SR-091107-11A~~+
~;,Yp, City Council Report
Santa Monica
5o.~{ember l1~ Z®Oz
City Council Meeting: ~~9t}#-
Agenda Item: ~ ~ ` ~
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Eileen Fogarty, Director, Planning and Community Development
Subject: Creation. of Preferential Parking Zone U in the Residential Neighborhood
Southwest of Pico and Lincoln Boulevards
Recommended Action
Staff recommends that the City Council:
1. Create Zone U, which would restrict blocks closest to Santa Monica High School
with "no parking, except by permit" and allow "two-hour parking, except by
permit" in the remainder of the zone. Specifically, it would include the following
regulations adjacent to residential properties:
A) No parking between lam and 6pm Monday through Friday, except by permit on:
• Bay Street between Lincoln Boulevard and 6th Street, and
• 6th Street between Pico Boulevard to deadend (eastern portion of 6th).
B) Two-hour parking between lam and 6pm Monday through Friday, except by
permit on:
• Bay Street between 6th and 4th Streets,
• Grant Street between Lincoln Boulevard and 6th Street,
• Pacific Street between Lincoln Boulevard and 4th Street,
• Strand Street between 7th and 4th Streets,
• Kensington Road between 7th Street and Beverley Avenue,
• Hollister Avenue between Beverley and 4th Street,
• 7th Street between Grant Street and Ocean Park Boulevard,
• Beverley Avenue between Kensington Road and Ocean Park Boulevard, and
• 5th and 6th Streets between Bay Street and Ocean Park Boulevard..
2. Approve the attached resolution creating Preferential Parking Zone U and
amending Resolution 9344 CCS (Resolution of the City Council of the City of
1
Santa Monica Re-Establishing Various Preferential Parking Zones) by replacing
Exhibit A.
Executive Summary
The residential neighborhood south of Pico and west of Lincoln, across from the Santa
Monica .High School, is the last remaining neighborhood adjacent to the high school that
does not have preferential parking regulations. Over the past five years, the residents
to the east of Lincoln (both north and south of Pico) have been granted preferential
restrictions, which has- shifted more demand for parking to this neighborhood. This
area has not been granted restrictions because it is located in the California Coastal
Zone, and the Commission had previously indicated that additional daytime restrictions
would not be approved. However, Commission staff has recently indicated that the City
could ask, clearly stating that the parking demand is from the high school and not
related to beach access.
A petition from the residents of the 600/700 block of Bay Street between Lincoln
Boulevard and 6th Street has been active since 2001. Staff now recommends granting
these residents relief in the form of preferential parking restrictions, and pre-approving
the entire area south to Ocean Park Boulevard and west to (but not including) 4th
Street. As additional petitions are received, preferential restrictions could be
implemented. There would be an initial increase in revenue of approximately $1,620
per year from permits sold, with incremental revenue likely as additional blocks petition.
2
Discussion
A petition requesting preferential parking for the 600/700 block of Bay Street was
received in May 2001. In response to this petition and others received from residents in
the 9th Street and Michigan Avenue area, the Transportation Management Division
completed a study in 2001 of the area east of Lincoln (both north and south of Pico-
Areas 1 and 2) and west of Lincoln (south of Pico to Pacific Street, and west to 4m
Street-Area 3). Areas 1 and 2 are not in the California Coastal Zone, while Area 3 is
in the coastal zone-the dividing boundary being Lincoln Boulevard. See map below.
2001 Study Areas--Neighborhoods around SAMOHI
s ~F" (~ s
'~ - imxsr ~ -+ i 'z ~
~ - 7 ? i . i
~ 7 i
~~. ~
~ ~,~
1~ Ji
~ ~ ~
T
' i' ~
~ `~
{
`~
4~ ~ ~
~ ~s=~d
~i
f
9
j ~;i
F !,
_
~ .
~
:
M
~~
P
Y_~
J
J •
n ,
~i IS.
~ _--~ ~ ~ __ _ arx ar
r
i
a4
a L
3 T
At that time (late 2001), occupancies were much higher in Area 1 than in Areas 2 and 3.
In addition, staff from the California Coastal Commission had made it clear that the
3
Commission would not look favorably upon any requests by the City of Santa Monica
for additional daytime preferential parking within the coastal zone. For both of these
reasons, City staff recommended that the Council pre-approve preferential parking
restrictions in Areas 1 and 2 only, and for only one side of these streets so that spillover
would be contained east of Lincoln and not move to the "coastal" area west of Lincoln.
In March 2002, Council created this zone, which put preferential parking on only one
side of many of these blocks.
When Council enacted the regulations, they asked staff to conduct a review six months
after implementation to determine the effectiveness of the regulations and to evaluate
the impact of "one-side-of-the-block" preferential parking, particularly on the 1800 block
of 9th Street between Pico and Michigan. This block .has approximately 50
perpendicular parking spaces adjacent to residential properties on the east side of the
street, and these were left unregulated. Residents of this block were not satisfied with
this situation, and repeatedly expressed their displeasure with the parking and traffic
situation on their block. They complained of extremely unsafe and rude behavior by the
high school students as the students attempted to secure parking spaces. They
documented this behavior in many reports and studies, and in a website they created.
Staff's follow-up study was completed and distributed to affected residents in April
2003. The study showed (among other things) that parking occupancies had increased
significantly in the coastal area west of Lincoln. As a result of that study, a subsequent
4
survey, and neighbor comments, staff returned to Council in March 2004. At that
meeting, the Council:
extended regulations to include evening/overnight and weekend time periods in the
four block 9t" and Michigan neighborhood, and
• placed restrictions on the perpendicular parking spaces on the east side of 9th
Street between Pico and Michigan, eliminating the one-side-of-the-block condition.
'Current Situation
The graphic below shows the current preferential parking restrictions in the
neighborhood around the high school.
'°`°
~„ No palling eam-5pm Fritlay
(zaao) _
~'~ ~~
3~hour-perking9ameprtY-;
No parking 6pm-gam Daily
(2004)
LINCOLN BLVD
s No parking Montlay-Fr tlay'y~
u ~
~~~ J`,
j
u ~ ;
I i
Santa Monica High School ~ eiH s
i 1
( I I
I
I i
PP Implemented 1 1
1 i
\\ I
t PP Pre-aPProved i > i
(Petition needed) i m 1
y i II
I I
`~
_....~..a .._. I n ' ii
~r ,'~
ii!,
~~t~!
~_ L
1 ~-~ - (
I
~ 1
~_
~-..._-J
~
LINCOLN BLVD
r---. ~ , r-...-
t i ~
t ~
t 1 'NO parkin
~
1 'Bam-Bpm
1 ~
1 ~ ('~
]TH ST
I
' ~-
'F
U
N''
i i
°~ ~
r
Sr
t
~ 1_.__
i I
I !
I 1
i
i I
~ I
FL_
b --~~
UI I~
~:
m
5
Though the majority of high school students take the bus to school or are dropped off,
those who choose to drive now generally look for parking in Area 3, southwest of Pico
and Lincoln Boulevards. This area is primarily multi-family residential, with some single-
family homes. Permit parking regulations stating "No parking Monday-Friday, except by
permit" have existed on 7th Street between Pico and Michigan across from the high
school since 1996. (This area just. north of Pico is not part of the Coastal Zone). In
additiorrto parking by high school students, customers and employees from businesses
along Lincoln Boulevard park in the neighborhood. Residents have also reported that
some of the Sheraton Delphina hotel visitors and employees sometimes park in the
neighborhood. Under a development agreement with the City of Santa Monica; the
hotel may not charge guests or visitors a parking fee, and its .employees are supposed
to be able to park free in the hotel parking structure. Any persons reporting suspected
violations pertaining to this agreement are referred to Code Enforcement.
In the past year, staff from the Coastal Commission have indicated to both staff and
residents in the neighborhood that the City of Santa Monica could approach the
Commission about daytime restrictions in this area, clearly stating that the parking
demand is from the high school and not from parkers seeking access to the beach. If
Council decides to create this zone, staff will then file an application with the Coastal
Commission.
Parking occupancy counts were conducted in February 2007. The counts indicate that
on-street parking on the residential streets can be difficult to find. Occupancies are
6
generally at or above 85 percent. In staff's experience, it is at this point that residents
have great difficulty and frustration when seeking on-street parking on the block where
they live.
Preferential Parking weekday Occupancy greater than 75%
600/700 Bay Street and weekday Occupancy btwn 50% and 74%
Surrounding Neighborhood
_, `- ~ ~ . l
LWCOLN BLVD
7TH ST
Santa
Monica
High
w.
4TH ST
Public Outreach
~'
i?
[ST
--='
A community meeting was held on February 22, 2007. Approximately 25-30 residents
attended. Residents spoke about:
• the difficulties they have finding parking, especially on street-cleaning days
• general poor behavior (noise and trash) of the high school students, and
7
• unsafe driving practices, such as hitting parked cars and pets.
Additional comments are included with Attachment B. Other residents. have commented
that the general requirements for preferential parking should be amended so that a
petition is not always required for a block to get preferential parking, i.e. once an area is
approved for preferential parking by the Council, implementation should automatically
occur on all blocks. This would require a change in the preferential parking ordinance.
Survey
Residents at the meeting were divided regarding the type of restrictions (no parking,
except by permit, or two-hour. parking, except by permit) and the hours of restrictions
desired. Therefore, staff sent a subsequent survey. to 1,094 residential units in the
neighborhood. See Attachment C. The following table summarizes the survey results:
Tvpe of
restrict
Start Time
End Time
Preferred Davs Season
Want No M- Sch
PrefPark? Park 22=hr lam gam 4pm 6pm 9pm M-F Sa ~ Onlv Year respond
600/700
Bay- 89% 68% 32% 50% 50% 27% 38% 35% 54% 4% 42% 19% 81% 58%
All 72% 42% 58% 54% 46% 30% 30% 39% 48% 6% 45% 30% 70% 18%
The survey showed that a majority of residents in the neighborhood wanted some sort
of preferential parking restrictions, that they should be weekdays only, and that
restrictions should exist year-round. Respondents are more divided regarding what
type of preferential parking they should have and what hours restrictions should begin
and end. Overall, there was an 18 percent return on the survey. See Attachment D for
full survey results.
8
Staffs recommendation follows the survey preferences as much as possible.
Regarding start and end times, it represents a compromise which maintains
consistency across the neighborhood. Staff recommends that the blocks closest to the
high school get "no parking, except by permit",while the remainder of the area have
"two-hour parking, except by permit". This recommendation is consisent with the survey
results.
Environmental Analysis
The proposed project has been determined to be categorically exempt from the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Article 19,
Section 15301 (c) which was recently amended to define Class 1 exempt projects in the
following way: "Class 1 consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting,
leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities,
mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving little or no expansion of use
beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency's determination..." This exemption
lists as an example of "existing facilities:" "(c) Existing highways and streets, sidewalks,
gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities." Preferential parking zones
involve only the issuance of permits for the use of an existing public street and include
negligible or no expansion of this existing use.
Budget/Financial Impact
It is estimated that area residents in the proposed zone will initially purchase
approximately 108 permits at $15.00 per permit. This will generate approximately
9
$1,620 in revenue in FY 07/08 and in subsequent years in account 01415:400290. If
subsequent blocks in the pre-approved zone submit petitions, additional revenue will be
generated as well.
Prepared by:
Ruth Harper, Transportation Planning Associate
Approved: Forwarded to Council:
Attachments: A Resolution Establishing Preferential Parking, Exhibit A -
Preferential Parking Zones
B February 22, 2007 Neighborhood Meeting Comments
C Preferential Parking Survey
D Preferential Parking Survey Full Results
10
r iannuiy auu vununw u~y ucvc~~Nincin
Attachment B
Comments from 600/700 BaV Street and Adjacent Area Neighborhood Meeting
February 22.2007
• Bay St. between 4th and 6th should have parking on both sides, even if it becomes aone-
way street
• Won't permit parking on Bay St. just shift the problem south?
• HS students park as far south as Los Amigos park now
• City should address parking needs of the HS
• Employees of mini-malls and hotels park on residential streets, too
• Many concerns regarding traffic safety on residential streets
• With 2-hour regulations, students will just move their cars
• Nighttime is not bad
• Regulations should start when the HS starts
• Students start arriving at 7:30am
• Some people think that hotel patrons park on the street
• Summers are not a problem: disagreement on this among meeting attendees
• Lincoln Blvd. employees and customers park on Bay St. at night
• Some weekends are terrible
• Hotel patrons park because they are charged to park
• Bay St. parking is bad alf the time, even at nights
• Grant St. parking is full
• HS has had a negative impact on the neighborhood-people are frustrated
• Parents and students of HS are also using Bay Street between 6th and Lincoln--
6th St (from Bay to Pico) and part of Bay between 6th and Lincoln as "official" drop-off.
The result is: cars double and triple park between 7:30 am and 8:30 am at these
locations. Suggestion: The HS could create an official drop off on Olympic or somewhere
else, and if the police could ticket illegal behaviors.
Present at meeting: 25-30
1
Attachment C
Transportation Management Division
- 1685 Main Street -Room 115, PO Box 2200
Santa Monica, California 90407-2200
_ 310/458-8291 fax: 310/576-9170
c„ o~
9:mta Monioa~
March 9, 2007 Survey Regarding Preferential Parking
in your Neighborhood
As you may know, a petition requesting preferential parking has been received from residents of the
600/700 block of Bay Street between 6"' Street and Lincoln Boulevard. Last month, the City of Santa
Monica held a meeting with neighbors to discuss preferential parking in your neighborhood. Most
neighbors felt strongly that preferential parking is needed due to non-residential parkers, and in
particular, the high school students. The Transportation Management Division would now like further
help in determining what types of regulations you feel would best meet your entire area's needs.
(This survey is being sent to residents bounded by Lincoln, Pico, 4`h St., and Kensington/Hollister.)
We would like to recommend to the Council regulations that are useful without negatively affecting
neighborhood quality of life.
Preferential parking can be implemented only on blocks that have submitted completed petitions and
on blocks which the City Council has approved to have preferential parking restrictions. (This is not a
petition, only a survey.) The California Coastal Commission will also need to approve this district.
Only residents would be able to purchase permits, which cost $15 each per year.
Please complete and return this survey by Friday, March 30, 2007 to:
Ruth Harper, Transportation Management Division.
By mail OR by fax: See address information above
Phone
Address
Unit #
1) Are you in favor of preferential parking restrictions on your street?
^ Yes
^ No
If yes, please answer the following:
2) Which type of restrictions would you prefer?
^ No parking, except by permit
^ Two-hour parking, except by permit
3) Which hour should restrictions start?
^ 7am ^ 9am
4) Which hour should restrictions end?
^ 4pm ^ 6pm ^ 9pm
5) Which of the following days of the week would you prefer for restrictions?
^ Monday-Friday
^ Monday-Saturday
^ baily
6) Dd you feel that restrictions are needed only when school is in session, or year round?
^ Only during the school year
^ Year round
**YOUR OPINION COUNTS**
Espanol: Su opinion es importante para nosotros. Para informacion en espanol, favor de llamar
a Elsa Gonzalez al numero 310-458-2275.
Attachment D
Block # '
',Street
In Favor? '
' Tvpe of
restnct
Start Time
: .End Time I
Preferred Days '
' Season
Yes
INo No P 2 hr 'i7am 'gam 4pm 6pm ',9pm !M=F M Sa ~ ~Sch Only 'Year
2000 4 IX .--
-_ ' X X 'X
-- 'X
2000 4 X X
-' X X X X
.2000 4 ', !X
-
-
-
--
2000 '4 )( X ~X X
- X
- X
2000 i4 X X X X X
- , -_ X
_ -
2000 ~4 - X I -
'2000 . -
',4 'X
- X ~- X X
- 'X
-- X
--
2000 4 X ~
',2000
'2000 4_
'4 'X
'X X , X X
!, X ',X
2000
4
X
X
X
I X - IX
2000
4
X
I X X ~ X X ~X
.2000 _
4 X -- X X , X
2000 ',4 ~X
_
'2200 '4 X 'X X X IX 'X
'2200 4- X rX X X X 'X
2200 '4 X
_
- -
2200 !4 'X X ', 'X I X 'X ' X I
2200 4 _. X
2300 4 _
X -
I X ' X-
- ' 'X
_ _ `X
- - X
2300 4 rX ~ -- - -
2300 '4 'X _ X X X :X i!X
2300 4 X X X
` X ' X X
-
2300 4 X -- X X ' X ' X -- X
2300 !4 X X
- X ,. X
- X X
2300 -
4 X X X ,X
- ' X
- X
-
2300 4 X ,
-_
2300 !4 X 'X X X I
- X X
2000 '`5 X X X
- IX 'X 'X
.2000 5 'X -
-
_
2000 5 X - - X X X ;
_ X -- X
-
2000
5
X __
IX
'X
X
X ,
X
2200 5 -_ X
~ X
I X X X ~ X
2200 5 . X
- -
-
_-
-
2200 5 'X X X X X - X
2200
2200 -_-
5
5
X
X
:
'X
X
X
X
X
X
_
'
'X
'X
-_
X
j~
2200 _5 X - X 'X
_ 'X X
- X
--
2200 5 X
- X --- X 'X
_ X
- 'X
-
2200
2200
2300 _ 5
5
5 X
'X
'X
! 'X
X
X
'X X
X X
,
X
X ' X
X
X X
X
'X
2300 5 X r
-
----- '
-----
2300 5 X X - X X X ', X -
1900
6 _-
X
~ -
-
----
'
1900
1900 -
6
6
X -
X
X
X
-
-
X
X
'
_
_
-
-_
X
1900 6 X X X X X
- X
1900 ',6 'X X
' X X X X
1900 6 X X : X ! X _
X X
.
1900 6 X - X X j X X X
1900 6- 'X
1900 ',6 X X X ', j X 'X ', IX
1
Attachment D
Block# I
'Street
' In
Favor? Tyue of
restrict
'Start
Time
''
End
Time
'
Preferred
Davs
Season
- ,Yes No No P '2=hr lam gam 4pm 6gm'9pm M F ~M=Sa ',~ Sch Only ',Year
1900 6 x -,
- -
-
_
' -_ - _
1900 ig x ,
- - -
1900 6 X
_ x X IX X
1900 6 X X X ~X X :X
1900 6 X 'X iX
_
- iX
- 'X 'X
-
1900 6 _-
X X x ',X !X X
1900 6 X IX X X X
- 'X
2000
zooo 6
I6 x X x
- x '
x Ix ', x-
2000 6 X X X rX 'X X
2000 -
6
X ---
iX
I
__
X
X
iX
'
X
_
2000 6 - 'X I
2000 '6 X 'X ',X X X X
-_-
2100 -
6 __
X X 'iX
- ~ X X
- X
2100
2100 '6
6 X
X !
X 'X
'X X X
X X
X
-
_
X 'X
-_
2200 16 - -'X X ' X X ~ - X X
2200
2200
2200 g
'6
fi - ,X
X
X
X X
- X
X
-
x 'X
-
X
! X
- --- x
x
:
-
-
- --
2200 6 -
X
- 'X X
-- X iX X
2200 Ig -- X - -
2300
2300
- -
2300
2300 6
g
6
16 X
X
X
X
' X
X
--
-
X
-
X X
X
X
~ X
'X
'
__
-
X X
x X
X
'X
2300 6 LX
-
-- _
2300 Ig 'X
-
2100
2100 '7
7 X
X - X
X - X
X 'X
X X
x
- 'X
X
2100 7- X x - X x !X
- x
_
' -
2100 '7 X X - X !X X 'X
2100 7 x
-__
--
2200 ] X X x - x - -- - X X
2200 '7 X X '
_ X 'X - X
- ' 'X
400 Bay X _- X X X ', 'X - X
400 'Bay X
_ X X X _ X X
_
400 Bay X X X
- X ! X
___ x
400
400
400
400
500 ,Bay
;Bay
!Bay
;Bay
Bay _
X
X
X
>X
'
X __
IX
X
X
- :X
X
X
X
>_
-
X
X
X X
- X
IX
X
X
- X
X
'X
_--
X
500- .,,;BaY X _ X ' x-- 'X - X x-
500
500
__
600
600
:....,Bay
-
Bay
',.,Bay
',Bay -
'
X
IX --
X
X
-
X
X
-
'X
-
x
-
X
X
-
-
X
X
'
,
X
'X
600 ',Bay X 'X X ' X X
600
600 'Bay
',Bay iX
X ',
- -
X ,x
-
X x X
x
x X
_
'
'X
-- X
_
-
_
600 .
!Be 'X x ~X 'X X x
2
Attachment D
''
' In Favor? Type of
restrict ',
,Start Time
'. End Time ',
Preferred Davs
Season
',Yes No
-_
rX NoP',2=hr
X '',7am 9am
'X ,4pm 6pmj9pm
X '',MF M-Sa',~
X - 'SchOnly (Year
' 'X
_-
X X X I X ', ' X X
'X
X iX - --
X '' X
X X
X
_ _ 'X
'X _ X
X
!X X X 'X ~
'X _
X.
'600 '..Bay X - _ ',
600 --
.;Bay
X
'
X
-
',X
X
'
--
X
X
600 'Bay X - X X
- X 'X X
700 Bay X X ',X X X !I X
700 '.,,,Bay 'X X X X X IX
700 ,Bay .X X
-- X
- X
- X X_
700 'Bay _
', X ',X X X ' X X
700 Bay X
-- ',X ' X X '' 'X X I-
700 -
.,.Bay X - ',X X 'X X iX
700 ',Bay X X X X X 'X
700 - --
',Bay
X
X
X
X
X
__ ----
X
-
700 Bay -
X X 'X
- 'X X ', X
700 Bay 'X - ; I
700 ;Bay X X ' X X 'X ' '
-_
X
700 -
Bay
X _-
X
-
X
X -
X - -
-
X
700 Bay X - X X X X 'X
2400 Beverly 'X '
-
- -
-
-_
-
2400 ,Beverly ' X '
' .
600
'Grant
X --
'X
X
_
X
' --
X _
- __
X
-
600 '.,,Grant X X X X - 'X X -
600 Grant 'X X X X 'X !X
,_-----
600 Grant X X X X X
' X
600 Grant !X X ___
- X ' 'X iX _ X
--
-
600 !Grant
--- 'X X -
X ~ X ',
- !X 'X
-
600 -Grant ',X
600
Grant
X
X
X
-
X
: --
X
X -
600 '.Grant X X `_- X X X X
600...
Grant
'
iX
' -.
'
600 Grant X X 'X X X X
-
700 ',Grant 'X X _ X X ' X iX
--' - - - --
700 Grant X ' IX X X 'X 'X
-- -' ~- - -
700 '.Grant X X _ X X X X_
700 --'Grant X X X 'X -- X 'X
-
700
Grant
X --
X
'
'X
' X
X -
' _-_
X
700
700
700 '...Grant
':Grant
Grant X
X
X
'
X 'X
X
'
'X
!X X
'
'
X 'X
',X X
LX
X X
X
X
-
700 Grant -
X -- X ' --
X
- X X '
-- 'X
700
700 'Granf
,.,Grant X
X_- X
'_ X- ,, X ! X X
700
400 Grant
:Pacific 'X
-
_ 'X
-
- X X :X
:
-_
- X
--
--
400 Pacific -
X X X X 'X 'X
400
500 'Pacific
-
Pacific X
-
X 'X
I - X X
! '
_ IX
- X
_-
500 ',Pacific X X -- X X !X X
_
500 ,Pacific - X
_ '
-
500 'Pacific _ X _ ~
3
Attachment D
Block #
Street
', In Favor? Type of
restrict
'Start Time End Time
'
Preferred Davs
',
_ Yes 'No NoP',2=h m 9am',4gm 6gm,9gm MF MSa~ Sct
500 Pacific X _ ~~ -
500 j Pacific ', X
600 Pacific 'X ~ 'X 'iX 'X X !X-
600 Pacific X _
600 Paafic i X
:
--
600 Paafic ,X
- ~ - - -
600
- 'Pacific ',X ,
- X
_ X 'X X
~ X -
600
'..Pacific -
X
~
` _
600
600 Pacfic
Pacfic 'X
!X
_ X
'X 'X
! ' X ~
X X X
X X
~
600 Pacific X '-X X _
IX ', ' !X
600 iPacfic X X X_ X X- - X
600 'Pacific X X 'X 'X 'X ~ _ _ ;X
700
700
iPacific
Pacific
UC
X
'
_
X
_
LX
'
',
X
X
iX
X __
X
X
_
X
'X _
700 Pacific X X X ' X 'X X
600
700 Pico
Pico X
-'X X
X X -
X iX
X _ X
X ',X-_-
X
700
._ Pico 'X
- 'X X
- X ',X i iilX
600 Pico PI
'- X
_
- -
400
Strand
;X _
400 Strand 'X X X 'X X X
400 Strand
- X
__ ~ X X X 'X 'X
500
(Strand
X __ _
500
500
'600 Strand
Strand
:Strand
'X
_
- X
X
~~'X
_
X
X
-_
X
'X
600
',Strand
',X
_
_ i
,
600 Strand 'X X X X X X
600
600. Strand
_ '..Strand X
X '
,
X X
- X
X
_ 'X
'X X
_
X X
X _...--
600 Strand 'X
_. X X X - X X
600 Strand
- X X 'X
_ IX X ' X '!
600
600 ;Strand
Strand X
'X
_ 'X
-
i~X
__ X
X X
X X
X _
' X
X -_
_
/
%
% _
%
%
%
% 68 9', 64 42 100
72°
0
28
42
0'!
58 ~
54
46 -
30
30°0 -
39%
' 48%
6% 45% _
30%' 70%
- - _ _ - '
193',received
1094 total ', 17.6% - _
4
Reference
Resolution No.
10246 (CCS).
Additional
attachments
available for review
in City Clerk's
Office.