Loading...
sr-111081-5b• GS:SS:EL:JJ:JH:dd To: Mayor and City Council From:._ City:Staff_ Santa Monica, California August 3, 1981 Subject:.- GRDUNDWATER PRODUCTION, SANTA MONICA WELLS #2, -3; 4 Introduction I J ~C`~ 2 ~ 9981 .~° .'~ Since the discovery of trace amounts of Trichloroethylene (TCE) in some locally produced groundwater, investigations into the problem have been conducted. This report describes the current situation, transmits the final report of Pacific Soils Engineering Company, (a consulting firm hired to conduct an underground 7CE survey) and makes recommendations regarding use of the affected wells. Background Neither of Santa Monica's two available sources of drinking water are. ideal. Groundwater from local wells is rather hard, and one of the City's best producing underground aquifers contains traces of TCE. When softened, aerated and blended at the treatment plant, the water delivered to the consumer is moderately hard and meets all Federal and State Nealth standards and regulations. Imported water purchased from the. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California is also hard, contains. relatively high levels pf Trihalomethanes (THMS), and con , tains. asbestos fibers ranging from 1 - 25 million fibers per liter. The content of THMs is within the. Federal limitations. No limitation on asbestos fibers has yet been established by health authorities but 0..5 mialion fibers-per liter has been sugges ed 6y the. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Of the two wells in which TCE has been detected, SM #2 contains less than the limitiation imposed by California State Health Department, and draws- water from an aquifer separated 6y a major geological discontinuity from SM #3, which. was 5 the major contributor of TCE to the water supply. is /® ~.~/ ~~ QCT 2 7 1981' Subject: Groundwater Production, Santa Monica Wells #2,.3,.4 Page 2 3 Returning the affected well (SM ~3) to service and the drilling of a hew well (SM #4) at a location .1000 feet west of the affected well are treated-in the conclusions-of the consultant's report bf underground survey. Those conclusions are: 1. In the area of Santa Monica: Well #3, there are at least two aquifers, separated vertically. Santa Monica Well #3 withdraws water from the lower aquifers below 200 feet. 2. TCE contamination is localized in the upper aquifer between 35 to 85 feet. 3. There may be an interconnection between the upper and lower aquifers. 4. Assuming there is an interconnection, TCE content at the well site proposed for Santa Monica Well No. 4 is expected to 6e negligible; as pumping of S.h1. #3 would tend to contain the TCE within its area of influence. 5. Aquifer sampling is recommended for Santa Monica Well No. 4.1 6. water from Santa Mohica Wells: 3 and 4 can be aerated and/or blended with non-contaminated waters in order to reduce TCE contamination (to levels below limits established 6y the StateJ. ANALYSIS OF THE. SITUATION The TCE content in the City's well water can be treated to a level wi hin Federal and State parameters using existing facilities and would appear to be less hazardous than, importing equivalent amounts of replacement imported water contain%ng 1. Aquifer sampling i,s a technique uti ize~i during the drialing of a well i;n which. each aquifer is sealed off from the rest of the well and the water therein is tested for .contaminant content. Such a proecedure is not recommended by Staff because of its unreliability, the fact that additional power is required for pumping water throughout the life of the well due to the "plugging" effect of the sealant used, and because of the additional initial cost (approximately $55,000). Subject: Groundwater Production„,Santa Monica. Page 3 ,;Wells #2, 3, 4 THM and asbestos. As previously reported, the City faces the situation of using imported ~1WD water containing about 80 ppb of THM or using water from wells #2 and #3 containing-from 5_to 40 ppb of TCE. The Staff believes that the water containing the. least. amount of organic contaminants should be used. CIINtv711RV 1: The TCE contamination is localized at rather shallow depths near the intersection of Centinela and Olympic Boulevard. 2 The TCE concentrations in delivered water can easily be controlled and limited to satis.fiy State and Federal guidelines. This was proven prior to closing the wells last year. 3. The levels of TCE in the wells will be closely monitored on a continuing basis and should there be a change, the pumps can easily be shut off. 4. TCE concentrations are much less in the groundwater than are the THM and asbestos concentrations in the imported water. ` 5. TCE cannot be easily completely removed from the groundwater, but the levels can be reduced substantially by aeration and blending. 6. THM levels (.in the imported water) can be reduced by aeration, but since. the levels are higher to start with, the resulting delivered water can- not be made as pure with existing treatment facilities as can the City's groundwater. ' 7. Asbestos in minute quantities can not be removed from the water. Recommendations Based on all of the facts and information gained over the past 9 months, it'is recommended that Council authorize: 1. That State and Federal requirements be followed in determining water quality parameters, ~. That manta t+lonica Wells No. 2 and 3 be returned to service utilizing Subject: Groundwater Production, Santa Monica Page 4 k!ells. #2, 3, 4 existing treatment techniques including aeration and blending. 3.. That Santa Monica U(eil No. 4 be drilled at the proposed location since this is 'the best location when both quantity and quality are considered. Prepared by: Stan Scholl Ed Lash John Johnson Jack Hoagland