SR-07-14-1992-7A
i
LUTM:PB:DKW:SMW:APP013:pcword.plan
Council Mtg: July 14, 1992
t(Ot/~tJ03 7-A
Santa Monica, California
.
JUl 1 4 1992
TO: Mayor and city council
FROM:
City staff
L( [) L/ ~ C ~' ~
ADDRESS: 3222-3232 23rd street
Applicants: Mohammad Siadat.and Mohammad Davari
Appellant: Mohammad Davari
SUBJECT: Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Tentative
Parcel Map 21159 and Variance 92-013 to allow the
subdivision of an ll,51S sq. ft. parcel with two
existing on-site single family dwellings into two (2)
parcels of 6,293 sg.ft. (Parcel 1) and 5,225 sq.ft.
(Parcel 2). Parcel 1 has a substandard depth of 59 I
and a 12' nonconforming front yard setback. Parcel 2
has a substandard depth of 88' and a nonconforming 5'
rear yard setback.
INTRODUCTION
This is an appeal of a Planning Commission denial of Tentative
Parcel Map 21159 and Variance 92-013 to allow the subdivision of
an ll,518 sq. ft. parcel in the Rl district with two existinq
single family dwellings into two parcels, with substandard
lengths and nonconforming building setbacks.
No changes to
existing structures are proposed.
This report recommends that the council deny the appeal and
uphold the Planning Commission's denial of Tentative Parcel Map
21159 and variance 92-013.
The applicant has agreed to an extension of the 30-day limit for
the City Council to act upon the appeal from July II to Jul~ l4,
1992.
7.;/Jr
- 1 -
JUL 11 1992
.--
,
.
...- .. ...,-.
BACKdROUND
The Planning Commission denied the applicants' request for
Tentative Parcel Map 21159 and Variance 92-013 on June 3, 1992 to
allow the subdivision of an 11,51S sq.ft. parcel in the R1
(Single Family Residential) District with two existing on-site
single family dwellings into two parcels, one equal to 6,293
sq. ft. (Parcel l) and the other equal to 5,225 sq. ft. (Parcel 2)
(Attachment B).
The existing 11,518 sq. ft. parcel is located on the northwest
corner of 23rd Street and Dewey street in the Rl District. An
alley is located to the north.
A radius and location map is
included as Attachment F.
The existing parcel dimensions are
shown on Attachment J. As indicated on the Tentative Parcel Map,
the parcel has a sl ightly irregular trapezoidal shape. Two
existing, one-story single family structures of l,463 sq. ft. and
l,125 sq. ft. exist on-site. A two car garage with alley access
exists for the residence at the rear. An attached two car garage
exists for the residence at the front of the property with
existing access from 23rd street. No changes are proposed to
existing on-site structures.
The subdivision of the existing parcel into 2 parcels is proposed
so that separate ownership may be obtained (Attachment A), with
one residence on each parcel. Parcell, with frontage along 23rd
Street and the alley to the north, has a 59' depth and a 107'
width for a total of 6,293 sq. ft. (Attachment I).
Proposed
se~back~ include a l2t front yard (along 23rd street), 7' and 34'
-..
.
- 2 -
side yards, and a 251 rear yard. A 20' front yard, 7 '2" side
yard and 251 rear yard setback is required for the proposed
parcel. A variance is required for the substandard 59' depth;
the parcel would have a nonconforming 12' front yard and 7'
north sideyard. Code requires a minimum width of 50' and depth
of 100 I. Parcel 2, with frontage along 23rd street and Dewey
street, has an 88' depth and a 59' width for a total of 5,225
sq.ft. Proposed setbacks include an existing 32' front yard, l2'
and 181 side yards and a 51 rear yard. A 20' front yard, a 5.9'
side yard and 25' rear yard setback is required for the proposed
parcel. A variance is required for the substandard 88' depth;
the parcel would have a nonconforming 5' rear yard setback. The
parcels meet the minimum lot size requirement of 5,000 sq. ft.
(Attachment C).
The Santa Monica Municipal Code allows modification of minimum
parcel dimensions [Section 9113.3 (a)]. The application was
denied by the Planning commission based on findings that the
proposed subdivision is not similar to the prevailing pattern of
development in the area and that substandard setbacks would
exist. (Attachment B).
APPEAL ISSUES
The applicant appealed the denial of the tentative map and
variance application, stating that the findings of dissimilar
development pattern of the proposed parcels and inconsistency
with the General Plan are not substantiated with text or. maps
from the General Plan (Attachment A). The applicant also states
- 3 -
that the density and land use of the property is eonsistent with
the General Plan and that the existing parcel has twice the
required parcel area in the Rl district. The applicant points
out that there are two lots at the west end of the block with
homes under separate ownership which are oriented in a similar
fashion to the proposed subdivision. The applicant contends that
.
there was no review of lots across the Los Angeles City boundary
which are similar in orientation to the proposed subdivision.
The applicant stated that a variance, granted in 1946 which
allowed construction of the second dwelling on-site, was not
addressed in the findings.
The applicant also suggests that a
deed restriction running with the property to require a
Conditional Use - Permit for further expansion of the existing
homes be recorded as a condition of approval.
ANALYSIS
policy l.l.l of the Land Use Element of the General Plan requires
that all development be consistent with the Land Use and Zoning
Maps. While the General Plan does not specify that proposed lots
be sim.ilar to existing lots, the proposed subdivision of the
existing Rl parcel into two parcels would permit a permanent
increase in density of the existing parcel and an increase in
intensity of the land use, as two dwellings would now be
permitted where only one is currently permitted by code.
The two existing single family structures are considered to be
legal nonconforming uses pursuant to the Municipal Code. If
substantial alterations were made to either one of the structures
... 4 -
~
(a "substantial remodel" under the Municipal Code), one of the
structures would be required to be demolished. Approval of the
subdivision would allow permanent development rights for a single
family structure on each new parcel. The applicant's proposal to
require recordation of a deed restriction requiring a Conditional
Use Permit for expansion of the structure would not mitigate the
impacts of increased development rights.
Review of original building permit applications reveals that a
Variance (#682-Y) was granted to allow the construction of a
second dwelling unit to the rear of the site in 1966 (Attachment
G). The first unit on the site was built in 1955 and appears on
the plot plan f~r the 1966 application that was for sUbdivision
into two parcels. This 1966 application was not approved
(Attachment G).
The applicant points out that two other lots facing 21st street
and Dewey street contain single family structures that are
oriented towards 21st street (Attachment H). The assessor's map
shows that a waiver of parcel map line divides the two lots into
parcels with dimensions and lot sizes conforming to code
requirements. It is important to note that in this case, two
parcels were reoriented from facing Dewey street to 2lst street
with no net increase in number of parcels. However, in the
proposed subdivision, the parcel would be reoriented from Dewey
street to 23rd street with an increase from one to two parcels,
thus effecting an increase in density.
- 5 -
~
The applicant has submitted copies of the building permit
applications for 3221 and 3233 2lst street (Attachment I). A
single family dwelling was constructed on-site in ~948 oriented
towards 21st street. The second dwelling was constructed in 1988
and is also oriented towards 21st Street. A required 25' front
yard setback is provided for both structures (Attachment H & I).
The applicant contends that there was no review of lots over the
city boundary line in Los Angeles. The Santa Monica Municipal
Code does not suggest taking into account the development pattern
of a neighboring jurisdiction.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
On June 3, 1992, the Planning Commission denied Tentative Tract
Map 21159 and Variance 92-013,a request to allow the subdivision
of an ll,518 sq. ft. parcel in the Rl District into two parcels
with substandard lengths and nonconforming setbacks. The
Planning commission denial was based on findings that the
subdivision is not in conformance with the general development
pattern of the city and that there are no special circumstances
applicable to the property, as its size and configuration are
similar to other Rl properties in the surrounding area. The
applicant states that the decision was not consistent with the
General Plan, that the density and land use is consistent with
the General Plan, that other lots to the southwest exhibit
similar characteristics as the proposed lots, and that a prior
variance permitting the construction of the second strQcture
on-site was not addressed. The applicant also proposes that a
- 6 -
'"
deed restriction requiring a CUP for any development to the
existing structures be recorded as a condition of approval.
Approval of the Tentative Parcel Map and Variance applications
would increase the permitted intensity of land use and density of
the existing Rl parcel and prolong the existing nonconforming
nature of the structures on-site.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACT
The recommendation presented in this report does not have any
budget or fiscal impact.
REQUIRED NOTIFICATION
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 9131.5, notice of the city
council meeting was mailed to all owners and residential and
commercial tenants of property located within a 300 foot radius
of the project at least ten consecutive calendar days prior to
the City Council meeting. A copy of the notice is contained in
Attachment D.
RECOMMENDATION
It is respectfully recommended that the council deny the appeal
and uphold the Planning Commission I s denial of Tentative Tract
Map 21159 and Variance 92-013 to allow the subdivision of an
ll,5lS sq. ft. parcel in the Rl district with two existing single
family dwellings into two (2) parcels with substandard lengths
and nonconforming setbacks with the following findings:
- 7 -
~
VARIANCE FINDINGS
1. There are no special circumstances or exceptional charac-
teristics applicable to the property involved, including
size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings, or to
the intended use or development of the property that do
not apply to other properties in the vicinity under an
identical zoning classification, in that the orientation
of the parcel as currently existing is similar to sur-
rounding properties and in that the number of on-si te
dwellings is legal nonconforming and that demolition of
50% or more of all exterior walls or load-bearing walls
will cause the nonconforming portion to be brought into
conformance with the code.
2. The granting of such variance will be detrimental or in-
j ur iOlls to the property or improvements in the general
vicinity and district in which the property is located, in
that the orientation and size of proposed parcels, Parcel
1 and Parcel 2, are not similar to the prevailing pattern
of development in the area, in that substandard setbacks
would exist and in that the intensity of land use and den-
sity would increase permanently for the existing Rl
parcel.
3. The strict application of the provisions of this Chapter
would not result in practical difficulties or unnecessary
hardships, not including economic difficulties or economic
hardships, in that the existing parcel fits into the es-
tablished pattern of development.
4. The granting of a variance will be contrary to or in con-
flict with the general purposes and intent of this Chap-
ter, or to the goals, objectives and pOlicies of the
General Plan, in that the orientation and size of proposed
parcels, Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, are not similar to the
prevailing pattern of development in the area, in that the
subdivision would result in substandard setbacks, and in
that the intensity of land use and density would increase
permanently for the existing RI parcel.
5. The variance would impair the integrity and character of
the district in which it is to be located, in that the
orientation and size of proposed parcels, Parcel 1 and
Parcel 2, are not similar to the prevailing pattern of
development in the area and in that the intensity of land
use and density would increase permanently for the exist-
ing Rl parcel.
6. The subject site is physically suitable for the proposed
variance, in that the parcel is level and the proposal is
to subdivide the existing parcel into two parcels wLth no
change to existing structures.
7. There are adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and
public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed
- 8 -
..
9.
variance would not be detrimental to public health and
safety, in that the proposal is subdivide an existing par-
cel into two parcels with all amenities on-site.
There will be adequate provisions for pUblic access to
serve the subj ect variance proposal, in that access to
Parcel 1 exists from Dewey Place North and access to Par-
cel 2 exists from 23rd street and no changes to access are
proposed.
The strict application of the provisions of Chapter lO of
the City of Santa Monica Comprehensive Land Use and zoning
Ordinance would not result in unreasonable deprivation of
the use or enjoyment of the property, in that the proposal
existing parcel is developed with two single family struc-
tures and no changes are proposed.
~
8.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FINDINGS
1. The proposed subdivision, together with its provision for
its design and improvements, is not consistent with ap-
plicable general and specific plans as adopted by the city
of Santa Monica, in that the proposed parcels are not
similar to the prevailing pattern of development in the
area, in that the subdivision would result in substandard
parcel lengths and setbacks, and in that the intensity of
land use and densi ty would increase permanently for the
existing Rl parcel.
2. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of
development, in that the proposal is to subdivide an ex-
isting parcel into two parcels with two existing single
family structures to remain and no changes are proposed.
3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density
of development, in that the proposal is to subdivide an
existing parcel into two parcels with two existing single
family structures to remain and no changes are proposed.
4. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements
will not cause substantial environmental damage or sub-
stantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat, in that the proposal is to subdivide an existing
parcel into two parcels with two existing single family
structures to remain and no changes are proposed.
5. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvement
will not cause serious public health problems, in that the
proposal is to subdivide an existing parcel into two par-
cels with two existing single family structures to remain
and with no changes are proposed.
6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements
will not conflict with easements, acquired by the pUblic
at large, for access through, or use of, property within
- 9 -
the proposed subdivision, in that the proposal is to sub-
divide an existing Rl parcel into two parcels with no
restrictions or changes to existing access.
4
ATTACHMENTS:
A. Appeal form dated 6/11/92.
B. Statement of Official Action dated 6/3/92.
C. Staff Memorandum to Planning commission dated 6/3/92.
D. Notice of Public Hearing dated 7/14/92.
E. Letter from Staff to Mohammad Davari dated 6/17/92.
F. Radius and Location Map
G. Applications for Building Permits dated 3/7/55 and
6/10/66.
H. Assessor's Map, Tract No. 8052, Map Bk. 91-38 and Tract
No. 8542, Map Bk. 104-27-29.
I. Letter from L. Paul Cook to city Council dated 6/26/92.
J. Tentative Parcel Map 21159
K. Site Photographs
Prepared by: D. Kenyon Webster, Planning Manager
Susan White, Assistant Planner
Planning Division
Land Use and Transportation Management Department
SMW
PC/APP013
07/08/92
- 10 -
AITACHMENT A
O()O~l
:.
City of
Santa Monica
CommUJ'\lty and EcoromlC Develor;ment Department
Planning and Zoning Dtvlslon
(213) 458.8341
APPEAl FORM
A92--c \4
I
FEE: $1 00.00
Oale Fiec::I .
ReceM!d by -
Receipt No. -.-
~ In /'12-
S~
~ J ""1 99. "1:--1
Name Mohammad Davarl
Address 3222 23rd Street, Santa MonJ.ca, CA. 90405
CcntactPerson L. Paul Cook, Phone (310) 312-8222
c.w. Cook Co., Inc.
Please deSCl'lbe the pttJlect and deoSlOl1 rl be appealed
Th1S appeal lS from the deClslon to deny a request for a two lot
Parcel Map flIed for the purpose of separatlng the ownershlp for
two eXlstlng homes, and also from the denlal of the correspondlng
Varlance Reauest.
.
CaseNum~r Vestlng Tentat1ve Parcel Map #21159 and Varlance 92-013
~re~ 3222-3232 23rd Street, Santa Monlca, CA 90405
A,oplcant ~1ohammad Davarl and Nohammad Sladat
Onglnal neanng care June 3 rd , 1 992
OnglflalaC".x:Jn Denlal of bo1;.h appllcatlons
Please state It1e speefflc reason(s> b" h a,toeaJ
According to the staff report, the primary reason these applications were denied was
because "the proposed parcels are not similar to the prevailing pattern of development in
the area", Some of the findings required for the variance and for the tentative parcel
map were not made, stating agam the same reason. This statement was also used to find
that the proposed project was inconsistent with the General Plan. However, staff could
not find any specific text or maps in the City's General Plan which would require new lot
shapes to be similar to the eXisting lots The density and land use is consistent with
the General Plan. This is the only lot in the neighborhood which has more than twice the
required Lot Area of the R 1 zone.
Further, staff and the Planning Commission did not realize that at the other end of this
very same block, there are two homes (under separate ownership) which arc turned precisely
the same way as the proposed lots are turned
Also, in the next block to the southwest. there are numerous "Reversed Corner Lots", which
is a corner lot which is turned 900+/- to the lot behind. See the circled lots on the
attached map.
Further there was no review of the lots over the city boundary line in Los Angeles.
Drivmg southeasterly on the same street, the very next block has all of the lots oriented
10 the same direction as proposed lots. Even though the lots are in a diffCTent city,
someone driving through the neighborhood would see this continuity. Because of all of the
a~= ;;:'o~ are similar to many lots in the area (see attached map).
~ '.~ l1addb::N1S1*>>.Meded.,lMblckofl':'lIll. / (CONTINUED ON BACK)
C!-lln f\,1 ~;f~ ea. ~,/ {(/q.2_
...,... \ 'V ~ / '
O~O~2
The City's 1946 Variance grant allowmg the construction of the two existing houses on the
subject site was Dot taken into account.
Staff mentioned that they were concerned about overbuilding on the resulting two new lots.
This could easily be controlled through a recorded deed restriction running with the land
requiring any expansion of the existing homes to obtain a conditional use permit and full
public hearing. This would assure everyone that any expansion is done carefully and with
consideration for the neighbors.
CONCLUSION:
1. There was no legal justification for the denial of .these requests.
2. The density and land use is consistent with the General Plan.
3. The proposed lots are similar in size and orientation to many lots in the
neighborhood (see map).
4. The two homes 8re existing because of a previous City grant (Variance),
S. Protection is readily available for the neighbors and the City regarding any new
construction in the future
6. This appeal shoul~ be granted, subject to the standard condition plus a special
condition to protect against overbuilding on the new lots in the future,
.'
OOO~3
-
~:(.
w.1 'I'
. . .
. .....
': 1. ":....r_
. ~: 110 l"",fl
~ ~ '
: f:';--
~~ ';"''''1'
J ~, .......,
.' -~~~
.Pi ~::-
~.:~J~,
~ H 1,0-1'9 ....1..
.. - II!.~I.. .....s.aI'J'I
. a "..fIII:DI " . ST"(~~~ :R(M.~I- ~
'.j,E-l~~- ~ I r
!..~ -Wt--- ~ -1~- ~
t 1 '!S'~ _ .......~.. ..
. . - Q Iwt I ~
~..;: u.:.. .. ;;,: [" .
~t 0(...... Z :.:: I
~ _.. ~ 7: I
'" :t ., j t -. I
. .~- - "- .
_T~ ,'''''''--,
.' n T' .
. :....:r ~ . ~ I
:.,~ L.... ~ :1-
, r It n
..liI .. '0-.
Lt'J,;, ':... ~
~.1 ~ I lOa_
.5-t 'II ..
-:C-,. ., ..~
".. . ,I
-;I~'@' ~ "n t':J
~~ ~... L_'
~ "".
l'- - .--
DIRECTION
;~I ...
~'.
> ~.~
f:
___LtH
THE LOTS HERE WERE
TURNED TO FACE 21ST. ST.
A FEW YEARS AGO.
TWO HOUSES NOW
FACE 21ST. ST
LEGEND:
o
REVERSE CORNER
LOTS
J
>
~
-
o
( CHANGED DIRECTION FROM
THE LOT BEHIND.)
THESE LOTS ARE ABOUT
THE SAME SIZE AS
THE PROPOSED LOTS
o G G ~ .1
FOR: APPEAL OF P.M.21159 & VARIANCE 92-013
~~H~C. W.COOK C~=............'" B.. ....
,~'\idtj UndSwoqtqj. Clwtl....-ll. .nlllkmcnlo' PubUcAlJaUo
.", "'"\. W-Iold<: 'J"""alO llllJ5 -, Olympk: ___.nl. S"l'" )'~
..." '" "\.1.''" ,,_1<0 Gol......lo. ooo6.t. _ FAX 1../!'2-~
.", "'"\. Td !."'!..~n. or 8..'''''5~'''
"Qualttv and ExperIence on Your Side"
AITACHMENT B
000:3
PLANNING COMMISSION
STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL ACTION
PROJECT
CASE NUMBER: Tentative Parcel Map 21159 & Variance 92-013
LOCATION: 3222-3232 23rd street
APPLICANT: Mohammad Siadat and. Mohammad Davari
CASE PLANNER: Susan White, Assistant Planner
REQUEST: Application for a Tentative Parcel Map and
Variance to allow the subdivision of a 11,518
sq. ft. parcel with two existing on-site single
family dwellings into two parcels of 6,293
sq. ft. (Parcel 1) and 5,225 sq. ft. (Parcel 2).
Parcell has a substandard length of 59' and a
12' front yard setback. Parcel 2 has a sub-
standard length of S8' and 5' rear yard
setback.
CEQA STATUS: Categorically exempt per the city of Santa
Monica Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA;
Class 5.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
6/3/92
Date.
Approved based on the following findings and
subject to the conditions below.
X Denied.
Other.
EFFECTIVE DATE(S) OF ACTION(S) IF NOT APPEALED:
6/13/92
6/13/92
Case #VAR 92-013
CaSe #TPM 21159
OOO~6
- 1 -
VARIANCE FINDINGS
1. There are no special circumstances or exceptional charac-
teristics applicable to the property involved, including
size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings, or to
the intended use or development of the property that do
not apply to other properties in the vicini ty under an
identical zoning classification, in that the property as
currently existing is similar to surrounding properties.
2. The granting of such variance will be detrimental or in-
jurious to the property or improvements in the general
vicinity and district in which the property is located, in
that the orientation and size of proposed parcels, Parcel
1 and Parcel 2, are not similar to the prevailing pattern
of development in the area and substandard setbacks would
exist.
3. The strict application of the provisions of this Chapter
would not result in practical difficulties or unnecessary
hardships, not including economic difficulties or economic
hardshipst in that the existing parcel fits into the es-
tablished pattern of development.
4. The granting of a variance will be contrary to or in con-
flict with the general purposes and intent of this Chap-
ter, or to the goals, obj ecti ves and policies of the
General Plan, in that the orientation and size of proposed
parcels, Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, are not similar to the
prevailing pattern of development in the area and the sub-
division would result in substandard setbacks.
5. The variance would impair the integrity and character of
the district in which it is to be located, in that the
orientation and size of proposed parcels, Parcel 1 and
Parcel 2, are not similar to the prevailing pattern of
development in the area.
6. The subject site is physically suitable for the proposed
variance, in that the parcel is level and the proposal is
to subdivide the existing parcel into two parcels with no
change to existing structures.
7. There are adequate provisions for water, sanitation, and
public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed
variance would not be detrimental to public health and
safety, in that the proposal is subdivide an existing par-
cel into two parcels with all amenities on-site.
8. There will be adequate provisions for public access to
serve the subject variance proposal, in that access to
Parcel 1 exists from Dewey Place North and access to Par-
cel 2 exists from 23rd street and no changes to access are
proposed.
- 2 -
000!.7
9. The strict application of the provisions of Chapter 10 of
the City of Santa Monica Comprehensive Land Use and Zoning
Ordinance would not result in unreasonable deprivation of
the use or enjoyment of the property, in that the proposal
existing parcel is developed with two single family struc-
tures and no changes are proposed.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FINDINGS
1. The proposed subdivision, together with its provision for
its design and improvements, is not consistent with ap-
plicable general and specific plans as adopted by the City
of Santa Monica, in that the proposed parcels are not
similar to the prevailing pattern of development in the
area and the subdivision would result in substandard par-
cel lengths and setbacks.
2. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of
development, in that the proposal is to subdivide an ex-
isting parcel into two parcels with two existing single
family structures to remain and no changes are proposed.
3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density
of development, in that the proposal is to subdivide an
existing parcel into two parcels with two existing single
family structures to remain and no changes are proposed.
4. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements
will not cause substantial environmental damage or sub-
stantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat, in that the proposal is to subdivide an existing
parcel into two parcels with two existing single family
structures to remain and no changes are proposed.
5. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvement
will not cause serious public health problems, in that the
proposal is to subdivide an existing parcel into two par-
cels with two existing single family structures to remain
and with no changes are proposed.
6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements
will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public
at large, for access through, or use of, property within
the proposed subdivision, in that the proposal is to SUb-
divide an existing Rl parcel into two parcels with no
restrictions or changes to existing access.
VOTE
Ayes: Mechur, Nelson, Polhemus, Pyne, Rosenstein
Nays:
Abstain:
Absent: Gilpin, Morales
ooo~s
- 3 -
NOTICE
If this is a final decision not subject to further appeal under
the city of Santa Monica Comprehensive Land Use and Zoning Or-
dinance, the time within which judicial review of this decision
must be sought is governed by Code of Civil Procedure Section
1094.6, which provision has been adopted by the City pursuant to
Municipal Code section 1400.
I hereby certify that this statement of Official Action accurate-
ly reflects the final determination of the Planning Commission of
the City of Santa Monica.
signature
date
Ralph Mechur, Chairperson
Please Print Name and Title
PC/st013
SMW
o ~ 0 :. 9
- 4 -
ATTACHMENT C
O~'J:"O
P&Z:DKW:SMW:PCWORD:TPMOOl Santa Monica, California
Planning commission Mtg: June 3, 1992
TO: The Honorable Planning Commission
FROM: Planning staff
SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 21159 & Variance 92-013
Address: 3222-3232 23rd street
Applicant: Mohammad Siadat and Mohammad Davari
INTRODUCTION
Action: Application for a Vesting Tentative Parcel Map and
Variance to allow the subdivision of a 11,518 sq. ft. parcel with
two existing on-site single family dwellings into two (2) parcels
of 6,293 sq. ft. (Parcell) and 5,225 sq. ft. (Parcel 2). Parcell
has a substandard length of 59' and a 12' front yard setback.
Parcel 2 has a substandard length of 88' and a 5' rear yard
setback.
Recommendation: Denial.
Permit Streamlining Expiration Date: October 14, 1992
Subdivision Action Deadline: June 3, 1992
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The subject property is an 11,505 sq. ft. parcel located on the
west side of 23rd Street between Navy street and Dewey Street
having a frontage of 194.93 feet. surrounding uses consist of a
single family residence (Rl) to the north, the City of Los An-
geles to the south, Santa Monica Airport (C5) to the east and a
single family residence (Rl) to the west. Existing on-site uses
include two single family dwellings of 1,462.5 sq. ft. and 1,124.8
sq. ft. There are fourteen mature trees on the site. No changes
are proposed to the existing on-site structures, vehicle access
or landscaping.
Zoning District: Rl
Land Use District: (Single Family Residential)
Existing Parcel 59.081 x 194.931 x 59.08' x 195.17' =
Area: 11,518 sq. ft.
proposed Parcel Parcel 1 - 1071 x 59' = 6,293 sq. ft.
Area: Parcel 2 - 591 X 881 - 5,225 sq. ft.
00Q:1
- 1 -
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting a variance and vesting Tentative Par-
cel Map to subdivide an existing 11,518 sq. ft. parcel into 2 par-
cels of 6,293 sq. ft. and 5,225 sq. ft. Parcel 2, facing Dewey
street, has a substandard length of 88' and, due to the proposed
lot split, the existing structure will have a nonconforming rear
yard setback of 51. Parcell, facing 23rd street, has a substan-
dard length of 59' and, due to the proposed lot split, the exist-
ing structure will have a nonconforming front yard setback of 121
and a nonconforming north side setback of a 7 feet. A minimum
depth of 100 feet and a minimum width of 50 feet are required for
an Rl parcel. Under Municipal Code Section 9113.3, a variance
may be granted to allow modification of minimum parcel
dimensions.
MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE
The proposed project is inconsistent with the Municipal Code and
the General Plan in that the proposed parcels are substandard in
terms of length and required yard setbacks, and the parcels are
not similar in orientation with the existing pattern of develop-
ment along 23rd ~treet.
CEQA STATUS
The project is exempt per the city of Santa Honica Guidelines for
Implementation of CEQA; class 5.
RENT CONTROL STATUS
An owner-occupied exemption exists for the two (2) existing sin-
gle family dwellings.
FEES
The project is not SUbject to any additional planning fees. A
final map filing fee of $350.00 is required prior to City Council
approval if the project is approved.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 9130.8, within 30 days after
the subject application was deemed complete, the applicant posted
a sign on the property stating the following information:
project case number, brief project description, name and
telephone number of applicant, site address, date, time and
location of public hearing, and the Planning and Zoning Division
phone number. It is the applicant's responsibility to update the
hearing date if it is changed after posting.
In addition, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 9131.5, notice of
the public hearing was mailed to all owners and residential and
commercial tenants of property located within a 300 foot radius
- 2 -
O(\~......,
"JIJ...":'
of the project at least ten consecutive calendar days prior to
the hearing. A copy of the notice is contained in Attachment B.
ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing the subdivision of an existing 11,518
parcel into two (2) parcels in the Rl district. The existing
parcel dimensions are approximately 59' in width by 195' in
length. This corner parcel faces 23rd street to the east, Dewey
street to the south, and an alley to the north. There are two
existing one story single family structures on-site. No changes
are proposed to the structures. Access to an existing two car
garage exists from the alley for Parcell. Driveway access to
Parcel 2 exists from 23rd street. No changes to existing access
are proposed.
Two parcels are proposed. Parcell, with frontage along 2Jrd
street and the north alley, has a 59 foot depth and a 107 foot
width for a total of 6,293 sq. ft. Proposed setbacks include a
12' front yard (along 2Jrd street), 7' and 34' side yards, and a
25' rear yard. A variance is required for the substandard 59'
depth and nonconforming 12' front yard and 7' north sideyard.
Parcel 2, with frontage along 23rd Street and Dewey street, has
an 88 foot depth and a 59 foot width for a total of 5,225 sq. ft.
Proposed setbacks include an existing 32' front yard, 12' and 18'
side yards and a 5' rear yard. A variance is required for the
substandard 88' depth and nonconforming 5' rear yard setback.
The minimum dimensions of 50 feet in width by lOa' in length and
a minimum size of 5,000 sq. ft. are required for parcels in the R1
District. Municipal Code section 9113.3 allows the modification
of minimum parcel dimensions and yard setbacks on parcels with a
depth of 90 feet or less or a width of 39 feet or less. The ap-
plicant is requesting a variance for both lot dimensions and
front and rear yard setbacks. The parcels do meet the minimum
lot size of 5,000 sq. ft. The orientation of the two parcels, as
proposed however, are not similar to the dominant orientation of
parcels in the surrounding residential neighborhood. All other
parcels face Dewey street and have parcel dimensions greater than
the minimum required by code. The proposed subdivision and
resulting parcels are not in accordance with this prevailing pat-
tern of development.
CONCLUSION
The applicant is proposing the subdivision of an 11,518 sq. ft.
into two parcels of 6,293 (Parcel l) and 5,225 sg.ft. (Parcel 2).
A variance is requested for proposed parcel dimensions and yard
setbacks less than the minimum required. Although code permits
granting of variances for parcel dimensions and setbacks, the
orientation of the proposed parcels is not similar to the pre-
vailing pattern of development in the area.
- 3 -
00Q~3
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning commission deny Variance 92-
013 and Vesting Tentative Parcel Map 21159 with the following
findings:
VARIANCE FINDINGS
1. There are no special circumstances or exceptional charac-
teristics applicable to the pr..operty involved, including
size, shape, topography, location, or surroundings, or to
the intended use or development of the property that do
not apply to other properties in the vicinity under an
identical zoning classification, in that the property as
currently existing is similar to surrounding properties.
2. The granting of such variance will be detrimental or in-
jurious to the property or improvements in the general
vicinity and district in which the property is located, in
that the orientation and size of proposed parcels, Parcel
1 and Parcel 2, are not similar to the prevailing pattern
of development in the area and substandard setbacks would
exist. -
3. The strict application of the provisions of this Chapter
would not result in practical difficulties or unnecessary
hardships, not including economic difficulties or economic
hardships, in that the existing parcel fits into the es-
tablished pattern of development.
4. The granting of a variance will be contrary to or in con-
flict with the general purposes and intent of this Chap-
ter, or to the goals, objectives and policies of the
General Plan, in that the orientation and size of proposed
parcels, Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 I are not similar to the
prevailing pattern of development in the area and the sub-
division would result in substandard setbacks.
5. The variance would impair the integrity and character of
the district in which it is to be located, in that the
orientation and size of proposed parcels, Parcel ~ and
Parcel 2, are not similar to the prevailing pattern of
development in the area.
6. The subject site is physically suitable for the proposed
variance, in that the parcel is level and the proposal is
to subdivide the existing parcel into two parcels with no
change to existing structures.
7. There are adequate provisions for water, sanitation~ and
public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed
variance would not be detrimental to public health and
safety, in that the proposal is subdivide an existing par-
cel into two parcels with all amenities on-site.
- 4 -
Or) 1"',.... 1
_ 'J ,.
8. There will be adequate prov~s~ons for public access to
serve the subj ect variance proposal, in that access to
Parcel 1 exists from Dewey Place North and access to Par-
cel 2 exists from 23rd street and no changes to access are
proposed.
9. The strict application of the provisions of Chapter 10 of
the City of Santa Monica Comprehensive Land Use and Zoning
Ordinance would not result in unreasonable deprivation of
the use or enjoyment of the property, in that the proposal
existing parcel is developed with two single family struc-
tures and no changes are proposed.
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP FINDINGS
1. The proposed subdivision, together with its provision for
its design and improvements, is not consistent with ap-
plicable general and specific plans as adopted by the City
of Santa Monica, in that the proposed parcels are not
similar to the prevailing pattern of development in the
area and the subdivision would result in substandard par-
cel lengths and setbacks.
2. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of
development, in that the proposal is to subdivide an ex-
isting parcel into two parcels with two existing single
family structures to remain and no changes are proposed.
3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density
of development, in that the proposal is to subdivide an
existing parcel into two parcels with two existing single
family structures to remain and no changes are proposed.
4. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements
will not cause substantial environmental damage or sub-
stantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat, in that the proposal is to subdivide an existing
parcel into two parcels with two existing single family
structures to remain and no changes are proposed.
5. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvement
will not cause serious public health problems, in that the
proposal is to subdivide an existing parcel into two par-
cels with two existing single family structures to remain
and with no changes are proposed.
6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements
will not conflict with easements, acquired by the pUblic
at large, for access through, or use of, property within
the proposed SUbdivision, in that the proposal is to sub-
divide an existing Rl parcel into two parcels with no
restrictions or changes to existing access.
Prepared by: Susan White, Assistant Planner
Attachments:
- 5 -
Of\"'~'-
J '.J , _ J
:
A. Municipal Code and General Plan Conformance
B. Notice of Public Hearing
C. Radius and Location Map
D. Vesting Tentative Parcel Map No. 21159
E. Photographs of site and Surrounding Properties
SMW
PC/TPMOOl
06/23/92
- 6 -
Orl.(";....n
"J 'J . J
ATTACHMENT A
MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE
Land Use
Element Municipal Code
Single Single Family
fam.res. Dwelling
Moratorium Status N/A
Category
Permitted Use
Dwelling Units
Parcel Dimensions
and size
setbacks
Front yard
Sideyard
Rearyard
Single Single Family
fam.res. Dwelling
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
50'W x 100'L
- 5,000 sq. ft.
minimum.
20'
7'2"
5.9
25'
- 7 -
Project
2 Existing Single
Family Dwellings
Single Family
Dwellings to
Remain
(
Parcel 1-
107'W x 59'L-
6,293 sq.ft
Parcel 2-
59'W x 88' L -
5,225 sq. ft.
Parcell - 12'
Parcel 2 - 32'
Parcel 1 -
7' & 34'
Parcel 2 -
12' & 18'
Parcell - 25'
Parcel 2 - 5'
o~a-:7
AITACHMENT D
01)")....8
v t ..,J
NOTICE OF DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
To:
Concerned Persons
From:
The City of Santa Monica
Subject of Hearing: Appeal of Denial of Application for
Tentative Parcel Map 22159 and variance
92-012, 3222-3232 23rd street, Rl,
Applicant: Mohammad Siadat and Mohammad
Davari
Appellant: Mohammad Davari
A Public Hearing will be held by the City Council on the
following request:
Appeal of a Planning commission Denial of Tentative Parcel Map
22159 and Variance 92-012 to allow the subdivision of an 11,518
sq. ft. with two existing single family residences in the Rl
(Single Family Residential) District into two parcels of 6,293
sq.ft. (Parcel 1) and 5,225 sq.ft. (Parcel 2) with substandard
lengths and non-conforming setbacks) .
TIME:
TUESDAY,
July 14, 1992 , 1992 AT 7:30 P.M.
LOCATION:
COUNCIL CHAMBER, ROOM 213, CITY HALL
1685 MAIN STREET, SANTA MONICA
HOW TO COMMENT:
The City of Santa Monica encourages public comment on this and
other projects. You or your representative, or any other persons
may comment at the City council's public hearing, or by writing a
letter.
Letters should be addressed to:
City Council, City Clerk's Office
1685 Main Street, Room 102
Santa Monica, California 90401
MORE INFORMATION
If desired, further information on any application may be
obtained from the city Planning Division at the address above or
by calling (310) 458-8341.
The meeting facility is handicapped accessible. If you have any
special needs such as sign language interpreting, please contact
the Office of the Disabled at (310)458-8701.
Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65009(b), if this
matter is subsequently challenged in court, the challenge may be
- 1 -
OJO~9
limited to only those issues raised at the Public Hearing
described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered
to the City of Santa Monica at, or prior to, the Public Hearing.
Esto es un aviso sabre una audencia publica para revisar
applicaciones proponiendo desarrollo en Santa Monica. Esto puedo
ser de interes a usted. S i deseas mas informacion, favor de
llamar a Elsa Gonzalez en la Division de Plantificacion al numero
(3l0) 45B-B341.
PCWORD/tempccpn
pc/apOOl
SMW
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
D. KENYON WEBSTER
Principal Planner
- 2 -
0')'1"0
" IJ J
AITACHMENT E
O~O:l
SANTA
MONICA
CIty Plannmg DIvIsion
(310) 458-8341
1685 Main Street, POBox 2200
Santa MOnica, CA 90407-2200
June 17, 1992
Mohammad Davari
3222 23rd street
Santa Monica CA 90405
Subject: Appeal of Parcel Map 21159 and Variance 92-013,
3222-3232-23rd street
Dear Mr. Davari:
According to Municipal Code Section 9381 (e), the City Council is
required to act upon the appeal of a Tentative Parcel Map within
thirty (30) days of the date of the appeal. The appeal was filed
on June 11, 1992 and the 30 day limit is July 11, 1992. We are
requesting an extension of the 30 day time limit, so that the
Council may review the appeal of the above noted project on
Tuesday, July 14, 1992. Please confirm that you or your
representative can attend the meeting on this date and that you
agree to the extension.
Please call me at 310 458-8341 if you have any questions.
Z:~l~
s~V~ite
Assistant Planner
cc: L. Paul Cook
PC/dvri
SMW
06/17/92
- 1 -
01'\"" ~. 'l
J:j..;. ~
-
-~
ATTACHMENT F
O~O:3
It ,.
i < \.nJ....
; - :j': ~
.... ::. I .Z
I ~ ~ I I
.a;-:; ~ I 0
tt~ 1.
!"~l'.%
~:c1 :
-... 1
~ ~-...... :.c
.~ ~ "';
u /-'
'I I;
h-
.. 23th
0
~
~ ~ ISI
'''10
51
g 0 149
i
" .., ~
~ ~ Be
.
-,
! ot ~ B"I
t'lOl
~
J
1- I"~
51 :lI 9: :i\ 9'
~J ''''1-,.
, :l- ez i !it n -: III
OJ 141 ~:; 14
~ 1111 81 !1; ~ 91 ': 0211 97 !1; :it III
21D1 16:1 '.. 2101 4~ ....'" ~~
D 21 th 0
~ &STREET
,:;:;
..., r .... I I .... I ~ 1 1 11I'11
t;;
z
~
o
AVE
I; r
~i!~ 0 I STH I eTI Nl1
'.: ~ I; MAP
LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 140. TRACT NO. 8542.
STREET ADDRESS 3222-32 23 RD 81:'
SANTA MONICA, 90405
APPLICANT
RADIUS MAP FOR
(p(lJ!\lNllN] 0 lNJ@ IQ)lE(Ptl\lF!lrlM~lNIlr
em Of
S-t- Jlto..i~a.
CALIfORNIA
CASE NO
1 I 1"1
v......{~
2. I \ 5"'1
92.- c t ~
ZONE
DATE 2 - 7 - 92
PUBLIC
. HEARING
DATE
R.f.rence.
Atlas Map
Sh..t Ho._ _ _ .
000:4
AITACHMENT G
On". '"'.....
JU_O
I
For DepL U. Only
Thia A.ppUcaticm M_t Be rUled ~t IA IDk J..
NOTE THIS IS MOT A IUlLDIHG PERMIT. DO MOT STABT WOD: 1.1 n:
BBE PLANS ,w:~PROVED. A.HD PEINIT IS ISSUED. 1,";)
~~~OOL..fffl?:J~.~ ~ .~.2~'L.?
LoL)I:j:./l.._Block_ __ _ _ m.Tract _ _ _%..~~-l_~....nm ... .._ .- . . .... . . .mn . .Slze of Lot. - _4" ~.~ t. x 17.!': ~8..
~
Lst Exlsbng Buddmgs On Lot and Useum _ m' _... . u oun .nu m . _ _ _. 00 _u. 00 ......-
No e I_~_~ j _......___
! I -
D-te ~ I 7 ~...,
.... ......l ~+
J
:5 ~~ CO 0
Fee. ._ _ ?':(\i ___
F'ireZC?!!-
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
BUILDING DEPARTMENT. CITY OF SANTA MONICA
..
OccUf- Group
Appr~v?
a;a~!;!..~A- ( -
Will It be necessary to request permission to remove trees from parkway to Install driveway (Yes.
(No. '-::'('"
Type of Construction:
Type ]-Fire Realsbve 0 Type 2-HeaYy Timber 0 Type 3-Ordin&.ry Masonry 0 Type 4-}..Aelal Frame 0 Type S-Wood Fram8 0
0\0 Nature of Work
Cor-struchon ~Enlargement 0 Alteration 0 CcnverSlon 0 Replur 0 Descnptlon
h ~I J "0 Ii fit;". 6~'fa1' r I
Speci~c Use of BUlldmg. n. -. J/... HI~: h6:.J._N~m . ..-. - - ..m~~~ - No of FamilIes.. .... _ on
Matenal Ex!encr W dlls ~~u. ..FU'St Floor JOIstS.... ..... x. _ _ . Sec::)nd Floor JOists 00 _ .x . ...._ . .
Number of Stones ( _ 00 _ _ -.mum .h.. .... ...Helght to lhghest Point...J..~. . Roof Material. ~... C
Size Width. 3 9_ _m _ -ft . by Length... _.::2f:- 0 OnnO . .mmnn....ft.' Total Floor Area. -Ii: 7 b .7.-2Pt ~ ~
{Including PlumbIng, Gas f'1tting, } Z'-' ---0 'rp
VALUATIOn OF PROPOSED BLDG Sewers, Cesspools. Electrical, $_ _ /- ^.' _ :-.. .... _ . 00 ..___.__.....
~ ~ / Painting, Fmiahing, all Labor, ete
Owner_..~{..Q._ _ ~~_ . ...__n_mAddress --;!-:-~.~.:~- R~/..~T; _ ._ _....___
Contractor. f't.f.E {,/[ ?,s; .~ ft.J. &.$... ! :".(;J... ...uu. uU_.U . _ . { 510le uoense No ..l'!;{~ G.!(- ji'/ ~
City Ltcense No .. ...L..~_ . ~ . ...... . '''_n_
Address.. t 2(). ~ll!Aa L4Ib. fj"f/.t?. .. ... Phone No _ .t/ :FA. t / 2./ l N
<.J.J
~
Architect
. .. ... State Ltcense No _ _
Address_ _
00 _ _ nnnn_ __ On... _ _ . _Phone No
NOTE T"-le g'anbng of ll. Bul'drng Permit does not grant any nght or priVilege 10 (1) Erect any bUIlding and/or structure
or dn\ po-I'on Ihereol. upon "ny lllreet, alley, or other public place or portion thereof. or (2) Use any bUilding and/or
struel'"re or any portlon thereof, for any purpose thOIIS. rr may e prohlblted by ordmance of the City of Santd MonIca
Tre grantmg of a Bu.ddmg Pemul does not affect or pre, any cllUIll. of btI. to, or right of possession in. the prop-
erty descrIbed In such Penmt -
~ i
I have read the above apphcatlon and know the contents thereof. the same IS true and correct I further state
that I am fa:1l11lar With the laWE govemmg bUllchng Within the City of Santa Maruca and State of Caltfomla, and
dIDendmen1s thereto. that the d )ove bulldtng and/or structure Will be budt In conformity therewIth, and that legal
properly hnes have been es1abl shed
I, the owner, certIfy that all labor employed on thiS work will be covered dunng course of constructIon by work-
man.s oompen.."on msmanee" reqwMd by the 5101~. ~:.cz:o'. .
Signature of Owner or A Date
~w
N~TE: SHOW PLOT PLAN ON OTHER SIDE.
0"1'\"1"
J:J ~v
:~/'
fFOR ZONING DEPA.RTMENT USE om.n
"') - Map Sheet No
Use Classlhcanon
I
Curb to Prep Lme
Property Lme '~ullcimg Lme
S:de Ya.:-d Wdtr:.
f
I
.1'1, tJ t
'\~-
~~.
,\c..
~,
~
"
, ..,
t-
( \
~'t;,
~ {\~ l
....... t\\ ,. ~
\\ r
~ C) ~~ \.N
~ \~
-- ..
,
- ,
/ ~
If, $ q r
!~ / ~f-
I
I
;~f
1,
--~ ,
~l ';.
"-
:
.1 /
- . -----......,
~ ----. J~ >t OQ{'~'"
-7- J~l
-
ij
For DIIpL u.. DIlly
- a..". --/G,. / FIle ?
No~~." ". _ Zaae.::;J
nal4.f..:.:',' __ r.,." _ =: .I
F.. ~- ~,('f. - ~ -;'"-AI
p.c N~ Y G:, ~ . ~&-PbA~
0..14$ - "",,-_S- ~-~. ~ I Locabon.
F.. ..-.z s .L c LoLi..~o Rieck..-. _ _ Tract. .B ~3z...._ _ _ _
LISI Ezmllng BuUdmgs On Let and Uee .#~_ p..Ji/-c~.L :A.:. -_ .AJ..oIVE
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
B1JILD1RG DEPARTMENT. CItY OF BARTA MOlffCl
'IluII .A.--:-"-."- Mat Be PIlMd OlaIlalnk
NOTE 1'HJS IS NOT A BlJU.DJMG PERMIT. DO NOT IIl'AaT Wom:
IEFOIE JIl.ANS AU: APPIlOVED. DD PEDCT IS JIISlIZ(l.
3v'V\./
Addres&. ---;12 ~ _ Z~ I~ S7'
_ S'ze of Lot
x
~~~(
NatuN 01 Work
C..n..ru....... IE- &ll..r~""'~' 0
"het.._ 0
CMWfllon C
b..." 0
Dnc:npben
I 0........::-...,(,.<'......
fJ.aTH_ .~#/ _ ~~
.
Speahc Use 01 Bwldmg__~S~_"""" ___._ _ .-
Malenal Ex'enor Walls SJ-""'c..a _ FIlSI Boor JOISts..
No of Rooms. :f _ NG- 01 farmhes J__. _._
S.......e
.x. Second Boor JOIsts .% __
Number of Stones OQ~
.H1!lghl to Highest Poml .b~ '_ Roof Malena] ji?~ .
SlZl' Width. 22.- It by Length_ . ~r .ft. Total Boor Area 'f11'&>
{ Includin'iJ P1\1J11bing Gas Fitt;ng 1 ll_ =-
VALUATION OF PROPOSED BLOG s...._. CeapooIa Electnc&. r $ /"~4~
P6Inting. FlIIlsbinsr .u 1.&bo:. .1e. ) C'd
Owner . tJ ~''''.h1 .., . Address. ~ z, ~_ Z ~ '- 5r-
_ _ ._.__ { State license No ?;'Z, o{/ j-
Clly license No _.
.....~"'---
"/
.aqft
ContrdCtor 6/"- "I ry
~~~~ __ ~'!:'S
" Address. - ~ ~ 2.:3
Ilr:..c
8J..Q~" ~'!" /W'~.J)C4Q
. Phone No -;F.r-).:f7' 7
Arelutect.
_ _Slale license No
Address.
______._ _ _Phone No
1he granting af ,. But.din; P...mlf do... not grant .ny t'oh. Of ptlvt~ to" (1j ENeI' .any buiiJdllftl .-.d/0l .'n,pctu.nl or pOrtiOn ~fr
vpon any In..., .1Iey or ether pof,IIbhc ilfHlCIt or pardon ..n.recl. .... (.2) UN _ny buildntSJI wIG' IUuCl'uq or arty poI"hI:lft the...of for
oIfty I)-urpoae 1M' .&. or rNI, be proh.biNd ~ ardin.nee of 1M C~ry of Sin.. Manta
The granting of . BuildiRg Parmi' Doe.l- IKIt .ffKt or ....ludiCl .any d.rm of tit" 10,. 01 right of poIH$IlOn In ..... propeny OIlO'lbtd
U'l 1111:1-. poI,m.t
11v owner or perm~ .. r.lparla,bl. fat tne ~jon o. properfy I~.nd buitcllftOi Dr :ul'uetur. w.th r.-g..-d 'to .... property Iii....
I ~fTify ",,.1 I ....ve r..iJdi this .ppltCIItlQl'1. .rut ,.... 1h.t .he ..bow. IpformeTlor) ., lI:orred I aliill'" to comply to .11 City OnlN'MIn.WI .ndi St.t. .... te...lIng
to blJlkitl'lliil eo"$t"UCfIC\ft ,j ~"Iiy 'M-r in 'Pt. pl-rfonn.nce of t.... .aeov. wor.. I ..hili nOl ."'Ploy .pwv peno-n ~n VKlI.'lcn pI the Laba.. Ced. o' C.lifern..
r.I.'lng to WDl'Io:~n s Cgmptln""~On InaurillnCtl
CQNrllAC'fQa SIGN allow
J catl,fy: thM I o!IM _ 11'*ftH'd CDfttfolCtOf .nd Nt .nrr ItatMe it in full fora- .nd .ffecr
~".......y &4f"!;
ConIrldOr
~
Ilr
~~
,
Au.horlZed Agent
OWNEIt .IUILDP SIGH M10W
I <etI;fy "'" I .m ...mp. Iram _ 1"'..",.;..... af ChIp. 9, Dj. 3. II .nd P Cado [eo..".....,', 1.0_ low) boaute (chid< one)
o I .m tt-e- owner of the ebo\I. prcpetty and waU ~lly perfotm 1M ..bon- work
o I .., Ire owner ot th. .bcrt. P'"o~rty Md I wiH confJ'oICt to htve- .all gf the ~ wetk pt'IfotllMCl by IiceftH(t eoMrKtOtl.
~
Ry
Au.horlZl<i A90~'
Owner', Stgnall"W.
NOTE: SHOW PLOT PLAN ON OTHER SIDE.
)
d. DAI :2?5i S'r(FOJl IOHlHG DEl'AUMEtlf USE OtlLY}
Curb to Prop bne c. "tV ,_ V"'~ ~ '1 Mllp Sheet No
, . r:I
Property line 10 Buddmg lIne/O ~ N .2:3.'- ",";>',
Side Yard Vhdlh .-:) c ,-I41./""r
Rellr Yard Dept{ c: k ..i.;) ,- .2 5 ~r< t
Depth Oll-stree~ LOCldmg
".2.,; Use Cl_hClll1on
-# -
!/trr'w/J{i' 0 ~ 2.. - V
(?'1>/''''7,,y~q' 7'...._ U'7' hs) -
~\
~!t!ln~ !?~'w~!n ElulldlO~s ~/ S ; "'Go'\ IV
Intended use of new c:onstrucl1on r", I .; ,.. I,t., I
or alterlll10n ,;, /} 1 If /; ",,1'1 r(""r. 1'1 - /- /i' N r
,~
O~G~S
A ~.'- ,J!E.1
1?C:"1IJ~
9.....~
,8'" 2.0
6"'&:1.
I~e'
\)too'f'
,.
on 0
H-':
AS" t- 2-C I +- 2.%-' -t q 006'
,
p,q/1.C~ A'"
- !
---
- PA~C!~~ · jl "
'z'u ~,.
(r.J'"
€1(1'S'7
{....o~
"'''~N/ICh
fS'
1 ~,(rsr 111
(}~C~"'. t I
I
I
t8,," +-:t:#I'
:
.1"'+ IS I
..
-
L/c=WCY
Sr
--
s'
-r
\
'l
~'
t
-f5'J
jfs-J
~
tAv
~.J~
~
~
I
.,~
3f~-
z
1
.-
'- "'-
-~'~
-.J_
O'Jij"ry
..
AITACHMENT H
DO:'}:\)
..... ...- :;.--~
-.....---......... - - -
.....~ ~~
",-:t~ "'.
l1l~t liI:~
;....... 't..
~~...... ;:,;li!
~~~~ ~"
~ ...~~ ~~
........ "'~
I' ~~
~
~
.. '<
~ ~
'" ~
~ ~~
~ -
o -
~ <
~ c
w _
~
~ ~
~ c
>
c
<-
c
C";
~
~
NI
"i
L!1 ~
C01 ~
o ..;.
z 0
lID
r ~
~
~I
C\J
l()
o
CO
co
or;
Z 0;
r III
U~
<{
((
t-
o
l\l
""
<0
o
(\j
.tl
.tl
r--
~
,.,
./\
~
~
-0(
~ 1-~[1
---, I
\l \ > i
-- -\
"\.I ~
"'" l~
----;- z
"
o 0
o rD
.... ~
1:;
::
2
O'}Q!l
ATTACHMENT I
O^"..,
iJ 1) 1 s..,.
~~~lll C.w.COOK C~:corporaced; E.C.19U
"'\."'1l.
.1l" '\." !.,.ntlSurveying. CIvllEngineering. Entitlements. Publl.cAffairs
.1l"'\."
_1l'" " " "Quality and Expenence on Your Stde'/
June 26, 1992
CITY OJ: ,A W:" UOl!'lC A
I w/'""it"" ~=- ~ ~ k.
CJT~ Pl H;l:" -_ '- "~r.1C::
Santa Monica City Council
1685 Main Street
P.O. Box 2200
Santa Monica, CA 90407-2200
"92 J.fi 29 ejl .r~ J
REGARDING: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION APPEAL
VESTING TENTATIVE PAIlCEL MAP NO. 21159 AND VARIANCE NO. 92...013
COUNCIL HEARING DATE: JULY 14, 1992
Honorable Council Members,
At the time we filed the above referenced appeal, all of our research and documentation
was not in place. I would like to add the fOllowing documents for your consideration.
The main reason your Planning Department staff recommended against this division is
because, they say, the "'orientation" of the proposed lots would not be "similar" to the
development pattern in the area. We disagree with that statement.
In addition to the previously submitted (acts and information, one of the key elements for
your consideration is the precedent set at the other end of the subject block on 21st
Street. At 3221 and 3233 21st Street, there are two houses that face 21st Street very
much the same way as is proposed for the subject parcel on 23rd Street. The original
house was built in the 19405, According to its address and physical location, it has
always faced 21st Street. In 1988, the City issued a building permit for a new single
family house on the northwesterly portion of the same lots that the original house was
built on.
For your edification. I am providing a current copy of the Tax Assessor's Map which shows
the two parcels facing 21st street. I am also enclosing copies of the various building
permits for these two houses.
With the enclosed and the previously submitted documents, we have clearly demonstrated
that the proposed lot pattern is consistent with previous City actions throughout the area
and that our appeal should be sranted.
y submitted.
cc: The Planning Department, Attn: Susan White
Mr. Mohammed Davari
Enclosure
ph/14/140005
wests1de ~.1183S West Olympic Boulevard, suite 37S
LO. Angeles, California 9006.t.-5004 PAX 310/3u.8049
Tel 310/311-8222 or 818/78S.S1,,1
OOO!3
...ili ~ ~
Il..~ '" ~
~:.i~~ ~'"
~~...'" <:>~
~:!..~ ~~
,~... _K
.~;;,:~~
I...... ~~
~i
""
..,
J1-.V:
.oc( '1.1..:'
"'~-'
~-~~
._ --:z:
'" ""
o -
...,."
~ <;>
'" ""'
... ,-
'" ~"-
... <;>
,..
....
'"
::>
<;>
...,
~
N
0 001
~ 0 fC
.... 0
N
~
~ Il\
Il\
,...
~ ./\ 000.1 {f :::
'"
- co t
".' I ~
~ -r ... 't 1:;
I ""
~ Q 0 "-
o W DC
UCO 0
...
(\)1
-q-
L()0l
1\I
co I r!.
N
01
Z ~
I(()
}-- .
u ~
<{
g:1
(\j
r.()
0
co
co
0 ~
Z I
01
r- lO
u ~
<( n:
I-
--.. -- --;;.
1'4... I
ItICIJPTS
C/37.2.
~--$"~I'Q
2t2..2L -
D-.
c:-.
f-~
.J~
p.r:
'-s
N6. A
PR!N~AlS mEnullanOK:
Ai C'Nner s Name' ._... /f.!!.L~_../1 h~t.!t2L ~." . . __ ______
Acdress . -..F .2..li uL'4'&t2.!L..t' _.d..-eu . _ .t':.Ztfld, zA' ~__..
3] ~.Jnm:c:or s Name' _ .L:'_'!(..&.a:LL__ ___ __ _ ....._
Adaress. _ __ _ __ __ _.___. _ ____ __ _..
.:: Arc..'utee, E."1Qin_r: (1_ "-':.6.i.€.4..-_______ _
Tel .fI$.2:-'i..::.7i'L
Tel __. __ _____
r.l. ., .___.._._. _
AC::c::'lIss.
I'.. N "'",
,/ y C} Len6r.q Aqency 't'..!-'-U.':'"_... _.... . __. _ _ _ __ _ .. _ 1'el: _.._ .__
; '- Acid:-ellll ___ .._.._. _'__ _ _ _ __'_'__'__ ______.__._ ._ _._ ._'__'
}
CDlmlCArIONS & CECLAllAnOHS;
.-\) O'#N~ DtC'...ARA roON
(;((,
o1L
\)j
~
--
oJ
[ nereby df1r:n the:: [ c::::1 eDmpt from the conlra::ter:l u.anse law bec::w.
_ i W"Ill do cl! werle personally er t.".ru wc:qe employ",. c:::nci \hIS str'.lCtUte ..s not Il1tft'.c.c ~cr scie
_ r '.nIl ~nlr:::d Wlth licensed contr:::::tcr, 10 constNd th1s proled
51<;ni::lUre -<. . __ __ _ ____..___ _.__._ . _.__ _ _._ . :;):le . __
2) UCENSm CONTRACTORS DECU\RA nON
! her.by =fi1rn1 thCl I hold an active Ucenu under the CallfClm1a Busmess 6 ?tc:essloM ::cde
weer-lie Clcss _ __._ _ _.____ No _________._ u._ . __ City Bus We No
SIc;natUre' ___ __ ___ __ _.____ _'n _ ____ . _ _ __ Dcte
o WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION INSUR&'lCE DECI..ARATION & VERIFICA!lON CF INfORMAT:ON
[ ~ereby cf!trm thct W crker s ComptlnscUQn b::lIUrcnee 1S In effect fer all work: cuthcm:ed. by th1.s ;:.r.:::t ~c!
p~:c[ cf tnSUlmIce ec:veraqe IS on W. wUh Cay
[ cerl1.4y that [ have r~w.d. th1S Cl:lP11Cat1cn end that the crbcve ulformcmcn IS ectnC"~ I ~ee :c ==m~iv
W'lth ell ~ty ordmances and state lews requlcnnq bwldmq C'CInstn.lc:non end hereQY c:uthcr-.ze en1:"V t.:~:::"1 :.~e
cesc:-:Ced property tor ~on ~Ut;:lOlles
5u;TlctW'e
OtfCX STATUS
Cate
Own... ~ Pr.ttClpl.
A..mo..zecl "Q.'"
%O"'ING US! ON1. T
~/
~. /...
Macl Sheer "'2"?- OL NOla
U.. 0- "'2, PL.lIL 1JJ' \. t;.l~k. C:::)u'l
'I ' 11 R 1~~ I 'to L..~ h+ Col\JN\&;7 l(\ .((orJyot'/
0...... nor -\b t;x~ ?;,I \1'\ n~~Vtt""
p~~ :.iPV'l1 , _ 1.-- 0;;. ftol ~ ~ ~ c.fX'k~- d'~
By' \~~ f~r~hl88-{h'~oyprwA.\.
'!'ores
Ne9- o.c
....00 d
F1re
Cen
Svs.
oae:
. -
,1
>fCOMOlNAIlUN'"
ADDRESS:
_ Dwlg
"'4U~~~.~ ~ft.~w.U~~
w-
CLASS
NAME/DBA/TEL
Comm _ Pool/Spa
date:
$
other
General (B-1)
Tel:
Electrical (C-10)
Tel:
Plumbing (C-36)--
Tel:
Mechanical (C-20)
Tel:
. Fire (C-16) Specialty (C-61)
Tel:
I STATE LIC I CITY LIC
I
. I
I
I
" l
--...-- ..------
;1/ _ - /" S 7"-
'7C/ :J ~ - ---, -- - --- - ---
-----.,- -
~
.
)~-~ ~--_.
i
I
)
J
1
~
I
~..- ---- ....------
<! ~..()- ~
r
-~
I
;
"j::
-- ~.....--
. --...
I
, ~ ---=--
" .
, -
~
^
...,..
~
1
~
~
~
,
i
i
l
"
0(').,.. · ...
U I) :~}
Far DepL U. 0Dly
7-.Q2~'7/2 :.:.
No -b2.....-...-..-~ OcNp t!u. ~-.... M_" rm.. om IaIU:
n_ / - :l A_/, /' ~p NOTE THIS IS KOT A JUlLDDIG PERMIT. J)() KOT ITAft WOU:
""'[.._~ I?f ~.~~ ~ JEPOJlE I'UJIS ABE AmOVED. AIm PEIIIar IS lIlou......
~ - ,
l. F_ I .9 0 0 - ~ Locanon Address.. U..Jr~ ._ __ _2'-:: :-_ ~ __ _ __ _ _
Lot1U:JL~:BIoeL_ __ Tr~O....s.-...2--- ____ _ __ ___ __.slm of lclt _ ____ _ oX. - -- -_ __
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
>>\Ju.DJNG DEPJUlTMENT. CITY OF SAN1'A MONICA
Lst EDstmg Bwldmgs On Lot end UM_ __. ___ _ _ ____
Will II be nec:nHrY to request pen."-<'WJ to remove trees from padway to matoll dnveway (Yes..._) (No_)
NaNN of Work.
JteJNJr
o
~
Descnption
tJt'~7-- -C? ..&~?.-4____~4.0-
~
~?
C.....II'vClian 0
EnlUV.lDe"t 0
eon.._
Alt.ra!tOl1 0 . _
Speclbc Use of B"'I.-I..,g____ f~~~ ':CL~ _ _ ___ _ ___-No of Roo!l1S _ __ _ No of F..mil.'lS... . __ _ __
\btenCll Extenor WI!JJh.~ ~~__ fIrSt Floor JolSts.- _ _ _-X. _______Second Floor JoISts __'"'
Number of Stone$ _ __ _ _ _ _. ___ __ . ..He1ght,!P Highest Pomt__._ ___.Roof Maten&l. . _.
Sue WIdth. _ _ __ _ It . by Lenglh.. __ _._ __ _ _ _ ___ n nfl., Total Floor Area
1 ~udlng P!umlmlg. Ge. n~, 1 - ., ~t!!f' ~. ~
V AWA TION OF PROPOSED BLDG s......... Ceapcoh, ~ n _ . L _ _ =- ___
If f P~g. FllIishl~g all Labor. .tc. ) I
Owner L? k_'C c_ ----Ii.-. ~};:~: . _.' Address. _ ____ .__ "._ . _ _ _ _
OJ /./ - 7h ~ . r State ucense No -'~_ 3_ i 1..2 ~
COntractor..,t...;..z::7- . - __c.!:2:k --L -- -/ -~- - ~~_... - -- -- i Q -? /~
. / C CIty l.1cense No - _L'?_ - "7 --
Address 1~.J C _ ~_.!~ : y?::. '!! ,) _ _ _. : _ _3!/"- ._Phone No. =j.i~_1' {2:(,. _ _
A.rdutect. _ ___ _ _ _ _.' _ __ ____ __ _ _ .Slate Lcense No__ _ _
sqtt
. ._(J.J
~
u.,
'W
Address _ _ _ ___ __ ____ _ _. _ .. _________Phone No.. _ ___. _ _ _ _ ____
NOTE. Th" SlT&nUng 01 .. BuIlding Permll cioft nol !IT'"I\1 any -.ghl Ot' prl'l'lIeg" to n I Erect ""y bUIlding omdl.... 11ruc:ture
or ony porUo" Ibere,,1 upon omy .u..!. &11.." Ot' olherpublic plaCll or portion tbereol or (2) U.. eny bwlding and/or
sl-ucture or omy port..." llMreol for -.ny JlUIiIOe5!tha b 01' m..y be prohlbiled by orclin4nCll oj Ih. CIty 01 Sana Monica.
Th. 9'anting 01 .. Bullclmg Pe=il cloes =1 &.IleeI r ~elucbCll any c1.u.. of I1tle to or right oj pceHUion In, !be prop-
e'!)' clescnbecl m suc:b Permit
f\
I h/lve re<l.d the above applIcatIon and know the contents thereof, the same IS true and cmrect I further state
that I am f/Ul1war WIth the laws govemmg buildmg WIthin the aty of S.snta Moruca and State 01 Califorma. 4nd
/l.'llendments thereto, that the above bwlchng and/or stl'.;cture will be bwll In confor.mty therewrth. and that legal
prope-ty !mes have been estabhshed
I the owner, cert1fy tho.t olIlabor employed on thIS work will be coveted dunng ceu'se of eonstrucl1on by work-
ltl/ln s compensabon msurance CIS reqwred by the St"te of Cahlonua
_/ fi ~
~..(~-.::'\,..-C---_._---, -.
Slgn"tUre of Owner or Agent
I - 1.' _- /
. -. --- .........
Dille
NOTE: SHOW PLOT PLAN ON OTHER SIDE.
1 I
, --6.: pb to Prop 1me
P""perl', Llrle to Buddmg Ltne
Slae Yard Wurth
Re"-r Y "rd Depth
Deo:"! OU-street Loachng
D's'/Ince between Buddmgs
(FOJl ZOJnKG IlE:PJUlJ14EIIT USE ONLY)
Map Sheet No
Use Cl4SSlbcabon
Intended IDe of n_ ccnstrucbon
or oIIlterlltSon.___ _ __
- . C1.1"'Ie' ,.....,.,_.......1 ,..,.,n n.... A"""""""v"";
']
000
...,
. f
Fer DepL '0.. 0D)y
;2 nr.:zen.
...c~-"" ~~ 7t- -----
: :- _. _?"~ ).. ~=~_ Occup Group
i /
r.. '_1.l?, ? ,(-._
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
iluUJ:I!NC DEPAB1MENT. cnT OF SANTA MONICA
TIua AppIlca" x...t Ie rw... Out Ia ru
NOlE TKIS IS Kot J. IWJlDIG rEBMl"I' no Not SU.IT WOll
lIJ(A11U.\a ... UftCI"m\ \"C1 1aMft " "''1m)
:!J233 2/ SV S""-
l.oc:anon. AddreIa.:__ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ __ ____
",,, g. - t "', ""
Lol!.!"l: _Blcd..__ Tr~___~g._ _._._.. _____ .__ ___ _SI%lI of loL_ /~-Jb.x /.7C#~'
ust ExLstlrlg Bu1lchngs On Lot onc:I. Use_ ~"1' e -=-___ ~ _.&"Y'!:&-: ti?."""LL4t __ ./ ant:. ~!"'. ./ "" H? tI'
'vI:: H be .eceuary to req1.lftl pe......,->""t 10 reP10Ye 11_ lro.m parkwAY lD blcall driveWilY <Yfi ) (No. "I}
Type of Construc:t1cn.
T1JM 1-1""". R..wuft 0 T1JM 2--HM.". T1mbc 0 TlP- 3-OrdIn..,. MuON'}' CJ T)'pe 4-M...I rr..... CJ Tnl- $-Woocl TUIII. S'
. NOlur8 of Wort. 6,4,.. < EpJT LA''';' &...n
Con.IN~'on III Enl~RI. AI........ 0 Con"._ 0 R.P4lr 0 DescrmtJ.on~7_,. '-1~ _- . - ~ . -
I ~ ~ ~.en:. CdCHr.e#
Specthe Use 01 Building. ~~.tt: _.li..M*~(:~;z.~_J1.0. of RoomL._L__ No of F..mlhq __C!.tl.e. .
~.{iltenill Exterior Walls ~c! ~ _ ___ _..First Floor JolSIS _ Z__ .%._ ,,_ _ Second Floor rOl5ts := ~ ___
~lumber 01 Slonn _1iJ~ ~ _ . .. _.___ _ _ ..Helght to H1ghest PomL 1!i!_~_1iool Miltenal. tW~ 5l~t
Sue Wldfr. _ ..30. !:4_~_1t., by l.eug\h._3~! ~/~__ __...It.; Toto!. Floot Area?~ . 8q h
{ lndud1IIg P1Wl1blng, G.u f!tlblg, 1 a Ad
v ALVA nON OF PROPOSED BLDG Sew.I'II, ~ .Electr1D4l, r I. ._ /. ~ _ <. ~
~ /' p PUl'l\lng, FlniW!\Q. ..n Labot:. .1<:. , s;t
Jw-.er ,1 ~~~7_ ___/'t:.qqp/:t.:_ _ . _Addrea-~_4-.2_" 2::( _ -?~
W;,$; G -h- ~ X r Stdte Ucenae No_. .t ~ (~:J21:1-
:Cr- tractor L.?';,' . -~ -=!. ;;;-- -. _h - .",.~_.._. - .... --- --- -- - - i ~ / c?
Clty l.1cense No _ . v.__'P . __. _
;~~-ess /7" ~if ...s; Bdff7.er.~d . 4~ .Phone No c!/?- / 7.2.: ~ 5'
Ar:::Lulect defn e. _ __ .__... _ .. _ . _ . _ _ . .-Slate l.1cense No
~d:i"'e'SS
____.___Phone No _
~;o,!'; Th. gr.nllng 01 . BuUdu-g Pamdl dOH no! gr.nl ....'1 right or prinlog. lo (I) !:Net any bw:cl1ng ""d/or .Inlc:lur.
er ." y p<:lIion t",,,ol. upon ...y ,w.1.. alley. or oUl.t public ple", or portion tb.....,1. or (1) U.. lUly building and/or
.'-~ :'u,. 0' any pen",,, \b.o...,{ lot flnY ~. thelis -:or mey be >>r<>I\~lod. by ordlnlUl'" Glth. '::11y 01 Santa Monic..
-no .......l\ng 01 11 BI1.ldmg P_il doa. not &Jloct or pr')udico "''1 claim 01 tlu. 10 or tlghl 01 pa...son 1ft. tho prop-
.roy dltScnbd In .uch hrmll I
I have ~ the above apphco.t1on azld moAe contents thereof. the MmB is true c.nd eol'l'8Ct I fur.her state
"~e' I dIn lallllhar with the IAW1I govemmg bwldmg Wlthm the Qty of SIIllI4 MOruCll and Stale of CelUomla, and
a.,-nendme"lts therelo. mo.l the above bwldmg and/or s!n.lcture will be built m conlornulY therew:tth. and thaI lega!
orcpe"tv !:"les have been estabhshed
I .;,.. owner, ceriLly thill Illl labor employed on thIS work wt.lI be covered dunng cou.se 01 c:ons:lUCUon by worl:.-
"m'~~",~~~_Uy~'b1~ ~ ~V;j-.J
....._ o~ 'goo, Do..
NOTE: SHOW PLOT PLAN ON OTHER SIDE.
L
_'0 'c p.O:: Lme
/" r
CP'OB ZORING DEPAJlTMEM1' VIE ORtY)
Mdp Sheet No ;:2. ,
Use CI.uswcellon
>J2- r
~-.- L.lne to BulldJ.nq Lme .1:J~'
- ie ....a:d W:cfth
F'
:trr
J Intended UN of new ccmstruchon , ~
oro!lte..... - - ~.~ .
! By ~'.>?/~~.Date ~t"jJ"j-1
;:;>;\r Y.:\rj Depth
:'eol~ OH-s:reet Loa.dJ.n9'
SlSla-ce be'ween Bmldlngs / iJ I
:-:;1' oi~ns C~ed~ed and Use Approved
""
\
QfJ:).~
'.
"
~
,1
/'
I
/7~c~ /
....
Q
~
b.:
'-1
_.-
" ,-.fry
~
~)'/:sr -CMf P-=i/ ... .~
;:,.,..~?#.~ Y . ~
Dwe/tll'j ~
I\t
"
~
..,.
'"
6r - /// - //;!
;2 / ST S>>-('~-C
,
z.r f~T6kK
7..d1f7 8d~Z
,
~M
:2J~ ""/1M I';' ~u.
'3' spa--...
OOQ~1
!/ For D.pt. U.. Qa1y
APPLICATION FOR IUILDING PERMIT
BtJILDING DEPAllTMENT. CIn' OF SJUfTA MONICA
N"
--' fos- 3 .
..r
De,.
~ - 3- 'f. ~
" S-f_ _
NOTE
n.a. ~ Mal .. nu.d Old III fall:
11lIS IS Jl'01' A IllIlDDfG PIIJIIl'. DO IfOT STJUI'!' WOB
IUORE P1JIlfS AJIE .vPB0VED. ARtI PE8MlT II IIIIllED.
~tJll-/l~ Block.
Tf<1d 10S.)..
~ , "t "Bt S--.."7..-.. M~
Si.1:e of l.otS2'J. ( z-l'l6.,"'(
F.... $
I
LOCATION AddNss ~ J.. 3 ~ -
(FOR DEPAUIWft' DIE OJItTl
Dilltance-Curb to Property LIne
t-,.1'1l'llmum Distance-Property UnIt to B1c\q. LIDe (
Map Sheet No.
~
-'
MinUnum Side Yard W1d1h.
MtnJmum Rear Yard Depth
Minimum Distance between BuiJdlnqs
Is 1h_ any exl.st1no bulldirnl on lot?
Type o~Ccnstrucl1on:{ :: ~~
'l'ype o&--M.tal F.....,..
'type S-Waod FfQDlB
:)c:;upaJ'::y Use of Buildinq 5 u"'" .Po.....c. 'h. i, ...<%:
. (
(
,
Y. 0 No 0
u. a...-1Bc:at1on. -
) fire Zone No.
}
How Uaed1
/
Nature of WCl'k.
{ ~C1
, ~ l!t.
A.1tar<JtIcp Cl
I,. Cm...m- (]
&\ICIIl' 0
No of Families
I
No of Rooms
'.A:c:tenc:' Exl<i!nor Walls W D (;) d
Fttsl Floor Joists
x
Second ~loor Joists
x
'lu:nber d Stones
I
Heiqhl to H!qhest Point q' Roof Mc:ctertal Um1(JO . I II tt1
SIZe Widfh
s
fl. by lRn01h
/I
fl, Total Floor Area
}:s fib U -r. / &Jd '-."
!
.3:1..~~~ ~l~
s~-
sq. ft.
"lA:'"'.1A:ION OFPROPOSEDBLDG {~~:: ~s.=.
l'<datlnq )',ft,.;....... <ill Lc.bco.. _0:-
o"..-:-:er j-. L f3 E r! T L ' ~ E.A.u.. G H Addr_
$i.
Col"trOC:or
()-( ~v
{ Slal0 Ucensa No.
Oty L1c:ense No
Phone No : ...:..;- S h
..~..cd!ess
~rn1ec1
Stale License No
A.cidress
Phone No.
r'
. nc:.
NOI:: n.. Qtm11iDq of tl lh"l<lh,,:! Pennil doN "'" -' =Y Mill Ill' pn...n.q. to Ul Erect Qll.y
b\illdIJIq =dllll' -... Ill' any portion 1"-1, upon aD}' _I, csll.y, cor ollM. pub]!" ~ <<
l><>I'lIao ~ ... W 11_ cmy buUdlrIq <md/<tr .~ ... aI1y portion 0.-1. lor anv I""'f'C8
tllCIlo, or may ~ p-Io,....'-;j by "...,____ 01 lbe C1ry 01 Santa NoaIca.
..... ~ alII '""~\"') PenllI\ cle.s tIOl <lit..,. or prwJUdD any cialm oI111~'O or MhI
of _.._ ~ pn..ptIny a.-tboKI In suoh !'emlll
n .
read ~e ~11c:a11on and know lhe conte1\1s thereof, the 3Clme 1:1 true and c:onect. I furIher stale
_=dicxr wllh the laws 'iovemm'i build1n9 wllhm the City of Santa Monlca and Stale of Cal1forma, and
:s !hetela\ and that llw above bu1ldinQ and/or structure will be built In confor~ty therewir.h
~ ,.dll /a1-~. I ~J /'-R_ _ ~--"L7
" U ~,')/~/ S.9ned (.AJ ~..~ cI.., '~7'~PPUeant
Jl'0TE> IF NO l'tA!I& AJlE I'II.I:D. POW tot' JUa) auu.olJl'G 5ITt. n..ur JUID W1JII)OW -17!" ON 0fHtR II!DI.
:::.ot ! c:-
-::"'"'I:.er:.~~6-
/~
/;-; --
,r
0....."::' '1
L'.J .-' "
..\.
"-
\
-~
.....-
~
--=~ ...t
../
t~-..-;. .
U' - _. --, .
t,. I - .
~. .
'" '
--"j
;'
.-,
~
"
- ~
yu'
OJ I _
(.
...i
I
,
I
')
l~
I ~
~
.!.
}
I
-J.
l.
j
!:
"'-- ...--
'--
.-~- '"
f
i
,i
'.)
I
'tV
\/
/
/
I,' -, "
, -"
:.
"
.. ~ ;-
O-d {J:- 1-
j-r:
'-r
~.... '\ C~~
- f'l
q0~~-~1J .~~.
,.(;
~-t-
.-
~I
.~
<.<
..--="
" ""
-:.,...;;..
~
L~" ~_
--
- - =-!
-~_ -t....r-....
-:.f--r~~~
:~~ l- _~-rt~';:
" ~~~-: j:=:L;. ~:~
..,. .-. "'-.. .....~....
..... - -
"'-
-- ~~ ...
~~:::~~.
_~~_o__
~f .;~/~~-, - -
~~':'~',
_..........::L -
_ ?-S~~~ ___;-~
..;;!--."":- ...-
~ -
, ;."';-
..
~..------- - - ~
~ ..... -..-"'- --...
~----
-'J'" ~ =-
oar. J~ -_'P'- ...::t-...
--- "",-.---'i'" -...'2'..
-~ ~:~:
~-
-~~
/
F or Dept. Use Qa)y
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT
BUILDING DEPARTMENT. CITY OF SANTA 1.toNlCA
"'i: .?c. c
Co. ( ,
Do; 9 . ]9 ,
Ire. -D
\5 '
NOTE
nw. A~ M_ .. nn.4 0tIl. hi b.k
THIS IS NOT A JUlIJ)!NQ PEI\MIT DO NOT STAaT WOU:
BUORE PLANS ARE APPROVED AIm PEIIMlT ]S ISSUED
UJCA TION Address
Lot III Block
11'2.
'7);J
Tract .fOSl.
.,f 0 C ."
aOR tlE1'AllTMEIfT USE ONLYI
u:star.ce-Curb to Property Li.."'I9 ()
Minimum D1StanC_PrOperty l.in& \0 Bld<; Lin9 { ].~'} Map Shfilet No
MInimum Side Yard Width ( If' Use ClaslllIication
Mtnlmum Rear Yard Depth ( 10' Fire Zone NQ
MUllmll{Il Dlstar:ce between Bu:1~qs (__ ~
15 there any eXlstinq bulldinq on lot? Yes 0 No Of How Used?
1/~
S;;:e of Lot
~t
,J"()'
~" .~
17 J-'
11J-.
I<Y
I
Tr.;-e of Construction)
i
,...
)= ~~c:-::<, ''':se of BU'<c'lrg I:H"" (,.l,.t'fVf:,.
FVl.1t1"J e
":: =- = ::x'<!nor VlaPs ~~ First Floor jOists '). x
~rdel?O
1 Heigh: to Highest Poinl
Typoo 4--M8IQI f"rc1m8
Type s-wood FreI"'"
Nature of Work. \
I
GoIlrINcIIon )(
~D
A!Ia_ 0
eor.....ffioa 0
1MP<Dt 0
Type I-Fire lleola11",.
Type 2-HeoYy Timber
T)'l>8 3-Ordlcory Mosoruy
No of Feoms
4
No of razmhes
I
: S atlas
G
/6
Second r'oor JOISts
x
rp __
....... ....."::'
Roof Metena! ~
~6.~rs
sqft.
S'z- "1:::":.- 3 a y.- f' by Lenqth "3 Y V ft Total Floor kea 11?,rC;
, , :; - '""]'0; ''"'''" o"Op"c:""", BLe'"" j j""l"djnQ" ~WI'';'lnq Ga. F11~oq. } $ -'1 Lf :: t) ,. \)
- -... - .....J.. v.. .. ~ _.....;...v I.,,;r "- Sew.grs .....esspoc].s Electrical
~ Pml'~n;; =~:".inq. all Labor .\t:
t1l fIJ en, r I ~ W ntv 1) A- f} Ell l/ Ii- H Address 3 2 3 3 - 2 I ,-/. f 11/v t ~
j Stat~ License No q f / tj If
t City wcense No / t b..s-
It d, It flJ..t..{bV,:;...n N H f:. Cf q ~ I
:>p Pnone 0 I
!1c;v,'e 11
VAN~noVJ.f J ff\i{,
..."c.:::: -ess
...., '1.. 31
SENRLJ)1/
~.-CC'" ,."ec~
S'ate License No
.:. de -es~
Phcne No
"
'. NOr!: T1.8 Qf'QtI:inQ oJ Q: !hJ.l~ciiuql Pard' d~. "'lor qn:r.,t ~ny rlqhl Qr" ptivUeqs- 10 HJ Erect anY
\ b1:Uc.l--""u; Gtld/cr SU'Wl'n.a..R or an~l por!lOD tWfecf UPO" any :ti~t cilley. or othar fnJhllc ~ace or
\,JJ porUor lhe...of ~- [2J U.. gny bulldinQ" <mcIi or '-~"'8 Qf CIly pg<tlgn thweof !g. c::-y P'-"P"f8
~ 1>at i. or mgy be pro.'Ub!t.d by crd1nonoe of the City o' Sen,,, MonLO:l
. T'O QrQ1l11", cl Q BWldlnq Penm, 4<>e" tll>l c1Ilecl or P18)udlao any claim 0' 1i,18 10 or rl\lO'
rU ~I _..."" In :he ptt.p8"y deoortbed i'1 .",,!, Petmit
c::: 'a r~d \.l.,.e ~,=,ve C1P~atJ.on and know \he contenu !bared the 6=e 15 true <~-::l cc"'ecj t iur'.her slate
:; :;:- :C:-':!Lar WIth t:'9 laws govemi..~.. bwldinq wlthm the City d 5=to Moruce: c: -c: Stale of Cch!omia and
- '0-01-,"-'5 ~:..er"to ar:d that me above bUlldinq andior st:'..:cture will be bUllt In confcrrr'ty there....r'ith
'oJ ~ - yw. i \ J ~\A.(...
Signed <? . 'J (;tA... /"'~vr' 1~'APph=t
Nom IT NO PLANS ARE fII.EtI. SHOW lOT .um BtJltllUlC SITE PtAN .um WUlDOW SIZES ON 0THE3 SlIlE.
n \0 'J"
Q./"'\V
-;/ -~.~
O I) IV' .,
oJ _ .~
ATTACHfvlENT J
00C:'"1
TE N T A TI VE
TENTATIVE PARCEL
M^P
MAP
NO.
21159
.
IN THE CiTY 0= SA:-..JTA MONICA
COU~Tv OF LOS ANGELES
ST ATE OF CA:"'IFORNIA
PROPOSE:! 2' lO'" S1N;A,! t:J1W1l'" SUS[)t~:SIQf.1
12 iE:CIS ~G 6fOl1SES)
S"'1IEE' <OOAESS 3222 23.~ SlIl[[l
FOR SUBDiVISION PURPOSES
BEING A
LOT ~ 4.0,
..~ 8
SUBDivrSiON OF
TRACT NO 8542
, 04-27 /29
t
-r!
"
",<'
"
VICINITY MAP
(110 ~
i
;1
I,
ii
'I
I'
I'
:1
.J i)(SiG..,.A""[O. 'SI"'GlE F'''''''!t.Y ItESlOE:HTIo\l.. ON -:HE C"TY OF s..N.....' YONtC....
C[NEJlAL Pl..Ah (u..X1YUllI 1 Ou a/P'A.RCEL)
... ARE....-Jl-SJ", sa n 127 AC) NET l""fHOVT S1JlEH ()R A:l....En
-2nl1 so I'T (:59 ~t:} CPross ("'Ia.IJ[JING. STII[ET .-.ND ALlE")
5 [xIST1NC lONE IS .-1 "'0 ("'''PoIi:[ CI1.NG[ P'qQPOSEJ
6 NO SIGlIF-CA.N'I" I-IERHAGE o~ TREtS "'0 OAK TR'[ES
ALL PUBuC ur-une.s; IN "'''''0 CONNt.CT!D
8 LOCATED CN
s......u ...QNIC.-. W'-P NO 23
"'0..<5 eRO"'E~ S ClIIOE <9 GRID D2
9 ..!...\. EItSnhC 5-TlPUClUIirE5 AND fREES ARE TO REWA.1N
~o THE 'Sr"1'f IS CENE~"'U 'f n.. T
11 Cl'ARM'ING TO B( :z CO'WE'R'ED 'S"'''C[S PEA' LOT Af2'E-.s
12 lJotER! APPtA.fl'S TO M 1olO F'01{NnAll Y OANC{,'IiI'OUS't.OCA TEO ON J).IE SI"t'[
O~G
I
~!
j)
i~
I'
II
!
13 DEV6.oP"E'<T IS COOINE~TEO 10 ElnSllNC SE."t~ S"'STE" AND DR"NAce IS
CONDUCT[O to stMET .l.ND EXlS11NG STOR\tI 0fI'",,*,, S'YSTEu
,. COWPlY 11Im AU IIIEQI,JII'lr(W1ENTS ",OU lt4[ CITY OF" S"NT.. ..OMC. CENEFtAL
SER"'crS DE~AJITY(NT
OWNER/SUBOIY1DER
':5 ... VARliANC( IS 'SIlI\A.TA...EOIJ9.Y eElNC MClUESTED tOR MINm OE",AnON F1I'ON mt
COllE IlUl: TO EXISlING SllWCTIJR[ ~OCA nONS JoHD ~OT OEP1>l
..R ..OHA....AO SWIAT
IlIR "OH.AIoU.I.AO QAVAIlI
322Z 2JRO STREET
SANTA ItIONlCA C\ !IO.fCS
(2'J)516-JJ9ol
Reviewed By,
~"'9".'" ()"I._
....0...' _~. 4J-- DOI'~
.., Or ~ Dat.~
-~ 4~D.t.~
I ~~: :~6B ~.. :f9 9.. I}g:-E,~.;-... --:.:.=
.' I ~ ,....u. .an.ln -c:....nJ...llt.I ean,..npb...
el I ,'\.~. T...... Ue3Io..... D.,..,.. ........,." ........ S7!!I
..' ""... _.... tA _ T.L tt'n1I-- or '''1786-t,<,
~~",';:,~ t13/S12-_'
50_ l' - 20'
ERR
6/18/1991 i
FXl-91-1073-B :~
JoO Numb.. I.
ATTACHMENT K
Or.,,-~~
<J" .
'"
-~~ ..t
I'
.~"
"A
4 ~afi
't.\. ~
~1 .,. ~
.,
-
--
-\
lo.
'"~/
*';~:;
..... -/ ~~~
-j,
"
'~
\
\
\ '
~
t
j
~
4
'-J
J
~
\--
t{\
'f\
s J.
1 i
~~
%
.1
p-
. : t
- i\
1,1 I!
. ..
- ' I
: t I
- f
r
m
!
~:r
~ \\)
~~
I )_
Z \il
~ ~
t~
\l! \:
j 1
W{J
1-~
J ~
~~
.
.
,
.7
,
\.....
.1"\\1
1. m
:; N
.)I,.t-
2f1
1 j~ ~
- \-.- \I't
.,f- ~ \'\ 1
!~\ ~
C:\\j
~
(1 4. \~
~(~
\
~~
~~
~1
1?
,
~
~\ \U
Do t
\. · r:v. ~
~.y f:~ ~ ~
~ .4'1__ 1 "-
' I '-l~'-' ,~- ~ 1
1 rJf';~ -' 'r- ~
~. 'k,t~~... ". \--~
~Jr. ,.,. _
. · .....' " : J t \
:, .[0. - In ~
'1' . ..,'.<'5.: ~.. "
w,"~ ,,_4'1 4. 'I
r \U U1
r. ~
1 ~~
J.f.'i
~~
j
(11),,\-:-
~~
\J1S
~]:
1!f
~~
l \f\
-\
ti
~, .
N \J --
~ \J' ;::; : ~~
~ =-
<- .
~~
~~
~i~
~~ ~
~~~
~\j\~
~~~
N ~
~~.
w. z
~rr
~~
? t
\\\ 1-
\)~
l r ~
\i\\-
~J~
~ ~
ffiz
~I
~~
~ V
11\ ~
~\f\
1
m
4
-
7-1t JUL 1 4 1992
- ..
i
A,
~-
~~
r~
~~ ~
\I.-~\\
\ W. ~
4 ~
hY'\h
~ f-:\ -
~ m
i\ --<. \
~ ~
\~t'
"\~r
: ~ s
~'N u
\~~
~~~
)
--
~
~i Z
~(
~~
t~
\1'
N~
~~
D ~
~ g-
,-
-r
L
~
+-
\\\
r
(\\
~
C)
l
-
r--.... --- - _ .
<..... - -
1> ~
r , ~
r -
m -
~ ~~
-....-'
DATE
ITEM #
'1--8 t:IJlI
/+10. 2 II S1
FILED IN
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE