SR-402-002 (15)
.
.
I ~2 :16
C/ED:PB:DKW:WW:ww
PC/cccup46
Council Mtg: June 26, 1990
Ljo'Z--O()-Z-
Santa Monica, California
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: city staff
SUBJECT: city Council Reconsideration of Appeal of Conditional
Use Permit 89-046 and Tentative Tract Map 48039 for the
Development of a Five Unit, 9000 Square Foot, Three
Story Condominium Subdivision on a 7500 square Foot
Parcel Located in the R3 (Residential Medium Density
Multiple Family) District. Applicants: Law Firm of
Lawrence and Harding Representing Rose and Leo Chang.
Appellant: Syd Jurin Representing Residents and
Homeowners of 11th Street.
INTRODUCTION
This report recommends that the city Council deny the appeal and
uphold the Planning Commission approval of CUP 89-046 and TTM
48039 for the construction of a three story, five unit
condominium at 1253 11th Street.
On May 22, 1990, the city
Council voted unanimously to reconsider the previous denial of
the project.
BACKGROUND
On August 2, 1989, the Planning commission voted 6-0 to approve
the development of a three story, five unit, 9,000 square foot
condominium on the 7,500 square foot project site.
The site
presently contains two detached residential structures. (See
Exhibit A). On August 11, 1989, Syd Jurin representing residents
and homeowners of 11th Street, appealed the Commission action.
On November 14, 1989, the City council voted 4-3 to reverse the
Planning Commission's unanimous approval of the project, and to
- 1 -
JUL 0 3 1990
12-A
JUN 2 6 1990
.
.
..
deny the development of the five unit condominium project. (See
Exhibits B, C).
On April 10, 1990, the law firm of Lawrence and Harding,
representing the applicants Rose and Leo Chang submitted a letter
to the City Council contending the findings proposed by the City
Attorney for project denial were insufficient and requested the
Council to reconsider the project based upon it's merits. (See
Exhibit D). The Council continued the consideration of the
matter to May 22, 1990. On May 22, 1990, the Council voted to
reconsider its denial action for the project and to reconsider
the merits of the project.
ANALYSIS
The project, as approved by the Planning Commission, conforms to
the uniform height, setback and density standards established for
the R3 District. Under the R3 District development standards,
the site could be developed with six residential units, eight
foot side yard setbacks and a 3 story, 40 foot height limit. The
developer has proposed to construct five units, with 8-12 foot
side yard setbacks and a 3 story, 34 foot height limit and
parking for 13 vehicles.
The August 11, 1989, appeal letter states that the existing
buildings and six other properties located in the vicinity of the
project site were built in 1904 as part of the "original" City of
Santa Monica and should be preserved as an historic district. On
November 9, 1989, five days prior to the scheduled City Council
hearing, the Landmarks Commission determined that the structures
- 2 -
.
.
referred to in the appeal did not merit formal designation as an
historic district. The Landmarks Commission determined that the
structures when viewed both individually and collectively do not
qualify as outstanding landmarks.
The Landmarks Commission
determination is binding on the city for a period of five (5)
years pursuant to SMMC section 9608N.
Building and Safety Division records indicate many of the
structures referred to in the appeal have been altered and have
not retained the original design, materials, or workmanship.
Many of the altered structures do not meet the criteria
established for landmark designation (SMMC Section 9606) and
therefore may not contribute to a sense of historical continuity.
The project was deemed exempt from environmental review under the
City of Santa Monica Guidelines for Implementation of the
California Environmental Quality Act (Resolution No. 6694 (CCS)).
The criteria used by the city to exempt projects
from
environmental review is consistent with criteria established in
CEQA Section 15061, which provides:
The activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA
applies only to proj ects which have the potential for
causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it
can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility
that the activity in question may have a significant
effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to
CEQA.
The Planning Commission as the authorized decision-making body
determined there was no possibility that the residential housing
activity proposed could have a significant effect on the
environment. The Planning commission made the same determination
- 3 -
.
.
for several other condominium proj ects approved on August 2,
1989.
state Zoning Law provides that the council should consider a
challenge to an environmental exemption granted if substantial
credible evidence of environmental impacts of a particular
project is presented in the written appeal or during the appeal
hearing. There was no evidence presented as part of the written
appeal or during the November 14, 1989 city council hearing, and
therefore this project cannot be subjected to environmental
review under the California Environmental Quality ActA
The proposed 34 foot height and massing of the structure will
appear similar to many of the two story mUltiple family
structures located along Eleventh street. The proposed five unit
density is consistent with the density permitted for development
in the R2 (Low Density) District. Under the R2 low density
zoning standards, a two story building with a staircase
enclosure, skylights or rooftop decks could maintain an overall
34 foot height. Rather than develop this site with a 40 foot
high structure, the developer has proposed a low scale 34 foot
building height that is more sensitive to adjacent two story
structures.
Much of the discussion during the November 14, 1989 hearing
focused on whether the City could impose a two story height
restriction for the R3 zoned parcel. Planning staff indicated
during the hearing that the development of a two story, five unit
condominium on this site would result in similar traffic
- 4 -
.
.
circulation, noise and shadow projections and that the property
owners should not be singled out and thus unfairly restricted in
the development of this particular site. The development of a
three story, five unit condominium will not affect the public
heal th, cultural or aesthetic values and the property owners
should be allowed to develop the property under the uniform R3
development standards. The redevelopment of other R3 zoned
parcels on Eleventh street should also be subject to the three
storyj40 foot height limit.
The floor plans show minor revisions that include: 1) orienting
the unit entrances toward the south property to project a more
low scale neighborhood friendly building design and 2) relocating
a second level family room above the second floor to reduce
building mass at the second level. Landscaping plans
accompanying the site plans indicate landscaping in excess of the
code requirement.
The proposed five unit, three story condominium building is
compatible with the policies and objectives of the Zoning
Ordinance and General Plan, and will not result in environmental
impacts that require consideration under CEQA. The tentative
tract map conforms with the Subdivision Map Act.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACT
The recommendation presented in this report does not have any
budget or fiscal impact.
RECOMMENDATION
- 5 -
.
.
It is respectfully recommended that the Council in it's
reconsideration of the project, deny the appeal and uphold the
Planning commission's approval of CUP 89-046 and TTM 48039 based
upon the following findings and conditions:
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FINDINGS
1. The proposed subdivision, together with its prov~s~on for
its design and improvements, is consistent with applicable
general and specific plans as adopted by the City of Santa
Monica.
2. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of
development.
3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density
of development.
4. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements
will not cause substantial environmental damage or sub-
stantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their
habitat.
5. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvement
will not cause serious public health problems.
6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements
will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public
at large, for access through, or use of, property within
the proposed subdivision.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS
1. The proposed use is one conditionally permitted within the
Subject district and complies with all of the applicable
provisions of the tlcity of Santa Monica Comprehensive Land
Use and Zoning ordinance", in that the 34 foot height pro-
posed does not exceed the 40 foot height limit established
for the RJ District and in that the 8-12 foot side yard
setbacks exceed the minimum 8 foot side yard setback re-
quirement, and in that the 50% lot coverage complies with
the R3 maximum lot coverage amount and in that the 5 unit
density is less than the 6 unit density permitted by right
in the RJ District and in that the 13 parking spaces ac-
cessed from an adjacent 20 foot wide alley comply with
parking requirements established by the Zoning Ordinance.
2. The proposed use would not impair the integrity and
character of the district in which it is to be established
or located, in that the surrounding neighborhood is
characterized by a mixture of pre-1940 and post-1940 mul-
tiple family residential structures that conta~n similar
- 6 -
e
.
building heights. The location of entranceways, building
orientation, outdoor open space, patio areas and landscap-
ing will provide an attractive low scale neighborhood sen-
sitive development that wi 11 transitionally relate to both
pre-1940 and post-1940 structures. The additional set-
backs provided along side building walls will reduce the
potential for solar access loss for adjacent residential
units. The development of five units rather than six will
reduce the number of vehicles using the adjacent alley for
aces purposes and will reduce the potential for noise or
other environmental concerns. Further, the Landmarks Com-
mission and Planning Commission fully considered the need
to designate the particular development site and surround-
ing sites as historical landmarks and determined that the
specific site and surrounding collective sites do not
qualify for historical designationA There is no evidence
at this time to support designating the site or surround-
ing neighborhood as landmarks.
3. The subject parcel is physically suitable for the type of
land use being proposed, in that the site is located in a
developed urban residential area of the City. The topog-
raphy of the site can sustain the development proposed.
The existing use and proposed use of the site was residen-
tial and do not involve the use of materials or substances
that could affect the public health, safety or welfare.
The three story/ 34 foot height, 5 unit density, 50% lot
coverage and setbacks as specified on plans are consistent
with the regulations established for the R3 District. The
building style, articulation, window and door fenestra-
tion, modulation and location of open space and landscap-
ing areas are consistent with other developments located
along Eleventh Street and in the R3 District.
4. The proposed use is compatible with any of the land uses
presently on the subject parcel if the present land uses
are to remain, in that the existing owner occupied multi-
ple family units located on the site will be removed and
replaced with multiple family structures. The residential
character of the neighborhood will not be affected or al-
tered by the development of the five units. The long term
use of adj acent properties, ownership or permanancy of
tenants, safety and moral well-being of residents will not
be jeopardized by the condominium development.
5. The proposed use would be compatible with existing and
permissible land uses within the district and the general
area in which the proposed use is to be located, in that
the R3 District standards permit a three story building,
five unit density ratio and 50% parcel coverage. Proper-
ties within a 1000 foot radius of the site have applied
similar development standards. The building style, loca-
tion of entranceways, location and sizes of patios and
open space areas, landscaping, placement and configuration
of the building are sensitive to adjacent pre-l940 build-
ing uses.
- 7 -
.
.
6. There are adequate prov~s~ons for water, sanitation, and
public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed
use would not be detrimental to public health and safety,
in that the site is located in an urban area that is ser-
viced by public utility companies. All utilities are
available to the site. The five unit project will not
result in a significant increase in the demand for water,
sanitation and public utilities.
7. Public access to the proposed use will be adequate, in
that the location and size of the parking garage and park-
ing spaces have been approved by the Parking and Traffic
Engineer and comply with the Zoning Code standards. Park-
ing is accessed from the rear 20 foot wide alley and will
not require the removal of the streetscape along Eleventh
street and will not interfere with pedestrian or vehicle
movement along Eleventh Street. The parking garage will
be properly lighted and a guest parking space will be pro-
vided on site.
8. The physical location or placement of the use on the site
is compatible with and relates harmoniously to the sur-
rounding neighborhood, in that the 34 foot height, loca-
tion and orientation of unit entrances, location and sizes
of open space areas and level of building articulation and
modulation will provide an acceptable transition between
the proposed development and adjacent pre-1940 structures.
9.
The proposed
and pol icies
regulations
coverage and
use is consistent with the goals, objectives,
of the General Plan, in that the R3 zoning
permit the height, density, setback, lot
type of development proposed.
10. The proposed use would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare,
in that the style of development, building height, mass
and level of articulation will integrate with surrounding
residential development and will not result in visual,
audio or traffic related impacts. The use of adj acent
properties will not be negatively affected by the develop-
ment. The perceived low scale residential sense of
security and privacy will not be negatively affected by
the development. The sense of neighborhood cohesiveness
and compatibility will not be negatively affected by the
development. An exemption under the City of Santa Monica
Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environ-
mental Quality Act was previously granted for the project
based upon a determination that the project does not have
the potential to cause negative environmental impacts.
There is no evidence that suggests the project will cau-
senegative impacts and will require environmental review
under CEQA.
11. The proposed use conforms precisely to the applicable per-
formance standards contained in Subchapter 6, section 9050
and special conditions outlined in Subchapter 7, section
- 8 -
.
.
9055 of the City of Santa Monica Comprehensive Land Use
and Zoning Ordinance, in that a performance standards per-
mi t is not required for development of the units. The
number and location of units proposed do not conflict with
this section of the code.
12. The proposed use will not result in an overconcentration
of such uses in the immediate vicinity, in that the R3
development standards and General Plan Land Use, Circula-
tion and Housing Elements establish the parameters for
development of residential units in this neighborhood.
The five unit project is not discouraged by the Zoning
Code or key General Plan Elements. The proposed develop-
ment conforms to District specifications and is compatible
with surrounding development.
CONDITIONS
Plans
1. This approval is for those plans dated 3/1/901 a copy of
which shall be maintained in the files of the City Plan-
ning Division. Project development shall be consistent
with such plans, except as otherwise specified in these
conditions of approval.
2. The Plans shall comply with all other provisions of Chap-
ter 1, Article IX of the Municipal Code, (Zoning Or-
dinance) and all other pertinent ordinances and General
Plan policies of the City of Santa Monica.
3. Final parking lot layout and specifications shall be sub-
ject to the review and approval of the Parking and Traffic
Engineer.
4. Minor amendments to the plans shall be subject to approval
by the Director of Planning. A significant change in the
approved concept shall be subject to Planning Commission
Review. construction shall be in conformance with the
plans submitted or as modified by the Planning commission,
Architectural Review Board or Director of Planning.
Architectural Review Board
5. Prior to consideration of the project by the Architectural
Review Board, the applicant shall review disabled access
requirements with the Building and Safety Division and
make any necessary changes in the project design to
achieve compliance with such requirements. The Architec-
tural Review Board, in its review, shall pay particular
attention to the aesthetic, landscaping, and setback im-
pacts of any ramps or other features necessitated by ac-
cessibility requirements.
- 9 -
.
.
6. Plans for final design, landscaping, screening, trash en-
closures, and signage shall be subject to review and ap-
proval by the Architectural Review Board.
7. The Architectural Review Board, in its review, shall pay
particular attention to the project's pedestrian orienta-
tion and amenities; scale and articulation of design ele-
ments; exterior colors, textures and materials; window
treatment; glazing; and landscaping.
8. Construction period signage shall be subject to the
approval of the Architectural Review Board.
9. Landscaping plans shall comply with Subchapter 5B
(Landscaping Standards) of the zoning ordinance including
use of water-conserving landscaping materials, landscape
maintenance and other standards contained in the
Subchapter.
10. Refuse areas, storage areas and mechanical equipment shall
screened in accordance with SMMC Section 9040.13-9040.15.
Refuse areas shall be of a size adequate to meet on-site
need, including recycling. The Architectural Review Board
in its review shall pay particular attention to the
screening of such areas and equipment.
11. No gas or electric meters shall be located within the re-
quired front yard setback area. The Architectural Review
Board in its review shall pay particular attention to the
location and screening of such meters.
Fees
12. The city is contemplating the adoption of a Transportation
Management Plan which is intended to mitigate traffic and
air quality impacts resulting from both new and existing
development. The Plan will likely include an ordinance
establishing mitigation requirements, including one-time
payment of fees on certain types of new development, and
annual fees to be paid by certain types of employers in
the City. This ordinance may require that the owner of
the proposed proj ect pay such new development fees, and
that employers within the project pay such new annual em-
ployer fees related to the City'S Transportation Manage-
ment Plan.
13. A Park and Recreation Facilities Tax of $200.00 per
residential unit shall be due and payable at the time of
issuance of a building permit for the construction or
placement of the residential unit(s) on the subject lot,
per and subject to the provisions of Section 6670 et seq.
of the Santa Monica Municipal Code.
Demolition
- 10 -
.
.
14. Until such time as the demolition is undertaken, and un-
less the structure is currently in use, the existing
structure shall be maintained and secured by boarding up
all openings, erecting a security fence, and removing all
debris, bushes and planting that inhibit the easy surveil-
lance of the property to the satisfaction of the Building
and Safety Officer and the Fire Department. Any landscap-
ing material remaining shall be watered and maintained
until demolition occurs.
15. Unless otherwise approved by the Recreation and Parks De-
partment and the Planning Division, at the time of demoli-
tion, any street trees shall be protected from damage,
death, or removal per the requirements of Ordinance 1242
(CCS) .
16. Immediately after demolition (and during construction), a
security fence, the height of which shall be the maximum
permi tted by the Zoning Ordinance, shall be maintained
around the perimeter of the lot. The lot shall be kept
clear of all trash, weeds, etc.
17. Prior to issuance of a demolition permit, applicant shal1
prepare for Building Division approval a rodent and pest
control plan to ensure that demolition and construction
activities at the site do not create pest control impacts
on the project neighborhood.
18. Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for this
project, the project shall comply with any ordinance adop-
ted by the city council to implement Program 10 of the
Housing Element. In the event that such an ordinance has
not been adopted prior to the issuance of a certificate of
occupancy for this development proj ect, this condition
shall be of no further force and effect. Failure to adopt
and implementing ordinance shall not excuse a developer
from the obligation to comply with any other condition
imposed in connection with Program 10 of the Housing
Element.
Construction
19. Unless otherwise approved by the Department of General
Services, all sidewalks shall be kept clear and passable
during the grading and construction phase of the project.
20. sidewalks, curbs, gutters, paving and driveways which need
replacing or removal as a result of the project as deter-
mined by the Department of General services shall be re-
constructed to the satisfaction of the Department of
General Services. Approval for this work shall be ob-
tained from the Department of General services prior to
issuance of the building permits.
- 11 -
.
.
21. Vehicles hauling dirt or other construction debris from
the site shall cover any open load with a tarpaulin or
other secure covering to minimize dust emissions.
22. street trees shall be maintained, relocated or provided as
required in a manner consistent with the City'S Tree Code
(Ord. 1242 CCS), per the specifications of the Department
of Recreation and Parks and the Department of General Ser-
vices. No street tree shall be removed without the ap-
proval of the Department of Recreation and Parks.
23. A construction period mitigation plan shall be prepared by
the applicant for approval by the Department of General
Services prior to issuance of a building permit. As ap-
plicable, this plan shall 1) Specify the names, addresses,
telephone numbers and business license numbers of all con-
tractors and subcontractors as well as the developer and
architect; 2) Describe how demolition of any existing
structures is to be accomplished; 3) Indicate where any
cranes are to be located for erection/construction; 4)
Describe how much of the public street, alleyway, or side-
walk is proposed to be used in conjunction with construc-
tion; 5) Set forth the extent and nature of any pile-
driving operations: 6) Describe the length and number of
any tiebacks which must extend under the property of other
persons; 7) Specify the nature and extent of any dewater-
ing and its effect on any adjacent buildings; 8} Describe
anticipated contruction-related truck routes, number of
truck trips, hours of haUling and parking location: 9}
Specify the nature and extent of any helicopter hauling;
10) state whether any construction activity beyond normal-
ly permitted hours is proposed; 11) Describe any proposed
construction noise mitigation measures; 12) Describe con-
struction-period security measures including any fencing,
lighting, and security personnel; 13) Provide a drainage
plan; 14) Provide a construction-period parking plan
which shall minimize use of public streets for parking;
15) List a designated on-site construction manager.
24. A sign shall be posted on the property in a manner consis-
tent with the public hearing sign requirements which shall
identify the address and phone number of the owner and/or
applicant for the purposes of responding to questions and
complaints during the construction period. Said sign
shall also indicate the hours of permissible construction
work.
25. A copy of these conditions shall be posted in an easily
visible and accessible location at all times during con-
struction at the project site. The pages shall be lami-
nated or otherwise protected to ensure durability of the
copy.
Environmental Mitigation
- 12 -
.
.
26. Ultra-low flow plumbing fixtures are required on all new
development and remodeling where plumbing is to be added.
(Maximum 1.6 gallon toilets and 1.0 gallon urinals and low
flow shower head.)
27. Prior to issuance of a certificate of Occupancy, project
owner shall present documentation to the General services
Department certifying that existing Santa Monica occupan-
cies with toilets installed prior to 1978 have been retro-
fitted with ultra low-flow toilets (1.6 gallons per flush
or less) such that development of the new project will
not result in a net increase in wastewater flows. Flow
from existing occupancies which will be removed as part
of the new development may be deducted from flow at-
tributable to the new development if such occupancies have
been occupied wi thin one year prior to issuance of a
Building Permit for the proposed project. Alternatively,
proj ect owner may provide a payment to the General Ser-
vices Department in an amount specified by General Ser-
vices in lieu of the installation requirement, which funds
shall be used by the City for the exclusive purpose of
achieving compliance with this condition by retrofitting
existing occupancies. Flow calculations for new develop-
ment and existing occupancies shall be consistent with
guidelines developed by the General Services Department.
Misce11aneous CUP Conditions
28. The building address shall be painted on the roof of the
building and shall measure four feet by eight feet (32
square feet).
29. If any archaeological remains are uncovered during
excavation or construction, work in the affected area
shall be suspended and a recognized specialist shall be
contacted to conduct a survey of the affected area at
project's owner's expense. A determination shall then be
made by the Director of Planning to determine the sig-
nificance of the survey findings and appr~priate actions
and requirements, if any, to address such findings.
30. street and/or alley lighting shall be provided on public
rights of way adjacent to the project if and as needed per
the specifications and with the approval of the Department
of General Services.
31. Any lofts or mezzanines shall not exceed 99 square feet
unless appropriate required parking is supplied. Such
areas shall also not exceed 33.3% of the room below unless
compliance with the distric~'s limits on number of stories
can be maintained.
validity of Permits
- 13 -
.
.
32. The conditional use permit shall be of no further force or
effect if the Tentative Map expires prior to approval of a
Final Map for said tract.
33. In the event permittee violates or fails to comply with
any conditions of approval of this permit, no further per-
mits, licenses, approvals or certificates of occupancy
shall be issued until such violation has been fully
remedied.
34. within ten days of Planning Division transmittal of the
statement of Official Action, project applicant shall
sign and return a copy of the statement of Official Action
prepared by the planning Division, agreeing to the Condi-
tions of approval and acknowledging that failure to comply
with such conditions shall constitute grounds for poten-
tial revocation of the permit approval. By signing same,
applicant shall not thereby waive any legal rights appli-
cant may possess regarding said conditions. The signed
statement shall be returned to the Planning Division.
Failure to comply with this condition shall constitute
grounds for potential permit revocation.
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CONDITIONS
1. All off site improvements required by the City Engineer
shall be installed. Plans and specifications for off site
improvements shall be prepared by a registered civil en-
gineer and approved by the City Engineer.
2. Before the City Engineer may approve the final map, a sub-
division improvement agreement for all off site improve-
ments required by the City Engineer shall be prepared and
a performance bond posted through the City Attorney's
office.
3. The tentative map shall expire 24 months after approval,
except as provided in the provisions of California Govern-
ment Code section 66452.6 and sections 9380-9382 of the
Santa Monica Municipal Code. During this time period the
final map shall be presented to the City of Santa Monica
for approval.
4. The developer shall provide the Engineering Department of
the City of Santa Monica with one Dizal Cloth print
reproduction and microfilm of each sheet of the final map
after recordation.
5. Prior to approval of the final map, Condominium Associa-
tion By-Laws (if applicable) and a Declaration of CC & Rls
shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. The
CC & R' s shall contain a non-discrimination clause as
presented in section 9392 (SMMC) and in the case of con-
dominiums, contain such provisions as are required by Sec-
tion 9122E (SMMC).
- 14 -
.
.
6. The developer shall provide for payment of a Condominium
Tax of $1,000 per saleable residential unit per the provi-
sions of Section 6651 et seg. of the Santa Monica
Municipal Code.
7. The form, contents, accompanying data, and filing of the
final subdivision map shall conform to the provisions of
Sections 9330 through 9338 (SMMC) and the Subdivision Map
Act. The required Final Map filing fee shall be paid
prior to scheduling of the Final Map for City Council
approval.
8. The final map shall be recorded with the Los Angeles Coun-
ty Recorder prior to issuance of any building permit for a
condominium proj ect pursuant to Government Code section
66499.30.
9. Pursuant to section 9366 (SMMC), if the subdivider or any
interested person disagrees with any action by the
Planning Commission with respect to the tentative map, an
appeal or complaint may be filed in writing with the City
Clerk. No appeal or complaint may be filed after a ten
day periOd from the Commission's decision on the tentative
map.
INCLUSIONARY UNIT CONDITION
1. The developer shall covenant and agree with the City of
Santa Monica to the specific terms, conditions and
restrictions upon the possession, use and enjoyment of the
subject property, which terms, conditions and restrictions
shall be recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorder's
Office as a part of the deed of the property to ensure
that one affordable unites) is (are) provided and main-
tained over time and through subsequent sales of the prop-
erty. An affordable unit shall be defined as being af-
fordable to households with incomes not exceeding lOOt of
the (HUD) Los Angeles County median income, expending not
over 30% of monthly income on housing costs, as specified
by the Housing Division of the Department of community and
Economic Development.
This agreement shall be executed and recorded prior to
approval of the Final Map. Such agreement shall specify
1) responsibilities of the developer for making the
unites) available to eligible tenants and 2) responsibili-
ties of the city of Santa Monica to prepare application
forms for potential tenants, establish criteria for
qualifications, and monitor compliance with the provisions
of the agreement.
Owner shall provide the City Planning Division with a
conformed copy of the recorded agreement prior to approval
of the Final Map.
- l5 -
.
.
This provision is intended to satisfy the inclusionary
housing requirements of Program 12 of the Housing Element
of the General Plan of the city of Santa Monica (nprogram
12 It) . Developer may satisfy the obligations created by
this Agreement by demonstrating to the Director of Plan-
ning compliance with Ordinance 1448 (CCS), which provides
implementation standards for Program 12.
Prepared by: Paul Berlant, Director of Planning
D. Kenyon Webster, Principal Planner
Wanda Williams, Associate Planner
Planning Division
Community and Economic Development Department
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A- Planning Commission staff Report and
Statement of Official Action
Exhibit B- Appeal Application
Exhibit C- November 14, 1989 Council staff Report
and proposed findings for denial
Exhibit D- April 10, 1990 Lawrence and Harding
Letter
WW:ww
PC/cccup46
06/19/90
- 16 -