SR-820914-12APL:JL:ly
,`Cou'ncil Meeting
,~
h '.
September '14, 1982
TO: The Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Planning Staff
!~.--
SEP d 4 1942
Santa Monica, California
SUBJECT: Appeal, Denial of Interim Development Permit,
DR 092, Demolition and New Construction, Savings
and Loan Office, 1505 Montana Avenue, C2, Glendale
Federal Savings
Introduction
This is an appeal from the Planning Commission's denial of an
Interim Development Permit for demolition of a small savings and
loan building to be replaced by a larger 4,960 square foot building
and to supply the remainder of the required parking on a vacant lot
to the east. Appeal is by Glendale Federal Savings.
Background
The application was for demolition and new construction of a
one-story 4,960 square foot savings and loan office located at
1505 Montana Avenue.
Following a Public Hearing the Planning Commission voted 2-2 (with
three commissioners absent) to approve the application as presented.
The two commissioners registering the negative votes stated that
although they were in favor of the project itself, they would not
support the implementations of the development fees as set forth
in Resolution 6385 (CCS) and as recommended by staff.
Alternatives
The City Council may affirm; reverse or modify any decision of the
1oZ-/4
SEP 1 4 1982
Mayor and City Council - 2 - September 14, 1982
Planning Commission in regard to an Interim Development Permit and
the decision of the Council is final,
Recommendation
It is respectfully recommended that the appeal be granted, and
the application approved in accordance with-the Interim Guidelines
with all of the original conditions recommended by staff.
Prepared by Nancy Desser
i ~ ,~~
CITY PLAAiD?1`LVG D`r.'i :~~RTi~'..''._: ~
CITY OP SA?I1'~l idONICA
i-i F, l4 O P. A D U P4
DATE: August J.6, 1952
TO: FIonora.bte Planning Cormttission
FROid; Planning Staff
SUDJECT: DP. 092 & C.U.P. 527, Dertalition and '~?er•:• Constr.uctiCin,
SaViT1~.~'+ and Laan Oif1CC', 150~i I`?GTTtt?f?a A`J2nLt°, C2,
Glendale F'ede:cal Saaings.
This 3.s ar. application for an Interim Derrelop_n-ant Permit for i_he
der?oli.tion of a small savings an, loan b;.iilci.-in~r 'co b~• r.€>pla.ceC1
by a larger x,960 sg.f't. bulld.lnq and to supply t:he- rematncier
of the required par}:in on a vacant lat to the east_
PXisting Conditions. EXistin is a ane sto~,> 2,~-00 s<,..C:t. .
building, 1,320 sq.ft. built in 19"/3 frith an additi.an built_ in
19 75. ~'i?ere are: ]_1 en si i;e pa:c};,ing spaces. 'i'ne 100' 100' si to
is located at the north.:aL corner or Fontana FVC=.nue anti :l5th
S tTCct Sal~th a a'_?e -StOY"y I:lc^_d l.cal office bLi-! ld)_7-: C tO "t-hE' E.aS}.:. anC'i
a a11? St.Or~' :;1ne,le faI`1111 Cit9G'llirtg tO the nO_"r~h _~Cr OS5 the Ca]C~'.
Tile 50' X 100'. e!Itpty lot on the northeast cog ner of %co.r.tana AtTenue
and 15th Court e:hich tae appJ_icant pr_opos~s i_o rise- far additional
pclrk tng 1S UT?paved anCi 15, prCSen"fly being LtSCC': fai: llnalt-i ~Iarl'I.cCi
parY.ing. To the aast of the lot at the .near is a 2 stori> 3 unit
aI>ar.triant building crith a 2 stagy commercial bniJ.din~ t•rith 3 small.
shops an the ground flaor at thy. front. Across the alley to the
r. ear is a 26 space parlcirg lot.
Proposed Develop;_nent. Proposed is a x,960 sc.ft. single story
saviligs and lc_tn office building faith. 1?. on site p°trk].na_ s~r,acrls
with 9 additional parking spaces to b•^_ provicieci en t?l~~ e~lpty
5~ ~ X lOCi ~ lat laE%at E'd. at tYl E', northeast Carn~?% Of :`i0I?taTla. rnd
15th Court. The 'parYinq layout has bean ap>rov~d b~ the Par]cing
and Traf flC Eng121eer1nCj DC-.'pc"12 t~;i=nt. Til E' tiU^~i)~r G:` f)~:r }; 7_nC_, S~7,Cl?S
provided exceeds code rec;ui_:reix>nts by ~ sLiac~s_
InL-eriTn Guideline_s_. Section l.Ii) of Resolui.ion 6_',5_i :;t-:.=ts =:h<t
parrc_iny in the C?.. Di.si.rict arty be 1-orated of-: the cr_ounct floor
street fr:ont.age by a. condi.t.i:onal use perlait i-r at J.C~=i; 7~^<. o%
the ground Moor street frontage on the bJ.oc:i; i_s d~,~;~o.cc to
corn~::Inity or;.e~nted uses.
(` ~>
'~ ~_I
_ -2-
Reco?emendation. It is respectfully reco::a<<ende:i that 'thE
application be approved in accordance erith the Interim Guidelines
on the follc:aing conc]:itionsc
1. The development is consistent caith. the findings and
purpose of Ordinance 1220(CCS).
2. The development is consistent crith presen'c ir.'terim
development standards .
3. The existing and/or proposed rights-of--~•ray for both
pedes'trlanand autorroblle trafflc w111 be adequate to accc?el~odate
the anti.cipa.ted results of the proposed de~'alo~_m:ant inc].ud?ng
Oif-s~tr_eot pzzT'Y.irig' Excl. ].1 LCe^ card aCC2S5 'tf?Carl t0.
4. The existing and/cr proposed public Ind/or private
health and safety facilities (inclndiny, taut r=ot lie±ited to,
sanitation, se~ier_s, stor?a drains, fire p~:otective devices,
protectic=e ~:rvices, anJ public utilities) will be ade:;uate 'ta
aC:COIf~~OClate ctfl2 b.ntlClpated reSUl't5 Of tfle pXC~K>EEd d•23VP.16p~1=`ilt.
5. TPie propased pl~:iis comply 1:'l-th exisi=ine reyul<-floes
contained in the Muni-c:ipal Code.
Condition. Under i;esoiution Phambcar 6>°5 (CCS) , :. dEVelop;nent_ fee
of ~$Lr9~3.63~ caould b~~ _required in connection ,.-%.th th:_ app7'ov 1
Of tf11S project. 1'•n C` Ci t:y Of SalTta I+IOP_1CEi 1S .. ...__~=n'tly BRJ07.'.lE=C?
from enforriny the provisions of such resolutio*_? re].a'tinc; fe
fees. If the Ci'cy of Santa 24onica prey:zi.ls ir_ 't±e case of
United Brotherhood of Carp•~raers anr_1 Joi.rders c_'_~:erica, et al.
v. City of Santa I•ioi~ica, et al . , Los F-tgeles Si:p•ari.or Court,
Case Num~cr i•''LC 06927%, such iee for any lesser. fee required b~=
any subsequently adopted ordin ance) sf?all he clue a.nd p,=...yable
erithin 90 days of .the date that City of San'~-a '°~~nica is nc,
longer subject 'to such i?:junc'ticn.
~4, 960 sq. ft. x $39:75 (Type V1iiR.) x 1. 5 ~ _ $2, 953. u
Respectfully submitted,
%~ ,.
I:ex Oi~erbeck
F1sso=date Planner
R~cnh
GLENDAIE FEDERAL.3AVINGS
SANTA. MONICA
~\ ~
~..!
~~ TUCKER, 9AOLER 9 A960CATE9. A.LA.
GLENDALE FEDERAL BAVING8
BANTA MONICA
NORTM~ELEVATION ~
fie..... o
aoo WEST ELEVATION
.a c~~e
ruc
•^ AACnKER. >3AOLEfi 8 AB90CIgTEB. q.l. q.
L~ t~ 1
fir{
d^/ 9
_p
brick pav n9
hell s
i
brick ~ °' ` `
pav ng ALLE V W AY
~f ntti. v
R
' ~ `
r
P }E Stx
5~ PR ~
/ ~
~
\
/
~A p
/ Slt
S`
,
/ t 10 ~ '6 ~
,
" ~~
"`brartoh ~ k { ~
}Ipah0lat ia9blV(Iba ~
m
di
l{affl
+
fi t
~ 1~
V
t
tl
h
8
id
tl
l
a
aa
ao
i +
a
s
op+.
\ an
a
re+
/ R Y \
i r. ~ v
i ~ ~ k
i
c
94 ~ ~ ~
3 i ~
,
_ ~e J 2 x r ~
~~ i
~
~ ~~
~
C a }F'
is b pk za
.
`a n9 .. ~ \
~y,
St ~ A
pedestr an benches htre
llis arcatle optional
TOTAL PARKING: 29 SPAC^a5 .
+y/+®a®y~pa~,tl~ pedesfr an benches
~
77 SPACcS RE GUtRE^ optional-
f~°''''~ ~~~~ '
0. 20 -:.i0' 80 80
TUCKER, SA®LEK3 S A550CIATESr A.LA.
® AR ae aT6C aS ANO" Pe AN eING CONSULTANTS aNG.
GLEND/