The URL can be used to link to this page

sr-120809-6aCity Council Meeting: December 8, 2009 Agenda Item: To: Mayor and City Council From: Eileen P. Fogarty, Director of Planning and Community Development Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Variance for The Parlor restaurant located at 1519 Wilshire Boulevard Recommended Action Staff recommends the City Council deny appeal 09APP-012 and uphold the Planning Commission's approval of Conditional Use Permit 08-015 and Variance 08-021 for The Parlor restaurant located at 1519 Wilshire Boulevard based on the draft findings and conditions contained in this staff report. Executive Summary In 2007, the owner of The Parlor restaurant applied for an Alcohol Determination (AD) and business license as the operator of a new two-floor alcohol serving restaurant at the site of a former restaurant operation. The former restaurant, Cinch, had been in operation for approximately 25 years. It was authorized as a 135-seat restaurant through the approval of a parking variance for off-site parking for a prior restaurant (there is no available on-site parking). Project plans from that time indicate that only the first floor of the two story building was to be used for the restaurant. The parking variance was approved for a limited 5-year term only. No Conditional Use Permit was required at that time for an alcohol serving restaurant. During the staff review of the 2007 AD application, it was determined that the variance for off-street parking for the restaurant had expired and there were no City approvals for restaurant use of the existing second floor. The applicant, therefore, requested a CUP to allow alcohol service in a restaurant with more than 50 seats and to allow the restaurant to expand to a total of 225 seats, including the use of the second floor. SMMC Section 9.04.08.40.040(a) requires a CUP for restaurants with more than 50 seats in the Neighborhood Overlay District and Section 9.04.10.18.020 requires existing alcohol outlets to obtain a CUP if there is a 10% or more floor area in the establishment or an increase of 25% or more in the number of seats in any restaurant serving alcoholic beverages. The proposed project represents a 28% expansion in floor area and a 67% increase in the number of seats. A Variance was also requested to reinstate the expired parking variance. On September 16, 2009, the Planning Commission approved, in part, the Conditional Use Permit and Variance with conditions. On September 30, .2009, the property owner of the subject property filed an appeal of the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission in its approval Background The original planning entitlement for a restaurant operation at this location dates back to the early 1980s. City business license records indicate that the project site has been a restaurant from 1981 to the present, operating as Verdi's, then Cinch, and currently as The Parlor The Planning Commission approved a parking variance (ZA #4321-y), on appeal, for Verdi's in December 1980, with a 5-year limited term and specific conditions. of approval. Plans from that time indicate that only the first floor of the'subject building was proposed for a restaurant with 135 seats. The original entitlement did not require a Conditional Use Permit for the restaurant or alcohol service. Since the original entitlements, the parking variance expired and the restaurant use has expanded to the second floor with an increased number of seats without City approvals, requiring the proposed CUP and parking variance. The Parlor proposes to operate between 11:30am and 2:OOam daily within the same dining areas (both first and second floors) and with the same number of seats (225) as the previous restaurant operation, Cinch, which began in February 1982. However; there are no records to show that the second floor was ever lawfully approved for restaurant use, and there are no building permit records for restaurant improvements to the second floor space. The applicant and owner of the property have been asked for any records or evidence to support their contention that the second floor has been lawfully permitted for restaurant use. To date, no information has been provided by either party. The originally approved restaurant, Verdi, was approximately 3,833 square feet with 135 seats on the first floor. The Parlor occupies the majority of the building consisting of 3,169 square feet of dining area with 225 seats (189 dining and 36 bar seats) and 1,768 square feet of kitchen, restrooms, and storage area (Attachment D). -2- Discussion Project Description As noted above, The Parlor occupies the majority of the building consisting of 3,169 square feet of dining area with 225 seats (189 dining and 36 bar seats) and 1,768 square feet of kitchen, restrooms, and storage area. The restaurant operator wishes to continue their current operation. The Parlor'roperates as asports-themed restaurant. As such, patrons come to The Parlor to watch televised sporting events throughout the year and play sports-themed amusement and video games. According to the restaurant's website, the establishment features over 50 televisions to screen sporting events, offers daily Happy Hours from 4:00 pm to 8:00 pm with reduced prices for alcoholic beverages and, while the restaurant typically opens at 11:30 am, it may open early on a "big game" day. In addition, The Parlor advertises "Beer Pong Tournaments" which are held every Wednesday night with cash prizes. During this time sit down meal service is curtailed.. Later in the evenings, amplified music is played within the restaurant after the sports day concludes. There is no dance floor, however, patrons identifications are checked. Although-food is offered and served at all hours the restaurant is open, food sales are not a significant component of the restaurant operation later in the evenings. -3- ~97"~ ~ _.. 3~ gZt`t~"~. Second floor plan Project Analysis The Parlor operation is fundamentally different than that of the previous restaurant Cinch,- which was a more traditional restaurant. Nearby residential neighbors have reported repeated problems of noise from The Parlor operation and with the behavior of patrons leaving the premises, including excessive late night noise, profanities, drunkenness, urination, trash, and vandalism. Patron parking and vehicle traffic in the neighborhood have also been cited as problems. There is no available on-site parking, hence the need for the original parking variance for off-site parking for Verdi restaurant and the request by The Parlor operators to re-instate the off-site parking variance. Although the operator of The Parlor provides security outside the restaurant, the neighbors reported at the Planning Commission hearing that the security is not effective in stemming these problems. Planning Commission Action On September 16, 2009, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing for the proposed project. During the public testimony and in written correspondence, the Commission heard extensively of the problems noted above. As indicated in the September 16, 2009 meeting minutes and as reflected in the Statement of Official -4- Action, the Commission found the adverse impacts of The Parlor's operation on the adjacent neighbors compelling. More specifically, in light of the substantial evidence regarding the adverse impacts from the expanded restaurant's operation, including excessive noise associated with the establishment, unruly behavior of patrons leaving the restaurant and parking and traffic issues, the Planning Commission found that the subject application fora 225 seat restaurant with operating hours from 11:30am to 2:OOam daily, valet parking available only between 5:OOpm and closing daily, and numerous video games and amusements in the establishment would not be compatible with the uses in the general area and would be detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. However, the Commission was also reticent about closing down an existing, albeit unpermitted, business. To address these undesirable late night activities and parking and traffic impacts, the Planning Commission adopted a series of conditions of approval related to restaurant operation, including: • Limiting the total number of seats to 135; • Limiting the hours of operation to 11:OOam to 11:OOpm Monday through Thursday, 11:OOam to 12:OOam Friday and Saturday and 11:OOam to 10:OOpm Sundays; • Limiting the number of video games to a maximum of three; • Requiring a minimum of six security personnel on-site from 9:OOpm to closing; • Requiring valet parking during all operating hours and limiting the valet parking fee to a maximum of $2.00 per vehicle; and • Requiring the applicant to submit to the City within 90-days of approval a report which outlines the restaurant's compliance with the conditions of approval to be forwarded for Commission review and consideration at a noticed public hearing where the Commission may re-evaluate the conditions of approval. In imposing the above conditions, the Commission concluded that restricting the number of seats, limiting hours of late night operation and requiring a minimum of six on-site security personnel would address the negative neighborhood impacts. More specifically, the intent was to reduce the overall number of patrons on-site and, with -5- additional security personnel present, more effectively control patron behavior. The Commission also limited the valet parking fee to encourage more patrons to utilize the service as it would result in patrons entering The Parlor at the Wilshire Blvd. entrance rather than circulating through the neighborhood in their vehicles in search of street parking or parking in the City's metered lot on 16th Street. Further, this could control late night noise impacts when patrons leave the premises as patrons would remain at the Wilshire Blvd. entrance waiting for their vehicle rather than walk through the neighborhood at a time when residents are most sensitive to noise, creating disruptions from talking, closing car doors, car alarms, and beepers, or other behavior. As proposed, the valet service would park patron vehicles at an off-street parking structure located at 16th Street and Arizona Avenue. Therefore, the valet route, which is subject to City approval, would not circulate through the adjacent residential neighborhood. Finally, the Commission required that the applicant. submit a compliance report within 90-days that outlined the restaurant's compliance with the CUP and Variance conditions. The report would then be agendized and discussed by the Commission at a noticed public hearing. The Commission could subsequently re-consider and amend the conditions of approval if warranted. Appeal Analysis Appeal Summary John Makhani, the owner of the restaurant property, filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission's action on September 30, 2009 (Attachment A). The appeal statement centers on the limited hours of operation (11:OOam to 11:OOpm Sunday through Thursday and 11:OOam to 12:OOam Friday and Saturday) and the limitation of a total of 135 seats. The appeal statement also indicates that, since the Statement of Official Action (STOA) was not available during the 14-day appeal period, there may be other issues related to the conditions of approval that may become evident to the appellant once the STOA is reviewed and adopted by the Commission on October 21, 2009. At the time of preparation of this staff report; no other issues have been raised by the appellant. -6- Appeal Issues Hours of Operation and Maximum Number of Seats The Parlor requested hours of operation which allowed for restaurant operation and alcohol service between the hours of 11:30am to 2:OOam daily. Based on testimony at the public hearing and written correspondence from nearby residential neighbors, the Commission approved hours of operation that called for restaurant closure at 11:OOpm Sunday through Thursday nights and 12:OOam Friday and Saturday nights. The appellant indicates that these limited hours deprive the restaurant operator of some of the most valuable and desirable operating hours and that such a punitive condition is not supported by the record and is unnecessary. The Parlor also requested a maximum of 225 seats within the restaurant. The appellant contends that the reduction to 135 seats does not allow for a reasonable patron limit to ensure a successful business operation and would result in an underutilization of valuable commercial floor area. The appellant also believes that Condition #13, which calls for the removal of building openings on the second floor, will mitigate the adverse noise impacts from the establishment. As indicated in the meeting minutes and previously discussed in .this report, the Planning Commission received extensive evidence and conducted substantial deliberations following the public hearing on this project. In light of the evidentiary record regarding the adverse impacts on the neighborhood from the expanded restaurant's operation, including excessive noise associated with the establishment, unruly behavior of patrons leaving the restaurant and parking and traffic issues, the Planning Commission found that the originally proposed restaurant would impair the integrity and character of the district as proposed by the applicant with 225 seats, operating hours from 11:30 am to 2:00 am daily, valet parking available only between 5:00 pm and closing daily, and the inclusion of numerous video games and amusements in the establishment. To address these undesirable late night activities, and parking and traffic impacts, the Planning Commission imposed conditions of approval that maintained the number of allowable seats to a maximum of 135 rather -7- than authorize an expansion in seating for a restaurant lacking any on-site parking and with a history of neighborhood complaints regarding the operation and required that the establishment close at 11:OOpm during week nights and 12:OOam weekend nights. Additionally, the Commission required valet parking services be available during all hours of restaurant operation. Due to the Commission's interest in ensuring that the business complies with the operating conditions, Condition #39 of the CUP approval requires a compliance report be submitted to the City by the applicant within 90-days of the approval. The Planning Commission would review the compliance report at a noticed public hearing and may subsequently re-evaluate the conditions of approval following the hearing, including the allowable number of seats within the restaurant and the hours of operation. Staff believes the number of seats and hours of operation authorized by the Planning Commission are justified and appropriate given the evidence provided at the hearing. This was not a punitive measure imposed by the Commission but an appropriate response to the evidence of the restaurant's operation and impacts. The Planning Commission determined these conditions were necessary for the Commission to approve the CUP and Variance. As noted above, Condition #39 requires the restaurant to comply with operating conditions aimed at reducing these adverse impacts and report back to the City after a 90-day period after which the Commission may re-evaluate the conditions of approval if warranted at a noticed public hearing. Environmental Analysis The proposed project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1), Existing Facilities, of the State Implementation Guidelines in that the project involves the permitting of a second floor space, within an existing building, for restaurant use with no increase in floor area to the building. Public Outreach Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 9.04.20.22.050, notice of the public hearing was -8- mailed to all owners and residential and commercial tenants of property located within a (500 foot) radius of the project and published in the Santa Monica Daily Press at least ten consecutive calendar days prior to the hearing. Financial Impacts & Budget Actions The proposed project has minor impacts on City revenues received from sales tax receipts associated with the restaurant operations. Prepared by: Paul Foley, Principal Planner Approved: Eileeri P, Fogarty Director, Planning Development Attachments and Community Forwarded to Council: P. A. Appellant's Appeal Statement B. Draft City Council Findings and Conditions C. Correspondence received since the September 16, 2009. Planning Commission hearing D. Restaurant floor plans E. City permit records -9- ATTACHMENT A Appellant's Appeal Statement Electronic version of attachment is not available for review. Document is available for review at the City Clerk's Office and the Libraries. -10- sty of Santa ~OBonica . Planning and Community Development Department City Planning Division (310) 458-8341 R~PPEAL.~ POI2IVI (Please Type or Print all fnfarmation) A plic ti Number ~~~~~ ~~ z Filed:~I•~O-D~ By: APPELLANT NAME: 1s19 Wilshire Blvd LP APPELLANT ADDRESS: zz16o Ventura Blvd, woodland xills, CA 91364 CONTACT PERSON: John Maxhani Phone: ale-~o4-1sz1 (all correspondence will be mailed to this address) Address: aa16o Ventura Blvd, Woodland Hills, CA 91364 PROJECT CASE NUMBER(S) : oacuPOls & oevaxozl PROJECT ADDRESS: 1519 Wilshire Blvd, Santa Monica, CA 90403 APPLICANT: 1s19 Wilshire Blvd LP ORIGINAL NEARING DATE: September 16, zoo9 ACTION BEING APPEALED: conditions of. approved oases: oaccrPOls ~ oev2uzozl Please state the specific reason{s} for the appea! {use separate sheet i# necessary}; Is the appeal retated to the.discrefionary action and findings issued for the proposed project? x Yes _ No If yes, explain: Is the appea! related to the conditions of approval? ~-- Yes ,_ No If yes, which conditions and why: Is the appeal related to design issues? _ Yes x No If yes, explain: !s the appeal related to compatibility issues-such as building height, massing, pedestrian I orientation, etc.? ,Yes _ ~ No If yes, explairo: Is the appeal related to non-compliance with the Santa Monica Municipal Code?_ yes x No If ves, which Code section{s) does the project not comply with and why: appeal related to environmental impacts associated with the projeet? _ Yes ~__._ it yes, explain: !s the appeal related to other issues? ~ Yes _ ~_ Nb If yes, explain: Please see attached APPELLANT SQGNd~,Tt1RE: NOTE: A hearing date on the appeal will not be s eduled unfit sufficient information regarding_the basis for the appeal has be received to enable City Plahning Division staff to prepare the required analysis for the staff report. 08CUP-015 September 29, 2009 08VAR-021 Appeal of City Plannine Commission Decision The appeal is related to the discretionary action and f"mdangs issued for the proposed project. This appeal addresses the discretionary action of the City Planning Commission in its detemsination to limit the number of patrons to 135, rather than the 225 patrons recommended by City Planning Department staff and to unduly limit the hours of operation from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday, 11:00 a.m. to-12:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday and 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Sundays, rather than from 11:00 a.m: to 1:00 a.m. Monday through Thursday, 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 am. Friday and Saturday and 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. Sundays as recommended by City Planning Department staff. The existing two-story building was originally used as a mortuary. In or about 1981, the building was converted to a restaurant. The current owner of the property purchased the property and operated a restaurant continuouslyfrom 1995 to 2007 when a new restaurateur began operating the current business. Both the fast and second floors of the building have been used continuously and simultaneously as combined parts of the restaurant business since the current owner purchased the property in 1995. As such, the building has a safe capacity well above 135 patrons. The City Planning Commission conditioned its action by requiring a review after 90 days in order to decide whether additional patrons (above 135) should be allowed. It would be far more useful in detel~+~r'~ng the appropriate number of patrons to allow the requested 225 patrons during a review period and decide whether this number should be adjusted at the end of the review period. The Conditional Use application was filed at the instruction of City staff after the current operator filed for a new business license and it was discovered that the parking variance had expired. But for this lapse in the City's parking variance, no Alcohol Determination would have been required and no new Conditional Use would have been required. It is noteworthy that this matter did not come before the City Planning Commission due to any complaints. Rather, the matter came before the City Planning Commission purely as an administrative "cleanup" item. The appeal is related to the conditions of approval. This appeal is related to the condition limiting the number of patrons to 135. The matter was not brought before the City Planning Commission as a result of complaints in the neighborhood and the property owner and restaurateur support the recommendations of the City Planning staff and agree to abide by all the staff recommended conditions. Ivlaintaining a reasonable patron limit is absolutely essential to the successful operation of the business. Closing the opening at the second floor to mitigate any noise impacts addresses the concerns raised at the City Planning Commission meeting. Any perceived land use impacts are adequately mitigated with the implementafion of the staffs recommended conditions. Unreasonably limiting the number of patrons that can be served 637615-0v1 08CUP-015 0$VAR-021 September 29, 2009 Page 2 of 2 would have the unintended consequence of greatly under utilizing valuable wmmercial floor area. Using the existing restaurant area at a reasonable level commensurate with its Building Code occupancy capacity allows for the maintenance of a valuable commercial establishment that is a vital element of the surrounding community. This appeal is related to the condition limiting the hours of operation from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday, 11:00 a:m. to 12:00 a.m. Friday and Saturday and 1 L•00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Sundays. These severely limited hours deprive the business of some of the most valuable and desirable operating hours. Imposing such a punitive condition is not supported by substantial evidence in the record and is unnecessary. As stated above, the property owner and restaurateur support the recommendations ofthe City Planning staff and agree to abide by all the staff recommended conditions. The appeal is related to other issues. As of the writing of this appeal, no written decision of the City Planning Commission taken at its meeting of September 16,-2009 was delivered to the property owner. Thus; the property owner is forced to file an appeal based solely on his observations of the City Planning Commission at its September 16, 2009 meeting. As such, we reserve the right to supplement this appeal at such future time as a complete written decision is delivered to the property owner. 647675AV1 ATTACHMENT B Draft City Council Findings and Conditions DRAFT FINDINGS & CONDITIONS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS 1. The proposed use is one conditionally permitted within the subject district and complies with all of the applicable provisions of the "City of Santa Monica Comprehensive Land Use and Zoning Ordinance", in that SMMC Section 9.04.08.40.040 (a) provides that all uses listed as Conditionally Permitted Uses in the C2 or underlying District may be permitted subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit, and Section 9.04.10.18.020_ provides that existing alcohol outlets shall also obtain a Conditional Use Permit if the use undergoes a substantial change in mode or character of operation such as an increase in of more than 10% in floor area or an increase of more than 25% of the number of seats. 2. The proposed use would not impair the integrity and character of the district in which it is to be established or located, in that the Boulevard Commercial (C6) with Neighborhood Overlay (N) district permits restaurants with more than 50 seats pursuant to the approval of a CUP. The proposed restaurant, as conditioned, would be consistent with and complementary to other uses in the area, and the site has been well-established as afood-serving use, operating as a restaurant with alcohol service since 1981. The Santa Monica Municipal Code allows conditions of approval to mitigate potential impacts associated with restaurants of this size. As detailed, conditions of approval have been added to address operational concerns for the amount of alcohol sales, patron oversight via neighborhood patrols, prohibition of cover charges, and a requirement for alcohol service with food service. However, in light of public testimony at the public hearing and the written correspondence regarding the adverse impacts on the neighborhood from the expanded restaurant's operation, including excessive noise associated with the establishment, unruly behavior of patrons leaving the restaurant and parking and traffic issues, the City Council, on appeal, found that the originally proposed restaurant would impair the integrity and character of the district as proposed by the applicant with 225 seats, operating hours from 11:30 am to 2:00 am daily, valet parking available only between 5:00 pm and closing daily, and the inclusion -11- of numerous video games and amusements in the establishment. To address these undesirable late night activities, and parking and traffic impacts, the City Council, on appeal, imposed conditions of approval to address the ongoing neighborhood concerns. Specifically, Condition #2 requires the restaurant to close at 11:00 pm Sunday through Thursday nights and 12:00 am Friday and Saturday nights and Condition #4 limits the total number of seats to 135. Condition #17 requires a minimum of six security personnel on-site between 9:00 pm and closing daily. Condition #23 limits the number of video games and amusements to three. Condition #29 requires valet parking during all restaurant hours of operation and Condition # 39 sets forth a condition that requires the applicant to submit a report to the City addressing compliance with permit conditions within 90-days of permit approval which shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission at a noticed public hearing. 3. The subject parcel is physically suitable for the type of land use being proposed, in that the building was constructed as a two-story structure and has operated as a restaurant since 1981 with no on-site vehicular access or parking. 4. The proposed use is compatible with any of the land uses presently on the subject parcel if the present land uses are to remain, in that the site currently operates as a restaurant with more than 50 seats and that use has been in continuous operation since 1981. However, given the fundamental change in the nature of the restaurant operation from the previous restaurant, conditions of approval further ensure that the restaurant operates in a harmonious manner with the other land uses, by restricting operating hours, regulating trash dumping and delivery hours. 5. The proposed use would be compatible with existing and permissible land uses within the district and the general area in which the proposed use is to be located, in that the Zoning Ordinance conditionally permits restaurants in the neighborhood overlay district. Afull-service restaurant on Wilshire Boulevard is compatible with permitted uses and other existing restaurant and commercial uses in the area. The conditions of approval will ensure that the use operates in a harmonious manner with the adjacent land uses and will not create any alcohol-related problems in the area. However, in light of public testimony at the public hearing and the written correspondence regarding the adverse impacts on the neighborhood from the expanded restaurants operation, including excessive noise associated with the. establishment, unruly behavior of patrons leaving the restaurant and parking and traffic issues, the City: Council, on appeal, found that the originally proposed restaurant would not be compatible with existing and permissible land uses within the district and the general area as proposed by the applicant with 225 seats, operating hours from 11:30 am to 2:00 am daily, valet parking available only between 5:00 pm and closing daily, and the inclusion of numerous video games and amusements in the establishment. To address these undesirable late night -12- activities, and parking and traffic impacts, the City Council, on appeal, imposed conditions of approval to address the ongoing neighborhood concerns. Specifically, Condition #2 requires the restaurant to close at 11:00 pm Sunday through Thursday nights and 12:00 am Friday and Saturday nights and Condition #4 limits the total number of seats to 135. Condition #17 requires a minimum of six security personnel on-site between 9:00 pm and closing daily. Condition #23 limits the number of video games and amusements to three. Condition #29 requires valet parking during all restaurant hours of operation and Condition # 39 sets forth a condition that requires the applicant to submit a report to the City addressing compliance with permit conditions within 90-days of permit approval which shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission at a noticed public hearing. 6. There are adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health and safety, in that in that the site is located in an urbanized area adequately served by existing infrastructure. 7. Public access to the proposed use will be adequate, in that the valet service, as conditioned, will operate auto drop-off and pick-up from Wilshire Boulevard, (an arterial street) and in addition pedestrian access is via Wilshire Boulevard. 8. The physical location or placement of the use on the site is compatible with and relates harmoniously to the surrounding neighborhood, in that in that the restaurant use has been located at the site since 1981. The expansion of the full- service restaurant, as approved under this CUP, will provide a floor plan and operational conditions for the restaurant use which currently do not exist. In .addition, the Land Use Element of the General Plan specifically encourages day and night pedestrian activity along Wilshire Boulevard by establishing uses oriented to walk-in traffic such as restaurants. 9. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, in that Land Use Element Objective 1.6 calls for commercial uses which serve regional, community and local needs along the City's commercial corridors while respecting the adjacent residential neighborhoods. Through the incorporation of the conditions of approval, the project is also consistent with Policy 1.7, which calls for the protection and expansion of uses within the neighborhood commercial areas of the City that provide for the day-to-day shopping and service needs of nearby residents and Land Use Element Policy 1.7.2 which calls for preserving the concentration of ground-level, street-front neighborhood commercial uses on Wilshire Boulevard from 12th to 16th Streets. 10. The proposed use would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare, in that the proposed use, as conditioned, is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and the Land Use Element of the General. Plan, and alcohol specific conditions have been added to mitigate any potential adverse impacts. -13- However, in light of public testimony at the public hearing and the written correspondence regarding the adverse impacts on the neighborhood from the restaurant's operation, including excessive noise associated with the establishment, unruly behavior of patrons leaving the restaurant and parking and traffic issues, the City Council, on appeal, found that the originally proposed restaurant would be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare as proposed by the applicant with 225 seats, operating hours from 11:30 am to 2:00 am daily, valet parking available only between 5:00 pm and closing daily, and the inclusion of numerous video games and amusements in the establishment. To address these undesirable late night activities, and parking and traffic impacts, the City Council, on appeal, imposed conditions of approval to address the ongoing neighborhood concerns. Specifically, Condition #2 requires the restaurant to close at 11:00 pm Sunday through Thursday nights and 12:00 am Friday and Saturday nights and Condition #4 limits the total number of seats to 135. Condition #17 requires a minimum of six security personnel on-site between 9:00 pm and closing daily. Condition #23 limits the number of video games and amusements to three. Condition #29 requires valet parking during all restaurant hours of operation and Condition # 39 sets forth a condition that requires the applicant to submit a report to the City addressing compliance with permit conditions within 90-days of permit approval which shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission at a noticed public hearing. 11. The proposed use conforms precisely to the applicable performance standards contained in Subchapter 9.04.12 and special conditions outlined in Subchapter 9.04.14 of the City of Santa Monica Comprehensive Land Use and Zoning Ordinance, in that a performance standards permit is not required for the proposed use. 12. The proposed use will not result in an over concentration of such uses in the immediate vicinity, in that there are two Type-41 public eating places within a 500-foot radius, which is not considered an over concentration for a commercial corridor such as Wilshire Boulevard. The proposed alcohol license will be for a full-service restaurant which is located in a district that encourages commercial, regional and neighborhood serving uses and activities. The general vicinity is frequented by large numbers of local residents as well as hospital workers, shoppers, and visitors from outside the City: This site has historically operated as a restaurant with more than 50 seats, and it is anticipated that the incorporation of various conditions of approval will minimize impacts and intrusions into any adjacent residential neighborhoods. The proposed use will not contribute to an undue concentration of alcohol outlets in the area in that the proposed the proposed project is an expansion of an existing restaurant with aType-47 alcohol license so no new alcohol licenses results from the project. ALCOHOL OUTLET FINDINGS -14- 1. The proposed use, as conditioned, will not adversely affect the welfare of neighborhood residents in a significant manner in that the existing use has been in operation since 1981 as a restaurant that serves alcoholic beverages. The State Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) .issued a Type 47-alcohol license for the restaurant's change of ownership in 2007. Alcohol sales will be ancillary to the primary restaurant use. Conditions of approval have been added to mitigate potential impacts associated with alcohol consumption. However, in light of public testimony at the public hearing and the written correspondence regarding the adverse impacts on the neighborhood from the restaurant's operation, including excessive noise associated with the establishment, unruly behavior of patrons leaving the restaurant and parking and traffic issues, the City Council, on appeal, found that the originally proposed restaurant would adversely affect the welfare of the neighborhood residents in a significant manner as proposed by the applicant with 225 seats, operating hours from 11:30 am to 2:00 am daily, valet parking available only between 5:00 pm and closing daily, and the inclusion of numerous video games and amusements in the establishment: To address these undesirable late night activities, and parking and traffic impacts, the City Council, on appeal, imposed conditions of approval to address the ongoing neighborhood concerns. Specifically; Condition #2 requires the restaurant to close at 11:00 pm Sunday through Thursday nights and 12:00 am Friday and Saturday nights and Condition #4 limits the total number of seats to 135. Condition #17 requires a minimum of six security personnel on-site between 9:00 pm and closing daily. Condition #23 limits the number of video games and amusements to three. Condition #29 requires valet parking during all restaurant hours of operation and Condition # 39 sets forth a condition that requires the applicant to submit a report to the City addressing compliance with permit conditions within 90-days of permit approval which shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission at a noticed public hearing. 2. The proposed use will not contribute to an undue concentration of alcohol outlets in the area in that the proposed the proposed project is an expansion of an existing restaurant with aType-47 alcohol license so no new alcohol licenses results from the project. 3. The proposed use will not detrimentally affect nearby neighborhoods considering the distance of the alcohol. outlet to residential buildings, churches, schools, hospitals, playgrounds, parks, in that there are no nearby churches, schools, hospitals or playgrounds and the conditions for approval, such as the hours of operation and compliance with the provisions of the Noise Ordinance, will minimize the potential affect on residential uses in the vicinity. The Community and Cultural Services Department has reviewed the project and has indicated no comments or objections to the proposal. However, in light of public testimony at the public hearing and the written correspondence regarding the adverse impacts on the neighborhood from the -15- restaurant's operation, including excessive noise associated with the establishment, unruly behavior of patrons leaving the restaurant and parking-and traffic issues, the City Council, on appeal, found that the proposed restaurant would detrimentally affect nearby neighborhoods considering the distance of the restaurant to residential buildings as proposed by the applicant with 225 seats, operating hours from 11:30 am to 2:00 am daily, valet parking available only between 5:00 pm and closing daily, and the inclusion of numerous video games and amusements in the establishment. To address these undesirable late night activities, and parking and traffic impacts, the City Council, on appeal, imposed conditions of approval to address the ongoing neighborhood concerns. Specifically, Condition #2 requires the restaurant to close at 11:00 pm Sunday through Thursday nights and 12:00 am Friday and Saturday nights and Condition #4 limits the total number of seats to 135. Condition #17 requires a minimum of six security personnel on-site between 9:00 pm and closing daily. Condition #23 limits the number of video games and amusements to three. Condition #29 requires valet parking during all restaurant hours of operation and Condition # 39 sets forth a condition that requires the applicant to submit a report to the City addressing compliance with permit conditions within 90-days of permit approval which shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission at a noticed public hearing. 4. The proposed use is compatible with existing and potential uses within the general area in that the Zoning Ordinance conditionally permits restaurants permitting alcoholic beverages. Afull-service restaurant with ancillary alcohol service on Wilshire Boulevard is compatible with permitted uses and other existing restaurant and commercial uses in the area. To address the fundamental change in the nature of the restaurant operation from the previous restaurant uses, conditions of approval will ensure that the use operates in a harmonious manner with the adjacent land -uses and will not create any alcohol-related problems in the area. 5. Traffic and parking congestion will not result from the proposed use in that the applicant proposes a valet parking program that will met the current demand generated by the proposed restaurant at a nearby location. Further, after considering public testimony expressing significant concerns regarding patron parking in the neighborhood and associated noise impacts, the Planning Commission added Condition #27 which establishes a $2 maximum charge for the valet parking to ensure broad use of the off-site parking facility and Condition #29 fo ensure that valet parking is available during all restaurant operating hours. It is also anticipated that customers will visit the proposed restaurant in addition to other destinations in the area and utilize transit or nearby public parking facilities, such as City Parking Lot 8, just behind the existing restaurant. 6. The public health, safety, and general welfare are protected in that the project is consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, and the Land Use Element of the General Plan, which encourage pedestrian oriented uses such as restaurants along Neighborhood overlay zone of Wilshire Boulevard and -16- conditions of approval have been incorporated to minimize adverse impacts on nearby land uses. 7. No harm to adjacent properties will result in that the conditions of approval with this approved Conditional Use Permit will ensure that the establishment operates in a manner which protects adjacent neighbors, whereas the current restaurant has no such conditions. 8. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, in that Land Use Element Objective 1.6 calls for commercial uses which serve regional, community and local needs along the City's commercial corridors while respecting the adjacent residential neighborhoods. Through the incorporation of the conditions of approval, the project is also consistent with Policy 1.7, which calls for the protection and expansion of uses within the neighborhood commercial areas of the City that provide for the day-to-day shopping and service needs of nearby residents and Land Use Element Policy 1.7.2 which calls for preserving the concentration of ground-level, street-front neighborhood commercial uses on Wilshire Boulevard from 12th to 16th Streets. VARIANCE FINDINGS 1. There are special circumstances or exceptional characteristics applicable to the property involved, including size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings, or to the intended use or development of the property that do not -apply to other properties in the vicinity under an identical zoning classification. Specifically, the site is improved with an existing two-story commercial building with no space available for on-site parking. In 1981 a restaurant use with alcohol service was authorized with the approval of a parking variance (ZA #4321-y) and the use has been in continuous operation since that time. 2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental nor injurious to the property or improvements in the general vicinity and district in which the property is located in that the proposed valet program will. meet the parking demand generated by the proposed restaurant. Further, after considering public testimony expressing significant concerns regarding patron parking in the neighborhood and associated noise impacts, the City Council, on appeal, added Condition #27 which establishes a $2 maximum charge for the valet parking to ensure broad use of the off-site parking facility and Condition #29 to ensure that valet parking is available during all restaurant operating hours. It is also anticipated that the parking demand will be further reduced since patrons will visit the proposed restaurant in addition to other destinations along the Wilshire Boulevard corridor, given the character of the area as both a neighborhood and regional destination for .those using the UCLA Santa Monica Hospital across the street. Consequently, both transit or nearby public parking facilities within the Boulevard Commercial District will be utilized to support patron transportation needs. City Public Parking Lot 8, in fact, is located behind the subject property and includes -17- 23 metered parking spaces that can accommodate customer who wish to self park. Condition #29 requires the restaurant operator to provide an annual report to the City's Planning Division or Transportation Management Division, which provides documentation of a lease agreement for at least 48 off-site parking spaces, a valet service agreement and permits via the City, and additional information such as quantifiable data associated with the ongoing demand and management of the off-site parking and any efforts by the applicant to provide transportation demand management for their employees to reduce the demand for parking. 3. The strict application of the provisions of this Chapter would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships, not including economic difficulties or economic hardships in that there is no on-site parking spaces and the parking variance, with specific conditions including the provision of off-site parking during all operational hours, would allow the continued use of the restaurant at the site, given the use has not ceased operations and denial of the variance would require the closure of the existing restaurant. 4. The granting of a variance will not be contrary to or in conflict with the general purposes and intent of this Chapter, nor to the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. Objective 1.6 which calls for commercial uses which serve regional, community and local needs along the City's commercial corridors while respecting the adjacent residential neighborhoods. Additionally, the proposed project is consistent with Land Use Element Objective 1.7 which calls for the protection and expansion of uses within the neighborhood commercial areas of the City that provide for the day-to-day shopping and service needs of nearby residents and Policy 1.7.2 which calls for preserving the concentration of ground- level, street-front neighborhood commercial uses on Wilshire Boulevard from 12th to 16th Streets. Circulation Element Policy 4.75 allows the reduction in parking requirements for ...."existing" development in accordance with approved transportation control measures which have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing parking needs and which are monitored and enforced by the City Policies 5. The variance would not impair the integrity and character of the district in which it is to be located in that the restaurant has been in operation without on-site parking since 1981 and the proposed valet program will encourage patrons and employees to take advantage of the off-site parking available via a valet operator. In addition, the lack of on-site parking will promote alternate modes of transit to the site, thereby reducing the amount of vehicular trips and parking demand within the area. The transportation demand plan will help increase the use of public transit and bicycles, supporting the pedestrian character of the district. To ensure the reduction of restaurant parking demand, staff has included condition of approval regarding the valet operation (Condition No. 29). -18- 6. The subject site is physically suitable for the proposed variance in that the site is improved with an existing two-story commercial building that has been operated as a restaurant since 1981. 7. There are adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed variance would not be detrimental to public health and safety in that the subject property is located within a developed urbanized environment that is adequately served by existing infrastructure, public utilities and services. It is not anticipated that approval of the subject application will create a need for additional utilities or services. 8. There will be adequate provisions for public access to serve the subject variance proposal in that in that although there is no vehicular access provided directly onto the site and no on-site parking available, the .project site is served by Wilshire Boulevard which provides pedestrian access to the site. In addition, the area is served by the Big Blue Bus. 9. For the reduction of the automobile parking space requirements, the reduction is based and conditioned upon an approved parking reduction plan that incorporates transportation control measures that have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing parking needs and that are monitored, periodically reviewed for continued effectiveness, and enforced by the City. Specifically, Condition No. 28 requires that the proposed Transportation Demand Management program be implemented to reduce the parking demand and the amounf of vehicular trips within the area generated by the proposed restaurant. The program may provide incentives for both employee and customers to use alternate modes of transportation other than private vehicle to the restaurant, including free transit passes for employees and complementary meals to customers. This requirement is intended to limit the potential impacts that restaurants have on nearby residential neighborhoods, including the associated parking and circulation effects. Therefore, this requirement acts as a transportation control measure in that it limits traffic-generating uses that may negatively affect nearby residents and the district. 10. The strict application of the provisions of this Chapter would result in unreasonable deprivation of the use or enjoyment of the property in that due to the existing improvements, practical use or enjoyment of the subject parcel would not be possible due to the inability to provide the additional parking spaces required by code on-site for a parcel that has no on-site parking. The existing restaurant has been in operation since 1981 and is a compatible use within the district. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -19- Project Specific Conditions 1. This approval is for a Type 47 (On Sale General -Eating Place) alcohol license only. Any request to modify the license type shall require approval from the Planning Commission. 2. The permitted restaurant hours open for business to the public shall be from 11:00 AM to 11:00 PM Sunday through Thursday; 11:00 AM to 12:00 AM (Midnight) Friday and Saturday with last call for alcoholic beverages one hour prior to closure. Complete closure and all employees must vacate the premises from one hour after closing, daily. No after hours operation shall be permitted. 3. No exterior activity such as trash disposal, deliveries or other maintenance activity generating noise audible from the exterior of the building shall occur from one hour after closing to 6:00 AM. In addition, there shall be no disposal of bottles or noise generating trash between 11:00 PM and 6:00 AM daily. Trash containers shall be secured with locks. 4. Seating arrangements for sit-down patrons throughout the first and second floors shall not exceed 135 total seats. 5. No more than 35% of total gross revenues per year shall be from alcohol sales. The operator shall maintain records of gross revenue sources which shall be submitted annually to the City of Santa Monica City Planning Division at the beginning of the calendar year and also available to the City of Santa Monica and the State ABC upon request. Alcohol Outlet Conditions 6. The primary use of the premises shall be for sit-down meal service to patrons: Alcohol shall not be served to persons except those intending to purchase meals. 7. The applicant shall patrol the neighborhood to monitor patron behavior and pick up any trash left behind by patrons. The route the staff patrols and the frequency of the patrols shall be approved by the City's Planning Division and maintained as part of the site operational plan until such time as the City may deem the patrols unnecessary. 8. No alcoholic beverage shall be sold for consumption beyond. the premises. 9. The establishment shall maintain a kitchen or food-serving area in which a variety of food is prepared and cooked on the premises. -20- 10. The establishment shall serve food to patrons during all hours the establishment is open for customers. 11. Customers shall be permitted to order meals at the bar areas at all times the bar or restaurant is open for business. 12. In order to maintain the primary use of the premises for sit-down meal service, patrons shall not be permitted to use the bar unless they are ordering a meal at the bar counter in the same manner as patrons ordering meals at the table seating: The seats located around the bar service area cannot be used as waiting area or as a bar where patrons may have a drink either before being seated for meal service, or as a bar where beverages only are provided. 13. A building permit shall be obtained to remove the doors leading to the 2"d floor roof deck, or these doors shall be made into a window so that patrons access to the roof would not occur. In addition, subject to review by the Architectural Review Board (ARB) or staff ARB approval if applicable, a building permit shall be obtained to close the open air portion of the 2"d floor veranda that faces Wilshire Boulevard with double pane window glass or another suitable architectural treatment that would lessen the noise emanating from the premises. 14. Any minimum purchase requirement may be satisfied by the purchase of beverages or food. 15. Take out service shall be only incidental to the primary sit-down use. 16. The operation shall at all times be conducted in a manner not detrimental to surrounding properties or residents by reason of lights, noise, activities, parking or other actions. 17. The owner shall control noisy patrons leaving the restaurant. A minimum of six security guards shall be provided seven days a week from 9 p.m. to closing to ensure that noisy and rowdy patrons leaving the establishment will not adversely affect the welfare of neighborhood residents. 18. Prior to final inspection or commencement of alcohol service, a security plan shall be submitted to the Chief of Police for review and approval. The plan shall address both physical and operational security issues. 19. Prior to final inspection, commencement of alcohol service, or within 30 days of the CUP approval, the operator shall submit a plan for approval by the Director of Planning and Community Development regarding employee alcohol awareness training programs and policies. The plan shall outline a mandatory alcohol awareness training program for all employees having contact with the public and shall state management's policies addressing alcohol consumption -21- and inebriation. The program shall require all employees having contact with the public to complete a California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) sponsored alcohol awareness training program within 90 days of the effective date of this approval. In the case of new employees, the employee shall attend the alcohol awareness training within 90 days of hiring. In the event the ABC no longer sponsors an alcohol awareness training program, all employees having contact with the public shall complete an alternative program approved by the Director of Planning and Community Development. The operator shall provide the City with an annual report regarding compliance with this condition. This project shall be subject to any future City-wide alcohol awareness training program condition affecting similar establishments. 20. Prior to final inspection or commencement of alcohol service or issuance of a business license, the operator shall submit a plan describing the establishment's "designated driver" program, which shall be offered by the operator to the establishment's patrons. The plan shall specify how the operator will inform patrons of the program, such as offering on the menu a free non-alcoholic drink for every party of two or more ordering alcoholic beverages. 21. Except for special events, alcohol shall not be served in any disposable container such as disposable plastic or paper cups. 22. No dancing, dance floor, or live entertainment beyond that allowed in the restaurant definition contained in the Zoning Ordinance shall be permitted on the premises. There shall be no cover charge or related minimum drink purchase requirement. 23. The establishment shall not operate as a game arcade per Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 9.04.02.030.325 (Game Arcade). A maximum of three games, video games or other amusements are permitted under this definition on the premises. 24. Window or other signage visible from the public right-of-way that advertises beer or alcohol shall not be permitted. 25. Applicant is on notice that all temporary signage is subject to the restrictions of the City sign ordinance. 26. The project shall at all times comply with the provisions of the Noise Ordinance (SMMC Chapter 4.12). Parking Variance Conditions 27. The maximum charge to valet a vehicle for customers is $2 dollars. _22_ 28. The applicant shall work with the City's Transportation Management Division to create a specific transportation demand management program for the employees of the restaurant. The goal of this management program is to reduce the employees Average Rider Vehicle (ARV) trips to and from their place of work. 29. The restaurant operator shall provide an annual report due October 15~ of each year to the City's Planning Division or Transportation Management Division, which provides documentation of a lease agreement for at least 48 off-site parking spaces during all operational hours, a valet service agreement during all operating hours and approved valet permits issued by the City, and additional information such as quantifiable data associated with the ongoing demand and management of the off-site parking and any efforts by the applicant to provide a transportation demand management program for their employees to reduce the demand for parking. The transportation demand management program may include the following: . Transportation Information. The applicant will provide on-site information for employees and customers about transit services (including ride share programs and shuttles) and bicycle facilities (including routes and parking). • Free Transit Passes for Employees. The applicant will provide all of its employees who commit to transit use each month an EZ Transit Pass through the Santa Monica Big Blue Bus or Metro program (or a similar bus pass if the EZ Transit Pass is no longer available). • The applicant will provide bicycles to all employees who commit to riding to work on a regular basis, and will provide bicycle parking/storage on-site. • The applicant will provide a cash incentive to employees who carpool to work on a regular basis in an amount equal to a monthly transit pass. • The applicant will encourage customers to use public transit, bicycles, or walk to the restaurant through various incentives, including conducting a weekly drawing to offer a complementary meal for those individuals that use such alternate modes of transit to the restaurant (random selection from names collected), or through incentives of similar effectiveness as may be designed and implemented periodically. 30. The valet operator shall at all times conduct the vehicle transport services between the site and the off-site parking lease area in a manner that protects the adjacent neighbors from nuisance, including excessive noise, and adherence to the rules and conditions of the City's approved valet permit. The valet service shall operate daily from the restaurant's opening to closing, and all day Saturday and Sunday during operation hours. The valet parking operation -23- shall be subject to the review and approval of the Transportation Management Division (TMD). 31. The Santa Monica Building and Safety Division and Fire Department (SMFD) shall review the restaurant's occupancy load to ensure compliance with existing Codes. 32. The applicant authorizes the reasonable City inspection of the property to ensure compliance with the conditions of approval imposed by the City in approving this project and will bear the reasonable cost of these inspections as established by Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 2.72.010 and Resolution No. 9905(CCS) or any successor legislation thereto. These inspections shall be no more intrusive than necessary to ensure compliance with conditions of approval. Administrative 33. The approval of this permit shall expire if the rights granted are not exercised within twelve (12) months from the permit's effective date. Exercise of rights shall mean actual commencement of the use granted by the permit. One six month extension may be permitted if approved by the Director of Planning. Applicant is on notice that time extensions shall not be granted if development standards or development process relevant to the project have changed since project approval. Additionally, the rights associated with this approval shall expire if the establishment ceases operation for a period of one year or longer. 34. Within ten days of City Planning Division transmittal of the Statement of Official Action, project applicant shall sign and return a copy of the Statement of Official Action prepared by the Planning Division, agreeing to the conditions of approval and acknowledging that failure to comply with such conditions shall constitute grounds for potential revocation of the permit approval. By signing same, applicant shall not thereby waive any legal rights applicant may possess regarding said conditions. The signed Statement shall be returned to the Planning Division. Failure to comply with this condition shall constitute grounds for potential permit revocation. 35. Within thirty (30) days after final approval of the project, a sign shall be posted on site stating the date and nature of the approval. The sign shall be posted in accordance with the Zoning Administrator guidelines and shall remain in place until a building permit is issued for the project. The sign shall be removed promptly when a building permit is issued for the project. 36. Prior to final inspection, the applicant shall post a notice at the building entry stating that the site is regulated by a Conditional Use Permit and the Statement of Official Action, which includes the establishment's conditions of approval, is available upon request. This notice shall remain posted at all times the establishment is in operation. -24- 37. Within thirty (30) days from date of the approval of the Statement of Official Action, the applicant shall provide a copy of the approved Statement of Official Action for this project to the local office of the State Alcoholic Beverage Control department. 38. Ih the event permittee violates or fails to comply with any conditions of approval of this permit, no further permits, licenses, approvals or certificates of occupancy shall be issued until such violation has been fully remedied. Conformance with Approved Plans 39. The applicant shall provide within 90-days of the effective date of the Conditional Use Permit and Variance, a detailed report to staff on compliance with the operational conditions of these permits. This report shall be evaluated by staff, and subsequently presented to the Planning Commission at a noticed public hearing who may subsequently re-evaluate and amend the conditions of approval 40. This approval is for those plans dated April, 2009, a copy of which shall be maintained in the files of the City Planning Division. Project development shall be consistent with such plans, except as otherwise specified in these conditions of approval 41. Minor amendments to the plans shall be subject to approval by the Director of Planning. An increase of more than 10% of the square footage, and increase of seating, or a significant change ih the approved concept shall be subject to Planning Commission Review. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the plans submitted or as modified by the Planning Commission, Architectural Review Board, or Director of Planning. No expansion in number of seats, intensity of operation, or outdoor areas shall occur without prior approval from the City of Santa Monica and State ABC. 42. The Plans shall comply with all other provisions of Article IX of the Municipal Code, (Zoning Ordinance) and all other pertinent ordinances and General Plan policies of the City of Santa Monica. Standard Conditions 43. Final approval of any mechanical equipment installation will require a noise test in compliance with SMMC Section 4.12.040. Equipment for the test shall be provided by the owner or contractor and the test shall be conducted by the owner or contractor. A copy of the noise test results on mechanical equipment shall be submitted to the Community Noise Officer for review to ensure that noise levels do not exceed maximum allowable levels for the applicable noise zone. -25- ATTACHMENT C Correspondence Received Since the September 16, 2009 Planning Commission Hearing Electronic version of attachment is not available for review. Document is available for review at the City clerk's Office and the Libraries. -26- JMB~ Jeffer Mangels Butler & Marmara LLP Kevin K. McDonnell KKM@jmbm.com 1900 Avenue of the Stars, 7th Floor Los Angeles, Cal'rfomia 90067-4308 (310) 203-8080 (310) 203-0567 Fax www.jmbm.com ReF. 04400-0000 September 17, 2009 VIA E-MAIL AND U:S. MAIL City of Santa Monica, City Planning Commission Attention: Amanda Schachter, City Planning Division Manager -1685 Main Street, Room 212 Santa Monica, CA 90401 Re: 08CUP-015 and 08VAR-021 1519 Wilshire Boulevard Deaz Members of the City Planning Commission: This office represents the owner and operators of The Parlor involving the matters referenced above. On behalf of our clients, we make this formal request for reconsideration of the City Planning Commission decision of September 16, 2009. My clients have new and compelling information they were unable to present at the City Planning Commission hearing fast night. We are hopeful that, given the opportunity to present this new information, an appeal of the City Planning Commission decision can be avoided. Very truly yours, ~_.~ KEVIN K. MCDONNELL of Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & Marmaro LLP KKM:kkm cc: John Makhani Regina Szilak via a-mail A Limited Liability Law Partnership Including Professional Corporations /Los Angeles • San Francisco ~ Orange County b455550v1 Sounds good. I am available whenever you need me. Ike: On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Roy Brown <Roy.Brown@smgov.net> wrote: > I'understand Ike. At this point there is nothing that we can do. I will call you in the next few days and get the information you have regarding the other witnesses. > Thanks, > Detective Roy Brown > -----Original Mess_a a----- > From: Ike Pyun > Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 1:26 PM > To: Roy Brown > Subject: Re: Re: > Detective Brown, > When we spoke, I thought that I had a larger hard drive in my > surveillance digital video recorder. After our conversation, I went > to burn the footage onto a dvd for you but upon searching for the > footage, I realized that when we added cameras to our restaurant, that > it took up more memory and only held on to two weeks of footage. I > wish I had tapes to show but if you want to come in and inspect my > dvr, you are more than welcome to. I have nothing to hide. I would > also like to furnish you with the testimonies of my security and the > name of the employee at Izzy's that mentioned that there were 3 > officers eating breakfast at the time she entered Izzy's as well as a > marked police car parked out front. Please call me at 310-383-2912. > I'm sorry about the misunderstanding. It is completely my fault. > Ike > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Roy Brown tRoy.Brown@smgov.net> wrote: » Hello Ike, » When we spoke a few weeks ago you said that you had already copied the tapes and were holding on to them until you spoke to your attorneys regarding releasing the tapes to me. I just want to clarify that you DO NOT have copies of the video surveillance any more. » + » I understand your issues with the victim however the victim is adamant that the suspects came from the Parlor. As I said before I could view the tapes without showing her and see if there is anyone who left the establishment that fits the description during the times she was assaulted and if so we could talk about the next step: Please let me know what's going on now. Your email says you don't have the tapes but that wasn't said during our initial conversation. The victim has mentioned lawsuits several times 1 involving the city of Santa Monica and the Parlor and I just want to make sure that I have exhausted all means of getting the surveillance tapes. » . > > , » Thanks, » Detective R. Brown » = » i »-----Original Message----- » From: » Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 2:23 PM » To: Roy Brown » Subject: Re: » To Whom it May Concern, » This email is in regards to a claim that ori'October 2nd, 2009, 3 » patrons of the Parlor assaulted an older woman as she was crossing » the street to pay her rent at 1:15am. We believe that her » accusations are false as well as other accusations that have been » made by other neighbors in recent months to create a list of problems » to bring up to City Council on December 8th, when the appeal of the » .conditions set forth by the Santa Monica Planning Commission are » reviewed. We have documented our account as well as have the names » and wr-itten testimony of people that agree that she was fabricating her story. » After the alleged assault, the elderly woman demanded that I show her » the footage of ail the people that were leaving. When I asked her » what the 3 men looked like, she only said that they were white and » drunk so they must have left from the Parlor. I urged that if she » was in fact assaulted, that we take her to the hospital. She refused » and demanded that I show her the footage. Feeling as if she only » wanted to point out 3 random people leaving the Parlor, I explained » that I would only release the footage to the Police after she had » given them a full detailed description. I called the SMPD to have » them file a report but later found out that she called to cancel the » call. When I called back later to the SMPD dispatch, the female » dispatcher told me that she had cancelled the call and that she » didn't believer her story as well. We have a file here at the Parlor » with written testimony from our security staff, the name of an » employee at Izzy's that saw the woman acting strangely, and a » timeline of the account and will gladly hand it over to the proper officials if demanded. » Unfortunately, we have lost the footage on our DVR. Our hard drive » only saves two weeks of footage and after discovering this,. we have purchased anew hard drive the saves up to 48 days of footage. » If there is anything else we can do to assist, please let me know. » We have made many changes to keep the peace and increase the safety » of our neighborhood and will continue to do so.even after our appeal » hearing on December 8th. » Ike Pyun 2 ATTACHMENT D Restaurant Floor Plans Electronic version of attachment is not available for review. Document is available for review at the City clerk's Office and the Libraries. -27- 49' ~ oa' BATHROOM -~I Ire BATHROOM u o: HALLWAY EXIT DISH i KITCHEN PASTRY PANTRY DRY M.. STORAGE 11tI1I~l WALK IN BUS BAR STATIO N ~. 14 sEATs (61+R SToaLSJ ~! (STANDAQD cNA1R5~ ~ti5 SEATS 16 SEATS 0 ~4 E w9' ~ (STANDAYZD GHAIt2S~ 19 SEATS 28 SEAMS (F~xED 6ooTH~ .At• ... L__1 (5(ANDA'RD CNAI(ZS/TABLES? 16 5EA'i5 (FIXED psoOYN~ 32 SEA'r5 ,- .MAIN ENZ~NCE ,_ . ~ (STANDARD 4 SEATS a- <s C~ovc~~ fo SegTS: -~~ .. . s ATTACHMENT E City Permit Records Electronic version of attachment is not available for review. Document is available for review at the City clerk's Office and the Libraries. -28- /~ BUILDING~AND SAFETY DIVISION 1685 MAIN STREET Plan Check Ne. PI"i SANTA MONICA, CA 9~4g7 r.r or ~,a>BZm hIIua6i~~ ELECTRICAL PERMIT APPLICATION Permit Number E -~?2 ~ Please complete this farm with a black or blue ink pen Permit Issuaxz Date ~ , ~ /~ .) Job Address r S 9 -pJt L.~~, rte,. Zrp de .~~ Ung Number Flcar Number Use of Builrmng (ogffi~ce,,re~taih,..apartment, single family dwelling, etc): Y•-.pla' C'r-' New r Existing But ' g' Pmpeny Owner's Nama: ~ - Pnone No. Fax No. Street Address City „ State Zip Coda Business TenanYS Name: Phone No. ' Street Adtlress City State ~ Zip Cnde Building to be Occupied during Constnrction Work tYes or Na): Number of Work Days Requiretl to Complete the Work Legal Name of Permit Holder Phone No. Fax Na. Street Adtlress ~ Ciry Stato Zip Code Legal Name of Conlractar f tea' E'ce ~~ '~ hone o. ~oo2.6d r~ s Fax No. a 73 sod y Street Address S City ~ State Zip Code Contra/~ta s City~Byu~i7"nesQ~/,~c~~/pse Np. /t fIVO° Contractor's S of CaGfomia License No. 7 Classification C-~C~ Legal Name of Electrical Engineer (Person): Phona Fax No. Street Atldress City ~ State lip Code Engineers CIry Business License No.` ~ Engineer's State of California Regisb'ation Na. "NOTE: Professional engineers and architects who perform consWcfion gbserraUOrt are required to obtain a Citybusiness license. Description of EI I Work /~ ~ ~ r Cast of wads: $ _ •C%v~ lam( ~C- ~- d~/ .1 1 r~ LCtSt-r'/r 7 / I ~ ~. , ,' ,,, j1 ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~v~ ' -~- ~17~`r "",1 n rn.' ( /t~'c 1-/ .- d~.el/~ ~ [C 3 ~ r fifi C'~Lc-t ~ [rX~t- ~ `- ~ U J ( / / q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, / f g /~ ~ ~ / / ~ / ~+ / ' ~" p Cj/1..(~~ yvp'"-'i-Gl,+~c- /V L`/Lt/ CiV.ff/ //C~Gf ~'ft ,G'i .i. ~f.(/KS. '.S' ~' Please complete the quantities of electrical components on the other side of this form. I certify thaf I' have read this application and state that the above information is correct. I agree to comply wRh all city and county ordinances and state laws relating to building construction, and hereby authorize representatives of the City of Santa Monica to enter upon the above-merttiorred property for inspection purposQs. f. "'7 / Authodzed Signaare - ~~ C~ Date 'Jr ~~ G"'/. ~f ,/ f y r/ ~~-s2 n ~~~ Name of Person Signing:'` -~ / -/ ` [l/GrT.(l~r4J i Title Nate: permtt holders for construction warts ort private property must be either the property owner or a licensed contractor. eas tai- oTrouot ELECTRICAL FEE SCHEDULE QTY FEE SUBTOTAL PLAN CHECK (when requfredj A. Issuance Faa ~ $2q.85 $24.65 B. Hourly Plan Review (City stag will complete this pan) ~ $93.90 Minimum plan review fee 15 foriwo hours {$187.80) Tdtsl Pian Clreck Fee (Minimum Fee>$212.05) INSPECTION . - ~- A. Issuance Fae - ~ ~ $24.65 524.65 B. Components 7 Receptacles, Switch, Light and Other Outlets First 20 Tuctures ~(~ $28,07 Each addi8onal 20 fixtures $2086 2 !.lghting Fixtures; Sockets 8 Other Lamp Holding Devices First 20 fixtures {A$ $34.29 Each addi8ona120 dxWres le $28 g7 Each asserrdlly of pole or pladorm~mounted lighting flxWres $4172 Each assemhly oFlheatnmMtype lighting fixtures $41 72 3 indivitlual ar Temporary Power Service temporary Power Pole and appurtenances ~ 010429 'Temporary POwerdislnbuti0n system for consWtdan sites $158.44 4 power Apparatus Motors, generators. irans(onners, reuYiflers, synchronous comertars, caparlfors, intlusulat hearing, sir conditioners and heal Aumps. cooking or baking equipment and other apparatus as follows: One KVA or less, each ~ $208.58 Over 1 KVA and not over 10 KVA, each $260.73 Over 10 KVA and rw[ over 50 KVA, each $281.58 Over W KVA and not over 100 KVA, each $312.87 Over 100 KVR, each $417.16 8 Trolley antl Piugtin Typa 8usways ' Each 100 teet M fraction thereof ~ $208.58 O 6 Oudine Lighting antl Marquees Frst Branch Circuit $158.44 Each Additional Branch CllCUII $73.W 7 Services 600 whs ar less and not dver200 amps in rating, each $208.58 600 votes or less and over 200 amps to 1,000 amps, each $312.87 600 vol#5 or over 1000 amperes In raring, oath $417.18 8 Mlscellanecus Conduits and Conductors Each 20 feet or fraction thereof ~ $10.43 9 Means and Methotls Inspeciiona-each 0 $t0q.29 10 inspection Fee Total (Minimum Fae = 5728.94) 11 Work Wfhouta Permit {non~emergancy cases} Investigation Fee = 700% inspection Fee Total ' Penalty= 70D°k of Inspection Fee Total 1Z Total Inspection Fae l ~~: 23 FOR CITY USE ONLY Plan Check Submittal Oate: Planning Wvision Approve{ ""'~ ~ Pian Checc Fens Paid by: Hama Title ~ j /] / yJ Cash - Si atur _ ~ Date A J b L~ {/ r' Check Number. Credit CaN: Bulltling and Safely sidn Apptovat Permits aalist: Means antl Method Plan Re uired YPS ~ NO ~ Permit fees Paid by: q ~~ ~ - Q/ Cash Name Title Check Number. - Cretlit Oard: Si nature Date Permits ecialist: Workefs Com nsation ve e Yes Fxem THANK YOU FOR HELPING US CREATE A BETTER COMMUNITY SANTA MpNiCA BUlLD1NG & SAFETY 2585 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90d01 393-9975 ~~-~~~'~t~Ce~L PERMIT APPL7CATiflN Job Address: ~S~g snti~s,ui,er .../Tel: C1 Dwlg ~ Apts g~ Comm [] Alts ^ Repair ^ ether USE e to-6~g) _--~-dchk - (~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,^~ Ccsh .ic' ~-w.c-~p Ct Application is made tc Santa Maniea 8uiiding & Safety far approval of the described work which shall conform tp city codes and other previsions of law. ffrKr.v r<. -E~a~~ P.ae ,City Bas. Applicont/DBA: Lic. No.l'~~/3 AddresslTef: S"~109 Mc~.eos~ +~~E L•A ~7g-oo¢z State Contr.~79422 e.o Lic. Na. Owner/Builder: VCe.D i ~=SSra/ k=+g~ r HOMEOWNER ~ COMBINATION Q * 1978 Narionai Electrical Cade -Effective 10/10/80 $ gEp + pUTLEi'S & FIXTURES (Switches, Li hts, ~ ' Recept.) ~7 ~ Tote! No. /$ • @ 5.30 ea. • APPLIANCES & EQUIPMENT {to 400 Amps.? Up to 2 °'Z ~ @ $ 2 HP, KW, KVA 2 to 20 __,s2__._ @ $ 6 --- RATING 20 to 100 @ $12 - Over 100 Cam? , $35 Swimming Poal (Incl. Bond, Light, Pump) @ $ 10 Raceways 8 Ducts feet. @ 3.02Ift. Bussways $ Power Ducts ft. @ $.lOJft SERVICES & SYVITCHBOARDS {to 500 volts) Services: (lnaludes Temp. Power3 Up ifl 200 Amps @ $ g 201 to 400 Amps .2 Ce} 51 p Switchboard & Panel Sect's ~ 525 SERVICE CHARGES Plan Check or Special trispenions Estimated: hours r~ $25lhr. Min. S50 Reinspection 315; Specie! Investigafian Fees S y~' SUBTpTAL FEES FROM pTHER SIDE OF FORM J ~~.~~y PERMIT FEE: working 35; Supplemental 53 Check: _ r=' L ~ ~r Cash: TOTAL FEE QUE ~ ~~~~ . ~~''" certify to Santo Monica Building & Safety that Workers Compensa- tion Insurance FS in effect for all work described in this applica#ion and prcof of coverage has been filed. Acplicants/RMp/RME Signature date Santa Monica enforces the U'niiarm Construction Caries SANTA. MpNICA BItILCtNG 3 SAFc't'Y . ? 685 ,btain Streer, Santa Mc»ica, CA 90401 343-9979 ~r~++ ~1`~,r~t~° AF~~.:cATror~ Jab Address: >~/9 (~9tC(c s-,sti~~ 8G"ash . •f ~°i. ^ Dwiq ^ gpts :~¢Camm CITY USE CNL'! E ~~~° © -~3v _ ~' ~: s ~V~7k ^ Casfi -- ©AJts Q Rtpair [~ Cther ^ J-ic. C C1 ..-~.® _ wcric~which shall confarm to cty ~cades~Ian~d ocher pr~nv#sions c~awef ~e described Applic9nrlDBA: /~/~ ~- ~G~~J'r2a ~ .Clty Bus. (~ 4 Lic. No. ' AddresslTet: ' ~ ~o `~ ~EG!aoJg ~`uc~ L,.¢, P7~,,,y~~ State Cantr~,t~ ~z2 Cwner/builder: ~~~D7 HOMEOWNER Q CQ,41BiNATIQN G '3.$7$ Naticnat Electricaf Cade - Efferive ?0/7.0/S~3 S F3= ; ` OUTLETS & FIXTURES {Switches,. lights, Recept ) . Tatal No, /SO. ~ 5 30 ,/ ~` , ea, ----~® APFLEANCES 8 EQL'iPMENT {#0 4¢D Amps.? HP, KW, KVA Up to 2 z#ozo ^ 5 Z ~ RATING 20 to 100 ~~ @ $12 Over T00 Swimming ?col {incl..6o»d, Light Pump} x'3$9 ( } . , Raceways $ Cuctg feet ~ $ TO '~ 3.0?/ft . ~,~ Bussways & Power Duos ft, R . ~ $.10lft SERVlC'c5 8 SWITCHBOARDS {ta 500 volts) Services tl»etudes Temp: power) Up to 20Q Amps ~ S 5 ' 2a 1 t9 aa0 Amp3 ' ~, $1 ~ - ----- Switehbaard & Panef Sect's ~ $ T 5 5E.4VIC= CHARC-E5 Plan Check ar Speci9! trtspectiens Fsrimeted: hours r S29Ihr. Min. S90 . Rei»spectio» 315; Special Invesrrgaricn Fees S `-~„ "~~ SUBTOTAL FEES FRCM pTHER Si ~ PQRMlT FEf: Working 3 upple~ M $ j' C}feck: I (~ . T{7TAL ~!: Q~B ~ S 1 certify ro Santa Monica Building & Safety rhat War!cers Ccmpensc- #ion insurance is in effect far all ~.var!< described in ;his apolicaticn and proof of coverage has been fiEed. ' ~T~.~-~ ~ ~ c~ t~~~ 3o isld°( ___ ACCliccnLQMC7/R,4V e' Siannn,r,. Monica eniarces the I;n•.~..+, r,,,,..,,. ___. I cQ DAM,AG ~ I) a~~Y sE~tPrs ~ ~ ~ B~ ~~~ N E: N / d Ci of Sams Monica ~ o. o. ~ Date: L~Pee $ - ~ v 27 BANTA MONICA BUIIDING& SAFETY 1685 Main Street, Banta Monica, Ca. 9(1401 ~_$ __ ,_ .~~ _ -~ QC7ieck Nn ` :~~ ~;o. ~ s~ C~rnbination Buildin . G~, GIS ~+~ - APP' g PERMIT APPLYCATI®N Occp. Date..- ! ! "~ (PRINTININK OR TYPE) ~ ! Coast- t < Applican t's Neme-.~. ~~ . Tel: PROJECT NEEN'FFIPICATION & ®ESCRIPTION: ` ~ Il A) Sleet Address;.-~/~f.:9~~`.1..GV `"G;S%dh'IY-~ ~ P~G+/./- Tax Code: Legal: Lot Block ~ Lot Size II X B) Class bfWork: _Dwlg _Apts _ _ Comm Other:_New Const~Altns_Repairs FLOOR AREA-Provide floorarea cauvuaons for rnarvruuatuses as weu as rover area.. Existing Floor Area (aq. ft of individual uses) : 9~~r ~~"E-~~ floor area to be Removed (sq. ft of individual rues) Total Proposed Floor area Site Dimensions Site Area Proposed Lot Cove BUILDING kiFfGliT Existing 25' Proposed_~ SETBACKS Existing Setbacks- ~ Pmnt Rear Proposed Setbaclcs•i Front ~Rear_ PARKING Existing ~ Proposed . RENT CONTROL STATUS: IpdiahRent Coptrn7status o(tlre) ' 7?r City nni)notproass apptiartionsJarvlvch regaimd Rrnt Contml Permits lmae not been obfainCd:' i TOTAL ES4TMATED VALUATION OF P172bffT IMPROVEMENTS YatvaNon is tlu total S oatae of aR tabor, materials, byermaponl equlpnspt tnrladed.fp So c+errept conatmtttan roar ipdeari fordetennipalian of ptenNt fm and trananeiKal ro theASaesrorS PRINCIPALS IDENT7FTCATiON: A) Owner's Name: !'~~R.rtaa S~~'! C ~ Tel: Address: lz;oo ct9:1Sf(//Y+E $LdA B) Contractofs Name - '2'a~*t~ °~~[.fi".rv1r'! C°C+tJ57' Tel: Address: ..., ' <s .~ ~. '° - z. t~; C) Architect,E ~ ! 'nt ~ /lJcl 'T~iG~ TeY~~[ Address: 22/~ 4J~`r3Fl~iP~ Bln1lD D) IEtrding Agency: ~ Tel: _ Addre55i ,•~ CERTIFICATIONS & DECLARATIONS: ~ ~ -, ~1. VERIFICATION OF INFORMATION & OWNER'S INTENT: I certify that information provided on this appllcatlon is correct and that the Owner(s). agr ordinances and state lawsregula(ingconsWdion &~demolition work. Furttierurore, the Own enter the descn'bsd property for tnspecY ppr Appltwnt's signature-: ~-lam >~~!'~- --- ., CiiECK STATUS Owner °~ C tractor Arch/Engr t L WORfQRS COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTffICATION 6r DECLARATION: A) CERTIFICATION: IcertifythatLNorker'sCompensatlon InsuranceisineffectforaBworkau thatacurrmt CER17FICATE of4pORKER5 COMPENSATION INSURANCE is on file with Owner/ConhaCtor s Signature: B) EXEPAPT[ON: I certify that I amexempl from thestate Worker'sCompen~tionInsrtrance t sole owns and wlll persorrallyperform AL~yorkau '7tldspermit coffin l'ssignatu~e: //~7~~ ~l ~e..uu T- 3. ASBESTOSIHAZARDOUSJTOJQC/MA't'FRiAT c CERTIFICATION & DEC[:ARATfONS: I certify that I have tnspected the' desaBted propertyand ro the best of my professional know asbestos based building rruteri'sls that rnuld cause airborne asbestos fibers during the c demoNiion process. Furthermore, this site does NOT handle or store hazardous or tone maie Name (print) ~ State Lic. No. Z to comply with all City s)autiwrizeCity staff to rte: 4` _Authorizad Agent am it does NOT contain icflon, alteratlon, or -~ asr Fire `~..GS/PW Other PLANSmustbeprovided toacmmpatiyall signiHCantSanta MOnigpermitapplieatlons. N01'E:PLANSpreparedbyastaie licensed Architect rn Engineer MUSTbe SIGNED k STAMPED by the A/£ when submitted per state law. {2) setsofplansareREQUIltEDfora115INGLEFAM1t..Yprojec~and otherminorremodefing8raccessory buildingprojecis tsigns, pools, fences, commercial models & tec~ant improvement (Tq Projects). (4) setsofplansareREQUIItED for NEW muldpleunitsattd NEW COnvnereialbuildingprojectsorsubstantial additions. (1) set of all project 5upporting~data (soils reports, strucmrat design & T-24 cotes, e[c) properly signed by responsible A/E's involved in preparation is required with filing. ALL PLANS SUBMITT® SHAfi. INCLUDE A. Plot plan of adequate scale to show dimensions and size of each lot b be built upon or otherwise used; the size, shape, ]omtionand useofexisdngand:proposedbuildings;thetayoutofparkingareas,parkingspaces,drtveways,walls,streets, alleys, adjacent buildings, as well as, existing street trees, sheet lights, sidewalks and hydrants. B. Dimensioned plans show(ngexterior elevations ofpropased new buildingand additions to existing buildings;exterior elevationsofproposedremodeSngor "facelifting". Exteriorelevahonsmustshow theheightofeachbui]ding. Elevation all exterior elevasions oFboth the addition and the existing buildingare required. C. FuBydimensioned Elornplansindicatingsquarefeef,interior ia}routincludingseaiing arz and the Bice. In thecase of remodeling, or demalition,existingand proposed dimensiom walls shag be clearly rnarked~ss existing to remain, to be removed, or new construction. D. SIZE PLANSKEI'CHShowing'generat loczdon&scopeofproposed work shall beprovid for the permanent mty recards~of this pemdt activity. 1. A v t ~ i i f R ` t I t 1 < bars . All C PERnuT APPra~A~'I®N Cin~ of Santa Monica, Building & Safety Division _ 1685 Main $t, Room 111., Santa Monica CA 40401 TEL: 1310} 458-8355 .FAX: (310} 396-5473 t:k Appdication farms are to beflled aut in blue or bdack ink only. JOB ADDRESS: 1'S j ~"/ l.~ t `~SCtt to Suite, Room, or Floor No. \ame Owner~I'enank:_; of ~ /cltc,-,,,,.ITelepLone AIo. WORK DESCRIPTION: checYt3 WORK CLASSJ: C Res ^ Comm .check 1~ WORK TYP£: C Applicant ~r.. vt t`C f ~~~~ A plicant Phone No.„ Contractor/DBA: ~,~,. /grt- ~ ~~~ty Bus.Lic. No ._~~ Contractor's Telephoae:~[`}' ~~ty -~„ t-L r gtAte Lic Na: S] tt Address_ / 3 Zd°© i7 ., r ~,, (i, Staee Lie Ciass:,s` ~_~d~,l~,r /' hf 9 t z ,__ Faz No: ~ ~ ~ 6 Application rs made to Santa Mondea joy irrspectdae and appravat of the d trades work whdedt will tonform to all appddcabte code and !egad re4 REQUIRED WORKERS COMPENSATION (WIC} INSURANCE CERY I further certify under the penalty of perjury is the CITY dF SANTA MO]Vit check one ® . .. I have and will maintain Workers' Compensation insurance for the 1 work for which this permit is issued. As s/Jo~e warker,l am exempt from W/C Insurance requirement. z~ Mew C1 Alu ORepair ~3 -Lst, r- ~ ~ ~- 9 r7--~'-- '~3d1cft~ {{~~~ scribed gaadifred J rirements. `--9 FICATION ~~ t~ A that: :rformance ofof th GENERAL PERMIT FEES ~ INSPECTION SERVICE Permit Issuance or Change of Address {each) ........... . Supplemental Permit ........... ............... $15.59 Special inspection Services {i.e. zzer regular work hours & default reinspec ' 0$9.35 (minimum 1 flour) ................... $62.36 ........................ (additional hourly) .............. . :..... $b236 Rein coon Fee hour .................... ~ ( ly) ......................................... .$41.58 INVESTIGATION &c PENALTY F~ (i.e. work done without proper permits) ............................. (charge is (3) times Total Perini Fees) PLAN CHECK. (required ONLY for the work over listed thresholds) (hqurlyj ......................... .............. .$41.58 .•• r1.w.xN~c ~wr/eeovwt. Is ~Qut~a F'o~ At.t, aotaFawouxrEn w Yn smE.rwats Eourentelvz..... ,. _ P ANNING ~ t;t/( `l d O ~ Q2u l DU~;°/~-" 1e-~J L L~y./~9'~~ Q 2_ ~u ct2. 1Q ~ o c.9-T(aJ `'~ ~ •ra~/ZO°`T ~~ ,~LrjC.Ds~`G-_S GAS SYSTEM C M . 7Tc AInC Gas Piping Systems to 5 outlets .. Cgyy ........ . band aver........... ... ......~...... 5 12.48Ea S Vent S stems far ........................... S 2.08E-a y appiianees 5-~---_ ........................ 5 I2.a8Ea Unclassifi annfactttteti Fireplaces SI8.71F.a . Boiie om rb Utdts {1 HP = 1 tan) ............. p to 20 HP/500 0 $'- $~ , 00 BTUs ........... .. St 8.71Ea ?~ 20 HP to 50 HP /1,000 000 BTUs . ......... $ ~ . . ............ 56236Fs Over 50 HPJI,OOD,000 BTUs} ~~~ 5` .. AIR ~ Y ............... . . $124.74Fa $ Heating Appliances - inci vetat ........... . . .$I8.7IEa _ ;.- Registers - ............ . „ $ Inlets ~? and outlets ~ ' `- 53.12Fa ~ 7 . _ Per 1:000 sf of area {Comm.) .. ~ ............. 5 ................ .. $24.95Ea . Per 1,000 sf of atm (Res.) . .. $ . ................ ~.. :. S 15.54Ea _ Evaporate Coolers . : 5 r ........ .SI8.7IEa -~I~ Hoods/Speci8l Vent Equip.... _ $ ..... Fire DamgetslExhayy* F ' " " - "' " " " " " • ~ • $37.42Es ~~ VCO~ ' $ Air Handlin .... ............. . $3.I2Es g Urtits- A/C _; . ........... . ...................$ISS9Ea ~ $ ,.... OTHER ITEMS Not ierrsi a t,,, s ~ haur}." .......... , $ 41.58 JFir. $ Descriptian , ,_. .. :..:., - SUB-TOTAL OF PERMIT FEES ..... ............... . .......... s PLAN CHECK /REINSP£CT FEES •••{Sa Thresholds Belaw)*•® . S41 S8 per Hr. AFTER H®idRS 56236 Per Fir. $ S ISSUANCE FEFS . SISS9 { 5935 Far Supplemen~l Permit) $ T®'I'~E. Tfils' S CEAT'~TCATIONS & D TIONS: SANTA MONICA BUILDING & SAFETY 1685 Moin Street, Santa Monica, CA 9040T 393-9475 h1E:CHANfCAL PElaMtT APPL1CATiOIy Job Address: ..i a Y ue,^-- SE ONLY M ~~ • 9~3- ~t • : Tel: ~ ~ - p ©~,p fee: ~ ®Cash Q Dwlg Q. ApZg: 1~.Comm Q Alts [j Repair Q Other L'G ~W-C- Q Cl APDlication is made to Santa Monica Building & Safety for dpprovai of the described work, which shah. con#orm to city codes and other provisions of law. Applicant/pBA:B~odv ~ Heating & Air Cond , INC City Bus: Lic. No. ~ ~ AddressJTe1;2718 S. !Robertson B1vd.La. Ca. 34 5tateCornr.256821 •P11.#. 836-0606 Lic. No. Qwner/Builder. HOMEdWNER Q _' ' COMBINATION p, ' T 476 Uniform Mechanical Code -Effective 2/?5/77 A) GAS.: SYSTEM COMPONENTS Gas Piping- Systems to 5 Outlets ~ $. 4 Woter Heaters ~. Pressure Regulators b & over ~ $~70 a®_ Appltanees i?i $' 3 Equipment (incl. Vern) ' ~ $ b Vent Systems (for APp: $ Equip.) ~ ~ 4 Boi3ers -Compressors'- Absorption Units Ta. 20. HP/500,000 BTU`s 3 ~ $ b 20 to 50 HIz/I,OQ0,000 BTU.`s +a~ $?0 Over 50' HP/I,000;000 BTU's ,.,,~_ ~ $40 -TYPE & RATING OF UN[TS B) AiR iiANDtlNG" SYSTEM COMPONENTS -USE OTHER SIDE SERVECE' CHARGES Plan Check ar Special Inspections Estimated: hours {off $25/hr. Min. $S0. Reinspection $15; Special Investigation Fees $ SUBTOTAL fEFS FROM OTHER SIDE OF FORM ~ ERM1T FEE: Working $5; 5uppiemental $3 Check: Cash: l-t?TAt~ FEE DUE S FEE ~ /~ ~~ ~~ ~~ 3 ~ `~- c °- o-o I~ ~~ I certify ro•S'anra Monica Building & Safety that Workers C~mpensa- tion Insurance is in effect for ail wark described in this application and proof of coverage has been filed -- ``9-3- St Santa Manico enforces tfie Uniform Construcfian SANTA MONiCA BUILDING. &. SAFETY 1685 Main Street, Santo Monica, CA 90dOT k~1 //~~+ g,3~93-99~7g5 p pa ,q y CiT1' USE ONLY_ tlli 4 H 4 ~ 7 ® 1. tea, 1~- i~ No. Mt .~,~ PERMtT-APPLBCATtON date: 1l..y-~ Job Address: ~,. ~ C.. ; ~^ ehk :..?el: fee: Cash ^: D`wlg ^' Apts_ ^ Comrrr ^: Alts ^. Repair ^ L2c LI Other ^`Yd•C ^ CI ' APPlicatian is. made to Santa Monica-Building & Safety far approval of the described work. which- shall conform to _city_eades~,and. other provfsdans bf law; - APP7iaant/DBA:, .,~ F~ ~~1~ H £}Tsl~ i `~ ~~ n ^ i C, City Bus. ~I~.~ Lic. No. Address/Tel: ~< /:$-1~.$ ~ , J,,~ ~~ State Contr.zl~/ Lic. No. __~_, 5r7t7 Owner/Builder. ~iG2N!!= ~~C~-~-l.... HOMEOWNER ^ - ~ CDM62NATION [j: I976 Uniform Mechanical Cade- Effective 2!25!77 $ pEE: /~±} GAS SYSTEM-COMPONENTS' Gas= Piping; Systems; to 5' Outfets~ Q $ d ,~ Water Heaters 8• Pressure Regulators. 6 &x$.70 ea. APP23ences & ~ S' 3 Equipment (incl. Venty ®~ $ 6 VeM Systems (for. APP. & Equip) ~__ ~ _$ 4 Bailers -Compressors _ gbsorptiott Units. To 20: HP/500;000 BTU's - -^- - ... . - - - 20 to 50 HP/2,000,000 BTU's ~ $ 6 ' Over 50 HPlT,OOO,i]00' STU's ~ ~® `-'----- .:TYPE & RATING:OF UNITS B}_AIR HANDLING SYSTEM COMPONENTS -USE OTHER SIDE: SERVICE CHARGES - Plan Check.ar Special Inspections ~~~' hours @ S25Ihr, Min. $50. Reirupeation $15; Special Investigation Fees s' ~-® SUBTOTAL FEES FROM OTHER SlD€ OF' FORM PERMIT' FEE: Walking $5; Supplemented $3 ,_~ Check: ®,® Cash: TCTAt_ FEE` DUE. $ 1 certify ta•Sonta tv9onieQ Building & Safety that Workers Compenso- tion Insurance. is i_ -effect for alt work described in this opptiwtion and"~of of ccv~ee has been filed. ~`~/ 30 ~~ Santa AAonico enforces the Uniform Construction es ' t. SAt~i9C,~c_ lNt3NfCe§- Ht1ILQiNCt ~ S,i,!`c7'Y r, tdi~ Maim Street',. Santa: Manua,. CA 9s3~1 CITY' USc. ONLY ': _ 393=94TH' '; ` F~1t2~4T 1-F~itCi~Tt~a'mi- arse: _ Tom; 3 ~! 3 ~#ae:: 5 °+.Cas.~ - ,~ iZ 0awi. ~ Q ~ Atts d' RaTaic Q Qther ~~ Q ~-C. Q C1: r,. iicatiitrrCs,mc~"e. te~$eryt~AAcnicy Hui9ding. ~: Safety icr agprsvai of f;-~ c'eericea waebu whic4. sltaili tanfomr to aitsp aedes• and. other ~ravi*,ians ai: Icw: ~ . Appkc~et ~ ~ r~A ~~ _ l ~ /~ La /NS/ct ~c 1v'~`%s ~ 7 `~ ° p ~, to Ccntr. ' Address~7"e1t ,`_'z~ hr/ /~/~/J /ilf~- /~~7 .P~C~ r,Lif Na. ~ ` ~ i~ Ownat )~-P '/~%'fil_ ~~~ . ~~~P ~~MEf3WiV{R Lt t" - CCMBSIVATiQ~ t ~ i °T9T§ tdnifarnr~ Piutnhing Cade - Effzcrtve ZXZSlTT $` F°c.' i . Watee~ Pipiny,~ gc ~^uipmanf {Ins:afl-reraie} !S ~ 3 Wctar Ijecters., (iridudes vent} ~ ' ~ 5 ; E7 'a ~resst:se R ~sletars~ ~ S 3 s ~ciiersa: M1^ Ztk FEP: rcrincr. ~ S g 1 r L'vet".'r.Q:.~$.~: rcting; ~i3+1Ci Ece.~e#iaw Cavie~-Yeeuum Bree(cers Ta 5' !r}5 4- (inc;uc'et. irsteliatiara ~ piping) -. 6:. &. aver ~ S.TQ ec. r; Lcwn° Sprinklers per vclve ~~. Ta a ~ $ ~i o {tncli:des IeostcEic:iea $ :.GGC#1cw) ®d ~; aver ~ $,To ea <' H} GA3" SX4T=1vt CGfMFCNEI i a C~cs t=fPin~. Sjsr:ms: a S cutlets ,~ $ 6 .O e7 `-~ -__r-- ~,~j ~"y~5~ii~aver~~ S.TO ec ®~='~~~ ~ , Water I-Featers. ~. ?tessun: R iatara '3t S 3. Applicxt~S~~ ~ ctiuipnsenr {ind_ Yens,) ~ S- k 6 CS• dRA1N.lGc_5'1'Si"c~.4 Cwti+tiFQNEtiti 7; $ F1XTE,lR~ - liSi: G%jS.4 m2Cc a SE.4~ti~ G 1rtRGi F ' Plan Cn nr Spr~ci lnsyeGicr;s j cstimaced; hears. r $2s"/hr, Min: 'a0 p Reinsaec:iarr 515; Sceeicl Imeri~ r9cn• F es 6 Cl t SUBTQTAI. ?°ce5 rRO1.Y c i ~5,~ {iCc CF ~CRM / r~ t _ . / ~~~P~:4ti,i F~ ~I~CPkIflQ; SJ; Surlerentcl S.a o a e chi: 1 /' CPS ~-® Cash: 7(7TAL Fe;s CEJc ~ ' f i Ciertiry to Satltard4oniec Building ~ Suety tket Y'~cr;cers Ccm~ensc- t tierr Ensursrres is in :eftec: 1'er cI1 wcrk described !n tF:is c~:.lictic:s ~n prce# cT c^~rcg hcs been fi!s~. t ~. Aociic_ is/R.~.+OiR,~+tE. Si .c:ure ~+a._ 6 Scnta ~tilaniea enfart_s ;4- {;nifarrr Ccnsrn:er9cn Caczs ~ +~ ~`~ /lA~ ~. 57~.,~Tu~L SAS kP9Ra.~n _t, _ _o ~~~ ~Z~l~~~ (). ~. ~ ~a r~.v~1 ~~J~1o~ ~.~~ iS~ 9 G~,~,15~~,-gyp G.?~ ~~/-~ ~ ~rK. t~ ~,.~-- 3 Z Xv9a9nE ~ 4Yat~ • ) • e f n a . No.B '73A: Pc.$i~~% ~ ~~/~°~ City of SantaMonit~ PG 19 SANTA MoxlcA ButLDINC a sAPETY Date: - ~ 'Fee$ a~ 16sb Main Street, 9enta Monica, Ca. 96401 Fee$ - .I7ate~ (raf7heck No.; ce9 LX7eeek_No:. $p f~ ° ' mD1NGS 1.®~'9tJ1I~I~IiDII ®IIiY{~BI~Ig ccs ~ d•. _ , ~a ~ PERMIT APPLICATION gyp' 'J~/ `~' (PRINT IN INK OR TYPE) Const. .. ,: Applfed'il~e Nome ~ ~ Tel:_ I'BOJHCT IDENTIFICATIO~f ~ DESCRIPI%ON: A) Street Address;:.:. /.5/`/.Gt'/i~z StfiRe= 9~Gt/~ Tax Code: legal: Lot ~ ~Y Z Block B 5 Trott Lot Size -3'6 X~Q B) Class of Work: __Dwlg _Apts~~Comm -Other: New Const_Altns_ Desexiphon GEZa,.r~.r- f3 tt<hi ,e..'GACnAE dD197RE'GGlS D ~~G!'v ~}~tia' 9 FLOOR AREA- Provide floor area Wcvtations for irldividieal uses as well as total area. Existing Floor Area (sq. ft of individual uses) _500 s. F. Floor azea to be Removed (sq. ft of individual uses) n!/n Total Proposed Moor area Site Dimensions Site Area Proposed Lot Coverage BUILDING HIIGHT Existing 33~ Promised 3?S ~ SETBACKS. ; Fxisttng Setbacks- Front Rear Sides ' Proposaai Setbacks Franc Rear Sides PARIONG Existing Proposed RENT CONTROL STATUS: IndirateRent C°atrofatatra afeheparn). The Citg tm7%not pratrs app7irsteasJor mhieh rryidrid Reef Canbal Perlrei'~Imx rmla~amea6laiwi. TOTAL ESTIMA'T'ED VALUATION OF PERNIIY IMPROVEMENYS .p /D, 000 W Yetuatfoa do tlu mW S e+a)ae of act kbor, xeaffiHa[e, &paeme¢rrategafywunt inNaded to the p•ojed. Ibtin•ated S are uwpa•ed m earrmt eoaahele 6ioa east tedexa for dere•wrtsatfaee of peraett fas'andteeruutlttot m tFeAaanm. f affier. PRINCIPALS ~IDBNITFICAnON: //- ~/ A> OwneYs Name: ~ose MSmeuo-v T.er.sr, ..61b//7nXiR>vi T,eesrec T~. 8/+~' ~~'f7a /n . Address: ~ . B) ConbacroYs Name: :::. .. ~ _ .. Ter>=•~:. .. Address -:.: ..` C) Architetk Engines: _1~oRTNE/yH ~ ~ Tel; .~ Jd - r}'19" ~~6s~ Aaaress: is ozz SAnfTT !~r ~cn RU//J GOS A~+°~.se .eft D) Lending AgsaCy:_ dtA Tel: Address: CERTIFICATT4NS Qc DECLARATIONS: 1. VERIFSCATION OF RJIYIRMATIC3~I & OWNERS A1TIISf: I certify that information provided on pplica on is correck and that the Ownes(s) agree to comply with all Gty ordirarecesand state lam regulating faction demolition the Owner(a)authodzeCity staffm enter the described property for' , C[~CK STATI~y~wOwner r ~rContractr~ Arch/Iinga / AuthorizedAgent 2. WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFfCATT~T & DECLARATION; A)CIItTIFICATION: Iostifydat Worker'sCompensationhtanranreisineffettforaB workauthorized bytle(spemtitand that a current CERTIFICATE of WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSIIRANCE is on fi7ewith the Gty of Santa Monim. 8J D~MI']ION: I certify fiat I requiresewntsbecaeuel am Date: 6 9 3. ASBES'ICAS/HAZARmUS/TOXIC/MATERIALS CERTiFSFIC'ATIGV 6r DECL.ARATIONS: I certify beat I have inspected the described property and to the Fiat of my professional knowledge it does NDT contain asbestos lug' d but~ding materials ttat mold ravse~airborne asbesto4 fibers during the mnstructlon, al(eration, err demoBtion proeeaa. FurBaetrrmre, this site does NOT hatWle or store hazardota oz roxie materials. Name <prhlq State Lie. No. Date By u a5F-zF USE ONLY ~ .- - - . ~.... ~. tPenriits~.. '~::' ~ . Notes.:. ~,$~~-(jf9j APPROYATS ~ RCB . Map Shcet~ ~ ~ ,~',i p~UIV I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ GS/PW . ~ q4 . Date ~~ -~~ CNo s~ur~e} other . f ?, ~- PLANS mustbepmvided to - ,mpanyall signifisntSanta Monica pennitapphstiom.. JT'E:PLANS preparedb•,~astate~ licensed Arr]ritect or Engineer MUST be SIGNED & STAMPED by the AIE when submitted per state law. (2) setsofplansareAEQU1BEDforallSINGLEFAMRYpro~etsand othermfno:remodeling&accrssory bur~dingprojects (signs, pools, fences, mmmercial remodels k tenant improvement (TD projects). (4} setsofp]ansareftEQUIItEDforNl:W multiple units and NEW mmmerciaibuildingprojectsorsul>stasttial additions. (i) set of all project supporting data (roils reports, structural design & T-24 talcs, etc) properly signed by responsbie A/Es involved in preparation, is required wish fiU'trg. ALL PLANS 5UBMRT® SHALL INCLUDE - A. Plot plan of adequate scale to show dimensions and size of each lot b be built upon or otherwise used; the size, shape, loattonenduseoferdstlngandproposedbuildings:the layoumfparkingareas, parldngspaces,deiveways,walls,streets, alleys, adjacentbulidixtgs, aswell as, existing stmet trees, sheet lights, sidewalks and hydrants. B. Dimensioned plans showing elevations of proposed remod measurements provided muss all eztaiae elevations of both C. FuBydimensinned flaorplaru and the like. Tn thecase oirer walls shag be clearly aurked D. SITE PLAN SKETCH Showln~ for the permamrtt dty teeord addition and listing squab sling, m demt of this permit attiviry. rennv~,or new rnnstntction.= /~ N gg 7~ - ... » l t_slt I R C BSF-26 AB ~ ~ _. S,AI'J?A M0197GA 81nLI?YNG b SRF$YY iy!~i f RtCEiFft~~,'. ~, CODI %883 b~aSa CG 4QEQ1 { ~~~ ~;~0 ~ i ~: ~.`s ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ ® ~ . h iii ) 4 A A U , , z ~~~. ~n r ~ ~ ~~ w j .. / ~ -y p ~ l ri { -!T - aY~i °g , . '~ Applieaafs BeNJtavinr F' C,q ~ e„'~ 8y g77`Zb~ Fa i ~ ~ -, j D E PLOT &~!!B, :OF .gQBM ~.if~.::.-: • ~~%' ~..''.. rsiP3: ~~ ~~c~ D) b'R tl'so: (ea OfSce, Pte? .~ _... _ . , .. - - - -- = Hemet '._._ o bE S~rtes _ rso, orv~ i y~ ~ ~ ~ ,. . ,~-,~,~~_.~ ....e.,,.~~.~ Tom,,. 1;3 TorV~' hY •~ c ~ ~ gaoZS ,iiaa -- _-- -- TeL . A+ddr~ o.: %' i.!' . r w. ~i~ `l , AA _ 'g,~9~ ~~-"~++ AA A~T-++.TTl!~11~~TT !~.'~.pp ~Qy~ 7Yg 'g-~7~T~-+ ~+~7 ~,fgr~-[ >~ x~ Par'bep[ Use Qnly [ .l~~~Ldi.,.l'L11V1V„ F'S,.)1'k" B V.AJq..1J11,V ~T Pl+'1\..LY~R A ` 'BT,7ILDtIx~~iGg}(~RMIT BiJILDING DRPARTMENT CIT'~ OI? SANTA bION ~' '"' x ~~~ ~ , Is ~' LOCATION Address I F'Ca .em ' _ I~Ot ~,+i+ . &loCk ~ ~ • 7.'1"aCt• ~' ° -' ^ ° ~- `t`` ``~ - ` ` - , , - i ,~i APPLICATI/ON ,~ Owner . ~ 4 ea ~ ~`, 'd 1,-19~~ ~ - ~ '" ~ °• , _ Occupant r - i"y flans tEed 19 - - , Checkedzb .. USE OR OCCUPANCY, Group j~ Dlvlsxon "r ' Use Lone No. G ` y . ~ ~ . `„ ~ Existing No of Rooms ' r No, II'ami3jea ' ' -- lU t ' II3xx~~ f of Clastxfia.araon ~'DP°sed• ~~NU of Rooms No,,Famil~es ~ "'~ - _ - - 1 0 e a E R i a ! ' OCC'F/YnN~Ye' I : - " ~ ' { , , ,1r,~;Mne ~t-.llyor We.tnW (.+aaypaa •Iepr1, 4..4 „f txrx+nxro wan mn+~ILn+6T ~-Mar,nA p1V4Nm {L.aLa. pu.L,~g In40 p ' ma[e) $~Aam d puLLe aett521sRC (oiler tbw ! ~ + ueetro w moClnW P><LUrV Wteew) G.n t e uaelpg mpaeitY of 84W or beet tY a¢y 1. n[ eeam $[eJE I.o,lpn nM Ured fa pbWw wihs,ngn wms i d wog ryVtvm eben:me p.nix denlb 6n~k of pm^mipm sell a rcxa a In. m CrvJp .1- nlvebn J Lut L¢rmA p I1 ' neroGng enlm<tty cf N.V W drW Sn a¢S N"[ -, L-$'61nt m 4eooq d lllvfeloo 9 LnL lur, g ~ eeeW+g u)mJty Waeyam..rm,llrm }baV 1Ju1~uA y,lvmry ..fu.,,.w[,u`, urylNma nrpil 1, Lwl ryy ~ e-Pm IWn w,ul..,,,mh „"ewm~ mae ,W m,d.. t. ,,L~w i mcd~iue ntV~ 1 ~ ~L«n g,w[amL> kpuLLG p.«gq p+^r w pno-davm peoduew a-Pf~v,,,K v,~~M,: f~.p,p~, waadvmking eml ~ .eat+xa fvctn,va ~-8 piw etV~nwU L~¢M1q'Mnmmnbin ar ex '1-{Yholesele epd rttul etaav pntm 6VIIOIpgr rnetwumaq, d[rawne y lays p[L,tL~x 1' - pl+we vu ,nipaiyobM,,nd $n [4.fm-, z-r..w,.,. anti xyel,rbrp, prong metenals nm L,aw~ mga,aw,L. Nr erNwwa m.sg. and mom remora ivr wmtm ~b'¢ eaei as ph¢d, p,a[r ehpta, yumprne plmU mIJ r l H~~a wnr'~ YbM d kehope wog IammGunG m.nmlpnvV mM~ aia 9-8rm~~~ tl wJn a a! meombmtlLlc { i' nlad.. goad. , 1-naxle, npmtmenb bwus, darwtpna icaArp, 14--Cmlanntsr on~setene§ dd p[aptn Sawa ~~ (.aanmaa~i.Gn¢i0wmorc) EI-.rh,.urvg• • ,i-»,.m wow , , YAa mY hNAdmw and NlucLnns we4 1+¢p, nL~d ~ f«pcen wa 4 tab nigh we unkn, yor. A-fit.dmmry n~v xv,ng elpnda, mavlemepg gwP ~ ~ aWnum ~ ,CONSTRUCTION. 7~pe F1re Zone-No - ~~' ; ' ' '` 4' , ~' ,_ ,,, ,r ' Nature of Work _ _° Ci.~ ', Valuation ~ ~-~~~ F '~ ,State License No. --I r~ Contractor ` ~~ ~ ~ ' ;~ ~°°~r~ - _ City Llcense No i t~ ~* ` ~ Address ~ " , , , ~, ''9 - Arehi'tect 'State, Llcense No,n Address - - , , r Material. Exterior Walls, ~ - Roaf ' ' f Height to Hlghcat Pomt Syr ft, No. Stories " ~ ~ - Other }3ulldings„On acme ]ot ~ Haw Uaed' - ,~• IVIlmmiun Distance from I'ropnaed work, of llulldings on"same lot ~' ft, ' .t on other lots ft ` '} ~ ~ ,. _ ~ ,^ .~-J .:P 5.I T , F Size. ,Width ~ ~ ft. by Length ft; Area of Iat Floor ~ R4• ft, ., _ u e _ _ yll{3TP The gr antLng of x Ruildmg permrt does not grant any right or privilege to (1) Erect any bpildmg and /or structure or any portion thereof, upon any atree t, alley, yr other publte place or portion thereof, or (`Lj, I1sa any 6ullding andJnr Ntructnre ar any portion thereof, toi any purpose that ia, or may lie proA>,blted by ordinance of the City aY Santa Monica , .. The granting of a Sutldmg Permit does not affect or pre~udiee any.elaun of title _ to, or right of posaeas~un In, the property described in suet Peraut Uae Zone App d nafe~~~~4'F PPr.~car~~ SIGIN PER ~r BpU~ILDING DEPARTMENT, CITY DF SANTA MONICA N V r BEF4R£ PJ.AN5 AFE APPAOVED AND P£RNUTAts i$SUED. FILL OIJT APPLICATION IN INK, Location Job Addresst /,Sl ~ y/ /L,~ i~///~~ .J/J~ Owner ~`~=~tJ~ '/~4L ,~J~G-`` Owner's Address ~~ ~//G~,~/fe.'~r Phone ~~~~~- ~-~~-~ ~ ~ State Incense No. Contractor City License No ~ Contractor's Address: ,.r~t~~ ~~+~_~~ Phone No. ~X~~`3' j Engineer phone No. License No 1. Typo of Sign Roof ^, Wall Ground ^, Marquee ^, Protecting ^, Billboard ^ 2. Material of construction (a) Supporting structure ~_''Tu~d~Gi (b) Frame of sign ~¢'~~ (e) Surface of siati C.~L~-~ C~ 3 Size of sign {a) Dunensions -~ ~ x jam- ~ -.` (b) Total area (all surfaces with copy)---- ~ ~ Rq. ft. ~ 4. Valuation of sign including cost of installation $ ~`-~~ m-r> ``~ 5, illumination to be used: Nane ~; Indirect ^, Direct p, l+lashing ^. Other ~ 6. Height of building (stories) 7. Will this be the only sign on this property3 Yes ^, No ^. 8 Will this be the only sign on this street frontage? Yes ^, No ~^, 9 SHOW PLOT PLAN, FRONT AND SH)E ELEVATION DN OTHER SH)E OF THIS SHEET. 10 Two sets of plans and engineering calculations shall be provided when regmred. ~~ I have read the above apphcatton and know the contents thereof, the same is true and correct I further to that i am familiar with the laws regulating the above work within the City of Santa Momea and the to of California and amendments thexeto and that the above work will comply therewith I certify that in doing the above work I will not employ any person in vtolatian of the Labor Code of the State of Cahforiua xe~latan/g to workman's compe/nls~ation insu rice. ~ /' Signature of CJwner or Agent Date e 4 J _ -. -_ ___ I ~} l~~''} y i }, I V J,tl'~ i' i !.~ ~ ;~~ I ~ ~I j- ---r ~'tta ~ - ~ ~ j t sty ~r~sae ~~ i _ ;' E `°~--=-~--f 2 4 t i ~ 3 I ~~ Q~ °a1j Pf~1.fC,ATI~IN f=t3R f3U1L©IfVCy PERMIT FSra 3iUII.DIlVG 17EP C17Y OF SANrA ItQONYCA ,r~ - Iona NO --`°°f-~~~/•-r~ pecvp /~ g Tlua Xppksahan Most Be Pstled Cut Ia dak Ikt® v J~~ ~ ~ Tytb® VT6 ~E ~ ~C7 A BUILAING BERi,IIS. DC NCT SSASY WC88 `~ Canetr BEFOHS pr.APtS A1tE APPROVED, AND PE9t.$Y iS tSSi7E0. Foe, ffi...._ _ ^ ~~~~~ Location Address ~ ~l ~ ~`-' "~ ~ "°-"' K . - - - Lat a~- 't! . $1txY Tract ..... ~ ... Snaze of Lot . - x - - List Fxistang Btuldings On Lot and Use '~'A'' ~ ~""~`~ " '~ ' -~ - -- - Will it be necessary to request permissaon to remove trees from parkway to install driveway (Yes ) {No_~) Nntura of Work• ~ - 1 {~ Corsntruetton^ Cenoenlan ~ DettCRiptiara t'~.IV'V~LCN~,{s.@ ~~ `~A~A.. 3t-~X4~ ~~S.~IIia+'"~_ Enlargement ,^ Repair !~' .gi.2.{{1 `_°.!'~luc~ 6° "'~,,9:q,'<` t^'1 >~per'^.f~,..+ Alteration ~q RV $ Si~cific Use of Building- ~?~~ ~ ~. ~e'li~. No of Rooms _ No of Families - - Material Exterior Wnlls _ _ _ First Floor ]otsts _ _ _ x Secontf Floor )Diets x_ umber of Stones Height to highest Point ..._ Roof Material Saze Width - - - H , by Length- - .. . _ .ft ; Tafal Ftaor Area - - aq ft Includanc3 Plumbing, Gas Fitting, t fl VALUATION OF lil?OISOSED BLDG ~ Sewers, Cesspools, Electnenl, ~ 1000 _ _ - _ ~~"" ~" ~' p amt F:mal+un ,all Labor, etc J $ (~ _ Ownar~?*^~~' ~- vxac Qr~+An~,p ~ Address )~f ~ ~uk~~.e.~.~e {,.~ ° titc`{a. ~4.sµ.~'~ (,7 (State Lacense Na _ - _ _ _ Contractor ~~{~ ^- ''` *_ _ ~T-` C?` Ca#y License No .___ -- . ddress l ~~ § 1x9 t~u~. `R `rd'~`~" - - - - -phone No S~ z- ~." O. Architect _ _ . _ State License No Address _ - ... -_ -.. -- . _~honeNo ---- .. -__--.. NOTE The granting of a Building Permit does not grant any right or pnvilegtr to (l) Erect any bualdmg and/or structure or any portion thereof, upon any etraet, alley, or athtrr pubAc place or portion thereof, or (2) Use any building and/or structure or any portion thereof, for any purpose that ra, x may be prahIbited by ordinance of the City of Santa Monica The granting of a Building Permit does not effect or prejud a any claim of tSile to, or right of poasesseon in, ilia prop- erty described ux such Permit I have read the above appitcatran and know th® co ants thereof, the same is true and correct I further state that I am famahar with the laws gaveminq buaiding rvat in the G4ty of Santa Monaca and State of Catifomia, and amendments thereto, that the above building andJor structure wall be hutlt m conformity therewith, and that legal property lines have bean established I, the owner, certify that all labor employed on this work wall be covered during course of construction by work- man's compensation insurance as required by the State of Cahiomia U~ ~tp t~~ Signature of weer or Agent Date t.~' NOTE: SHOW PLt7T ®N OTt~R ~ID£. (FCA aorrur~ DEPARTAT>?NT v8E oNaY) Curb to Prap Line IMap Sheet No Use Classification 0 ~1 L S,~ltl==: ~ a i d-~ ~'~ ~+ t .~ ~~x~S~ Lazo``/_ -------+ M w------~ m ~ .~ ~. 1 ti~ _r a' .. SL' i j T /-- ~ {~ D ~'v ~ ~--.2~,I2.~s Bo(~ ~ ~~.. Car,s~. Gr. ~~ ~ti ~i,~ ~~~ i ~ ~t~l, . ~, J 0 CITY OF SANTA M6MICA DEP'AIiTMENT ~~~11L61HG w-rneR Wilshire B1, roa ley ~~ ~«r 1 2Be~nar zsega~ YmACP es saran OWMYw awe CRW~nYCi ~ [n * d w r ... w C] Cawv . .. p wv~R (3 Sq rY !{~~~} RPXR C~16 CwMTMGMR cw+t Ews - O Gorses # 150,400 $ 7SS, +911 ~-ii-SZ Natfonal ~~~ 15fl{D 10. aria Storace 25 000 155 a CITY flF SANTA MONIC'A Y~NER epartmEnr of Bmid~n~s xES~r W ~A ~ ,~-.~ .-.fL CITY OF SANTA MO.NICA Department of $mldui6s 2 a`~ TREET FJ45..i....,... u~..a WNER tSOggs & Mas~ttlayer nmc ; 80~O.yee $ 4.0~ .kg ~ladition to uuilding CITY OF SAIJ7A MOHICA pEPARTIJIEMT OF BUILDING ~ .R~~ y}i~s$ir~ BlTrr3. Ko 151{} TT.. ~q~~ etacK f1S tRACr ~N S ,r3ry YNER ~IF'~'S 6G 181$LAILLey2 ~~l$}7 2'Ff ^~BY~r~ ~I'~. 1+ ~RSTMULT a ~J CNL4FIIEN T ~' T ~ 49n• rv LJ nCrn lrv PeaMIT vws5 (.oNTWACTCa COS4 F[i f 9 QATB OP ~K {P{9PRCT6A i s~ [ 7 wt 4d 6+~K.7yi City of ~ S~n~a M©ri7 1585 Main Street Santa Mon ~~~ Lat-d Use and Transportation Manage i'ii`} !JII.`.;Filf•?E eiL!'1:! lit~.~'. CI ,'a,.' £_h~t,~i.t!-11~;.73~ii+,i~, PEF'fltt- F F'rxrmit ila, ~4o^~D7"7 1 :'~~ I haF'7F:Pli'tT i (711 ra~elrrus 15i,'~ i,JSL`3t-ili?I= :31~r.~~~ Job Title 1~~1!a i,~ltl..SN,IP:f: ~I_liG UcaSa r i f t ion t1bC'r f'C . r Ll~~ Q *;:1't~='*~c:'$~ t~ty'( NG . ~K S Cf 6j W~ r~ „ tr'~* ..6F;C:4~'i"Y3~ ~ . T'JkJ:~ ,~ `Tt~., Y`JO , 91' il:~ i #; °vn ,.r.''~ikEr"f~r~ 4'41 it i7 C~7 .~..;M1 f~.°...:d . i?t''~'..Itiihl3 IPi[~~i~'t'lrt'r`~llt# ~~ ,: A, ~`tBtYie `' '. ,..LIF'1I~ ~t`f3~~e~~T ~'.t7rJ7f!~ttCr f~~~ 3f"'rfdr{i!..t_ ~il~,. . t~dgr~,,r. , .&; ~ ..,,a..>,:~;nt7F~ ~ ~ , ,~ : -SST t`1 s.r ~ S y /IA~'~OIIF v«{r~ ''z Ph an F ~•I'c . ~ . ` -C ft"~ >5 "' ~ C~ ~ r4~r3aaarlas 1'~tnF r e - '. Jt+" . .~{ + `':{ ~t : TAT f~L ~"f• ~~ '~- ~ . z J ~~~ a, '° F .3 YYt:.. =1 . I Ct~hii'i~Al 1"P: "y '~ l~'(~.ri:s3P~XC~N~~:, ~~'I^~t'-:T:lr T ubl _ „ J , v~-,. INSPECitON 8Y DATE NOTES B: C: E M: P: FbUNDA7WN 9• • g E: M: P: M - E; M: P: UnderPlaar or slab ~ • M: P: ROUGHIFRAME m,~. E: M: P: Las Q FINAL E M: P•. FP; GS: PZ: LR: 24A T m Power Poo! E: - M: P:.. - -- Sewer FUY Water H!Y Gas H/Y Gas Final A IianceorAcce o E: M: P, T of Service No. of Meters E: P: Maters Released E: P: ~~ DAM~G~ lI a~~Y RECEIPTS City a£ Santa Monica No. ^ , ~~~~- ' No: A loo ~~ Date: ~( Fee $ SANTA MONICA BIJILDLNC & SAFETY 2~ 1685 Main Street, Santa Monica, Ca. 90401 Fee-$ ° :Date I . m } ~9 ®® r~ s'f ~CheckNo. CODINIkNo~. ~+ ~®tll}JIC11tt0~1 Ivam'iA'ae GIS 7~ App'd PER11'IIT APPiiC.4.TION Occp-___~ }Date___~~~~~~ (PRINT IN INK OIt TYPE) Const;' - ~ . Applicant's Name j~ Tel: PAOjECT IIJENTIFICATION & DESCRIPTION A) Street Address.: /~i /'9 1.''uJ '~S~/ F,~'~ ,::~+~ ~~ 'Tax Code: Legal Lot Block I -~rd~'t Lo; Size II X B) Class of Work. _Dwlg ~ Apts Comm}-Other New Const II Altus Repairs Description ~ fil^f~c~uK'~f ~~~ '??'~ ~ f'C~tJOUIi~~- S1~A-f~S~ ?!YrIN .. 11 FLOOR AREA -Provide floor area calculations for individuaLuses as well as total area.. ~~ Existing Floor Area (sq. ft. of individual uses) ~~~T ~•~° ~~ t _~ Floor area to be Removed (sq. ft. of individual ices} II Total Proposed Floor area II Site Dimensions Site Area Proposed Lot Coverage BUILDIIVG HEIGHT Existing 25' Proposed SETBACKS Existing Setbacks - ~ Front Rear 1 Sides Proposed Setbacks-i Front Rear II Sides PARING Existing I 'Proposed I RENT CONTROL STATUS: ~ Indicate Rent Control status of the Jp l t. T!u City will nut process applications ~ which reguind Rent,Conirol Permits lwt•e not dean obtaiiaeS.' - TOTAL EST%MATED VALUATION OF PERMIT IMPROVEMENTS +y ~ l~r~jOt7 •p' Valuation is the total $ value of aR Iabor, nurteriats, b permanent equipment inehsded;in the project. Fstvnated $ are compared to current construction mst Indexes fm determination of permttfees and transmfttaJ M tJaeAssessar's ~offtce. i PRINCIPALS YDENTI A) Owners Name: ~ Address: !z ~ B) Contractors Name: Address: ~'} G Architect, Engirieer: Address: .Z2 D) Lending Agency: _ Address: Tel: ,~,6 z Z Tel: ..'mac CERTIFICATIONS 8c DECLARATIONS: 1. VERIFICATION OF INFORMATION & OWNER'S INTENT: I certify that information provided on this application is correct, and that the Owner(s) a ordiriarices anti state laws regulating canstniction & demolition work. Furthermore, the Oi enter the desrn'bed property #or inspectio~ti p~rposs. ~ . i--~ _-1e__~_-_ _ __a.-_- _- _ _, CHECK STATUS ~ Owner `~' Contractor Arai/Engr - i 2. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATION & DECLARATION: A}CERTIFICATION: dcertifythatWorker'sCompensatianInsuranceisineffedforallworkaui that a current CERTIFICATE of YVORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE is an file with OwnerlContractoi's Si tun: State Licence Nv ~~,,, `~ `~ yam- '' .Cite Bus. Lia No B) EXEMPTLON: I certify that d am sole owner and will personally per ~~• is signature: ~ fmm the state Worker's Compensation Insurance L~vark ~u ' his permit. 3. ASBESTOS/HAZARDOUS/TOXIC/MATERIAt SCERTIFICATION &r DECLARATIONS: i ,.®.e:a, +i.u+ i 7.z..e 9eac..en+,s,i +s,a eimrn'4ud nrnmrW and in tha hacP of rnv nmfoeainnal knm to comply with all Ciry s) authorize City staff to rte: Qc Agent izedbythispermitand City of Ssnta Monica. arnentsbecauseI am ice/ it does NOT contain PLANS must be provided to accoiiipariy all significant Santa Monica permitapplications. NC)TE: PLANS prepazed by a state licensed Architect or Engineer MUST be SIGNED & STAMPED by the A/£ when submitted per state law. (2) setsofplansarel2EQUIREDforallSINGLEFAMILYprojectsandotherminorremodeling&accessorybuildingprojects (signs, pools, fences, commercial remodels & tenant improvement (TI) projects). t4) sets of plans areREQUIREDforNEWmultipleuniisandNEWcommercialb~ildingprojectsorsubstantia]additions. (1) set of all project supporting4data (soils reports, structural design & T-24 talcs, etc) properly signed by responsible A/E's involved in preparation, is required with filing. ALL PLANS SUBMITTED SHALL, INCLUDE: A. Plot plan of adequate scale to show dimensions and size of each lotto be built upon or otherwise used; the size, shape, location and use of existi ng and proposed buildings; the layout of parking areas, parking spaces, driveways, walls, streets, aiteys adjacent buildings as we31 as existing street trees, street ]aghts, sidewalks and hydrants. B. Dimensioned plans showing exterior elevations of proposed new building and additions to existing buildings; exterior elevationsofproposedtemodelingor °facetifting". Exteriorelevationsmustshowtheheightofeachbui]ding. Elevation measurementsprovided mustbecertifiedbyalicensed stuweyororengineer. Inthecaseafadditionstoexistingbuiidings, all exterior elevations of both the addition and the existing building are required. C. Fully dimensioned Eoor glan§ indicating square feet, interior layout including seating arrangements in restaurants, ban and the like. In the case of remodeling, or demolition, existing and proposed dimensioned floor plans are required. Ail walls shall be clearly marked.as existing to remain, to be rerr~ved, or new construction. D. SITE PLANSKETCHshowing"generallocation&scopeofproposedworksha]IbeprovidedBkl.Ow ON THIS FgRM for the permanent city records of this permit activity. "~ E f F OE ~' ~ ._ Qt7 Use Only Applkaat's Noma i ~. PERMiT APPLICATION jPR1NT tN tNK OR TYP~J BROViDE' PLOT /_i OF FORM ' ~ I i I ~~ i ,~ P80lECT ID£N'1'>FICATI~O~Itd--,$t D ON: A3 Street Address ./.S/ a fL .1fi`/ ... , ~~__._.....__.Toz:Code:._.__,.__ ._....._........~..~ Legai:. Lot Block _._. Trort .M__ ~. Lot Size .. ~x....._..._.__ fi7 Class of Work:. ®Dwlq ®Apta ~ Comte .Other : ~ew Canst .._ _.11tns _ Rapadss: . _ ~_ awn ..__ ,.._ n..y.F ~ _ ~ ..-_ .. _ ._ FIaor Ateaa by Ctse: (eg: Apts:, Office; Forking} .~__..._._ _._.... .._.._A _~ _ Height ._____........__ ft._ -- ._..._..,-__w_w.__. .~._~~ Na. of Stories __..._~._... Tt72AL.ESTIIVIATEff 7ALUATIOIZ OF IMPRO*/II`•YhZ4TS $ ~S~• - Vaiuv3ion is the~totai:~value• of all labor. maieria3s, & petmonent squiPment inciuded in the. protect: Estimated ~ ors compared to. cuaent constrstction mst indexes for determination of permit face. i PBIpiCIPRLS' IAENTIFSCA~fONc Rt Owner's Name: ~/ J ~ +U ~ _~_._..._~__ Tek .__._._ Bt Cantracrors Nemec / E .~~.~. Tei: .~~5 O / Addteaa:, __.f~:. /. ~4 ~ ~ ~ _._ ,~~ Cl. Architect/Engiaeer:._ .__.___.__.._......Y~._._._..._ Tei:..._.,.._._~_..~_~.._ ' Address _ _~._.. ..._~._.... I~ Lettdina Agescp: __......._._...~ ..._~~_.~..... _.~.:.~Y ~. T®1:..._..___..~..._~~~ Address: CESTffiCATIONS &. DECLA$ATIONS: F~l OWNERS' DECLARATION: ~/ I hereby affirm shot I am ezempt from. the-contractors iicense Iaw because: -- I;wtll da afL. work personaiiY or thru wade employees: attd this strucnue. is not intended for saie: t\ ~.I wtfl CCS3tSaCi with. IIG9n86d CCII1traG2OI3-t0 C031sh11Ck tf1L4~prCjeC1. Signature ._ __ .~ ............._.._..._...__........__._.__ Data: ._..........._... ~' HS LICENSED CONTRACTORS DECLARATION:. '. I hereby affirm that I hold as active license under thqe California Husfnesa ~ Professions C e. Licenas Cktss~cr -~ ..~Z~.g..t._...__: .._ City,Bus Lie. No....,~,..._/ '~L ....,..._..,. Signature:. _ d~!~~-_.__..~_._._. Date: ..aY.'.f.L:'s~{r_.._..._._ ~Q WOf?KMAN°& COMPENSATION INSiJRANCE DECLARATION 6 VERffTCATION 4F INFORMATION I hereby affirm that Worker's Compensation Insur~ea is in effect for alI worms authariaed by this permit and proof of instutatce coverage is on Ella with City. I cert3£y ;hat I have reviewed this app[iaatian attd that the above ittformatiott fs correct. I agree to comPiy with ail diy state lases g buildang construcKfonlond hereby authariie entry upon the described. props tot L' res. ~/ ~ Sfgaature: --- -._~.....__... Dater _~ _....__ CFt STA7U5~ r ~ Canhoetor- `- Pri~eioia AutFnrized Agtni i. SANTA MONICA;HUiLDING. 6 SAPE'tY 1685 Maia Street,. Smrta Moafca. Cm 906tH ZONING USE ON4Y e r_,_.:o ;Cttp vas aniy _ sAivTA r~laxccA~ sunDtxG ~ sAFl:xx ~ ~. .-~RjEC~¢I-P+T~S~~~`®~c"otslNt,5 1885 Mctin Streeb Sontd Moaicc. Ca. 9040E ., !i ` ~~~ ~ Ak, w°""^'~'"°.~'.~ Pint ~ -.. ® ,_~' s. ~- i i F« $ : APPLICATION i " iPR'wr iN jNK oR rrPPa: N~ A W~_ > Data. ?'~'d• ~ APPiicanYs Name '.J ti ~ t Ti-I ~ N ~-\`~N'1.~- K Tal ~~~~'~~'~' r~aa s-~ `. „~ PRaVIDE- PLOT PLAPI ;ON OTFIDR SIDE OF„FORM ' I i - ~ PROJECT. IDELd7tFiCATIOIS' b DESCRIPTION: ~ A) street Address :.~~ 1 ~ \~l'.Li _~ 411 ~ ~~- _ Taz Code. p Legal: tot i Z` ....._.. Block ~' `.~~ ._~._ .............. Trrrci~tiY~ atwur;r Lot Size /~" c? ...a. L~ ° ~. B} Class of Work• _ Dcvlg ~_ Apts 'Comm Other : New Coast ~_._Altns.. _ Repairs. I Descriptton ..:.._ °~ _.~._ .-~. ~ - .~-.. Flooc Araas by Use leg APta., QfHce» .. ~'> (~"-~~,:!.~...~--.~.~'~~'ti'~ ~`"'~ eighY,f~~ ~ fL ~ -r._... TOTAL ESSIMFiTED VALUATiaN OF IMPROVEMENTS ~ ~•~ ~~~~-~~ Valuation is tfte' total $ value of all Iabor. materials, 6 permanent equipment included in #he` prolecf, , Estimated $ are compared to; current construction rnst indexes for determination of pe;tnit f®es::: - ,`PRIIQCIPALS IDENTIFICATION: ' A) Owners .Name: L!~t? . ~~~~ ~: ~.9~1+;;v, Te1::.~33.~~r,~- - -, h Address:.,..~6 1 ~? _~~.1~?r Lr`t Y ~ .~....1-.ll._._Y . ? "5~ ~._ ~ ''. IlJ Contractors Name !v1iK_.~...~=>/\' ~: ci ... _ .. X.~? r`;/_r ....:......_ ........ .... Tel. N~.L__..j.~~~ Address ::.._.. l'~ ~ f _ _~xG ~ 1-fi. fr70 z J ...........__._ :._... ... C}, Architect/Engineer ¢Yl ~:'/.~'.ft/~ }L .... ~._ ' L 1 ._.... .. _...._..... Tel: ~.~? .~~ ./~, . Address.:..,,... ~~~ {..~~C.» ...~..._.. ..:~:_._ 6Jfb L ~ ............._....._...._~_..:. ._._...._..... D); Lendtng Agency: -----•---------._.».-_.. -.: .-...._......_ ..:...........__-___.:_.__.......-:_........._.._ Tel:...... .:.._.._._.,:_....._....._ ~ =;. ~. Address:...s..._.._:_.._.._.........._._...-.. ~_.._._............__._.._...__.._._ ..:.._.__._.._ ............._.......~:_.._._..:.._..-.__ <. t)~TIFSCATIOIJ3 6 DECLARATSONS: ~ A) OWNERS DECLARATION: '\ I hereby affirm iftat I am exetnPt frem a contractors license law because: ~ R .Pwl(1".do all work personally or thnr wage employees; cmd ihis:structiue is not intended for sale. " ~ I: will' contract with lleensed .contractors to construct this protect:.. u Signature . ::....................__.._ ~_._._.._......._..».»_-----------------................. ..~.. `Date::..... ......,......._ ._.:.;... ~ B) LICENSED CONTRACTORS DECLARATION: I hereby affirm that I hold an active license under the California Business & Professiona'Cade _" ~..,.z` ~~__........ ' License Class .~-?._._._...:..._.. No:.-.:;.:r.~~-%.----lf~,'_.. CityBus Iac. No...:. /. / i .: ,. Slgnatueei :.:._ __ .......:......».......__._.._..._.........-_..__.__.._--------....»_..__._._... Date:.---.. .:..:;..------_-_:....._ :. Q WORI{MA1V'S, COMPENSATION IIISURANCE DECLARATION & VERIFICATION OF .INFORMATION : I hereby afSrrn :that Workei s Compensation Insurance is in effect far all work authorized by- permit and ' proof of insurance crovetage is on file with City. I crertify, tliat3 have revtewed this aPPlication and that the above' information is correct. E agiee to coniPly • -with all -city .oiiiirtances and state laws regulating buildins construction a_ ad hereby authorize enty, upois iha deackibed pmpertp for inspection _purpoaes. Signature• :..:.. .~t,~~~.~.._:~~r~~~-.~1~`~::~,..:~-- ------- Date::._.l ~ _~'1 ... ~'---- $TATUS' Owner ~ Contractor Principle _~ Autfwrised Agan4 . ~ ~....... _.. :. . ~ ZONINfa USE 9NLy ~ - = ~ ~ ~ ~ .:: ; ~ ~ .. . ~'~.Moa Sheet CPL Notae: ~ . . - `--80R- Jte ARS-. - u.g _ , -u..i - M Vit VGLL IS31 j„z.-plre"i'1 wathym the erection. ofisaad bualdang _ , %~ Santa Mon forma, ~h Lot No. ~ ,Block No _ „Tract_ Zone _ - _ , What other bldgs on lot, No ,~~m.~ 1 Purpose of Bualdang Is any part to be 4 5 6 7. 8. 2 '1 Owner's name a-~~O-n tJ . ~r~~ 3. Owner's address ' - 9. lo. 11 12. 13. 14. ls. 16 17. is 19 20. 21. 22 23 24. 25 26. Architect's name _ Builder's name ~ G __ Builder's address ! " / ~o,`/~ ~ f _ _ Estimated coat of dwi ~ ! ~~~ ~ ~ g $ / of garage $ ~ ~8 ~rof Will the building be erected on the front or rear~of lot? _ Ctr! Size of Iot _ ~ _ x ,lo~~1 ~ Saze of building Number of stories m height CX • , heaglit from curb levol to What. as the character of the ground; rock clay, sand„Riled, etc _ ~ Of what material will foundation wails be bualt?..%'~ ~ .. ~: - - - store 1$. _ _ .. ~a e~t point O~-~ ~`'' ---- ,,,~~ Give thickness of foundation walls ~ ~i..•Fave tljickneas and width of footings. /~ .._ .. l What will be the depth of foundationp~,,Is below the surface of the ground? ~ . ~_ .. WaIi there be a cellar or basement? { /~' .Will walla be of brick, stone or concrete? _ , Give thickness of same ~ _ __ .. . Alao height of cellar wall_~. __. , ___, Kind of chimne _ _ Number of #luea_ What will be the size of mud salts? _~ x ~ S2ze'of/ girders or stringers 1 _`'~!'~1 ~ What will be the size of exteriorppstuds~_ .~ x„~'7. ., Interior studs?. ~~ .x. ?`. Bearing partition studs c~ . _ x _ !. __ _ I __ _ Give size of floor ~ oast I //~ lot floor _ " ~~ 2nd floor >~ .___ xl:_.L.. _ 3rd floor _ x _ 4th floor _ _ _ __ x L... .. _ 5th floor x _ _ 6th floor _ _ x . .. _ Gelling ,Dist ~ x Imo" ters _ ,f-~. x WiIF the roof be peak, flat or man/sard?.. • Materaal of roofang ~--~C.~_ Ilow many fare escapes wall be provided? ~ _ (Where pia ~~t~,t~D - - - - - - >~-ti~l`1- ~ - - - _ - Will cellar ar basement ceahng be pIa __ or-wc>~di+l'~%-~-'Z'~`t~'s-~ - ----~~ na< Are any buildmgsto be taken down? . igg i.~•"' - u ~iiiany~ _ 1 Frame or stuccos ,r..E'-?~ _ ~ I _ __ _ Of what materials wall floors be construeted'+ _ _ ' e *~ ~ _ __ __ __ _ _ How many thicknesses? ~ > What kind of foie-proofing? .. _...... ,. , .~, ~~ FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION OF THE SAP7TA MONICA CITY PLANP7INGCOMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF AN APPEAL FROM THE ZONING ADMINISTRATORS DENTAT, OF A VARIANCE.OF PARXING REQUIREMENTS. Z.A: CASE N0. 4321-Y Variance of Parking Requirements 1519 Wilshire Boulevard, C4 Bernard and Sheila Segal, Appellants An appeal having been filed by Bernard I. and .Sheila x, Segal from the Zoning Administrator`s denial of a variance of parking requirements for a restaurant at 1519 Wilshire Boulevard, Santa Monica, and a public hearing having been held on the matter on December 15, 1980 in accordance with the provisions of Section 9145.0£ Chapter 1, Article IX of the Santa Monica Municipal Code, thePlanning Commission hereby finds as follows: 1. Strict application would result in unnecessary hard- ships inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the Code in that parking will be provided by lease and no suitable area for purchase exists. 2. There are exceptional circumstances applicable to this particular property .that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone •in that the building, by its unique location and design, is especially suited to the intended use as a cabaret supper club"and in that sufficient available parking exists on nearby lots during evening and weekend hours to avoid .street nBrY.ing: impact on the neighborhood. 3. The granting of the variance would not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or-aurrQUn:ling.neig`~SoY•hood because the restaurant use must maintain at least eighty available parking spaces in order to continue operating. The City Planning Commission therefore determines that a variance to operate a restaurant, supper club ar cabaret with entertain- ment o£ an operatic or classical nature at 1529 Wilshire Boule- vard without providing twenty-seven off-street parking spaces under the same control and `ownership should be and is hereby GRANTED subject to the .following terms and conditions: 1. That the variance hereby allowed is conditional upon the privileges being utilized within 18G days after the effective date thereof and, if not utilized or construction work is not begun within said time~and carried on diligently to completion, this authorization shall become void and any privilege or variance granted hereby shall be deemed to have lapsed. 2. That the applicant shall comply with all other~provi- sions of Chapter 1, Article IX, Municipal Code of Santa Monica .and with-a11 other pertinent ordinances o£ the City of Santa Monica. 3.. That the appellantscovenant with the City of Santa Monica that .the restaurant operation will be closed immedi- ately if and when at least eighty of£-streetr parking spaces are not available solely for use of the restaurant during hours of operation and not iaubject to-being shared by others, theform •of such covenant to be prepared and approved by the City Attorney. 4. That the variance shall begranted to the appellants alone for a-period of five years from initial opening, shall not be transferable or assignable without specific :,~.. Z. A. Case No. 4321-Y ~ Page 2 consent of the City Council 'and shall be renewable at the end of five .years on conditions or reguirements of the Planning Commission. 5. That the operation shall at all times be conducted in a manner not detrimental to surrounding properties by reason of noise, lights, activities, congestion or other reason and any violation shall~be cause for revocation of the variance and £orfiture of the right to operate. Dated t'vis 15th day o£ December, 1960 HEREERT , JR., Ch i City Planning Commi ion City of Santa Monica The above actionwas approved by the following vote: AYES : Cloke, Edwards, Hotrchkiss, Rennedy, Sullivan, Katz NAYS :~ None A95ENT: Kle£fel :J 6. PllBLIC HEARINGS: A. Appeal: Z.A. Case No. 4321-Y The staff report. concerned an appeal from the determination of the Zoning Administrator denying an application fora variance of parking requirements for establishment of a restaurant with entertainmentat 1519 Wilshire Boulevard requested by Bernard and Sheila Segai,.the appellants. Planning Director Lunsford also noted receipt of a letter supporting the appellants from Eunice Kendig and a letter in opposition from Monroe Askins, Sr. Chairman Katz noted receipt of a letter from Joseph Bird Production Company in favor of the matter. Mr. Segal was present and spoke for his request and distributed pictures to the Commissioners. He~noted that Or.~and Mrs. Pillae and~Mr. and Mrs. Grieve who'had sent letters in . opposition bad presented him with another letter withdrawing their earlier objections. Also present to speak in support of the requested restaurant project during the public hearing were: Florence Young, 1142 Sixteenth Street. Mikolay Vishmid, 1138 Sixteenth Street. Ysidro E. Reyes, 1245 Chelsea Avenue. Dr. Hosney G. Mansour, 1138 Sixteenth Street. Gabe Raphael, 1138 Sixteenth Street, #1. Robert Turner, 253 Eighteenth Street. Ruth Rosen, 305 Alta Avenue. Irene Krementsky, 1138 Sixteenth Street., #3. John Leroi, 2728 Washington Avenue. Don Franzen, 947 Eleventh Street. Dale Wendel, 944 Twenty-first Street, #D. Note: Supporting communica- tions also on fiTe:from: Wayne J. Harmon, 1510 Wilshire Boulevard, Allan E. Kreiger, M. D., 903 Centinela Avenue. Speaking in opposition: Rose Topes, 1132 Fifteenth Street. Note: Also received and on file is a letter in opposition from John E. and Helene 6. Galway. At the hearing's close, Commissioner Edwards asked that 11r. Friedman of Kenny's Delicatessen at 1433Wilshire 6oiilevard come forward regarding the parkiny'situa- tion in relation to his business and the proposed restaurant. Commissioner Cloke moved to permit the restaurant and to grant the appeal subject to compliance with Conditions 2, 3 and 4 listed at the end of the Zoning Administrator's report to `~-~'t-`Rc~t»~T~~` Seconded by Commissioner Kenney "ari'amen~ment ptppose by Commissioner SuTTivan was added changing Condition 2 to read: "That the appel- lants covenant. with the City of Santa Monica that the restaurant operation will be closed immediately if and when at least 80 off-street parking spaces a17 to be available solely for use of the restaurant during~.hours of ooeration and not sub- ject to being shared by others are not available and in use for parking for the .restaurant..:" The. motion carried~by unanimous vote of the six memhers.present. _ ~7: NEW BUSINESS: None. 8. OLD BUSINESS: Nane. 9. CONMISSION AGENDA: Commissioner Sullivan placed a motion to reconsider the 3 to 3 vote on Item 5E' before the Commission. Seconded by Chairman Katz, the motion. carried as follows: AYE: Hotchkiss, Kennedy, Edwards, Sullivan,. Katz - . NAY: Cloke ABSENT: KTeffel Thereafter, Conu~issioner Sullivan moved to grant a 90 day extension on Item SE of this agenda. Seconded by Chaimnan Katz, the motion carried as noted: AYE: Hotchkiss, Kennedy, Edwards,,Sullivan, Katz NAY: Cloke ABSENT: Kleffel ~. ~ q"-;~ - occuP.,racr ~ ~-~ aH~ „a SPADE P-Fq'p~, gPl~2oX ~ ~ VER D I wn n tJ p o~ . ~~ ~ ~ ~~: `3G T a3 yZ9 ~ ~ ' xiu caxr wT.. ~.unr•~a.w. somas .. I ~ 16th ST.. ~I:. ;?I L, ~ ~r4 i Aark ~ 1 =ing ~'_~_ a ~ ~ ~ I ~ YERDI ~ 1 ~ PARKINGA ~ s I I i 1 ~ i t 1-_________-~ 15th ST. I 1 ~ ~ other park- ~ I ing I _ f I I t 1 ~ --t---~ ~ t I pJJ~ 1 ~ I +__Y r////J ~__-__ ~ ~f!/~ ~ ~ ~i YER01 ~N ~jPARK1NG I' t 8 I r ~ ~__-_.J J C11 W C 2 to J SECURITY pACI~1C BANK 14th ST. ~i i I ! I I 1 1 i t ~~ I 1 1 1 I . I i I other I f I parking I I 1 1 I f i I~ I ~ i I I I i t-.~__ _1 e it i i N~ , v E R D i vicinity m a p 1" = 104'. 12-15-80 s ~rchifecfure Planning '113 Stoner Avenue I_~'S r'inC?iBS ~~iiYlr Additional documents available at City Clerk's Office