SR-400-004 (27)
~
'1?JC-- 001/
'7.A
APR 28 1987
C/ED:RAS:RM:nh
council Mtg: April 28, 1987
Santa Monica, California
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Staff
SUBJECT: Recommendation to Adopt Resolutions Approving General
Plan Land Use Element Map Amendment GPA-04 and
certifying the Project Environmental Impact Report, and
to Direct city Attorney to Draft Ordinance Approving
zoning District Amendments 26 and 27.
INTRODUCTION
This report recommends that following a public hearing the City
council:
1)
adopt
the
attached
Resolutions
certifying
Environmental Impact Report EIA-828 and approving General Plan
Land Use Element Map Amendment GPA-04, and 2) direct the city
Attorney to prepare an Ordinance adopting Zoning District
Amendments 26 and 27. The Amendments are proposed by st. John's
Hospi tal and Health Center and recommended for approval by the
Planning Commission.
(The Resolution certifying EIA-828 is
Attachment A. The Resolution approving GPA-04 is Attachment B.)
General
Plan Amendment
GPA-04
would
reclassify to
the
"Institutions" District all "Low Density Housing" District
properties on the west side of 23rd street between Arizona Avenue
and Santa Monica Place alley (on the 1300 block of 23rd street).
Zoning District Amendment 26 would reclassify to the R2 Multiple
Residential District all CP Commercial-Professional Office
District properties in the block north of Arizona Avenue between
21st and 22nd streets.
7-A
APR 2 8 1987
- 1 -
Zoning District Amendment 27 would reclassify to the CP
Commercial-Professional Office District all R2 MUltiple
Residential District properties on the west side of 23rd street
between Arizona Avenue and Santa Monica Place alley (the 1300
block of 23rd street).
At its March 24, 1987 meeting, the city Council set April 7,
1987, as the date for a public hearing on these requests. The
meeting was cancelled and continued to April 28, 1987.
BACKGROUND
On March 2, 1987, the Planning commission conducted a public
hearing on these requests and voted to forward to the City
Council a recommendation that the City council certify the
proj ect Environmental Impact Report and approve the requests.
(see March 2, 1987, Planning Commission statement of Official
Action, Attachment C, which incorporates specific findings in
support of the proposed changes.) At its April 6, 1987 meeting,
the Planning Commission is scheduled to adopt a formal Resolution
restating the March 2, 1987, findings in support of the General
Plan Amendment. (A formal Resolution is required pursuant to
Section 9413 SMMC.) The Draft Planning Commission Resolution and
GPA-04 Exhibit Map is attached (Attachment D).
The specific properties involved are as follows:
GPA-04: Lots 19 through 29 of Tract 4618 in the City of Santa
Monica, more commonly known as 1302 through 1342 (even numbers)
23rd Street.
- 2 -
Zoning District Amendment 26: Lots 22, 23, 24, 28, 29 and 30 of
Tract 199 in the City of Santa Monica, more commonly known as
1247-1251 21st street and 1246 22nd street.
Zoning District Amendment 27: Lots 19 through 29 of Tract 4618
in the city of Santa Monica, more commonly known as 1302 through
1342 (even numbers) 23rd Street.
Both of the proposed zone changes and the proposed General Plan
Amendment are consistent with the draft Hospital Area Specific
Plan (HASP), which was reviewed by the Planning Commission on
March 2, 1987. The applications are also consistent with the st.
John's Master Plan, which was developed with extensive
neighborhood involvement. The General Plan Amendment and the two
zone changes proposed by st. John's are fully consistent with
amendments and zone changes proposed by the HASP and endorsed by
the Planning Commission in its actions to date on the HASP.
These elements of the HASP were also supported by the Mid-City
Neighbors Community Organization. Other aspects of the HASP are
still under review by the Planning Commission; a hearing before
the city Council on the HASP is not likely to occur until late
spring or early summer.
st. John's filed its General Plan Amendment and zone change
applications in correct anticipation that the Hospital Area
Specific Plan might require lengthy review. Since approval of
these applications would be consistent with actions proposed by
staff and the Planning commission in the HASP, and since approval
will also allow st. John's to proceed with part of its parking
- 3 -
and housing mitigation program without having to delay these
projects for several months pending adoption of the HASP, staff
supports affirmative action on these applications in advance of
the HASP.
In a related but separate action on March 2, 1987 governing the
23 rd street properties, the Planning Commission approved
Development Review Permit 328 and Conditional Use Permit 419 to
allow the expansion and consolidation of the existing parking
lots on the west side of 23rd street which serve st. Johnts
Hospi tal and Health Center. Existing residential buildings on
the subject properties will be moved or demolished and replaced
pursuant to a Removal Permit Agreement between the Santa Monica
Rent Control Board and st. John t s Hospital and Health Center.
Commission approval of DR 328 and CUP 419 is contingent upon
Council certification of the same Environmental Impact Report as
covers the subj ect Land Use Element and Zoning District Map
Amendment requests.
Location maps and additional background regarding the proposed
Map Amendments and the reasons they are being requested by st.
John's Hospital and Health Center may be found in the March 2,
1987 Planning Commission staff Report (Attachment E) .
The project t s Environmental Impact Report (Attachment G) found
that the proposed Amendments would not have any significant
environmental impacts.
- 4 -
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACT
The recommendations presented in this report will not have any
budget or fiscal impact.
COUNCIL CONSIDERATION
The City Council may: 1) adopt the attached Resolutions
certifying the project EIR and approving Land Use Element Map
Amendment GPA-04 and direct the City Attorney to prepare an
Ordinance for approval of Zoning District Amendments 26 and 27;
2) continue consideration of the requests until such time as the
Hospital Area Specific Plan is presented to the council; or 3)
deny the requests. Zoning District Amendment 27 (23rd Street)
requires prior or concurrent approval of GPA-04 to ensure zoning
and General Plan consistency.
The Council also may act to certify the Environmental Impact
Report while continuing or denying the Amendments in order to
allow related projects covered by the EIR to proceed (such as DR
328 and CUP 419 noted above).
RECOMMENDATION
It is respectfully recommended that the City council 1) adopt the
attached Resolutions certifying the Environmental Impact Report
EIA-828 and adopting Land Use Element Map Amendment GPA-04 and 2)
direct the City Attorney to prepare an Ordinance adopting Zoning
District Amendments 26 and 27.
- 5 -
Prepared by: R. Ann Siracusa, Director of Planning
Richard Mills, Associate Planner
city Planning Division
Community and Economic Development Department
Attachments: A. Resolution Certifying Environmental Impact
Report EIA-828.
B. Resolution Approving GPA-04.
C. March 2, 1987, Planning commission statement
of Official Action.
D. April 6, 1987, Planning Commission
Resolution.
E. March 2, 1987, Planning Commission Staff
Report, with Location Maps.
F. April 7, 1987, Council Hearing Public Notice.
G. project Environmental Impact Report.
RM:nh
CCGPA04
04/21/87
- 6 -
-
f(fT1\tA\ HeJ-r "
......
RESOLUTION NO. 7420 (CCS)
(City Council Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SANTA MONICA CERTIFYING
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EIA-828
ON ZONE CHANGES AND ASSOCIATED PROJECTS PROPOSED
BY SAINT JOHN'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CENTER
WHEREAS, a Notice of Preparation of an Environmental
Impact Report was issued on October 24, 1986; and
WHEREAS, a Notice of Completion of a Draft Environmental
Impact was published on December 17, 1986, in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the city of Santa
Monica CEQA Guidelines: and
WHEREAS, the required public review period for the
Environmental Impact Report expired on January 30, 1987; and
WHEREAS, on March 2, 1987, the Planning co~~ission having
fully reviewed the Final Environmental Impact Report, found that
the Report was prepared in conformance with City and state CEQA
Guidelines and adequately analyzed potential environmental
effects of the proj ect and I accordingly, recoIIll1lended that the
C~~~ ~=~~~~: ~e~~~=7 t~a ~~~~: :~~~~=~=e~ta: I~pac~ R2~cr~; a~d
WHEREAS, on April 7 I 1987, the City Council, as Lead
Age~cy, rev~ewed the Final Environmental Impact Report; and
~'l/nEREAS, the Environmental I:rrpact Report found that the
A~endment would no~ have a~y slgnlflcar.t envlronmental impac~s;
- 1 -
~
-
NOW I THEREFORE I THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
MONICA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
The ci ty Council has reviewed Final
Environmental Impact Report EIA-828.
SECTION 2.
The city Council finds that the Final
Environmental Impact Report adequately reviews and analyses
potential environmental impacts and effects of the proposed
project.
SECTION 3 .
The city Council certifies that the
environmental review for the project was conducted in full
compliance with CEQA and with state and city CEQA Guidelines,
that there was adequate public review of the Draft Environmental
Impact Report, that the City council has considered all comments
on the Draft Environmental Impact Report, and responses to
comments, that the Final Environmental Impact Report adeq~ately
discusses all significant environmental issues and that the city
Council has considered the contents of the Final Environmental
Impact Report in its decision-making process.
SECTION 4.
The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
-.+= t.~:.s
Pt::"!.C::~' f'......'~......
........---..;------.......,
a::1::
-=~e:;,':: e=~~t:t
a~~
....~o,.....o:=_...::......o-
-......-- -'-"'"- --- ,
":~e
sa:'":.e
shall be in full force and effect.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
f1..rf.r-A '--. \...---......--
?"OBE::(T 11. MYERS 0
City Attorney
- 2 -
,'"
Adopted and approved this 28th day of April, 1987.
a A^~ OA
c~~
I hereby certify that the foregolng Resolution No. 7420(CCS)
was duly adopted by the Clty council of the Ci~y of Santa Monica
at a meeting thereof held on April 28, 1987 by the follovling
Council vote:
Ayes:
councilmembers:
Jennings, Finkel, A. Katz, H.
Katz, Reed, and Mayor Conn
Noes: Councilmembers:
None
Abstain: Councilmembers:
None
Absent: Councilmembers:
Zane
ATTEST:
1<> /A ~ ~;(J -,
~~ /? ..>9-Y~'-(
Clty Clerk
~~()\t-\EN1' e,._
RESOLUTION NO. 7421 (CCS)
(City Council Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA ADOPTING GPA-04,
AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE
AND CIRCULATION ELEMENT MAP OF THE
SANTA MONICA GENERAL PLAN
WdEREAS, the City of Santa Monica adopted its existing
Land Use Element in october 1984: and
w~EREAS, st. John's Hospital and Health Center applied on
August 14, 1986, to amend a portion of the Land Use and
CirCUlation Ele~ent Map: and
w~EREAS, on March 2,
1987, the Planning commission
conducted a duly noticed Public Hearing on the proposed revision,
and on April 7, 1987, the City Council conducted a duly noticed
Public Hearing on the proposed revision, affording any interested
person opportunities to comment on the matter: and
WHEREAS, on April 6, 1987, the Planning co~~ission adopted
a Resolution reco~~ending that the City council adopt the
proposed Amendment: and
WHEREAS, the proposed ~~endment to the Land Use and
CirCUlation Element Map is consistent with other portlons of the
Land Use Element and other Elements of the General Plan: and
~1EREAS, the p~blic necessity, public convenience, general
welfare and efflciency and econoillY in the process of development
requlre the proposed Land Use Ele~ent &~end~ent; and
- 1 -
--
-
WHEREAS, the proposed change represents a reasonable
consolidation of commercial land use zones: and
WHEREAS, "Insti tutions" would be a more appropriate. and
more compatible designation than "Low Density Housing" given the
existing hospital facilities abutting the subject lots and the
fact that the majority of the lots have not been actively used
for residential housing for a considerable length of time; and
WHEREAS, the proposed change is fully consistent with the
Draft Hospital Area Specific Plan recorn..'"[lended by the Planning
Commission on March 2, 1987, and would not prejud1ce adoption of
said Specific Plan: and
WHEREAS, an Environ:nental Impact Report on the proposed
Amendment was prepared, finalized, and fully reviewed by the
Planning Commission and certified by the city Council: and
WHEREAS, the proj ect Environmental
that the proposed &'"[lendment would not
environmental impacts;
Impact
have any
Report found
significant
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
MONICA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. General Plan Land Use and Circulation Element
Map A.'tI.endment GPA-04 I shown on the Land Use and Circulation
Element Map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein
by this reference, 15 hereby approved and adopted.
- 2 -
.-
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall
be in full force and effect.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
rwtn-k \-. \.--rs
ROBERT M. MYERS
city Attorney
J
- 3 -
r~
-
Adopted and approved this 28th day of April, 1987.
Ch^~R00
~ - '\\. - '-...J.K
\.. ' ..,,>;or______
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 7~21(CCS)
was duly adopted by the city council of the city of Santa Monica
at a meeting thereof held on April 28, 1987 by the following
Council vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers: Jennings, Finkel, A. Ka t z , H.
Katz, Reed, and Mayor Conn
Noes: Councilmembers: None
Abstain: Councilmembers: None
Absent: Councilmembers: Zane
ATTEST:
t:~---- h ~uLA--Z
Clty Clerk
23rd
20th
17th
14th
........ ..
._.......~
r-.
-
EXHH3\T A-
LAND USE ELEME~T D\STRIC T 5
PRoPOSED
GPA.-O~ :
.. Low DE"'lSI"N \-IoJS1~"
1O~ I NSTI"TVTIOtJS"
>-
113
~
-a
113
o
~
c:l
.-;
li ,;c
'!j -
-'
:> ,... ctI
.-I '1l tJ
::::\ :> -~
o:C C
h. 0
-
j..; it: :E
-.... t::
-'- 0 m
tI1 N ~
..... .,..f C
.-l ,... '0
3: <: cr.
~
HEm
~
~
~
r-~ ::_:~~
f""'--"l
- ....'.....,.../-~'......._....
.. . ~.. I .
.. ...-, -;: ..:... ,-.. ..!
Downtown Core
+
General Commercial
SpecIal OffIce District
Oceanfront Speclai District
Service and Specialty CommGrClal
NeIghborhood Commercial
Broadway Mixed-Use DistrIct
Industrial
Institu tlons
Parks
I Sf Single Family Housing
f t.O ~ Low DenSity HOUSing
I -:~. .f Medium DenSity HOUSing
1:\~~~:::::I High DenSIty HOUSing
+ ,-INCOu-../ (NO;2.,Trl) fio1"'"rl :.J.SE S
elRCUlATiON
1
~
f
~
~
,
~
r
.
~
-""""'Ii
\
Freeway
Arterial Street
Collector Street
i~ Feeder Street
.
EXIST:NG LAND USE k~~ CIRCCLATIO~ P~A~ ~~;P
~
e
e
A'I., ACHfI/IENT
c
STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL ACTION
PROJECT
NUMBER: General Plan Amendment, GPA-04, Zone Change 26,
and Zone Change 27.
APPLICANT: st. John's Hospital and Health Center
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
3/2/87
Date.
x
Recommendation to City council to Certify Project
EIR and Adopt Requests based on the following
findings:
Denied.
Other.
FINDINGS
1. The pUblic necessity, public convenience, and general welfare
require the proposed Land Use Element Amendment and Zone
Changes in that:
a. The proposed changes would have beneficial land use
effects on the integrity of the surrounding residential
neighborhood by grouping similar land uses more closely
together.
b. The proposed changes represent reasonable consolidation of
both commercial and residential land use zones. Since
roughly equivalent areas of commercial and residential
land are being "exchanged," no substantial growth-inducing
impact will result.
c. Zone Change 26 (CP to R2) will bring the subject
properties' zoning into conformance with the existing Land
Use Element's Low Density Housing designation.
d. Zone Change 27 (R2 to CP) would be a more appropriate and
more compatible designation given the existing hospital
facilities abutting the lots and the fact that the
maj ori ty of the lots have not been activiely used for
residential housing for a considerable length of time.
- 1 -
e
e
e. The proposed changes are fully consistent with the
September 1986 Draft Hospital Area specific Plan and would
not prejudice adoption of said Specific Plan, based on the
analysis contained in this staff report and incorporated
herein by reference.
f. An Environmental Impact Report on the proposed changes was
prepared, finalized, and fully reviewed by the Planning
Commission. The EIR was prepared in conformance with city
and state CEQA Guidelines and adequately analyzed
potential environmental effects of the project. The EIR
found that the proposed changes would not have any
significant environmental impacts. The EIR is
incorporated herein by reference.
g. The Planning Commission has fully reviewed the March 2,
1987, Staff Report on the subject proposed changes, the
September 1986 Draft Hospital Area Specific Plan, the
January 26, 1987, and March 2, 1987, Staff Reports on said
Specific Plan, and the Environmental Impact Report on said
Specific Plan, the contents of all of which are
incorporated herein by reference.
VOTE
Ayes:
Burns, Farivar (GPA-04, ZC-26 and ZC-27), Nelson,
Perlman, Hecht
Nays:
Abstain:
Absent:
Farivar (EIR)
Israel, Latimer
I hereby certify that this statement of
accurately reflects the final determination
commission of the City of Santa Monica.
Official Action
of the Planning
p~~
signature
3/2tt/~7
date
Rrcffftf2-V {Vl1i-l.,..S ftS~/It7'"'C PUWNE~
print name and titie
RM: nh
STZONE
03/11/87
- 2 -
AT TA. C t-\ tv\ E---1T D
RESOLUTION NO.
(Planning Commission Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA
RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE
LAND USE AND CIRCULATION ELEMENT MAP
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Monica adopted its existing
Land Use Element in October 1984; and
WHEREAS, st. John's Hospital and Health Center applied on
August 14, 1986, to amend a portion of the Land Use and
Circulation Element Map; and
WHEREAS, on March 2, 1987, the Planning Commission
conducted a duly noticed Public Hearing on the proposed revision,
affording any interested person opportunities to comment on the
matter; and
WHEREAS, the proposed revision to the Land Use and
Circulation Element Map is consistent with other portions of the
Land Use Element and other Elements of the General Plan: and
WHEREAS, the public necessity, public convenience, general
welfare and efficiency and economy in the process of development
require the proposed Land Use Element Amendment: and
WHEREAS, the proposed changes would have beneficial land
use effects on the integrity of the surrounding residential
neighborhood by grouping similar land uses more closely together;
and
- 1 -
WHEREAS, the proposed change represents a reasonable
consolidation of commercial land use zones; and
WHEREAS, "Institutions" would be a more appropriate and
more compatible designation than "Low Density Housing" given the
existing hospital facilities abutting the subj ect lots and the
fact that the majority of the lots have not been actively used
for residential housing for a considerable length of time; and
WHEREAS, the proposed change is fully consistent with the
Draft Hospital Area Specific Plan recommended by the Planning
commission on March 2, 1987, and would not prejudice adoption of
said Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report on the proposed
change was prepared, finalized, and fully reviewed by the
Planning commission, the EIR was prepared in conformance with
city and state CEQA Guidelines and adequately analyzed potential
environmental effects of the project, and the EIR found that the
proposed change would not have any significant environmental
impacts;
Nmv-, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
SANTA MONICA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Land Use and Circulation Element Map,
attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this
reference, is hereby approved and adopted as the Planning
commission recommended amendment to the original Land Use and
Circulation Element Map of the General Plan.
- 2 -
SECTION 2. The Secretary of the Planning Commission shall
certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and thenceforth and
thereafter the same shall be in full force and effect.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~ '-"--. v--y-
ROBERT M. MYERS
City Attorney
- 3 -
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this
day of
, 1987.
Eileen Hecht, Chairwoman
Planning Commission
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution No.
was
duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa
Monica at a meeting thereof held on
by the following Commission vote:
, 1987,
Ayes:
Noes:
Absent:
Abstain:
ATTEST:
R. Ann Siracusa, Secretary
Director of Planning
RM:nh
RESGPA04
03/12/87
- 4 -
E"XH\6 \, A-
LAND USE ELEMENT D\STRtCTS
l'RoPOSED
GP}lt.... - Ot.t :
.' low t>e.~SI1"'1' ~l~"
10.1 N"iiTITVTIOtJS.
\ . '.' - 0' ,-
23rd
17th
I
I
..
.,
.
I
.
I
I
.
.
.
..~
. ..
. .
. ..
...
... ...,
-- .---
>.
~
~
't:I
~
o
l-l
j;Q
14th
.
.......... I -
r-4
. Q) Q:l
"0 ='
:> s:: ~
r-I Q) 0
a:l > .....
oeC s::
Q) 0
l-l 1t1 :IE:
..... ~
.s::: 0 lU
(Q N -4J
...-l ..-1 s::
.r( $.I. lt1
~ oeC en
~
mtffi
~
~
t .... .~
... ...,11-... .__
........ - .....
- ~ .. .
'1 ... "
f Sf I
[::ici: j
~......
:::00::
. .. .. . . .. .
Downtown Core
+
General Commercial
Special Office District
Oceanfront Special Distric t
..
Service and Specialty Commc.-rclaf
Neaghborhood Commercial
Broadway Mixed-Use District
Industrial
Institutions
Parks
Single Family Housing
Low DenSity Housing
Medium Density Housing
High DenSity HOUSing
+ l..tNCo,-",", (NORTH) 6c:rn"., USE S
CIRCULA liON
r
r
Freeway
1 Arterial Street
1 CoHector Street
~ Feeder Street
EXISTING LAND USE AND CIRCULATION PLAN ~~p
e
e
ATTAC.H MEN\" S
CITY PLANNING DIVISION
Community and Economic Development Department
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 2, 1987
TO: The Honorable Planning Commission
FROM: R. Ann Siracusa, Director of Planning
SUBJECT: General Plan Land Use Element Amendment (GPA-04) and
Zoning District Amendments (Zone Changes 26 and 27)
Requested by st. John's Hospital and Health Center.
INTRODUCTION
st. John's Hospital and Health Center has appl ied for certain
amendments to the Land Use Element and Zoning Districts to be
considered and acted upon separately from the Hospital Area
specific Plan (HASP) and the HASP rezonings. The st. John's
requests, detailed below, are consistent with proposed changes in
the HASP. An Environmental Impact Report for these requested
amendments and related projects, following due public review, has
been finalized and is attached for review.
SPECIFIC REQUESTS AND INVOLVED PROPERTIES
Both the Land Use Element and Zoning District Maps are proposed
to be amended, as follows:
The Land Use Element Land Use Map is proposed to be amended by
reclassifying all "Low Density Housingll District properties on
the west side of 23rd street between Arizona Avenue and Santa
Monica Place alley (on the 1300 block of 23rd street) to the
IIInstitutions" District. (See Attachment A for location map).
The Santa Monica District Map is proposed to be amended by 1)
reclassifying all R-2 Multiple Residential District properties on
the west side of 23rd Street between Arizona Avenue and Santa
Monica Place alley (on the 1300 block of 23rd Street) to the C-P
Commercial-Professional Office District and 2) reclassifying all
C-P Commercial-Professional Office District properties in the
block north of Arizona Avenue between 21st street and 22nd street
to the R-2 Multiple Residential District. (See Attachment B for
location map) .
- 1 -
e
e
The specific properties involved are as follows:
Land Use!
Zone Change Lots
Tract
Location
General Plan 19 thru 29
Amendment-04:
Low Density
Housing to
Institutions
4618
1302-1342
23rd st. (west
side of 23rd st.)
Zone Change 27:
R2 to CP 19 thru 29
4618
1302-1342
23rd st. (west
side of 23rd st.)
Zone Change 26:
CP to R2 22, 23, 24,
28, 29, 30
199
North side of 2100
block of Arizona;
1246 22nd st.;
1247-1251 21st st.
SITE DESCRIPTIONS
The project locale is largely characterized by three major land
use types: medical-related uses which are dominated by Saint
John's Hospital and Health Center, residential uses which are
predominately multiple family, and commercial development located
primarily along Wilshire and Santa Monica Boulevards.
The properties at 1302-1342 Twenty-Third street, currently zoned
R2, are developed with a mix of multi-family residential
buildings containing a total of 26 dwelling units interspersed
with three surface parking lots containing a total of 116 parking
spaces. All but two of the buildings on this site are vacant.
The two buildings that are occupied contain a total of thirteen
units.
The properties at 2101, 2121, and 2129 Arizona Avenue, currently
zoned CP, are developed with surface parking for 90 vehicles, a
medical office building with 13 associated parking spaces, and
one two-unit residential building.
Additional detailed information may be found on pages 8 through
14 of the project EIR. (Attachment C).
CEQA STATUS
An Environmental Impact Report on the proposed Land Use Element
and Zoning District Amendments (and related projects) has been
prepared. The EIR found no significant impacts which would
result from the amendments.
- 2 -
~
-
e
Since the City Council has final authority over amendments to the
General Plan and Zoning Districts, certification of the EIR is
the responsibility of the Council.
ANALYSIS
The specific requests herein are a sub-set of map changes
proposed in the Hospital Area Specific Plan. No text changes to
the Land Use Element or the Zoning Ordinance are proposed by st.
John's in these requests. Attachments "AII and liB" illustrate the
st. John's map changes as compared to the zone changes proposed
in the HASP.
To the extent the HASP proceeds in a timely fashion without
significant modification, these specific requests become
unnecessary. The applicant is concerned, however, that issues
unrelated to these requests could in some manner delay adoption
of the HASP. Accordingly, the applicant requests that these
specific amendments be adopted independently from the HASP.
Zone Change 26, which would change parcels on the north side of
Arizona Avenue between 21st and 22nd streets from CP to R2, would
bring the zoning into conformance with the present Land Use
Element "Low Density Housing" designation for the property as
shown on the Land Use Element Map_ The HASP proposes the same
zone change.
The "lest 23rd Street Land Use Element Amendment, GPA-04, from
"Low Density Housing" to "Institutions" and Zone Change 27, which
would change the same area from R2 to CP, are consistent with the
proposed HASP. (The HASP would change the "Institutionsll
designation to "Medical" in the Specific Plan area. At such time
as the HASP is adopted, it would supersede the "Institutions"
designation.)
As would be accomplished on
John's proposed changes to
Districts result in a
commercial professional uses
of residential uses on the
considered positive from
compatibility_
The project EIR found no significant impacts which would result
from the requested amendments. However, the Arizona Avenue zone
change would cause the existing medical office building at the
northeast corner of Arizona Avenue and 22nd Street to become a
nonconforming use. This building is potentially eligible for
local landmark designation based on its 1920's low-scale Art Deco
architecture. This issue is discussed on pages 75-76 of the
proj ect EIR. One option to mitigate the concern of making a
possible future landmark a nan-conforming building would be to
retain the CP District designation on its site (Lot 3D, Tract
199). Staff does not support this, however, since there is no
assurance, even with a landmark designation, that the building
would remain. Leaving one small lot with a commercial
a broader scale by the HASP, the st.
the Land Use Element Map and Zoning
consolidation of hospital-related
on the one hand, and a consolidation
other, an impact that is generally
the perspective of land use
- 3 -
e
e
designation within a residential district would constitute "spot
zoningll and would be inconsistent with the overall goals of the
HASP. Rezoning of the lot to R2 would not force removal of the
commercial use for at least 25 years.
Except for the non-conforming building issue noted above, there
are no other mitigation measures proposed in the proj ect EIR
which relate directly to the map designation changes proposed by
st. John's Hospital and Health Center.
PLANNING COM}tISSION ACTION
Since these requests were initiated by a property owner, the
Commission may either disapprove the requests or recommend them
to the city Council for approval along with appropriate required
findings. A Commission Resolution of Intention is not required.
If the requests are recommended for approval, the Commission
should also recommend that the proj ect EIR be certified by the
Council.
CONCLUSION
The above Land Use Element Amendment and Zone Changes are in the
public interest, whether adopted as part of the Hospital Area
Specific Plan and its rezonings or adopted independently from the
Specific Plan. The public interest and public welfare would be
best served by approval of the proposed requests.
RECOMMENDATION
It is respectfully recommended that the Planning Commission
forward to the City Council the commission's recommendation to
certify the project's Environmental Impact Report, and to adopt
General Plan Amendment 04 and zone Changes 26 and 27 based on the
findings below.
FINDINGS
1. The public necessity, public convenience, and general welfare
require the proposed Land Use Element Amendment and Zone
Changes in that:
a. The proposed changes would have beneficial land use
effects on the integrity of the surrounding residential
neighborhood by grouping similar land uses more closely
together.
b. The proposed changes represent reasonable consolidation of
both commercial and residential land use zones. Since
roughly equivalent areas of commercial and residential
land are being ltexchanged,lI no substantial growth-inducing
impact will result.
c. Zone Change 26 (CP to R2) will bring the subject
properties' zoning into conformance with the existing Land
Use Element's Low Density Housing designation.
- 4 -
e
e
d. Zone Change 27 (R2 to CP) would be a more appropriate and
more compatible designation given the existing hospital
facilities abutting the lots and the fact that the
majority of the lots have not been activiely used for
residential housing for a considerable length of time.
e. The proposed changes are fully consistent with the
September 1986 Draft Hospital Area Specific plan and would
not prejudice adoption of said Specific Plan, based on the
analysis contained in this staff report and incorporated
herein by reference.
f. An Environmental Impact Report on the proposed changes was
prepared, finalized, and fully reviewed by the Planning
commission. The EIR was prepared in conformance with City
and state CEQA Guidelines and adequately analyzed
potential environmental effects of the project. The EIR
found that the proposed changes would not have any
significant environmental impacts. The EIR is
incorporated herein by reference.
g. The Planning commission has fully reviewed the March 2,
1987, Staff Report on the subject proposed changes, the
September 1986 Draft Hospital Area Specific Plan, the
January 26, 1987, and March 2, 1987, Staff Reports on said
Specific Plan, and the Environmental Impact Report on said
Specific Plan, the contents of all of which are
incorporated herein by reference.
Prepared by: Richard Mills, Associate Planner
Attachments:
A. Existing Land Use Element Map, with GPA-04
Highlighted
B. Proposed H.A.S.P. Rezonings, with st. John's
Requests Highlighted
c. Project EIR
RM: nh
Zone
02/25/87
- 5 -
f"'I"elnX> '2) l,ei7, 'Si-'lu. ~n
e ATIACHMENT A
LAND USE ELEMENT D\$TR1CTS
e
Downtown Core
+
General CommerCial
~
f8H.i:i
f::::::j
++++++
++++++
Special Office District
PRoPOSED
GP~-o" :
.. Low DE"'ISI"N ~I~"
~ -ro~INS"'TUTIO""S"
Oceanfront Special District
.
Service and Specialty Commr:rclal
~
~
F94'~'._-
~. I.. __ ..'II
,1 --
Neighborhood Commercial
Broadway Mixed-Use Dlstnct
23rd
Industrial
Institullons
20th
Parks
SF I
I. t~ j
I ~:~ ~-,
t:::::~{:J
Single Family Housing
>..
ll:l
~
't:l
~
o
lo-t
!Xl
17th
Low Density Housing
.,-..... .., -...' .,-....-
....:.'_:~':~..- ,....':::':;...,
~~. ,.,- -' 1" "'...' ....t
~'.~~f:~:,._:=: :::.',,:~,:,_
......_,...,.., ....t_'-.f...,-~
... -I:.'::~f:f: I'_~r~(.:,,:,'
".. ~::"'::':':J ,:.:,:::.'.."",
~ ,-,.......... .....'....'-,.....
;:::: ::::::~
Medium Density Housing
High Density Housing
+ L.INCOl...N (NORTH) fb'Trl USE 5
14th
. - . . . J - . . - . .
" .,1... .......
,
..... ....."..
,~ . ." .. ...... ~
...-I
c::l
CIRCULA TION
~ .... Freeway
I
~ ~ Arterial Street
I
I
1 -----Ii Collector Street
,-- J
~ Feeder Street
OJ
::l
t::
OJ
:>
<
.
'0
:>
...-I
!Xl
OJ
lo-t
'r-l
..c
In
...-I
~
~
It!
()
-~
a
o
::e:
It!
.j.l
s:::
ltl
tI)
It!
s:::
o
N
.~
~
II::C
EXISTING LAND USE AND CIRCULATION PLAN MAP
..:JML" 1 .. 1 .. , ... I" ~ i .. 1 'f i '4 I .. I .. 12.4f1 0
STREET
:j
~ ~t.. J .0 " '" ': '" I"'! .. . .. 1 .. ! .. .1" "'1
~ - 9 ~ ~,,~:f;lLA ; ~I ~i ~ ~
8 1 9 [10 14 11! 13 14 I :S i 16 !. n I 13
.. "0' i I i I.. . i
- M ; 40 ' 4G l ..;:; ~...~ '" 4C"'" ~.sO 6Cf J .a(J
:: ~f" : -;"~I-:"'"":" . .. , .. I .. . .. I .. ~c;;'. .,~~
_~ ~ n: 18 i. 11 ' 16 : lS eft i 11 ; nJ' 1\ ! ,0:. ~~
~ :;: M ~ 3! ~. ~i fi)l ")) ~ jl ~I
~ ~ 1 ~i :; ?'i It'\L5 ~I ~ ~ ~
; I' "0 : 10 . ..0 I (~ : 6C I 40 I .10 i &0 ~ 40 I &(J I A(l 2:JOJ 0
2.~""~
-~ ~ 4G . ole ..\,~. ~ LD...c. to '" iIC I ~ . il(I
i ~ ~I~i =-fbl ~ ::: :Il, ~ . :::
~ ~~ ~: Il ~~LS ;! ~ ~: - ~
_~. . 9 ; 10 ::} ~ I'll 13 : 14 ! IS I': 17 18
)So".\to'1;('; . ~ lot ~ 1;1)' 4tJ
.... 1fII..... 1E--::' to
_ .l.t::i40 4D oU:i."O 'O,60''I):4C_iI.(J
'0." : I :....e l'lo,~ t~i! I
: ~ ~ ~ ?8 i n ~ 26 1 ?S~:. 24; i3 ~_ n '. 21 ' '20 :. 19
" R' jl 1..' ~I E ID),. ,:::, ::I
~ : ~, .L:.. EI ~ ,. ..,: ~, ~ ;:
,,~ ..., I lie . 4[; "" I ~ .~ ~ ~ 40' 4( : ~
Uor
6c'U
2.2~
&kJP '~IG J Y i >0 j '.
~. . tlR Ar~ 25 ~I " u1 'Z7
,- J Tft\'jf",,<o
_~\ 5< ~~~ ~ ~
;~. P -; 18~' '9 i '0-1 ,1
-;~, R~; .\ C Tl
:I ! ,
~ !rO I c,,- !h I. "'C' ~ ~ I ......
\0
C'\l
f-iE-t
(,!}UZ
:z:t-Ij:::j
I-ql,:; ::E;
ZE-<Cl
OU)Z
NHji:j
q~
~
~.Ol 0
2.t'!!
'1'"-j";"'I" sa
I~ Q j~51 ~1fil 9
3 :' . ~i 5 ~ 6-~1 7 ~ 8 ~
~& i ':oD I 'i(' I ~::. I ~ I 'iC I
EIH
.. , ..
~. \
51!
STREET
'"9! ~. i~" 12
9d~'l
>< 1 ~~..
,- \ '~~f:- ., I[ :, '"
S ~ R'b - ~; ~~
I . Q po: N 41'"
10~ 1 \ i
.: r ,e I~. 'i i ~ I, I"
G
'"
~ I f
~ i!
~ :;
-.,w ,
~ U : T
I !
i'
~ 1!tC
'),
" '" .. ~ ~C~ ! ~. '" 'I ..
-io- F'G -;
r II 'f. ~.i - -, ~ I I J K I ~
I
~
"e 5'- "g 8
m
i! lWOllY.YI\'Rtl
C.OuRT
at; . 4') . .;:: i ..: ~" ...... ,... r: '" 40 .::,(. ,
~3 42: 4' '~o '39--138" 3"! 3& 35d4d3 :;
I . ; ~ :;:- . I 9: il! ::J:..
- ~ ~ - ~' ..,r"l;u,. ~...,- .; .:-.<:
_ _I gj _' _~.........- 'l...... .L ~o'"
i I z~
~
0< .
.,~ .I !
141: ,-; I
STREET
~ ..
w~ t'~_
~~ Ii s
~ ~ ~- 0
. I w:,.., _
w
~ ~
.1,; ZONING DISTRICT ~i
~, p ~TD~' 'T 2'" . -,
19 ,,_!'"' , E ~ _ "lE"\) ---,-----!_ ~ '8 i ?9
? ~
, , ."
~ ~.~ ~:'~i~.~ ~ · ~I~ T I ~
18~, :~". 'I; j 5..J~._, ~~<i 'I~ 'O~' '3 <>I8~ 1 ~ Ii)
~ ~ ~ ~ ',I ~ ~ ~ ~ i,!V~loe~....
.. - O...L. '" A : Q' 'L 8' ;::! !:>; ~ j i 2 .'
~~ ~ 5 'P , <J! 01 .Ii '!l '1 '1 6 i.
6.tl .LO ...:; ~ I.r.::: I 10 "0. tC ...:..u; .... .2101 0 ~
tol,"
o~
~
STREET
,...
~[p
_0' 'J
~OCII.!
ORCHAllD }RA.CT
'0 5~ 60 "91 ~~ ,
~~
:..-'" 't
M!
..
"
1)
w
J, ~
,
" I ..
o
,.,..
e4-
o
...
1/101 111
..
'"I'" ~"~rM fl< I"
, 1 \blJ'F I I
~ c. 'I 0 ! E i F _1 ~~ Jot
:k(~
J..
i ~:~;if=~1 ~ ~I~
I ~ . -
;: 5 ~ 6
~Slo CLOVER FIELl
:t
; .: 3 ~ ~~
5(f:~?.,~ E---'lH~
-~-s- -
120 ~ I 51 '0
!' ~ I~
~ ~HOt
?
~
.
i\ e. TWENTY-THIRC
~ ~{l
.i
5 ",; 6
-~ --- ~ - !--4
, 1.' ~
-----"-- -~ --~
.i 3 ~ 8 .......
--"------A; n n
"J {i:\.-/ 51 9
; 11 . !\ I -: 10
~
- 5-
~RCH
Y-' I u-
100
, G OL:D
1~. "5
~ :!~~ ~' ;
\1'ot:::.. ~ . ,.. y:; J it
- f\c, TWENTY-FIRST
2.e .. 'I< !>< 10'"
Q- , , ;.
< I.
C' ~ r ra'\1.... 3 '" · .of s
; ~!' ", !I
~ ~I"I" ~~
~ ~~j ORCH
r, \ I "...c....no --
&Il.~~-o,<il<'l'"
OJ: ~11F!
'f, ~I ' I 'J ~
, . 1 :
Ot " :" :" I" II
05
..
-N-
~
~~
..!~ (.
<(
. .
~ ~... , 501"
1 '
l~~
J~:
['fIo.~dr- 2) 1<i6119+&~~ f(..,.r<:>- T
,", /1
eA TTA..CH.!,+1 c-NT 3-
i2l Ell : , ' , ; : ! : i ; : II ! 11 1 ~ Hlili:..l1lilliIl=1lliWl1J~ a 1111111111 I-l-t
~ ~I:"" :,f'1iil i'!lt ~ III ~ 1~ L31l1TITfTITr:l ElmTTmlg FlI11IlIIIII ~
ii] f3li": Ii! 1lF3 ~fTiiTTm~ nfiiTTITTITTl ~ " 1111111 Twr -I't~.
~ ~~~:~~~!J~,~0ITID[j ~~illJJJ}:lDI t~lEl~IIIJ) ~
~ tjLJ.llll1Jfj DOUGI.AS f]LfIillBb i ~ 11111 , II J
~ I:::FfT11TflE3 ":2". 4 I-jfiiTTIITTTI1 , WIIIID
1i ~t:::,;jl~~l:~:::i;l~ F"-1111 -:~~~~ ~
Jl ~~~F"O~T.I"1.1 I" j ~~
r..., (31 ~~I I 'J II: ! ! ! 11 ~ITIIIIIITID
,'I .;. NTY foil ·
~ ~l ' ] , : '; . ~ DfIIITITIW] ~.
~ tj[ 1 I, , I tll; I ! i! i II : i I
-n TW N y. ~ f'..I .5"'~~f
',I I :, I I,ll' "':. I' ! ~L-
~ :,11,\ ',',; I"
WENTY.F'RST ... .TRE
~ I ~: j I: ~:: -I Ff :;' i }--l i ilIl1 fR ' : :
:=J ,i,! I ~ ~, I ~ ~LfnHH] I :"i I r \ j ! f Ir-1
W. NT I E M w
:-11 ! j:"" J~~ i ~.:: !! II 11 r! Ii: ! ! : ; ~ ! q EITIIIIIIJJJ I"
:J I ~~:, II"." t:--1 r:' ']1'1'111':1 ' I!:'I ~
""':NE,-rEE':!.TH I STa......- - ,J ..,jool;f'\
:d I '" II" 1 F i' ~ ~ I I..{] : I r! i " - - . -.. ". .. .
a l. " . ,: .11 .::'. n R i i; : i I: I d;l: " : i : 'I i: I KEY
!;'GHT!:ENTH .. Hm ~ c-p to be rezoned
ITjl (: \. , 1 \ 1 r r j 'i; I ' , 11---1 r I : [ '1 : . ; '1'1: Iii I ' I 1.1 I . R- 2
~'!!1 1_..~.~ I :,; H!~~ .I! ! I. ~I ,1,
Yi t .. '. i I r-;.::J , J..-....l I ]"1 ' T r 11'1\ I'.. I ' . I II I
~ ~ i! i J,. : I I ; I, ;. I' - H! I, ~ i I : II. j i ::: 1 1 : 1m R-2 to be rezoned
SEVENTEENTH · ffiil c-p t:
JD HqfH! I ; ~~j l=-1?C II:-i t=1.t~q in: II I; 3pO; , It] II 1 ..... C-A to be rezoned "I
]] I::!!) \11: u t=! i . .. i;~ 1 ~ I j ! : - 11 ' ; I I' I : : I ' : I : ~ I,:,.! ; .. c-p ~
I _;:;'.!.XTEENTM I -:'1'
:J I ~ , II --i t-f;:! ! I ! I Ii,:,,:::!! II IIII!!: I f ~ IIIII~ 1"11111 ! i Ii ! I;
:w I U"COV' F; :1. i Al:~ (. ,. I ! : ' i ! [I rTl1TTmll rmmmm I l ......o-,..~
....,..'0.. ..,.;.. I eTpEET'
~ sc: HO 01.. I l"lll. J I Il1flllJIII Ii", "11" ~ 1111111111'.' I. ....iJJItta
PRoft:>SED H.A..S. P. RE:ZON,f\iCcS
W\T'-'
SAINI ..TOHN~~ ~EGlUES-rG CIRCLED
~
//t?t?-CJO~
~.
CjED:PC:nh
Councll Mtg: January 28, 1986
Santa Monica, Cal~forn~a
TO: Mayor and C~ty Council
FROM: C~ty Staff
SUBJECT: Transm~ttal of Draft Zonlng Ordinance and Recommenda-
t~on to Adopt Resolut.1.on of Intent~on to Amend the
Zoning Ord~nance Text.
INTRODUCTION
ThlS report transmits to the Clty Council a draft comprehens~ve
rev~s~on to Chapter 1, Artlcle IX of the Santa Mon1ca Mun~cipal
Code, the C~ty's Zon.1.ng Ordlnance, wh~ch lS requlred to ~mplement
the goals, obJect~ves, pol~cles and standards conta1ned 1n the
Land Use and C~rculatlon Elements of the General Plan adopted ln
October 1984.
Also attached to thlS report lS a proposed Resolu-
t~on of Intent10n to Amend the Zonlng Ord~nance Text, as requlred
by SMMC Section 9149, d~recting the Planning Commlss~on to com-
plete its cons~derat~on of thl s draft and return a report and
recommendatlon to the Councll Wlthln 4 months.
The key prlnclples underly~ng staff I s approach to the proJect,
the organlzatlon of the document and a summary of ~ts contents
are ~ncluded in thls report. A more detalled dlScussion of ind.1.-
vldual sectlons and topJ..cs wlll be presented to the Planning Com-
ml SSlon during .1. ts reVlew of th~ s draft.
The process for cow-
pletlng reVlew and adoptlon of the draft Zoning Ordlnance lS also
summarlzed.
- 1 -
The draft ordlnance lS the result of a slgnlflcant 1nter-
departmental Clty staff effort durlng the past twelve months to
translate the general requirements of the Land Use and Circula-
tlon Elements lnto speclflc standards. The draft was prepared
inl t1ally by the Cl ty Plannlng D1V1Slon of the Communl ty and
EconomlC Development Department and has been extensively revlewed
by other D1V1Slons of that Department, other Clty Departments,
the Clty Manager and the City Attorney. The draft ordlnance is a
complex technlcal document whlch was prepared and revlewed ln a
relatlvely short period of tlme.
As a result there may eXl st
some internal inconslstencles withln the text, however It is an-
t1clpated that any dlscrepancles w111 be clarified durlng the
extenslve public reVlew process.
The Plannlng Commlsslon wlll begin lts reVlew and publlC hearlngs
on the draft In February according to a schedule approved by the
Councl] on December 17, 1985. Copies of the draft ordlnance and
th1s stdff report w111 be avallab1e for reVlew ln all Clty publlC
llbrarles and at the City Plannlng D1V1S1on publlC counter. Cop-
les will also be available to bUSlness groups, communlty groups
and other C1V1C organizatlons who participated actlvely ln the
Land Use and C1rculatlon Elements proJect. Addl tlonal coples
wlll be avallable for purchase at the Clty Planning Div1sion.
BACKGROUND
On October 23, 1984 the Clty council unan1mously adopted new Land
Use and Clrculatlon Elements of the Clty'S General Plan. ThlS
- 2 -
actlon completed two and one-half years of active study and ex-
tenslve publlC particlpation by numerous groups and lndlVlduals
throughout the Clty about how Santa Monlca should grow and
develop ln the comlng decades. The Implementatlon Sectlon of the
Element identlfles the Zonlng Ordlnance as the prlmary vehlcle
for lmplementlng the goals, obJectlves, pollcles and standards ln
the Land Use and Clrculatlon Elements.
The numerous changes and modlflcatlons enacted during the past
thlrty-seven years Slnce the last comprehensive reV1Slon to the
Zonlng Ordinance has resulted In an ordlnance that 1S frequently
confuslng for staff, declslon makers and the general publlC.
The number and extent of changes to SMHC Artlcle IX, Chapter 1
that were requlred to achleve cons1stency wlth the new Land Use
and Clrculatlon Elements presented staff the opportunlty to
slmultaneously lncorporate pollcles of the recently adopted Hous-
lUg Element, recent Cl ty Councll, Plannlng Commi SSlon and Ar-
Chl tectural ReVlew Board actlons, and an opportunl ty to reor-
ganlze the ordinance for greater clarlty and lnternal
cons1stency.
Santa Monlca has a wealth of lnherent assets to protect i an
oceanfront w1th publlc beach access, a busy successful downtown,
characterlstic nelghborhoods and commerClal dlstrlcts, well ten-
ded parks, a strong sense of place created by the rlch archltec-
tural and cultural heritage. The purpose of the Zonlng Ordlnance
is to protect and pre serve these assets by gUldlng growth and
- 3 -
development ~n a balanced ratlonal manner.
The Zon~ng Ord~nance
lS des~gned to prov~de:
o Predlctlbill ty: Clear reliable standards and procedures to
gUlde developers, res~dents, declslon makers
and City staff In the development of Santa
Monlca.
o Compatibillty: Assure that new development occurs ~n a form
that lS compat~ble wlth the eXlstlng urban
context and l5 not detrimental to the unlque
character of Santa Mon~ca.
o Stablllty:
Protect and enhance the hou5~ng and employ-
ment opportunlties.
KEY PRINCIPLES
In preparlng the draft Zon~ng Ordlnance staff was gUlded by the
follow~ng general pr~nclples:
1. Translate General Plan pollcles into spec~flc, quantlf~-
able and understandable standards.
The Land Use, Clrculat~on and Houslng Elements contaln
numerous obJectlves, pollcles, programs and requlrements.
Most of these statements are clear expresslons of publlc
pollcy whlch are easl1y translated lnto regulatory re-
quirements.
Some, however, are vague and occaslonally
contradlctory.
The draft Zon~ng Ordlnance lncludes the
expl~c~ t standards from the Elements, such as the floor
area ratlo and bUlldlng helght l~mlts ~n the new Land Use
Element, and also attempts to resolve amblgult~es based on
actual proJect-related experience during the ~nterlm peri-
od Slnce adoptlon of the most recently amended General
Plan Elements.
- 4 -
2. Incorporate recent C1ty Councll, Plann1ng Cornrn1SS1on and
Arch1tectural ReV1ew Board procedures, standard cond1-
t1ons, and POllCY gU1dellnes
Slnce the Development Moratorium of 1981 the Councll,
Planning CornrnlS Slon and Archl tectural Revlew Board have
been act1vely 1nvolved in rev1ewing a wlde var1ety of
development proJects.
Th1S process has permltted dec1s1on
makers and the publ1C an unusual opportunity to evolve
general consensus on a number of City plann1ng 1ssues and
procedures.
The draft Zonlng Ordlnance codlf1es standard
cond1t1ons of approval for a variety of land uses based on
this experience, and adds new ffi1nlffium Ob]ect1ve requ1re-
ments for certaln uses over Wh1Ch dlscretlonary actlon
wlll contlnue to be requlred.
Various other procedural
lssues WhlCh have emerged over the years are lncorporated
luto the permlt process, (for example, the power to revoke
permits under speclfled circumstances).
Responses to
other lssues Wh1Ch the general publlC and dec1sion makers
have reque sted, such as addl tional setback requirements
for substantlal remodel1ng of slngle fam1ly homes, park1ng
structure standards, lot coverage and density calculat10n
methods, perfil tted exceptlons to bU1ldlng height limits,
and general procedural
streawl1nlng,
have also been
addressed.
3. Maintaln the structure of the eX1stlug Zon1ng Ordlnance,
but ellmlnate amblguous language and re-organize subjects
for eaSler access to 1nformation.
Unllke other sections of the Munlclpal Code, the Zonlng
Ordl.nance lS read and lnterpreted on a dally basls by
- 5 -
everyone involved 1n the development of property 1n Santa
Mon1ca.
The language of the ord1nance, therefore, should
be as clear as poss1ble and the organlzat1on of the or-
dinance should ant1clpate the informat1on needs of 1 ts
many users.
The eX1st1ng Zon1ng Ord1nance often falls to
sat1sfy these two obJectives, but because it has been 1n
actlve use for so many years, drast1c restructur1ng m1ght
have proved more confus1ng to the public than careful
reorgan1zatlon.
The proposed draft Zoning Ordinance,
therefore, resembles the baslc structure of the eX1stlng
ordlnance, but related tOplCS have been loglcally grouped,
the format un1f1ed and the language style made more con-
slstent.
Ent1rely new sections have been added (for exam-
pIe, SlX new Zon1ng Dlstrlcts) and other sections deleted.
In many cases, eX1stlng text has merely been edl ted for
conS1 stency of tone and wr.l tlng style.
In other cases
eX.lst1ng text has been relocated to sect10ns where con-
cepts and standards are more closely llnked.
The draft
ordinance also lncludes cross-reference reminders for re-
lated subJects, an index of uses and subJect 1ndex.
4. Incorporate contemporary plannlng concepts, recent State
and Federal law, and legal precedents.
In prepar1ng thlS draft Zonlng Ordlnance, staff has care-
fully
revlewed
contemporary
professlonal
11terature,
zon1ng codes from other Cl tles, recent changes 1n state
and federal Clty plannlng law and jud1clal dec1s1on
trends.
The proposed parklng regulat10ns and satelll te
- 6 -
d1sh antennae standards, for example, resulted from exten-
S1ve research 1nto the profess1onal and legal 11terature.
Other State-mandated zon1ng requ~rements such as var10US
types of ch11d care fac111t1es, manufactured hous1ng,
second dwel11ng un1ts and 1ncentives for affordable hous-
1ng (1e. dens1ty bonus) have also been addressed.
GENERAL STRUCTURE OF THE DRAFT ZONING ORDINANCE
Although Art1cle IX of the Mun1c1pal Code 1S frequently referred
to as the City's "zoning code", it 1S actually only Chapter 1 of
the Article's nlne Chapters wh1ch const1tutes the Comprehensive
Land Use Ord1nance. The other e1ght Chapters lnclude other reg-
ulations wh1ch are closely 11nked W1 th the zon1ng regulations:
the ReSldent1al Building Report Ordlnance (Chapter 2), the Sub-
d~v1s10n Ordlnance (Chapter 3), the Master Plan Ord1nance (Chap-
ter 4), the Archltectural Rev1ew Board Ord1nance (Chapter 5), the
Landmarks Ord1nance (Chapter 6), the Adult Enterta1nment Or-
d1nance (Chapter 7), the Development Agreements Ord1nance (Chap-
ter 8), and the 81gn Ord1nance (Chapter 9). The attached draft
ordlnance would replace only Chapter 1. Changes to the other
Chapters wl11 11kely occur at a later date and may be made wlth-
out first adopt1ng a Resolut1on of Intentlon.
The proposed draft Zonlng Ord1nance includes n1ne maJor subJect
group1ngs. These subject groups are presented here for ease of
explanat10n but are not necessarlly labeled as such 1n the at-
tached draft Zonlng Ordlnance:
- 7 -
o Introduct~on and General Requ~rements (commenc~ng wlth
Sect~on 9000.1) ~ncludes the Chapter tltle, statement of purpose,
deflnltlon of terms used throughout the ord~nance, establlshes
the Zonlng Dlstricts and enumerates several general requlrements
includlng a vested rlghts standard for proJects ~n process at the
tlme the new Zon1ng Ord~nance 1S adopted.
o Zonlng Dlstrlcts and Uses (commenclng w1th Sectlon
9010.1) 11sts all of the proposed Zonlng Dlstrlcts In a standard
format WhlCh lncludes a statement of purpose, l~st of permitted
uses, uses subJect to performance standards, uses subJect to S~te
Plan ReVlew Permit or Condltlonal Use Permit, prohlblted uses,
property development standards, archltectural review require-
ments, and references to related requlrements (eg. park~ng
standard s) .
o ProJect Design and Development Standards (comrnenclng
wi th Bectlon 9040.1) groups together mi sce1laneous deslgn and
development standards WhlCh must be met In add1tlon to the baslc
property development standards contalned In each Zonlng Dlstrlct.
These supplementary standards include many eXlst~ng subJects,
such as screenlng requlrements, as well as new subJects such as
detalled landscaplng requirements, mixed use development stan-
dards and satelllte dlSh antennae standards.
o Off-Street Park~ng Standards and Load~ng Requlrements
(commenclng Wl th Section 9044. l) presents detalled new parklng
standards for a wlde varlety of uses, plus varlOUS park1ng layout
and deslgn standards, and off-street loading requirements.
- 8 -
o Standards for Certain Uses (commenclng wlth Sectlon
9050.1) speclfles certaln mlnlmum design and operational stan-
dards for varlOUS uses. Those uses sUbJect to the new Perfor-
mance Standards Permlt are uses presumed to be compatible w~th
the surroundlng context only lf the speclf~ed m~n~mum condltlons
are met. For Cond~tlonal Uses, the baslc questlon of com-
patlbl1lty must be addressed by the Plannlng Commlssion and the
speclfled mlnlffium condltlons must also be met.
o Nonconforming BUlld~ngs and Uses (commenclng with Sec-
tlon 9080.1) speclfles procedures for termlnatlng bUl1dlngs and
uses eXlsting at the date the draft Zonlng Ord~nance 1S adopted
but which are inconslstent with the new ordlnance. Certaln
limltatlons for mod~fYlng such buildings and uses prlor to thelr
term~natlon dates are also dlscussed.
o Zonlng Admlnlstratlon (commenclng with Sectlon 9100.1)
establlshes the authorlty of the Zoning Admlnlstrator and out-
llnes the procedural requlrements fer Home Occupatlon permlts,
Temporary Use permits (new), Performance Standard permlts (new),
Varlances, Condltional Use Permlts, Slte Plan Revlew permlts
(new), Zonlng Ordlnance amendments, and adoptlon of the General
Plan and Speclflc Plans and amendments (new).
o Appllcatlons, Hearlng Procedures and Appeals (commenc-
lng W1th Sectlon 9131.1) presents the procedural requlrements for
maklng proper permlt appllcatlons, conducting permlt hearlngs and
appeals, lncludlng tlme llffilts and coordinatlon wlth the Clty'S
- 9 -
Gu~del1nes for Implementat10n of the Cal1forn1a Environmental
Quality Act.
o Enforcement (cornmenc1ng wlth Sectlon 9150.1) spec~fles
the roles of var~ous C~ty Departments ~n enforc1ng the Zon1ng
Ord~nance.
DRAFT ZONING ORDINANCE SUMMARY
Following 1S a section-by-section summary of the draft Zoning
Ordlnance.
SECTION 9000.1 - TITLE, clearly 1dent1f~es Chapter 1 rather than
all of Article IX as the C1ty'S zon~ng regulations. Artlcle IX
has been re-t~tled as "Plann1ng and Zon1ng."
SECTION 9000.2 - PURPOSE, enumerates ten purposes for the Zoning
Ord~nance drawn from the Land Use and C1rculat1on Elements and
exist1ng ordinance text. The second half of the eX1st1ng purpose
statement now 1n SMMC Section 9101 has been relocated 1n edlted
form to 1ntroduce the Rl Slngle Fam1ly Dlstr1ct.
SECTION 9000.3 - SPECIFIC DEFINITIONS, conta1ns a detailed sum-
mary of terms used throughout the ord1nance, lncluding many new
terms not currently 11sted in SMMC Sect10n 9102. Effort has been
made to reconc11e def1n1 t10ns of many confuslng terms such as
"floor area" and "loft." The term "lot" has been deleted and all
references to development sltes are now termed "parcels." Staff
proposes to add graphic ll1ustratlons for certa1n terms at a
later date 10 the ordlnance reV1ew process.
- 10 -
SECTION 9001.1
ESTABLISHMENT OF DISTRICTS, 11stS seventeen
prlnclpal Zonlng Dlstrlcts and three overlay deslgnatlons. New
Dlstrlcts lnclude the RVC ResldentlaljV1sltor-Servlng CommerClal
Dlstrlct, MXD Mixed Use Distrlct, C5 Special Offlce Commerclal
Dlstrict, C6 Boulevard Commerc1al Dlstr1ct, CC C1V1C Center Dis-
tr1ct, and PL Public Lands Dlstrlct.
The Downtown Core Overlay
Deslgnatlon and Nelghborhood CommerClal Overlay Deslgnations are
new. The tltles of the multl-fam1ly resldential Distr1cts (R2,
R2R, R3, R4) and one commerclal D1strlct (C3) have been changed
to reflect terms used 1n the Land Use Element. The eXlsting CA
Commerc1al Administratlve Distrlct, C4-A Llm1ted Hlghway Commer-
clal Dlstrict, CR Commercial Recreatlon Distrlct, M2 General In-
dustrial Dlstrlct, and S Slte Plan Revlew Distrlct have all been
ellm1nated.
SECTION 9001.2 - ADOPTION OF DISTRICT MAP, llke the second half
of the current SMMC Sectlon 9103, thlS sectlon l1nks the D1S-
trlcts establlshed above to a Zonlng Dlstrlct Map.
SECTION 9001.3 - RULES TO DETERMINE APPROPRIATE DISTRICT, lncor-
porates concepts from SMMC Sectlons 9135 through 9135E.
SECTION 9002.1 - APPLICATION, requlres that all development and
bUlldlng alterations and all uses of property must be conslstent
with the Zon1ng Ordlnance regulat1on5. Slmllar language 15 now
contalned 1n SMMC Sectlons 9104 and 9l04A through 9104D.
SECTION 9002.2 - VES'I'ED RIGHTS, a new sectlon, establl shes the
necessary standards for determln1ng how to apply the new Zonlng
Ordinance to proJects WhlCh were prevlously approved.
- 11 -
SECTION 9002.3 - BUILDING PERJviITS, relocates the eXlstlng re-
qUlrement for a bUlldlng permlt now in SMMC Sectlon 9152, to thlS
sectlon of general requlrements.
SECTION 9002.4 ZONING CONFORMANCE REVIEW, a new sectlon,
codlfies existlng admlnlstratlve policy that all constructlon,
changes of occupancy and changes of use must be reviewed by the
Clty Plannlng Dlvlsion for conformance wlth the Zonlng Ordlnance.
SECTION 9002.5 - USE OF STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION (SIC)
MANUAL, a new sectlon, lndlcates that staff used, and recommends
that the Cl ty continue to use thl s standard Federal reference
publlcatlon to ald in defln1ng commerclal and industrlal land
use s .
Both the deflnltions and the unlque numerlcal classlflca-
tlon system ln the SIC manual will asslst staff to develop
computer-asslsted correlatlons between land Use data and econOffilC
data (eg. sales tax revenues) for future research and policy
analysls.
SECTION 9002.6 - CONFLICT WITH OTHER REGULATIONS, a new sectlon,
lndlcates that In cases where the Zonlng Ordlnance establlshes a
more stringent requlrement for the use of land than the Building
Code or other regulatlons, thdt the Zonlng Ordinance requlrements
take precedence.
SECTION 9002.7 - COMPLIANCE, requlres Clty offlclals to apply the
Zonlng Ordlnance, as currently stated In SMMC Bectlon 9153.
SECTION 9002.8 - COMPLIANCE BY CITY, SCHOOL DISTRICT AND OTHER
AGENCIES, a slgnlflcant modlflcatlon of eXlstlng SMMC Seetlon
- 12 -
9154, requlres that all publlC as well as prlvate entitles must
comply wlth the Zon~ng Ordlnance.
SUBCHAPTER 4A
Rl-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT REGULA-
TIONS, 1ncorporates requ1rements of SMMC Sect10n 9106 through
9106B w~ th appllcable helght and densl ty standards from the Land
Use Element. The purpose statement (proposed Sec. 9010.1) con-
denses the "quallty-of-l1fe" language now conta1ned 1n SMHC Sec-
tlon 9101. Perml.tted uses ~nclude those now permltted by SMMC
Sect10n 9106A, but I1sts certa1n other uses in separate condl.-
tlonally permitted categorles (Uses Subject to Performance Stan-
dard and Condltionally Permltted Uses). Note that the Use Permlt
procedure of SMMC Sectl.on 9146 has been el~ml.nated as a redundant
procedure and therefore certain condit~onally permitted uses from
that sectlon now appear in each of the Zoning D~strlcts. Other
new condl.tl.onally perm1tted uses, such as daycare facl.llties and
second dwell~ng unlts WhlCh are now mandated by State law, are
also listed. The Rl setback requlrement for structures between
25 feet and 30 feet h1gh has been ~ncreased 1n response to
Cl tlzen and Plannlng CommlSSlon concern about l.ncompat1b~li ties
of many new and substantlally remodeled slngle family homes. A
new maXlmum standard for front yard pavlng has also been added In
response to cltlzen concerns.
SUBCHAPTER 4B - R2R LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY BEACH RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT, lncorporates the same standards now 1n SMMC Sectlons
9107 through 9l07C, but clarlfles that the max~mum number of per-
mltted storles lS two.
- 13 -
SUBCHAPTER 4C - R2 LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DIS-
TRICT, ~ncorporates the general requ~rements of SMHC Sections
9108 through 9108B comb~ned w~th the new denslty l~mlt from the
Land Use Element. Ne1ghborhood grocery stores and subterranean
parklng structures are listed as condltlonally permitted uses.
SUBCHAPTER 4D - R3 MEDIUM DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT, 1ncorporates the general requ1rements of SMMC Sect10ns
9109 through 9109B with the new Land Use Element denslty
standard.
SUBCHAPTER 4E - R4 HIGH DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DIS-
TRICT, 1ncorporates the general requ1rements of SMHC Sectlon 9110
through 9110B w1th the new Land Use Element denslty standard.
Hotels, formerly perm1tted by right, would now be subJect to a
Condlt1onal Use Perm1t 1n the R4 Dlstrlct.
SUBCHAPTER 4F - RVC RESIDENTIAL/VISITOR-SERVING COMNERCIAL DIS-
TRICT, 1S a new resldential D1strlct to 1mplement Land Use Ele-
ment Po11cles 1.5.1 through 1.5.4 affect1ng the current R4 D1S-
trlct west of Ocean Avenue between P1CO and Colorado. The Dis-
trict would permit eXlstlng res1dent1al development to remain,
but would requlre a Condltlonal Use Permit for new multi-famlly
development. A variety of commerclal uses catering prlmarlly to
coastal Vlsltors and tourlsts would be permltted. Certaln uses,
lncluding outdoor cafes, restaurants servlng alcohol and lnciden-
tal offlce space would be permltted wlth condltlons. Outdoor
dlsplays of artwork and certain other products would be condl-
tlonally perm~tted on the Promenade and pedestrlan-orlented
- 14 -
streets.
Santa Monlca Pler would be re-class1.fled from CR Com-
rnerclal Recreatlon to thl s new RVC D1.strict.
Property develop-
ment standards are a combinatlon of those llsted In the Land Use
Element and the eXlstlng R4 setback and yard standards, except
that a new 35-foot setback from Ocean Avenue lS requlred to lm-
plement Urban Design POllCY 3.5.5 ln the Land Use Element.
SUBCHAPTER 4G - MXD MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, 1.S
a new resldentlal Dlstrlct to lmplement Land Use Element POI1CY
1.6.3 regardlng the Broadway area east of Llncoln Boulevard. The
llst of permltted and condltlonally permltted uses reflects the
resldentlal deflnltion of the Dlstrlct, but allows for certaln
convenlence type commerclal goods and serVlces. Property
development standards for free-standlng resldentlal proJects,
mlxed resldentlal and commerclal proJects and free-standlng com-
merclal proJects feature a comblnatlon of the Land Use Element
standards WI. th the existing R4 yard and setback requlrements.
Proposed Sectlon 9016.6(a) contalns the flrst reference In the
draft Zonlng Ordlnance to the Slte Plan ReVlew procedure 1.n the
Land Use Element.
SUBCHAPTER 4H - C2 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, lncorporates
standards now contalned In SMMC Sectlon 9115 through 9115B wlth
appllcable pollcles of the Land Use Element. Certa1.n uses are
permltted only ln certain locatlons (eg. offlces) and others only
by Condltlonal Use Permlt (eg. serVlce statlons and multl-family
resldential uses). Beglning w1.th thlS flrst commercial Distrlct,
- 15 -
the draft Ord1nance places new 11ffi2ts on the use of rearyard set-
backs and clar1fles current Zon1ng and BU11dlng Code requirements
for certaln sldeyard setbacks.
SUBCHAPTER 41
C3 DOWNTOWK COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, 1ncorporates
standards now contalned 1n SMMC Sectlons 9116 through 91l6B wlth
appl1cable pol1c1es of the Land Use Element. proposed Section
9018.2 contalns a more speclflc 11st of perm1tted uses and cond1-
t10nally permltted uses than 15 now 11sted 2n the Zon1ng Or-
dlnance. The "Downtown Frame" concept 1n the Land Use Element
wll1 be operatlonally deflned as the entlre C3 Dlstrlct mlnus the
area mapped w2th the C3C Downtown Core D1strlct Deslgnat1on.
SUBCHAPTER 4J
C4 HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS, lncorporates
standards now contalned 1n SMMC Sect10ns 9117 through 9117B with
appllcable policles of the Land Use Element. The proposed prop-
erty development standards do not, however, 1ncorporate the Land
Use Element's Standard 1n Policy 1.6.2 that new auto dealerships
be permitted to bU11d as-of-r2ght to 54 feet on Santa Monlca
Boulevard wh11e other uses may only exceed 45 feet by approval of
a Slte Plan Rev1ew Permlt. Staff recommends modifying the Land
Use Element standards and requlre a Sl te Plan ReV1ew for any
proJect on Santa Monlca Boulevard 1n the C4 Distrlct 1n excess of
45 feet.
SUBCHAPTER 4K - C5 SPECIAL OFFICE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, a new D1S-
trlct to implement Land Use Element Pollcles 1.8.1 through 1.8.8
for the eastern Industrial Corrldor area. The list of permltted
- 16 -
uses was developed after conslderlng regulations governlng Slml-
lar Dlstricts In other Callfornla cities. Restrlctlons are
placed on the Slze of certaln common commerClal uses to prevent
thlS part of the Clty from becomlng another commerC1al core con-
trary to the lntent of the Land Use Element. However, allowlng
limlted amounts of such business and employee-related serVlces
may help reduce auto traffic assoclated Wl th new development ln
thlS part of the Clty.
SUBCHAPTER 4L - C6 BOULEVARD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, lS a new D1S-
trlct lntended prl.marlly for \'111 shlre Boulevard, as a way to
recognlze lts unlque role ln the C1ty and to clearly d1stlngu1sh
1t from the H1ghway Commerc1al D1strict, a more automotlve-
orlented Dlstrl.ct as its name lmplies. Perm1tted uses lnclude
most uses permitted in the C2 and C3 D1stricts. Auto dealer-
shl.ps, veh1cle repalr and service buslnesses, serVlce statlons,
drl ve-ln and Slmllar uses, and mul tl.ple faml1y reSl.dentlal uses
would all requ1re Condl.tl.onal Use Perml.ts. Property development
standards l.ncorporate standards now contained In SMMC Sectlon
9117 through 9l17B, Land Use Element Poll.cy 1.6.1 and other ap-
pllcable Land Use Element pollcles.
SUBCHAPTER 4M - CM MAIN STREET SPECIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, 1n-
corporates the eXl.stl.ng requlrements of SMMC Sectlon 9119 through
9119D, wl.th the mod1flcation to maX1mum perm1tted floor area ra-
t10S contal.ned 1n Land Use Element Policy 1.6.7. Hotel sand
hostels would become cond1tl.onally perm1tted uses anywhere along
Mal.n Street (SMMC Sect10n 9ll9B(3)(g) currently limits such uses
- 17 -
to the CM4 area north of Bay Street), and adds a prov1s1on allow-
lng the 11ffilt of two restaurants per block now conta1ned In SMMC
Sect10n 9119B(4)(d) to be exceeded by approval of a Conditlonal
Use Permlt. All other requlrements of the eXlstlng Maln Street
Ord1nance remain unchanged.
SUBCHAPTER 4K - CP COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL DISTRICT, 1S 1ntended
as an 1nterlrn set of standards unt11 the Specif1c Plan requlred
by Land Use Element POlicy 1.13.1 for the two Clty Hospltal cam-
puses 1S completed. The three-story, 45 foot maXlmum helght
Ilmlt, 2.0 maXlmum floor area ratlo, and the IlSt of permltted
and condltlonally permltted uses were developed after considerlng
CP Dlstr1ct proJect approval experlence during the past several
years, the completed St. John's Hospltal's Master Plan and pre-
Ilmlnary lnformatlon from Santa Monica Hospltal's Master Plan now
belng developed. Setback and yard requlrements are consistent
wlth other Commerclal Dlstricts.
SUBCHAPTER 40 CC CIVIC CENTER DISTRICT, 1 S another lnterlm
standard pend1ng complet1on of the CiV1C Aud~tor~um study now
under way. The lnterlm maXlmum standards of three storles, 45
feet and 2.0 floor area ratio are all lower than the maXlmums
permltted under Land Use Element POllCY 1.12.2.
SUBCHAPTER 4P - HI INDUSTRIAL CONSERVATION DISTRICT. lncorporates
standards now contalned In SMMC Sectlons 9120 through 9120C wlth
Land Use Element pollcies 1.9.1 through 1.9.4.
SUBCP~PTER 4Q - PUBLIC LANDS DISTRICT, lS a new Dlstrlct lntended
to consolldate all publlCly owned open space (parks, beaches,
- 18 -
cemetery, publ~c park~ng) and other publ~c property, lnclud~ng
School D~str~ct property, into one D1strict. Any proposed
development or use of these properties for other than the permit-
ted public uses would require a Sl te Plan Rev1ew Permit. All
property development standards are to be established on a case-
by-case basis through thlS d1scret1onary reV1ew procedure, with
the pr~nc~ple cri ter~on belng compat1b11i ty Wl th the scale of
development preva111ng 1n the surround1ng commun1ty. Re-use of
eXlst1ng structures is encouraged.
SUBCHAPTER 4R - A OFF-STREET PARKING OVERLAY DESIGNATION, one of
three such "overlay" deslgnatlons WhlCh, when spec1f1cally ass1g-
ned to a parcel or geograph1c area, establ1shes special requ1re-
ments and standards 1n add1t1on to the bas1c underlY1ng Dlstrlct
Wh1Ch rema1ns 1n effect. The "A" Des1gnat10n in the proposed
draft Ord1nance 1S much more detailed than the standards now con-
ta1ned 1n SMMC Sect10ns 9112 through 9112B, and responds to
c1t1zen concerns and certain ambiguities about Land Use Element
Pol1cles 1.2.2 and 1.2.3. All surface parking lots and parklng
structures (above grade or below grade) on "A" parcels would re-
qUlre a Slte Plan Review Perm1t. Surface parklng lots only (not
above or below grade structure s ) would be perrol t ted where "A"
parcels abut C2 parcels (eg. along Montana Avenue). Above grade
parklng structures would be proh1blted on RIA parcels (surface
lots or below grade structures condlt10nally permltted). New
property development standards include maXlffium permltted parklng
structure heights, maXlmum parcel coverage, m1n1mum yards and
- 19 -
setbacks and varlOUS deslgn standards to ensure that parklng on
"A" parcels lS compatlble wlth adJacent residential development.
SUBCHAPTER 4S - C3C DOWNTOWN CORE DISTRICT DESIGNATION, 1 S In-
tended to lmplement concepts contalned ln Land Use Element POll-
Cle8 1.3.4 through 1.3.8. ThlS Deslgnatlon, geographlcally and
8ubstantlvely can be carefully coordlnated with the Mall Speclflc
Plan, since the two sets of standards wlll be under conslderatlon
by the Plannlng CommlsS1on at about the same tlme.
SUBCHAPTER 4T - N NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT DESIGNATION,
18 lntended to lmplement concepts contalned ln Land Use Element
Pollcles 1.7.2 and 1.7.9, WhlCh seek to preserve neighborhood
commerClal uses at the ground floor along certaln streets (eg.
Wilshlre between 12th and 16th Streets) whlle permlttlng develop-
ment above the ground floor to be constructed to the llrnl ts of
the underlYlng Dlstrlct.
SUBCHAPTER 5
PROJECT
DESIGN AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS,
lntroduces a new maJor sectlon of the draft Zonlng Ordlnance
WhlCh consolidates a number of mlscellaneous addltlonal plannlng
and deslgn standards now scattered throughout the eXlstlng Zonlng
Ordlnance.
SECTION 9040.3 - BUILDING HEIGHT AND EXCEPTIONS TO HEIGHT LIMIT,
a substantial rnodiflcatlon of SNNC Section 9126, clarlfles how
bUlldlng helght is to be calculated, particularly on unusually
contoured parcels, and establlshes new Ilmlts for roof-top ele-
ments (eg. skyllghts and mechanlcal equlpment enclosures) and
- 20 -
other deslgn features whlch are exempt from the bUlldlng helght
llmlts In the var~ous Dlstrlct regulatlons.
SECTION 9040.4 - BUILDING VOLUME ENVELOPE, a new sectlon, imple-
ments various Land use Element urban deslgn policles, such as
pollcy 3.1.1. Thl s new standard would requ~re portl.ons of new
bUlldJ..ngs or addltlons to eXlstlng bUlldlngs to "step back" at a
ratlo of I' -4" for every foot of hel.ght above 30 feet at the
street frontage. The Archltectural Review Board ~s empowered to
develop volume trade-off gUldel~nes to achJ..eve superior deslgn.
SECTION 9040.5 BUILD-TO-LINE, a new section, lmplements Land
Use Element urban deslgn policy 3.3.3.
SECTION 9040.6 FLOOR SETBACKS IN COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL
BUILDINGS, a new sectlon, lmplements Land Use Element POI1CY
3.2.2 to achleve bUllding scale transltlons where new commerclal
or lndustrJ..al bUlldings abut resldentlal property not In commer-
clal use. ThlS new standard would require addlt~onal bU1.1dlng
setbacks for all commerclal or industrlal floors above the maxi-
mum helght of an adJacent resldentlal Dlstrlct accordl.ng to a
speclfled formula.
SECTION 9040.7 - BUILDING MATERIALS, a new sectlon, lmplements
Land Use Element urban deslgn POllCY 3.1.2 by establlshlng maXl-
mum llmlts on black or reflective glazlng, requ~r~ng non-
reflective rooflng and mandatlng transparent glazlng and mlnimum
V1Slbllity from the ground floor street frontage in certaln
pedestrlan-Orl.ented comrnerclal Dlstrlcts.
- 21 -
SECTION 9040.8 - FENCE, WALL, FLAGPOLE, establishes a new proce-
dure for 1ncreas1ng res1dent1al sldeyard and rearyard walls above
the as-of-right maximum of six feet to a maX1mum e1ght feet pro-
v1ded the adjacent ne1ghbor(s) consents 1n wr1t1ng. Th1S proce-
dure would el~m1nate the need for AdJustments now granted under
author1ty of SMMC Sect10n 9144B. EX1sting front yard fence
he1ght 11m1ts and measurement method 1n SMMC Sectlon 9127H{7) are
lncorporated, and flagpoles are Ilm1ted to the max~mum he~ght of
the underlY1ng D1str1ct.
SECTIONS 9040.9 THROUGH 9040.10 - ACCESSORY BUILDINGS (ONE STORY
AND OVER ONE STORY), 1ncorporates eX1st1ng standards 1n SMMC Sec-
t~ons 9128 through 9128B and var10US Zoning Adm1n1strator admln-
lstratlve gUlde1ines. Codlflcatlon of these standards should
help reduce the current volume of AdJustments and Var1ances for
accessory bUlldlngs. Accessory bU1ldings in excess of one story
or 16 feet 1n he1ght would now require a Condlt1onal Use Permlt.
SECTION 9040.11 HAZARDOUS VISUAL OBSTRUCTIONS, incorporates
eXlstlng requ1rements 1n SMMC Sect10ns 9127K through 9127k(3).
SECTIONS 9040.12 THROUGH 9040.15 - SCREENING STANDARDS, incorpo-
rates eXlst1ng requ1rements 1n SMMC Sect10ns 91271 and 9127J(2)
through 9127J(4).
SECTION 9040.16 DRAINAGE, a new sectlon requir1ng adherence to
Buildlng Code requ1rements.
SECTION 9040.18 - UNEXCAVATED AREA IN SIDEYARD, lncorporates ex-
istlng requ1rements of SMMC Sectlons 9108B(9), 9l09B(9) and
- 22 -
9110B{lO) wh~ch requlre a plantable area along one or both slde-
yards, depend1ng upon the lot wldth, and extends thlS requ~rement
to the new RVC and MXD resldent~al Dlstr1cts.
SECTION 9040.19 - PROJECTIONS PERMITTED INTO REQUIRED YARDS, 1n-
cludes a much more complete and more easlly understood set of
requ~rements than are now conta1ned In SMMC Sectlons 9l27H.
SECTION 9040.20 BUILDING ADDITIONS EXTENDING INTO REQUIRED
YARDS, c1arlfles and modlfles the current provlslon on SMMC Sec-
tlon 9127H(11}, WhlCh concerns the abillty to malntaln or extend
non-conformlng sldeyard condltlons. ThlS subJect has frequently
been a source of controversy 1n slngle famlly dwelllng remodels.
SECTION 9040.21 - MANUFACTURED DWELLINGS, lS a new sectloD WhlCh
responds to a State mandate permlttlng the use of manufactured
houslng a dwelllng constructed off-Slte and moved to the
deSlred parcel for placement on a permanent foundatlon). Th~s
sectlon lncludes certa1n m1m1mum compat1b1l~ty deslgn standards
WhlCh can be consldered by the Archltectural Review Board.
SECTION 9040.22
RELOCATED BUILDINGS, 16 a new sectlon In
response to cltlzen concerns WhlCh requlres that relocated bUlld-
lngs be generally compatlble wlth those already ln the area sur-
roundlng the parcel on WhlCh a relocated buildlng 1S intended to
be placed, and t1me llmltatlons on the commencement and comple-
tion of buildlng constructlon.
- 23 -
SECTION 9040.23 - SOLAR ENERGY DESIGN STAKDARDS, lS a new seetlon
WhlCh responds to certalu State requlrements, and establlshes
mlnlmum deslgn standards for solar energy systems.
SECTION 9040.24 - PARCEL AREA FOR RESIDENTIAL DENSITY CALCULA-
TIONS AND REAR YARD DEPTH INCLUDES ONE-HALF ALLEY DIMENSION, In-
corporates eXlstlng standards lU SMMC Sectlons 9125B and 9127E.
SECTIOK 9040.25
DWELLING UKIT DENSITY CALCULATION, codlfles
eXlstlng concepts from SMHC Sectlon 9133 and admlnlstratlve prac-
tlce of "rounding" fractlons of unlts.
SECTION 9040.26 - PARCEL COVERAGE CALCULATION, lS a new sectlon
WhlCh codifles admlulstratlve POllCY,
SECTION 9040.27 - THROUGH PARCEL MAY BE TWO PARCELS, lncorporates
the eXlstlug standards of SMMC Sectlon 9l25C.
SECTIONS 9040.28 THROUGH 9040.37 - ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STAN-
DARDS, are all new sectlons WhlCh establlsh obJectlve, and ln
most cases, measurable thresholds for llghtlng, sound, vibration
and radioaetl Vl ty or electrlc dlsturbance, tOX1C substances and
waste.
SECTION 9040.38 PERMITTED OUTDOOR USES, lncorporates, wlth
mlnor modlficatlon, includlng de1etlon of automoblle hOlstS, the
eXlsting requlrements of SMMC Sectlon 9137A.
SUBCHAPTER 5B - LANDSCAPING STANDARDS, lS a new seetlou, WhlCh
lucludes detalled requlrements for landscaplng of parcels In all
- 24 -
Dlstrlcts except the R1 and R2R Dlstrlcts (but lncludlng RIA par-
cels developed for parklng purposes). These standards are base-
don extenslve research lnto Slmllar requlrements In other cltles
and are consistent with Archltectural ReVlew Board pollcles.
ThlS sectlon also lncludes the landscape screenlng standards for
commerclal and industrlal propertles now located 10 SrIi-1C Sectlon
9127J(1), but adds a new 2'-0" wlde x 1'-0" hlgh screening re-
qUlrement for auto dealershlps.
SUBCHAPTER SC - MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, are new sec-
tlons, WhlCh establish certaln minlmum shared parkJ.ng standards
and nOlse 11mJ.ts to better ensure compatlbl11ty between reslden-
tlal and commerclal uses wlthln the same development.
SUBCHAPTER SD - SATELLITE DISH ANTENNAS, are new sectJ.ons WhlCh
pre scrJ.be under what condl tlons the City wl11 permit satelll te
dlSh antennas In the varJ.ous Dis~rlcts.
SUBCHAPTER 5E - OFF STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS, lnclude totally
new parklng space requirements for varlOUS land uses together
wlth parklng layout and deslgn standards currently located In
S~1MC Sectlon 9129 through 9129F(10). Proposed Sectlon 9044.5
also includes the Clrcumstances under WhlCh the ZonJ.ng Ad-
mlnlstrator, In consultatlon wlth the Parklng and Trafflc En-
glneer, may approve a reductlon In the requlred number of parklng
spaces. Proposed Sectlons 9044.7 through 9044.9 attempt to
clarlfy the frequently confuslng Land Use and Clrculatlon Ele-
ments po11cles about "alley access" to new resldential and non-
resldentlal development.
The residential parklng requlrements
- 25 -
would now be based on the more easl.ly monitored number of bed-
rooms rather than the eXl.sting ratl.O of parking to dwell1ng unit
51 Z e .
Guest park1ng requ1rements and maximum per cent of compact
spaces have been added. Requirements for commerc1al, educat1on-
aI, health serVlces, industrlal, entertainment and other uses are
much more detalled than eXlstlng requlrements and generally
result 1n more parklng requ1red. The requlrements are based on
extens1ve research of parking standards 1n Californ1a and else-
where, and have been carefully revlewed by the Clty'S Parklng and
Trafflc Engineer who concurs In these recornmendatlons.
SUBCHAPTER SF
OFF-STREET LOADIKG REQUIREMENTS, 1ncorporates
eX1sting regulat10ns 1n SMMC Sectlons 9130A and 9130B w1th only
minor amendments.
SUBCHAPTER 5J - ALCOHOL OUTLETS, 1ncorporates the existlng Al-
cohol Outlet Ordlnance lnto the Zon1ng Ordlnance.
SUBCHAPTER 6 - PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR CERTAIN USES, all new
sectlons, enumerate speclflc minlmum deslgn and operatl.onal stan-
dards for Large Family Day Care Homes, Auto Dealershl.ps, Auto
Rental Agencles, Pr1vate Tennls Courts, Senlor Group Houslng,
Slngle Story Accessory Llv1ng Quarters and Game Arcades. These
uses are presumed to be compat1ble wlth other uses 1n speclf1ed
Dlstrlcts provlded these standards are met to the satisfaction of
the Zonl.ng Admlnlstrator, or Plannlng COmmlSSl.On on appeal.
SUBCHAPTER 7 - SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR CONDITIONAL USES, enumer-
ates a slffil1ar range of mlnlffium requlrements for uses requ1rlng
Condltlonal Use Permlts: Chlld Day Care Centers 1n Resident1al
- 26 -
Dlstricts, Vehlcle SerVlce Statlons, Vehicle Repalr Facilit~es,
Auto Dealershlps ln C5 and C6 Dlstricts, Auto Rental Agencles 1n
C5, C6 and CC Distrlcts, Second Dwell1ng Unlts on Slngle Fa~ily
Lots, Ne1ghborhood Grocery Stores In Mult1ple Fam1ly Resldentlal
D1strlcts, Drlve-In, Drlve Through, Fast Food and Take-Out Res-
taurants, Self-Servlce Storage Warehouses and Sldewalk Cafes.
These condlt1ons speclf1cally enumerate minimum acceptable des1gn
and operatlonal standards WhlCh should be 1mposed If the Plann1ng
ComnusS1on,
or Clty Council on appeal,
question posed by a
answer the basic use com-
patibillty
Condlt1onal
Use
Permlt
appl1cat1on.
SUBCHAPTER 8 - NEW CONDOMINIUM REGULATIONS, lncorporates eXlst1ng
regulat10ns 1n SMMC Sections 9122 through 9122E with only m1nor
amendments, includ1ng references to commerc1al condom1n1ums and
coord1nation w1th Art1c1e XX of the Clty Charter (Tenant Par-
t1cipatlng ConverSlons).
SUBCHAPTER 8B CONDOMINIUM CONVERSIONS, lncorporates eXlst1ng
regulat10ns 1n SMf.1C Sectlon 9122F, Wl th only m1nor amendments.
Standards for off1ce, cornmerclal and lndustrlal condominium con-
verS10ns have not yet been developed, but approprlate sections
are re~erved for future use.
SUBCHAPTER 9 - NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS AND USES, conta1ns regula-
t10ns for the orderly term1natlon of buildings and uses rendered
non-conformlng upon adoptlon of the new Zoning Ord1nance, and
speclfles llmltat10ns on expanslons and contlnuatlon of such
buidings and uses. An amortlzatlon schedule for non-conformlng
- 27 -
uses and bU11d1ngs 1S establ1shed Wh1Ch relates to the structural
type of bu~ld~ng construction. These sections substant~ally
modlfy, clar1fy and expand existlng prov1s1ons 1n SMMC Sections
9136 through 9136D. Special non-conform1ng use regulatlons ap-
pl~cable to the CM (Maln Street) D1strlct (SMMC Seetlon 9119C(9))
have been relocated to thls sectlon of the Zonlng Ordlnance.
SUBCHAPTER 10 - ZONING ADMINISTRATION, establ1shes the author1ty
of the Zonlng Admlnlstrator as now prov1ded 1n SMMC Seetlons 9140
and 9141, w~th only mlnor modif1cat1ons.
SUBCHAPTER lOB - HOME OCCUPATION PERMITS, ~ntroduces a new con-
slstent format for present1ng the purpose and procedural requ1re-
ments for all dlscretlonary permlts.
The Horne Occupatlon sect~ons ~ncorporate many of the eX1stlng
regulations 1n SMMC Sectlon 9143 through 9143B. The proposed
sectlon includes expanded requlred flnd1ngs and for the first
tlme l~sts certain Home Occupations WhlCh are categorically pro-
h1blted (eg. auto and vehicle repair). Authority to revoke a
pennlt under certain Clrcumstances lS stated (as lt lS for all
subsequent perm~t sections). The existing approval procedure (by
Zonlng Admlnlstrator wlth appeol to the Plannlng Cornrnlsslon) re-
malns unchanged.
SUBCHAPTER IDC - TEMPORARY USE PERMITS, a new permlt requirement
to control short term act1 Vl t1es on pr1 vately owned land (eg.
temporary offlce tral1ers, art displays, fairs and festlvals).
- 28 -
The perrn1 t does not requ1re a publ1C hear1ng, but Zoning Ad-
m1n1strator approval requ1res certaln m1n1murn f1nd1ngs and cond1-
t10ns of approval may be 1mposed.
SUBCHAPTER laD - PERFORMANCE STANDARDS PERMITS, a new permit re-
qU1rement to ensure that m1n1mum des1gn and operational standards
for certa1n uses are met. No publlC hearlng is required, but the
Zon1ng Admln1strator 's determlnat10n must be dlstr1buted to the
applicant, adJacent property owners and res1dents, and the Plan-
n1ng Commisslon. Appeals may be heard by the Comm1SS1on.
SUBCHAPTER lOE - VARIANCES, 1ncorporates eX1stlng regulat10ns of
SMMC Seet10n 9145, but expands the requ1red findings. The eX1st-
ing publlC hearlng requlrement before the Zoning Administration
and appeal to the Comm1ssion cont1nue.
SUBCHAPTER lOF - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS (CUP), 1ncorporates ex-
lstlng regulat10ns of SMNC Sect10n 9148, but the requ1red find-
1ngs have been expanded. CUp's wlll continue to be heard by the
CommlsSlon w1th appeals taken to the City Counc11.
SUBCHAPTER lOG - SITE PLAN REVIEW PERMIT, is a new pernll t re-
quired by the Land Use Element to allow d1scretionary reVlew by
the Plann1ng Comm1ss1on (or Councll on appeal) when the prlnclpal
lssues are 1ntensity and design related rather than use related.
Procedures are slmilar to a CUP.
SUBCHAPTER lOH - COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE ORDINANCE TEXT AND MAP
AMENDMENTS, incorporates exist1ng regulat10ns of SMMC Sectlon
- 29 -
9149. Proposed Sect10n 9120.6 presents a new 1nterlm zonlng pro-
cedure as provlded for ln California Government Code Section
65858.
SUBCHAPTER 101 - GENERAL PLAN AND SPECIFIC PLANS, specifles new
procedures to replace Art1cle IX, Chapter 4 (Master Plan). These
sectlons speclfy the procedures and requ1rements for adopt1ng and
amending the General Plan, lndividual General Plan Elements and
Speclflc Plans. proposed Section 9121.8 provides for prlvate
property owners to lnltlate amendments to the General Plan lf
such amendments lnvolve development or modificatlon of property
located wlthln the area affected by the proposed amendment.
SUBCHAPTER 10J - APPLICATIONS AND FEES, lncorporates the requlre-
ments of the State Permlt Stream11nlng Act and enables the Coun-
cll to establlsh by resolutlon a schedule of fees for varlOUS
permlts, appeals, amendments and approvals requlred by the Zon1ng
Ordlnance.
SUBCHAPTER lOK - HEARINGS AND PROCEDURES, consolldates l.n one
portlon of the Zonlng Ordinance all requlrements for varlOUS
publlC hearlngs. Proposed Section 9131.2 speclflcally permlts
the Plannlng Cornmissl.on to hear Varlances 1f they are flIed con-
currently Wl th other appllcations tYPlcally declded by the Com-
mlSS10n rather than the Zoning Adminlstrator (eg. CUP's and Sub-
d1vlsion Maps). These sectl.ons also incorporate recently adopted
Plannl.ng Cornmlss1on procedural rules for publlC hear1ngs.
- 30 -
CHAPTER lOL - APPEALS, slmllarly consolidates all procedures for
appeallng Zonlng Administrator actlons to the Plannlng Cornmis-
Slon, and speclfled Plannlng CommlSSlon actions to the C1ty Coun-
cll. All appeals are de novo proceedlngs, meanlng that the en-
tlre matter, not Just the stated appeal obJection, 1S before the
appeal body. Appeal procedures would remaln exactly as they are
handled under appllcable provlslons of the current Zonlng
Ordinance.
SUBCHAPTER 10M - ENFORCEMENT OF PROVISIONS, incorporate the lan-
guage now In SMMC Sectlon 9157, descrlblng the responslbllltles
of various Clty Departments to enforce the Zonlng Ordlnance.
SUBCHAPTER 11 - INDEX OF USES, a new seetlon outllnlng In deta1l
the perrnl t ted use s, use s permitted Wl th per formance standard s,
uses permltted with restrictlons, condltlonal uses, and pro-
hlblted uses In each Zon1ng District.
- 31 -