SR-10-21-1981-11I
I~I`~,.:.. 9
tl
October &® 19$1.
Mr. James Lansford, Secretary
City. Planning Commission
City of Santa Monica, California
Dear Mr. Lansford:
In accordance with the provisions of Section 9122C and 9148C
of Chapter 1, Article IX of tiYe Santa Monica Munioiapl Code
and with the provisions of Section 66452.5(d) of the State
Map Art, I appeal the Planning Commission°s October 5® 3981,
decision to table and thus take no action an tine fol7.oeainge
Tentative Tract 1VO. 41814, 5-unit new condominium,
1510 Princeton Street, K2, R. Murphy.
Tentative Parcel iJo. 14444m 4~unit condominium
conversion, 631 California Avenue,: R3, M. Daley.
and its decision to take no action one
Tentative Tract No. 42087, 19-unit condominium office
conversion, 2120 Wilshire k~oulevard, C4, F. lsoble.
CITY PI,ANNINC DEPARTMENT
CITY' OF SANTA MONICA
M E M O RAND U M
DATE: October 5, 1981
TO: T~onorable Planning Commission
FROM: Director of Planning
'~h
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel No. 14444, 4®Unit Condominium
Conversion, 631 California Avenue, Rag M: Daley,
This is an application for a 4rUnit condominium conversion
at 631 California Avenue on which no action was taken at
the May 4, 1981 meeting. As the applicant has executed a
written waiver allowing the Commission 180 days to act on
the tentative map it will be deemed approved on October 11,
1981 unless acted upon before that date.
Under Section 2(b) of the Interim Permit Procedures Ordinance
in effect October 1, 1981, a tentative tract or parcel map
for which application has been made cannot be approved.
RECOMMENDATION. It is respectfully recommended that Tentative
Parcel Map No. 14444 be denied in accordance with the
requirements of Ordinance No. 1220
Respectfully_submitted,
for o'f Planning
JL:nh
y. y> .... ...
a. .. .... n • 1 I
. ',
• A ~:
Planning Commission Minutes` -2-
6. PUBLIC HEARI'r~GS
Plone.
OLC BUSINESS
A. Tentative Parcel No. 14444
4 .
October S, 1981
The staff report stated that this application for a four-unit condominium con-
version at 631 California Avenue by Fiargaret Oaley had been before the Commission
for tentative approval May 4, 1981 when the applicant executed a ~•aritten G•raiver
.allowing the Commission 180 days to aot on the tentative map. The Commissioners
consulted with the City attorney Stark on alternative means to deal with the matter
under Interim Permit Procedures Ordinance No. 1z~0. Following discussion, attorney
for. the applicant, .Gordon Russell, addressed the Commission as did Mrs. Daley,. both
responding to questions. Commissioner Cloke stated she felt that the Commission
did not have adequate information an new requirements; She moved to adjourn to a
study session with legal counsel ahd c:orrtinue the matter to Wedsneday night when
they could act on the mattev~°. Gommissioner McKee seconded the motion and further
consideration and dis~cussiord fo:l~lawed. Commissioner Hotchkiss made a substitute
motion to table the matter and Chairman Katz seconded it. Commissioner Shearer
offered. to move the recorimendation of the staff report but Commissioner Hotchkiss
noted that a motion to table is not debatableg adding he felt tabling sues a clearer
act than abstaining from voting. Thereafter the motion to table carried. as fellows:.
AYE: Clokea Hotchkiss, McKee, Kleffel, Katz
P1AY: Shearer
ABSENTo Sullivan
8. Tentative Tract No. 41814
Staff member Kenyon Webster read the staff report which concerned a ne~v five-
unit condominium at 1510 Princeton Street proposed by Robert Murphy and Bud Richard-
son. Mr. Richardson was present and res.panded to questions, noting Mr. Murphy lived
in'the old single--family dwelling file partners had owned fror¢ early 1979. The prop
had been before the Commission for tentative approve'! May 4., 1981 and had been held
over on a 180 day waiver.. It ~••ras noted that one of the partners lined on the pra~
perty in the old single-family home there. Following discussion, Commissioner
Hotchkiss moved to table the matter. Seconded by Chairman Katz, the motion carried
Planning Commission P4inutes
6, PUBLIC WEARI~dGS:
Plone.
7. OLD BUSINESS
A. Tentative Parcel No. 14444
I
-2_
The staff report stated that this application for a four-unit condominium con-
version at 631 California Avenue by ~9argaret Daley had been before the Commission
for tentative approval May 4, 'i981 when the applicant executed a a~rritten ~•raiver
allowing the Commission 180 days to act ore the tentative map. The Commissioners
consulted with the City Attorney Stark on alternative means to deal with the matter
under Interim Permit Procedures Ordinance No. 1220. Following discussion, attorney
for the applicant, Gordon Russell, addressed the Commission as did Mrs. Daley, both
responding to questions. Commissioner Choke stated she felt that the Commission
did not have adequate information on new requirements< She moved to adjourn to a
study session with legal counse'i arAd continue the matter to t~dedsneday night when
they could act on the matters Commissioner McKee seconded the motion and further
consideration and discussioh'fol:loweda Commissioner Wotcl7kiss made a substitute
motion to table the matter and Chairman Katz seconded it. Caimnissioner Shearer
offered to move the recorimendation of the staff report but Commissioner Wotchkiss
noted that a motion to table is not debatables adding he felt tabling avas a clearer
act than abstaining from voting, Thereafter the motion to table carried as follows:
AYE: Choke, Watchkiss, McKee, Kleffel, Katz
PJAY: Shearer
ABSENTS Sulli-van
B. Tentative Tract No~ 41814
Staff member Kenyan IJebster read the staff report which concerned a new five-
unit condominium at 1510 Princeton Street proposed by Robert Murphy and Bud Richard-
son. Mr. Richardson was present and respondeii to questions, Hating P~1r. Murphy lived
in tfie old single-t'amily dwelling the partners-.had owned from early 1979. The pro=
had been before the Commission for tentative approval May 4., 1981 and had been held
over on a 180 day waiver. It uaas noted that one of the partners lived on the pro-
perty in the old single-family home there. Following discussion, Commissioner
Hotchkiss moved to tab~de the matter, Seconded by Chairman Katz, the motion carried.
by a vote identical to that immediately above.
C. 7eni;ative Tract No. 42087:,
P•ir. blebster`s staff report noted an application for conversion of a nineteen
unit office building to condominiums at 2120 !lilshire Boulevard presented by Frederick
PJoble.before the Commission Ciay 4, 1981. A 180-.day waiver had been executed by the
applicant. ..Chairman Katz and Commissioner Pic Kee noted they had not been present at
that meeting. A motion was made by Commissioner Shearer and seconded by Commissioner
Cloke to deny the tentative map in accordance vrith requirements of Ordinance 12200
The vote was as follows, and did no receive a quorum:
October 5, 1981
AYE:. Cloke, McKee, Shearer
ABSTAIN: Hotchkiss, Kleffel, Katz
ABSENT: Sullivan
~'-~ ~
~®i~D®N ~.. ~~ss~LL
o~~~r~ ~~~,~,-, ..
~c ~ cl 11 +~c~ ~~' 8rrrpppl^^^
~~~~ y k'v@4k,ti~"~~1~~~W ILS HIRE 60ULEVAR O. SUITE 410
SANTA MONICA~CAIIFORNIA 90403
(213) 829-3x88
October 20, 1981
Ann M. Shore, City Clerk
City of Santa Monica
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, Ca. 90401
Dear Ms. Shore:
Please be advised
granted by Margaret Daley to
October 14, 1981.
Re: Parcel Map 14444
Margaret Daley
that the extension of time
the City has expired as of
In accordance with the subdivision laws, since
the City failed to deny the above referenced tentative
parcel map within the allotted time, the map is deemed
approved. Therefore, demand is hereby made that you sign
the proposed map..
ver~ truly yqurs~~~
<~ '~//,
r'` GORDON L. RUSSELL
GLR:brs
cc; Margaret Daley
DATE: October 21, 1981
T0: City Attorney
Director of Planning
FROM: City Clerk
SUBJECT: Tentative Parcel Map 14444 submitted by
Margaret Daley
Attached is a copy of a letter from Gordon L. Russell, law
offices, requesting that I sign Tentative Parcel Map 14444
in that the extension of time granted has expired as of
October 14, 7981.
I will do nothing in regard to this request until I receive
further direction from the City Attorney.
~`-'G~i
Attachment