SR-400-001-03 (7)
} ...'
e
.. e
-
ID-A
HB 2 5 ""
CjED:PC:KW:nh
CouncIl Mtg:
Ljpo ....OO/~Kfa~onIca, CalifornIa
February 25, 1986
TO:
Mayor and CIty Councll
FROM:
C~ty Staff
SUBJECT:
Recommenda tIon to Adopt Resolut lon of
InItIatIng Amendment of Program 12 of
Element of the General Plan.
Intent~on
the HOUSIng
INTRODUCTION
ThIS staff repor t transmIts the recommendatIon of the plannIng
CommiSSIon that the CIty CouncIl adopt a ResolutIon of IntentIon
to beg In formal proceed Ings to amend Program 12 of the CIty'S
Housing Element.
BACKGROUND
program
12
of
the
Houslng
Element
establishes
a
25-30%
Incluslonary houslng reqUIrement for new hOUSIng developments of
three unIts or more.
InItIally, concerns about Program 12 were
raIsed
In the context of CouncIl and PlannIng CommIssIon
dISCUSSIon of an In-lIeu fee ordInance which would have allowed
developers of small proJects to satlsfy thelr Incluslonary
oblIgatIons by payment of an In-lIeu fee.
In
response
to
the
concerns
raIsed
by
CouncIlrnembers,
CommISSIoners, developers and others, the Planning CommiSSIon
apPolnted a subcommIttee to revIew program 12. The consensus of
the subcommIttee was that changes to program 12 should be made,
,o-~
FEB 2 5 1986
- 1 -
. ' ,
It
e
and
that
the
HousIng
Element
reVISIon process
should
be
InItIated.
To provIde a prellffilnary focus for dIScussIon, the subcommIttee
prepared tentatIve amendments to program 12, as well as poss~ble
elements of an Implementlng ordlnance. These items are provlded
In Exhlblt 1. The subcommlttee prepared these Items for
dlScuss~on purposes only, and the PlannIng Commiss Ion has not
endorsed them, nor IS the City CouncIl beIng asked at thIS tIme
to approve or adopt them.
On Saturday, February 8, 1986 tne PlannIng Commlsslon conducted a
PublIC Hear lng on the subcommIttee's prelImInary recomrnenda tIon
(see ExhIbIt 1) to amend Program 12 of the Clty'S Houslng
Element. A summary of the hearIng lS prOVIded as ExhIbIt 2. The
CommIssIon approved a motIon to recommend to the Council the
adoptlon of a ResolutIon of IntentIon to amend Program 12, wIth
speclf IC amendments to be developed dur Ing the Hous Ing Element
amendment process. In partIcular, the CommISSIon would like an
analys1s of mechanIsms for adJustment of the program ln a more
expedIent manner than IS currently avaIlable. AdoptIon of the
ResolutIon by the CIty Councll w111 begln the formal amendment
process.
By adoptIng the ResolutIon of IntentIon at thIS tIme, the CounCIl
IS not asked to approve the exhIbIts to thlS report. The
Plannlng CommISSIon will be addreSSIng tne lssues presented In
that report and after further delIberat10n and Input from the
publlC WIll return to the Councll wIth recommended changes.
- 2 -
e
e
The process for amending Program 12 Includes the following:
AdoptIon of CIty Councll ResolutIon of IntentIon to Amend
Program 12
Staff analysls and preparatlon of recommendatIons and
environmental documentatIon for presentation to the PlannIng
CommIssion. Staff wIll seek input from the Planning
CommIssion subcommIttee, the HousIng CommiSSIon, community
and busIness groups, and other Interested persons In
formulatIng specIfIC recommendatlons.
PlannIng CommiSSIon publIC hearIng and recommendatIon for
reVISIon to program 12.
CIty CounCIl publlC hearIng and adoptIon of reVIsed Program
12.
ReVIew by the State of Callfornla would also be reqUIred prior to
adoptlon of any amendments to the HOUSIng Element.
It IS
estImated that the entIre process WIll take four to SIX months to
complete.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACT
The recommendatIon of thIS report has no budget/fInancIal Impact.
RECOMMENDATION
It IS respectfully recommended that the CIty CounCIl adopt the
proposed ResolutIon of IntentIon to amend the HOUSIng Element.
Prepared by: D. Kenyon Webster, SenIor Planner
CIty Planning DivIsIon
ExhIbltS: 1. PlannIng Commlsslon SubcommIttee Report.
2. Summary of Planning Commission PubllC HearIng.
3. ResolutIon of IntentIon
- 3 -
ExhIblt 1
SUM}~RY O~ANNING CO~~ISSION PROGR~2 DISCUSSION
CommlSSloner Israel moved that the Plannlng CommlSS10n
off Ie lally recommend to tne Cl ty Coune 11 that 1 t IS sue a
notIce of Intention to modIfy the General Plan ~n respect to
Houslng Element Program 12 and that the subcommIttee report
be sent to them as advlsory materIals ln connectIon WIth that
recommendatIon. The rnotlon was seconded.
CommISSIoner Heche responded that she was concerned about the
percentage fIgure expressed In the subcommIttee 1 s adVIsory
memorandum. She asked that it be clearly stated that
ultImately the program should include a SImple mechanIsm
WhiCh allowed adJustment of the Incluslonary percentage as
Clrcumstances or needs may change.
CommiSSIoner Israel saId that he could except thIS amendment.
CommISSIoner Hebald-Heymann commented that she felt that the
In-lIeu fees should go down rather than up In order to
encourage development to bUIld more unlts.
Commlssloner KIrshner responded that as tentatIvely
structured by the subcommIttee, the number of unlts that are
bUIlt will not be affected by ~he In-lieu fee.
Commlssloner Shearer asked for a summary of the process by
WhICh any change In the HOUSIng Element has to be made.
Staff responded that the process begIns With a resolutlon of
Intentlon by the CounCIl. The Councll will refer the matter
back to the PlannIng ComrnlsSlon. Staff wIll more than lIkely
have to do some envIronmental work on the matter. The
Commlsslon wlll act upon the amendment and then forward the
matter to the Cl ty Coune 11 who wIll ul tirnately approve the
amendment and the envlronmenta1 documentatlon. PublIC
hearings must be conducted by both the CommISSIon and
CounCIl.
A vote was taken on the motlon and Its amendment.
votIng yes were Commlssloners Hebald-Heymann, HeCht,
and KIrshner. CommISSIoner Shearer voted no.
Those
Israel,
pc020886
e
e
Exh,b,t 2
M E M 0 RAN DUM
CITY PLANNING DIVISION
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
DATE: February 5, 1986
TO: The Honorable PlannIng CommlSSlon
FROM: PlannIng Staff
SUBJECT: Transm~tta1 of Hous~ng Element Program 12
RecommendatIon
Attached for your reVIew are the recommendatIons of the
Comm~sslon's subcommittee regardIng the Inc1uslonary
program of the CIty'S HousIng Element. The subcommIttee
of Commlssloners Perlman, KIrshner, and Israel.
PlannIng
hOUSlng
conSIsts
The proposed lnclusionary requl.rements are based upon an
evaluatlon of the effectIveness of the eXIstIng Incluslonary
progr am, costs of developIng affo rdable hous lng, the exper lence
of other ]urlsdlctlons, and the economIC Impact of Incluslonary
reqUIrements on proJects of varYlng SIzes. Staff concurs 'inth
the subcomm~ttee's recommendatIons.
1'hlS matter IS set for publlC hearIng and
Saturday, February 8,1986, at 9:30 A.M.
Chambers.
Comm~sSlon reVIew on
In the C~ty CounCIl
Recommendation
Is respectfully recommended that the Plann~ng ComffilSSlon allow
l~terested members of the publlC to comment on the subcommIttee's
recommendat~ons, follOWIng which the Comm~SSlon adopt the
S~bCo~illl~tee's recommendatIons and forward chem to the C~ty
Counc~l for ~ts reVlew.
DKW:klc
Attachment: proposed Changes to Houslng
Element Program 12
e
e
January 31, 1986
?ROPOSED C~~GES TO HOUSING ELEM~NT PROGR&~ 12
Th~s is a ?roposal to the Plann~ng Com~sslon, from the Subcommittee appo~nted
for thIS purpose. The approprIate process is ror the Planning Commission as a
whole to recommend :0 the CIty CouncIl that ~t InItIate the process of changIng
HouSlOg ~~ement Program 12. Par~ or thIS process wlll =eoulre the matter to
be of~~cially referred to the PlannIng CommIssion for public hearIngs, etc.
The HOUSIng Element IS necessar~ly broad and general. After It is revised. it
WIll stlll be necessary far an ~mplementlng ordinanc~ to be prepared. The
Subco~ttee felt that It would be qUIte useful. If not essentIal, to discuss
Its ldeas as to what the detaIls or such an implementIng ordinance might be,
Slnce that seems the best way to most clearly present and reVIeW the likely
effect and ImplementatIon of a reVIsed HOUSIng Element Program 12. Hence, the
results of such dis~~sslon appear later in th~s ~emo.
~
Refer to ~he annotated copy of a~~ached (pages 73-76). The first portIon or
the second ?aragraph of 2ART 1 ~s to be =e?laced wath the folloWing:
ThlS incluslonarf program shall be desl~ed to prOVIde housing affordable
to ~e~sans ~th ~ncomes at 80% or less of the Couney ~edian. The inclus~onary
requlrement shall be proportIonal to the square rootage af ne~ market rate
hcus~ng Inc:uded ~n eac~ suoJec: pro]ec:. InItially the ratIO shall be
15%. E"~s rat~o may be ari:usteci by the C~ty Councll, followi~g ~eVleW and
recommenaat~an by the ?lannlng Co~sslon, no more often than once every
c~o years, ~ased on ~~anges :~ t~e ~eed ~or an :ncluslonary reqUIrement,
economIC =easIbll:ty at ?ar~lcular leve:s or for ?roJec~s or particular
SIZes, and the avallaolllty or ocher slg~lf:canc benefIts to the CIty. The
l~u:e~ent:ng JrdInance may ?rovlde for satIsfactlon oi chis :ncluslonary
recu:re~ent JY on-slte hOUSIng. or:-slte hOUSIng, an In-lleu fee to be held
~y t~e CIty and dedIcated express:y Co ?rOV~dIng lncluSlona=y hOUSIng under
City dl~ec~~on. or a comblnat~on or Chese elements.
e
e
Projects with less than four (4) units shall be exempced entirely from the
lnclusionary requ1rement. All projects receiving approval to actually
construct an lnclus10nary unit shall be ellgl~le for a denS1ty bonus 1n the
same 1ncluslonary ratlo as stated above, wlth the incluslonary portlon to
at least equal the space constructed under the denslty bonus ?rovlsion. In
lieu fees, subject to formula increases to recognIze the effec~ of inflatlon,
shall be established with due regard to the City's ability to obtaln the
benef1ts of State-mandated density bonuses. Projects including less than
nlne (9) new market rate unlts are to be subject to progressively reduced
in lieu fees.
PART 2 should be deleted entirely, but wlCn the additlon or the zollowlng to
PART 1. The expliclt subtltle MPART I" can then be deleted as ~ell.
The lncluslonary houslng ordinance which lmplements thlS ?~ogram ~y provlde
encouragement, Vla specific lnCentlves, to projects Nn~crt ?rOvlae low or
moderate income hous~ng In great~r proport~ons than ~nlmum reaUlremen~5.
SPECIFIC ELEME~TS OF IMPLEMENTI~G ORDINANCZ
The followlng comments and descr1pclons =eflect the Subcom~:tee's :hlnKlng as
to reasonable and llkely proVls~ons In an lmplementlng ordlnance, wnlch are
conSlstent wlth and would carry out the Intent ot :~e revlsed ?rogram 12.
1. 3-unIt and 2-unlt projects are explicltly exe~pted.
2. The City's use of 1n-lleu fees is expllcltly oandated and :lilllted to p~ovlde
affordable houslng at the level of 80% or :ess oi County mealan income.
3. If the RCS mandates new lnclusionary unlts In a ?artlcuiar ?ro]ect, at the
80% lncome level (as contrasted WIth reDlacemenc lnc~uslonary unlts), the
ordinance should not requlre duplicaclon under ChIS ?rogram, that 1S, any
such ~ew RCB-mandated unIts are permltted to satisfy the requlrements of tnls
programas well.
--
e
e
1
I
!
I
4. As a policy ~cter, there should be a slight ~conomlC bias (approximately 5-20%)
towards actually building lnclusionary units rather than paying the in
l1eu fee, based on scaff analysis of the net cost of on-site inclusionary unlts.
5. Based on ?rellmlnary analysls conducted thus far, it appears that the
followlng In-Ileu fees ~ould be approprlate and would meet other stated
Ob]ec:lves of the revlsed Program 12.
J of In Ll.eu Fee Typical
Unl.ts(a) ?er Sq. Foot ProJect Fee(b)
4 $4.00 $16,000
5 $4.50 $22,500
6 35.00 330,000
7 55.50 538,500
8 56.00 $48,000
9 or illare $6.50 $58,500 (9 )
(a) Markee-rate, excludlng dens~ty ~onus available at 7 unlts or more.
(b) Based on ave~age I,JOO square foot unlts.
6. ~t 1S perrnatted to satlsfy :ie lncluslonary requlrement by a comolnacion of the
pe~tteci me~hods. The ~ost llkely example 15 a bUlldlng Wlth less than
the mandated ~ncluslonary square foocage (on or off slte), and paylng for the
excess on a 9roportlonal basls. For example, suppose an a-unit proJec:,
agg=egat:ng 3,JOO 5qUa~e feet: (lgnorln~ densl:Y bonus) and hence wlth an
incluslonary requlrement: for 1,200 square feet: (15%), could most conveniently
oe JULIe wlth only a 1,JOO square foot Inclusionary unlt ln the developer's
ODl~lon. :he de~elope= ~ould je pe~ltted to satIsfy the lnclusionary
requl=ement ror an addi:lonal :00 square feet by paylng 38,000, whl.ch lS
1!6th oi :he stated lncluslonary fee for the full 8,000 quarter feet (at
8 llcltS). The U6th :-ac.:o comeS about 'Jecause t:he ZOO "JUsslng square
feet. 15 i/6th or the :ncluslonary =equlrement of 1,200 square reet.
i. ~he C?l prOV~Slon WhlCh ap?eared Ln the preVlOUS draft ordinance is approprlate.
...
--
---
PROGRAM 12: Develop an inclusionary zoning program.
OBJECTIVE: Promote development of housing af=ordable to low- and
-
-,
moderate-income persons.
DESCRIPTION:
PART 1
The City shall adopt an inclus~onary zon~:1g program. The
inclusionary requirement shall apply to all market rate
housing whether resulting f=om new construc~ion. substantial
". r
remodeling,
or market-rate conversion of aoart:nent units,
"211.~ dt.t~e~e5 ~
single fa.'!1ily homesAshall. be exemp"te -:::,"...o,:,"',,-~l
except that
a-"'~
~!,~1'<;+- i ~l
. ~
<:1.-'-........
I _ _ ~__
~a. --~-.1.
::.?~=::;Jri:J.~a
..3:____.,. ___ _ I
.....~"'I ~..........,.t:"'..-~........
~L::.ll
-i !! '= ! ~ i 0 :-.. c.. ;: ~.. - -:"'j, vi...;.;:, 1. ';1 ~ u :., 1 :... S .:. -:. .:. 0 n r: 3. C C ,'J r C. :.. :: :; ~ .~ "':. :" 0
~~o~~i~~~~~~= cf
Ci~:r
~7.:.:d~,' c:: :::],00.
~....
_..Ji.~
--... --
1.,.,1......- .::I__...........,j,~
m
... c ::':':-.t.;:"'~" ,j
~;;'...f~:...=.:..::.,:.:-..~ :h::l~ 1.....:. ~~..... ~-::. :l
every ~4rket rat~ housi~g uni~
.30
; i-
un_ _s
120
afforc.able
to pe~scr..s
at
percent
!Ited~an
orov:.ded.
or
the application
less t~an a ~hole
nunber, i~ shall be
to t:J.e ne a= as-:. who 1 a
nu.-nber, exc&?t
shall prov:.de
at least
1 inclusionary
=<Jr~"l1er de'le2.op a
the Ci ty
mechan~srn
upward or
t~e percentage
as to re!2.ect changes ~:l t:he
for a:l
requ~rement, and =egulat~ons s~a:l
::le:dble appl.:.ca~.!.on of inclusiona=y
73
-0
])e(~
Ccve,..e...J.
'io" L u E
"ib( e{e
y~ (I
I rtl!~
7.....e.
( u.... I.
b~ 71IJOl
..) I
I"" "" -r- .
-r:- I
-......
, ~
e
e
,:~~~S~qn_i~~;~~~ ~~~~e~~~~,Yb~ ~~tt_~~'ied.
__.-_'j!?r1~~~ ~~__.._ _.._......~ __v_...~
......,,....~_...~,. 'L- ~ho ,..,~..... '--':~n~~"-l :_-',"' --
~:pp:o:::a t: :eg~-l-a-:1o:~- - :~~ll-- be - :'~:~t::'~ ~:~ ~::::~
e,xemption procedures for remodeling and convers::..ons.
Such
exempt~ons shall not conflict with other laws and shall
provide protec-:'1ons aga1nst tenant displacement and for
preservat10n of the affordable housing stock.
Inclusionary units produced shall be ownership~ or rental
units, and shall be subJect to controls to maintain
a::fordabili ty.
The inclusionary units shall be made affordable and
available to persons in the 0% to 120% of median County
incorne_ ~
Lhe econolili<,.; .LlJ. ~ uf
J ~ t""'t _ _ _..
t.;...i.= """--.1
L. 't_ _
....i.J.~ "_
l "II, I
"_..<a"_
c-~.... ;:l:-~r:.r..-i-~ .--:..:-~~l~;;.; a ~ea. in'" -:...l~t;; _....1......: ~~ ;,c;:.J.r~r ~::.:. ~s .
5 tandar ds
shall be developed for provision of un~ts witn1n
'l?Oz...
sub-c:a"tegor1es of the 0% to~ of median income range.
':'~e Ci ,;:y shall. encourage the provis ion of uni -:'5 tHi th an
apprOpr12.te number of bedroorr.s and othe= iea"ture5 so as "':0
oes't. meet "the needs of 5 en10r ci tizens ,
- , , .
1: 3.::11 ..:..1.e5 ,
large
c~sabled persons, and pe~5ons with other s?ec~al ~eeds.
'I':,.e =elev2.:lt prcv~s~ons of State law, i!1cl'..ld~r:.g Gove=:lme:--.c
Code Sec"':ion 65915-65918 shall be complied with 1.n t~e
develo9rnent of the l.nclusionary housing ordinance.
74
: .
...-i.
,-
-
e
P ART I!
1>e(e~e
produced.
In
years most of the ne..... zr.ult.1.-family hous~n
in Santa Monica have been
to only very small proport;.cn of
\
\
-This proce\ has resulted 1.0 a
h.1.storic d.1.v~s.1.~Y, ~o address
res 1. den t. s .
the Ci t.y · 5
the number of
expens1. ve. mar:
permitted shall be
related to the
housing units
USl.ng ye~-u~r~leased
income data for Santa
Hcn1.ca, the Ci ':.y
the proportion of the
Ci~y's low-, mccerat~-
households.
The
number of
issued for low- and
mOde.::-ate-;':lcame
the previous calendar
yea:. toge ~~er ",o/::'~.. : 980 0= low- and
=d.".to- ,ncome l>.:s.o.01dS shall to deter:nin. the
allowable numbe~ of :r.ar1<:e~-rate mUl"t.:"~milY housing un!. ts
per=ttad "'-/ s,-ran "e'''. Fer e"a:no~~e, if 513% 0= the
/
<::'":.'.1'3 'house"holds 'Ne=~ :'ow- or rnode=a~e- ::. cerna, and -:.here
we" ~ bU,l.bng p."= ~s for 306 10w- and 1II~ ~ t. - income
:hoc.s~::g~r..:. ':.5 .l.ss:..:ed .:.n t::J.e pr e'll.OUS calenca_ year I the
al::.ocfc.l.on of ma=~-cet.-=ate nulti-.:amily t;"e
I
curl en t year would equal 300 uni. t.s .
~sehclds were low- or ~ode~ate-~nccme in th~s
//1 1 - T . . ~
1- ocat~an :or mar<et-=ate ncus~ng wou~a
/mU2.t..!.-.:anUol'l :..lnl.-:'s. Va=::ance ==cm t......u.s ?=ogram shElll
If 40% ot
the
75
---.oiIf
,J"
.'
e(-
e
....
j)e(e~~
~f it is deter~ned tha~ s~gnifi~an~oenefi~s . "11
These prov~s~ons
1 market-rate ~ulti-farnilv
~ -
1---"
~n. vo '''~ng new co ns t::- uc t.::.on 1
-...
housing
condominiu.
~
cooper a t~ V'e conver s ion s 1 ()r~=
Any reference herein to subd.::.v.::.s:.cn maps
pa::-cel maps.
- -.......-...-
n1PLEMENTAT ION:
Res?ons.::.ble Agency:
Commun.::.ty and 3conomic Developme~t
Depart..'1Ie:l t.
Cost:
Est~mated ann~a~ cost of S0 to 513,700.
Zst':'.:!1.at.:c
one-t.::.me costs of ~0 ~o ssa0.
Staffincr:
..
Zero to one-~al~ Assist~~t Planner.
Fundina :
-
City General P~nd, in-l~eu fee reve~ue.
Schedule: j.
Quant~f~ed I~?ac~:
S1..qn.::.::.:.cant l..ncrease in :=.e'., a::=ordabl e
housi:lg.
Es~.::.matec potential acd.::.~ion of
- ~
j .J
to 130
inclus~onary un.::.ts per year.
76
e
e
Agenda Item #
BEFORE DISTRIBUTION CHECK CONTENT OF ALL
DISTRIBUTION OF RESOLUTION # 7175.--
oJ7s /J' C
/0 ~ /f--
fro
FOR CITY _CkERK'S ACTION
ORDINA.:\TCE #
Councll Meetlng Date
Introduced.
Adopted.
Af]."lAYS PUBLISH AOOPTED ORDINANCES *
*Cross out Attorney's aDDr'oval
f')
0
......
;,
"
......
7l
f)
11
)
~
~
~ ~
::
.oj
:l
..
)
~
)
J
)
Was it amended?
VOTE: Afflrmative: ~~()
Negatlve:
Abstain:
Absent: 4'-_ . L
{~e'T
PROOF VOTE,c WITH ANOTHER PERSITN BEFORE ANYTHING
DI5TRI~iI0N'ORIGINAL LO-De signed, sealed' and filed in Vault.
NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION (Date:
)
)
Department o11ginating staff report (
Management Serv,~~e? Lynne Barrette urdinances only
<<It-
Agency mentIoned In document or staff report
(certifled?)
Subject fIle (agenda packet)
Counter file
1
1
Others:
AIrport
Parking Auth.
Auditorum
Personnel
BuildIng Dept.
Planning
I
CuIllll.mi ty and EconatUc Dev.
Finance
PolIce (en-
forcement?)
Purchasing
..
FIre
Recr/Parks
General Servo
TransportatIon
LIbrary
Treasurer
Manager
SE~D FOU~ COPIES OF ALL ORDINANCES TO:
CODfD SYSTEMS, Attn Peter Maclearie
12_9 ~tain 1"~r~et ~
. Av6"1,1 N"€iw Jersey_07717 .
SEND FOUR COPIES OF ~J.J. onn TMJHJrpC; -to:
~ltifl r.(d.~fEk MUNICIPAL COURT
.' 725 MAIN STREE1; Room 118
SANTA MONICA, CA 90401
*Check COde Sect~ons before sendwg.
TOTAL COPIES
3
.. .
"
e
Exhl.blt 3
e
RESOLUTION NO. 7172
(CCS)
(CIty Council SerIes)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF TrlE CITY OF SANTA MONICA
INITIATING PROCEEDINGS TO CONSIDER
AMENDMENTS TO PROGRAM 12 OF THE
HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN
WHEREAS, the PlannIng CommIssion of the CIty of Santa Monl.ca
has requested the CIty Councll to lnltlate proceedIngs to
conSider amendments to Program 12 of the HousIng Element of the
General Plan,
NOW, TdEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIry OF SANTA MONICA
DOE3 RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The CIty CouncIl authorlZ9s the PlannIng
CommIssion to lnltl.ate proceedings to conSIder a~endments to
Program 12 of the HousIng Element of the General Plan.
SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certlfy to the adoptlon of
thIS ResolutIon, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be
In full force and effect.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~~.~
ROBERT N. MYERS 0
City Attorney
~ ');
.
e
e
Adopted a~d approved thIS 25th day of February, 1986.
I JJA ~JA~
/~. V!V5YUTempo(j'
I hereby certlfy that the foregol~g Resolutlo~ No. 7172(CCS)
was duly adopted by the Clty Cou~cll of the Clty of Sa~ta MO~lca
at a meetlt'lg thereof held 0'1. February 25, 1986 by the followlng
COU!1Cll vote:
Ayes: Cou!1cllmembers: COt'l!l, Epsteln, A. Katz, H. Katz,
Zat'le and Nayor Pro Tempore Jennlngs
Noes: Cou'1cllmembers: None
Abstal~: Cou'1cllmembers: NO'1e
Absel1t: Cou~cllmembers: Hayor Reed
ATTEST:
~~.~
Clty Clerk