 0 Conu atad Containers 2,9 118.0 N 5W 23 MaiaL0les/Plyd -class mail 16.1 5N 4 Newspaper 17.6 16.1 5W 6 Olflce Pa er 51ews a ar P] 5N 1 [A.Wonal LUmber 2066.3 514 611 Food Scraps 1 N4 40.9 1 1 4 Yard Td s 5A 76.6 1.249 Pood Scre s 1 Grass 5A 162 4 1 Leaves 5Yr 16.2 3 Branches N4 70,8 16.2 21 Wed Paper enera9 Leaves 435.6 514 N4 Mad Metals 667.0 5W 6 Wool PIe30cs 883.6 Wad Paper a eree 5W 10 Wed ics N4 99.9 1 Mod Metals 1 WO MW 657.o 1,736.9 5W 30 Car et 135.2 N4 2 Personal Computers N4 $0.9 99.9 514 1 Concrete Mxetl MW 2,028.4 iM M 23 Asphefl Shingles 1 481.0 % 5 wa0 330.7 51A N4 12 50,9 Wnv.te 0 1643.1 355.3 0 389.7 91,3' 0 all 207.9 62.5 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 D 0 0 b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1,335) commodity Tons 5ourse Reduced Tons Recycled Tons landRlled Tens Combusted Tons Composted TOMIMTCE meeicans - 6,0 N4 0 Glass 56.0 N4 1 HOpE 1.5 N4 0 PET 2,9 N 0 C mated Containers 116.0 tN 23 Me ezines/IMrtl -cuss mal 16.1 - 514 4 51ews a ar 17,8 NA afice Pa er 7.7 5N 1 ehmnsbnal Lubber 1,689.9 396.4 N4 1.249 Pood Scre s 1 1 40.9 4 Yam Trimtln s 5P 16.6 Grass 514 16.2 Leaves 514 16.2 Branches N4 70.0 Wad Paper a eree 514 435.8 1 Mod Metals 514 657.o Mad Mail. 514 003,6 Mxed Or anks N4 M 99.9 Mxetl MW tU Sb 1,736.9 carrot 135,2 Porsonal CafryNers 50,9 Wnv.te N4 1643.1 355.3 As haRGMO les 389.7 91,3' ) all 207.9 62.5 112 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Change in GHG Emission$ (MTCE): (680) appendix e IM E -23 city of santa monica zero waste strategic operations appendix e E -24 Attachment 7 City of Santa Monica Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan Revenue and Expense Data from City E%HIBITI Resource Recovery& Rerytling(g]) Fund GMDER nnuns .nI Ed., IDOLLY EI wE1nuF Aenie '. 6wms CLOSE,/ ELINALMn Cememv. - Peres. 5 In ROGR 61 YAG io)AL wTH, IOF GEP .x ..G. RED. O,A. REM", 11.1P NTPL 63.14% 3604% COLLECTION FEES 515603W] 901510 TRANSFER STATI ON EA1.1 OAO% O.00% III 901530 SIEGAL PIE% -VPS 5) O00 H.S. Pm CL. wcrER nISNN E.G. C.D. III a'. LIKE 6 40AV0 OTHER 0.EVExGE M FACTS .W% mx .4% FISAx IFECREENG LIPS ,GI SFL1 OF IFILLIS PASS (200) Isoo 4050HE TRANSFER STATION Lc USE Ind.. Hal PRIVATE MILLER ICI I (141,1111 1 0% 4.0o% 300,00E Do R ITAI .0 DOC o0% 4079W STATE PEEYCLNG PROGRAM : O.W% G.so% 3690% PRON NO ON &OEMOLrtION 35000 Sconce 1.,.% da IEI OO.OP.S :Cal ))SO E UN CHECK FEES 3usee SOG W% 1W 00% 9WO00 PEENV6 29/6966 SS1W] P TEMPLOYERS Sv3x392 IS, 55% DEC. 5.11% 461% . 15.9)% OI 0.95% 1.6t% 9.33% 6t3% 10.03% 31". ).05% ).91% 5.30% 1.63% 6W% 951% I AM 233% 3.18% Ed 90 OVERTME 10.13% CI. 0.39% 6.33% I 330% 690% 3133% .W% 0 ➢0% .0.00% Oe0% .0% I.. 61, 6M 3.)0% 0.)9% OWw NFO% O.W% eU 35% o. 0.95% .6t% 511)30 OV.111 9 COMPINSVPANCE t3.55% .3 E% 1.11% 'D61% .... I SA]% .13% .t3% A3% 51.55% 7E. ).AS% 5.30% LOO 191. SA3% 3.10% PC PI MELICAL-MIAL FORT 1,171,1E' 3'. 030% 3.13% ST. '. 15AM GM% a3% 1,55% 51% 1.4. 5.03% 3.1H% Ed ... 0.95% I'Ll 4.33% .30% �.% SITE. COUR I 55% .30% 061% 111. E6% AS% SLSS% >C. ]4% 5.30% 1.63% 3a3% 3.10% vssw s.ux GAI1 -HEAE .a% e3% s3% LA6% EE HEALTH CONTRII0NTON .tl% :ISAM C.C6w 0.95% 16t% 413% �20% 3L. 511))3 REREMENT � MSC. EMIL IRSO 35, 9M as% 3155% )05% 951% n3% 1.- 511774 RETIREMENT AFFLOODED con EUddu F.A. Lo. Focal I a.. 40. �00% .56% EG. W% MP 16366 061% 'SSATb 215 % a3% 3.18% 5119)B E pE : III 23v% '15.4)% .33% O.t3% 1003% DITS. ]85% EAM .63% 6.E0% 951% End con A 36 3355% SAA6 1 AS% 161% 9.53% 5.30% 1.63% 6.60% I.E. AINSURANCEe O .55% 11% 15AT.5 006% 0.9E% 74911 3a3% 3.16% 5119>F OI RALTY 931 33 .55% OxG% t3v% 061% 3 SA>% O6% 0.95% 1 .6t% 633% 9 0.1)% 1083% SITE. )85% )91% 534% 1 .63% EEO% 9.Si% 196% 1P3% 310% 510000 SAUPIES ANO WP46 0)e) 331 533110 LrtL -EGL POwEP 300EO 300.% of ",I. HCHIP ES -WATER GO..% MCI MCI 500 FROPERSE 101 1. IFFS, EP HO "I'll FIGGISITID :1.,Off: .. W ➢0 5433N INVEMOPY I"IF. IW.L4w 1..00% CONANA .00% CO. 1 ELI I.E. OTHER OP EPATIxI SPOT 55.0% 486% 5.10% .% WA FACING ..OE% iWeO% O09 11.10 '.'AIR'6 IFIA I LL .d. .3S% .33% 395% O.OJ% ITS)% 6.T1% SW% 3.36% 9.31% .63% 3.95% 3.95% 1004M 522SCRE VEFAGLES-AEPPAIFREC�- "'Coo a.. 050% B.3S% OREP a% oa,m# 11.11 1. PHIL 3053W 14. 336% 911% .95% N MAINTENANCE 0.506 0.36% 0.% 080% 6.13% A9% 1.5% 18)% AUTO 050% ..% O.O. .A% B.IE% a9% 95% Mil PROPERTY INSURANCE Ono { E0000% o...% QFH20 SPECIAL EQUIP MAINT N,A. LUI OmAymi SHEM E.11 'Ll C cOn 014. LI ElyP OCR% II.Cal 1. NEI cal . .1 A 1m5I 4 Ol 17.11% IrIll UIG4 1311 _ TOO AM 533180 TRANSFER STATION CHEMICALS E j7n�d )50 OE. 6G A)% C.W% .00% OW% 40% MA0. BOONS P 5E0 1..% OC.OWE IODEPERS PRINTED FORMS A,,CD . Ed . OSGY SO% 0.13% 906% se% IIRALLIED I C44170 UNIFORM I PROTECTIVE AS% 3a>% >.5>Y 297M 19.1 HENSTROM V AIDE MELEGRE CO.. .4111 11. Dr.'s 20AM 00.% Ox .55% .10% 3.11% 0.61% 15: ,c 61% Al. .43% .63% E60Y »x ss.Sa Cox.xanLGiu sExvlcFS 147 ALI AIDE N.OG% AOw vw so Too- sx1. .loz ..90% IDOGREAS CUAI o.row .17. L49u vA 55060 PR06L SIGN vi [RVIC[SMr evil 40.16% ERA 1936% 5.13% O.N .60% A6% 10.00% 150% W% On. aC. 1000Ud 555070 RACYCLUSIDISPol FEES COCA I onany, 1. 51.)1% .95% 555300 PE MBV0.5E ENG NEEDING OFFICE 100.W% OOr 31359 2443%".. .99% 013% V O..w .Y% 93% 100l. 5]9390 UT CH M E LLN G SEPVICE 04 W 0W% 91 AO% 101% 9.16% G ➢1% 100,0OM SSOWI SUPPU6Axp.11.115 SSert003 50090 COMMVNCAT ON55Y1TFIVS so. C..% .0.30% 036% C.03% 1>3AM 11PA% 8011% 70534 0W% 5721 1806% 0.89% t00,Opd L:\CllerMASANTA MOMCASCro Wam SCULAREPEEMSpreadsNeets Final VersonVInAlleetl SpreaESlleelSWpested ELI and Fxpense Oats hom CINAIIOeatlon by BUtlOet- 5 Ev111 -1 E%XIBRS Pemueed Remvery & heryCing(27) Fund L: \Cllentd\ NTN MONK Veto Waete MII \REP0RM\SpteadeM1eeb Rl nal ve Jan \Flnalaad 5pteadshaata\ Updated Revenue and Expen.e Oat , Mann CltyFllomtlon by Budg.t - $ Fah l -3 Stettin At Ma M3710'", L: \Cllentd\ NTN MONK Veto Waete MII \REP0RM\SpteadeM1eeb Rl nal ve Jan \Flnalaad 5pteadshaata\ Updated Revenue and Expen.e Oat , Mann CltyFllomtlon by Budg.t - $ Fah l -3 ..,.I'd Resource Remyery & Reryeling (g)) Fund L:\Cllents\S9NTP MDNILtdesa Waste 3011\ REPORT\ spseadm,mm'In.'Velslon\Flnallxed 5pseadmvmtd \LpdatedRevenue and Expense Data from ClWAllobacm: by 9udgH -$ pM1l -3 � ® ® ®m�mR�6fl1 ® ® ® ® ®i3 a6mml' ' �0.•F91m�� ® ® ® ® ® ®� © ®�1�® •• .:. �m�mimlmm ®�mm ® ® ®Qm� ©��C�I ®m�m��® ©SID ©EDDmFI ®� © ®F�® 1.1--s—se- . .. �m�mimlm ®� ® ®mmml ®mom ® ® ®�mlml ® ®ml ©m�l� ©mG3.71�® WE �m�mlmlmm��m® mm ®mcim� ® ®F�� ®mlm� ® ® ®�mR•e11�(� Ron. ....... �F�® F�®® �m® F�F�mlm lm� ®m�m�� ®ml ®F� ®F��m0�F�aFII.11 ..; �m�w�mt mmo. ���® mm® me • ®m• ®�� ®mlm�F'le��E?0�m51�I�F� �m�mlmlm® �m© �Imm® ml m�F�E��I ©[aHs'.Ilm�m� ® ® ® ® ® ®�R�'.D• 1�® ... .. ������. ��m��R��r• �noE��E�aa�o�® I�a�����F�m� r.��� ®��F�n���s���mn��m � ® ® ® ® ®�mm ® ® ®ms• ® ®® ®gym ® ® ® ® ®�ms�® '• .: ®®® m��r •�mc��mta��m�ma� ® ® ®E�s�F����r•� ��m ® ®m�on� ®m ® ® ®me• ® ®® ®gym ® ® ® ® ®�mnc.��® ��oa® m, mr is �m�mm ®E�Emm� ®��m•� ®Em ® ®E�E��m�m�m � ® ®® Emma® �mmEie ® ®m�m•m• ®m•�m ® ®n�� ®� ® ®�r•� � ®oa�m, ®�o�mmE�E�Em gym•® ®gym ® ®E�E� ®�mn�.��r� �mn ® ® ®Eam��m ® ® ® ®me• ®�m�m ®gym ® ® ® ® ®�mn�� ®� �ma ® ®m�m� ® ® ® ® ®ml>• ® ®® ®gym ® ® ® ®m�mnc��m �® �FmFmE�r ��mmF�F�R�F�m •m•m• ®��Emm.m ® ®�m��E� ®®® mm.. mm® ®Emm ®�oa�m��E��� ®mm,�mm ®��mn�E� ® Emrmm® �mm�� ®���� ®� ®m�m� ® ®��o ®���mao�® � ®m ® ®m ®mom ® ® ® ®me• ® ® ® ®� ® ® ® ® ® ®� ®��® L:\Cllents\S9NTP MDNILtdesa Waste 3011\ REPORT\ spseadm,mm'In.'Velslon\Flnallxed 5pseadmvmtd \LpdatedRevenue and Expense Data from ClWAllobacm: by 9udgH -$ pM1l -3 E%XIBI1I Resource Rucmery & ReWding (37) Fund L\CIIenu \SANTA MONICVM Wam 2011 \REPOMSprmdsh.eIs Flnal I— Ian \Flnalhud 1,— dsheets \Uptlated Revenuean d Expense Oa. hom ClryAlontlon Ey BUEget -5 Fxh1 -4 Attachment 8 City of Santa Monica Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan Zero Waste Program Cost Analysis City of Santa Monies Cost Analysis for Behavior Change Marketine APPENDIX HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G -1 Nrrent Low S$$ Web SSS Current LowW Hi ,h Current Low$$$ hill S$5 Material Handling Costs Current Annua l Refuse Tons Collected 6,305.41 20,610.30 38,226.25 Target Additional Annual Tons 409.78 409.78 1,549.29 1,549.29 2,831.35 2,831.35 - CorrentRefuseDisPOSalCOst/Ton $ 38.41 - $ 38.41 - $ 38.41 Avoided Disposal $ (15,]39]1) $ (15,]39]3) $ (59,508.42) $ (59,506.42) $ (108,]52.23) $ (306,]52.23) 0ganics Tonnage - 151.17 478.58 902.6] Organics Material Handling Cort/Ton $ 64.00 $ 59.00 $ 59.00 Increased Organics Processing Costs $ - $ 9,6]4.6] $ - $ 28,236.50 $ - $ 53,25].32 Low assumes that RCM campaign is teaching how to avoid generating waste food; high assumes organic processing NET CHANGE MATERIAL HANDLING COSTS $ (15,]39.]1) $ 16,065.041 $ (59,508.42) $ (31,271.921 $ 1108,]52.23) $ (55,494.92) Behavior Change Marketing Costs Number of Units ],38] 45,209 1,270 Multi - Family based on units not accounts Per Uni[ Cost per Month $ 0.50 $ 0.75 $ 0.50 $ 0.75 $ 0.50 $ 0.75 High based on HOR study for Alameda County C09PERYEAB $ 44,322 $ 66,483 $ 271,254 $ 406,881 $ 7,620 $ 11,430 NETCOST /(SAVINGS) $ 28,582.29 $ 60,417.96 $ 211,]45.58 $ 3]5,609.08 $ (101,132.23) $ (44,064.92) Rote Impact( %pfRefuu Collection Revenue) 1 1.096 2.1% 1.8% 5.0% -L1% -0.5% C05T /(SAVINGS) PERTON DNERTED $ 69.75 $ 147.44 $ 13667 $ 242.44 $ 35.721 $ 1556) HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G -1 HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G -2 City of Santa Monica APPENDIX G Cost Analysis for Food Scraps Collection - Residential . Collection Costs Current Annual Greenwaste Tons Collected 6,378.68 Target Additional Annual Tons 1,124.12 1,124.12 Current Greenwaste Direct Cost /Ton Collected $ 158.97 New Organics Route Costs - $ 178,698.93 $ 178,698.93 Residential Refuse Direct Cost Per Ton $ 124.10 - Less: Refuse Route Savings $ (111,603.48) $ (69,752.17) Assumes 50% (High); 80% (Low) Efficiency Factor NET CHANGE COLLECTION COSTS $ 67,095.45 $ 108,946.75 Material Handling Costs Refuse Txfr /Txpt /Disposal $ /Ton $ 60.69 Organics Txfr /Txpt /Processing $/Ton $ 78.18 New Organics Txfr /Txpt /Processing Costs $ 87,883.51 $ 87,883.51 Less: Avoided, Disposal Costs (68,222.70) (68,222.70) NET CHANGE MATERIAL HANDLING COSTS - $ 19,660.82 $ 19,660.82 Education and Outreach Costs - - - Annual Food Waste Customer Mailer Design Cost $ 208 $ 312 Based on $52 /hour staff rate including benefits Production Cost $ 377 $ 538 Assumes $0.07 (low); $0.10 (high) per unit Customers with Yard Waste Service 5,379 Mailing Cost 0.45 $ 2,421 $ 2,421 Food Waste Customer Mailer Cost $ 3,005 $ 3,270 - Container Hanger Design Cost $ 208 $ 312 Based on $52 /hour staff rate including benefits Production Cost $ 377 $ 565 Assumes $0.05 (low); $0.105 (high) per unit Customers with Yard Waste Service 5,379 $ 585 $ 877 Food Waste Customer Cart Hanger Cost ADDITIONAL EDUCATION & OUTREACH COST $ 3,590 $ 4,147 TOTAL PROGRAM COST /(SAVINGS) $ 90,345.88 $ 132,754.82 Rate Impact I'M of Residential Refuse Collection Revenue) 3.1% 4.5% COST /(SAVINGS) PER TON DIVERTED $ 80.37 $ 118.10 HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G -2 City of Santa Monica APPENDIX G Cost Analysis for Weekly Organics and RecVlables Collection; Bi -Weekly Refuse Collection - Residential HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G - 3 Collection Costs - Res. SW Direct Route Cost /Hour $ 80.88 From Santa Monica Transfer Station Study- does not include container costs Res. SW Route Hours per Year - 4,464.20 Route Hours Required for Every Other Week Refuse 2,455.31 2,678.52 Assumes 55% (Low); 60% (High) Based on Portland, Oregon Savings In Route Hours (2,008.89) (1,785.68) Change in Direct Route Costs $ (162,479.02) $ (144,425.80) NET CHANGE COLLECTION COSTS $ (162,479.02) $ (144,425.80) Education and Outreach Costs Accounts Affected 7,387 Residential SW Routes /Day 2.15 Labor Cost /Hour $ 50.00 $ 65.00 Hourly City staff rates including benefits Cart/Door Hanger Distribution Cost $ 4,300.00 $ 5,590.00 Cart/Door Hanger Design Cost $ 208 $ 312 Based on $52 /hour staff rate including benefits Cart/Door Hanger Production Cost $ 568.80 $ 853.20 Assumes $0.07 (low); $0.105 (high) per unit ADDITIONAL EDUCATION & OUTREACH COST $ 5,076.80 $ 6,755.20 TOTAL PROGRAM COST /(SAVINGS) $ (157,402.22) $ (137,670.60) Rate Impact (96 of Residential Refuse Collection Revenue) -5.4% -4.7% Target Additional Annual Tons - 504.46 504.46 COST /(SAVINGS) PER TON DIVERTED - $ (312.02) $ (272.91) HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G - 3 HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G -4 Cost City of Santa Analysis for Wet /Dry Monica APPENDIX G Collection - Residential Collection Costs Current Solid Waste Route Hours 4,464.20 Decrease in Route Hours 3,571.36 3,124.94 Service reduced from 3- Stream to 2- Stream collection (Law =80 %of current route hours; High= 70 %of current route hours Residential Direct Cost per Route Hour $ 80.88 From Santa Monica Transfer Station Study - does not include container costs Residential Route Hours 14,893.32. _ Change in Residential Route Cost $ (288,851.60) $ (252,745.15) Processing Costs Disposal Cost/Ton $ 38.41 Target Wet Tons 320.06 Pre - Processing Cost/Ton for AD $ 8.00 $ 24.00 Transfer/Transport Cost /Ton (assumes same as existing) $ - $ - Anaerobic Digestion Cost/Ton - $ 65.00 $ 66.50 $65 /ton San Jose @ ZWED; $66.50 /ton CCCSWA @ EBMUD Target Dry Tons 241.98 Recyclables Processing Cost /Ton $ (33.31) $ (29.98) Includes net value of commodities after processing cost. High assumes 90% of material handling cost Wet Tons Processing Costs $ 23,364.47 $ 28,965.55 Dry Tons Processing Costs - $ (8,059.90) $ (7,253.91) Avoided Disposal Costs - $ (21,588.16) $ (21,588.16) NET CHANGE PROCESSING COSTS $ (6,283.59) $ 123.47 Education & Outreach Costs $ - $ - HF &H assumes no change in Education & Outreach Casts resulting from this program. Assumed to re- purpose existing education /outreach efforts /investments to align with - $ (295,135.19) $ Wet /Dry system. (252,621.67) TOTAL PROGRAM COST /(SAVINGS) Rate Impact (% of Residential Refuse Collection Revenue) ,. -10 -1% -8.6% _. Target Additional Annual Tons 562.05 562.05 COST /(SAVINGS) PER TON DIVERTED $ ' (525.11) $ (449.47) HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G -4 City of Santa Monica Cost Analysis for Residuals Processing APPENDIX I Single Fermi multHFamily Commercial Notes urr n Low S$5 High Cement Law SS High SSS Current Low 555 High Collection Costs -No change in collsaion casts Processing COSts Current Disposal Tip Fee - $ 38.41 $ 38.41 $ 38.41 $ 38.41 $ 38.41 $ 38.41 Transformation Tip Fee $ 47.00 $ 49.00 $ 47.00 $ 49.00 $ 47.00 $ 49.00 Tip Fee Per TOn Increase $ 8.59 $ 10.59 $ 8.59 $ 10.59 $ 8.59 $ 10.59 1.5 mile lncreaseto SERRF from Puente Hills -will change with closure of Puente Hills Landfill Residual Tons 1,247.54 3,376.74 4,886.67 Education &Outreach Costs HF &H assumes no change in Education & Outreach Costs resulting from this program. Assumed to re- purpose existing education /outreach efforts /investments to align with Wetd)ry TOTAL PROGRAM COST /)SAVINGS) $ 10,716.40 $ 13,211.49 $ -29,006.23 $ 35,759.71 $ 41,976A7 $ 51,749.80 Rmelmpaa( %of Refuse Collection Revenue) 0.4% 0.5% 0.4% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% COST /)SAVINGS) PERTON DMERTED - $ 8.59 $ 10.59 $ 8.59 $ 10.59 $ 8.59 $ '- 1059 HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G -5 City of Santa Monica Cost Analysis for Bulky Item Collection; Move -In /Move -Out Program ection Costs Direct Cost per Route Hour Direct Annual Alley Crew Cost (Illegal Dumping) Total Multi - Family Dwelling Units Target Diversion Tonnage Collection Tonnage - Annual Participation Rate Annual Collection Events (Demand) Daily Collection Events - Pounds per Collection Event Collections Per Hour Per Route (Productivity) Percentage of Alley Crew Costs to be Saved from Reduced Illegal Dumping New Collection Costs Avoided Alley Crew Collection Costs NET CHANGE COLLECTION COSTS terial Handling Costs Disposal Cost Per Ton New Re -Use Coordination Costs APPENDIX G $ 126.54 (Commercial front - loader Cost Per Hour from City's Transfer Station Study $ 533,603.13 Alley crew collected 791 tons of illegally dumped material 45,209 - 175.63 175.63 tons is projected to be diverted from the Move -In /Move- out /Bulky 243.14 182.36 Item Reuse program 824.41 18,254.01 15% 20% Based on 1 collection per unit per year 6,781 9,042 - 26 35 243.14 182.36 6 4 18,254.01 5% 20% 175.63 divided by the current illegally dumped item collection of 791 tons ication and Outreach Costs = 22% which would be the maximum theoretical savings $ 143,019 $ 286,037 $ (26,680) $ (106,721) $ 116,339 $ 179,317 $ 38.41 $ 25,000.00 $ 30,000.00 Santa Monica Shares Cost. Low= $59,050 initial cost less $35,000 one- time set up charges Avoided Disposal Costs (6,745.99) (6,745.99) NET CHANGE IN MATERIAL HANDLING COSTS $ 18,254.01 $ 23,254.01 ication and Outreach Costs Does not include technical assistance to multi - family units Annual Multi - Family Customer Mailer Number of MFDUs 45,209 - NumberofMFProperties 4,974 Design Cost $ 208 $ 312 Based on $52 /hour staff rate including benefits Production Cost $ 3,513 $ 5,018 Assumes $0.07 (low); $0.10 (high) per unit Mailing Cost 0.45 $ 22,582 $ 22,582 Multi - Family Customer Mailer Cost $ 26,303 $ 27,913 ADDITIONAL EDUCATION & OUTREACH COST $ 26,303 $ 27,913 -AL PROGRAM COST /(SAVINGS) Rate Impact (% of Multi-Family Refuse Collection Revenue) ;T/(SAVINGS) PER TON DIVERTED $ 160,895.68 $ 230,483.37 2.1% 3.1% $ 916.10 $ 1,312.31 HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G - 6 City of Santa Monica Cost Analvsis for Food Scraps Collection - Commercial Collection Costs Current Annual Organics Tons Collected 1,919.03 Target Additional Annual Tons 3,975.27 3,975.27 Current Com'I Organic Direct Cost/Ton Collected $ 172.48 New Organics Route Costs $ 685,653.30 $ 685,653.30 Commercial Refuse Direct Cost Per Ton $ 95.89 Less: Refuse Route Savings $(304,939.28) $ (190,587.05) Assumes 50% (High); 80% (Low) Efficiency Factor NET CHANGE COLLECTION COSTS $ 380,714.02 $ 495,066.25 Material Handling Costs Refuse Txfr/Txpt /Disposal$/Ton $ 60.69 Food Waste Txfr/Txpt /Processing$/Ton $ 73.18 New Food Waste Txfr/Txpt /Processing Costs $ 290,910.08 $ 290,910.08 Less: Avoided Disposal Costs (241,258.98) (241,258.98) NET CHANGE MATERIAL HANDLING COSTS $ 49,651.09 $ 49,651.09 Education and Outreach Costs Technical Assistance City Staff Cost per Hour $ 50.00 5 65.00 Hourly City staff rates including benefits Hours per Customer per Year 1 4 " Customers 400 360 160 Assumes Outreach to 90% (low); 40% (high) of customers Technical Assistance Cost $18,000 $41,600 Interior Containers Containers Provided per Customer $ 1 55.75 2 $ 61.25 Low=68G ($39 +$16.75 delivery); High =95G {$44.50 +16.75 delivery). Does not Cost per Container - include sales tax of 9.25% Customers Requesting Containers 100 200 Assumes 25% (low); 50% (high) request interior container Interior Containers Cost $5,575 $24,500 Posters /Flyers for Container Signage Initial Design Costs $ 208 $ 312 Based on $52 /hour staff rate including benefits Interior Posters $7 $ 1,400 $ 2,100 Assumes 50% (low); 75% (high) request signage Exterior Bin Signage /Stickers $5 $ 1,000 $ 1,500 Assumes 50% (low); 75% (high) request signage Container signage Costs $ 2,608 $ 3,912 Annual Food Waste Customer Mailer Design Cost - $ 208 $ 312 Based on $52 /hour staff rate including benefits Production Cost $ 28 $ 40 Assumes $0.07 (low); $0.10 (high) per unit Mailing Cost 0.45 $ 180 $ 180 " Food Waste Customer Mailer Cost $ 416 $ 532 ADDITIONAL EDUCATION & OUTREACH COST $ 26,599 $ 70,544 TOTAL PROGRAM COST /(SAVINGS) $ 456,964.11. $. 615,261.34 Rate Impact (56 of Commercial Refuse Collection Revenue) 1 5.2% 7,O56 _ COST /(SAVINGS) PER TON DIVERTED $ 114.95 $ 154.77 HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G - 7 APPENDIX G HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G - 8 City of Santa Monica APPENDIX G Cost Analysis for Wet /Dry Collection - Commercial Collection Costs Increase in Route Hours -2.6% -2.6% Based on data from proposals submitted to San Jose (Low); Fresno (High) for wet /dry collection. Service reduced from 3- Stream to 2- Stream collection. Commercial Direct Cost per Route Hour $ 126.54 From Santa Monica Transfer Station Study - does not include container costs Commercial Route Hours 52,697.32 - Change in Commercial Route Hours - (1,370.13) (1,370.13) NET CHANGE COLLECTION COSTS $ (173,376.29) $ (173,376.29) Processing Costs Disposal Cost /Ton $ 38.41 Target Wet Tons 1,418.41 Pre - Processing Cast /Ton for AD $ 8.00 $ 24.00 Transfer /Transport Cost /Ton.(assumes same as existing) $ - $ - - Anaerobic Digestion Cost/Ton $ 65.00 $ 66.50 $65 /ton San Jose @ ZWED; $66.50 /ton CCCSWA @ EBMUD Target Dry Tons 1,201.35 Recyclables Processing Cost /Ton $ (33.19) $ (33.18) Includes net value of commodities after processing cost Wet Tons Processing Costs $ 103,544.22 $ 128,366.47 - Dry Tans Processing Costs $ (39,867.93) $ (39,857.48) Avoided Disposal Costs $ (100,624.96) $ (100,624.96) NET CHANGE PROCESSING COSTS $ (36,948.66) $ (12,115.98) Education & Outreach Costs $ - $ - HF &H assumes no change in Education & Outreach Costs resulting from this program. Assumed to re- purpose existing education /outreach efforts /investments to align with Wet /Dry system. TOTAL PROGRAM COST /(SAVINGS) $ (210,324.96) $ (185,492.27) Rate Impact (% of Commercial Refuse Collection Revenue) -2.4% .2619.76 - -2.1% 2619.76 Target Additional Annual Tons COST /(SAVINGS) PER TON DIVERTED $ (80.28) $ (70.81) HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G - 8 HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G -9 City of Santa Monica APPENDIX G Cost Analysis for Food Scraps Collection - Multi - Family Cart Customers Collection Costs Current Annual Greenwaste Tons Collected 609.83 Target Additional Annual Tons 475.83 475.83 Current Greenwaste Direct Cost /Ton Collected $ 158.97 New Organics Route Costs $ 75,641.77 $ 75,641.77 Multi - Family Refuse Direct Cost Per Ton $ 127.24 - . Less: Refuse Route Savings $ (48,437.31) $ (30,273.32) Assumes 50% (High); 80% (Low) Efficiency Factor NET CHANGE COLLECTION COSTS $ 27,204.46 $ 45,368.45 Material Handling Costs Refuse Txfr /Txpt /Disposal$/Ton $ 60.69 Organics Txfr /Txpt /Processing $/Ton $ 78.18 New Organics Txfr/Txpt /Processing Costs $ 37,200.37 $ 37,200.37 Less: Avoided Disposal Costs (28,878.10) (28,878.10) NET CHANGE MATERIAL HANDLING COSTS $ 8,322.26 $ 8,322.26 Education and Outreach Costs Annual Food Waste Customer Mailer Design Cost $ 208 $ 312 Based on $52 /hour staff rate including benefits Production Cost $ 408 $ 583 Assumes $0.07 (low); $0.10 (high) per unit Customers with Yard Waste Service 5,828 Mailing Cost 0.45 $ 2,623 $ 2,623 Food Waste Customer Mailer Cost $ 3,239 $ 3,517 Container Hanger Design Cost $ 208 $ 312 Based on $52 /hour staff rate including benefits Production Cost $ 408 $ 612 Assumes $0.05 (low); $0.105 (high) per unit Customers 5,828 $ 616 $ 924 Food Waste Customer Cart Hanger Cost ADDITIONAL EDUCATION & OUTREACH COST $ 3,855 $ 4,441 TOTAL PROGRAM COST /(SAVINGS) $ 39,381.24 $ 58,132.05 Rate Impact (% of Residential Refuse Collection Revenue) 1.3% 2.0% COST /(SAVINGS) PER TON DIVERTED $ 82.76 $ 122.17 - HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G -9 City of Santa Monica Cost Analvsis for Food Scraos Collection - Multi - Familv Bin Customers Collection Costs Current Annual Organics Tons COFected 609.83 Target Additional Annual Tons 463.22 463.22 Current Multi - Family Organic Direct Cost/Ton Collected $ 172.48 New Organics Route Costs $ 79,896.89 $ 79,896.89 Multi - Family Refuse Direct Cost Per Ton $ 127.24 - - Less: Refuse Route Savings $ .(47,154.16) $ (29,471.35) Assumes 50% (High); 80% (Low) Efficiency Factor NET CHANGE COLLECTION COSTS $ 32,742.73 $ 50,425.54 _ Material Handling Costs Refuse Txfr/Txpt /Disposal$/TOn $ 60.69 Food Waste Txfr/Txpt/Processing$/Ton $ 73.18 New Food Waste Txfr/Txpt /Processing Costs $ 33,898.77 $ 33,898.77 Less: Avoided Disposal Costs (28,113.10) (28,113.10) NET CHANGE MATERIAL HANDLING COSTS $ 5,785.67 $ 5,785.67 Education and Outreach Costs Technical Assistance - City Staff Cost per Hour $ 50.00 $ 65.00 Hourly City staff rates including benefits Hours per Customer per Year 1 4 Customers 1,395 1255.5 558 Assumes Outreach to 90% (low); 40% (high) of customers Technical Assistance Cost $62,775 $145,080 Interior Containers Containers Provided per Customer 1 $ 55.75 2 $ 61.25 Low =68G ($39 +$16.75 delivery); High =95G ($44.50 +16.75 delivery). Does not Cost per Container include sales tax of 9.25% Customers Requesting Containers 348.75 697.5 Assumes 25% (low); 50% (high) request interior container Interior Containers Cost $19,443 $85,444 Posters /Flyers for Container Signage Initial Design Costs $ 208 $ 312 Based on $52 /hour staff rate including benefits Interior Posters $7 $ 4,883 $ 7,324 Assumes 50% (low); 75% (high) request signage - ExteriorBinSignage /Stickers $5 $ 3,488 $ 5,231 Assumes 50% (low); 75% (high) request signage Container Signoge Costs $ 8,578 $ 12,867 Annual Food Waste Customer Mailer Design Cost $ 208 $ 312 Based on $52 /hour staff rate including benefits Production Cost $ 98 $ 140 Assumes $0.07 (low); $0.10 (high) per unit Mailing Cost 0.45 $ 628 $ 628 Food Waste Customer Mailer Cost $ 933 $ 1,079 ADDITIONAL EDUCATION & OUTREACH COST $ 91,729 $ 244,470 TOTAL PROGRAM COST /(SAVINGS) $ 130,257.62 $ 300,681.22 Rate Impact ( %ofCommercial Refuse Collection Revenue) 1 1.5 %. 3.4% COST /(SAVINGS) PER TON DIVERTED $ 281.20 $ 649.10 HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G -10 APPENDIX G City of Santa Monica APPENDIX G Cost Analysis for Weekly Organics and Recylables Collection; Eli- Weekly Refuse Collection - Multi - Family HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G - 11 Collection Costs Side- Loader SW Direct Route Cost /Hour $ 80.88 From Santa Monica Transfer Station Study- does not include container costs Multi - Family SW Route Hours per Year 6,489.60 Route Hours Required for Every Other Week Refuse 3,569.28 3,893.76 Assumes 55% (Low); 60% (High) Based on Portland, Oregon Savings in Route Hours (2,920.32) (2,595.84) Change in Direct Route Costs $ (236,195.48) $ (209,951.54) NET CHANGE COLLECTION COSTS $ (236,195.48) $ (209,951.54) _ Education and Outreach Costs Accounts Affected 4,075 Multi - Family SW Routes /Day 3.12 Labor Cost /Hour $ 50.00 $ 65.00 Hourly City staff rates including benefits Cart /Door Hanger Distribution Cost $ 6,240.00 $ 8,112.00 Cart /Door Hanger Design Cost $ 208 $ 312 Based on $52 /hour staff rate including benefits Cart /Door Hanger Production Cost $ 313.78 $ 470.66 Assumes $0.07 (low); $0.105 (high) per unit ADDITIONAL EDUCATION & OUTREACH COST $ 6,761.78 $ 8,894.66 TOTAL PROGRAM COST /(SAVINGS) - $.(229,433.71) $ (201,056.88) Rate Impact (% of Residential Refuse Collection Revenue) -7.8% -6.9% Target Additional Annual Tons 2694.18 2694.18 COST /(SAVINGS) PER TON DIVERTED $ (85.16) $ ' (74.63) HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G - 11 City of Santa Monica Cost Analysis for Wet /DrV Collection - Multi - Family APPENDIX G HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G - 12 Collection Costs Decrease in Route Hours -2.6% -2.6% Based on data from proposals submitted to San Jose (Low); Fresno (High) for wet /dry collection. Service reduced from 3- Stream to 2- Stream collection. Multi - Family Direct Cost per Route Hour $ 106.45 From Santa Monica Transfer Station Study - does not include container costs Multi - Family Route Hours _ 22,213.88 Change in Multi - Family Route Hours (577.56) (577.56) NET CHANGE IN MULTI- FAMILY COLLECTION COSTS $ (61,481.36) $ (61,481.36) Processing Costs Disposal Cost /Ton - $ 38.41 Target Wet Tons 774.41 Pre - Processing Cost/Ton for AD $ 8.00 $ 24.00 Transfer/Transport Cost/Ton (assumes same as existing) $ - $ - Anaerobic Digestion Cost/Ton $ 65.00 $ 66.50 $65 /ton San Jose @ ZWED; $66.50 /ton CCCSWA @ EBMUD Target Dry Tons 840.60 Recyclables Processing Cost /Ton $ (33.19) $ (33.18) Includes net value of commodities after processing cost Wet Tons Processing Costs $ 56,531.86 $ 70,084.02 Dry Tons Processing Costs $ (27,896.25) $ (27,888.94) Avoided Disposal Costs $ (62,032.55) $ (62,032.55) NET CHANGE PROCESSING COSTS $ (33,396.93) $ (19,837.46) Education & Outreach Costs HF &H assumes no change in Education & Outreach Costs resulting from this program. Assumed to re- purpose existing education /outreach efforts /investments to align with Wet /Dry system. TOTAL PROGRAM COST /(SAVINGS) $ (94,878.28) $ (81,318.82) Rate Impact (% of Multi- Family Refuse Collection Revenue) -1.3% 1615.01 -1.1% 1615.01 Target Additional Annual Tons COST /(SAVINGS) PER TON DIVERTED $ - (58.75) $ (50.35) HF &H Consultants, LLC Appendix G - 12 City of Santa Monica Cost Analysis for Expansion of Mandatory Commercial Recvclin Collection Costs Current Annual Recycling Tons Collected 4,046.30 Target Additional Annual Tons 905.95 905.95 Current Recycling Direct Cost/Ton Collected $ 365.50 New Recycling Route Costs $ 331,123.11 $ 331,123.11 Commercial Refuse Direct Cost per Ton $ 95.89 Less: Refuse Route Savings $ (69,494.44) $ (43,434.03) Assumes 50% (High); 80% (Low) Efficiency Factor NET CHANGE COLLECTION COSTS $ 261,628.66 $ 287,689.08 Material Handling Costs Refuse Txfr/Txpt/Disposal$/ran $ 38.41 Recycling Txfr/Txpt /Processing Revenue$/Ton - $ (33.18) New Recycling Txfr/Txpt /Processing Costs $ (30,056.96) $ (30,056.96) Less: Avoided Disposal Costs (34,797.45) (34,797.45) NET CHANGE MATERIAL HANDLING COSTS $ (64,854.40) $ (64,854.40) Education and Outreach Costs Technical Assistance (Site Visits) City Staff Cost per Hour $ 50.00 $ 65.00 Hourly City staff rates including benefits Hours per Customer per Year 0.50 1.00 Customers 453 226.5 362.4 Low assumes 50% customers of the 453 customers not currently receiving recycling from FAR are self - recycling; High assumes 20% are self - recycling Technical Assistance Cost $5,663 $23,556 Additional Recycling Containers 0.50 1.00 0.50 = shared container Containers Provided per Customer Cost per Container $ 55.75 $ 255.19 Low=68G ($39 +$16.75 delivery); Med =95G ($44.50 +16.75 delive Customers Requesting Containers 317.1 407.7 Assumes 70% (low); 90% (high) Additional Recycling Containers Cost $8,839 $104,041 Posters /Flyers for Container Signage Initial Design Costs $ 208 $ 312 Based on $52 /hour staff rate including benefits Interior Posters $7 $ 1,586 $ 2,378 Assumes 50% (low); 75% (high) requestsignage Exterior Bin Signage /Stickers $5 $ 1,133 $ 1,699 Assumes 50% (low); 75% (high) request signage Container5ignage Costs $ 2,926 $ 4,389 Annual Recycling Customer Mailer Design Cost $ 208 $ 312 Based on $52 /hour staff rate including benefits Total Number of Commercial Customers 1,270 Production Cost $ 32 $ 45 Assumes $0.07 (low); $0.10 (high) per unit Mailing Cost 0.45 $ 204 $ 204 Food Waste Customer Mailer Cost $ 444 $ 561 - ADDITIONALEDUCATION &OUTREACH COST $ 17,871 $ 132,547 TOTAL PROGRAM COST /(SAVINGS) $ 214,645.48 $ 355,381.79 Rote Impact( %ofCommercial Refuse Collection Revenue) 2.5% 4.1% COST /(SAVINGS) PER TON DIVERTED $ 236.93 $ 392.28 HF &H Consultants, LLC - Appendix 6 -13 APPENDIX G City of Santa Monica Attachment 9 Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan .- V Report Contributors o city of santa monica zero waste strategic operations The following organizations and individuals contributed to the research, preparation, review and evaluation of the City of Santa Monica Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan. CITY OF SANTA MONICA Kim Braun, Division Manager, Resource Recovery and Recycling Annette Morales, Principal Public Works Analyst, Resource Recovery and Recycling Myesha Jones, Resource Recovery and Recycling James Keezall, Resource Recovery and Recycling Wes Thompson, Resource Recovery and Recycling James Conway, Office of Sustainability and Environment HDR ENGINEERING. INC. Michelle P. Leonard, Vice President, Zero Waste Strategic Operations Plan Project Manager Jennifer Lao, Solid Waste Engineer Ruth Abbe, Vice President HF &H Consultants LLC - Financial and Rate Structure Analysis Laith Ezzett, CMC, Senior Vice President Robert Hilton, Vice President Debbie Morris, Project Manager IUR H -1 Oversized attachment available for review in the City Clerk's Office