The URL can be used to link to this page

sr-102709-8aCity Council Meeting: October 27, 2009 Agenda Item: SA To: Mayor and City Council From: P. Lamont Ewell, City Manager Subject: Response to Concerns about Methane Gas from Santa Monica City Yards having an impact on the Proposed Location for the Expo Light Rail Maintenance Facility at the Verizon and SMC parking lot sites. Recommended Action Residents from the Pico Neighborhood Board expressed concerns about methane gas having an impact on the Exposition light rail maintenance facility if it is located at either the Verizon site or hybrid alternative that would utilize the Verizon site and the Santa Monica College (SMC) parking lot. This supplemental report supplies Council. and the community with answers from ICF Consulting that provides operation, maintenance and monitoring services for the inactive landfill gas extraction services at the City Yards in compliance with the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services (LACDHS). Executive Summary SCAQMD and LACDHS monitor compliance with regulations on the site of the inactive landfill at the City Yards and Stewart Street Park. The attached consultant's letter and recent quarterly reports show full compliance with the regulatory agencies. Ambient air samples since installation of the permanent control system have not contained detectable concentrations of methane. The Exposition Construction Authority and their consultant Leighton and Associates also analyzed the issues raised and will be prepared to provide their assessment at the Council meeting as well as include their analysis in the Environmental Impact Report for the Exposition Light Rail phase 2 project. There is no fiscal impact associated with this supplemental report. Discussion Portions. of the City Yards and Stewart Street Park lie over an inactive landfill. Since 1998 the City has operated a landfill gas extraction and treatment system to collect and treat landfill gases generated from the former landfill which is composed of primarily construction debris such as concrete blocks, bricks and trees. The extraction system is located on the, City yards and operates continuously. Residents of the Pico Neighborhood Association have expressed concern regarding locating the Exposition maintenance facility on the Verizon site and the hybrid alternative which would utilize the Verizon and SMC College parking lot and provide a linear buffer facing most of the residents on Exposition. Staff researched the concerns and requested an assessment from ICF who monitors the landfill in accordance with SCAQMD and LACDHS regulations under contract to the City. The attached letter answers the concerns. ICF has determined that the levels of methane being detected along the surface of the landfill and within the landfill itself are well below the regulatory action levels, pose no explosive risks, are undetectable along the surface in the ambient air, and that the methane is unable to travel laterally via subsurface utilities to the sites being proposed for the Expo Light Rail maintenance facility. ICF's findings are supported by ongoing quarterly samples collected from an extensive network of trench probes, subsurface vapor probes, and ambient 'air samples located within the landfill and along its perimeter. City staff were unable to identify any subsurface utilities that have laterals servicing the proposed maintenance sites. The City will continue to operate the landfill gas control system and submit quarterly reports to the LACDHS and SCAQMD until the landfill ceases to generate landfill gases. The landfill's ability to generate methane is currently very low and will continue to decrease over time. Budget/Financial Impact There is no budget impact of this report. Prepared by: Dean Kubani, Director of Office of Sustainability and the Environment Kathryn Vernez; Assistant to the City Manager for Community and Government Rela#ions Approved: Forw~ded to Council: Kathryn ~'/ernez " /~'.,L~mont EN Assistant to the City Manager for ity Manager Community and Government Relations Attachment A: ICF Landfill Letter 10-22-09 Attachment B: CCY Landfill Letter 2"d Quarter SCAQMD Attachment C: CCY Landfill Letter 2nd Quarter LACDHS Attachment A October 22, 2009 Mr. Dean Kubani City of Santa Monica Office of Sustainability and the Environment Subject: Pico Neighborhood Association Concerns Related to Methane Dear Mr. Kubani: ICF International (ICF) has reviewed the October 14, 2009, letter from the Pico Neighborhood Association (PNA) regarding their concerns related to the presence of methane associated with the inactive landfill present beneath Stewart Street Park and portions of the City Corporation Yard. This letter summarizes the concerns expressed in the PNA letter that are directly related to the landfill and presents additional information related to those concerns. The PNA letter presented the following general concerns/questions: 1. Have assessments of the methane produced by the landfill been made? 2. Seepage of methane gas is occurring up and out of the park 3. Seepage of methane gas is occurring laterally through underground services 4. .Once vented, methane gas moves with the air currents and is highly flammable To provide additional information related to the above concerns/questions, ICF presents the following: 7. Have assessments of the methane produced by the landfill been made? -Under contract to the City of Santa Monica (City), ICF (then operating as Arthur D. Little) initiated assessment of the inactive landfill in 1996 by conducting a Solid Waste Assessment Test (SWAT). The test included the installation of temporary subsurface vapor probes located within the landfill and in native soils outside the landfill. Additionally, air samples were collected directly above the surface of the landfill. In response to the SWAT findings; the City expanded the assessment of the landfill and over the following four years installed 29 multi-depth subsurface vapor probes in native soils outside the landfill, 8 trench probes located in the backfill of nearby 1 Ada Parkway, Suite 100 ~ ~ Irvine, CA 92618 -- ~ 949-333-6600 ~ ~ 949-333-6601 fax - ~ www.icfi.com October 22, 2009 Page 2 Mr. Dean Kubani Office of Sustainability and the Environment City of Santa Monica utility lines, 5 subsurface vapor probes located within the landfill, and a permanent landfill gas (LFG) control system. These activities are described in more detail below. The 29 multi-depth subsurface vapor probes (identified as perimeter probes PP-1 through PP- 29 in the attached figure) are located in native soils along the perimeter of the landfill at approximately 150-foot intervals. The purpose of the perimeter probes is to assess and monitor the potential vertical and lateral migration of methane gas in native soils surrounding the landfill. The assessment activities also included the installation of multi-depth subsurface vapor probes located in the backfill above utility trenches that crossed the landfill footprint or were located in close proximity to the landfill. A total of eight trench probes (referred to as TP-1 through TP-8 in the attached figure) were installed to assess and monitor potential methane migration along utility trenches. The assessment also included the installation of subsurface vapor probes located within the landfill. A total of five landfill probes (referred to as LFP-1 through LFP-5 in the attached figure) were installed to monitor conditions within the landfill. Based on the results. of the assessment activities, the City authorized construction of an LFG control system with the objectives of • reducing methane concentrations within the landfill; • reducing methane concentrations in native soils surrounding the landfill; • reducing. methane concentrations in identified utility trenches; and • maintaining methane concentrations outside the landfill below the regulatory action level (50,000 parts per million, equivalent to the lower explosive limit for methane). In March 1998 ICF installed an interim LFG control system; the interim system began operation in June 1998. Construction of a permanent LFG control system that incorporated the existing interim system was completed in the fourth quarter of 2000. The LFG control system is composed of five primary components: extraction wells, conveyance piping, treatment equipment, extraction blower, and subsurface monitoring probe network. The well field consists of ten vertical LFG extraction wells (LFG-1 through LFG-10) that are located to the north and east of the City's former nursery building and along the southern and eastern sides of Stewart Street Park. Each well is connected to a common below-grade header pipe that sab sab.02]915.winxp.02]915528.10/22/2009 October 22, 2009 Page 3 Mr. Dean Kubani Office of Sustainability and the Environment City of Santa Monica conveys the LFG to the treatment compound located in the southeastern corner of the City's Water and Wastewater Division yard. The LFG control system is operated under. permit from the County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services (DHS) and the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAOMD). The permits require periodic monitoring or the perimeter probe network, ambient air quality above the landfill, and control system operation. Compliance reports are submitted to the DHS and SCAOMD on a quarterly basis. 2. Seepage of methane gas is occurring up and out of the park - As indicated above, an extensive network of subsurface vapor probes exists at the site and is periodically monitored as required by regulatory agencies. Since the permanent LFG control system began operation in 2000, regulatory-required monitoring of subsurface vapor probes has documented that methane concentrations in native soils surrounding the landfill are below regulatory action levels. Additionally, operational permits require that an air sample be collected directly above the landfill surface to assess seepage through the landfill cap. An ambient air sample was collected as part of the SWAT activities and detected methane at a concentration of 8.8 parts per million (compared to the lower explosive limit for methane of 50,000 parts per million). Ambient air samples collected since the installation of the permanent LFG control system have not contained detectable concentrations of methane. 3. Seepage of methane gas is occurring laterally through underground services - As indicated above, a network of trench probes exists at the site and is periodically monitored as required by regulatory permits. Since the permanent LFG control system began operation in 2000, the compliance-related trench probes have not contained methane in excess of the regulatory action limit. In response to the PNA letter, the City has reviewed its available utility maps to assess if utilities are present below Stewart Street that may have laterals extending to the Verizon site and also to the City Corporation Yard and/or Stewart Street Park. The City has indicated that this review did not identify. any subsurface utilities that have laterals servicing to both sites 4. Once vented, methane gas moves with the air currents and is highly flammable - As indicated in responses 2 and 3 above; vapor monitoring in the native soils surrounding the landfill have been below regulatory action levels since operation of the permanent LFG control sabsab.02]915.winxp.02]915528.1 Q/22/2009 October 22, 2009 Page 4 Mr. Dean Kubani Office of Sustainability and the Environment City of Santa Monica system began and ambient air samples collected directly above the landfill surface have not detected methane since operation of the permanent LFG control system began. In addition to the information presented above, there are general landfill conditions that are pertinent to the concerns raised by PNA. Through the course of ICF's assessment and control system construction activities, we have drilled several borings and excavated trenches within the landfill. The landfill waste encountered during these activities has consistently been composed of construction debris such as concrete blocks, bricks and trees. As part of our early analysis of the landfill, ICF evaluated the. methane generating potential of the landfill based on the volume and type of waste in place and the known time the landfill was in operation. The output of this analysis is presented below and indicates that the landfill's ability to generate methane is currently very low and will continue to decrease through time. Estimated Volume of Methane Generated g d Y a . m ~ ~ i. a a ~ e F Year sabsab.02]915 winxp.02]915528.1 0/2 212 8 8 9 /9d0 1950 1966 1970 498D 19~ 2UG`Q ZG10 E6'A 20.?Q 2G:0 295Q October 22, 2009 Page 5 Mr. Dean Kubani Office of Sustainability and the Environment City of Santa Monica If you require additional information or clarification of the information contained in the letter, please contact me directly. Sincerely, ~~r- Scott A. Broten Principal sab sab.02]915.winxp.02]915528.10/22/2009 _..-.-J -~ _..I -- J ___~t -_-... :_.._-i I~\I ~nl\ s 8~,"~6A ~\ // \ \~~ /gyp N(G/IGAN AVENUEe ~PP@ AspF ~///T // g C$~\- ` Z r- " '~~ //// 9S0{t ~~ vNewW • ~ n I ~ ~ corx. wawa "'""°°'" ~__ //// 4g \ ..~ -~] - __ _ \ \ '\ I I~ITII~ IIIIII~' - -- n = ~ .- ~ ~~ am. I a n j r 1~~YNNOBIOIf -~F~PP~O YbVbla LLl.l~lY ~ yyY\ ~I ~~_~ amx i -~"~ ~ ~-r fl~~'U L_-._f ~ q~ q w~ae / PP„~ ~a\\ (/ "°`~ 0 6P e ~~.__ .. ~ ~ TINM] uew ~_~~.P-b lt, Y N PP. ] M Sim. ^ l p y . 3 c I- J u r \ ~ ~w ~x~ ~\ TP-< ~ ~ PP-0 LFO9 II~~\~ LPPA \~\ ~SLq~ °~` Pe S _ I I 1 \ /--~~~~~f PP-21 AsOa eYTP-9 IFP ~ PP•IB /(v)/ Y s "-1 _'_~ rte.."~ pp ,~,g II Pa~s~c II f I I ~ /~ '.""° ~ ~~\\ ~v ~r,\`~ \^ o ~] C~ I A P n _._-.-.:1... II \\ I ~ ~f¢I N hl < ~w~,'" w ^ nn I ~~\. \\ \ ~ \\ ~ ~ L- _ ~ IF Ls s I\ ~/l 'n I i~l\ ~eaaavenws u I \`~ \`~ \ ~~ ~ \ O° '~' PP-ax ~p ^^mxv10 m] I j(,~, ~-lE~€°~~ tras j~~,\. Pf~ A, J~~~ _ a ~~\\ ~~ ~~ ~~\~~^ - 'U o-1 PP s y~z \Lra-srY --~~P~z '\w"J°. ~ it /J~~ ' j/` ~, ~; ~~ a..d,..w I ~ I l~ _ \~` \\ .a~.~~ Mrs `~ ~~\.s~~ i`~ ) O~ LJsI~'~" I~G71~~ II ~~ ~ / PPn ~~ ..« I - ~_ I \ sq~ ~ ~~\ ~~~O..r/~ -~~' ~.~ I [7-Cl~lllooo I II m1 ~:w,,,„°"° .~',- o ~ _~-=- i ~` __y ~~ n~~~ll ~e~_`„` `~~ ~O ~~\ ~~ *\ / I ~ Lr-~I ~I ICf~-~1 0~+' I \ PP re -~-w.:..aa.w Hn~ o ~~ I _ ~ =,,~ ~` ~ ~~ ~~:~ ~ I ~o°°II I I ~ mwwr as ,~ r II ~. L1 ~J ~. ~\ ~ ~ _ I fl ~C3 I(V, h '~'tman mxv y,. I ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~~ TN ~ n . I ~ \ ~\ ~ w,~'I I [To o~l ~I ma -~-3a'Y' ~°aa"`..n ~"" (I .S r~~r ff Jl{." ~ n A I ~~ \ ~~ -1~n I I ~ ~.. ~. ~., I e I 1 ~ .~S ° I ; t I~^~,7~~ ~ 1. ~~('_~r ~Cn~LJ~ II ~ I ~~J 4\:~~~°~.`~\. ~ ~~^\. LL ~ I Ili~~ araam ®awM... +,.wea ~e<,«., ~.. ~. _Lf f.ll t~~_L~(~.~~_~_L~~~~^. ~~_ _ J_~__ \` \ \ \ ® ~ ~ tFIGURE 1 [ ~ ~~ - ~' 'l VIRGfN(A AVENUE °~-y_\ \ ` ICjF v" imyn o psoA~ __ ` ,,,,.,,.,e MONITORING PROBE AND AMBIENT __ -~s>~--~-"-- - .-_-„~--~i~-~ ----L "`~" -~ r- - q ~~ SAMPLE LOCATION MAP /~"'-I t- IFl a 1 e - __r`~c APPROVALS PATE Ilr -t >~ II11i 'i1711~I~Ixr I ~I ~ (~ I r I I " ELK 11/06 CITY OF SANTA MONICA CORPORATION YARD ~u0vi.r""R~~~wwuy x"ra ..... `-~' ~, ~1 rlUa o - o- I ~JI u l JJ ~~~ SAB 11/06 CITY OF SANTA MONICA 1 INCH = 150 FEET ro~.n°.m~e''a'n.L1°'r.~^.°'° ww+"°m°"'~,..d°'w' ~ IfL'~,L,I4L. _" °m J II x ~ ~ SFC 11/06 °jL'° "' `"~°"° ° ° °°"0' °" n°"'°° °`1i ; e ~J m \ SFC 11 06 NOV. 2006 ]0260486AWG ~_ J - ~~ / ARTHUR D. UTTLE, INC. SHEET 1 OF 1 INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC. Attachment B INTERNATIONAL August 13, 2009 Mr. Edwin Pupka South Goast Air Quality Management District 21865 East Copley Drive Diamond Bar, California 91765 Subject: Second Quarter 2009 Compliance Report Inactive Landfill at City of Santa Monica Corporation Yard 2500 Michigan Avenue Santa Monica, California {Facility ID 18223) Re: IGF Consulting Reference lVo. 027915 Dear Ms. Jones: On behalf of the City of Santa Monica {City), lCF Consulting has prepared this letter to fulfiEl reporting requirements set forth in the South Coast Air Quality Managemen# District (SCAQMD) Rule 1150.1 Compliance Plan {Plan) for the inactive landfi8 at the City of Santa Monica Corpora#ion Yard, 2500 Michigan Avenue, Santa Monica, California, for the second quarter of 2009. A description of the site, a table summarizing Pian issues and a discussioh of landfill compliance during the second quarter 2009 are provided below. Site Description The subject site is an inactive landfill located in the area roughly bounded by Michigan Avenue, CloverBeld Boutevard, Stewart Street, and the Santa Monica Freeway in a primarily light-industrial and commercial section of Santa Monica, California (Figure 1). The subjecf site includes the City Corporation Yard, which contains offices, vehicle maintenance and sforage areas, a firefighter training.yard, a refuse transfer station, as well as Stewart Street Park. In March 1998 Arthur D. Little, Inc.; installed an interim. landfill gas {LFG} control system to address LFG being produced at portions of the site. The interim system began operation in June 1998. Construction of a permanent LFG 7 Ada Parkway, Suite 100 ~_. Ineine, CA 92618 444.333.6600 ~._ 444333.6601 fee idl.com August 13, 2009 Mr. Edwin Pupka South Coast Air Quality Management District control system that incorporates the existing interim system was completed in the fourth quarter of 2000. The LFG control system is composed of five primary components: well field, conveyance piping, Treatment equipment, extraction blower, and subsurface monitoring probe network. The well field consists often vertical LFG extraction wells (LFG-1 through LFG-10} that are located to the north and east of the Cify`s former nursery building and along the southern and eastern sides of Stewart Street Park. Each well is connected to a common below-grade header pipe that conveys the LFG to the treatment compound located in the southeastern corner of the City's Water and Wastewater Division yard. Within the treatment compound, the untreated LFG passes through an entrainment tank to remove separate-phase LFG condensate; a dehumidifying unit, which coots the LFG and then removes liquid condensate that is produced; and vessels of vapor-phase granular activated carbon (GAC) and potassium permanganate alumina (PPA) to removeloxidize select volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Treated LFG is discharged to the atmosphere through a 26-foot-high sfack. The collected liquid condensate is pumped through two drums of aqueous-phase GAC and injected into 600 gallon holding tank. Compliance Summary Compliance with the Plan during the second quarter of 2009 is summarized in the following table and discussed in more detail below: Compliance Issue Compliance Status 1.0 Subsurface Refuse Boundary All probes in compliance Monitoring Probes 2.0 Integrated Landfill Surface Sampling In compliance 3.0 Instantaneous Landfill Surface In compliance Monitoring 4.0 Landfill Gas Sample from Gas In compliance Collection System 5.0 Landfill Gas Collection and Control In compliance with SCAQMD Permit to System Operate Nos. 401482 and 420462. .1 mb.saC.027915.xifA0.027915517.dGG Augusf 13, 2009 Mr. Edwin Pupka South Coas# Air Ouality Management District 1.0 Subsurface Refuse boundary Probe and Trench Probe Monitoring Monitoring of the boundary probes and fhe trench probes was conducted by ICF Consulting personnel on June 4, 9, 24, and 30, 2009. The probes were monitored for the presence of carbon dioxide, oxygen, methane, hydrogen sulfide, and non-methane organic vapor. Probe locations are shown on Figure 1; monitoring results are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Boundary probes are multi-level devices consisting of three levels designated as A, B, and C, respectively: a shallow level (A) that is typically screened from 7 to 9 feet below ground surface (bgs); an intermediate level {B) that is typically screened from 18 to 20 feet bgs; and a deep level (C) that is fypically screened from 33 to 35 feet bgs, which is the estimated maximum depth of the waste mass at this site. Methane concentrations measured in ail compliance plan probes during the second quarter 2009 monitoring event were below 5 percent. During the second quarter of 2009, LFG collection occurred in LFG-2 through LFG-5 and LFG-7 through LFG-9. Optimization of the extraction system will continue during the third quarter of 2009. 2A tntegrated Landfill Surface Sampling Integrated landfill surface sampling was conducted at Stewart Street Park on June 30, 2009. A weather station was used to verify that wind conditions were acceptable far sampling. The wind speed and directional data from the weather station are provided in Table 3. The integrated landfill sample was collected in one 10-liter Tedlar bag over a continueus 25-minute period as ICF Consulting personnel walked a grid pattern across the site (Figure 2). The sample was analyzed for VOGs by EPA Method TO-14, sulfur compounds by EPA Method 15!16, fixed gases by EPA Method 3C; and. for non- mathane organic compounds {NMOC) by EPA Method 25C. Additional samples were not required because the total area of the unpaved sections of fhe site is well below 50,000 square fee#. The analytical results are summarized in Table 4; fhe analytical reports are provided as Attachment B to this letter. The Plan states that the combined permissible limit of fatal Toxic Air Contaminants {TAC), which include 17 VOCs and hydrogen sulfide, and Total Organic Compounds {TOC}, measured as methane, is 50 parts per million by volume (ppmv). As shown in Table 4, the combined concentrations of TACs and TOCs did not exceed 50 ppmv. Limits for sulfur compounds other than hydrogen sulfide, NMOC, and other fixed gases are not specified in the Pian. mb.saH.927916.win9QA2797551T.doc August 13, 2009 Mr. Edwin Pupka South Coast Air Quality Management District 3A Instantaneous Landfill Surface Monitoring Instantaneous landfill surface monitoring was not conducted at the site during the second quarter of 2009. As stated in the Plan, "Any closed landfill that has no monitored exceedances of the 500 ppmv standard in three consecutive quarterly monitoring periods may monitor annually." The third instantaneous [andfill surface monitoring without an exceedance of the 500-ppmv standard was conducted a# the site on December 14, 2000. Therefore, this sampling is now conducted annually. The next Instantaneous landfill surface sampling is currently scheduled for the third quarter of 2009, 4.0 Landfill Gas Sample from Landfill Gas Confral System The Pian requires sampling of the LFG control system on an annual basis. Sampling of the influent of the LFG control system to comply with this requirement for 2008 was conducted during the third quarter of 2008. The next sample from the LFG control system to comply with this requirement is currently scheduled for the third quarter of 2009. 5.0 Landfill Gas Control System As specified in the Pian and in lieu of conducting an annual source test, the LFG control system is required to be operated in compliance with a valid Permit to Construct or Permit to Operate. The LFG control system is permitted under Permit fo Operate Nos.. 401482 and 420462. System operation was in full compliance with the requirements of Permit to Operate Nos. 401482 and 420462 during the second quarter of 2009. If you have any questions or comments regarding this compliance report, please contact me at (949) 333-6683. Sincerely, i $co Bro en Program Manager mb.sab.027916.vrin00.0279156/7.doc August 13, 2009 Mr. Edwin Pupka South Coast Air Qualify Management District References: Arthur D. Little, 2000. Latter to Mr. Ron Lem of SGAQMD regarding a Request for Modificaticn to Permit to Construct No. 328767, Landfill Gas Control System Expansion, City of Santa Monica Corporation Yard. June 20. SCAQMD, 1999. Rule 1150.1 Gomptiance Plan for Facility ID 18223, City of Santa Monica, 2500 Michigan Avenue, Santa Monica. December 17. Attachment: A: Analytical Report and Chain of Cusfody for Integrated Landfll Surface Sample cc: Mr. James Velez-Gonway -City of Santa Monica (both hard copy and electronic) Mr. Pete Oda -County of Los Angeles 5 mb.~b.02T976.wib00.62TB566R.tlx TbblP t: CbmpllpnDO PIpn MOpI19a4B Dela-0etlmptpr ProbDs Lantl011 D03 C4nIrpl Byplam 21la DIlAnprsone a A~ ~ ,.,~ ,,- 'h , ..a .G)_'~5 ~8. ..O,A yu~.~ A9`urz.. ... ...._ -.A 13P. ,. P ... .~ x~m. '.. ,~- c* ~. ~ , 3,,p ~ e . ~ ~ ~d ~ s ~, p - J ] ~ _ ~ a ~ P . a3w , . , A ~ I m ~~xau a 1 i "ro la -,D as p_3Y.. p 1 ,: n ~ o`•• .. m m~ ,+~a°b~ - 5 ma. Pen Rn .. VP.1 9A ]gb9A Gpb IPO Cmyu45111 09 12:10 MO/ISZ Pv Ircaf t0 J0.0 .CO 4.8 II.6 OA 0.0 QO e+.lY _ Aw31A IBAb33A [ aw 3111 ON6N09_ __ 11:10 MOMZ W irtef ]0 30.0 O.W 5.4 9.6 OA 0,0 ZI PP.IC 35D 3)Am35A ]xAroJ6A 6Y1 N Ob/Oq 12;10 M&KZ P Wirexl t0 J0.0 O.W 1]. 3.9 0.0 0.0 1.$ PPQ PF]A lAb9A 3.Ob lpq ~ SIII Clv '0 /09 _ 11:15 M&1(Z Y1¢¢ )0 30.0 0. IIA 0.5 0.0 00 0.0 ih3e IvOroEOA li.ow3os 3p N OW04/09 11:15 M8M2 P iexl ]0 30.0 O.Po 5.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 PI.]C ]i0 1]Om)5-0 1I0b36A c1 0 /09 11:15 MH0:2 YW ]0 JOA O.W 15.5 00 1.] 0.0 0.0 ePJ PRA 9.p w9,0 60w10.0 Cbpysiu 0 N9 10:15 MB Pm uDlrtel VB 6 29.9 O.W 3.3 11.2 0.0 0.0 Q3 Yllp 21.0 IROb320 SWaMCIey ObI2A/09 ID:IS MD Pm reel aeSf o 68 M.9 O.M 5.6 5.9 0.0 OA OA Pvac L.OwJJO )nem]nD Svop SW OBMPo9 10:15 MB P e/Dirzcl ovem4 L0 29.9 0.011 11.9 Ib 0.0 0.0 I Imo YNA lom9.D M101o 100 2409 3Q5) Mb Pu eNual ]rn9 88 29,9 OCO .] 13.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 PNV 3ps IS.5aRP5 13.em33a eu BvW OskIPo9 ID:5] MD P </DVtt[ ttwl 8B 29.9 O.GYI 161 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 eP9c ]S.e 3)AmJt.p 3IAwJ6A nlGlgmlMe Flue OW24/09 10:5] MB PYIge/OLac ea61 88 29.9 O.CO I.b 162 0.0 - 0.0 0.8 PPoA ePSM 9.0 )Ab9A 60m 11.0 ~ 10:55 MHII(Z /f)IttCI Imsl b) 49,9 O.CO 3.9 13.8 0.0 0.0 OA PP3AA 3i0 3LObEl.O 19.Ob15A cvymSpbsmO 06N9I09 10:55 MAMZ PO NIrcOI I[ml b] 29.9 OAq 15.5 B,d 0.0 0.0 0.0 PPJRC 3R.0 35.Ow110 ]l.Ob39A C1 9/O9 10:55 MBML Pu ire[I rtazl b] 29.9 UAO 18.] b.J 0.0 0 0.0 PPd PPbA 9.0 30m9. 6Am10A [ vN31Y N2q/09 Ip5 P Pu 1rce1 rcul 68 19.9 0. (4.1 0.0 0.0 9.2 Pe3p RIA 19.Om3W IA.Ob320 8p cl v Obflgl09 11:44 MD P irM ercul 68 19.9 0.00 3.0 11.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 ro-0c >SO )l.Om)SD Jn0aJ6.0 ,Cp ptt ObfLdN9 11:45 MA P1 ieut rtsst 6 9.9 IB .0 .0 _ --- PP~i PP-0A 9.0 ].Om9.0 6010100 911bCIV 09 : 9 PW [Nrtal vtt[0ef b] O.OD 1.1 b.l OA 0.0 0.0 PP-0p 21A 19.OmR1.0 ISAmx].0 CY m4Y11 p(J091119 9:M MB/KZ PW e/Dirc[I me5f b] 29.9 U.W M.2 0.3 1.1 OA 0.0 ereC ]5.0 3lAalf.O 33A6)6.0 Clv m4S01 9 9' MO/L(Z Pm eNiarl 9 ] 29. 0 160 0.0 LJ 0.0 0.0 _ __ PP.W Ph1pA 9A )Aa9.0 GOm II.D C4 III 0 13: MO P CNrtfel vem9 0 2J.9 O.W 18.1 0.0 OA .0 1.1 PhlOp 3).0 31Ab31A IAOw35q Clevautl610 ObI24109 13:20 MO P PIDIreeI DM¢azt ]0 29.9 0.00 ].1 6A 0.0 _ 0.0 __ 0.] vlvac 9nD 3AOmn.o 3xpbno nlv4 y~rme ON24Po9 I$:M MD P s NU < ]0 19 9 __ ~~~-~ u gc a rcml . O.W 8.] Z] 0.0 0.0 0.2 ePAI Pw IA 0.5 6smas ssw9.v ' v0U 06YN109 10:38 MB Purge/OIree4 vesl 6S 29.9 O.Lb LS 13.2 U.0 -- 0.0 0.1 PPJIU @A 3POa13q 1&Ob210 30 CI ON24N9 10:38 MF Pu dDirtrl rcpsh 68 29.9 O.CO 1P.2 1.3 0. 0.0 0.0 PPIIC J].D )f.Ob]]A ]3.01039.0 ell C6 06h4/09 10:38 MB P dD rtel Imsl 68 29.9 O.CO 2 0.1 0.0 1 PPd3 YP.I]A 100 a0a100 6AIOl3A SN1 8 0 24 1 ] Plv a Irctl ttml 68 29.9 1. ].3 0.0 0. 0.2 IT.13p 1)A 31.Om33.0 39.DI935.0 ep0'CI OLryM09 IOF] MU e/Dirce[ Iwl 68 R9.9 O.CO IJ.9 ].d 0 OA 0.1 PFI3C 9D )S.pwn.o )1,0440.0 5' SbJ 0(JNN9 0: I rcazl 68 '29.9 2,1 1].2 0.0 0.0 0.1 PR14 Pe.IOA 9A tAm9.0 601011.0 SIIbCIey 09 9 : 5 N01rcxt ovaeolt b] 29.9 O.W L0.1 9.3 0.1 0.0 00 Pe.laO 23A RIAm33.0 19.Ow R5.0 eil CI 0/09 9 13:15 M90I2 P tlD'rtel n'o91 C 6] 29.9 0.0] 1.0 b.0 00 0.0 OA PPI4C 31.0 35.Db J].0 31.04 H.0 &M [L 0 11'1 MB/KZ P MIi asl t 299 O.W ].0 .2 0.0 0.0 00 PR 5 PFISA 9A 1. a . f01o 110 30 C (p.2B MD P eNirtcl vercssl 68 19.9 O.Po 1.9 122 0.0 0.0 OA eRI3p 33A 31.Ow9.0 1PObR5.0 nl clo 0 41U9 1 ~ 8 MB Yuf pvpeml 68 19.9 0.W A.0 12.1 0.0 0.0 __ 0.0 PP.ISC J0.0 A.Ow39.0 )30mgOq umxCp,Grdy ON29/09 f0:16 MB YutgONirtcl ovarntl 60 29.9 O.W 13.6 1.3 0.4 0.0 0.5 PRI] PFI]A 9D ]-0w9.0 60.4110 SIItyC4y OWMNA 11:51 MB/KT. Puf II[cl ]0 30.0 O.W I$.B U.0 0,6 0.0 1.5 YP-VB i1.0 SIAm33.o OmESA SII eta 06N4109 L1:H MB/KZ PuF elDlrtcl >0 30.0 110] 1].8 0.0 1.] 0.0 0.0 vhbc ]sDm]n0 330mJ9A 06rtlU09 11:54. MBMZ Pue e/D rccl ]0 30.0 0.0] 186 0.9 L2 00 0.0 PP-IS PP.ISA 9.0 ]Dm9A 6AbIlA ep Cla Il;p Pm IttG ]0 30.0 0.0] 26.0 ,1 4.2 0.0 0.0 PP-ISB ILS 19sw313 IcSmais epbCle 06kdN9 IIRO MHIKZ Ilat )0 30.0 O.W 19.) 0.1 40. 0.0 0.0 PPIAC ]x0. JSOaI].p J10bJ9.0 BJ CIa 06gdN9 1 :M Z Pu /O' t ]0 JO ROS O2 .I OA 0.0 pP.l9 PP.19A 9.0 tAm9.0 6AalI.D 80bCla U 3: Po a' 1rt1 veaP51 ]0 29.9 0 2Q0 23 3.5 0.0 20. Pvd9p D.0 21.OmZtO 19.OIOxSO 311 Cla q/p9 13:30 MB Pp e/Direct 0vertwl ]0 29.9 O.W I&5 1.1 3.0 0.0 0.9 _ PP-19C ]]A 3SOlol].0 3l.Om]9.0 -' ~ 1012 mbeo693)016M1ApA1'/814510aU.&12N0J Table l• Comp116nc0 PIpn MAOIIOr1000at0-POam010PProben Laaaml oba cpmra system zna oI1.Ire.zoDB y ~ ~ . L ". + y r m ~ DRabl!. :a ti .~ ~ &~yA33J 4P. i Ll3~Vi0iE~ ~.~~¢ 41n ¢ i =ya #v: ~ - e ~ 1 ~ r ~ - I ' ~ k e z~ s ~ • {A~ ~ ~ N. : ~ f ~ v n aID. D a0E v)t 03 P~ $' .MIAP. If IA) ~ Upi_ o u . 9M 9 ~ }x.A09A~b1R .(IM 5 1 i`k/)1 II 1 POpN [ t +( • . (PP61 ~ . '31 N`30 PPxA 9,0 9.Oa9.0 6Am11A cmy Wp9/09 IOAO M9/KZ GOistt3 '[mft b'1 29.9 O.CO 1.9 123 0.0 0.0 0.0 rrwn _ nnm3W IppbESA __ Cu` 06109109 10:40 MflIXZ_ Pu e/Dis¢el ovgrtasl 61__ ___29.9 _ OFO _ 0.6 I5.] 0.0 0.0 0.0 YY3m AA 350m9A vAmsao sm4 SB o WIp3/09 IU:40 MBMZ Pu elOlrcee met 6l R9.9 0. 0.1 IBA 0.0 0,0 0.0 MN31 eealA i.Oro9.0 6Am11A C CNy1IW 11:35 T40 Pu elDireel rc65t _68 _ 29.9 O.CO t1.2 _ 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 YY919 3)A x1.01v3A0 19Aa31.0 CLn ONMIOA 11;35 MB Pw GDbat msl ave _ _ OB_ _ _ 29.9 O.ql _ J. 1 ~ _ 123 0.0 0.0 1.8 eP31C )ZA 35.OmJ80 YLOw J9.0 31 Cu 06/24109 11:33 Mb eNired mull 68 29.9 0.00 _ _ _ ).A _ 129 OA 0.0 0.3 veal eeiZA 9.0 Io9.0 EA 0.010 11A Cm gem ON09/09 10:15 MB/KZ p ¢Ai(¢el Insl mVe 6] R9.9 _ _ O. W_ __ 23 15,] 0.0 0.0 0.0 PY3ie ~ _33A - ZIAIO3x0 19AmEfA 611 Flne3ma O6IO9N9 10:15 MB/KZ Y e/DircCl Werc05[ 61 _. _ 29_9 0.01 5.5 11.1 0.0 -~- 0.0 0.0 PPaic RO 33AmP.0 3IAmJpA Sne paLM O6Po9/09 10:15 MNKZ Pv •e/Oirccl Ovemu[ 6] 29.9 O. 4,4 13.9 0.0 --- 0.0 00 PPIJ PIIlM AO ~ 1.0109.0 6.Om 11.0 6atlCIeY 06IOM09 13:12 M&K2 PYgelDertcl BOAY 10 30.0 O.W 0.0 (2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 en21e 3].0 31 omx).o 19Amx5A SluyNy 061D4I09 1];11 M&KZ PB9pe/Oircel tinny 10 300 OAI OJ 11.0 OA 0.0 9.0 Ye33c J10 ]5.0431.0 3)Ab39,0 611tlCJOY 06NN09 13:12 MBM2 P e/Direcl 10 300 Q01 22 14,0 0.0 0.0 IJ.J PPIg PP34A AO 2049.0 6Ab11A LI O6N409 13:N MBMZ IRfI 10 ]0.0 0.011 0.0 T.1 0.0 A 0.0 PPSae P.0 EIAw9A 19pm3AO Cb 06Po4I09 13W MtlMZ PO imex slmu ]0 30.0 O.W O.D IL.O 0.0 0.0 D.0 epa4c 40.0 Ye.0aw.0 1).010134 Dm li sma 0610'1(09 13:00 MD/KZ PlvgtlfEUttl wny ID 30.0 0.00 1.9 13.9 ¢0 - OA 0.0 _ _ _ PP31 PP33A 9.0 JAb90 60m11-0 Cle 0 12:45 MIi Z rein Nnll 10 30.0 O,W p.0 16.1 0.0 U.0 0.0 PPam llA xl.oml).0 IfOm:sA aey 06104109 ISb3 1.®11(2 PY eNittel ~ 10 30.0 O.W D.1 14.0 0.0 ... 0.0 0.0 40A JBAb90.D W.Oeo4x0 Cb m611 Lm 06/04/09 12:45 M9aC2 P Wlette 20 30.0 __ O.CO 0.1 12E 4A 0.0 0.0 PP36 PP36A 9.0 OIe9A 6Ab11A _ YIII~CI~ _ ~ W/M/O9 IR:35 _MH!KZ Pu WIRfI __]0 30.0 O.CO 0.9 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 ee36e e9pabA slll a 06/04109 13:)5 MHOCZ PII NDieed p0 30.0 O.N U2 11.6 0.0 0.0 9.0 vA )f.0aT.0 JInaJ9A Sni CL 04104109 IR33 MHO(2 Pu Ireel 10 30.0 O.W 0.5 10.9 0.0 0.0 L.1 PI-SZ AO 3Aa9A Ny O4N4 9 12:15 MB Pw P/Dlreel 10 30.0 O.W 1.l 5.1 .0 0.0 0.0 PP-SID D,0 alAwEl.O I9nmxfA 06104109 12:13 MB Pw c/Dleal 10 30.0 O.W L1 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 PP-33C J)A mvo J vAmJ9A EII [le O6N4N @;IS M0 Pu IvDlettl '/0 IOA 0.62 6.6 q8 0.0 00 0.0 P3 YFa9A 9A lAm9- 6.Om 11.0 qe 068409 II:E2 Me Pu rtCl. smut 68 29.9 0.00 ]A 1].1 OA 0.0 0.0 PP-396 E1.0 nAwDA 19AbiW CI 06e14Po9 11:21 MB Pu tlDlred elmxt 68 89.9 6W 12.1 1.L 0.0 0.0 0.1 Pv.39C 9 dorcc 2of2 mp.SO0N3816wIn0].021813618ab.SlIYNW lel-MOWpNlnlem6fw exM1pwbausb4iueMlntraOeWUrveNvB b WNIIVmNgwlxxdb06010wpmW3Xllw~{Nbmtabb peobvAVV4dw(dnp Probaj. NI-1A6owgloutlew0lmtlrto[NVemrtpemmebbePoVw Itl°6u0pllog pnwu4 ¢qu6N eu %~fim Nein6Nep~pen mpugingeaM1paba Mnlmumofwrolum Vppvee mmPln mr<e mumlm.m.o.lnw by enemy aewnel~ ~m mammmbmnmvmpo- 411°A4owemeouad+ivMwWBnlnrvXm AWe1 W~60 Celeeme. [el-xeyln<r mwl. [0"i Nlvnrvm<eAVeN:novaNIXlMnuvoWlouM meleekmMguMapmerc NOxo xiNV eem tvlue. 181°Aaweemtev odolneaueinge MF6aPF.IPpaloNmlon I,Wtlo.. ..-rcq Apylbubl/AN NevmM Ay-MwwOmunamlmee ny-Zatmem LO-[aebnlbnoNa CUs-QebvUbHOv trbP-PgnxFVbrtoM1ep HAI-HOwcxliwme Ils-vPwgmeolrtm ID-lee~4nren[n Iv. H3-b[ mey Celuva In.ly6-Inenn OlWEUe COIwm L~am16e. A4 Ovett;le. AMIY-AIanPAryWne O~-Oy&^ 96-P<ettnl byValumv rv-Pmmeme PObe.eN. PryCOepmlev Ym4 pPmv-PNe Per 3111NOn by VAwe Table 2: Compliance Plan Monitodng Gala-Trench Probes landfill Gas Control t3yatem 2ntl Guedor 2008 .~. ~0: =t ~„ ~~,. ,0 :.t.. ,.~, lee an .~ t._ Fm' Ste, a ~ ¢ I I +, , T ~ .. D ~ Q d" b , toa : 0 d Irt ,bsa ` n 4 ac ) ~ za ? ' a1hP. [a91 ~ RD l0 e: x Ra$~h6 S . in°. $ I[ 7 dlr. aPl I@ ~ : Is dla a ~ ', ~j= f 1 n• 3.[ 1 ~ ~ 1~ $a ~ R AAa' TP-1 TP-I 6.0 4.0m6.0 3.5106.5 Silly Clay U6/24N9 12:J0 MB Purge/Dimct ovemaso ]0 29.9 0.00 2.9 12.4 0.0 --- 0.0 0.9 TP8 TP-2A ].0 S.OIO ].0 4.0 LO 10.0 Fina Sand 06/09/09 11:41 MB/KZ PorgNDUect canny ]0 29.9 0.00 33.t 0.6 29.3 -- - 12.0 1S.] TPdD 20.0 18.0 to 20.0 V.01o 2t.0 Fine Rend 04/04/09 11:41 MB/f:Z Parge/Dbect smmy ]0 29.9 0.00 32.9 0.0 28.2 --- 10.4 0.0 TP-3 TP-3 ].0 S.O b].0 4.5 to ].5 Silt and Clay 06/09/09 10:34 MB/KZ Puge/Direcl overosst G8 29.9 0.00 2.8 14.3 x.U --- 0.0 0.0 TR4 TYd 13.0 ILO to 13.0 IOAm14.0 Bilty Sand 06R4/U9 12:00 MB Porge/DiYCCt ovmcast 68 29.9 0.00 3.9 14.8 0.0 --- 0.0 6.2 TP-6A 8.0 6.Ob 8.0 5.0 to R.5 Medium m 06/09/119 9:43 M&K'L PorgeNireet ovc¢asl 69 29.9 0 00 6 4 4 9 0 0 --- 0 0 0 0 •yp.b Pine Sand . . . . . . TRbD 1].B 15.010 I].0 14.0 to 1).5 Pinc SnM 06/09/09 9:43 MB/KZ PurgeNecct ovmwsl 6] 29.9 0.00 6.6 9.1 0.0 --- _ 0.0 0.0 TP-8 TP-R 4.)5 3.]5 to 4A5 3.25 to 5.0 Clay Si Bendy 06/09/09 10:25 MB Purgc/Dircct overcast 6] 29.9 0.00 14.9 4.4 0.0 --- 0.0 OA l Noks: ]ol°ASOVilortdiNtml9 fm CUM1probBUrvmtliwkdln IM1BneWOefwding muwrBmm~eeeBlBn: oahB(a~.no.rmbe),>=nmr P~~k~meama Prow ), wtl blue [dttp pkbel~ rol°eonmBam B~aiwmBl,a~nneme0pem~nbuammm. Io1=BM~Dling -nsenMlae9ulrcddebbYxnlmtssu~ethe Pmbeplesuro endWeupuraingaBLpwMxmioLuumafanewlume BPga. Vryws wmples rullrcl<aendbmlyadbytlircaly[Bnrwninglk InswmemsklMprobv. [dl = mwwrcmrnlB amamm uskg B lewkc Mwel cn -a9 oek~ [ej =Ntgnf ewlwsemra[uumnuoem<meets. [d'TOrlroinslmmm~evu-0, ~owekBlNwvBwwliawfor IM1eindieelNpR,eeM1aporeresM1Bxm n'Ilhaverowlue, (g1-AfeuurcmeMObminNUSinge Af bRFBMwloiaovnllrn omroroe. .-= Nol nyDUrnblrrtrm Mrewrc3 bµ=fltlmvGmuntl SVRUe cx,-Meamm CO=CerbonMOnoxidB COs°Cmbon Oio~ido Ue6. Y° IXgeees Filvmheil wM=HOBwdINBks xs=xyamarv semae m=IMnlifleBilou be NB ° Imbo ornkmmy colunm is lls0=Nehes ofWeles Column rFG-rnaaral GBa A1tl=Mann tlvrcm, lr. MNN-n+Bm6mar/vrar Os"Oxygen M=Pertenlby VBlunw ypmr-YeM1 YerMillknbyVelvmB TP=Trcnv'h ProMV1112 CiIYCOryBmtiouYnN 1 Of t mb.eeb.02iB16.van90,02in16518.Ue.el12@OGg Table 3: Wind Speed Data -Integrated Landfill Surface Sampling Second Quarter 2009 ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~Ave~e~V~"~~ f>n'a'lti urr-~1~iind -~;~~~a .~* ~s~ ~. ~ ~peea ~z ~ ~ ~'~'s e ~ ~ ~ ~,_~ ~e" ~ ~7~me ~ ~ ~i~ h) ~ ' ph ~`~ ~~ ~t11 Wit~(i Direction= ~~ _~ p ? ~ 06!30!09 12:00 2.0 2.0 N 06J30/09 12:05 1.0 2A NW 06130/09 12:10 1.0 2.0 N 06/30109 12x5 1.0 2.0 W 06!30!09 12:20 2.0 2A N 06(30!04 12:25 1.0 2.0 NW mbsab.027915.wIrA0.027915518xAC8f12f2009 rK Table 4: Malytlcal ResuMs for lnfegrated Landfill Surtace Sample City of Santa Monica Corporation Yard Second Quarter 2999 Notns [a)=amecdov tlmid very. mogind from 2 to 10 pp W, tlependingon Iheaperificanolyte. Thesum ofMO tlMaBOV hmi4freNe 17 V00o mW hytlrogen sulfide (nperified as TAG) e I~ Ihmi Nc Plvn limit for imepOtedlOntl671 aurfica amnplivgaf58ppmv. Q=Valueinpmmmheacs vthc dekedon llmil forthn OOmpOUnd SPA ~^ 8nW1'ommrntpl PretBCYO(1 A$mlCy M/D/Y=MOnth1J)aY/YeM 1N =NOt Oelected NMOCa -Non-MCthavo Organic CemPOVn& pp6v» Ports PmHilNon by Volumn DPmvC=Pane PCr IAllioq by Volumo. icportMaSplbOn V OCs> volMla Orymnia CampoivKls - 7-HsumatM rcsol4lw thm the coporclns limit. N2-COmetivo ocnon Nkcn. PlOOac ace ComaSvo Action BOpon 1Y/81 {n maxiWed analyeonl mport, •-VaNercfersto Htbylbvmu OIAl. mbseb.02]915.win00.02]815516.xk.8M7@808 ~`~~ ° N(&NIGrIN AVENUE, .. ~ -_ ..N....M.~...v~. a '~I __cw_._ d,_ I - ~a ~~FF n,. i ~ Q ~¢/~„_ w~aa~~oi~~ coot cw .~.. •~ i ~ !t YYY~)CIlW)Im[!f. VP-8 YHKY M.WICVMYfx,~,MT ~l ms ' " ~~ 1,~]Plwv' Lb b°° ma hqn W Nbtl Iafnl 6wM+. Aa. of Co~Of ftlBOnib ~i Xwunb~rry 1pB~y0)~)w~ W Pb a15~mWyYenkw ]. axe W IN &pq ~bn~Y 'xtlmoL°IM, 1 Ei~Ap~ '~":u~lw'°"w°"w oi°E»~'i °'~ wem]il ° a+we"e3'°°"~n,1e]v]e). "~°nm°. Mw o°~ w""wu'mvo° °I wv°c=n°w °°e~°R°~ non... II d~ II ~o r~~~ a ~~ ~ ,~ _~~ LEGEND ~~~~~~ ~w~o =c p1~w/urrr 68'xe o,~_ we°rnw I~ ,°°` o p .oanx / ~r °.( ~ - .,~ ~]>~] „~ ~, ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ER`Ld'R" ~ / < ;, EBaBEtlEa~@ ._._ ^~ I v,°]. ~~ it ~--__ ~ r ~\ __ \% I I ~ ~ _¢„ ate,.«,w ~•~~]„ ~. I VP~ta mya,.. au O LFP-1 -4- taMi/AViar I II f~ ]~ PP~ ~ ~ ,».,. CITY OF SANTA M S DATE 2500 MP ELH 7/os SAMA M SAg 7/0.5 CNY OF SAMA MONICA SFC 7/05 JULY 2005 SFC 7/05 ARTHUR D. LITTLE. INC. INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, fi JRPORATION YARD iVENUE ,ALIFORNIA 1 INCH 150 FEET 70260406.DWC SHEET ~ OF ~ I_-- -_-- h _ _ _ .-- -- P' "wbr°G~, S A.Aq p (fit, LECEUo mxwwn - _ - . NId.WlGAN AVENUE. Asph. 3 '~ G1y _---_ .,~. mza°ax .__ _ ... -- ^~t .q. l 0 coot, warmwuuavo+r ~Ort. o .._ wwmwwn I Ca cwt ".,..-, `°`.n.~ ~ ° I r r u~ m"i"i1°n.,. rwa,w,nmw~mom. ~ /d p°`n+< ~'~^~ 'y ~ ~ / x ~~~, ~ ,~,A~ ~. ~ ~ o __ ~~ \ ~ ~ o wwxl.[ B ° -_ ~y ) v ~ YMM[ rVl F . ~P ~~~: ~.~ ~~ . Asnh PAa ~ . '.C ~ . T t~4Sefi ,~ ~„~ `1~~~~\ ~~~\ ~\ I ~1' r ~~I~ ~ ~ ° i'I 0 wwwxron~~ .,. \~~\~~1~~~ \~ \~.'~ h ~ ~ ~ `l. I X it ~~ ~ese~'mnws _I ~\ \\~ :\ ~ ~ I _ _ .... ~ ~, ~~~ ~~~ ~~: \~\\ °" wy, ?:.' yy*rq`swx~~eeNr: ~~ Say - -°,°.ro ~~~ ~~ ~ ...t \~` `` `.\ 1 \ \ \ u[t~~~ /. )5~ ~ ~ ~~ I I~ I I \ ~~ V'~' /m/.v.uW trM1nt rv9'R'i9u°°~' ~ 1 O ~~ ...~ ~~, cy~~ ~ ~ ~ fL~.!pG Ifl II ~ m«wu+wabcu ~'yp~~ \~ '~' p II /' n (~N* ~`~ ~~° \~~~~'~ ~ ., .~ l l~ I o°I ' II ` Iso-s ry~{~ l~ L_ L ^ II ! r~~ 0 ~'~\.. ~, \`'+. 'rte I I° I p~~ ~~Q ~y ._... - I -_-- ~~ .-_ ~5^t, I -__- ~~_~- "h`~\~, `.\" IC FIGURE 2 ----- - - Y~NffiAY~M%E___._._.._~ _., ~~ F AREA IDENTIFICATION MAP _ __ - f~° +°r" ~~II -~ r - ~~ INTEGRATED LANDFILL SURFACE SAMPLING --~ - #' Il,r, G ra ~~ ~ Q ` ~PRGV'~LN 11/x7 CITY OF SANTA MONICA CORPORATION YARD ~} n I ,~~~~~~ P~ '~ o I ~ ~ SAB 11/07 CHY OF SANTA MONICA 1 INCH = 750 FEET Sy~ ~ SFC 11/W ryOV. 200] ]02800.9].DWG ~~'"'" II 6 ~ SFC 11/07 II ARTHUR D. LITTLE. INC. SHEEP ~ OF INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC. Attachment A: Analytical Report and Chain of Custody for Integrated landfill Surface Sample m0.saD.027Bt 6.xi~8.0278i bStT.dac Tes~~m~r~~a TILE LEADER IN ENVlRE7NtdENTAL TESTING a585 CadillacAVenue, 3uiteACesta Mere. CA a282&•T1-0-25&e610•Pax 7t4-X590927 July 09, 2009 LABORATORY REPORT Client: ICF Consu@ing Group, Ino. Work Order: LSG0016 1 Ada Parkway, Svite [00 Project Name: LFG Irvine, CA 42618 Project Number: 027915 Attu; Mario Barrcra Jr. - Date Received: 07!01/09 TesLlnrer[ea Los Angeles certifies that the test restrlrs provided ix thisrepart suet alt N6LAC requirements forparamet¢rs jor rvhich accredltatlmr is requtredormnilable. Ar7yexceptrwu(oNELAC regxiremen(s are noted in (he CarrectheAclion Report. NELAC Cerl~cntion Numberjor TestAmarica Lor.L+geles is&87652. TTie testresdts ltstedn~idiia7hisLabomtory Reporlpenatn only ra The samp/es tested in lbe labaratop~. ThisLnboratoryReport it colfdenfial and is t+trendedfor the sole rrre ofTestAnrerica mrd lts client TTers repart shatlnol be reprorlnced,e>'cepl htfirtl,rci(Aoul wr7rrenpernnsslonfrom TesLtmerlca. The Chain ofC+urody, lpage, is inchrdedandts an iutegralpart ofthis report. Thisenure reporfxas retinved andapprm~edfor release. if you have a,ry questions relafing to this analytical report, please contact your Laboratory Project Manager at 714.258-8610. Analyses included in this report were performed by the laboratory shown at the top of this report urdess otherwise indicated. Approved By: Marisol Tabirara Project A4anager 1 of 73 LSC~0016 Test~merica THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING 83a3 CedillaCAVenue. SUdeACOSIa Mesa. CAS262s'7t9-25e-a610 •Fax779-2384927 ICF Consulting Group, lnc. Work Order: LSGOOib Received: 07/01/09 12:20 i Ada Parkway, Suite t 00 Reported: 07/09/09 18:04 Irvine, CA 92618 Project: ~ LFG Mario Barren Jr. Pmject Nmn6er: 027915 - SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION INTEGRATED063009 LAB iV[Jil1BER LSG0016-01 COI.LECTTON 06130!09 13:20 2 of 15 bIATRIX CONTAL\ER TI_ Air Tedlaz Bag lOL LSG0016 Test~4mericc~ THE [.FADER IN ENY[RONMENTAL TEST[NO 3585 Catlillac AVmua, SuiteACOSIa Mesa, CA 32626'714-258-B67U'Pax 774258-OS21 iCF Consulting Group, brc. ~VOrk Order. LSG0016 Received: 07!01/69 12:20 1 Ada Parkway, Suite i00 Reported: 07(09/09 ]8:04 Irvine, CA 92618 Projeci: LFG Mario Barrera Jr. - ProjectNnmber: 027915 CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT #1,145 Department: Sample Control Date: 07101!2009 Method: Matra: QC•Batch: Identification and Definitimi of Problem: Please note that EPA Meihod TO-14A describes the use of canisters for sampling and analysis. Use of Tedlar sample bags constitutes a modification to ihemethod. QualityAssurance: - Date: 07/Oll200904:33PM Maria Friedman 3 of 75 LSCznO]6 Tes~~r~erica THE LEADER IN ENVIRdNMENTAI TESTING 3585 CarCllacAVemre, SutlnACosla Mesa, CA 92626.714-25&8610-Fex 714258-0921 ICF Consulting Group, Ina 1 Ada Parkway, Suite f 00 Irvine, CA 92618 Mario Barrera Jr. work Order: - LSG0016 Project: LFG P roject Nlwber: 0279 t 5 Received: 0?!01109 12:20 Reported: 07/09109 18:04 ANALYTICAL REPORT Data Date QC Analyte Result Qnalifiers Units IiDL RL DllaHon Analyzed Instrument Analyst Batch Sample ID: LSGOOlfi-01 nNTEGRATED063009 - Alr) Sampled: ~ 06/30/09 73:20 EPA TOSJA- VolaNe Organic Cmnponnds by GC/hIS Aeetpna ND ppbv 2.3 ]0 1.0 07/0110923;27 M$A TD 4602009 Benzeve ND ppbv 1.5 3.0 t.0 07!01/0923:27 htSA 7D 9602009 Benzyl chloride ND ppbv 2.0 ]0 1.0 - 07!01(0923:27 A1SA TP 9602009 8mmodicblaromeifiepa ND ppbv L0 2.0 1.0 07lO1N423:27 MSA ZD . 9602009 Smmoform ND ppbv 0.30 2.0 L0 07!01!0923:27 MSA TD 9602009 Bmmomeihena ND ppbv 2.0 4.0 LA 07/O1N923:27 MSA TD 9602009 2-Butanona (hIBK) ND ppbv 2.0 10 1.0 07/01!0923:27 hiSA TD 9602009 Cafiandisulfide ND ppbv 2.0 10 L0 ~ 07/01!0423:27 hISA TD 9602009 Carboatehacfiloride ND ppbv 1.0 2.0 1.0 07/01!0923:27 MSA TD 9602009 Chlarobemena ND ppbv 1.0 2.0 L0 07/0t/092327 MSA TD 9602009 Dbromochloramedune ND ppbv 1.0 2.0 i.0 0710[/0923:27 MSA TD 9602009 CWorcethane ND ppbv 15 4.0 L0 07/O1N923:27 MSA TD 96@009 Cfilomfom[ ND ppbv LO 2.D 1.0 07lOIPo923:27 hfSA 7D 9602009 Chtoromeihane ND ppbt• 2.0 4.P L0 97!07/0923:27 h1SA TO 9602009 t,2-Dihronsoethana (EDB) ND ppbv 1.0 2.0 LD 07l01AI923:27 MSA TD 9602004 1,2-Diehlarobenzrne ND. ppbv 090 2.0 L0 D7lOT(0923:27 bISA TD 9602009 1,3Aichlorobevzeue ND ppbv 0.80 4.0 1.0 07!01(0923:27 MSA TD 9682004 L,4-Dich7ombenzena ND PPbv' !A 4.0 1.0 07/01!0923:27 hiSA 7D 9602009 DicfilorodiFlUOromeihane ND ppbv LS 3.0 1.0 07!01!0923:27 AfSA TD 9602009 f,t-DichlproeWana ND ppbv 1.0 2.0 IA 07!01/092327 ~ MSA TD 9602009 1,2-Dichloroedwx ND ppbv 1.4 3.0 L0 07!01!0923:27 h(SA TD 9602009 cis-1,2-Dicbloroeihene ND ppbv 0.80 2.0 L0 .07!01!0923:27 MSA 7D 4G020D9 trans-I,2-Dichiaro<Ureea ND ppbv 1.0 2.0 1.0 07/01!0923:27 htSA TD 9602009 1,1-Dich[ommhrne ND ppbv 1.0 2.0 L0 - 07/0]!0923:27 h15A TD ' 9602009 1,2-Dichloropropane ND ppbv i.5 3.0 L0 07/01!0423:27 MSA TD 9602009 cis-1,3-Dichloropropeee e1D ppbv 1.0 2.0 1.0 07/0!!0423:27 MSA TD 9602009 hens-t}-Diddoropmpene ND ppbv 1.0 2.0 1.0 07N1/0923:27 AISA TD 9602009 I,2-Dich[oro•I,t,2,2-tetrefluaeoethaee ND ppbv 1.0 2.0 1.0 07/0[N92327 h14A TD 9602009 Ethylhenzene LJ 1 ppbv 1.0 2.0 t.0 07!0(!092321 R15A TD 9602009 J-Edgltoluene ND PPbv 1.0 2.0 1.0 07/0!!0923:27 hiSA TD 9602009 HesacMorobutediene ND ppbv 73 4.0 1.0 07!01/0923:27 MSA TD 9602009 2-Haeanone ND ppbv 2.0 !0 1.0 01/07!0923;27 MSA TD 9602009 Methylene cMnride 1.5 1,B ppbv t.0 2.D 1.0 07lO1Po923:27 hiSA TD 4GD2044 4-Alathyl-2-pealmtona1h11BK) - - ND ppbv 2.0 10 I.0 07lQIN923:27 h1SA TD 4602009 gene ND PPbv LO 2.0 IA 07(01!0923:21 h1SA 7D 4602009 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroe0uea ND Pabv LO 2.0 ~ t.0 07lOIN923:27 h1SA TD 9602004 Tehachloroeehene ND ppbv 1.0 2.0 L0 07l01N923:27 hfSA TD 9602004 Tolueoa ND ppbv l.0 5.0 to 07lOIN92327 MSA TD 4602009 1,2,4-Trichtorobcnzene ND ppbv 2.5 SA 1.0 07/01!0923:27 h1SA TD 4602009 1,1,1-Trichlorcethane ND 'PPbv L0 2.0 IA 07/01/0423:27 MSA TD 9602009 1,1,2-Td<NOroeduaa ND ppbv L0 2.D i-0 07(01!0923:27 htSA TD 9602009 Tricidorcetfiene ND ppbv 1.0 2.0 I9 07/bIN923:27 hISA TD 9602004 d of ti LS600t6 Test~r~~ric~ THE LEAI?Et21N ENVIRONMENIAt 7E5T1NtU 3585 CSdillaa Averiu¢,Su"M1eACasfe Maea, CA82828 •]f4-268A8f0 •Fax 714-258-0921 1CF Consuhing Group, inc. 1 Ada Pazkway, Suite 100 Twine, CA 92618 Mario Barrera Jr. Norte Order. LSG0016 Project: LFG Proje ct Number: 027915 Received: 07/01/09 12:20 Reported: 07109!09 18:04 ANALYTICAL REPORT Data Datc QC Anal}•te Result Qualifiers Unifs ilIDL RL Dilation Analyzed Instrument Anal}•st Batch Sample ED: LSG0016-OS (INTEGRATED063009 - Ah•) -coot. Sampled: 06130!09 13:20 EPA TOI4A-Volatile Organic Campounds by GCG1IS-coot TrieWocafluommcfhane ND PPbv 1.0 2.0 1,7,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-fdfluoroedran¢ ND ppbv ~ ].0 2.0 i,2,4-Tdmelhylbeaxa¢ ND ppbv 1.3 3.0 1,3,5-Trimefhylbemm~¢ ND ppbv L1 3.0 Viny[acetaze N73 PPbv 2.0 !0 Viayl ehlodd¢ ND PPbv 2.0 4.D Xpienes, laia; 17 PPbv 1.0 2.0 1.0 ~OIfO1N923:27 b1SA TD 9602009 1.0 07107!042327 b1SA TD 9602009 1.0 07lOIN923:27 h?SA 1D 96020D9 L0 07/01!0923:27 MSA TD 9602009 LD 0710 7 /09 23:27 b/SA TD 9602009 1.0 07/01!0923:27 MSA TD 9602009 1.0 07!07!0923:27 115A TD 9602009 5 of 75 iSG005S Testm~rica THE iEADE:R 1N ENVfRC)N1vtENTAL TESTINCa 358.5 CaeIDacAVenue, SUHeA COSta Mesa, CA 92626.714-25s8610'Fa[]t4256-0921 ICF Consulting G[oup, Inc. I Ada Pe[k5vay, Suitc 100 Irvine, CA 92618 Mario Barrera 7r. 1Vork Order: LSGOOIb P[o}ect: LFG Pco}ec# Nnmber. 027315 Received: 07!01/09 12:20 Reported: 07l09/0918:0~1 ANALYTICAL REPORT Dafa Dafe QC Analyte Resulf Qualifiers Units MDL RL Dilution Anal}zcd Iustrumenf Aaalys# Batch Sample lD: LSGOOlb•Ol (iiVTEGRATED063009-Air) Sampled: 06!3010913:20 EPA 15/Ifi-Sulfur Compounds Carbon dindfide ND ppmv 0.012 0.10 f.0 07102(0906:26 GC7 YZ 9G0200I Cedwrtyl sulfide ND ppmv 0.050 0.10 1.0 07!02!0906:26 GC7 YZ 9G02001 Dunethyl disulfide ND ppnv 0.012 O.IO L0 07(02N906:26 GC7 YZ 9G0200I Dimethy]sulfide ND PPmv 0.023 0.10 1,0 07!02!0906:26 GC7 YZ 9G02001 Hydwgds sulfide ND ppmv 0.050, 0.10 L0 07l02N906:26 GC7 YZ 9G0206I Ethyl mercaptan ND ppmv 0.050 O.1D 1.0 07!02/0906:26 GC7 YZ 9G02001 Methyl mercapfan rYD ppmr 0.050 0.19 ].D 07/02N90626 GC7 YZ 4602001 EPA 25C -Total Nonmefhane Drganic Campomtds - r Total Nan-Methane Hydrocarbons as IDlelhana 12 J ppm-C 5.0 30 1.0 07m1Po915:38 GC8 E[ 960[003 EPA 3C-FixedGases _ Carhan dioxide - 0.038 %a(v!v) 0.0020 O.OIO 1.0 07N1N1915:38 GC8 EI 9601003 3Scthane 0,00020 %(vh•) OA00060 OA0020 1.0 O7/O1N915:38 GC8 E[ 9GOW03 Nitrogen 80 %QeN) 0.50 LO L0 07/01N913:38 GC8 Ef 9GOW03 Oxygen 32 %Qvh•) 0.030 024 1.0 D7/0](0915:38 OCS EI 9GOI003 8 of 15 - LSG00'IS T~s~~4r~erica TH6 LEAt7ER IN ENV1Rt3NirfENTAI TESTING 3'.,85 Caeltac AVenu9, SUrteA COSta Mesa, CA 92026 `7 5 4258-861 0 `fax 7i4-258.0321 ICP Consulting Group, Ine. \Vork Order: LSCa0016 Received: 07/0L09 12:20 i Ada Pazkway, Suite 100 ~ Reported: 07!09/09 18:04 Irvine, CA 92618. ~ Project: LFG Mario Barrera Jr. Project Number: 027915 PROJECT QUALITY CONTROL DATA IIlank Anafyfe Data Result Qualifier Unifs IJDL RL Dilution Date Analyzed Instrument Analyst QC Batch SamplelD; 9602009-BLKI (Blank-Airj EPA T014A -Volatile Organic Compounds by GCI114S Acstone NU ppbv 2.5 10 1.00 O7lOU09 22:01 hiSA DLK 9602009 Henerne ND ppbv t.5 3.0 1.00 07/01709 22:04 htSA DLK 9602009 benryl chiodde ND ppbv 2.0 10 1.00 07IO1N9 22:04 hiSA DLK 9602009 Hrdmodichloromethave ND ppbv LO ~ 2D IAO 07!01(09 22:01 bISA DLK 9602009 6romofacm ND ppbv 0.50 2.0 1.04 07!01/09 22:01 hISA DLK 9602009 Hmmameihave ND ppbv 2.0 4.0 1.04 07!01/09 22:63 hISA DLK 9602004 2-Dutanone (b[£K} ND ppbv 2.0 IO 1.00 07/OIN9 22:01 hISA DLK 9602009 Cafion disulfide ND ppbv ~ 2.0 ' IO 1-00 67101!09 22:61 MSA DLK 9602009 Carbon teuvchloride ND ppbv L0 2.D L00 07lOIPo922:04 hISA DLK 9602009 Chlombenzene ND ppbv 1.0 2.D 1.00 0710 UD9 22:01 MSA DLK 9602009 Dibromochtocomethane ND ppbv 1.0 ~ 2.0 L00 07(01/09.22:03 biSA DLK 9602009 CMoroethaeo ND ppbv 1.5 4.0 ~ L00 07/01!09 22:04 bISA DLK 9602009 Chlmofocm ND ppbv 1.0 2.0 L00 07/01!09 22:01 hiSA ULK 9602009 ChloromeU+ane ND ppbv 2.0 4.0 1.00 07/O1rD4 22:01 hISA DLK 9602009 1,2-Di3ramceihane (EDH) NO ppbv 1D 2.0 1.00 07fOW922:03 bfSA DLK 9602009 ' I,2-Dichlowbenzena ND ppbv 0.90 2.0 L00 07/01/09 22:04 b1SA DLK 9,602009 i}-Dichlorobevzave ND ppbv 0.80 4.0 I-00 07(01109 22:04 'MSA DLK 9602009 I,4-Dichlorobevuve - ND ppbv 1.0 4.0 L06 07(OIPo9 22:05 htSA DLK 9G020D9 DichlorodiFlUOmmeOuve ND PPbv f.5 3.0 1.00 O7(DIPo4 22:03 hISA DLK 9602009 I,FDichtamethan< RD ppbv L0 2.0 1.OD 97(01!09 22:04 bISA DLK 9602009 12Dichtoroetha+w ND ppbv 1.5 3.0 1.00 07l01N9 22:01 MSA DLK 9602004 ris-1,2-Dich[oroe0ehe ND ppbv 0.80 2.0 1.00 0710IM9 22:04 bfSA DLK 9602009 buns-l,2-DicMorcelhtne ND ppbv I-0 ~ 2.0 L00 0710!/09 22:OS MSA DLK 9602009 I,l-DicWoccefhene N'fl ppbv 1.0 2.D 1.00 07l6IA9 22:03 hiSA DLK 9602009 IyDiehlwopropana ND gpbv 1,S 3.D L00 07(01109 22:0; MSA 'DLK 9602069 cis-1,3•Dichlomprapene ND ppbv h0 2.D LOD 07!01/09 22:01 MSA DLK 9602004 traned,3-Dichloroproprnc ND ppbv 1,0 2.0 1.OD 07(OIPo9 22:0; htSA DLK 9602009 1,2-DicWaco-[,1,2,2-tetraFluorcelhane ND ppbv 1.0 2.0 L00 07!01/04 22:03 MSA DLK 9602004 Eihylbevuve ND ppbv 1.0 2.0 LOD 07/91A14 22:04 bfSA DLK 9002009 4.6Flryltolume ND ppbv I,0 2.0 IAO 07/07N9 22:03 hSSA DLK 4602009 Hexachlorobuladiene ND ppbv ]3 4.0 IAO 07Po1rU9 22:01 MSA DLK 9602009 2-Hexanone ND ppbv 2.0 10 1.00 07/PIA9 22;03 hfSA DLK 9602009 6fethplene chloride 3.11 J FPbv 1.0 2.0 L00 07101/09 22:03 h?SA DLK 9602009 4-h4ethyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ND ppbv 2.0 ]0 L00 07!07709 22:W MSA DLK 9602064 Styrrne ND ppbv 1-0 2.0 1.00 D7l01I09 22:45 h1SA DLK 9602009 I, 1,2,2-Tetrachlorceihane ND ppbv 1.0 2.0 1.00 07(01!04 22:W hiSA DLK 9602009 Teixaebloroetbene ND ppbv I.0 2.0 1.00 Oi(Otl44 22:05 biSA DLK 9602004 Toluene ND ppbv LO S.0 1.00 07(OIaN 22:65 hISA DLR 9602009 1,2,4-Trichlarobenzeve ND ppbv 2,5 5.0 L00 07NIN4 52:61 MSA DLK 9602069 7 of 15 LSGOflt6 T~s~~meri~a TFIE CEAOEf21N ENViFEONMENTAL TESTING 3585 CetlilWCAvaswe, BUdeACOSIa Mesa Cn D262a X774-25sesto'FVC77425&-D9zt TCF Consulting Group, Inc. 1 Ada Parkway, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92618 Mario Barrera Jr. Work Order: LSGOOi6 &oject: LFG Project Number: 027915 Received: 07/01709 12:20 Reported: 47/09/09 18:04 PROJECT QTJALITY CONTROL DATA Blank-Cont. Data Date QC Analyte Result Qualifier Units MDL RL Bilution Analyzed Insh•ument Analyst Batch Sample ID: 9602009-BLKI {Blank-Ai19 -wni. EPA T014A - Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/DIS LI,t-Tsichlorocaunc ND ppbv 1.0 2.0 1.00 07/01!09 22:01 h13A DLK 9602009 t, I,2-Tnchloxceihane NO ppbv L0 20 1.00 07/01!09 22:03 hISA DLK 9602009 Tricfilo[ce[hena ND ppbv L0 2.D L00 07(OIN9 22;04 MSA DLK 4602009 Tricfile[oauoromethane ND ppbv 1.D 2.0 L00 07(01/0912:04 MSA DLK 4602009 t, I,2-Tnchlmo-1,2,2-ldaumcethane ND ~ ppbv lA 2.0 L00 07!01/09 22:01 MSA DLK 9602009 1,2,1-Tsimethylbenune ND ppbv 1.3 30 L00 07/01!09 22:0.4 MSA DLK 9602009 t,3,5•Tsuuelhylbenxcne ND ppbv 1.1 3,0 L00 07(O1N9 22:0; MSA DLK 9602004 Vinyl acetate ND PPbv 2A ID L00 07(OIN422:04 hISA DLK 9602004 Vinyl chloride ND ppbv 2.0 4.0 L00 O7lOIN9 22:03 hISA DLK 9602009 %}•lenes, total ND ppbv LO 2.0 L00 07lOIN9 22;04 MSA DLK 96021109 Blanlt-Cont. Data Dafe QC Anal}9e Result Qual~er Unifs IiDL RL Dilufion Analyzed Instrument Analyst Bafch Sample ID:9GOi003-BLKI (Blank-Air) EPA 25C -Total Nonnretkane Orgmtic Compounds Total Nan•hiethane Hydrocarfionsazhiethanu ND ppm-C 3.0 30 1.00 07/0/N9 3Sd2 OC8 EI 4601003 Sample ID: 9GOi003-BLKI (Blank -Air) EPA 3C - Pixed Gases Cufion diavide ND %(vlv) 0.9020 0.010 L00 07/0110915:12 GC8 EI 9601003 hfethmre ND ~ %(v/v) 0.000060 0.00020 L00 Ol/0]/0915:12 GC8 EI 9601003 Nivogtn ND %(vh•) 0.50 L0 1.00 07/OIPo915a2 GC8 EI 9601003 Daygen ND %.(vh•) 0.030 020 I-00 O7N]Po4 15:12 GCS EI 9601003 Santpic ID: 4602001-BLKI (Blank -Air) EPA 15!16 - Sulfur Cmupounds Carbon disulfide ~ ND ppmv 0.0]2 0.14 1.00 Wl02l09 6:08 GC7 YZ 9602001 Caalwvyl sulfide ND ppmv 0.050 0.10 1.00 07!02/09 6:08 6C7 Y2 9602001 Dimethyi dlsutPda ND- PPm•' 0.012 0.10 1.00 07!02!09 6:08 GC7 YZ 9602001 Dimethyl sulfide ND ppmv 0.025 0.10 1.D0 07/02!04 6:08 GC7 YZ 9G020i1} Fiydrogm sulfide ND' ppmv OASO 0.10 1.00 07l02N4 6:08 GC7 YZ 9602001 E[hyfmmwptan ND ppmv 0.050 D.ID 1.00 07lD2Po4 6:08 GC7 YZ 9602001 hiethYl mercaPtav 1VD PPmv 0.050 0.10 L00 07!07104 6:08 GC7 YZ 9602001 8 01'15 LSfi6016 T~s~m~rica THE LEA6ER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TES71Nf3 3-+`a+`Caddiac Avenue, SUiteA~osta Mesa, CA 92626'754-258-~10'Far X14-258-0924 ICF Consulting Grovp, Inc. t Ada Pflr}avay, Suite 100 Trvine, CA 92bIS Mario Barrera ]r- l9ork Order: LSGODlb Project: LFG Project Number 027915 Received: 07!01!09 12:20 Reported: D7l09l0418:04 PROJECT QUALITY CONTROL DATA Blank -Cont. Data Date QC Analyte Result Qualifier Units NIDL RL Dilution Analyzed Insteument Analyst Batch Sample ID: 9G02001-ELK1 (Blauk -Air) -cont. KPA ISt16 -Sulfur Compounds 9 of 15 LSG0016 Test~meri~~ THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING 5595 Cadllae AVerwe, SudeA COSIa tAesa, CA92625'7t 4-25fi86t0-Fax 714258-0921 ICF Consulting Gronp, Inc. 1 Ada Parkway, Saite 100 irvitie, CA 92618 ivlario Barnm Jr. Work Order: LSGOOIfi Froject: LFG ProjectNumber: 027915 Received: 07/01/09 22:20 Reported: 07109(09 18:04 PROJECT QII9LiTY CONTROL RATA LCS Data Spike Target Date QC Analyle Result Qualifiers Units RL Diludun Conc %Rec Range Iustrument Anal-IZed BateL Sample ID: 9602009-BSI (LCS-Air) EPA T014A -Volatile Organic Compounds Vy GCLIiS Denzen¢ 36.3 ppbv 3.0 1.00 SO-0 113% 70-1I5 AfSA 0 7/0110 9 2 0:36 9602009 bmmadichlmomtnwre 54.3 APbv 2.0 1.00 50.0 103% 70-125 ASSA 07/01/0920:16 9602009 Bmmametfiane 30.T ppbv 4.0 LDO 50.0 101% 30-123 h1SA 07N1l0920J6 9602009 2•HUiamna (AIeK) 47.J ppbr IO L00 53.0 87% 70.130 A1SA 47701!0920:16 9602009 Cadwn duulCide 31.7 ppbv 70 1.00 50.0 103% 70.134 h1SA 07/61N920:16 9602009 Ctdorabenzene 51.9 ppbv 2.0 IAO 52.5. 99% 74-110 h1SA 07Ntl0920:16 9602009 Chlomfonu 31.4 pnbv 2.0 L00 30.0 103% 74-130 hfSA 07!01/0920:16 9602009 1,4-Dlchlombenzen¢ 50.7 ppbv 4.4 L00 30.0 101% 33•[20 hfSA 07!0[/0920:16 9602009 Diddomdifluomme0uua 30.3 ppbv 3A LW 50.0 IOI% 20-150 MSA O]Pol/0920:16 9602009 eis-1,2--ichlometh¢ee 30.0 ppbv 2.0 IAO 33.3 93% 70-I30- hLSA 0 710 7 /09 2 0:16 9602009 1,1,2-Trichlorce4uve 51.6 ppbv 2.0 1.00 30.0 103% 70-110 h15A 07!07/0920:16 9602009 Trichloroetbene 33.1 ppbv 20 1.00 50.0 110% 70•I1S h1SA 07/m/0920a6 9602009 1,2,4•Trimethylbenzene 52.8 Dpbv 3.0 1.00 50.0 lOb% 30 • 145 Ai3A 07lOIPo420:16 9602009 Vinyl chloride 48.9 ppbv 4.0 1.00 30.0 98% 70.115 A1Sd 07/OIN920:16 9602004 ' m,p-XYleoe 106 ppbv 4.0 1.00 100 106% 70.130 hiSA 07l0191920:Ib 9602009 n-Xylene 51.3 ppbv 2.0 1.00 50.0 103% 70-123 AISA 07/0110920:16 9GW009 ' LCS - Conf. - Data - Spike Target Date QC Aoalyfe Result Qualifiers Uni#s RL Dilulian Cone kRer Range Instrument Anallzed Balch Samp[e 1D: 9603003-BS2 (LCS-Air) EPA2SC-Total Nonmethane Organic Compounds Total Non-Rldhane Hydre¢arbons as hfediane 64.0 ppm-C 30 IAO 60.0 107% 80-120 GC8 07lOF/0914:II 966#003 Sample ID: 9601003-BSl (LCS -Air) EPA 3C-Filed Gases Carbon dioxide 1.43 °b(vly) 4.010 1.00 0.998 103% 75 -125 GCS 07!01!09 11:48 4641003 hfeth¢no O.OS30 %(v1v) 0.00020 L00 0.0504 I06% 7S-13S GCS 07l91l09I1;48 9601003 Nitrogen 26.6 %(v!v) 1.0 1.00 24.3 I09% 70-130 GCS 07/OIN9I7:48 9Gm003 O.ygev 5.43 %(vA•) 0.20 1.00 4.98 109efe 70-130 GC8 07N1(09II:48 9601003 Sample ID:9602001-BSl (LCS-Air) EPA 15116 -Sulfur Compounds - Carbon disulfide 0950 ppmr 0.10 1.00 0.450 100% ]0-120 GC7 07102N905:34 9602001 +a o++s Lscoo+s Test~m~ri~a THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMI=N7 AL TE571NG 3~'CaQNi ac Avenue, Suae Acosta Mesa, CA 0282B'7t4-2Sa-ect0 •Fax 7t4-258-0927 ICF Consulting Group, Inc. Nork Order: LSGOOlb Received: 07/Ofl09 12:20 3 Ada Parkway, Suite 100 Reported: 07Po9/09 18:04 Irvine, CA 92628 Project: LFG Maria Barrem Jr. ProjectNuml3er: 027915 PROJECT QUALITY CONTROL DATA LCS -Cont. Data Spike Target ~ Date QC Aualyte Result QuafiOers Units RL Dilution Conc °1o Rec Range Instrument Analyzed Batck Sample ID: 9G02001-BSl (LCS -A ir} -cant. EPA IS/16 -Sulfur Compounds Carbonyl su76de 1.16_ ppmv 0.10 1.00 LD3 113% 7S-I40 GC7 - 07l02N90S:34 9G02001 Dimethyl disol6de 0.282 ppms• 0.10 1.06 0.300 94°/a 70-130 GC7 07l02N90S:34 9G02001 D'wxe0ryl sulfide 1.04 ppmv 0.10 1.06 6.985 I06% , 70-130 GC7 07!02/6905;34 9C02001 Hydrogen sulfide 0.778 ppmv 0.10 t.06 6.980 79% fi0-130 GC7 ~ 07f62N90594 9G62001 Ethyl mercaptan 0.781 ppmv 0.10 1.00 0.890 88% 70-330 GC7 DI/OZN986:34 9602001 Mnhyl merwptan 0,867 ppmv 0.10 L00 0.930 93~ 75-130 GC7 07N2(090534 9G0200t 11 of t5 LSGOOt6 Tes~~merica THE LEADER IN ENVIFtUNMENTAL TESTING 3695 CadTac Avenue, SUiteACosbMesa, CA 02028.7142SS-8610•Fe:c 714258-0921 ICF Consulting Gmup, Ina iVork Order: ISG0016 Received: 07/01/09 12:20 1 Ada Parkway, Suite 100 ~ Reported: 07/09/09 18:04 Irvine, CA 92618 ~ Project LFG Mario Barrera Jr. Project Number: 027915 PROJECT QUALITY CONTROL DATA LCS Dup Data Sptke Target Date QC Analyte Result Qua]i0ers Units RL Dilution Conc %Rec Range RPD Limit Analyzed Batch Sample ID: 9602009-BSDi (LCS Dup -Air} EPA TO1JA -Volatile Organic Compounds by GCn1S Benzene 59.3 LS ppbv 3.0 ' 1.00 Bmmodichimomelheue 55,7 ppbv 2.0 1,00 Bromomethane 53.7 ppbv 4,0 L00 2-BUlanone (biBR} 59-T ppbv IO L00 Carbon disulfide 592 ppbv 10 L00 Chlorobevsm _ 52.8. ppbv 2.0 L00 Chlarofonn 59.9 ppbv 2.0 L00 1,4-Dichlambsvzrne 51.8 PPbv 40 L00 Dichloredifluamme0ane 57.7 ppbv 3.0 L00 cis-1,2-Diehloroelhena 48.6 ppbv 2.0 LOD 1,t,2-Trichloroediane 53.d ppbv 2.0 1.00 7dchloreethene 56.5 ppbv 2.0 [.00 1,2,4Tsaneihylbenzeoe 50.7 ppbv 3.0 L00 Vinyl chloride 53.9 ppbv 4.0 1.00 mgXykn¢ tl2 PPbv 4.0 L00 a-Xylene 51.7 ppbv 2.0 - 1.00 LCS Dap- Conf. 50.0 119% 70-115 5 50.0 II]% 70-123 6 50.0 107% 50-125 6 35.0 t09% 70-330 22 50.0 118% 70-130 13 52.3 100% 70-IIO 2 50.0 120% 70-E30 is 50.0 104% 45 • [20 2 50.0 ]IS% 20-130 14 53'.3 IIO% 70.130 l6 30.0 107% 70.110 3 50.0 113% 70-113 3 50.0 IDl% 30-14s 4 so.o tos% 7o-Its to !00 ]l2% 70•[30 6 50.0 103% 70•HS 0.9 35 07!01!0420:50 9602009 25 O7(O1Po920:50 4602009 25 07/01/0920:50 9602009 2S 07/01/0420:50 9GD2009 25 Olroi/0920:50 9602009 zs o7rolro9zo:5o 96ozao9 25 D710tN920:50 9602004 2S O7f0If0920:50 9602009 2S 07!0170920:50 9602009 25 47lO1t0920:50 9602009 25 07(OU0420:30 9602009 25 07/0[!6920:50 9602009 25 07/0(!0920:30 9602009 2s D7ro1,ro42o:so 96ozoo4 25 07NIN920:50 9602009 25 07/01N920:50 9602009 Data - Spike Target Date QC Analyte Result Qualifiers Units RL Dilution Conc %Rec Rangn RPD Limit Analyzed Batch Sample ID: 9601003-BSD2 (LCS Dup -Air) EPA 25C-Total Nonmethane Organic Compounds Total Nan-1lethan¢Hydrocarbons ash[ethana 63,7 ppm•C 30 lA0 60A 106% 80-720 0.5 20 07101/0914:38 9601003 Sample ID: 9601003-BSDi (LCS Dap -Air) EPA 3C-Fixed Gases Carbon dioxide 1.03 °!o(v/r) 0.010 L00 0.948 103% 75-125 0.3 20 07(01!0412:17 9601003 A4dune ~ O.OS24 %(vIr) 0.00020 1.00 oasoo l06% 75-135 0.2 20 07roi10412:17 9601003 Nitrogsv - 26.6 %(vN) L0 1.00 24.3 110% 70.130 03 30 07ro1l091217 9601003 Ox}gen SAS %(rlv) 0.20 1.00 4.98 109% 70-130 03 30 07!07!091217 9601003 Sample ID: 9602001-BSDi (LCS Dup - Alr} EPA 15/16-Sulfur Compounds Carbon disulfide 0922 ppmv 0,10 1.00 0.950 47% 70.120 3 25 01f02i0965:52 9602001 12 of 15 LSG0016 Tesf~meri~a THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTINU' 6686 Cad0ac Avenue, SudeACOSIe Mass, CA 02626'714-25a-8610'Fax 71425a-0825 ICF Consu]ling Group, Inc. I Ada Pnrktivay, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92618 Mario Barrera Jr. Work Ordor: LSG0016 Project: LFG Project Nlunllor: 027915 Received: 07/01{09 12:20 Reported: 07/09!0418:04 PROJECT QUALITY CONTROL DATA LCS llup-Gout. -ata Spike Target Date QC Anaiyte Result Qualifi¢rs Unlts RL Dilution CmtO %R¢¢ Range RPD Limit Anallzed Eat¢h Sample ID: 9602001-BSDS ¢CS Dup -Air) -coot. - EYA 15116- Sulfur Compounds Carbonyl sd6da L.13 ppmv 0.10 1.00 3.03 109% 75.140 3 25 07/02/0905:52 9602001 DaneWyl disulfide - 0270 ppmv 0.10 1.00 0.300 90% 70-130 4 30 07702/0905:52 9602001 Dimethylsulfide 0.999 ppmv 0.10 7.00 0.985 IDI% 70•]30 4 30 D7/02+0905:52 960200] Npdrogen sulfide 0.748 ppmv 0.10 1.00 0.980 76% 60-130 4 25 07(02N905:52 9602001 Gthy]mercaptan 0.139 ppmv 0.20 L00 0.890 85% 70-130 3 30 07Po2Po905:52 9602001 ,-lcthyi m<rcaptav 0.840 ppmv O.FO 1.00 0930 90% 75-I30 3 2S 0]70210905:52 9602001 13 of 1b LS00016 T~~t~~merica THE LEADER IN ENVIRI'7Nh7ENTAl TESTING 35&S Cetlillac Avenue, $UdeAC0612 Me$9, CA 9T328'714-258-8670 `Fax774-253-0921 iCF Consulting Group, Tnc. Work Order: LSG0016 Received: 07!01109 12:20 1 Ada Parkway, Suite 100 Reported: 07/09/09 18:04 Irvine, CA 92618 Pmject: LFG Mario Barrera Jr. Project Number: 027915 i ' DATA QUALIFIERS AND DEFINfTiONS B Analyte was detected in the associated Method Bla3dc. J Estimated value. A~>alyte detected at a Ievel less then the Reporting Limit (RL) and greaser than or aqua[ to the Method Detection Limit (MDL). The aser of this data should 6e aavare that this data is of ]trotted reliability. L5 Analyte recovery outside of specified criteria. Individual analyse criteria exeeedences allowed for multi-component analyses without disqualification of data per NELAC Standard, DOD QSM and/or AFCEE QAPP. W Not detected at the reporting limit (or method detection limit if shown) 34 of 15 LSG0038 a 0 °o rn Cooler Number of ICFConsulting - 1 CHAIN OF CUSTODYRBCORD "`°`1©Q`~ Paae__.._.___ of II. PROJ No. PROJEO7 NAME ANALYSES ~ "~ SAMPLERS: {Signauua) ~~ ~~~ JG:. ~1 ~(~d ~, ~~ t~,~ Feld Sampte Number pate Time `Sample x °of Container preservation l~Y' o43Dnq •~ o oq 132 1 N~~ /~J i Yme ivedAy: Daze ~ ,7iJJ 5~~: J'~~l~ ~ ~ Rel ) JCYJd. D 2 Yme i ~Oti i\ ' ~ R re) ~ D i Yhfw\\ I~KJ ~ /Iyrvtf/~ ~~ Rorma 'snea cr:ls' ) nee? rma ~ .ls;9nawr.9 a:e rma 'f~ SOt~1!'r' t ~}/jl~jr(LFl~ ICF Cw~suldng 2500 Michelson Drive, Suite 710, Irvine, OA 92612 Yelaphone 949-Y15.8700 • FaX 9 4 92 25-61 61 Dam Yme canter/ABbIrt M S.SoSt SED-$ayimaM W-Watw WVapep a)py Attachment C INTERNATIONAL July 30, 2009 Mr. Pe#e Oda Solid Wasfe Management Program County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services 5050 Commerce Dr. Baldwin Park, CA 91706-1423 Subject: Second Quarter 2009 Sampling Program Results Landflli Gas Control System City of Santa Monica Corporation Yard 2500 Michigan Avenue Santa Monica, -California (SWIS #19-AA-5350) Rs: ICF Consulting Reference No. 027915 Dear Mr. Oda: On behalf of the City of Santa Montca (City}, ICF International has prepared this letter presen#ing the second quarter 2009 sampling program resulfs for the IandCl€ gas (LFG} conirol system located at the above referenced site. A letter presenting the details of the proposed sampling program was previously submitted by Arthur D. Little (1998} to the County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services (DHS}. That fetter included proposed sampling procedures, locations, and frequencies, as well as proposed Target analytes and analytical test methods. Unless otherwise noted, the second quarter 2009 sampling program compiled with the original proposal to the DHS. To better understand the sampling program, a general description of the LFG control system components and their current configuration is provided below. Documents providing detailed information on the components of the LFG control system were previously submitted to the DHS (Arthur D. Little, 1997, 1999a, City, 1997}. i Ada Parkway, Suite tOD ~- Inrine. CA 4261 B ~ 944.333,6600 ~ 949333.660t fez ~~ icff.<om Jufy 30, 2009 Mr. Pete Oda Solid Waste Management Program County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services Pertinent Background ]nfarmatlon forthe Landfill Gas Control System The LFG control system is composed of five primary components that include: the well field, conveyance piping, treatment equipment, an extraction blower, and a subsurface monitoring probe network. The well field consists often vertical LFG extraction wells (LFG-1 through LFG-10) that are located to the east and north of the City's former nursery building and along the southern and eastern sides of Stewart Street Park (Figure 1). Individual extraction wells are controlled and monitored at the wellhead. Each well is connected to a common below-grade header pipe that conveys the LFG to the treatment compound loco#ed in the southeastern corner of the City's Water and Wastewater Division Yard. Within the treatment compound, the untreated LFG passes through an entrainment tank to remove separate-phase LFG condensate. The LFG then passes through a dehumidifying unit where the relative humidify of the LFG is reduced by cooling the gas and removing the liquid condensate that is produced. The Yeduced- humidltyLFG than passes through vessels of vapor-phase granular activated carbon (GAC) and potassium permanganate alumina (PPA) to ramoveloxidize select volatile organic compounds (VOCs}. The treated LFG is then pulled into the extraction blower and discharged into the base of a 26-foot-high stack. The collected liquid condensate is pumped through two drums of aqueous-phase GAC and injected into a 600 gallon holding tank. The Treated LFG is then discharged from the top of the stack into the atmosphere. Sampling Program Results For this program, sampling locations included perimeter and trench monitoring probes, the interiors of key on-site structures, the area around the control system discharge stack, the inlet ofi the control system treatment vessels, and the outlet of the control system treatment vessels. All sampling was performed as proposed in the original sampling program (Arthur D. Little, 1998, modified June 8, 1998 based on a conversation with Mr. Chris Mastro of the DHS). Perimeter and Trench Monitoring Probes A subsurface perimeter and trench monitoring probe network has been installed around the landfill (Figure 1 }. All perimeter probes (PP-1 through PP-29} were 'sntended to be installed in na#ive soil surrounding the waste mass; however, due to the close proximity mb.sa6.027915.xin06.0278155t4 July 30, 2009 Mr. Pete Oda Solid Waste Management Program County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services of the waste mass to the property line, Perimeter Probes PP-13 and PP-16 were installed in refuse. Trench probes (TP-1 through TP-8) targeted the porous bedding material that is usually placed around subsurface utilities during construction. Perimeter probes are multi-level devices consisting of three levels designated as A, B, and C, respectively: a shaliow.level (A} that is typically screened from 7 to 9 feet below ground surface (bgs); an Intermediate level (B) that is typically screened from 18 to 20 feet bgs; and a deep level (C) that is typically screened from 33 to 35 feet bgs, which is the estimated maximum depth of the refuse at this site. In general, irench probes are singie- level devices that vary in depth based oh the depth of the assoc€ated utility trench. Specific consfruction details for ail perimeter and trench probes installed at the si#e were previously submitted to the DHS (Arthur D. Little, 1998, 1999b, 2000). Field monitoring for the second quarter of 2009 was performed as originally proposed in the sampling pragram (Arthur D. Little, 1998). Perimeter and trench probes were monitored for various LEG components using field instruments on June 4, 9, 24, and 30, 2009. A Landfec GA-90 Landfill Gas Analyzer was used to assess concenfrations of primary LFG components {e.g, methane, carbon dioxide) and hydrogen sulfide. A photoionization detector (PID} was used to assess the concentrations of total nonmethane organic vapor within the LFG. The resin#s of the perimeter probe and trench probe sampling are included in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. The data collected during the second quarter 2009 monitoring event indicates that methane concentrations were below the 5 percent limit in all compliance plan monitoring probes. Interiors of Key On-Slfe Structures To assess potential migration of LFG into structures at the site, field monitoring of the indoor air was performed. The interior of each fully enclosed on-site structure was monitored by trained ICF International personnel using field instruments. The monitoring was conducted on June 30, 2009. A combination flame ionization detecfar (FID) and PID was used to assess concentrations of total organic vapor wi#hin the structures. [f detectable total organic vapor concenfrations were observed with the FID, the PID was used to assess the concentration of total non-methane organic vapor at the locafion. A copy of the field monitoring data and a map identifying the various structures at the site and the areas of monitoring are provided in Attachment A. mbsab.Q2i8t3.wtnW.02T976514 July 30, 2009 Mr. Pete Oda Solid Waste Management Program County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services Area Around fhe Landfill Gas Control System Discharge Stack Ambient air samples were collected upwind (AM801) and downwind {AM602} of the LFG control system discharge stack on June 30, 2009. Upwind and downwind samples were collected in Tedlar bags and submitted to Test America Laboratories, Inc. {formerly Severn Trent Laboratories, tno.} of Santa Ana, California. Each sample was analyzed for methane by modified South Coast Air Quality Management District {SCAOMD) Method 25.3. Approximate sample locations for this event are shown on Figure 1. Results of the laboratory analyses for these samples are presented in Table 3. A copy of the laboratory report for this sampling event wilt be furnished upon request. Landfill Gas Control System Process t!apar The Inlef and outlet ports of the GAC treatment vessels were sampled as originally proposed {Arthur D. Little, 1998). The inlet and outlet samples were collected in Tedlar bags and submitted to Test America Laboratories, inc. Each sample was analyzed for methane and total non-methane hydrocarbons {TNMHCs) and sulfur compounds by modified SCAQMD Method 25.3 and EPA Method 15 and 16, respectively. The results are presented in Table 3. The inlet and outlet samples were also analyzed for VOGs and the results are presented in Table 4. A copy of the laboratory report for.this sampling event will be furnished upon request. Please contact me at {949) 347-6110 i# you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, Scott A. roten Program Manager 4 - mb.pbA27915.vAriW.0279fb574 July aa, 2oos Mr. Pete Oda Solid Waste Management Program County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services References: Arthur D. Little, Ina 1997. Latter #o Mr. Ron Lem of the South Coast Air 4uality Management District. Addendum fo Permit Applicafion Nas. 328766 and 328767, Interim Landfill Gas Confrol System, Cify of Santa Monica Corporation Yard, Santa Monica, California. Prepared by Andrew Jaksich. August 21. Arthur D. Little, inc. 1999a. Letter to Mr. Ron Lem of the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Addition ofAncillary Equipment, Permit to Construct Nos. 328766 and 328767, fnferim Landfill Gas Control Sysferri, Santa Monica, California. Prepared by Andrew Jaksich. May 6. Arthur D. Little, Inc. 1999b. Le##er to Ms. Virginia Matoles of the County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services. Sampling Program Results, Interim Landfill Gas.Controt System, City of Santa Monica. Corporation Yard, 2500 Michtgah Avenue, Santa Monica, California, (SWIS #19 AA-5350}. Prepared by Andrew Jaksich. December 7. Arthur D. Lit#le, Inc. 2000. Letter to Ms. Virginia Maloles of the County of Los Angeles Department of Health Services. Second Quarter 2000 Sampling Program Resu/fs, Interim Landfill Gas Control Sys#em, Cify of Sanfa Monica Corporation Yard, 2500 Mlchfgan Avenue, Santa Monica, California, (SW15 #99: AA-5350}. Prepared by Scott Broten July 28. Santa Monica, City of (City). 1997. Leiter to Mr. David T. Jones of the South Coast Air Quality Management District..SuBmittal of Permit Application Forms and Fees, Interim Landfill Gas Control System. Prepared by Brian J. Johnson. May 29. Attachment A: Indoor Air Field Monitoring Data and Structure Identification Map cc: Mr. James Velez-Conway -City of Santa Monica {both hard copy and electronic) 5 mbsdbA278t5xrim`A.027475514 Table is Perlmakr Prabp MODltOdnB Dete Lantlllll Gae CAnlrol Byalem 2nd Quetler PppB i 1 I ~~ PI IP 4.Apl ~ P 1 i EM1R &W~4 15a~ ` YP-IA TM~ RL IltYlf/ 4e1 ~ 9.0 FP WW 1 3rerti 9k !13{yel YWb ].Ow AO 0.pkkbmin s xpq $!~ vl~llmlll Y 1~6 6.Ob10.0 r4U pall Nl4p~' ~,n.~t*atA Pi ~5eu4, 3nao 1' C6 en II ynAe 1 §RWtlry4 /03 ~ c (rk~~R'In 1 ~RxlmF .9'-IW I i, - - 12: Rwaswi / / ~ y~ nMag44¢. ,p[grooei: M W 3atp~ulpn g~ '` Y'f~'5 <Mel)tod a $') Pu ant s - t i >rcf3'M 3)?'hIRM ~ ihoNtlom ` A MfPI 2tma R '14W . ~ ]0 Rmw e ip~v !MN91411e 3 ~ d' AO IXUp x I Y~+a~Y~ [f5a"59' (~~1' ~. O.M [ i4 RCQ>, . p4 d, .8 S p. 1 P v d , 11.6 a+n ~ 1 '~., ~ M d 0.0 lWxnmw S3W 1 I i +x S'.0. i d - - 10 IexdFAa fl I. Ri3 ~ ' fu a 0.0 : psl ~ ~uM4 W$flW4YeQ? m/ " v _ AO '. F y 1 [ I / t. ~A' k '(b"mbeoti 1 CDmpLentt PP-IB 21,D 19.Ob 21.0 IB.Ow22A Clfl pnd SJl pyp311H IR:10 MOMZ iaml ]0 30.0 0.80 S6 9.6 OD AO 2.1 PlflnProlo YRIC 35.0 ]3AbbA 320w J6A 9il Cle 06N1pA 1210 b1BIKZ 4nl ]0 30.0 0.f0 199 1.9 0.0 0.0 1.J PP3 PP-RA 9.0 ].Ob 9.0 6.D IO10.0 SII Ge 06ro410A 11:15 M&%L Pu iaml ]0 300. AM 11.4 0.5 0.0 AO 0.0 _ Cmoplimtt pp-2B 20.D IO.OW P3A 1].Ow NUS silt Clp 06giN9 11:15 MIVK2 Pue in[I ]0 30.D 0.W 5.9 0.3 OA 0.0 0.0 PIOn POW PRRC .D J3Ab35A 32.Ob J6A q0 - 0610N09 ILIS MBII(Z Pu laml ]0 ]0.0 0.f0 13.5 OA L) 0.0 0.0 PP-30. 9.0 ].Ow 9.0 6.OIO 10.0 Cle Bi0 O6tlq/0A 10:15 MD Pu eNVxl ~[ 6H 29.9 D.CO J.3 14S PO 0.0 0.I CDmpOporo pR)8 RLO 19AwRIA IB.Ob 2i.0 SilendQ 0624/03 10:15 MB eNlanl avercW 60 39.9 O.W 5.6 5.9 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 _ PbnProW PP.3C 35.0 J3.Ob MA 32-0w Y.O 6ood SN D624/OA 10:15 MB Pu iaeet OOeme[ 68 29.9 0.f0 11.9 1.6 W - OA 1.0 pP-0q 9.0 ]Ab9.0 6,01010.0 fill p D62MC9 1 :5] MB Pu [/Dlae[I xmA 80 199 0.f0 6] II. OA 0.0 0.0 Cpmplknro pp-0N ID,3 IB.Sro NIS IB.Ob 82.0 511 BeM W/24/OJ 10:5] AID pu irtet aun BB 29.9 OM Ib.l 1.1 AO 4D 0.1 Plan YmW pRgC %.0 33Aro35A 32.Ob]6A M1 iuml InO D624N2 10:5] MB P1 ammL BB 89.9 O.W Ib IG2 OA 0.0 0.8 PPSM 9.0 ].O w9.0 6.OIO 11.0 Clp O6M3IC9 10:55 MBML Pu /Dlrcet Ommal 6'I 29.9 O.OJ J.9 13.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 Complkv[p pRSRB D.D 1L.Ob33A 19.Ob 25.0 Gn wS111 Send O6N9/pl 10:55 1.0/1(2 _ inOt e1w1 69 29.9 O.W 13.3 SA 0.0 -- _ 0.0 0.0 PIOnProW PRSRC 3].0 33.Ob3]A 31.Ob39.0 Clp p6b9/W 10:55 MBMZ Pu IrtOt aew[ 6] 29.9 0.0] IB] 63 0.0 0.0 0.0 YP-60. 9.0 ]Aw9.0 bAlO1A0 Cle end 3111 11:15 MO N inY ovemtt 60 89.9 O.W 3F 14.1 0.0 0.0 13 COmvlW~up PP6B RL0 19.OWRIA 18.Ow 83.0 SIII Ge 0424109 IIMS MB Po Irt[I ercp4 6B 29.9 0.03 i0. 14.6 0.0 - 0.0 0.1 PlanhOW pp.6C __ 35.0 3.O bJ3.0 SR.Ow J6.0 Send Ina 3111 D6R4I09 IP 5 B Pu I mR 6B 29.9 0.00 IA 16.0 0.0 - - 0.0 0,0 PH] PP-]A 9.0 ].OW9.0 6.01010.0 30 pa 09/W 9:9 MHIRZ Po itM nmt T 19.9 0.00 20. 6.1 O.D OA 0.0 Campl4nro pp-]B ZL0 19.Ow21A IB.Ow RR.O qn OM5111. 06NWOJ 9%9 R®MZ Pu lattl awd 6] 89.9 0.00 14.2 0.3 LI - 0.0 0.0 Plan Prow PP.]C 350. J3.O IO HA ]2.Ow36.0 qe eOd Nll OGNWOA 9:19 MBM2 PO e1DLM mtl 6] 29.9 0.00 16.0 0.0 19 0.0 0.0 PP-BA 9.0 ].Oro9.D b.Oro10.0 SII pe OWO9109 9:19 MRIR2 Por Intl em62 69 29.9 0.00 0.2 18.2 0.0 OA 0.0 PPB PP-80 81.0 19.O w2L0 IBAbR3.0 Clfl &nd Dbb9AH 9:19 MBIK2 Pp[[NOe[1 m¢I 69 29.9 _ O.W 4.2 14.5 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 PP~BC 31.D 33.Ob)5A 32.Ob36.0 CIgry, Sil~ryPna ON0929 9:19 MB/1(Z PuagtlOiaM rceal 69 _ N.9 _ 0.00 8.]' 8.8 0.0 --- 0.0 OA PR9q 10.0 8.Ob10.0 ].01011,0 pp an II 0 ro'9 13:2 n0 PO eNIaA rt0sl 68 29.9 O.W 3.9 121 0.0 0.0 0.1 ___ PPA PPAB 29.0 R.Ob24A 2LDw 23.0 Ge Orv1601 06124PoA @:12 AID Pu eNirt[I rtul 68 19.9 ~~- D.00 22 14.0 0.0 0.0 OA PPAC d1.D 29.Oro 410. 38.pw 420 501 6pad pa OGR4/m 12:12 M11B PO Ni[a[ om[sst 68 19.9 O.C-0 1.6 14.3 0.0 - 0.0 0.] PPdOA 9.0 9.Ob9.D 6DIO 11.0 Gfl aM5111 0624/0 1300 AN PO tlplattl rcul ]D 29.9 O.CO IO.I 0.0 0.0 -- 0.0 ]3 PR10 COm llenre PRIOB H.0 21.Ow 230. I9.Ob 25.0 pe andslll p6R4/W 13:80 M9 POartlDlrt[t ]0 29.9 0.00 ].2 6A 0.0 -- 0.0 0.] p Plan ProM Complknca pp.lOC P- PP.IIB 3].0 8.3 22.p 35.Ob320 Sm 10.Ob22.0 33.Ob )9.5 5, b IS.Ow 24.0 MWm~na Pl°p ro80 pe 0624109 OG2VC9 II:20 1 .] 10.30 MD MB MB POrgelBlrcn Yua ODinet M OM rcut e[e[1 ttntt 90 8 68 29.9 1 .9 39.9 0.00 O.CO O.ql 8.] 11.2 ].] .2 Id 0.0 0.0 D.0 --- - - OA OA OD DS O.I _0.8 PlnnProW PP-IIC 3].D JS.Ob3]A DAb39.0 SIII Clp O6YW0 IP.]8 MB M eNiaM autl 68 89.9 O.W 129 AS 0.1 0.0 1,8 PP.13 PP.IRA Ip.O 8AIO 100 6Aw13.0 514.6pod Cle ONi Ik4] MB PmgND"ve.Y anal 68 29.9 0.W 1.8 1].3 0.0 0.0 0.2 Cowplunro PP-320 81.0 21,Ob23A 19.Ow R5A 811 CId OW24I03 10:4] nIB Pu p'pLtt4 ercafl 68 29.9 D.M 1].9 JA _ 0.0 - D.0 0.1 Plpvpmtp PP-2C 3L0 JS.Olo 3]0. 3J.Dw90D 6i115md 062NW __ Ik4) MB P dDinet mvl 68 29.9 D.ql 21 1].1 0.0 0.0 0.1 ' PP.UA 9.0 ZOb9.0 6Aw10.0 6i11 CIO UN09I03 11:30 MBII(Z tlB4a! aaft 6] 89.9 0.M 9.] 9.1 OD 0.0_ 0.0 PP-1) PR13B 220. RO.Ob 22D 19.Ob23A Fsflm 06g9Po9 ll:Jp AOIKZ Pu ONVt[t __ rcul 6] '29.9 0.03 ]S.I S.D 0,0 - 00 0.0 PY.13C 310 J3.Ow95A ]20b J6A V Finn Snnd ON09109 IIOO M11Bn(Z Pw NA'uM Omel _ b] 19.9 O.M &3 109 OA - 0.0 00 PY-140. 9.0 ].ObAO b.D 1011.0 SII Clfl NO9/m II:IS MBO(Z Pu WircIX v[mA bt 29.9 OM 10.2 9d 0.1 0.0 0.0 Complimre Pp-19B 21.D 21.Ob23A 19.Ow R5A SIO Gn ON09RN 11;25 M6%Z Pm tlOirtR ve1[ul 6'/ 39.9 0.00 1.0 13,0 AO D.0 0.0 P18n prow PPA4C 3].D JS.Ob 3]0. 3].Ob J9A Smd Cle ON09/fA 11:15 MBII(Z Pw eNlrcd 69 19.9 O.OD ].0 0.2 0.0 - OA AO PP-ISA 9.0 ].Ob 9.0 QOIO 11.0 6i0 Clp 0684109 10.'28 MD Pua eNirtcl mn 68 19.9 O.W 1.9 1]] 0.0 p.0 O.D Compll[MO PP.15R 1).0 21Aw 130. I9.Ob R3A Sil p ON24% 10:28 MB P NLecl vercnt 68 29.9 O.W S.0 121 D.0 0.D 0.0 pW PaOW )2. 40.0 n1 A' 1 1 9. 0 I .5 Soft m6eab M)916 W WA.y/1916516ke Tablet: Perlmeler Probe MOnltorlnO Gefa LengXII GOS COnlrol Byalam 2ntl gaetlar Y000 > F 4~ 7gP4 r) 'In I 1 ~ 1 ~'. D5 1beWPtr 1, Stl; PP-16A 4y .N 1 pol+ld PI~~ t ~~ [ f/el e 9A .4W P DR fiqui~ ~3 '~ \ pl ].0109.0 GANDF 41iP'P49 \ ,pYPp ~] RI .~: ae( 6.O to IL0 ea Uryy~ply "rtd"^"C ) I ~4sm51d $'~+ ~$°9 Ivlmil h 3 &6ue ~ 'A d p,._q,~ I ^#"PWia OW2N09 ~ A s ~4PF~M< A jlm9 a :~l'~~1 t. nt ~ S.~ 11:0] GwMr8HryP ! 1 kSlwfk^e. ~tX ll Sm 51a¢ WI a:l 1 } 1 t 4.{4t aARA , 1h1YDCd ~ Yu1 eN4M IS: ~~SA~1[.H~11 d ~r,T"/ L{nAllimf OvaOVSI AWII~a.3 1k~1'll'i , JF'ga, P " 68 PhJp ~ 1 " t }n el°4dFi -ro 11 4 29.9 n40M i J^!7`1 ~ >vbt' 16'.n OIY~ 0.00 Ri b 44 P( SL d ` IR.] 4 6ie+M f f: , ~4 I d 0.0 HFnmO ~O i ~,°., E IRMIM5MY : s b 1i B]Y ~' w d UA IX4 y ~gp~144 9q,.u YM~ ; J 1.8 S '. I ' r .o ti.. i•AageoY PRIb PP-IbB 23.0 2LOIO33A 19,OWRSA Ibfiue W2N99 _ 11:01 MB Pu lest ra<asl 69 29.9 0.W 19.] 0.3 R.9 9R L2 PP.IbC 3].U 35.0 to3].U 3LOIOgUA Pi1:e And ON24W fl:% MB Pm eNirttl rcael 6H 29.9 0.CA ].I IL% 0.0 0.0 09 PP-1% PRI]A 9.0 ].069.0 b.01o 11.0 Sil Cla OWWO9 3L34 MB/RZ eNimX %0 10.0 O.CO IR.9 0.0 0.6 OA 1.5 Compllavm PP.1%B 33.0 21.OIU RSA IAOb 25A Sil Cla 04Nt/09 11:54 DmMZ Pm dDie<d ]0 ]0.0 O.C-0 tl.8 0.0 2.1 OA OA Plan Pmy pp.l]C I].0 JSOb J]A ll.Ob J9A 911 Cle DNW09 11:59 MHO(Z Pu eNuM %0 30.0 O.CO 18.6 0.9 1.2 0.0 0.0 PP.IBA 9.0 ].Ob 9.0 :i.Ob 11A MI [la 06i0V03 II:RO MW%Z Pu %0 30.0 O.C- 26.0 A] 4.2 U.0 0.0 _ CwvPila:ue PP.I9B ZL5 19,56 RLS IB_Sb RLS _SI>~Igy CN-JA9 II:RO F®/1(Z Pw ImY )0 30.0 O.C-0 I9.] Od 9.0 - 0.0 0.0 PhopmW pp.18C J].0 35.Ob]]A 3J.Ob 39A SII Cla OYOW9 11:20 A10IK2 Pm 0 3A0 0.CO MAS 02 4.1 0.0 0.0 pP.19 PR39A- 9A ].Ob 9.0 6.Ob 11.0 3111 Ch ON24/W 13:30 MB Pu ImY overcast 90 29.9 0.C0 RQO 1] 3.5 UA 2.4 Comp4sn[e PP-t98 23.0 21.06 R3.0 19.06 25.o SII Cls O[JNPo9 13:30 MH Pu LM mst 10 R9.9 0.00 18.5 2.1 3.0' 0.0 0.9 PbvPmW PP.19C 120 JS.ObI1.0 3 Ob J9.0 Sil Cle Oyi4109 4:30 MB eIDImY wmatt %0 29.9 O.CO 31.3 AO ]] 0.0 1.8 -2 PP-20A 9.0 ].OW9.0 LAb11.0 C 0 9109' 10.N0 M&I(Z Pu U-uM rcml 69 29.9 0.00 1.9 12.3 0.0 OA o.0 Compllaott PP-20- R3.0 2LObR3.0 19.0 bR5.0 Cln fd09/OD IO:gO MBIKL Pu bM eeeafl 6] 29.9 0.00 0.6 15.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 _ PlenProW PP.2pC 3L0 35.06 J].0 JLOb J9.0 Sil 19ne Send ON09I09 IONO MBII(]. Pu fmt oro1mR 6] 29.9 O.CO' O! tB.q OA 0.0 0.0 PP-JI PPOIA 9.0 - %.OM 9.0 L.Ob 11.0 Cla OEIiN09 II:IS MB Pu e/DOee; 68 29.9 QW IIR 5.] 0.0 0.0 O.R Compliann pp-21B R3.0 21.0 IO2IA 19.Ob25A Cle ON)N09 II:35 M9 NOltz[t t1t¢A 69 29.9 0.W 3.] 12.1 0.0 0.0 I8 Plvn Prolw PP.21C I]A JS.Ob J]A J].Ob J9A Silt CIe ONR4/09 11:]5 M- Pu eA)irtel leae'1 68 39.9 0.[O 3.9 (R.9 0.0 OA 0.] PPRR 9.0 ].0109A 60ro 11A Clv 9en 10x5 AIBMZ Pw Irt<t easl 6] 29.9 AUO 2.5 15.3 OA 0.0 OA Comptimm PP-22B 23.0 21.0623A I9.Ob 25A SIII xinO3anJ 06109109 ID:15 THNSZ Pw uD4at <rc0a1 6] 29.9 0.01 5.5 12] 0.0 - 0.0 ___ OA __ PlanProW PP.21C 3].0 SS.Ob J]A JLO b39A SO Flne3anJ ON09/0A ID:IS MHMZ Pm Nirevl rcut 6] 29.9 0.02 9.9 1J.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 PR23 PR23A 9.0 %.Ob 9,0 6.ON 11.0 9111 Cla CNMIW 1112 MHMZ P UDlrttt ]0 30A 0.W 0.0 129 0.0 0.0 OA Comp-sore PR218 23.0 21.06 23.0 I9.Ob 25A fill Clfl ONON09 __ 13:12 _ __ GmMZ P:¢ IUVM ']0 30.0 0.01 A3 1].0 0.0 OA 9.0 PIvn ROW PP.1]C I],0 JS.Ob J].0 JJ.Ob3A0 Sil Cle ONMI09 Ik12 M-MZ Put ImY %0 J0.0 0.01 3R Id.O 0.0 0,0 U.3 pp 34 PP•2gq 9.0 %A69A 40611.0 LYe 13;0] MBMZ Put W %0 30A 0.W 0.0 %.1 0.0 - 0.0 OA ll r C PRMB R3.0 31.0623.0 19.0625.0 CW OLroN09 13:00 MI3IKZ Pue uM %0 30A 0.00 0.0 140 U.0 - 0.0 OA omp a bo planproW PR24C 4A0 38.0690.0 33.0643.0 8i11y Cley to ON04109 13:02 M&KZ Pu1HWi: M vunoy 90 10.0 0.00 1.9 13.9 0.0 ... 0.0 0.0 PP.25 ppdSA 9.0 1069.0 60611.0 Cle U6gV09 IRAS A1NI(L Put i:M ]0 ]0.0 O.CO 0.0 16] 0.0 0.0 0.0 ____ Cmoplisneo pP-25B 13.0 21,0 b23A 19.0635.0 C4 OWWND 12:45 b03M2 ImY NI 30.0 O.CO AI 14,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PlanProb> PP-25C 40.0 38.0690.0 3JDb410 Ce 1 SOt vnd 06Po1/09 1395 41BMZ Pb elO11M ]0 J0.0 0.00 0.1 @] 00 0 .0 PY-26A 9.0 ],Ob 9.0 6.OIOll.O AI CSa 06b9N9 1135 MHIKZ Pb IKUI 10 JO.o 0.00 0.9 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 CoOlpimro PR368 23.0 21.Oro2L0 19.06 15.0 Sill Cle OW09/09 1235 MHMZ Pue eNimy _ ]0 3DA O.CO 03 11.6 0:0 0.0 9.0 Plan PmW YP-26C 3].0 ]5.010 3J,0 33.0639.0 &1p CIU OWWI09 1235 MNKL Pu i:M ]0 ]0.0 O.Iq 0.5 10.9 0.0 U.0 6.1 PP-2]A 9A ].069.0 6.0611.0 Cla ON09/89 1115 M- Pm eIDieM %0 JOA O.CO' 1.1 5.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Con:plienm PP.2]- 23.0 21.Ota R1A 19.Oa 15.0 CIa OW04IW 1205 MX Pue uM %0 30.0 0.00 Jd 5.1 AO 0.0 0.0 PIm Y1vW pp9°%C __ J].0 35.010 3]A IJ.Ob 39A 8111 Cla OWOM09 11:15 M1® Pu tlO11M ]0 J0.0 0.00 6.4 A.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 PP3tlA 9A %.069.0 6,0611.0 Cle W/NI03 ILIH A18 Pw 11eN ¢asl 68 29.9 O.W 99 Ild 0.0 0.0 0.0 YP3H PR19- 2IA 21.06 23.0 19.0615A C6 061241% If:18 MB Pu dOilett vemat 68 29.9 O.W ]23 5.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 PPRHC 3].o i5.O 103].0 SL06 H.0 Cla C6bAl0A 11:18 MB Pu e/Olrctt vercnt 68 29.9 O.M p.3 6.5 9.4 0.0 0.1 PP.R9A 9A 9.069.0 6.0611.0 Cla CNWIW ILt] MB Pu ilevt mst 68 29.9 O.M J.4 13.] 0.0 0.0 _ 0.0 Campllentt PP39B. _33A _ 21.0Ia R3.0 19.06 RSA Clo C6R4M Ih2% A18 Pu dO11M ttut 68 29.9 0.00 12.1 L6 0.0 0.0 O.R Plan Plow R2 ]. 35.010 J].0 J].01039.0 9 1'R] MB Pue eN 6fl R9.9 O.OJ 10.8 1 0.0 1.6 pe e~: 19 •>6ibag0a=nwfo:evn O:utr.:. wa,:.amw m4®:4w MWaRPexto;~dorvxWp(mllwpog3,glbwl6Y~mWlh wnx.ronremn9.mr.3. PI=LraaleYvun01mlu6.eormenm9<m+<W+uNmn l•1•a+Anuy y,m'mel.nu6m4uohYMrme+xviV:mp,xmpumrc m40:nP'WUa+Swum.m~a®u.: utumatlurtwofpc Vgm ..mYe.x<amo ..aw.m>uehreha:lr.~+'ooem. z9ea m0aa00i)016.xNM0E101 (5bffi 141-Memmmm4dWVMWVaIeMUVMOIAOI..A OneM Ie1•n'eame awuxnx.,:®memmnuo> m-ym:6m6mm~lua.~.:fln.:Mwlwwmmw~ u.xxwwww,roi.ma~xx., nm.,,A mae fPl-blmortmenUabJeefwWeYivhaAn Xw:oloMWm - xw /.pi1M1r]NmMeuxJ 1y-Oe1ex'amue4ANra 014°MUNee w-aromsw:d:a m,-r.:6xlrww -a.Pt:avawoau Da~RIwOAma mb B:nen 11m-xoovawm.. 1~6 KKIDWgen6Afl4a OWm «aan.::ycomo. In, HBO-Imho IN W e6faluma ]wOn Ow ubW-wawa9rn~ o,-P~y:: by VOamr hTUn:PdvssJ2 -tltlre9+:Y4nYW Worv-]nh~bDDbnhYVabsv Tebla 2: Tronoll Probe Monlloring Gela LendDll Gas Control5ystem Pnd Quarter 20D0 ~. 4 ~NGp rQQ@6JRGDRP gDbelDl 1 rGD1i4GE$RIR IDI{g4Pt0}@glI@ ,PMY I p 4AO (Ier M FwPrem dh iQ, ( i "J ILL ~ AR 13'FP~R IA{i4IPB/ I f .. i ApPrPE~nl iR r l w Y IM~141RPe 't f bW~Opp1AAME4 YRPARE!} 4 LFVr- }'robe '. Probe $c~bEb vbrgX~ 011q I gd1d I l9yl "~ 4^2 : r f t. ~ ot g4Ml ry R mpsrt 1 1 , : IWOPI s i ;' f C{RA~ I)IgM v ~ rt; R by ~pIDPk': DFPIb !}I li 7 }Rf n' g Pruti'9sgPd I S Ph+I a S mp k~ Sampl~Pk i $RWh7la6 7 '~RW~M1e 51!!!e DRI'ut4~r15 -- Prv7lF f DP 4 Az L" ~ I a) IHE$v O~quIR YPWr 1 e n M1 ~ T~ i. ~ l ~ jj9„ + c f r ' : ~ j H ~ ` 4` I 89 `y S ° r t y v ~~ ~ " ~ ~ i ~ N ~6..DA... , TD . t ,(QOEbsd fl), i :QJeI` k.(fA1 b8g) h: JIOtIYNPI lilf.m v~.bR , ~ P6ptM) ., ~ 4 LIWA16e1° o `MOIIWJ C 4 , ..TieJdllloN n 4 44&~) e. iq,8 . D .. gIP. feD11 - +~pk)i l. ( /pl llli { u(~~~1 _,PPIIMIdIi o-pPmvEdly Y/ W.(pPfO gl n ~ , . n O O Ob TP-1 TPd 6.0 4.0106,0 3.5106.5 SiiEy Cley O6fJA/09 12:30 MD PPIBNDir<ct overcazt 70 29.9 0.00 2.9 12,4 0.0 --- 0.0' 0.9 TP-2A 7.0 5.0107,0 4.Oro 10,0 Pino Send 06/04/09 11:41 MB1KZ PurDeJDbecl coma ]0 29.9 0.00 33.1 0.6 29.3 --- 12,0 15.9 TP-2B 20.D IS.Olo 20.0 1].Olo 2L0 Finn Send 06/04N9 IIF( MB/I(Z PureeNircU enwy 70 29.9 D.OD 32.9 0.0 28.2 --- IOA 0.0 TP-3 TP-3 7.0 5.0ro],0 4.5ro ].5 Slll end Cley 06/09N9 70:34 MBMZ Parge/D'uecE overcesl 6H 29.9 D.00 2,8 14,3 0.0 --- 0.0 0.0 TP-0 TP-4 13.0 11.0 ro 13,0 10.0 ro 14.0 Silry Send 06/24/09 12:00 b4D PurgeNbect Dvemesl 68 29.9 0,00 3.9 14.8 0.0 --- 0.0 6.2 TP-5 TP-5 8.5 6.5[08.5 S.OroIQO Silty Sand to O6/04N9 13:20 MDMZ Purge/Dbect canny 70 29.9 0.00 7.4 9.1 0.0 --- 0.0 0.0 Pine Gravel TP-bA 8.0 6.0IO 8.0 5.0108.5 hlediumto 06109/09 9F3 MOfKZ PurgGDirttt DveeceW 67 29.4 O.OD 6.4 9.4 0.0 --- 0.0 0.0 '1'P-6 Pine Send TP-6D 12D 15.Oro19.0 14.0 totl.5 Fim Sand 06/09/09 9:43 MB/ISZ PorBe/DirRCt overcaW 6] 29.9 0.00 6.6 9.1 0.0 -- 0.0 0.0 TP-] TP-] 19.5 125 to 19.5 16.5 to 20.5 Fine Send 0624/09 tZ20 MD PurecNircct ovarceW 68 29.9 0.00 16.4 0.7 0.0 --- 0.0 ].2 TP-8 TP-8 6.75 3.751049$ 3.25105.0 Clayey, Sandy 06/09/09 10:25 MB Pnrge/Dir<et overcast fi7 29.9 0.00 t4.9 4.4 0.0 --- 0.0 0.0 Shc Ndc:: lol=MOnibrediMerrplskrm<hpwW mu WlcekdblM fl[Wettmding Io lAefallmnpg[olon: wNk Dlwllowyro4). )<Ilow(Ink~mMielo pmh<),aM blue(dxpprobe). 167=WM1OIOgICmJl Whntiroahkmostprnlmblesinnon. fol°SOmplin8 P<rtooo<I otyuirNtlels bytlrslmfiuudnBth<PwW Prtsu'e uW lM1rnpwging m[h WOn<emNlmmuofm<cNWleofges. Vapor wmplttw<rv<olktlW Pndumlyudbydirtolly[OnnaTOglhe ~mlwn[nblolM1Oprvbe. [U1=MmmememsoblolnNP[IngalmWkc Ftotld OA-90 Delnlor, [<] =NCM Wv slues nro w[umn measertnunu. IQ°FDr IAClnslrvnum mM,nmAdttudmv[enlmlimsfor IM IPNnud ppseYVepor orc sMwn wilb v u,o wlm. Igl ° M<mm<mmh adWlud udng P Flini~RAB Ph[biortimlion 61MIM. -~-Nd Apgie<b1eMa1 Memurtd bgq=&bwOwwdSlufero cW-nmdmae CO=Cmbon MO,axide CQI-CmhmDiowde Lb&F=peaecaFeMnheit bm-hf[rio~lma cu=cmme D•Amow H:M-HOUrz:Flinups IIrS^Hplrog<nSWfite w. Hg=IO[hei[IMercuryCalmno in.li,ll= IneM1n of W<kc Wlumn DPH-18nEfmHn nPDrcenwwaD<Yrcmr q=oxmen Y.=pcrcentbYVWwoe 'fP-TmncAPebcetlhc q1Y Cmp[mlo¢VW ppiov-Ruk PC[M1Dllionby VOlumo mwamnnrnma 1 oft mbe ab 02t915.MM0.02Y815512tJs Table 3: Summary of I..aboratory Analytical Results for Natural Gases and Sulfur Compounds landfill Gas Control System 2nd Quarter 2009 i of7 mb.oabaxn[swtnoo.ane+ssta.a. -^Npt MSly~eNNO[Messved EPA°Uviretl Stores F,uWrpnmevtpl Praectiav ASenry NA=Not Applicable ()°VaiYe N'Iplln pwemheenticmatljnsted repoNnSlimit H:M=Houtv:Mim~tes ND=NO[dotxtnd(nbove me asmdnted re{mttinS limit) (Il]~Othanmlyk3 covslROfcarbovyl aulfide.mathylmareapton.embon ID°itlevtifitadon ppmv~Pmta Per Minim byVObme 4imlfNe, ctlryl metanpMn, dimeW,tlsolfide, anddimethyldieal8tle. M/D/Y=MOnWDay/Yeu ppm-C®Pmty Pm Mplim RcportedmCarbm oSS=Above GmmM Sartme SCAQMD~SOmh ('.asst Ah QuIDlryMmogmnm[INsIriM 7 -HStlmated resu141exv tlwvrnparov8limit E-Coo<enmdon exceeds the mlibmdm rmge. E=AnWyea vms demmed to the osmeOted Meltwd Hlmk 1.1-AVbm~b~enmpNsseM9.a dmW x~x.,~~.~o.~..a~.~ww c r. ~w..wa+~:...w.am~wiw,. vA-Y[+Y6uw W~uwmiu~mm~m~gn wow=*weo.a.~.w:~aeu.,.~..mwn.w~. nu :~Y m.mru.:nmwurm~w~md~ ~x~.u+vue:..e ~d~. ~ WAOp~xw XnMyWk .m..wo-~wm.www.~w«.ro e`-b~av'~n~m~°y~m 1x1 Tepled: 8ummeryof LaEweWry Mely11ee18esu11eforVeleBla Orponlc Compountle By LOwtlon LentlNl Oee Control eyebm RnJ OmrterR00B ~ ~~ N{fMGAN AVENUEe „um w.m...'. Lonc. ~ xI._ _____ Y - _ %ya rP-0B 1P-1 Tr'^ ~ pp-yG PP'!4 I Lonc Conn l J f o ~~ ~~~ •P, ~ ~n wx°q°aomn°ooc rr-a ww. uuimww owr. _. `~ d.- __ ice? s~ , ' .. ~~ ,P4 ~°~ ~. °~ _.-- 01_ -~'r° ~ ~u.lu ^ I ~ o ~; ~ -_----~ _- ~I ~y ~° I 6 ~~ ~~ "°<<,\ pio sAe I t ~~...~ ~~ LEGEND 4~ _ _ \~ aruw - u.. aim - 1__ ~~Q 01~ a ~~ ; a / ~.~ 1 ~~ ~ ~~ j~~.C~ .d ~x~I «---- ~I r`~~ I ~I III rru -¢-~«:«,. ^°^~ ~I II nMeo1 a ..w.,... ~mm.«.m, FIGURE 1 MONITORING PROBE AND AMBIENT SAMPLE LOCATION MAP CITY OF SANTA MONICA CORPORATION YARD Cltt OF SANTA MONICA 1 INCH 750 FEET NW. 2008 ]02R049S.DWG ARTHUR 0. LITTLE, INC. SHEEI'~_OF 1 ANO AERW.. SURVEYS, INC. Attachment A; Indoor Air Monitoring Data and Structure Identification Map Indoor Air Monitoring Data Privileged and Confidential City of Santa Monica Corporation Yard Attorney -Client Work Product cyslk.33226t6.wlneS.IrMooralr monlbPog.rJS.7/222008 1 Of 3 Indoor Air Monitoring Data Pzivileged and Confidential City of Santa Monica Corporation Yard Attorxxey -Client Wark Prodnet ' `i[~ €ii viii(€I~edS t .~.:>:.....:iii~i t . ~tpet d .... €iii;€iii~iz~~~i;~ii~i€3s>~:s#~>ii . ~ ~~ [ Vii' ?Eii "i''r'.[ili'ii ' ' i i i iiiiil~piii~ iiiiii .;€iiiii i€isp ~ `ii ~i~ ~iis .I~.... ' ::>:::s.E: ~:i ii:`:];'' s ~:zax~ <: ii[[ :.':its<ii1i s~~~~ iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii:ii!i' i ~iiiisi:i::i:i ii~ _i ii ii~ ii~iiiiiii€ ii i'.[i€>~Ai~#iii;ii:iii i ............... iii ii";°`'si~ i ...... >~ ~'€': $... ...... -;`tiiii~ii -': ~''.: ....'~..:::. ........ €i~"'~': ::.:.......... ..:....: fi~isi"'isiiisisii'ii€~is'i~~' .:...:: tc . ........{~. cx~W.:::: ~ :e: ':.i....1..... ... i;;::~.:.~:..:::::€: xe:: :: ~ :.. ... 1y . ~h#~t1 . .0.rIQ e. :~~~'^:.:>:s:e;a;:; :>::: . ~ ::: .ii's„isiii~>iiiii~'•.~~'> 's'>'r'<~i?s~li~siil'. ...... ....................... ::~ ::_~::~•~:,<..:: .:..::::: :::::::: ~:::'r ~:: ~ t::sttt::; ~:::i:r:rst;t;:;:;t „s ~~ :::::::: st i3 ..... :. :p:itfti~ t'~t. iBf~:::s ~;tss:::: .........!•!........:.. ...:.:.... .::.:..::::....: ::t::::; r::it:Crt:•r~ ~ t::ss~;: ::.:.... :..:.... ........<.. :._,::.>:: ~ : .. .> . ;:; 41. ..: ttt .. . ..BatY~ f~T:< :::..:.ly:....... t< ........:: .:~'~.e..ff![il#!.L.rf.:. i ~isi~:€:~ .. ..'r' :~€:'s>s's .::..:.:...:h1.fd?ifel~F,.:..:::.~ S:'::i:ia'._..>...:~iiisit ...::.~; :..::.~: ist;:~,• "•~'•'iti:itst .::.:.:;~ ...:.::.::. :>s:isissei:i;>;:;:its -......,,tttp~:i:E<s:'sti tsr, ::.:.::._::::.:..f~i:.:.::.:...:.: i~ itl,Y?isi iii ~ i?€iiOe~cN aa~:::::.::: ::~ ::N)tsei . :s:: :: e ~ l~fl I . ::<::::: ...... Irts3~rserds:: ~~ :: ~: :::~,:: pr~t~ :~ ::€< :;::::<: rn.W : _;:::~ :<:~ : ~:::;::: ~:~Saputtents ~<:i _::€: ~:; M Fc Boothaint [b] r ~ 4 ~ 6.6 SU ~ n ~ ~ ~ t l N Storage Building [b] b ~~~ O Office & Storage Buildi [b] ~ ( ~D 10 ng P Office Building [b] ~ b 3J Q Maintenance Bays [c] ~ ~~ Q R Public Restroom [c] (5 S Storage Building [b] Q~~'~ T1 Storage Building [b] T2 Former Nursery De t Buildi Ib] 6 ~ ~ ~j p ng U Raised Office Unit [a] ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V Recycling Center [b] ~~'1,C{. 1N Trensfer Station S l H [b] Q ~,„ M y~ ca e ouse aq.elk3322&ie.W,n95Jntlaoralr monll~d:gxls.7/21/2009 2 of3 Indoor Air Monitoring Data - Privileged and Confidential City of Santa Monica Corporation Yard Attorney -Client Work Product Notes: [a] =For raised temporary structures, focus monitoring around the base of the structure, along cracks in the pavement, and at subsurface utility connections. Conduct general air monitoring within structure. [b] = For enclosed permanent stmctvres, focus monitoring on crawl spaces, floor seams and cracks, subsurface utility connections, and the interstitial wall space around electrical outlets. Conduct general air monitoring within structure. [c] =For open-sided stuctures, focus monitoring around the base of the structure, along cracks in the pavement, and at subsurface utility cornections. [d] =Monitor with a FID and record an average reading for each observation above 20 ppmv. At locations with average FID readings greater than 20 ppmv, record a corresponding PID measurement and draw a sketch of the affected area on a separate sheet. Indicate on the sketch the suspected source (e.g., crack in floozy and location (e.g., section of structure) of the elevated FID measurement. FID =Flame Ionization Detector ID =Identification H:M = Hours:Minutes M/D/Y' = Montb/Day/Xear ppmv =Parts Per Million by Volume PlD = Photoionization Detector sq,olk.35228-16.wIn85.lndooratr manlMrin9~s.7/27J2009 3 Ot$ Operational Status of the Landfill Gas Control System During Monitorvzg: ONlOFF (Circle one) ~, ~ ~'"' ~~ _ I~ ~-`~~_ °~ d . qa/`~~, 1.-/ 7yk 1 . -.;u: I _l I I ~ ~ ~~ a ;~~.\~ o A,y,. vAg =b,1 emwun ;~ ~,~~ I _ ° _.- I~lk~ ~rfG-...I 1.-. I III Ilf 1 I kl I 6 ~g__~~~ J ~~L1( ~1~ `~ _y ___ ~~;~~ ~~"_~ _ ~ L6pkND ~,~ ~d~, ---- ~ ~ ~ ~°~ ~~ r--, ~° z_ _ _~___ '~ ~ ~M ~~~ y ~~ , g ~• r~ r^-I ~ 1 I ` ~~ _ I ~~~ ii I s ~ ~1 ~y ~---w.~, oR I (1~~ `~ Co°~ ~ w~n,w~ ~nM S ^ o p_ . I C o ° I I I ® wc. uwrmn~nw ima ]I I~I o~~ I~Q I~~ 7 Lb II ~l U° °~i it ~ I Imo!' FIGURE i STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION MAP pA~ INDOOR AIR MONITORING ElN 11/06 CITY OF SANTA MONICA CORPORATION YARD ACJ 11 /OB CITY OF SANTA MONICA 1 INCH m 760 FEE( SFC 17/06 NOV. 2006 ]02600.1].OWG- ARTHUR 0, MTRF INC. SNEEf 7 OF 1 INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC. 0 ~.r~Y t~;Y o~ Santa M1lonica' City Council Report City Council Meeting: October 27Q2009 Agenda Item: Z~-~ To: Mayor and City Council From: P. Lamont Ewell, City Manager Subject: Exposition Light Rail Phase 2 Maintenance Facility Update -Expo Construction Authority Consideration- of Verizon Site and Santa Monica College parking lot as the Hybrid Site within the City of Santa Monica Recommended Action Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Authorize the City Manager to continue to work with the Exposition Construction Authority (Expo) to further explore and mitigate the effects of the proposed Phase 2 Exposition Light Rail maintenance facility, including the proposed alternative concept "hybrid" maintenance facility site which consists of the Verizon property and the Santa Monica College .(SMC) parking lot as the location for the maintenance facility (Attachment A). Such an alternative will include a tightly configured storage and maintenance facility on the Verizon/SMC site adjacent to the railroad right of way, and a linear buffer of 100 - 110 feet for most of the frontage facing residents on Exposition Boulevard. Currently, the Exposition Light Rail Phase 2 Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) identifies the entire Verizon site in Santa Monica as the only option. The DEIR does not analyze the proposed alternative hybrid concept. Expo has previously agreed to analyze both sites in the Final EIR if so requested by the City. 2: Request Expo to continue working with the City and community to ensure that, if the alternative hybrid concept is accepted by Expo, any environmental impacts associated with the hybrid concept are fully mitigated. Direct staff to work with Expo to minimize the visual and environmental impacts of the maintenance facility and enhance its aesthetic interface with the community. 3. Direct City staff to work with Expound other agencies on layout and financial issues associated with the newly proposed hybrid alternative. Efforts will include discussion with Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro), the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and SMC. 1 4. Direct City staff to -work with SMC on the identification of property on Airport Residual land as replacement parking and possible terms for a land swap. 5. Direct staff to work with Expo to develop any necessary agreements regarding the hybrid site if it is adopted by the Expo Board as the recommended site and adjust the final budget for the Expo Phase 2 project as appropriate. Executive Summary Expo will make decisions on the maintenance facility in consultation with the Operations group at Metro. The Expo Authority Board of Directors is responsible for deciding on the final project, not the City Council, which can only make recommendations. The project budget in the Phase 2 DEIR currently assumes that Expo will acquire only the Verizon site. The City is requesting that the Expo Phase 2 budget be adjusted, as necessary,-for the hybrid alternative if it is selected by the Expo Board. The DEIR, issued in January 2009, summarizes the review of a number of candidate sites fora Phase 2 maintenance facility, but concludes that the Verizon site is the only viable alternative. The City Council and neighbors expressed concern about locating the proposed maintenance yard adjacent to a residential area and requested Expo to continue to look for an alternative location. The City hired real estate and design consultants to evaluate options. Several alternatives were explored including a "split alternative" using Verizon, SMC and 1800 Stewart Street with the facility spanning across Stewart Street. Since this split alternative involved significant cost to acquire the site from an unwilling leaseholder, garnered no support from the adjacent neighbors and generated new opposition, Expo concluded that the split alternative would not be a preferred or recommended option for a maintenance facility. At the August 11, 2009 Council meeting, the Expo Authority and the City's Real Estate consultant, The Maxima Group, provided additional information regarding sites considered. Council requested further exploration of a site between 9th and 11th Streets while continuing to explore a hybrid alternative utilizing Verizon, SMC and a portion of the City Yards. After further exploration Expo has concluded that the site between 9th and 11th Streets would not be considered as a recommended alternative for the maintenance facility. This site creates additional safety and environmental impacts, including socioeconomic impacts and dislocation as well as costs ranging from $152 million - $203 million. Expo and the City have continued to explore the hybrid alterative utilizing the Verizon site and the SMC College parking lot for the maintenance facility. Through redesign, the portion of the City Yard is no longer required for a shared parking facility. The hybrid alternative also includes a number of design and operational changes to be responsive to community concerns. These changes include the elimination of track loops with their associated noise, as well as the mitigation of other operational concerns in response to 2 residents, who have toured the Green Line maintenance facility with Expo and City staff. Importantly the hybrid alternative provides a 100 - 110 foot buffer for most of the frontage facing residents on Exposition Boulevard. This is the alternative presented for consideration in this staff report. Use of the SMC property, a 2.35 acre site at Stewart and Exposition, allows for the creation of a 100 - 110 foot buffer area along Exposition Boulevard across from the residential area opposite the Verizon property. The buffer could be used for possible housing and community uses which would be defined through a separate City-run community process. Expo is working with the City to determine the cost of the hybrid alternative, including a possible land swap for the SMC property that would make the project feasible and secure a buffer of 100 - 110 feet. Appraisals are being conducted to determine the value of the properties. Both the City and Expo will continue to work with the community and the College to ensure that concerns are addressed and any impacts are fully mitigated in accordance with CEQA requirements. Further, Expo has pledged to host a workshop and meet with the community to receive additional design input for the maintenance facility building. Background In January 2009, Expo issued a DEIR for the Expo Light Rail Phase 2 project. The DEIR included the proposed maintenance yard just east of Stewart Street between the right of way and Exposition Boulevard on property currently owned by Verizon and used for their telecommunications fleet maintenance yard. Expo has explained that they are required to have a yard for maintenance within the Phase 2 project and the location within Santa Monica was the only viable site they could identify. As shown. in the aerial photo below, there is a residential neighborhood just south of the proposed site. The City Council submitted comments on the DEIR expressing concern about locating. the proposed maintenance yard adjacent to a residential area and requested Expo to continue looking for a more suitable location elsewhere. The Authority and its environmental/engineering consultant had examined potential locations within reasonable proximity to the alignment and narrowed the possibilities to 20 different locations. Most of the potential sites were eliminated due to inadequate size. The remaining locations were then analyzed to greater detail based on criteria including location, shape, topography, access, ownership and potential environmental impacts. Six sites were eliminated due to various reasons such as engineering challenges, multiple parcel owners, and project development by others of the site. The 3 last site, the Verizon property located in Santa Monica, was screened down to the preferred location based upon the established criteria: The City also hired both real estate and design professionals to pertorm an independent review of possible sites. On July 14, 2009 Council considered a "split' maintenance facility alternative cooperatively developed by the City and Expo. The "split alternative" site failed to win community support and was opposed by the long-term lessee, Lionstohe, who threatened legal proceedings that would potentially delay the project. Thus, the "spilt alternative" did not mitigate community concerns, generated additional opposition and could have resulted in additional impacts. In addition, Metro Real Estate- staff determined that the full cost of the "split alternative" was prohibitive since it included at least a $30 million lease-hold investment, as well as the value of current site improvements and a potential substantial sub-lessee investment. Given these factors, Expo informed City staff that this split alternative was not a preferred option that they could recommend. At the August 11 meeting staff redoubled its efforts to review sites, including sites with multiple ownerships. The City's evaluation process included information about. ownership, size of site existing uses, description of existing improvements, zoning and description of surrounding neighborhoods. The Maxima Group analysis confirmed the 4 Proposed Maintenance Facility in the DEIR lack of feasible sites within the Phase 2 area that met Expo's relevant criteria, particularly with respect to safety, size and operational considerations. Council directed further reexamination of the site between 9th and 11th street as well as further exploration of a hybrid alternative that utilized Verizon, SMC and a portion of the City Yards for ajoint-use parking structure for the maintenance facility and the yards. Discussion The costs and potential impacts of acquiring and redeveloping the site bounded by Colorado, Olympic, 9th and 11th Streets into a maintenance facility for the Phase II Expo Line is substantial. Metro Real Estate has estimated that the total cost would be $152 to $203 million in order to acquire the land and compensate for relocation and goodwill. This site would potentially displace approximately 25 viable businesses based upon the visual reconnaissance prepared by The Maxima Group LLC. The displacement of this magnitude may constitute a significant socioeconomic impact and would need to be analyzed and disclosed in the project EIR. The 25 businesses are located on 27 parcels and are held under 14 different owners. Virtually all of the properties have been improved and some of these businesses may be difficult to relocate to a comparable site within the City. The businesses include the LA Car Guy Body Shop, Lexus Service Center, WIC, Golftec, Christopher Grimes Gallery, ArmaGen Technologies, WW Grainger, Beryll Corp, Mahalo, Jerry Bruckheimer Inc., Juice Studios, Secret Weapon, America's Finest Products Corp, Klown Records, Konscious Studios, Hard Tail, Ear to Ear Studios, Howard James Newton Inc, Brownstone Productions, the Framestore, Fibermark, Guido Marcello LTD Imports, AF Performance, the Salvation Army. Thrift Store and the Bourget Brothers Building Materials. Access to this site would require lead tracks across the eastbound lane of Colorado, creating potential safety concerns. Several community members continue to raise questions regarding why Bergamot is not considered as an appropriate site for the maintenance facility, particularly given that transit money was used to purchase it. According to Expo, Bergamot's irregular shape and the added cost to make it functional, which would require utilizing the adjacent 1800 Stewart Street site, makes the site cost prohibitive. The same issues previously 5 identified with .the 1800 Steward Street would also come into play with this site. Furthermore, because the site narrows at the western end, a workable maintenance yard configuration would potentially necessitate acquisition of the private property fronting Michigan, further exacerbating costs. "Hybrid Alternative" Currently Being Developed Given the results of the first, second and third property surveys that failed to identify another possible maintenance facility site within the Phase 2 area, the approach has been to explore whether it is possible to develop a maintenance facility while providing a substantial buffer for the residential neighborhood, and also to move some maintenance facility components as far away as possible from the residential neighborhood. Expo has modified its parking solution so it is no longer necessary to plan for ajoint-use parking facility on a portion of the City Yards. Attachment A is a conceptual diagram of a possible layout of the revised hybrid site. • The storage tracks and traction power station are located behind a 100 - 110 foot linear buffer. In addition, some facilities have been placed on the right-of-way, moving functions away from the residential neighborhood. For example, the car wash is now located on the Expo right-of way rather than in the Verizon yard. The cleaning platform is on the right-of-way further east of the Verizon site. • Office space and shop areas would be located in a fully enclosed structure in the area currently occupied by SMC parking. The City has requested a buffer area in this location as well but Expo cannot fit one into the site. Walls and building treatments will be discussed with the community in a design workshop. The 100 - 110 foot linear buffer facing most of the residential neighborhood could be used for housing and neighborhood serving uses defined through an extensive community process with recommendations for Council consideration since the property would be controlled by the City. 6 • The bikepath has also been included on the north side of the right-of way. Expo has begun discussion with the community on how to achieve a "good neighbor" facility. Several tours were conducted by Expo and Metro of the Green and Gold Line maintenance facilities. The community identified several concerns when touring these maintenance facilities on August 24, September 29 and September 30, 2009. Responses to address these issues are included below. Some of the solutions/mitigations will depend upon the forthcoming environmental analysis specific to the site: 1. Track loop a. Issue: The Green Line has a tight track loop. that produces "wheel squeal". Additional concern was expressed about any tight turn that causes squeal. b. Response: Both the DEIR and the latest recommended maintenance facility layout do not have the same type of loop as the Green Line. Expo/Metro have agreed to consider additional treatments on any curved tracks. 2. Alarm for vehicle lift a. Issue: The Green Line has an extremely loud alarm for the vehicle lift inside the maintenance facility building. b. Response: Metro is willing to look into reducing the volume, making it directional, or other such measures to the audible alarm in order to accommodate the community. 3. Air conditioning (AC) unit for the traction power substation (TPSS) a. Issue: The Green Line's AC for its Traction Power Sub Station (TPSS) is loud. b. Response: Expo has stated that the FEIR will assess the potential impacts related to the TPSS, including the AC unit, for both the Expo Line maintenance facility layouts. Mitigations to address the impacts will be 7 included in the FEIR. City staff has requested that appropriate measures to muffle the noise be included. Note that the TPSS is proposed to be located approximately 150 feet north of Exposition Blvd. for both layouts. 4. Blowers for carwash a. Issue: The Green Line does not have blowers associated with the carwash. However, blowers are proposed for the Expo Phase 2 maintenance yard. b. Possible solution: Expo has stated that the FEIR will assess the potential impacts related to the carwash, including blowers, for both the Expo Line maintenance facility layouts. If required, mitigations to address the impacts will be included in the FEIR. Note that the canvash is proposed to be located along the Expo right- of- way north of the Verizon property for both layouts and the blowers will be located within the carwash building. Other issues that have been raised are: elimination of the paint and body shop; incorporating design elements into the maintenance .building that will muffle noise; access to the facility restricted to Stewart Street; use of only directional lighting; sufficient landscaping to soften the building facade; and mitigating horn testing. Expo has initiated outreach with the adjacent residential community and has committed to a series of meetings and a community design charrette to explore ways to mitigate noise, vibration and air quality concerns as well as solicit input regarding the aesthetic interface with the surrounding neighborhood. In an effort to retain a sizable residential buffer, City staff and SMC have discussed the possibility of a three party land exchange among Expo, SMC and the City, which allows for using the SMC parking lot as partof this new hybrid alternative. SMC and its Board of Trustees are willing to consider relocating their Exposition parking facility oh the condition that SMC will be made whole with a replacement site acceptable to SMC. To this end there have been exploratory discussions between City and SMC staffs about whether it is possible to provide SMC with suitable land for replacement parking adjacent to SMC's Airport Bundy Campus. Under this approach, Expo would obtain 8 SMC's current Exposition parking site, with SMC obtaining the land identified as the potential maintenance facility buffer. SMC and the City would then enter into a swap, with the City obtaining control over the. buffer land, and with SMC obtaining control over land owned by the City at the Airport where SMC can relocate its parking facility. If this all is to happen, public hearings would need to occur and agreements would need to be entered into that provide for the land swap, to be authorized by the SMC Board and Santa Monica. City Council, under mutually agreed to terms and .conditions. An agreement would also set forth a process to continue to complete all required studies and environmental mitigations including CEQA requirements. Budget/Financial Impact Following further study of this alternative, cost issues will be refined and brought back for Council consideration. Prepared by: Kathryn Vernez, Assistant to the City Manager, Community and Government Relations Ellen Gelbard, Assistant Director, Planning and Community Development Department Approved: Assistant to the City Manager for Community and Government Relations Forwarded to Council: P.,~afiiont Ewell Ci Manager Attachment A: Conceptual Plan: Hybrid Verizon-SMC-City Yards Alternative for Expo Maintenance Yard Facility 9 D v s (D D