SR-082173-7CCITY OF SANTA MONICA 73-C-80
UATEi: !lugust 16, 1473
TO; The Honorable City Cauncil ~~ u
/a ,,~~ss~p ®i~
F'RGM: Interim City Manager ~~~Y °YS~6~I~~L
SlT13JECT; Paxkin.g Structure Security Patrol '~UU2 g Ty7~
~aaos l~uJ~J~' ~ ~_
aeruewe® ro aN~
CBYT CB.~d~ET's ~FFI~~
Attached are the reports dated August 6 and August 15 submitted by Mr.
Jixri Wrenn, Parking and Traffic Engineer, regarding the above,
Mr, V°Tren;a anakes several proposals, all excellent, but same more
" elaborate and therefore rnor, e expensive,
In x^eviewing this report this morning, I recommend that the plan, identified
as l,xliibit VIII a.nd less costly, be i.niti.ated. Lf this plan is approved, then
axxoth:er $10, 000 will have to be appropriated to purchase two three-wheel
scooters anal other eq~.xi.pxnent including repairs, .etc, to effectively cax•ry
out the program..
City Manager
3:SG: •j s
e~ttaclxxn ent
7 ~~
R p,
ti _/r
° ~ CITY OF SANTA MONICA
INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMO
DATE: August 15, 1973
TO: Interim City Manager
FROM: Parking F, Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: Addendum to Parking Structure Security Patro L Report
Our memorandum to you of .August 6, 1973, regarding the possible parking structure
patrol options was discussed at the agenda meeting in your office on August 9. It
was established that Councilman McCloskey, who initiated the original proposal on
June 26, had in mind the hiring of elderly or retired individuals similar to the
police crossing guard program. We pointed out that this type of personnel and
salary range would be more in the watchman concept, as opposed to a higher salaried
and younger type personnel who might be more able to apprehend a vandal or thief.
Based upon this revised thinking, we have prepared this addendum to our original
report of .August 6, including the attached additional Exhibits 11 and 12.
Exhibit 11 shows comparative annual costs for full 78-hour coverage with one man
stationed in each structure.' The comparisons are based upon the hiring of as-needed
personnel ranging as shown:
Parking Attendant-$2.59
Crossing Cuard-$2.94
Police Cadet-$3:15
Parkette-$4'..35
Annual Cost - six structures:
Parking Attendant-$66,183
Crossing Cuard-$75,126
Police Cadet-$80,490
Parkette-$120,876
Utilizing the above possible hourly rates for attendants, Exhibit 11 also shows a
comparative annual cost between the type of coverage suggested in Exhibits 8, 9 and
11, for informational .purposes.
Exhibit 12 shows what we believe to be a realistic coverage of .the parking structures
utilizing 12 parking attendants on an as-needed basis and one full-time .supervisor. It
will provide for Option A coverage, which essentially is one attendant for each two
structures for a period of 78 hours when activity is at its highest. Thus, each struc-
ture will be checked a minimum of once per hour with the exception of Sunday lunch
breaks, which would be staggered and Option B patrol would be in effect, i.e., one man
per three structures.
We again respectfully request that Council advise us of their wishes as regards to
..hours of patrol, number of men, etc. We still.believe that the most reasonable hours
of patrol would encompass 78 hours per week and would:suggest that authority be`granted
for the hiring of 12 unarmed parking attendants and one supervisor to fill the schedule
shown on Exhibit 12. This course would require an additional appropriation of some
$26,-000 to implement Exhibit 12's schedule.
JJW/sg
Att-2
J,/ J~. Wrenn
~- harking $ Traffic Engineer
cc: City Engineer
PARKING F, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
PROPOSED SECURITY GUARD SCHEDULE
Full 78-Hour Coverage One Man Per Structure '
r'~" ---
E °' o Ann ual Costs @ Rate s Shown '
~ i
~_~~ !gin Rtcnc y j Tuesday
~ j^7ednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Sunday Total
HrsJWeek Parking Attendant*
2
59 Hr
$ / Crossing Guard*
$2
94/H Police Cadet* Parkette**~
i
~ , .
.
.
r. $3.15/Hr. $4.35; Hr.
' ~ ` ~ ~'n 1 9a:~-6pm
`
gy
~ 2 ~ 9am-6 m
~ 9am-6 m gam-6 m OFF OFF 40
$5,657
$6,421
$6
879
$10
280 j
~
.s--
p j 6pm-9~m
~.~ OFF OFF 6 m-9 m gam-6pm 9am-5 m 25 $3,535 4,013 ,
.4
300 ,
6
425 ~
~ ~ ~~ 3 \ o~ 27; 12~;-2pm
~ 12N-2pm 12N-2pm 12N-2pm 12N-2pm 12N-2pm , ,
~,
'_ ~ "• j 5pm-9pm
~'
6 m-9 m
6pm-9pm 26 3,677 4,174 4
472 6
882
E f ~ ~<,.-•-6pt i 9~m-bna
1 ~"
!~ gam-6 m gam-6 m gam-6 m OFF OFF 40 5,657 6
421 ,
6
879 ,
280
10
~
_ OFF OFF
d
o b m-9 m 6 m-9 m 6 m-9 m gam-6 m gam-6 m 25 ,
4
013 ,
4
300 ;
b 425
~
,;,_i~~ 1 ~ ~a-n-6pm
1 9am-6 m gam-6 m 9am-6pm OFF OFF 40 5 b37 ,
6 421 ,
~ ; ~ i f ~ ~-_~-O~tr ~ 6^m-9 m
'
7
.
i OFF
OFF
6 m-9 m
gam-6 m
gam-6 m
25
3,535
4,013 6 879
4
300 10 280
6
425
;
_
_
_,oon-~? 12N-2pm i2N-2pm 12N-2pm 12N-2pm 12N-2pm 12N-2pm , ,
,~~, N, s _ ,v i c ,r_gp a 6pr.. 9pm 6 to-9 m 6 m-3 m 26 3, 677 4,174 4
472 882
6
0 5 }-~~-6~.^t Sa:~-6nm
v;
F gam-6 m gam-6 m gam-6 m OFF OFF 40 5,657 6
421 ,
6
879 ,
10 280
i
t iC ~ 0?
~ OFF
f ~
i
` 6 m-9 m 6 m-9 m 6 m-9 m gam-6 m gam-6 m 25 3 535 ,
4
013 .
,
4
300 425
6
~
-
a::~-~ ,; ` 9-~r" i ~ `
~.
~
.
- i
; u.r 9am-6pm 9am-6 m 9
am-6 m OFF , , ,
,
_,~
~
=
12 i-
m
OFF
40 5, 657 6, 421 6
879 10 280
bP
,o
-9n~~ ~ 6 ,n-9 m
a `'~-~
~ OFr OFF 6 m-9 m 9am-6 m 9am-6 m 25 3, 535 4, 013 ,
4
300 425
6
l
tiooa-2P 12N-2pm
'
` 12N-2gm 12I~r-2pm 12Ai-2pm 12N-2pm 12N-2pm , ,
v i~ ,_ LL
t apt 9p^.i ~ Gp~n Spm
14
i
- 6 m-S m 6 m-9pm 26 3, 677 4,174 4
472 6
882
9a
?;
.,-gym ~ 9am 6-;n
I
"' ~
5
~ 9am-6 m 9am-6 m 9am-6 m OFF OFF 40 5,657 6,421 ,
6
879 ,
10
280
i
~ u.
P OiF
r--- -- j=~--~-
' 6prt-9pm 6 m-9 _m 6nm-9pm 9am-6pm 9am-6 m 25 3,535 4,013 ,
4,300 ,
6,425
Z"OT',=.i..-:OUPS
~rlr ~ 9ar.,-9p~n ~ 9a;n-9E;u, ~
OFrAT„__, I
9am-9pm
9am-9pm
9am-9pm ~
9am-6pm
9am-6pm ~
468 For 6
Structures: For 6
Structures: For 6
Structures: For 6
Structures:
6
~ Hrs/Week $66,183
$75,126
$80 490
$120 876
5~ added to Cover Compensation
''*13.E2`, Added to Cover Compensation and Retirement
~~°'
!''
s ,
4
yi
~. ~.
;. .. `
COMPARATIVE ANNUAL COSTS
~ EXHIBIT VIII EXHIBIT IX EXHIBIT XI
Parking
~-vttedant Crossing
Guard Rate Police Parkette
Cad
t R Parking Crossing Police Parkette Parking Crossing Police Parkette
t ~°
~
: i e
ate Rate Attendant Guard Rate Cadet Rate Rate Attendant Guard Rate Cadet Rate Rate
.
.
~
Rate _
Rate
~A6,970 ~ $20,84 $22,335 $30,675 ~ $24,484 $27,793 $29,778 $49,900 $66,183
$75,1.26
$80,490
$120,876
e
PARKING $ TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
PARKING ATTENDANT SCHEDULE
OPTION A COVERAGE (EkHIBIT V)
'o. o£ Men I Monday Tuesday VJednesday Thursday ~ Friday Saturday Sunday Total Hours Annual Cost
@ $2.59/Hr.
I gam-1 m gam-1 m gam-I m 9ani-1 m gam-1 m OFF OFF 20 $2,828*
2 gam-1 m gam-1 m gam-1 m gam-1 m gam-1 m OFF - OFF 20 $2,828''
3 gam-1 m gam-1 m gam-1 m gam-1 m gam-1 m OFF OFF 20 $2,828*
4 l m-S m l m-Spm l m-5 m lpm-S m lpm-S m OFF OFF 20 $2,828*
S l m-S m l m-S m 1 m-S m l m-5 m l m-5 m OFF OFF 20 $2,828*
6 l,m-5 m l m-S m l m-S m l m-S m l m-5 m OFF OFF 20 $2,828*
7
~ i 5 m~gum S m-gym t Sgm-9 m ~ Spm-9 m Spm-9pm CFF OFF 20 $2,828*
'
'
!~, i
f
' S
m-9 m; Sim-9 m 5 m-9 m 5 m-9pm 5 m-9 m OFF OFF 20 $2,828*
s !
9 !
S n,-9 m ~
5 ;n-9 m
S,m-9 m
S m-9 m
S m-9pm
OF"r
OFF
, 20
$2,828*
10 OFF CFF OFF OFF OFF gam-6 m gam-6 m 16 $2,263*
it ~~ CFF OFF OFF OFF OFF gam-6 m gam-6 m 16 $2,263*
i2 1~
Su ervisor ~;
Total I
Hours (
on Duty ,~ OFF
21a:,-7 m
~
Sam-9pm OFF
Ilam-7 m ~
I
gam-9pm OFF
llam-7 m
gam-9pm OFF
llam-7 m
gam-9pm OFF
llam-7 m
gam-9pm gam-6pm
llam-5 m
gam-6pm gam-6 m
OFF
gam-6pm 16
40
268 $2,263*
$13,730**
Total Annual
Cost:
$45,971
*So Added to Cover Compensaticn
**13.62~ Added to Cover Compensation and Retirement
f
° c:~ rY ~~~ sarlra, t~suEVECa
DATE: Aub ist 6, 1973 '
TC+: Interim City Manager
r~'ROT.vI: Parking it Traffic F,nginoer
STI13Jk7CT: Parking Structure Security Patrol
The City Gouficil, at its meeting of June 26,.1973, authorized the establishment of
a security patrol in the parki;xg structures downtown and appropriated $30,000 to
initiate such a program, Per your i.nstiuctions, we have compiled the following
inforro;a.tion to assist the city Council in determiaxing the scope of the program
9aaey wish to establish.
A survey of eleven neighboring mrmicipa.liti_es and the County of Los Angeles
reveals that eight of the twelve juxiscli.ctions have parking structures, vaith only
ttao or" these having a security patrol arrangement. However, seven of these agencies
do have parking attendants in their str-dxctures; ixxcluding the two that have security
patrols. You will note en Exhit;it I that the c'iut:y hours of the two structures hav-
ing secax°ity patrols are .five days aweek--one from 7 a,m. to 6 p.m., the other from
7:30 a.m. to h:30 p.nt. .Basically, this is because both structures with security
patrerls service governmental complexes, as opposed to our six parking structures
which exist pranar_ily for conunercial. purposes, and thus have longer hours of
opcra.tioix.
11re suggest that the hours of operation for a secixxity patrol should be 9 a.m. to
9 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., Saturday and Sunday. This_
7S-hour pa.t.rol period we believe to be c•easonable in that it will cover the 'ti:aes
of greatest activity within the parking structures when any incidents rni.gtrt possibly
occur.. As you can see from Exhibit. TI, occupancy does drop after 9 p.m., a.l.ong
:r:it:h a corresponding reduction. i.n incident, po*e^.tial.
The: over-night parking survey, reflected in Exhibit II, was taken wh:}.le we were
dctermi:ning the feasibility of possibly closing the structures nightly. 6Vh9.le
Structt.~°~ 3 had na vehicles parlcod bc.t:woeir 1 a.;n. to 6 a.m., each of the ottzer
f:i.ve structures dial have occupancy ranging from two to sixteen parked vehicl.cs.
Although the.over-aighl: occul:;ancy was minianal., even though ;ve soil par. king perrr:its
to residents of t}xe apartme.nt-hotols located within the assessment district, the
largos-€: facf.ox against securing the structures at night is the cost of ptrysical.ly
doing jxxst that. It would cost between $120,000 to $150,000 to provide security
screening along the alley openings and gates .across the pedestxi.an acid vehicular.
openings in the: narking structures. Sipe do not believe the problem is acute enough
i.n t}xe i~arly a.m. hours to .;~arra.nt the expenditure o£ upwards of $.150,000, not t'o
mention the impaired estl:eti.c appearance that such security screening would impart
to the pa.rlcing structures.
"~
_~_
6Ve.had~a mc;c.t.ing with Chief of Police Reinl,a7.cl and Assistant Chief Constable, tq
discuss the vaxying facets of t};.is security patrol program. We .requested, and
they agreed, to continue to enforce the three.-Hour limit, along with providing
continual police surveil7.ancc: as they have dome in the past in all six parking
structures. We believe this to be. a. necessary step because the initial appropria-
tion. of $30,000 waald provide for t.h<; hiring of only two private patrolmen. to
cover the six parking structures for the aforementioned recommended 78-hour patrol
period. The Purchasing Department 1?rocidad us with cost estimates from toro private
patrol firms, calling for ;3.50 pex hour for a. single patrolman on foot, and $6.00
per hour for a single Iiat-rolman wi.tl-a tr.nrsportat.on. However, both the Chief and
the Assistant Chief recommended that we hire our. own personnel .rather than contract
with a private patral firm in order to exercise closer srpervision over the secnr:ity
patrols. They also furnished rxs with Exh>:bit 7:II, which is the latest monthly
cri.mc- report on the parking structures, and .Exhii.~it IV, which shows a comparison
of parking structure crimes in the first seven woxk periods in 1972 versus 1973.
The Chief pointed nut there has beer. a 34~-9J1.0~ decrease in parking structure cri.!nes
in the first 6~ months of 1973.
In order to assist the Council in det^rmining the extent of patrol coverage we
could provide, w:;I•~ave prepared Exhibits V, VZ and VII. Exhibit V shows Option A,
a t:lcree-roan patrol ai7d Option B, a t~nro-ria.n patral.. The basic difference between the
two apti_ons :is that Cpti_on A provides one pa.t:Tolman for two structures, while
Option B provides ane pa.i:Tolman for three structures. Exhibit VI shows the elapsed
t:iare i.t takes to walk eithex Option. A or Option B. Under iValld.ng Option A, a
patrolman could check oath structure once every hour, Under Walkiii~; Option B, a
pa.traliran could check each strtxcturc: an average of once evexy hour. and a half.
ExIcibit VII shoias tine e:l.a~osed time necessary i:o drive either Option A ar B. Under
Driving Optian A, a patralman could check each structux•e twice every hour. Under.
Driving Option B, a patrolman cauld ::heck each st:rracture an average of once every
hanr..
Beaa.ri.ng iu mind Chief Re:iilbald'srecomiirerida.tion to utilize Ci.ty_persornel rather
than private patrol, eve ha~/e prepared Exhibits VIII and IX, which reflect a madified
rrersion of Options A and L' util:i.zi.ng City persorurel, and Exhibit X, which ref'7ects
costs. of private patro L coverage. L'xh.bits VIII and. IX reflect. proposed schedules
utilizing either three or s"aur men and their salary requirements: ]:n addit_.nn to
7.abcr casts, we riusC add t~1u,00i7 to the tha;•ee-man prapasa:i. or $1.4,000 t:o t.ire four-,
man prapasal. These figures include i,riti.szl capital :item expenditures for three-
vh.e*.1 Cushman motor scooter;, uniforms ai:d palice -ra.dios, a.nd estimated maintenance
costs. Exliib:it X reflects V+7allcing and Driving Options A and. B for the full 78-ha;zr
coverage period. Shawn also are t:he casi,s Iox modified VValkiiig and Driving Options
A and B for comp«rison with those figures sho~~rn on Exhibits VIlI and IX.
S'Ve respectfully regzzest tYiat (:ouncil. aavise us of the.i.r wislxes as .regards to hours
of patrol., number of men, etc. We Uc;lieve that the most reasonable hours of patrol.
.would encompass 78 leours per week, and wcu:l.d suggest the hiring of four guards to '
fill the scbsdul.e spawn aiz ExhiL-it IX. 'Phis, of course, would require an additional
apprepriatian of same $35,000 to implement E:ch::LLit TX's schedule.
~ ,J ) 3tirenn
JJVV/sg 1'ark~,a.g W Tr .ffic Engineer.
cc: City Z;ngincer
Chief of Palice
Attachments--1U
SECURITY PATROL IrNENiTORY
PARKING $ TRAFFIC F.NGINEERFNG
City
Parking _ Secuxity Parking Number
Struct;xre How Manv Patrol. Attendant , of rye„
Hours
i
. Beverly Hills ~
Yes
3
No
Yes
Unk. -
~ No ~ -- -------
+ Leased to APCOA
"' '. Burbank
No
I
I
~
No _
5. Culver City No I Aio
6:OOpm-11:OOpm, Free
' 6:30am - 6:OOpm i Parking No Attendants
4.
Glendale Yes 1 No Yes 2 6 days a week No Gates Close at 11:00 m
_ S. Huntin tor. Beach
No `
~ I ~
! No ~ -
Inglewood Yes 1 No Aio ~ ~ No
. On Parking Stlvcture
' 7:OOam - 6:OOptr, I Ur, Mended.
~ 7. Los Angeles (Cit ) Yes 2 Yes Yes 3 S days a vreek ~ D?o ~ Ens ~~,ee Parking
County Services Bep`_. is is
Los Angeles County 7:OOam-6:OOpm charge of all County-owned
8. Services Yes 44 I4o Yes 56 S days a vreek No ! parking structures
~
~
7:OOam-IO:OOpm -I
~
4
~ _
Pcrtion leased to
_ s. Long Beach Yes 1 DIo Yes 2 6 days a week No rivate co>rn~any
Pasadena ~ 7:30am - 4:30pm ~ Attendant and Guard are.
?. Cit -Count Com Tex Yes 1 Yes Yes 2 S da s a wee'.< Nc County Employees
8:OOarn - 6:OOpm
_ _. Riverside Yes 2 Ato Yes 2 5 days a week No
_. Torrance No No ~
.s.~~~ ~ i
~
~$$$~$~-~# `~~ C:1'1'Y YHKiC1N Ci-7'1'liUC:'1'UKY~S
OVERNIGHT PARKIhTG SURVEY
9 p.m. 9 a.m.
9 p.m. July 27, 1973 to 6 a.m. July 28, 1973 ~ 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. July 31, 1973
Stn~cture #1 Structure #2 Str cture #3 St ucture 4 Structure 5 Structure '
Time ehs ,% Occu anc Vehs % Occu anc Vehs % Occu an Vehs % Occu anc Vehs % Occu anc Vehs % Occur
9 p.m.
76 21.6% 74 20.7% 59 16.8% 104 28.8% 48 13.5% 39 5.8%
10 p.m. _.
27 7.6% 56 15.7% 28 7.9% 98 27.2% 27 7.6% 27 4.0%
11 p.m.
11 3.1% 45 12.6% 8 2.2% 62 17.2% 16 4. 5% 13 1.9%
!2 a.m.
8 2.2% 29 8.~% 1 .2% 23 6.3% 13 3.6% 9 1.3%
1 a.m.
5 1.4°j° 21 5.8% 0 0% 4 1.1% 5 1.4% 2 .3%
2 a.m.
5 ~.'.4% 16 4.4% 0 0% 2 .5% 3 .8% 2 .3%
°`3' a.m.
4 1.1% 16 4.4% 0 0% 2 .5% 3 .8% 2 .3%
a.m.
4 1.1% 16 4.4% 0 0% 2 .5% 3 .8% 2 .3%
a.m.
4 1.1% 12 3.3% 0 0% 2 .5% 3 .8% 2 .3%
a.m.
7/28/73
4 1.1% 10 2.8% 0 0% 2 .5% 3 .8% 2 .3%
0 a.m.
7/31/73 %
4 1.1% 16 4.4% 3 .8% 4 1.1°°; 4 l.l% 8 1.2
7 a.;n.
8 2.2% 20 5. n% 10 2.8% 4 1.1% 11 3.1% 15 4.2%
8 a.m.
35 g, 9% ' 32 8.9% 35 10.2% 26 7.2% 19 5.3% 56 15.7%
•"~• 108 30.7% 97 27.2% 105 29.9% 72 20.0% 68 19.2% 93 26.1%
- .. ,.~ :-. iv i <s .. v.`+ .. 1, tt r is :Z n. 1 V Ci S :i' tt iJ C 'A' U K E S
DisT:: 5-24-73 TO 7 3 o SssNTA
° 2 l J *:O;~ICA .POLICE Dr PA^-.Tt4uDtT
MCiV^i;L~' ~wRI'td'- ri?POST
' - ~ T'ril5 ~I PREVIOUS
.. DATE i+ I10^i:T$
TOTAL REPORTEn ca~irs ' . a s '
TOTAL OTr.'ER 9CCURRENCE _p I _0
. IdOST ACTIVE BUILi)I:vfiG {s) t5 x5
MOST ACTIVE DAY(s} I
N.ON. MON. S SAT.
MOST CRIMES, SaNG'LE DAY (s) {5-25-73 ). 2 ~ ~
TINE OF D?1X {67a~ch} 0°N:or::.ng' 3-DaY 0-:.'fight i-Un:c. i
TOTAL P30~?ETARY LGSS REPORTED. (G.T.A,'NOT INCLUDED) $350.00 I $303.00
'_ ~ ~ J
F 0 U R :' Fi S T R S E T
a
a
:~ .
.~
J
i .. Iii A L I,
~~ . ~
tX
n
~:
a
~a ~
w o
O
N
H
t~
z
.~
,G ~`
S
A
O
q
^,~ _ -
' -- sr;coivn sTr~;~;;T
::~M ~ ~
.-
. ~~ ~ ~
~f f/~`./~ %lr/~~_.. tw. ~ /•..,,C^~ ~ / ~~"~~r_~ l.~I....~..._V-.A.e...~% ~!:~...-...aa5 ...
1
f
i'
C\ ~
t i~ ~.
~l .M ~a A~
N N ry) `
0
~~
~
p n~
~ `\
, m
.cam
V\
~ ~ '.
~
~ ~
. •
N ~
~
ca
~ ~ ;
~
~~ ~
~
i; by
~
~ ~
(~
(\ nn
i~
h
~ ~.
~ ~~
~ ~~~
(\ ~
. ~:
i
n~ its ~ ti
c4 ~~ ~ .•~
t~ (~ ~ ~
~. n; ,~ ~
.~'~ ~ n,
~~
1° 1° ~° n
1
`~- ~ ~~
r~
Z~
ti N ~~ N
,.
-~
49h
,~
~xuy
rucfure a, ~: ~~p~~S~f~r~~u:~9ur~e
-~
m
SANTA ~~C~ CA •• ~~,4t~L
Q~
•~
0
- _- .~~..._ v
~~. SPru~fure q Sfructurei;i;:>:':::
~~:~~
1 2nd ) ~-._®____.~~._._.,~~ )
PARKING $ TRAFFIC ENGINCERING
STRUCTURE SURVEILLANCE
Walking Patrol 'I`irne Check
STRUCTURE 1
Started at ground level at 4th Street entrance. Checked all the up rvnps and
staircases on the way to the top floor.
ELAPSED TIME - 8:10 Minutes
Proceeded down from roof, checked all down ramps ahd staircases.
ELAPSED TIME - 16:30 Minutes
Rode each elevator, stopping an each floor and checked restrooms.
TIME TO COMPLETELY CHECK STRUCTURE - 22 Minutes.
STRUCTURE 4
Started at ground level at 2nd Street entrance. Checked all the up ramps and
staircases on the way to the top floor.
ELAPSED TIME.- 6:45 Minutes
Proceeded down from roof, checked all down ramps and staircases.
ELAPSED TIME - 13:45 Minutes
Rode each elevator, stopping on each floor and checked restraoms.
TIME TO COMPLETELY CHECK STRUCTURE - 20 Minutes
WALKING OPTION A - 3 Men
TRAVEL TIME FROM STRUCTURE 1 TO STRUCTURE 4
Started at the alley exit of Structure 1, went through "Fashion Center" and
Woolworths to Structure 4.
ELAPSED TIME - 3 Minutes
TP.AVEL TIME FROM STRUCTURE 4 TO STRUCTURE 1
Started at the 2nd Street entrance of Structure 4 and walked around the block to
Mall Court East and into Structure 1 through the alley.
ELAPSED TIME - 3:20 Minutes
'TRAVEL TIML'• AA'll TWO STRUCTURE CHECKS - TOTAL MINIDNM ELAPSED TIME - 48 Minutes
rdALKING OP'.ICN L - 2 Men
TIIAVEL TIME FROM STRUCTURE TO STRUCTURE
Structure 3 to Structure 1 - 3:I8 Minutes
Structure 1 to Structure 5 - 4:23 Minutes
Structure 5 to Structure 2 - 7:25 Minutes
Structure 2 to Structure 4 - 4:50 bli.nutes
Structure 4 to Structure 6 - 2:35 Minutes
Structure 6 to Structure 3 - 7:27 Minutes
T'RAyEL TIME ANU THREE S'I'RUCTIJRE CIIECICS -TOTAL MINIMUM ELAPSED TIME - 77. Minutes
PARKING $ TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
STItUCT'U12E SURVETL,I,ANCE
Driving Patrol 'time Check
STRUCTURE 1
Started at ground l.evei at 4th Street entrance. Checked all th'e up ramps and
staircases on the way to the top floor..
ELAPSED TIME - 4:30 Minutes
Proceeded doom from roof, checked all down ramps and staircases.
ELAPSED TIME - 8:30 Minutes 1' ESE ~E '~'
Rocte each elevator, stopping on each floor and checked restro ~~L
TIME TO COMPLETELY CHECK STRUCTURE - 13:30 Minutes ~ UV 2 1 193
THIS iW11D57 B
RETURNED Td THE
STRUCl't1RE 4 CITY CLERK'S l4FFICE
-_ .- fOa FLING.
Started. at ground level at 2nd Street entrance. Checked all .the up ramps and
staircases vzz the way to the tep floor.
ELAPSED TIIvIE - 3:00 Minutes
Proceeded dawn from roof, checked all down ramps and staircases.
ELAPSED TIME - 5:15 Minutes
Rode each elevator, stopping an each floor and checked restrooms.
TIME TO COMPLETELY CHECK STRUCTURE - 10:15 P•Ii.nutes
DR1V.T.NG OPTION A - 3 Men
TRAVEL TIME PROM. STRUCTURE 1 'f0 STRUCTURE 4
Started at the 4th Street exit of Structure 1 and drove around the h1ocY, to
the 2nd Street entrance of Structure 4.
ELAPSED TIME - 2 Minutes
TRAVEL TIME AND Ti40 STRUCTURE CIIECKS - TOTAL MINIMUM ELAPSEll TIME - 26 Minutes
'DRIVING OPTION B - 2 Men
.TRAVEL TIME FROM STRUCTURE TO STRUCTURE
Structure 3 tv Structure 1 - 1:00 Minute
Structure 1 to Struct;ure 5 - 1:05 Minutes
JLLtC tUe J.tU ~L7': C:i. in.'s'e 2 - 1.:22 Aii-32171 cS
Structure 2 to Struccturc 4 - 1:00 PdnliYe
5ti;zlcture ~ tc> Struc urc 6 - 1:00 :/inute
Stx-~lcture 6 to Struci.lare 3 - 1:32 minutes
TP,A1'f.L TT?^E AA1~) T.t3:EE S?'RUCTIIhE CI~FECKS - 'fOIPI MI:P~ih~^'7MEiTAPS7:D TIME - 38 Mi3r~zi:es
f ~ _r ~ , a~~~,
PARKING F, TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
PROPOSED SECURITY GUARD SCHEDULE
3 MEN {CITY PERSONNEL)
*Yearly cost based on Paxkette salary range of $585 per month to $754 per month, (13.62% added to cover compensation
and retirement).
Two man coverage, 1 p.m. to S p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., Saturday, (Option B)
a
MONDAY TUESDAY IUEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY SUNDAY TOTAL HOURS YEARLY COST*'
1 g am to 9 am'to 9 am to 9 am to 9 am to OFF OFF 40 $7,934 to
6 pm 6 pm 6 pm 6 pm 6 pm $10,225
w 2 12 Noon 12 Noon t OPF OFF 12 Noon 9 am to 9 am to 40 $7
934 to
to 9 pm 9 pm to 9 pm 6 pm 6 pm ,
$10,225
w
0
3 OFF OFF 12 Noon 12 Noon 12 Noon 9 am to 9 am to 40 $7
934 to
to 9 pm to 9 pm to 9 pm 6 pm 6 pm ,
$10,225
z
0
Total
Hours of 9 am to 9 am to 9 am to 9 am to 9 am to 9 am to 9 am to $23,802 to
Patrol 9 pm 9 pm 9 pm 9 pm 9 pm 6 pm 6 pm 120 Hrs/Week $30,575
__ ~,...r_- --.__ i_....-
PARKING $ 1`RAFFIC ENGINEERING
PROPOSED SECURITY GUARD SCHEDULE
4 MEN (CTTY PERSONNELI
s" o
"•~
MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY jSATURDAY SUNDAY ' ' TOTAL HOURS YEARLY COST*,
1 OFF 9 am to 9 am to 9 am to 9 am to 9 am to OFF
40
$7,9
to
r 6 pm
_ 6 pm 6 pm 5 pm 6 pm . 25
$10,<
2
~ 9 am to 9 am to 9 am to 9 am to 9 am to OFF OFF
40
$7,934 to
I o 6 pm 6 pm 6 pm 6 pm 6 pm $10,225
x -
rWa
3
9 am to
12 Noon to
I7_ Noon t
OFF -
OFF
9 am to
9 am to
40
$7,934 'to
6 pm 9 pm 9 pm 6 m
P 6 pm $10,225
4 ~ 12 Noon to OFF OFF 12 Noon 12 Noon 3 am to : 9 ain to 40 $7,934 to
9 Pm to 9 prn to 9 pm 6 pm 6 pm $10,22.5
Total
Hours 9 nm to 9 am to 9 am to 9 am to 9 am to 9 am to 9 am to 160 Hrs/Week $31,736 to
of Patrol 9 pm 9 pm 9 pm 9 pm 9 pm 6 pm 6 pm $49,900
*Yearly cost based on Parkette salary range of $585 per month to $754 per month, (13.62% added to cover compensation
and retixement}.
Three man patrol coverage, 2 p.m. to S p.m., Monday through Friday, and 9 a.m. to 6 p.m., Saturday, (Option A)
4
J
~.~y
PARKING ~ TRAFFIC ENGINEEkING
ESTIMATED PRIVATE PATROL COSTS
FULL 78 HOUR PATROL
Option A - 234 Man-Hours/Week
Option B - 156 Man-Hours/Week
MODIFIED 78 HOUR PATROL
Option A - 160 Man-Hours/1Veek
Option B - 120 Man-Hours/Week
ourly Rate _-
Hours Week
Weeks Year
Annual Cost
Option A
Walking $3.50/Hr X 234 X 52 = $42,588
Option A
Driving $6~00/Hr X 234 X 52 = $78,008
Option B
i^Jalking $3.50/Hr X 156 X 52 = $28,392
Option B
Drii~ing $6.00/Hr X 156 X 52 = $48 672
Hourly Rate Hours/Week Weeks/Year Annual Cost
tion A ~
Walking $3.50/Hr X 160 X 52 = $29,120
Option A
Driving $6.00/Hr X 160 X 52 = $49,920
Option B
Walking $3.50/Hr X 120 X 52 = $21,840
Option B
Driving $6.00/Hr X 120 X 52 = $37,440