Loading...
sr-041172-8a DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT :r § CITY OF SANTA MONICA ~ c'"""' r t INTER-DEPARI'MENt MEMO ~_~~~~°~,~'~,~~~, March 23, 1972 P~~~`~u-'"'"~' ~6y 19t k R r ~"Lr-y. City Manager, Via City Engineer r~ ra~ra~ ~s a ,~ ~~. ~"~~ C.~ P Parking & Traffic Engineer ~~ °' /~ ~L - Report and Recommendation -- 23rd Street, Ocean Park to Dewey The City Council, at its meeting of February 8, 1972, heard a request from three residents of 23rd Street in the subject area that the recent- ly installed parking prohibitions be removed. Following a discussion, the Council moved the matter be held over until we could procure hourly traffic counts and instructed us to furnish additional recommendations on possible traffic signal improvements on 23rd Street and Ocean Park, along with determining the feasibility of abandoning 23rd Street as a truck route. We herewith submit our report and recommendation, including supporting Attachments and Exhibits in three parts: ', A) Initial Complaint B) Volume - Capacity C) Summary A) 2nitial Complaint In the three months since parking prohibitions have been in effect on 23rd', Street, this office has received only three complaints. Mr. and Mrs.'', Roach of 2301 Ashland Avenue wrote the Council requesting a hear- ing. They, along with two of their neighbors, Mr. Nixon and Mr. Passmore, spoke opposing the parking removal, principally, as they put it, because it presented a hazard to them when backing out of their garages. Based on normal petitioning procedures, these three residents represent only', 12.7 percent of the 23rd Street frontage affected by the changes instituted by this office. There are 13 driveways on 23rd Street in the subject area. The complainants' three driveways represent only 23 per- cent'of the total properties where access is directly affected. Prior and subsequent to the removal of parking, we conducted parking studies to determine demand on 2.3rd Street. It is our belief, substan- tiated by repeated observations, parking, per se, is not a factor in this''matter. When Mr. Roach initially complained we suggested, and he procured, the approval of his neighbors on Ashland Avenue for the removal of the daily no parking prohibitions that had been in effect for over five years. This, in effect, remedied the parking loss on his 23rd Street frontage. y~~ ~. `~ -__ -2- We felt parking could remain on the west side of 23rd Street between Oak and Ashland in attempting to remove the minimum parking consistent with safety requirements. We are submitting Attachments I and II, which are summaries of a 12-hour parking survey conducted after the parking was removed. As you can see from these Attachments, there is less than 50 percent occupancy on one block face and less than 25 per- cent occupancy on the other block face where parking remained even after parking was removed from the east side of 23rd Street. Parking demand is never considered crucial until such time as it exceeds 85 percent occupancy. In regards to the complainants' concern regarding backing into the street, we respectfully point out that this situation occurs in numerous areas of the city. We refer you to Attachments III and IV, which are photographs of actual driveway situations wherein the resident must exert caution. In the California Vehicle Code, Sections 21804 (a) and 22106 were included to cover situations such as this because the legis- lature believed it was incumbent upon the motorist to exert due caution entering or exiting private property. In Exhibit B are included loca- tions and dimensions of the three complainants° garages as they relate to the 23rd Street curb face. You will note that Mr. Nixon has 30 feet of clearance, Mr. Passmore 20 feet, and Mr. Roach 16 feet. You will also note the sketch showing the four garages to the apartment house located at 2640 - 23rd Street on the southwest corner of Ocean Park Boulevard and 23rd Street. For 12 years, parking has been prohibited on the curb fronting this apartment house and two of these garages actually have less clearance to the curb face than Mr. Roach. Location wise, we believe these garages to be more hazardous than either of the three complainants' because they are located on the curvature of 23rd Street in close proximity to the intersection at Ocean Park Boulevard. We were able to contact only one of the four users, but he informed us he had no problem utilizing his garage. The photographs shown on Attach- menu III and IV reflect some locations where clearance between garage and curb is less than that of the complainants on 23rd Street. Mr. Roach's garage is situated adjacent to a 20-foot wide alley and the garage could be modified so that ingress and egress be achieved via the alley instead of 23rd Street. We do not believe that in requesting the complainants to exert due caution in utilizing their garages we are being unreasonable, in view of the numerous other locations throughout the community where similar situations exist. In considering our changes on 23rd Street, we must weigh the limited use of three driveways against the traffic needs of over 13,000 motorists per day. Parking was removed in front of the aforementioned apartment house at 2640 23rd Street when conditions warranted it. Conditions now warrant the removal of parking in front of the complainants° residences. In fairness to all, any change in the parking prohibitions on 23rd Street in the vicinity of Ashland Avenue should be accompanied by a change in the parking prohibitions near Ocean Park Boulevard. To do any less would be unfair to one property owner while benefiting another; however, to relax these parking prohi- bitions in either locale would be chaotic and lead to an increase in accident potential. -3- B. Volume - Capacit Results of the hourly traffic volume counts requested by the Council are shown on Attachments V and VI. Attachment V reflects the hourly traffic volume on 23rd Street, both north and south of Ocean Park Boulevard, while Attachment VI indicates the hourly traffic volumes on Ocean Park Boulevard both east and west of 23rd Street. These traffic volumes substantiate what we stated to the Council at the February 8 meeting, i.e., traffic volumes (13,225 VPD) south of Ocean Park are more than double traffic volumes (6,500 VPD) north of Ocean Park Boulevard on 23rd Street. In order to more graphically illustrate the complexities of traffic movement in the intersectional complex of 23rd Street, Cloverfield and Ocean Park Boulevard, we have prepared a traffic flow map, Exhibit A. Please note that the daily traffic volumes on the narrow 40' wide 23rd Street south of Ocean Park nearly equal the volumes on the 60' wide Ocean Park Boulevard where we have room for four moving traffic lanes and two parking lanes. Capacity is defined as the maximum number of vehicles which has a reasonable expectation of passing over a given section of a lane or roadway in one direction during a given time period under prevailing roadway and traffic conditions. Based upon the highway capacity manual, 23rd Street has an Ocean Park Boulevard approach capacity of 566 VPH (Vehicles Per Hour) with the existing parking prohibitions in effect. Prior to-the installation of the parking prohibition, the capacity was 396 VPH. In addition to the parking versus non-parking factor, various other factors are considered in determining capacity including approach width, one-way or two-way operation, turning motions, etc. The narrow 40' width of 23rd Street and the heavy turning movement at its inter- section with Ocean Park Boulevard are key factors in this limited capa- city figure. You will note on Attachment 5 that traffic volumes on 23rd Street exceeded the 396 VPH capacity with parking permitted for six hours, with three additional hours approaching within 10 percent of capacity. With the removal of the parking as we now have it, our capa- city of 566 VPH is exceeded in only two hours. This is a marked improve- ment and should result in less driver frustration and reduction of accident potential. We have had Exhibit B drawn to illustrate to the Council a cost compari- son between the widening of 23rd Street per the master plan, versus the parking removal already completed along with signal improvements to be recommended. It would cost a minimum of $350,000 to widen 23rd Street from Ocean Park Boulevard to Dewey to provide in essence what we are already doing with the parking removal and signal improvements at an estimated cost of $14,000. We believe that updating and modernizing the signals at 23rd Street and Ocean Park Boulevard by permitting the signals to be traffic responsive actuated by loop detectors, along with the parking prohibitions already in effect, will permit us to adequately handle the traffic volumes on this arterial corridor. Thus, we feel that this treatment will provide a maximum benefit to the community at the minimum .cost and eliminate the necessity for acquiring expensive right-of-way for the entire length of 23rd Street in the subject area. In fact, numerous structures, including Mr. Roach's garage, would be effected by any widening. Therefore, our treatment of 23rd Street in effect, really aids the complainants because it will eliminate the need of acquiring their property just to widen the street to provide for intermittent curb parking. -4- We have prepared Exhibit C, which is a city map showing location of truck routes, both primary and secondary, to more graphically illus- trate the importance of 23rd Street as a natural corridor connecting Santa Monica with the Mar Vista area. Due to the Pen Mar Golf Course and the Santa Monica Airport, 23rd Street is a prime natural route be- tween our two neighborhood communities serving as a link for business, social and cultural reasons. There are numerous Santa Monica based firms whose trucks at one time or another make use of 23rd Street in servicing accounts they have in the Mar Vista area. Any removal of 23rd Street from our approved truck routes would, in our opinion, prove detrimental. We would be faced with a policing problem because trucks, especially those on a delivery schedule, approaching 23rd Street from Walgrove would continue up 23rd Street. we believe the Truckers Associa- tion and the Teamsters Union, along with businessmen in our community whose trucks use 23rd Street, would object to the removal of this street from our truck route. Should it happen, we estimate a minimum annual truck operating cost of $7,605 to these operators, plus the cost of policing and litigation that might arise from citations, because due to the golf course and airport, it would require any truck to detour a minimum of one mile to achieve its; destination. A look at our truck route map reveals only three basic truck corridors into Santa Monica from the south. To attempt to close 23rd Street to truck traffic means placing additional burdens on an over-loaded Lincoln Boulevard. Because of this, we recommend that 23rd Street remain as an approved secondary truck route. We would like to relate a piece of information furnished us by an execu- tive of the largest retailing operation in our CBD several years ago. Fie told us that over 70 percent of his firm's business was derived from people living south of Pico Boulevard, Mar Vista and Venice. This gentleman's statement was verified this year by another executive of a different firm. While his firm did not realize 70 percent, he did, however, enjoy substantial business from residents of the Mar Vista and Venice community. We believe that with the over-crowded conditions on Lincoln Boulevard, that no attempt should be made to curtail the only other natural artery we have serving the Mar Vista - North Venice area. C. Summarv A point we believe should be noted by the Council prior to their determination of our recommendation is that with the backing of the administration and the City Council, during the last 32 years, we have installed and had approved more traffic engineering improvements than our three predecessors were able to accomplish in the preceding 11 year existence of this division. These improvements, we believe, have had a direct bearing on the downward trend in Santa Monica's traffic fatality rate per 100,000 population. According to National Safety Council statistics, in 1970, while California was realizing as a whole a 24.4 fatalities per 100,000 rate, Santa Monica had seen its rate decrease from 15 in 1969, to 12 in 1970, and to 8 per 100,000 in 1971, and unfor- tunately last week we suffered our first fatality of the current year -5- versus two during the same period last year. we definitely believe this improvement in our traffic fatality rate is based on the support we have received from the administration and the Council in our endea- vors to institute the necessary traffic engineering improvements to provide for the safe and expedient movement of goods and people. Since one of the suggestions raised at the February 8 meeting related to the possibility of rush hour only parking prohibitions, we took the liberty of seeking outside opinions on the wisdom of such a move. Due to the typography and the relatively light parking demand, rush hour prohibitions would, in our opinion, be hazardous. we asked two traffic engineers with a combined total of over 45 years experience what their opinions would be. One of these is a gentleman now employed by a traffic signal company, the other is a traffic engineer for the City of Los Angeles, who has resided on Pier Avenue just east of 23rd Street for the past 10 years, and has an intimate knowledge of the subject area. while we discussed the subject with each traffic engineer separately, both of these gentlemen informed me that in their opinion the installation of rush hour prohibitions would be creating an undue hazard. Therefore, with an opinion based upon a combined total of 60 years experience from three traffic engineers, including myself, we must respectfully recom- mend that the rush hour prohibitions not be considered. To do otherwise would be to create a dangerous and deficient condition. Therefore, in summary we recommend: 1) That the parking prohibitions currently in effect remain. 2) That the traffic signals at the intersectional complex of 23rd Street, Cloverfield and Ocean Park Boulevard be im- proved and that $12,000 necessary for making this inter- sectional complex traffic actuated be appropriated to Account ##8413-920 so that the necessary work may be accomplished. //'~"P~~ J. Wrenn Parking & Traffic Engineer JJW/sg Attachments-9 iF APPROVED: q~l~, ~Pr'' ~~ City Eng'n er t!E'; TF3El UNDEkS.IGNEll' OBJECT TO '1''HE "N0 S`POPPING A`P ANY 'I'II44E" ON 23RD STREET SL'1'P1EEN OCEAN PARK SOUL] VAEiD AND DE;n,IEY STREET ,/,=„w' rr ,,,,~" AT 1V0 TIluE '+JEka~ ~°7E~; CONTACTED BY GiTY ILALL 1N IiLGA~IJ„,~~(~ :I~~ C~,T~NGE IYY~~ ` TRAI?i+'TC ON 2~kD STRLET~ ANJ V1L ART: DES'"1'NTZ'L'LY tQ0`P'~~R,~~+~'I`~; TT ~ , DANGI;kOUS TO SOTfT Pl+DESTkIANS AND V1?,IIICI,ES. TIi7sRE~~~P " rr`u~r, ~I kL'~,Ik ~C AND SPEED LIMiT IS .N07' QBEYEll. _ t'a`r ~ : i . NAME ADDRESS eF.gpe ~'DI~TE: , 4" _..,w.~-° ~. J~ ~'r- ,~~ ~ ~r~ ti , , Tom;-~--~~~r,~2_.. ` ~~ ~~~~r ., c' _ ,~, .. ~ 6 > _. ~ /G ' ~° a ., ~ .' ~- J ~,` `~ ~~ ,~ .~~~ ~~ ~ f ~` ~_ `~~ ~ ~sU ~rLC_ ~~ as , ~j-~( ~~EV~~', l ,, , ~~ ~ 5 ~' d r~~' lm..., l~~ r ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~. 1'7 ~ ~ ~~%:~~ ;~: ~ . rte,--~.,, ~, ~. t--r ( ~ \ /~ ` l ~ cs~.v>r. `~ ~ ~ ~. °~.. ,'-~. t' ~. ~. 'fi`t,` ~Ell_.E~,~t~ ~L ~ - `t "_ (~, - ~ ~.. ~~ t~~}Z?tir ~~,~ ~~ 02L ~ l~~vf'~ !.~ n,eC~~ ~ I,.f4~._ ~' 4 ~ ~`~ /~~ i~t ~ ~,,~ ,~, WE., THE UNDERSIGN~ID, OBJECT 'PO THE "NO STOPPING AT ANY 'PINlE" ON 23RD STR'BET BETWEEN OCEAN PARK BOULEVARD AND DEV°71Y STREET. AT NO TIPl~ ~ W's~Rli tiVE CONTAC`1'P;D BY CT`PY HALL IN R7~'GARDS 'PO THIS CHANGE TN THE 'PRAF~'IC ON 23RD STREET, AND 4`JE ARE DEFINIT~Y NOT IN FAVOR OF IT, IT IS DANGEROUS TO BOTR PEDfi;STRIANS AND VEHICLES, THERE TS MORE TRAFFIC AND THE SP's;ED LIMIT IS NOT OBEYED. NAME. `~~~ `~~~ r- ,~~ ~ a,f ,.c.r',z f, ,, r. j! ,! ADDRESS' DA'PE ~F `r <. aod.~ .~~ . ~ _ i i / . Z c_f-P~1 4Y`Gi.'L.e..'d Z-G'( ... ~L~ ( C.cs L't~~'C._.. ~ ~ r~ f~ ~„~... ~ ~ ~.~ _ ~/} ~~ f Z ~~ ,'', qq~yy { r ,_1! _ '~-y(. cl„(?a~~ ~~ f.-C~'vYyvl.~ :~ ~~-'°~ ~ !`dz.~,.~, ~ ~ - .r~1 ._• ,~? _- 'q~ o~..... ,ti . j a, - ~`~ ~"'Gti/L:r.:^ ~C.u.,,4e-~-~..y-~ ` ~ ~ 1 ~' f/-YfL.L'.(~ ~ ~' - cam` - 7 ~ ^.a~;j°~ S. ~ 6., r ~ ,,_ I `i'ce - e~~~` `~`._c(~-v~ ~ ' ~J ~_ r, ~ ~ l~ ~_ . I3 ,J Ca , ~ a( G J ~ ~ ...'_eu,,,,~ ~ n -/- .~.. 3 ~ ~~ `~ (.•i,~,~.Hl ~ ~•r--'l.l~. {'ice.. ~~ Y V ~:.~Y4-~, ~C ~J' "1. ~ Y: .v '~r -~t-E ~~<~ a •.. ~ _ ~ ~ ~~~ ~,~ r ~ _._. ,- -. ~, ~ w ,. r r~-Ye...~rz-c...e~t.,..., ..-~s .Z.rr~,-~ ~ .A /,°,. ` f~ .~ f~ ~~~ p~ M ~i -~ ~,.~ //~) ,,,rpp~~'~~~~~ f r ``y ~,+ i i / / L~ ! ` f p~~Jr ~ f ~~~ ~, ~-S,a e ~ ~ d..~..._. 1 ~ ~ -`~JV C, i < /~ ~ v( /~ L~ ~.czdlic~/-/~-r,, -¢~N nG• ^~r(, ~ ~- rt%E,LV/~, ~~.,Z /S tea. L~t'L G ~'~~ ~~ ~.~~ ~ ( --~~" ' NTE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OBJECT TO THE 1tNO S`POPPING AT ANY TI1V(E"' ODI 23RD STREET BETVTEEN OCt;AN PARK BOULEVARll AND DEVdEY S'PREF,TS'. AT NO TIPrIG WERE 'uVE CONTACTED BY CI`T'Y HALL IN REGARDS TO TFIIS CHANGI; TN THE TRAFFIC ON 23RD STRF,ET', ANll WE ARE DI;FTIdI'.PELY NOT IN T'AVOR OP IT. T`I' TS DANGEROUS `PO BOTH PEDESTRIANS AND VEHICLES, THERE IS NiORE TRAFFIC ANl) THE SPEED LIl~~iIT IS NOT OBEYED. RTAIV4E AllDRPSS, llATE ~~ 7~ ~-_, V ~ 1 -~" -~~. ~~~ -~'- 7 ~-- ~`~ ~~~ ~ , ~~ r ~ ~ i 3 ~ G~ ~ ~ z~ziu ~ ~___.- ~% ~ -~ 7 ~ ~„ ~ 6%~~.. --- o ~ '~c-~„~..-u.~.._. ~ `~ ~" ~ ' ~;~ /; ~~ •~> ~~1v~~~~ ~~~ ~, cl ~ K l .~,_r/' >~ - ~~-~~ { i -- cx2~r of - SANTA P10NICA FORM 107 OFFICE OF TRAFFIC ENGINGyRIPdG ANALYSTS OF CURB PARKIDIG LOCATION 23rd 57~ FROM As~ I o.~.,CL vQ TO /!"~L - _. strRVEY TIME 12 ~ouRS - BETwEEN~m. and -1 PM.-DATE 2-'1-~2 TYPE OF PA.'RKING METERS -! NON METERED ANGLE ~ PARALLEL TIME REGULATIONS- N P ~q -9a t,.y~rl COMPILED BY ~~ =a PARKING 1 2 N-S-E IJ SIDE N-S-E-W SIDE TOTALS t1 ~ DURA`i'IONS `r,OUR - - - V - - - V ~ ~BOTH IN .HOURS SP.9CES NUATBER OF VEHICL^cS H '~NMBER OF VEHICLES H III iSIDES a _ UNDER z ~ II 7 1, __ _ b z to 1 2 ~ 1 J, . , c 1to2 4 5 - d 2 to 3 6 i , ,o ' ~ , { ! 7 e 3L•o4 g ~ ~ ~ q, 9 f 4to5 1.0 11 i g 5 to 6 12 t-`---- h 6to7 14 " i 8 15 ~ 6 f • ~ 7 to 1 17 ! J 8to9 18 !~ t2-i lg 4 I 1 k g to 10 2O { Y~ ~ , 1 ToTArs `.~ $ _ , ...~. 2 # of STALr~S 3 -~,` UNUSED 2 1 TUR2dOVER~'~J ,~'1 v~ t~ ~SPr~ ~ N0.1 2 Hr. ,~~5 SPACES tJO, ETQPTl' ~ ~ Hr,SPACES ~ ~~ occuP~.NC~r- ~~ 5 j P/~ftlil^tG u la ~ 1- F-ir.or rrssll c~,5 ~0 1 Iir, or Le[s:s (i" Zf3.5 ° o ~ ,., z ? t O-t~ 1,'. 1 ~ : " n --. is ~ .. . 2 2:r. oz Les (1~_.. ~__.. lfi-a' . ~ f~ ~~ V70r-,hTTO?dS »• ._._ ` r ~}urznT~ ora ~ ~~~. T _TAC1-~M~.1V -r.. ._ CITY OF - SANTA MONICA -FORM. 107 OFFICE OF TRAFFIC EIJGINEERING ANALYSIS OF CURB PARKING .- ._ LOCATION 23rd ST S - _< FROM I~I~L ~ TO OAk T SURVEY TIME 1 Z HOURS -BETWEEN ~I A M. and ~ ~M. -DATE ~-~i'~~L TYPE OF PARKING METERS / NON T7ETERED ANGLE ~ PARALLEL TIME COMPILED BY J Pe W Z PARKIDIG 1 2 N-S-E I•J SIDE N-S-E-W SIDE TOTALS -~1 i ~ DURATIONS HOUR - - - V - - - V .BOTH IN .HOURS SPACES , NTJR~ER OF VrHICL~S ~H , i~IUMf3ER OF VEHICT_,ES H SIDES a UNDER z 1 i~ ~ [ ~ 'l.s b z to 1 2 ~ l 1.a ~ ~~ 2 ~ o c lto2 4 ~ 1 0 5 , 3 1~ i d 2to3 6 ~ 1 0 7 e 3to4 g _ ~ - f l4to5 9 LO 11 1 ~~ 5 ~ 5td 6 + 1 12 ~ ~ ?~.. ~~ l 65 h 6to7 14 ' 15 ~ 1 1 7s i i 8 7to ~. 3 8tog '-~ 2Z i }-- ~ i k t .: o-'' ' ---r i g o 10 2 f i{~ C .-o{ - -- - 1 TGTALS ~(o lS 2 ~ of STALLS /Q 3 # uNUSFD O 1 TUP,IdOVER I .~o~~ ~'~c~ !1 N0.1 2 Hr. SPACES ~ sO 5 P10. EDiPTYT 1 Zg ~~ S Hr.SPAu~ i~ or `~ `-5 O i y A~ 8 ~ °~ CCUPP.it CY pl . o N PARKI'JG a 1 Hr.or Less 1~ ~ o -~ p PARKI~JG a;~u ~ do/ l Hr.or I,es:~ ~1 . 0 °o V'COL' ATIO~~1S ~~~. L_ _: _ ._ ---_ tlt,l'91'ia11.S , " 'an ~*^? " ~~. n,:p s 1~ 4.. _ ~- ~,q ~. ~ W r'~ 7 ~ k„Y ~,: ~ ~ e°V` 1~Y' i i" F ~o T~ ~ Car'~,i , ,,,.~,~ -sa;4~ s ~~ w~ "1 r " ~ ~L a „~+~ $~ '"". .6 ~~' a S ~ ~. ~' ~'.i A ~ if ~ s d fi s ! R y ~i°~...s.. ~St: + .. _. \ Y~.~w a {•, } s~ }~~d~' x~rG~s.~SAnvwd. ws laxa,.u,a~w\\aw~~y~c ~'~11~W\5 ;n\uuwN~lUit;.J4k1N1~1e£1:Ueht~l~tl1M\~Ym„~+,dlee.we\s iVS?a4.lw.~. o-ssle ~. ;~ ."'1 ~ ~ f-~ w~ ti-1 ~ r A ~'\d nod _:. J,1 ~v , _"~P „~~" ~' ~ - ~ -~' . `~ ~ ~ ~ \Y w„ ~ ,1 t~~~1°ha ~' y ~~ `7v~! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~» ~ 'ov N mwa d. ~ "YY'S ~v ~ j 'fin vA v~\ vSa ~ v v,As~~ ~N,ne \ .n~i~ ' ~ ~tv~~'~a d~ `las.` y } e e. i g ~ '""Y4ut v a l~kV~„y ~k a.. '~ ,~`~'m"~d ~ d~"~A a ~ ~ " V '~ ~ v v',1v a v " ~, . ~v ~ ~' ; \ ~V AA V ~~AV A ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a ~~ ~ \AAY~~ ,.~~ ggAP°, deg ~1Aso„ '~v~ ~ ac i ~ hVA\A1~~ \ ~~y ~ i,>+'z ¢.~ 8 v~ t7 V ~y ~A v ~ nVVA~VAA ' Y\b~~~ ~~ ~.~.~`„~ ~! ~ w ~`8` vVAV ~VA~ w A~ ~, °w.. ~~ ~.AA~ .i•...,,~.. ~ ~. ~Y AN ll.u.~,. ~~V~A1~~u '~iPVY~~A~.~~~~~~itil~~~~~1 .~~A„tity Y~ sAF~ . ~ . ~ ~ aadNYl w. ~... IF~f ~~. I'T ~,~~ri ~. s`~ ~ C7f~}^.~,~~4~A'~'.. _...... ~'~.y/rr~'T pNC)i_l(~j'[tC.~-~=~q(-~f~d~`sg ~ ~1q1~~' cg?~~``p~' .`i7(: `y _ q 4a~t,,,j ~7 ~'~,"~td.J 6A"3 V"~.. L7'~wl~~P4` f-p~f'~F`3da1 49~»~ ,r^d7 ~.~i t,.~~od ~IJ~~., 1~'"'~ ..,,_i~. . .~ , 7.., a , ...:: <.., ., .:.: ,,.. ..,,.._ , _.. .1 _~: ..rte ~i c ~ rake a+...U ,~1` r3~ ~ ~ `~" yam. ~' ~~.:' mss,. Y~ ~ ~, _ ~g ~ 4 r r r ~ r r3, rid / ' ~ §§S~ ~~ ~ p ` "fit ~z, r ~ = ,' ~. / i .; f `` _._ 25 ~O ~Mt~lYT~tNA ~7N ~~"~-w ~~ -f j f f G ~ ~ ~ s ~~~ ~ y_ ~ l f 5~ I ~ W ~ h 1 ~`~ ~~t ~ r~s~ y {} d ~ $ Y t q $~ tj ~`y ~ ~ ~ (SY ,. ` ~y Y n....1 ,y f y. wt~ Kku~ryNM~NnWPPo t ~ h +.u Y" .. .. ... t F %. V _ ( l '~_~ ~, f ~ any t~.~ v ~.p _ j .. ~ M r fa ~«. ~ ~ ,2"~" _ . 4RH Y: h~ ~ ~l 4 ? g S `( i' j 5 ~ ~ t~ a ~ 1 1 4 I ~ ~ t ~: ~ ~1 # f ~ F e` L I Q t~~Y MY ~ f ~ ~ ~ 1 2PVn fiw t ~ ~~i Y . ~~\ g ~r ' f W .N ~\\ v T12AFFS~. E2+tG1NL'liRZLSG Y. J'<.:'. s l AUTOb1ATIC VOI,UiTE COUNT .. ~ LOCATION 2~Rn RTRT?RT DATE 2 15 72 ___ ~ OCEAN PARK ~- WEATHER CLEAR CON1I?ILED BY °p i II OF OCEAN PARK.... SOUTH O OCEAN DATE 2 15 72 2./i,5~7 .. ~ ~...... _ ` 2 15 7 . 2 ........ Tues ues Tues Tues _, DIRECTION N B S/B TCJTAL N/B S/B COUNTER NUf iBEP. 3 5 4 6 II iI. H. ~ INT . 12.-1Tfl. ~ I F/, ~ny GO /D;L ~2 1-z l ,2 S ~ ~/y 6 -o. .5~ g / 3 /b l S ~ S _ / /~ 3 Ss ,~'~ ~~ //3 0 /G ~ ,~~/8 l ~ 3'~~ 2~6 30 ,390 ~ 1 ~ ~y 7''9 ~- 173 /yl fly 3r// .: ~a:z~ S93 1~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~'3 oy SS'7 -1_2 lG3 _ 3, 8 ~~ l ~ S ~S /~° ~y~/ 33/ 3;~~ /Sr^ ,208 ~ ~~ l 3'7 / ~• 3 ~ °7So _~: ~"2- ~s y~~ __ ~ s Sl3 coq ~~9 yai ~s°o ~~s ' ~3tI iy~" _ ~,~o ~ /C C J~ t/US ~ ~3 :~~~~~ .23 ~ ~ o r ~y~% y~~ ~ ill ~ ~ ~ ~o a r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 /f r ~ / ~ ! 57 /ay ls~! l~~ /9 ~J _ TOTAL.... _,~ ~`7 JAI/~ ~~J o b ~l/Sy C~7~r I %i~:'cS GP.AND -- -- TOTAL -~-_ S ` 8 I3. I-I. - - --~_AVG -- ------ - --------% Y'-T'- _ _ __ TA C H~1 HIV ~` 'Sf1~F~~':CC E1vG1i~3LlilNi; •, . AUTUCv1ATIC VOLUP-iE CUUNT LOCATION O('FA,I~T PARK Cl 23RD STREET DATE 2.1•>~/_~•?~_~___~ _ WEATHER _~,J,F.AR COMPILED BY c EAST OF 23RD STREET WEST O 23RD S TRR~.m DATE 2/23/72 2/~3/ ' /23/T 2/23/7 ....-. Wed. Wed. Wed. Wed. .. DIRECTION E/B W/B TOTAL E/B W/B TOTAL COUNTER NUTsB^P. HOUI' 5 o} 4 < 6 '~' 3 e &' iI. II. Ci INT. ~~ ,12YlIQ. ~ //i'3 ~ ~ 1' .i ~-2 a.3 ~ ~ .~ S' ,_ ~° ~_ ~9 ~~-- ~ z9 ~s' 1 S /oa ~/i5 a ~"S ~ :~S! ~_~ ~'~ 3~I~ /s'3 < ~2 _ ~ ~~ qs ' ~~ ~ l P.iI. Lf/2- 38a '79y yy ~ ~• 8~:~ _ ~` `d no G~iQ ` ~- ~, ~ ~ ~~ _a Sd 9 ~/~~l a 6 50.2 G i C~`1 ~ ~.~ 3 ~3 /' ~ -- Sy hS ~ i,~r~~ ~ 3y oc~ /~ 3~ ~ 1, ~ iav~ ~~_ . Y ~ ~s- 3 't °3 7a3 - ~ ~~ y~ ~ _. io~~ ~~~~ ~_ a ~ <f<n s~i_ _ ~~~ a~~ Aso e_ ~/) ~ JS ~ ~_ lA~/l / iz-iz // lOG ~~a-- D D~- .~c~S° 'rOTA7~ _'1~~~--_ ~'7~Y ~/~a~G ~ ~ ~ oS /3 ~~a GRANl7 ' TOTAL ~_.