Loading...
SR-810825-10B®` Santa Monica, California, August 25, 1981 T0: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Staff AU6 2 ~ 1981 SUBJECT: Recommendations of Citizens Task Force on Development in Commercial and Industrial Zones on Parameters for Development of Main Street. Introduction This report forwards to the City Council the recommendations of the Citizens Task Force on Development in Commercial and Indus- trial Zones regarding parameters for development of Main Street. Background On June 23, 1981, the City Council directed that three subcommit- tees be formed within the Citizens Task Force on Development in Commercial and Industrial Zones to work with the owners and devel- opers of three project areas in order to establish appropriate parameters for development. The full Task Force was requested to recommend to the City Council a land use and development plan for each site at its first regular meeting after August 1. Recommen- dations for two of the project sites were forwarded to the City Council for its August 11 meeting. At its July 30, 1981 meeting, the Task Force, by unanimous vote of all members present, decided that the complexity of issues in the Main Street area required that the Task Force postpone its recommendations so that the area could be given further study. At its August 13, 1981 meeting, the Main Street Subcommittee presented the amendments to the Main Street Master Plan which had been agreed to by the representatives of the Ocean Park a AUG 2 5.1981 Mayo r and City Council -2- August 25, 1981 Community Organization and the Main Street Association. Several merchants and residents at the public meeting. ward the major portion Main Street Master Plan tinue discussion of the deliberations. of the Main Street area were present The Citizens Task Force agreed to for- ~f the OPCO/MSA Agreement to Amend the to the Council at this time, and to con- remaining items during Phase 2 of its RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITIZENS TASK FORCE On the basis of the foregoing discussion, the Citizens Task Force on Development in Commercial and Industrial Zones adopted the following recommendations for parameters for development on Main Street at its August 13, 1981 meeting. NEW ZONING PROVISIONS I. Requirement of pedestrian orientation A. On parcels having a depth in excess of 80 feet, pedestrian orientation along Main Street frontage shall be mandated. Pedestrian orientation shall be achieved via a combination of frontage lease space and pedestrian facilities, though driveways and frontage parking .shall be permitted where associated parking lots adjoin lease space (not beneath) and do not exceed 40g of Mais Street frontage. B. On parcels having a depth of 80 feet or less, new construction shall be exempt from the pedestrian oriented requirement unless such a parcel has street frontage exceeding 100 feet or has surface area exceeding 7,000 square feet, in which case new con- struction shall be pedestrian oriented with a minimum of 30% of street frontage improved with commercial space. Mayor and City Council -3- August 25, 1981 II. Occupancy by Community Oriented Uses A. In all new construction a minimum of 30% of commercial floor area but in no case less than 20% of net usable floor area shall be occupied by community oriented uses (goods or services; shops or office space), except as exempted below. B. Parcels having 75 feet of less, or having less than area shall be exempt from occupancy requirement. Main Street frontage or 5,000 square feet of surface the community oriented III. Artists' studio, craft shops, and/or artisan-type manufac- turing --.separately or in conjunction with associated. artist's residential usage -- shall be permitted in the CM District with a Conditional Use Permit. IV. Development Fee / Development Credit System Fee Structure Fee structure to be based on a development credit system in which an array of socially beneficial development attri- butes are identified and weighted to reflect their respective levels of attractiveness within the community. Under this system,. some 10 attributes have been weighted for a possi- ble total of 48 credits. New development would be assessed the maximum city-wide development fee, according to the following. schedule, and reduced by 5% for each development credit to a maximum of 20 credits, or 100% of the fee. NET USABLE FLOOR AREA (SQ. FT.) FEE EQUAL TO FOLLOWING PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL PROJECT COST 0 - 2,000 1.5% 2,001 - 5,000 5.0% 5,001 - 10,000 6.0% lo,ool - zo,ooo e.o% 20,001 - 40,.000 9.0% 40,001 - 50,000 10.0% 50,001 - 70,000 12.0% Projects in excess of 70,000 sq. ft. net usable floor area would be subject to the 12.0% fee plus site review/devel- opment agreement. Mayor and City Council -4- August 25, 1981 Development Credits Credit Weight Attribute 1 Height, floor area reduction below maximum (1 story or 25% floor area) 2 for 6 spaces plus 1 for each additional 3 spaces Provision of more parking than to a maximum of 5 required. credits 1 - 2* Special appurtenances (landscaping, furniture, lighting, architectural details, etc.) 1 - 7* 1 per each 10% over the required 30% community oriented occupancy 1 per each 10% to total employment Santa Monica resident employees to a maximum of 5 1 - 7* Pedestrian orientation beyond required. 1 per each 10% over 30%. 2 Alternative energy 4 Mixed use: residential with com- mercial (residential minimum of 30% of floor area) 10 Mixed Use: .residential affordable to low and moderate income residents (10 per each 20% o£ floor area) 1 - 5* Other social benefits: community rooms, use of local suppliers, retention of displaced businesses, subsidized social service, subsi- dized service rates for select groups, etc. 48 Credits * The person or-group who will decide how the various attributes are weighted where this weighting is discretionary will be determined by the Task Force in Phase 2 of its deliberations. Mayor and. City Council -5- August 25, 1981 V. Unadopted elements of the Main Street Master Plan A. Parking 1. Encouraging the efficient use of existing capacity. 2. Allowing 304 of the new parking capacity to be designed for compact-size vehicles. 3. Implementation of a park-and-ride system. 4. Implementation of an in-lieu parking system where new: development could transfer its parking obligation to off-site locations where additional spaces would-be developed. 5. Design and finance a parking structure on a designated site. 6. Encouraging alternative modes of access to the area. B. Circulation 1. Developing bike parking facilities. 2. Periodically closing Main Street to vehicular traffic for special public events, C. Open Space 1. Development of a pocket park at Kinney Street. 2. Development of a town square at Ashland Avenue. 3. Improvement of the park at Pacific Street. D. Architectural Review Board guidelines 1. Development and implementation of ARB guidelines.- E. Landmarks Commission 1. Surveying Bain Street with the aim of preserving potential landmark structures. F. City-wide. 1. Permits for demolition of commercial structures to be based on a discretionary hearing considering the replacement structure, hazards, etc. CThe above topic heading "Unadopted elements of the Main Street Master Plan" appeared on the dacument approved_by the Citizens Task Force. The specific subtopics A-F appeared on a preliminary draft of the proposed. amendments to the Main Street Plan but did not appear on this final approved document. Subtopics A-F have been reviewed by-the Task Force but have not as yet been discussed or voted on individually by the Task Force. C. J, Jones, Chairperson of the Task Force, has stated t',^,at the Task Force's recommendation on these unadopted elements will be clarified during the Phase 2 period.). Mayor and City Council -b- August 25, 1981 YES: Bergstrom, Broughton, Gabree, Goldway, Jones, Newcombe, Olivier, Weiss, Zeitlin NO: None ABSTAIN: Barnard ABSENT: Blumthal, Kleffel, Mastroianni, Neville, Girard Alternatives The City Council may accept the recommendations of the Citizens Task Force, alter them, or reject them. Recommendation It is respectfully recommended that the City Council accept the recommendations of the Citizens Task Force on Development in Commercial and Industrial Zones as the parameters within which development is permitted on Main Street. Prepared by: Patricia Reilly Christopher Rudd