The URL can be used to link to this page

sr-012610-8dCity Council Meeting: January 2b, 2010 Agenda Item: ~ To: Mayor and City Council From: Lee E. Swain, Director of Public Works Subject: Measure V FY2010-11 through FY2014-15 Five Year Plan Approval Recommended Action Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the Measure V FY2010-11 through FY2014-15 Five Year Plan. Executive Summary The Clean Beaches and Ocean Parcel Tax (Measure V) was passed by over two-thirds of Santa Monica voters in November 2006. Measure V raises revenue to be used solely for the purpose of implementing the City's Watershed Management Plan. This report highlights the key components of the proposed Measure V Five Year Plan for the period of FY 2010-11 through FY 2014-15 which include green streets, park retrofits, biofilters, catch basin inserts, curb extensions, rebate programs, regional project contributions and use of permeable surface construction in the public right of way. Background The goals of the Watershed Management Plan are to reduce urban runoff pollution, reduce urban flooding, increase water reuse and conservation, increase recreational opportunities and open space, and increase wildlife and marine habitat. Measure V generated revenues can be used for necessary capital as well as operations and maintenance costs related to storm drainage systems and multipurpose capital improvement projects that improve the quality of storm water, as well as paying for any indebtedness incurred for these purposes. The urban runoff management and pollution prevention activities of the Plan will assist the City in complying with National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, meeting the goals of the Clean Water Act and new regulations promulgated by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board relating to Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs). Compliance with these regulatory standards over the next several years will require a significantly 1 enhanced effort by the City, and the consequences to cities that do not comply with the urban runoff requirements could be severe. On September 25. 2007, the City Council conceptually approved the proposed phase I Plan for use of Measure V funds which included nine priority projects with broadly defined scopes. Construction of the Bicknell Avenue Green Street, the Beach Lot Greening project and the Pier Storm Drain Upgrade has been completed. The Pollution Prevention Reduction component of the latter is 75% complete with the installation of the bird netting currently in progress. The Ocean Park Boulevard Green Street Project is currently in ,the conceptual design phase. A feasibility study is being prepared for the SMURRF Water Storage Reservoir. The. 16~" Street and Airport Watersheds Retention System (also known as the City of Los Angeles' Penmar Water Quality Improvement project) is currently at 80% completion of the design phase. The Airport Watershed Best Management Practices and Multi Benefit Urban Runoff Pollution Control projects have been incorporated into the Five Year Plan as Low Impact Development strategies throughout the City. The Pico-Kenter Storm Drain Upgrade project scope was enhanced in the Plan by adding trash and debris removal as a focus. Discussion Citizens Oversight Committee Action On December 17. 2008 and February 11, 2009, the Citizens Oversight Committee (COC) reviewed the list of priority projects approved by the City Council and made recommendations as to how future projects are evaluated and proposed for consideration by the COC. On June 10. 2009, the COC approved a List of Best Management Practices and Low Impact Development Strategies and requested staff to create a 1-5 year priority list for the COC's consideration. 2 On September 16, 2009, the COC approved the Five Year Plan for presentation to the City Council. Additionally, the COC approved the format for the Quarterly Report which provides a financial and project status report for the Measure V Program. On December 9, 2009, the COC approved the revisions that were made to the Five Year Plan and Quarterly Report format and recommended it for presentation to the City Council. A copy of the Five Year Plan as last presented to the COC is attached (Attachment A). The plan lists storm water improvement projects totaling $13.7 million in expenditures over a five year period from fiscal year 2010-11 through 2014-15. A financial analysis performed by the Finance Department determined that the projects can be implemented on apay-as-you-go basis. The Five Year Plan will serve as the Measure V program's annual list of projects for the next five years. However, in a dynamic regulatory environment that continues to be developed by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, old TMDLs are continuously revisited and updated, new TMDLs continue to be established, and the City's compliance goals are expected to change over time. Staff plans to periodically review projects in the Five Year Plan in order to evaluate if they remain applicable and, depending on the then current regulations, revise certain scopes or eliminate certain projects where called for. The initial goals of the. plan include treating an additional 1200 acres of drainage area within the City limits, reducing overall urban runoff volume by 12.3 million gallons a year and harvesting 10.3 million gallons of storm water annually for use in irrigation. Projects in the Five Year Plan include construction of green streets, curb extensions; permeable alleys, permeable street gutters and permeable parking lots, installation of 3 catch basin filter screens and parkway/sidewalk biofilters. The Five Year Plan also includes park retrofits, where storm water is harvested and used for irrigation purposes, a feasibility study for an experimental in-line storm drain infiltration system and rebate programs for the installation of rain barrels, cisterns and for downspout redirection. Details of each project are outlined in the Five Year Plan Lastly, the Five Year Plan includes an annual monetary contribution to joint jurisdictional projects. In June 2004, the City entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with agencies in the Santa Monica Bay watershed jurisdictional groups to achieve compliance with the wet weather bacterial TMDL using an Integrated Water Resources Approach. This MOU included provisions for preparing an implementation plan and for joint funding of the implementation plan. On December 17, 2008, the COC agreed to a contribution of Measure V funds not exceeding $4 million. The Quarterly Report (Attachment B) contains a financial overview of Measure V funds, detailing revenue, appropriation and expenditure amounts. It also provides a status report of each project that has been funded by Measure V. The Quarterly Report will be updated and submitted to the COC for review at each regular committee meeting. A copy of the latest report will also be posted on the Measure V website for review by the public. Staff will submit a regular Information Item for the City Council to review the Quarterly Report. Financial Impacts & Budget Actions There are no immediate budgetary impacts associated with the adoption of the Plan. The Plan simply sets forth the anticipated use of Measure V funds. Funding for specific projects will be appropriated as part of the City's broader budgetary process. 4 Prepared by: Rick Valte, P.E., Principal Civil Engineer Approved: Forwarded to Council: ~- ~~S~iry~ { ..~ Lee E. Swain, Director P Department of Public Works ~ Attachments: A. Measure V's FY2010-11 through FY2014-15 Five Year Plan B. Quarterly Report (thru 9/30/2009) 5 Attachment A ~..ea. City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program •••°•••^~ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABB REVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................. ................ II 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................:........................... ................ 1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................... ..................1 1.2 Capital Improvement Plan Goals ................................................................... ............:..... 1 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS ................................................................... ................ 2 2.1 Permeable Surface Alleys .............................................................................. .................. 3 2.2 Permeable Surface Street Gutters/Intersections ........................................... .................. 5 2.3 Miniature Parkway/Sidewalk Biofilters ........................................................... ..................7 2.4 Street Curb Extensions .................................................................................. ..................8 2.5 Green Streets ................................................................................................. ..................9 2.6 Permeable Surface Parking Lots ................................................................... ................10 2.7 Park Retrofits ................................................................................................. ................12 2.8 Deep Infiltration In-Line Storm Drain Pilot Project ......................................... ................15 2.9 Payment on J-2/J-3 Agreement with City of Los Angeles .............................. ................16 2.10 Trash BMPs ................................................................................................... ................17 2.11 Downspout Redirect Program ...................................................................:.... ........:.......22 2.12 Rain Barrel Program ...................................................................................... .........:......23 2.13 Cistern Program .....................................................................................:....... ................24 3.0 SUMMARY OF THE 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN ........... .............. 25 4.0 REFERENCES ....................................................................................... :.............31 Appendix A: List of Alleys Appendix B: Map of City Zones for Street Improvement Program & Locations of Existing Pervious Concrete Gutters Appendix C: Map of Ocean Park Boulevard Green Street Project Area Appendix D: Estimated Turf Irrigation Requirements in Santa Monica Appendix E: Park Retrofit Projects Conceptual Level Cost Opinions & Estimated Costs of Wet Season Harvesting Projects within the City of Santa Monica Appendix F: Review of Geotechnical Reports Appendix G: Pico-Kenter Trash BMPs Conceptual Level Cost Opinions for Alternatives 2 and 3 Appendix H: Approximate Treated Areas and Reduction of Urban Runoff & Estimated Costs per Drainage Area Treated Rev. 2 -Updated: 12/3/2009 TOC - i - '~..~ City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program °•^•°~ •' 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS The following abbreviations and acronyms are used in this report. AF acre-feet B&V Black & Veatch BMP Best ManagemenfiPractice CASQA California Stormwater Quality Association EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency LARWQCB Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board LID Low Impact Development O&M Operations and Maintenance OC Measure V Citizens Oversight Committee sf square feet TMDL Total Maximum Daily Loads WERF Water Environment Research Foundation WMP Watershed Management Plan TOC - ii Asa City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program ••^^•°~•~ 5-Year CapitallmprovementPlan December 2009 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background Measure V In November 2006, the Clean Beaches and Ocean Parcel Tax (Measure V) was passed by over two-thirds of voters in the City of Santa Monica (City). Measure V raises property tax revenue to be used solely for the purpose of implementing watershed water quality improvements in the City in accordance with the City's Watershed Management Plan (WMP) adopted in 2006. 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan Black & Veatch (B&V) was retained to assist the City with development of a 5-Year Plan (FY2010-11 through FY2014-15) for implementation of various stormwater best management practice (BMP) projects. Based on the Guidance List of BMP and Low Impact Development (LID) Strategies, which has been reviewed and approved by the Oversight Committee (OC) in June 2009, the following general categories of projects are proposed. A brief project description for each category of projects is provided in Chapter 2. 1. Permeable Surface Alleys 2. Permeable Surface Street Gutters/Intersections 3. Miniature Parkway/Sidewalk Biofilters 4. Street Curb Extensions 5. Green Streets 6. Permeable Surface Parking Lots 7. Park Retrofits 8. Deep Infiltration In-Line Storm Drain Pilot Project 9. Payment on J-2/J-3 Agreement with City of Los Angeles 10. Trash BMPs 11. Downspout Redirect Program 12. Rain Barrel Program 13. Cistern Program As part of this effort, B&V was also retained to develop several initial alternatives for water quality improvements to the Pico-Kenter Watershed, in addition to the alternatives previously presented. 1.2 Capital Improvement Plan Goals Upon successful completion of this 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan, it is anticipated that the following goals will be achieved: Approximately 1,200 acres of drainage area will be treated through various structural and non- structural BMP and LID strategies. An estimated 10.5 million gallons (MG) of water will be harvested and used for irrigation each year. Urban runoff will be reduced by approximately 1.8 MG per year as a result of increased permeable surface area and infiltration. ~® City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program •^°°-~~~ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS The following sections describe each category of projects. Where project-specific data is available, additional details are provided. ~® City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program ••^•^°^•` 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 2.7 Permeable Surface Alleys Project Description As part of routine alley replacement program, center swales will be replaced with a permeable surface, such as pervious concrete, to demonstrate the effective use of permeable products on the market. Three to five locations will be selected per year for this type of improvement. Measure V will fund the incremental cost between the regular concrete and pervious concrete or equivalent. Appendix A presents a list of alleys that are scheduled for alley replacement for FY2009-10 through FY2013-2014. For planning purposes, the City is divided into five zones, and the alley replacement will be performed in one zone per fiscal year as follows: FY2009-10: Zone 1 FY2010-11: Zone 2 o FY2011-12: Zone 3 e FY2012-13: Zone 4 FY2013-14: Zone 5 Reference Standard California Stormwater Quality Association (CASOA) BMP Fact Sheets SD-20 will be utilized as guideline. Another option may include area drains at 50 feet apart with 2 foot gravel base to accommodate 3/4" rainfall Local site conditions shall be considered when designing and implementing these types of improvements to avoid issues associated with saturated soils. In some locations, subsurface conditions may require sub-drainage systems to relieve water to local storm drains or other means of drainage. Costs An approximate unit cost for installation of pervious concrete is estimated to be $9:3/sf (Water Environment Research Foundation, WERE). The unit cost includes construction costs, contingency, engineering, and construction management. Unit cost of regular concrete is estimated to be $3.0/sf (RS Means). Thus, the guideline incremental cost of $6.3/sf will be funded by Measure V. Annual O&M costs associated with the water quality benefits derived from this application is estimated to be $0.4/sf (WERE). An initial guideline annual budget of $70,000/year plus an escalation rate of 3% per year is allocated in the Measure V 5-Year Plan to implement this type of projects. Table 2.1 shows a summary of the cost breakdown. It is estimated that approximately 8,000 to 10,000 sf or 4,000 to 5,000 linear feet of 2 foot wide center swales will be replaced each year. ~.. City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program •••••^••~~ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 Table 2.1: Summary of Project Costs for Pervious Concrete Alleys 4 - * Escalated at 3% per year. **Includes construction costs, contingency, engineering, and construction management. ~...a, City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program •• ••' S-Year Capital Improvemerit Plan December 2009 2.2 Permeable Surface Street Gutters/Intersections Project Description As part of routine street improvement program, concrete cross-gutters and intersections will be replaced with permeable products, such as pervious concrete, to demonstrate the effective use of different permeable products on the market. Measure V will fund the incremental cost between the regular concrete and pervious concrete or equivalent. Pervious concrete street gutters have previously been installed in: Oak Street and Hill Street between 18`h and 25`h Street Ashland Avenue between 23`a and 25`" Street 2151 Street between Pearl Street and Pier Avenue Grant, Pacific and Maple Streets between 14`" and 16`" Street Washington Avenue between 26`" and Stanford Street Harvard Street between Montana Avenue and Wilshire Boulevard For planning purposes, the City is divided into five zones,. and the street gutters/intersections replacement will be performed in one zone per fiscal year as follows: FY2010-11: Zone 7 FY2011-12: Zone 1 o FY2012-13: Zone 2 o FY2013-14: Zone 3 FY2014-15: Zone 4 Appendix B shows a map of the City zones for the street improvement program as well as the locations of the existing pervious concrete street gutters. Reference Standard CASOA BMP Fact Sheets SD-20 will be utilized as guideline. Local site conditions shall be considered when designing and implementing these types of improvements to avoid issues associated with saturated soils. In some locations, subsurface conditions may require sub-drainage systems to relieve water to local storm drains or other means of drainage. Costs An approximate unit cost for installation of pervious concrete is estimated to be $9.3/sf (WERE). The unit cost includes construction costs, contingency, engineering, and construction management. Unit cost of regular concrete is estimated to be $3.0/sf (RS Means). Thus, the incremental guideline cost of $6.3/sf will be funded by Measure V. Annual O&M costs associated with the water quality benefits derived from this application is estimated to be $0.4/sf (WERE). An initial guideline annual budget of $70,000/year plus an escalation rate of 3% pear year is allocated in the Measure V 5-Year Plan to implement this type of projects. Table 2.2 shows a summary of the cost breakdown. It is estimated that approximately 8,000 to 10,000 sf of street gutters/intersections will be replaced each year. ~.~ City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program •••••^°^•^ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 Table 2.2: Summary of Project Costs for Pervious Concrete Gutter/Intersections * Escalatetl at 3% per year. "Includes construction costs, contingency, engineering, antl construction management. ~.~ City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program •^••^°~^` 5-Year CapitallmprovementPlan December 2009 2.3 Miniature Parkway/Sidewalk Biofilters Protect Description Where nuisance or dry season flow exists, demonstration-scale wetlands, tree wells, and other bioretention features will be installed to capture and utilize the runoff. Acustom-designed system or a packaged system may be utilized. Larger applications favor custom-designed systems. Reference Standard CASOA BMP Fact Sheets TC-32 will be utilized as guideline. Similar projects that have been implemented in the City of Portland could also be used as general guideline. http://www.oortlandonline.com/bes/index cfm~c=44463& Suggested Products and Suppliers MWS by Bioclean Environmental Services. http://www.biocleanenvironmental.com Biorention System by Filterra. http:/lwww.filterra.com Tree Wells and Biofilters by Contech. http://www.contech-cgi.com Treepod Biofilter by Kristar. http://www.kristar.com/ Costs An approximate unit cost for installation of bioretention features is estimated to be $70,000/acre of drainage area (WERE). The unit cost includes construction costs, contingency, engineering, and construction management. Annual O&M cost is estimated to be $10,000/acre of drainage area (WERE). An initial guideline annual budget of $100,000/year plus an escalation rate of 3% per year is allocated in the Measure V 5-Year Plan to implement this type of projects. Table 2.3 shows a summary of the cost breakdown. It is estimated that the City will be able to install bioretention features that would treat approximately 0.7 to 1.3 acres of drainage area each year. Table 2.3: Summary of Project Costs for Miniature Parkway/Sidewalk Biofilters " Escalated at 3% per year. *"Includes construction costs, contingency, engineering, and construction management. g-.® City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program •••°~•°^^ 5-Year CapitallmprovementPlan December 2009 2.4 Street Curb Extensions Project Description In this application, the- street curb is extended at the downstream end of streets to install wider, depressed landscaping to capture and retain runoff; these extensions will include climate- appropriate plants and drip irrigation. Installation of a cistern will be considered where suitable to supply water for onsite landscaping. Runoff would be captured in one location rather than distributed along the street. Reference Standard CASOA BMP Fact Sheets TC-12, TC-32 and SD-11 will be utilized as guideline. Suggested Products and Suppliers A list of cistern system suppliers can be found at the City's website: As with many water quality features, larger applications favor the development of acustom-designed facility. Costs An approximate unit cost for installation of curb contained bioretention features is estimated to be $70,000/acre of drainage area (WERE). The unit cost includes construction costs, contingency, engineering, and construction management. Additional cost for a cistern and irrigation system will be determined once specific project locations are selected. For the purpose of the 5-Year Plan, $50,000 is allocated per project to cover the costs for the cistern and irrigation system in addition to the costs associated with the bioretention features. Annual 0&M cost is estimated to be $10,000/acre of drainage area for the bioretention features and $12,000/acre for a cistern and irrigation system (WERE). An initial guideline annual budget of $100,000/year plus an escalation rate of 3% per year is allocated in the Measure V 5-Year Plan to implement this type of projects. Table 2.4 shows a summary of the cost breakdown. It is estimated that the City will be able to install bioretention features with a cistern system to treat approximately 0.2 to 0.5 acres of drainage area each year. Table 2.4: Summary of Project Costs for Street Curb Extensions "Escalated at 3% per year. *'Inclutles construction costs, contingency, engineering, and construction management. ~.~ City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program •••°°°~~ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 2.5 Green Streets Project Description Ocean Park Boulevard Green Street Project will include implementation of various LID features, such as permeable gutters, sub-surface infiltration, permeable parking lanes, depressed parkways with drip irrigation and climate-appropriate plants, curb extensions, and depressed planters to capture runoff. A map of the project area is included in Appendix C. It is anticipated that construction of this project will start in 2011. It is currently planned that $1 M of the total project capital costs, O&M costs, and other associated costs will be funded by Measure V in support of water quality benefits provided by the project. If implementation of the Ocean Park Blvd. Green Street Project is found infeasible due to funding or other issues, retrofits at Los Amigos Park and Parking Lot 9A or 11 will be considered as an alternate project. Concept for the alternate project is to divert runoff from the middle section of the sub drainage area to Los Amigos Park, capture runoff, and' use the harvested flow for irrigation. Similarly, runoff from the southwesterly section of the sub drainage area would be diverted to Parking Lot 9A or 11, which is located on Neilson Way, and the runoff would be captured for infiltration, if deemed feasible. Reference Standard CASOA BMP Fact Sheets TC-32 and SD-20 will be utilized as guideline. Bicknell Green Street Project will also be used as a model. Costs It is assumed that $700,000 and $300,000 will be expended in FY2010-2011 and FY2011-12, respectively, to cover the capital costs. Annual maintenance cost is estimated to be $7,000/acre of drainage area (WERE). Annual O&M cost associated with water quality benefits are estimated to be $21,000 based on the drainage area of approximately 3 acres (WERE). Table 2.5 shows a summary of the cost breakdown. Table 2.5: Summary of Project Costs for Green Streets `Includes construction costs, contingency, engineering, and construction management. "Escalated at 3% per year. ~.-~ City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 .~ Measure V Program •••••^•°•~ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 2.6 Permeable Surface Parking-Lots Overview As part of City's overall facility program, permeable surfaces, such as porous asphalt, will be utilized for retrofit or new city parking facilities to demonstrate the effective use of different permeable products on the market. Depressed planters will also be implemented to capture runoff. Measure V will cover the portion of the project cost that is associated with the stormwater quality enhancement (i.e. depressed planters and incremental cost between the regular asphalt and porous asphalt). The installation cost is estimated based on an incremental unit cost of $0.80/sf ($1.4 for permeable asphalt and $0.6 /sf for regular asphalt) and an allocation of $10,000/acre of parking lot for depressed planters. Annual O&M cost associated with the water quality benefits derived from this application are estimated to be $0.2/sf (WERE). The following parking lots are planned for resurfacing and re-striping in FY2011-12. Parkino Lot 9 ® Project Location. Parking Lot 9 is located eastside of Neilson Way between Ashland Avenue and Hill Street. a Lot Size. 1.55 acres ® Installation Costs. $73,685 ® Annual O&M Costs. $14,314' Parkino Lot 9A Project Location. Parking Lot 9A is located eastside of Neilson Way from Hill Street to mid- block. ® Lot Size. 1.2 acres Installation Costs. $57,047 Annual0&M Costs. $11,082' Parkina Lot 11 ® Project Location. Parking Lot 11 is located eastside of Neilson Way between Ocean Park Boulevard and Hollister Avenue. Lot Size. 1.3 acres Installation Costs. $61,801 Annual O&M Costs. $12,005' Parking Lot 26 Project Location. Parking Lot 26 is a small lot located eastside of Neilson Way between Hollister Avenue and Strand Street (most of the block is community gardens). o Lot Size. 0.16 acres o Installation Costs. $7,606 Annual O&M Costs. $1,478' 'FY2011-12 O&M costs based on escalation at 3% per year. Reference Standard CASOA BMP Fact Sheets SD-20 will be utilized as guideline Local site conditions shall be considered when designing and implementing these types of improvements to avoid issues associated with saturated soils. In some locations, subsurface conditions may require sub-drainage systems to relieve water to local storm drains or other means of drainage. 10 - '~® City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program ••°••••~~ 5-Year CapitallmprovementPlan December 2009 Table 2.6 shows a summary of the cost breakdown. Table 2.6: Summary of Project Costs for Porous Asphalt Parking Lots 11 - Q Escalated at 3% per year. "'Includes construction costs, contingency, engineering, and construction management. ~® City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program •^°^•~•°` 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 2.7 Park Retrofits Overview As part of these projects, wet weather runoff from a main storm drain will be diverted to an adjacent park for treatment (pretreatment and disinfection), storage, and use as irrigation water within the park. A replicable model will be developed and used throughout the City. It is currently assumed that a vortex separator or equivalent will be provided for pretreatment, and a tank will be used for storage. Data from the California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS), which is included in Appendix D, was utilized to estimate the typical turf watering requirements in Santa Monica during the wet season. The size of the storage tank at each project location was estimated based on the 6- month average (October through March) irrigation requirement of 1.8 inches/month, the approximate turf area at each park, and 2 weeks of storage period required between storm events. The following locations are considered for park retrofits. Memorial Park ® Project Description. Memorial Park is amulti-purpose Park located centrally within the City. The City is planning to construct a 1 MG buried non-potable water reservoir and a pump station at Memorial Park to improve the operational flexibility, reliability and performance of their existing non-potable water system. This reservoir will provide additional storage in the system for SMURRF effluent to meet potential peak system demands, and the booster pump station would eliminate existing pressure problems. In conjunction with this planned project, the City is proposing to construct a stormwater harvesting and use facility at this Park to divert some of the wet weather flows from the Kenter Storm Drain, retain and treat the flow, and utilize the harvested water for Park irrigation and other non-potable uses in nearby areas. As Memorial Park is located adjacent to the Kenter Storm Drain, which carries flows from a significant drainage area within the Kenter Canyon Basin, it is one of the most suitable locations within the City to implement a stormwater diversion and harvesting project. The stormwater harvesting system will likely include: e A diversion structure • A submersible pump station for conveying stormwater to the park • Apre-treatment system for trash and sediment removal • A below-grade tank • A strainer and disinfection system • A pumping facility for irrigation • Site piping for irrigation (modifications to and/or replacement of the existing piping) • Irrigation system improvements (modifications to and/or replacement of the existing system) As both projects will require abelow-grade tank and a pump station, it would be cost effective to combine the two projects. A dual reservoir with two compartments (hydraulically isolated) with a divider wall in the middle could be constructed, in lieu of two separate reservoirs. By the logic outlined above, it is estimated that a 200,000-gallon tank would be required in this application. v Capital Costs. $3.7M including construction, design, and construction management costs. o Annual O&M Costs. $25,000 Schedule. It is anticipated that the stormwater harvesting facility will be constructed concurrently with construction of the non-potable reservoir for SMURRF effluent, which is currently scheduled for FY2012-13. 12 - ~...a City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program •^•^~•^•~ 5-Year CapitallmprovementPlan December 2009 Ozone Park a Project Description. Ozone Park is located within the Lincoln Basin near the City boundary with the City of Los Angeles. A stormwater harvesting and use facility .similar to the one proposed for Memorial Park is considered. It is estimated that a 15,000-gallon tank would be required in this application. Capital Costs. $845,000 including construction, design, and construction management costs. o Annual O&M Costs. $20,000 Schedule. It is anticipated that the facility will be constructed in FY2010-11. Marine Park Project Description. Marine Park is located within the 16`" Street Basin near the City boundary. Upon completion of Phase 2 (the recycled component) of the Penmar Project (City of Los Angeles), anon-potable water pipeline could be extended from the reservoir at the Penmar project site to Marine Park for use of the captured stormwater. Capital Costs. $1.OM including construction, design, and construction management costs. Annual O&M Costs. $20,000 Schedule. It is anticipated that the facility will be constructed in FY2011-12. Virginia Park o Project Description. Virginia Avenue Park is located within the Pico-Caltrans Basin south of the 10 Freeway. The City is considering a stormwater harvesting and use facility similar to the one proposed for Memorial Park. It is estimated that a 65,000-gallon tank would be required in this application. o Capital Costs. $1.9M including construction, design, and construction management costs. o Annual O&M Costs. $20,000 o Schedule. It is anticipated that the facility will be constructed in Post-2015. Reed Park Project Description. Reed Park is located within the Wilshire Basin. The City is considering a stormwater harvesting and use facility similar to the one proposed for Memorial Park. It is estimated that a 40,000-gallon tank would be required in this application. o Capital Costs. $1.7M including construction, design, and construction management costs. Annual O&M Costs. $20,000 Schedule. It is anticipated that the facility will be constructed in Post-2015. Clover Park Project Description. Clover Park is located within the Airport Basin. The City is considering a stormwater harvesting and use facility similar to the one proposed for Memorial Park. It is estimated that a 200,000-gallon tank would be required in this application. o Capital Cosfs. $5.3M including construction, design, and construction management costs. Annual O&M Costs. $25,000 o Schedule. It is anticipated that the facility will be constructed in Post-2015. Los Amigos Park o Project Description. Los Amigos Park is located within the Pico-4t" Street Basin. The City is considering a stormwater harvesting and use facility similar to the one proposed for Memorial Park. Retrofits at Los Amigos Park will be considered as an alternative project, If implementation of the Ocean Park Boulevard Green Street Project is found infeasible. due to funding or other issues. A conceptual level cost opinion for each of the park retrofit projects is included in Appendix E. 13 9 ~..+ City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program •^•^^••~^ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 During the OC meeting held in September 2009, the OC requested that an estimated unit cost for stormwater harvesting at each park be provided (in $/ac-ft) for comparison with cost of potable water. This information is provided in Appendix E. Reference Standard CASOA BMP Fact Sheets TC-12, TC-32 and SD-11 will be utilized as guideline. Suaaested Products and Suppliers A list of cistern system suppliers can be found at the City's website: http://www.smpov.net(uploadedFiles/Departments/OSE/Categories/Urban Runoff/Barrel Cistern S upplierslist%204-22.pdf. A package system may be considered in some applications; however, these larger applications may find benefits in acustom-designed facility. 14 ~~ City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program *^°^ •` 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 2.8 Deep Infiltration In-Line Storm Drain Pilot Project Proiect Description A pilot-scale aquifer recharge system will be considered to infiltrate dry and wet weather runoff from a storm drain via deep infiltration wells. B&V reviewed geotechnical reports made available by the City to assess general surface soil conditions within the City area. A summary of the geotechnical reports review is provided in Appendix F. Geologic reconnaissance will be pertormed to further assess feasibility of such project and to develop concept. Costs It is assumed that $100,000 plus an escalation rate of 3% per year will be allocated to perform the geologic reconnaissance and develop concept(s) in FY2010-11. 15 - g~ City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program ^•^•*°~~^ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 2.9 Payment on J-2/J-3 Agreement with City of Los Angeles Proiect Description Per the Draft Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with the City of Los Angeles for the Santa Monica Bay Beaches Wet Weather Bacterial TMDL Implementation Plan Projects Cost Sharing Jurisdictional Groups Two and Three, dated August 2007, it is currently assumed that the City of Santa Monica will contribute a total of $4M over a 20-year term towards implementation of a series of City of Los Angeles projects in the jurisdictions, including the Penmar Water Quality Improvement Project. , Costs It is assumed that $200,000/year plus an interest rate of 3.25% per year will be paid to the City of Los Angeles over the next 20 years. 16 - ~ City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program °•^•^••~~ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 2.10 Trash BMPs Protect Description In order to achieve compliance with a Santa Monica Bay trash TMDL, trash BMPs, such as vortex separators or inlet filter/inserts, will be installed to reduce the amount of trash entering the Bay upon storm events. Reducing the amount of trash discharged from Pico-Kenter Outlet is considered as the primary focus of the City's trash BMP implementation in the next 5 years. Three basins (Kenter Canyon, Pico- Caltrans, and Pico-4th Street Basins) totaling over 4,000 acres drain to the Pico-Kenter Outlet, and limited trash BMPs have been implemented in these basins to date. Approximately 2/3 (or 2,645 acres) of Kenter Canyon Basin, which is the largest of the three basins, is located within the-City of Los Angles. The following three alternatives are considered for trash BMPs for the three basins (collectively referred as Pico-Kenter Watershed) that discharge to the Pico-Kenter Outlet. Alternative 1. Install catch basin screening throughout watershed. If assumed that all of the City of Santa Monica owned catch basins within Pico-Kenter Watershed without inserts/filters will be retrofitted with inserts/filters in the first phase of implementation. In the second phase of implementation, the City will coordinate with the County of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, and other entities to retrofit the remainder of the catch basins within the Watershed. Alternative 2. Install five vortex separators at the Pico-Kenter Outlet. All separators will be installed at once. ® Alternative 3. Install five vortex separators at the Pico-Kenter Outlet. The five separators will be installed in phases. In FY2010-11, one unit will be installed at the northwest side of the outlet. In FY2012-13, another unit will be installed at the southeast side of the outlet. In FY2014-15, three additional units will be installed at the northwest side of the outlet. A breakdown of the ownership and retrofit costs are summarized in Table 2.10-1. Table 2.10-1: Cost for Filters/Inserts for Catch Basins throughout the Pico-Kenter Watershed 17 - Based on estimated installed cost of $2,700 per catch basin (based on quote from Bio-Clean v~ith an 80% allowance to account for contingencies). Program oversight and administrative costs of $98,000/year to be included in annual expenditure schedule in adtlition to the filter/insert costs. " Maintenance costs developed with 3 cleaning/year with a 2 person crew spending 1/2 hour per catch basin. Labor costs estimated at $35/hour/person. Vactor operating costs estimated at $130/hour. Solids disposal cost at $66/ton. Solids generation of 66 ibs/calch basin is assumed based on data provided by the City. "* All catch basins owned by the City of Santa Monica are considered to be Phase 1. '~..~ City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure VProgram ••^•,^^~ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 Costs In order to compare the long-term overall project costs of the three alternatives, a 20-year present- worth cost analysis was performed, as summarized in Table 2.10-2. In addition, advantages of each alternative are also summarized in Table 2.10-2. 18 - -.® City of Santa Monica Measure V Program ^'°•~-~°° 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan Table 2 .10-2: Pico-Kenter Wa tershed Treat ment Alternati ves -Summa ry Cost Com parison r Intercepts flow further up in the Catch Basin Throughout Screens at all catch watershed; may Screening watershed basins within the distribute $1,002,900 $2,376,000 $0 $3,378,900 $360,000 $8,451,000 watershed. maintenance between agencies better Concept for fve 64 cfs E d f Pi Discharge at vortex separators at the Single site; n o pe the Beach foot of Pico Blvd. All five economy of $7,200,000 $0 $0 $7,200,000 $35,000 $7,694,000 separators will be installed ~ scale. at once. Phased concept to implement a total of five 64 cfs vortex separators at the foot of Pico Blvd. In FY2010-11, one unit will be installed at the Single site; Phased End Discharge at northwest side of the phasing allows of Pipe the Beach outlet. In FY2012-13, for incremental $3,812,000 $2,342,000 $3,536,000 $9,690,000 $35,000 $10,184,000 another unit will be addition and installed at the southeast improvement. side of the outlet. In FY2014-15, three additional units will be installed at the northwest side of the outlet. * See Table 2.10-1 for development of Alternative 1 O&M costs. For Alternatives 2 & 3, four cleanings/yr with a 2 person crew spentling 4 hour per vortex separator assumed Solids , . capture was the same by area as with Alternative 1. "Costs include sanitary sewer diversion and improvements to dry weather diversion at the Pico-Kenter Pump Station. The total project cost for these improvements are estimatetl to be $236,1 D0. 19 m ~-.® City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program •••°•••^•` 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 Although Alternative 2 (i.e. a regional facility) demonstrates long-term cost effectiveness, the upfront cost of over $7M would consume over 3 years of revenues from Measure V. The phasing approach in Alternative 3 allows for incremental addition and improvements; however, the total project cost is high due to escalation factors and reduced economy of scale. As a result, per direction of the City, Alternative 1 is currently proposed, as this option will allow for trash to be captured further up stream and may distribute maintenance better between agencies. It is assumed that the first phase of implementation, which is to install inserts/filters in all of the City of Santa Monica owned catch basins within Pico-Kenter Watershed, will be included in this 5-Year Plan. The first phase of project will be implemented in FY2010-11 and FY2011-12 with a capital cost of $1.,002,900. The Phase 1 project cost includes costs for addition of sanitary sewer diversion capability and improvements to the existing dry weather diversion piping at the Pico-Kenter Pump Station, which are estimated to be $236,100. The improvements include addition of a forcemain from the pump station routed to a sewer manhole, which would allow for diversion of dry weather runoff to sanitary sewer when SMURRF is out of service. Improvements to the existing diversion piping would allow for more reliable diversion of dry weather runoff to SMURRF. Annual O&M cost is estimated to be $93,400 for Phase 1. The costs associated with the second phase of implementation (i.e. retrofit of catch basins owned by other agencies) are not included in this 5-Year Plan. Additional details on the conceptual level cost opinions for Alternatives 2 and 3 are provided in Appendix G. Other Alternatives Two other alternatives, as summarized in Table 2.10-3, were also considered. However, due to cost and complexity, these alternatives were not carried forward in the evaluation. Table 2.10-3: Other Alternatives Initially Considered (but not carried forward due to cost and complexity) ~• ., Capture and use of wet season Beneficial use of wet season flows; some flows at Memorial Park with benefits of sharing the site with planned Memorial Park+ Memorial Park + phased concept for multiple vortex 1 mgd non-potable reservoir for Phased End of Pipe* Discharge at the separators at the foot of Pico SMURRF effluent at Memorial Park; may Beach Blvd. Over $12M in capital costs. allow for additional storage and more O&M costs could exeed effective use of dry season flows. $75,000/year. Capture and use of wet season flows at Brentwood and Memorial Brentwood + Memorial Brentwood + Park with vortex separators Park + Downstream Memorial Park+ downstream watersheds (Pico- Similar to above; may reduce size of the Sub watersheds Downstream Sub Caltrans, Pico 4th and drainage at Pico Blvd. facility. watersheds the foot of Pico Blvd.) Over $18M in capital costs. 0&M costs could exeed $75,000/year. `The stormwater harvesting component of this alternative will be carried forward as part of the Memorial Park Retroft Project, as described under Section 2.7. 20 - , ~..w City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program ••^••~~ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 Other Considerations During the OC meeting held in September 2009, it was requested that a hybrid option that implements both catch basin screening and vortex separators be also considered. It was suggested that this hybrid facility could be located either near the beach (similar to Alternatives 2 and 3) or near the City boundary with the City of Los Angeles. It was surmised that this approach may help address uncertainties associated with how the other agencies within the Pico-Kenter Watershed may implement TMDL measures in the future (i.e. timing and extent of catch basin screening implementation and the level of maintenance to be provided). In addressing OC's comment, a brief evaluation on the hybrid option was conducted to estimate the capacity of the vortex separators that would be required and the additional costs associated with implementation of the vortex separators. It was estimated that the scale and cost of the vortex separator facility near the beach would be similar to Alternatives 2 and 3 described above. If the facility were to be located near the City boundary with the City of Los Angeles near Brentwood, the size of the facility could be reduced by approximately 40%. Due to high capital cost and City's belief that other stakeholders may choose their own compliance methods, further evaluation of the hybrid solution was discontinued. Other agencies regulated by the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB) have developed approaches and implementation plans for trash TMDLs. The. County of Los Angeles, as one such agency, has developed an approach that the LARWQCB has certified to achieve full capture for trash removal. This approach, as defined in Resolution No. 04-023, contains criteria for a full capture trash removal system that are summarized below: The system shall trap particles retained by a 5mm mesh. o Sizing is based on a one year frequency, one hour rainfall event. o Rational method hydrology is utilized for determining the peak flow rate The LARWQCB has accepted a Connector Pipe System (a vertical stainless steel screen with 5mm openings inside a catch basin in such a manner that all water entering the basin must pass through the device) as an approved full capture system for the County's needs. Some concern exists relating to the screens blinding within these systems, thereby limiting hydraulic capacity at the catch basin, and creating flood control challenges upstream. Early in the design phase of the City's Trash BMP Program, it is recommended that examples of approved practices within the region are assessed carefully and balanced with maintenance practices and flood control objectives of the City. This initial determination and any refined criteria specific to the City's Program should be reviewed with the LARWQCB prior to commencing design of the catch basin inserts. As noted above, this evaluation utilizes aBio-Clean system to derive a unit cost for the catch basin insert/filter system. It is believed this system serves as a conservative unit cost for this comparison. During the design phase this system, as well as others, may be considered to meet the objectives of the City's Program. Reference Standard The criteria for a full capture system, as described above, will be considered in design of the Trash BMPs. CASOA BMP Fact Sheets MP-52 will also be utilized as guideline. Suppested Products and Suppliers Bio Clean Environmental Services, Inc. http://www.biocleanenvironmental.com/products/ Flogard by Kristar. http://www.kristar.com/ 21 - ~-aa City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program °°^°°^^ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 2.11 Downspout Redirect Program Proiect Description The City currently administers the Downspout Redirect Rebate Program. Up to $40 of rebates per qualified downspout are available for the cost (material and labor) of redirecting rain gutter downspouts to permeable surfaces, such as landscaped areas. Additional information could be found at the City's website: htto://www.smaov.net/Departments/OSE/categories/content.asox?id=3847. Reference Standard DS Redirect Instructions. http~//www smaov net/uoloadedFiles/Departments/OSE/Cateaories/Urban Runoff/Downspout Redir ect HowTo.pdf. Costs An annual budget of $4,000/year plus an escalation rate of 3% per year is allocated in the Measure V 5-Year Plan to support this program. 22 0 g-.e City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program ^"^^^~ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 2.12 Rain Barrel Program Proiect Description The City currently administers the Rain Barrel Rebate Program for storage of rainwater. Rebates up to $250 per barrel (limited up to 499 gallons) are available for the cost of design, labor and materials. Additional information could be found at the City's website: http://www.smaov.net/Departments/OS E/cateaorieslcontent.aspx?id=3847. Reference Standard Rain Barrel Installations & Maintenance http://www.smaov.net/uploadedFiles/Departments/OSE/Cateaories/Urban Runoff/Install Maintain RainBarrel.pdf Citv's List of Suppliers http://www.smaov.net/uploadedFiles/Departments/OSE/Cateaories/Urban Runoff/Barrel Cistern S uppliersl ist%204-22. pdf Costs An annual budget of $12,000/year plus an escalation rate of 3% per year is allocated in the Measure V 5-Year Plan to support this program. 23 D ~-.~ City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program °•~•°-~^ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 2.13 Cistern Program Project Description The City currently administers the Cistern Rebate Program for storage of rainwater. The City may increase the rebate amount from $250-$500 (per the existing program) to $800 to help cover installation costs, which include electrical, plumbing, backflow prevention devices, and permitting costs for pressurized system. The rebates are limited to cisterns over 500 gallons each. Additional information could be found at the City's website: http://www.smaov.nel/Departments/OSE/categories/content.aspx?id=3847. Reference Standard Rain Barrel Installations & Maintenance http://www.smaov.net/uoloadedFiles/Departments/OSE/Cateaories/Urban Runoff/Install Maintain RainBarrel.pdf Costs An annual budget of $50,000/year plus an escalation rate of 3% per year is allocated in the Measure V 5-Year Plan to support this program. 24 - Q ~.r City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program °^••-~•' S-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 3.0 SUMMARY OF THE 5-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Table 3-1 presents a summary of the proposed Measure V 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan. A schedule of project implementation is presented in Table 3-2. A schedule of expenditure for capital costs, O&M costs, and the total project was also developed based on the proposed Measure V 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan and is presented in Table 3-3, 3-4, and 3-5, respectively. The costs presented in Table 3-5 are total project costs, including construction, engineering, construction management, burdened salary for the City's Watershed Program Manager, administrative expenses, and O&M costs. It is estimated that the annual expenditure for Measure V in the next 5 years will range from $1.3M to $4.1 M, totaling $13.7M. A summary of drainage area treated, reduction of runoff resulting from the Measure V 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan, and capital cost per drainage area treated for the proposed projects is provided in Appendix H. 25 - s Table 3-t Guidance List of Best Management Practices antl LOw Impact Development Strategies r ro Summary of Measure V-5-Year Capitallmprovement Plan -~. A. pan a raw~e auey repkamml Pmemm, amen awake wuma mplazen wEh pemeade eurteae,aWlaa pervleus wl[refe. le /tlley replacement Pmnesale 5urtace Nle re tlemon9rzleRceefletlrve ice INpermeabk wetlWSOn lFe makes. puiretl ea pan ale ClP $]g ~'yeaY $3A,WY Mnual 3fi laalbrewill beuleGetl per yearRrN6npe atimprcve Measure VwJl(uM lhelrcramenlelcvl beMwnMa regWarm~ Pre1¢q ' male antl pen+ws wn<rek ar equrvalenl. Pc part e! rMlrc 54ee1 impmremeN prgram, wrcrefe uow gutters antl lnlersMUns wdl be replacetl vnM pemeo suRaa, strze[gulleTn[eaNRn vameabk s~rtaa seal cNkamma~aeman aernaa Pen'mus wrcrek.maemo~Male tla eeeuaa gam mbw Rena aTR cmymY aisg ao~ annwl amereN Pamable waaada a~lne maMA Meaaare vwm oMy as pan ma s r , . wMlhe Neim'remerAelcml beMeen Ilia regular corvele ena Cl P pmpcf Diu comele aequlvabnt orErym wevWS, ensbati welkntls~l®ewells.aM CRxr bureleMCn (ealw¢will be lnsUllea Cuslcm tlespn cr Mniaeae ParkwaylSlamelk 9bfitters bwppue antl Nfiue lM1ervaR Acuslem-0esipnetl system wailabb p $i N,PTIyeeY S:U$,WS Mwnl aakyea ay.Nem ar ae munea. Ia~ga aPPgeNbn raver ww Proa ~m o~ma maMat eslgrretl ayYemsm mPaapPllweon, Pe sramank enemas auM1e aowasra em elsreedwi~dag waeraepre. alaaecaplrreb apw aaa Steel Curb EMemicns elan rvmH Peso eats riaolu vnlllMUae tlimafaappmpasle planla WNe Sree4 wIN MgM1 $i WL 6W GV ' P I anttlnp bngallort InGalbticn ola cslem wlll bemnutlerM where runcR 2fe W year . . b nni¢ wlU6le fo wally water fw croslle laMSwpvg. RwwR wcultl be wrea m we mahaa aPer Ibex a'maeNm slay Pe areal. Rret wojetl Imwrntlim wul abrt in on em z ) NO mnme impl mkuon a.anwe uo reawree. ww ae eable gutlen.aWr-.urkalnfilLeticn. permeable pahnp lanes a E1 M'br OCeanPaM BIW Green 3eeHS epreaeetl pahways MP arip imeation aJ abnabaPPrew a pleMS, mN etlerePV,aM eprevea planlera la apwre vw R wma 9ra.h wlN mgh Rrefe, target areas lc . Green 61ree1 Prekcl b1 WJ,WT FY ID10.11 Implemenkhon ellM1eOcean PaM BNd Grttn 9reelProleG is IMil4ale for Relrefils al LOS Am gas auntllNeatibk tlue lc lwtllrp moNer Issues. regards al LC¢ Parhj Amgcs PaM ant ParknB Lc19A or 11 wa be wraiaeretl as an aXamsle pmjeq. !ss Wn c(C'M1y's ove211 hWily prag2m. permeable sufauy suM1 sphall. will be NJee3ler relmfil cr new chy paatiy see PmjM OesorylPm ~aerce~meamo~aeal. Pa.rtamve as mem.rem Parma a eln parUiy lefe sue for Pr mat aelal mr PretlulS On lM maMeL Cepressetl Planters mll alw be imp~m~mlS,pUmea esuRaciy am lnslalgn0 r bee TaOle 35. Permeable surtax PaMi y loP Impkmenletl to wplure luncfl. Meawre VVnX mver lM1e pcnlon cl Pa rtly bls. cr Perkng Na vnP aralrege tlepresatl planb Stl'etluk cf P°aaMras FY Mif-1] IFe proletl wsl gal'o asmcialea wilM1 Peslermwalerpala~ issces peepng LOb 9, 9A 11, " ~ en111.e. 0epreseea PUnU emenUlmS m 36 eregula aspFallaM Porw aspFaX) Ozone PaM FY )1110.11 AaPM Nlhrse prcletls wet weather rvrwfl hum a mein sP Mallne Pa M:%A11-12 " IvaMab an aaUceN pant br baaMenl (preeeM sa bee cable 3b. Msmenal Park FY TJ13-13 vk Retrofits antl tlS Meulm), LCrage, antl uu as lnigalion water wlPln lM1e Pa XS near reglw-al As pUnnetl scM1eauk o! Clovxr PaM,NgIMa AVx. Pant, Wrk. AreplvablemWel vnA be tlevebpetlaM USetl R,rougMNllu dorm each Eepenaema LiIY" aretl park PesF3015 Pmgos Pa M: QrHlec o(Ilem T A pilo4amle apuRer rechege system will be mraiaeretllo infiXmla sbelepiclmllonsb be $1 N,IXL•Pr PItiL Ceep lnfileaaon lrvkne SPrm OraP Pibl ROletl ana wet weagpr wleR ROm aabnn tlraP na seep Pfilballm ary seIMeG WCetl on results geobge rewnlulswnce 51 W, W]' FY A10.11 l mlagm raca~niaaanae wnl ea partaaaea ma.-.. r a ' mgeplpgip em wmept aeampmm e a ealn of wdt Proieclam to aweloP mrcepl. r.wn~warewe Paymml kr PeOaft Memoratlum WOgree eM IMOA)wXM1 Lin Pr11a 6anU M1brtiw bay eea4les Wel Wealicer 6agerm bp3,g3tyear plus lNeresl See Table 3d, Payment en J-]/J3 Agreemml wlP Cln oILA TMOLImplemenlNlen Plan Protects CON SM1any See MOA le el scMauleN Mnunl JwlM idlervalGroups Two Mtl Three. ASwmes payment ClNM war IDyearlerm. 3.cS%per year EFenallaes urea to echiwe mmpliava wan a SaMn MOnia Bay ea TMOL eaN BMPa. soul as snnex apamPra orlnlel fitleTmm4 reTabla 2163.Rw 6 6ttiable 3b, Tmsn BMPS reduce th amaunl allaN eNenrg lM 6aY Upan Kehler Walershetl Tealmenl Nlemallves As sMwnin Plain 3cM1etlule of es E+psriailw See PeejeN Oesmplun evems. NwnapoN Rea hetl Program ORer$W rehafe kr pansfivWUtioa per 05 $4 WLyear SA.WT Mnlal I Prrgam ORer E350 reW1e upb Q99 gallon Bartel 312SONeaY S'~.Oa]' Mniml May increau Ne rebate amaunl hum 515O6.N (per Pe ez - progrem)fo$BL IO Mpcoverir~Nallaeon m9s, whbhincwtl m Ryram eleGrcal. plumbvg, CacMlew prevenlcn tlevices. and pumllting S`.rlNlyeaY $LU,P9' Pmual wsls fcrpreswneetlsyslem. Thk applies to system c(6gC gallon ffi® City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program ~•~••^•°•^ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 27 - s Table 3-2: Implementation Schedule of BMP Practices and LID Strategies Measure V 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan g..m City of Santa Monica Measure V Program ^•°^-~~ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan Table 3-3: Schedule of Expenditures for Best Management Practices and Low Impact Development Strategies Measure V 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan -Capital Costs* - Ozone Park $894,742 $0 $0 $0 $0 $694,742 -Marine Park -Memorial Park $211,773 $0 $676,411 $540,265 $211,938 $2,903,548 $0 $602,113 $0 $0 $1,100,122 $4,045,925 Deep Infiltration In-Line Storm Drain Pilot Project $109,063 $0 $0 $0 $0 $109,063 Payment on J-2/J-3 Agreement with City of L.A. r Trash BMPs $218,656 $845,217 $230,381. $428,039 $233,281 $106,820 $273,715 $109,760 $329,079 $112,700 $1,285,051 $1,602,536 Downspout (DS) Redirect Pro ram $4,363 $4,585 $4,632 $5,421 $6,501 $25,502 Rain Barrel Program Cistern Pro ram $13,088 $54,532 $13,756 $57,317 $13,895 $57,898 $16,264 $67,768 $19,503 $81,264 $76,507 $318,778 Totals $3,427,665 $2,811,606 $3,827,820 $1,393,418 $901,356 $12,361,865 "Includes escalation at 30 per year, burdened salary for City's Watershed Program Manager, and administrative expenses. Also includes program administrative cost of $98,000/year escalated at 3% per year for implementation of Trash BMPs. 28 City of Santa Monica Measure V Program w~•' 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan Table 3-4: Schedule of Expenditures for Best Management Practices and Low Impact Development Strategies Measure V 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan - O&M Costs" * Includes escalation at 3% per year. 29 _ ~'~ City of Santa Monica Measure V Program ^~•^°"- 5-Year Canital Improvement Plan Table 3-5: Schedule of Expenditures for Best Management Practices and Low Impact Development Strategies Measure V 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan -Total Project Costs -Ozone Park -- $894,742 $21,200 $21,800 $22,400 $23,000 $983,142 - Marine Park - Memorial Park $211,773 $0 $676,411 $540,265 $233,738 . $2,903,548 $22,400 $630,713 $23,OD0 $28,750 $1,167,322 $4,102,675 Deep Infiltration In-Line Storm Drain Pilot Project' $109,063 $0 $0 $0 $0 $109,063 Payment on J-2/J-3 Agreement with Ci of L.A. r Trash BMPs $218,656 $845,217 $230,381 $527,043 $233,281 $208,626 $273,715 $214,368 $329,019 $220,110 $1,285,051 $2,015,364 Downspout (DS) Redirect Program* $4,363 $4,585 $4,632 $5,421 $6,501 $25,502 Rain Barrel Program" Cistern Program' $13,088 $54,532 $13,756 $57,317 $13,895 $57,898 $16,264 $67,768 $19,503 $81,264 $76,507 $318,778 Totals $3,461,464 $3,057,414 $4,126,705 $1,754,759 $1,293,042 $13,694,785 Costs include escalation at 3% per year, burdened salary for City's Watershed Program Manager, and administrative expenses in addition to the initial budgets that are shown in Table 3-1. 30 _ ~1~ City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program ••°•^••~~ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 4.0 REFERENCES Major references for this 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan are listed below Amendment to the Water Quality Control Plan for the Los Angeles Region to Amend the Total Maximum Daily Load for Trash in the Ballona Creek and Wetland, Los Angeles RWQCB Resolution No. 04-023, March 4, 2004 Certification of the Connector Pipe Screen Device as a Full Capture System for Trash Removal under the Ballona Creek and the Los Angeles River Trash Total Maximum Daily Loads, Los Angeles RWQCB, August 1, 2007 City of Santa Monica Hydrology Study (Volumes A & B), Berryman & Henigar, Inc., July 1998 City of Santa Monica Watershed Management Plan, Brown and Caldwell, April 2006 Draft Memorandum of Agreement, Santa Monica Bay Beaches Wet Weather Bacterial TMDL Implementation Plan Projects Cost Sharing Jurisdictional Groups Two and Three, August 16, 2007. Investigation of Reported Beach Ponding Downstream of the Pier Storm Drain Diversion and Recommended Mitigation Measure, PSOMAS, October 2007 LID Cost Tool, WERF, May 2009 RS Means Heavy Construction Cost Data, 2007 Operational Assessment of the Santa Monica Urban Runoff Recycling Facility -Five Years Later, PSOMAS, March 2007 Pico-Kenter Storm Drain Upgrades Final Concept Report, Black & Veatch, April 2009 Santa Monica Bay Beaches Bacterial TMDL J2/3 Implementation Plan (PowerPoint Presentation), City of Los Angeles; Santa Monica, EI Segundo, County of Los Angeles, and Caltrans, August 2008 Statement of support for the efforts of responsible jurisdictions and agencies in Jurisdictional Groups 2 and 3 to utilize an integrated water resources approach to achieve full compliance with'the Santa Monica Bay Beaches Bacteria Wet Weather TMDL in the shortest possible timeframe and no later than 2021, Los Angeles RWQCB Resolution No. 2006-006, April 6, 2006 31 ~~ City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program ••••••••~^ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 APPENDIX A: List of Alleys ZONE #1 FY2009-10 NORTH OF MONTANA YESINO CIP ADD 2'GUTTER SHORTDESC ZONE ALLEY ID LENGTH WIDTH AREA DATE INSP FIELD - yes 10th CT 502 1 5449 599 20 11980 2/27/2008 TB yes 12th CT 302 1 5466 550 20 11000 1/18/2008 TW yes 12th CT 502 1 5493 600 20 12000 1/18/2008 TW yes 12th CT 602 1 5370 816 20 16320 1/18/2008 TW yes 15th CT 502 1 5504 656 20 13120 1/19/2008 TW yes 22ntl CT 302 1 5901 794 20 15880 2/29/2008 TB yes 9th CT 302 1 5433 347 20 6940 2/2/2008 RJ yes 9th CT 402 1 5419 550 20 11000 2/2/2008 RJ yes 9th CT 602 1 5374 816 20 16320 2/2/2008 RJ yes ALTA PL N 402 1 5378 1131 20 22620 2/2/2008 RJ yes EUCLID CT 302 1 5480 550 20 11000 2/9/2008 RJ yes SAN VICENTE PL N 124 1 5385 536 20 10720 2/29/2008 RJ yes SAN VICENTE PL N 340 1 5382 549 20 10980 2/29/2008 RJ yes SAN VICENTE PL N 402 1 5356 1356 20 27120 2/29/2008 RJ yes SAN VICENTE PL S 274 1 5911 137 20 2740 2/29/2008 RJ ZONE #1 ~ 15 9 987 199 740 - ~ ~_- ~ ~ q- ~ .. a ~- ZONE #2 FY2010-11 MONTANA TO WILSHI RE YES/NO CIP ADD 2'GUTTER SHORTDESC LENGTH WIDTH AREA DATE INSP FIELD ZONE ALLEY ID - yes 12th CT 1002 2 5750 600 20 12000 1/18/2008 TW yes 12th CT 902 2 5716 601 20 12020 1/18/2008 TW yes 15th CT 1102 2 5758 600 20 12040 1/19/2b08 TW yes 16th CT 902 2 5960 600 20 12000 2/29/2008 RJ yes 21st CT 1162 2 6007 451 20 9020 2/29/2008 TB yes 4th CT 902 2 5550 601 20 12020 2/1/2008 RJ no 5th CT 902 2 6569 148 15 2220 2/1/2008 RJ yes 6th CT 1002 2 5672 602 20 12040 2/1/2008 RJ yes 6th CT 802 2 5633 599 20 11980 2/1/2008 RJ yes 6th CT 902 2 5643 600 20 12000 2/1/2008 RJ yes 7th CT 802 2 5634 600 20 12000 2/2/2008 RJ yes 9th CT 902 2 5660 600 20 12000 2/2/2008 RJ no CHELSEA CT 1001 2 6136 371 15 5565 2/9!2008 RJ yes LINCOLN CT 802 2 5651 600 20 12000 2/15/2008 RJ yes LINCOLN CT 902 2 5657 599 20 11980 2/15/2008 RJ yes STANFORD CT 823 2 6280 1326 20 26520 2/29/2008 RJ yes STANFORD CT 824 2 6307 50 20 1000 2/29/2008 RJ ZONE #2 17 9,548 188,405 ZONE #3 FY2011-12 WILSHIRE TO PICO east of 26th St YES/NO CIP ADD 2'GUTTER SHORTDESC LENGTH WIDTH AREA DATE INSP FIELD ZONE ALLEY_ID no ARIZONA PL S 2634 3 6261 340 15 5100 2/2/2008 RJ no BERKELEY CT 1301 3 6382 436 16 6976 2/9/2008 RJ no BERKELEY CT 1701 3 7086 610 16 9760 2/9/2008 RJ no COLORADO PL S 3002 3 6448 290 16 4640 2/9/2008 RJ no FRANKLIN CT 1201 3 .6462 296 16 4736 2/9/2008 RJ no FRANKLIN CT 1259 3 6387 158 16 2528 2/9/2008 RJ no FRANKLIN CT 1701 3 7087 610 . 17 10370 2/9/2008 RJ yes PICO PL N 3002 3 7128 902 20 18040 2/23/2008 RJ no SANTA MONICA PL S 2702 3 6369 311 15 4665 2/29/2008 RJ no SANTA MONICA PL S 2902 3 6347 340 15 5100 2/29/2008 RJ no SANTA MONICA PL S 3002 3 6402 340 15 5100 2/29/2008 RJ no SANTA MONICA PL S 3102 3 6395 340 15 5100 2/29/2008 RJ no STANFORD CT 1401 3 6342 426 15 6390 2/29/2008 RJ no STANFORD CT 1501 3 6433 440 15 6600 2/29/2008 RJ no STANFORD CT 1601 3 6449 475 15 7125 2/29/2008 RJ no WILSHIRE PL S 3202 3 6341 328 16 5248 2/29/2008 TB no YALE CT 1501 3 6421 440 17 7480 2/29/2008 TB ZONE #3 17 7,082 114,958 U , ~ X~~~ ..... "~.~ ~ ' ~ ~ om Y*x~S~u` "~ ~ . .v ' 'i. ~ ~ '~'•:~~ '~3 ~ ~?~~~ . i . ~ . ttfr. . ~ : im j. .-.n J.: .. • ZONE #4 FY2012-13 WILSHIRE TO PICO west of 26th St~ i -- YESINO CIP ADD 2'GUTTER SHORTDESC LENGTH WIDTH AREA DATE INSP FIELD ZONE ALLEY_ID yes 14th CT 1202 4 5616 601 20 12020 1/18/2008 TW yes 14th CT 1402 4 5832 601 20 12020 1/19/2008 TW yes 17th CT 1502 4 6202 600 20 12000 2/29/2008 RJ yes 19th CT 1402 4 6176 600 20 12000 2/29/2008 RJ yes 20th CT 1501 4 6218 274 20 5480 2/29/2008 TB no 24th CT 1202 4 6235 441 16 7056 2/9/2008 TW yes 9th CT 1302 4 5794 600 20 12000 2/2/2008 RJ yes BROADWAY PL S 2001 4 6214 121 20 2420 2/9/2008 RJ no CALIFORNIA PL S 2502 4 6154 280 15 4200 2/9/2008 RJ no CHELSEA CT 1202 4 6249 442 '15 6630 2!9/2008 RJ yes EUCLID CT 1202 4 5618 600 20 12000 2/9/2008 RJ yes . EUCLID CT 1802 4 6603 1156 20 23120 2/9/2008 RJ yes LINCOLN CT 1202 4 5622 600 20 12000 2/15/2008 RJ yes LINCOLN CT 1402 4 5776 601 20 12020 2/15/2008 RJ no OLYMPIC PL S 18 4 5605 185 17 3145 2/23/2008 RJ ZONE #4 15 7,702 148,111 ZONE #5 FY2013-14 SOUTH OF PICO YESINO CIP ADD 2'GUTTER SHORTDESC LENGTH WIDTH AREA DATE INSP FIELD ZONE ALLEY_ID yes 11th CT 2701 5 6753 300 20 6000 1/18/2008 TW yes 24th CT 2206 5 6834 837 20 16740 2/9/2008 TW yes 5th CT 2648 5 5640 600 20 12000 2/1/2008 RJ yes ASHLAND PL N 1802 5 6951 500 20 10000 2/2/2008 RJ no HILL PL N 402 5 6528 160 17 3200 2/15/2008 RJ yes HILL PL N 804 5 6733 787 20 15740 2/15/2008 RJ no MAPLE PL N 1002 5 6680: 501 17 8517 2/23/2008 RJ yes OCEAN PARK PL N 1702 5 6956 417 20 8340 2/23/2008 RJ yes PEARL PL S 2532 5 7055 168 20 3360 2/23/2008 RJ yes PICO PL S 2502 5 6832 316 20 6320 2/23/2008 RJ no PINE PL N 1002 5 .6658 500 16 8000 2/29/2008 RJ ZONE #5 11 5,086 98,217 ~~°~ % ~'` ~' ` _ ~ ~ - p '~ ~ ~". ~ `' . .n.. ..+ .. ,r 'ss ra...4s .. . , _ F . , .. _ .m ,. . z .m. {+ , F . *a . e. .x. ~-~ City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program •••~°^•°K°' 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 APPENDIX B: Map of City Zones for Street Improvement Program Locations of Existing Pervious Concrete Gutters GEND: 77~Ji' ZONE 1 ZONE 2 l5',,1, ZME 3 ~- j ZONE 4 ZONE 5 _."_'~ ~ ZONE 8 ~~ ZONE ] Locations of Pervious Concrete Gutters E ~M• % apt b1R 1~ i. i ._ _.y x ~ sr ~ ms n ~. ` y srso i ~ e ~ ~.~r ~ 4 xq. q a Q 3 ~. s~ ~. -- s mno ~ sr g ~ ~ _ ~ e ` `0 3 s 4 sratiRO~ ~ ¢ , ~ ~ , / rP~ sr ® ~ 'q. t ~ s: ~~ mr ~ P .... z9r N sr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ sr ~ . ~ ~ r rerx ~ ' j Ei r r ~ ~ ` ~ Sf F 1 9i ~ >; ~ ~ rx Frry ~' b m " u a ~ ~ °f^ Y ' L ~ m ~ o p o wni_ i ~r .wr. ann .W ~ ~ t1rR sr ]n 1 } 9R0: Si I 'M xH 3! ~ s ~' !!! ~ ~ aRO i se ervo ao~evgErc 1 T ~ S1sRPL ~ ~ ~~ (Fi IINO 6i tl ~ 3 ~+ *~ Ro J tt ~ ~ e r4 ' ' 9~ S xz,sr B ~ ~ sr ~ z.. $ ~ B Y o t : , IINO. Rr . ~ a 'a 3mi ~ o H 3 Sr W ~ ~ ~ t~sr ~ Arl ai j~ mo 9i1 6i F ~ ~ w ~ y ~ a ' R sr n; s~' 4 w 5 £ ~ ~ = _ lorx ~ . ....... .. ,,. . . ~ ~ 4 <r ¢~ x R ' ' a ~ .. ~ ..si ... ...., ... , n C' d. ° tl ~ ~ d inR. y7 1 i imp f t sr ~mR sr b r __ .,. <. ierx :~ ~~ 6i (g_ m v. m Sr e w 6AM1M Sf 4 WM i , nrR sr y o a ~ ~3 ~~ euao sr euccm a ~ ~o ~: S 'm +eTM __ . a ~ +zm ~ nrx sr & ~~ ~ ~ m +nn sr ~'. ~+. $ eanr sr e rr ~. u o ~ > S a -~ ~ w '+ ~ sr Y' < 3 m , w ..,.,. a' om p ~ for sr a o sr ' e '` i ..'" _._ a 9 } S " 333 ~ ` uxcow ,.e~w nx sr~ rx sr 'a. ~ ' ~ j ¢ "~ t q ~ ' ~ orR ~ ~ p ~ Ynsrza srr~ ~sr s _ . ~ t~ ~ sr -~ ma Si ~ a r n H ! ~ H ~ ~ 9 ~ y 5 i a F rv ' S 3 ~ 3N a O sr ~ FP PROM bi ~ ~ yY P i u ~u ~ 5 ~ .. ~ o ~ q~ S a. .... . ..... MPN 8 '< x r o ~ ~ S C sr ~ ~ n 3 '„+E ceA~ nPE $ «EaR M.~~~» -« : c~x• h ~ "? "' V' ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ "»:; 4~ ~ t ~ ~..~ City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program •••••a••°~ 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 PPEN®IX C: Map of Ocean Park Boulevard Project Area ~,..aa City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program ••°^°•°•^ 5-Year Capitaf Improvement Plan December 2009 ~-PPEBVDI D: Estimated Turf Irrigation Requirements in Santa Monica Average Monthly Turtirrigation Requirements in Santa Monica, CA ' Station ID: 99 Station Name: Santa Monica Region: Los Angeles Basin ETC= Kc x ETo Kc = 0] (orturtgmss (an average of cool antl warm season species) 'Monthly average ETO was wlcula[etl basetl on a long-term average of monthly ETO tlata since December 1992. 'Data source: Califamia ImgaGOn Management Information System (CIMIS) httpJ/wwwdmis watecca.gov 'ETO: Referenw Evapotranspiration 'ETC. Crop Evapotranspiration 'KC' Crop Cceffuent Estimated Average Monthly Tort Irrigation Requirements 4 00 . ` 3'~' ~ `'~' „ 3.50 z? ~ .. ~ '~ sl a k; 'S b 1 S'^~ 3 00 N , , m y rc*, '.: r kc ""` x `. 250 srx ...~... n Ti c 200 c ' t50 i it t, T t 00 _ Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Montb Wet season(OC-Mar Monthly AVerage)= t]8 inches/month Dry season(Apr-JUn Monthly AVerage)= 3.38 incheslmonth g® City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program ^°^~•` 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 APPENDIX E: Park Retrofit Projects Conceptual. Level Cost Opinions & Estimated Costs of Wet Season Harvesting Projects within the City of Santa Monica Memorial Park Stormwater Harvesting (FY 2012-13) Conceptual Level Preliminary Construction Costs Conventionally-Reinforced Concrete Reservoir* $500,000 300 gpm Submersible Pump Station (From 15' Deep Storm Drain) $150,000 Irrigation Pumps $10,000 Hydrodynamic Separators (CDS®), Diversion Structures and Piping $735,000 Strainer/Disinfection (Allocation) $75,000 Site Piping (Allocation) $100,000 Irrigation System Improvements (Allocation) $25,000 Subtotal 1, Construction Costs $1,595,000 Mobilization (5%) $79,750 Permits (10%) $159,500 Allowances (5%) $79,750 Subtotal 2 $1,914,000 Estimating Contingency (25%) $478,500 Subtotal 3 $2,392,500 Escalation (3 yr, 3% per year) $221,849 Subtotal 4 $2,614,349 *Earthwork and dewatering included. Conceptual Level Preliminary Total Project Costs Construction Costs $2,876,000 Design (15% of Construction Costs) $432,000 Construction Management (15% of Construction Costs) $432.000 Ozone Park Stormwater Harvesting (FY 2010-11) Conceptual Level Preliminary Construction Costs Conventionally-Reinforced Concrete Reservoir` $37,500 25 gpm Submersible Pump Station (Assume 15' Deep Storm Drain) $80,000 Irrigation Pumps $5,000 Hydrodynamic Separators (CDS®), Diversion Structures and Piping $237,850 Strainer/Disinfection (Allocation) $10,000 Site Piping (Allocation) $8,000 Irrigation System Improvements (Allocation) $3,000 Subtotal 1, Construction Costs $381,350 Mobilization (5%) $19,068 Permits (10%) $38,135 Allowances (5%) $19,068 Subtotal 2 $457,620 Estimating Contingency (25%) $114,405 Subtotal 3 $572,025 Escalation (1 yr, 3% per year) $17,161 Subtotal 4 $589,186 Construction Contin enc 10% $58,919 Construction Cost Total $648,104 "Earthwork and dewatering included Conceptual Level Preliminary Total Project Costs Construction Costs $649,000 Design (15% of Construction Costs) $98,000 Construction Mana ement 15% of Construction Costs $98,000 Total Pro'ect Costs $845,000 Marine Park Retrofit (FY 2011-12) Conceptual Level Preliminary Construction Costs Irrigation Piping from Penmar and Other Improvements (Allocation) Subtotal 1, Construction Costs Mobilization (5%) Permits (10%) Allowances (5%) Subtotal 2 Estimating Contingency (25%) Subtotal 3 Escalation (2 yr, 3% per year) Subtotal 4 *Earthwork and dewatering included. Conceptual Level Preliminary Total Project Costs $450, 000 $450,000 $22,500 $45,000 $22,500 $540,000 $135,000 $675,000 $41,108 $716,108 $71,611 Construction Costs $788,000 Design (15% of Construction Costs) $119,000 Construction Mana ement (15% of Construction Costs $119,000 Total Pro'ect Costs $1,026,000 Clover Park Stormwater Harvesting (Post-2015) Conceptual Level Preliminary Construction Costs Design Items': Total Cosfi; Conventionally-Reinforced Concrete Reservoir" 400 gpm Submersible Pump Station (From 15' Deep Storm Drain) Irrigation Pumps Hydrodynamic Separators (CDS®), Diversion Structures and Piping Strainer/Disinfection (Allocation) Site Piping (Allocation) Irrigation System Improvements (Allocation) Subtotal 1, Construction Costs Mobilization (5%) Permits (10%) Allowances (5%) Subtotal 2 Estimating Contingency (25%) Subtotal 3 Escalation (5 yr, 3% per year) Subtotal 4 'Earthwork and dewatering inclutled. Conceptual Level Preliminary Total Project Costs $1,000,000 $175,000 $15,000 $735,000 $75,000 $120,000 $30,000 $2,150,000 $107,500 $215,000 $107,500 $2,580,000 $645,000 $3,225,000 $513,659 $3,738,659 Construction Costs $4,113,000 Design (15% of Construction Costs) $617,000 Reed Park Stormwater Harvesting (Post-2015) Conceptual Level Preliminary Construction Costs Conventionally-Reinforced Concrete Reservoir' 75 gpm Submersible Pump Station (Assume 15' Deep Storm Drain) Irrigation Pumps Hydrodynamic Separators (CDS®), Diversion Structures and Piping Strainer/Disinfection (Allocation) Site Piping (Allocation) Irrigation System Improvements (Allocation) Subtotal 1, Construction Costs Mobilization (5%) Permits (10%) Allowances (5%) Subtotal 2 Estimating Contingency (25%) Subtotal 3 Escalation (5 yr, 3% per year) Subtotal 4 'Earthwork and dewatering included. Conceptual Level Preliminary Total Project Costs $100,000 $100,000 $70, 000 $332,850 $30,000 $30,000 $6,000 $668,850 $33,443 $66,885 $33,443 $802,620 $200,655 $1,003,275 $159,796 $1,163,071 Construction Costs $1,280,000 Design (15% of Construction Costs) $192,000. Virginia Avenue Park Stormwater Harvesting (Post 2015) Conceptual Level Preliminaryv Construction Costs Design Items:: Total Cost' Conventionally-Reinforced Concrete Reservoir' $162,500 100 gpm Submersible Pump Station (Assume 15' Deep Storm Drain) $100,000 Irrigation Pumps $75,000 Hydrodynamic Separators (CDS®), Diversion Structures and Piping $347,850 Strainer/Disinfection (Allocation) $30,000 Site Piping (Allocation) $40,000 Irrigation System Improvements (Allocation) $8,000 Subtotal 1, Construction Costs $763,350 Mobilization (5%) $38,168 Permits (10%) $76,335 Allowances (5%) $38,168 Subtotal 2 $916,020 Estimating Contingency (25%) $229,005 Subtotal 3 $1,145, 025 Escalation (5 yr, 3% per year) $182,373 Subtotal 4 $1,327,398 Construction Contin enc 10%) $132,740 Construction Cost Total $1,460,138 'Earthwork and dewatering included Conceptual Level Preliminary Total Project Costs Construction Costs $1,461,000 Design (15% of Construction Costs) $220,000 Construction Manaoement (15% of Construction Costs) $220.000 Estimated Costs of Wet Season Harvesting Projects within the City of Santa Monica ie prolna cosr inciuaes construcnon, cesign, ana consvupion management. 2. Does not indutle burdenetl salary for Watershetl rogram Manager or atlminisiratlve expenses. 3. For the purpose of wnceptuel level assessment, a 2-week cycle is essumatl for (fling antl use of the hervestetl water tluring the wet season (October through March). No tlry season flows are indutled. 4. Current retail cost of potable water is generally less than $1,000 par acre-foot. ~® City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program ^ •^• •' 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 APPENDIX F: Review of Geotechnical Reports ~~ -~ Review of Geotechnical Reports B-8: 0.4 to 4.0 (gaittf2lday) Big Blue Bus 1660 7th Street = 0.032 to 0.27 (inctMaur) N/A N/A Santa Monica, CA 6-10:0.0040.04 (gal/It2/day) = 0.00032 Co 0.0027 (inch/hour) Southwest Comer of Airyort Douglas DC-3 Avenue & Donaltl Douglas Monument Project Loop South N/A 2 Silty Santl Santa Monica, CA Cdy of Santa 2nd Street (Between Arizona Monica Parking Ave antl Santa Monica WA 2 B-i: Lean Clay Structure #4 Boulevartl) B-2: Poorly Gratletl Santl Santa Monica; CA City of Santa 1440 Fourth St Manua Parking Santa Monica CA N/A 2 Clayey Silt SWCture A6 , A-2 Clay A-3: Santly Clay A-4: Santly Clay/Clay Mountain Vew 1930 Stewart Street A-5: Silty Sand Mobile Hame Park Santa Monica, CA N/A 13 A-fi: Sandy Clay/Silty Santl A-7: Clay A-8: Silty Sand A-9: Silty Santl A-t0-A-14: Clay Santa Monica BH-1:23.0 (minutes inch) 9 (only two boring RecyWing and Drop 2417 Delaware Ave =2.6 (inctMOUr) were used to BH-1: Clayey Sand/Santl Off Facility Project Santa Monica, CA BH-8:299.7 (minutesMch) tletermine BH-8: Clayey Santl/Clay/Santl =0.2 (inctMaur) percolation rate) &1: Sill with Sand B-2: Silt with Santl City of Santa 72344th Street antl 1431 2ntl BJ: Silt with Clay antl Santl Monica Parking Street N/A 8 6-4: Silt antl Santl Structures #1 antl Santa Monica CA B-5: Santly Silt with Clay #6 , B-6: Sandy Silt &7: Santly Silt B-8: Santl Silt &1: Sill with Sand B-2: Silt with Santl Proposetl Police, B-3: Silt with Clay and Sand Fire and Emergen Olympic Drive & Fourth Street N/A B B-4: Silt antl Santl Operations Center Santa Monica, CA B-5: Santly Silt with Clay B-6: Santly Silt 6-7: Santly Silt B-8: Santl Silt City of Santa Monica City Hall 7685 Main Street N/A 5 B-i - B-5: Lean Clay Seismic RetroR Santa Monica, CA B-1: Santly Sill B-2: Silty Sand Prior Ground Motio B-3: Silty Clay Study for City of 1686 Main Street WA 9 B-0: Silty Ciay Santa Monies City Santa Monica, CA B-5: Silty Clay/Silty Santl Hall B-6: Silty Santl B-7: Silty Clay/Silty Santl B-B: SiI Cla /Sit Santl Bicknell Avenue Bicknell Avenue blw Main Street Greening SVeet and Ocean Ave 0.25 (inch/hour) 4 B-1 - B-0: Santly Clay/Clayey Santl Santa Monies, CA Pier Stonn Drain 1550 Parking Lot N/A 7 B-1 - &7: Santl (loose to metlium Im rovemen[ Santa Monica, CA tlense Beach Greening 2030 Barnard Way Santa Monica CA 60 (inch hour) 5 B-i - B-5: Silty Sand Colorado Ocean Colorado Avenue8Ocean B-1 - B-11: Unclass~etl m'u of soils, Relief Sewer Ave, Santa Monies, CA N/A 11 inclutling dense clayey sand, firm to ' still cla ,and silt ~® City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program ••°~°^°^^' 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 APPENDIX G: Pico-Kenter Trash BMPs Conceptual Level Cost Opinions for Alternatives 2 and 3 Pico-Kenter Trash BMP -Alternative 2, End of Pipe No Phasing Conceptual Level Preliminary Construction Costs Earthwork & Dewatering $1,192,500 Hydrodynamic Separators (CDS®or equivalent), Diversion Structures and Piping $2,351,000 Sewer Diversion Capability at Pico-Kenter PS & Improvements to Dry Weather Diversion $120,800 Subtotal 1, Direct Construction Costs $3,664,300 Mobilization (5%) $183,215 Permits (5%) $183,215 Allowances (5%) $183,215 Subtotal 2 $4,213,945 Estimating Contingency (25%) $1,053,486 Subtotal 3 $5,267,431 Escalation (1 yr, 3%) $158,023 Subtotal 4 $5,425,454 Construction Contin enc 10% $542,545 Construction Cost Total $5,968,000 Conceptual Level Preliminary Total Project Costs Construction Costs $5,968,000 Design (10% of Construction Costs) $597,000 Construction Mana ement (10% of Construction Costs $597,000 Total Pro ect Costs $7,162,000 Pico-Kenter Trash BMP -Alternative 3, End of Pipe Phasing Conceptual Level Preliminary Construction Costs Phase 1, FY2010-11 (One unit installed at the northwest side of the P-K Outlet) Phase 2, FY2012-13 (Another unit installed at the southeast side of the P-K Outlet) Phase 3, FY2014-15 (Three additional units installed at the northwest side of the P-K Outlet) $2,933,000 $1,806,000 $2,742,000 Construction Cost Total $7,481,000 Conceptual Level Preliminary Total Project Costs Construction Costs (Total of All Phases) Design (15% of Construction Costs -Total of All Phases) Total Phase 1 Project Cost (with Design and Construction Management) _ Total Phase 2 Project Cost (with Design and Construction Management) _ Total Phase 3 Project Cost (with Design and Construction Management) _ $7,481,000 $1,123,000 $3,813,000 $2,348,000 $3,586,000 Pico-Kenter Trash BMP -Alternative 3, Phase 1 (FY 2010-11) Conceptual Level Preliminary Construction Costs Design;ltems ~.~ ~, ,Total Cost Earthwork & Dewatering $462,500 Hydrodynamic Separators (CDSO or equivalent), Diversion Structures and Piping $1,217,000 Sewer Diversion Capability at Pico-Kenter PS & Improvements to Dry Weather Diversion $120,800 Subtotal 1, Direct Construction Costs $1,800,300 Mobilization (5%) $90,015 Permits (5%) $90,015 Allowances (5%) $90,015 Subtotal 2 $2,070,345 Estimating Contingency (25%) $517,586 Subtotal 3 $2,587,931 Escalation (1 yr, 3%) $77,638 Subtotal 4 $2,665,569 Construction Contin enc 10% $266,557 Construction Cost Total $2,933,000 Conceptual Level Preliminary Total Protect Costs Construction Costs $2,933,000 Design (15% of Construction Costs) $440,000 Construction Mana ement 15% of Construction Costs $440,000 Total Pro'ect Costs $3,813,000 Pico-Kenter Trash BMP -Alternative 3, Phase 2 (FY2012-13) Conceptual Level Preliminary Construction Costs m• Earthwork & Dewatering $438,000 Hydrodynamic Separators (CDSB or equivalent), Diversion Structures and Piping $606,900 Subtotal 1, Direct Construction Costs $1,044,900 Mobilization (5%) $52,245 Permits (5%) $52,245 Allowances (5%) $52,245 Subtotal2 $1,201,635 Estimating Contingency (25%) ~ - $300,409 Subtotal3 $1,502,044 Escalation (3 yr, 3%) $139,280 Subtotal 4 $1,641,324 Construction Contin enc 10% $164,132 Construction Cost Total $1,806,000 Conceptual Level Preliminary Total Protect Costs Construction Costs $1,806,000 Design (15 % of Construction Costs) $271,000 Construction Mana ement 15%of Construction Costs $271,000 Total Pro ect Costs $2,348,000 Pico-Kenter Trash BMP -Alternative 3, Phase 3 (FY2014-15) Conceptual Level Preliminary Construction Costs ~• Earthwork & Dewatering $952,500 Hydrodynamic Separators (CDS®or equivalent), Diversion Structures and Piping $543,000 Subtotal 1, Direct Construction Costs $1,495,500 Mobilization (5%) $74,775 Permits (5%) $7q~775 Allowances (5%) $7q~775 Subtotal 2 $1,719,825 Estimating Contingency (25 %) $429,956 Subiotal3 $2,149,781 Escalation (5 yr; 3%) $342,404 Subtotal4 $2,492,106 Construction Contin enc 10% $249,219 Construction Cost Total $2,742,000 Conceptual Level Preliminary Total Protect Costs Cost Items - Total Cost Construction Costs $2,742,000 Design (15 % of Construction Costs) $412,000 Construction Mana ement 15% of Construction Costs $412,000 Total Pro'ect Costs $3,566,000 ~.~ City of Santa Monica B&V Project: 162324 Measure V Program ••~°^°°•` 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan December 2009 APPENDIX FI: Approximate Treated Areas and Reduction of Urban Runoff & Estimated Costs per Drainage Area Treated Approximate Treated Areas and Reduction of Urban Runoff Resulting from Measure V 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan Approximately i1 acres of pervious concrete center Swale will be installed in the Syear period, as proposed in City's alley replacement program. Damage area is Permeable SUrtace Alleys 11 04 based on 20.feet wide alley and 2-feet wide Swale. AlNOUgM1 potential infiltration will require further evaluation, 20%of a 3/flinch storm over the drainage - area is assumed m be Ne volume retludion. 10 reinfali events peryear is assumed. Approximately 1.1 acres of pervious concrete center Swale will be installed in the 6-year period, as proposetll~ in City's street improvement program. Drainage area treated assumed to be approximately 20 times the area Permeable Surface Street Gutters/Intersections 22 0.9 of installed pervious wncrea{e street gunerslntersedions. Although potential infiltration will require further evaluation, 20% of a 3l4-inch storm over the drainage area is assumed to be the volume retludion. 10 rainfall events per year is assumed. Approximately 4.9 acres of drainage area will be irealetl with parkway/sidewalk biofilters to be installed Miniature Parkway/Sidewalk Biofilters 4,9 02 in Ne Syear penoU. AItM1OUgh potential infiltration will require Nrther evaluation, 20%of a 3l4-incM1 storm over the drainage area is assumed to be iM1e volume retlucGOn. 10 rainfall events per year is assumed. Appmximately 1] aces of drainage area will be irealetl with miniature parkway/sidewalk biofilters to be Street Curb Extensions or BUlbouls 1] O8 installed in the Syear period. Atotal of5systems with a 15,000.gallon cistern per system is assumed It is assumed that each cistem will be flletl by the captured mnoff IDfimes er ear Drainage area treated based on the approximate surface area of Ocean Park Blvtl. between Neilson and Green Streets 3.5 0.1 L'nccin. Alhough potential infiltration will require ruble evaluation,20%of a 3/4-inch Storm over the drainage areais assumed to be the volume reduction 10 rainfall events per year is assumed. Approximately 4.2 acres of porous aspM1alt will be installed in the Syear petloq as proposed in City's Permeable Burtace Parking LMS 42 02 facility program. AlNOUgM1 potential infiltration will require further evaluation, 20%of a 3/4-inch storm over the dreinage areais assumed to be iM1e volume reduction 10 rainfall events per year is assumed. Park Retrofits -Ozone Park NA 0.2 Only a small portion of eacM1 storm event will be diverted for harvesting (i.e. not all of the flow hom the -Marine Park NA 12 upstream drainage area will be treated). The volume o harvested runoff is based on 2 weeks of storage between storm events during wet weather (October- -Memorial Park NA 26 MarcM1). Deep Infiltration In-Line Storm Drain Pilot Project NA NA Pending results of pilot test. Some retlucGOn Drainage area irealetl based on prorated share of g1M Payment on J-2/J-3 Agraementwiiit Ciry of LA. 5] anticipated MmugM1 (City of Santa MOnicas share included as part ofS proposed future water Year CIP) for the total cost of $66M to treat 4,920 acres harvesting projects as shmm in ExhibitC of DraftMOA for J2/J3. Drainage area treated based on promied share of 264 Tresh BMPS 1034 NA catch basin insertsMlters of atotal of 1,164 catch basin inseris/filters within Kenier Canyon, Pico-Calirans Basin, and Pico4ih Street Basins. Downspout (DS) Redirect Program NA NA Part of project category No. 12 or 13 below. Drainage area heated based on 1,000 sf of root area Rain Barzel Program 14 08 harvested by eacM1 rain barrel. The volume of harvested water based on a 12Sgallen bane) filled 10 times per yeas $100 rebate per rain barrel assumed. Drainage area Ireatetl based on 2,000 sf of roof area Cisiem Program 46 50 harvested by each cistem. Thevolumeof harvested water based on a 500.gallon cistem filled 10 times per year. $250 rebate per cistem assumed. Appmximately 10.5 MG will be M1arvestetl and used for Total 1,t98 12.3 i mgation. Approximately l.9 MG will be reduced by i nfiltration. Project Cost Per Drainage Area Treated Measure V 5-Year Capital Improvement Plan Approximately 1.7 acres of pervious concete center Swale will be installed in the 5-year pedotl, as ',, Permeable Surface Alleys $367,907 11 $34,600 proposed in City's alley replacement program. ~' Drainage area is based on 20.feel witle alley and 2- feetwide Swale. Appmximalely 1.7 aces of pervious concrete center Swale will be installetl in the &year period, as Permeable Surtace Street Guders/Intersections $367,907 22 $16,700 proposed in City's street improvement program. Drainage area treatetl assumetl to be approximatery 20 times the area of installed pervious wnaeate street guttersfintersections. Approximately 4.9 acres of drainage area vnll be Miniature Parkway/sitlewalk Bimfilters $423,61 4.9 $86,500 treatetl with parkway/sitlewalk bioflters to be installetl in the 5-year pertad. Approximatety 1.7 acres of drainage area will be Street Curb Extensions $462,405 1.7 $272,000 treatetl with miniature parkway/sitlewalk bioglters to be installed in the 5-year periotl. Drainage area Veatetl basetl on the approximate Green Streets $1,065,365 3.5 $304,400 Surtace area of Ocean Park Blvtl. between Neilson and Linmin. Approximately 4.2 acres of porous asphalt will be Permeable Surtace Paddng Lots $276,439 4.2 $51,400 installetl in the 5-year pedotl, as proposetl in City's facility program. Park Retrofls - Ozone Park NA NA NA Only a small portion of each storm event will be diverted for harvesting (i.e. not all of the slow from the -Marne Park NA NA NA Upstream drainage area will be Veatetl). Cost per volume harvestetl was tlevelopetl instead(see -Memorial Park NA NA NA Appentlix E). Dee Infiltration In-Line Storm Drain Pilot Pra ect NA NA NA Pentlin results of pilot test. Drainage area treatetl basetl on prorated share of $1 M (City of Santa Monica's share inclutletl as part of Payment on J-2/J-3 Agreement with City of L.A. $1,100,122 57 $19,200 5-Near ClP Plan)for the total cost of $86M to Veat 4,920 aces as shown in PxhibitC of Draft MOA for J2/J3. Drainage area Veatetl basetl on prorated share of 28 Trash BMPS $4,045,925 1,034 $3,900 catch basin insertsKlters of a total of 1,164 catch basin inserts/filters within Kenter Canyon, Pico- Caltrans Basin, antl Pico-0th Street Basins. Downspout (DS) Retlirect Program NA NA NA Part of project category No. 12 or 13 below. Drainage area Veatetl basetl on 1,000 sf of roof area Rain Barrel Program $76,507 14 $5,600 harvested by each rain barrel. $100 rebate per rain barel assumetl. Drainage area Veated basetl on 2,000 sf of roof area Cistern Program $318,778 46 $6,900 harvested by each cistem. $250 rebate per cistem Attachment B Citizen's Oversieht Committee Mark Gold, Chair Susan Bracey, Vice Chair Reza Iranpour Vanessa Meier Mark Peacor Bicknell Street Greening Project 1.0 Budget Report ............................................... 3 2.0 Financial Projection (5 Year Plan) .............. 7 3.0 Status Report ............................................... 8 2 of 9 Prepared by the Civil Engineering Division Table of Contents Cluarteriv Reaort -Sep 30.2009 Quarterly Report -Sep 30.2009 ~.~ ~ •~~~ Land Acquisition $0 .00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 Project Management $0 .00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 Preliminary Design $34,000 .00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 Design $106,000 .00 $0. 00 $0. 00 $0. 00 Design -Constr. Admin. $52,000 .00 $52,000. 00 $6,000. 00 $6,000. 00 ConstruMion Cost $538,477. 00 $88,477. 00 $0. 00 $3,528. 00 Construction Management $0. 00 $159,523. 00 $0. 00 $7,097. 34 Total $730.477.00 5300.000. 00 56.000. 00 516.625. 34 Measure V Fund Allocation by Phase ® Land Acquisition ® Project Management ~ Preliminary Design ® Design ~ Design -Constr. Admin. ~ Construction Cost Construction Management PierStorm brain(C069010.589000 & 0069010.589110) Administrative Expenses $397,952.00 $27,287.32 $3,259.52 $94,839.84 Project Management $440,000.00 $440,000.00 $99,706.37 $382,002.93 Preliminary Design $69,340.00 $69,340.00 $0.00 $68,909.76 Design $350,000.00 $350,000.00 $41,956.61 $189,962.24 Construction -Environmental $72,692.00 $72,692.00 $0.00 $48,372.50 Construction Cost $1,126,444.00 $1,126,444.00 $572,980.40 $947,075.40 Construction Management $143,572.00 $143,572.00 $101,344.84 $120,624.64 Total $2,600,000.00 $2,229,335.32 $819,247.74 $1,851,787.31 Measure V Fund Allocation by Phase $143,572.00 $1,126,444.00 ®Administrative Expenses ® Project Management ~ Preliminary Design ~ Design ~ Construction -Environmental ~ Construction Cost ~ Construction Management Prepared by the Civil Engineering Division Land Acquisition $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Project Management $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Preliminary Design $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Design $0.00 -$0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Design -Constr. Admin. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction Cost $107,758.00 $107,758.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction Management $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total $107,758.00 $107,758.00 $0.00 $0.00 Measure V Fund Allocation by Phase ~ Land Acquisition $107,758.00 ®Project Management - ~ Preliminary Design ® Design ~ Design -Constr. Admin. ~ Construction Cost Construction Management 'Ocean Park Boulevard Street Greening Land Acquisition $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Project Management $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Preliminary Design $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Design $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Design -Constr. Admin. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction Cost $5,500,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction Management $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Measure V Fund Allocation by Phase ~ Land Acquisition ® Project Management ~ Preliminary Design ®Design ~ Design -Constr. Admin. ~ Construction Cost Construction Management 4 of 9 Prepared by the Civil Engineering Division Land Acquisition $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Project Management $0.00 $0.00 $0:00 $0.00 Preliminary Design $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Design $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Design -Constr. Admin. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction Cost $666,0OO.Ofl $566,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction Management $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total 5566.000.00 Measure V Fund Allocation by Phase ® LandACquisition e Project Management Preliminary Design ® Design ® Design -Constr. Admin. ~ Construction Cost Construction Management Expenses $7,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Consultants $503,000.00 $503,000.00 $49,360.94 $343,676.70 Staff $163,000.00 $41,000.00 $41,000.00 $41,000.00 Total $673,000.00 $544,000.00 $90,360.94 $384,676.70 General Administration Expenses $41,000.00 ~ Expenses ~ Consultants Staff 5 of 9 Prepared by the Civil Engineering Division $503,000.00 Measure V Funds Collected thru Sep. 30, 2009 $5,266,009.00 Measure V Funds Allocated thru Sep. 30, 2009 $3,747,093.32 $915,608.68 $2,253,089.35 Measure V Funds Available $1,518,915.68 Measure V fund Status $1,s18,91 $3,747;093.32 Measure V Funds Allocated thru Sep. 30, 2009 Measure V Funds Available 6 of 9 Prepared by the Civil Engineering Division Section 1.0 - Bud>?et Summary Quarterly Report -Sep 30, 2009 1• 1 1 . STARTING $ 1,518,915.68 $ 4,018,915.68 $ 3,057,451.68 $ 2,500,719.68 $ 882,352.68 $ 1,630,874.68 BALANCE REVENUE $ 2,500,000.00 $ 2,500,000.00 $ 2,500,000.00 $ 2,500,000.00 $ 2,500,000.00 $ 2,500,000.00 S YEAR PLAN $ _ $ (3,461,464.00) $ (3,056,732.00) $ (4,118,367.00) $ (1,751,478.00) $ (1,288,895.00 EXPENDITURE ) YEAR END $ 4,018,915.68 $ 3,057,451.65 $ 2,500,719.68 $ 882,352.68 $ 1,630,874.68 $ 2,841,979.68 BALANCE $4.5 $4.0 o $3.5 Ei $3.0 ti ~ $2.5 z g $2.0 o $1.5 LL $1.0 $0.5 $- Fund Balance Projection (5 Year Plan) t~ ~~ FISCAL YEAR ~ YEAR END BALANCE 7 of 9 Prepared by the Civil Engineering Division FY09-10 FY10-11 FY11-12 FY12-13 FY13-14 FY14-15 Section 3.0 - Project Status Project Manager: Jessica Arden Project Manager: Jessica Arden Tel. No: (310) 458-8727 8of9 Quarterly Report -Sep 30. 2009 Prepared by the Civil Engineering Division Tel. No: (310) 458-8727 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Section 3.0 - Project Status Quarterly Report -Sep 30, 2009 • Designer: Not Applicable Improve Pier water quality through DESIGN 0% installation of bird deterrent strategies -no design is required such as ultrasonic/sonic devices, Contractor: Bird Busters contraceptive feeding, spikes and netting CONSTRUCTION 75y - is in progress. Sonic devices and Project Manager: Randy Little spikes have been installed. Ovocontrol is in progress. Coastal Commission approval for bird netting Tel. No: (310) 458-2201 ext. is pending. 6980 COaSta DDmmi$$ion PermC- Wa5155ned CONSTRUCTION on 11/9/09 DESIGN 0% 10% 20% 30% 40Yo 60% 60% 70Y 80Y 90% 300Y ~ :• r Designer: Urban Studio Streetscape improvement project that Conceptual Design 75% provides opportunity for street greening -Ig in progress. and stormwater runoff harvesting. Contractor: Project Manager: Peter James Tel. No: (310) 458-2201 ext. 5292 Design pq Construction 0% Planning Staff is searching for addi' funding to supplement Measure V Construction Design Conceptual Design 0% lOYo 209 30Y 40% 60% 60% 70% SOYo 90% 100% 9of9 Prepared by the Civil Engineering Division