Loading...
SR-410-001 (23) -~~ - -~'"" ~ '" (,,-0 i ./ -- '/1 p~ ()O! JAN 1 2 1986 . ...- CjED:CPD:DKW:JWR COUNCIL MEETING: January 12, 1988 Santa Monica, California TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City staff SUBJECT: certification of Third street Mall Initial study INTRODUCTION This memo requests city Council certification of the Third street Mall Public Improvement Project Initial study and Negative Declaration. A brief summary of the Initial study is provided. BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY The original Third street Mall Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report did not examine the impacts of adding two lanes of motor vehicle traffic to the public right-Of-way. Thus, the purpose of the attached Initial study was to consider the potential impacts of vehicular traffic on the Mall. Among the issues addressed in the Initial Study are air quality, noise, circulation, and neighborhood impacts. with respect to air quality, the study indicates that patrons of the Mall will not be exposed to carbon monoxide levels in excess of state and federal standards. since the completion of the - 1 - ~.o J A N 1 2 19M ... ~ ~ Ini tial Study, the plans for the Improvement proj ect have been modified slightly to allow outdoor dining at points where the street will divide to form. pavilions. However, even with this modification to the original plans, all outdoor dining will take place at a minimum of 8 feet from the street and, in most cases, at least l8 feet from the street. Thus, there should be limited effects from auto traffic on outdoor dining. The study examines the level of noise likely to be generated by vehicular traffic and concludes that exterior and interior noise levels along the Mall will not exceed state and federal standards. Several circulation issues are addressed in the report. Potential increased hazards to pedestrians on the Mall would be fully mitigated by 3-way traffic signals. Since vehicular traffic on Third street at the intersection of Third and Arizona would be halted during the Farmers' Market's hours of operation, there would be no negative impact on the Market. Finally, the study concludes that auto traffic on the Mall would have no significant disruptive impact on circulation in and around the area. with respect to neighborhood impacts, the Initial study states that rather than having a negative impact on the surrounding neighborhood, the project would likely enhance quality of life by helping revitalize the Mall. - 2 - " CONCLUSION According to the Initial study, the Third street Mall Public Improvement project will have no significant environmental impacts. Thus, a Negative Declaration was prepared. BUDGET/ECONOMIC IMPACT Funds for the Mall construction project have been the subject of separate Council action. The recommendations of this report have no budget or economic impact. RECOMMENDATION staff respectfully recommends that the Council: 1) Find that the Initial study and Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance with state and City CEQA guidelines, that there is sufficient data to support a finding that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment, and that the City Council has considered the contents of the envrionmental analysis; and 2) That the City Council certify the Initial Study and Negative Declaration. Attachment: Third street Mall Public Improvement Project Initial study Prepared by: John W. Read, Associate Planner wjCC3rdrpt 1/5/88 - 3 -