SR-400-002 (35)
e
f/tJo ~ oo-z-
e
Santa Monlca, Callfornia, July 18, 1977
TO:
Mayor and City Council
loA
FROM:
Clty Staff
AUG 9
";. ~ 1
....... '
~ .... . I
SUBJECT:
Eliminatlon of Transitional Uses ln the Rl
Dlstrict
Introduction
ThlS report transmits the Planning Commlssion's recommenda-
tion that the Rl ZOnlnq regulations be amended to ellmlnate
the automatlc approval of duplexes on transitional lots.
Back9round
The present Zon1ng Regulatlons provide that any Rl lot Wh1Ch has
a slde lot line either adjoinlng or separated by an alley from
an R2, R3 or R4 property is entitled to construct a duplex as a
matter of right. This prOV1Slon has eXlsted for almost 30
years.
Earller this year it was discovered that whereas the two units
could be regularly constructed and occupied, they could not be
sold as condominiums because of the Clty'S rigid Ordinance pro-
hlblt1ng condominiums in the Rl Dlstrict. In an effort to re-
solve th1S apparent confllct, the Planning Commiss~on undertook
a study of the sltuat10n and alternatlves and concluded that the
automat1c duplex provision should be eliminated. The Commission
found that the protectlon and Maintenance of single family areas
were not encouraged by the possible replacement of existinq slngle
famlly homes wlth duplexes, that slngle family dwelllngs provide
,0 ~
'971
MJG 9
e
e
TO: Mayor and City Council
- 2 -
July 18, 1977
the best transitional uses for single family areas and that the
regulatlon had not been wldely used.
A survey of the 99 transitional Rl lots shows that 65 are pre-
sently in use as slngle family homes. Ten have been developed
with duplexes and the remaining 34 have been developed with
other uses rang1ng from three units to parklng. In brief, over
the 30 year period only 10% of the eligible lots have taken ad-
vantage of the duplex opportunity and 2/3 have remained ln single
family use. On th~s basis, the Planning Commlssion recommends
the eliminat~on of the automatlc provisions with the understand-
ing that those properties involved st11l have access to the
varlanceprocedures 1n the event that adequate reasons to Justlfy
special consideration eX1sts.
Alternatives
Section 9l49C of the Santa Monlca Municipal Code provldes that
the City Council may aff1rm, reject or modify any recommendatlon
by the Planning Commission. The Counc11, therefore, has the
alternative of accepting or rejecting the suggested change. Ac-
ceptance of the recommendatlon would refer the matter to the Clty
Attorney for preparation of an Ordlnance which would then come
before the Councll ln the usual manner for conslderation and adop-
t~on. ReJect~on of the Commiss1on's recommendations would leave
the Ordinance unchanged.
e
-
TO: Mayor and Clty Counc1l
- 3 -
July 18, 1977
Recommendation
It lS respectfully recommended that the City Councll act favor-
ably upon the Plannlng Co~ission's recommendat~on by direct-
ing the C1ty Attorney to draft an ordinance encompasslng the
amendments proposed and returning it for the Counc1l's cons1d-
eratlon in the usual course of procedure.
Prepared by: James Lunsford
JL:bt
June 6, 1977, hereby finds as follows:
1. The Santa Monica Municipal Zoning Ordinance presently pro-
vides for the development of duplexes as trans1t10nal Rl uses
where the slde lot line of an Rl lot lS adjacent to or separated
by an alley from a lot in a multiple residentlal district.
2. The Santa Monica General Plan encourages the protection and
ma~ntenance of single faml1y dwelllngs and areas as essential to
the resldentia1 character of the community.
3. Evaluation of the concept of transitional Rl uses does not
lndicate that duplexes on transitional Rl lots encourage the
protect~on and malntenance of 51ngle famlly dwell1ngs and areas
and that single fam11y dwellings provide the best transltlonal
use or buffer for these areas.
4. The proposed amendment would further the goals and objects of
the Santa Monica General Plan by ellmlnatlng the right to con-
struct duplexes on translt~onal Rl lots thereby protecting and
ma1ntaining approximately 65 single fam1ly dwellings which might
otherWlse be removed or modified.
5. The public necesslty, convenience, general welfare and good
zonlng practice requlre the adoptlon of thlS amendment.
The Clty P1annlng Commission of the City of Santa rionica, therefore,
respectfully recommends that those sectlons providing for transltlonal
uses in the Rl Dlstricts by deleted in their entlrety.
The Chairman 18 authorlzed to execute and the Secretary to certify to
the adoption of these Findings and Recommendations which shall there-
after be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Santa Uonica.
APPROVED this 6th DAY OF JUNE, 1977
~UA:lf~.
-lffiRBER'l" ~hai~an PYO Tern
Clty Pla~q Commlssion
I, JAMES LUNSFORD, Secretary of the C1ty Planning Commlssion of the
Clty of Santa Monlca hereby certlfy that these Findings and Recommen-
dations were approved by the City Planning Commlssion by the follow-
1ng vote:
AYES:
Commissioners Gould, Hotchkiss, Katz, Savage,
Schneider.
NOES:
Commissioner Lonsinger
ABSENT:
Chairman Malcolm
~JW
~~ES LUNSFQJD{ Secretary
(/~~:y Planning Commission
City of Santa Monlca
~-
... _........1 --.
e
e
) (. :D
ADVANCE COpy
STA'l'l1d'LSHT PROPOSEJG Tl-'::E RE-D~FIYITIOH O? ltR_l Zm3"
TO BE HADE B3:FCRE TEE SA:;~A ii01JICA :PLAn:i:TIUG GCiIHISSICn
August 1, 1977 by:
Horace Gains
713 Georgina Avenue
Santa ~onics, CA 90~02
451-1241
Before you a~e copies of my state~ent ~ade to the City C01~~cil
July 12th. Could this state~ent, ~hich expresses what I thir~
of any orcinance which would tie personal relationships in ~:th
the right to live in an R-1 zone, be accepted as 9srt of my
presentation? I do not want to waste you~ ti~e re-reading.
~Tha~~ you---I have extra copies ~or those in the audience who
are interested.
A ~ntch's bre~ of emotionalitYI seasoned with s~ch sca~e-words
as 11 cO:!'1mune, II It family" and "boardin:; houses", is being served
up to us. \lb.at utter rot 11
.elT"t1'~"
establishAa cO~Mune O~ a
aB too individualistic
stay at my board~ng house
You have my word that I will never
boarding house at 713 Georgina. :
to join a co~une. No guest would
for more than one meal.
Levity aside, all we need do to get out of this messy situation
is look at what an R-l zone really is, and re-define it sccorcingly.
~fuat is an R-l zone? A collection of R-l dwellings.
'..!hat is an R-1
For eX8C"!"81e, I
door is o?en.
me to lmock.
G.wellin~r;> One structured as a sinGle 1iv:.ng-unit.
can enter any room of 713 Georgina of which the
If a door is closed, co~~on courtesy requires
How does living in an R-l d~ellin6 differ fro~ living in an
apartment house or a condo~inium? If I were l~ving in an
a:part~ent house or a condonini urn and were to ,.rander th:ooughout
the whole place without askin; pernission of ~y fellow-tenants,
I would likely end up havins to ask my la~~er-son to defend me
in court---that is ir he would accept the case.
~e should have no difficulty codifyin~ this difference into a
workable ordinance. An ordinance containing no reference
whatever to either life-style or to relationship between people.
Proper safeguards snould be included as to ?op~lation censities
and the possible subdivision of R-1 dwellings ~nto T:ulti~le
living-units. The tec~~ical details I gladly leave to the
specialists. Eo~ever, I reserve the right to review their
final product for accuracy and integrity. Thank you.
fA
.
_JiW,TJ\RKS COlITRA TEE CONC3PT OF II CO?'il:f"LJNE-CONTROLIl ORDINANCES
e e
Made 7/12/77 bei'ore the Santa i'IQl1ica City Council by:
Horace Gaims
713 Jeorgina Avenue
Santa Monica, CA 90402
451-1241
Madam Mayor, Members or the GOUllCil:
I Cannot see how any "Co'11'1Ule-Controln Ordinance can be
enforced unless we are prepared to imitate Big Brother right
here in Santa Monica, at least to the extent or encouraging
citizens to inform on their neighbors.
If my neighbor becomes my friend----wonderfull But this
would have to be a spontaneous develop~ent, one whlch cannot
be forced.
otherwise, I ask but two things of my neighbor:
That he maintain his property
That he behave himself within my sight and hearing.
His beliefs and personal relationships are his own business
just as mine are my own business.
Any inquiry into such Matters constitutes an invasion of
privacy, no matter what euphe~ism is employed. I have no use
ror peeping toms--I would rather that they got their kicks some
other way.
I feel that were any or the founding fathers able to be with
us tonight, he would either explode into ~ighteous anger or
snirf with disdain at the prying and snooping i~plicit in any
such ordinance.
Finally, I realize that if so-called t1com."::lune-d..rellers1T
can be scrounged today under the guise of enforce~ent of zoning
regulations, then you and I could be scro~~ged to~orrow on so~e
equally transparent excuse. Thank you.
CA RLK:SIS:J~k 4-27-77
FOR COU~CIL MELT"~
OF 5/10/77
e
f,..- ~
, ..
f'(lO.r- 00 '7
e
Santa Monlca, Ca11fornla
Aprll 27, 1977
~~
, J
TO: Mayor and Clty Councll
FROM: Clty Attorney
SUBJ~CT: Zone Change from R2 to Rl; South Slde of PaclflC
Street between Fourteenth and Slxteenth Streets.
.
Introductlon
This report transmlts the attached ordlnance to
change the zonlng on the south Slae of Paclflc Street between
Fourteenth and Slxteenth Stre2ts. ThlS ordlnance was
requested by the Clty CounCll at lts meetlng of March 23,
1977, and was lntroduced, glven Flrst ~eadlng and PubI1C
e
Hearlng on Aprll 26, 1977.
Background
The attached ordlnance rezones 1402 through lSl8
PnClflC Street and 2201 throuqh 2205 Fourteenth Street from
R2 and Rl. A copy of the prevlous staff reports are attached
hereto for lnformatlona1 purposes.
Alterndtlve Solutlons
Not applJ..cable.
-1-
e
. \~11
;."
'(\~,
e
e
e
C~ RLK:SIS:]ak 4-2h-77
e
e
Recommendat~ons
It 1S respectfully recommended that the Clty Councll
1ntroduce the attached ordlnance for second readlng and adopt
the same.
Prepared by:
Rlchard L. Kn~ckerbocker, Clty Attorney
Samuel I. Strelchman, Asslstant CJty Attorney
-2-
-
e
..,.....-
e
CA 77-38 RLK:SIS:]dk 4-12-77
FOR COUNCIL MEE~
OF 4-26-77
e
Santa r1onlca, Ca1lfornla
Aprll 12, 1977
TO: Mayor and Clty Councl1
FRat1: CJ. ty Attorney
SUBJECT: Zone Change from R2 to Kl; South Slde of Paclflc
Street between Fourteenth and 81xteenth Streets.
Introduction
Th~s report transmlts the attached ordlnance to
change the zonlng on the south slde of Paclflc Street between
Fourteenth and Slxteenth Streets. This ordlnance was
requested by the Clty Counc11 at lts meetlng of Barch 23,
1977.
Background
The attached ordlnance rezones 1402 through 1518
PaclflC Street and 2201 through 2205 Fourteenth Street from
R2 to RI. A hearlng was held on thlS matter by the Plannlng
COMmlSS10n on February 28, 1977, and the Plannlng Com~lSS10n
has recommended such change. A copy of the prevlous staff
report lS attached hereto for lnforrnatlonal purposes.
Alternatlve Solutlons
Not appllcab1e.
~ 1--
LA RLK:~lS:Jak 4-12-77
e
e
Recommendat~on5
e
It 15 respectfully recommended that the C1ty
Counc~l 1ntroduce the attached ordlnance for first read~ng
and hold a publ1C hearlng thereon.
Prepared by:
Rlchard L. Knlckerbocker, Clty Attorney
Samuel I. Strelchman, Assistant Clty Attorney
e
e
-2-
r---- ,
----
IDA
e
e
Santa Monica, Callfornla, March 8, 1977
e
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
City Staff
SUBJECT:
Zone Change from R2 to Rl
Introduction
This report transmits the Plannlng Commission's recorr~endatlon
that e1ght lots on the south side of Pacific Street between
14th and 16th Streets be down zoned from R2 to Rl.
Background
In early February, it was brought to the Planning Commissionfs
attent10n that the south slde of Paclfic Street between 14th and
16th Streets w~s zoned R2, whereas the north slde was zoned RI.
4It Furthermore, whlle the R2 zonlng had been in effect for more than
30 years no multiple development had taken place. One of the
resldents on the south slde, upon learnlng that an apartment
bUlldlng was contemplated ln the mlddle of the block, requested
the Plannlng CO~~lssion to reevaluate the zonlng and consider
changing the south slde of the street from R2 to Rl, the same as
the north side. The Planning CO~lSSlon set the matter for con-
slderatlon on February 28th and followlng a PubllC Hearing at which
the change was supported by a large nu~ber of persons and opposed
by none, approved a recorrnendatlon for the chang~.
The property involved consists of 8 blocks on the southeast slde
of Paclfic Street between 14th street and a point 97' westerly of
e
16th Street.
Seven of the lots front on Pacifie Street and one
r
e
e
e
r-,
e
r--
e
TO:
The Mayor and City Councl1
:1 arc h 8, 19 7 7
- 2 -
corner lot fronts on 14th Street.
Each of the properties in-
volved is developed with a single dwelling.
Under existing R2
zoning, each property can be developed with a 5 unit structure,
for a potentlal development of 40 units. Under the proposed change
future development would be limlted to slngle famlly dwellings except
on those lots at 1516 Paclfic Street and 2201 - 14th Street which
would be entitled to duplexes by vlrtue of becoming Rl lots w1th a
side lot Ilne adJacent to an R2.
Alternatives
Under Section 9149 of the f1unicipal Code, the City Council may by
ordlnance affect a change of zone or any portion thereof recom-
~ended by the Plannlng Comrnisslon.
The Council has the authority
to accept or reject the Plannlng Comrnisslon's recommendation in
whole or in part.
The COUDCll may, if deemed advisable, set the
matter for Public Hearing and have notices sent to the property
owners and neighbor1ng areas. The second reading on an ordlnance
constitutes an automatlc Public HGarlng but not1ces to involved
property owners are not glven.
Recoffi.,.'Uendation
In view of the fact that the current zoning lD the subJect area is
not in accordance wlth gooo ZODlg practice or co~siste~t with the
Clty'S General Plan and the proposed change 15 supported by a sub-
ste.ntial r.1ajorl ty of the proper~.:.y m.mers 1I1volvect, 1 t 15 respect-
fully reconQcnded that the City Councll accept the reco~~endation
of the Plannlng CO~lssion by requestlng the City Attorney to pre-
pare the necessary ordlnance and return It for conslderation In due
e
e
e
,r--....
e
.~
e
TO: The Mayor and Clty Councl1 -3-
r.~arch 8, 1977
course with the additional stlpulation that at the time of Second
in the area.
readlng on the ordlnance, wrltten notice be made to propety owners
Prepared by: J. W. Lunsford
JWL:bt
- - -..__u ~ .~.. UHU. -LULU L:lLLeeLS legally descrlbed as Lots 6, 8,
10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 24 ln Tract 9446 from the R2 Multiple
Residential District to the Rl One Famlly District and a Public
Hearing having been held upon the matter on February 28, 1977
hereby finds as follows:
1. That the above descrlbed propertles co~~only known
as 1402 through 1518 PaClfic Street and 2201 through
2205 - 14th Street are presently classlfied in the R2
Multiple Resldential District and have been so classified
for more than 30 years.
2. That the properties are currently developed wlth
single famlly homes and no multiple development in accor-
dance with the existing 20nlng has occurred during the
~ore than 30 years in which lt has been permitted.
e
3. The opposite side of the street is ln the Rl One Family
District and good zoning practlce generally supports both
side of a street being in the same zoning classlficatlon.
4. The Santa !.!onica General Plan, specifically the Houslng
Element and the Goals and the ObJective calls for encour-
aging preservatlon of single family areas and preventing
introductlon of inco~pallble uses into these areas.
5. The proposed change in zoning lS supported by a high
proportion of the property owners ln the area of Pac1fic
Street affected by the proposed change.
6. The proposed change 1n accordance wlth good zoning
practice, in the public lnterest and necessary that sub-
stantial changes be done.
SECTION 2. The City Pli1nning Cor.rnission, therefore, recoffi:.l1ends
that the Santa Monlca City Cauncll initiate procedures to re-
class1fy those propertlCs legally described as Lots 6, B, 10, 12,
14, 16, 18 and 24 in Tract 9466, cOJTLffionly knm'ln as 1402 through
1518 Pacific Street and 2201 through 2205 - 14th Street from the
R2 Multiple Residential District to the Rl One Fam11y District.
e
SECTION 3. The Chalrman Pro Tem of the Clty Planning Co~misslon
is authorized to ex~cute these Flnd1Dcs and Recor.~endatlon and
the Secretary to certify La their adoption after which they shall
be in full force and effect.
OA'!'!'; 0
TEM
J,MES Lu~~arY
ity Planning ~o:nission
City of Santa Monica
e
.
e
- 2 -
e
e
vr ~ntlr~Ln ~, rlK~~~~n ~, ~nL~~U~
9103 OF ThE SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL
CODE REGARDING CERTAIN LOTS ON
PACIFIC STREET AND FOURTEENTH STREET.
THE CITY COlli~CIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
That the d15trlctlng map WhlCh 15
attached to and made a part of Chapter II Art1cle 9, Sect~on
9103 of the Santa Monlca Munlclpa1 Code lS hereby amended as
follows:
"Lots 6. 8. 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and
24 of Tract 9446, commonly known as
1402 through 1518 Paclflc Street and
2201 through 2205 Fourteenth Street,
WhlCh property 15 now deslgnated R2
ffiultlple resldent~al d1strlct 15
hereby changed to Rl one famlly d1strlCt. II
SECTION 2.
The Clty Councll f1nds that a publ1C
hearlng was held before the Plannlng CO~~~SSlon of the Clty of
Santa aonlca on February 28, 1977, and that the Plannlng
Coromlsslon has recommended such change of zone to the Clty
Councll.
SECTION 3.
The Clty Councll flnds and determlnes
that the publlC necesslty, convenlence, general welfare and
good zonlng pract1ce requlre that the amendments set forth ln
Sectlon 1 be made.
SECTION 4.
Any provlslons of the Santa Monlca
Munlclpal Code, or appentl~ce5 thereto lnconslstent herewlth,
to the extent of such 1nconslstencles and no further, are
hereby repealed or mod~f1ed to that extent necessary to effect
the provlsions of th1S ordinance.
-1-
e
.
ordlnance and each and every section, subsectlon, sentence,
clause or phrase not declared lnvalld or unconstltutlonal
wlthout regard to whether any portlon of the ordlnance would
be subsequently declared lnvalld or unconstltutlonal.
SECTION 6.
The Mayor shall slgn and the Clty
Clerk shall attest to the passage of thlS ordlnance. The
Clty Clerk shall cause the same to be published once In the
offlc~al newspaper wlthlng flfteen (IS) days after lts adoptlon.
The ordlnance shall become effectlve after thrlty (30) days from
lts adoptlon.
ADOPTED and APPROVED thlS
day of
1977.
HAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
STATE OF CALIFOlli~IA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES} 55.
CITY OF SN~TA MONICA )
I do hereby certlfy that the foregolng ordlnance was
duly and regularly l.ntroduced at a meet1ng of the Clty Councll
on the
da y 0 f
, 1977; that thereafter the sal.d
ordlnance was duly adopted at a meetlng of the Clty Councll on
the
day of
, 1977, by the followlng vote
of the Councll:
-2-
e
e
ABSENT:
- --......-.JI~J:.l'( .:
Co UIIl CI LMEMBER:
~;!,.JlWf;D AS ~ro ~!Rl>~1J: //'~
/*j, I.' I . /' j .
.: / " : ) '- ~--'(
, z-,:,/L_} rA /;4:-__:,-:,< , ,4.- _ "---__
'CI'I'Y A TTO Rt\j'Ey /
-]-
CITY CLERK
CA 77-57 RLK:SIS:]ak 4-28-77
~ . -
FOR COC:.rCIL j\IEET~lJG
OF 5/10/77
e
t/ t'tJ,.- {/r'P-Z--
/- ~
(~rt
e
Santa Monlca, Callfornla
Aprll 28, 1977
TO:
Mayor and Clty Councll
FROM:
Clty Attorney
SUBJECT:
Hotels and Mote 15 In Indust]-lal Dlstrlcts
Introductlon
ThlS report transffilts the attdched ordlnance to
permlt hotels and motels In the HI l~mlted lndustrlal
dlstrlct and M2 general lndustrlal d1strlet by use perrnlt
only.
ThlS ardlnance was requested by the Clty Caunell at
lts meetlng of Aprll l2, 1977.
e
B~.ckground
The attached ordlnance provldes that a use permlt
may be lssued for hotel and molel development .Ln elther
1'11 or j\12 zone.
Under present zonlng regulatlons, the hotel
or ~otel lD the lndusLr1al dlstrlct 1S permltted wlthout a
use permlt.
A hearlng was held on thlS matter by the PlaDDlng
ConW1SSlon on March 7, 1977, and the Plannlng COITmlSS10n has
recommended thlS change. A copy of the prevlous staff report
15 attached hereto for lnfarmatlonal purposes.
Alternat1ve Solutlons
Not appllcable.
e
-1-
HAY 1 0 I4ll
CA RLh.~~~:Jak 4-28-77
e
e
Recommendatlon
e
It 15 respectfully recommended that the Clty CounCll
lntroduce the attached ordlnance for flrst readlng and hold
a publlC hear1ng thereon.
Prepared by:
Rlchard L_ Knlckerbocker, Clty Attorney
Samuel I. Strelchman, ASslstant Clty Attorney
e
.
e
-2-
. .
e
e
e
-------
---
e e
Santa Monica, Cal1fornia, Parch 30, 1977
TO:
Mayor and C1ty Councll
FROM:
City Staff
SUBJECT:
Hotels and Motels in Industrial Dlstricts
Introduction
ThlS report transmlts the Plann1ng COF.~lSSlOn's reco~nendat1on
that hotels and motels be permitted in the industr1al distrlcts
only by Conditional Use Permit.
Bac1.::.ground
The present zoning regulat10ns per~lt hotels and Motels in the
Ml and M2 Inoustrlal Distr1cts as a matter of r1ght on the basis
that they are co~~erc1al rather than residentlal uses.
On rlarch
25, 1977 the Clty Councll requested that the Plannlng CO~isslon
reV1ew the subJect of hotels aDO rotels in industrlal dlstricts
and consider alternatlves to the present restrictlons. Accord-
ingly, the Plannlng COrt,-nlsslon has rl2viewec1 the ffiatter, includ-
1ng a Publlc Fearing on Harch 7, 1977 and recof1lIDends t:'1at the
Zonlng Ordlnance be a~ended to prov1de that hotels and Motels be
s~bJect to the Conditlonal Use Per~lt procecures.
This Fould be
acco~plished by aDenning sectio~s 9120Al and 9146A3.
Sectlon
9120A regulating the uses per~itted ln the Ml Dlstrlct would be
amended to lnsert hotels and ~otels as an excluded use except by
Conditlonal Use Permlt and Sectlon 9146A3, regulating COnd1tlon-
al Use Permlts, would be a~ended to provlde for coverage of hotels
and ~o~els in the HI and ~2 Dlstr1cts.
Correction of Sectlon
e
e
e
e
e
TO:
t1ayor and Cl ty Counell -2-
!.~ arc h 3 0, 1 9 7 7
9120Al for the Ml Dlstrlct wlll autonatlcally extend to 9121A
covering the t~2 Dlstrlct.
RecoTflJT1endatlon
It is respectfully recoITmended that the Clty Councll request
the Clty Attorney to prepare the necessary ordlnance lncorpora-
ting the proposed changes and return It for full consideration
In the usual course of procedure.
Prepared by: J. W. LG~SFORD
,J1>JLj J S
----r--- -, '"-~......""'-....._......- ---....... -...... ............- ................L........"o...Ac .L~-_-"-~....L.................. ..LJ.-....a-J.-.l.---'--"----'--p..............L ,-",",--,,'o....&-_..L.,"-"
latlng to zanlng: and, a PubllC Hearing havlng been held on
March 7, 1977 on the proposed anendwents, hereby flnds as
follows:
1. Under the present zoning regulations, hotels and
motels are a permltted use ln the ~l and M2 Dlstrlcts
ln that they are cor~erClal uses WhlCh are not speclf-
lcally excluded.
2.
InasDuch as hotels and wotels are by thelr nature
resldentlal ln character, as well as commerclal,
the publlC lnterest would be best served by re-
qUlrlng that such uses sltuated ln industrlal areas
resubJected to the evaluation and controls afforded
by the Condltlonal Cse Perffilt procedures.
e
3. The proposed aFend~ents wo~ld have the effect of
requlrlng hotels and motels to be subJect to the
lssuance of a Conditlonal Use Permlt lf located In
the MI or 112 Dlstrlcts.
4. The publlC neccsslty, conve~lence, ge~eral welfare
and good zODlng practlce requlre the amendments as
proposed.
SECTION 2. The Clty Plan~lng COr.~lSSlon of the Clty of Santa
Manlca therefore recorGends that Sectlons 9120Al and 9146AJ of
Chapter 1, Artlcle I X of the Santa !':onlca !lu:llcl.?al Code be de-
leted ln ltS entlrety and a ~ew wordlng for these sectlons be
adopted to read as follows:
SECTION 9120A.
perni ttcd In the
Uses Per~ltted. The followlng uses are
'Ml' L1Mited Industrial Dlstrlct:
e
1. All uses permltted ln the Cor~erclal Dlstrlcts
except retall stores deallng In or offerlng for sale
~cn's or women's wearlng apparel, cosrretlcs or beauty
supplles, packaged food or grocerles, home furn1ture
o~ furnlshlngs, resldentlal uses, hotels and motels,
boardlng houses, hospltals, sanltarlu~S, convalescent
and nurslng ho~es. Provlced, however, tr.at a manu-
facturer shall be permltted to ~ake retall sales of
his product 1n co~~ection wlth and on the same prenl-
ses as hlS ~anu[acturLng operatlon. Provlced, further,
tr,at the Zonlng Ad~ln1stra tor nay grant a use perml t for
hOspltals, hotels and Motels ln accordance wlth Sectlons
9l46B, 9146C, and 9146D.
SECTION 9146A3. Traller courts or tr~11er parks may be
perr'u tted ln the "C4" Dl s trlct and hotels and ITo-Lels
riay be ?2nr\ll t.J~d ln the ~1l or :C~2 :::>1 S trlcts.
;
I
-1--
e
e
'..-lLj' r-LC1..Jl.LL-.l..l1"j LULlLJLL...1...':::.J..LUJl
Cl ty of Santa i10nlca
I, JhV~S LU~SFORD, hereby certlfy that the above actlon was approved
by the Clty Plannlng CO~~lSSlon by the followlng vote:
AYES:
COITID1SS10ners HotchklSS, Katz, Lonslnger,
Savage, Schnelder, Malcolm
NOES:
None
ABSENT:
CorrmlSSlo~er Gould
Dated:
.L1arch 7, 1977
;
{
-2-