Loading...
SR-052466-6B,,~~~ ,,° '` ~~ CITY OF SANTA MONICA INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMO DATE: May 20, 3966 r- ' ~, ~~ TO: City Manager _,_., FROM: Parking and Traffic Engineer SUBJECT: Street name sign program ~~~' ~ c: K L a ~ \;h k012 rtii~G, This, is to present to you the current planning and opera- tional status of the street name sign program. ~ r+J ; r Prior to beginning an installation program, this office made a series of operational policy decisions. These decisions, and our reasons for them, are as follows; 1. Wherever practicable, new street signs would be bracket-mounted to the side of existing street light or traffic signal poles. In the case of traffic signal poles, one sign blade would be attached to each signal pole on the "near" right-hand corner. Our reason for this was twofold in that, first, this eliminates the cost and the cluttered appearance that separate street sign posts would cause, and second, it places the street name sign in the most obvious location for the driver to see. 2. Whenever two sign blades were to be mounted on the side of any street light pole (or other fixture) they were to be mounted one above the other, so that both signs could be seen by drivers approaching from either direction. We arbitrarily instructed our work crew to place the north-south street name in the upper position for the sake of uniformity. 3. New sign posts, when required, should be in- stalled on the northeast and the southwest corners of each intersection at or near the end of the curb radius on the east-west street. This policy was established in the interest of providing uniformity of location, so that drivers would find our street signs in approxi- mately the same location at every intersection. 4. New sign posts should be installed not less than 27 inches behind the face of the curb, City Manager Street name sign program P4ay 20, 1966 Page 2 so that even our longest sign blades vaould not extend into or over the street roadway where they might be hit by trucks, buses, etc., turning corners. 5. Existing street sign posts, if in the proper location and of the proper size, should be left in place. This policy was established, obviously, to conserve both material and labor. Previous street sign programs have used sign posts varying from 2-1/2" to 4" I.D. with the signs mounted on the sides of the post in a cantilevered position at right angles to each other and parallel to the curbs. Sign posts under previous programs were in- stalled within a few inches of the face of the curb. To this date, we have found no existing sign posts in the field which are either in the proper location or of the proper size to fit the hardware purchased as a part of this program. It is estimated by our work crew that approximately 80% of the sign posts they have encountered thus far have been the 4" I.D. pipe which will not fit the hardware fittings we have purchased. In those instances where the existing sign post has been of the proper size, its proximity to the curb has prohibited its use with the new street name signs to conform to our established policy as indicated in paragraphs 2 and 4 above, Installation of the new sign on the existing post, using the standard cap and right angle fitting, would extend the sign blade out beyond the curb line, exposing it to potential damage. If we were to cantilever the new signs on the existing post at the same elevation, we would effectively be hiding from view one of the two street names from approaching drivers. On the other hand, we could not place one above the other, as in the case of street light standards, since the lower sign would be so low as to create a hazard to pedestrians. City Manager Page 3 Street name sign program May 20, 1966 Considering all of these factors, and in an effort to expedite the installation of our new street name signs, it was determined that the most desirable. procedure would be to install new posts of the proper size and in the proper location at each intersection, and that the existing posts should be removed. 6. We established an installation policy of sign- ing our major east-west thoroughfares first, beginning with Ocean Park Boulevard, Pico, Colorado, etc. When these were completed, we had intended to begin signing major north-south streets. However, it has since been determined that it would be easier, and accomplish the same - --results,-to-confine--our-s-gning-activit-ies to -- --- east-west streets. In this manner, we can maintain a more efficient fabrication and in- stallation program. We have therefore modified our installation program to confine it to east-west streets, with our work crew attempting to split its effort approximately equally to areas north and south of the Santa Monica Freeway. 7. In the interest of operating efficiency, and attempting to expedite the actual installation of these new street signs, our work crew in- stalls the new signs and posts, relocates any necessary traffic signs (i.e., STOP signs, parking or bus stop signs) on an entire street. When this street is finished, we notify the Street Division, which then removes any old posts on that street which are no longer needed. The old posts are stored at the municipal yards until some determination is made as to their reusability for other purposes, or for salvage value. The above statements reflect the major operational policies which this office has adopted. The current status of the program, briefly, is as follows: 1. To this date our work crew (consisting of one permanent employee and one "as needed" employee) City Manager Street name sign program May 20, 1966 Page 4 has installed approximately 1,400 new street name signs, either on new posts or on street light or traffic signal standards. 2. It is estimated that there are approximately 1,800 more signs to be installed, most of them on new posts, 3, To complete this project, we will have to purchase an estimated 700 new posts at a cost of approximately $6,300 and additional sign blades and miscellaneous hardware at an es- timated cost of $3,900. This money, together with funds for labor costs, is included in the 196b-67 budget request of the Street Division. 4. Based on current projections of work produc- tion, it appears that we will not complete this program before early 1967, due to the limited staff available. If there are any questions concerning this program which have not been answered, please let me know. JDNejh eco City Engineer Joseph D~. Nadon ,,Parking and Traffic Engineer ~i