The URL can be used to link to this page

SR-07082008-8A~.Zv'~y,,J f~cb ~~ City Council and ccY at Redevelopment Agency Report Santa bianica~ City Council and Redevelopment Agency Meeting: Juty 8, 2008 Agenda Item: To: Mayor and City Council Chairperson and Redevelopment Agency From: Andy Agle, Director of Housing and Economic Development Subject: Parking Structures 7 and 8 -Improvement Project Recommended Action Staff recommends that the City Council (Council): adopt a Resolution finding that the proposed improvements to Structures 7 and 8 are of benefit to the Earthquake Recovery Redevelopment Project; 2. authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a Cooperation Agreement between the City and the Agency to carry out the Project; 3. adopt a Resolution authorizing waiver of competitive bidding requirements to enable the Macerich Company (Macerich) to construct the improvements; and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute agreements with Macerich for final design and construction of the Project consistent with Agency approval in an amount not-to-exceed $10 million for fapade improvements, solar panels, and attendant parking; for leasing and management of the proposed pedestrian- oriented retail uses; for attendant parking operations; and for energy rate reimbursements for the solar photovoltaic systems. Staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency (Agency), after consideration of the Addendum to the 2005 Civic Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report and the tiered 2007 Santa Monica Place Remodel Mitigated Negative Declaration: approve proposed schematic designs for Structures 7 and 8 and authorize staff to implement the proposed Project involving construction of fapade improvements, pedestrian oriented spaces and solar photovoltaic systems, and installation of attendant parking improvements, as conditioned; adopt a Resolution finding that the proposed improvements to Structures 7 and 8 are of benefit to the Earthquake Recovery Redevelopment Project; 3. authorize the Executive Director to negotiate and execute a Cooperation Agreement between the City and the Agency to carry out the Project; 4. approve Lemon Scented Gum tree for the streetscape improvements along Colorado Avenue; and 5. authorize the submission of an application for reimbursement from the State related to the installation of solar photovoltaics, estimated to be $593,000. Executive Summary On March 11, 2008, the City Council gave project direction regarding issues related to facade and attendant parking improvements proposed for Parking Structures 7 and 8 adjacent to Santa Monica Place. This staff report seeks formal approval to implement that direction, including: • Assign responsibility to Macerich to prepare final construction designs and construct the project, including waiving public bidding, in order to achieve cost and time savings and enhance constructability; • Assign responsibility to Macerich for management and leasing of the ground- floor, pedestrian-oriented spaces proposed for the parking structures; • Authorize a funding application and reimbursement agreement for the installation of solar photovoltaic panels on the parking structure roofs; • Consider the Addendum to the 2005 Civic Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, which demonstrates the proposed project does not generate additional environmental impacts; and • Authorize application to the Architectural Review Board and Coastal Commission for applicable permits based on the updated fagade improvement designs. Background On March 11, 2008, staff presented the Agency with several recommended actions concerning the proposed attendant parking and facade improvement project at Parking Structures 7 and 8. At that meeting, the Agency directed staff to move forward with: • Attendant Parking -making changes necessary to align the operations and pricing of Structures 7 and 8 with downtown parking Structures 1 through 6; 2 Fagade Improvements -completing schematic fagade improvement designs, with special attention to the visual orientation of the solar photovoltaic panels and landscaping along Colorado Avenue where pedestrian-oriented uses are not proposed, returning to the Agency with updated designs; • Retail Leasing -negotiating terms with Macerich for leasing and management of the proposed pedestrian-oriented retail spaces and developing standards to ensure proposed tenants will compliment the surrounding areas and enliven the sidewalks; • Final Design and Construction of Improvements - negotiating terms with Macerich for the preparation of final construction designs and construction of the improvements on behalf of the City; • Streetscape Improvements - implementing streetscape improvements on Colorado between Second and Fourth Streets, including landscaping adjacent to Parking Structure 8 on Colorado Avenue; and • Valet Program -allowing valet parking in the parking structures, pursuant to standards. At this time, staff is working with Macerich, Bayside District, and the Convention and Visitors Bureau to refine and finalize the proposed program for Council consideration at a future date after completion of appropriate environmental review. Discussion As directed, staff has returned with an update on the fagade improvement design and seeks formal approval of the following items: 1. Construction of Improvements - to execute an agreement delegating Agency authority to implement the Project to the City; and to execute an agreement assigning Macerich the responsibility to construct the Project; 2. Waiver of Public Bidding - to forego bidding requirements to ensure coordination with the Santa Monica Place remodel and to realize cost and project time savings; 3. Management of Retail - to execute an agreement with Macerich to manage the leasing of proposed pedestrian oriented retail spaces. 3 Fagade Improvements -Update The original concept design features of trex-clad veneers, colored channel glass enclosing stairwells, public art and creation of ground-level, pedestrian-oriented space remains integral to the proposed fapade improvements. In addition, ground-level landscaping has been added along the Colorado frontage where pedestrian-oriented uses are not proposed. Based on Council feedback, Pugh + Scarpa has redesigned the solar photovoltaic panels to complement the scale of the parking facilities and surrounding features, while providing a significant design element that signifies Santa Monica's commitment to solar power. The design has also been modified to further enhance details related to pedestrian-oriented uses. The spaces are designed to be flexible to accommodate uses such as retail and bicycle parking. The schematic designs show options for bicycle facilities in both structures; however, staff will determine the optimal location for bicycle parking in relation to the on-going analysis of bicycle facilities in the whole downtown area, including Parking Structure 2. It is likely that the final location of the different pedestrian-oriented uses will be determined after ARB approval but prior to construction drawings. In total, up to approximately 275 bicycle parking spaces (77 at PS 7 and 198 at PS 8) could be created. The ARB will review the final design paying particular attention to articulation of store front and signage, to ensure that the architectural and design elements create active and engaging corners at 2"d /Colorado and 4th /Broadway and the details of materials and how it interfaces with existing materials and the public art. The cost for final design and construction of the fapade improvements is estimated to total approximately $5.5 million. The updated schematic designs are provided in Attachment F. Streetscape improvements along Colorado Avenue will be implemented as required by the Santa Monica Place conditions of approval, according to the recommendations from the Certified Arborist Report for the Colorado Avenue Trees dated February 21, 2008. The City will maintain the six ficus trees (fronting Structure 8) in their current location. The eight magnolias (fronting Macy's) will be removed and replaced due to their existing poor to weak condition. Staff evaluated three options for replacement trees including: 4 Lemon Scented Gum, Sweetshade and Pink Trumpet Tree. Staff recommends the magnolias be replaced with the Lemon Scented Gum tree, an evergreen tree that reaches a height of 60 - 80' wide with a canopy spread 35 -40' in coastal conditions. Lemon Scented Gums are popular for their smooth light colored trunks and their aroma that smells strongly of lemons. An example of this tree and the two other alternatives considered is provided in Attachment G. The Lemon Scented Gum is an evergreen tree that provides dappled shade throughout the year. This species does well when planted near structures as its growth habit accentuates the architecture of buildings, and it thrives in high traffic urban conditions. Its maintenance requirements are consistent with existing street trees in the downtown area. Solar Photovoltaic Systems As established in the solar study from Community Energy Independence Initiative, the downtown parking structures owned by the Agency were identified as viable solar sites. City staff met with Macerich regarding the proposed solar initiative and discussed integrating solar photovoltaic panels with the proposed fagade improvements at Structures 7 and 8. Macerich is supportive of solar systems at Structures 7 and 8 as solarizing the parking structures coupled with the green building features of the mall remodel project may contribute to LEED certification of the Santa Monica Place project, potentially becoming the first adaptive-reuse shopping center with this designation in the nation. Prior to installation of the solar systems, a study evaluating the maximum capacity of solar energy needed for Structures 7 and 8 will be conducted and depending on the cost-effective calculations (or the ARB-approved design for the sunshades), the amount of solar PVs to be installed will be incorporated in the construction designs accordingly. Assuming the proposed sunshades cover approximately 35,500 square feet of the parking structures' roofs with 333 kilowatts AC of solar panels, electricity savings will be approximately $2,170,000 net present value (over a 25 year warranted life of the solar modules) at current rates and based on $.32 per kWh generated. The City can also potentially receive nearly $593,000 in Performance-Based Incentive (PBI) payments 5 from the State paid over five years. Macerich's architect will enter into a contract with a qualified solar integrator to design and provide for the installation of the sunshade structures and solar systems as part of Macerich's construction scope of work. The solar integrator will be responsible for reserving the PBI funds with Southern California Edison. The City will negotiate a contract with Macerich to reimburse the City for Macerich's electricity cost savings from the solar installations. The solar systems would be mounted on custom-designed shade structures and cost approximately $3.5 million. Based on the proposed solar PV installation on the roof on Structures 7 and 8, and after taking into account the PBI payments and the yearly electricity cost savings, the City will have invested approximately $.737 million on this solar initiative. Attendant Parking Staff is moving forward with plans to convert Structures 7 and 8 to attendant parking. Pursuant to Council direction on March 11, existing agreements with Macerich will be amended to ensure that the City and Macerich are kept whole financially in the shift to attendant parking. Integration of these two facilities within the downtown parking management systems will be completed by Fall 2009. The cost of attendant parking improvements is estimated to total approximately $1 million. Construction of Proposed Improvements and Waiver of Public Bidding As directed by Council on March 11, Macerich will construct the fapade and attendant parking improvements in order to eliminate the potential for conflicts among multiple construction entities on a single site. To implement Macerich's role, staff recommends that Council adopt a resolution waiving the proposed construction from competitive bidding and authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with Macerich to carry out preparation of final construction designs, perform and complete proposed construction of Project improvements and obtain all applicable permits in concert with the Santa Monica Place reopening by Fall 2009. Construction work will be subject to prevailing wage and all applicable State and local laws. 6 Manaaement of Retail Spaces Following the Agency's direction to move forward with negotiating terms to manage and lease the proposed retail spaces at Structures 7 and 8, staff met with Macerich to discuss leasing strategies and related issues including property management, operations, management responsibilities, tenant selection, rent structure, preferred retail uses and services, as well as prohibited uses and maintenance standards. The proposed terms of the retail leasing strategy are attached and staff recommends that the Agency authorize the Executive Director to execute an agreement to assign leasing responsibility to Macerich. Other Downtown Parking Structures At its March 11 meeting, the City Council directed staff to consider measures to ensure that the facades of Parking Structures 1 through 6 are addressed with the same level of care as the proposed facades for Structures 7 and 8. In order to keep the current facade improvements planned for Structures 1 through 6 on schedule, (bids were received on June 23, 2008), staff proposes to prepare a second phase of facade improvements for these parking structures on Second and Fourth Streets that would build upon the improvements currently underway. Constructing additional improvements could cost several million dollars. Staff proposes to fund those improvements with revenues that are expected to be raised from parking rate adjustments in the Downtown, prior to bonding for additions to the Downtown parking supply. Environmental Analvsis Pursuant to CEQA, the project has undergone an environmental analysis resulting in preparation of an Addendum to the 2005 CCSP EIR and the "tiered" 2007 Santa Monica Place Remodel Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Addendum (Attachment E) finds that there are no new significant impacts and none of the conditions requiring preparation of a subsequent environmental impact report have occurred; therefore it is recommended the Agency authorize staff to proceed with the application to the City and Coastal Commission for applicable permits. The proposed project for Structures 7 and 8 will comply with all applicable mitigation measures identified in the previously certified 7 2005 EIR for Civic Center Specific Plan project and the adopted 2007 Mitigated Negative Declaration for Santa Monica Place remodel project. Attachment H summarizes the applicable mitigation measures that will be applied as conditions to the proposed Project, as well as the City's standard conditions. Public Art The process of renovating Structures 7 and 8 presented an opportunity for public art to be incorporated on the shear walls facing 4th Street (Structure 7) and 2nd Street (Structure 8). Per the direction given by the Arts Commission, a request for qualifications was developed with a budget of $150,000, including contingency. The Request for Qualifications was issued in February 2008 and on March 13, 2008 an artist selection panel met and selected eight finalists who later presented proposals on May 21, 2008. After reviewing the proposals, the panel selected two proposals, one submitted by Anne Marie Karlsen and one from the team of Benjamin Ball and Gaston Nogues. Staff will present the proposals to the arts commission on July 28, 2008 and will be recommending that the Commission approve the artists recommended by the artist selection panel. The artists' preliminary concepts have been incorporated into the renderings, and these will be refined through the final design process. Next Steps With Council and Agency approval, staff will finalize the proposed fagade improvements for Architectural Review Board approval. The improvements and attendant parking program also will be presented to the Coastal Commission for appropriate review. Macerich will take responsibility for final design and construction of the improvements, with a target to complete the improvements. when Santa Monica Place reopens in Fall 2009. Financial Impacts and Budget Actions 1. Funds for the City's portion of the parking attendant improvements currently estimated at $1 million are available in account 0160621.589000; 8 2. Funds for parking structure Facade Improvements in the amount of $5.1 million are available in account 0170621.589000 and $.4 million in account 0160621.589000; 3. Funds for the installation of solar systems in the amount of $3.5 million are available in account 0170621.589000. Prepared by: Tina Rodriguez, Redevelopment Administrator Approved: Forwarded to Council: Andy Agle, Director Housing and Economic Attachments: Attachment A: City Resolution -Findings of Benefit Attachment B: Agency Resolution -Findings of Benefit Attachment C: City Resolution -Authorizing Waiver of Bidding Requirements Attachment D: Proposed Retail Leasing Terms Attachment E: CEQA Analysis -Addendum to 2005 CCSP EIR Attachment F: Updated Schematic Designs - Fagade Improvement Program Attachment G: Tree Specimens -Colorado Avenue Attachment H: Parking Structures 7 and 8 Improvement Project -Conditions of Approval 9 Attachment D Proposed Retail Leasing Terms The Redevelopment Agency owns Parking Structures 7 and 8 and as part of the fagade improvement program for these two facilities, pedestrian-oriented spaces including. bicycle parking and retail (in the form of small kiosk-type commercial operations) will be incorporated to enhance the pedestrian experience along Colorado Avenue and Broadway. At its March 11, 2008 meeting, the Agency directed staff to negotiate terms with Macerich to manage and lease the retail spaces at Struc#ures 7 and 8. Macerich has agreed to the following terms: Management Fee: $2,500 monthly management fee to Macerich (deducted from the Gross rents); Net Rents: Net rents are gross rents less the management fee. Agency would receive 50% and Macerich would receive 50%; Maintenance. Repair and Taxes: Passed through to the Tenants without Agency participation; Management Responsibilities are to: • Maintain lease space (roof, electrical, plumbing, doors); paint exterior and remove exterior graffiti. • Advertise and recruit tenants as vacancies arise • Evaluate tenant applications and negotiate leases • Monitor .lease compliance including payment of rent, maintenance of insurance, 7eporting of gross receipts, maintenance of lease space • Establish and maintain standards for attractive visual merchandising • Organize cooperative advertising on behalf of tenants • Arrange for regular maintenance of the facilities • Pay rent to City in a timely manner • Provide City annual reports on tenants, rent charged, and other matters • Conduct business in an ethical and professional manner Operations: • All commercial spaces shall be attended by staff. • Kiosk spaces shall not be made available for static displays. • All busihesses shall adhere to the same regular hours of operation as the hours of Santa Monica Place tenants. • All users must strictly adhere to maintenance standards and operate their spaces in a clean and orderly manner (see attached for additional language) -1- • All business signage will conform to any master signage program approved by the Architectural Review Board, for SM Place on PS 7 & 8. Tenant Selection: The property management objective is to tenant the retail spaces with a variety of uses that satisfy customer demand. The City will delegate to Macerich authority to enter into leases or licenses for the retail spaces in accordance with the preferred and prohibited uses outlined below. Preferred retail uses may include, among others: • Men's, women's and children's clothing • Accessories such as hats, belts, sunglasses and scarves • Shoes • Jewelry • Handmade. crafts • World crafts • Toys and games • Books and magazines • Stationery, gift cards and wrapping • Decorative household items • Specialty pet items • Health and Beauty Aids • Florists Music and musical instruments • Garden supplies • Food or pre-packaged food. Preferred service uses may include, among others: • Shoe repair and shoe shine • Jewelry repair • .Shoe shine • Photographic developing • Tickets for tours and performances Prohibited uses include • Check cashing • Cell phone • Alcohol sales • Tobacco sales • Tattoo • Massage • Henna • Weapons sales -2- Sub-tenant additional maintenance standards: Sub-tenant will at its expense: (a) keep the inside and outside of all glass in the doors and windows located in the Premises intact and clean; (b) replace promptly any cracked or broken glass located on the Premises with glass of like grade and quality; (c) maintain the Premises in a clean,. orderly and sanitary condition and free of insects, rodents; vermin and other pests; (d) keep any garbage, trash, rubbish or other refuse in rat-proof containers within the interior of the Premises or in Lessee designated trash containers until removed; (e) have such garbage, trash, rubbish and refuse removed on a daily basis; (f) keep all mechanical apparatus reasonably free of vibration and noise which may be transmitted beyond the Premises; (g) comply. with all applicable Law; (h) light exterior signs during Tenant's business hours and turn the same off to the extent reasonably required by Tenant; (i) comply with and observe all rules and regulations established by Tenant; (j) maintain sufficient and seasonal inventory and have sufficient number of personnel to maximize sales volume in the Premises; and (k) conduct its business in all respects in accordance with high standards as reasonably determined by Landlord. Sub-tenant will not cause, permit or suffer any nuisance or waste to or of the Premises or any disturbance of the quiet enjoyment of-any other tenant, licensee, occupant, visitor or other user and shall not (I) place or maintain any merchandise (or permit any vendors to display wares in any manner outside the Premises), trash, refuse or other articles in any vestibule or entry of the Premises; on the footwalks or corridors adjacent thereto or elsewhere on the exterior of the Premises, nor obstruct any driveway, corridor, footwalk, parking area; or any other Common Area; (m) use or permit the use of any objectionable advertising medium, including, without limitation, loudspeakers, phonographs, public address systems, sound amplifiers, radio or television broadcasts which are in any manner audible or visible outside of the Premises; (n) permit undue accumulations of, burn or dump garbage, discharge of any sewage, trash, rubbish or other refuse within, without or under the Premises; (o) cause or permit foul and offensive odors to emanate or to be dispelled from the. Premises; (p) solicit business outside of the Premises except in the normal course of advertising and promoting sub-tenant's business (which advertising and promoting shall not interfere with the Common Area or with other tenants); (q) distribute handbills or other advertising matter to, in or upon any automobiles parked in the parking areas or in any other Common Area; (r) permit the parking of vehicles so as to interfere with the use of any driveway, corridor,. footwalk, parking area, or any other Common Area outside of the Premises; (s) receive or ship articles of any kind outside the designated loading areas for the Premises; (t) use any portion outside the Premises for the sale or display of any merchandise or for any other business, occupation or undertaking; (u) conduct or permit to be conducted any auction, fire, going out of business, bankruptcy, or other similar type sale in or connected with the Premises (but this provision shall not restrict the absolute freedom of Tenant in determining its own selling prices, -3- nor shall it preclude the conduct of periodic seasonal, promotional or clearance sales); (v) knowingly use or permit the use of any portion of the Premises for any unlawful purpose or for any activity not authorized under this sub-lease; (w) place a load upon any floor which exceeds the floor load which the floor was designed to carry; (x) operate its heating or air-conditioning in such a manner as to drain heat or air-conditioning from other tenant spaces; (y) use or operate all or any portion of the Premises for any purpose whatsoever which shall interfere or be inconsistent with any covenants; (z) permit animals of any kind to be brought into or kept in or about the Premises, unless they are being sold in a shop, except animals assisting the blind or physically handicapped; (aa) permit the Premises or any part thereof to be used for lodging or sleeping; or (bb) cause or permit any Hazardous Substances to be brought upon, kept or used in or about the Premises by Tenant, its agents, employees, contractors or invitees; except for Hazardous Substances which is necessary to Tenant's business and will be used, kept and stored in a manner that complies with all Environmental Law regulating any such Hazardous Substances); or (cc) cause or permit any violation of Environmental Law. -4- ATTACiiMENT E CEQA Analysis -Addendum to 2005 CCSP EIR The document is not available electronically. ATTACI-IlVIENT E City of Santa Monica Addendum to the Certified Civic Center Specific Plan Environmental. Impact Report .and Santa Monica Place Remodel Project Mitigated Negative Declaration July 2008 City of Santa Monica Civic Center Specific Plan Comprehensive Update, Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Amendment and Associated Development ~~ Addendum to the Certified Final EIR for the Santa Monica Civic Center Specific Plan and Mitigated Negative Declaration for -the Santa Monica Place Remodel Project for the Santa Monica Place Parking Structures 7 and 8 Improvement Project Prepared by: ' City of Santa. Monica Planning & Environmental Programs Division 1685 Main Street, Room 212 P.O. Box 2200 Santa Monica, CA 90407 Contact: Sarah Lejeune, Senior Planner Prepared with the assistance of I2incon Consultants, Inc. 790 East Santa Clara Street, Suite 103 Ventura, California 93001 (310) 458-8341 July 2008 This report is produced on 50 % recycled paper with 30 % post-consumer content. Santa Monica Place Parking Structures 7 and 8 Improvement Project Addendum to the Civic Center Specific Plan EIR and Santa Monica Place Remodel Project MND City of Santa Monica-Civic Center Specific Plan Comprehensive Update, Downtown Redevelopment Plan Amendment and Associated Development Addendum to the Certified Final EIR and-Santa Monica Place Remodel Project-MND TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..... .....:.................................................:...............................1 Original Project Description/Bacicground ............:................................................................... 2 Proposed Project Modification ....................................................................................................4 Environmental Impact Analysis of Project Modification ................. Aesthetics and Shadow Effects ................................................... Air Quality.,. ..........:..........:............................................................ Construction Effects ...................:................................................. Cultural Resources ....................................................................... Geology and SoiLs ......................................................................... Hazards and Hazazdous Materials ............................................ Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................... Land Use and Planning ............................................................... Noise ............................................................................................... Population and Housing ............................................................. Public Services .............................................................................. Traffic and.Circulation .............................:................................... .Utilities and Service Systems ...................................................... .Mandatory Findings of Significance .......................................... Conclusion ...........................................:.......................:................. Figures Figure 1: Regional Location Figure 2: Project Location Figure 3: Basic Site Plan Figures 4 and 5: Conceptual Photosimulations Figure 6: Conceptual Ground Floor Plan - Pazking Structure 7 Figure 7: Conceptual Ground Floor Plan -Parking Structure 8 Appendix Traffic and Circulation Study Memo .:.............. 5 ................ 5 ................ 6 ................ 6 ................ 6 ................ 6 ................ 7 ................ 7 ................ 7 .....:.......... 7 ..:............. 7 ................ 8 ................ 8 .:.............. 9 ................ 9 ..............10 City ofSantaMonica Santa Monica Place Parking Structures 7 and8lmprdvement Project Addendum to the Civic Center Specific Plan EIR and Santa Monica Place This page intentionally left blank. Cityof Santa Monica Santa Monica Place Parking Structures 7 and 8 Improvement Project Addendum to the Civic Center Specific Plan EIR and Santa Monica Place Remodel Project MND This page intentionally left blank. City of Santa Monica Santa Monica Place Parking Structures 7 and 8 Improvement Project Addendum to the Civic Center Specific Plan EIR and Santa Monica Place Remodel Project MND INTRODUCTION This document is an Addendum to the environmental documentation prepared for the City of Santa Monica Civic CenterSpecific Plan project and the Santa Monica Place Remodel Project. The Addendum has been prepared in accordance with the relevant provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970 (as amended) and the State CEQA Guidelines as implemented by the City of Santa Monica. The prior environmental documentationreferenced in this Addendum consists principally of the certified 2005 Santa Monica Civic Center Specific Plan project EIIZ and the adopted 2007 Santa Monica Place Remodel Project Mitigated Negative Declazation (MND), which itself follows and is "tiered off" the Santa Monica Civic Center '° Specific Plan project EIR. Both aze incorporated by reference. This Addendum refers to each of these documents as appropriate when comparing the impacts of the proposed modifications to those identified in the prior analyses. According to Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, an addendum to a previously certified EIR or Negative Declazation is the appropriate environmental document in instances when "only minor technical changes or additions aze necessary" and when the new information does not involve new significant environmental effects beyond those identified in the EIR or Negative Dedazation. Specifically, Section 15164 (b) of the State CEQA Guidelines states that it is appropriate for a Lead Agency to pxepaze an addendum when some or all of the following criteria aze met: (1) Only minor technical changes are needed to make the analysis in the prior EIR (or MND) sufficient; (2) The changes fo the Project Description are non-significant and contain elaborations upon or clarifications to components of a project that were described in a conceptual or schematic manner in the original EIR; (3) No new previously unanticipated environmental impacts are anticipated and other impacts studied are either non-significant or were contemplated, described and mitigated in the prior CEQA document for which the Addendum is being prepared (Guidelines Section 15164 (d), and no additional substantial mitigation planning is necessary for project implementation-clarification and refinement of mitigation planning is acceptable (Guidelines Section 15164 (e)). As discussed below, the change being contemplated involves minor revisions to the previously proposed plans, with no identifiable increase in development intensity. In addition, as supported by the analysis below, the proposed revisions would not result in new significant environmental effects beyond those previously identified. As such, the addendum is the appropriate environmental document under CEQA. All mitigation measures identified in the previously certified EIIZ and MND shall apply to the current proposal. In addition, the adopted Mitigation Monitoring Plan from the previous CEQA documents shall remain effective for the current project. tarty of Santa Santa Monica Ptace Parking Structures 7 and 8 Improvement Project Addendum to the Civic Center Specific Plan EIR and Santa Monica Place Remodel Proied MND This Addendum includes a description of the revised plan as it is currently proposed and a compazison of the impacts of the revised plan to those identified in the environmental documentation previously certified/adopted by the City of Santa Monica. ORIGINAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION/BACKGROUND Project Location The project site is located in the western portion of Los Angeles County, in the City of Santa Monica. Figure 1 shows the regional Iocation and Figure 2 shows the location of the project within the City of Santa Monica. The Assessor's Pazcel Numbers are 4291-026-021 and 4291-026- 022. The project site comprises two city blocks bounded by Broadway on the north, 4~ Street on the east, Colorado Avenue on the south, and 2nd Street on the west. Regional access to the site is provided from the Santa Monica Freeway (Interstate Highway 10) to the south via an exit ramp to 4th and 5~ Street. Santa Monica Place Remodel Project Description (Approved September 11, 2007) The Santa Monica Place Remodel Project studied in the 2007 MND consisted of an adaptive reuse project involving a remodel of the existing Santa Monica Place enclosed mall shopping azea, retaining the two existing anchor depaztment store spaces and the two existing parking structures. (As stated above, the adopted Santa Monica Place Remodel Project MND followed and was "tiered off" the8anta Monica Civic Center Specific Plan project EIR.) The basic layout of Santa Monica Place is shown on Figure 3. The azea to be remodeled included three levels of retail and restaurant uses as well as changes to the pazking structures, resulting in a reduction in overall floor azea and pazking spaces provided, as summarized in Table 1. The reduction in retail space resulted in a corresponding increase in available. open space and pedestrian walkways leading to a central open-air plaza. The completed height was proposed to remain at the existing height of 56 feet. Table 1 Remodel Summary as Studied in the 2007 MND Uses Existing Use Proposed Use Decrease Total Area (sf) 677,209 586,453 90,756 Gross Leasable Area (sf) 558,556 - 548,322 10,234 Parking Spaces 2,246 2,197 49 Note: Gross leasable area includes retail, restaurant (dining/supporf/bar), food couK (retaiUseafing), anchor retail and Macy's, and does not include community room, management & security offices, enclosed walkways, or service circulation. sf =square feet Source: The Macerich Company, Jerrie Architecture Urban Design, Drawing No. Ag.002, 2007. City of Santa 2 Santa Monica Place Parking Structures 7 and 8 Improvement Project Addendum to the Civic Center Specific Plan EIR and Santa Monica Place Remodel Proied MND The redesign of the interior section of the mall required partial demolition removing less than 50% of all the structural members; possible minimal excavation, relocation of interior walls, and removal of skylights and roof sections. The demolition for the northern access that connects the central court to the Third Street Promenade included demolitionof a portion of Parking Stmcture #7, all of the roof, and many of the current walls and existing tenant spaces. The two existing pazking structures (one in the north and the other in the southwest portion of the site) were proposed to remain and be used for customer pazking. Upon completion, the Santa Monica Place Remodel Project would have 2,197 available pazking spaces, 1,919 on-site and 278 off-site parking spaces. CEQA Process: EIR and Mitigated Negative Declazation An Environmental Impact Report (EIIZ) was prepazed for the original Civic Center Specific Plan (CCSP) project in accordance with Section 15087 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Guidelines. The original CCSP project included a proposal for the Santa Monica Place site that consisted of 560,000 square feet of reconfigured or reconstructed commercial retail space, 85,000 squaze feet of new office space, and 450 multi-family dwelling units. Two Notices of Prepazation (NOP) were filed with the California Office of Planning and Research and distributed to involved public agencies and interested pazties for 30-day public review periods that concluded on February 1S, 2003 and May 10, 2004. Public scoping meetings were held on January 21, 2003 and April 15, 2004. Copies pf the Draft EIR were made available for a 45-day public review period, which closed on July 22, 2004. A total of 13 comment letters on the Ihaft EIIZ were received. These comment letters, as well as the response to comments, were included in the Final EII2. The EIR addressed the potential environmental effects of the proposed project. The scope of the EIR included environmental issues determined to be potentially significant based on the Initial Study and responses to the NOP. Significant and unavoidable impacts that could not be mitigated were identified in the EIR and addressed in the adopted CEQA findings and statement of overriding considerations as follows: • Cultural Resources - unmitigable significant impacts to cultural resources if a large Moreton Bay Fig is removed or unsuccessfully relocated; • Traffic/Circulation - unautigable significant traffic impacts to nine intersections, including PCH /California Incline, Ocean Avenue /Colorado Avenue , 4~ Street / Broadway, 4th Street /Colorado Avenue, 4~ Street / I-10 Off-ramp, 4~ Street / I-10 On-ramp, Lincoln Boulevazd / I-10 Off-ramp, Lincoln Boulevard / Pico Boulevard, and Fifth Street J Colorado Avenue; immitigable significant traffic impacts at one CMP arterial monitoring intersection, Lincoln Boulevard / Pico Boulevazd; immitigable significant neighborhood traffic impacts on 4~ Street between Pico Boulevazd and Ocean Park Boulevazd and between Ocean Pazk Boulevard grid the southern City limits; Monica Santa Monica Place Parking Structures 7 and 8 Improvement Project Addendum to the Civic Center Specific Plan EIR and Santa Monica Place Remodel Project MND • Air Quality - urunitigable significant air quality impactsselated to ROG, NOx and CO emissions from vehicle trips, natural gas use, and landscape maintenance equipment; • Construction Effects - unmitfgable significant impacts to air quality from NOx emissions during demolition and construction and ROC emissions during application of architectural coatings; and • Neighborhood Effects - unmitigable significant impacts identified above related to Air Quality, Construction Effects and Transportation and Circulation. The Final EIR for the Civic Center Specific PIan was completed in October 2004. The Specific Plan, EIR and related actions were reviewed by the Civic Center Working Group on May 3, 2005 and by the Planning Commission on May 18, 2005. On June 28, 2005 the City Council certified the EIR, adopted CEQA findings and a statement of overriding considerations, and adopted the Specific Plan amendments which ultimately excluded Santa Monica Place. Subsequently, a reduced project, the Santa Monica Place Remodel was brought forward for this portion of the analyzed area. Subsequent to certification of the CCSP EIR, the City prepared an Initial Study (IS) for the Santa Monica Place Remodel project, resulting in preparation of a draft Mitigated Negative Declazation (MND) pursuant to CEQA for the proposed remodel of the enclosed mall shopping area. The MND followed and was "tiered off" the Santa Monica Civic Center Specific Plan project EIIZ. The MND found no significant impacts that could not be mitigated. The potentially significant impacts were chiefly associated with construction. Mitigation measures were identified to address construction impacts related to air quality, traffic and parking, noise, hazardous materials and neighborhood effects. In addition, mitigations reflecting standard Santa Monica building requirements were identified to address potential geology and soils impacts associated with construction in areas with active or potentially active earthquake faults. The Draft IS/MND was circulated fof 45 days with a public comment period ending on August 24, 2007. On September 11, 2007 the City Council and Redevelopment Agency adopted the MND and approved the Santa Monica Place Remodel project. PROPOSED PROJECT MODIFICATION: PARKING STRUCTURES 7 AND 8 IMPROVEMENTS The proposed modifications to the Santa Monica Place Remodel project consist of reconfiguration of Santa Monica downtown Parking Structures 7 and 8, owned by the Santa Monica Redevelopment Agency and located adjacent to Santa Monica Place. The assessor's pazcel numbers are 4291-026-916 and 4291-026-917. The project includes the following primary components: • Re-striping and circulation adjustments for Pazking Structures 7 and 8; Conversion of the 4~ Street driveway accessing Parking Structure 7 to right-turn outbound only; Installation of an attendant parking program with associated control equipment; City of Santa 4 Santa Monica Place Parking Structures land 8 Improvement Project Addendum to the Civic Center Specific Plan EIR and Santa MonicaPlace Remodel Proiect MND • Installation of ground level pedestrian-oriented improvements, including retail uses and bicycle pazking facilities, and Facade improvements including solaz photovoltaic panels. Parking Modifications Prior to beginning of construction for the Santa Monica Place renovation project (currently underway), Parking Structures 7 and 8 contained a total of 1,968 pazking spaces. The Santa Monica Place renovation project would reduce the number of pazking spaces available in Parking Structures 7 and 8 to 1,919 spaces, commensurate with the reducfion in square footage of the mall. The Parking Structures 7 and S Improvements Project, with attendant parking program and ground level pedestrian-oriented uses, would result in a slight reduction in the number of vehicular parking spaces from the September 11, 2007 approved remodel project . Structure 7, located at the intersection of 4~ Street & Broadway, would be re-striped to accommodate 834 spaces, a reduction of 49 spaces from the recently approved remodel project of 883 spaces; Structure 8, located at the intersection of 2nd Street & Colorado Avenue, would be re-striped to accommodate 1,009 spaces, a decrease of 27 spaces from the currently approved 1,036. In addition to the spaces available in parking'structures 7 and S, Santa Monica Place has historically had use of 278 spaces at a remote location for employee pazking. The revised project includes relocating 76 spaces from the on-site Pazking Structures land 8 to the off-site location identified in the existing Off-Site Pazking Agreement to maintain the overall Santa Monica Place parking supply at a minimum of 2,197-spaces per the approved Santa Monica remodel project, increasing the number of off-site spaces from 27S to 354 spaces. The proposed parking and circulationplans for the ground floors of structure 7 and 8 are shown on figures 6-and 7 respectively, subject to minor changes in final design. Renderings of the proposed facade improvements are shown on figures 4 (a through d) and 5 (a through c), subject to minor changes in final design. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS OF PROJECT MODIFICATION This section addresses each of the environmental issues that have the potential to change as a result of the revised project. This section also compazes the effects of the revised plan currently proposed to the effects of the approved plan that was the subject of the previous CEQA documents. Aesthetics and Shadow Effects The height, volume and general massing of the Santa Monica Place enclosed mall shopping area would remain generally the same under the proposed modifications. The facade treatments and ground floor frontage changes to the parking structures may affect the overall limits of the structure in minor ways, but the perceived mass and building height would remain generally the same as analyzed in the 2007 MND. Total street frontage landscaping would be incrementaIly _ City of Santa Monica 5 Santa Monica Place Parking Structures 7 and S Improvement Project Addendum to the Civic Center Specific Plan EIR and Santa Monica Place Remodel Proied MND reduced to accommodate pedestrian access improvements and some ground floor uses. The solaz panels proposed for the rooftop parking gazage would not significantly alter the perception of height and mass from public viewing areas . In addition, Architectural Review Boazd appYOVaI would be required for the design of the facade improvements, which would avoid incompatible design or aesthetic degradation of the site. The facade improvements do have the potential to result in light and glaze impacts; however, mitigation measures identified in the 2007 MND limiting the use of reflective materials and lighting would apply and would reduce the impacts to less than significant levels. In summary, because the height and mass of the structures would not change and as the project requires Architectural Review Boazd approval, aesthetic and shadow impacts would remain less than significant with the mitigation measures identified in the 2007 MND. Air Quality The Santa Monica Place Remodel project MND concluded that air quality impacts would be less than significant. Site uses would remain the same under the proposed modifications as for the project studied in the MND. In addition, as discussed below under Traffic, Circulation and Pazking, the project would not generate additional daily vehicle trips. The proposed facade improvements and access/pazking configuration changes would not result in any additional air quality impacts. Impacts would remain less than significant. Construction Effects The Santa Monica Place Remodel project MND identified potentiaIly significant cozvstruction effects and included mifigation measures to address construction dust and pollutant emissions and traffic and parking impacts related to construction. The proposed facade improvements and access/parking configuration changes would not result in any additional construction effects. As the general scope of construction activities would be the same for the modified project, the same mitigation measures would apply and residual impacts would remain less than significant. Cultural Resources ' The Santa Monica Place site was surveyed for historic significance by PCR Corporation as part of the technical documentation for the 2005 CCSP EIR. As discussed in the 2005 EII2 and 2007 MND, the historic resources report found that Santa Monica Place is not a historic resource pursuant to CEQA. The proposed facade improvements and access/pazking configuration changes would not result in any additional impacts to cultural resources. Therefore impacts resulting from the proposed modifications would be less than significant, similar to the previously analyzed projects. Geology and Soils The proposed uses and structural extent of the modified project are the same as for the project analyzed in the 2007 MND. Building height, excavation depth and other basic project attributes would remain unchanged. Mitigation measures included in the 2007 MND, including seismic risk reduction requirements and soil testing for expansion potential, would apply to the modified City of Santa Santa MonicaPlace Parking Structures 7 and 8 Improvement Project Addendum ~to the Civic Center Specific Plan EIR and Santa Monica Place Remodel Project MND project as well as the original remodel project. With this mitigation; impacts related to geology and soils would be the same as those identified for the previous project in the 2007 MND, and would be less than significant. Hazards and Hazardous Materials T'he proposed uses and structural extent of the modified project aze the same as for the project analyzed in the 2007 MND: Excavation depth and other basic project attributes would remain unchanged. MitigaSon measures included in the 2007 MND, including testing and removal standards for asbestos, Iead-based paint testing and an environmental assessment and contingency plan would apply to the modified project as well as the original zemodel project. With this mitiga8on, impacts related to hazazds and hazardous materials would be the same as those identified for the previous project in the 2007 MND, and would be less than significant. Hydrolo~y and Water Quality The development envelope and site coverage of the revised project would be essentially the same as the project studied in the 2007 MND. The proposed facade improvements and access/pazking configuration changes would not result in any additional drainage of water quality impacts. Although total Iandscaping would be incrementally reduced> the modest reduction world not have a measurable impact on infiltration capacity or runoff quality, The changes from the approved project would not affect the analysis ofhydrology or water quality in the 2007 MND, and impacts would remain less than significant. Land Use and Plannin;; The proposed uses and the general size and extent of structures on the site are essentially the same as for the project analyzed in the 2007 MND. The proposed facade improvements and access/parking configuration changes would not result in any additional land use impacts or conflict with City policies or ordinances. Impacts would remain less than significant. Noise Proposed land uses, traffic generation and construction scope and duration for the modified project would be generally the same as those proposed for the project studied in the 2007 MND. As these noise-generating factors would be unchanged, noise impacts would be similaz to those identified in the 2007 MND. The proposed facade improvements and access/pazking configuration changes would not result in any additional noise impacts. The noise mitigation included in the MND limiting construction noise and construction hours would apply to the modified project, and impacts would remain less than significant. Population and Housing Similaz to the project studied in the 2007 MND, no housing is proposed for the site as part of the modified project. No housing exists on the site currently. Impacts would remain less than significant. City of Santa Monica 7 Santa Monica Place Parking S Addendum to the Civic Center S Public Services ~es.7 and 8 Improvement Project Plan EIR and Santa Monica Place Remotlel Project MND Public service impacts associated with the approved project were determined to be less than. significant. The revised project would not affect the analysis for the previously approved project, as the proposed uses and intensity of development would remain approximately the same. The proposed fa$ade improvements and access/parking configuration changes would not result in any additional impacts on public services. Impacts would remain less than significant. Traffic, Circulation and Parkine Project Traffic Shift Analysis The reconfiguration of Santa Monica downtown Pazking Structures 7 and 8 is not expected to generate additional daily vehicle trips. The potential conversion of Pazking Structure Ts 4~ Street driveway to egress only is expected to shift traffic turning movements at the intersection of 4~ Street & Broadway. Thus, a traffic study was conducted to analyze the impact of this circulation change on affected intersections by the application of a set of significance criteria established by the City of Santa Monica (see Table 2 of the traffic study, included as an appendix to this Addendum). Figure 1 of the traffic study details the traffic shift volumes by movement and also illustrates volumes for existing, cumulative base, and cumulative with project scenarios. As discussed in detail in the traffic study, the traffic shift would result in a significant impact at the intersection of 4~ Street & Broadway. The 2005 CCSP EIR also identified a significant impact at this intersection. The magnitude of the impact identified in the CCSP EIR at this location for the weekend peak hour was a change in vehicle delay of 33 seconds, with the intersection projected to operate at LOS F. The CCSP EIR also identified a significant impact at 4~ Street & Broadway during the weekday PM peak hour at buildout of the entire CCSP. The CCSP EIR determined that no mitigation would be feasible at this location due to unacceptable secondary impacts and thus the impact would be significant and unavoidable. Accordingly, the City adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations when the EIR was certified. While significant, the magnitude of impact that is projected for the current revised Santa Monica Place Remodel project would be less than that anticipated in the CCSP EIR. The projected increase in delay during the weekend midday peak hour would be Iower than that anticipated previously (30 versus 33 seconds per vehicle) and the current project is not expected to have an impact during the weekday PM peak hour. Parking Supply and Demand Analysis The parking supply in structures 7 and 8 prior to commencement of construction of the Santa Monica Place renovation project totaled 1,968 spaces. Structure 7 provided a total of 939 spaces in six levels and Structure 8 provided 1,029 spaces in six levels. Monica Santa Monica Place Parking Structures 7 and 8 Improvement Project Addendum to the Civic Center Specific Plan EIR and Santa Monica Place Remodel Project MND Pazking demand accumulation surveys conducted by Crain and Associates in June 2007 prior to commencement of construction of the Santa Monica Place Remodel project were provided by the City of Santa Monica for use in this analysis. As detailed in the traffic study, a total peak demand of about 1,250 spaces, in both structures combined, was observed on weekday afternoons. This represented about 63% to 64 % of the available spaces. A peak demand of 1,818 spaces was observed on Saturday, about 92 % of capacity. The Santa Monica Place Remodel project would reduce the number of parking spaces available in parking structures 7 and 8 by 49 spaces, to 1,919. The installation of an attendant pazking program (with required control equipment) and ground level pedestrian-oriented uses would reduce the otal combined parking supply of structures 7 and 8 from 1,919 to 1;843. The reduced pazking supply of 1,843 spaces would exceed the observed peak demand of 1,818 spaces by about 25 spaces, resulting in peak occupancy of about 99 % in the two garages combined. The proposed improvements would require, however, that 76 additional spaces be relocated to the off-site pazking facility, totaling 354 spaces at the off-site location and 1,843 on-site, for a total of 2,197 spaces on-site and off-site combined. Although pazking would be adequate to meet demands, this represents a full condition with motorists circulating through the garage looking for available spaces. Implementing the City's real-time pazking variable message signage program at gazage entrances and the addition of 76 off-site spaces would help to alleviate these less than significant effects. In summary, impacts related to traffic and circulation would be slightly reduced compazed to those identified in the previous CEQA documents. A significant and unavoidable impact would still occur at the intersection of 4~ Street and Broadway, but the impact would be less severe than that identified in the 2005 CCSP EIR. In addition, the re-configuration of Pazking Structure 7 from inbound to outbound only would re-route left bound traffic to the signalized intersection, eliminating an un-signalized left turn which contributes to delay on 4~ Street, thus improving downtown circulation. Pazking impacts would remain less than significant, as were those associated with the project studied in the 2007 MND. Utilities and Service Systems `I`he proposed modified project would retain the commercial and parking uses analyzed in the 2007 MND, and at rohghly the same squaze footages and scale. T`he proposed facade improvements and access/pazking configuration changes would not result in any additional impacts on utilities or service systems. The revised project would not change the impact analysis or conclusions of the MND related to municipal services or infrastructure. Impacts would remain less than significant without the need for mitigation. Mandatory Findings of Significance The revised project would not substantially change the analysis or mandatory findings of significance that were adopted for the previously approved Santa Monica Place Remodel project. Impacts would be less than significant. City of Santa Monica 9 Santa Monica Place Parking Structures 7 and S Improvement Project _ Addendum to the Civic Center Specific Plan EIR and Santa Monica Place Remodel Project MND CONCLUSION The proposed changes to the Santa Monica Place Remodel Project are limited in scope and would not substantially increase the size of structures or substantially change the general use of the site. Based on the analysis above, the proposed changes to the project would not generate new significant environmental impacts or substantially increase impacts identified in the Civic Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report or Santa Monica Place Remodel Project MND. City of Santa Monica 10 Santa Monica Place Parking Structures 7 and 8 Facade Improvements and Attendant Parking Program Addendum to the Civic Center Specific Plan EIR '} 1 1 ' z~ s prOle~t ~O~dtioh Los i ~=~ Santa Monica. nN V ~~ 0 5 10 Miles i I Huntington Beach ~ E INYa "ay iuu ree `~- SPY< LS YE RN p~ ~°O S9N9ERNAl1CIN0 SPMP9zeenx4 C0.5PX n ~.a dC}t:? NV£RSIOE . q O S9NgEG0 Regional Location _ u!ac :~.i:z fa~_.~,_ lenda pas dena e °~ EI onte ale 01 Hacienda Heights 6° 1 Santa Monica Place Parking Structures 7 and 8 Facade Improvements and Attendant Parking Program Addendum to the Civic Center Specific Plan EIR a food zcco Scale in Feet Project Location Figure 2 City of Sanfa Monica N Topo Source: National Geographic TOPOl, 2001, BeveAy Hills, CA 1995 A Santa Monica Place site boundaries Santa Monica Place Parking Structures 7 and 8 Facade Improvements and Attendant Parking Program - Addendum to the Civic Center Specific Plan EIR Parking Structure 7 -~B-rte-,~ A_ ~ -= o. ,~ J f ~ i~~u//~~/i/r/u////,t~~ ~ /n.' ~ ' I ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~u~~~~ ~~ yi ~ ~ , r i ~i~~. 0//~!///////Ir 9/ ////~/rn ~ '~~ ~,v///ni///n/unnun/I ~, ,~ i ,- -~ ~ ~. i ,, ~ , ~ r _ `--~~ -- ~ i ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ . ~~~~w I pr/~//i//f/ U//////N//i/////~ ~ s ~, Iii -- - - ti - ---. "~ g Structure 8 Base Drawing Source: City of Santa Monica May 2008. , Basic Site Plan Figure 3 City of Santa Monica Santa Monica Place Parking Structures 7 and 8 Fagde Improvements and Attendant Parking Program Addendum to the Civic Center Specific Plan EIR Proposed Parking Structure 7 Conceptual Photosimulations Figure 4a City of Sanfa Monica Existing Condition Image Souroe: City of Santa Monica, May 2008. Santa Monica Place Parking Structures 7 and 8 Facade Improvements and Attendant Parking Program Addendum to the Civic Center SpeciflcPlan EIR Y I' ' ~5- ~ fi ; ~ ~ i ~ j II f^'r - Y l I y ~ I ~ - ' ?r~ ~ ~ ;' ~ ~ - ~~I1i4 '~~ ~- I ,` ~ ' CITY OF SANiq µONIGA li' c PARKING GARAGE M View 2 Proposed Parking Structure 7 Conceptual Photosimulations Figure 4b City of Santa Monica Proposed ..,...,.,.,~_...,., ,,, .,..,,.o..,,,.,, ay ~~„o. Santa Monica.Place Parking Structures 7 and 8 Facade. improvements and Attendant Parking Program Addendum to the Civic Center Specific Pian EIR Proposed Parking Structure 7 Conceptual Photosimulations Fi~ttre 4c City of Santa Santa Monica Place Parking Structures 7 and 8 Facade Improvements and Attendant Parking Program Addendum to the Civic Center Specific Plan EIR v rcw a Proposed Parking Structure 7 Conceptual Pltotosimulations Figure 4d Santa Monica PlaceParking Structures 7 and S Facade Improvements and Attendant Parking Program Addendum to the Civic Center5pecific Plan EIR Proposed Parking Structure 8 Conceptual Photosiinulations Figure 5a EXIStIItg COOdltlOtl Image Source: City of Santa Monica, May2008. Santa Monica Place Parking Structures 7 and 8 Facade Improvements and Attendant Parking Program Addendum to fhe Civic Center Specific Plan EIR Parking Structure 8 Conceptual Photosimulations ire 5b Monica V ieW 2 Image Source: City of Santa Monica, May 2008. Proposed View 3 Proposed Santa Monica Place Parking Structures 7 and 8 Facade Improvements and Attendant Parking Program Addendum to the Civic Center Specific Plan EIR View 4 Proposed Parking Structure 8 Conceptual Photosimulations Figure 5c City of Sanfa Monica Sente Monica Place Pa,kinB Simdures 7 entl S Improvement Project Atltlentlum fo the Civic Center SpeclSC Plan EIR entl Santa Manlca Place Remotlei PraJeet MN~ u p` ETNL1 i PETAIL ~ REi M1 ~ © .i `~ ~ ~ 4 I Y~~~ m /r ` ~ rl I I S<GKAGE ~~ _ n I I I .~ I LL- e ~-- o e ~ _ ~ - I J :~ ~ ~ I i ` i I ...;u ee°a ~~ i ~ ~ ~ i.~ I ~ ~i PE]FIL<. EIKE6TATION EL]O G I ~ n = I I \7I __ ~__ _ , \1I, \7I, \1I \1I , ~ V ~ ~~u//' / / ' / ~ \ \ I\ \ \ \ \ \ ,.,. I '1T6' ~ ~ ~ .. I C ~ ' I~ ~ I ' I ~~ I I o I / ~~ I I ~ ~ ~' I -~ ~ C I '! I I I ~~~~ I i I I I I I I T I I ~ I f ' m ~ `~ . _ ___ _ ~ E _ \ I i I ' I I I I I I I I I - I I j ~ ~ I ,,. m - --- ~r, ----~ - - -- -- -- -- --- -- -- -- - - ~ a ----- _ -- _ _ -- _ ° I ___ - ~ IG` ~ ~ . :,,~ - - a a ,G 1E !sue Conceptual Ground Floor Plan -Parking Structure 7 NeMnq SOVCO: PU.]M1d SC¢mc MNleNUa, Mey 2], 4IXWIB ecale In FVOt Figure 6 r, Cityol Sanh MOOIGd Sense Monica Place Perking Stmqures ] end B Improvement Project Atltlentlum to the Clvle Center SpeelRC Plen EIR antl Santa Monica Placa Remotlel Project MND . i 1 1 I' / ..~ 4 5 6 } .. B 1 1 1 td -". 14 1 16 1 mi R i J BN FR ~ 9:1 X ¶~ =- .r.. ~...~ .,. __ _ 1` 6:. I, wi ~~~/' ~/' L I I i Y " F ~ ~ .. O -- I , .,,,, I I I I I I e l _ G~~ W~' ~ ~ - - . i ' ~' I., i ~ w ~y~ ~~I ~~~ iii I ~ ~ \I \I. ~ _~ ~, 'o-' Oy Y`' ~, :: I i i i I i ~, i ~ ~~ i i ~~lIX3 111X3 W ( i I / t~® I/~ d~D I I I e ~ ~.~,.~ ~ ~ --" ~ . I / /I / /I / /I / /~ / ,/I / /~ / /I / /I - -~/- -~ //I/ ~ ~ I I I ~~ I 1 I ..l k ~ i I i ~; .~.7" ~d~pQ~sp l ~~~A~~ M. ~ ~ . I I I I ~ . _ I I I `~°~~°"° I ~~ ~ i D ~ i ~~ I I I I ~ . x~, w N. w ex~t ,~~,.,~ ~\~\ w~ uu I I - I x I I I I I I I I ..aj ~ I ~ I Q I 4 - - - - -- - --- ~µ uau~pem. \ .. ~ Y^o"e~un __ ...w ~-.V ' wrzq .m.w.o .~ . k y G--------_...------'I -_I-- - - -- a-__.. --'1 -~ . G'I..., .~• s~ _ - --LO ~.,, -- ~.~® Conceptual Ground Floor Plan -Parking Structure 8 arearre soi.~.: v~pnasraa.a~X.uuo, ~W,.. zaoa swmm P..r Figure7 r City o/Santa Monica Appendix A Traffic and Circulation Study Memo FFHR & PF.E}ZS :U-CNJ\SSOCIRTES DRAFT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: Sarah Lejeune, City of Santa Monica FROM: Tom Gaul and Arshak Hovsepian DATE: July 1, 2008 SUBJECT: Traffic and Parking Study for REF: LA08-2279 Parking Structures 7 and 8 Improvement Project This memorandum summarizes 'the results of a traffic impact analysis conducted- by Fehr i£ Peers/Kaku Associates, using current City of Santa Monica guidelines, for the proposed renovation of Parking Structures 7 and 8 in the City of Santa Monica. Subsequent to the approval of the environmental impact report (EIR) for the Santa Monica Civic Center Specific Plan (CCSP)', a series of improvements have been proposed for Parking Structures 7 and 8 adjacent to Santa Monica Place that include modifications to the ingress and egress functionality of Parking Structure Ts driveways. The CCSP EIR evaluated proposed redevelopment of Santa Monica Place as envisioned at that time as one cdmponent of the CCSP. This study addresses whether the currently-proposed improvements would cause new significant impacts not identified in the CCSP EIR. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of reconfiguration of Santa Monica downtown .Parking Structures 7 and 8, owned by the Santa Monica Redevelopment Agency and located adjacent to Santa Monica Place. The project includes fagade improvements, installation of an attendant. parking program (with required control equipment), installation of ground level pedestrian-oriented uses, installation of bike parking facilities, and conversion of the 4`h Street driveway to Parking Structure 7 to right-turn outbound only. Prior to beginning of construction for the Santa Monica Place remodel project (currently underway) Parking Structures 7 and 8 contained a total of 1,968 parking spaces. The Santa Monica Place ' Civic Center Specific Plan Comprehensive Updafe, Downtown Redevelopment Plan Amendment and Associated Development, Fina/ Environmental Impact Report, City of Santa Monica Planning & Community Development Department and Rincon Consultants, October 2004. 201 Santa Monica Blvd, Ste 500 Santa Monica, CA 90401 T: (310) 458-9416 Fc (310} 344-7663 fehrandpeers.com To: Ms. Sarah Lejeune July 1, 2008 Page 2 remodel project will reduce the number of parking spaces available in Parking Structures 7 and 8 to 1,919 spaces, commensurate with the reduction in square footage of the mall. The attendant parking program, ground level pedestrian-oriented uses, and bike parking facilities proposed in the renovation of Parking .Structures 7 and 8 would result in a further reduction in the number. of vehicular parking spaces available, to 1,843 spaces. Structure 7, located at the intersection of 4th Street & Broadway, would be restriped to accommodate 834 spaces, a reduction of 49 spaces from the currently approved 883; Structure 8, located at the intersection of 2"d Street & Colorado Avenue, would be restriped to accommodate 1,009 spaces, a reduction of 27 spaces from the currently approved 1,036. In addition to the spaces available in Parking Structures 7 and 8, Santa Monica Place historically has use of 278 spaces at a remote location for employee parking. These proposed improvements require that 76 additional spaces be relocated to the off-site parking facility, totaling 354 spaces at the off-site Iodation and 2,197 spaces on-site and off-site combined. Table 1 summarizes the past and future changes in parking supply in Structures 7 and 8. The project's only street traffic implications would be from the potential conversion of Parking Structure 7's 4th Street driveway to egress only. This conversion would shift traffic turning movements at the intersection of 4th Street and Broadway only. Consequently, this is the only intersection requiring traffic analysis. The proposed pedestrian-oriented uses are not expected to generate new vehicle trips to downtown Santa Monica. EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The assessment of existing conditions relevant to this study includes traffic volumes and operating conditions at the intersectioh of 4tn Street & Broadway. Existing a.m., p.m., and weekend peak period traffic volumes and levels of service (LOS) were obtained from the current City of Santa Monica TRAFFIX database. Existing Street Svstem Colorado Avenue, Broadway, 4th Street, and 2nd Street are key streets providing access to the parking structures. Regional access is provided from the Santa Monica Freeway (I-10) via interchanges at Lincoln Boulevard and 4t" Street. Brief descriptions of key streets in the vicinity of the parking structures follow: Colorado Avenue -Colorado Avenue as an east-west street generally providing four travel lanes (two in each direction). Colorado Avenue is a Class III bicycle route between the Santa Monica Pier and Main Street. On-street parking is unavailable in the vicinity of the parking structures while metered parking is available east of 5t".Street. Colorado Avenue is designated as an arterial street by the City of Santa Monica Circulation Element. To: Ms. Sarah Lejeune July 1, 2008 Page 3 2nd Street - 2"d Street is a north-south street providing two travel lanes (one in each direction). On-street parking is unavailable adjacert to the parking structures while metered parking is available north of Broadway. 2"d Street is designated as a collector street by the City of Santa Monica Circulation Element in the vicinity of the project site. 4'" Street - 4`h Street is a north-south street providing iwo travel lanes (one in each .. direction). On-street parking is unavailable adjacent to the parking structures while metered parking is available north of Broadway. 4'h Street is designated as an arterial street by the City of Santa Monica Circulation Element in the vicinity of the parking structures. North of Wilshire Boulevard and south of Pico Boulevard, 4th Street is classified as a collector street. Broadway -Broadway is an east-west street providing iwo travel lanes (one lane per direction) and bicycle lanes. On-street parking is unavailable in the vicinity of the parking structures while metered parking is available east of 5'h Street. A westbound bus lane is provided on the north side of Broadway from 5'h Street to Ocean Avenue. Broadway is designated as a collector street by the City of Santa Monica Circulation Element. Existing Levels of Service Level of service is a quantitative measure used to describe the condition of traffic flow, ranging from excellent conditions at LOS A to overloaded conditions at LOS F. The City of Santa Monica uses the "Operational Analysis" method from Highway Capacity Manua/ (HCM) .(Transportation Research Board, 2000) to determine the average vehicular delay and corresponding level of service for signalized intersections. Lever of service definitions for signalized intersections are provided in Table 2. Existing (2004) weekday a.m., p.m., and weekend peak hour levels of service for the intersection of 4t" Street and Broadway were found to be operating at LOS C (a.m., p.m., and weekend) according to the City of Santa Monica TRAFFIX database. PROJECT TRAFFIC SHIFT ANALYSIS The reconfiguration of Santa Monica downtown Parking Structures 7 and 8 is not expected to generate additional daily vehicle trips. The potential conversion of Parking Structure 7's 4'h Street driveway to egress only is expected to shift traffic turning movements at the intersection of 4'h Street & Broadway. The year 2014 cumulative with project scenario evaluates the impact of these traffic shifts on the intersection during the future operating condition. Vehicular turning movement counts were conducted for Parking Structure 7's driveways on 4'h Street and Broadway in June 2008 (Appendix A). The traffic shift methodology is outlined below: To: Ms. Sarah Lejeune July 1, 2008 Page 4 • Existing northbound left turns into Parking Structure 7's 4th Street driveway were shifted to make a northbound left turn atthe intersection of 4th Street & Broadway,- followed by a left-turn ehtrance into the Broadway driveway. A portion of the. existing southbound right turns into Parking. Structure 7's 4tn Street driveway were shifted to make a southbound right turn at the intersection of 4`h Street 8 Broadway, followed by a left-turn entrance-into the Broadway driveway. The remaining southbound right turns into Parking Structure 7's 4"' Street driveway were shifted by moving westbound left turns to the westbound through movement, followed by a left-turn entrance into the Broadway driveway. • A portion of existing northbound right-turn exits at the Broadway driveway with a southbound directional travel via 4`h Street were shifted to exit from the 4th street driveway, thereby reducing the eastbound right turns at the intersection of 4`h Street & Broadway. Figure 1 details the traffic shift volumes by movemeht and also illustrates volumes for existing, .cumulative base, and cumulative with project scenarios. INTERSECTION IMPACT ANALYSIS The significance of project-related impacts on future intersection operating conditions was determined by the application of a set of significance criteria established by the City of Santa Monica. For reference, the city's significance criteria for intersections are shown in Table 3. Table 4A presents the existing .and future levels of service for the intersection of 4th Street & Broadway, as projected in the current City of Santa Monica TRAFFIX database. As shown, LOS E and F is projected during the a.m. and weekend peak traffic hour, respectively, for the year 2014 cumulative base scenario. At LOS E, the City of Santa Mohica's minimum criteria for a significant impact would be any increase. in average vehicular delay: At LOS F, the City of Santa Monica's minimum criteria for a significant impact would be avolume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio increase of 0.005. As shown in Table 3, the intersection. of 4`h Street & Broadway would have a significant impact during the weekend midday peak hour. The LOS worksheets are included in Appendix B. Field observations indicate that Parking Structure 7 is currently operating at roughly one-third capacity due to a temporary closure of levels 3 through 6 for construction. Due to the timing of this study, the driveway counts were of necessity conducted while this temporary reduction in capacity was in effect. The analysis indicates that the analyzed intersection would be impacted simply considering shifts of the current driveway volumes that do not represent the parking structure's full operating capacity. At full capacity, even more inbound vehicles-would be expected to shift to the northbound left turn at the intersection of 4th Street. & Broadway. A significant impact of a greater magnitude could reasonably be expected with higher driveway To: Ms. Sarah Lejeune July 1, 2008 Page 5 volumes. Therefore, in order to estimate the potential level of impact when the garage is fully operational,: the existing driveway volumes were extrapolated upwards based on the ratio of currently available to future number of spaces in the garage to represent potential traffic conditions when Parking Structure 7 operates at full capacity. As shown in Table 4B, the weekend peak hour would be significantly impacted with a change in vehicle delay of 30 seconds. Figure 2 details the traffic shift volumes by movement for the extrapolated scenario. The CCSP EIR identified a significant impact at 4th Street & Broadway during the weekend peak hour with implementation of Component 2 (Santa Monica Place) of the CCSP. The magnitude of the impact identified in the CCSP EIR at this location for the weekend peak hour was a change in vehicle delay of 33 seconds with the intersection projected to operate at LOS F.Z The CCSP EIR also identified a significant impact at 4th Street & Broadway during the weekday PM peak hour at buildout of the entire CCSP: The CCSP EIR determined that no mitigation would be feasible at this location due to unacceptable secondary impacts and thus the impact would be significant and unavoidable.3 While significant, the magnitude of impact that is projected for the current project would be less than that anticipated in the CCSP EIR. The projected increase in delay during the weekend midday peak hour would be lower than that anticipated previously (30 versus 33 seconds per vehicle) and the current project is not expected to have an impact during the weekday PM peak hour. PARKING SUPPLY AND DEMAND ANALYSIS The parking supply in Structures 7 and 8 prior to commencement of construction of the Santa Monica Place renovation project totaled 1,968 spaces. Structure 7 provided a total of 939 spaces in six levels and Structure 8 provided 1,029 spaces in six levels. Parking demand accumulation surveys conducted by Crain and Associates in June 2007 prior to commencement of construction of the Santa Monica Place remodel project were provided by the City of Santa Monica for use in this analysis. The surveys were conducted between the hours of 11:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. on Thursday, June .14, 2007; Saturday, June 16; and Tuesday June 17, 2007. The survey data is included in Appendix C. Table 5 summarizes the pre-construction supply and demand for the observed peak hour of parking demand. A total Transportation and Cirou/a5on Study for the Santa Monica Civic Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Repoli, Kaku Associates, Inc., 2004, Tables 86 and SD. a As stated in the Transportation and Cimulation Study for the Santa Monica Civic Center Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (Kaku Associates, Inc., 2004), "Mitigation measures that would fully mitigate the project-related impact at this location would require improvements such as widening the westbound approach to provide a second left-turn lane. Implementation of this mitigation measure would require right of way acquisition by the City, reducing pedestrian sidewalks, bus stop and pedestrian crossing waiting areas in a heavy pedestrian-use area, andlor removal of all or parts of public or private buildings. Because of these secondary impacts, this mtigation measure is deemed infeasible. Therefore, the impact at this location would be sign cant and unavoidable." To: Ms. Sarah Lejeune July 1, 2008 Page 6 peak demand of about 1,250 spaces, in both structures combined, was observed on both Tuesday and Thursday, at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesday and at 1:00 p.m. on Thursday. This represehted about 63% to 64% of the available spaces. A peak demand of 1,818 spaces was observed on Saturday, about 92% of capacity. As shown in Table 1, the Santa Monica Place remodel project will reduce the number of parking spaces available in Parking Structures 7 and 8 by 49 spaces, to 1,919. The installation of ari attendant parking program (with required control equipment) and ground level pedestrian-oriented uses will reduce the total combined parking supply of Structure 7 and 8 from 1,919 to 1,843 (see Appendix D}. The proposed improvements will require, however, that 76 additional spaces be relocated to the off-site parking facility, totaling 354 spaces at the off-site location and 2,197 spaces on-site and off-site combined. The reduced parking supply of 1,843 spaces would exceed the observed peak demand of 1,818 spaces by about 25 spaces; even if all of these vehicles were to continue to park in one of the iwo structures. It is .reasonable to assume, however, that a portion of employee-related parking demand in. the structures would shift to the replacement spaces to be provided at the remote location. Thus, no significant parking impacts are anticipated. Nevertheless, the garages are expected to operate under near capacity conditions as they have historically, with motorists circulating through the garage looking for limited available spaces. Implementing the City's real-time parking variable message signage program at garage entrances would help to alleviate this effect. CONCLUSIONS This study was undertaken to analyze the potential traffic impacts of the renovation of Santa Monica Parking Structures 7 and 8. The renovation is not expected to generate a net increase in daily or peak hour trips. The potential conversion of Parking Structure 7's 4th Street driveway to egress only would significantly impact the intersection of 4th Street & Broadway during the weekend peak hour. The intersection of 4th Street & Broadway was previously analyzed in the CCSP EIR, which determined a significant impact for which a Statement of Overriding Consideration (SOC) was adopted. The proposed Parking Structure 7 and 8 Renovation would not result in a significantly greater impact to this intersection than was previously analyzed. No significant parking impacts are anticipated. Parking conditions in Structures 7 and 8 would, however, be expected to continue to operate under near capacity conditions after the installation of an attendant parking program (with required control equipment) and ground level pedestrian-oriented uses. This level of occupancy would result in motorists circulating throughout the garage in search of a limited number of spaces. Implementation of real-time parking message signs would help alleviate this effect. '~~~ ~ '~i3i~Y 4 F i r~rr~i~t ~ i + y~yQ*a,4~~,~~~~~EFj ~}r~'~^ ~0 (~7 ~,~' x ~, ~ ~.. `ija `v~ ~. .,.1 r m. uz ~,'4a~`~~~`tR~n~ 1'^"y ~, ) ~o~~P ~a co~~e ~~a rn ~ Ga ~ . e~\ 2a oc~c'A 6 a ~ cn cn m N ~ ~`yr a ,~ o' m m~ ~ as ~ ~ To a w ~ 62(105)[1121 m w T. ~ 96(123)[729] ocaP ~sr ~'y u F 320(305)[381] 'y '~ ° F 394(357)[487] p~~ /1 ~, S- r' S0(84)[197j Il ,~, S- ~ 112(129)[214] Broadwa Broadway S~ 190(318)[190] -~ o, a m 233(380)[231] -~ m ~ ~ hsi a~a'~ 87(242)[266] ~[ ~ ~° m 157(295)[289] '~[ ^ r.~i <°n ^ oa Qua ~ a 0 u m - ,~?: da a e ~ se0 q`0 j ~ -~'-' y aialplCT~UPE] ftK y Dn`^ ! t qt ~ i ~ Av v trN'S y~ ~ ~ i t ; An Y} ~. I~~ t deh ~ 4a~{4Y :y~'~r6t' Ah5 ~n ~'~~yt~+. 7~~+ ~ua,~eA~ x°.~~, "ra,~t~N yp"¢',njv"~i~ a~~~~pawry ~ i~,~ vrJ~~~ 'Qp. ~A~d ' y ~ S'`~~+~i~,~w7 r~ ~~~m s , ~ 4~~~~~ + "~ ~~ ~`~1'SS !~ ~P'~' F rr~5a ~f o1Y~^P~a rt~1 ~,y~ r~.~kk«a " ~ 1^ "~~ H^"1 ~~[. s z pe x`, r~~yn~ ++. ri%: '~ w '~yT~1ft ~rnu~,+rr~~~~~ M ~, t z, .. odLix ~,~tk' .,~ tea, v. i?,~r ., ~c,. x~ u., x„ t,. ~..r,ft _, a~,..~r...". 10 o mm. o ~ ~ ^ r ~d71~ ~ W O] J OJ 4i~i'... Vl ~ ., ~ 96(123)[729] taJ''~ r>= , a 6 n <o a w `W' f 1(2)[5] °~ a o F 395(359)[492] <~d"~ /1 1(-2)[-51 K y 111 127 209 ~~~$~~~aFw ~ Broatlwa ~ ~ Broadwa ~ ~ ( )[ ] rstl~~;n1]L ~~ -7(-50)[-82] ~[ rl 1(2)[0] -~ rl ~ ~ LEGEND n~ 233(380)[231] -~ m ~ ... w 15o(zas)[zo7] ~[ ~ V ~ x(x)[x) AM(PM)[Weekend] u, ~ Peak Hour Traffic Volumes N _. m .~ ~ ~ N ,~ ~ Analyzed Intersection ~ u Nc[to Scale FEHR & PEERS TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES I(ALNnSSOCInTES (EXISTING, CUMULATIVE BASE, CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT) AND TRAFFIC SHIFT VOLUMES dun z7, 2ooe '- - FIGURE Y ~ p e Y k ~ ~ ~ it n4yn~vi* 0 (' s r f~~, ~ ~ "'`af~~~ ~~wP~ ~so~ ~~~a N ~ Gab° e~~~a e~oo. G°~~ r.Ni ~ ~ ~~yr ~ m Nm m yac ~ ~ o tC 96(123)[129] oc~Qo '~~sf t- 394(357)[487] Qs`1' 11 y ~- ~ 1.12(129)[214] Brcadwa /h 1(2)io] -?~ ~ ~ ~ of ~ 233(380)[231] --> G, ~ , ~Sr y~a'~ 157(295)[289] "y `^ N N ~ ~oa5 Q~e m uJi crOO 4 O Oc ~'s ass asp Go° g as d~ ss q ~a P PNRKING in ~ 5r.:"" to P s Y ii ~ h d[y, sieuciuRF i ~ ~M1 E ~'}A ~ ~, ~~~1~ ;~ p a ~ %aR~i~c'~~1~~~du~~~t,SeIS~Q~~SQt~rr' ~ cnP~C i~~x~JJr. ikw s± ~t.w ~~ P~if'- ~y-Zr2~rrS,~*r',n Y 10 N w N .w. ~ m ~ W ~~ , 2Jd~7 _ v ~` 96(129)[129] r a ~ , .(-398(363)[502] `~'t'i`~ /1 y, ~- ~ 108(123)[199] ~~~~~~ ~{ Broadwa ~,G~~'fi'K' a y, .rr wrl - 1(z~[9] .a ~ LEGEND 233(380)[231] ~ ~ , - 135(138)[28] 'y ~ ~ ° x(x)[xj AM(PM)[Weekend] ~~~ .. ~ `~ Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ~mm ~ Q Analyzed Intersection ~ Not to Scale ~ n ~bY ,,t~p '. ~ 1~~. I a (~ ~ t ~~hRav{~` "~ ~. r ~:. 9~~ m a m <n °i w O A W IC 62(105)[112] .. o ~ ~ f 320(305)[381] Il y. ~ ~- 50(84)[197] &oadwa 0(0)[1] -~ '~ ~' jI 190(318)[190] -~ c, a, G, 87(242)[266] '~ ~ ~° ~ o a o rn N O] N m o UJ N '-' u W ~~ ~~ ~ ~ Y '~ty'KY "d'I t~Yi~ W 1`Jt ir~ ~ ~ y" .%8 r j ''~P ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ , f i ~ v ~~";~r4.~~~'~rG~ili1$ Sd~S ~ew'A'N~ W ~ .. N ~ m~ F 4(6)[15] I W (t -4(-6)[-151 Broadwa -22(-157)(-261] '~[ "1 m 0 A m 0 FEHR & PEERS TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES CU1L(UnSSOCIATES WITH EXTRAPOLATED SHIFTS AND CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT VOLUMES FIGURE 2 a TABLE 1 CHANGES IN PARKING SUPPLY IN STRUCTURES 7 AND 8 nor o an a. Monica Place Approved Level With Santa After Structure 7 and 8 Remodel Project Monica Place Remodel Project Reconfi uration [a] Suppl Suppl Net Chan a Supply Net Chan e Structure 7 939 883 (56) 834 (49) Structure 8 1 029 1 036 7 1 009 27 Subtotal On-Site 1,968 1,919 (49) 1,843 (76) Off-Site 278 278 0 354 76 Total 2,246 2,197 (49) 2,197 0 Required [b] 2,193 2,193 2,193 Notes: a. Attendant parking program, ground-level pedestrian-oriented uses, bike parking facilities, etc. b: Total parking supply required for Santa Monica Place per Redevelopment Plan. TABLE 2 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS (2000 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL OPERATIONS METHOD) Average Control Level of Service Delay per Vehicle Definition (seconds) A <10.0 EXCELLENT. No vehicle waits longer than one red light and no approach phase is fully used. B >10.0 and <20.0 VERY GOOD. An occasional approach phase is fully utilized; many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within groups of vehicles. G >20.0 and <35.0 GOOD. Occasionally drivers may have to wait through mote than one red light; backups may develop behind turning vehicles. D >35.0 and <55:0 FAIR. Delays may be substantial during portions of the rush hours, but enough lower volume periods occur to permit clearing of developing lines, preventing excessive backups. E >55.0 and <80.0 POOR. Represents the most vehicles intersection approaches can accommodate; may be long lines of waiting vehicles through severaLsignal cycles. F >80 FAILURE. Backups from nearby locations or on cross streets may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approaches. Tremendous delays with continuously increasing queue lengths. Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000. TABLE 3 CITY OF SANTA MONICA SIGNIFICANT IMPACT CRITERIA ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR INTERSECTIONS FUTURE BASE SCENARIO FUTURE PLUS PROJECT SCENARIO IF LOS = A, B, OR C SIGNIFICANT IMPACT IF: __> and is a collector street Average vehicle delay increase is > 15 seconds intersection or LOS becomes D, E, or F __> and is an arterial Average vehicle delay increase is > 15 seconds intersection or LOS becomes E or F IF LOS = D SIGNIFICANT IMPACT IF: __> and is a collector street Any net increase in average seconds of delay per vehicle . intersection __> and is an arterial Average vehicle delay increase is > 15 seconds intersection or LOS becomes E~or F IF LOS = E SIGNIFICANT IMPACT IF: __> and is a collector or Any net increase in average seconds of delay per vehicle arterial intersection IF LOS = F SIGNIFICANT IMPACT IF: __> and is a collector or HCM V(C ratio net increase is > 0.005 arterial intersection TABLE 4A EXISTING AND PROJECTED INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH TRAFFIC SHIFTS BASED ON JUNE 2008 DRIVEWAY VOLUMES . Intersection Arterial or Collector PeakHour Existing LOS' Year 2014 Cumulative Cumulative+ - Pro'ect Change in Change in Significant Impact? Intersection V/C Dela sec LOS! V/C Dela sec LOS V/C Dela sec LOS V/C Dela sec 1. 4th Street & Arterial A.M. 0.691 26 C 0.970 60 E 0.970 60 E O.D00 0 NO Broadway P,M. 0.723 22 C 1.029 47 D 1.027 47 D -0.002 0 NO WEEKEND 0.846 27 C 1.016 83 F 1.056 91 F 0.040 8 YES TABLE 4B EXISTING AND PROJECTED INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE WITH EXTRAPOLATED TRAFFIC SHIFTS FOR CUMULATIVE + PROJECT SCENARIO Intersection Arterial or Collector Peak Hour Existing LOS Year 2014 Cumulative Cumulative+ Pro'ect Change iri Change in Significant Impact? Intersection V/C Dela sec LOS V/C Dela sec LOS V/C Dela sec LOS V/C Dela sec 1. 4th Street & Arterial A. M. 0.691 2fi C 0.970 60 E 0.973 6D E 0.003 0 NO Broadway P.M. 0.723 22 C 1.029 47 D 7.034 52 D 0.005 5 NO WEEKEND 0.846 27 C 1.016 83 F 1.345 173 F 0.329 30 YES TABLE 5 PEAK HOUR PARKING DEMAND AND SUPPLY IN SANTA MONICA GARAGE STRUCTURES 7 AND 8 PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF SANTA MONICA PLACE RENOVATION PROJECT Tuesday Thursday Saturday June 19, 2007 June 21; 2007 June 23, 2007 2:00 m 1:00 m 3:00 m Supply 939 939 939 Structure 7 Demand- 688 683 904 Utilized 73% 73% 96% Unused Spaces 251 256 35 Supply 1,029 1,029 1,029 Structure 8 Demand 568 559 914 Utilized 55% 54% 89% Surplus 461 470 -115 Supply 1,968 1,968 1,968 Total Demand 1,256 1,242 1,818 Utilized 64% 63% 92% Surplus 712 726 150 Source: Crain and Associates surveys. APPENDIX A TRAFFIC COUNT DATA WILTEC INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT: FEHR AND PEEERS PROJECT: SANTA MONICA PLACE DRIVEWAY COUNTS DATE: THURSDAY, JUNE 4TH, 2008 PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM INTERSECTION: WS SANTAMONICA PLACE DRIVEWAY E!W BROADWAY Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 5640969 ,~, -~ .1sY~i1~GQLDIF~ '-i 53 ''~=n.~ d':'. Y .~: s. x"~e _ w a.~ s^t ~ i ,' k'.. ~ ar ...,.. . <: 4~ ~7 ~' a ha%-~,~ ,~`r,~"'3'`gs`3: s ''3 ,.:s.-'4 'S.yrk5k'G~`~'{wT ~ h A a ~" '"'~ ~•9 , . r s~0 Lb .. ~k ~E '€2 .. "':.' ~" -OII .,mSBA~F ~a%SB~[ S SBLT ~_~INBRi r . ~4V6'SE! . W9E~ s ;, .,,;;N6RT ,, , NB=TH '' N817 ~ EBRT ~`E6TR B O L 7At1'-JE ~ -' 0 0 0 0 0 , . •E LTr T TA ~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 ~EO _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 2 0 0 7 . QO'~~S 0 0 D 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 10 _ ~'_~~8'C5. ~'"~x`.`z-`e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 3 0 0 14 s~a3a ~ 0 0 0 0 o 7 3 0 0 5 0 0 15 as9.aas~ =' 0 0 o s 1 a o a o 0 11 64~x'90(i~~ . 0 0 0 a o m a o o 2 o a zo . 91fi&° : 0 0 11 ] 0 0 5 0 0 23 0 ~ 9 0 0 0 0 14 6 0 1 3 0 0 24 9#'S'~38= ~ .. 0 0 0 0 0 70 9 0 0 6 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 8 10 0 0 2 0 0 20 0 h1~120k~7R~A1rs~ 0 s.Y."". G 0 ~~ 0 0 s:.~; 71 ~ ,,~*; :~ 9 TZ i ~ 0 - N- 0 ~ 5 m:; 0 0 25 'i .c~~* ~~ ~' ~z~ . 3 ~ 4 n5 '~ 3~ . 9 £"'7 _ , L& 3 ~ .» T ~ '. , 1 F.nY ~5~~ ~„S&~ ~ 3BLT .aNBRT .,.,WBTH .,.WELD ~_~N86~F _ Ne'GEI NeCT EBi3T ~E'e-Fdt E 7AOe60ff ~~` 0 0 ~ ,v . ,_E u ~ BE3 j~T0.TAE ` c~ ~f5 Wis + 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 8 0 0 5 0 0 31 . . ;3@"83Lh~ >~.- 0 0 0 0 25 17 0 0 10 0 0 46 -, Q~f$IS<_~" - 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 28 70 0 0 - 12 0 0 50 . Off~ 0~O~:'- ~" 0 0 0 0 33 13 0 0 14 0 0 60 _ , ` 0 0 0 0 34 19 0 0 i6 0 0 69 - x : =~' - 0 0 0 0 0 41 22 0 1 14 0 0 78 a . ~- r'~~ 0 0 0 0 0 -45 30 0 1 16 0 0 92 0 0 0 0 49 32 0 1 16 0 0 92 900~OQ ~`. 0 0 0 0 0 43 34 0 1 76 - 0 0 94 A.M. PEAK HOUR 900-7000 0 I0 0 0 ~ 0 ~-1 1 ~y ~ 43 --~ ~ T r BROADWAY 0 '-i 7 0 34 i6 SANTA MONICA PLACE DRNEWAY WILTEC Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626} 564-0969 u~icnaci,nVrv iunnirvts MVVtMtNI COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT: FEHR AND PEEERS - - PROJECT:. SANTA MONICA PLACE DRIVEWAY COUMS - DATE: THURSDAY, JUNE 4TH, 2008 PERIOD: 4:30 PM TO 7:30 PM INTERSECTION: N/S SANTA MONICA PLACE DRIVEWAY EhV BROADWAY - 15 M1t4COt3hEi5 -'`n-~ , *.~ ~ ` , .x,~ za t r .~ ,,, ; ~. "~' ~ s ~`h~ ~ ~y2 ' ; f ~0 `~-y4 Y rm r rv~ 4 .~~ ~0"€ F3•. ~ 9 ' ~`EO r ~~TY r ,.ms 72 BE .~56E3~ sSe7f1 ~: "SBLT >•,4~TBRT _ VJflLf.{ ritt~BLT .?;NBY~ , i~,1V&f["i NBLT > EBA :-~.E@FT}3 E~ET ~ ~tOYAL .'4~4'::~;~ 0 0 0 0 0 28 20 0 2 „ C~n~x°~' 0 0 0 0 0 23 42 0 0 it 8 0 0 0 61 ~;'~"N a o 0 o a za 4a a o 14 a 0 73 `v~ 0 0 0 0 0 15 23 0 0 15 o az 0:~~~ 0 0 '0 0 0 22 43 0 0 0 0 53 ~~ 0 0 0 0 0 24 43 11 0 0 76 6a~G6F~a t `' 0 0 0 0 0 33 41 0 0 0 16 0 0 83 , '0630' ~., 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 85 ~, ~, 0 .690:"' 0 0 18 37 0 1 11 0 0 67 . E4~}AEk 0 0 0 0 ' 21 37 0 0 15 0 0 73 ~~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 33 38 0 1 9 0 0 8,1 : 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 20 31 0 1 11 -0 0 63 . QL'tR."fA0"tAES 's a`y 7 0 0 ~ > 0 C' i6 37 7ra+~ 0 .;Ts--a 0 =~ 6 -- 0 3r' -~r 0 v 59 ,~'~~` t -~ ~ ~", 2 :, 3 ::, ~ 4 a?, 5 E ,;,.,~.~ wr '+ x~ ax. + 8 ~ $ . r { }Q . ., ~Y r 1.2 . i " ~S S&T€i ~" SBLT ~Vv.BRT -~W87k1 ~'~WBE= .. ,~'NBRT , , , ~.NB.'GH NBLT .'~Y EHRT ; ~~-E6TH ~~:EBL'€ . - FOTAL A3t1:53f1~.~~~hh~ 0 ~~ ` ~~~ ``'' D 0 ~0 0 90 129 - 0 2 48 0 0 269 ^ 0 ~Q'`:~ - 0 0 0 - 0 0 64 152 0 0 48 0 0 264 . G6S '. 'Or 0 0 0 0 85 153 0 0 56 0 0 294 , 0 3 0 0 0 0 94 150 0 0 53 0 0 297 ,i6 ,~si 0 ~a 0 0 0 0 97 164 0 1 49 0 0 311 .~*.~. 0 ' `"~ ~ 0 0 0 0 96 158 0 1 53 0 .0 306 60G .~700- G~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 105 153 6.fs~£5 ;z 0 0 0 0 2 46 o a 306 . 073Q;£,'_; ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 143 0 3 46 0 0 284 0 90 143 0 2 41 0- 0 276 P.M. PEAK HOUR 530-630 BROADWAY 0 0 0 .~ 1 ~-. o 1 0 ~ 1 49 L-_ 0 ~ 0 97 T r_ 0 164 SANTA MONICA PLACE DRIVEWAY W I ~~`~ Phone: (626) 564-7944 Fax:-(626) 564-0969 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY - .CLIENT: FEHR AND PEEERS PROJECT: SANTA MONICA PLACE DRIVEWAY COUNTS DATE: THURSDAY, JUNE 4TH, 2008 PERIOD: 7:00 AM TO 10:00 AM INTERSECTION: N/S 4TH STREET E/W SANTA MONIGA PLACE DRIVEWAY 431NIrLCOUPLLS~~~~ '~~:. ~ ~ RER1Q ~,:~BHY 7D0'-3;-t5'r' 1 X{5~,r5n~,,. 1 ~ .) ~ , ~~ '~ ~BYA 0 0 . • -8 ~:~.. SBLT 0 0 z~ .; 4 ~ N+BRT 0 0 's _~._d. *' 5 ., :VYgTEI 0 0 .z . ,..r,.. ~ 6 We€.`E - 0 0 : '~~ ~'TYBR'[ - 0 0 ~, ;. z,. r `..$ 9 `.-;NBTH . ~NBLF 0 5 0 2 t ~ ' .` EBRT 0 0 .,I s ~~ ~ ~ EBTF[ 0 0 xv F25 ~°~. s'EBLT ~. •~TOFAL 0 6 0 3 77<~a5~s z o o a D D D o s D s D e •.as64a:.~+ t a o o - D o D D 4 a - D a s saute; "s 2 o a D D a o a 1 D o a o 12 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 - 0 0 5 - '„ 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 ~V:~''90A'.~ 3 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 12 ~Q76. - -_ 3 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 6 0 0 0 9 88a--. ,. t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 4 =345 i s §~ 5 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 17 40fl ,° 2 ~'{~~~~ ~`~~ T~~ ~~~x Y.161E'_ 45BE~F ~ 0 ~~ ~.. 1 r'~,~ 2 ,t: SBYH 0 ~ F~ 3 . SBLT 0 ..f.'r ~ k~?:,~c4 :'^WBRT 0 Bbl i..r3.u ~.w ~v'~ ...?WBY6G 0 ;~ T,^~Q ~..WBh'E 0 6.... Yrsa ~,, ~`~S~ BRT> 0 j6. 3(a~S:~Y.~ ,y k~s,~ ,,.=NB:+ 73 ~i ~~e~ ~`~*'NBtT 0 ,°~ YO :`EBR'C 0 rh £# ~, `~:-'~~' :'. 'E87H 0 ,~~`~72 .'.-EBLY 75 ..~.`~.:. ; 'f ~= ~~TOikt .,.a0"841Ek~ - 5 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 77 0 0 0 22 ~.YS~.-~8'E' ~ 6 0 0 0 D .. 0 0 D 22 0 0 0 28 7.3fi~36"" ~- 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 30 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 25 800'= a~...~ -~ 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 32 s?s-a~s~ to o 0 0 0 0 0 0 1e o 0 0 2s sao<s3a'?~ s o D o 0 u D a 1 s o D s 29 8:4~-A4S£~%'.'e~°~ 12 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 24 0 D 0 36 30€FIYIOFk~` 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 28 0 0 0 39 A.M. PEAK HOUR L 900-1000 0 11 0 0 ~ 0 .~ l ~. .~ D o 1 ~ I SANTA MONICA PLACE DRIVEWF 0 ~ 28 O 0 0 4TH STREET WILTEC Phone: (626j 564-1944 Fax: (626) 5640969 IN 1 tH~tO1 ION I UHNINCi MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT: FEHR AND PEEERS PROJECT: - SANTA MONICA PLACE DRIVEWAY COUMS DATE: - THURSDAY, JUNE 4TH, 2008 PERIOD: 4:30 PM TO 7:30 PM INTERSECTION: N/S 4TH STREET ' EM/ SANTA MONICA PLACE DRIVEWAY kSMIN;CO[~NbSw.e~s'~ ,L,.,kk. ey w' ' ,, ~ a c z-; y~xh ~ ~ 1 -,, a. t F a',~;~ E~~ ~ a ~~ 2 Y~ E s•56T€l BBET ~„G.VBR,T-`&NXBIEE '~3*(BtT °~~7 RT ,°z-`N&t'tl .`.NB1T ::4 EBBT z:~BFH ,.:E86F „~'FOtAC 2 "~ "' - 0 0 0 -0 a o o a o 0 0 to s a o 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 1a SOfFS'f nom': 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 ~ 0 0 0 5'5~3,3E^-C^'. 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 530{45-fir€. 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 1 0 0 - 0 i2 "~„~ 1 o a o 0 0 0 o s t 0 0 11 s6~-5• ~r i 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o o o a ~'S= ?'- 5 c-~- ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 7 9 :-fi 45~_ 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1-0 0 0 0 13 fi4QQ~ 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 9 0 0 0 '~~ 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 3 0 0 0 11 6 ~30s 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 6 EI4Ik#Fk.~4T+A `N~ ~§R.."~ a: ° - ~°4 Lcp '~i`(. ~r ~v, .;i j r^=i f s ''~: „'~~ :Y 3 ^f~~. ~,4 n~ ~ 6 ~` 6 ~: ~i7 3 ~' ' 9 t0 , i~i: ' t t2 ; ~ '.TilME.'4~ w.83:. ._56TF1 ::: SBLT ,4~l1BRT -WBTFE , '~:WBLT 4 -?:~NBRT f.NBTH _ ,NBET : EBRF ,~ ?`EB7H , „ E91T ~ =COTAL ~30~3E7 ' 19 0 0 ~0 0 0 0 0 . 23 1 0 0 _ 43 44fi~9.5'~'d*. *e 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 7 0 0 50~260fka,~ i 16 0 0 0 0 0 44 ~ 0 0 21 2 0 0 39 ..~ s; 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 2 0 0 38 53r3~H3fl>'' .. 13 - 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 20 2 0 0 35 ~'' ~- 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 2 0 0 37 600` 13 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 26 1 0 - - 0 40 545'35 ~ 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 1 0 0 6;#0":230:~s~..*f=' '11 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 5 39 2 0 0 0 36 P.M. PEAK HOUR 445-545 20 0 .-~ 1 o~ SANTA MONICA PLACE DRIVEWf 0 ~ 1 0 0 ( ~"-~ 0 ~. ~ a ~ r 23 0 0 4TH STREET WILTEC INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY CLIENT: ~ FEHR AND PEEERS PROJECT: SANTA MONICA PLACE DRIVEWAY COUNTS DATE: SATURDAY ,TUNE 14, 2008 PERIOD: 1:00 PM TO 5:00 PM INTERSECTION: WS SAMA MONICA PLACE DRIVEWAY E/W BROADWAY' Phone: (626) 564-1944 Fax: (626) 564-0969 isrmnt c o brt~c~~t ~ .3 ~ ~ :: ~ ~ ~ , . ,~~ ~ >£u, ~A"`„~ I~ E ~ P€Oi7OB ..56fitT ~ t~ 2 ~ .+SBTk~ '3 _ , SBLT i. 'T" '4 ; , ' WBRT +c& of cars ,. W 6:TE1 ~ ~ 6 ~.~ ...~ WBLT r~s~o-`~+'~ ~.>~ ` ~ NBRY ~~ a ff ~, NBTH c~4i fr. A NBLfi -. r ~~ m `,. EBR-€ Ya € ,~ .sk$~Fi 12 - `EelT .,_. - TAl"AL ~L'E'lft.=-s~,~~~' 0 0 0 0 0 16 41 0 0 12 0 0 69 k'k'SiS3Q~ 0 0 0 0 0 35 67 0 0 20 0 0 122 73 ~fy s'~':`• 0 0 0 0 0 38 66 - 0 0 19 0 0 123 "'.'.. ~Oik 0 0 0 0 0 42 80 0 0 14 0 0 136 20 .2]!5 ~',r. e 0 0 0 0 0 17 59 0 0 9 0 0 85 ~~to~~g ' 0 0 0 0 0 o sz o 0 0 0 o sz '° ¢` 0 0 0 0 o a zs a a o 0 6 zs zassoo~ o a o o a o zo a o o . o a zo 36~°.44~ 0 0 0 0 ' 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 38 3'f,3"`~~~,~n~' 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 34 a~ac^ = a o 0 o a o zo a o 0 o a zo a~ ~f o 0 o a o a1 19 0 0 14 0 0 7a 'n' 0 4'F5;A3R,`'x.": 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 30 13 _ 6 0 0 0 0 14 9 0 0 - 0 0 78 -45 '""~ f o 0 0 0 o ez za o 0 7 0 o a7 :49:nfi0'~ ^.e'. 0 -raev~.n 'TA(4l 4:a A& ~„~~ 0 ~.e3~~E.va:. ~r k-? Y?iS@`LH 0 ~.- = 3 r . SBLT. '0 - . ,ir 4 „V11BR7 0 SS,.~, * =~ ~ t. WBF1d 9 -.-? tia ~ ..WBC'E' 23 t 'L'~ *3 1.s '7 „/:NHA~`i` 0 x~ .te.< ,~,,i~•i ;t~$ ... NB;CH 0 A -..,~. 9 *e,N$6T. 3 K - 'a,'f6 ,~ _EBRT 0 ~'T9 ='fE&TH - 0 Y 42 ~,~"'eBLI' 35 ' s :: TOFAk $,0~ 0 0 0 0 0 131 254 0 0 65 0 0 450 ~-'3.23 ~..Y: 0 ±fi.~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 732 97 272 257 0 0 0 0 62 42 0 tl 0 0 466 396 4.~i'2~4:~.+1--. 0 ~'.._ ~. 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 59 17 216 156 0 0 0 0 23 9 0 0 0 0 298 182 ~ #~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 135 0 0 0 -- 0 0 135 0 0 o a o o an o a o 0 0 1n x"` a `¢a- 0 o 0 a 0 o 0 a o o a1 nz 111 a 0 o 0 0 1a o o a 0 11z 1ss ~u~-ar~°`_` 0 0 0 0 o sz as o a za a o zos ~'a;u~' a -4S 0 ` o 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 1zz 174 sa 66 o 0 a 0 37 44 o 0 a 0 zn 284 ' P~aSfIF;?l' -*. 0 0 0 0 0 142 70 0 0 33 0 0 245 PM PEAK HOUR - 175-275 1 0 0 0 0 I ~ ~ 0 132 + ~ BROADWAY - 0 ~ ~ } r 6 0 0 272 62 SANTA MONICA PLACE DRIVEWAY ' Structrue closed at 2:10 and reopened at 3:45 and then closed agai n at 4:50 due to the lot being to full. WILTEC INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT SUMMARY GUENT: FEHR AND PEEERS PROJECT: SANTA MONICA PLACE DRIVEWAY COUNTS DATE: SATURDAY JUNE 14, 2008 PERIOD: 1:00 PM TO 5:00 PM INTERSECTION: WS 4TH STREET. EAN SANTAMONICA PLACE DRIVEWAY Phone: (626)564-1944 Fax: (626j 564-0969 YS:;fv1Uk CQUN~SZ"`~ .~ . _: ~--. c . - .. s z ti ~ ~ 'nom '.: ~~., "~~ :; r`'~ ""i2 '~ s „n c y.~4 ~ t ~ n 6 ~, `" ~ r, ~ ~8 ~"> 8 _ r qfQ = F7 12 + " PEI?IQD,t .m .SB18'E ae:S&T~H :~ . S6LT "tna(~SRT C- .~_AM&F" a:`.WBLT n 4 .+~ _._NB[#T , ;~NBTL~ a NBLT „ ESRT . ~ E6T-Y+ ~'- EBLT , TOTAL S.BO-"<'.'.P5'`..f'~'~". 10 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 8 :. 0 , ~~' to a o 0 0 o 0 0 18 as to 0 ~ 0 o o a o o o fa " 0 0 b o o is o o 0 2s ;t~,~ 27~, s o o g o a ` o o tz o 0 0 27 ~ u a o 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 19 zsa to o o a a o o a n o a ':~ 0 0 0 0 0 _ ~ o zs 0 0 0 9 o 0 9 a 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 o a o a o _~: a ' a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a a o Q~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 o ss=4ui1 o 0 0 0 o a o o a o 0 0 0 A00-4ti5 ate"; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4E6-030-~~.%': 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~4sa 1t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 ~ ~~ L(C1f1BT.T~~4~$,f~~4'~ " S ~i. T - yk iZ+ { e s • __ is -~, ~ ~~.t 0 t'* 0 . : ~'~ . ~~~~~ ` .. "'~ 9 ' £ r ~A ' ~ cor`fi~y,5 ~,~" ~ ' x~~ sq.~~~~ ~"w FS r-34 z~}`..~ -~~..4. ~~1 ~ "j2 z ? s.; e.:~ ~S9RT ~ -SB ? SBLT ~ 1!R BFOT r,,;yy9,EL{ ~IUB L~ ~.-N8& ;~.NB~ .. r°A_19OT . u-: EBRT „S EE'1'F7 EBE'3 a,T.4FAL "°.%.. 39 ' " ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 86 _ -. : do a o 0 o g o 0 4i o o ~ 0 67 ra -zap as o 0 0 0 o a o so 0 0 i'~ft~45. `i^'^'. 38 - 0 0 0 ' 0 0 0 o sa 'T~ 0 31 0 0 0 69 '- - 29 ~ ~ 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 ' 19 0 0 0 48 '22ifr•. - 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 -0 0 0 ` 29 •~ 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 zd~~ o 0 0 0 0 9 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 s' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 `°; o o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _.~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 9 4eo= Fi~'~~~'~ a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 PM PEAK HOUR 730-230 48 0 0 i `~ i SANTA MONICA PLACE DRIVEWF 0 ~ ~ ~ 1 I 6 ---". so o a a -~ 4TH STREET Entrance to the structrue closed at 2:30 due to the lot being to full. APPENDIX B TRAFFIX LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS Existing AM Wed Jun 25, 2008 20:26:38 Page 3-1 Santa Monica Parking Strucutres7 and 8 EXISTING (2004) CONDITIONS - AM PEAK HOUR Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) ***********~*********************+*********:r***a+***********************:r******+ Intersection #33 FOURTH STREET/BROADWAY :c*t********.***********<*****tf**ts~**:t***************x*****#*********:t**:t*******< Cycle {sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap. (X}; 0.691 Loss Time (sec): 12.(Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 25 .9 Optimal Cycle: 81 Level Of Service: C *****+*,F**:t*w****xx******t***w**:t***:+*******t*~*********:r**+*****:t*x**:t*******t* Approach: North Sound South Bound East sound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T- R L - T - R L - 'T - R ____________I_______________ _I~___ _________ II_______._______ ___________ _ Control: Prot+Permit II Prot+Permit Permitted Prot+Permit Rights: Ovl Include Dvl Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 D 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ____________I__________._____I_______________~I_______________I~_______________~ Volume Module: - Base Vol: 52 491 85 52 363 46 0 190 ~ 87 - 50 320 62 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 52 491 85 52 363 46 D. 19D 67 50 320 62 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 D.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 .0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF. Volume: 58 548 95 58 405 51 0 212 97 56 357 69 Reduct Vol: 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p Reduced Vol: 56 548 95 58 405 SI 0 212 97 56 -357 69 PCE Adj: 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.OD 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 58 548 95 56 405 51 0 212 97 56 357 69 ____________I_______________II_______________II_______________II_______________ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: D.78 0.87 0.52 0.77 0.69 0.73 1.00 0.84 0.57 0.79 0,87 0.53 Lanes: .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.79 0.21 ~D.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1485 1654 994 1454 2342 - 297 0 1595 1088 1492 1654 1004 ____________I_____________.__fl___ ' ____________I~_______________I'_______________ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.04 0.33 0.10 0.04 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.13 0.09 0.04 0.22 0.07 Crit Moves: **~** **** **„+ Green/Cycle: 0.49 0.39 0:65 0.40 0.36 0.36 0.00 0.16 0.24 0.41 0.41 0.46 Volume/Cap: 0.16 0.85. 0.15. 0.34 0.48 0.48 0.00 0.85 0.38 0.12 0.52 0.15 _ Delay/Veh: 11.5 32.4 5.7 17.7 20.4 20.4 0.0 55.5 26.5 15.0 18.4 12.7 User DelAdj: 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 11..5 32.4 5. 7. 17.7 20.4 2D.4 0.0 55.5 26.5 15.0 18.4 12.7 HCM2kAvg: 1 15 1 1 5 5 0 8 2 1 7 1 Tra£fix 7.7.D515 (c) 2005 Dowling'ASSOC. Licensed to KAKU, SANTA MONICA, CA:7 Existing PM Wed Jun 25, 2008 20:27:10 Page 3-1 Santa Monica Parking Structures 7 and 8 EXISTING (2004)CONDITIONS - PM PEAK HOUR _____________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Base Volume Alternative) wwwwww+ww*wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww*w*ww*wwwww*wwww*wwwwww**ww*,:wwwww-:tww:ww*ww*www*w+ww* Intersection #33 FOURTH STREET/BROADWAY - wwwwwwww**wwwwwwww*wwwwwwwww****w*wwwwwww*:t*wwww*www*wwwwwwww*www*ww*wwww**ww** Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.723 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 22,4 Optimal Cycle: 59 Level Of Service: ~ ~ C w**ww*wwwww**www**w**ww*wwwww wwwwwww*www*+wwwwwwwwwwwww*wwwww**wwwwwww*wwwwww*ww Approach: North sound South sound East sound West. Bound Movement ; L - T - R L - T - R L - T- R L - T - R ____________I______________ _II_______________~I______________ _______________ Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit 'I Permitted Prot+Permit Rights: ~ Ovl Include Ovl Ovl Min. Green: 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 .0 D 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1. 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ____________I_______________II_______________I_______________I_______________ - Volume Module: Base Vol: 80 466 60 - 78 634 60 0 318 242 84 305 105 Growth Adj:. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 I-. 00 T:O6 1. 00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 80 466 60 78 634 60 0 318 242 84 305 105 User Adj: 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Y.00 PHF Adj: 0.96.0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 83 484 62 81 659 62 0 331 252 87 317 109 Reduct Vol : 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 83 484 62 81 659 62 0 331 252 87 317 109 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - Final Vol.: 83 484. 62 81 659 62 0 331 252 87 317 109 ____________I_______________I_______________II_______________II_______________I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.79 0.87 0:51 0.76 0.69 0.74 1.00 0.84 0.53 0.79 0.87 0.45 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.84 0.16 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1505 1654 972 1448 2418 229 0 1595 1004 1492 1654 849 ____________I_______________II_______ _II_______________II______._ ________ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.06 0.29 0.06 0.06 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.21 0.25 0.06 0.19 0.13 Crit Moves: **** w*ww **ww wwyrw Green/Cycle: 0,52 0.41 0.49 0.48 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.29 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.44 Volume/Cap: 0.28 0.72 0,13 0.31 0.68 0.68 0.00 0.72 0.68 0.38 0.52 0.29 _ Delay/Veh: 11.3 23.9 11.4 13.9 21.5 21.5 0.0 31.3 -26.4 19.2 20.6 14.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 11.3 23.9 11.4 13.9 21.5 21.5 0.0 31.3 26,4 29.2 20.6 14.6 HCM2kAvg: 2 11 1 2 9 9 0 9 7 2. 7 2 *wwwww**www*wwwwww*wwwwww**w*wwwwww*www*www*w+*www*ww*ww*www*wwww*wwwwwwww*ww*ww Traffix 7.7.0515 (c} 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KAKU, SANTA MONICA, CAO Existing Weekend Wed Jun 25, 2008 20:28:09 Page 3-1 Santa Monica Parking Structures 7 and 8 EXISTING WEEKEND CONDITIONS Level Of Service ComputationReport - 2000 HCM Operations .Method (BaseVOlume .Alternative) *x*:t***,t*********,t*****:t**********:c*.*:t**:t+>***********rr**:t*******vr*x*t+***~.t*~:v :t* Intersection #33 FOURTH STREET/BROADWAY Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.846 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R.= 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 26.9 Optimal Cycle: 81 ~ Level Of Service: ~ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T' - R- L - T - R L - T - R ____________~_______________'_______________~I_______________II_ __.I Control: Prot+Permit - Prot+Permit - Permitted Prot+Permit Rights: Ov1 Include Ovl Ovl _ Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 ~0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ____________I________ II_______________II________._______~'____________ Volume Module: Base. VOl: 269 516 50 35 585 90 1 190 266 197 381 112 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 269. 518 50 35 585 90 1 190 266 197 381 112 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 0.75 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 283. 545. 53 37 616 95 1 200 210 207 401 88 Reduct Voli 0 0 0 0 0 0 D D 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 283 54S 53 37 616 95 1 200 210 207 401 88 PCE.Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj : 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 283 _545 53 37 616 95 1 200 210 207 401 88 ____________I_,______________II_______________'~_______________I________.______I Saturation Flow Module: - Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.80 0.87 0.58 0.77 0.69 0.74 0.90 0.84 0.63 0.80 0.87 0.59 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.75 0.25 0.01 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1516 1654 1102 1462 2287 352 8 1581 1201 1516 1654 1124 ____________I_______________I_______________I!________________ ' ______________ Capacity Analysis Module: _ Vol/Sat: 0.19 0.33 0.05 0.03 0.27 0.27 0.13 0.13 0.17 0.14 0.24 0.08 Crit Moves: ****_ ~ **:+ **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.58 0.50 0.66 0.36 0.32 0.32 D.15 0.15 0.37 0.31 0.31 0.35 Volume/Cap: 0.63 0.66 0.07 0.14 0.85 0.65 0.85 0.85 0.47 0.64 0.78 0.23 Delay/Veh: 14:1 16.8 a,g 17,3 33.4 33.4 56.9 56.9 20.0 26.7 32.6 18.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00' 1,00 1:00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 14.1 16.8 4.6 17.3 33.4 33.4 56.9 56.9 20.0 26.7 32.6 18.7 HCM2kAvg: 6 11 0 1 11 12 8 B 4 6 11 2 **++*************+***+*******+*********s**:r*.**********+***:c********:r******+**** Traffix 7.7.0515 (c} 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KAKU, SANTA MONICA, CAC Cumbase AM Wed Sun 25; 2006 20:30:16 Page 3-1 Santa Monica Parking Structures 7 and.8 CUMULATIVE BASE (2014} - AM PEAKHOUR Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) *****************x********a***a**************:r************+*a********+********** Intersection #33 FOURTH STREET/BROADWAY- ****************+**********x*****:t***r~:t***********~****************+*********** Cycle (sec): 80 - - CriticalVOl:/Cap. (X};- - 0.970 - Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec} Average Delay (sec/veh}; 60.1 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: E Approach: North Bound South Hound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T - R - L' - T - R L - T - R L - T - R _______________I___________ ____________ ____~I______________________________~ Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit ~ Permitted Prot+Permit Rights: Ovl Include Ovl Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ____~________I____.___________II_______________~`_______________II_______________I Volume Module: Base Vol: 52 491 85 52 363 46 0 190 87 50 320 62 Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 1.08. 1.08.1.08..1.06 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 Initial Bse: 56 530 92 56 392 50 0 '205 94 54 346 67 Added Vol: 13 242 13 ~~ 1 167 2 1 28 63 58 48 29 PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0- 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 69 772 105 ~57 559 52 1 233 157 112 394 96 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90.0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 77 862 117 - 64 624 58 1 260 175 125 439 107 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 77 862 117 64 624 58 1 260 175 125 439 107 PCE Adj: 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 77 862 '117 64 624 58 1 260 175 125 439 }07 ____________I_______________'I_______________'I___________..____II_______________I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: ~ 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 .1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.79 0.87 0.53 0 .39 0.69 0.73 0.90 0.84 0.57 0.78 0.87 0.52 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.84 0.16 0.01 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 Final Sat.: 1503 1654 1007 744 2422 224 7 1569 1068 1491 1654 990 ____________~_______________II_____________________________________________' Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.05 0.52 0.12 0.09 0.26 0.26 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.06 0.27 0.11 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.53 0.45 0.67 0.44 0.40 0.40 0.14 0.14 0.22 0.37 0:37 0.40 Volume/Cap: 0.24 1.17 0.17 0.49 0.64 0.64 1.17 1.17 0.73 0.30 0.72 0.27 Delay/Veh: 10.5 113 5.0 15.9 20.5 20.5 148.1 148 39.9 17.9 26.1 16.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 10.5 113 5.0 15.9 20.5 20.5 148.1 148 39.9 17.9 26.1 16.3 HCM2kAVg: ~ 1 40 1 2 8 8 15 14 6 3 11 2 ******<******~************a****:r*****************************x**s****+********x* Traffix 7.7.0515 (c3 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KAKU, SANTA MONICA, CA'7 Cumbase PM Wed Jun 25, 2008 20:30:49 Page 3-I Santa Monica Parkinq Structures 7 and 8 CUMULATIVE BASE (2014) - PM PEAK HOUR Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ^*****++***********:r*************:****:****:******:e********+**********k********* Intersection #33 FOURTH STREET/BROADWAY ****************************************~:r*****x*****x******************:******* Cycle(sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.029 Loss.Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 47.1 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: - D +**************************o-*******:r*****x****xt****+*******+*******:****:***:** Approach: North sound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R _ ____~_______________I_______________~_______________~I_______________I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted Prot+Permit Rights: Ovl Include Ovl Ovl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 D 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ____________I_______________I_______________II_______________II_______________I Volume Module: Base Vol: 80 466, 60 78 634 60 0 318 242 84 305 105 Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 Initial Bse; 86 503 65 84 685 65 0 343 - 261 91 329 113 Added Vol: 32 253 34 - 3 310 3 2 37 34 38 28 10 PasserByVOl: 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 118 756 99 87 995 6S 2. 380 295 129 357 123 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHFAdj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 PHF Volume: 123 786 103 91 1034 70 2 395 307 134 372 128 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 123 786 103 91 1034 70 2 395 307 134. 372 128 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1,00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 123 786 103 91 1034 70 2 395 307 134 372 128 ____________'_______________~I_______________I_______________~~_______________ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900.1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.80 0.87 0.52 0.61 0.70 0.74 0.90 0.84 0.53 0.79 0.87 0.43 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1,00 1.88 0.12 0.01 0-. 99 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.OD Final.Sat.: 1514 1654 987 1160 2483 169 B 1583 1004 1501 1654 818 ____________I_______________I'_______________~_______________.I,_______________I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.48 0.10 0.08 0.42 0.42 0.25 0.25 0.31 0.09 0.22 0.16 Crit Moves: **** - **** ***: **** - Green/Cycle: 0.56 0.46 0.55 0.49 0.43 0.43 0.24 0.24 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.39 Volume/Cap: 0.55 1.04 0.19 0.55 0.96 0.96 1.04 1.04 0.94 0.63 0.68 0.40 DelayjVeh: 15.3 63.7 9.3 21.7 39,4 39.4 86.0 86.0 60.1 27.4 26.6 18.4 User De1Adj: 1 .00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD Adj Del/Veh: 15.3 63.7 9.3 21:7 39.4 39.4 86.0 86.0 60.1 27.4 26.6 18.4 HCM2kAVg: 3 29 1 3 19 20. 18 17 12 4 9 3 Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to XAKU; SANTA MONICA, CAf] Cumbase Weekend Wed Jun -25, 2008 20:29:10 Page 3-1 _ Santa Monica Parking Structures 7 and 8 CUMULATIVE HASE (2014) CONDITIONS - WEEKEND - Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #33 FOURTH STREET/BROADWAY Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.016 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 63.2 .. Optimal .Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: - F Approach: ~ North.BOUnd South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T- R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ___________________I'_______________II_______________I_______________I Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted Prot+Perm it Rights: Ovl Include Ovl Ovl Mina Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1- 1. 0- 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ____________I_______________I_______________If_______________I______________.-.~ Volume Module: .Base Vol: 269 518 50 35 504 90 0 190 230 170 .408 112 Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 1, 08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 .1.08 1.08 1.08 Initial Bse: 291 559 54 38 544 97 0 205 246 164 441 121 Added Vol: ~36 176 -13 ~~ 2 293 0 0 26 41 30 46 8 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 Initial Fut: 327 735 67 40 837 97 0 231 289 214 487 129 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 0.75 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0..95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 344 774 ~ 71 42 881 102 0 243 226 225 512 102 Reduct Vol: 0 D D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -0 Reduced Vol: 344 774 71 42 881 102 0 243 228 225 512 102 PCE Adj: 1.00 L00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 344 774 71 42 881 102 0 243 226 225 512 102 ___________________________'_______________'_______________'I_______________~ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.38 0.87 0.58 0.67 0.69 0.74 1.00 0.84 0.63 0.80 0.87 0.59 Lanes: - 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1,00 1.90 0.20 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 716 1654 1102 1265 2369 275 0 1595 -1201 1516 1654 1124 ____________~_____________.__I_______________'I_______________~'______._________I - Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.48 0.47 0.06 0.03 0..37 0.37 0.00 0.15 0.19 0.15 0.31 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **:* *„** - Green/Cycle: 0.53 0.45 0.70 .0.33 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.12 0.30 0.37 0.37 0.40 Volume/Cap: 0.97 1.04 0.09 0.36 1.25 1.25 0.00 1.25 0.63 0.49 0.84 0.23 Delay/Veh: 60 .5 64.4 3.9 23.1 150 150.4 0.0 182 27.4 19.5. 32.8 16.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 60:5 64.4 3,9 23.1 150.150.4 0.0 182 27.4 19.5 32.6 16.2 HCM2kAvg; 14 29 1 1 27 29 0 15 6 5 14 2 .x*x*****~********************************:r***:t**x+************xx**********+***x Tra£f ix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KAKU, SANTA MONICA, CRO Cum+Proj AM Wed Jun 25, 2008 20:27:38 Page 3-1 Santa Monica Parking Structures 7 and 8 _ CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS - AM PEAK HOUR ________________________________________________________________________________ Level Of Service. Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) w*wwww:twww*w*wwwwww*w*ww*wwww:}*w+w*wwwwww*wwwwwwwwww*wwwwww*wwwwwwww*wwwww*wwwww - Intersection #33 FOURTH STREET/BROADWAY w**wwwww*wwwwwswwwww+wwwwww**wwwwwwww*wwwwwwwww~wwwwww*wwwwwwww*wwwwwww*wwww*www cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 0.970 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 59,g ,optimal Cycle: 180Level Of Service: g *wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww*wwwwwww*wwwwwwwwwwwww _ Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Baund Movement : L - T - R L - T - R L - T- R L - T - R ___________________________~I_______________I__________._____I______________ ' Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted Prot+Permit Rights: Ovl Include Ovl Ovl - Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ____________I______________________________I~_______________II_______________I Volume Module: Base Vol: ~ 52 491 BS 52 363 46 0 190 87 50~ 320 62 Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 1.08 T.08 1.08 1. 08 1.08 1.08 1,08 1.08 1.08 1.08 Initial Sse: 56 530 92 56 392 50 0 205 94 54 346 67 Added Vol: 13 242 13 ~~ 1 167 2 1 28 63 58 46 29 Shifts: 28 0 0 0 -10 10 0 0 -7 -1 1 0 Initial Fut: 97 772 .I05 57 549 62 1 233 150 111 395 96 -- User Adj: 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 108 862 117 64 613 69 1 260 167. 124 440 107 ReduCt Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 108 862 117 64 613 69 1 260 167 124 440 107 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 MLF Adj :: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 108 862 117 64. 613 69 1 260 167 124 440 107 ____________~_______________II_______________.II-______________II_______________I Saturation Flow-Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2906 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.79 0.87 0.53 0.41 0.69 0.73 0.90 0.84 0.57 0.78 0.87 0.52 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.81 0.19 0.01 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1503 1654 1007 772 2376 267 7 1589 1088 1491 1654 990 ___________________________II_______________II_______________I_______________.I Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.07 0.52 0.12 0.08 0.26 0.26 0;16 0.16 0.15 0.08 6.27 0.11 Crit Moves: **** wwww **ww Green/Cycle: 0.53 0.45 0.67 0.41 0.38 0.38 0.14 0.14 0.25 0.37 0.37 0.40 Volume/Cap: 0.32 1.17 0.17 0.49 0.68 0.68 1.17 1.17 0.63 0.30 0.72 0.27 Delay/Veh: .11.0 113 5.0 17.2 22.9 22.9 148.5 148 31.6 17.9 26.2 16,3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 - Adj Del/Veh: 11.0 113 5.0 17.2 22.9 22,9 148.5 148. 31.6 17.9 26.2 16.3 HCM2kAVg: 2 40 1 2 8 9 15 14 5 2 11 2 www:twwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KAKU, SANTA MONICA, CAC' Cum+Proj PM Wed Jun 25; 2008 20:28:41 Page 3-1 Santa Monica Parking Structures 7 and 8 CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS - PM PEAK.HOUR Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) e*****x*****+**x:t********+****x**:t*************~*:s**f**************~.tt+*:t*:t***** Intersection #33 FOURTH STREET/BROADWAY Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol./Cap. (X): 1.027 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 47.0 Optimal.. Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: ~ D ****f*****Yr4****5******&*#****************W******************#***********t****Y* Approach:: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R~ L - T - R ___________________________II_______________I'_______________I______ _ Control: Prat+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted Prot+Permit Rights: Ovl Include. Ovl Ovl Min. Green: 0 0~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ____________I_______________'_ ________~I_______________II_______________ Volume Module: Base Vol: 8D 466 60 78 634 60 0 318 242 84 305 105 Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 1.OB 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 Initial Bse: 86 503- 65 84 685 65 0 343 261 91 329 113 AddedVOl: 32 253 34 ~~ 3 310. 3 2 37 34 38 28 10 Shifts: 23 0 0 0 -18 18 0 0 -50 -2 2 0 Initial Fut: 141 756 99 87 977 86 2 380 245 127 359 123 User Adj': 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0:96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.9fi 0.96 PHF Volume: 147 786 103 91 1015 89 2 395 255 132 374 128 Reduct Vol : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- D 0 D 0 0 Reduced Vol: 147 786 103 91 1015 89 2 395 255 132 374. 128 PCE Adj: 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Vol.: 147 786 103 91 1015 89 2 395 255 132 374 128 ____________I_______________I~_______________~~_______________II_______________ Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.80 0.87 0.52 0.62 0.69 0.74 0.90 0.84 0.53 0.79 0.87 0.43 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.85 0.25 0.01 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1514 1654 987 1178 2435 214 B 1583 1004 1501 1654 818 ____________I_______________'_________.______'_______________II_____.________. . Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.10 0.48 0.10 0.08 0.4Z 0.42 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.09 0.23 0.16 Crit MOVes: **** **** ~***. **** - - Green/Cycle: 0.56 0.46 0.55 0.48 0.42' 0.42 0.24 0.24 0.34 0.33 0.33 0.39 Volume/Cap: 0,62 1.03 0.19 0.55 0.99 0.99 2.03 1.03 0.75 0.62 0.68 0.40 Delay/Veh: 18.1 63.1 9.3 21.8 47.0 47.0 85.3 85.3 32.-2 27.3 26.8 I8.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 18.1 63.1 9:3 21.8 47 .~0 47.0 85.3 85.3 32.2 27.3 26.8 18.5 HCM2kAVg: 4 29 1 3 20 21 18 17 7 4 9 3 Traffix 7.7'.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KRKU, SANTA MONICA, CPv^., Cum+Proj Weekend Wed Jun 25, 2008 20:29:42 Page 3-1 Santa Monica-Parking Structures 7 and 8 CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT (2014) - WEEKEND ________________________________________________ Level of Service Computation Report - 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) Intersection #33 FOURTH STREET/BROADWAY ********************+r***,e***:r****i~****a*********:***********+*+**x+**r********* Cycle (sec): 80 Critical Vol,/Cap. (X): 1.056 Loss Time (sec): 12 {y+R = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 90.9 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: _. g *****+*a********************,r*****************:*************x******************* Approach: North Bound - ~South_Bound East Bound West Bound Movement : L - T- R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ____________~_______________II______________ _II________________I_______________ Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted Prot+Permit Rights: Ovl ~ Include Ovl - p~,l Minr Green: 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 ~ 0 0 Lanes: 1-0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 7 1 0 1 0 1 __._________~___________-___._I_______________I._______________I~_______________~ Volume Module: Base Vol: 269 518 50 35 504 90 0. 190 230 170 408 112 Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 Y.OB '1 .OS 1.06 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1..08 1.08 1.08 Initial H Se: 291 559 54 38 544 97 0 205 248 184 441 121 Added Vol: 36 176 13 ~~ 2 293 0 0 26 41 30 46 8 Shifts: 50 0 0 0 -43 43 0 0 -62 -5 5 0 Initial Fut: 377 735 - 67 40 794 140 0 231 207 209. 492 129 User Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 0.75 1.00 1.00 D.75 PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0:95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 D.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 PHF Volume: 396 774 71 42 836 148 0 243 164 220 .518 102 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 396 774 71 42 836 148 0 243 164 220 518 102 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.D0 1.00 ]..00 1.00 Final Vol.: 396 774 71 42 836_ 148 0 243 164 220 518- 102 ____________I____________.___~I_________.______~'_______________'_______________I Saturation Flow Module: - Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 19001900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.36 0.87 0.58 0.73 0.69 0.74 - 1.00 0.84 0.63 0.80 0.87 0.59 Lanes: 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.DD 1.72 0.28 0,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat,: 678 1654 1102 1385 2241 395 0 1595 1201 1516 1654 1124 ____________L_______________~_______________I_______________I~_____,__________ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.58 0.47 0.06 0.03 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.31 0.09 Crit Moves: **** **** Green/Cycle: 0,57 0.46 -0.70 0.32 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.12 D,32 0.36 0.36 0.39 Volume/Cap: 1.01 1.01 0.09 0.35 1..29 1.29 0.00 1.29 0.43 0.49 0.87 0.23 Delay/Veh: 70.7 57.4 3.8 23.1 171 170.7 0,0 201 22.2 20.0 37.0 16.8 User De1Adj: 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 70.7 57.4 3.8 23.1 171 170.7 0.0 201 22.2 20.0 37.0 16.8 - HCM2kAVg: 17 28 1 1 28 30 0 15 4 5 15 2 Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc: Licensed to KAKU, SANTA MONICA, CAC7 Cum+PTOj AM Fri Jun 27, 2008 13:35:12 Page. 3-1 Santa Monica Parking Structures land e CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS - AM PEAKHOUR - EXTRAPOLATED SHIFTS LeveL.Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) . Intersection #33 FOURTH STREET/BROADWAY *****************}*4ii**iii**%******}%********#*#*#**t#*******}***i#**#*4}*i**%* Cycle (sec)t' 60 Ciitical Vol./Cap. (X}: - 0.973 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+A = 4 sec) Average Delay (sec/veh): 60.4 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: g *#*#***}*******i*#******t#***##it***i****##***********i##****i#****Y#*i****#}**t. Approach: North Bound South Bound East Sound West Bound - Movement: L - T - R L - T - R ~ L - T - R L - T - R ' ____________1______________11______ ______11_______________1i___________ Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted Prot+Permit 1 Rights: Ovl Include Ovl avl Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0~ 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ------------I--------------II---------------fl--------------II---------------I Volume Module: Base Vol: 52 441 85 52 363 46 0 190 87 50 320 62 Growth Adj: 1.08 1.OB 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08. 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.08 Initial Bse: 56 530 92 56 392 50 0 205 94 54 346 67 Added Vol: 13 242 13 ,. 1 167 2 1 ZS 63 58 48 29 Shifts: 90 0 0 0 -31 - 31 0 0 -22 -4 4 0 Initial Fut: 159 772 105 57 528 83 1 233 135 108 398 96 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1-, 00 1.00.1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.40 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 PHF Volume: 178 862 117 64 589 92 1 260 151 121 444 107 Reduct Vol: 0- 0. 0 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 178 862 117 64 589 92 1 260 151 121 444 107 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj:' -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.DD Final Vol.: 178 862 117 64 589 92 1 260 151 121 444 107 ____________1____________-_11_______________1.1_______________11_____.__________1 Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.79 0.87 0.53 0.44 0.69 0.72 0.90 0.84 0.57 0.78 0.87 0.52 Lanes: 1.'00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.74 0.26 0.01 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1504 1654 1007 828 2275 356 7 1589 1088 1491 1654 990 _ _______________.11______ ___________ ________11_______________11_______________1 capacity AnalysisMOdule: Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.52 0.12 0,06 0.26 0.26 0.16.'0.16 0.14 0.08 0.27 0.11 CYit Moves: **** **** ***# Green/Cycle: 0.53 0.44 0.67 0.37 0.33 0.33 0.14 0.14 0.29..0.37 0.37 0.41 Volume/Cap: 0.48 1.17 0.17 0.49 0.78 0.78 1.17 1..17 0.46 0.29 0.73 0.27 Delay/Veh: 12.3 114 5.0 19.5 28:9 28.9 149.5 149 29.5 17.7 26.2 16..2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDelfVeh: 12.3 114 5.0 19.5 28.9 26.9 149.5 149 .24.5 17.7 26.2 16.2 HCM2kAVg: ~ 4 40 1 2 10 10 15 14 4 2 11 2 *#***********i}#*t**i***ii**i#****}***i##*****'}*#***i****i***}**i#t***}*t****%i* Traff ix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KAKU, SANTA MONICA, CA Cum+Proj PM Fri Jun 27, 2008 13:31:46 page 3-1 Santa Monica Parking Structures 7 and 8 CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS - PM PEAK HOUR EXTRAPOLATED SHIFTS ___________________________________ _________________________ Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) InteYSectiOri #33 FOURTH STREET/BROADWAY - ****.******t***t**********Y*Y#4******Y£#*********************###*4#YY#Y#££******* cycle (sec): 80 Critical vol./Cap: (X): 1.034 Loss Time (sec):' 12 (Y+R = 4 sec) AverageDelay (sec/Veh): S2.1 Optimal Cycle: 180- Level Of Service: D #*#*t*####t****#**######*£*******#*****************#*i********#YY#4*#*********** Approach: North Sound South Bound East Hound West Sound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R~ L - T - R L - T - R ____________~_______________I__.___________-_I_______________II_______________~ Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted -Prot+Permit Rights: Ovl Include Ovl - 'OVl - Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 Lanes: 1 p 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 __-_________I_______________'I_______________~_______'______.__'_______________I Volume Module: _ Base Vol: 80 466 60 78 634 60 0 318 242 84 305 105 Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.06 1.08 1.08 i.06 1.OB 1.08 1.08 1.08 l.OB Initial Bse: 86 SD3 65 84 685 65 0 343 261 91 .329 113' ' Added Vol: 32 253 34 ~~ 3 310 3 2 37 34 38 28 10 ' Shifts: 74 0 0 0 -56 58 0 -0 -157 -6 6 0 InitialFUt: 192 756 99 87 937 .226 2 380 138 123 363 123 User Adj: 1.D0 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,D0 PHF Adj: 0.96 0,96 0.96 -0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0.96 PHF Volume: 200 786 103 91 974 131 ~ 2 395 144 128 376 128 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0. 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 200. 786 1D3 91 974 131 2 395 144 128 378 128 ' PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 MLF. Adj: 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00. 1.DD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '. Final Vol.: 200 786 103 91 974 131 2 395 144 126 378 128 ___________________________II____ __I_______________II_______________I Saturation Flow Module: Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 .1900 1900 1900 Adjustment:- 0.61 0.87 0.52 0.67 0.69 0.73 0.90 0.84 0.53 0.77 0.87 0.43 Lanes: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.77 0.23 D.O1 0,99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 1151 1654 989 1276 2325 .312 B 1583 1004 1456 1654 811 ___________________________I~_______________'_______________II_______________I Capacity Analysis Module: - - Vol/Sat: 0.17.0.48 0.10 0.07 0.42 0.42. 0.25 0.28 0.14 0,09 0.23 0.16 Ciit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0:56 0.47 0.55 0.46 0.40 0.40 0.24 0.24 0.37 0.32 0.32 0.38 Volume/Cap: 0.73 1.02 0.19 0.55 1.05 S.DS 1.05 1.05 0.39 0.62 0.71 D.41 Delay/Veh: 25.1 56.9 9.2 21.6 64.3 64.3 89.2 89.2 19.5 27.7 28.1 16.9 User.DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 25.1 58.9 9.2 21.6 64.3 64.3 69.2 89.2 19.5 27 J 28.1 18.9 HCMZkAVg; 6 28- 1 3 22 23 18 17 3 4 10 3 *******££**********#**4*#********##*#X*******#*******#***#****t******£***#*k**** Traffix 7.7.0515 (c) 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KAKU, SANTA MONZCA, CA Cum+Proj Weekend Fri Jun 27, 2008 13:33:20 Page 3-1 Santa Monica Parking Structures 7 and e COMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT (2014) - WEEKEND EXTRAPOLATED SHIFTS Level-Of .Service Computation Report _ 2000 HCM Operations Method {Future Volume Alternative} Intersection #33 FOURTH STREET/BROADWAY Cycle (sec}: BO .Critical Vol./Cap. (X}: 1.345 Loss Time (sec): 12 (Y+R = 4 Sec} Average Delay (Sec/veh}: 113.4 Optimal Cycle: 180 Level Of Service: F Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Sound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L T - R ____________I_______________~_______________I_______________II______.________ Control: Prot+Permit Prot+Permit Permitted Prot+Permit Rights: Ovl include Ovl Ovl Min, Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lanes: 1 o i 0 1 1 a 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 ____________~._______________~~_______________!~_______________II_______________I . Volume Module: Base Vol: 269 518 50 35 504 90 0 190 230 170 908 112 Growth Adj: 1.08 1.08 1.06 1.08 1.0H 1.08 1.08 1,08 1.08 1.08 1,06 1.08 Initial Bse: 291 559 54 38 544 97 0 205 248 1H4 441 121 Added Vol: 36 176 13 .. 2 293 0 D 26 41 30 46 B Shifts:. 160 0 0 0 -139 139 0 0 -261 -15-- 15 0 Initial. FUt: 487 735 67 40 696 236 0 231 28 199 502 129 user Aaj: l.oo l.oo l.oo l.oo l.o0 1.oo l.oo l.oa a.7s l.oo l.oo o.7s PHF Adj: 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 '0.95 PHF Volume: 512 774 71 42 735 249 0 243 22 209 526 102 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 512 774 71 42 735 249 0 243. 22 209 528 102 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00' 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 00 Final Vol.: 512 774 71 42 735 249 tr 243 22 209 528 102 ____________~_____________________________________________L_______________~ Saturation Flow Module: - ~Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.33 -0.87 0.58 0.77 0.68 0.72 1.00 0..84 - 0.63 0.80 0.87 0.59 Lanes: 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1.00 1.52 0.48 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 621 1654 .1102 1462 1951 660 0 1595 1201 1516 1654 1124 _________.__I_______________~_______________'I_______________I___ __~ Capacity Analysis Module: Vol/Sat: 0.82 0.47 0.06 0.03 D.38 0.38 0.00 0.15 0.02 0.14 0.32 0.09 Crit MoVea: **** **** Green/Cyc1e:.0.59 D.48 0.71 0.30 D.27.0.27 0.00 0.11 0.35 0.34 0.34 0.37 Volume/Cap: 1.13 0.97 0.09 0.35 1.40 1.40 0.00 1.40 0.05 0.49 0.94 0.25 _ Delay/Veh: 105.4 44.9 3.6 23.1 216 216:0 0.0 245 17.2 21.2 50.8 17.9 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00- 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Del/Veh: 105.4 44.9 3:6 23.1 216 216.0 0.0 245 17.2. 21.2 50.8 17.9 HCM2kAVg: 25 25 1 1 31' 33 0 17 D 5 16 Z Traffix '7.7.0515 (c} 2005 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KAKU, SANTA MONICA, CA APPENDIX C PARKING ACCUMULATION SURVEY RESULTS CRAIN AND ASSOCIATES, JUNE 2007 Cain antl Assouates 6202067 Dail Date of Surve Tuestla ,June 19,.2007 Parking Accumulation Survey Stmdfare 7 (Southwest comer df$roadwaV I4th S TIME 17:011 AM NOON 1:011 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM Visitors 117 117 117 117 717 Em to ees 0 0 0 0 0 Levelt Total Parked 117 777 117 117 11T Parking Sup ly 177 177 717 - 117 117 Spaces Not Used 0 0 0 0 0 Visitors - 138 749 752 753 145 Em to ees 0 0 0 0 0 Leve12 Total Parked .138 149 152 153 145 Parking Supply ~ 154 154 154 154 .154 Spaces Not Used 16 5 2 1 9 Visdars 118 165 765 165 762 Em to ees 0 0 0 0 _ 0 Level3 Total Parked 118 165 165 165 .162 Parking Sup ly 165 7fi5 165 165 165 Spaces Not Used 47 0 0 0 3 Visitors 21 51 83 9fi 77 Em to ees 0 0 0 0 0 Total Parked 21 51 83 96 77 Leve14 parkin Su 1 177 777 177 177 777 S aces NOt Used 156 726 94 8t 100 Parkin Su I After Deck Removal 161 161 161 167 161 Spaces Not Used (After Deck Removap 740 110 78 65 84 Visitors 41 60 78 118 713 Em to ees 5 fi 6 6 6 Total Parked 46 66 84 124 -019 Level 5 parking Su ply 187 187 187 187 187 S aces Not Used 141 121 103 63 66 Parking Su ply ARer Deck Removal) 765 765 765 165 - 765 Spaces Not Used (After Deck Removal] 779 99 81 41 46 Visitors 19 22 26 25 37 Em to ees 4 5 5 8 8 Total Parked 23 - 27 31 33 39 Level 6 parkin Su i 739 139 139 139 139 Spaces NOt USed t76 772 108 106 100 Parking Sup ly (After Deck Remdvap 114 114 114 114 1 t4 Spaces Not Used (After Deck Removal) 91 87 63 87 75 - Totaf Visitors ~ 454 564 621 674 645 Total Employees 9 11 11 14 14 Total Parked -Levels 1 thm 6 463 575 632 688 659 ~ _ b A ExisOng Parking Supply 939 939 939 939 939 ~ > E O b Percentage of Parking Occupancy 49.3% 61.2% 67.3% 73.3^/ 70.2% b ~ m Spaces Not Used 476 364 307 251 280 ~ _ b j ExisOng Parking Supply 876 876 876 - 876 876 ~ O E C b Percentage of Parking Occupancy 52.9% 65.6% 72.1% 78.5% 75.2% a~ Spaces Not Used 413 30t 244 188 277 Crain and Assodates 6/20/2007 Draft. Date of Surve Thursda ,June 1fi, 2007 Parkins Accumulation Survev Structure 7 (Southwest comer bf eroadwav / 4th St 1 TIME 11:00 AM NOON 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM Visitors 115 117 117 113 709 Em to ees 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 Levell Total Parked 115 117 117 113 109 Parkin Su I 117 117 117 117 117 Spaces Not Used 2 D 0 4 8 Visitors ~ - 136 154 154 154 149 Em Io ees 0 0 0 0 0 Leve12 Tofal Parked 136 ~ 154 154 154 149 Parkin Su I t54- 154 154 154 ~ 154 Spaces Not Usetl 18 0 0 0 5 visitors 77 165 165 160 1st Em to ees 0 0 0 0 0 Level3 Total Parked 77 165 165 160 161 Parking Su I 165 165 165 165 165 Spaces Not Used 88 0 0 5 4 Visitors 41 64 103 99 85 Em to ees D 0 0 0 ~ 0 Total Parked 41 64 103 99 85 Level4 parking Supply 177 177 177 177 177 5 aces Not Usetl 136 113 74 78 92 Parkin Su I After Deck Removal 161 161 161 161 161 Spaces Not Used (After Deck Removal) 120 97 58 62 76 Visitors 35 66 97 95 90 Em to ees 3 4 4 4 4 Total Parked - - 38 70 701 99 94 Levels parkin Su I - 787 187 187 187 187 S ces Not Usetl 149 117 86 86 93 Parkin Su I After Deck Removal 165. 165 165 165 165 Spaces Nat Usetl (After Deck Removal) 127 95 64 66 71 Visitors 25 40 36 42 40 Em to ees 6 7 7 7 7 Total Parketl - 31 47 43 49 47 Level6 parkin Su I 139 139 139 139 139 S ces Not Used 108 92 96 90 92 Parkin Su I After Deck Removal 114 114 114 114 114 Spaces Not Usetl (Aker Deck Removal) 83 s7 71 65 67 Total Visitors 429 606 672 663 634 Total Employees 9 11 11 11 11 Total Parketl -Levels 1 thm 6 438 617 683 674 645 ~ Existing Parking Supply 939 939 939 939 939 D > `o m Percentage of Parking Occupancy ~ 46.6% 65.7% 72.7% 71.6% 68.7% b ~ m Spaces Not Used 501 322 258 265 294- ~ _ m ~ Existing Parking Supply - 876 876 876 876 876 ~ o ~ E 4: ~ Percentage of Parking Occupancy 50.0% 70.4% 78.0% 76.9% 73.fi Spaces Nat Used 438 259 193 202 231 Crain and Assoaates 620!2007 o~an Date of Sdrve SatuNa ,June 76, 2007 Parking Accumulation Survey Structure 7 (Southwestcomer of Broadway / 4th St.1 TIME 11:00 AM NOON 1:00 PM 2:00 PM .3:00 PM Vishgrs 717 177 117 174 117 Em to ees' - 0 0 0 0 0 Level! Tofal Parked 117 117 717 114 717 Parking Su I 777 777 777 777 117 Spaces Not Used 0 0 0 3 0 Visitors 738 154 154 154 154 Em la ees' 0 0 0 0 0 Level2 Total Parked - 136 154 154. 164 154 Parking Supply 154 754 754 754 154 Spaces Not Used 76 - 0 0 0 0 Vishors 745 7fi5 165 165 765 Em to ees' 0 0 0 0 0 Levei3 Total Parked 745 765 165 165 165 Parking Su 1 765 165 165 165 165 Spaces Not Usetl - 20 0 0 0 0 Visitors 167 162 170 774 170 Em to ees` 0 0 0 0 0 Tafal Parked 161 167 770 174 170 Level4 Parkin Su I 177 177 777 177 177 S aces Not Used i6 75 7 3 7 Parkin Su I After Deck Removal 161 761 161 767 161 Spaces Not Used (After Deck Removal) 0 (1) (9j (73} (9) Visdors 7fi- 6fi 139 785 187 Em (o ees" 0 0 0 0 0 Total Parked 16 66 739 785 187 Levels parking Sup 1 187 187 187 te7 787 S aces Not Used 771 727 48 2 0 Parkin Su I (After Deck Removal t65 765 765 165 165 Spaces Not Used (After Deck Removal) 149 99 26 (20) (22) Visitors - - 6 7 12 57 110 - Em to ees' 1 1 1 1 1 Total Parked 7 8 13 58 t71 Level 6 parking Sup I 139 139 139 139 139 5 aces Nat Used 132 131 126 81 28 Parking Supply (After Deck Removal - 174 174 114 174 114 Spaces Not Used (After Deck Removal) 107 706 101 56 3 Total Visitors - 583 671 T57 849 903 Total Employees' 1 1 1 1 1 Total Parked -Levels 7 thru 6 584 672 768 850 904 ~ _ b N Existing Parking Supply 939 939 939 939 939 O > ®E r? d Percentage of Parking Occupancy 62.2% 71.6% 80.7% 90.5% 96.3% m ac m Spaces Nat Used 355 267 181 89 35 ~ _ b ; F~cisfing Parking Supply 87fi 876 676 876 876 `a ~ Percentage of Parking Occupanty 66.7% 76.7% 86.5% 97.0 % 700.0% a~ Spaces NOt Usetl 292 204 118 26 0 Deficit in Total Supply (2g) ' Em to ees are instructed tg ark at Structure #5 an Saturda s er Macerich Secu ' Sta Cain antl Assodates 620/200] Oaft Date of Surve Tuesda ,June 19, 2007 Parkino Accumulation Survev Structure 8lNortheast comer of Calomdo.Ave./2nd St1 - TIME 17:00 AM NOON 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM Visitors 72 86 124 734 -126 Em to ees - 0 0 0 0 0 Leve11 Total Parked 72 86 124 134 726 Parking Su ly 738 138 738 138 738 Spaces Not Used 6fi 52 14 4 12 Visitors 37 50 55 65 65 Em to ees 0 0 0 0 0 Level2 Total Parked 37 50 55 65 65 Parkin Su I 168 166. 768 768 168 Spaces Not Used 731 718 173 103 103 Visitors 83 87 118 .153 753 Em to ees 0 0 0 0 0 Leve13 Total Parked 83 87 118 753 153 Parking Su ply 173 173 173 173 173 Spaces Not Used ~ 90 86 55 20 20 Visitors 25 30 39 Sfi 46 Em to ees 0 0 0 0 0 Level4 Total Parketl 25 30 39 56 46 Parkin Bu I 183 183 183 783 183 S aces Not Used 158 753 144 127 137 Visitors 26 28 49 57 31 Em to ees 21 20 34 34 32 Leve15 Total Parked 47 46 83 97 63 Parkin Su 1 187 187 187 .187 167 S aces Not Used 740 139 704 96 124 Visitors - 22 26 26 28 - 26 Em to ees 31 30 40 41 37 Level fi Total Parked - 53- 56 66 69 63 Parkin Su I 780 180 780 180 780 S aces Not Used 127 124 774 711 717 Total Visitors 265 307 411 493 447 Total Employees 52 50 74 75 69 Total Parked -Levels 7 thm 6 377 357 485 568 51fi F~cis8n9 Parking SuPPIY 1,029 1,029 1,029 1,029 1,029 Percentage of Parking.Occupancy 30.8% 34.7% 47.1% 55.2% 50.7% Spaces Not Used 712 672 544 461 513 C2in and Associates 680/2007 D2R Date of Susie Thurstla ,June 14, 2007 - '~ Parking Accumulation Survey Structure 8 (Northeast comer of Colorado Ave.! 2nd St.l TIME 11:00 AM NOON 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM Vlsrtors - 89 119 130 129 115 Em to ees 0 0 0 0 0 Levelt Total Parked 89 119. 130 129 115 Parkin Su I 136 138 138 138 138 Spaces Not Used 49 19 8 9 23 Usdors 39 65' 87 80 74 Em to ees 0 0 0 - 0 0 Levelt Total Parketl 39 65- 81 80 74 Parkin Su 1 168 168 166 168 168 Spaces Not Used 129 103 87 88 94 Visitors 75 111 154 143 132 Em to ees 0 0 0 0 0 Level3 Total Parketl- 75 111 154 143 132 Parkin 8u 1 173 173 173 - 173 173 Spaces Not Used 98 62 19 30 41 Visitors ~ - 15 ~ 26 50 45 35 Em to ees 0 0 0 0 0 Level 4 Total Parked 15 26 50 45 35 Parking Supply 183 183 183 .183 183 S aces Not Used 168 157 133 138 148 Visitors 10 71 -41 32 27 Em la ees 47 34 29 30 26 Levels Total Parketl 57 45 70 62 53 Parkin Su I 167 167 187 187 187 S aces Not Used 130 142 117 125 134 Visitors 21 23 25 26 34 Em Iq ees 34 36 49 52 47 Level6 Total Parketl 55 61 74 78 75 Parkin Su pi 180 160 180 180 180 S aces Not Used - 125 119 106 102 105 Total Visitors - 249 355 481 455 417 Total Employees 81 72 78 82 67 Total Parketl -Levels 1 thm 6 330 427 559 537 484 Existlng Parking Supply ~ 1;029 1,029 1,029 1,029 1,029 Percentage of Parking Occupancy. 32.1% 41.5% 54.3% 52.2% 47.0% Spaces Not Used 699 602 470 492 545 C2in and Assgciates 6202007 Daft Oate of Surve Saturda ,June 16, 2007 Parking Accumulation Survev Structure 8 1NOrtheast corner of Colorado Ave. / 2nd St.l TIME 11:00 AM NOON 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM Victors 135 133 128 131 135 Em Ic ees' 0 0 0 - 0 0 Levell Total Parked- 135 133 128 131 135 Parkin Su I - ~ 138 138 136 138 138 Spaces Not Usetl 3 5 10 7 3 Visitors 71 102 165 162 166 Em to ees' 0 0 0 0 0 Levell Total Parked - - 71 - 102 165 162 766 Padcin Su I - 168 766 168 768 168 Spaces Not Used 97 66 3 6 - 2 visitors 144 171 172 172 172 Em to ees" 0 0 0 0 0 Level3 Total Parked 144 171 172 172 172 Parking Su ly 173 173 173 173 173 Spaces Nat Usetl 29 2 1 1 1 Visitors 29 72 - 121 132 175 Em to ees' 0 0 0 0 0 Level4 Total Parked ~ 29 72 121 132 175 Parkin Sup I 183 183 763 783 183 S aces Not Usetl 154 171 62 51 8 Visitors 34 57 94 134 181 Em to ees' 0 9 3 4 6 Level 5 Total Parked 34 66 97 738 187 Parkin Su I ' 187 187 187 187 .187 S aces Not Used 153 121 90 49 0 Visitors - 17 19 32 44 74 Em to ees" 5 6- 8 9 5 Leve16 Total Parked 22 25- 40 53 79 Parking Su ly - 180 780 180 160 180 S aces Not Usetl 156 155 140 127 701 Total Visitors - ~ 430 554 712 775 - 903 Total Employees' 5 15 11 13 11 TotalParked -Levels 1 thru 6 435 569 723 788 914 Exisiing Parking Supply 1,029 1,029 1,029 1,029 7,029 Percentage of Parking Occupancy 42.3°/ 55.3% 70.3% - 76.6 % 86.8° Spaces Not Used 594 460 306 241 115 • Em to ees are instructed to ark at SVUCture #5 on Sa[urda s er Macerich Secud Sta APPENDIX D COMPARISION OF PARKING SUPPLY FOR PARKING STRUCTURES 7 AND 8 EXISTING VS. PROPOSED CITY OF SANTA MONICA PARKING STRUCTURES 7 and 8 Comparison of Parking Supply Existing vs. Proposed S a~ SNNTp MGNICp PLACE PROJECT AppgOVEO ON 811110] pROPO6E0 pftGJECT RESTRIPINO FGR SpNTp MONICp PIACE.PROJECT (6anb Manl[i PIwe MN01 CONVER6ION TO p]lENGANT PARKING AN01N6TALLATION OF pEOESTRLW E%ISTING IFIELO-VERF EU I ORIENTEp USES P bl Parlan8 Employee Okabletl plaabletl Parkln0 Van Level Total peNlc Perkl ae EmgEVea Patl6n9 Olaabktl pkebled Van level T t l PuNk Perking ~ Plezbletl e e Employee ParMrO Oleabletl Van Level TClel. Lovell fl] 0 p o 11] 122 0 p 0 I ' iz2 ]2 0' o Leve12 t52 0 2 0 154 i52 p 2 2 ` 158. o ' 152 " O" 2 ]2 Level3 163 p 1 1 165 165 n -- 2 _p i6] 2 'y55 " 0 2 156 Level4 164 p 11 2 1]] 152 B Jig 0. 182 0 °y52 0 i iBT Levels 13] 49 1 p i0T 85 ]6 tl 2 -0 i6q p ~ 0 [ ) i .162 Leve18 p 13] 2 0 139 0 110 " t 1' 'H2 .0 y6. 2 8 t65 ' Total )33 105 1) 3 B3B . B]] 100 a) 3 . BB3 0 :110. t 1 626 iB6 1T 112 - 3 8]4 ParklnB apaces tool tlua to ANendult Parklnp I2B1 . PurMnB Spaces Lwt-Installatlon of Petlea4len OrlenbalOaes (Eatlmatel I~I _. s;t u« RE6TRIPINB FOR 9pMA MONICA PLACE P0.OJECT (Santa Monks Place MN01 CONVERSION TO ATTENppNT PARIUNO ANO IN5Tpt1gTION GF PEOESTRWN: E%ISTING ..ORIENTED U6E5 Public Employed Olsabletl Ole bl tl ~ ' Parkl~ a e Parkln9 Ven Level Total pudic Pafdn9 Employee PaHdn9 Oleabktl Oleabletl Van Lpvel Total Public ParMnB Employee PeHtln9 '. Obabletl pkabletl V;n Level Talal Lave11 138 0 o p 130 138 0 -. 0 0 139 12T p' 0 Level2 ifie 0 0 0 0 y60 B 166 ' -0 p 0 112 - Level3 92 8 p 1 l)3 1]3 p j p :1)4 'j]3' p- 1 169 LeVel4 1]] p 6 p 103 1)0 p . 4 2 104 0 1 ]0 0 4 1]4 ' Leve15 103 8 q 0 t6] 165 ~ p q 'p 'i09 . . 2 -]93 ` . i04 Level6 i6 i53 18 1 106 10 153 0 ~3 ' iB2 BS q B 10 ' -099 Total 859 i5] 20' 2 1 029 061 153 9 5 1,030 163 : 8 3 049 153: P 5 1 008 Parkln9 npecea lost tlue to ANentltlnt Perking 'Y12) ' Perbn9 Spaces lpat-InskllaHOn INPMasVlen OrleniM Uses IEatlmateL (151 Todl ParMn85pacon LOet-InsmUatlop INPatMn9 ConVOla: :, 1411 T[kl PaeNln9 6pacea Loa4lnatelletlon IN Petlegrlen Orknhtl Uvba lEatlmetel; :`~]5) Total ParNlnP 6pareaLOat• .OI Total F%bUnB Parpn9 Supply. Ott-alto Parkln9 SePPIY iBOB 12@ Tptei Parking Supply wlR IrlplnB: 1,818 To1alwNroppeoq parklnp ConV[la8 Petl6sblan Oelantetl Uces' `.1,80.3 ~ 3248 OH+Ite ParMnO SUPPIY: IZfl •OHSIte Parklnp 6uPPly: 339 3,19] 2pB1 'Replacement paMin9 vJll beacwm[tlaktl al the Clvlc Cenkr Parkln9 6(mclma (2]0 off-elfe parpn9 apaces t ]6 =35q) r Compatlean of PorWn9 6upply.P6) 80 -ravlsetl 06.30 B6.xls ATTACHMENT F Parking Structures 7 and 8 ATTACHMENT H CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, Santa Monica Place Remodel with Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project included. Agency Approval (RDA) The term "Developer" shall be defined as Macerich or its successors in interest (for the purposes of Parking Structures 7 & 8 Improvement Project, "Developer" shall be defined as the Redevelopment Agency or its successors in interest). Project Specific Conditions Operations Alcohol serving uses shall be subject to standard discretionary review under the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Access to the facility shall remain open as provided in the Amended Sublease and Construction, Operation and Reciprocal Easement Agreement (REA). (Parking Structures 7 and 8 shall remain open consistent with the hours of operation of Santa Monica Place and the other downtown parking structures). 3. No building permit shall be issued for the Project until the developer obtains the approval of the City Attorney of an agreement with developer that during the life of the Downtown Redevelopment Project Area the developer shall notify the Agency of its intent to file an appeal of a property tax assessment of the Project property 20 days before filing an appeal, and that it shall not object to or oppose Agency participation in any assessment appeal. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 4. -The developer shall pay fair market value for relinquishment of the Agency's exclusive easement for. parking uses in the Project property in the agreed amount of One Million Four Hundred Forty Thousand Dollars ($1,440,000), before the issuance of a building permit.. 5. For any- parking spaces affected by proposed or future improvements to Parking Structures No. 7 or No. 8, Developer shall work with City to implement an equivalent increase in the number of parking spaces governed by the off-site parking allocation in the Off-site Parking Easement and Permit Agreement, as amended, to ensure that the ratio of parking spaces to square feet of gross commercial area .conforms to the requirements of the Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Redevelopment Project. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). Public Improvements 6. The developer shall participate in making streetscape improvements to street lighting, landscaping, and sidewalk paving in the locations noted on the streetscape Improvements Diagram (Exhibit 1) and as further described in Section 7 below, as reviewed and approved by the City. Street trees shall be maintained, relocated, or provided as required in a manner consistent with the City's Community Forest Management Plan 2000, per the specifications of the Community Maintenance Departmenf, Public landscape Division and the City's Tree Code (SMMC Chapter 7.40) and the current edition of the Pilot Parkway Landscape Policy (PPLP) published by EPWM. 7. The streetscape improvements for Second Street, Colorado Avenue and Fourth Street shall be designed and approved as one project, although construction for the Second Street frontage may take place in several phases. The improvements which the developer shall provide at its expense include, at a minimum, the following items: a. 2"d Street and 4th Street i. Demolition and replacement of sidewalks and pavement, to provide design consistency, shall include but not be limited to, removal of all existing brick 'pavers, ii. Clearly defined pedestrian path of travel. on 4th street, which includes replacement of sidewalks and pavement City will construct certain streetscape improvements along 2"d Street and 4th Street between Colorado Avenue and Broadway. Developer shall cooperate and coordinate the construction of public improvements required by this condition so as to ensure design consistency and successful implementation of these streetscape improvements, including protection of City-installed public improvements and, if necessary, coordination of the installation of public improvements as described in the Developer's approved Construction Management Plan. b. Colorado Avenue i. Replacement of sidewalks, pavement and landscaping; and ii. Installation of new/additional street andior pedestrian lighting iii. Removal of existing street trees and installation of new trees, to be approved by the City's Community Forester and PCD. 2 c. Parking Structures 7 & 8 i. Remove and replace the interior stairs; and ii. Remove and replace the 2 elevators in Parking Structure 7, and remove and replace the elevator in Parking Structure 8. d. Broadwav Avenue Relocation of the traffic signal controller box at the corner at Broadway and Second Street (developer's cost not to exceed $25,000); and 8. Plans and specifications for off site improvements shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer licensed in the State of California for approval by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 9. Final parking lot layout and specifications shall be subject to the review and approval of the Transportation Management Division. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). Subsequent Approvals 10. No building permit shall be issued for the Project until the developer complies with the requirements of Part 9.04.10.20 of the Santa Monica Municipal Code; Private Developer Cultural Arts Requirement. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with the .requirements consistent with the Percent For Art Allocation for Municipal CIP projects). No building permit shall be issued for the Project until-the developer complies. a. If the developer elects to comply with these requirements by providing on-site public artwork or cultural facilities, no final City approval shall be granted until such time as the Director of the Community and Cultural Services Department issues a notice of compliance in accordance with Part 9.04.10.20. (Not Applicable to Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project). 11. Developer shall obtain approval of the California Coastal Commission prior to issuance of any building permits by the City of Santa Monica. Applicant is responsible for obtaining any such permits. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 3 Final Design 12. Prior to the issuance of a building permit; the final design of the remodel project shall be reviewed and approved by the Architectural- Review Board within the areas described in the ARB purview diagram (Exhibit 2). The Architectural Review Board., in its review, shall work with Planning staff to ensure pedestrian orientation and amenities, integration into the downtown, scale and articulation of design elements; exterior colors, textures and materials; window treatment; glazing; landscaping; mechanical screening and signage. a. Landscaping design review shall be limited to the ground floor. b. Any subsequent ARB review for tenant improvements will not re- open previous approvals. c. Developer shall, at the request of staff provide plans showing design of the pedestrian experience for the purpose of context review by the ARB. 13. The Architectural Review Board shall have purview over the individual design of the building facades and signage for all facades on Second Street, Colorado, Avenue and Fourth Street and all building facades which face onto the internal promenade at the Broadway entrance as iridicated in the ARB purview diagram contained in Exhibit 2. The applicant and/or their tenants may apply for separate ARB review for these facades subsequent to the initial Agency approval of the re-model Project. 14. Final design of trash enclosures shall be subject to review by the Architectural Review Board and EPWM Solid Waste Management Division. The applicant and/or their tenants may apply for separate ARB review for the enclosures. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 15. On its review, the Architectural Review Board shall specifically. review conformance with direction of the Redevelopment Agency which was given at the time of its approval. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 16. Landscaping plans shall comply with Subchapter 9.04.10.04 or equivalent section (Landscaping Standards) of the Zoning Ordinance, including use of climate appropriate California native, or equal, flora materials, low volume non- spray irrigation systems or equivalent as approved by the Environmehtal Programs Division Water resource Specialist (Exterior) water-conserving landscaping materials, landscape maintenance and other standards contained in the Subchapter. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 4 17. Irrigation plans shall comply with the current edition of Guidelines for the Design and Construction of Water Efficient Irrigation Systems in the City of Santa Monica published by the Environmental Programs Division of EPWM. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 18. Refuse areas, storage areas and mechanical equipment shall be screened in accordance with SMMC Section 9.04.10.02.130, 140, and 150. Refuse areas shall be of a size adequate to meet on-site need, including recycling. The Architectural Review Board in its review shall pay particular attention to the screening of such areas and equipment. Any rooftop mechanical equipment shall be minimized in height and area, and shall be located in such a way as to minimize noise and visual impacts to surrounding properties. Unless otherwise approved by the Architectural Review Board, rooftop mechanical equipment shall be located at least five feet .from the edge of the roof. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 19. No gas or electric meters shall be located within the required front or street side yard setback areas. The Architectural Review Board in its review should pay particular attention to the location and .screening of such meters. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 20. Prior to consideration of the project by the Architectural Review Board, the applicant shall review disabled access requirements with the Building and Safety Division and make any necessary changes in the project design to achieve compliance with such requirements. The Architectural Review Board, in its review, should pay particular attention to the aesthetic, landscaping, and setback impacts of any ramps or other features necessitated by accessibility requirements. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 21. Construction period signage shall be subject to the approval of the Architectural Review Board. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 22. As appropriate, the Architectural Review Board shall require the use of anti- graffiti materials on surfaces likely to attract graffiti. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 23. Prior to issuance of a building permit or business license, whichever is sooner, to the extent applicable, the entryway to any establishment which will serve alcohol shall be designed to provide for double doors to mitigate possible noise impacts. 5 Environmental Mitigations Aesthetics 24. Low-Glare Materials. Development shall include screening of mechanical equipment and use of low-reflective roofing materials to reduce potential visual and glare. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). a. Shielded Exterior Lighting. The applicant shall design exterior building lighting to ensure that light does not project on adjacent sites. Such lighting shall incorporate "cut-off" shields as appropriate to prevent an increase in lighting at adjacent and nearby uses. b. Shielded. Landscape Illumination. Landscape illumination and exterior sign lighting shall be accomplished with low-level, unobtrusive fixtures. Such lighting shall be creatively shielded to direct light pools away from off-site viewers. Construction 25. A construction period mitigation plan shall be prepared by the applicant for approval by the Department of Environmental and Public Works Management prior to issuance of a building permit. The approved mitigation plan shall be posted on the site for the duration of the project construction and shall be produced upon request. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). As applicable, this plan shall: a. Specify the names, addresses, telephone numbers and business license numbers of all contractors and subcontractors as well as the developer and architect; b. Describe how demolition of any existing structures is to be accomplished; c. Indicate where any cranes are to be located for erection/construction; d. Describe how much of the public street, alleyway, or sidewalk is proposed to be used in conjunction with construction; e. Set forth the extent and nature of any pile-driving operations; f. Describe the length and number of any tiebacks which must extend under the property of other persons; g. Specify the nature and extent of any dewatering and its effect on any adjacent buildings; h. Describe anticipated construction-related truck routes, number of truck trips, hours of hauling and parking location; i. Specify the nature and extent of any helicopter hauling; 6 j. State whether any construction activity beyond normally permitted hours is proposed; k. Describe any proposed construction noise mitigation measures, including measures to limit the duration of idling construction trucks; I. Describe construction-period security measures including any fencing, lighting, and security personnel; m. Provide a drainage plan; n. Provide aconstruction-period parking plan which shall minimize use of public streets for parking; o. List a designated on-site construction manager; p. Provide a construction materials recycling plan which seeks to maximize the reuse/recycling of construction waste; q. Provide a plan regarding use of recycled and low-environmental- impact materials in building construction; and r. Provide a Storm Water Pollution Preventions Plan (SWPPP) for the construction period, i.e. water runoff control plan. 26. Fugitive Dust Control Measures. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). The following shall be implemented during construction to minimize fugitive dust and associated particulate emissions: a. All material excavated or graded shall be sufficiently watered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Watering should occur at least three times daily with complete coverage, preferably at the start of the day, in the late morning and after work is done for the day. b. All grading, earth moving or excavation activities shall cease during periods of high winds (i.e., greater than 20 mph measured as instantaneous wind gusts) so as to prevent excessive amounts of dust. c. All material transported on and off-site should be securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust. Additionally: i. Soils stockpiles shall be covered; ii. Onsite vehicle speeds shall be limited to 15 mph; and iii. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit the construction site onto paved roads or wash off trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip. Sweep streets at the. end of the day. using SCAQMD Rule 1186 certified street sweepers or roadway washing trucks if visible soil is carried onto adjacent public paved roads (recommend water sweepers with reclaimed water. Vehicles hauling dirt or other construction debris from the site shall cover any open load with a tarpaulin or other secure covering to minimize dust emissions. 7 Immediately after commencing dirt removal from the site, the general contractor shall provide the City of Santa Monica with written certification that all trucks leaving the site are covered in accordance with this condition of approval. 27. Ozone Precursor Control Measures. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). The following shall be implemented throughout construction to reduce emissions of ozone precursors ROC and NOx: a. Low VOC coatings shall be used on all remodeled components; b. Equipmeht engines should be maintained in good condition and in proper tune as per manufacturer's specifications; c. Schedule construction periods to occur over a longer time period (i.e. lengthen from 60 days to 90 days) during the smog season so as to minimize the number of vehicles and equipment operating simultaneously; and d. Use new technologies to control ozone precursor emissions as they become readily available. 28. NOx Control Measures. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). Throughout construction, off-road and on-road diesel equipment shall use cooled exhaust gas recirculation to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides. 29. Final Review of Construction Traffic Management Plan. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement. Project shall comply with this condition). The final Construction Worksite Traffic Control Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of a building permit. The Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. Construction traffic along Santa Monica Boulevard shall be discouraged. During peak hours -(weekday 7-9 a.m. and 4-6 p.m.) construction traffic may not use Santa Monica Boulevard. b. Trucks staging on 2nd Street shall turn right onto Broadway rather than continuing north on 2nd Street to Santa Monica Boulevard. It may be necessary to close the left turn lane from westbound Broadway to accommodate this change. c. To the extent feasible, truck trips should be scheduled outside of peak traffic hours. 30. Construction Parking Plan. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of a Construction Parking Plan 8 from the City of Santa Monica Planning and Community Development Department that contains the following provisions: a. Construction employee parking shall not be allowed to reduce the availability of public parking spaces in Structures 7 and 8 below existing occupancy. If construction activity does impact the availability of public parking, construction workers shall be required to park in an off-site location with available parking (such as the Civic Center Parking Structure) and, if sufficiently far away, be shuttled to the work site. b. One of two methods could be used to determine existing parking occupancy: The results of the occupancy survey already conducted by Crain and Associates in June 2007 could be used. This would result in a need to parking construction workers in an off-site location on weekends throughout the construction period and on weekdays during the last few months with high levels of finishing workers. ii. An additional Parking Demand Analysis could be performed in advance of or during the mall closure, in order to assess the reduction in parking demand in the two structures due to closure. of retail tenants during construction. If the results of the Parking Demand Analysis demonstrate that the estimated or actual downtown visitor parking occupancy of Structures 7 and 8 during closure is or will be less than that identified in the June 2007 parking occupancy survey, the Construction Plan may be modified to allow additional construction parking in the structures so long as the occupied number of public parking spaces is maintained. c. During closure of levels 4, 5 and 6 in Structure 7 during the demolition phase, remaining mall employee parking shall be relocated from Parking Structures 5, 7, and 8 to the-Civic Center Parking Structure or an alternative available location outside the downtown area of Santa Monica on weekends (Saturday and Sunday). d. Re-striping of Structures 7 and 8 shall be conducted by temporarily closing one level at a time in the structures, on weekdays only, during the lower-demand period between the demolition phase and the finishing phase in the last few months when a high level of workers will be present. 9 e. The applicant and the City shall work together to ensure the demolition phase and its associated closure of levels 4, 5, and 6 in Structure 7 shall not be conducted at the same time that existing downtown public parking structures are closed for retrofit or replacement as part of the Santa Monica downtown parking program. 31. Seismic Risk Reduction Building Requirements per UBC and CBC Code. Design and construction of the Santa Monica Place remodel shall be engineered to withstand the expected ground acceleration that may occur at this site. The calculated design base ground motion for the site shall take into consideration the soil type, potential for liquefaction, and the most current and applicable seismic attenuation methods that are available. All on-site structures shall comply with applicable provisions of the Uniform Building Code and the California Building Code. 32. Soil Testing for Expansion Potential. Prior to issuance of a building permit, soil samples of final sub-grade areas and excavation sidewalls shall be collected and analyzed for their expansion index. For areas where the expansion index is found to be greater than 20, the appropriate grading and foundation designs shall be engineered to withstand the existing conditions. The expansion testing may be omitted if the grading and foundations are engineered to withstand the . presence of highly expansive soils. Hazardous Materials 33. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) Testing. Prior to issuance of a demolition or renovation permit for the Santa Monica Place shopping mall, an ACM survey shall be performed by a licehsed asbestos sampling company. All testing procedures shall follow California and Federal protocol. The asbestos survey report shall quantify the areas of asbestos containing materials pursuant to California and Federal standards. 34. ACM Removal Procedure. Prior to any demolition or renovation, onsite structures that contain ACM must have the ACMs removed according to proper abatement procedures recommended by the asbestos consultant. All abatement activities shall be in compliance with California and Federal OSHA, and with the South Coast Air Quality Management District requirements. Only asbestos trained and certified abatement personnel shall be allowed to perform asbestos abatement. All ACMs removed from onsite structures shall be hauled to a licensed receiving facility and disposed of under proper manifest, if needed, by a transportation company certified to handle asbestos containing materials. Following completion of the asbestos abatement, the asbestos consultant shall provide a report documenting the abatement procedures used, the volume of ACM removed, where the material was moved to, and include transportation and disposal manifests or dump tickets. Each abatement report 10 shall be prepared for the property owner or other responsible party, with a copy submitted to the City of Santa Monica. 35. Lead-based Paint Testing. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). Prior to the issuance of a permit for the renovation or demolition of any structure, a licensed lead-based paint consultant shall be contracted to evaluate the structure for lead-based paint. If lead-based paint is discovered, it shall be removed according to proper abatement procedures recommended by the consultant. All abatement activities shall be in compliance with California and Federal OSHA, and with the South Coast Air .Quality Management District requirements. Only lead-based paint trained and certified abatement personnel shall be allowed to perform abatement activities. All lead-based paint removed from these structures shall be hauled and disposed of by a transportation company licensed to transport this type of material. In addition, the material shall be taken to a landfill or receiving facility licensed to accept the waste. Following completion of the lead based paint abatement, the lead based paint consultant shall provide a report documenting the abatement procedures used, the volume of lead based paint removed, where the material was moved to, and include transportation and disposal manifests or dump tickets. Each abatement report shall be prepared for the property owner or other responsible party, with a copy submitted to the City of Santa Monica. 36. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. Prior to demolition and development, a Phase I environmental site assessment shall be performed to determine the likelihood of contaminants. The Phase I ESA shall follow the current ASTM standard (ASTM E 1527-05). All recommendations contained within the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment shall be implemented according to standard regulatory procedures. 37. Hazardous Materials Contingency Plan. All demolition and remodeling conducted at the Santa Monica Place mall shall have a contingency plan. to be implemented in the event that contaminants or structural features-that could be associated with contaminants or hazardous materials are suspected. or discovered. The contingency plan shall identify appropriate measures to be followed if contaminants are found or suspected. The appropriate measures shall identify personnel to be notified, emergency contacts, and a sampling protocol to be implemented. The excavation and demolition contractors shall be made aware of the possibility of encountering unknown hazardous materials, and shall be provided with appropriate. contact and notification information. The contingency plan shall include a provision stating at what point it is safe to continue with the excavation or demolition, and identify the person authorized to make that determination. 11 Noise 38. Diesel Equipment Mufflers. All diesel equipment shall be operated with closed engine doors and shall be equipped with factory recommended mufflers. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 39. Electrically-Powered Tools. Electrical power shall be used to run air compressors and similar power tools. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 40. Timing Restrictions. The noisiest phases of construction shall be restricted to between the hours of 10:00 AM and 3:00 PM, Monday through Friday, in accordance with Section 4.12.110(d) of the Santa Monica Municipal Code. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 41. Additional Noise Attenuation Techniques. For all noise generating construction activity on the project site, additional noise attenuation techniques shall be employed to reduce noise levels to City of Santa Monica noise standards. Such techniques may include, but are not limited to, the use of sound blankets on noise generating equipment and the construction of temporary sound barriers between construction sites and nearby sensitive receptors. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 42. Construction Sign Posting. In accordance with Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 4.12.120, the project applicant shall be required to post a sign informing all workers and subcontractors of the time restrictions for construction activities. The sign shall also include .the City telephone numbers where violations can be reported and complaints associated with construction noise can be submitted. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). Mitigation Monitoring Program 43. Pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, the City Planning Division will coordinate a monitoring and reporting program regarding any required changes to the project made in conjunction with project approval and any conditions of approval, including those conditions intended to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment. This program shall include, but is not limited to, ensuring that the City Planning Division itself and other City divisions and departments such as the Building and Safety Division, the Department of Environmental and Public Works, the Fire Department, the Police Department, the Planning and Commuhity Development Department and 12 the Finance Department are aware of project requirements which must be satisfied prior to issuance of a Building Permit, Certificate of Occupancy, or other permit, and that other responsible agencies .are also informed of conditions relating to their responsibilities. Project owner shall demonstrate compliance with conditions of approval in a written report submitted to the Planning Director and Building Officer prior to issuance of a Building Permit or Certificate of Occupancy, and, as applicable, provide periodic reports regarding compliance with such conditions. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 13 City Standards Conformance with Approved Plans 1. Within thirty (30) days after final approval of the project, a sigh shall be posted on site stating the date and nature of the approval. The sign shall be posted in accordance with the Zoning Administrator guidelines and shall remain in place until a building permit is issued for the project. The sign shall be removed promptly when a building permit is issued for the project or upon expiration of the Design Compatibility Permit. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 2. In the event permittee violates or fails to comply with any conditions of approval of .this permit, no further permits, licenses, approvals or certificates of occupancy shall be issued until such violation has been fully remedied. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 3. This approval is for those plans dated August 29, 2007 a copy of which shall be maintained in the files of the City Planning Division and the Redevelopment Agency. Project development shall be consistent with such plans, except as otherwise specified in these conditions of approval. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition. This approval is for those plans dated July 8, 2008). 4. Minor amendments to the plans shall be subject to approval by the Director of Planning and Community Development (PCD) and the Director of Housing and Economic Development (HED) or their designees.. An increase of more than 10% of the square footage, or a significant change in the approved concept shall be subject to Redevelopment Agency Review. Construction shall be consistent with the plans submitted or as modified by the Redevelopment Agency, Architectural Review Board, or Director of Planning. No expansion in food service area, intensity of operation, or outdoor areas shall occur without prior approval from the City of Santa Monica.. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 5. Project plans shall be subject to complete Code Compliance review when the building plans are submitted for plan check and shall comply with all applicable provisions of Article IX of the Municipal Code and all other pertinent ordinances and General Plan policies of the City of Santa Monica prior to building permit issuance. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 14 Cultural Resources 6. If any archaeological remains are uncovered during excavation or construction, work in the affected area shall be suspended and a recognized specialist shall be contacted to conduct a survey of the affected area at project's owner's expense. A determination shall then be made by the Director of Planning to determine the significance of the survey findings and appropriate actions and requirements, if any, to address such findings. Project Operations 7. The operation shall at all times be conducted in a manner not detrimental to surrounding properties or residents by reason of lights, noise, activities, parking or other actions. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 8. The Project shall at all times comply with the provisions of the Noise Ordinance (SMMC Chapter 4.12). (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). Construction Plan Requirements 9. Final building plans submitted for approval of a building permit shall include on the. plans a list of all permanent mechanical equipment to be .placed indoors which may be heard outdoors. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 10. To the extent applicable, all restaurants and commercial cooking facilities must conduct operations in a manner which avoids causing grease blockages to the City sewer. All new, rebuilt or remodeled restaurant facilities are required to install a Gravity Grease Interceptor in order to pre- . treat wastewater containing grease. The minimum capacity of the interceptor will be determined by using table 10-3 of the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code, Section 1014.3. Contributory sources shall include wastewater from kitchen areas including pot sinks, pre-rinse, dishwashers, floor drains, and mop sinks. Table 7-3 of Section 701.0 of the 2006 Uniform Plumbing Code will determine the Drainage Fixture Unit Value (DFU) for each contributory source. All units regardless of size shall be fitted with a standard final-stage sample box. Demolition Requirements 11. Until such time as the demolition is undertaken, and unless the structure is currently in use, the existing structure shall be maintained and secured by boarding up all openings, erecting a security fence, and removing all debris, bushes and planting that inhibit the easy surveillance of the 15 property to the satisfaction of the Building and Safety Officer and the Fire Department. Any landscaping material remaining shall be watered and maintained until demolition occurs. a. Prior to issuance of a demolition permit, applicant shall prepare for Building Division approval a rodent and pest control plan to insure that demolition and construction activities at the site do not create pest control impacts on the project neighborhood. Construction Period 12. Immediately after demolition and during construction, a security fence, the height of which shall be the maximum permitted by the Zoning Ordinance, shall be maintained around the perimeter of the lot, except for the structures that will remain open during construction. The lot shall be kept clear of all trash, weeds, etc. Standard Conditions 13. No fence, gate, or wall within the required. front yard setback, inclusive of any subterranean garage slab and fencing, gate, or railing on top thereof, shall exceed a height of 42" above actual grade of the property. 14. Roof locations may be used when the mechanical equipment is installed within asound-rated parapet enclosure. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 lmprovement Project shall comply with this condition). 15. Final approval of any mechanical equipment installation will require a noise test in compliance with SMMC Section 4.12.040. Equipment for the test shall be provided by the owner or contractor and the test shall be conducted by the owner or contractor. A copy of the noise test results on mechanical equipment shall be submitted to the Community Noise Officer for review to ensure that noise levels do not exceed maximum allowable levels for the applicable hoise zone. 16. The property owner shall insure any graffiti on the site is promptly removed through compliance with the City's graffiti removal program. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 16 Environmental and Public Works Management (EPWM). 17. Developer shall be responsible for the payment of following EPWM permit fees prior to issuance of a building permit. a. Water Services b. Wastewater Capital Facility c. Water Demand Mitigation d. Fire Service Connection e. Construction and Demolition Waste Management (Deposit) 18. Any work or use of the public- right of way will require a permit from the EPWM -Administrative Services Division19. Drainage: To mitigate storm water and prevent dry weather surface runoff from the project site or parcel, an Urban Runoff Mitigation Plan is required by the Department of Environmental and Public Works Management (EPWM) pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 7.10 should any thresholds of this ordihance be exceeded, requiring post-construction Best Management Plans (BMPs). Prior to submittal of landscape plans for Architectural Review Board approval, the applicant shall contact EPWM to determine applicable requirements, which include the following: a. Non-storm water runoff, sediment and construction waste from the construction site and parking areas is prohibited from leaving the site; b. Any sediments or materials which are tracked off-site -must be removed the same day they are tracked off-site; c. Excavated soil must be located on the site and soil piles should be covered and otherwise protected so that sediments do not go into the air, street or adjoining properties; d. Washing of construction or other vehicles shall be allowed on or adjacent to a construction site. No runoff from washing vehicles on a construction site shall be allowed to leave the construction or adjacent sites; e. Drainage controls may be required depending on the extent of grading and topography of the site; and f. New or redevelopment areas required to reduce storm water runoff from storm events up to 3/" through incorporation of design elements or principles, such as capturing and reusing onsite, capturing and infiltrating onsite, increasing permeable surfaces, diverting or catching runoff via swales, berms, and the like; orientation drain gutters towards permeable areas; modification of grades; use of retention structures and other methods that follow the low-impact development principle. Check the latest ordinance requirements in SMMC 7.10 for the latest requirement. 17 19. To the extent applicable, Parking Areas and structures and other facilities generating wastewater with potential oil and grease content are required to pre-treat the wastewater before discharging to the City sewer or storm drain system. Pre-treatment will require that a clarifier or oil/water separator must be installed and maintained oh site. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition by installing a BMP (Best Management Practice) device in-lieu of a clarifier to treat the runoff, to be approved by EPWM). Hazardous Materials 20. Prior to the demolition of any existing structure, the applicant shall submit a report from an industrial hygienist to be reviewed and approved as to content and form by the Environmental and Public Works Management/Environmental Programs Division. The report shall consist of a hazardous materials survey for the structure proposed for demolition. The report shall include a section on asbestos and in accordance with the South Coast AQMD Rule 1403, the asbestos survey shall be performed by a state Certified Asbestos Consultant (CAC). The report shall include a section on lead, which shall be performed by a state Certified Lead Inspector/Assessor. Additional hazardous materials to be considered by the industrial hygienist shall include: mercury (in thermostats, switches, fluorescent light); polychlorinated biphenyls (PGBs)"(including light ballast), and fuels, pesticides, and batteries. Streets 21. Unless otherwise approved by the Department of Environmental and Public Works Management, all sidewalks shall be kept clear and passable during the grading and construction phase of the Project. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 22. Sidewalks, curbs, gutters, paving, and driveways which are damaged as a result of the project and need replacing or removal as determined by the Department of EPWM shall be reconstructed to the satisfaction of the Department of EPWM. Review and approval for this work shall be obtained from the Department of Environmental and Public Works Management prior to issuance of the building permits. The use of permeable materials is required where appropriate in replacing impermeable hardscapes with permeable hardscapes to reduce urban runoff, such as permeable concrete, permeable asphalt, and other permeable paving products. (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 18 23. Street and/or pedestrian lighting, including tree uplighting shall be provided on public rights of way adjacent to the project to the satisfaction of Department of Environmental and Public Works Management (EPWM). (The Parking Structure 7 and 8 Improvement Project shall comply with this condition). 24. Streetscape for Colorado Avenue frontage, such as AC pavement rehabilitation, replacement of sidewalk, curbs and gutters, installation of street trees, lighting and other appropriate street improvements shall be designed and installed to the satisfaction of the Department of Environmental and Public Works Management (EPWM) and Open Space Management Division. Environmental Mitigation 25. To mitigate solid waste impacts, prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, project owner shall submit a recycling plan to the Department of Environmental and Public Works Management for its approval. The recycling plan shall include: a. List of materials such as white paper, computer paper, metal cans, and glass to be recycled; b. Location of recycling bins; c. Designated recycling coordinator; d. Nature and extent of internal and external pick-up service; e. Pick-up schedule; and f. Plan to inform tenants/occupants of service. 26. Ultra-low flow plumbing fixtures are efficient fixtures are recommended on where plumbing is to be added. C Division Water Efficiency section for efficiency. required;. however, the most water- all new departments and remodeling 'neck with Environmental Programs the current standards of maximum Police 27. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, or a business license, or commencement of alcohol service as applicable, a security plan shall be submitted to the Chief of Police for review and approval. The plan shall address both physical and operational security issues. 19 PARKING STRUCTURE #7 ATTACHMENTF 2 View 1 Proposed PARKING STRUCTURE #7 View 2 Proposed View 3 Proposed 3 PARKING STRUCTURE #7 View 4 Proposed PARKING STRUCTURE #7 View 5 Proposed PARKING STRUCTURE # 8 view 1 Proposed Existing Condition ATTACHMENT F 6 PARKING STRUCTURE #8 Proposed 7 View 3 Proposed PARKING STRUCTURE #8 View 4 Proposed ATTACHMENT G Proposed replacement trees for Colorado Avenue First choice: Lemon Scented Gum (Corvmbia citriodora) An evergreen tree that reaches a height of 60 - 80' wide with a canopy spread 35 -40' in coastal conditions. They are popular for their smooth light colored trunks and their aroma that smells strongly of lemons. (This tree is formerly known as the Eucalyptus citriodora) -1- Second Choice Pink Trumpet Tree (Tabebuia ipel A semi-evergreen tree that reaches a mature height of 25-50' with a canopy spread of equal proportions. They have small, dark green leaves with light pink flowers that bloom in late winter or early spring. -2- Third choice Sweetshade (HVmenosporum f/avum) An evergreen tree with glossy foliage that is slow to grow at first with a variable shape that is open, graceful and upright. They quickly reach a height of 25 - 40' with a canopy spread of 10-20' wide. They have yellow flowers with a pronounced orange-blossom honey fragrance in the summer months. &~. >.. ~. - aUV EtECA -3- ,,. ,. ,. :: '- ~ ~~ ..SM :. .~~_ . 5-. .u ~ .: 'i. s u_ V ~~ Z k y _~-`' `~ .,, -_ r~ ,~ CITY OF SANTA MONICA f ~ , PARKING .GARAGE # 7 is 'd PRE-ARB .PRESENTATION cy JUNE 2008 ~-C ~ ~ 1 µ~, . ,e~ .~~._ _.~:v~.~ o y ~.' °::~~, .. ., ~ ~. ..~ CITY OFSP PARKINGC 0 Y b ~1J31 Z 5( sq; ~. ~ ~~~. N sy z=- •aS e, ,~' "~` ~` £C"'-.' 'r«~=.~«°*'3- " '.~ _ vow` `rl ,~ ~, "~"^"'='^"~'^'x"1"~3~ ~+ ~.i~,w•- ~^^T"--^` i.~ aye ' Ts~,...~..,,m..~+~+"?J ~ r ~F f~ _ ~- .- ~` g ~+'"' `-.re' ~~a_ R ~'9^' y ."sue ;, `~, r//f//iv r .n 'm' .~~1`..,'^'^ ..~ ni ; i "_; ~ 's ~ ~ ~ '~ * ~ r cu. ~ .-.,,~~ '~ fits -~- .., - ~ ~ x ~ a ~ FY„~'1 Y ;F -.»r ~.'~ ~ is p +`° ~ )~,. 4^, ~, /r~, ~ n . .. ~ 1 t sex w'Y hs iS~.i ` 'Yj-'~ "~,'~„ t am-a' ~a~r a ~b~' "'° L..~.-. ~-~.~+-.i .~~-Fem.,"" # ~ s ~.iw..~. ~t' .,. . r ~. $ ' i k Y Y x ~ w ~ ` ~ a ,~~~~ ~~ ~ xj 1 ry ~ ~ ~ j ~wr~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~, x r. _ ~ ~_ x-"° ,~~ s w..- _~ '_' w. _ ~.~ s' .1 ;; d ~~l s~ * ~:., <~~,~~, ,, , r t ~,~~ ~~ ~~ ~~g `~ lx' ~'91~y A~~1~ US "'~~ kY~'N Y ~~r n. ` ~ d ~'~ rz F- s I gT'~J5 3,£ tY ~ f ~,~§ tif. S ~'' Reference Contract Nos. 8949 (CCS) and 8950 (ccs). Reference Resolution Nos. 10318 (CCS), 10319 (CCS), and 510 (RAS).