r-10597Resolution ofi Statement of Overriding Consideration Santa Monica, California
City Council Meeting: July 26, 2011
RESOLUTION NO. 10597 (CCS)
(City Council Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA
MAKING FINDINGS NECESSARY TO
ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS AND MITIGATION
MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE 2834 COLORADO AVENUE
CREATIVE STUDIO PROJECT
WHEREAS, an Environmental impact Report was prepared which analyzes the
environments! effects of the 2834 Colorado Avenue Creative Studio Project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, as Lead City Agency, reviewed the Final
Environmental Impact Report in full compliance with State and City CEQA Guidelines;
and
WHEREAS, on July 2&, 2011, the City Council certified that the Final
Environmental impact Report was prepared in full compliance with State and City CEQA
Guidelines.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA
DOES HEF2EBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Consistent with Article V1, Section 12 of the City of Santa Monica
CEQA Guidelines and Sections 15128 of the State of California CEQA Guidelines,
the Initial StudyiNotice of Preparation incorporated herein by reference determined
that the following environmental impacts were not considered potentially significant
and were not addressed further in the Final EPR: aesthetics, agriculture and forestry,
biological
resources, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous
materials, hydrology/water quality, land use/planning, mineral resources,
population/housing, public services, recreation, and utilities/service.
SECTION 2. Consistent with Article VI, Section 12 of the City of Santa Monica
CEQA Guidelines and Sections 15091 and 15092 of the State of California CEQA
Guidelines, the City Council finds that most impacts resulting from the project can be
reduced to a level that is less than significant. More specifically, significant
environmental effects, as identified in this Section below, can feasibly be eliminated or
substantially reduced to below a level of significance..
(a) The Final EIR determined that without mitigation, the project could have
a potentially significant effect due to construction effects. Consistent with Article VI,
Section 12 of the City of Santa Monica CEQA Guidelines and as detailed in Section 4.3
of the EIR, incorporated herein by reference, the City Council finds that the following
mitigation measures have been required in the project that will mitigate or reduce most
of the project's construction impacts to below levels of significance:
CON-1 Construction Impact Mitigation Plan. The applicant shall prepare, implement
and maintain a Construction Impact Mitigation Plan which shall be designed to:
• Prevent material traffic impacts on the surrounding roadway network.
• Minimize parking impacts both to public parking and access to private
parking to the extent practicable.
• Ensure safety for both those constructing the project and the
surrounding community.
• Prevent substantial truck traffic through residential neighborhoods.
2
The Construction Impact Mitigation Plan shall be subject to review and
approval by the following City departments: Public Works, Fire, Planning
and Community Development and Police. This review will ensure that the
Plan has been designed in accordance with this mitigation measure. This
review shall occur prior to commencement of any construction staging for
the project. The mitigation shall, at a minimum, include the following:
Ongoing requirements throughout the duration of construction:
• A detailed traffic control plan for work zones shall be maintained
which includes at a minimum accurate existing and proposed: parking
and travel lane configurations; warning, regulatory, guide and
directional signage; and area sidewalks, bicycle lanes and parking
lanes. The plan shall include specific information regarding the
project's construction activities that may disrupt normal pedestrian
and traffic flow and the measures that address these disruptions.
Such plans must be reviewed and approved by the Transportation
Management Division prior to commencement of construction and
implemented in accordance with this approval.
• Work within the public right-of-way shall be performed between
9:OOA.M. and 4:OOP.M., including: dirt and demolition material hauling
and construction material delivery. Work within the public right-of-
way outside of these hours shall only be allowed after the issuance of
an after-hours construction permit.
• Streets and equipment shall be cleaned in accordance with
established PW requirements.
• Trucks shall only travel on a City approved construction route. Truck
queuing/staging shall not be allowed on Santa Monica streets.
Limited queuing may occur on the construction site itself.
• Materials and equipment should be minimally visible to the public; the
preferred location for materials is to be on-site with a minimum
amount of materials within a work area in the public right-of-way,
subject to a current Use of Public Property permit.
• Any requests for work before or after normal construction hours within
the public right-of-way shall be subject to review and approval
through the After Hours Permit process administered by the Building
and Safety Division.
• Off-street parking shall be provided for construction workers. This
may include the use of a remote location with shuttle transport to the
site, if determined necessary by the City of Santa Monica.
3
Project Coordination Elements that shall be implemented prior to
commencement of construction:
• The traveling public shall be advised of impending construction
activities (e.g. information signs, portable message signs, media
listing/notification, implementation of an approved traffic control plan).
• Any construction work requiring encroachment into public rights-of-
way, detours or any other work within the public right-of-way shall
require approval of a Use of Public Property Permit, Excavation
Permit, Sewer Permit or Oversize Load Permit, as well as any
Caltrans Permits required.
• Timely notification of construction schedules shall be given to all
affected agencies (e.g. Big Blue Bus, Police Department, Fire
Department, Public Works, and Planning and Community
Development Department) and to all owners and residential and
commercial tenants of property within a radius of 500 feet.
• Construction work shall be coordinated with affected agencies in
advance of start of work. Approvals may take up to two weeks per
each submittal.
• The Transportation Management Division shall approve any haul
routes, for earth, concrete or construction materials and equipment
handling.
• Project Coordination shall consider any other construction projects
occurring at the same time as the construction of this project.
CON-2(a) Diesel Equipment Mufflers. All diesel equipment shall be operated with
closed engine doors and shall be equipped with factory-recommended mufflers.
CON-2(b) Electrically-Powered Tools. Electrical power shall be used to run air
compressors and similar power tools.
CON-2(c) Restrictions on Excavation and Foundation/Conditioning. Excavation,
foundation-laying, and conditioning activities (the noisiest phases of construction)
shall be restricted to between the hours of 10:00 AM and 3:00 PM, Monday through
Friday, in accordance with Section 4.12.110(d) of the Santa Monica Municipal Code.
CON-2(d) Additional Noise Attenuation Techniques. For all noise generating
construction activity on the project site, additional noise attenuation techniques shall
be employed to reduce noise levels to 83dB or less from 8:OOam to 6:OOpm
weekdays and 9:OOam to S:OOpm Saturdays. Such techniques may include, but are
4
not limited to, the use of sound blankets on noise generating equipment and the
construction of temporary sound barriers around the perimeter of the construction
site.
CON-2(e) Construction Sign Posting. In accordance with Santa Monica Municipal
Code Section 4.12.120, the project applicant shall be required to post a sign
informing all workers and subcontractors of the time restrictions for construction
activities. The sign shall also include the City telephone numbers where violations
can be reported and complaints associated with construction noise can be submitted.
CON-3(a) ROG Control Measures. The applicant shall ensure that architectural
coatings use on the project comply with SCAOMD Rule 1113, which limits VOC
content of architectural coatings.
CON-3(b) Fugitive Dust Control Measures. The following shall be implemented
during construction to minimize fugitive dust and associated particulate emissions:
• Sufficiently water all material excavated or graded should be to
prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering should occur at least
three time daily with complete coverage, preferably at the start of
the day, in the late morning and after work is done for the day;
• Cease all grading, earth moving or excavation activities during
periods of high winds (i.e., greater than 20 mph measured as
instantaneous wind gusts) so as to prevent excessive amounts of
dust;
• Securely cover all material transported on and off-site should be to
prevent excessive amounts of dust;
• Cover all soils stockpiles;
• Limit on-site vehicle speeds to 15 mph;
• Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit the
construction site onto paved roads or wash off trucks and any
equipment leaving the site each trip;
• Appoint a construction relations officer to act as a community
liaison concerning on-site construction activity including resolution
of issues related to PM10 generation;
• Sweep streets at the end of the day using SCAQMD Rule 1186
certified street sweepers or roadway washing trucks if visible soil is
carried onto adjacent public paved roads (recommend water
sweepers with reclaimed water).
5
(b) The Final EIR determined that without mitigation, the project could have
a potentially significant effect on geology. Consistent with Article VI, Section 12 of the
City of Santa Monica CEQA Guidelines and as detailed in Section 4.4 of the EIR,
incorporated herein by reference, the City Council finds that the following mitigation
measures have been required in the project that will mitigate or reduce the project's
impacts on geology to below a level of significance:
GEO-4(a) Excavation Stability. If temporary construction embankments are to be
maintained during the rainy season (November 1 through April 15), berms shall be
installed along the top of the embankments where necessary to prevent runoff from
entering the excavation and eroding the excavation faces. The soils exposed in the
excavations shall be inspected by qualified personnel from Geotechnologies, Inc. so
that modification can be made if variations in the soil conditions occur. All
excavations shall be stabilized for 30 days from the initial excavation. Water shall not
be allowed to pond on top of the excavation or allowed to flow towards the
excavation.
GEO-4(b) Retaining Wall Back Drainage System. A plastic drainage composite such
as Miradrain or equivalent shall be installed in contiguous four foot wide columns
along the back face of the retaining wall, at eight feet on center. The top of the
drainage composite columns shall terminate approximately two-feet below the ground
surface, whether either hardscape or a minimum of two feet of relatively cohesive
material shall be placed as a cap. The vertical columns of drainage material shall
then be connected at the bottom of the wall to either a continuous four foot high strip
of similar drainage composite or a four inch perforated subdrain pipe covered with a
minimum 12 inches of gravel per lineal foot. This system shall then be connected
through pipes placed in sleeves through the bottom of the wall or footing, where they
shall then connect to a sump located below the floor slab.
(c) The Final EIR determined that without mitigation, the project could have
a potentially significant effect on traffic. Consistent with Article VI, Section 12 of the City
of Santa Monica CEQA Guidelines and as detailed in Section 4.8 of the EIR,
incorporated herein by reference, the City Council finds that the following mitigation
measures have been required in the project that will mitigate or reduce the project's
6
impacts on traffic at five studied intersections (26th Street and Santa Monica Blvd., 26th
Street and Broadway, Stewart St. and Olympic Blvd., Bundy Dr. and Pico Blvd. and
Bundy Dr. and I-10 eastbound on-ramp) to below levels of significance:
T-1 (a) Transportation Demand Management Program. A TDM plan shall be
submitted to the City of Santa Monica Transportation Management Division for review
and approval prior to issuance of building permits. As part of the TDM plan, the
applicant shall include the following:
• Achieve at least a 50% reduction in peak hour trips for the media studio/office
uses relative to the trip generation projected for ITE general office (#710);
• The TDM plan trip reduction targets shall incorporate yearly monitoring,
reporting, and enforcement. Annual monitoring and reporting shall include
morning and afternoon trips counts as well as observations.
• As outlined in Appendix D of the Final EIR, potential TDM strategies may
include transit pass subsidy, ridesharing, vanpool subsidy, parking cash out,
guaranteed ride home, bicycle facilities, flexible work hours, transportation
information center, wayfinding signage, and/or commuter club.
T-1 (g) Stewart Street and Olympic Blvd. The traffic signal at the intersection of
Stewart Street and Olympic Blvd. shall be modified to provide protected-permitted
left-turn phasing for all legs of the intersection, except for the southbound leg. A
combination of new signage, controller cabinets, poles, mast arms, detectors, and/or
signal heads shall be installed to implement the protected-permitted left-turn phasing.
T-1(i) Centinela Avenue (East) & Olympic Boulevard. The mitigation measure that
would fully mitigate the project-related impact at this intersection would require the
introduction of an exclusive right-turn lane on the northbound Centinela Avenue
approach to Olympic Boulevard. This would .bring the lane geometries for the
northbound approach to two left-turn lanes and one right-turn lane. Currently, parking
is allowed along the western side of Centinela Avenue. In order to provide adequate
roadway width for the exclusive southbound left-turn lane, approximately eight on-
street parking spaces along the west side of Centinela Avenue, south of the
intersection, would need to be removed: Some combination of new signage,
detectors, and/or lane restriping would also be required. Since this intersection is
controlled and co-owned by the City of Los Angeles, the implementation of this
mitigation measure would require their approval based on their criteria. Although
mitigation at this intersection appear feasible, implementation is dependent on factors
outside the City of Santa Monica's and the applicant's control. Accordingly, the
applicant shall not be required to implement this measure unless it is approved by the
City of Los Angeles. The applicant shall use its good faith reasonable efforts to
obtain such approval, including filing a "B" permit application or other application
7
plans, specifications and studies that provide sufficient information and details to
enable the City of Los Angeles to evaluate implementing the Mitigation Measure.
These applications shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. If
timely approved by the City of -Los Angeles, such improvements shall be completed
prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the project.
T-1 Q) Centinela Avenue & Exposition Boulevard. The following options would
mitigate project-generated impacts at this intersection to varying degrees; Option A
would fully mitigate impacts and Option B would fully mitigate impacts under HCM
methodology and partially mitigate impacts (AM peak hour only) under CMA
methodology. Option A would require City of Los Angeles approval.
Option A: An exclusive northbound left-turn lane on Centinela Avenue shall be
introduced and some combination of new signage, controller cabinets, poles, mast
arms, detectors,. and/or signal heads shall be installed.
Option B: The eastbound approach on Centinela Avenue shall be restriped to
provide separate right- and left-turn lanes and the northbound approach shall be
restriped to provide one left-turn lane and one through lane.
The City of Los Angeles has complete ownership of this intersection; and initial
analysis of such an improvement by the City of Los Angeles indicates that this
improvement is feasible. The final outcome of this recommended improvement is
outside of the control of the City of Santa Monica. Accordingly, the applicant shall not
be required to implement this measure unless it is approved by the City of Los
Angeles. The applicant shall use its good faith reasonable efforts to obtain such
approval, including filing a "B" permit application or other application plans,
specifications and studies that provide sufficient information and details to enable the
City of Los Angeles to evaluate implementing- the Mitigation Measure. These
applications shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits. If timely
approved by the City of Los Angeles, such improvements shall be completed prior to
issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the Project.
SECTION 3. Consistent with Article VI, Section 12 of the City of Santa Monica
CEQA. Guidelines and Sections 15091, 15092, and 15093 of the State of California
CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that the significant environmental effects as
identified below cannot feasibly be avoided or mitigated to below a level of significance.
Nevertheless, this impact is found to be acceptable due to overriding considerations as
discussed in Section 5.
8
(a) The Final EIR determined that the project could result in significant and
unavoidable impacts from construction effects .(air emissions). Consistent with Article
VI, Section 12 of the City of Santa Monica CEQA Guidelines and as detailed in the Final
EIR at Section 4.3, incorporated herein by reference, the City Council finds that the
proposed project would result in construction-related emissions. Specifically, the Final
EIR found. that the proposed project would result in significant and unavoidable
construction-related impacts from PM10 and PM2.5 dust emissions.
(b) The Final EIR determined that the project could result in significant and
unavoidable impacts from traffic (intersection delay). Consistent with Article VI, Section
12 of the City of-Santa Monica CEQA Guidelines and as detailed in the Final EIR at
Section 4.8, incorporated herein by reference, the City Council finds that the proposed
project would result in traffic-related impacts to nine intersections in the project vicinity.
Specifically, the Final EIR found that the proposed project would result in significant and
unavoidable operational impacts at the following intersections:
20th Street and Olympic Boulevard (PM peak hour)
Cloverfield Boulevard and Colorado Avenue (PM peak hour)
Cloverfield Avenue and Olympic Boulevard (PM peak hour)
Yale Avenue and Colorado Avenue (AM and PM peak hours)
Stewart Street and Colorado Avenue(AM and PM peak hours)
Centinela Avenue and Colorado Avenue (PM peak hour)
Centinela Avenue and Exposition Boulevard (AM and PM peak hours)
Centinela Avenue and I-10 westbound ramps (AM and PM peak hour)
Bundy Drive and Olympic Boulevard(AM peak hour)
As discussed in Section 4.8 of the EIR, pp. 4.8-63 to 4.8-66 mitigation measures were
identified for each of these intersections which would reduce the impact to below the
level of significance. However, as discussed in Section 4.8 of the EIR, pp. 4.8-67 to
9
4.8-78, these mitigation measures are determined to be infeasible due to a variety of
secondary impacts associated with the implementation of these measures including
elimination of functional and necessary roadway features, removal of mature median
trees, prohibition of necessary turn movements, promotion of cut-through traffic,
removal of on-street parking, reduction of pedestrian sidewalks, .and
pedestrian/motorists safety impacts. These secondary impacts would adversely affect
pedestrians, motorists, and the City's existing green space. Moreover; certain of the
intersections are owned and controlled by the City of Los Angeles and therefore the City
lacks the jurisdiction to impose these mitigation measures. Each of these secondary
impacts cannot be mitigated and there are no other mitigation measures that can
reduce the project-related impacts and these intersections. Since the proposed
measures would result in unmitigable adverse secondary impacts to the built
environment and the existing pedestrian and vehicular network, these mitigation
measures are determined to be infeasible and the project-related impacts at these
intersections would be significant and unavoidable.
(c) The Final EIR determined that the project could result in significant and
unavoidable impacts from traffic (neighborhood street impacts). Consistent with Article
VI, Section 12 of the City of Santa Monica CEQA Guidelines and as detailed in the Final
EIR at Section 4.8, incorporated herein by reference, the City Council finds that the
proposed project would result in .traffic-related impacts to two street segments in the
project vicinity. Specifically, the Final EIR found that the proposed project would result
in significant and unavoidable impacts to the following street segments:
10
• Yale Avenue between Broadway and Colorado Avenue; and
• Nebraska Avenue between Berkeley Street and Franklin Street.
Pursuant to the City's Significance Criteria, the project's impact is considered significant
on local streets if the existing Average Daily Trips are greater than 2,250 and there is a
projected increase of one additional trip or more due to the project. Both Yale Avenue
between Broadway and Colorado Avenue (2,890 vehicles) and Nebraska Avenue
between Berkeley Street and Franklin Street (2,860 vehicles) have existing ADT in
excess of 2,250 vehicles per weekday. The EIR estimated that 80 vehicle trips per day
would be added to these street segments, creating significant adverse impacts. As
indicated by their volume, these two street segments are prominent routes for traffic in
the project area. There is no feasible mitigation measure, including relocating the
project's access point or turn restrictions that would limit motorist that access or depart
the project site from using the public street grid and these street segments. Short of full
closure of the affected street segments, which would not be acceptable since these
streets serve adjacent land uses and carry substantial traffic volumes that would then
need to shift to other nearby streets, there are no mitigation measures that would
reduce project related vehicle trips on these two street segments. Therefore, these
impacts would be significant and unavoidable.
SECTION 4. Consistent with Article VI, Section 12.a (3) of the City of Santa
Monica CEQA Guidelines and Section 15091, 15092, and 15093 of the State CEQA
Guidelines, and as analyzed in the Final EIR at Section 6, incorporated herein by
reference, the City Council finds as follows:
11
(a) The CEQA mandated environmentally superior alternative is the "No Project
Alternative." The No Project Alternative would be environmentally superior to the
proposed project because it would involve no change to the environment. However, the
No Project alternative is not feasible since it does not satisfy the applicant's basic
objectives for the project to develop a creative studio and retail project and provide a
variety of community benefits. None of these benefits would be obtained if the No
Project Alternative were adopted.
The CEQA Guidelines require that if the environmentally superior alternative is the No
Project Alternative, that the EIR shall also identify an environmentally superior
alternative among the other alternatives. Consistent with Article VI, Section 12 of the
City of Santa Monica CEQA Guidelines and Section 15091, 15092, and 15093 of the
State of California. CEQA Guidelines, and as detailed in the Final EIR Section 6.0,
incorporated herein by reference, the City Council finds that based on the project
alternatives studied, the Residential/Commercial Project Alternative is environmentally
superior to the proposed project. The Residential/Commercial Project Alternative would
eliminate the proposed project's unavoidably significant traffic impacts on the affected
street segments and have significant and unavoidable impacts at only one to two
intersections due to the decrease in the number of vehicle trips generated by the
alternative project above the current trips generated by existing uses on-site. However,
Residential/Commercial alternative would not meet project objectives identified in
Section 2.0, Project Description of the Final EIR. Specifically, the
Residential/Commercial alternative would not meet the project objective of developing a
12
creative studio/local serving retail facility on the project site that would contribute to the
City of Santa Monica and would be viable in the current and future market. In addition,
the project objectives include contributing to the area's vision as atransit-focused
employment center with mixed-use creative arts and a neighborhood that provides a
quality transition to residential neighborhoods to the north, east, and south as
envisioned in LUCE Goal D24. LUCE Policies D24.2 and D24.4 envision a diverse mix
of creative arts facilities as well as local serving retail uses, which is also a project
objective. The Residential/Commercial alternative would also not create atransit-
employment center to the same extent as the proposed project
The Reduced Creative Studio/Office Retail Use would met the basic project objectives
related to the development of a creative studio/retail project, but would not be
environmentally superior to the proposed project. .More specifically, although this
alternative would incrementally reduce the project's significant impacts related to
emissions and traffic, as with the proposed project, this alternative would not reduce any
of these impacts below the threshold of significance, thereby resulting in the same
significant and unavoidable construction-related and traffic impacts.
SECTION 5. As fully described in Section 3, the Final EIR found that the
proposed project would result in significant and unavoidable adverse impacts from
construction effects (air emissions - PM10 and PM2.5) and traffic/transportation.
Consistent with Article VI, Section 13 of the City of Santa Monica CEQA Guidelines and
Section 15093 of the State of California CEQA Guidelines, the City Council hereby
13
makes a Statement of Overriding Considerations and finds that the benefits of the
creative studio/retail project outweigh the unavoidable environmental impact based on
the reasons stated below. The benefits identified are each one, in and of themselves,
sufficient to make a determination that the adverse environmental effects are
acceptable.
(a) Transportation Demand Management Program: The applicant shall
implement the following TDM measures as required in Article 2.8 of the Development
Agreement and detailed in Exhibit "J" of the Agreement, which is incorporated herein by
reference:
• Transportation Information Center
• TDM Website Information
• Employee Transportation Coordinator
• Pedestrian Way-finding
• Transportation Demand Management Association
• Carpool Program.
Parking Pricing
• Convenient Parking for Bicycle Commuters
• On-Site Showers and Lockers
• Compressed Work Week Schedule
• Flex-Time Schedule
• Carshare Space
• Subsidized Transit Passes
• Vanpool Subsidies
• Parking Cash Payment
• Guaranteed Ride Home
• On Site Information Program
• Coordination
• Leases
(b) Project and Community Benefits: The applicant will provide the following
project and community benefits required by Article 2.7 of the Development Agreement
and detailed in Exhibits "D", "F" and "G" of the Agreement, which is incorporated herein
by reference:
14
1. Project Benefits
• Increasing tax revenues;
• Space for development, production and distribution of movies, music,
television, video content, electronic games and related office space in
order to retain and attract good-paying entertainment jobs;
• An estimated 450 well-paying jobs within the City;
• Reducing vehicle trips by implementing a TDM program that takes
advantage of the forthcoming Expo Line and other modes of
transportation that are alternatives to the automobile; and
• Contributions to child care and cultural arts.
2. Community Benefits
• Walkways and Enhanced Walkway Areas within the Project
• Pedestrian Cafe Open to Public
• Pennsylvania Avenue Extension
• Sidewalk Widening
• Contribution to Expo Station Enhancement at Bergamot Station
• Parking District Management.
• Internship
• Local Hiring
• Sustainable Design Features
• Interface with Expo Light Rail System
SECTION 6. Consistent with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, the City
Council adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program, which is included as Section 9 of the
Final EIR, to mitigate or avoid significant effects of the project on the environment, as
detailed in Sections 1 and 2 of this resolution, and to ensure compliance during project
implementation.
15
SECTION 7. Consistent with Section 21081:6(d) of the California Environmental
Quality Act, the documents which constitute the record of proceedings for approving this
project are located in the Planning and Community Development Department at 1685
Main Street, Room 212, Santa Monica, California. The custodian of these documents is
Paul Foley, Principal Planner.
SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and
thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
o ~GCQ
MA SHA NES M TRIE
Ci ttor
16
Adopted and approved this 26th day of July, 2011.
Richard Bloom, Mayor
I, Maria M. Stewart, City Clerk of the City of Santa Monica, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 10597 (CCS} was duly adopted at a meeting of the Santa
Monica City Council held on the 26th day of July, 2011, by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers: Holbrook, O'Connor,
Mayor Pro Tem Davis, Mayor Bloom
Noes: Councilmembers; None
Absent: Councilmembers: McKeown, O'Day, Shriven
ATTEST:
~~
Maria M. Stewart, C y Clerk