Loading...
sr-111976-cao opinionCA RLK:DTO:JK ''1-19-76 CITY ATTORNEY OPINION Opinion CA 76-71 - November 19, 1976 SUBJECT: Extension of Time for Filing Nomination Pavers REQUESTED BY: Kenneth -0. Grubb, City Clerk OPINION BY: Richard L. Knickerbocker, City Attorney Dennis T Omoto, Deputy City Attorney QUESTION PRESEiVTED Generally, does Section 228.40.5 of the Elections Code, which provides foY an extension of time to nominate non-incumbent .candidates if the incumbent does not timely file nomination papers, apply to a municipal election held in the City of-Santa Monica? CONCLUSION Yes. As a broad rule, if the nomination papers for an incumbent elected officer of the City of Santa Monica are not filed by twelve o'clock noon. on the 68th day before a municipal election, the voters of the City shall have until twelve o'clock noon on the 63rd day before said election to nominate candidates other than the incumbent for such elective office. (See Section 22601 and Section 22840.5 of the Elections Code, Section 1403 of the Charter of the City of Santa Monica). ANALYSIS The City Charter and Ordinance. General reference to the procedure of holding -1- CA RLK:DTO:jk ~1-19-76 elections in the City can be found in Section 1403 of the Charter of the City of Santa Monica, which provides as-: follows: "Unless otherwise provided by ordinance, hereafter enacted, all elections shall be held in accordance with the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California, as the same now exists or may _hereafter be amended, for the holding of elections in cities of the sixth class insofar as the same or not in conflict with this Charter." Vdith regard to the time requirements for the nomination of candidates for elective city offices, the Elections Code of the City of Santa Monica has provided for otherwise pursuant to the above Charter provision, wherein, it states in relevant part that: "Not earlier than the 89th day nor later than 12:00 o'clock noon on the_, 68th day before a :rrsnicipal eieetion, the. voters may nominate candidates for election by signing a ro~ination petition. .". Section 11000 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code. _Z_ CA RLK:DTO:JK' ~-19-76 The City's Elections Code does not specifically detail a mechanism for extensions of time to nominate candidates or file nomination papers, thus., Section 1403 of the Charter of the City of Santa Monica, quoted hereinabove requires that reference be made to the Elections Code of the State of California. State Elections Code. The particular state statute concerning extensions of time to nominate candidates sets forth the following language: "Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 22836 and 22840, if nomination papers for an incumbent elective officer of the City are not filed by 12:00 o'clock noon on the 68th day before the Alection, the voters shall have until 12:00 o'clock noon on the 63rd day before the election to norinate candidates other than the incumbent for such elected office." Section 22840 S of the Elections Code. The hereinabove quoted code section is located in Part 2 of Division II of the Elections Code; which means that it is subject to the following state lao~: "The provisions of this Part [2~_sha11 apply to all municipal -3- CA P.LY.:DTO:JR 11-19-76 elections except where otherwise provided for in the Constitution of the State or in a charter duly adopted or an!ended pursuant to the Constitution of this State." Section 22601 of the Elections Code. Consequently, both the above. mentioned statute and Section 1403 of the Charter of the C~_ty of Santa Monica lend substantial support to apply Section 22840.5 of the Elections Code to a municipal election of the City. In conclusion, based on all of the foregoing discussion, the voters of the City have until twelve o'clock -noon on the 63rd day before a municipal election to nominate candidates other than the incumbent for an elected office of the City if the nomination papers for the incurbent elected officer are not filed by twelve o'clock noon on the 68th day before said election. Respectfully submitted, DENNIS T OMOTO, Deputy City Attorney APPROVED BY: RICFIARD L. KNICKERBOCKER, City Attorney -4-