O2394f:\atty\mu nNaws \barry \LUC El nteri mOrd2345ModOrd0228122d
City Council Meeting 02 -28 -12 Santa Monica, California
ORDINANCE NUMBER 2394 (CCS)
(City Council Series)
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SANTA MONICA AMENDING THE EXTENDED INTERIM ORDINANCE NUMBER
2345 (CCS), WHICH ESTABLISHED INTERIM DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURES
PENDING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LUCE, ADOPTING MODIFICATIONS
ADDRESSING ORDINANCE APPLICABILITY, CM DISTRICT NON - CONFORMING
USES, SHARED PARKING AND FAR CALCULATIONS IN THE DOWNTOWN, AND
EXEMPTIONS FOR CITY PROJECTS, TO ADD PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE
PERMITTED NUMBER OF RESTAURANTS IN THE CM DISTRICT AND THE
REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING PUBLIC PARKING SPACES WITHIN PUBLIC
PARKING STRUCTURES IN BSC -2 AND C3 -C ZONING DISTRICTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Findings and Purpose. The Council finds and declares:
(a) The City adopted a new Land Use and Circulation Element of the General
Plan of the City of Santa Monica ( "LUCE ") on July 6, 2010 but has not yet adopted
amendments to the City's Zoning Ordinance reflecting the LUCE's policies, goals and
standards.
(b)_ The adoption of the LUCE was the culmination of a multi -year planning
process that commenced in 2004.
1
(c) The LUCE encompasses the community's vision of the City's future and is
designed to maintain the City's character, protect the City's neighborhoods, manage its
transportation systems, and encourage additional housing in a sustainable manner that
ensures a high quality of life for the City's residents.
(d) The LUCE implements the community's core values through its focus on
community character and neighborhood conservation, future trip reduction, vibrant and
walkable villages, integrated land use and transportation, local land uses and housing,
jobs tied to housing and transit, promotion of social and fiscal health and diversity,
sustainability, community benefits, open space, and implementation, phasing and
monitoring.
(e) The LUCE goals and policies are predicated on the integration of land use
and transportation including a focus on the type of land uses, the location of land uses,
the quality of projects, the amount of developmental change, and the pace of this
change.
(f) The LUCE was prepared with the general purpose of guiding and
accomplishing coordinated and harmonious development of the City which, in
accordance with existing and future needs, best promotes the public health, safety, and
general welfare, as well as efficiency and economy in the process of development.
(g) The LUCE substantially revises the City's land use policies, goals, and
standards.
(h) The City's planning and zoning regulations are presently under
comprehensive review and revision in order to ensure that such regulations are
consistent with the General Plan as amended and consistent with the public health,
2
safety, and welfare. This comprehensive revision of the City's Zoning Ordinance is a
substantial project which is crucial to the community's long -term welfare as reflected in
the goals, policies, and standards of the LUCE. Major elements of the comprehensive
revision of the Zoning Ordinance are expected with 18 -24 months.
(i) Certain critical areas of conflict between the LUCE and the existing Zoning
Ordinance have been identified by the City's Planning and Community Development
Department as it has reviewed pending applications subsequent to the adoption of the
LUCE.
(j) Zoning Ordinance Part 9.04.20.28 establishes the applicability and procedures
for issuance of administrative approvals which provide for the ministerial administrative
review and assessment of proposed developments subject to explicit standards
contained in the Zoning Ordinance.
(k) The administrative approval process is premised on the assumption that the
explicit standards in the Zoning Ordinance have been adopted to ensure that a
completed project is in harmony with existing or potential development in the area and
is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan.
(1) However, this premise underlying the administrative approval process is no
longer applicable given the significant ways in which the LUCE differs from the prior
Land Use and Circulation elements including, but not limited to, the direct linkage
between land use and transportation policies and programs and the establishment of
new development policies and standards which ensure that quality development
contributes to the character of the City.
3
(m) Additionally, the LUCE establishes a base height for each land use as a
baseline. Proposed development which seeks additional height above the base is
subject to discretionary review and must meet additional requirements consistent with
the community's broader social, environmental, and circulation goals. This approach is
defined in three tiers.
(n) Under the LUCE, Tier 2 and Tier 3 projects must provide community benefits
for the City and the neighborhood. More specifically, a developer seeking to develop a
Tier 2 or Tier 3 project must include certain preferred uses, beneficial project design
features, and provide critical amenities or meet other development standards that
address the community's core needs —it's social, cultural, physical, transportation and
environmental goals.
(o) The LUCE identifies five priority categories of community benefits —new
affordable and workforce housing, GHG emission and congestion reduction, physical
improvements to create connections and open space, social and cultural facilities, and
historic preservation.
(p) The existing Zoning Ordinance does not currently incorporate this tier structure
or establish a mechanism to prioritize and necessitate that projects participate in the
community benefit tier structure, which is the basis by which much of the LUCE vision,
goals, and policies will be achieved.
(q) Additionally, the LUCE establishes 17 distinct land use designations. One of
these land use designations is the Downtown Core. The purpose of this designation is
to maintain and enhance the downtown area as the heart of the City and as a thriving,
mixed use urban environment. Unlike the other land use designations, the LUCE does
IH
not establish new height and FAR development parameters, but instead provides that
the height and FAR along with other development standards shall be determined
through a specific plan process.
(r) At present, there are approximately 700,000 square feet of administrative and
development review projects, not including development agreements, pending planning
review. Of the 700,000 square feet, approximately 500,000 square feet is located within
the Downtown Core. Approximately half of the projects in the Downtown Core are
Administrative Approvals that do not require public review and need only comply with
objective standards in the existing Zoning Ordinance. Within the Downtown, bringing
forward approximately 200,000 square feet of new development outside of the
development agreement process before the completion of the Downtown Specific Plan
means that nearly a quarter of the growth anticipated in the Downtown could be
constructed inconsistent with the yet to be adopted Specific Plan. The Downtown
Specific Plan will include a circulation framework that will address the integration of
Expo light rail into the Downtown system, freeway access, direct parking structure
access, and congestion; establishing the foundation for future land use and
transportation decisions. If these Administrative Approvals proceed in a piecemeal
fashion without these components, it undermines the community vision set forth in the
Downtown District goals and policies, as well as the Downtown Specific Plan process
underway and would detrimentally affect the City's ability to implement LUCE goals and
policies, particularly with respect to: providing open spaces, trip reduction, coordinating
with adjacent sites, congestion management, and achieving community goals through
community benefits and quality urban design.
(s) Additionally, transit - oriented districts in the City's transitioning industrial areas
are not reflected in the current zoning ordinance, which allows uses that would now be
considered undesirable and inconsistent with the LUCE.
(t) Pending completion of the comprehensive update to the Zoning Ordinance, it
is essential that development be consistent with the General Plan so that the goals and
values of the community, as reflected in the LUCE, are not significantly undercut.
Adjusting the development standards as provided in this Ordinance will ensure that the
quality of life, the environment, the ability to move around the City, and the efficacy of
the ongoing planning process are preserved.
(u) Adoption of this ordinance would not prohibit any development, but would
instead provide an alternate process by which development is reviewed and approved
so as to ensure consistency with and appropriate implementation of the LUCE.
(v) Adoption of this ordinance would also not materially alter the City's substantial
incentives for residential or mixed use development in non - residential zoning districts.
These incentives would be preserved in local law and policy. For example, residential
development in all of the City's commercial districts would remain authorized. Thus,
residential development could still occur in over 80% of the City.
(w) After the adoption of the initial interim ordinance, issues were raised relating
to the processing of projects that were in the pipeline prior to the effective date of the
initial interim ordinance which require the City to expeditiously consider and adjust the
applicability provisions of the interim ordinance to ensure fairness to project applicants
while preserving the City's ability to effectuate the goals and policies of the LUCE.
0
(x) In light of the above - detailed concerns, on February 8, 2011, the City Council
adopted Interim Ordinance Number 2345 (CCS) establishing interim development
procedures pending implementation of the LUCE through a revised Zoning Ordinance
and on April 26, 20111 adopted Ordinance Number 2356(CCS) extending Ordinance
Number 2345 (CCS).
(y) Pending completion of the City's review of its planning and zoning regulations,
it is necessary on an interim basis to modify the Zoning Ordinance as set forth in
Section 2 of this Ordinance.
(z) Since the interim ordinance was extended on April 26, 2011, it has become
apparent that allowing two restaurants per block on the east side of Main Street north of
Ocean Park Boulevard will promote the general welfare by encouraging additional
investment in that neighborhood and strengthening the connection between Main Street
and the Civic Center.
(aa) As detailed above and in the LUCE, the City's downtown is a thriving, mixed-
use urban environment for people to live, work, be entertained, and be culturally
enriched.
(bb) This area has the greatest concentration of activity in the City, anchored by
the core commercial district, including the Third Street Promenade and Santa Monica
Place.
(cc) The City's publically owned parking structures in the BSC -2 and C3 -C zone
districts are essential to a vibrant, economically viable downtown area, providing
parking for the offices, restaurants, theaters, and residences.
Iri
(dd) The vast majority of City's residents regularly visit downtown and use its
parking resources.
(ee) The importance of the City's publically -owned parking infrastructure in the
City's downtown is reflected in the numerous studies and reports over the past dozen
years, including but not limited to the 2000 Downtown Parking Management Program,
the 2002 Downtown Parking Task Force strategic plan, the 2006 Downtown Parking
Program, and the 2009 Walker Parking Study.
(ff) These centrally located parking structures enable their users to park once and
then walk to multiple destinations.
(gg) This "Park Once" philosophy contributes to the Downtown's pedestrian
character and is a major underpinning of its success.
(hh) These parking structures are also operated in a manner to meet the City's
LUCE, transportation and economic goals.
(ii) The LUCE calls for a parking management approach which utilizes a shared
pool of parking resources creating a true shared parking district.
(jj) Given these fundamental goals, it is essential that these parking structures be
protected as precious resources to ensure that adequate parking is available and that
easy access is provided to the core of the Downtown thereby promoting its vitality.
(kk) The City has spent millions of dollars retrofitting and maintaining many of
these structures.
(II) Since the interim ordinance was extended in April 26, 2011, the California
Supreme Court issued its decision in California Redevelopment Association v. Ana
G
Matosantos, affirming AB 1X26 which provides for the dissolution of redevelopment
agencies.
(mm) In AB 1X26, the State legislature incorporated provisions that purport to
require properties formerly owned by the City's Redevelopment Agency to be sold so
that the proceeds can be transferred to the County auditor - controller for distribution to
taxing entities as property tax proceeds.
(nn) In such event, to ensure replacement parking essential for the economic
viability of the City's downtown, there is a need for a development standard that
requires an owner to first obtain a final permit for a project providing replacement public
parking within the same district before an owner may remove, redevelop or convert a
parking structure in a manner that results in the removal of public parking spaces.
(oo) As detailed above and in the January 25, 2011, April 26, 2011, and February
14, 2012 City Council staff reports, there continues to exist a current and immediate
threat to the public health, safety, and welfare should the interim zoning ordinance and
necessary amendments not be adopted and development of projects inconsistent with
the LUCE be allowed to proceed through the issuance of Administrative Approvals or
Development Review Permits which are not consistent with the explicit standards of the
LUCE or with the tier structure and the provision of community benefits.
SECTION 2. Interim Zoninq Regulations
Notwithstanding any provision of the City's Zoning Ordinance to the contrary, the
issuance or extension of permits for either a new development project or for the
E
expansion of an existing development project that exceeds 7500 square feet
( "development project') that does not comply with the interim zoning standards set forth
in Section 3 of this Ordinance is hereby prohibited and no zoning permits or approvals,
subdivision maps, building permits, or other land use permit shall be approved, issued,
or extended for a development project in contravention of Section 3 during the
pendency of this Ordinance or any extension thereof.
SECTION 3. Interim Zoning.
(a) Administrative Approvals. No development project shall be approved
pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.04.20.28.020 [Administrative
Approvals] unless all of the following findings are made:
(1) The proposed development does not require discretionary review or approval
as established in the Zoning Ordinance, the LUCE, or this Interim Ordinance.
(2) The proposed development conforms precisely to the development standards
contained in both the Zoning Ordinance and in the LUCE for the zoning district and land
use designation in which the development is located.
(3) In the case of any inconsistency between the Zoning Ordinance and the
LUCE pertaining to any objective development standard or permitted use, the proposed
development conforms to the more restrictive development standard and is a permitted
use authorized by the LUCE.
(4) Additionally, notwithstanding subsection (c) of this Section, any pending
Administrative Approval application filed on or before March 11, 2011 for a housing
10
development project must meet the following Transportation Demand Management
requirements:
(i) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the property owner shall
prepare, implement, and maintain a Transportation Demand Management plan,
to the satisfaction of the City, including physical, operating and leasing conditions
that will be reasonably likely to result in attainment of a 1.50 a.m. and p.m. AVR
among employees at the development within three years and continued
achievement and maintenance of the AVR targets thereafter. The following
measures shall be included in the developer's TDM. plan:
(A) Transportation Information: Developer (and its successors and
assignees) shall provide, to the satisfaction of the City, bulletin boards, display
cases, or kiosks, displaying transportation information located where the greatest
number of residents and employees are likely to see them. This information shall
also be provided annually and upon signing of any lease, to residents and
commercial tenants. Information shall include, but is not limited to, the following:
Current maps, routes, fare information, and schedules for public
transit routes serving the site.
Telephone numbers and website links for referrals on transportation
information including numbers for the regional ridesharing agency
and local transit operators.
Ridesharing promotional material supplied by commuter - oriented
organizations.
11
■ Bicycle route and facility information, including regional /local bicycle
maps and bicycle safety information.
A list of facilities available for carpoolers, vanpoolers, bicyclists,
transit riders, and pedestrians at the site.
■ Walking maps and information about local services, restaurants,
movie theaters, and recreational activities within walking distance of
the project.
(B) Motorcycle Parking: Developer (and its successors and assignees)
shall provide two motorcycle parking spaces allocated in the commercial
subterranean parking level, if commercial parking is provided on -site.
(C) Bicycle Parking: Developer (or successors and assignees) shall provide
and maintain long - term, secure bicycle parking, such as a locked room or cage, for
commercial tenant employees at a rate of one space for each 5,000 sq. ft. of
commercial area, with a minimum of two spaces in City- approved locations. Long -term
secure bicycle parking for the residential component shall be one space per bedroom
and shall be provided in an enclosed, secure space (e.g. bike room, bike lockers).
Short -term bicycle parking for the residential component shall be 0.2 spaces /unit with a
minimum of 4 spaces.
(D) Bicycle, Vanpool, and Carpool Parking Spaces: Developer (or
successors and assignees) shall provide parking space in accordance with
SMMC 9.04.10.08.050. Preferential parking within the parking garage shall be
provided for project employees who carpool or vanpool to work. The charge for
such parking spaces will be at a reduced rate.
12
(E) Showers: A minimum of one women's and one men's shower and
locker facility shall be provided for employees of commercial uses on site who
bicycle or use another active means, powered by human propulsion, of getting to
work or who exercise during the day.
(F) Unbundling of Parking Spaces: If the City adopts an ordinance or
other legal mechanism which authorizes the unbundling of parking, the Applicant
(or Applicant's successors and assigns) shall in all leases it executes as landlord
or residential units within the Project provide residential tenants with the option of
leasing parking space(s) separately from the residential unit. Any parking spaces
not leased by project residential tenants may be leased to any lessee on a month
to month basis, whether or not the lessee otherwise occupies or works at the
project, provided project residential tenants are given first priority to lease such
spaces.
(G) Transportation Management Organization: Developer shall agree
to participate in a Transportation Management Organization serving its area and
require same of its tenants. If the City adopts a requirement that a
Transportation Management Organization be formed for the project's geographic
area, property owner and tenants shall participate in any specific strategies that
may be implemented, including but not limited to, support for transit use, shared
parking, car sharing opportunity, and pedestrian and bicycle improvements.
(b)
Tier 2 and Tier 3
Development
Projects.
Notwithstanding the development
standards
specified in the
Zoning
Ordinance, no
development project which would
13
constitute a Tier 2 or Tier 3 project as established pursuant to LUCE Chapter 2.1 shall
be approved except City projects or projects developed pursuant to a development
agreement adopted pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code Chapter 9.48. City
projects are defined as City public works projects and City community facilities (e.g.
libraries, public parking structures, recycling centers, and community centers), not
including public /private partnerships, and City projects shall be deemed to meet the
community benefit requirements of Tier 2 and Tier 3 development projects.
(c) Downtown Core. Notwithstanding the development standards specified in the
Zoning Ordinance, no development project in the Downtown Core as delineated in the
Land Use Designation Map approved by the City Council on July 6, 2010 shall exceed
32 feet in height except City projects or projects developed pursuant to a development
agreement adopted pursuant to Santa Monica Municipal Code Chapter 9.48. However,
development projects located entirely within the BSC1 Zoning District shall not be
subject to these interim standards provided that the development project is less than the
height and floor area of the existing building.
(d) 100% Affordable Housing Projects. Notwithstanding subsection (b) and (c)
of this Section, affordable housing projects with 50 units or less in which one hundred
percent (100 %) of the housing units are deed - restricted or restricted by an agreement
approved by the City for occupancy by households with incomes of eighty percent
(80 %) of median income or less will continue to be processed ministerially. Such
affordable housing projects may also include non - residential uses, as long as such uses
do not exceed a maximum percentage of 33% of the total floor area.
14
(e) Shared Parking. The following administrative process is hereby established
authorizing property owners and tenants to request shared parking in the Downtown
Core, except for projects that are processed through a development agreement. A
shared parking permit is intended to permit the owners of parking facilities to rent or
lease underutilized parking that is available in their facility to nearby residents, workers
or businesses while reserving sufficient parking supply needed for on -site uses.
(1) Permit Required.
A shared parking permit, approved by the Planning Director, or his /her designee,
shall be required and shall be issued prior to the commencement of a shared parking
use of any private parking facility that is otherwise limited to on -site users. The Planning
Director, or his /her designee, may establish additional conditions to further the intent of
this subsection (e) and ensure that parking spaces needed for the primary on -site uses
will be available during the hours needed for their use. A public hearing shall not be
required for issuance of a shared parking permit.
(2) Application.
Application for a shared parking permit shall be filed in a manner consistent with
the requirements contained in Municipal Code Part 9.04.20.20.
(3) Findings.
The Planning Director, or his /her designee, or Planning Commission on appeal,
may approve a shared parking permit application, in whole or in part, with or without
conditions, only when all of the following findings are made in an affirmative manner:
15
(i) The operation of the requested shared parking permit at the location
proposed and within the time period specified will not adversely impact the primary use
of the parking facility for its intended on -site users, or otherwise endanger the public
health, safety, or general welfare.
(ii) The shared parking permit sets forth the maximum number of shared
parking spaces that are being approved for use by off -site users that will be available
during peak and off -peak parking demand periods so as to ensure that a sufficient
number of spaces will be provided to meet the greater parking demand of the
anticipated users.
(iii) Additional requirements, restrictions or agreements, as deemed necessary
by the Planning Director, or his /her designee, are included as a requirement(s) of the
shared parking permit to ensure that parking spaces needed for the primary on -site
uses will be available during the hours needed for their use.
The Planning Director, or his /her designee shall prepare a written decision
which shall contain the findings of fact upon which such decision is based and all
required conditions, if approved. The decision shall be mailed to the applicant and to
property owners and residents of parcels adjacent to the parcel for which the Shared
Parking Permit is requested. Copies of the decision shall also be provided to the
Planning Commission.
(4) Term of Permit.
A shared parking permit shall be valid for a one -year period from the date of
issuance unless a different period is set by the Planning Director, or his /her designee, or
16
the Planning Commission on appeal, as a condition of granting the shared parking
permit. The permit shall renew automatically for additional one -year periods unless the
permit is modified or revoked in accordance with subsection (6) of this Section.
(5) Monitoring.
The permit holder shall grant City staff access to the parking facility for the
purpose of verifying parking availability prior to issuing the permit as well as to allow
random monitoring after the permit is issued.
(6) Modification or Revocation.
The City may modify or revoke an approved shared parking permit in accordance
with the following procedures:
(i) If the Planning Director designee receives evidence that the conditions of
the permit have not been met, or the permit granted is being or has recently been
exercised contrary to the terms of the approval or in violation of a specific statute,
ordinance, law, or regulation, the Planning Director designee shall serve notice of these
violations, either in person or by registered mail, on the owner of the property and on
the permit holder and shall provide the permit holder with a reasonable opportunity to
cure the violation(s).
(ii) If the permit holder or property owner has not responded to the notice
within 10 days or the Planning Director designee determines that the permit holder has
failed to cure the violation, the Planning Director designee may refer the matter to the
Zoning Administrator for a revocation hearing. Notice of hearing shall be published
once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City and shall be served either in
17
person or by registered mail on the owner of the property and on the permit holder at
least ten days prior to such hearing. The notice of hearing shall contain a statement of
the specific reasons for revocation.
(iii) After the hearing, a shared parking permit may be revoked by the Zoning
Administrator or by the Planning Commission on appeal or review if any one of the
following findings is made:
fraud
(A) That the Shared Parking Permit was obtained by misrepresentation or
(B) That the conditions of the permit have not been met, or the permit granted
is being or has recently been exercised contrary to the terms of the approval or in
violation of a specific statute, ordinance, law, or regulation.
A written determination of modification or revocation of the shared parking permit shall
be mailed to the property owner and the permit holder within ten days of such
determination.
(7) Appeals.
Any person may appeal the approval, conditions of approval, denial, modification
or revocation of a shared parking permit to the Planning Commission if filed within
fourteen consecutive calendar days of the date the decision is made in the manner
provided in Municipal Code Part 9.04.20.24, Sections 9.04.20.24.020 through
9.04.20.24.040.
(f) Floor Area Calculations in the Downtown Core. In the Downtown Core,
below -grade floor area shall not be included when calculating a project's floor area ratio
(FAR). However, such below -grade floor area shall be counted in establishing a
project's parking requirements.
(g) Non - conforming Uses in CM District. An existing use in the CM District shall
be considered no longer existing if that use is changed to another type of use or if for a
period of one year such use has not been in regular operation. Regular operation shall
be considered being open for business to the general public during such use's
customary business hours.
(h) Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 9.04.08.28.070 of the Zoning Code,
two restaurants per block shall be allowed on the east side of Main Street north of
Ocean Park Boulevard and south of Pico Boulevard.
(i) No removal, redevelopment or conversion of a parking structure in BSC -2 and
C3 -C zone districts, publically owned as of February 14, 2012, which results in the loss
of parking spaces above the ground floor shall be permitted unless the final permit to
commence construction for a project providing the one -to -one replacement of this
parking has been issued in the same zoning district and this replacement parking will be
offered to the public at rates comparable to the most recent rates offered to the public
for the removed parking spaces.
19
SECTION 4. Applicability.
Except for subsections (e) through (g) of Section 3 which shall be
applicable to existing and future development, this Ordinance shall apply to any
development project which has not received its discretionary planning entitlements (e.g.,
development review permit, variance, architectural review permit, conditional use
permit) or has not filed any requested extension to these planning entitlements as of
March 11,.2011 unless the development project has otherwise obtained a vested right
to proceed. Discretionary project applications that were filed prior to the effective date
of Ordinance Number 2345 (CCS) and which are subject to its provisions and any
extension thereto shall automatically be converted to a development agreement with
fees already paid to be applied towards the development agreement deposit.
SECTION 5. Any provision of the Santa Monica Municipal Code or
appendices thereto inconsistent with the provisions of this Ordinance, to the extent of
such inconsistencies and no further, is hereby repealed or modified to that extent
necessary to effect the provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 6. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of
this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of
any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the
remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would
have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause,
or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion
of the ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.
NN
SECTION 7. This Ordinance shall be of no further force or effect after
October 26, 2012, unless prior to that date, after a public hearing, noticed pursuant to
Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.04.20.22.050, the City Council, by majority
vote, extends this interim ordinance.
SECTION 8. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the
passage of this Ordinance. The City Clerk shall cause the same to be published once
in the official newspaper within 15 days after its adoption. This Ordinance shall become
effective 30 days after its adoption.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
MAASHAJ ES M TRIE
Cit Attorn
21
Approved and adopted this 28th day of February, 2012.
Richard Bloom, Mayor
State of California )
County of Los Angeles ) ss.
City of Santa Monica )
I, Denise Anderson - Warren, Assistant City Clerk of the City of Santa Monica, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2394 (CCS) had its introduction
on February 14, 2012, and was adopted at the Santa Monica City Council
meeting held on February 28, 2012, by the following vote:
Ayes: Council members: Holbrook, McKeown, O'Connor, O'Day, Shriver
Mayor Pro Tern Davis, Mayor Bloom
Noes: Council members: None
Absent: Council members: None
A summary of Ordinance No. 2394 (CCS) was duly published pursuant to
California Government Code Section 40806.
ATTEST:
al O�& Aol�t-
Denise Anderson-Warren, Assistant City Clerk