Loading...
SR-01-10-1978-10A '. - - tj06 ~()( Santa Honica, Cal1forn1a, December 6, 1977 TO~ Hayor and C1ty Councll IDA FROH: C1ty Staff JAN 1 0 1978 SUBJECT: Recommended Changes to Landmarks 0rd1nance. Introduct1on Th1S re90rt transm1ts a recommendat1on by the Landmarks Com- mlSSlon that certa1n chanqes in the t1~e Ilmlts set forth ln the Landmarks Ordlnance be made. Background On October 11th the Clty Councll requested the Landmarks Com- m1sslon to reVlew the regulat10n perMitting recons~derat1on of a proposed land~ark after only one year followlng denlal w~th a Vlew toward 1ncreas1ng the time per10d to f1ve years. On ~ovember 1st the Landmarks COMM1SS1on reviewed the Ord1nance and approved a recommendat~on that the time 11mlt be 1ncreased fro~ one year to three years wlth the except10n that the owner of the property 1nvolved would not be restrlcted to the three year term. This would permlt a new owner or one who may have had prev10us Ob]ect1on to have an appl1cat1on recons1dered at any tune. The Comm1SS1on also has found that the present thlrty day limlta- t10n for the staff to submlt a prel1minary reco~endatlon and the sett1ng of a publ1C hearlng after the re~ort 1S rece1ved does not prov1de suff1Clent t1me for the CommlSSlon to act In the event lOA J AN 1 0 1978 .' - e TO: nayor and Councl.l - 2 - December 6, 1977 they only Meet once a month. The Commission recommends that the time period be l.ncreased from 30 to 45 days In both l.n- stances whl.ch Wl.ll provide ample time in the event only one meeting a month 1S held. Alternatl.ves The Cl.ty Councl.l has the a1ternatl.ve of actl.ng favorably upon the recommendations of the Landmarks COmM1SSl.On by instructl.ng the Cl.ty Attorney to pre~are the necessary amenQments or may mod1fy the recommendations of the COmm1SSl.On by requesting an ordl.nance w1th a d1fferent t1me ll.mitat1on. RecoITlffiendat1on It 1S respectfully recommended that the Landmarks Comml.ssl.on's suggestl.on be accepted and the Clty Attorney d1rected to prepare an ordl.nance lncorporat1ng these aMendments and return it for Councll consl.deratl.on l.n the usual course of procedure. Prepared by: James Lunsford JL:bt . . l' .' . e FINDINGS AND RECOMHENDATIONS OF THE SANTA MONICA LANDf1ARKS COHMISSION ON A PROPOSED CHANGE IN THE LAND~ffiRKS AND HISTORIC DIS- TRICTS ORDINANCE RELATING TO RECONSIDERA- TION OF PROPOSED LAND~~RKS~ The Santa Monica City Council having requested that those regu- lations pertaining to the perlod of time required between re- consideration of a Landmark or Historic District be reviewed and the advisability of increasinq the present one (l) year period and the Landmarks Commission havlng undertaken the requested review and consideration of alternatlves hereby reconmends as follows: That the present one (l) year minlmum period between denial of a landmark designation and reapplication or resubmission be increased to three (3) years wlth the exception that the owner of the subject property May reapply at any time. That the present thirty (30) day period during WhlCh a prelim- inary recommendation and the setting of a public hearlng on an application for a Landmark or an Historlc District be increased to forty-five (45) days ln both instances. The Landmarks Commisslon believes these changes to be necessary for the followlng reasons: 1. Membership of the Commission may change substantially within a three (3) year period and reconsideration of a previously den~ed application may he viewed d~fferent1y by a new Commission. 2. New historic lnformation may have been uncovered re- garding a potential Landmark or Historic District. 3. The community's sensitivity to historic preservation may have 1ncreased in a period of three (3) years. 4. Changes in structural engineerlng methods and tech- niques involving the preservation of historic properties may occur. e ,-,L_____ __ L"__ ___________~~ -~ . , ,j; . . I, JOSEPH EISENHUT, Acting Secretary of the Landmarks Commission hereby certify that the above recomMendation was ap~roved by the Landmarks Commission by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Bach, Kliegman, Hill, Maler, La Tour and Stern. NOES: None ABSENT: Comm1ssioner BaMbrick. ~~ ~:))~ l~ Joseph Eisenhut, Acting Secretary Santa "~onica Landmarks Commiss1on