Loading...
SR-402-002 (10) LftJ~ ~ oo-z.- 1:Z-~ ~tf ~ : rl87 Santa Monica, California CjED:SF Council Mtg: October 13, 1987 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City staff SUBJECT: Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Development Review 390, 1344 l8th street, To Permit The Removal of a Single Family Dwelling Unit and The Construction of a Surface Parking Lot. INTRODUCTION This report recommends that the city Council deny the appeal and affirm the Planning Commission decision denying the application for removal of the single family dwelling unit and construction on a surface parking lot at 1344 18th street. BACKGROUND On June 15, 1987, the Planning commission conducted a public hearing on a request to remove an existing single family dwelling unit and replace it with a surface level parking lot at l344 l8th street. The parking lot is zoned R2A and was designed to provide seventeen new customer and employee parking spaces for the adjacent Acura and Volvo automobile dealerships. The Planning commission denied the request on the basis that the proj ect did not meet the criteria for a categorical exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proj ect is adj acent to the lot at 1348 18th Street vlhich is designated as the lot for vehicle loading and unloading in connection with the proposed Honda Dealership building at 1801 - 1 - t:l-~ OCT 1 3 1987 OCT 2 1 19&7 -- Santa Monica Boulevard. The Commission concluded that the application proposed at 1344 18th street is interrelated with the adj acent lot and therefore should be evaluated as a cumulative project in the environmental impact report (EIR) being prepared for the dealership building. Based on this conclusion, no development could proceed until the EIR was reviewed and certified for the project at 1801 Santa Monica Boulevard. The second finding for denial was based upon the conclusion that the project was not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. This was based upon the fact that the project represented further commercial encroachment into the residential district and would result in increased light and noise. ANALYSIS Under the provisions of CEQA, the Planning Commission, or City Council upon appeal, is considered to be the decision-making body on CEQA determinations. As such, the decision-making body may find that a categorical exemption is inapplicable when there is the potential for cumulative impacts due to successive or related projects. When presented to the Planning Commission, staff recommended a categorical exemption in that the project was not associated with the Honda dealership building. However, the Planning Commission determined that a categorical exemption was not appropriate and that the proj ect was interrelated to the adjacent lot proposed for the Honda dealership's off-loading requirements. - 2 - As noted in the Planning Commission staff report, the project is consistent with the Zoning requirements for surface level parking lots in the A District. Under Ordinance l3 21, the Planning commission must make a finding that the change of use from residential to commercial would be compatible and relate harmoniously to the surrounding sites and neighborhoods. Based upon the public testimony of approximately ten speakers in opposition, the Commission found that the project would be detrimental to the neighborhood. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACT The recommendation presented in this report does not have any budget or fiscal impact. RECOMMENDATION It is respectfully recommended that the council deny the appeal and uphold the decision of the Planning Commission according to the findings and conditions contained in the June l5, 1987 statement of Official Action. Prepared by: Suzanne FriCk, Principal Planner Planning Division Community and Economic Development Department Attachments: A. Planning Commission statement of Official Action B. Applicant's Letter of Appeal C. Planning Commission staff Report SF:Dez PCjdr3901 10jOlj87 - 3 - ,. f\r\achrtent- ~ STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL ACTION PROJECT NUMBER: DR 390 LOCATION: 1344 18th Street APPLICANT: Kramer Motors REQUEST: Demolition of Single Family Dwelling to Construct Surface Parking Lot on R2A Lot. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION 6/15/87 Date. Approved based on the following findings and subject to the conditions below. x Denied based on findings below. other. FINDINGS 1. The project does not meet the criteria of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for Categorical Exemption on the basis of the cumulative impacts which may result from this and related projects. 2. The proposed project is not compatible with, and does not relate harmoniously to surrounding sites and neighborhoods in that the project would result in negative impacts re- lated to increased light and noise being projected farther into the R2 residential district. VOTE Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Absent: Vacancy: Burns, Lambert, Nelson, Perlman Farivar Hecht one - I - ." I hereby certify that this statement of accurately reflects the final determination Commission of the City of Santa Monica. STDR390 RM:nh 06/30/87 ~ /)o,,~//.Le~;~ A/~~o~ print name and title - 2 - Official Action of the Planning 7~"fr ? date r th~..e- - C?.io;;- )"", ~~aJt~ Es~ t CITYOFS~.~!-:\~~~,~f~" SHE~'v\AN L STACEY CITY PLAHi. .~:'"" - ~,' A PAO~ESS' :)NAL LAW CORPORATIQ" 299 OCEAN .ll.VEl\IUE A-.::!EA. COCiE: 2'3 ,3;94-' 63 o 5' I-E 3 :) -87 J.H 32 r 3:5 SA' TA, \'0"" IC; CALlFOR1'.IA 904:)1 t7'2.je>7 ~~ "75.00 ~:~ i:. IU<t't'f- July 2, 1987 Dlrector of Plannlng City of Santa Monlca 1685 Maln Street Santa Monica, California 90401 Re: Kramer Mo~ors, Inc. Applicatlon for Development Revlew No. DR-390 Dear Sir: On behalf of Kramer Motors, Inc. I hereby appeal the decislon of the Plannlng Commlsslon on June 15, 1987 to deny the Appllcation for Development RevieN Perml t No. DR-390 for the demolltion of an eXlsting vacant single famlly residence and the construction of a parking lot at 1344 18th Street, Santa Monica. The decision to deny the applicatlon is inconsistent with the perml tted uses under zone R-2A and is lnconsistent with the provisions of the Santa Monlca General Plan. The decision as to whether or not A zoned lots would contlnue to be available for use to serve adjoining businesses which front on Santa 'Monica Boulevard was made when the Land Use Element of the General Plan was debated and adopted. The Planning Commlsslon could not make adequate findings to supports its deClsion to deny a use which is spepifically permitted on the property. I am enclosing a check for $75.00 in payment of the appeal fee. Very truly yours, c9{~ ;f sIa ~ SHERMAN L. STACEydr SLS/sh cc: Mr. Robert Kramer e e Mro.c.hlNrk- C; 76 , CITY PLANNING DIVISION Community and Economic Development Department MEMORANDUM DATE: June 15, 1987 TO: The Honorable Planning commission FROM: Planning Staff SUBJECT: DR 390, Demolition of Single Family Dwelling to Construct Surface Parking Lot. Address: 1344 18th Street Applicant: Kramer Motors SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The subject property is a 7,500 sq.ft. parcel located on the west side of 18th street between Santa Monica Boulevard and Arizona Avenue. Surrounding uses consist of a Volvo automobile dealership to the south (C4), an Acura automobile dealership and mUlti-family residential across 18th street to the east (C4, R2A, and R2), an automobile dealership across 17th Court alley to the west (C4, R2A and R2), and a two-story, eight-unit mUlti-family residential building to the north (R2). Zoning District: Land Use District: R2A Low Density Housing Parcel Area: 7,500 Sq.Ft. (excluding rear alley) PROPOSED PROJECT Proposed is the demolition of a single family dwelling and the construction of a surface parking lot. Seventeen new parking spaces would be provided, including ten standard, six compact and one handicap space. Circulation would be one-way, with vehicles entering from 18th Street and exiting onto 17th Court alley. A 20' deep landscaped front yard and a l' 8" to 5' wide landscaped north side yard would be provided. A 51 high masonry wall would be provided along the north property line. The wall would drop down to a 3'6" maximum height in the front setback area. The Parking and Traffic Engineer has approved the parking plan, with the requirement that the paved width of the double-loaded parking lot be 48' -4 II where standard spaces are placed on both sides of the aisle. The lot would be used for employee and customer parking for the adjacent Volvo and Acura automobile dealerships. The lot would - 1 - e e not be utilized in conjunction with the Kramer Honda dealership building proposed at 1801 Santa Monica Boulevard. MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE The proposed project is consistent with Municipal Code and General Plan requirements as shown in Attachment A. CEQA STATUS Categorically Exempt. Class 1 (11) and 3 (14) Santa Monica Guidelines for Implementation. Note: The subject project is not associated with the Kramer Honda dealership building proposed at 1801 Santa Monica Boulevard and is not subject to environmental review within that project's pending environmental impact report. ANALYSIS As noted, the proposed project is fully consistent with applicable Municipal Code and General Plan requirements for nAif District lots. The lot would be used for customer and employee parking only, and would reduce the demand for on-street parking in the adjacent neighborhood. The existing single family dwelling has been issued a permanent exemption from rent control and qualifies for removal pursuant to rent control regulations. Conditions of approval would minimize impacts on the residential uses to the north. Public address systems, vehicle repair work, and trash containers would be prohibited. Lighting would be shielded from adjacent residences and landscaping would be provided in the front and north side yards. Final design would be subject to approval by the Architectural Review Board. The alley and street access is acceptable in that it allows more parking spaces to be created via a one-way double-loaded diagonal parking aisle. Also, requiring alley-only access would increase traffic on the residential-serving alley by forcing both arriving and exiting vehicles to drive on the alley. Applicable General Plan policies are stated in Attachment A. CONCLUSION In that the project conforms to zoning standards for "An lots, the Land Use Element of the General Plan allows commercial parking use of nAif lots, and the removal of the residential unit is permitted by Rent Control regulations and the Housing Element, the project should be approved. RECOMMENDATION It is respecfully recommended that DR 390 be approved with the findings and conditions below. - 2 - e e FINDINGS 1. The development is consistent with the findings and pur- pose of Ordinance 1321 as set forth below. 2. The physical location and placement of proposed structures on the site are compatible with and relate harmoniously to surrounding sites and neighborhoods in that the proposed parking lot use will not include any structure; landscap- ing will be provided in the front yard setback area and adjacent to the north side property line; and a 5' high block wall will buffer the use from the adjoining residen- tial lot. 3. The existing and/or proposed rights-of-way and facilities for both pedestrian and automobile traffic will be ade- quate to accommodate the anticipated results of the pro- posed development including off-street parking facilities and access thereto in that the use will not generate in- creased parking demand but, rather, provide needed addi- tional off-street parking area; and alley and street ac- cess are acceptable given the one-way parking lot circula- tion system and in order to limit traffic volume on the residentially-serving alley. 4. The existing and/or proposed public and/or private health and safety facilities (inClUding, but not limited to, sanitation, sewers, storm drains, fire protection devices, protective services, and public utilities) will be ade- quate to accommodate the anticipated results of the pro- posed development. 5. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan of the city of Santa Monica and the Zoning Ordinance in that the project will conform to the height, bulk, use and urban design policies for the Low Density Housing and Commercial Corridor Districts as specified in the Land Use Element of the General Plan and conform to the appropriate R2A District standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. The subject lot (Lot I, Block 132, Town of Santa Monica) shall be used only for customer and employee parking and not for the display or storage of vehicles intended for sale or lease. 2. Customer and employee parking spaces shall be made avail- able without cost to the users. Signage designating the availability of the free parking for customers and em- ployees shall be posted on the subject lot. 3. No loudspeaker or public address system shall be utilized on the subject lot. - 3 - e e 4. No vehicle repair, servicing, detailing or finishing work shall occur on the subject parking lot. 5. There shall be no trash containers or trash enclosure on the subject lot. STANDARD CONDITIONS l. Plans for final design, landscaping, screening, trash en- closures, and signage shall be subject to review and ap- proval by the Architectural Review Board. 2. Minor amendments to the plans shall be subject to approval by the Director of Planning. A significant change in the approved concept shall be subject to Planning Commission Review. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the plans sUbmitted or as modified by the Planning Commission, Architectural Review Board or Director of Planning. 3. The rights granted herein shall be effective only when exercised within a period of one year from the effective date of approval. Upon the written request of the appli- cant, the Director of Planning may extend this period up to an additional six months. 4. The applicant shall comply with all legal requirements regarding provisions for the disabled, including those set forth in the California Administrative Code, Title 24, Part 2. 5. The parking lot shall be striped, screened and landscaped in conformance with Sec. 9l27.J.l and Sec. 9129.F.7 (SMMC) . 6. Final parking lot layout and specifications shall be sub- ject to the review and approval of the Parking and Traffic Engineer. , 7. A 5 to 6 foot solid masonry wall shall be provided along property lines which abut residential property in accor- dance with Sec. 9127.I (SMMC). 8. The operation shall at all times be conducted in a manner not detrimental to surrounding properties or residents by reason of lights, noise, activities, parking or other actions. 9. Street trees shall be maintained, relocated or provided as required in a manner consistent with the city's Tree Code (Ord. 1242 CCS), per the specifications of the Department of Recreation and Parks and the Department of General Ser- vices. No street tree shall be removed without the ap- proval of the Department of Recreation and Parks. - 4 - e e 10. street and/or alley lighting shall be provided on public rights-of-way adjacent to the project if and as needed per the specifications and with the approval of the Department of General Services. 11. Any outdoor lighting shall be shielded and/or directed away from adjacent residential properties, with any such lighting not to exceed 0.5 foot candles of illumination beyond the perimeter of the subject property. (Reference Section 9112A.3 SMMC) l2. This determination shall not become effective for a period of twenty days from the date of determination or, if ap- pealed, until a final determination is made on the appeal. Prepared by: Richard Mills, Associate Planner RM:nh DR390 06/10/87 Attachments: A. Municipal Code and General Plan Compliance B. site Plan - 5 - e e ATTACHMENT A MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE Land Use Category Municipal Code Element project pennitted Use Surface Surface Surface Parking; Parking*; Parking Residential Residential Setbacks Front yard 20' 20' Sideyard None Required l' 8" Rearyard None Required O' Parking Access Alleys and Alley and Side Side Streets, street but Minimize Residential Intrusion** * Land Use Element Policy 1. 2.3 allows "An District lots adjacent to the C4 District to have surface commercial parking and, subject to site review/development review, parking structures and underground parking as well. ** Applicable Land Use and Circulation Element policies related to parking lot access are as follows: 3.3.2 Ensure continuity of the sidewalk by limiting curb cuts; locating parking behind buildings or below grade; and, except for development on large parcels in the Oceanfront/Civic Center area (such as the Rand site and civic AUditorium), the Special Office District, and at the Airport, encouraging vehicular access from alleys and side streets. Encourage alley and side street access only when the potential traffic intrusion into adjacent residential neighborhoods is minimized. 4.3.7 New driveways and mid-block access points shall be limited, especially along major roads. Where alleys exist but do not abut residential neighborhoods, access from the street shall be discouraged. Where alleys exist that do abut residential neighborhoods, alley access shall be encouraged only when the potential traffic intrusion into the neighborhood is minimized. - 6 - e e 4.7.9 Encourage parking and service access from existing and future alleys that do not abut residential neighborhoods. Where existing or future alleys abut residential neighborhoods, encourage parking and service access from the alley only when the potential traffic intrusion into the residential neighborhood is minimized. - 7 - e e ~ ~ , , --4. nlh COU~ l')O',I:l.l...l..n) f~ ~o' .00' .--...J _ . ___ _ .; - Q. _~~n i L ~ I ~ ; ~ jl -fl' . .'1. ~ ~r \ I. If ~ ~I. ~ ~~~ ~ ; gji !~ \ \~ll f~ \ ,s. !i '- P : ~) Ai -~~~- "', I ~, ""4T6 e&1UC....._ - - ~ I. '''-. \ ). o it '/ . 'T -." - I ' ! - - .:! "? ~- ~- ---~~- -\ --~-+J ___..'x: . I I !~ m it i - i;i_I.:~f l !~ijt !~i~~1 .~i,1 U 1 '11" n !"HlUil -f II f tt ~ )( c ~ ~:s ,~ ~. 4: leU"='T ~-- --t-t- I lor 1"$:: ~ & ! ~ ~ ~tt ~ ~ : ~ '8 ~ OJ ~ ~&~~ J .. ~ ':: I Ij~ ~ ,.oi ~ 1" ~~l ~ ~~! ~ i;j p 1\ ~~. r ~ :::! [ <i\ ~ ~ I J J ~ " , 0.. ~ I I <!ioll"'PL.AooU/1'"l..~I+.lG- ~L.,.,..,o.J oe..,.....,1.. ';'lJQ.F,o.c~~~Iuc;. I-OT l'!l~b I&V-.T ~"~Q. C. qo4o.\