sr-060909-8a~~
City Council Supplemental Report
cry of
Santa MonicaW
City Council Meeting: June 9, 299
Agenda Item: ~ '1~
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Andy Agle, Director of Housing and Economic Development
Carol Swindell, Director of Finance
Subject: Redevelopment Agency Capital Funding- Priorities: Supplemental
Information on Remaining Recommended Projects
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council provide additional direction on long-term funding
priorities for the Redevelopment Agency and prioritize the remaining recommended
capital improvement projects. The recommendations contained in this report and
previous reports are based on staff's review of proposed projects relative to community
priorities. Staff seeks direction from Council on the final prioritization of projects.
Executive Summary
This staff report follows two previous reports presented on A ril 14 and Mav 12
concerning redevelopment funding priorities for capital improvement programs and
projects. At the May 12 meeting, Council identified several projects as senior priorities
for funding. This .report provides supplemental information including project objectives
and refined operating and maintenance costs for Council's consideration in prioritizing
the remaining projected Agency funding capacity.
Background
At its April 14 and May 12 meetings, Council considered a summary of recommended
capital improvement projects and preliminary funding allocation recommendations
based on an estimated Earthquake Recovery Redevelopment Project Area funding
capacity of $283 million (excluding redevelopment funds set aside for affordable
housing). The proposed capital projects were recommended based on specific criteria
related to long-standing community priorities including affordable housing, open space,
circulation and parking, and arts and culture. The proposed preliminary funding
1
allocations were based on'several factors including the desire to capitalize on one-time
opportunities and to help move or accelerate projects forward.
Each recommended capital project was evaluated based on the following criteria:
• Advances Redevelopment Agency goals and priorities
• Advances City Council-adopted community priorities
• Satisfies long-standing, unmet community needs
• Creates facilities that can be maintained and operated in the long-term
• Leverages funding from other sources
• Advances a prior City investment
Following extensive consideration of the recommended capital projects, Council
reached consensus to .support senior priorities for the following projects and in the
amounts reflected below.
Project 5/12109 Council Priorities
in millions)
Civic Center Planning and Design $ 2.5
Palisades Garden Walk and Town Square 25.0
Civic Auditorium Renovation 25.0
Civic Auditorium District Pro ects 21.0
Earl Childhood Education Center 4.4
Ex o Green Streets and Pathwa s 20.9
Santa Monica Hi h School Joint Use (Phase 1) 57.0
Civic Center District Shared Parkin 25.0
Memorial Park Expansion 2.3
Pico Nei hborhood Branch Libra 12.8
Ex osition Li ht Rail Station Enhancements 10.0
Total $206.0
If staffs understanding of Council's direction, as shown in-the table above, is correct,
approximately $77 million of the total estimated funding capacity of $283 million remains
available to allocate. After reviewing notes from the May 12, 2009 Council meeting, as
well as subsequent review.of the meeting recording, staff seeks clarification regarding
two points of the Council's action. First, it is unclear whether the motion was to allocate
the full amount ($30 million estimated. cost) to construct the Pico Neighborhood Library
2
on Pico Boulevard, or the lower amount ($12.8 million) to develop within Virginia
Avenue Park. Second, Council's prioritization included the parks, cultural facilities and
circulation systems in the Civic Center. Staff seeks clarification as to whether the $2
million allocation to study and design freeway capping was included in that allocation.
Discussion
Following prioritization of the first tier of "senior priority" capital projects, staff seeks
direction from Council on prioritization of the remaining uncommitted redevelopment
funds ($77 million.) A synopsis of each remaining recommended project is provided in
Attachment A. It should be noted .that project costs are. estimated based on the best
information currently available and do not yet reflect fully analyzed hard costs. As stated
above, each recommended project was evaluated based on specific criteria .and these
projects were included for consideration because they achieved several of the criteria.
Attachment B shows the City Council's May 12, 2009 allocation and lists the original
and revised, recommended RDA allocations for the remaining projects that are RDA
eligible and continue to be recommended for funding. These include:
Affordable Housing
• The demand for affordable housing exceeds supply. Provision of additional funds
for this activity will be used to support efforts to preserve and produce affordable
housing for very low and low-income households in Santa Monica. The $10
million could increase the supply of affordable housing by approximately 30 to 35
residences. Existing apartment buildings could be rehabilitated and dedicated for
affordable housing are readily available for purchase. Recommended allocation:
$10 million
Civic Center Parks and Public Facilities
• Freeway Capping: The $2 million of recommended funds would be used to cap
or bridge the freeway east of the McClure Tunnel, in order to correct the
irregularly shaped. bridge deck and allow for an entrance into Palisades Garden
Walk at the key pedestrian intersection of Ocean Avenue and Colorado
Boulevard, across from the Santa Monica Pier. Currently, the north edge of the
bridge funnels pedestrians onto a 10-foot wide sidewalk at a substandard Rapid
Bus stop. Providing a pedestrian entrance to the park and an improved bus stop
area would provide opportunities to improve pedestrian paths of travel, as well as
supporting the. approved Civic Center Specific Plan for connecting the Civic
Center to the Pier and Palisades Garden Walk. Recommended allocation: $2
million
3
Downtown Parking Strategic Plan
• Parking Design and Construction: Continued design and construction of
Downtown Parking Structures 1 and 6 to include ground-floor pedestrian-oriented
spaces, per the Downtown Parking Strategic Plan. Combined with $17 million of
Parking Authority Funds, the recommended $1 million would fulfill the City's
funding obligation for the project. Recommended allocation: $1 million
• Acquisition: Continuation of the Downtown Parking Strategic Plan through
acquisition of strategic properties. If acquired properties are not needed for
parking, they could be used. for other public purposes such as open space or
affordable housing. Recommended allocation: $27 million
Commercial Corridor Enhancements
• Lincoln Blvd: In coordination with the LUCE Strategy Framework, this project
seeks to improve pedestrian facilities and landscaping, enhance transit stop
facilities, create gateway treatments, and create shared parking at the Ocean
Park/Lincoln Activity Center identified in the Strategy Framework. Funding of the
planning efforts is recommended to cover the development of a master plan for
the corridor and to define specific projects. Recommended allocation: $1.1
million
• Pico Blvd: Funding of the planning for this. project is requested for master
planning and defining specific projects to improve the walkability of Pico
Boulevard including construction of additional crosswalks, to improve the
Dorchester Tunnel and other connections, and to explore shared parking facilities
for the activity centers and a potential parking district, in coordination with LUCE
Strategy Framework. Recommended allocation: $600, 000
Traffic Signal Master Plan
The multi-phased upgrade of the City's signal technology will enable the City to
manage the entire system of traffic signals from a centralized location in real-time
to closely manage incidents, special events, and specialized timing needs. The
upgrade includes new traffic signals, video detection,- controllers and
communication through fiber-optic or wireless. Funding this project is critical in
order to reduce traffic congestion and improve circulation, two major concerns of
Santa Monica's residents, workers, and visitors. Funding the final phases of the
City' traffic .signal system (the ATMS project) is critical in order to achieve the
goals of the ATMS project. Without these two final phases, the City's traffic signal
system will not be completely interconnected along major corridors, and future.
plans for the centralized monitoring and control of these intersections will not be
achievable.
• Phase IV -Mid-City/Ocean Park Blvd/Main St./Arizona Blvd: Phase IV covers
intersections in the Mid-City area and Arizona in the downtown, as well as
portions of Ocean Park Boulevard, and the Main Street/Neilson Way corridor.
4
Mid-City segments include sections of Broadway, Olympic, 17th Street, 14th
Street, and 11th Street. The traffic signal equipment at the intersections along
Arizona in the downtown is very old. Recommended allocation: $4.4 million
Phase V -Northern Section of the City: Phase V, the final phase of the City-wide
upgrade project, covers the northern portion of the City and includes Montana
Avenue, sections of 26th Street and 7th Street. Recommended funding: $3
million
Infrastructure Improvements
Newcomb Deck Improvements -The recently completed Santa Monica Pier
Infrastructure Assessment Study evaluated the condition of all structural
elements of the Pier and determined that substantial improvements were needed
on the Newcomb Deck. Various areas of the Newcomb Deck are constructed
differently and require different levels of upgrades in order to support structural
loads of 15 tons. The Study determined that Areas 2, 4 and 7, at the eastern
portion of the Newcomb Deck, were in immediate need of repair to stringers and
deck boards. Over the Next five years, the Study estimated that the total cost of
the Newcomb Deck Repairs, including Areas 2, 4 and 7, would be $8.1. The
report scheduled other repairs in years six through ten. Although this project is
not located within a redevelopment project area, it is contiguous and of benefit to
the Earthquake Recovery Project Area, as retrofitting the Pier produces safety
benefits for all residents, businesses and visitors in the Project Area.
The previous RDA recommendation included $2.964 million towards Phase IV
infrastructure improvements to the Municipal Pier. As the proposed FY
2009/2010 CIP Budget includes funding for this project from other sources, this
portion of the Pier infrastructure improvement project is no longer recommended
for redevelopment funding. Recommended allocation: $8.1 million
Beach Bike Path Extension: North of the Santa Monica Pier, pedestrians are
forced to share the beach bike path with cyclists. The County of Los Angeles
recently submitted a Metro Call for Projects grant to create a dedicated pathway
for. pedestrians terminating at the northern city limit. The City's local match
commitment to the project would be $365,000. Additional funding is requested to
implement improvements along the heavily used Pier section of the Beach Bike
path. Recommended allocation: $1 million
Citywide Tree Planting: The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction Tree Planting
Project is being conducted in conjunction with the US Forest Service's Center for
Urban Forest Research (CUFR) who has developed protocols for reporting actual
carbon storage by trees. In order to qualify for carbon credits on the Climate
Registry, the protocol requires that cities undertake 6HG tree planting projects,
adding an additional 1,000 trees to a municipality's baseline tree inventory. The
trees must be sustained for at least 100 years. This project demonstrates the
5
second guiding principal of the Sustainable City plan by helping to restore the
natural environment. This project is the first of its kind in the US and will be used
as a template for other public agencies across the US to follow. This project will
bring the City of Santa Monica closer towards generating reliable information on
reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Without funding this project will not go
forward. Recommended allocation: $300,000
• Bike Transit Center: Funding this project confirms the City's commitment to
promoting multi-modal transportation and sustainability. The Bike Transit Center
will provide attendant and self-park secure bike parking, lockers, showers, repair,
retail and rentals as a store-front facility in .Parking Structure 2. Providing such
facilities can reduce vehicle trips to the downtown, thus reducing the need to
build future vehicle parking spaces. The facility on 2nd between Arizona and
Wilshire will. be part of a system of facilities to serve employees, visitors and
residents. This request is for local funding to prepare construction drawings for a
project that will be constructed with federal grant funds. Recommended
allocation: $200,000
• Streetlight Retrofit/Replacement: The Maintenance Management Division is
requesting $1 million in RDA funds to upgrade/convert 33,431 linear feet of the
City's existing high voltage circuits (5,000 volt) to low voltage (120/240 volt).
Approximately 1/3 of the City's remaining high voltage circuits fall within the
Earthquake Recovery Redevelopment Project Area. Funding this project will
address issues of .maintenance costs savings, safety and sustainability.
Residents are very concerned when the streetlights are out on their streets.
Because high voltage circuits are older, more antiquated systems and because
there are very few companies that produce replacement parts, it typically takes
several weeks or months until the custom order parts arrive. The City has
experienced outages to high voltage equipment that required an electrician to
turn on the lights each night and turn them off each morning for several weeks
until repairs were completed. It is expensive to have SCE repair and replace
high voltage equipment and it is not efficient as high voltage systems consume
more energy and result in costly repair fees. Funding the completion of this
project will help the City realize costs savings in terms of operations and
maintenance; ensure that residents have reliable well lit streets; and, advance
the City's goals related to sustainability. Without these improvements
neighborhoods in the RDA area will continue to lose all the street lights at one
time, experience darkened and perhaps dangerous conditions, but with these
improvements they will experience added safety with reliable streetlight features
and improved aesthetic in .their neighborhoods. The recommended
redevelopment funds are to cover the shortfall from the proposed FY 2009!2010
CIP Budget. Recommended allocation: $1 million
6
Given the need to prepare 'and complete the City's FY 2009/2010 budget and the
Agency's Five-Year Implementation Plan, as well as meet the Agency's deadline of
2014 to establish debt and the desired timing of 2012 to issue bonds, staff seeks
Council's prioritization of the remaining funds.
Project Considerations
In the absence of redevelopment funding or an increase in the General Fund's ability to
fund capital improvements, the projects described above will be deferred. As General
Fund revenues have tapered off arid operating expenses have continued to grow, the
General Fund CIP Budget has continued to shrink, to the point that very few capital
projects can be funded by the General Fund: The availability of Redevelopment Agency
funds creates on opportunity to continue to fund'Iocally important capital improvement
projects. For the recommended infrastructure projects, delaying replacement-will result
in increased maintenance and utility costs, for streetlights for instance, and continued
inadequate conditions, for instance on the Pier and beach bike path: If grant funds are
secured for projects but no local match is available, the City will need to forfeit the grant
funds.
Another project consideration relates to the Civic Center Specific Plan's call for a
dedicated sports field as part of the Civic Auditorium Park. Creative Capital, as well as
the Civic Center joint-use campus planning with the school district, envisions the area
developed with .more flexible open space that supports. the adjacent cultural and
community facilities. .The demand for a dedicated sports field in the Civic Auditorium
Park could be alleviated by creating a new sports field as part of the Memorial Park
expansion or as part of the Civic Center Joint Use Project at Santa Monica High School.
Based on the Council's final direction regarding funding priorities, staff will continue to
work with School District representatives on the structure for providing redevelopment
funding for the Civic Center Joint-Use Project at Santa .Monica High School. The
structure will likely take the form of an agreement between the Agency and School
District which includes provisions for the disbursement of funds which will take into
7
account redevelopment requirements as it relates to advancement of future pass-
through payments to the School District along with the cash flow requirements of the
Civic Center Joint-Use Project. The terms of the agreement would also be expected to
include requirements regarding the projects to be coristructed and operated pursuant to
redevelopment funding. The current Civic Center Joint Use Project schedule reflects a
three-year pre-construction phase. During that period, it is anticipated that final designs
and a financing plan for the Project will be developed. In the event appropriate funding
cannot be secured for the project, the project could be designed to match the available
funds or the redevelopment funds could be redirected to other eligible projects. Such
timing requirements will apply to all projects proposed for funding by the Agency.
Operating and Maintenance Costs
While Redevelopment funds can be used to construct facilities and public
improvements, California Redevelopment Law prohibits the use of funds to assist with
the operations and maintenance of such facilities. Recognizing that there are
implications for the City's general fund relative to on-going costs for new facilities,
Council requested information regarding the estimated operating and maintenance
costs associated with each proposed project.
At this point, the operating and maintenance costs (O & M) for the projects are very
conceptual and will likely change as the projects are further designed (Attachment C).
Facility Maintenance, Public Landscaping and Community Forest, Custodial Services,
and Community Programs updated their O & M costs based on current estimates for
similar facilities, rather than based on general industry standards or other measures.
The revised estimates are mostly affected by the recalculation of utility costs using.
current expenses for comparable facilities.. Shared Parking and Palisades Garden Walk
estimates are the most revised with respect to O & M cost reductions at approximately
$2.5 million and $2 million less, respectively, than originally estimated. The Civic
Auditorium District Project's revised estimates are lower by roughly $1.5 million and
Memorial Park revisions are nearly $1 million less than originally calculated. With the
8
revised estimates, Council can more appropriately consider the full cost of proposed
projects.
Estimated O & M costs for the Santa Monica High School Civic Center Joint-Use
facilities project have- also been revised. Several factors were taken into account in
developing these estimates including staffing (for running the programs and
maintenance staff during the proposed public use times) and other factors such as
utilities, equipment and supply costs. While using the current cost formula for School
District Joint-Use facilities, Custodial Services found that their cost estimates are higher
than originally projected for the gym, yet lower for the pool. Custodial Services based
their estimates on in-house custodial costs for similar staffing and hours of operation at
the Memorial Park Gym and the Swim Center. However, these costs should be partially
offset by revenues from fees that would be collected for Community Programs.
Attachment D shows the various cost factors that were used to develop the annual
estimate of $2.86 million (the $2.86 million reflects the net O & M after the reduction of
$590,000 of estimated revenues) for the School District Joint-Use facilities project's O &
M. It is important to note the estimated revenues are based upon similar facilities
operated by the city.
Funding Considerations
As noted in earlier reports, the estimated funding capacity is predicated on a number of
factors that may change over time, including growth in tax increment, timing of the bond
issue(s), whether any bonds would need to be issued on a taxable instead of tax-
exempt basis and the general conditions of the municipal credit markets at the time
bonds are issued. The current estimated funding capacity of $283 million assumed that
the first bond issuance would occur in FY 2009-10. The actual timing of bond issuances.
will have an impact on capacity. If the first bond issue were delayed until 2011-12, for
instance, and the same underlying assumptions are maintained, there would be
additional project capacity of approximately $31 million. However, other factors could
reduce capacity. If,. for example, assessed valuation dropped by 4% in 2010-11 and
remained relatively flat through 2013-14, funding capacity would decrease by $40
9
million. In addition, interest rates for municipal debt have already increased since the
time the model was prepared and may be higher than those in the model by the time the
Agency issues bonds, which would further reduce funding capacity. Staff will regularly
report back to the Council regarding factors which affect the Agency's funding capacity;
using the annual budget adoption process and mid-year budget review as two
opportunities each year to update Council. For example, cost estimates for the
proposed projects have been developed based on the amount of information currently
available. As projects are further defined, updated cost estimates will be developed to
provide a more refined assessment of funding needs. If the updated cost estimate for a
project is lower than originally anticipated or if grants or other opportunities to leverage
funds are available, staff will seek Council direction on how to reallocate the excess
funds. Likewise, if cost estimates prove to be greater than estimated or total funding
capacity is less than estimated, staff will ask Council for direction on reallocating furids
between projects. The need for reallocation of funds could be affected by a variety of
factors, ranging from growth in assessed property valuation to borrowing .costs to
budgetary and legislative actions by the State of California.
Staff will also continue to explore various debt instruments to maximize funding, while
moving forward with community design of projects to capitalize on the ideal bonding
window and the final debt obligation deadline. There is typically a long lead time
required for the issuance of bonds, in particular lease revenue bonds. Therefore, the
final projects should be identified twelve to eighteen months before bonds are issued, in
order to support adequate project planning. It is important that the projects. be fully
defined, including completing design, CEQA review and obtaining construction. bids,
before going to the bond market. This ensures a high level of certainty that the bond
amount will fully fund the proposed projects and that the projects can be completed
within the three-year spending requirement. In addition, much of the debt will need to
be issued as Lease Revenue Bonds, which have certain requirements related to the
beneficial use of the property being leased and may require capitalizing interest during
the construction period. The flexibility to shift funds between projects will depend to a
large extent on the type of financing structure used. Some structures provide more
10
flexibility than others. When examining the financing plan, City staff and consultants
will analyze the projects to be financed in order to determine the financing structure that
best meets the City's needs in maintaining flexibility with respect to less certain projects
and reducing the overall costs of borrowing. Flexibility to shift funding between projects
will be highest prior to the issuance of bonds. The ability to reimburse funds-for prior
expenditures can help to maximize this flexibility.
Once the City or the RDA issues lease revenue bonds, the bond offering documents
must describe the actual projects to be financed, the expected cost to complete the
project and the time expected for completion. The City must also enter into lease
agreements with the Santa Monica Public Facilities Financing Authority (or another
appropriate entity) for the long-term use of the facility and agree to make lease
payments to repay the bonds. After the bonds have been issued, and if circumstances
warrant, it would be possible for the City to reallocate the bond proceeds to one or more
additional projects; however, these other projects must meet similar characteristics to
the original projects. For example, the substituted projects must have a useful life at
least as long as the original project, must have a fair rental value at least equal to fhe
original project and would have to also qualify for tax-exempt financing at the time the
substitution occurs. The City may also be required to certify that the substituted project
has a similar or greater importance to the City than did the original project.
Next Steps
The Agency funding priorities will be reflected in the City's final Capital Improvement
Program for FY 2009-10 through 2013-14, the City's final FY 2009-10 Budget, and the
Agency's Implementation Plan to be considered later this year.
Financial Impacts & Budget Actions
All budget actions resulting from these funding commitments will be included in the FY
2009-2010 Budget and any approved funding commitments beyond this fiscal year will
be appropriated each fiscal year thereafter. Funds for operating cost impacts will need
to be identified and appropriated as well.
11
Prepared by: Tina Rodriguez, Redevelopment Administrator
Forwarded to Council:
Agle, DirectorC~ P,~Lont Ewell
Housing and Economic Development i Manager
~~ ~~
G~~''
Carol Swindell
Finance Director
Attachments:
Attachment A: Summary of Remaining Recommended Projects
Attachment B: Updated Summary of Recommended Funding Allocations
Attachment C: Updated Operational and Maintenance Costs
Attachment D: Santa Monica High School Civic Center Joint-use Facilities Project
(O & M Detail)
12
Project Description Acquisition and rehabilitation of affordable The demand for affordable housing
.housing. To preserve and produce affordable exceeds the supply. The $10M could
housing for very low and low-income households in increase the supply of affordable
Santa Monica . housing by approximately 30 -35
units.
Criteria for Consideration a Agencygaals ~ "[ityCOUncil- ~ Long-standing, *"SUStalnabljlty"
and priorities adapted priorities unmet needs
Long-term ~ Leveraging ^ Prior City
investment
i
i
O&
M opportun
t
es
EQ Project Area Objectives 408.2 Increase and Improve the Supply of
Affordable Housing.
Cost -RDA Recommended Funds will be used to make loans to
non-profit developers to purchase
existing buildings for rehabilitation
or acquire land for new construction.
$10,000,000
Cost -Full CIP Request N/A
Operational & Maintenance
Funded through the development which covers the
Annual Costs costs of O & M
Other Funding Sources No other funding sources available to replace the
City's Housing Trust Fund loan program
Leveraging Opportunities
HUD-CDBG, HOME, and McKinney. State of
California Mental Health and Multi-Family Housing
programs. Federal and State Tax Credits and bank
loans
Project Readiness Non-profit developers can find existing properties
within Santa Monica for sale to rehabilitate within 1-
3months.
EQProjectArea ~ InsideEQ 0 ontsme ~ ContiguaustoEQ
Project Area project Area Project Area
1
Attachment A -Summary of Remaining Rec®mmended Projects
Project Description Phase 1 Cap or bridge over the McClure Tunnel and
the 1-10/PCH transition"square off" and open up
the current inadequate bridge to allow for
entrance into Palisades Garden Walk. North edge
of bridge currently funnels pedestrians into 10 ft
wide sidewalk.
Criteria for Consideration ~ Agency goals ~ 'City Council- ^ Long-standing,
and priorities adapted priorities unmet needs
^ Long-term Leveraging Prior Ci[y
0&M ~ opportunities ^ investment
EQ Project Area Objectives
§406.2 -Public improvements, specifically the
bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
-RDA Recommended
Will also allow for improved bus stop
environment. At present, the heavily
used Metro Wilshire Rapid bus stop
has no amenities (shelter, seating,
etc.)
*"Capital Needs & Infrastructure" and
"LUCE"
Phase I -Design and Construction of
capping/bridging over the McClure
Tunnel.
(Cost -Full CIP Request Additional phases are: Phase 2 -
OceanAvenue to Main Street and
$165,000,000 Phase 3 -Main Street to 4th Street
& Maintenance
ual Costs
Other Funding Sources
Joint development opportunity; Federal and State
2
Attachment A -Summary of Remaining Rec®mmended Pr®jects
\;
Project Description Reconstruction of Downtown Parking Structures 1 CEQA review has been completed for
& 6 to include ground floor uses to activate the the demolition and rebuilding of
surrounding areas, per the Downtown Parking Parking Structures 1, 3 and 6, as well
Strategic Plan. as one additional parking structure
within the downtown.
for Consideration ~ /+genrygaals ~ `CityCOUncil- ~ Long-standing, *"Capital Needs & Infrastructure"
and priorities adopted priorities unmet needs and "LUCE"
Long-term Leveraging Prior City
0&M ~ opportunities ~ investment
EC! Project Area Objectives §406.2, Exhibit 3 -Repair and renovate public
parking facilities in the downtown commercial
district.
-RDA Recommended
- Full CIP Request ' $219,000,000
rational & Maintenance
ual Costs
N/A
Funding Sources
3
would. fulfill City's commitment in
concert with $17 million from
Parking Authority
Parking fees, assessment fees, in-
lieufees
Parking revenue would cover O&M
Attachment A -Summary of Remaining Recommended Projects
Project Description Continuation of the Downtown Parking strategic If properties are not needed for parking,
Plan through opportunities for acquisition of they could be used for other public
appropriate properties. needs, such as open space or affordable
housing.
Criteria for Consideration ~ Agency goats ~ •CitvCOUncil- ^ Long-standing, * Capital Needs & Infrastructure"
and priorities adopted priorities unmet needs
^ Lang-term ^ Leveraging ^ Prior City
investment
i
i
O&M apporton
t
es
EQ Project Area Objectives §406.2, Exhibit 3 -Repair, upgrade,
rehabilitate, or acquire property as needed for
public facilities
Cost -RDA Recommended $27,000,000
Cost - FuILCIP Request $27;000,000
Operational ~t Maintenance
Annual Costs
Minimal costs to maintain properties
Other Funding Sources
Leveraging Opportunities Property acquisitions would position the City to
develop properties by 2012
Project Readiness N/A
EQ Project Area ~ Inside EQ ^ Outside Eq ^ Contiguous to
Project Area Project Area EQ Project Area
4
Attachment A -Summary ofi Remaining Recommended Projects
Project Description In coordination with the LUCE Strategy Framework, Master planning of corridor will
improve pedestrian facilities and landscaping, identify and define specific projects.
transit stop facilities, create gateway treatment, Transition of Caltrans ownership to
and create shared parking at the Ocean the City needs to be negotiated and
Park/Lincoln Activity Center identified in the finalised.
Strategy Framework.
Criteria for Consideration ~ Agency goals ~ =ctvcoooen- ~ Long-standing, *"Capital Needs. & Infrastructure"
and priorities adopted priorities unmet needs and "LUCE°
Long-term Leveraging Prior City
~ investment
rt
iti
O&M ~
oppo
un
es
EQ Project Area Objectives §406.2 -Public improvements, specifically curbs,
gutters, sidewalks, streetlights, medians, electrical,
natural gas, etc.
Cost -RDA Recommended RDA funding represents planning
funds and design funds for
corridor master planning.
$1,100,000
Cost -Full CIP Request No alternative source of funding
$12,000,000 currently available.
Operational ~t Maintenance
Annual Costs
Other Funding Sources
Leveraging Opportunities
Project Readiness Conceptual design 2011; final design 2013 and start
construction 2014
EQ Project Area ~ InsideEQ y^ Outride EQ ~ Contiguous to Mostly within or contiguous to the EQ
Project Area Project Area EQ Project Area project Area
5
Attachment A -Summary of Remaining Recommended Protects
Lincoln Boulevard Enhancements
E.Q. Redevelopment Project
6
Attachment A -Summary of Remaining Recommended Projects
Project Description Improve walkability of Pico boulevard and
connections, in coord'enation with LUCE Strategy
Framework -additional crosswalks, improved
Dorchester Tunnel connection, and shared parking
facilities for the Activity Centers and potential
parking district .
Criteria for Consideration *"Capital Needs & Infrastructure"
Agency goals ~ 'City Council- ~ Long-standing, and "LUCE"
and priorities adapted priorities unmet needs
Operational a~ Maintenance
Annual Costs
Funding Sources
Leveraging Opportunities
7
Attachment A -Summary of Remaining Recommended Projects
Pico Avenue Enhancements
E.Q. Redevelopment Project
s
Attachment A -Summary of Remaining Recommended Projects
Project Information Notes
Project Description The multi-phased upgrade of the City's signal Phase IV includes sections of
technology will enable the City to manage the Broadway, Olympic, 17th Street,
entire system of 160 traffic signals from a 14th Street, 11th Street and Arizona.
centralized location in real-time to closely manage The upgrade includes traffic signals,
incidents, special events, and specialised timing detection, controllers and
needs. Phase IV covers the Mid-City area and communication through fiber and/or
Arizona in the downtown. wireless,
Criteria for Consideration *"Capital Needs & Infrastructure"
Agency goals ~ *[ity Council- ~ Long-standing, and "LIJCE"
and priorities adapted priorities unmet needs
Long-term y Leveraging y Prior City
~ investment
i
i
~
opportun
t
es
0&M
EQ Project Area Objectives §406.2 -Public improvements, specifically
traffic signals and synchronization.
Cost -RDA Recommended The current funding plan condenses
the phases to complete the entire
$4,400,000 project by 2011.
Cost -Full CIP Request
(Updated)
$4,400,000
Operational & Maintenance Traffic signals are already in place and
Annual Costs maintained by City crews
EQ Project Area Mostly within or contiguous to the EQ
Inside EQ ~ Outside EQ ~ Contiguous to project Area
erniwn area Project Area EO Project Area
9
Attachment A -Summary of Remaining Recommended Projects
Project Description The multi-phased upgrade of the City's signal
technology will enable the City to manage the
entire system of 160 traffic signals from a
centralized traffic will be from a central location in
real-time to closely manage incidents, special
events, and specialized timing needs. Phase V
covers the northern portion of the City and will
complete the entire upgrade.
for Consideration
EQ Project Area Objectives §406.2 -Public improvements, specifically
traffic signals and synchronization.
Cost -RDA Recommended The current funding plan condenses
the phases to complete the entire
$3,000,000 project by 2011:
Cost -Full CIP Request If funding is not available, the project
will be phased over additional years.
$3,000,000
~ Maintenance
Funding Sources
Leveraging Opportunities
Agenrygoals ~ *City Council- ~ Long-standing,
and priorities adopted priorities unmet needs
Long-term ^ Leveraging ^ Prior City
O&M opportunities ~ investment
Phase V includes Montana Avenue,
sections of 26th Street and 7th
Street. The upgrade includes traffic
signals, detection, controllers and
communication through fiber and /or
wireless.
*"Capital Needs & Infrastructure" and
"LUCE"
Traffic signals are already in place and
maintained by City crews
Not good candidates for grant funds-
notheavily used by transit.
Project Readiness (Concept design by 2010; final design by 2010; start
construction 2011
EQ Project Area
Inside EQ ~ Outside EQ ~ Contiguous to
Prajec[Area Project Area EQ Project Area
Mostly within or contiguous to the EQ
Project Area
10
Attachment A -Summary of Remaining Recommended Projects
Traffic Signal Master Plan
u
~-
.~:_ i
11
Attachment A -Summary of Remaining Recommended Protects
Project Description In accordance with the recommendation from the Santa
Monica Pier Infrastructure Assessment Study, on the
Newcomb Deck, remove broken and undersized stringers
with adequately sized and spaced stringers and replace
broken or worn deck boards, to support structural strength
for vehicles weighing up to 15 tons. (Additional structural
upgrades to the Pier that will occur simultaneously and will
be funded through non-RDA monies include structural
upgrades in "Phase IV", a project that replaces wood timber
piles with concrete piles in tidal zone, between Bents 40 and
58 to provide structural support for 20-ton vehicles,
including fire vehicles, and construction of an emergency
gangway at the western end of the Pier.
Criteria for Consideration
ECt Project Area Goal &
-RDA Recommended
- full CIP Request
& Maintenance
Agenrygoals ~ 'City council- ~ Long-standing,
and priorities adopted priorities unmet needs.
Lang-term Leveraging ~ Prior City
O&M ~ opportunities investment
§406.2 -Public improvements, specifically the
$8,100,000
IVo additional OBtM funds require, and could
The Santa Monica Pier Infrastructure
Assessment Study identified portions
of the Newcomb Deck (Areas 2, 4 and
7) to be in need of immediate repair.
These areas are at the eastern end of
the Pier. The cost is $2.8 million. This
work would occur after the
Centennial celebration is complete,
as portions of the work area would
be unavailable for special events or
parking.
*"Capital Needs & Infrastructure"
Funds will be used for design,
construction management, and
Other Funding Sources None
Leveraaine Opportunities None
Project Readiness
EQ Project Area
2009-2010
Inside EQ ^ putside E Q ~ Contiguous to EQ
Projec[Area Project Area Project Area
The benefits of retrofitting the pier produces
benefits (safety) to the residents of the
redevelopment project area
12
Attachment A -Summary of Remaining Recommended Projects
Project Description North of the Santa Monica Pier, pedestrians are
forced to share the beach bike path with cyclists.
The County of Los Angeles recently submitted a
Metro Call for Projects grant to create a dedicated
pathway for pedestrians terminating at the
northern city limit.
for Consideration *"Capital Needs & Infrastructure" and
Agency goals ~ *City Council- ^ Long-standing, "Recreation & Living"
and priorities adapted priorities unmet needs
^ Long-term Leveraging Prior City
0&M ~ opportunities ~ investment
$1,000,000
13
Attachment A - Surnrnary of Rernaining ftecorsimended Projects
Project Description The Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction Tree
Planting Project is being conducted in conjunction
with the US Forest Service's Center for Urban
Forest Research (CUFR) who has developed
protocols for reporting actual carbon storage by
trees. In order to qualify for carbon credits on the
Climate Registry, the protocol requires that City's
undertake GHG tree planting projects which adds
an additional 1,000 trees to a municipality's
baseline tree inventory. The trees must be
sustained for at least 100 years.
for Consideration
Agency goals ~ •City Council- ~ Long-standing,
and priorities adopted priorities unmet needs
^ Long-term ^ Leveraging ^ Prior City
0&M opportunities investment
This project demonstrates the second
guiding principal of the Sustainable City
plan by helping to restore the natural
environment. This project is the first of
its kind in the Us and will be used as a
template for other public agencies
across the Us to follow. This project
will bring the City of Santa Monica
closer towards generating reliable
information on reducing greenhouse
gas emissions. without funding this
project will not go forward.
*"Capital Needs & Infrastructure"
"Sustainability"
EQ Project Area Objectives §406.2 -Public improvements, specifically medians
and other street improvements.
Cost -RDA Recommended $300,000 Planting 390 (36' box)
Cost -Full CIP Request $750,000 Unknown at this time
Operations & Maintenance Includes yearly cost for watering
Costs and maintenance
Other Funding Sources None
Leveraging Opportunities None
Project Readiness Complete all work by 2010
EQ Project Area 390 Trees, only within EQ Project
Inside EQ ^ Outside EQ ^ Coniiguousto AYea
Project Area Project Area EQ Project Area -
14
Attachment A -Summary of Remaining Recommended Projects
Project Description The Bike Transit Center will provide attendant and
self-park secure bike parking, lockers, showers,
repair, retail and rentals as astore-front facility in
Parking Structure #2. Providing such facilities can
reduce vehicle trips to the downtown, thus
reducing the need to build future vehicle parking
for Consideration
Agency goals - ~ *City Council- ^ Long-standing,
and priorities adopted priorities onmeC needs
^ Long-term Leveraging Prior City
d O&M ~ opportunities ~ investment
The Structure #2 facility on 2nd
between Arizona and Wilshire will be
part of a system of facilities to serve
employees, visitors and residents.
*"Capital Needs & Infrastructure" and
"LUCE"
EQ Project Area Objectives §406.2 -Public improvements, specifically the
bicycle and pedestrian facilities.
Cost -RDA Recommended
Cost -Full CIP Request
To prepare construction drawings to
enable the City to move forward with
$200,000 grant funded construction.
The remainder will come from grant
money from the construction funds
$300,000
Operational & Maintenance User fees could cover 0&M, likely
Annual Costs N/A operated by outside entity
Other Funding Sources Received 2007 Metro Call for Projects Grant - $1.69 The City already has put aside the
million local match for construction.
Leveraging Opportunities With this funding in place, there is possibility of
contracting with an outside operator.
Project Readiness Final design by 2010 and start construction
2010
EQ Project Area
Inside Eq ^ Outside Eq ~ Cantigaous to
Project Area Project Area Eq Project Area
15
Attachment A -Summary of Remaining Recommended Projects
Project Description The goal of this project is to convert the existing SCE has confirmed that it is very difficult to
high voltage street lighting circuitry and get parts for high voltage transformers. The
Components to low voltage within the EQ City has experienced outages to high voltage
equipment that required an electrician to turn
Redevelopment boundary. Upgrade/convert on the lights each night and turn them off
33,431 linear feet of conduit, wiring, fixtures and each morningforseveral weeks until repairs
cracked streetlighting poles within the EQ were completed. It is more expensive for SCE
Redevelopment Project Area. multi-year to repair and replace high voltage equipment
conversion project to convert all high voltage and these increased repair costs will continue
to equate to rate increases for high voltage
(5,000 volt) streetlighting circuits to low voltage lighting that the City will have to pay.
(120/240 volt).
Criteria for Consideration *"Capital Needs & Infrastructure"
Agentygoals ~ 'City Council- ~ Lang-standing,
and priorities adopted priorities unmet needs
Long-term Leveraging Prior City
O&M ~ opportunities ~ investment
EQ Project Area Objectives ~ §406.2 -Public improvements, specifically
Cost -RDA Recommended Funds will cover shortfall from
proposed FY 2009/2010 CIP Budget to
convert existing high voltage street
$1,000,000 Ii htin circuitr and components to
Cost -Full CIP Request Funding from proposed FY 2009/2010
(Updated) $4,500,000 CIP Budget allocation
I & Maintenance
Annual Costs
Operation costs will decrease
because the circuitry is more energy
efficient and maintenance costs will
lower for the first 3 to 5 years
because all off the components are
None
Other Funding Sources
Leveral;ing Opportunities
Readiness
IEQ Project Area Replace high voltage streetlight
Y^ InsideEQ O Outside EQ O Contiguous to system components and circuitry
Project Area Project Area EQ Project Area
within the EQ Protect Area.
16
ATTACHMENT e
City Council Updated Summary of Recommended Funding Allocations
Total Funding'
Request millions)
Recommended RDA
Allodation (millions)
112109 Cil Codncil Prioritization 5172/09 City
Council
Prioritization
(millions)
-
RDAEIi ibis and Recommentled -Not Yet Prioritized ' Remaining RDA
:Recommended
Projectsl>
(minions) Previously
Recommeded:
Allocation
(millions)
N/A 1O Affordable Housing o Affordable Housing l0
Civic Center Parks and Public.Facilities :. Civic Center Parks and Public Facilities
2.5 2.6 Alanniagattd;l0e51 n :;2~5
33 25 f?ahsadea Gatslep Waik and'TawO $ pdYE~, :I;zS
117 26 €iVIC AUditorlurr Renavatioh ZS
90 21 ir1YICAUdi~tariuenDistrictPrgjaeCs :~21
4.4 4.4 EdY Chrdhodtl Etlllcdtiah'CQhteY ,;¢~4
165 2 :~'.; Sl Freeway Capping - g;
31.9 20.9 Eapa6reenStieetSdY[dPa#IWay5 ~ ~ .'::20:9
230 46 $znta fvFOniedFll h Sthoa€ Jamt Use .~'57
100 26 Sliaretl PdYftifig ,;25
Downtown Parking Strategic Plan Downtown Parking Strategic Plan
219 1 ~ 0 Parking Design and Construction 1
N/A 27 0 Property Acquisition 27
ommercial Corridor Enhancements - Commercial Corridor nhancements
12 1.1 0 Lincoln Boulevard Enhancements 1.1 9
9 0.6 0 Pico Boulevard Enhancements 0.6 9
Traffic Signat Master Plan Traffic SignalMaster Plan
4.4 4.4' (See Note No. 1) 0 Phase IV-Mid City/OP Blvd/Main (See Note No. 1) X4:4 2.4
3 3 ~ 0 Phase V-Northern Section of City 3
z1 z:3 3NemanalPak;~xpahslgri; ;',~~
Infrastructure Improvements Infrastructure Improvements
11 8:T 0 Pier Infrastructure Improvements (See Note No. 2) '8.1, 11
30 12.8 :Rico Ne' hbdi-Niood 8rarctalbrar (SNe!Note No 3 .i' x;29
4 1 0 Beach Bike Path Widening 1
0.75 0.3 0 Citywide Tree Planting 0.3
0.3 0.2 - 0 Bike Transit Center 0.2
29.7 10 Eiiposttion L'~hf Ralf Station~.Enhancements ~0.
4.6 f 0 Streetlight Retrofit /Replacement (See Note No. 4) 1 0.3
254.6 Total Recommended Total Recommended 59.7
28.4 Remaining$alance Remaining Balance : .17.3
$1,122 $283 Funding Capacity $206 Funds Available for Allocation $77
NOtel•Tlleaevlsetlluntling requeF(i aueto en aaarc onaiiunaingshortfal of$Xm
Note2 rh[rov a(u es r<quesLeiulteafrom PlerNlniia ReProleRreaiefganallaeatlon'
f anotM1enource. Note3 rnbessumes
tlwttbe Plm.Llbrarywll be lo[etedeW rgna PVe ParX
NO[¢9: rM1e revs ed funding le du[to proposes rYSOOe/i010 CIP BUagetallootlon edY[ng[M1e FM1Ort
fall bath[Stieatl ghtRrtrol lt/RepleeementproleRfa$]: Atli
Attachment D
Santa Monica High School Civic Center Joint-Use Facilities Project
O & M Detail
Santa Monica High School Civic Center Joint-Use Facilities Project
Estimated Operations & Maintenance = $3,452,312 Million.
(Estimated Revenue: Approximately $590,000)
Net O&M Cost = $2,862,312
Cost/Facility:
Fields/Track (3) -Available M-F evenings, S/S all day, 2,632 hr/yr - $757,000
• Public Landscape and Community Forest - $30,000
1. Fields: gator: (utility vehicle), tow-behind sweeper, greens groomer (a synthetic
sports turf groomer to allow fast, efficient grooming of all infill synthetic sports
turf. Stands turf fibers up, levels the infill, and relieves compaction in a single
pass).
• Custodial Services - $80,000
1. Electricity - $80,000
Community Programs - $47,000
1. 2.4 FTE plus 30% for overhead & supplies - $318,000"
a. 1.4 CCS Leader
b. 1.0 CS Program Coordinator
2. Fees for use/revenues, estimated from similar city operated facility, could total
$271,000 for net cost of $47,000"
"Note: Cost are offset by estimated fees ($318,000-$271,000 =$47,000 net cost)
Tennis Courts (5) -Available M-F evenings, S/S all day, 2,860 hr/yr - $106,772
• Public Landscape and Community Forest - $65,772
1. One FTE Groundskeeper (Step 2, fringe): To maintain the 3 synthetic sport fields
(sweep daily to pickup litter and field groom weekly to condition the synthetic
field) and 6 tennis courts sweep three times a week and wash once a month).
• Custodial Services - $8,000
1. Electricity - $8,000
• Community Programs -$33,000
1. 4 FTE (details below - if courts on reservation system) plus 30% for overhead &
supplies -$75,000'
a. 1.4 Office Assistant
2. Fees for use/revenues, estimated from similar city operated facility, could total.
$42,000 for net cost of $33,000"
"Note: Cost are offset by estimated fees ($75,000-$42,000 =$33,000 net cost)
Gyms (2) -Available M-F evenings, S/S-all day with some short Sat, 2,704 hr/yr - $588,634
Attachment D
Santa Monica High School Civic Center Joint-Use Facilities Project
O & M Detail
• Facility Maintenance - $41,250
1. Costs derived from existing city gym facilities and encompass repairs, parts
replacement costs, equipment for repairs, plus inspections:
• Custodial Services - $425,384
1. Based on in-house Custodial costs for similar staffing and hours of operation at
the Memorial Park Gym -This includes 2 Custodians. Salaries based on Step 5
w/ benefits. Costs also include uniforms and one pick-up truck and associated
fuels, repairs and insurance. Cost includes annual refinishing of the gym floors,
cleaning and paper supplies, etc., based on actuals at the Memorial Gym)
multiplied by two. - $357,384
2. Utilities -$68,000
a. Gas - $4,000
b. Water-$4,000
c. Electricity - $60,000
• Community Programs - $122,000
1. 1.3 FTE (details below) plus 30% for overhead & supplies 1.3 CCS Leaders -
$143,000
2. Fees for use/revenues, estimated from similar city operated facility, could total
$21,000 for net cost of $122,000"
"Note: Cost are offset byestimated-fees ($143,000-$21,000 =$122,000-net cost)
Pool (1) -Available M-F 5-Sam and 6-11 pm, S/S all day, 3,640 hr/yr - $2,009,906
• Facility Maintenance - $285,000
1. Costs derived from existing swim center facility and encompass repairs, parts
replacement costs, equipment for repairs, plus inspections.
• Custodial Services - $581,906
1. Based on in-house Custodial costs for similar staffing and hours of operation at
the Swim Center. This includes 1.5 Aquatics Maintenance. Worker and 1
Custodian I. Salaries based on Step 5 with benefits. Costs also include uniforms
and one pick-up truck and associated fuels, repairs and insurahce. Also included
are pool chemicals, cleaning supplies, paper supplies and other supplies based
upon Actuals at the Swim Center - $341,906
2. Utilities - $243,000
a. Gas.- $123,000
b. Water-$36,000
c. Electricity $81,000
• Community Programs -$1,143,000
1. 9.62 FTE (details below) plus 30% for overhead & supplies - $1,399,000
a. 2.03 Aquatics Site Supervisor
b: 5.19 Lifeguards
c. 0.9 Jr. Lifeguards
d. 1.5 Office Assistant
2
Attachment D
Santa Monica High School Civic Center Joint-Use Facilities Project
O & M Detail
2. Fees for use/revenues, estimated from similar city operated facility, could total
$256,000 for net cost of $1,143,000`
Note: Cost are offset by estimated fees ($1,399,000-$256,000 =$1,143,000 net
cost)
3
City Council and Redevelopment Agency Meeting: May 12, 2009
Agenda Item: 5" ~
To: Mayor and City Council
Chairperson and Redevelopment Agency
From: Andy Agle, Director of Housing and Economic Development
Subject: Redevelopment Agency Capital Funding Priorities: Supplemental
Information
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council provide direction regarding long-term
redevelopment funding priorities for capital .improvement projects.
Executive Summary
The Council directed staff to address specific questions discussed at its April 14, 2009
meeting. This report summarizes the supplemental information provided in response to
those questions, while clarifying certain project descriptions to provide more detail
regarding leveraging opportunities, project readiness and estimated operational and
maintenance costs.
Background
On April 14, 2009, staff presented information regarding the Redevelopment Agency's
ability to fund priority capital projects, including the need to establish Agency debt by
2014 (or preferably 2012 to bond at the best possible terms), the Agency's estimated
funding capacity of $283 million and the need to refine the Agency's funding. priorities
and commitments. Given the upcoming deadlines for establishing Agency debt, as well
as the pending FY 2009/2010 City budget and the need to adopt aFive-Year Agency
Implementation Plan by the end of 2009, staff presented preliminary funding allocation
recommendations for capital improvement projects identified as potentially eligible for
redevelopment funding.
1
Following the staff presentation and public comment, Council requested additional
information to assist with its deliberations in refining priorities and funding commitments.
Discussion
Provided below is supplemental information in response to the Council's questions from
the April 14, 2009 meeting
EXPO Light Rail: Timing and Phasing
Opening of the EXPO Light Rail Transit (LRT) in Santa Monica is expected in year
2014-15. The design-build process is slated to commence next year,'starting in early-
to-mid 2010. The City will need to work closely with the Expo Authority to capitalize on
the opportunity provided by the coming light rail line and to ensure functional
connections for passengers accessing the transit system. Essentially, the City has two
years to plan and design the connecting and complementary projects and.three years to
construct the improvements, if they are to be completed prior to the opening of the line.
As a result, the City must move immediately if the CIP projects related to the LRT are to
be in place by the time the rail line comes to Santa Monica.
It is critical that the City coordinate station area planning with the Exposition Authority to
ensure appropriate transit connections, convenient and safe pedestrian access and
continuation of a functional bicycle path. The three Santa Monica stations (Downtown,
Mid-City and Bergamot) will require careful attention to address:
access issues generated by transit, private vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians;
• provision of station amenities; and
• development of a desirable station footprint in relation to any future development or
open space on or adjacent to the station site.
The City will be defining the improvements through a station area planning process that
will commence immediately. Station area improvements could include:
• Downtown Station: 1) a pedestrian plaza on the SE corner of 4t" Street and
Colorado, 2) improved passenger interface with transit and passenger drop-off/pick-
up, and 3) streetscape improvements at intersections accessing the station.
2
• Memorial Park Station: 1) streetscape improvements on Colorado,. 14th and 17th
Streets, 2) pedestrian and transit connections, 3) shared parking, and 4) a bike
transit facility.
• Bergamot Station: 1) reestablish the street grid for vehicles, bikes and pedestrians
(expected to be largely developer funded), 2) intersection improvements at 26th
Street and Olympic Boulevard to enhance pedestrian access, 3) landscaped
streetscape improvements with improved crossings, 4) an enhanced Olympic
Boulevard median from Stewart Avenue to Cloverfield Boulevard, 5) shared parking,
and 6) a bike transit facility.
Debt Capacity Analysis
In response to Council's request for additional information regarding. the Agency's debt
capacity, a study session was presented to the Council on April 28, 2009, to convey the
fundamentals of bonds and debt capacity including bond issuance, types of bonds, flow
and structure of bond funds, debt ratios, factors in calculating funding capacity, and the
leveraging of tax increment and financing projects.
Flexibility of Funding Commitments
Council requested additional information regarding the flexibility of funding and project
commitments. The debt capacity analysis provides a current snapshot of the Agency's
estimated financing capability, while the project cost estimates are based on current
information regarding projects and funding sources. In the coming years, these factors
may change if assessed valuation grows at a different rate than projected, construction
costs vary from estimates, borrowing costs change, outside grant funding is obtained for
certain projects, the .State take-away is adjusted or new state laws are adopted that
affect redevelopment financing. If changes in these factors indicate that additional
capacity will be available for projects, staff will return to CounciP for direction on
allocation of additional funds. Similarly, if changes in these factors indicate that the
redevelopment funding capacity will be reduced, staff will return to Council for guidance
and direction.
3
Leveraging of RDA Funds
Council requested information regarding leveraging opportunities for the proposed
projects. Giveh limited resources and competing capital- improvement needs, the City
actively pursues opportunities to leverage funding in order to maximize the ability of the
City to complete as many capital projects as possible. These leveraging opportunities
include competitive grants, formula grants and partnerships with public or private
agencies.
Currently, the City is awaiting decisions on the applications for MTA Call for Projects
(biannual opportunity to receive transit-related. funds) and a Proposition 1 C Infill Grant,
while programming formula-based grants from Proposition A, Proposition C and
Measure R for transit-related purposes., as well as from federal sources. The City has
applied for Federal Economic Stimulus funding and regularly seeks federal allocations
for regionally or nationally significant projects. Attachment A summarizes the leveraging
opportunities for each proposed capital project.
Operational and Maintenance Costs
Council requested information regarding the expected operational and maintenance
costs and needs associated with the proposed capital projects. Attachment B
summarizes the estimated costs for operation and maintenance of each proposed
capital project. The costs estimates are based on assumptions ranging from whether or
not restroom facilities will be included in the projects to whether the City will contract
with third-party operators for facilities such as the Civic Auditorium, Early Childhood
Education Center and Bike Transit Center. Two pertinent assumptions include MTA
providing the operations and maintenance of the Expo LRT Stations and sharing the
operational and maintenance cost with the School District for the Joint-Use facilities.
Operational and maintenance costs are calculated per project as they relate to utilities,
facility maintenance, public landscaping, community forests, custodial services, and
community programs. The estimated annual operational and maintenance costs per
proposed capital project are summarized in Attachment B.
4
Schoo/ District -Joint-Use Project
Council requested additional information regarding the proposed Civic Center Joint-Use
Project at Santa Monica High School. The School District's formal response to the
Council's questions is provided in Attachment C-1. Since the Civic Center Joint-Use
Project includes the development of new recreational facilities and it is being proposed
that these new facilities will be made available for public use during non-school hours,
the City must consider its ongoing costs associated with staffing, programming, and
supervising the classes and programs at the facilities, based on the maximum days and
hours offered in the Civic Center Joint-Use Proposal. Attachment C-2 summarizes the
estimated operational costs for public use and programming of Joint-Use recreational
facilities. The City's five year forecast does not. include- any of these operating costs
impacts.
Pico Library
At the A rp it 28 study session on the Pico Library, Council was asked to consider two
options for creation of a new branch library: building in Virginia Avenue Park or
purchasing a property for library development on Pico Boulevard. The cost to construct
a library at Virginia Avenue Park is estimated to be approximately $12.8 million, while
constructing on a separate Pico Boulevard property is estimated to be approximately
$30 million. Council directed staff to continue efforts with respect to both options. The
recommended allocation in the previous staff report is expected to be sufficient to
finance the construction of the library at Virginia Avenue Park. If Council prefers the
Pico Boulevard option, allocation of additional funds is necessary.
Project Readiness
An important consideration with regard to refining .priorities is project readiness and the
ability of projects to take advantage of the optimal window for issuing debt (2012) and
the final deadline for establishing Agency debt (2014.) Staff has completed amore
refined analysis of project readiness, which is reflected in Attachment E. Some of the
projects are infrastructure improvements that can move to construction quickly (e.g.
street light replacement, traffic signal master plan implementation, tree planting, Pier
5
improvements, etc.) Other projects are broader in scope, but have already completed
master planning and CEQA analysis and are expected to be able to proceed forward
within the optimal window (e.g. Civic Center Specific Plan projects, Downtown Parking
Strategic Plan Implementation.) Certain projects have not completed design or CEQA
review, but are of a discrete nature to allow their readiness for Agency funding (e.g. LRT
stations, Pico Library.) Three of the projects face significant hurdles with respect to
readiness according to the Agencydeadlines. The first is the Memorial Park expansion.
While the park expansion itself could be ready according to RDA funding timelines,
public landscape operations that currently occupy the former Fisher Lumber site must
be relocated before park expansion can occur. Finding a site and creating a facility for
public landscape operations is expected to be a lengthy process, with no funding yet
identified for a relocation project which is ineligible for redevelopment funding. In spite
of these challenges, Council may wish to consider allocating funds in the amount of
$2.3 million to supplement $1:1 million in budgeted FY 08-09 funding for the preparation
of the master plan including the identification and evaluation of sites for public
landscape operations, design of the Phase I .park improvements to incorporate the
former Fisher Lumber site into the park block and associated environmental review as
necessary steps in realizing the Memorial Park expansion. The other two projects of
concern are corridor improvements for Pico and Lincoln Boulevards. Currently,
improvement strategies for the boulevards must be prepared, which would identify
specific projects that need to be designed and reviewed for environmental impacts.
Staff's assessment is that it is unlikely that these steps. will be completed within the
timeline. In past years, funds were allocated for the development of the boulevard
strategies. To allow the process to continue forward, Council may wish to consider
providing funding of $560,000 to match a Metro Grant ($800,000) for pedestrian'
improvements on Lincoln Boulevard and $515,000 to assist with development of a
comprehensive strategy plan for Lincoln Boulevard. Council may also wish to provide
funding of $600,000 to support planning, design and construction of pedestrian
improvements on Pico Boulevard.
6
Cost Estimate Revisions
Provided in Attachment D is an updated summary of recommended funding allocations
based on refinements to cost estimates and project readiness of the proposed capital
projects. The Civic Center Early Childhood Education Center is now estimated to have
a funding shortfall of $4.4 million, rather than the $3.4 million listed in the previous
report. The previous staff report erroneously listed the cost. of completing streetlight
retrofitting and replacement in the Redevelopment Project Area as $300,000; the
correct figure is $4.5 million. The School District's Joint-Use project has been updated
to reflect cost estimates of $230 million, rather than the -$235 previously proposed. In
addition, the cost estimate allocations among the various Civic Center park ahd cultural
facilities have been updated to reflect the redevelopment project funding
recommendations. While staff has not revised the recommended funding levels for
these projects, the readiness of certain projects creates opportunities to re-allocate
funds.
Next Steps
The Agency funding priorities will be reflected in the City's Capital Improvement
Program for FY 2009-10 through 2013-14, the City's FY 2009-10 budget, and the
Agency's Implementation Plan to be considered later this year. Staff will continue to
explore debt instruments to maximize funding. If the Council approves funding for
Santa Monica High School joint-use improvements, staff will work with School District
representatives on requirements and agreements related to such funding.
Financial Impacts & Budget Actions
All budget actions resulting from these funding commitments will be included in the FY
2009-2010 Budget and any approved funding commitments beyond this fiscal year will
be appropriated each fiscal year thereafter. Funds for operating cost impacts will need
to be identified and appropriated as well
Prepared by: Tina Rodriguez, Redevelopment Administrator
Andy Agle; Director
Housing and Econo
Attachments:
Development
Forwarded to Council
• ~~!_~
a nt Ewell
City anager
Attachment A: .Leveraging Opportunities
Attachment B: Operational and Maintenance Costs
Attachment C-1: School District's Response Regarding Joint-Use Project
Attachment C-2: Operating Costs for Public Use and Programming of New Samohi
Recreational Facilities
Attachment D: Updated Summary of Recommended Funding Allocations
Attachment E: Project Readiness
8
~raeing~Onrnrtuni~
Affordable Housing x
Civic Center Parks and Public Facilities
Planning and Design
Palisades Garden Walk (and Town Square) X Applied for HCD Prop lC Infrastructure Grant-seeking $15 coil
Civic Auditorium Renovation X Potential opportunity-RFOfor private/public partnership
Potential - (Future years) Metro CaII For Projects funding of Michigan
Civic Auditorium District Project (park and more) X Promenade thru Civic
Received RAND & Related Companies Contribution - $1 mil towards
Early Childhood Education Center X operations and construetion;SMC bonds
Freeway Capping X Joint deyelo mento
p pportunity; Federal and State funds
Expo Green Streets and Pathways X Applied for METRO Call for Projects (for Colorado Ave) -seeking $4.2 mil
The School District seeks Agency funding onlyfor the joint use elements ofthe
Santa Monica High School Joint Use X Santa Monica High School final buildout: the Civic Center Joint-Use Project.
Shared Parking X Potentialo ortuni
pp ty-Private developer contributions
Downtown Parking Strategic Plan
Parking Structures Design and Construction X Parking Authority funds-$17 mil; parking fees; assessmenm in-lieu fees
Property Acquisition X
Commercial Corridor Enhancements
Received METRO Call for Projectr Grant (w/Westride Cities far Pedestrian
Improvementr)-$800,000. The local match requirement for Santa MOnICd s
share of the Westside Cities grant (Lincoln) is $125,000 in.FV09-10 for design
Lincoln Boulevard Enhancements X and $435,000 in FYll-12 for Construction
Pico Boulevard Enhancements X Potential candidate for various grant bpportunites.
Traffic Signal Master Plan
Phase lV-Mid City/OP Blvd/Main X Received 2007 METROCall for Projects Grant (Ocean Park Blvd-$933
000
,
Phase V-Northern Section of the CiTy X
Memorial Park' Expansion
Infrastructure Improvements
Pier.lnfrastructure Improvements X
Pico Neighborhood Branch Library X
Beach Bike Path Widening X Applied for Metro Call for Projects (partnering with County)-seeking $ 3.6 mil
Citywide Tree Planting X
Bike Transit Center - X Received 2007 Metro Call For Projects Grant- $1.69 mil
Applied far 2009 Federal SAFEFEA-LU application for downtown plaza and
Exposition Light Rail Station Enhancements X pedestrian connections-seeking$5 coil; joint development; Metro funds
Streetlight Retrofit/ Replacement X
April 30, 2009
AndrewAgle, Planning Director
City of Santa Monica
Dear Mr. Agle:
Extraordinary Public Education
Please find attached the District's responses to what we understand to have been the questions
asked by Council members at the April 14, 2009 Council meeting regarding the Civic Center
Joint Use Project (CCJUP).
The district's architect for the Project, R. L. Binder, FAIA, as a result of the current and projected
trends in the local construction industry, has reviewed and revised the estimates included in our
February 25, 2009, proposal for RDA funding of the CCJUP.
The savings shown are a result of a recalculation of escalation allowances (please see note 5
on the Summary sheet). There was no change in the 2008-dollar estimation of hard costs or the
soft costs (40% of hard costs). Overall project costs are as follows:
PHASE Descri tion FEBRUARY24, 2009 ! APRIL 22, 2009
Michigan Avenue Promenade,
Phase 1 football track/field/stadium; tennis $58;143
400 $56
189
000
Alt. 1 courts/stand; 490-space , .
,
,
subterranean arkin
Phase 1
Alt. 2
Gyms, pool, soccer field
$118,272,000
$118,272,000
Phase 2 Demo gyms/pool; Greek; baseball,
$58
550
590
$55
468
980
softball; basketball ,
, ,
,
TOTALS $234,965,990 $229,929,980
Beginning design for all three phases at the same time could generate a significant savings in
soft costs.
Ms. Binder also prepared four new renderings of the CCJUP, which are also attached.
Please feel free to contact me if you have further questions or you need additional information.
Very truly yours,
Tim Cuneo, Superintendent
Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District
Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District
1651 Sixteenth Street • Santa Monica • California 90404-3891 • (310) 450-8338 • www.smmusd.org ___.,
Board of Education: Ben Allen • Oscar de la Torre • ]ose Escarce • Maria Leon-Vazquez • Ralph Mechur •.Kelly Pye • Barry Snell urs
Tim Cuneo, Superintendent of Schools
Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District
Responses to City Council -April 14; 2009
Page 1 of 3
May 1, 2009
Responses to Council members' questions of April 14, 2009 regarding the Civic
Center Joint Use Project
1. Is there flexibility in the phasing of the Joint Use Project? Could underground
parking improvements be included with alternative phases?
Response: The order of Alternatives 1 and 2 of Phase I of the Civic Center Joint
Use Projecf schedule is interchangeable. Alternative 1 includes the Michigan
Avenue Promenade, a new football/soccer/rugby/lacrosse field, CIF track, 2000-seat
stadium, lighted tennis courts with viewing stand and 490 spaces of subterranean
parking. Alternative 2 includes a new soccer/rugby/lacrosse field above afull-facility
gym, practice gym and swimming pool. Phase II, which cannot be done before
Phase I Alternatives 1 and 2, includes shared subterranean parking, construction of
new baseball and softball fields, which will be lowered to the level of 4th Street,
renovation of the Greek Theatre, and construction of new lighted, outdoor basketball
courts.The District, in consultation with City staff, has commissioned a parking
analysis to assess the site's non-school hour needs. The District looks forward to
continuing to work with City staff to develop a comprehensive shared parking plan
that can meet multiple needs in an efficient and sustainable manner. Data from the
District's analysis will be formatted to meet the City's requests. Shared
subterranean parking opportunities exist in Phase I Alt 1 and in Phase II.
2. Could the plan provide for public and bike access on Michigan Avenue during school
hours?
Response: In the District's February 25, 2009 request for funding, the Michigan
Avenue Promenade was described as being closed during school hours. The
District's current plan includes consultation with the Santa Monica Police
Department on ways to ensure the safety and security of students during the school
day and direction to the architect to explore ways of designing the Promenade so
that it can be open to the public all hours. The District needs to maintain flexibility
regarding this issue to address community concerns about safety and security of the
school.
3. What security provisions are being proposed by the School District for the proposed
improvements?
Response: The site currently has security officers stationed at all entrances to the
campus during the school day. Campus security also includes a bicycle patrol during
the school day and during the weekends. Currently, events on campus during non-
school usage are covered by the- District's permit process and often include
Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District
Responses to City Council -April 74, 2009
Page 2 of 3
May 7, 2009
additional security as needed. As the proposed plan does not enlarge the size of the
school, the District does not anticipate an increased need for campus security forces
during school hours. The design will allow the academic areas of campus to be
secured during non-school hours. As management of the site during non-school
hours is yet to be determined, the District and the City will collaborate on security
needs during these times.
4. What is the District's ability to raise additional funding for this project?
Response: The District seeks Santa Monica Redevelopment Agency funding only
for the joint use elements of the Santa Monica High School final buildout: the Civic
Center Joint Use Project. The District's sole method for raising capital improvement
funding is to seek voter approval of bond measures. In November 2006, the
District's voters approved the $268 million Santa Monica-Malibu Schools Safety and
Repair Measure. Of that, $100 million has been allocated to the new Science and
Tech Plaza at Samohi. The District will be proposing future bond measures to
complete the academic elements of the high school's final buildout, which are
estimated at $250 million (2008 dollars). The District has nineteen school sites,
each in need of facilities improvements. Any future financing plan must consider the
needs of all the District's sites.
5. What is the breakdown of areas dedicated for fields and open space and. net new
open space? What is the breakdown of public access hours?
Response: The Civic Center Joint-Use Project will result in 14.5 acres of open
space, 3.38 acres more than are currently present on the site. Phase I Alt 1, which
includes the construction of the Michigan Avenue Promenade, providing 2.48 acres
of active/passive open space; constructs a new football/track and field stadium, and
new tennis courts providing 5.21 acres of active open space at a total project cost of
$56.2 million. Phase I Alt 2, which takes the soccer field currently in the Civic Center
Specific Plan off the Civic Auditorium Campus and puts it above the new gyms and
pool, provides _ 1.95 acres of active open space at a total project cost of $118.3
million. This results in 5.6 acres of flexible open. space instead of the soccer
currently identified in the Civic Center Specific Plan. .Phase 2 includes the
construction of new softball and baseball fields, providing 4.87 acres of
active/passive open space at a total project cost of $55.5 million. Final buildout will
add another 2.34 acres. Please see the attached Civic Center Joint Use Project -
Open Space and Existing and Buildout plans of the site.
Briefly, with addition of lights, synthetic turf and an additional soccer field as well as
extending hours to 11:OOpm, the CCJUP increases public access hours to the fields
and track by 143% above current conditions, increases public access to outdoor
Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District
Responses to City Council -April 14, 2009
Page 3 of 3
May 1, 2009
basketball courts by 74%. By making both gyms available to the public during non-
school hours, public access is increased 157%, and public access to the pool is
increased by 21 %.
The list of public access hours, by venue, as provided iri the original proposal is also
attached: Joint Use Recreational Benefits. A study was done in July 2008 of the
number of Santa Monica residents using the facilities. Excerpts from that report,
Public Use by Permitted Groups and Public Use by Individuals, submitted to the
RDA staff, are also included.
6. How does the school district propose to operate and maintain all of these facilities?
Response: The District anticipates additional custodial and maintenance costs
associated with the new facilities, including the new stadium. However, it is
expected that some new costs may be offset by savings associated with synthetic
turf fields (that have lower repair and maintenance costs than the existing grass
fields) and new facilities (that also have lower maintenance and repair costs than the
existing, obsolete facilities.) The District is continuing to evaluate operational costs
for the new facilities. The District does have permit policies and a fee schedule to
cover operating and maintenance costs associated with the use of its facilities during
non-school hours, much like the City is planning recover new, added costs for user
groups of the new JAMS fields, which it operates during non-school hours.
P ®~ LI p,n I p' q ®v CIVIC CENTER JOINT -USE PROJECT SUMMARY
f` fVi iM!"4R i April 22, 2009
Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District
Yearly Project Costs in 2008 Dollars (NO escalation is included) Pro Design Construction Anticipated Project Cost
Deign Activities
a
`m
o 0
ii ~ ~ Z ' w
' v ` w m m a c U
~
o .- m r h m ~ E v ~ U o m 9 ` m
a,
m ~
m
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ o O o Q p o
_°> m 'o
N
i N N \ N ` \ N
m
a
o
' , U ~+
z s
a`
o ao m m m m m m ~ V
m o ~ w m v ~ co a ~ 0 2 c ~ o `m `o E :a o m
°0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a O @
~
=
~
~
n
n
n
~ F
- ii m o n o
C e
°
$
~
° o
i z z^ U O U ie w'~ a
PHASE 1, AIt1 -
2014Gratluation
TrackL Football Pield/
Stadium/ Pkg:/Olympic
Access/Promenade $3,9M $3.3M $6.7M $17.3M :$17.3M $1.M $D.M $O.M n2nD9 warm :enmo ennf zn onn nnn ,z eenn~,. .zze ~~„ .
«,e,. ,,,,,.
Noes:
1-PHASE 1 Project Alts. 7 and 2 are interchangeable as PHASE 1 and 2.
2-Parking is included as: $42,000.00/stall on 7 level subterranean (50D stalls under footbal stadium/450 under baseball)
3-Second level subterranean @ $38,000.00/stall can be added
4All amounts are shown in 2000 dollars; escalation column is not included in the yearly outlay figures and is included for information only at this time.
5-Excalation is based on 2 % for 20D9, 3 % for 2010, 4% for 2011, 5% for 2012 onwards
o«aceaa~~on,r,~nr,a~ea~a~andccaoaviNn~.,u R. L. Binder FAIAArchitecture Planning
PRELIMINARY CIVIC CENTER JOINT -USE PROJECT DESCRIPTION Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District
April 22, 2009
SCOPE PRE-CONST.
ACTIVITIES CONSTRUCTION
ACTIVITIES ANTICIPATED PROJECT COST COMMENTS
d ~ ~ °
N 6 O ~ O
N '- ~ m S ~ U
c ^.
m c
~ wm 3 m m
~
U
~ N~ C O
N O
¢ C
O
7
m
~
C C
o
' U
, ~
t O
~ a
a
afQ mE
` m .N
m Y>
2 ~ 5
o d~
m-, ,.v,,
o c
w
° uo c°i
a
. ~.,., .,.a,.,,.,,,, ~.y., ..,r., yc
Promenatle r Se •09 Sec-09 Mar-12 Ma -73 iAu d 34900,000 13,960,000 '7728,000 56;18900
:h a tennis courts 175000
ih (e) baseball feld , 225 000
~h:(e) Olyrhpic access 75,000
ct new subterranean Pkg ,..21,000,000
ct new Olym Ic access ' .450 000
ct new Tennis Courts ,. 675 000
cCnew synthetic track & feltl/
m bleachers wdh concession'
ntl lockerdbbms 7,500 000
ct promehatle From 7th St to.4th
sroject stormwater management
s approxr$30 per square foot.
rk-ups) 3;400000
e Mam Trans & over tlistrib.. ':800,000
e basketball courts 600 OOD
Graduation
Graduation
o«~ooaamon~ra=~-„a«s~na,o~e,~PF~nA~.a R. L. Binder FAIA Architecture Planning
pp qq ~/ ®Qt®UUCIVIC CENTER JOINT - JECT Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District
R LI I /'1 i PHASE I, ALT I Scope Summary
Task Year
Amounts Reflect 2008 D
ll ~ ~ N
o
ars
(No Escalation is Included) N
~ ~
~ O N
~ O O
N
~ ~ ~
O)
O O ~- N M <r
N
N
N
N
N _
r f` r ~ r r F~-
Coordination with Architects and other Consultants
Master Butl et Develo ment
Master Schedule Develo men[
Funding Plan Development (including assistance with all types of
funtlin rocuremenf as needed
Contracts Coordination
EIR/ Oversi ht and Coordination
Communit Outreach at all levels 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.5 4.3
A enc Coordination
Outreach antl Coordination with City of Santa Monica, DSA and other
ke entities
Development of Construction Sta in &Phasin Plan
Develo ment of O erations and Occu anc Plan
Fees/Ins ec[ion
EIR"/Traffic/Historical/Air Quali 0
6 0
4
S ace Pro ram Develo ment/Pro rammin .
0
3 . 1.0
Schematic Desi n DD 50%CD . 0 3
100 % Construction Documents
DSA/ Bid 8 Award 1.2 1.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 4.6
Pro'ect Closeout
Construction 4.6 15.0 15.3 34.9
Contin enc /Sta in &Phasin as a ro riate to hase 0
6 0
7 0
8
P
i . . . 1.0 0.7 3.8
er
otl Cost 3.3 3.3 6.7 17.3 17.3 1.0 qg,9
Notes: If Phase 1 Alt II is selected as the first project, multiply above by a factor of two.
oazzossamon~ras~-1,a<KS~~a,~~c,~PF~Na~.x~s R. L. Binder FAIA Architecture Planning
®ncet Final ui6®ut
~,,
!III _, '=~_
F
~, ~;~ ~ 0
r ~~
t - - ~ m,~,
~ \i _-,
,~ s ~
~~ ~
,` __
~.~
~..
~ ~ ~'
I ~~ ~
I ~ -..
~~
a~
~~
~~ j
~ {,
€°" ~
rf o~
;
~ „b~ ~ ~
f
~~
,~~..,; ~ f
pp. ~ ,~ ~
~
,
,,
:K
'/
~d~ ~ ~ ~~F'O G~
F
~
'
s
'<:/. 1'
a~~9f
~~~
~~
i~
~~. ,,
Phas`~ II
.~''
r
Looking east along 6th Street from Olympic
Olympic size pool, practice'gym and full gym on left;
new regulation soccer field above; new CIF track and field on right
CIVIC CENTER JOINT USE PROJECT R. L. BINDER, FAIAARCHITECTURERND PLANNING
Looking North along Pico
Baseball field and Greek Theatre
Looking east from 4th Street
Michigan Avenue Promenade
CIVIC CENTER JOINT USE PROJECT R. L, BINDER, FAIAARCHITECTURERND PLANNING
Michigan Avenue Promenade
' 1\. l.. LJ IIVLILf~~ rMlly l'~RlJfll l Cli I Uf[C MIVU rL/11V IV IIVV
CIVIC CENTER JOINT USE PROJECT -OPEN SPACE
VENUE labeq EXISTING MEASURE BB CCJUP BUILDOUT
Football field (B) 152,000..,,~.~.... , ~, .,.. > ~~ ~~~=
football/tennis
(Baseball/basketball & tennis courts (C) I 230,0001 .:~_ ~..._ ~.,.~;L~ -'. L:--,,, ,, ,~_~~%I
Softball D 32 000
i~
~s ~
~
~ ~- '~~~
, ~
,
Main uad E 25,000 ,~„ ,~,_ ~
,,. ~~; ' ..F : ~~ 43,000
Science quad (A) (H) 46
000 32
000 ~ ,
, , ,
,,,
,
New soccer (D) „ ~ ,~,; - 85 D00 ~ ~~
,., ,;,,, ., ,, . ~ , v
Michigan Avenue Promenade (A) ~ ~~` ~~~ 108-000 `'~
New History Building Greens (F). ~
~:;.. .,. ~~~ ~~
~ '~~
~
25,000
New Center Commons (G) ~ - ~~~ ~
~ °- 34
000!
,
„ „ ,
TOTAL SQUARE FEET 485;000 32,000 632,000 102,000
TOTAL ACRES 11.13 0.73 14.51 2.34
4/23/2009
Does not inlcude gyms, pool, Barnum Hall, Greek Theatre
~ l
r
l ~, ~ `ir ,
~i ~, a~ s rr1i/>%riirr a_ ~ EF ,,,
~ ~, f ~ o
p /~ Gis~r r- f,~ ~---~„ 1 + ~
°T--~ -.~ ,,. ,
~~~~awww raw~tl S.I JI w'EY~m#ir~'3, or~ ~ ~
~° Ifl7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ li~i is l' i~ I illi.lll llllll i°
f II'ilrl ~T
~(` ~'~~, ,~ \ /~~„ ~~~ fl ~; 1 11'~ilill l~il I~ FBI ~~I~IIII 11 lll~ll (i~l)I III' I l
r,
y~.1 } ~ I ~I w ii i ~~fA^ ~L11FJIif11 ~ l ~-
{;,~~ / ~ _ ~- ~ ~ ~ 4° 7 iV i I i. 77i it I fl in lilt IIti~L~ t-~
~ '~~ - ie ~_~. iJ~"1111 ~ I_.J_.L~_~J A ~ LI I~ I ,i ill ii ~ V a
~ 1 / ~-~ YiPrQ. ~~J4iW F
wl /e~ ~f ~ ~ ~a ~ .. _ ~ I ~ ~ ~-~ ,
~ C 1230 009S.F f° I ~~ ~~~ ~ ~,
!Qo~i ~ 1~ `i ~ ~ E
I
z ~I I~,~~~~~ ~' J /j ~~ i~ I i I ~ 4~ T I4., ~ j ~ . P' S4~`000S F ~ ; ~ h
r,l~ ~
< ~~ ~ 1 l , o o _ ~
w sw w wwrL e ~ I) ~ ~p /
~t ~l 7 ~ a.. ~` w~,'
H. - ~ ~
hJ f
~ ~~?~ j ~ ~ ar,~i~l' ~~~~ '7 ~ ~ ili I I. i °~ l~A d OS ~ !tom y i ~ r-1
VIII Illii \°l~i: - X ~~b• `y.*~`~ ~ ~ ~~,-~,--~~I~ ~`.,~.i
blur. wrwa wspwd' '~
.i ~ r ~ ~ I
I Y r d,-7-~ ~/ I f S
~'~ ~/~ II~B t152,000S.F I t I~ ~E I~~I~~; ~,~, ~~' I ,~;lll
11 1 ~ ,t ~ 'v
J`
x,~ -rp 'I ;~~~~,I~~ 3, r
M1M1s+ III ~`(-r,' / fe q ^ r i`-~ aj
III ~ } }I ~~ f ~`
PSI I i/, r ~~i~ ~~ ~~r I
f pp p 5
~i~wwssii y_iw~P Rit4 ~. I ~ -~~ r fi1_ ~~ i "~ ~ I t
r./ ~ "~ ~rl 1~ 1/1 ~ ~" I IS ~5
1/ J rev I
r ,j • a > ~~, : ~ i
~ ~ ~l.~_ r ~ ~J .e
~- ~
/~ , a-o
~ti r.~ ! / \ ~ ~ I ~-.,... ~ 04/20/09
V >V lVV 1~U \/
SMMUSD SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL
CCJUP OPEN SPACE :EXISTING CAMPUS
R. L. BINDER, FAIA ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING 7726 W. DiST STREET, PLAYA pELREV, CA 90293
~ i77'~
~ 1 ~
f y~
{ J E 'Y":
0 50 100 150 ~./
SMMUSD SANTA MONICA HIGH SCHOOL
CCJUP OPEN SPACE : BUILDOUT
R. L. BINDER, FAIR ARCHITE CTU RE&PLANNING ]]26 W. 81ST STREET, PLAY ADE IR EY„CA 90293
JOINT-USE RECREATIONAL BENEFITS
Fields and Track
There is currently heavy public demand for field use throughout at the City, particularly
by Santa Monica youth soccer teams. Both the football field and baseball fields are used
year-round for youth soccer. The track is used extensively by individual runners during
early morning hours, evening hours and on weekends. Permitted groups, such as the
Special Olympics hold annual events on the track. Table 1 below indicates a total of
5882 hours the fields and track are currently available for community use.
Table l: CURRENT Available Hours -Fields and Track
naseoam mmn-use nela m-r opm toausK Not available M-P 6pm to tlusk 1672 2gWn
Sat. 2pm to dusk SaVSun Sam to dusk ~
Sun-8 am to tlusk "~ ~'
Football/Multi-use Fald M-Fepm to lopm exceptnotThUrffnln Fell M-F6 pm to lg (winter break) Not Available-Reseed Feld 1754 3Spf~
Sat 2pmt010 pm (fall~6amto tepmwinferkpring M-Feem fo l8 (sprang break) ,,, - .,j ^y
~Ifack ~M-F Sam te7am;6pm f010 pm ~M-F~mto]am;6pm 1p 10 pm ~M-F Sam to]am;fipmto lop ~ '~16~ 6y45~
SaVSuneam to l0 pm SatlSun Bam to l0 pm SaVSuneam to l0 pm ~ ;:°;,
The CCJUP replaces the above three fields with lighted, upgraded synthetic turf fields
that may be used for multiple sports and adds one new regulation
soccer/rugby/lacrosse field. In addition, a regulation size track is included as part of the
new football field/stadium complex. The number of hours for community use
increases to 14,296 which represents a 143 % increase in the field
availability for the community, as shown in Table 2.
Table 2: POTENTIAL Hours for Community Use -Fields and Track
Facili '. School Year 38 weeks) WinlerlSpdng Bieak gweeksSummer 10 weeks Tobl Hours Publb USa%
Softball Field ~
M-F 6pm to 1l pm
M-F 6p.m. until l7 pm i
M-F6pm to 1l pm ^1632 72.%
(synthetic tuAAights) Sat. 2 pm to 11pm SatlSun 6 am -11 pm SaVSun e am to 11 pm ~~
Sun. 8 am to 11 m ,.,,,~c-i
Baseball/Multi-use Feld M-F6pm toll pm M-F6p.m.unlilllpm M-F6pmic1lpm 2fi92 72yn
(synthetic turfilights) Sat 2 pm to 11 pm SaVSUn 8 am -11 pm SaVSun a am to 11 pm ;
Sun.eem to 1lm ''^
.<v
FoolbaNMUltt-uSe Field M-F 6pm to 11pm exceptnot ThUrlFn in Fell M-F6pm to 1l (vAntarbreak) M-F6 pm to 1l pm ~SMM ~at°T
f
(Synfhafie fuAAighIS) Saf. 2pmto 11 pm (fwq; a am to 11 pmwnlerhpAng M- F B am to 11 (sprang break) SallSun 8 am to 11 pm L?
Sun.Bam to ll m SaVSun Bam to 7l m
Soccer Field (taeroSSY andm M-F epm to l1pm M-F8 am1o 11 M-F6pm to 11 pm ,~,D 66%
(synthetic turfilight) SaVSuneam to 11 pm SaVSun 8 am to 11 pm SaVSun a am to 11 pm
Track M-F6am {o7am;6pm to 1l pm M-FSamm]am;spmmll pm M-PSam to]am;fipm ~o ll pm 389¢ ~6fi
~
SatiSuneem to l1 pm SaVSun Bam to ll pm SaVSuneam to l7 pm „H,,,, ,. `., ,,,u w,,,,'
,
Tennis and Basketball Courts
The unlighted tennis courts are also popular with the public. Through an unwritten
agreement, the City of Santa Monica currently permits the six tennis courts. The
seventh court has an uneven surface and is used only for warm-up. Walk-on play is
available to individuals if courts are not permitted or being used by the school. The
courts are available to the public from 8 am to dusk on the weekends. The outdoor
basketball courts are available after school and from 8 am to dusk on the weekends
since there are no lights. Table 3 shows the total hours for these courts that is currently
available to the community.
Table 3: CURRENT Available Hours -Basketball Courts
'Facili School Year(38 weeks - WintadSpdng Break (6 weeks) 'SUmmer(tUweeks Total HOUrs Public use%.
Tennis Coums M-F 6pm until tlusk M-F 6p.m. until tlusk. M-F 6p.m. until dusk ~. ~'„4308 ;' ,-- 36
SaUSuneam-tlusk" SaUSuneam-dusk SatlSun Sam-dusk
~
ONdoor Basketball Courts M-Ffipm to dusk M-F Bem to dusk M-f Bam to dusk '1B8U -. ~S4Yo
SaVSun Sam to dusk SaUSun Bam to dusk Satl$un Bam to dusk
1TOtal Annual HOUrs ~`.. ;:,_32881
The CC7UP provides new, lighted tennis courts with center court and viewing stand and
new outdoor basketball courts. These will have lights so the use will be extended to the
evening hours. Table 4 shows that the potential hours of community use will
grow by 74% to 5720 hours.
Table 4: POTENTIAL Hours for Communi Use -Basketball Courts
Facili -'-School Year 38 weeks Wintarl5 ring Break (l weeksp Summer 10 weeks TotaLHOUrs Public USe%
Tennis Courts M-Ffipm until 11 pm M-F 6p.m. until 11 pm M-F 6p.m. until 11 pm --286g -';- .,; ;J,B%
(lightsy SaUSuriBam-11 pm SaUSun Bam-11 pm SaUSun Bam-11 pm
Outdoor Basketball Coutls M-FBpm to l1 pm M-F ep.m. until7l pm M-F 6p.m. until 11 pm ~-:3886 ,~Ifl%
(lights) SaVSun a am to 11 pm SaUSun 8 am-11 pm SatlBun a am- 71 pm
Total Annual Potential HOef6 ~ fiZ7~Q
Available for Communi Use
Gvmnasia
The south gym is used on weeknights by the public for basketball and is available. on
the weekends to the public for basketball and volleyball. Currently the north gym is not
used by the community. The weight rooms and dance studio are not regularly used by
the public. Table 5 shows the current hours available for community use in the two
gyms.
Table 5: CURRENT Hours Available -Gyms
Facili School Year(38 weeks) '.Winletlspdng Break (4 weeks) Summer 1U weelo; Tafal HOUrs Public USe%
Sculh Gym Tueslrhurs 6pm to 1U pm M-Ffipm to l0 pm k'M-Ffipm to l0 pm ~.f88R z r37%p
Sale mto pm(Ib season);eammfgpm resmtyear SaUSun Bam to l0 pm SaUSunBam to lU pm _
Sun Bam to tom
c,
Nodh Gym Not cunengy available Not currently available Not cunently avalleble ,:°Hq ;[;(J(q
IAVailable fo Publicbse r ;,1+
The CCJUP provides two new gymnasia: one practice gym and one full facility with
dance studio and weight room. The new gyms fulfill the objective of the
Recreation and Parks Master P/an and will provide an additional 2,954 hours
of community use over the current facilities, a 157% increase, as shown in
Table 6.
Table 6: POTENTIAL Hours for Community Use - (;vms
Facili School Year SS weeks Winterrsprins creak aweeks) Summer(10 weeks) Total Flours Public USe%-
NewSOUthGym M-F 6pm to 1l pm M-F6pm toll pm M-F6pm to 1l pm 2709 ~:. 53°h
Sat2 ~o 11 pm(bb season);Bamto if pm rest oryear Sat/Sune am to ii pm SaUSun Bam tO ti pm
F .~
Sun 8 am to 11 pm
~
New North Gym M-F6pm to 1l pm (2 nights per week) M-Ffipm to 11 pm M-F6pm to ii pm ;;"2M134 '
' A2°ya'
Sate m 11 pm(bb seazong a am-11 pm rest oryear SatlSun 8 am to 11 pm SaUSun 8 am (011 pm
Sun 8 am to 11 pm
tOt31 Annual Potential Hours ~ ~ 983dI
Available for Community Use
POOI
The Drake Pool is currently used by the public for lap swim for several hours prior to
the start of. the school day and in the evenings and on weekends. Table 7 below shows
that the pool is currently available for community use for 3,016 hours per year.
Table 7: CURRENT Hours Available -Pool
Facili School Year(38 weeks) Wiaterl5 ring Break (4 weeks) Summer 10 weeks Total Nours Public use.%.
Drake Pocl M-F Sto7 am;6pm to 10 pm M-F Stolem;6pm to tOpm M-F bto]em;spm to iopm '-,~. y9U16 ,, ~!:;";~; y5~e.§
SatlSun Bam to l0 pm Sat/Sun Bam to lU pm Sat/Sun Bam to l0 pm
Total Annual kfours ;' ,ROTe
Available for Public Use
The CCJUP provides a new Olympic-size indoor pool. This new centrally located
pool will meet the objective of the Recreation and Parks Master P/an and will
offer 624 more hours for community use, for a total of 3,640 hours, or a 21%
increase, as shown in Table 8.
Table 8: POTENTIAL Hours for Community Use -Pool
FacJi 'School Year 38 weeks) Winkr/Spring Break 4weeks): Summer(10 weeks) Total Flours PublipLSa%.
New POOI - M-F5-B am;6pm to 1l pm
SaUSun 8 am to 11 pm M-FS-8 am;8 pm to 1l pm
SaVSun 8 em to 11 pm M-FS-B am;epm to 1l pm
SaUSun a am (011 pm i '2fi4U !r''";`~7}~,X
?
OPEN SPACE
The City adopted the Open Space Element of its General Plan in March 1997. It
establishes along-range vision for future development of parks and open spaces within
the City. It also focuses on reinforcing the social, environmental, cultural and
recreational role of open space within the City. The Civic Center Joint Use Plan
embodies the following five objectives included in the Open Space Element and certain
associated policies.
Open Space/Pedestrian/Bicycle Use'
During the nearly one hundred years since the Samohi campus was-first opened, its role
as a vital center of the community has been diminished to its current appearance as a
walled facility that appears inaccessible and unwelcoming to the community. A key
component of the CCJUP is the re-connection of the campus to the community which is
accomplished in several ways. The central .element is the Michigan Avenue Promenade
opening from East (7th Street) to West (4th Street) allowing for Samohi campus use
during school hours and public use including bike and pedestrian paths in the
afternoons, evenings, and on the weekends with a secured campus north and south of
the Commons. The Michigan Avenue Promenade will once again provide pedestrian and
bicycle access to the Civic Center Campus, the Pier, beach, and Palisades Park for the
underserved Pico neighborhood. The creation of the Seventh Street Promenade,
connecting the resurrected 7th Street overpass with the new Michigan Avenue
Promenade will connect the downtown and north side of the City to the Samohi and
Civic Center campuses. In fact, this will create a full bicycle path from 7th Street
through the downtown and Civic Center to the beach and back up to 7th Street. Table 9
details the 6,880 hours of new recreational use for the community.
Table 9: POTENTIAL Hours for Community Use -
oll pm M-h bam to ti pm M-F4pm to 1l pm
Sam to t7 pm SaUSun Sam to 11 pm SaUSun Bam to 11 pm
path) m ISaUSuntB am~o 11 pm ISaUSun 8 amlto 11 pm ISaUSun 8 em to t1 pm
To be consistent, the table above shows the Promenades open until 11 p.m. It is
expected that they will remain open during all non-school hours.
Public Use by Permitted Groins
The determination of the number of members of the public using the facIlities is more
complex. As indicated earlier, the permit records are not complete so this discussion
will provide a general range of users based on actual permit data, site observations, and
interviews with Samohi staff. As Table 2, Samohi Facilities permit Users shows, an
estimated 53,000 members of the public participated in permitted events and sports
during the past year; 35,000 are estimated to be Santa Monica residents or affiliated with
Santa Monica-based groups.
Table 2
Samohi Facilities Permit Users
Public Use by Individuals
Several facilities are currently used informally by individuals who walk on the campus
before and after school hours and on weekends. These include the tennis courts, the
outdoor basketball courts, the Memorial Greek Theatre, the track, and early morning
pool use. It is estimated that another 22,000 members of the public enjoy individual
activities on the Samohi campus as shown on Table 3, Samohi Facilities Individual Users
below.
Table 3
Samohi Facilities Individual Users
ATTACHMENT C-2
OPERATING COSTS FOR PUBLIC USE AND
PROGRAMMING OF NEW SAMOHI RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
The Samohi Civic Center Joint-Use Projects (CCJSP) Report includes development of
new recreational facilities to be built in phases as part of the campus master plan. The
Report recommends that the facilities be made available for public use outside of school
use hours. .This attachment summarizes estimated staffing and administrative costs
for public use and classes/programs to supervise and/or activate the facilities for the
maximum days and hours offered in the CJSP Report. These costs will be modified
based on actual facility availability and community demand. Estimates for the tennis
courts, fields and gymnasiums were based on permitted or drop-in use. and do not
include direct service programs.
Potential revenues which may off-set costs have been included. Where applicable, a
discussion or analysis of potential for use and demand is included. This summary does
not include contributions to the District to off-set the City's share of utility, custodial and
maintenance costs associated with public use days and hours. Community
Maintenance has estimated these costs based on comparable City facility costs (see
Attachment B).
Fields and Track: The Samohi CCJSP Report includes three fields or tracks: 1) a new
football/soccerlrugby/lacrosse field with .CIF track; 2) a new regulation
soccer/rugby/lacrosse field with support spaces; and 3) a new baseball/softball field
which can also be used for soccer, rugby or lacrosse. Fields should be staffed with one
recreational coordinator and leaders for an estimated annual cost of $245,000.
Revenue estimates are averaged based on a range of light and heavy use
(football/soccer versus softball/baseball, amount of lighting, level of typical wear and
tear) and youth versus community permits. Annual average revenue is estimated to be
$271,000. Staff is concerned that the days and hours of public access listed in the
CCJSP Report may not adequately take into consideration the hours that Samohi
teams may need for practice and/or actual games.
-1-
Tennis and Basketball Courts: The Samohi CCJSP Report includes six new lighted
tennis courts with center court and viewing stand, as well as four lighted basketball
courts.. Basketball courts could be available to the public on a drop-in basis which
would not require the City to staff the courts. Tennis would similarly have no staff costs,
if used on a drop-in basis. If tennis courts were made available on a reservation basis,
staffing costs would be $58,000/year which could be off-set by $42,000 in revenues for
an annual cost of $16,000. Staff sees little demand for outdoor basketball courts, when
indoor courts are available.
Gyms: The Samohi CCJSP Report includes two gymnasia (one practice and one full
facility with dance studio and weight room for indoor basketball and volleyball). Each
gym should be staffed with a recreational leader to supervise activities. Based on
Memorial Park gymnasium use patterns the costs are estimated of $110,000, which
would be offset by estimated revenues of $21,000 annually, for an annual net cost of
$89,000 to staff the two gyms. Again, staff is concerned that the days and hours of
public access list in the CCJSP Report may not adequately take into consideration the
need for Samohi team practice use.
Swimming Pool: The Samohi CCJSP Report includes an Olympic-size indoor .pool
with locker rooms and support spaces. Staff evaluated potential lap swim, fitness class,
swimming. lessons, and permit group use based on available days and hours. Early
mornings and evening use might be lap swimming with some fitness classes and permit
groups. Swim lessons would most likely occur in the morning and afternoons on
weekends. With these uses, staff costs (site supervisor, lifeguards, instructors, office
assistant, administrative expenses) would total about $2,000,000 which could be off-set
by $700,000 in revenues, for an annual net cost of $1,300.000. The early morning
hours (before lam) on the weekends and late evening hours daily (after 8pm) listed in
the CCJSP Report may have little to no demand.
-2-
ATTACHMENT D
Summary of Recommended Funding Allocations
Updated Cost Information and Project Readiness Considerations
RDA Eligible and Recommended '
CIP Projects < Recommended
Allocation (millions) Totaf Funding
.:Request (millions)':
10 N/A
Planning and Design 2.5 2.5
Palisades Garden Walk and Town Square 25 REVISED 33
Civic Auditorium Renovation 25 REVISED 117
Civic Auditorium District Projects 21 REVISED 90
Early Childhood Education Center 3.4 REVISED 4.4
Freeway Capping 2 165
Expo Green Streets and Pathways 20.9 31.9
Santa Monica High School Joint Use 46 REVISED 230
Shared Parking 25 100
Parking Design and Construction 1 219
Property Acquisition 27 N/A
Lincoln Boulevard Enhancements 9
Pico Boulevard Enhancements 9 `
Phase IV-Mid City/OP Blvd/Main 2.4 2.4
Phase V- Northern Section of City 3 3
Pier Infrastructure Improvements 11 11
Pico Neighborhood Branch Library 12.8 30
Beach Bike Path Widening 1 4
Citywide Tree Planting 0.3 0.75
Bike Transit Center 0.2 0.3
Exposition Light Rail Station Enhancements 10 29.7
Streetlight Retrofit /Replacement 0.3 REVISED 4.5
highlighted in yellow represent revised costs from 4/14/09 staff
ATTACHMENT E
,a ~.„~'~ `r.°"~s"s,.,.a..~~~"`-~. `~k'x'*`-s,%'i"n~~".:r:. r-
~~, ~ ~ .x.Ut~-'a ' ~s°,~ P. a~, -~e."'a
~'l
~1r'a' "Mi "^:
K
'
~^s "~.v.1
t~'
"
?~' ,x~~~a ~c',~v..r~-`Y~,~rs 'ss„~~.~`.;.,c~-,s" ~,""`,. '~-~-~- c.c ,"„~ ' s''u3 c,"t-.'7 -~~,.v
~ry~y~"`~.- `u~ "ts. x "'s ,"r... -~a.~.,a 4 :~ ".. ~"i , :; ~^~
~.~
&v may. ~`ni"•hyyk`$.~Y y"~ iy
'x Y`.
.-~ ~- v'~
`:~.
.`~+Y'•.....x S~~h~.y
~'.y$^~^
"}
*
'
c
'.
+i
''
"
e ~
^5
6
4
"
^
"3?"
,,,x~~.,^32"~.,
Y`zT'~.s "vs~ ~~.~: 'v`
n^~ k~ ~r "~
,
~
,
~
' N
a
y
,~
{
r .r
3
aa ""-'.~^"%~~.~°~w~.,'~,~Y+,~,~,k'=~ ~ 5t ^$` ~.-{<Yyt`*'
~--~^ ~`ie a~]3X~. `'
~°`~.s.3°
~r
n
'~''
'
`"~
"te
`
~`
~
"
~
~
.
~
<,-i.
'
F.~
?
~
'~'"~C.SS~'i.. 5.,~
rvy~'~'
R".x.. u^ 5"3'w.'c., s"°3i. +``YV..,~
~~~w-^q k5 ~-•^-~ """~.ro,Sw '=
'SSyu~M ~~ 'a~~
a ...
^fi-
a' ~. g,"`~.. ~~
.:
5~~~
v
',e'~,s,~ .
k"~.,
'-o~`*~F
''~~ fti..ev R „"ICES ~ ~L; .'
'i
~z. "^t ~h~~
'
,,~`~`~ a ~
,"3 *:`5
i
~
~~ 5 -~n_. 'sh,,'"~'
.
ax
t'`
'
~
~
~~
.,i~.^
.`~7 i "'~~~.^~~
~iw; ~"'~°`*° hC ~~ ~~~
'a
'
"
`t
h
~ ~
~
~
.
.
?:f
..
~+' h
..v
Y
'~n`.~C,?. A~*.`5'*. '~'T`
. J*°~ 'w "".~
~S"~y~"c,(~~
~~.'w' a ~~h"+.., t~.\ '~~UR~' ~~~"S
"fi '"'ev'*"-~~,y
.~.;
'.
'~ a
~1G
v
m
`"
'-.
`~
'
l
'
a
~
~
,s>r'.s~,
*a~
x
ra,
'ti:nSS"^ •^raa~'`
`-.~ 3 '^~"~ ~
:•~
*
3 6 3 A
~"
~
~~~
-
'S* k
,
,
.
'.i 'i.
~ `
:
c'r ,
.
..,~-
"~. e' S
.. ~ ate' "'
b
~+
~ ~ `
"M"me
•
N
~
~
`P
~
'~-CC %r
'
~
"
~
~ ~"~
9 u
~
~
-
ani
S
~ k
_~
~e~3.~u`.-.-1~',v.._x _yw~ ..~ •-n
.
•
.'~w
Affordable Housing
~ +"
~`
.
V~
A
`
t
Y.4c~
ci,
.~,..'. `.1.
x
~ _~. f '~ .
~n'3
~ '~~?...+..~.a~~'~
C. \,=..~ ~
n
.
~_
~ ~=v `
1~~.e
~.
_
~ ~__._,_~ _,. Y
Civic Center Parks and Public Facilities ~
Planning and Design ~ X
Palisades Garden Walk (and TOwn Square) X 3Final design by 2010; environmental review 2010; start of construction 2011
33
Civic Auditorium Renovation ~ X 3Final design by 2011; start of construction 2013
d
Civic Auditorium District Project (park and more) X Final design by 2011; start construction 2013-
Early Childhood Education Center ~ X ~ Final design by 2012; start construction 2013 '~.
~500'widening of McClure Tunnel-foal concept design by 2011;environmental
Freeway Capping 1 X ~review.2012; start construction 2014
Final concept design by 2010; environmental review by 2012; start construction
Expo Green Streets and Pathways f X 12012
Santa Monica High School Joint Use 7
j
Phase 1(Alternative 1-Football Field/Stadium/Parking/Olympn: ~
Access/Promenade) ~ X Final design by 2009; start construction 2012
Phasel(Alternative 2-Gyms/Pool/Soccer Complex) X 1Final design by 2010; start construction 2013
Phase 2 (Baseball Field/Softball Field/Field House/Greek Stage) ; X ~ Final design by 2011; start construction 2014
Shared Parking
..
.,
,.
.
_
._ ~ X t
..
~-.-
._
.
_
_._
. _ _ _..__ ._ .. _._~.._ .
~,
Downtown Parking Strategic Plan M
~
,z~,
Y j
Parking Structures Design and Construction X 31ncludes demolition and new construction of
arkin
structures 1 and 6
p
g
Property ACgwsrtmn i X ~~~
Commercial Corridor Enhancements ~
Lincoln Boulevard Enhancements X ~COnceptual design 2011; foal design 2013 and start constuction 2014
a
Pico Boulevard Enhancements ~ X ~Conreptual design 2011; foal design 2013 and start <onstuttion 2014
~-~
-
~
~ _.
~ ,
~ _ _= ~_ ~N
Traffic Signal Master Plari ~
Phase IV-Mid City/OP Blvd/Main j X 3 Concept design by 2011; final design by 2012; start construction 2012
Phase V Northern Section of City ~ X $ Concept design by 2010; final design by 2010; start construction 2011
i
__
m,.-a.___ __ _
_-.r
3The master plan for the Memorial Park Expansion could by completed_by 2012,
Memorial Park Expansion X with redevelopment funding.
Implementation of the master plan assumes that a new site for the City's
~ Community Maintenance facility has been identifed, in which case construction
X tof Phase 1 improvements could commence 6y 2014
Infrastructure Improvements
Pier Infrastructure Improvements K :Final design by 2009; start of construction 2009-2010
Z
3 Assuming library is located at Virginia Library Park--foal design by 2010; start
Pico Neighborhood Branch Library X sof construction 2011
Beach Bike Path Widening ? X Final design by 2010; start <onstruttion 2011
t
Citywide Tree Planting
X ^~Complete all work by 2010
1
Bike Transit Center
X ~ Final design by 2010 and start construction 2010
4
Exposition Light Rail Station Enhancements X j Final design by 2013; start of construction 2013-2014
Streetlight Retrofit/Replacement X EComplete all work by 2012
~® City Council and
~~LY at Redevelopment Agency Report
Santa Monica
City Council and Redevelopment Agency Meeting: April 14, 2009
Agenda Item: ~"~
To: Mayor and City Council
Chairperson and Redevelopment Agency
From: Andy Agle, Director of Housing and Economic Development
Carol Swindell, Director of Finance
Subject: Redevelopment Agency Capital Funding Priorities
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency and City Council approve
redevelopment funding priorities for capital improvement programs.
Executive Summary
In preparation for the FY 09/10 Budget, as well as the Redevelopment Agency's Five-
Year Implementation Plan for 2010 - 2015, staff recommends that the City Council
adopt refined funding priorities- and preliminary funding commitmerits to allow key
capital projects to continue forward. Approximately. $1:27 billion dollars of projects are
potentially eligible for Redevelopment Agency funding. The Agency's total debt capacity
through 2014 is estimated to range from $283 million to $313 million. This report
discusses redevelopment funding considerations and community needs that are
potentially eligible for redevelopment funding and makes recommendations regarding
long-term capital funding priorities. Staff seeks Council direction on which projects
should be included in funding plans for the Redevelopment Agency.
Background
Within the Earthquake Recovery Redevelopment Project Area, the Agency's largest
project area, tax increment funds can be collected through 2042. While the Agency is
able to collect tax increment through 2042, it must issue or commit all debt obligations
by July 21, 2014. As a result,. the City has been refining capital programs and their
associated costs. On April 8, 2008, the Agency confirmed its long-term priorities
regarding capital programs to be funded with redevelopment funds, as follows:
1
• Affordable Housing
• Civic Center Parks and Public Facilities
• Downtown Parking Strategy
• Traffic Signal Master Plan
• Memorial Park Expansion
• Commercial Corridor Improvements
Infrastructure Improvements
In addition, City Council directed staff to review whether proposed improvements at
Santa Monica High School could be eligible for redevelopment funding. To accelerate
the planning and design of the capital programs, the Council approved creating and
funding positions in the Community and Cultural Services, Public Works and Planning
- and Community Development departments. To date, each .department has hired
supplemental staff and work efforts to expedite the capital programs have commenced.
The next step for the programs is project design, cost estimating and implementation. A
status update concerning each program is provided in Attachment B.
Given the 2014 deadline for establishing Agency debt, as well as the. pending FY
2009/2010 City budget and the need to adopt aFive-Year Agency Implementation Plan
by the end of 2009, staff has reviewed all proposed City capital improvements, as well
as the joint-use improvements proposed at Santa Monica High School, to assess
eligibility for redevelopment funding, consistency with the Redevelopment Plan and
consistency with the City Council's funding priorities. Of the $1.4 billion in City capital
needs, as well as the $235 million in funding formally requested for joint-use
improvements at Santa Monica High School, approximately $1.27 billion in capital
projects appear to be eligible for redevelopment funding, provided that certain state-
mandated findings can be made and requirements can be satisfied.
In order to frame the Council's consideration of Agency funding priorities, Public
Resources Advisory Group (PRAG), the Agency's financial advisor, has prepared an
updated estimate of the Earthquake Redevelopment Project Area's debt capacity
(including pay as you go projects), excluding housing set-aside funds, over the next five
years (see Attachment C). Using various debt structures, PRAG estimates a Project
Area debt capacity of $283 million to $313 million, depending on assumptions regarding
2
the State's continuing efforts to appropriate local redevelopment funds. The debt
capacity estimate is based on relatively conservative projections of growth in assessed
valuation to reflect the current state of the real estate economy and the City's past
experience with real estate downturns. The $283 million debt capacity estimate
assumes permanency of the State take-away that was implemented during the current
fiscal year. Since the Project Area has a limit on tax allocation bonds of $95 million, the
debt would need to be structured in other ways in order to borrow more than that
amount. The debt could take. the form of lease revenue bonds through the General
Fund or other funding mechanisms to leverage the Agency's tax increment. It may not
be possible to borrow the full projected capacity without negatively affecting the City's
AAA bond rating, and therefore RDA borrowing under a lease revenue structure may
need to be balanced against other City borrowing needs. As the long-term priority
projects are further defined to the point of becoming project-ready, a recommended
debt structure for each project will be prepared. Going forward, the City's and Agency's
ability to access debt will be impacted by several factors, including the state of the real
estate and credit markets, the City and Agency's assessed valuation of real property,
and expected impacts of debt financing on the City's credit rating. Given the 2014
deadline for the Agency to incur debt, the City and the Agency will need to explore
various financing mechanisms, including lease revenue bonds, bank financing,
cooperation agreements and reimbursement agreements.. Some of the financing
instruments, such as cooperation agreements, could be structured to provide for greater
flexibility in the event that the actual growth in tax increment is higher than debt-
financing estimates allow.
Discussion
With the pending preparation of the FY 2009/2010 City budget and the. Five-Year
Redevelopment Agency Implementation Plan, staff seeks City Council direction on
refined Agency funding priorities and commitments. Staff has prepared funding
recommendations for Council consideration. In considering the Agency's funding
capabilities, staff recommends that preliminary allocations be considered relative to the
$283 million debt capacity estimate. Although, the Agency's ultimate debt capacity
3
could be greater if the State take-away does not become permanent, or if tax increment
grows more quickly than estimated, it is also possible that the debt capacity could be
lower if the State take-away is increased or assessed values decline. The $283 million
is the most reasonable- estimate at this time for consideration of funding
recommendatiohs.
In evaluating the $1.27 billion in capital projects that are potentially eligible for
Redevelopment funding, staff has reviewed proposed projects according to the following
criteria (see Attachment A):
• Advances Redevelopment Agency goals and priorities
• Advances City Council-adopted Community Priorities
• Satisfies long-standing, unmet community needs
• Creates facilities that can be maintained and operated in the long-term
• Leverages funding from other sources
Advances a prior City investment
On that basis, staff recommends that Council approve the following preliminary funding
allocations, to be reflected in upcoming budgets and plans (see Attachment D):
- Affordable Housing
Funding the production and preservation of affordable housing is $ 10 Million
required of all redevelopment agencies. Santa Monica has historically
funded these activities at a level higher than required by State law in
order to support community priorities related to housing accessibility,
homelessness and economic diversity, and to achieve compliance with
voter-mandated outcomes related to housing diversity. In addition to
the $75 million line of credit that has. already been .established for
affordable housing, an additional $34 million is expected to be available
from the Earthquake Project Area Affordable Housing Set-Aside. Staff
recommends that the Council continue to dedicate all net available
funds from the Ocean Park and Downtown Redevelopment projects
areas to affordable housing, in addition to the required set-aside funds,
which is expected to total $12 million. Staff recommends that an
additional amount from the Earthquake Recovery Project Area. non-
. housing funds be allocated to affordable housing.
4
- Civic Center Parks and Public Facilities
The City adopted the first incarnation of the Civic Center Specific Plan in
1993, followed by amendments in 2000 and 2005. The anticipated arrival
of the Exposition Light Rail, as well as Santa Monica High School Master
Plan, creates exciting opportunities to enhance integration among the Civic
Center, Downtown and High School. The City Council discussed these
opportunities at a study session on March 24. 2009.
Allocations are recommended for specific components of the greater Civic
Center area plan:
Planning and Design:
Palisades Garden Walk: The Civic Center Specific Plan envisions the
creation of a six-acre park and its surrounding streetscape across from
City HaII and The Village, which would result in a net new addition of
park space to the City's open space system and provide critical
pedestrian links. The proposed allocation potentially could be leveraged
with outside grant funds.
Civic Auditorium Adaptive Reuse and Renovation: The Civic Center
Specific Plan and Cultural Capital envision the Auditorium as a
rehabilitated cultural gem with additional cultural amenities. Pursuant to
recent Council direction, staff is pursuing potential public-private
partnership opportunities. Under any scenario, a capital contribution
toward the Auditorium's rehabilitation is anticipated.
$2.5 Million
$25 Million
$25 Million
Civic Auditorium District Projects: The Civic Cehter Specific Plan $21 Million
envisions a 5.6-acre park, anew cultural facility as envisioned in
Creative Capital and the more recent joint use study of the Samohi and
Civic Auditorium campuses, surrounding streetscapes and pedestrian
linkages that complement the Civic Auditorium's programs.
Early .Childhood Education Center: The Civic Center Specific Plan $3.4 Million
envisions a center serving infants, toddlers and pre-school age children
that complements the form and activities of the Civic Auditorium District.
The proposed allocation would support necessary utility and site work to
facilitate development of the center by Santa Monica College with
approved Bond funds.
Freeway Capping: The Downtown/Civic Center strategy, as well as the $2 Million
LUCE, Open Space Element and Civic Center Specific Plan, envision
decking the I-10 freeway. The proposed allocation could be used to
address the connection between Palisades Garden Walk and
Downtown, or could serve as a local match for outside grants to pursue
5
broader capping opportunities.
Expo Green Streets and Pathways: The tremendous increase in $20.9 Million
pedestrian volumes generated by the Expo terminus station creates the
need for new circulation improvements, including widening Colorado
Avenue sidewalks and creating alternatives to relieve pressure from
Fourth Street and Colorado Avenue The proposed allocation could
facilitate the minimum necessary circulation improvements and/or could
be used to leverage other funding.
Santa Monica High School Joint Use Project: While not a part of the $46 Million
adopted Civic Center Specific Plan, the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified
School District (SMMUSD) has developed a broad plan to overhaul
Santa Monica High School. The plan includes the Michigan Avenue
pedestrian concourse to facilitate public access through the campus and
new or redeveloped recreational and cultural facilities that the broader
community could access when not needed by the high school. The
proposed allocation could be leveraged with other funding sources. A
primary concern with the creation of new joint-use facilities is the City's
long-term ability to provide the necessary operating funds for staffing
and maintenance to support the community's use during non-school
hours.
Shared Parking: Several of the cost estimates for projects in the Civic $25 Million
Center, including the Santa Monica High .School Joint Use Project,
assume that underground parking will be incorporated into the projects.
Pursuant to Council direction, staff is currently completing ashared-use
parking analysis in order to ensure that parking is strategically placed to
be shared among the various destinations, instead of being overbuilt in
separate locations. Rather than funding individual parking for each
project, staff recommends an allocation for shared parking among the
projects.
- Downtown Parking Strategic Plan
.The City Council formally adopted the Downtown Parking Strategic Plan in
2005, following several years of consideration by aCouncil-appointed task
force. Implementation of the plan supports the Community Objective related
to infrastructure and addresses parking needs, one of the top issues
consistently identified in the biannual resident survey.
Parking Design and Construction: The plan anticipates that the City $1 Million
will make a contribution of $18 million toward parking structure design
and construction that is equivalent to what the Agency would otherwise
have spent on seismic retrofitting of three parking structures; $17 million
of Parking Authority funds are estimated to be available based on
6
PRAG's debt capacity analysis for the Parking Authority and the Agency
is recommended to contribute the balance.
ProperEyAcquisition: An allocation for property acquisition purposes is $27 Million
recommended to ensure that the City is able to implement the parking
program. If properties purchased are not needed for the parking
program, they could be used for other community purposes such as
affordable housing or open space.
- Commercial Corridor Improvements
The LUCE planning process has identified the need for improvements to
key commercial corridors in Santa Monica. Enhancements to the corridors
could include streetscape improvements, shared parking strategies, fagade
improvements, etc. Two of the highest priorities identified through the
LUCE process are Lincoln and Pico Boulevards.
Lincoln Boulevard Enhancements: As a key gateway to Santa $9 Million
Monica and the Earthquake Recovery Redevelopment Area, Lincoln
Boulevard and the surrounding neighborhoods would benefit from a
comprehensive strategy to enhance the boulevard. The recommended
allocation could be used to leverage public and private funds.
Pico Boulevard Enhancements: While streetscape improvements $9 Million
were completed along Pico Boulevard in the last decade, Pico
Boulevard and the surrounding neighborhoods would benefit from
additional strategies to enhance the boulevard. The recommended
allocation could be used to leverage public and private funds for these
improvements.
- Traffic Signal Master Plan
Addressing traffic congestion is consistently rated as one of the highest
priorities in the biannual resident survey, and the Community Priorities also
address the need to upgrade aging Infrastructure. City, Agency and
regional transportation funds have financed Phases I -III of the Traffic
Signal Master Plan. An allocation to complete the final Phases is
recommended.
Phase IV: Portions of 11th, 14th, 17th, 20th 30th Streets, Broadway Ave., $2.4 Million
Cloverfield Blvd., Colorado Ave., Michigan Ave., Ocean Park Blvd.,
Olympic Blvd.
Phase V: Portions of 7th Street, 30thStreet, Montana Ave., and Ocean $3 Million
Ave.
7
- Memorial Park Expansion
In 2004, the City invested $18.5- million to purchase the 2.9 acre Fisher $15 Million
Lumber site, at 1601 14th Street which is adjacent to Memorial Park, with
the intention that the additional property could enhance recreational
opportunities and potential water infrastructure needs, supporting
Community Priorities related to Youth, Sustainability; Infrastructure and
Recreation and Active Living. Park expansion is also supported by the
goals of the City's Open Space Element and Parks and Recreation Master
Plan. In addition to park development costs, project implementation
considerations include the need to relocate the .City's Community
Maintenance Yard from the potential park expansion site (former Fisher
Lumber site) and the need to provide for ongoing maintenance of an
enlarged park.
- Infrastructure Improvements
Other infrastructure improvement projects that are being recommended are
as follows:
Pier Infrastructure Improvements: Investing in the core infrastructure $11 Million
of the Pier supports the continued operation and safety of the landmark
attraction for residents and visitors.
Pico Neighborhood Library: Creation of a neighborhood library ih the $12.8 Million
Pico neighborhood has gained strong community backing. Anew
branch library would support Community Priorities related to Youth,
Education and Infrastructure. A primary challenge in considering a new
library is the on-going costs to operate and maintain the facility.
Beach Path Widening: Staff is pursuing grant funding to allow for $1 Million
separate bike and pedestrian paths north of the Santa Monica Pier. The
recommended allocation would allow for a local match as well as an
opportunity to address the significant bicycle and pedestrian path
conflicts that occur on the existing path north of the Pier to the northern
boundary of Santa Monica State Beach immediately adjacent to the
Pier.
Citywide Tree Planting: The recommended allocation would support $.3 Million
street tree planting within the Redevelopment Area.
Bike Transit Center: The recommended allocation would leverage $.2 Million
other grant funds that have been allocated to the project.
Exposition Light Rail Station Enhancements: Creating high-quality $10 Million
station areas will be critical to the success of light rail transit in Santa
Monica. The recommended allocation could leverage other public and
8
private funds in the creation of world-class station areas.
Streetlight Retrofit: The recommended allocation would address the $.3 Million
safety and reliability of a core infrastructure that serves the project area.
In addition to the allocation of funding relative to the Agency's currently estimated debt
capacity, the Council may wish to identify additional projects that could be considered if
the State take-away is not permanent or if assessed valuation within the Project Area
grows more quickly than expected.
Next Steps
The City Council and Agency-funding priorities will be reflected in the City's Capital
Improvement Program for FY 2009-10 through 2013-14, the City's FY 2009-10 budget,
and the Agency's Implementation Plan to be considered later this year. Staff will
continue to explore debt instruments to maximize funding. If the Council approves
funding for Santa Monica High School joint-use improvements, staff will work with
School District representatives on requirements and agreements related to such
funding.
Financial Impacts & Budget Actions
All budget actions resulting from these funding commitments will be included in the FY
2009-2010 Proposed Budget and any approved funding commitments beyond this fiscal
year will be appropriated each fiiscal year thereafter.
9
Prepared by:
Tina Rodriguez, Redevelopment Administrator
Approved:
~X,
Andy~le, Director _'
Housing and Economic Development
Approved:
~~ ~1 ~ Fsz~
Carol Swindell, Director
Finance
Attachments:
to Council:
i /vv
P. ont Ewell
City Manager
Attachment A: Redevelopment Eligible Projects
Attachment B: Status Update on Redevelopment Priority Programs
Attachment C: Summary of Debt Capacity Estimates
Attachment D: Summary of Recommended Funding Allocations
10
PROJECT TITLE
Equipment Replacement
City T.V. Studio
Civic AuditoriumNVAC Upgrades
Fire PersonalProtective Equipment Replacement
Fire Radio Infrastructure Replacement
Fire Vehicle Replacement Program
Municipal Trunked Radio Comm
Purchase Building for City TV
Refuse Container Replacement
Vehicle Replacement
Vehicles -New Solid Waste
TOTAL
Facilities:
City TV Studio -Adelphia Funds
Civic Auditorium Carpet Replacement
Civic Auditorium Chair Replacement
Civic Auditorium District Projects*
Civic Auditorium Repairs
Civic Center - ECEC*
Civic Center Project Planning - CCS*
Colorado Yard Replacement
Council Chamber Meeting Mgmt & AV Upgrade
Facilities Renewal Program
New Fire Station #1
Newcomb Pier Improvements
Ocean Park Library Renovation
Pico Neighborhood Library -Option 1
Attachment A oa/o~/zoos
S of7
REDEVELO PMENT ELIGIBLE PROJECTS
2009-2014 Capital Need Total
Five -Year
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Need
1,500,000 0 0 0 0 1,500,000
505,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 605,000
65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 65,000 - 325,000
100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000
625,100. 645,000 736,800 747,200 751,100 3,505,200
7,000,000 0 0 0 0- 7,000,000
3,200,000 0 0 0 0 3,200,000
525,000 525,000 620,000 620,000 732,500 3,022,500
4,379,180 4,475,423 - 4,387,623 4,386,172 4,392,760 22,021,158
293,800 169,500 372,900 334,500 113,500 1,284,200
18,193,080 6,004,923 6,307,323 6,277,872 6,179,860 42,963,058
1,500,000 0 0 0 0 1,500,000
200,000 0 200,000. 0 0 400,000
0 180,000 0 0 0 180,000
0 16,592,000 126,420,000 54,307,000 0 197,319,000
200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000
0, 215,000 3,175,000 0 0 3,390,000
2,500,000 0 0 0 0 2,600,OQ0
0 3,068,032 22,254,512 22,254,512 0 47,577,056
445,000 0 0 0 0 445,000
3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 15,000,000
5,149,000 5,149,000 5,149,000 5,149,000 5,149,000 25,745,000
2,800,000 2,052,000 1,753,000 1,333,000 330,000 8,268,000
0 0 29,801 508,971 0 538,772
704,933 11,237,684 862,803 0 0 12,805,420
*Projects identified as candidates for RDA funding
Attachment A
REDEVELOPMENT ELIGIBLE PROJECTS
2009-2014 Capital Need
PROJECT TITLE
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012
04/07/2009
2of7
Total
Five -Year
2012-2013 2013-2014 Need
Pico Neighborhood Library-Option 2* 17,673,076 11,277,101 862,803 0 0 29,812,980
Pier Infrastructure Improvements 2,964,000 0 0 0 0 2,964,000
Promenade Facility Maintenance 200,000 210,000 220,000 230,000 240,000 1,100,000
Public Safety Storage Facility* 4,999,600 0 0 0 0 4,999,600
Reactivation of Fire Com Center 94,650 0 0 0 0 94,650
Recarpeting Brach Libraries 0 95,830 0 0 0 95,830
Recycling and Solid Waste Drop Off Center 1,000,000 12,000,000 0 0 0 13,000,000
Senior Recreation Cntr & KEC Use Study 0 165,000 0 0 0 165,000
Structural Evaluation of Fire Station 3* 150,007 0 0 0 0 150,007
Woodlawn Cemetery Mausoleum Electrical Repair 170,000 0 0 0 0 170,000
Woodlawn Cemetery Irrigation System Upgrades 130,000 0 0 0 0 130,000
Woodlawn Cemetery Sewer Replacement 240,000 0 0 0 0 240,000
TOTAL with Library Option 1 24,747,190 54,164,546 163,264,116 86,982,483 8,919,000 337,697,335
TOTAL with Library Option 2 41,715,333 54,203,963 163,264,116 86,982,483 8,919,000 354,704,895
Housing:.:
City Wide Housing Trust 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000
HOME Housing Trust 475,000 475,000 475,000 475,000 475;000 2,375,000
Housing Projects 1,529,000 1,529,000 1,529,000 1,529,000 1,529,000 ~ 7,645,000
Low /Moderate Income Housing -Downtown RDA 247,000 251,000 368,000 429,000 437,000 1,732,000
Low /Moderate Income Housing -Earthquake RDA 10,513,586 7,646,508 ~ 8,179,586 8,718,820 9,297,208 44,355,708
Low /Moderate Income Housing-Ocean Park RDA 282,600 294,100. 305,300 316,200 328,700 1,526,900
TORCAAffordableHousingTrust 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000
TOTAL 13,647,186 10,795,608 11,456,886 12,068,020 12,666,908 60,634,608
* Projects identified as candidates for RDA funding
Attachment A
REDEVELOPMENT ELIGIBLE PROJECTS
2009-2014 Capital Need
PROJECT TITLE 2009-2010
Parks
Beach Bike Path Widening* 1,000,000
Beach Restrooms 600,000
Beach Volleyball Court Replacement* 115,000
Civic Center Freeway Capping* 250,000
Civic Center Freeway Capping Option 1 * 0
Civic Center Freeway Capping Option 2* 0
Civic Center Freeway Capping Option,3* 0
Civic Center Palisades Garden Walk* 5,290,000
Crescent Bay Park Rehab* 0
Memorial Park Freeway Capping* - 0
Memorial Park Master Plan* 300,000
Par Course Equipment* 0
Park Fencing* 360,180
Playground Shade* 182,000
Retaining Wall for Joslyn & Los Amigos Parks* 380,000
Shotgun.House Preparation* 38,000
Signage and way finding for beach & parks 75,000
Universally Accessible Playgrounds* 0
TOTAL with Freeway Capping Option 1 8,590,180
TOTAlwith Freeway Capping Option 2 8,590,180
TOTAL with Freeway Capping Option 3 8,590,180
2010-2011 2011-2012
04/07/2009
3 of7
Total
Five -Year
2012-2013 2013-2014 Need
3,000,000 0 0 0 4,000,000
0 0 0 0 600,000
115,000 0 0 0 230;000
150,000 350,000 600,000 0 1,350,000
0 0 0 2,000,000 2,000,000
0 0 0 57,000,000 57,000,000
0 0 0 165,000,000 - 165,000,000
270,000 70,684,000 3,601,000 0 79,845,000
0... 0 0 2,778,797 2,778,797
75,000 300,000 750,000 182,000,000 183,125,000
1,160,000 19,550,000 0 0 21,010,000
0 0 0 125,000 125,000
0 0 0 0 360,180
135,000 0 0 0 317,000
210,000 0 0 0 590,000
0 0 0 0 38,000
75,000 75,000 0 0 225,000
100,000 50;000 500,000 0 650,000
5,290,000 91,009,000 5,451,000 186,903,797 297,243,977
5,290,000 91,009,000 5,451,000 241,903,797 352,243,977
5,290,000 91,009,000 5,451,000 349,903,797 460,243,977
* Projects identified as candidates for RDA funding
PROJECT TITLE
Streets/Sidewalks& Traffic -
1550 Palisades Beach Road (PCH) Signal
7th Street Bridge*
Additional Tree Planting*
Airport Slurry Seal & Re-Stripe
Annual Alley Improvement Program
ATMS Phase V*
ATMS Playa Vista
ATMS Special Office District Funds -Phase 4
ATMS Traffic Signal Timing Plans*
Bicycle Racks*.
Bicycle Technology Demonstration Project - MTA
Bike Transit Center-Grant Funded
Bike Transit Centex-Unfunded
Bike/Ped Wayfinding Signage
Borderline Neighborhood Improvements
Bus Pads on Transit Routes -Prop A
Civic Center Bridge Alternatives*
Civic Center Fujinamiya Douri Extension*
Cloverfield Replacement Lighting*
Colorado Ave. Streetscape*
Lincoln Corridor Strategy & Improvements
Crosswalk Repair
Downtown Strategic Parking Enhancement Program*
Expo/Bergamot Station*
Expo/Downtown Station*
Expo/Memorial Park Station*
Attachment A o4imizoo9
4 of7
REDEVELO PMENT ELIGIBLE PROJECTS
2009-2014 Capital N eed total
Five -Year
2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Need
0 300,000 0 0 0 300,000
0 50,000 150,000 600,000 11,500,000 12,300,000
650,000 50,000 50,000 0 0 7$0,000
250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,250,000
2,303,982 2,373,101 2,444,294 2,517,623 2,593,452 12,232,452
0 3,000,000 0 0 0 3,000,000
636,000 0 0 0 0 636,000
5,000,000 0 0 0 0 5,000,000
50,000 50,000 50,000 0 0 150,000
100,000 100,000 100,000. 100,000 100,000 500,000
240,000 85,000 0 0 0 325,000
2,253,000 50,000 0 0 0 2,303,000
320,000 0 0 0 0 320,000
100,000 250,000 0 0 0 350,000
3,410,000 0 0 0 0 3,410,000
300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000. 1,500,000
50,000 450,000 500,000 500,000 10,000,000 11,500,000
15,000 .100,000 75,000 1,550,000 0 1,740,000
623,000 0 0 0 0~ 623,000
75,000 150,000 400,000 600,000 7,400,000 8,625,000
0 3,000,000 0 0 9,000,000 12,000,000
78,000 78,000 ~ 75,000 78,000 78,000 390,000
11,000,000 6,000,000 88,240,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 .117,240,000
100,000 _ 250,000 500,000 5,000,000 0 5,850,000
100,000 250,000 600,000 8,000,000 0 8,950,000
100,000 250,000 500,000 2,000,000 11,000,000 13,850,000
* Projects identified as candidates for RDA funding
PROJECT TITLE
I-10/4th Street/Olympic Blvd. improvements*
Ocean Park Blvd Improvements (Lincoln to Neilson)
Parking Lot Maintenance (Airport)
Parking Meter Debit Card System
Parking Meter Replacement & Coin Repair
Pico Blvd. Corridor Improvements*
Real Time Beach Parking Signs*
Real Time Beach Parking Signs -MTA
Santa Monica Blvd. Street Resurfacing
Security Enhancement Project
Signing & Striping Plan Preparation
Southside Improvement Project
Street & Parking Lot Resurfacing/ Sidewalk Repair
Street Light Retrofit*
Traffic Signal LED Replace & Countdown
Traffic Signal Synchronization*
Traffic Signal Synchronization -MTA
Westside Ped Imp @ Bus Stops
Wireless Parking Meter Pilot
TOTAL
Technology
Alert Notification System
Broadband Wireless Network
Computer Disaster Recovery
Computer Equipment Replacement Program
Computer Network Maintenance -
Integrated Library System
Attachment A
REDEVELOPMENT ELIGIBLE PROJECTS
2009-2014 Capital Need
2009-2010
2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013
oa/o~/zoos
S of7
Total
Five -Year
2013-2014 Need
0 200,000 0 0 0 200,000
3,000,000 3,000,000 0 0 0 6,000,000
50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000
100,000 0 0
~ 0 0 100;000
101,400 101,400 2,100,000 37,000. 37,000 2,376,800
250,000 150,000 200,000 400,000 8,000,000 9,000,000
250,000 0 0 0 0 250,000
401,000 66,000 0 0 0 467,000
357,333 0 0 0 0 357,333
70,000 70,000 0 0 0 140,000
70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 350,000
100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000
5,239,650 5,247,555 5,255,430 5,263,365 5,271,270 26,277,270
3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,000,000. .3,000,000 15,000,000
160,000 160,000 1fi0,000 160,000 160,000 800,000
2,367,000 :0 0. 0 0 2,367,000
0 0 264,000 669,000 0 933,000
0 0 0 1,600,000 0 1,600,000
0 105,000 0 0 0 105,000
43,270,365 29,706,056 105,436,724 38,844,988 74,909,722 292,167,855
125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 625,000
450,000 0 0 0 0 450,000
445,000 0 0 0 0 445,000
1,602,410 1,089,555 1,089,956 1,089,957 1,089,958 5,961,836
55,250 55,250 55,250 55,250 55,250 276,250
344,060 0 0 ~ 0 0 344,060
* Projects'identified as candidates for RDA funding
Attachment A
REDEVELOPMENT ELIGIBLE PROJECTS
2009-2014 Capital Need
PROJECT TITLE 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014
Meet Me Room 5,000,000 ~ 0 0 0 0
Preferential Parking System Tech Imp 85,000 0 0 0
Telecommunication Services - 716,644 716,644 716,644 716,644 716,644
TOTAL 8,823,364 1,986,449 1,986,850 1,986,851 1,986,852
Utilities
Arcadia Reservoir Roof Replacement 8,580,000
A81600SewerExpansion 375,000
Analysis of non-Potable Water Dist. Sys. 100,000
Hanson 8 Software Upgrade 150,000
Hyperion Capital Payment 3,948,030
San Vicente Water Boost Station Generator 400,000
Title 22 SMURRF Upgrades 0
Underground Tank Management 462,587
Vertical Asset Mgmt Plan -Wastewater 0
Wastewater Main Replacement 300,000
Water Main Replacement 925,000
Water Main Replacement -Force Account 500,000
Advanced Fleet Mgmt System 1,000,000
TOTAL 16.740.617
0 0
500,000 500,000
0 0
0 0
4,938,030 4,989,330
0 0
2,500,000 0
242,587 242,345
500,000 0
500,000 500,000
1,000,000 1,500,000
500,000 500,000
0 0
10,680,617 .8,231,675
04/07/2009
6of7
Total
Five -Year
Need
5,000,000
85,000
3,583,220
16,770,366
0 0 8,580,000
500,000 500,000 2,375,000
0 0 100,000
0 0 150,000
3,139,110 2,709,450 19,723,950
0 0 400,000
0 0 2,500,000
328,409 132, 319 1,408,247
0 0 500,000
500,000 500,000 2,300,000
1,500,000 1,500,000 6,425,000
500,000 500,000 2,500,000
0 0 1,000,000
6,467,519 5,841,769 - 47,962,197
* Projects identified as candidates for RDA funding
Attachment A
REDEVELOPMENT ELIGIBLE PROJECTS
2009-2014 Capital Need
PROJECT TITLE 2009-2010
Transit
AdvacnedFleet Management Program
Bus Components Replacement Program
Bus Replacement Program
Bus Stop Amenities
Campus Expansion Project
Downtown Transit Mall
Facility Upgrade and Renovation
Farebox System
Prop 1B Safety and Security
Safety & Security Project
Service Vehicles
Shop Equipment
Technology Equipment
Telecommunication Services
Transit Center Project
Universal Fare System
Yard Improvement
TOTAL
2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014
oa/m/zoos
~or~
Total
Five -Year
Need
1,000,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000
2,895,000 5,450,000 3,780,000 4,835,000 4,595,000 21,555,000
16,222,305 7,003,000 0 0 39,305,000 62,530,305
1,670,000 1,620,000 60,000 10,000 10,000 3,370,000
1,000,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,000
10,000 10,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 55,000
275,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,275,000
1,075,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 2,075,000 3,375,000
476,373 476,373 476,373 476,373 476,373 2,381,865
0 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000
0 460,000 80,000 0 0 540,000
60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 300,000
1,000,000 600,000 600,000 600,000 256,506 3,056,506
50,000 50,000 43,340 43,340 43,340 230,020
168,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 768,000
0 0 0 0 100,000 100,000.
400,000 400,000 400,000 200,000 200,000 1,600,000
Total with$23
Potentia6RDA Funded Projects: 64,080,796
RDA Funding
SMMUSD,
uded above:
69,312,785 323,546,606
93,490,000
to
480,382,797
1,433,942,082
1,597,322,082
1,265,778,974
* Projects identified as candidates for RDA funding
ATTACHMENT B
STATUS UPDATE ON REDEVELOPMENT PRIORITY PROGRAMS
Affordable Housing: The preservation and production of affordable housing has been
a top priority for Agency funds. At its April 22, 2008 meeting, the Agency authorized an
agreement with Bank of America to obtain a line of credit in the amount of $50,000,000
for purposes of accelerating affordable housing development, with an option to increase
the line of credit by an additional $25,000,000. This leveraging of-set-aside funds
enhances the City's ability to more immediately address the need for affordable housing
and avoid inflationary increases in land and construction costs. Historically, the Agency
has provided more than the 25 percent of its gross redevelopment tax increments and
over 40 percent of net available redevelopment revenues on affordable housing. The
Agency shall continue to fund affordable housing and whenever possible allocate
additional resources beyond the required 20 percent housing set-aside.
Civic Center Parks and Public Facilities: Extensive efforts to implement the Civic
Center Specific Plan have been made since its adoption in 2005. On June 10, 2008, a
significant milestone was achieved when the Agency adopted the resolutions approving
the DDA and Lease Agreement between the Agency and Related/Santa Monica Village,
LLC for the Village project, which features housing, neighborhood serving retail, open
space and additional public benefits that reflect the City's values and. policies toward
supporting affordable housing and child care, artist housing, alternative energy
production and sustainable design and transportation.
To continue moving the Civic Center program forward, redevelopment funding is
necessary to implement other key public improvements such as the design and
construction of the Palisades Garden Walk Park and the Early Childhood Education
Center and the rehabilitation and expansion of the landmark Civic Auditorium.
Additionally, with Redevelopment funds, the City will have the opportunity to transform
circulation patterns within the Civic Center and the Downtown by integrating efforts to
_~_
address the following objectives:
o Connecting the Civic Center and Downtown
o Creating a vibrant downtown LRT transit gateway
o Enhancing and expanding open space and park area
o Resolving circulation issues for pedestrians, bicycles, transit and. other vehicles
o Addressing parking needs comprehensively, identifying shared use opportunities.
The areas of focus are briefly described below.
• Connecting the Light Rail Station, Downtown and the Civic Center districts
together by widening the sidewalks along Colorado to create a green pedestrian
boulevard from the Expo light rail station to the Pier, beach and Civic Center by
removing one vehicle travel lane. This improvement would facilitate the
tremendous increase in pedestrian volume generating from the station.
• Modifying the circulation system through revisions to the street grid with the
creation of a new street to divert traffic away from the 4th and Colorado
intersection. This improvement would reduce conflicts with Big Blue Bus and
enhance circulation in the downtown and civic center.
Creating additional park and open space by decking the I-10 freeway for all or
part of the sections from Ocean Avenue to 4th Street, this improvement would
integrate the Colorado Avenue streetscape as the northern edge of Palisades
Garden Walk (PGW) and create a pedestrian promenade/axis from 2"d Street
across the deck and into PGW.
• Comprehensively evaluating parking needs to maximize shared use by
considering peak demand days, times, and fluctuations caused by events and
seasons. This effort would maximize the value of investment by evaluating joint
use opportunities for special events, Samohi, the Civic Center Auditorium, and
transit.
Enhancing cultural facilities through joint use opportunities with Samohi and
Civic Center Auditorium. The Santa Monica-Malibu School District, drawing on
the opportunity to connect its long-range plan to expand the Samohi campus with
revitalization efforts in the Civic Center, proposes to construct several new
improvements including apedestrian/bicycle promenade, recreational facilities
and amphitheater. Based on review of the School District's proposal, these
projects appear to be eligible for redevelopment funding, subject to the School
District's ability to meet certain Agency .requirements concerning ability to
demonstrate need for funding and findings of community benefit.
-2-
Downtown Parking Strategic Plan: In FY 08-09, Walker Parking initiated a study
concerning the pricing and operations of the downtown parking structures. The final
recommendations from this study will be presented to Council at a future date. City staff
has issued an RFP for the design and build of Parking Structure 1 and 6; award of
contract for the selected firm will be presented to Council in early FY 09/10; design work
is anticipated to commence in Fall 2009 and construction in FY 11/12. Bayside District
stakeholders have requested that the program address project enhancements, including
parking structure landscaping, signage and entrance lighting. This program also
includes funding for land acquisitions, purchase and installation of bicycle racks within
the downtown and in the newly constructed bicycle transit centers.
Traffic Signal Master Plan Implementation: This program features improvements to
synchronize traffic signals, modernize and install fiber optic communication to connect
every traffic signal at all the intersections onto the City's Advance Traffic Management
System, and the. installation of a traffic. signal to control northbound and southbound
traffic on PCH. Phase 1 and 2 of the program, which includes the traffic signals in the
downtown, portions of 4th street and Lincoln have been completed; Phase 3 is currently
underway and anticipated to be finished by Fall 2009; Phase 4a and 4b is anticipated to
be completed by Fall 2010.
Memorial Park Master Plan: The LUCE identifies Memorial Park as an "activities
center" with the park block serving as a catalyst for building a vital mixed-use
neighborhood. This direction, combined with the policies of the Open Space Element,
make the careful master planning of this block particularly significant. The first phase of
this project will be extensive community process to develop a long term master plan for
this 13.4 acre block bounded by 14th Street, 16th Street, Colorado Avenue and Olympic
Boulevard including the development of the programmatic vision for the property, a
phasing and financing plan, environmental review, and phased implementation including
identification of a site, design and construction of a permanent facilities for the
Community Maintenance uses that are currently occupying a portion of the property.
-3-
Commercial Corridor Improvements: To date, extensive community outreach for the
City's Land Use and Circulation Element have been conducted and the work related to
framework, design studies and improvement studies has commenced. Based on the
community's input, this program will include installation of pedestrian access ramps,
pedestrian barriers, and traffic signal modifications to increase pedestrian safety;
increased parking opportunities; expanded. public bus facilities; and strengthened street
connections.
Infrastructure Improvements: To evaluate which of the City's core infrastructure,
such as streets and sidewalks,. storm water facilities, and streets lights are in need- for
seismic upgrades and complete reconstruction, the Agency approved funding to
complete a full study of these needs. Studies of these needs are currently underway,
with the needs assessment for the City's existing streetlights, parks/beach signage and
wayfinding and bike/pedestrian wayfinding signage completed. The completed studies'
results recommend replacement of outdated circuits and light poles throughout the City,
implementation of new and improved signage and wayfinding for all parks .and the
beach, and commencement of signage strategy and plan development for bike/ped
wayfinding. Findings from the remaining assessment studies and related improvement
costs will be incorporated into the City's CIP program in the future.
-4-
ATTACHMENT C-SUMMARY OF DEBT CAPACITY ESTIMATES (Schedule 1)
CiTy of Santa Monica -Earthquake Redevelopment Area
Scenario: Base Case with Permanent ERAF
(Amounts in $000)
FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14
Taxable Value' 10,387,402 10,387,402 10,387,402 10,583,999 10,784,527 10,989,066
Base Year AV (3,867,833) (3,867,833) (3,567;833) (3,867,833) (3,867,833) (3,867,833)
Total Increment 6,519,569 6,519,569 6,519,569 6,716,166 6,916,694 7,121,233
Tax Rate 1.01286% 1.01095% 1.00906 % 1.00718% 1.00520 % 1.00520%
lax Increment Revenue 66,034 65,910 65,786 67,644 69,527 71,583
* Assumes real property AV growth rates of 0.0% 0.0 % 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%
current uebt Service. _ (890) (889) (890) (891) (890) (890)
Projected Debt Service (1) 0 (8,065) (8,065) (8,145) (8 145) (8 237)
Net Revenues 12,317 4,228 4,202 4,493 4,870 5,190
Other RDA Purposes
TI after Housing Set Aside 52,827 52,728 52,629 54,115 55,621 57,266
ERAF, Admin Fee, Pass Thru (22,395) (22,778) (23,087) (23,811) (24,545) (25,463)
SM CCD Repayment 378 377 377 392 407 424
Net Revenues 30,810 30,327 29,918 30,696 31,484 32,227
Current Debt Service (3,560) (3,557) (3,562) (3,562) (3,562) (3,558)
Projected Debt Service (2) 0 (3,656) (3,656) (3,978) (3 978) (4 346)
Net Revenues 27,250 23,115 22,701 23,156 23,944 24,323
Other Debt Obligations and Uses
Parking Obligation Debt Service (3,670) (3,670) (3,670) (3,670) (3,670) (3,670)
Projected LRB Debt Service (2) 0 (15,020) (15,020) (15,690) (15,690) (16,700)
RDA Administration Expenses (2,475) (2,636) (2,741) (2,843) (2,951) (3,065)
Net Revenues 21,105 1,788 1,270 953 1,633 889
Notes:
FY2009-14
Total FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14
(1) HOUSING
RDA Debt Proceeds 11,400 9,606 0 847 0 947
B of A Proceeds 75,000 75,000 0 0 0 0
HOUSING DEBT CAPACITY SUBTOTAL 86,400 84,606 0 847 0 947
Remaining for PAYGO 22,983 4,228 4,202 4,493 4,870 5,190
HOUSING TOTAL PROCEEDS 109,383 88,835 4,202 ~ 5,340 4,870 6,137
(2) OTHER
RDA Debt Proceeds 54,742 46,161 0 4,069 0 4,512
GF-backed LRB Proceeds 221;714 199,767 0 8,911 0 13,036
OTHER DEBT CAPACITY SUBTOTAL 276,455 245,928 0 12,980 0 17,548
Remaining for PAYGO 6,534 1,788 1,270 953 1,633 889
OTHER TOTAL PROCEEDS 282.989 247,717 1.270 13.933 1.633 18.436
Debt Assumptions Housing Other Bank Line GF Lease
Debt Debt of Credit Rev. Bonds
Interest Rate 7.50% 6.00% 4.70% 5.25%
Term (Years) 30 30 15 30
Target Min. Debt Service Coverage 125% 125% 125% 110
Max. Outstanding Principal n/a 95,000 75,000 n/a
ATTACHMENT C-SUMMARY OF DEBT CAPACITY ESTIMATES (Schedule 2)
City of Santa Monica -Earthquake Redevelopment Area
Scenario: Base Case with One-Time ERAF
(Amounts in $000)
FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14
Taxable Value` 10,387;402 10,387,402 - 10,387,402 10,583,999 10,784,527 10,989,066
Base Year AV - (3,867,833) (3,867,833) (3,867,833) (3,867,833) (3,867,833) (3,867,833)
Total Increment 6,519,569 6,519,569 6,519,569 6,776,766 6,976,694 7,127,233
Tax Rate 1.01266 % 1.01095 % 1.00906% 1.00718% 1.00520 % 1.00520%
Tax Increment Revenue 66,034 66,970 65,786 67,644 69,527 71,683
`Assumes real property AV growth rates of 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 2.0 % 2.0%
Projected Debt Service (1) 0 (8,065) (8,065) (8,145) (8,145) (8,237)
Net Revenues 12,317 4,228 4,202 4,493 4,870 5,190
Other RDA Purposes
TI after Housing Set Aside 52,827 52,728 52,629 54,115 55,621 57,266
ERAF, Admin Fee, Pass Thru (22,395) (22,778) (18,379) (19,111) (19,854) (20,650)
SM CCD Repayment 378 377 377 392 407 424
Net Revenues 30,810 30,327 34,627 35,396 36,175 37,040
Current Debi Service (3,560) (3,557) (3,562) (3,562) (3,562) (3,558)
Projected Debt Service (2) 0 (3,656) (3,656) (3,978) (3,978) (4,346)
Net Revenues 27,250 23,115 27,410 27,856 28,635 29,137
Other Debt Obligations and Uses
Parking Obligation Debt Service (3,670) (3,670) (3,670) - (3,670) (3,670) (3,670)
Projected LRB Debt Service (2) 0 (15,020) (15,020) (16,850) (16,850) (17,750)
Notes:
4,652
FY2009-14
Total FY 2009-10 FY 2010-11 FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14
(1) HOUSING
RDA Debt Proceeds - 11,400 9,606 0 847 0 947
B of A Proceeds 75,000 75,000 0 D 0 0
HOUSING DEBT CAPACITY SUBTOTAL 86,400 84,606 0 847 0 947
Remaining for PAYGO 22,983 4,228 .4,202 4,493 4,870 5,190
HOUSING TOTAL PROCEEDS 109,383 88,835 4,202 5,340 4,870 6,137
(2) OTHER --
RDA Debt Proceeds 54,742 46,161 0 4,069 0 4,512
GF-backed LRB Proceeds 235,722- 199,767 0 24,339 0 11,616
OTHER DEBT CAPACITY SUBTOTAL 290,464 245,928 0 28,408 0 16,128
Remaining for PAYGO - 22,076 1,788 5,979 4,493 5,164 4,652
OTHER TOTAL PROCEEDS 312,540 247,717 5,979 32,900 5,164 20,780
Deht Assumptions Housing Other Bank Line GF Lease
Debt Debt of Credit Rev. Bonds
Interest Rate 7.50% 6.00% 4.70% 5.25%
Term (Years) 30 30 15 30
Target Min. Debt Service Coverage 125% 125 % 125% 710
Max. Outstanding Principal n/a 95,000 75,000 n/a
ATTACHMENT D
Summary of Recommended Funding Allocations
RDA Eligible and Recommended
CIP Projects Recommended
Allocation (millions) Total :Funding
Request (millions)
Affordable Housing 1o N/A
Civic Center Parks and Public Facilities
Planning and Design 2.5 2.5
Palisades Garden Walk 25 80
Civic Auditorium Adaptive Reuse and Renovation 25 197
Civic Auditorium District Projects 21 39
Early Childhood Education Center 3.4 3.4
Freeway Capping 2 165
Expo Green Streets and Pathways 20.9 31.9
Santa Monica High School Joint Use 46 235
Shared Parking 25 100
Downtown Parking Strategic Plan ~
Parking Design and Construction 1 219
Property Acquisition 27 N/A
Commercial Corridor Enhancements
Lincoln Boulevard Enhancements 9 12
Pico Boulevard Enhancements 9 9
Signal Master Plan
~PhaselV I 2.4I I 2.4
Phase V
Memorial Park Master Plan 1s 2s
Infrastructure Improvements
Pier Infrastructure Improvements 11 11
Pico Neighborhood Branch Library 12.8 30
Beach Bike Path Widening 1 4
Citywide Tree Planting 0.3 0.75
Bike Transit Center 0.2 0.3
Exposition Light Rail Station Enhancements 10 29.7
Streetlight Retrofit /Replacement 0.3 15
$283
Z
n
Q.
e4
~ L
e
t®
r
~n O
F ~ ~ ^ ~ 4
n a ~~ w a ^a w ~
w
n
~~ f,. w ~ w " 6 ~ w
~-
ao ~ ~- O.; rOO ~ o ~ ~
h ~ ri Vl O ^ N .." ^ '~
~ w "a
w '7 a ~ ~ n n lJ~ ~ Ui
~u `C Cn ¢ J O „ y ~ O
~ ~~ .~ Cd
ti'
~~~~ ~•~ ~ rt o ~~
~G w '3 ^~ y n Y w rn ~
~ ~. v ~ b7
~ [Ip ~ A' ~ h ~ h
O
o ~ " P' ~ „'t ra ~
~` ~ ~ rt i ~
O- "~' Ort w ~ O N N ~N
m x ~. y ro o p_ ~.
w ~ rt '~ P-
S' y y y 0.~ P- n
N 2 O ~
o O ~ ~ ~ a'
w ~
~ r
h
as '
'!
R- O
ao O
h• N
.w. Vi
O
~p _ w ~ rt _T
R N. 0. `~ w
O
,,, w ~
~ w
n n
~ 7
O-.
w O D_ • .
y O w S O p- p
N ~ ~ ~ '~' ~
o 0
.,
J
w D ~
P ~u
.
> ~
~ N
0. - v- ~
rt "7
w
y rt ~ ~
•. ~
C
~ ~. O ~ ~ ~ 0.
c ~ ~ ~
y ~ ~- C1
rv
O
~I
~
a' ~ .~-.
"'"~ O v C n
o ~ ~
" ~ ~ n_ a
n ~. 't
+ ,Q', o y
O R ~ w UQ ~
.a p71 ~ "O ^~t i~C O
~
R
~
~ ^}
a ~
~ "
~ d y tD 0. O .~
rt' `~ - ~ '~ ~
~ °
~ ~ n
5-' rt
w , ~ w
_
.C
y w
n
CJ (
d
r
S
rn
n
w
i
C
n
C
n~
K
P-
0
w
h
O
r
b
n~
G1
i_i
~.
a '~ c,
-`
4
e
1
J > 7
n io a'
c
~.
n
~0 A
N ~
w A
~ ~
~ ~
C
7' n'
rt ~
]' R.
~ Q.
~ r
~ ~.
rn
A
O .,S
c
~' d
y Uw0
n O
~` w
"v ~
a..II
'O-h o
O