SR-406-004 (2)
.
e
'f0/:;-00 i
/;;;.. -It
!'L:JL:ND:lv
Council ~1eet~ng:
October 12, 1982
Santa ~1onica,
Cal~forn~a
OCT 1 2 1982
TO: 7he Mayor and C~ty Counc~l
FROIl: The C1-ty Flamnng Staff
SUBJECT: Appeal, Approval of Certlflcate of ~pproprlateness,
Addltion to Restaurant, 301 Santa Eonica PH:r 1
Soathovse 2estaurant
Ir, trod ue tlon
~' lot
approval 0= a
~hlS ~s an appeal from the
Certlflcate of ApproprlateD
14 72 sel . f 'c .
ex te.L:';lon tr the western pc_ _____
______~re, a relocatlon
of the slgn on tbe east Sloe of the bUlldlng, and the additlon
of a ventllator duct also on the east elevation. Appeal 15 by
Davld Cameron, Chairperson of the Landmarks COffiITllSSlon.
~ackground
~he applicat10n was submltted with the follow1ng alteratlons re-
quested:
o NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO-STORY 1472 S,J. Fl'. LXTENS1.0N 1'0
BE. ADDED TO ThE r'ITSTERi~ YLEVATION OF THE STRUC'IlJR:r::: (APPEALED)
The addltlon woula measure 19 feet to the west and
38 feet 9 lnches to the north. All SlQlng materlal
used would match the eXlstlng sldlngi
o ADDITION OF A Sl;lOKE-STACK STYLE VE"t~TILATOR m~ TEE EP.S'IERl:
ELEVATION (APPLALED)
The smoke stack style ventllator ,nil be boxed ln Hlth
redwood clapboard sidlng to match the ex~stlng s~ding;
I;). -It
eel 1 2 1982
tit
Mayor and Clty Caunell
-2-
e
October 12, 1982
o RELOCATION OF THE EOATEOUSE SIGN ON THE EASTERn ELEVATION
(APPEALED)
The slgn that reads "Boathouse" on the eastern eleva-
tlon 1S proposed to be relocated approxlmately 10
feet to the north of ltS present location;
a ENCLOSuRE OF TFE RESTAURN~T STAIR~AY OK THE EASTEffiJ LOCATIOX
(NOT APPEALED)
T~e enclosure of the restaurant stalrway on the eastern
elevatlon wlll also be of the same sldlng materlal as
now exists.
These improvements were approved by the LandT3arks ConffillSSlan at lts
August 17, 1982 meetlrlg and an InterHfl Develo::::lITlent Pernut was granted
by the Plannlng CommlSSlon at its meeting of September 13, 1982.
The Archltectural Review Board gave its conceptual approval but
requested the appllcant return wlth a reworking of the exterior
ventllator and rehandllng of the eave Ilne. The appllcatlon has
also been reviewed and approved by the Pler Task Force at 1ts
August 31, 1982 meetlng.
Mr. Cameron believed that the best lnterest of the Clty would be
served In hav1ng the Clty Councll reVlew the matter. It is his
Vlew that the lmprovements do not meet the crlterla for a Certlflcate
of Approprlateness set forth 1n liunlclpal Code Sectlon 96llA.
Alternatives
The Clty Council may afflrm, reverse or modify any declslon of
the Landmarks COIDilllsslon ln regard to the Certlflcate of Appro-
prlateness and the decislon of the Councll lS flnal.
Mayor and City CO~~l
-3-
4Itoctober 12, 1982
Recommendat~on
It ~s respectfully recommended that the appeal be den~ed and that
the Counc~l approve and aff~rfl the declsion of the Landmarks Com-
mlsSlon.
Prepared by ~ancy Desser
Attachment
. .
.
.
August 26. 1982
Director of Planning
City of Santa Monica
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica. CA 90401
/City Clerk
City of Santa Monica
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
... fqj
Fl., - '1 ~ _~ . .. ,
t\U,- L..
~~~.~ ='v~~.iLoJ~\)'" ..L;r
Re: Appeal from decision of Landmarks CoAuission approving
application for Certificate of Appropriateness. Case No.
LC-D2-006H-2. 301 Santa Ifonica Pl.er. Boathouse Restaurant
Pursuant to Sections 9613.A.S and 9613.B. of the Santa Monica Municipal Collie. I
hereby appeal to the City Council the decision of the Landmarks CoDlDls8ion. JD&de on
August 17, 1982t to approve the application of the City of Santa Menica for a Certifi-
cate of Appropriateness for the following changes to the Boathouse Restaurant. 301
Santa Monica Pier: 1. Seaward extension of building; 2. Addition of ventUator duct
and crAnge of dgnage.
This Notice of Appeal 18 not being filed non a form furnished by the Planning De-
partment." as required by Section 9613.8. of the Municipal Code~ because I have been
advised by the Director of Planning that no such form exists.
This Notice of Appeal is being filed within tne ten day time period cODlllencing frOlll
the date of the Cuiilii18sion r s decision. III the event that the date of the decision it-
self is different from "the date that such.. . decision was filed with the Director of
Planning" referred to in Section 9613.B., then 1 hereby request the Director of Planning
to advise me of the latter date SG that I can file another appeal within the ten day time
period commencing on that date and 80 be sure of complying with the ordinance.
Pursuant to Sectlon 9613.B. of the Municipal Code. this Notice of Appeal i. not ac-
co.panied by a fee in the amount prescribed by Section 91S1 of the Municipal Code. because
I am a .ember of the Coaaission.
The grounds for thi8 appeal are that the application for the Certificate and the in-
formation and test~ny presented in support of the application do not Ju.tlf, a deter-
lIlination that the criteria in Section 9611.A. of the Municipal Code would be met.
CA 90406-0611
cc
C'C'1H/9''''<
(';[:1 < 1 tt~ <
/ 1'/ - n
, _ f
L CL'- i!Cq
- ./--- -- ---- .---- -