Loading...
SR-400-004-04 I> . . Ii tJtJ- OP y-() '-I II-R MAY 2 NS7 C/ED:RAS:SF Council Mtg: May 26, 1987 Santa Monica, California TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Staff SUBJECT: Recommendation To Direct city Attorney To Prepare An Ordinance To Amend Section 9157 (SMMC) To Authorize citation Powers For zoning Enforcement And Amend sections 6124, 6125, and 6126 (SMMC) To Provide For A Business License Revocation Hearing Process. INTRODUCTION This report recommends that the City council direct the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance to amend Section 9157 (SMMC) to authorize citation powers for zoning enforcement and to amend Sections 6124 through 6126 inclusive to provide for a business license revocation hearing process. BACKGROUND On June l7, 1986, during the review of the FY 1986-87 Budget, the City Council added an objective to the Planning Division's Performance Plan. The intent of this objective was to enhance and emphasize monitoring and enforcement of Zoning Ordinance violations and conditions of approval imposed by various city agencies, such as the Planning Commission, Architectural Review Board and Zoning Administrator. At the time the objective was approved, staff was directed to prepare a report on how to accomplish the objective. The report was to include changes to existing enforcement practices to - 1 - determination of II-B MAY 2 6 1987 facilitate a proactive enforcement approach, a . . sensitive areas within the City, types of uies that necessitated proactive enforcement and more effective ways to monitor and track conditions of approval and enforcement complaints. A determination was made early in the fiscal year to consolidate enforcement considerations as part of the comprehensive Zoning Ordinance update, and the draft recommended by the Planning Commission includes a section on Enforcement. On May 19, 1987, the matter was raised by the Council with the direction that the issue of citation powers in particular be brought back to Council prior to the Zoning Ordinance. This updated report provides the City council with recommendations to implement a new approach to Zoning Ordinance enforcement to address the concerns expressed, including authorizing citation powers. EXISTING ENFORCEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES The Planning Division presently has two full-time zoning Inspectors responsible for enforcement of the Zoning Ordinance and conditions of approval imposed by the City Council, Planning Commission, Architectural Review Board and the Zoning Administrator. with the exception of signs, violations of the zoning Ordinance or condi tions of approval are enforced on a complaint basis only. Once a complaint is received, it is assigned to a Zoning Inspector for investigation. Within three days the Inspector verifies if a violation exists by conducting one or more site visits to document the violation with photographs. If the complaint is enforceable, the Inspector will issue a violation - 2 - ... . . notice to the property owner and if applicable, to the business tenant. Depending on the nature of the violation, a period of 7 to 90 days is given to correct the violation. If the violation is not corrected within the specified period of time, a second notice is mailed indicating that the matter will be referred to the city Attorney's Office. To ensure that adequate time has been given for compliance before the matter is referred to the city Attorney, a second period of time, typically 30 days, is given to the parties involved. If the matter is not corrected at the end of the second period of time, a third notice is mailed informing the individual that violation has been referred to the City Attorney's Office. It is at this point that the City Attorney's Office becomes responsible for any further enforcement action and the Planning Division no longer has the ability to track the complaint. In the event the violation can be corrected through the approval of a Planning Commission, Zoning Administrator, or Architectural Review Board Permit, the individual is given a specified period of time in which to file an application. Once an application has been filed, enforcement action is deferred pending a decision of the appropriate regulatory body. Impact of Current Enforcement Procedure Currently, approximately 35% of the complaints are corrected upon receipt of the first notice, 40% upon receipt of the second notice, and 25% are not corrected until after an office conference is held with the city Attorney's Office. Because few - 3 - . . penalties exist for Zoning Ordinance violations or violations of condi tions of approval, enforcement is prolonged and a significant amount of time is spent by both the Planning staff and City Attorney's Office before a violation can be corrected. Planning Division records show that when a violation can be brought into conformance through the approval of a discretionary permit, most individuals will pursue this option as a means of correcting the violation. Once an application is filed, the matter is then referred to a planner for processing and enforcement action is suspended until the final outcome. In the event the permit is denied, the Inspector resumes the enforcement action. Experience has shown by proactive enforcement of the Sign Ordinance that at least 90% of the violations will result in an application before the Architectural Review Board when the matter can be corrected in this manner. PROPOSED ORDINANCE Staff is proposing the adoption of an ordinance which enhances the city's ability to enforce the zoning code and conditions of approval. This ordinance would include several key components, incl uding citation powers and a hearing procedure for revoking business licenses. The ordinance will include language ensuring that failure to comply with the terms and conditions of any approval granted will apply to anyone who owns the property or operates a business on the property. - 4 - . . citation Powers In examining ways to provide for more effective enforcement, staff concluded that citation power provided the greatest incentive for compliance. Information gathered from l6 jurisdictions indicated that Santa Monica was one of the few cities which did not use citation power as a means of enforcing the Zoning ordinance. The following table presents the findings of the survey. SURVEY OF SIXTEEN CITIES CITATION POWERS City Citation Power Misdemeanorl Yes/No Infraction Anaheim Yes Mis Beverly Hills Yes Inf Buena Park Yes Mis Costa Mesa Yes Inf Culver City No Mis Fountain Valley Yes Mis Fullerton Yes Mis Garden Grove Yes Mis Glendale Yes Mis Irvine Yes Mis Laguna Yes Inf Long Beach Yes Inf Newport Beach Yes Mis Orange Yes Inf Pasadena No Santa Ana Yes Mis To implement a more effective enforcement program including citation powers, it will be necessary to revise the existing zoning ordinance. Presently, any violation of the Zoning Ordinance is a misdemeanor and subject to enforcement under SMMC Section 1200. Upon discussion with the City Attorney, it was concluded that violations will remain misdemeanors; however, a - 5 - . . process similar to the Aircraft Noise Abatement Code (SMMC section 10050) will be established by which violations are subject to a civil penalty of $500.00 for each citation issued. Impact of citation Powers on Workload The impact of citation powers on Planning Division workload would be positive. During FY 1986-87 the two Zoning Inspectors investigated 1,000 zoning complaints (an average of 19 per week) and 2,400 sign ordinance violations (approximately 46 per week) which are pursued on a proactive basis. Most complaints require at least two site visits. During that time period, over 700 Planning Commission, Architectural Review Board, Zoning Administrator and Administrative Approval applications were approved within the last year, each with from 1 to 25 conditions of approval attached, which presently are enforced on a complaint basis only. In addition, the Zoning Inspectors also process approximately 1,300 Residential Building Reports, l,200 Business License Applications, 500 Home Occupation Permits, and 50 Deed Restrictions each year. citation powers will enable staff to process zoning violations and complaints more efficiently as well as more effectively, since it is anticipated that compliance will be achieved with fewer inspections and therefore less follow-up. Thus, with the proposed ordinance, the Planning Division will be able to process more complaints with the same staffing level. - 6 - . . Business License Revocation Procedure In addition to granting the Planning Division citation powers, staff proposes that Business License revocation procedures be included in the ordinance to ensure that business licenses can be revoked for failure to comply with any condition of a development approval. This involves amending sections 6124 to 6126 of the SMMC to provide for a business license revocation hearing before the Planning Commission and appeal to the City council for revocations concerning Zoning Ordinance violations. BUDGET/FISCAL IMPACT The recommendation presented in the report has no budget or fiscal impact. However, a proposed ordinance which provides for citation authority would increase the revenues collected by the City. Presently no fee or penalty is collected for violations of the zoning ordinance, and should the proposal be adopted at some future date, the City would have the ability to assess a $500.00 penal ty for each violation if not corrected after the first notice is issued. RECOMMENDATION It is respectfully recommended that the City Council direct the city Attorney to prepare an ordinance to amend Section 9157 (SMMC) to authorize citation powers for zoning enforcement and to amend Sections 6l24, 6125, and 6126 (SMMC) to provide for a business license revocation hearing process. - 7 - . . Prepared by: R. Ann siracusa, Director of Planning Suzanne Frick, Principal Planner Renee Cowhig, Zoning Inspector Planning Division Community and Economic Development Department codal ~s OS/20/87 - 8 -