sr-112861-6aCITY OF SANTA MONICA
DATE: November 24, 1961 „~ -~q .- ~ '°' ~'" t~
a ,
J ~ N 1 j .~
TO: The Honorable City Council ~~. ~ ,~ ~''` " ~~"
~!.ri~+~ c3 7.01
i :., L' ,.
FROM: Maurice M. King, Acting City Manager ~ .,Q s "'"
4
ga ~' ,F ~~ o d~ _ ,.~
7w -3 ~:.4 yea k~~~
ST7BJECT: Central Business District Redevelopment Pr~,~~bt~~ ~~~~ ~ , , i,; ~,e,~.
r,;
~, e.$,
~`y~~u; The Redevelopment Agency has recommended to the City
Council, by memorandum dated November 20, 1961, that
approval be given for the undertaking by the Agency, on a
three-fourths grant basis, of a survey and planning program
in the subject project. In addition, it was recommended that
the City Council appropriate $35, 000 to the Agency for this
program and that the services of the City Attorney, City Engineer,
Planning Director and T3uilding Officer be made available.
The Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce, by resolution dated
November 20, 1961, recommended a redevelopment program
in the Central Business District.
I:E the City Council approves the Agency's recommendation, the
City Administratson suggests the following procedure:
1. Instruct the City Manager to enter into an agreement with
the Agency* whereby up to $35, 000 in survey and planning
funds. for the C. B. D. project a.re made available for neces-
sary surveys, appraisals and agency administrative costs
for the period January 1, 1962, through June 30,1962, These
funds are to be repaid to the City if the project is executed
from the Agency's tax alleviation bond issue.
2. Establish the policy that tlae services o£ the Csty Attorney,
City Engineer, Planning Director and Buildang Officer will
be available to the Agency during this period to complete a
redevelopment plan based upon necessary planning, engin-
eering and legal studies and structural surveys. The City
is to be reimbursed for the cost of these services from the
Agency°s bond issue.
The City Controller has advised the City Manager that necessary
funds ($35, 000) could be made available from the City°s general
fund.
MAU`RICE P/S. KING (j
Acting City .Manager
MMK/fc
Encl. (2)
(;<%
~~ ,
~ ~' ~. .,~ "'. , t.
DATE November 20, 1961 r,~~;~; ~ s~ )oE)
TO Honorable Members: City Council <,~ ~~` ~~~~
e ..~
FROM Redevelopment Agency +~ ~~~
SUBJECT: Central Business District (C.B.D.)
Reclevelo mroject
L -Recommendation: The Redevelopment Agency
of the City of Sarita Monica recommends to your
honorable body that you:
1. move to adopt the attached resolution
approving the undertaking by the Agency
of surveys and plans for the C. B. D. Re-
development Project on a three-fourths
capital grant basis and request concurrence
by the H.II.F.A. Administrator, and
2. move to appropriate $35,000. to the
Agency as set forth in the attached survey
and planning budget, and
3, make available to the Agency without
charge the following staff services for
planning this Project:
a} City Attorney
b) City Engineer
c) Planning Director
~1) City Building Officer
II. Back~round•
1. Santa Monica Central Business_ Area__Planninct
r ea`± sibili~v StucCY _. _ _ _ _ ._
Victor Gruen Associates, in October, 1960
recommended, among other things, that a
major new department store be brought into
the established primary retail core by
the utilization of every means and effort
available.
2, 'Department Store Committee Report and
~commenda ion:
a) D~e~artm~ent~~Store Analysis: Larry
Smith and Co.: '~
On August 17, 1961, Larry Smith and
Co. found t11at the Santa Monica C.B.D.
currently has an $11 million unsatis-
fied department store potential, and
recommended that the Committee continue
to interest a department store to
locate in the vicinity of Third and
Broadway on a private basis or through
urban redevelopment.
b) Department Store Committee Recommenda-
tion: The Department Store Committee
of the Citizens' Progress Committee,
on September 7, 1961 recommended that
the Redevelopment Agency make a survey
and planning study to be presented to
the H.H.F.A. for the site of 3rd
and Broadway.
II. Background (continued)
3. Redevelo ment Agenc ; Area Desi nation:
The Redevelopment Agency on October 8,
1961, designated the Central Business
District Redevelopment Area. (See
Attached Map).
4. Planning Commission Selection of Projec
The Planning Commission on November 6, 196.1
selected the entire Central Business Dis-
trict Redevelopment Area as a project
area.
III. Survey and Planning Program:
The City of Santa Plonica and its Redevelopment
Agency may plan the C.B.D. Project in one
of three ways;
1. As a two-thirds grant project, with survey
and planning funds advanced by the H.H.F.A.
as in the Ocean Park program.
2. As a three-fourths grant project, with
survey and planning funds advanced by
private redevelopers. (The Agency has an
offer from Kern-Webb to provide $50,000.
in advance planning funds if Kern-Webb
is given the right of first negotiation.
The H.H.F.A. has recommended that the
City not proceed in this manner. This
recommendation need not be followed.)
3. As a three-fourths grant project, with
the City providing advance planning funds
and staff services. (City Engineer, City
Attorney, City Building Officer and Plan-
ning Director.) All planning funds ad-
vanced and cost of services provided would
be repaid to the City by the Agency from
the proceeds of its tax allocation bond
issue which would also provide for the
local one-fourth share of net project
costs and for the Agency's administrative
costs during the project development phase,
(The phase, after Council adoption of the
redevelopment plan, when land is acquired,
people are relocated, etc.)
It will be advantageous to plan and develop
the C.B.D. Project on a three-fourths grant
basis because:
1. it can be planned in an estimated six
months rather than one year as would
be required on a two-thirds grant basis
because surveys would not need to be
made on a sequential basis and federal
reviews would be eliminated; and
2, it can be carried out at less cost to the
City because the estimated one-fourth
net cost plus administrative costs should
be considerably less than a one-third
net cost which would include all adminis-
trative expenses.
IV. Project Devel_____o m'~nt„:
The procedure to be followed in developing
the project site after completion of planning
is outlined in the attached Resume of Three-
Russell F. Priebe
Executive Director
Attachments;
1. Proposed resolution
2. Survey and Planning Budget
3. Map; CBD Area
4. Resume; Three-Fourths Grant Provisions
JI e~"i ~3 PP .HJ, v, .. r! .?J~
de )~S i,7 ° )H rgPe SAi 6 ~i aYdCY fi
.:§':f,. „_E:j"h:~id ,~Y~t"ti-!~, 4i~J!`fiJ~Ma1! S~ -_nTa _p z~, >: t%.r 1. ~.; ~f. : .l :i x: .;;;:.
;~P. ~, a , ?off Y. ~ ~ ~`. ~"~~ 9r~d~ ~".'-;5,)~1 G.~ ~ n;c ~ sa ._.. _ _
~3 ~r E =.x! i~ xrea ~ n e a r exE , -..a r dPt, ( ?.1 i Ef, R3:e ( r s ,d,-=ai Via; ,°"
h s a x d.~ 1 e!" 1
> ~,,:t .i n r g a t..a t, ei ~.ea
d E e ror a ~ er x% m < n d tt dxE > eoE .. [ ~'^,. e ~ ,
~.,_, ._ ._.. ._...." .._ _.. ... ._ T ..., .... ..... _ ..-.. ~.._. ~..__ .... ~._ ....... '.r _.._,. f
Y~!,ar.; IvSL'S t,,.l Ti;i 11 w.. -p F.., r .,,".. I~.ty, ..~ .
i
t
tV'ej t
x. 1'("d rt ca ,dot (Nn. _1, xd.
vA~~r. A 1,. ._ __ _3 3:3 `Yi :~_ 3.9re;d~ Aa`r ,. U1d `r ~ '
'-~
I d- J t3 fatSi'' Fil Y" lPP 1 itY $F E 1 f
U Ji _r:; 1 n._.i it i 1 °3'i IY'
aq;
k. _ d{ i Y ri? „ic i,~dii QH i ( p Dr r i ,,.
i. ), 1 iL FP 1~~HC 1hl iJS V . ?. t. L, e FGR i'-OV,,
~'
I+ ,0, iT '-0 1 I ~
I r ~ S
I ~ ~ ~- I,QNie- _..-A)N I 7
~f ~
1 b~ (3 ~
ft p
~ ~. r+:Fh F t ^PS i s . ^bi, . &, vr,. +~..d .> (r 'AP i3 ~5..
ii tk ID 0 •i. 14 ».14i, t i;i,J r, p 1~~. f.l
x~, P~. e ~.`"t x d` P . ~;
i ra r~^ rR,"? da'1' S I'AT3r °„ ~...:; =S .r?'. r~'. i„'i 4i }
A __._ "__._ _. _~_..."
i
a ".?r{, dr ~'?;; P ,27a1.tD2A, 1 .n ,. n~}
1 -`^Y7N` t) FIA%ii S k'Y~ iRt3 r?J, ft :do'f!)
l _
~ to is :.J t kt?is' '~'f',1 r«gac ;n E :t,~.1:??, 2aAi Ca2'r~,
~ a,.,: i7ta P~1 i,.h3~'d3, IF ,~3iP ,...k, ¢. 7~~r,, n71 __ __.
__ _._ _-
?b"i liA, t :".n i g7s~ 3J
~ ..
i
j
R
Illj
~)
~,r.? ~,
r !~lJ
f'Y ~'.~, ~'I
[,~, 3, 1n
n ,~
i ( ^n. ^^+@ t 1 A?dk~ Ps 4 eV tiVt3 ¢,SOk^~ _-_- - - _~
',
. o~.a a 'k~r
m
•~
~ « •
i ~ ~
~
.,, ~
_~.
P "a ox.r P ;e„ ,. av ~ E.1_ia% R pct .., e - -
nor n~., e ah s~'! ~ t
c
r
E
t ,,. >
sd. ~.^
,
ar _.. ~e
,
a xe~ ,,;.~"
~, -,ink`,^x .i" ..i.
f _...._ _.-. __.__-
- _
a-.
rot4or _ _ _
,.
rvz
~ ~ d. ''. Jx t t.,. ~.,n~~~: ~r
,' .
J t
++ ~
~ S.l d_ F~~ P A~ k ~ '^ d -r Y
_~.f~~ Urn
~~, ~ -
_~ _
_."_.... _" .. ~
~,~~;c _ ~ ~ ~~ ~
. A,..c ~,. t ~,
e'
~ ,
- ~~~r~
„
~ C..r ~ F. I.1' e..q .~
~ ~ _..._ _" _ ___
. 1`[ c
_. ___._ __- _ _.
i ry, _
~
.+i<=?^y .. ,~E .„n Y~ E, ,{., h..^a.{v ccP~"<n d
'-
.__ __ _.
,r f0;; sxnl ciir .ra; '.: 6.
".
., E
,
- i
_..
~
., . ,..
„xrn~r~ n E
i .r
E ~ 3. ,mil 912°~~ l()T 1(?:2 (1 ZIY . .
r
,.
j
~~a ~::a: zE- -, ~ r Ea,_ ,
_.. _._ - .. ~.
~VAa&49H 9CPRRk1
1
-~
g
1~A
_0
b
HIGPp
34P/UUL
~~~ ~
ij
D
~z~~ ~~
~] ,
A~~~~E ;
®E~ ~,,RK
~~~®
ur..u ~, rl P.;R l6 T
__.__~~_" ~_ _, -avdeM b/Ob PA®{ 4/%,g WeO /IDS/ -
` - 4
~~
~"
1 Ce ~~ ~a R~dw~3opm~n~k ~Ar~s~ '---~-- ~r-
2~
p~ I
C22'X Q~' '~~. IGps
.,
II ~'8k,Y
_~__ ~_~______ 9
~~~N
'~ 3EA31t)&: PARE(--
fJetob~r 18, 1961
St`~LT«.SJFi C !'~~Q ~"t' !3 `. "'C'. ~ ~?, '1:51:
.~'.swu.*r;~ Uf
_._
"1~~~~r~-toz ~th€ (ti:cl~ aioa~ 9 5'a"o~ ~;io~~~
_.._
~~~ R.. ,:~'J' ) £1 :eCt ,7 ~i?itS`..J"91:1 ~il:~(':i ~.J ,'i 'v'' 1 ~F"",,(% ~[:1 .r ''". f:':- r: i.'t )> O%'
j{l ii t; x~ ar1-,.',:xw',"w?. f~d~ < ~ it C:?S" ;5'~i4 CC: k"'.S„
/;, ~il.:[~~d~)r :?.i1i3', ill.. t'.z dl Clli:.r~ C3Xt')G [~.'~i P:1A:i c^~ ','lc ~" 1. i'..~'. ilrl ""CA a7'i
I-,T..~S'^. .-%Jj~C~ COSt.,
.~.~ ~l., kim ':./#„ C~Ja Cil ?:: aT,l~," :1. Tt `C)P.ltr71 .~'i't~al. [. OY- .S i:i.T~+r t?G' c~.nd
~J1~~nrl;nc~ do .., no4 obliga`o ..a5fmt~m~~A t ;r.sl:~' 1i~.~nc:ia:~
~ ~_
--.+~`.-n17~'-.'1 C+~'' c dpi. Ll. J,~:tO~:., _+Or f d?~~}s?RCI' Oi)C .J i. C))~t~~o
~ r ,
~e %1 ~I t'A dl:;: l.. t-i c~$sl a~.J llCe`~" i. ,+,. STt9(X4T a.'3~i v~31f @5~.~;°;.'. E1~/ t-~„~.~~"fl~~
i
,'~ ~~~a'yi ~,.~ o'a't a,c,i==:;tr ~_casn~ a,la ~~an~_:; ~r.
c'1"1r c11 .~r'7~)1 P^ rJR c"A (~'a ".?p',-.i'.r- _Chv. - s.:~i',w_~O1~Tt;l 17•~r~la ~`C)S:°,
e?.r a'i;: s(a -^':s C:'.'3,'U a.Sl.t 1~?71.
bl %a~Idlc,l:i.ti. z,
C'.) 5~'t:^ ~:J" l".'j''nl. ]"r3 ~" golf ' ;3I1 (i Arn})e"i' oei . .'.}"s
c'~ 1~*u] d~ a~or;i'tic.n' :^-;~ .. ens
C?-:: £~" ", r1C~yClJ it .l 4'a ~'.: X'i3 i i. i'L~ ^.) >'L ~+ !~,li :'1P. r_~ p'Jp sJ)?"C"~.: c''.`C e`"?C'.ita-..'?Tl
aoti:,.c~ ,~c 5`A.:t~Ltl,e= `Er,m ir,,, ,`,car 'rl'lc,r Si9?.nt ~ron.d
~ loc~.L a..~-~,.outth>;,haxc~
na }a~c:jf~^r2 costs.
3 , ~'r o r. e _. ~~ s cs ,
~~ - i --
~rx:c ~JrJ~~e r A<~~ncy ~t.~s,.xlNtr~ C,JI) r2c~~?V'e1.~,~~T.;n~
.., I..,'"u ;;rm!r;,..i~*t ::e~lr C'n~i',;mr>~o7^ct
.~, A'.i. ~!Il" s ~' ~,`.C r1: 1'tl ~S 1. OIl P•; 1'Fv} <~ Eg ,i Xr lliil-l. it rl. l"y 1'.~. L;11
_,;
s~., < ._~+" t.L (}~Jnl f^t1.i >-1C~J r_^ tr ~. vi.:is jlr :C i'.v': U~t tl'i J.Od r',.'})Ki Z~:.V . ii rY
eit.ix~r~ anti >in;illi ~ lixorxam r~r.l r~<~u sting LN.f`~)lA
4` }
j ., l~ i i.;"~/ ' + Tl ;',? .I .l: `."9SC 7_ ~dF 17,'t t_' 4iS ~ rf A ?v. Y;7 z%i/~
t'« '. it l`.. r;X i_A1`p "cJ1 €^i":'iYl . i'i:: ~a'.S?r !Ty t'AR.~. ~x ct.7_il ~.atC.J {-~1 it r'i5
? .s.AF2C~i Mt.lrafn y` c¢11 ??). ctilrl;n~5 (::itU<:(X:7_it~.
c3 .. v.~,'~~ Li;lt1`l x.. ~i'C):r;'fr'. r.'OitilACS a.t I'"?f' r?. il!~ fi!.C~e'.'I~i C',~ ,C i1i 'u'
C'O1TLTr t Pi d3i.% ; t}~?)<;;,g `ii?~; t1'l: j i C; :Y"a°`
`; ~'„I'.,,t ~~~ ~;;;pzov~ zcd+^1r~lopm~Nn.t SJ1~sa
a. l~ d,:7?",I'r }^c_ ~i S'CJ?e +„" 7'f;"C ld; s: ca j. OtvCli r": it 1~ k.i~ s:Jk'1 < .iU,k?l.. J.C
j J (l .za)'1.rC
.l..x. 1.. 7. ~{+.. '. Ul1.Il i;A( U'.~JS1T~C {?~. .C i''^C4. ~'. zY'~~~<i~~T1Q"„1. C. '.i ~-CJYIc
F111.'1t. ~_f ~i~(11 ~. ~.. 11'
I n
111 .t`~C}n";TIrV (:.Tt ~~c^_2~ :I.'R t: <) a(>~...;1 c'sl.: Clxt°A'?6: C"Ci €I~Ac~i?=;Si..i`;?.
A.3~ f.r,~ttlaF?". pzr~,c^fk )~rtk?St1~.^F.i I,
,'
J. :7- 1 r'.v: {`'i+~, j:)s og)': A"i:Y .i ad"i"i c?7: Y,'J 3x'e: ). i`77>4i. x'10?"i t t?^'^PI^'-Sl L:s
(.%. 7i. t. `? ,(4 ~'L`"'j ~C'c~Ci'~, l!?i1 i
L "~ ,i~ ~, ~a it ~ "• 1 '' p"JC3 ~' 7 L; it
~y
1 `~.t d13:~<i~;3m T I p t.)fi^'ls€ ,k ~'<`s',. r c^,J 1.1 ~ sC. ?~ 1i~i1. i
I rx :: G"
RE S O LU TI O N atn;~ef,~ fa.~m.
~ x 'a ': ti'
~Ix ~ .~ ~
4 ~,r i
A RESOLUTTON OF THE SANTA MONICA CHAMBER ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~~
„. ~,, « s ,
COMMERCE RECOMMENDING A REDEVELOPD9ENT PROGRAM ~~~~/~ ~ 1967
IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT OF SANTA MONI~¢4~yB~ ~,~~.. ,,
~ t~"Y d J'
WHEREASa private business interests in the C~~Jt"~'~~1~Btael~xiGssy , ~„~~^~
Pltde~n. ~~R.S s~°+u.~;
District (C.B.D.~ have had a Department Stare Feasibility Study made
by Larry Smith and Company; and
WHEREAS9 the Study has shown that there is a market for
another department store in the C.B.D.; and
~~ WHEREAS, the study has recommended the 3rd Street - Broadway
Avenue area as a desirable site; and
WHEREAS9 the Department Store Committee of the Citizen's
Progress Committee has studied the problem of land acquisition in the
area and has recommended that the Redevelopment Agency take necessary
steps to apply for a survey and planning advance from the United States
Government; and
WHEREAS9 the Redevelopment Agency is considering the desig-
nation of a Central Business District Redevelopment Area in the general
area of 3rd to 5th Street9 and from Broadway Avenue to Colorado Avenue
as indicated on the attached map;
NOW THEREFORE9 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SANTA MONICA CHAMBER OF
COMMERCE:
SECTION 1. That the Chamber endorses the desirability of
obtaining a full-line9 first class department store for Santa Mohica's
Central Business District - but is opposed to the creation of a new
shopping center complex9 which would detrimentally affect the present
main section of the Central Business District.
SECTION 2. That the final determination of a "full-line9
first class Department Store" be made upon the recommendations of a
committee appointed by the Mayor? including retail merchants qualified
to make such determination.
SECTION 3. That adequate parking for existing retail
businesses - a ma7.l - and the new department store should be developed
in this sequence.
SECTION 4. That the Chamber of Commerce feels that the
development of a new department, store should be achieved by private
enterprise and that all possible efforts be made to exhaust this line
of approach.
SECTION 5. That the Chamber of Commerce feels the impor-
tance of an additional full-line9 first class department store to the
Central Business area be such that it wishes to go on record as stating9
"That if all efforts called for in Section 4 are taken and it is found
impossible to achieve the addition of the department store to the Central
Business Districts that the Chamber would then support the principle of
the redevelopment approach proposed by the Redevelopment Agency."
SECTION 6. That if the redevelopment approach is takeny
the Chamber reserves judgment on the economic soundness and feasibility
of the redevelopment plan to be developed until it has reviewed and
reported on it.
SECTION 7. The Chamber further resolves that at no time
will it support the Redevelopment Agency if anything less than a full-
line9 first class quality department store is considered.
SECTION 8. That any final approval of the plan be predicated
6
on approval of the department store to be selected.
r-
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this `4~ G~ day of ,/~' ~''L~ s 1961.
ATTEST:
Se c r. e tary
r, ,
J~ ~_L1._LLi '
e ~.~J..,L.I.Ll.r~4~
y
-,-~ ,-II-,I-i -,-~y{
._..I_Li1_I~ ~ - I
`r`r ~ Tom' I
C_J:.~ .~._ ._._.~~.
i II
~._. _._.~..y_.~,...i..l
~.~
!_'~_.....~J.__L._~
~ 1 T _Trrv !1
r~ 1 ~ _
Ylv FS~ ~_
s
r.. ~__ ____._.
~ _J~'~1
1[~ 1
r u~ n
M *AN NiLN r/pF
TENTH T~
-^`^-7 }
-____ o
_ STR
LINCOI N
~ k- -_. ~, .~ ~ r.
~~~ L~
rt~TSEVE NTN _____
.. _ '
-_
J ~T
~~~ C
I FIFTH
STREET ~ ~ ~.~-._.
~~ 5\
AVENUE __ ~ OG:EAN _,~ VE
f ~~.._-~.-,---~
~'.~ f~ f\ - ~ / L
~~ ~~
- __ Cf \5111 I'\I!1
uNF ES ~~ fNCO ~9L~~ ~ ~~~ -
F .. ..l _ ... _ .~
day P R O P O S E D
`J C„B,D® RED~9ELOPMS-dT ®REA
' .~~,° REDE•lEI.OPMENT ACiEN6Y
OF THE
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
r,
Octob®r 1$, 19b~
~L
i ~ ,.,-
,~--f{ ~~
:i 6
i
A
.. _. _.
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
I i'-DPTEt MEMO
DATE:
TO
FROM:
November 2~6, 1961
City Council
Attention: M. M. King,
~~~*y~
~,
~st~
Acting City Manager ~ "I ~= ~ ',q ~
~`,~ ~ .
~,. ~t ~p ' ~ ", ~ f l qF1
„'
s
~ ~~"' a f~ 9
r ' ["v
I~. A. IIard, City Controller
SUBJECT: C}3D Planning .Advance
If the proposal that the Redevelopment :'Agency
proceed with a 3~4 Federal Grant basis for the redevelop-
ment of the Central Business Distr9.ct project is approved,
we will need an appropriation from General Fund Unappro-
priated Surplus to A~c 1ti06-80 CBD Planning in the amount
or ~s35,oo0.00.
IF 'the project is brought to successful completion,
this sum will be recoverable Prom the proceeds of the tax.
increment bonds issued to Finance the City's 1~4 contribution.
~l
L,vJ. ~'. ``.~~,-lam'/j
IW. A. HARD
City Controller
~7&1H: ob
,~
THIS .AGRhEBME'NT entered into this 2 ~ day of ~cG7yccec ,
],962, by and betureen the GITY OF' S6tNTA MONICA, a municip 1 cor or-
ats.on, here;irnafter called "CI^lY" and Ti3E: RFDBVELOPNLT'NT AGENCY OP
`.C:-il/ CITY OAS SI~NTA MONICA, hereinafter called "P-.GrNCY,"
1rvT I T N ;/' S .S E T H
W1~REAS, the parties hereto have agreed 'chat the City
c~,i11 <zdvance up to 175,000,00 to :agency in survey and planning
funds for the Central Business District Redevelopment Project Frith
the understanding that said ~p35,000,00 vai°i.a. be repaid to City if
and ~,vhen bonds ~~.re issued by the Agency to cover costs of executing
the praject, and
Wh'ER?rAS, the parties vrish to formalize this understanding
here5.n,
NO"vJ, THLJRErORP'~, it is agreed as follows:
Ci'cy sJ.xall advance to `Agency the sum of :35,000.00 and
Agency agrees to use said money for a survey and planning for the
Central Business Distra.et Redevelopment Project, Agency shall
repay saa,d sum to City :i.f and when bonds 21re issued to obtain
money to execute said project, or if and t,*hen money is otherwise
<A.va.9_lable to .repa.y .said sum.
IN 1nrTTNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have caused 'this
agreement to be er,ecu'ced the day and year. f'~rst above written.
ATTEST:
t~ -? ,, r
,Approved as to form this
15th day of January, 1962„
..._..._
CITY 0~' SAN7.'.A b10NICA,
a muna ipal corporation
by i~GZly~-G~c-i
~ City Malnager
T1iE RED~Vh,LOPML'NT .AGENCY OF THE.
CxTY,.a~E`' SANTA MOI~I,~~~'`
.~ ,,