SR-082807-7A (2)City Council Meeting: August 28, 2007
Agenda Item: ~e
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Eileen Fogarty, Planning & Community Development
Subject: Introduction and adoption of an Emergency Interim Ordinance to require a
Development Agreement for projects over 7,500 square feet of floor area
or projects containing more than 15 housing units, artist studio units or
single room occupancy units in the Light Manufacturing and Studio District
(LMSD) and Industrial Conservation (M1) district, and for changes in land
use on parcels that exceed 32,000 square feet in the LMSD and 15,000
square feet in the M1 district.
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council introduce and adopt the subject emergency
interim ordinance that for a specified temporary period of time:
1. establishes for a specified temporary period a Development Agreement
requirement for projects that contain more than 7,500 square feet of floor area or
more than 15 housing units, artist studio units or single room occupancy units in
the LMSD and M1 zoning districts; and,
2. establishes a Development Agreement requirement for changes in Iand use on
parcels that exceed an area of 32,000 square feet in the LMSD and 15,000
square feet in the M1 districts.
Executive Summary
On July 24, 2007, the City Council directed staff to prepare an interim ordinance to
effectively manage the currently piecemeal development activity in the industrial districts
and ensures the City's opportunity to adequately plan for the future of this area. The
proposed interim ordinance is designed to address the type, use and scale plus the Iack
1
of public infrastructure for development currently occurring in the manufacturing and
industrially zoned districts. Current proposals, though technically consistent with the
current zoning, violate the original intent of the existing zoning as well as the direction
the community is taking with the LUCE planning process, both for the industrial areas
themselves as well as the community as a whole. The conflict between what is
intended and what is occurring is not simply one of policy. It is also one of safety and
quality of life for the current and future residents. The proposed interim ordinance
addresses both problems by establishing additional discretionary review for projects of a
certain size and allowing them to go forward pursuant to a development agreement
process, which ensures City Council review.
Discussion
Backqround
Significant changes have occurred in the area over the last year. A combination of high
land values, the national decline tin traditional industry and strong demand for housing
encourages rapid shifts in land use and physical changes. At the same time; the
community's progress creating a vision and goals through the LUCE update has
energetically established overall planning principles. These advances will be
significantly undermined and marginalized if the City does not immediately address
large unplanned development projects in the industrial area.
Current development is in conflict with the intent of the current zoning, the planning
principles that have emerged from the LUCE community planning process, and issues
identified by the community at a recent workshop specifically dedicated to the area.
2
. Projects are proceeding under a land use policy direction established 23 years
ago
• There are limited opportunities for a resident in the industrial area to walk, bike or
use transit to access commercial services such as restaurants, banks, dry
cleaners or other services typically found in neighborhoods
. There are limited parks and open space to support significantly new housing
opportunities in this part of town
. Development is being proposed on a street grid a lot pattern designed for light
industrial uses; housing projects at the scale and intensity proposed will likely
require infrastructure improvements
• Projects are proposed on parcels that far exceed the typicai lot size in other parts
of the City
• Significant components of the City's business and economic base are being
replaced by unplanned housing
• The introduction of a significant number of new residents into an existing
industrial area establishes conflicts between current industrial and future
residential uses.
Intent of Current Zoninp for Industrial Area
The intent behind the current zoning is to preserve light industrial uses and encourage
low-impact, high-employment entertainment industry facilities along with creative arts
and supportive uses. The area does has neither the physical layout nor the public
infrastructure in terms of streets, sidewalks, open space, and other amenities
appropriate for people who live and work there. It was never intended to develop in
piecemeal fashion into large, unplanned, unbroken blocks of dense multi unit residentiai
without necessary infrastructure and amenities.
Zoning for the industrial corridor includes provisions to:
. preserve of existing industrial uses;
• create opportunity for small businesses engaged in product design, development,
and manufacturing and distribution;
• encourage film and music production and post-production facilities
3
• encourage visual and pertorming arts
The zoning code aiso considers through a discretionary review process limited housing
opportunities that support the arts community and single room occupancy (SRO) uses
intended to serve as transitional housing for those in need.
Industriallv Zoned Lands and Studv Area
~I %ssYbleLlBh[
... '. '. RailStaRan
LI~[flall
d1~4nmen[
~ mi m:m«
~ wso m.ma
Character of Industrial Area
The industrial districts are marked by low profile buildings, large parcels and blocks, and
a street grid pattern suited to the former traditional industrial land uses, including
manufacturing and distribution facilities along the abandoned rail line, studio-related
uses, and historic farming plots.
4
East of 20~" Street, the street grid and parcel size support large industrial uses within a
significant distance from residential and other sensitive land uses. Access in the area is
dominated by the automobile, so that it is not friendly to the pedestrian. There are few
sidewalks, limited bike paths and few transit lines that serve the area. There are few
parks or open space for basic recreational needs. Today, entertainment industry related
uses and office buildings are the dominant uses, but these areas are not well served by
restaurants, cafes or other services used by the daytime population. Private schools
and institutions have historically located there and are expected to grow modestly as
education demands change. The industrial district also has a thriving arts community
including Bergamot Station's nationally recognized galleries, the 18th Street Arts
Complex provides studio space and housing opportunities for artists, and live work
spaces throughout the district.
Past and Recent Development Activitv
5
Modest development activity has occurred within the last seven years for post
production, office and automobile-
related uses. Three residential projects
were approved; including a 100 unit
SRO project, 49 bed homeless shelter,
and an 18 unit artist studio
PosYProduction Post Productian
105,822 SF
Residential Residential
• 100 SR units . 48 units artist studios
development. Currently, and over 1,000
multifamily housing units are pending
approval in or immediately adjacent to
the industrial area. This dramatic
increase in residential activity is
~• 49 bed shelter • 623 units SRO
• 8 artist studios • 2 units artist studios
Office Commercial e 91 units artist studios
42,403 SF . 66 units artist studios
' Industrial . 235 units SRO
29,929 SF
unprecedented in the industrial area,
which is not equipped with
infrastructure and amenities to allow for
the safe use of this development. In
addition; the unplanned introduction of
new residents to an existing industrial
area almost always creates conflicts with existing industrial uses because of safety, and
other operational impacts such as traffic, parking, noise, odor, and hours of use.
6
Land Use and Circulation Element Proiect
The City has been actively engaged in a process to re-examine land use policy, identify
priorities and establish a plan to direct all future development and circulation patterns as
well as infrastructure in the City. Most recently, the City held four workshops that were
attended by over 300 residents and business owners. The results of these workshops
were previously presented to the City Council on June 19, 2007; the City Council
endorsed the Placemaking Principles developed out of that process. The majo~
concern of these principles is the quality of the environment that could or should be
created for the future by the manner in which the public realm and transportation
systems function, buildings are designed and constructed, and uses and users interact
for the benefit of aIL
A fifth workshop solely devoted to the industrial lands was held in July, where the
community articulated the following observations and issues.
• Much of the land in the industrial area presents an opportunity to advance public
policy objectives
• Opportunities for industrial uses and businesses should be preserved
• Opportunities created by light rail to transform portions of the industrial area
shouid be maximized
• Alternative strategies should be developed to address traffic conditions and
development should be consistent with them, including public infrastructure
• There is some support for some additional housing if at strategic locations (not
throughout the entire area), at appropriate scales and densities consistent with
the Placemaking Principles, and with transportation and other infrastructure in
place.
7
• If residential uses are developed, there must be adequate infrastructure and
supporting services.
• Smaller street grid patterns appropriate for walking, biking and transit should be
created from large blocks to create and strengthen neighborhood connections
within the area as well as between the area and the rest of the city
• Pedestrian access to supporting retail and services like grocery stores should be
created
Opportunities/
Challenges
The Julv 24 Citv Council Report includes additional information about the LUCE
planning effort and key principles that have been developed over the workshop series.
The project website (www.shapethefuture2025.net) also provides the latest information
from the successful Industrial Lands Workshop, including a video of the workshop and
8
expert panel presentations. A second workshop that focuses on the industrial area is
tentatively scheduled for October 2007.
Proposed Ordinance
StafF recommends a number of regulations to proactively plan for the future while
preserving the public process and providing property owners and developers an
opportunity to maintain businesses and support minor expansion and construction
activity in the industrial area
1. Development Aqreement Threshold: New Construction
Requiring a Development Agreement (DA) for certain developments that exceed
a specified threshold ensures that the approved project is consistent with City
Council policy objectives and that the project provides reasonable public benefits
to the community. The California State Iegislation establishing the DA procedure
provides that an applicant, upon receiving approval, can proceed with the project
in accordance with existing policies, rules, and regulations, subject to conditions
of approval. The DA process was enacted by the Legislature to strengthen the
public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive
planning and reduce the economic costs of development. As a negotiated
agreement between the City and an applicant, and as a legislative action, any
project approved pursuant to this procedu~e will be consistent with City Council's
policy directives.
9
The DA alternative is superior to the existing Development Review (DR) process
because it ensures that projects will be approved consistent with the desire of the
community and the direction of the City Council. It gives the City the flexibility to
define and shape projects on a case by case basis. It also provides the City the
opportunity to ensure that large projects do not undermine efforts currently
underway with the LUCE project by allowing for careful examination of the mix of
uses and provisions for infrastructure improvements as appropriate. While the
DR process allows for examination of these and other issues, state law limits the
discretion of local agencies to disapprove a DR housing project or condition its
approval upon reduction of ailowable densities if that project complies with
applicable, objective general plan and zoning standards and criteria, including
design review standards, in effect at the time the project application was
determined compete for filing.
The threshold to require a DA is recommended for projects over 7,500 square
feet of new floor area or more than 15 housing units, artist studios, or SROs. The
City has previously established 7,500 square feet as a development threshold
that ensures the scale and character of existing neighborhoods are maintained
and the residents' quality of life and the environment are preserved. The average
multifamily development project in the City completed since 1998 has been 15
units, exciuding two atypically large projects, the Arboretum and Sea Castle, the
former of which was undertaken pursuant to a DA. New construction at 7,500
10
square feet or less, or fewer than 16 units will continue to be processed pursuant
to existing regulations.
2. Development Apreement Threshold: Chanqe of Use
In addition to new construction that adds floor area, significant investment into a
buiiding or property to support a change in use can limit the City's ability to
implement infrastructure improvements such as sidewalks and streets, and result
in land uses that do not have long term benefits, such as a storage facility near
the planned light rail station. Many of the large parcels in the LMSD and M1
districts contain buildings with ample building floor area to accommodate a new
use. Such investment to recondition an existing building for a new land use could
cost tens of millions of dollars and remove the parcel as an opportunity site that
supports future planning efforts. To preserve the efficacy of the City's broader
planning efforts it is recommended that a DA threshold be estab~ished as follows:
LMSD: Require DA for changes in land use on parcels that exceed an area of
32,000 square feet
M1: Require DA for changes in land use on parcels that exceed an area of
15,000 square feet
These different thresholds reflect the difference in the average parcel size in
each district. These thresholds are not unduly restrictive; they would apply to
approximately 25% of the parcels in each of the industrial districts. Key to this
11
recommendation is an understanding that reasonable development activity
should be permitted and that modest investments encouraged to support existing
businesses. This provision specifically applies to changes in use and does not
apply to remodel projects that will continue to support existing land uses.
Existing educational uses are consistent with the desire to maintain cultural uses as well
as the purpose of existing zoning. Therefore, staff recommends that these uses remain
subject to the Development Review Permit process which includes public hearing,
environmental, and public review.
Previous Councit Actions
Over the past sixteen months the City Council has taken the following actions with
regard to the industrial area:
April 11, 2006: Implementation of the City's state density bonus (Ordinance 2180
expires May 11, 2008, citywide)
April 24, 2007 Interim emergency ordinance requiring housing projects over 50 units
to obtain a DR permit. (Ordinance 2226 expired June 23, 2007)
May 22, 2007: Interim Ordinance 2226 extended (Ordinance # 2226 (Ordinance 2232
Expires May 8, 2009)
July 24, 2007: Directed staff to prepare subject interim ordinance
Alternatives
The City Council previously rejected alternatives that relate to a status quo (no changes
to development standards) and moratorium options. Other alternatives the City Council
may consider include:
1. Modify the thresholds at which a Development Agreement is required.
12
Eliminate or modify specific components of the ordinance, such as the Development
Agreement requirement for changes in land use on large parcels Implementing any of
the alternative actions has the potential to increase or decrease the number of projects
that will be subject to a Development Agreement process.
Environmental Analysis
The proposed emergency interim ordinance is exempt from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State Implementation
Guidelines in that CEQA applies only to projects having the potential to cause a significant
effect on the environment. The` proposed action to require a Development Agreement
application for development over 7,500 square feet in area or more than 15 units, or for changes
in land use on certain sized parcels in the industrial district does not have this potential. Rather,
the proposed amendment will expand the number of projects subject to public review and
evaluated pursuant to CEQA. Additional findings supporting this exemption are included in the
attached ordinance.
The proposed ordinance is also exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
15183, which provides that projects that are consistent with development density
established by existing zoning or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified
shall not require additional environmental review except as might be necessary to
examine project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.
The proposed ordinance modifies development application and review procedures by
requiring a Development Agreement application for development over 7,500 square feet
in area or more than 15 units, or for changes in land use on certain sized parcels in the
LMSD and M1 zone districts. Within these designated zone districts, projects below
13
these thresholds will remain subject to existing development standards and procedures.
Projects above these thresholds wili require a Development Agreement application and
approval. No change in the General Plan Land Use and Circulation Element (LUCE) is
proposed. No parcel rezoning is proposed; all affected parcels will retain their current
zone district classification. Thus, under the proposed ordinance, potential development
will be the same or less than the density established by existing zoning and generai
plan policies for which the following environmental documents were certified pursuant to
CEQA: Final EIR on the proposed Santa Monica General Plan LUCE, February 1984;
Final EIR for the City of Santa Monica Zoning Ordinance, December 1986; Final
Supplemental EIR for the City of Santa Monica Zoning Ordinance, June 1988.
As stated above, the proposed ordinance makes procedural changes for
development above identified thresholds; they do not change existing density-related
standards contained in the LUCE or Zoning Ordinances and reviewed in the above-
referenced EIRs. In addition, there are no project-specific significant effects which are
peculiar to the proposed ordinance or sites subject to it. There are no reasonably
foreseeable project-specific significant effects caused by the enactment of the
ordinance and the Development Agreement requirement since physical changes do not
directly result from these ordinance amendments. Rather, these amendments are of
general application and at least twice removed from potential physical changes. Future
physical changes will not occur unless (1) a specific development project is proposed,
and (2) the City grants its approval for that specific project by Development Agreement.
The intervening project application and City review and approvai prevent any impacts
asserted to result from future projects to be characterized as peculiar to the ordinance
14
amendments themselves. Accordingly, the proposed project is categorically exempt
under CEQA Guidelines section 15183, and no additional environmental review is
required.
Budget/Financial Impact
The recommendation in this report does not have any significant budget or fiscal
impacts, however, the Planning and Community Development Department expects
minor decreases in revenue generated from fees that may have been collected over the
next two years related to permit activity. The City would not receive increased property
taxes generated by a property that might have been redeveloped under existing zoning.
Since it is unknown which properties may have been redeveloped and to what extent
proposed improvements would contribute to a property's valuation, it is not possible to
calculate unrealized tax revenue.
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Emergency Interim Ordinance
Exhibit B: Parcel Area Data for Property in the LMSD & M1 Zoning Districts
Forvvarded to Council:
Eil~en Fogarty
Director, Planning
Development
P.,L~ary(ont Ewell
~ty~~itanaqer
F:\CityPlanning\Share\COUNCIL\STRPi12007\Industriai Zoning IEO.doc
15
AREA SITUSADDR CONDO ZONING
560.43750 2500 MICHIGAN AVE N LMSD
564.08056 2430 OLYMPIC BLVD N LMSD
638.25000 2500 MICHIGAN AVE N LMSD
1313.09375 1816 24TH ST N LMSD
1483.25000 1709 20TH ST N LMSD
1920.56250 2900 NEBRASKA AVE N LMSD
2331.25000 1818 CLOVERFIELD BLVD N LMSD
2750.00000 2412 DELAWARE AVE N LMSD
2802.50000 2308 BROADWAY N LMSD
3000.00000 3110 PENNSYLVANIAAVE N LMSD
3875.00000 1701 BERKELEY ST N LMSD
4834.90625 1920 FRANK ST N LMSD
4959.28125 2314 MICHIGAN AVE N LMSD
5020.31250 2310 MICHIGAN AVE N LMSD
5096.75000 1818 CLOVERFIELD BLVD N LMSD
5747.00000 1671 20TH ST N LMSD
5775.00000 1637 STANFORD ST N LMSD
5775.00000 1641 STANFORD ST N LMSD
5775.00000 1645 STANFORD ST N LMSD
5775.00000 1651 STANFORD ST N LMSD
5775.00000 1653 STANFORD ST N LMSD
5854.37500 1708 BERKELEY ST N LMSD
5854.37500 1712 BERKELEY ST N LMSD
5985.00000 1645 21 ST ST N LMSD
6017.25000 2615 COLORADO AVE N LMSD
6017.25000 2615 COLORADO AVE N LMSD
6070.50000 2601 COLORADO AVE N LMSD
622125000 2015 COLORADO AVE N ~MSD
6238.21500 1903 HIGH PL N LMSD
6265.00000 1733 20TH ST N LMSD
6300.00000 1800 FRANKLIN ST N LMSD
6331.15625 1818 CLOVERFIELD BLVD N LMSD
6750.00000 1544 20TH ST N LMSD
6750.00000 1753 21ST ST N LMSD
6817.62500 3002 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N LMSD
6857.06250 1702 BERKELEY ST N LMSD
6874.37500 1527 20TH ST N LMSD
6875.00000 1707 BERKELEY ST N LMSD
6921.53125 1721 22ND ST N LMSD
6965.56250 3003 PENNSYLVANIAAVE N LMSD
7000.00000 1715 20TH ST N LMSD
7000.00000 1725 20TH ST N LMSD
7000.00000 1727 20TH ST N LMSD
7000.00000 1729 20TH ST N LMSD
7000.00000 1731 20TH ST N LMSD
7060.53125 1709 20TH ST N LMSD
7100.00000 1653 20TH ST N LMSD
7100.00000 1657 20TH ST N LMSD
7100.00000 1663 20TH ST N LMSD -
7100.00000 1667 20TH ST N LMSD
7207.50000 1519 26TH ST N LMSD
7362.50000 1527 26TH ST N LMSD
74Q9.53125 2211 MICHIGAN AVE N LMSD
7440.00000 1523 26TH ST N LMSD
7500.00000 1528 20TH ST N LMSD
7500.00000 1534 20TH ST N LMSD
7500.00000 1538 20TH ST N LMSD
7500.00000 1711 21ST ST N LMSD
7500.00000 1712 21 ST ST N LMSD
7500.00000 1714 20TH ST N LMSD
7500.00000 1715 21ST ST N LMSD
7500.00000 1716 21 ST ST N LMSD
7500.00000 1718 21ST ST N LMSD
7500.00000 1720 21ST ST N LMSD
7500.00000 1728 21ST ST N LMSD
7500.00000 1730 21 ST ST N LMSD
7500.00000 1734 21 ST ST N LMSD
7500.00000 1736 22ND ST N LMSD
7500.00000 1752 22ND ST N LMSD
7500.00000 1920 OLYMPIC BLVD N LMSD
7506.25000 1507 20TH ST N LMSD
7506.25000 1511 20TH ST N LMSD
7506.25000 1517 20TH ST N LMSD
7506.25000 1519 20TH ST N LMSD
7506.25000 2010 BROADWAY N LMSD
7650.00000 1720 22ND ST N LMSD
7650.00000 1729 21 ST ST N LMSD
7650.00000 1731 21ST ST N LMSD
7746.37500 1914 FRANK ST N LMSD
7750.00000 1902 FRANK ST N LMSD
7750.00000 1908 FRANK ST N LMSD
7947.50000 1547 26TH ST N LMSD
8075.00000 1533 26TH ST N LMSD
8320.09375 2011 COLORADO AVE N LMSD
8525.00000 1907 HIGH PL N LMSD
8593.75000 1725 BERKELEY ST N LMSD
8900.00000 1556 20TH ST N LMSD
9017:00000 1625 20TH ST N LMSD
9022.56250 1955 CENTINELAAVE N LMSD
9266.37500 2200 MICHIGAN AVE N LMSD
9600.00000 2912 COLORADO AVE N LMSD
9640.12500 1660 STANFORD ST N LMSD
9953.96875 2902 NEBRASKA AVE N LMSD
10255.09375 2908 NEBRASKA AVE N LMSD
10683.25000 3202 OLYMPIC BLVD N LMSD
10887.31250 1706 21ST ST N LMSD
11218.31250 2330 26TH ST N LMSD
11400.00000 1630 21 ST ST N LMSD
11448.18750 1752 CLOVERFIELD BLVD N LMSD
11550.00000 1748 21ST ST N = LMSD
11687.50000 1727 BERKELEY ST N LMSD
11687.50000 1741 BERKELEY ST N LMSD
11687.50000 1745 BERKELEY ST N LMSD
11708 .75000 1716 BERKELEY ST N LMSD
11775 .00000 1617 STANFORD ST N LMSD
11785 .00000 2848 COLORADO AVE N LMSD
11812 .71875 2920 NEBRASKA AVE N LMSD
12224 .00000 2927 NEBRASKA AVE N LMSD
12701 .50000 2919 NEBRASKA AVE N LMSD
12706 25000 1751 BERKELEY ST N LMSD
13750 .00000 1715 BERKELEY ST N LMSD
14350 .00000 1923 COLORADO AVE N LMSD
14462 .68750 1721 22ND ST N LMSD
14537 .87500 2932 NEBRASKA AVE N LMSD
14775 .00000 1728 22ND ST N LMSD
14812 .50000 1718 20TH ST N LMSD
14950 .40625 1701 21STST N LMSD
14962 .93750 1704 22ND ST N LMSD
15000 .00000 1717 21 ST ST N LMSD
15000 .00000 1744 22ND ST N LMSD
15000 .00000 1756 22ND ST N LMSD
15150 .00000 1706 22ND ST N LMSD
15200 .00000 1674 20TH ST N LMSD
15365 .43750 2944 NEBRASKA AVE N LMSD
15577 .50000 1836 FRANKLIN ST N LMSD
16107 .50000 1545 26TH ST N LMSD
16275 .75000 1776 CLOVERFIELD BLVD N LMSD
16500 .00000 3060 NEBRASKA AVE N LMSD
16529. 06250 1800 BERKELEY ST N LMSD
16564. 71875 1802 CLOVERFIELD BLVD N LMSD
17233 28125 2014 BROADWAY N LMSD
17600. 00000 1631 STANFORD ST N LMSD
17712. 00000 2399 MICHIGAN AVE N LMSD
17882. 50000 1832 FRANKLIN ST N LMSD
18000. 00000 2878 COLORADO AVE N LMSD
18038. 08138 2029 OLYMPIC BLVD N LMSD
18858. 43750 2800 OLYMPIC BLVD N LMSD
19223. 15625 3200 OLYMPIC BLVD N LMSD
19537. 50000 2020 BROADWAY N LMSD
19759. 93750 2218 BROADWAY N LMSD
19874. 00000 1634 20TH ST N LMSD
19987. 50000 3122 NEBRASKA AVE N LMSD
20013. 12500 1618 STANFORD ST N LMSD
21177. 25000 2110 BROADWAY N LMSD
21716. 46875 2230 BROADWAY N LMSD
21973. 71875 1814 STANFORD ST N LMSD
22090. 71875 1752 CLOVERFIELD BLVD N LMSD
22500. 00000 1741 21ST ST N LMSD
22550. 00000 2944 COLORADO AVE N LMSD
22800. 00000 1668 20TH ST N ~MSD
23396. 25000 1717 STANFORD ST N LMSD
23405. 06250 1721 22ND ST N LMSD
23417. 50Q00 1738 BERKELEY ST N LMSD
23685. 50000 3300 OLYMPIC BLVD N LMSD
26071. 12500 2202 OLYMPIC BLVD N LMSD
26729.50000 1760 STEWART ST N LMSD
26990.62500 3111 OLYMPIC BLVD N LMSD
27666.46875 2308 BROADWAY N LMSD
29248.50000 1740 STANFORD ST N LMSD
29784.46875 2415 MICHIGAN AVE N LMSD
2980425000 1860 FRANKLIN ST N LMSD
30268.78125 1750 BERKELEY ST N LMSD
31408.73858 3301 EXPOSITION BLVD N LMSD
31450.00000 1724 STANFORD ST N LMSD
33319.50000 1909CENTINEIAAVE N LM8D
33827.06250 1751 CLOVERFIELD BLVD N LMSD
34291.18750 2230 MICHIGAN AVE N LMSD
35144.00000 2939 NEBRASKAAVE N LMSD
36003.50000 2202 BROADWAY N LMSD
37191.56250 2011 COLORADO AVE N LMSD
37305.18750 2225 COLORADO AVE N LMSD
37366.27797 3301 EXPOSITION BLVD N LMSD
37500.00000 1502 20TH ST N LMSD
38044.37500 1820 BERKELEY ST N LMSD
38134.50000 1819 CLOVERFIELD BLVD N LMSD
38570.28125 2701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N LMSD
39143.50807 2400 OLYMPIC BLVD N LMSD
40359.65625 1655 26TH ST N LMSD
40687.59375 1633 26TH ST N LMSD
41066.25000 1660 STEV1/ART ST N LMSD
46329.37500 1655 26TH ST N LMSD
46769.59375 1633 26TH ST N LMSD
48170.68750 1723 CLOVERFIELD BLVD N LMSD
48187.28125 1520 CLOVERFIELD BLVD N LMSD
53610.18750 1757 STANFORD ST N LMSD
57435.31250 2419 MICHIGAN AVE N LMSD
59101.09375 3200 OLYMPIC BLVD N LMSD
59637.62500 3025 NEBRASKAAVE N LMSD
63439.09375 2341 MICH~GAN AVE N LMSD
70762.09375 1810 BERKELEY ST N LMSD
71454.81250 2015 COLORADO AVE N LMSD
72913.06250 1707 CLOVERFIELD BLVD N LMSD
76860.00000 2834 COLORADO AVE N LMSD
78805.28125 2211 MICHIGAN AVE N LMSD
80266.53125 2500 MICHIGAN AVE N LMSD
80384.00000 1701 STEWART ST N LMSD
80655.81250 3401 EXPOSITION BLVD N LMSD
82310.00000 2902 COLORADO AVE N LMSD
84920.09375 1701 STEWART ST N LMSD
87052.4D625 2700 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N LMSD
89428.28125 1920 COLORADO AVE N LMSD
89590.15625 2043 COLORADO AVE N LMSD
96430.50000 1805 STEWART ST N LMSD
96437.65625 2050 BROADWAY N LMSD
107132:00000 3220 OLYMPIC BLVD N LMSD
107755.00000 1703 STEWART ST N LMSD
109328.37500 1660 STEWART ST N LMSD
111999.81250 1630 STEWART ST N LMSD
112390.50000 2235 COLORADO AVE N LMSD
129937.89261 1955 CENTINELAAVE N LMSD
152796.94388 3003 EXPOSITION BLVD N LMSD
197722.37500 1740 STEWART ST N LMSD
212077.90625 1721 22ND ST N LMSD
220750.00000 1801 CENTINELA AVE N LMSD
287926.12500 1681 26TH ST N LMSD
320275.43750 3000 OLYMPIC BLVD N LMSD
398192.64696 2909 EXPOSITION BLVD N LMSD
411782.59375 2500 MICHIGAN AVE N LMSD
32528.08692
AREA SITUSADDR CONDO ZONING
968.00000 1642 19TH ST N M1
1761.00000 1620 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
1761.50000 1624 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
3977.50000 1708 17TH ST N M1
4420.62500 1030 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
5246.87500 1815 24TH ST N M1
5270.00000 1710 18TH ST N M1
5925.00000 1620 EUCLID ST N M1
6000.00000 1711 14TH ST N M1
6065.00000 1430 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
6079.56250 830 COLORADO AVE N M1
6264.18750 1715 18TH ST N M1
6619.37500 1606 EUCLID ST N M1
6784.06250 1008 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
6900.00000 1646 EUCLID ST N M1
7266.12500 1927 FRANK ST N M1
728125000 1656 9TH ST N M1
7281.25000 1660 9TH ST N M1
7281.25000 1664 9TH ST N M1
7281.25000 1670 9TH ST N M1
7425.00000 1714 17TH ST N M1
7437.50000 1709 17TH ST N M1
7437.50000 1713 11TH ST N M1
7475:00000 1330 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
748125000 1220 OLYMPIC B~VD N M1
748125000 1720 EUCLID ST N M1
7493.75000 1643 EUCLID ST N M1
7493.75000 1644 14TH ST N M1
7493.75000 1651 EUCLID ST N M1
7493.75000 1655 EUCLID ST N M1
7493.75000 1657 EUCLID ST N M1
7493.75000 1663 EUCLID ST N M1
7493.75000 1669 EUCLID ST N M1
7500.00000 1001 COLORADO AVE N M1
7500.00000 1003 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
7500.00000 1415 COLORADO AVE N M1
7500.00000 1500 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
7500.00000 1501 COLORADO AVE N M1
7500.00000 1509 COLORADO AVE N M1
750Q.00000 1532 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
7500.00000 1541 15TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1547 10TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1547 11TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1547 15TH ST N M1
7500.00000 7547 16TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1547 18TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1547 19TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1547 EUCLID ST N M1
7500.00000 1548 11TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1548 18TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1548 9TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1550 EUCLID ST N M1
7500.00000 1551 10TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1551 14TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1551 16TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1552 18TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1553 17TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1556 17TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1558 18TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1601 COLORADO AVE N M1
7500.00000 1629 12TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1630 EUCLID ST N M1
7500.00000 1631 COLORADO AVE N M1
7500.00000 1634 EUCLID ST N M1
7500.00000 1638 12TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1643 10TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1643 12TH ST Y M1
7500.00000 1643 9TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1644 11TH ST N M1 '
7500.00000 1646 11TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1648 11TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1649 11TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1649 9TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1650 EUCLID ST N M1
7500.00000 1653 11TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1654 12TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1655 9TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1656 12TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1664 12TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1665 10TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1665 11TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1666 EUCLID ST N M1
7500.00000 1668 EUCLID ST N M1
7500.0000~ 1670 17TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1701 COLORADO AVE N M1
7500.00000 1709 16TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1711 16TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1713 15TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1714 16TH ST N M1
7500.00000 1831 COLORADO AVE N M1
7500.00000 801 COLORADO AVE N M1
7500.00000 801 COLORADOAVE N M1
7512.50000 1921 FRANK ST N M1
7531.25000 1709 EUCLID ST N M1
7568.68750 1639 EUCLID ST N M1
7568.68750 1640 14TH ST N M1
7587.50000 1710 12TH ST N M1
7587.50000 1716 12TH ST N M1
7750.00000 1720 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
8000.00000 1643 19TH ST N M1
8000.00000 1646 19TH ST N M1
8000.00000 1649 18TH ST N M1
8000.00000 1649 19TH ST N M1
8000.00000 1650 19TH ST N M1
8000.OQ000 1653 19TH ST N M1
8000.00000 1654 19TH ST N M1
8000.00000 1660 19TH ST N M1
8000.00000 1663 18TH ST N M1
8000.00000 1665 18TH ST N M1
8000.00000 1707 19TH ST N M1
8000.00000 18000LYMPICBLVD N M1
8000.00000 1809 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
8000.00000 1820 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
8000.00000 1831 OLYMPIC BIVD N M1
8019.53125 1714 14TH ST N M1
8037.50000 1030 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
8100.00000 1638 EUCLID ST N M1
8250.00000 1547 9TH ST N M1
8250.00000 1548 17TH ST N M1
8250.00000 1713 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
8250.00000 1715 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
8412.50000 1734 COLORADO AVE N M1
8603.78125 825 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
8775.00000 1738 COLORADO AVE N M1
8821.87500 1713 EUCLID ST N M1
8910.00000 1642 18TH ST N M1
8996.25000 1301 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
9000.00000 1003 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
9000.00000 1101 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
9000.00000 1201 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
9000.00000 1219 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
9000.00000 1673 9TH ST N M1
9019.00000 2329 DELAWARE AVE N M1
9137.50000 1804 COLORADO AVE N M1
9600.00000 1674 17TH ST N M1
9660.00000 612 COLORADO AVE N M1
9675.00000 1634 10TH ST N M1
969625000 1714 19TH ST N M1
9705.93750 1637 7TH ST N M1
9750.00000 1715 14TH ST N M1
10037.68750 1714 15TH ST N M1
10145.00000 1353 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
10184.91774 2329 DELAWARE AVE N M1
10200.93750 900 COLORADO AVE N M1
10404.00000 1637 19TH ST N M1
10950.00000 1648 10TH ST N M1
11250.00000 1647 10TH ST N M1
11250.00000 1653 10TH ST N M1
11310.56250 1621 12TH ST N M1
12300.00000 1650 10TH ST N M1
12300.06250 2322 MICHIGAN AVE N M1
13000.00000 1629 18TH ST N M1
13562.50000 1702 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
14250.00000 903 COLORADO AVE N M1
14325.00000 1639 9TH ST N M1
14987.50000 1654 14TH ST N M1
1500600000 1025 COLORADO AVE N M1
15000.00000 1101 COLORADOAVE N M1
15000.00000 1205 COLORADO AVE N M1
15000.00000 1301 COLORADO AVE N M1
15000.00000 1633 12TH ST N M1
15000.00000 1649 12TH ST N M1
15000.00000 1652 12TH ST N M1
15000.00000 1659 11TH ST N M1
15000.00000 1660 EUCLID ST N M1
15000.00000 1805 COLORADO AVE N M1
15000.00000 1823 COLORADO AVE N M1
15000.00000 1909 COLORADO AVE N M1
15162.50000 1707 12TH ST N M1
15752.00000 1640 19TH ST N M1
16000.00000 1661 19TH ST N M1
16000.00000 1669 19TH ST N M1
16000.00000 1899 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
16500.00000 1131 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
16500.00000 1646 18TH ST N M1
16500.00000 929 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
16680.00000 1717 19TH ST N M1
17691.87500 1634 18TH ST N M1
18345.43750 1626 11TH ST N M1
19173.18750 1610 17TH ST N M1
19986.93750 612 COIORADO AVE N M1
20340.00000 1623 7TH ST N M1
20860.12500 1810 COLORADO AVE N M1
21332.50000 1660 14TH ST N M1
21728.87500 1601 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
21739.43750 1020 COLORADO AVE N M1
22500.00000 1205 COLORADO AVE N M1
22500.00000 1431 COLORADO AVE N M1
22500.00000 1560 12TH ST N M1
22500.00000 1560 14TH ST N M1
22500.00000 1657 12TH ST N M1
22500.00000 1658 10TH ST N M1
22500.00000 1665 9TH ST N M1
22509.031251704COLORADOAVE N M1
22650.00000 1519 COLORADO AVE N M1
23083.87500 1631 10TH ST N M1
23479.12500 1630 12TH ST N M1
23630.06250 1726 COLORADO AVE N M1
23873.31250 1640 9TH ST N M1
26383.43750 2330 MICHIGAN AVE N M1
26523.75000 1625 17TH ST N M1
30374.31250 1621 EUCLID ST N M1
30742.25000 1620 14TH ST N M1
32000.00000 1651 18TH ST N M1
34267.62500 1612 19TH ST N M1
35513.31250 612 COLORADO AVE N M1
36589.21875 1641 11TH ST N M1
39000.00000 1660 11TH ST N M1
41250.00000 1749 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
42900.00000 1649 17TH ST N M1
43754.15625 601 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
47434.00000 1610 COLORADO AVE N M1
47445.75000 612 COLORADO AVE N M1
49440.00000 623 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
49629.78125 1653 7TH ST N M1
5457L25000 1020 COLORADO AVE N M1
55065.12500 505 OLYMPIC BLVD N M1
63360.09375 1636 9TH ST N M1
80042.93750 916 COLORADO AVE N M1
126989.93750 1601 44TH ST N M1
137928.93750 612 COLORADO AVE N M1
162197.68750 1651 16TH ST N M1
208900.09375 1100 COLORADO AVE N M1
15915.98618
;
~
~
~
•
~~ _ u~~~~ ~~~~ ~,
~u~.~
, ~I
I~V'
fo ~'ll~l',
~~
_
~
m= ~
~.
~
,
r
~ y+
~'
,~
~ i~
~
I'
;~f ° ~~~ }~ ~
;
,
'~ I~
!i
i ~
~10i I~~~
:
.
,
'
~
, ~~
~,
yp, r i
'
,
'~
t ~
4~
;
t i
,~
~, i ~ ~~
~i~~,
t ~.:
~
y~~ ~'j'
Pi ~ ~ s1 ~%
~
,~'~
~I ,
, ,
i
,
h
~ ~
'
~
~ ~
'
~y
fNf
,M1
~
y~,
~ I
`S 8~
g l` ~~4'~f AII tll ~I'i ~
~
~
r
~
t
I ~
F V
~ `'
~u~~ / i
I
Q
b
- i I ~i ~~
~
,
~§§
~
~j~ ,
+ f ,
~ tA,ti~
~
~
i
I
i
I
' r
v , ~
.s
li ~
~ ~
l
ili
i
i s
,
~
i
Il
l
j+ ~i
~ ~
~
f
~ 1~
l
I"
~ 4 h )~ ~ i
>,~:
'
j ~
h
~
)
~ 1 t t
~ `
i
i7 .~
~
~ ..~ { >
{ >
:
( "
~
t
',
1 si
j
I
~ i
~ . ~}j
.~~ft
1 3~
t
l d 1 ~'fl~
'
' ~ L
, 9
t4.~
1 I
~:1
~ s ~~'s
,
• City Council Direction
- Options to ensure future planning opportunities in the
industrial areas
• Increasing Public lnterest
- Heightened Awareness
- Concern with Scale / Pace of Development
• LUCE Planning Effort
- Critical Examination of lndustrial Area
- Preferred Vision
- Guide for Future Land Use / Circulation Policy
- July 21 Industrial Lands Workshop
Santa Monica
• Manufacturinq,
fabrication,
assemb(y, repair,
servicin~, processinq,
testing
• CUP
• Mu(ti-family
housing
• Schoo(s
Affordable Housin~
(up to 50 units
a((owed by riqht)
d
• Research re(ated to
Manufacturing,
fabricafion,
assemb(y, repair,
servicin~, processinq,
testin~,
• Entertainment
Industry
• CUP
Schools
• Affordable SRO (up
to 50 units a(lowed
b y ri~h t)
• Artist Studios
Current Land Uses:
• Post Production
~ Construction Support Services ti
• Automobile Related Uses
• Warehouse / Storage ~
• Distribution Facilities ~
• Private Schoois
• Major Utilities (Edison, Verizon, C
• ~us and City Yards _ ~~,~~
• Limited Housing
~v ~ ~V ~ , ,.: ~ •
' FII171, RaCelO TV
> O -~ o `~ °
•
~ 1 ~.I I ~<~ ~~ ~,.~ o ~~ y~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ r~,~ ~~ "~ ~ ° ,-~ _~'
~`~,~v00
~
O
'D° O
r.
~
~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~
tr et attern
Industrial
area has
large blocks
and lacks
connectivity
• Much of the industrial study areas is regarded as an opportunit
(Water Garden, portions of the Arboretum and possibly Yahoo Center '
not likely to change in 20 years)
• Preserve opportunity for industrial uses and support businesses
• Light Rail can be used to transform portions of the industrial area
• Opportunities to improve traffic conditions
• Support for housing at strategic locations and at appropriate scales
and densities - not for the entire district
• Need for services that support residential uses
• Better neighborhood connections
• Improve pedestrian access to places like Ralphs grocery store
• Support for transforming Iarge blocks into a more pedestrian scaled
environment
• Unplanned development
• Large scale piecemeal residential proposals - not
transit oriented
• Lack of roadway continuity
• Lack of neighborhood environment
• Maintaining ~iabiiity of creative/entertainment/arts
uses '
• Retention of existing businesses and services that
support the community
• Increasing conflict between housing and existing
uses
• Increased speculative development pressure
• Light Raii Transit
• Large Parcel Availability
• improve traffic conditions through
transportation alternatives
- Creating connectivity by extending the grid
• Creating usable op:en space
• Establishing a more sustainable community
=Addressing the jobs housing balance
- Workforce housing opportunities
• Ensure the city's economic diversity
• Moratorium
• Moratorium, Allow Projects to Proceed
with a Development Agreement {DA)
~ Revise Development Standards
- LMSD: permit projects under 7,500 SF /
less then 15 units, or subject to DA
- M1: permit projects under 7,500 SF / less
then 5 units, or subject to DA
• Maintain Status Quo
Direct S#aff To:
• Continue with LUCE planning effort
• Prepare an interim ordinance to require
Development Agreement for projects
over 7,500 square feet and when
exceeding a specified unit threshold
~ J
~
~ ~ I ~R
.
Yt
?~
' , ~''
t r{) 2~ t ~ ~ .
L~ M1 / ~ ~
~~'
~ a ~
h
I f
~ ~ ~
~
tt
/ ~ ~
I Y ~ ~
~_
~~/ ~
~
) r'!.
:
~~~~ ~ ~ ~/a
`
~ .
~'
j,'
t~ ~ A Y,,.
ki
~ ~
~ ~ ti
1 -
£ 5
L] 1 ~i
~ ~
, 1':
t'
~
+ ~ ~
l~
D
x
~~
~
4 ± ~ {
~ J
~
i
,
+
`~ ri
:~
' j <3,
~
' ~~, >
~r~~
i '~ ! ~
;
~
~ ~
{
~ ~~
~
ta
x
! ~I
~
~ _ , ai~ , .
Reference
Ordinance No. 2238
(CCS)
Additional
attach ments
available in City
Clerk's Office.