SR-3-A (2)`^ ~ ' ` 3A
~
MQY t i ~g
f lctyclerklelection10424-2599 canvass stf rpt Santa Monica, California
Counal Meetmg May 11, 1999
TO Mayor and City Counal
FROM C~ty Clerk
SUBJECT Resolution of the City Council of the City of Santa Monica Accepting the
City Clerk's Official Canvass and Official Statement of Votes Cast for the
Special Muniapal Election Held on Apnl 24-25, 1999. and Declanng the
Results Thereof
INTRODUC710N
On Apri! 24-25, 1999, a speaal municipal election was held in the City of Santa Monica
for fhe purpose of elect~ng one member to the Santa Monica City Councd to fill an
unscheduled vacancy with a term ending November 2000
The City Counc~[ also placed one measure, a charter amendment. on the ballot
requinng a ma~onty vote of thos~ voting in order to pass The measure placed on the
ballot read as follows
PROPOSITION I Shall Santa Monrca C~fy Charter Secfion 1806(b) be
amended to prowde that a fenant in a controlled renta! unrt cannot be
evicted unless fhe tenant has comm-tted a matenal and substantral
vro/ation of the lease whrch the landlord has not waived or otherwrse lost
the legai nghts to use as the basrs for an evrctron~
BACKGROUND
On September 25, 1998, Councilmember Asha Greenberg tendered her resignation
from the City Counci] due to moving her residence outside of the City boundaries At its
regular meeting of October 13. 1998, the City Council accepted Councilmember
Greenbe~g's resignation and declared her seat vacant Section 603 of the City Charter
provides for fdling of any unscheduled vacancy on the Council by appointment within
MAY 1 1 ~ggg
3A
thirty days after the office is declared vacant and, that if not fdled, a speaal elec#ion be
called to fill the vacancy The City Council d[d not fill the vacancy w~thin th~rty days and
on December 22, 1998, adopted a resolution calling a special election to be held over a
two-day period on Saturday and Sunday, April 24-25, 1999
Although the City usually consolidates a61 its special and regular elections with Los
Angeles County ~n order to encvurage hrgh voter turn out and to minrmize costs.
because the date the special election was scheduled was off-season, consolidation with
the County was not possible In addition, because of the unprecedented nature of
holding a two-day, weekend, stand-alone election in the City, the City Clerk was
directed to use all means avadable and necessary to ad~ertise the election
ELECTION RESULTS
For this election there were 54,156 registered voters in the City There were seven
candidates on the ballot for the Councd vacancy Candidate Richard Bloom received a
ma~onty of 7,848 votes that equaled 54 0% of the fotal ballots The charter amendment
passed with a total of 10,231 equaling 71 8% of the vote The number of ballots tallied
was 14,869 Out of that number 5,183 were absentee ballots (with a few pro~isior~al
included) and 9,686 voted at the polls for a final 27 5% turnout of ~ofers
R~PORT ON TWO-DAY WEEKEND ELECTION
Precinct Workers
Staff was prepared to have difficulties recruitmg precinct workers that would agree to
work both election days and/or work during a weekend Staff was gratified to secure,
within a reasonable time, poll workers who committed to work both days In addition,
staff had a waiting list of ~ver 100 people that were willing to be precmct workers On
the days of the election there were the expected worker cancellations due to unforseen
even#s However, staff was able to substitute workers quickly and all the preancts were
stafFed as planned
~
Precinct workers attended a mandatory 90-minute training class on the procedures
established for the two-day election and on the process for securing the "hve" (~ofed)
and unused (unvoted) ba1[ots at the end of the day on Saturday
Pollinq Sites
The County precincts were consolidated from 66 into 34 City preancts Although stafF
made every effort to utilize the polling sites used by the County m previous elections,
fifteen of the sites were not available for the entir~ two days and were not available
because of the weekend Sfaff was dingent in secunng thirteen conventional
(residences, schools, ho#el lobbies, etc ) polling sites to replace t~ose that were
unavailable. except for two Out of this necessity arose the concept of using two coffee
shops as pollmg s~tes Based on the comments recei~ed by staff, the use of the two
coffee shops as polling sites was a no~elty and appears to have been beneficial
A number of inembers of the public called our office prior to the election to express
concerns regarding, and/or to protest #he change in polling places The callers were
understanding once staff explained the reasons for the changes Staff prowded pollmg
site location information continuously ~ia the telephone during the last two weeks before
the election and from 7 00 a m, to 7 00 p m, the Friday before, and on Saturday and
Sunday of the election Precinct boards were provided with a city-wide polling site map
to assist them in directing voters to their appropnate polling place
After the end of the absentee votmg period on March 26`h and through 7 00 p m, on
Sunday of the election, staff pro~ided home delivery and pick-up ser~ice of ballots to a
number of indi~iduals physically unable ta go vote at the polls
Student Worker Proqram
The three local high schools. Samohi. St Mon~ca's. and Crassroads. were in~ited to
participate in the Student Precrnct Worker Program The requirements for students
wishing to participate were that they be U S citizens, seniors with a minimum of 2 5
3
grade point average and that they attend a precinct worker training class At the outset
twenty-one studen#s signed up to partiapate However, for vanous reasons sixteen
students canceled and five students worked on Saturday and Sunday of the election
Reports from the Precinct Inspectors where the students were assigned indicate that
the students performed their duties in a competent and efficient manner The students
were paid the same stipend as the precinct clerks, $50 for the first day and $75 for the
second day
Advertisinq
Staff advert~sed the election in various ways !n coordination with the School District,
notices were sent home one week before the election with elementary, middle, and high
school students not~fying voters of the election and remmding them to vote Six
banners were placed at ma~or intersections throughout the City from April 5-25, 1999
Fifteen panels were placed on the outside of the Big Blue Buses from March 8-2fi,
1999, adver#ising the deadlme ta register to vote, and from A~ril 5-25. 1999, remmding
people to vote on the election days
Staff included notices in Our Trmes, Seascape and ~n the Rent Control News, as well as
on the City's Webpage and on CitylV During the Santa Monica Fest~~al on Apnl 17,
staff hired an indi~idual to dress as "Uncle Sam" walking on stdts who drstnbuted sun
visors advertising the election to attendees ~inally, after voting at pollmg sites, voters
were gi~en red penals inscribed with I voted at the Apn124-25. 1999. Santa Monrca
Special Munrc~pai Elecflon~
Saturday and Sunday
The opening and closing of the polls was uneventful on both days The turn out was a
total of 4.950 mailed absentee ballots, 4.571 votes cast on Saturday, 5.115 votes cast
an Sunday. and 233 absentee/provis~onal ballots from the ~olls Staff visited every
pol[mg site on Saturday to assist the precinct boards, mon~tor the process. and answer
questions related to the two-day procedure
4
Staffs most pressing concern, afso voiced by members of the public, was secunty of
the ballots voted on Saturday Precinct inspectors were instructed to return to City Hall
after the closing of #he palls on 5afurday, with the voted ballots in a sealed box, and
hand them into the custody of the elections official The pol~s closed at 7 00 p m By
8 30 p m, all 34 precincts had reported ~n with the voted ballots in a sealed contamer,
as well as absentees dropped off at the precinct and pro~isional ~otes received, in a
sealecf envelope The contamers were stored m the City Clerk's vault The
combination to the ~ault was changed on Friday, the day before, and was known only to
the elections staff The ~ault was then locked and a Sheriff's Deputy stood guarc€
overnight until 8 00 a m, on Sunday morning when staff returned The sealed boxes
remained m the ~ault unt~l 7 00 p m, Sunday, and were then escorfed by a an elections
warker and a Police Officer to the central caunting area in Councd Chambers to process
for counting
Countinq of Ballots
A total of 6,150 applications for absentee voting were received and the same number of
absentee balfots was issued for this election Out of this number, 4,835 absentee
ballots were returned by voters by the end of the day Saturday. April 24, 1999 The
Absentee Canvass Board processed (prepared for counting) the absentee ballots
received by mad on Friday and Saturday The absentee ballots that were dropped off
at the polling sites on Saturday were processed on Sunday and mtegrated with the
mailed-m absentees These were the first ballots to be counted by the computer
immediately after the polls closed at ~ 00 p m, on Sunday Whi1e the absentee ballots
were being counted elections staff opened the sealed boxes contaEning ballots voted on
Saturday, prepared them for the computer, and were counted next The third and final
count on Sunday was the "hve° ballots voted on Sunday and deli~ered by the precmct
inspectors to the central counting place The last precinct reported in at approximately
9 30 p m, and the counting was finished by about 10 00 p m
;
There were 233 remaining pro~isronal and absentee ballots after the final count on
Sunday They were a combination of provisional ballots voted on Sa#urday and
Sunday, ar~d absentee ballots dropped off at the polls on Sunday Final count of these
ballots was campleted on Thursday, April 29, 1999
TELEPHONE SURVEY REPORT
As it has been portrayed by the news medfa, this is the first two-day weekend election
that has been held in the State of CalFforrna and in the nation, m modern times
Because of its uniqueness, staff contracted with Paul Goodwin, of GLS Research. to
conduct a post-election telephone survey The findings and summary are attached as
Exhibit B The report concludes that were the City to switch to a two-day weekend
election. it might increase turnout among ~oters ieast iikely to participate during
elections held on Tuesdays, including younger ~oters, mmorities, renters, and non-
partisan voters Conversely, such a practice might impact a large block of more
frequent voters for whom a weekend election would be incon~enienf or less convenient,
or who would be concerned about cost issues
The survey included a question about an all-mail ballot After being informed of the
benefits of an all-mad baliQt, including cost-savings and mcreased voter participation.
69% of the voters were in support and 24% opposed
RECOMMENDATION
It is respect~ully recommended that the City Councd adopt the resolution certifying the
canvass of the votes cast at the special muniapal election
Prepared by Maria M Stewart, City Clerk
Beth Sanchez, Assistant City Clerk
Attachments Resolufion
6
EXHIBITA
RESOLIfTiON NO 9390 (CCS}
(C1TY COUNGL SERIES)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~HE CITY
OF SANTA MONICA ACCEPTING THE CITY CLERK'S
OF~ICIAL CANVASS AND OFFICIAL STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST
FOR THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON
APRIL 24-25, 1999, AND DECLARING TH~ RESULTS THEREOF
WHEREAS, a Speaal Municipal Election was hefd m the City of Sante Monic~
on Apnl 24-25. 1999. for the purpose of filling an unscheduled vacancy on the C~ty
Counc~l and to place a rneasure on the ballot, and
WHEREAS, the provisions of the Electrons Code of the State of California for the
holding of e~ections in Charter cities were complied w~th and notice of the election was
g~ven in the time. form and manner as provrded by law. voting precincts were properly
estabhshed. election o~cers were ap}~ointed. votes were cast, received and canvassed,
and the returns were made and declared in the time, form and manner as required, and
WHEREAS, the Santa Mo~~ca C~ty Clerk canvassed the returns of the election
and certrfied the results to the City Counal, and those results are attached and made a
part hereof as "Exhibit A."
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA
DOES RE50LVE AS FOLLOWS
SECTION 1 The ~ote totals for the Special Muniapal Elect~on held on
April 24-25, 1999, in the City of Santa Manica. as certif~ed by #he City Clerk, sha11 be
and hereby are approved and adopted as the farmal vote count of the City of Santa
Monica for said office and said measure of said elect~an
SEC~'fON 2 The names of the candidates on the ballot were
Santa Mornca City Council
Richard Bloom
Susan Cloke
Frank E Juarez
Don Gray
Peter R Kerndt
Jon Stevens
Marc J Sanschagnn
SEGTION 3 The number of voted ballots cast for Proposition 1 and for the
election to the City Counal were
REGISTERED ABSENTEE PRECINCT TOTAL
V~TERS BALLOTS BA~LOTS BALLOTS
54,156 5,983 9,686 14,869
SECTION 4 The #ollowing candidate was elected to the office of City
Counalmember
CANDIDATE VOTES
RicMard Bloom 7.848 (54 0%)
SECTION 5 The measure that appeared on the ballot read as follows
PROPOSITON I Shall Sarrfa Monica Crty ChartEr
5ection 9806(b) be amended to provrde that a tenant ~n a
controlled renta! unit cannot be ev~cted unless the tenanf
has comm-tted a matenel and substanf-af v~o~a6on of the
2
lease whrch fhe landlord has nof waived or otherwrse lost
the legal rrghts to use as the basrs for an ev~ctron ~
The measure did receive the required votes, and therefore was approved by
the following vote
Proposition 1
Yes 10,231 {71 8°l0)
No 4.010 (28 2%)
SECTION 6 The City Clerk shalf enter on the records of the Santa Monica City
Council, a statement of the result of the election showmg (1) the total number of ~otes
cast for the office and the measure in the electron, (2} the names of the persons voted
for. (3) the tex# af the measure voted upon, (4) the office that candidates were running
for. (5) the number of votes given at each precmct to each person. and #or and against
the ballot r~easures and (6} the total number of votes giuen tv each pe~son, and for and
against the ballot measure
SECTION 7 The City Clerk sha]{ immediatery make and deliver to the person so
elected a Certficate of Election signed by the City Clerk and authenticated The City
Clerk shall also administer to that person elected the Oath of Office prescr~bed ~n the
Constitution of the State of California and shall have that person subscnbe to it and fde
ft in the office of the City Clerk The persons so elected shall then be inducted into the
office to which he has been efected
3
premiums fior the purpose set forth in this Section Employees sF~all have the
nght to volunteer for this ass~gnment by causing their names to be placed on an
availabilEty list Assignments shali be made from the hst on a rotat~ng basis to
employees who are qualified to per#orm the duties required for the film~ng
assignment. However, if an insufficient number of volunteers are available from
that hst to serve a particular pro~ect, the Crty may assjgn any qualified
employee(s) who are willing to work such pro~ect. The Police ~epartment shall
supply the necessary two-way radio communication between the employee and
the Police Station and transportation from the station to the filming site.
Subject to the provrsions of this Section, the admmistration of this program shall
be performed by the City at its discretion and this Section shall be promulgated
as Police Department rules and regulations Employees who are given filming
assignments shall receive a bonus of 550.00 for each day assigned to movie
overtime.
This provision of the MOU shall oniy apply to employees represented by MEA
as long as employees covered by the Santa Monica Police Officers` Association
(SMPOA} MOU are eligible to receive this benefit.
29
OFFICIAL CANVASS
SPEClAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - APRIL 24/25,1999
I, MARlA M STEWART. Ciry Clerk of the City of Santa Mon~ca. State of
California, do hereby certify that the attached is a true and correct Canvass of the votes
cast for all candidates for the offce of MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL and for
PROPOSITION 1, during the election held an Aprd 24-25, 1999
I further certify that the total ballots cast is as fol4ows
REG ABSENTE~ SATURDAY SUNDAY TOTAL
VOTERS BALLO7S CAST BALL07S CAST BALLOTS CAS7 BALL07S
54,15fi 5,183 4,571 5,115 14,869
i further certify that the total vates cast for the o~ce of City Councilmember is as
follows
COUNCILMEMBER ABSENTEE SATIJRDAY SUNDAY TQTAL
CANDIDATE VOTE VOTE VOTE VOTE
Richard Bloom 2,593 2,519 2,736 7.848
Susan Cloke 1,673 1,508 1,695 4,876
Frank Juarez 250 182 253 685
Don Gray 78 59 66 203
Peter Kerndt 217 100 132 449
Jon Stevens 50 25 25 100
Marc Sanschagrin 177 1 d2 __ 119 398
TOTALS 5,038 4,495 5,026 14,559
I further certify that the total votes cast for each cand~date, per prec mct, is as
follows
1
P{~EC REGIS
NO VOTERS BLOOM CLOKE JUAREZ GRAY KERNDT STEVENS SANSCHAGRIN
01 1555 84 401 04 09 12 03 14
03 1594 84 397 11 06 17 03 13
06 1585 252 157 05 07 22 02 16
07 1426 244 222 10 06 26 03 17
10 1651 144 315 13 05 17 06 15
15 924 88 151 05 04 11 03 11
16 1647 258 162 16 03 '10 04 11
18 1567 300 90 05 01 08 01 11
20 1722 342 76 05 06 07 01 10
29 i702 184 287 18 07 21 06 19
32 1698 311 131 10 08 09 04 06
35 1671 281 103 09 08 05 03 04
38 162D 158 42 06 02 05 ~3 07
41 1581 286 77 12 10 07 04 09
43 1573 209 113 13 04 11 03 17
4fi 1634 254 94 11 04 12 04 23
50 159Q 221 91 26 03 17 02 14
~2 1596 211 63 28 05 06 03 08
2
£
Sfi£
----------------
----------------- 006
------------
------------ 61~tr
-----------
----------- £OZ
-----------
---------- 5$9
------------
---------- 9L8`b
-----------
----------- 8t+$`1
----~__----
--------- 9S4`tiS
---------
---------
-----
-----
OL 60 60 SO Z4 81 4~E t~6Lb 56
b~ ED £6 90 60 96 £OE 6994 t~6
~0 b0 86 40 £l £0~ 00£ SL94 £6
El Zd LO £0 0£ Z£b d8Z 90L4 ~6
l6 SO ZE 9p Z9 4EZ E6l 8696 L8
80 ti0 OZ 80 96 L8 80£ D£94 68
LL ti0 64 LO Eb E6Z 69Z trLL6 8L
~l 9D 96 ~0 OE 6L6 66Z 9~L1 9L
til 90 64 Z4 LZ 8L6 6bZ 08LL ZL
86 00 L6 LO £Z l~6 lbZ 9LLl 69
ZO EO 96 ~0 Z9 69 8$4 56£b 89
ZL LO ZZ ~0 L6 6Z6 68Z Z854 L9
LO 6Q 90 64 6l 89 £Sl 0£S4 99
66 00 80 tZ 09 LL S64 LL84 Z9
80 60 LO b4 Lb LS b~l E86 69
lL LO £6 90 6~ 99 £6~ ~9ti4 09
I further certrfy that the total absentee. Saturday and S~nday votes cast per
candidate, by precinct, are as follows
For R~chard Bloom
Precrnct Absentee Saturday Sunday Total
01 35 29 20 84
03 34 22 28 84
Ofi 87 93 72 252
07 99 85 60 244
10 44 52 48 144
15 25 32 31 88
16 100 79 79 258
18 102 87 111 300
20 124 1'l3 ~05 342
29 56 65 63 184
32 89 108 114 311
35 90 79 92 261
38 70 49 39 158
41 93 1~4 89 286
43 72 54 83 209
46 95 72 87 254
50 58 65 98 221
52 75 53 83 211
f0 76 51 66 193
61 26 44 64 13~4
62 53 63 79 195
65 61 48 74 183
67 80 87 122 289
68 65 64 59 188
69 70 88 83 241
4
72 63 92 94 249
76 96 98 105 299
78 70 79 112 261
81 $3 ~10 115 308
87 68 60 65 193
92 72 92 116 280
93 115 96 89 300
94 105 99 99 303
95 ~42 107 92 34~
TOTALS 2,593 2,5'!9 2,736 7,848
~or Susan Cloke
Precinct Absentee Saturday Sunday Total
01 96 148 157 401
03 127 122 148 397
06 40 51 6B 157
07 149 35 38 222
10 90 121 1U4 315
15 36 59 56 151
16 56 71 35 162
18 39 25 26 90
20 29 15 32 76
29 88 73 326 287
32 49 3$ 44 131
35 42 27 34 103
38 16 13 13 42
41 34 22 21 77
43 41 33 39 113
46 38 26 30 94
50 29 33 29 91
5
52 24 Q9 30 63
60 31 16 19 66
61 12 2G 21 57
62 33 25 19 77
65 26 09 23 58
67 45 31 53 129
68 36 15 18 69
69 38 61 52 151
72 70 56 52 178
76 58 62 59 179
78 65 65 83 213
81 24 27 36 87
~7 61 78 92 231
92 25 54 53 T32
93 45 25 33 103
94 43 21 32 96
95 38 38 22 78
Totals 1,673 1,508 1,695 4,876
For Frank Juarez
Precinct Absentee 5aturday Sunday Totai
Q1 01 01 02 04
03 04 03 02 i1
Q6 03 01 Q1 05
07 10 00 00 10
'~0 03 08 02 13
15 02 00 03 05
16 08 06 02 16
18 03 d0 02 05
20 02 01 02 05
6
29 06 06 Q6 18
32 04 04 02 10
35 06 00 03 09
38 02 03 01 06
41 05 01 06 i2
43 09 01 03 ~3
46 06 02 03 11
50 12 05 09 26
52 04 ~2 12 28
60 08 11 10 29
61 09 12 26 47
62 21 19 28 60
65 05 QS 06 19
67 05 Q2 1Q 17
68 17 20 15 52
69 03 11 09 23
72 07 08 12 27
76 11 03 16 30
78 ~3 14 ~6 43
81 05 03 07 45
87 29 09 14 52
92 08 12 10 3Q
93 07 01 05 13
94 Q5 01 03 09
95 07 02 03 12
Totals 250 182 253 685
For pon Gray
Precinct Absentee Saturday Sunday Total
01 04 DO 05 09
7
03 01 04 01 06
06 05 02 00 07
d7 04 02 00 06
10 02 03 fl0 05
15 04 00 00 04
16 01 00 02 03
18 01 00 00 01
20 02 00 04 06
29 01 d1 05 07
32 04 01 03 OS
35 03 00 03 06
38 01 01 00 02
41 07 01 02 10
43 01 02 01 04
46 02 02 09 04
50 02 09 00 03
52 09 02 02 05
60 02 01 Q3 06
61 01 ~2 02 04
62 02 11 08 21
65 04 ~1 06 11
67 00 03 01 04
68 03 01 00 04
69 04 02 01 07
72 00 09 03 12
76 01 02 01 04
78 05 00 02 07
81 02 02 04 08
87 02 02 01 05
92 01 01 01 03
8
93 00 00 Q1 01
94 03 00 Q2 Q5
95 03 01 01 05
Totals 78 59 66 203
For Peter Kerndt
Precinct Absentee Saturday Sunday Total
01 07 05 00 92
03 0~ 13 OQ 17
D6 11 01 10 22
07 24 00 Q2 26
10 13 02 02 17
15 08 01 02 11
16 06 02 02 10
18 a3 00 05 08
20 03 02 02 07
29 11 06 04 21
32 04 02 03 09
35 Q4 ~1 00 05
38 03 01 Oi 05
41 02 00 05 05
43 04 00 07 11
46 05 03 04 12
5Q 10 ~4 Q3 17
52 04 DO 02 06
60 07 02 04 13
61 06 00 OT 07
62 04 03 01 OS
65 03 01 02 06
67 03 05 14 22
9
68 04 08 04 16
69 06 07 04 17
72 fl2 05 04 ~ 1
76 08 04 04 16
78 04 03 04 91
81 06 04 10 20
87 11 06 15 32
92 03 03 01 07
93 14 05 03 18
94 07 01 Q5 13
95 07 00 02 09
Totals 217 100 132 449
For .lon Stevens
~recinct Absentee Saturday Sunday Total
01 01 02 00 03
03 02 00 01 03
06 01 00 01 02
07 03 00 00 03
1 a 02 03 01 06
15 02 00 01 03
16 01 01 02 04
18 01 00 OD 01
2Q 00 01 DO ~1
29 02 01 03 06
32 03 00 D1 04
35 02 00 01 03
38 00 02 09 03
41 02 02 QQ Q4
43 02 00 01 03
10
46 01 02 01 04
50 00 00 02 ~2
52 03 00 00 03
6Q 01 00 00 01
61 00 01 Op U1
62 DO DO 00 00
85 01 00 OD 01
67 01 00 00 01
68 02 Q1 00 03
B9 00 00 00 00
72 02 03 01 06
76 06 00 DO 06
78 02 00 02 04
81 00 02 02 04
87 02 01 02 05
92 02 00 00 02
93 01 03 00 04
94 01 00 02 03
95 01 0~ 00 01
Totals 50 25 25 100
11
For Marc Sanschagrin
Precinct Absentee Saturday Sunday Total
C~ 1 02 08 04 14
03 07 05 01 13
06 03 05 08 18
07 13 02 02 17
10 07 02 06 15
15 08 03 00 11
16 03 02 06 1~
18 03 04 04 11
20 03 02 05 10
29 09 05 05 19
32 01 02 03 06
35 Q3 ~1 00 04
38 04 01 02 07
41 04 01 04 09
43 06 07 04 17
46 09 10 04 23
5Q ~3 04 07 14
52 Ofi 01 01 08
60 08 01 02 11
61 01 03 04 08
62 04 00 07 1'1
65 Q1 03 03 07
67 06 00 06 12
68 QO 01 01 02
69 09 04 D5 18
72 07 02 05 1~4
76 06 03 03 12
78 09 02 Ofi 17
12
81 05 01 02 08
87 05 02 04 11
92 04 08 01 13
93 03 01 01 05
94 08 05 01 14
85 07 01 02 10
Totals 177 102 119 388
I further certify that tf~e total votes cast for the measure on the ballot is as
fol lows
ABSENTEE SATURDAY SUNDAY TOTAL
VQTE VOTE VOTE VOTE
YES 3,575 3,153 3,503 10.231
NO 1,430 1,208 1,372 4,010
TOTALS 5,005 4,361 4,875 14,241
I further certify that the total absentee, Saturday and Sunday votes cast for the
measure. by precinct, is as follows
YES VOTES
Precinct Absentee Saturday Sunday Total
01 64 61 53 178
03 65 59 77 201
Ofi 103 111 98 312
07 165 92 69 326
10 81 92 86 259
15 45 55 44 144
1f 122 1D4 96 322
18 131 93 122 346
20 145 128 128 401
13
20 145 128 128 401
29 90 89 92 271
32 112 120 137 369
35 125 91 110 32fi
38 91 63 45 199
41 133 115 103 351
43 106 72 105 283
46 124 92 105 321
50 86 84 121 291
52 104 65 109 278
60 104 73 83 260
61 41 64 9fi 201
62 94 76 116 286
6~ 73 59 90 222
67 112 102 156 370
68 103 90 75 268
69 83 113 111 307
72 94 123 114 331
76 116 100 115 331
78 105 104 150 359
81 104 126 135 365
87 81 75 101 257
92 97 116 138 351
93 14$ 114 ~07 369
94 148 113 116 377
95 180 119 100 399
Totals 3,575 3,153 3,503 10,231
14
NO VOTES
PrecEnct Absentee Saturday Sunday Total
01 76 121 129 326
03 'l08 9$ 97 303
06 49 35 47 131
07 'i33 31 31 195
10 73 90 75 238
15 39 37 48 124
16 49 5~4 34 137
'18 23 18 18 59
20 20 06 21 47
29 83 61 110 25~1
32 39 27 33 99
35 27 13 22 62
38 05 07 11 23
41 19 17 23 59
43 28 22 26 76
46 27 24 27 78
50 34 21 24 79
52 12 'I3 23 48
60 28 12 20 60
61 13 21 21 55
62 20 34 25 79
65 24 09 23 56
67 29 26 42 97
68 21 19 22 82
69 45 52 31 128
72 58 43 49 150
7fi 60 68 63 191
78 63 55 67 185
15
~
81 20 20 37 77
87 93 75 81 249
92 20 41 33 94
93 38 14 18 70
94 28 16 28 72
95 26 08 13 47
Total 1,430 1,208 1,372 4,010
IN WITtVESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my
seal this 6`" day of May. 1999
Mar~a M Stewart
City Clerk
City of Santa Monica
16
~
Adopted and approved this 11th of May, 1999
i
~~ '~ 6 ~ 4 ~ i "t!_~
"
Ram O'Connor, Mayor
I, Mana M Stewart, City Clerk af the City of Santa Monica, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution 9390 (CCS) was cluly adopted at a meeting of the Santa
Mon~ca City Gouncil held on the 11th of May, 1999 by the following vote
Ayes Councilmembers Feinstein, Genser, Halbrook. McKeown,
O'Connor, Rosenstein
Noes Councdrr~embers None
Abstam Councilmembers None
Absent Councdmembers None
ATTEST
` ~~
i~~ ~
Mana M Stewart, City C~rk
~~ ~~
~~ ~
~~_~ _
~ ~i_.-_ ~!~
- ~ ~ r t
~~~ ~F ~~~ ~~_
~y~_ s ~~~
~~ ~~ ~~~
+.~'~'~~~`li
G~~ May 1, 1999
~ESEARCH
MEMORANDUM
TO: BETH SANCHEZ
City of Santa Monica
FROM: PAUL GOODWIN
GLS Research
RE: 5ummary of Findinqs: Santa Monica Post-Election Study
METHODOLOGY
GLS Research conducted a telephone survey of 300 registered ~oters li~ing in
Santa MonECa The study was conducted on Aprd 26 and 27, 1999, the two days
immediately following the city's firs# weekend election The sample was drawn
randomly from the city's official voter file, and every voter in the city with a
telephone had a equal opportunity of being interviewed The margm of error for a
sample of this size is plus or minus 5 6 percent at a 95 percent confidence level
The purposes of the study included the following
• To e~aluate the publ~c's response to the weekend election, and assess
whether there is a clear preference for a weekend or for a traditional Tuesday
election, and
• To evaluate response to a possible all-ma~l ballot
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
• Santa Monica voters show no clear preference when jt comes to a weekend
election compared to a Tuesday election Forty-three percent prefer voting
on Tuesday, compared #0 39 percent who prefer voting on the weekend
• About 60 percent of the Tuesday supporters said they prefer to vote on that
day because they find the weekends to be too busy or to be a time that is
devoted to other activities, sucf~ as famdy, work. travel, or outdoor acti~ities
Another third of the Tuesday supporter expressed a preference for that day
because they are familiar with voting on that day and do not wish to change
SpN FRANCISCO • LOS ANGELES • LAS VEGAS • MOSCOW, RUSSIA
Sumrr~ary of Findings Santa Monica Election Study
Page 2
. The main reason that weekend supporters prefer to ~ote on those days is that
they find it more convenient and they ha~e more time to vote Eighty-two
percent of the weekend supporters expressed those views
• Only 9 percent ha~e "strong personal ob~ections" to a weekend election,
chiefly related to the cost associated with such elections
The strongest variation in preference for election days is seen among
hameowners compared to renters 56 percent of homeowners prefer voting
on Tuesday, compared to 34 percent af renters, 27 percent of homeowners
prefer voting on the weekend, compared to 47 percent of renters In
add~tian, less frequent voters are more likely than very frequent voters to say
they prefer the weekend election, and young voters also appear more likeiy to
say they prefer the weekend compared to older voters Less frequent voters
are more likely to be non-wh~te, non-partisans, younger than age 50, and
renters
• Fifty-eight percent agree that they are more IEkely to vote if the polls are open
two days rather than one This figure is highest among those people who
vote least frequently, among renters, and among r+oters under age 35
• Eighty-seven percent said they were aware of the election the city held fast
weekend Voters under age 35 were significantiy less hkely to be aware of
the electEOn
• Voters divide evenly on the question of holding city elect~ons entirely by mad
Initially, 47 percent support the idea, and 43 percent oppose it But once
voters learn more about elections by mail (i e that it sa~es the city money,
that it irtcreases ~otmg participa#ion, and fhat they cauld dehver the ballots by
hand on election day), support rises significantly fo 69 percent, with ~ust 24
percent opposed
These figures suggest that by switch~ng to all-weekend voting over two days, the
aty is likely to facihtate turnout among those ~oters who are least likely to
participate at present En elections These would include younger voters,
m~nonfies, renters, and non-partisan voters
However, there would remam a large block of more frequent ~oters for whom a
weekend elect~on would be inconvenient or less convenient, or whom would be
concerned about cost issues
Summary of Findings Santa Monica Election Study
Page 3
When it comes to an all-mail ballot, the s~rvey makes it clear that the city must
transmit some cntical mformation to ~oters in advance of any such election Only
after ~oters learn about the cost savEngs, convernence, and increase in tumout
associated with mail ballots does ma~ority support for an all-mad ballot emerge
A voter education in ad~ance of any such change would be extremely ~aluable
DETAILED FlI~DINGS
Preference Tuesday v Weekend
Voters divide nearly evenly when asked ~f they would prefer to ~ote on a Tuesday
or rf they prefer voting o~er a weekend As shown in Table 'f , neither opfion
earns ma~ority support among voters
Table 1
Preference Tuesday or Weekend Elections?
Response %
Tuesday 43
Weekend 39
Votes absentee 4
Other 3
No preference/not sure '! 1
BASE (30a}
Statistically significant differences in response are shown in Table 2 It indicates
the following
• Those who report voting most frequently are more likeiy to prefer a Tuesday
election, whde those who say they ~ote only occasionally appear to prefer
weekend voting
• Renters prefer weekend voting compared to homeowners
• People who have ne~er voted absentee are more likely to prefer weekends
than those wha ha~e voted absentee
• People who have partiapated En fewer than 5 of the last 9 elections are more
likely to prefer weekends o~er more frequent voters
• Finally, it suggests that those who say they did not vote in the weekend
election prefer 7uesdays for voting However, the wide disparEty between
Summary of Findings Santa Monica Election Study
Page 4
reported voting beha~ior among respondents (close to 50 percent
participation) and actual participation (27 percent) makes these results
unreliable
Table 2
Election Day Preference Statistically Significant Differences in Response by
Voting Group
I Prefer
Group Tuesday Weekei
% %
Say they always vote 46 29
5ay they occasionally vote 37 51
Say they ~oted in weekend election 37 41
Say #hey did not vote in weekend election 49 37
Home/condo owners 56 27
Renters 27 47
Voted ~n 8 or 9 of last 9 elections 48 32
Voted in 5 to 7 of last 9 elections 48 31
Voted in 0 to 4 of last 9 elections 39 46
Absentee voters 46 30
Never voted absentee 42 43
BASE ~ (300)
Reasons for Preference
There are two mam reasons gi~en for prefernng a Tuesday elect~on a negative
reaction to the idea of voting on the weekend, and a positi~e inclination towards
Tuesday voting As shown in Table 3, close to two-thirds of those prefernng a
Tuesday ~ote indECate some concern about weekend voting, with about a third
who have an attachment especially to Tuesday
Summary of Find~ngs Santa Monica Efection Study
Page 5
Table 3
~ Do You Prefer Tuesda~
Reason I %
Don't Like Weekend Voting 64
Weekend is for famdy 8
Work on weekends 3
Busy on weekends 24
Out of town on weekends 14
Like to be outside 4
Weekend is inconvenient 4
Weekend not tradctional 6
ReEig~ous ob~ection 1
Prefer 7uesday Voting 33
Tuesday is more familiar 16
Tuesday is more convement 9
Just prefer Tuesday 4
Other reasons 4
BASE ~ (130}
Virtuakly e~eryone who preferred a we~kend vote said that it was more
convenient, as shown in Table 4, only a handful said t~ey were against Tuesday
voting in particular
Table 4
Why Do You Prefer Weekends?
Reason
%
Like Weekends 87
Weekend more convenient 4fi
Have more time 36
Less Frantic 4
Just prefer weekend 1
Prefer Two Days 8
Tuesday Too Busy 4
BASE (117)
Summary of Findings Santa Monica Election Study
Page 6
Respondents were also asked if they had any "strong persanal ob~ections" to
votmg on a weekend Only 9 percent reported such ob~ections Significant
differences in response are shown in Table 5
Table 5
Ob~ections to Weekend Voting Significant Variations m Response
Group
Home/cando owners
Renters
Age 65+
Younger than 65
Republicans
Nonpartisans
BASE
Yes No
% %
15 85
5 94
19 81
6 93
15 85
0 98
(300)
We asked voters with significant ob~ections to weekend voting to identify their
concerns Of the 28 with such concerns, 11 reported a concern having to do with
the cost of the elecfion Other responses were too small to classify
Impact of Votinq O~Er Two Days
In totaf, 58 percent agreed that "7'm more likely to vote ~f the polls are open two
days ~n a row rather than~ust one day " Many of the 34 percent who disagreed
werE ~oters who always vote anyhow For example
• Among ~oters who have participated in at least 8 of fhe last 9 primary and
general elections (23 percent of this sample), 48 percent disagreed with th~s
statement These ~oters will partiapate regardless of how many days they
ha~e available to vote
. In cpntrast, among voters who have participated in four or fewer of the last
nms pnmary and generaf elections (abou# half the sample), only 23 percent
disagreed and fully 73 percent agreed
Summary of FEndings Santa Mornca Election Study
Paqe 7
The impact of hav~ng two days for voting is likely to be especially pronounced
among voters under age 35 79 percent of them agreed that they would be more
likely to ~ote given two days Renters were aiso more hkely to agree at 66
percent campared to 47 ~ercent for owners 7hose who vote least frequently
were also among the most likely to say they would ~ote more often if the polls
were open two days
Table 6
More Likely to Vote Ef Polls Open Two Days Significant Variations in Response
Group ,4gree Disagree
% %
18-34 79 17
65+ 53 36
Voted in 8 or 9 of last 9 elections 41 48
Voted in 0 to 4 of last 9 elections 73 23
Homeowners 47 47
Renters 66 26
BASE (300)
Reaction to Vote by Mad Proposal
When first presented with the concept of ~oting entirely by mai l, voters divided
nearly evenly 47 percent in fiavor in favor of it, and 43 percent opposed There
are four significant differences in response to this ques#ion
• Two-thirds of those who say that they were unaware of last weekend's
election said they would fa~or a ~ote by mail election, compared to 45 percent
of those who said they were aware of it
• Sixty-three percent of those who say tMey only rarely ~ote would favor a vote
by mad election, compared to 46 percent of those who say they almost
always vote
• F~fty-six percent of those who say they did not vote in #he weekend election
wouid fa~or a vote by mail election, compared to 39 percent of those who say
they did ~ote
• Fifty-six percent of ~oters under age 35 would fa~or a vote by mad election,
compared to 38 percent of seniors
Summary of Findings Santa Monica Election Study
Page 8
These results would suggest that the least reliable voters are most likely to say
wauld prefer a ~ote by mad election
Response to All-Mad Ballots
Group
Table 7
Signifiicant Var~ations
Fa vor
%
56
38
n Response
Oppose
%
41
47
18-34
65+
Say they ~oted in weekend election
Say they did not vote in weekend election
Say they ~ote in e~ery election
Say they only vote occasionally
BASE
(300)
Respondents were then read three statements about vote by mail elections, and
asked if the statements made them more or less likely to favor such elections
All three were fa~orabiy received by ~oters that a ~ote by mail election would
save taxpayers money, that it would increase voter turnout, and that voters who
forgat to mail theEr ballot in can deli~er them in person on election day
After hearing this information, ~oters shifted strongly in favor of the vote by mad
plan 69 percent would fa~or it, and only 23 percent would oppose it
Women in particular shifted to fa~or the plan, w~th 75 percent in fa~or of it
compared to 62 percent of inen Voters under age 35 also moved strongly favor
it at 77 percent, compared to 60 percent of seniors
Awareness of Weekend Efection
Eighty-seven percent said they were aware of the weelcend election, ~ncluding 98
percent of seniors compared to 73 percent of those under age 35 Of those who
said they did not vote in that election, 76 percent said they were aware of it
Pa~ictpatian in Weekend Election
Fully 48 percent claimed that they ~oted in the weekend election, far exceedmg
the actual 27 percent turnout Significant differences m reported participat~on
rates include the following
39 48
56 39
44 46
63 33
Summary of Findings Santa Monica Election Study
Page 9
. Fifty-four percent of Democrats, compared to 49 percent of RepubEicans, and
32 percent of nonpart~sans
• Fifty-three percent of white voters, compared to 20 percent of m~norities
. Eighty-five percent of senEOrs, compared to 62 percent of those ages 50-64,
46 percent of those age 35-49, and ~ust 19 percent of those under age 35
GLS Research (1)
Santa Monica City
AGGREGATE RESULTS #99336 (N=300)
RespondentlD#
Gender of Respondent
1 (Male)-----°----------------------------- 49%
2 (Female)-------------------------------- 51
Political Party
1 (Democrat)----------------------------- 56%
2 (Republican)--------------------------- 22
3 (Non-Partisan) ------------------------ 16
4 (Other)------___°------------------------ --6
April 22, 'i999
Hello, I'm from GLS Research, a public opinion research company May I speak to ?
{MUST SPEAK TO VOTER LISTED. VERIFY THAT THE VOTER LIVES AT THE ADDRESS LISTED,
OTHERWISE TERMINATE.) We've been asked by the city of Santa Monica to conduct a bnef, five minute
survey of local residents to learn your views on issues facing the aty This is not a sales call and I am not
asking far money All your answers are kept sfrictly confidential ~IF RESPONDENT SAYS NO OR NOT
NOW, ASK TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT FOR LATER)
As you may know, city elections are usually held on a Tuesday Howe~er, this past weekend. the aty
held a speaal municipal election Were you aware of the election the city held ]ast weekend, or not~
Yes, aware-----------------------------------------------87°/o
No, not aware-------------------------------------------13
(DON'T READ) DK/NA------------------------------ 0
If you had to choose, which would you prefer voting on a Tuesday, or voting o~er a weekend, on a
Saturday and Sunday~ (IF RESPONDENT SAYS HEISHE ALWAYS VOTES BY ABSENTEE
BALLOT, CODE AS 6. IF RESPpNDENT ASKS WHETHER WE MEAN SATURDAY OR SUNDAY,
TELL THEM WE MEAN THE POLLS WOULD BE OPEN BOtH DAYS FOR PEOPLE TO VOTE)
Prefer Tuesday (ASK Q.3)-------------------------------------------43°/o
Prefer SaturdaylSunday {SKIP TO Q.4) --------------------------39
(DON'T READ) VOTES ABSENTEE {SKIP TO Q.5) -------- 4
(DON'T READ) OTHER (SKIP TO Q.5)------------------------ 3
(DON'T READ) DK/NA (SKIP TO Q.5) ------------------------11
Time Started
Time Finished
Total Time
Santa Monica Study 99336 Page 2
IF RESPONSE IN Q.2 IS TUESDAY, ASK Q.3, THEN SKIP TO Q.5:
3 Why would you prefer to vote on a Tuesday rather than voting over a weekend? (RECORD VERBATIM
AND THEN CODE -- PROBE TO FIT INTO CATEGORIES IF PQSSIBLE - OTHERWISE CODE AS
OTHER)
(N=130)
(DON'T READ)
Refigious ob~ections to weekend votEng------------------------------- 1%
Weekend not traditional-------------------------------------------.._______ g
Weekend is time for family----------------------------------------------- 8
Not in town on weekends------------------------------------------------14
Work on weekends--------------------------------------------------------- 3
Busy on weekends-----------------------------..______________--------____24
Sports on N on weekends ---------------------------------------------- 0
Like to be outside on weekends ----------------------------------- ----- 4
Confusing/lEkely to farget if weekends---------------------------- ----- 2
Weekends inconvenient for other reasons --------------------------- 4
Tuesday is more famdiadtraditionaf------------------------------ ----16
7uesday more convenient------------------------------------------------ 9
Vote Tuesday on way to work/school/dropping off kids, etc ---- 2
Just prefer Tuesday--------------------------------------------------- ----- 4
Other ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2
None-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0
IF RESPONSE IN Q.2 IS SATURDAYISUNDAY, ASK Q.4:
4 Why would you prefer voting on the weekend over voting on Tuesday? (PROBE TO FIT INTO THESE
CATEGORIES IF POSSIBLE) (RECORD VERBATIM AND THEN CODE)
(N-117)
(DON'T READ)
Weekend more convernent-------------------------------46%
Have more time on weekend-----------------------------36
Like having two days to vote ------------------------------ 8
Weekend more relaxed/less frantic---------------------- 4
More iikely to be in Santa Monica on weekend-- ----- 0
Usually busy on Tuesday ---------------------------------- 3
Just prefer weekend---------------------------------------- 1
Ofher------------------------------------------------------------ 1
DK/NA ---------------------------------------------------------- 1
ASK EVERYONE
5 Do you ha~e any strong personal ob~ections to the city having held an election on a Saturday and
Sunday~
YES (ASK Q 6) ----------------------------------- 9%
NO (SKIP TO Q 7)------------------------------90
(DON'T READ) DK/NA (SKIP TO Q 7) -- 0
Santa Mornca Study 99336 Page 3
IF YES ON Q_5 ASK:
6 in a word or two. what was your ob~ection to the aty having held an election on a Saturday and Sunday~
(PROBE TO FIT INTO THESE CATEGORIES IF POSSIBLE) (RECORD VERBATIM AND THEN
CODE)
{N=28}
(DON'T READ}
Religious ob~ections-----------------------------7%
Not traditional ------------------------------------- 4
~ay for famify -------°----------------------------- 0
Not m town on weekends ---------------- ------ 7
Work on weekends ------------------------------ 0
Busy on weekends -----------------------------14
Sports on N-------------------------------------- 0
Like to be outside on weekends-------- ------ 4
Confusing/lifcely to forget-----------------------4
Inconvenient for other reasons --------------- 4
Just prefer Tuesday----------------------------11
Cost of weekend election ---------------------3fi
Other----------------------------------------------1 fl
None ------------------------------------------ ------ 0
ASK EVERYONE
7 Next, please tell me whether you agree or disagree with the followmg statement (IF AGREE/DISAGREE
ASK) "is that STRONGLY or SOMEWHAT?" (ROTA7E)
STR S W S W STR DK
AGR AGR DfS DI5 NA
I'm more likely to vote if the polls are open two
days in a row rather than ~ust one day-------------- 36%-------------22°/a ------ 95°/o-----19% ------ 8%
8 Next, which of tF~e following two statements comes closer to describing your attitudes about voting
(READ BOTH BEFORE RECORDING - ROTATE)
[] A I vote in every election or nearly every election---------------------------------------------------------82%
OR
[] B I only vote when there is something really big at stake------------------------------------------------17
(DON'T READ) OTHER------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0
(DON'T READ) DK/NA -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1
9 And which of these #wo statements comes closer to your voting behavior (f2EAD BOTH BEFORE
RECORDING - ROTATE)
[] A I generally vo#e by absentee ballot whenever I can ----------------------------------------------------15%
OR
[] B I generally prefer to vote 3n person at the polls on election day-------------------------------------81
(DON'T READ} OTHER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2
(DON'T READ) DK/NA-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2
10 Last weekend, there was a city election Many people did not get a chance to vote in that election Did
you happen to vote in the election last weekend, or did you not get a chance to vote m that city election
for any reason~
Yes, voted ----------------------------------------48%
Did not vote -------------------------------------51
(DON'T READ) DK/NA ---------------------- 1
Santa Monica Study 98336 Page 4
11 Some people have proposed that aty elections be heid entirely by mad, so that everyone would vote by
maEl ballot rather than by voting at the polls on election day Does this sound like someth3ng you would
favor or oppose for aty elections~ (IF FAVOR/OPPOSE ASK) "Is that strongly or somewhat~"
Strongly favor------------------------------------19%
Somewhat favor---------------------------------28
Somewhat oppose------------------------------17
Strongly oppose---------------------------------26
(DON'T READ) DKIfVA ---------------------- 9
12 Would you be more likely, or less likely, to favor holding elections entirely by mad if yau knew that (READ-
ROTATE) (IF MOR~/LESS LIKELY ASK) "Is that MUCH (more/less) likely or SOMEWHAT~" (ROTATE)
MUCH S W S W MUCH (DON'T READ)
MORE MORE LESS LESS NO DK/
LiKELY LIKELY LIKELY LIKELY EFFECT NA
[] a People would have an extended period
En which to turn in their mad bal[ots.
anck could deliver them by hand on
elect~on day if t~ey forgot to mail it in --------39% -------- 28%-------- 3% ------ 14%-----14°/a -----2%
[] b Vote by maii elections held in Oregon
and in parts of Cahfornia resultecf in
much higher voter turnout and
participation ----------------------------------------44 ----------- 27----------- 2----------- 7-------1 fi--------4
[] c HoEding an election entirely by mad is much
less expensive and saves the taxpayers
money----------------------------------------------54-----------18----------- 3-----------9 -------13--------3
13 FEa~ing heard more about elections in which the voting is conducted entirely by mad, does it sound hke
samething you wouid favor or oppose for aty elections~ (IF FAVORIOPPOSE ASK) "Es that strongly or
samewhat~"
Strongly favor------------------------------------35%
Somewhat favor---------------------------------34
Somewhat oppose------------------------------- 5
Strongly oppose---------------------------------18
(DON'T READ) DK1NA ---------------------- 8
NOW FOR A FEW BACKGRQUND QUESTIONS
14 Do you own or rent your home, condommium,
or apartment, or do you live in a mobde home~
Own home -------------------- 35%
Own condo-------------------- - 6
R e n t----------------------------- 56
Mobde home------------------ - 0
Refused------------------------ - 2
i5 With which racial or ethrnc group do you
identify yourself White or
European, Black or African-
Amencan, Hispanic or Latino,
Asian, o# mixed race, or of some other ethnic
or raaal background~
W h ite-----------------------------~----------------- 74%
Black/Afncan-Amencan ------------------------ 2
Hispanic/Latino --------------------------------- - 7
As Ean ------------------------------------------------ 4
Mixed Race--------------------~------------------ - 2
Other----------------------------------------------- - 2
(DON'T READ) REFUSED ------------------ - 8
Santa Monica Study 99336 Page 5
16 Finally. what year were you born in, please~ (RECORD LAST TWO DIGITS EXACTLY AND CiRCLE
APPROPRIATE CATEGORY BEL.OV~ {IF REFUSED, ASK} "Well, were you born in {READ RANGES
OF YEARS) "
1980-1974 (i 8-24)------------------------------ - 8%
1973-1969 (25-29)------------------------------ - 7
1968-1964 (30-34)------------------------------ 11
1963-1959 {35-39)------------------------------ 14
1958-1954 {40-44)------------------------------ - 9
1953-1949 {45-49)------------------------------- 9
1948-1944 (50-54)------------------------------.. g
1943-1939 (55-59)------------------------------- 6
1938-1934 (60-64)------------------------------- 6
1933-1929 (65-69)------------------------------- 4
1928-1924 (70-74)------------------------------- 3
Before 1923 (75+) ------------------------------- 9
(DON'T READ) Refused ---------------------- 6
THANK AND TERMINATE
Name
P recmct
Address Rep #
City Page #
Z[p
Interviewer Cluster #
FLAGS
J/90-------------------------------------------------- 0°/a
N190 ------------------------------------------------- 0
Area code ( ) J/92-------------------------------------------------37
Phone # N/92------------------------------------------------59
N/93 ------------------------------------------------30
Date J/94---------------°---------------------------------31
N/94 ------------------------------------------------54
M/96------------------------------------------------43
N/96 ------------------------------------------------65
J/98-------------------------------°__---------------52
N/98 ------------------------------------------------77
ABSENTEE
1 t~me ----------------------------------------------15%
2 t~mes---------------------------------------------- 6
3 times---------------------------------------------- 2
4 times---------------------------------------------- 1
5 or more times-------- --------------------------- 4
Not reported----------- --------------------------72
SpNTp MONICA CITY S1UDY #99336
Table of contents
Table 1 q 1 AWARENESS OF WEEKEN~ ELECTION
Ta61e 2 4 2 VOTING DATE PR[fERENCE
7able 3 U 3 WFIY PREFER TUFSf1AY
Table 4 q 4 WHY PREFf.R WEEKEND vOTING
Tdble 5 Q 5 ANY OBJ[CTIONS TO CITY H6LOING ELECTION ON SATUROAY AN~ SIJN~pY
7able 6 q 6 UBJECTlONS 7U CITY HOLPING ELECTION ON SATURDAY ANO SUNDAY
Table 7 q 7 MORE LIKELY TO VOTE IF POLLS ARE OPEN iWU ~AYS iN A ROW
Table 8 q 8 ATTIn1DE TOWARDS VOTING
Table 9 q 9 VOTING BENAVIOR
Table 19 q 10 ~I~ YIX1 VOTE IN LAST WfEKEND'S ELECTION~
Table 11 q 11 FAVOR OR OPPOSE ELECTIQNS BY MAIL
Table 12 Q 12 SUMMARY OF MUCH MORE/SOMEWIIAT MIXtE LIKELY RESPONSES
7ablc 13 Q 12 MORE OR LESS LIKELY TO FAVOR ELECTIONS BY MAIL
A PEOPLE WOUL~ HAVE AN EXTENDEO PERIO~ T'0 TURN IN BALLOTS
Table 1M1 Q 12 MORE OR LESS LIKELY TO FAVOR ELECTIONS BY MAIL
B VOTE BY MAIL ELECTIONS NA4E RESIILTED IN HIC~IER ~OTER TURNOUT
Table 15 4 12 MORE OR LE55 LIKfLY TO FAVOR ELECTIONS 8Y MAIL
C HOLDING AN ELECTION BY MAIL IS LESS EXPENSIVE /WD 5/1VE5 TAXPAYERS MONEV
Table 16 Q 13 FAVOR OR OPAOSE ELECTION NEL~ ENTIREI.Y BY MAIL
Table 17 Q 14 OWN/RENT
Table iB q i5 ETHNICITY
Table 19 Q 16 AGE
fable 20 FLAGS
Table 21 ASSEN TEE
Table 22 GENDER
Table 23 POLIT ICAL PARTY
Table 24 NUMBER OF ELECTIQNS
GLS RESE4RCH (~99336}
Santa Mom ca Ci ty
Table 1 1
Q 1 AWARENESS OF WEEKEN~ ELECTION
p 2 Q 8 ELECTION p 9 ABSENTEE 4 10 ELECTION
PREF~RENCE INTENT --- --- - -~
GENDER PARTY Q 1 AW/tRENESS ^~- VOIE DID
--- ~ - --- ---- - WEEK~ 81G AB IN ROT
MALE FEMkLE DEMO REPUB N/P YES NO iUES END EVERY ONLY SENTEE PERSON VOTED VOTE
TOTAL
-- -- (A)
--- -~ (B)
- - - (C)
- . (D)
.. (E)
. . (F)
- - - (G)
-- - (H)
-- -- (I)
-- -- W)
- ---- (K)
------ (L)
--- -- (M)
-- -- (N)
-- -- (0)
---~--
TOTAL 300 146 154 169 67 47 262 38 139 117 246 51 45 242 145 153
ioox ioox ioox ioox ioaz ioo~ iooz ioox ioox iooz ioox ioox iaax ioax iooz ioo~
YES 262 88% 86k B/X 93X 83k 100$ OX 88% 86X 92X 65X 89X 88X 100X 76X
87X G F K J 0 N
N0, NOT AWARE 38 12X 14X 13X 7X 17X ~X 100M 12R 14$ 8$ 35$ 11X 12~ OX 24%
13% G F K .] 0 N
DK/NA 0 OX 9X OX OR OX DX OX O% 0% OX OX O% OX OX OX
0%
Table 1•2
Q 1 AWARENESS OF WEEKEND ELECTION
FIAGS A9SFNTFF
q 11 ETHNI CITY UOTE~ VOTE~ VUTEO EVER NEVER
VOTE $Y MAIL OWN/RENT ~R AGE IN fN IN VOTED VOTED
~ -- - MI- -- - - S OR 9 5-7 0-4 PB- AS-
FAVOR OPAOSE OWN RENT WHIiE NORITY 18•34 35•49 50-64 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SENTE[ SENTEE
(A)
..--- (B)
-----• (C)
•• • • (D)
•---- (E)
•-- - (F)
- -- - (G)
- - - (N)
-- - (I)
-- -- (J)
----- (K)
-- --- (L)
------ (M)
----- (N)
------ (0)
- - -
-
TOTAL 143 130 124 169 223 40 78 98 60 47 69 77 154 84 216
100X 100k 100X 100X 100x 100X 100R 100X 100k 100X 100X 100% 100k 100k 100X
YES 83k 93X 91% 86% 88X 83X 73~ 90% 93k 9flk 100k 92k 79k 92k 86X
B A HIJ GJ G GH LM KM Kl
N0, NOT AWAftE 17R 7X 9R 14~ 12X 18X 27X lOX 7X 2% OX B% 21X BX 14%
B A HI.] G,] G GH LM KM KL
DK/NA 6X Ok OX OX OX Ok OX OX OY Offi Ok OX Ok OX DX
GLS RESEARCH (#99336)
Santa Momca City
Table 2-1
Q 2 liOTING DATE PREFERENCE
Q 2 Q 8 ELECTION Q 9 ABSENTEE Q 10 ELECTION
PREFERENCE INTENT -- ~-y=~ ~~Y ~=
GENDER PAf2TY Q 1 AI~U~RENE55 ~~~ - - - --- -----•--- VOTE ~ID
-- ---- --- ------ ------ WEEK- BIG AB IN NOT
MALE FEMALE DEMO REPUB N/P YES NO TUES END EVERY ONLY SENTE[ PERSON VOTE~ VOTE
TOTAL
-- (A)
--- - (B}
- - - (C)
--- (0}
- (E)
-- (F)
- - (G)
- - (H)
• (I)
- (J)
- -- (K)
. . (L)
- -- (M)
-- -- (N)
----- (0)
- - -- -
TOTAL 30D 146 154 lb9 67 47 262 36 130 117 246 51 45 242 145 153
~ooz ioox iooz ioo~ ioox ioox ioox ioox Zooz ioox ioax iooz ioox ioox iooz toox
PkEFER TUESUAY 130 45X 42% 45X 46M 36X 44% 39X 100X OX 46X 29X 29X 47X 37~ 49X
43X I H K J M L 0 N
PREFER ShTUR~AY/SUN~AY 117 39X 39X 3fiX 40% 43R 39X h2k Ok 100R 37X 51X 36X 40% 41% 37X
39k I H
VOTES ABSENTEE 11 3% 4% 4k lk 4k 4X OX OX OX 4% 4X 22X OX 7X 1X
4% G F M L 0 N
OTHER ].0 3% 3X 4% 3X 7X 4X OX OX OX 3k 4X 2X 4X 5X 2X
3~ G F
DK/NA 32 lOX 12% 11X 9X 11X 10X 18X OX OX lOX 12k llk lOX 10& 12k
11X
Table 2-2
Q 2 VOTING ~ATE PREFERENCE
FU1G5 ABSENTEE
^ ~
Q 1 1 ETHNI CITY VOTED VOTED 40TED EYER NEVER
VOTE BY MATL OWN/RENT -- AGE IN IN IN VOTED VOTED
~- MI• -- -- 8 OR 9 5~7 0-4 AB- q6-
FAUOR OPPOSE OWN RENT WFIITE NOit1fY 18-34 35•49 50-64 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SENTEE SENTEE
(A)
•- - (B)
-~ (C)
----- (D)
-- -- (E)
---- (FD
-- -- (G)
~ -- - (H)
•- - (I)
- •-• (J)
•• •• (K)
•• -- (L)
------ (M)
- ---- (N)
----- (0)
- -• -
T6TAL 143 130 124 169 223 40 78 98 60 h7 69 77 154 84 216
100X 100X 100X 100R 100~ 1UOk 100X 100X 100X 100R 1UOX 100X 100X 100X 190k
PREFER 7UESDAY 42X 47k 56k 34X 40k 48X 45X 44X 47~ 34X 48X 48X 39X 46X 42X
D C
PREFER SAl11R~AY/SUNDAY 42~ 37X 27X 47~ 39X 43k 47X 37X 37X 38k 32R 31~ 46X 30X 43X
D C M M KL 0 N
VOTES ABSENTEE 5% 2k 4X 4X 5X Ok 3k 1% 3X 11X 3% 5X 3% lOx 1X
F E J H 0 N
91HEl2 1% 5R 3X 4R 4k 3X 1X 4X 5X 4k 4X 1X 4X 2k 4X
~K/NA lOX 9ffi 9X 11X 12k 8X 4X 14X BX 13X 13X 14X 8X 12X lOX
H G
GLS RESEARCH (#99336)
Santa Momca C~ty
Table 3•1
q 3 WHY PREFER TUESDAY
Q 2 Q 8 ELECTION Q 9 ABSENTEE Q 10 ELECTION
PREFERENCE INiENT - - ---
G[NDER PARTY Q 1 AWARENESS --- -- - - VOTE UID
--- -~~P. ~-v- "~ ..~-@, -, _.~~' -°- -- WEEK- 8IG AS- IN NOT
MALF FEMALC DEMO REPUB N/P YES NO fUES END t:VERY ONLY SENTEE PERSON VOfEU VO1E
T9TA1.
-- --- (A)
---- (B)
• .. (C)
.. . {D)
... (E)
. ... (F)
.. . . (G)
. . .. (H) (I)
..~ -- - (J)
-- ------ (K) (L)
- - - -- -- (M) (N)
---- - - --- (O)
- -- ---
TOTpL 130 65 65 76 31 17 115 15 130 0 113 15 13 113 54 75
100X 100X 100k 100k 100R 100k 100k 100X 100X Offi I00% 109X 100% 100X 100X 100X
RELIGIOl15 OBJECTIONS 70 1 OX 2X Ok 3% Ok 1X OX 1X OX lX 9X 0~ 1$ 2% OX
WEEKEN~ VOTING 1X
WEEKEN~ NOT TR40ITION~4L 8 9X 3X 11X UX OX 6X 7X 6X flX 7X UX 15% 5X 11~ 3X
fik DE C C K J
WEEKEND IS TIME FOR FAMILY I1 8k 9k 5X 16R 12k 9X 7X 8X Uk 9X 7X 23% 7X 6X llk
Sk
NOT IN TOWN ON WEEKENDS 18 17X llk llk 16X 18X 15X 7X 14X Ok 12X 33X OX 16X 2X 23X
14X M L 0 N
WORK ON NEEKENDS 4 2X 5X 4% 0% 6~ 3X 7% 3X OX 4X OX 6X 3X 2~ 4X
3X K J
B115Y ON WEEKEN~S 31 28X 20% 24% 23X 29% 24X 20% 24% OX 25X 13X 23k 23X 20~ 27X
24X
SPORTS ON N ON WEEKEN~S 0 Ox OX OX Ok OX OX OX OX OX OX OX Ok OX OX Ok
OX
LIKE TO BE OUTSIDE ON WEEKEN~S 5 3X 5X 3X 6k 6~ 3X 7X 4X OX 4x 7X 8k 4% 4k 4k
4X
CONFUSIkG/LIKELY TO FORGET IF 3 D% 5k 1X 6X OX 2k 7% 2% 0% 3% 0~ 0% 3X 0% 4X
WEEKENQS 2X
WEEKEN~S INCONVENIENT FOR 5 OX SX 4X 3% 6X 3X 7X 4X OX 4X OX 8X 3X 2X 5X'
OTHER REASONS 4k B A K J
TUESDAY IS MORE FAFIILIAR/ 21 15% 17X 18X l6k 12k 17X 7X 16% OX 17X 13X 9X 17X 28X 8%
TRADITIONAL 16X 0 N
TUESDAY IS MORE CONVENIENT 12 8R 11~ 11~ 6X 6% 8X 20X 9X 0% 9% 13X 8X 10% 13~ 7%
9X
VOTE TUES~AY ON WAY TO I+~ORK/ 3 3R' 2X 3X OX 6X 2X 7X 2X Ox 1X 13~ OX 3R' OX 4X
SCHOOL/DROPPING OFF KIDS, ETC 2%
JUST PREFER Tl1ESDAY 5 5Y 3X 5k 3k Ok 4X OX 4k Ok 4% Ok 0% 4X 7ffi OX
4X E C G F K J M L 0 N
aTHER 3 3X 2X 1X OX OX 3X OX 2X OX 3X OX OX 3X 4X 1X
2~
NONE 0 Ok Q~ OY OX 0~ Ok OX Ok Ok Ok OX OX Ok OX OX
0%
GLS R[SEARCH (#99336)
Santa Mom ca C~ ty
Table 3 2
Q 3 WHY PREFER TllE56AY
FLAGS ABSENTEE
Q 11 EihiNICITY VOTED VOiED 401E~ EVER NEVER
YUTE 8Y Mp1L OWN/RENI =~~~~~~-•~~~ AGE IN IN IN VOTED VOiCD
-------- -- MI ----._ _- -- 8 OR 9 5-7 0-4 AB AB-
FA40R OPPOSE OWN RENT WHIiE NDRITY 18 34 35-49 50-64 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SENTEE SENTEE
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0)
TOTAL 60 61 70 58 9~ 19 35 43 28 15 33 37 6S1 39 91
100k 100X 100X 100X 100X 100k 100~ 100X 100k 100% 100k lOOX 100% 100$ 100Y
RELIGIOUS OBJECTIONS TO OX 2X OX 2X ]~ OR OX Dk Uk 6k 3k Ok Ok OX 1X
WEEKEN~ VOTING
WEEKEND NOT TRAdITIONAL lOk 3X 10X 2k Sk SR' UX 14X 4R 0% 15R 5X 2X 13X 3%
~ C H G.7 N M K
WEEKEND IS TIME FOR FAMILY lOk 7X llX 5k 9X 1fi% 11~ 7X 7X 13X 9X 8X BX 18R' 4X
0 N
NOT IN TOWN ON WEEKENDS 17X 13% 13k 16% 16X llk llX 21k 14k 6X 3X 22X 15Y 3X 19X
LM K K 0 N
WORK ON WEEKENDS 3X 3X 1X 5% l% 5k 3k 5$ 0$ 6~ 3X Ok 5k 3% 3k
BUSY ON WEEKENDS 23X 26X 19X 29% 23X 21~ 25X 21X 32.Y 13X 12X 16X 35X 21k 25X
M M KL
SPORTS ON TV ON WEEKENUS U% OX 0% OX U% 0% 0% OX OX OX OX 0$ OX OX OX
LIKE TO BE OUTSIDE ON WEEKEN~S 2X 5k 4k 3k 3R" Sk 3X 5Y 4k 6X 6k 3X 3X 3X 4$
CONFf1SINGlLIKELY TO FORGE~f IF 3X 2k 3X 2k 2k SX 3k 2X 4X OX OX 3k 3k 3X 2A
WEEKEN~S
W[EKEN~S INCONVENdENT FOR 7X 2X 4% 3X 3R 11X 3X 7X 4X 0% 0% 5% 5% 5X 3X
OTHER REASONS
7UESbAY IS MORE FAMILIAR/ 12X 15k 17X 16X 14X 11X llk 9R' 21k 25k 21X 19k 12X 18X 15X
TRA~ITIONAL
TUES~AY IS MORE CONVENIENT lOk lOX 7X 12X 12X 5k 20ffi 7X 4k 6k 6X llX lOX 5k 11~
I G
VOTE TUESDAY ON WAY TO WORK/ 2X 3X 1X 3k 2X 0% 6X OX OX OX 3k 3k 2X OR' 3k
SCHOOL/DROPPING OFF KIOS, ETC
,]I1ST PREFER TIIESDAY OX 7k 4k 2~ 2X OX Ox Ox 4k 13k 12X 3k 0$ lOX lk
B A M K
OTHER 2X 3% 4% 0% 2% 5X 0~ 2~ 4~ 6k 6k 3k Ok Ok 3X
NONE OX OX 0% OX OX 0$ 0~ Ok OX 0~ Ok Ok Ok OR OX
GLS RESEARCH (#94336)
Santa Momca C~ty
Table 4 1
Q 4 WHY PREFER WEEKEND VOTING
TOTAL
WEEKEN~ MORE CONVENIENT
HAVE MORE TIME ON WEEKEND
LIKE HAVING TW6 DAYS TO VOTE
WEEKEND MORE RELAI(ED/LESS
FRANTIC
MORE LIKELY TO BE IN SANTA
MONICA ON WEEKEN~
USl1ALLY 6USY ON TUESDAY
JUST PREFER WEEKEND
OTHER
DK/NA
~ 2 Q$ ELECTION Q 9 A85ENTEE Q 10 ELECTION
PREFERENCE INTENT =^---_---- ----
GEN~ER PARTY Q 1 AWARFNESS --- ------ --- VOTF. DID
_~.~.~-~ --- -- =~ ~__~-_-_ = WE[K BIG PB IN NOT
MALE FEMP,L[ DEMO REPUB N/P YES NO TUES END EVERY ONLY SENTEE PERSON VOTED VOTE
TOTAL (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (.]) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0)
-- --- - - -~ -- ~ -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- -- - -- -- -
117 57 60 61 27 20 101 16 0 117 91 26 16 96 60 56
ioox ioox ioox ioox iooz ioox ioox ioox oz iaox iaox iaox ioox ioox iooz ioax
54 46X 41% 44X 48X 50% 46% 5UX O% 46% 45% 50% 44X A6X 38% 55%
46.X
42 37X 35X 30X 44X 45X 38k 25X Ok 36X 35X 38X 31X 39% 38X 34k
36X
9 9X 7X lOX 7X Ok 9.X O.Y OX 8X lOX Ok 13k 7X 15X OX
S% E C G F K .7 0 N
5 4X SX 8X O% Ok 5X OX Ok 4X 5X OX 6% 3X 7X 2X
4k DE C C G F K J
a ox az ox ox ox ox oz o~ ax ax ax ox oz ox ox
OX
4 4X 3% 3X OX 5X 1X 19X 0~ 3X 1X 12k 6X 3k OX 5X
3k
1 OX 2X 2X ~X OX lX OX Ok lX lX Ok OX 1$ Ok 2X
1X
i ox zx zx o~ or ix ox ox ix ix ox ox rx zx oz
lX
1 2X OX 2% 0% OX OX 6X OX 1X 1X OX OX OX Ok 2ffi
lk
GLS RESEARCH (#99336)
Santa Momca City
Table 4-2
Q 4 WFiY PREFER WEEKEND VOTING
FLAGS ABSENiEE
Q li ETHNICITY VO1ED VOTED VOTED EVER NEVER
VO~E BY MAIL OWN/RENT AGE IN IN IN VOTED VOTE~
---- MI- ----- 8 OR 9 5 7 0-4 AB- AB-
FAVOR OPPOSE OWN RENT WHITE NORITY 18-34 35•49 50 64 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SENTEE SENTEE
(A) (B) (C) (~) (E) (F) {G) (H) (I) (,7) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0)
••••• •••• ••••• ••• • ••• •• •• •••• ••••- -- -• • • • • . . . . . . .. . .. .. .
TOTAL 60 48 34 80 87 17 37 36 22 18 22 24 71 25 92
100X 190X 100X 100X 100X 100k 100R' 100% 100k 100X 100X lODk 100X 100k 100R
WEEKEN~ MOf2E CONVENIENT 42X 98X 38X 49X 47X 41X 57X A4X 45R 28X 36X 38k 52X 40k 48X
.1 G
HAVE MORE 71ME ON WEEKEND 48X 23X 38k 36X 37X 41~ 32X 36% 32k 44% 35X 46X 32X 40% 35X
8 A
LIKE HAVING TW~ ~AYS TO VOTE 2X 17k 12% 5X 9% Ok 3X 11X 5% 17% 14X BX 6X 4X 9k
B A F E
WEEKEND MORE RELAXE~/LESS 3k 6X 6X 4% 3k' 6% OY 3k 14X 6X 9X 8X lX 12X 2~
FRANTIC
MORE LIKELY TO BE IN SANTA OX OX OX OX 0~ OX OX 6$ OX 0% OX OX Ok Ok 0%
MONICA ON WEEKEN~
USUALLY BUSY Ok 7UESdAY 5k 2~ OX Sk 2~ OX 8k 3X OR 0% 0% OX 6X OX 4X
~ C M M KL 0 N
JUST PREFER WEEKEND OX 2% OX 1X OX 6X OX 3~ Ok Ok OX Ok 1X OX 1X
OTHER OR 2X 3k Ok 1% OX 0$ OX 5X OX SX OX OX 4% OX
DK/NA OX OX 3~ Ok Ok 6X 0$ OX Ok Gk Ok OX lX O% 1~
GLS RESEARCH (#99336)
Santa Momca City
Table 5-1
Q 5 ANY OBJECTIONS TO CITY HOLDING ELECTION ON SAillR~AY AND SUNDAY
Q 2 Q 8 ELECTION Q 9 ABSENTEE Q 10 ELECTION
PREfERENCF INTEHT -
GENDER PARTY Q 1 AWARENE55 ---^~^^~-._•°= -•.^^^~-P=~ VUfE UID
-- - --- - - WEEK BIG AI3~ IN NOT
MALE FEMAEE ~EMO REPUB N/P YES NO 7UE5 END EVERY ONLY SENTEE PERSON YOTED YOTE
TOTAL
. . (A)
- - (B)
- ~ - (C)
- (~)
---- (E)
- - (F)
- (G)
- (H) (I)
-- - W) (K)
- - - (L)
- - (M)
- - (N)
- - (0)
- - --
1'OTAL 300 146 154 169 67 47 262 38 130 117 246 51 45 242 145 153
100X 100R' ~aax 1DOX 1DOR' 100k 100k 100X 100X 100X 100X 100X 100X 100K 100k 100X
YES 28 SX lU~ 9k' 15X UX lUX hX 18X UX 11X 4X 11X 9X 12X 1k'
9x E E C~ I H K .1
NO 271 92R 89X 91% 95X 98k 90k 95% 82X 100X 89X 96% 87~ 91X 98X 93X
90X E f CD I H K .1
DK/NA 1 0~ 1$ OX OX 2X 9X OX ~X OX OX OX 7.k QX lk OX
0%
Tab7e 5 2
Q 5 ANY OBJECTIONS TO CIiY HOL~ING ELECTION ON SATURDAY AN~ SUN~AY
FLAGS ABSENTEE
p 11 EfHNICITY VOTE~ VOTE~ VOTE~ EVER NEVER
VOTE BY MAIL OWN/RENT AGE IN IN IN VOTED VOTE~
--- ----~- - MI- --- 8 OR 9 5 7 0 4 AB AB
FAVOR OPPOSE OWN RENT WHITE NORITY 18 34 35-49 50•64 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SEKTEE SENTCE
(A) (6)
... . •• (C)
•• • - (D)
-.-•-. (E)
•••• • (F)
---• (G)
---- - (H) (I)
------ ---- (J)
----- (K)
•-- .. (L)
....- {M)
•• • (N)
•• • (0)
•.. .
TOTAL 143 13a 124 169 213 40 78 98 60 47 69 7/ 154 B4 216
ioox ioox ioax ioox ~oox ioox ioox ioox ioox ioox ioox ioox ioax iooz iooz
YES 9X 9R 15X 5% 9k 8Z 5k 6X 7% 19k 14X 8X 8X 13X BX
D C J J GH
NO 91% 91k 85k 94$ 91X 93R 95X 93X 93k 81$ 86& 92k 92X 86R 92k
~ C .1 G
DK/NA OX OX QX 1X OX OX OX 1X OX OX OX OX 1X 1X OX
GLS RESEARCH (#99336)
Santa Momca City
Table 6-1
Q 6 6BJECTIONS TO CITY HOLDING ELECTION ON SATURDAY AN~ SUNDAY
TOTAL
RELIGi0U5 OBJECTIONS
NDT TRADITIONAL
OAY FOR FAMILY
NOT IN TOWN ON WEEKENDS
WORK ON WEEKENDS
BUSY ON WEEKENDS
SPORTS ON TV
LIKE TO BE OUTSIDE ON WEEKEN~S
CONFUSINGlLIKELY TO FORGET
INCONVENIENT FOR OTHER REASONS
JUST PRE~CR Tl1ES~AY
07HER
NONE
Q 2 q 6 ELECTION Q 9 ABSENTEE Q 10 ELECTION
PREFERENCE INTENT --- ---
GF.NUER PARTY Q 1 AWARENESS -_-~_ -~---~ YOTE DIo
-- -- --- --..------~--.... WEEK BIG AR IN NOT
MALE FEMALE DEMO REPUB N/P YES NO iUES EN~ E~ERY ONLY SEPFTEE PER56N VOlEO VOTE
TOTAL (A) (8) (C) (~) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (U (M) (N) (0)
~ - ---- ------ -- - - -- - ----- ~ ~ - - ~-- -- -- - - --
28 12 l6 16 10 D 26 2 24 0 26 2 5 22 17 11
100X 10UX 100X 100R 1~0X OX 100% 100% 100X OX 106K 1~Ok 160X 100X 10~k 100%
2 OR 13% OX 20X OX 8% OX t3% UX kix UX 20X SX 6R 9R
7X
1 B% OX 6X OR 0& 4k OX 4X 0~ 4X 6X OR 5X OX 9R
4X
0 Ok OX OX 0~ Ok Ok OX OX OX Ok Ok Ok OX Ok 9%
OX
2 17k OX 6X lOk OX 8% OX 8% 0% $Y OX OX 9R 6~ 9%
7X
a o~ oz ax oz ox ox ox ox ox ox ax ox oz o~ ox
0%
4 25k 6~ 13k 16X Ok ]5X OX 13k OX 15X OX Gk 18X 18% 9%
14% G F K ,] M L
0 OX Ok Ok 0$ Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok OX Ok OX OX OX 0~
OX
1 8X OX 6X OX OX 4X OX 4X 0% 0% 50X 0~ 5X OX 9~
4X
1 8X 6X 6k OX Ok 4X Ok 4X 0% 4X OX 20R OX 6X OX
4X
1 OX 6X 6X OX OX 4X 9X 4k OX 4X OX 0% OR 6M UX
4X
3 8R 13X 6X 20k Ok 12X OX 13X OX 12% 0% 0% 14X 6% 18%
Elk
13 25X 63R 50k 40R OX 42X I~OX 42X Ok 46X 50X 60X 45X 53X 36%
46~ B A G F
0 ox ox ax oz ox ox ox ox ax az ox oz ox ax flx
ox
GLS RESEARCH (#99336)
Santa Momca City
Table 6-2
4 6 OBJECTIONS TO CITY NOLDING ELECTION ON SAl11RDAY AND SUNDAY
T6TAL
REI.IGIOUS 08JECTIONS
NOT TRADITIONAL
DAY FOR FAMTLY
NOT IN TOWN ON WEEKENUS
WIX2K ON WEEKEN~S
BUSY ON WEEKEN~S
SPORTS ON T4
LIKE TO BE WTSIDE ON WEEKENDS
CONFUSING/LIKELY TO FORGET
INCONVENIENT FOR OTHER REASONS
JUST PREFER TUESDAY
OTHER
NONE
FLAGS ABSENTEE
Q 11 EiHNICITY VO7F:U VOTED VO~E~ EVER NF.VF.R
VOTE BY MAIL OWN/kENi --~--•--~- AGE IN IN IN V01E[l VOiE~
-------_ --- MI ~-~~ _...-- 8 OR 9 5-7 0-4 AB• AB
FpVOR OPPOSE OWN RENT WIiITE NORITY 19-34 35 49 50-64 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SEN-!EE SENTEE
(A) tB) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) W) (K) (L) (M) {N) (0)
------ ---- - - - -- -- --- - -- -- -- -• ••• . .. . ...... . _.. • • -- ••• • •• -----
13 12 i8 9 20 3 4 6 4 9 10 6 12 11 17
100X 100% 100X 100X 100X 100k 100X 200X 100X 100X 100X 100X 1RDX 100k 100x
0% 17X 6X 11X lOX 0% 25% OX OX 11X lOX 6k 8% 9X 6X
8X Ok 6X O% 5% OX OX OX OX OX 0% OX 8R OX 6$
oz ox oz ox ox ox ox ox ox ox ox ox a~ ox ax
Bk 8k 11% Ok 5X 33X OX 1JX OX 11% lOX 17R OY 9R 6X
Ok OR Ok aX Ok OX 0& Ok OX 0% OX OX 0% OX OX
8X 25X 17X 11R 5X Ok Ok 17X 25~ llX 20k 33k OX 0% 24X
0 N
OX O.X OX Offi OX D% OX Ok OX OX Ok 0% OX 0% Ox
Bk OX OX 11X 5k OX 25X Ok Ok OX Ok OX 88 OX 6X
8% Ok 6X OX OX 33X OX 17~ OX 0~ lOX OX OX 9k 0%
Offi SX OX lIX 5X 0% 25X OR' OX OX OX OX 8X 9~ OX
15R Sk 6k 22k lOk 33% 0% 17X SOR OX OX 17X 17X OX 18X
46k 33X 50k 33k 55X OX 25X 33Y 25X 67% SOk 33X 50k 64X 35k
f E
o~ ax ox ax ox ox o~ a~ oz oz ox ox ox ox ox
GLS RESEARCH (~99336)
Santa Momca City
Table 7~1
Q 7 MORE LIKELY TO VOTE IF POLLS ARE OPEN iW0 DAYS IN A ROW
q 2 Q 8 ELECTION Q 9 ABSENTEE p 10 ELECTION
PREFERENCE INl'E NT --~ •~__-~
GENOER PAISTY Q 1 l~WARENE55 - - --- VOTF ~l~
-
~I WEEK- BIG AB- IN NO1'
MALE FEMALE OEMO REPUB N/P YES NO TUES END EVERY ONLY SENTEE PERSON UOTED VO~E
TOTAL
--- (A)
-- (B)
- - (C)
- (D)
~ (E)
- (F)
- -- (G)
- - -- (H)
- -- fI) (J)
-- - - - - (K)
- -- (L)
-- -- (M)
-- - (N)
-- -- (a)
-- -
TOTAL 300 146 154 169 67 47 262 38 130 117 246 51 45 242 145 153
100X 100X 100X 100X 100% 100X 100X 1Q0X 100k 109X 100X 100X 100X 100X 100X 160X
AGREE 174 64X ti3% 54X 55X 68X 5k~ 58X 39X SSX 54X 76K 69X 57X 51X 65R
58X I H K J 0 N
~ISAGREE 193 29X 39& 37k 39X 26X 34X 39X 57k 9k 37k 22X 20X 37X 372" 32~
34X I H K J M L
STRONGLY AGREE 198 40k 32k 33X 31k 51X 36% 34X 20k 63~ 33% 47X 47X 35x 32X 39k
35X E E CD I H
SOMEWFIAT AGRE[ fi6 23% 21% 21x 24% 17X 22X 24R 19X 25% 21R 29X 22X 22X 19X 25~
22k
SOMEWFUtT DISAC~2EE 46 14X 17% 18% 15% 9% 15X 16k 24X 4k 16k 12X 13k 15X 15% 15X
15k I H
STRONGEY DISAC~2EE 57 16X 22R' 19X 24X 17X 18k 24R 33ffi 4k 21X 10% 7X 21k 21k 17~
19% I H K J M L
DK/NA 23 7% Bk BR 6% 6k 8k 3t 4k 3k 9% 2% 11X 6~ 12X 3X
SX K J 0 N
GLS RESEARCH (#99336)
Santa Monica City
Table 7-2
Q 7 MORE LIKELY TO VOTE IF POLLS A{2E OPEN TWO DAYS IN A ROW
TOTAL
AC~tEE
DISAGREE
STRONGLY AGREE
SOMEWW~T AGREE
SOMEWFlAT ~ISAGREE
STRONGLY DISAGREE
DK/NA
FLAGS ABSENTEE
Q I1 ETHNICITY V9TED VOTE~ VOTEO FVFR N[UER
VOTE BY MAIL OWN/RENT ------ ----- AGE IN IN IN VOfED VOIEU
-~a~=~ MI- ~ 8 9R 9 5 7 0 4 AB- AB•
FAVOR 6PPOSE OWN RENT WHITE NORITY 18-34 35 49 50•64 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SENTEE SENTEE
(A) (8) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (k) (I) (,7) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0)
.. . .... ... . .. . .. . . .. . . . . -- • •. - - .. . - -- - -- - - --
143 130 124
100X 100k 100k
62R 55X 47k
D
30Y 38X 47k
D
41X 35X 25%
0
22X 21X 22X
13X 20X 22X
0
17X 18% 25k
0
169
100k
66k
C
26%
C
44X
c
22k
11%
c
15%
c
223 40 78
ioox ioax iooz
59X 60~ 74R
HIJ
33X 33X 17X
HIJ
35% 38% 51X
IJ
24X 23X 28X
I
15X 15R' 9R
H
18k 18% e%
IJ
98 60 47 69 77 154 84 216
1DOk ioaz iooz ioox ioox ioox zoox ioox
58k 43k 53k 41X 44X 73X 51X 61X
G G G M M KL
37X 45X 3fiX 48X 45X 23X 38X 33X
G G G M M KL
38M 30X 23X 26k 21X 48X 32X 38X
G G M M KL
20X 13X 39~ 14X 23k 25% 19% 23X
c,~ z
S% 7% 6~ 8X 8X 8~ 4k
21% 15X 13X 16X 22k 12x 14~ 16~
G
15X 30X 23X 32X 23X 11X 24X 17X
I GH G M M KL
5R 12X llk 12k lOX 5X 11$ 6X
GLS RESEARCH (#99336)
bu~ldina shall be allowed if oarkina reauired by this Ord~nance for the second
unit is provided. and all other provisions of this Ordinance are met.
(~) Conversion of existina floor area of the main dwellina. The
creation of a second unit thrq~gh conversion of ~art of the existina floor area
of the main dwelfina shall be allow~d. provided it does not resuft in the floor
area of the main dwellina beina less than 150% of the floor area of the
second unit. or in violation of the standards of the Uniform Bu~fd~na Code or
Undorm Hausina Code.
~ Prohibition aaainst rental. The second unit shall not be
rented except to those oersons whose occupancy is authorrzed by
subsection 9 04 13 040fa~
~ ~eed Res#riction. Pnor to issuance of a buddina permit. or in
the case of an existina second unit. within 45 days follow~na the effective
date of aooroval of a Use Permit. the aoolicant shall record a deed restriction
w~th the Countv Recorder m a form aoproved bv the City Attorney sett~na
forth the reauirements of this Ordinance. includ~na the apolicable occuoancw
and sale restrict~ons. This deed restriction shall run with the land.
26
~"'~ ~'.
Santa Momca C~ty
Table 9 t
q 9 VOTING BEHAVIOR
Q 2 Q 8 ELECTI~N Q 9 ABSfNTEE Q 10 ELECTION
PREFERENCE INTENT -- -- --.~~- _
GENDER PARTY Q 1 AWAfZENESS -~-- ~« ~ VOTE UID
-- ~- - --- "---- ~~° ~_- WEEK BIG AB 1N N(Tf
MALE FEMALE OEMO REPUB N/P YES NO 1'UES END EVERY ONLY SENTEE PERSON VOTED VOTE
TOTAL
..- - (A)
-•-~-- (B)
- - (C)
. . (D) (E)
. ~ (F)
- - (G)
- (H)
-- (I)
- - - (J)
• (K)
-- • (L)
• • (M)
- - (N)
- - -- (0)
-- --
TOTAL 300 146 154 169 fi7 47 262 38 130 117 246 51 45 242 145 153
100X 100k 100X 100R' 100k 100X 100X 1~~~ 100X 10UX 100X 100k lODk 100X 100X 100%
I GENEW4LLY VOTE BY A6SENTEE 45 12k 18X lh% 13X 23$ 15% 13X lOX 14X 15X 14X 100X OX 18X 12%
BALLOT WFIENEVER I CAN 15X M L
I GENERN.LY PREFER TO VOTE IN 242 &3$ 79X 81X B7X 68X 81M 79k 87~ 82k S1X B2% OY 100Y 79X 82X
PERSON AT THE POLLS ON 81X E D M L
ELECTiON DAY
OTHER 7 1X 3k 3k OX 4X 2% 5k 1X 3X 2X 2~ OX Ok 2X 3X
2% 0 C
~K/~ 6 3X 1% 2X OX 4k 2k 3k 2X 2k 2X 2% OX OX 1X 3X
2X
Table 9 2
Q 9 VOTING BF.HAVIOR
FLAGS qBSENTEE
Q 11 ETHNI CITY VOTED VOTE~ VOTED EVFR ~ NEVER
VOlE 8Y MAIL OWN/RENT -..-- --- p~E IN IN IN VOl'ED 40TEU
- MI- -~- 8 Oft 9 5-7 0-4 AB• AB
FAVOR OPPOSE OWN RENT WHITE NORITY 18-34 35•44 50-64 65+ OF 9 pF 9 OF 9 SENTEE SENTEE
(A)
-- -- (B)
----- (C)
------ (D)
---~ - {E)
- --~ (F)
- - {G)
-- --- (H)
.•• •• (I)
•• - (J)
----- (K)
- •-- (U
•• •• (M)
•• •- (N)
- - (0)
-- -
TOTAL ]43 130 124 169 223 40 78 98 60 47 69 77 164 84 216
ioox ioox ioox ioox ioox ~oox iooz ioox ioox ioox ioox ioox iaox zooz iooz
I GENERALLY VOTE BY ABSENTEE 17X 13X 15R 15X 18k lOX 14R 15k 12X 23k 12X 18X 15X 39X 6%
BALLOT WHEHEVER I CAN p N
I GENERALLY PREFER TO VQTE IN 78X &}% 82X 79X 78.~ 85X 79~ 83k 82k 74~ 87X 78X 79% 56X 90X
PERSON AT THE POLLS ON 0 N
ELECTION ~AY
OTHER ]$ 2~ lX 4X 3X OR 3% 1X 5X Ok lX 3X 3~ 2$ 2X
F E
DK/NA 3R 1~ 2X 2X lk SX 4k 1X 2R' 2X' OR 1& 3k 2X 2X
M K
GLS RESEARCH (#99336)
Santa Momca City
7able 10-1
Q 10 DID YOU VOTE TN LAST WEEKEND'S FIFCTTON~
GENDER PAR7Y
MALE FEMA~E DEMO REPUki N/P
TOTAL {A) (B) (C) (D) (E)
~OTAL 300 146 154 169 67 47
ioox ioox roaz iooz ioox ioox
YES VOTEO 145 52% 45X 54X 49X 32X
48X E C
~ED NOT VOTE 153 47X 55X 44~ 51Y 68X
S1R E C
DK1NA 2 lk 1$ 1X Ok OZ
ik
Ta61e 10-2
Q 10 DI~ YOU VOTE IN L45T WEEKEND'S ELECTI6N~
TOTAL
YES, V07ED
63~ NOT VOTE
~K/NA
p 2 Q S ELECTION q 9 ABSENTEE Q 10 ELECTION
PREFERENCE INTENT -- -~>~ •-- -
Q 1 AWARENE55 -- ---~_ -- - VOTE D1D
---- ------ WEEK- BIG AB- IN NOT
YES NO TUES END EVERY ONLY SENTEE PERSON VOTED VOTE
(F) (G) (H) (I? W) (K) (L) (M) (N) (Q)
262 38 130 117 246 51 45 242 145 153
ioox Zoox loox ioax ioox ioaz ioox ioox iooz ioax
55% OX 42X 51X 58% 4k 58R 48X 100k OX
G F K J 0 N
44X 97X 59k 48k 41X 44X 42X 52X OX 100X
G F K J 0 N
O% 3X 1% 1% OR 2.ffi OX 18 OX OX
FiAGS A85ENiEE
q 11 ETHNICII'Y VOTED VOfED VOTED EVER NEVER
~OTE 8Y MAIL OWN/RENT AGE IN IN IN VOTEO VOTED
- -- MI- - 8 Oft 9 5-7 0 4 AB- A8-
FAVOR OPPOSE OWN RENT WFIITE NDRITY 18•34 35-49 50 64 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SENTEE SENTEE
(A) (B)
- - -- - (C)
------ (D)
-- - - (E)
-- -- (F)
-- --- {G)
-- --- (HD (I)
•--- - ----- (J)
- • • (K)
•• -• (L)
••- •- (M)
- - (N)
- -~- (D)
- --- --
143 130 124 169 223 40 78 98 60 47 69 77 154 84 216
100k IOOX 100k 100k 100X 100X 100k 100k 100X lUOR 100k 100k 100X 100X 100~
40X 54X 53X 45X 53X 20R' 19R 46k fi2k 85X &1.% 57.X 31X G5X 42~
8 A F E HIJ GJ fiJ GHI LM KM KL 0 N
59X 45% 46k 54X 47% SOX 79X 54X 37k 15Y 16X 47X 69R 33X 58X
B ~ F E HIJ GIJ GHJ GFII LM KM KL 0 N
lX 1X 1$ 1X OX 0$ 1X 9X 2X OX OX 1k lk 1X 0%
GLS RESEpRCH (#99336y
Santa Monica City
Tahle 11 1
Q 11 FAVOR OR OPPOSE EL[CTIONS BY MAIL
Q 2 q 8 ELECTION Q 9 ABSENTEE Q 10 ELECTION
PRFFERENCE INTENT - -- - -
GENUER PAR~Y Q 1 AWARENE55 -~ ~-~-^_ ~-~-^ ~e^•a VOiE ~I~
------ ----- ------ ---- ----- WEEK BIG AB IN NOT
MALE FEMALE ~EMO REPl3B N/P YES NO TUES ENU E4ERY ONLY SENTEE PERSON VO7E~ VOTE
TOTAL
.. ••- (A)
•--~- (B)
------ (C)
----- (~)
--- (E)
---- - (F)
--- - {G)
---- (N)
.. . (I)
.. .. (J)
. • • (K)
•. {U
. .. (M)
. . (N)
. . . . (0)
. ...
TOTAL 300 146 154 169 67 47 262 38 130 117 246 51 45 242 145 153
100X 100$ 100X 100X 100X 100X 100ffi 100X 100k 100X 100X 100Y 100X 100X 100R' 100k
FAVIX2 143 45X 51~ 45X 46k 51X 45k 6bk 46k 51X 44X 63Y 56X A6~' 39X 56k
48k G F K .] 0 N
OPPOSE 130 47X 40$ 47~ 43X 34X 46X 24$ 47k 41% 46X 33X 38X 45X 48% 39X
43X G F
STRONGLY FAV6R 58 16X 23X 19X 248 15% 18X 29X 15X 25X 17X 27X 27$ 19X 14X 24X
19X I H 0 N
SOMEWHAT FAV6R 85 29X 28X 26x 72X 36R 27X 37X 32x 26k 26X 35X ?_9x 28k 26X 31X
28X
SOMEWH{1T OPPOSE 51 16X 18X 20~ 9X 21X 17X 16X 15X 21~ 18k lAk 18R 17% 17% 17~
17% D C
SiRONGLY OPP05E 79 31X 22X 28G 34X 13~ 29.Y Sk 32S' 21% 28k 20X 20k 28X 31R 22X
26X E E CD G F I H
~K/Wt 27 9X 9X 8k lOX 15X 9X 11X 7X BR lOX 4X 1t 9k 12X 6X
9X
GLS RESEARCH (#9933fi)
Santa Momca City
Table 11-2
Q 11 FAVOR OR OPPOSE ELECTIONS 8Y HAIL
FLAGS ABSENTEE
Q 11 F.THNICiTY UOTED VDTE~ VOIED F.VFR NEVER
VOT[ BY MAIL OWN/R ENT --~ ~ AGE IN IN IN 40TE~ 4DTE0
------ -- MI• 8 OR 9 5•7 0•4 AB- AB
FAVOR OPPOSE DWP! RENT w}iITE NORITY 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SENTEE SENIEE
(A) (B)
- - - -- (C)
-- (A)
--- -- (E)
-- - - (F)
----- (G)
-- - - (H) (I)
--- - - - - (J)
-- --- (K3
-- --- (U
---- (M3
- ---~ (N)
- -~ (0)
-
i'OTAL 143 130 124 169 223 40 78 98 60 47 69 77 154 84 216
100X 10UX 100R 100R 100X 1OOX 100X 100~ 100X 100X 100X lUOX 1DOX 100% 100X
FAUOR 100X OX 4B~ 47X 47X 58X 56R 47X 52X 38X 43X SSX 46% 51X 46k
B A .] G
OPPOSE OX 100X 41X 45R 44X 40k 41X 44R 42X 47X 42% 39~ 46X 38X 45X
B A
STRONGLY FAVOR M11X OX 15X 22% 17X 30X 28% 74% 22X 15X 16X 18k 21X 21X 19X
B A H G
SOMEWIIAT FAVOR 59k 0~ 33X 25X 29X 28X 28X 33X 30X 23X 28k 36X 25k 30X 28%
B A
SOMEWfiAT OPPOSE Ok 39X 16k 18k 17X 18X 21k 20X 13X 13k 9k 16X 21$ 12x 19X
B A M K
STRONGLY OPPOSE Ok 61R 25~ 27X 27X 23X 21X 23k 28X 34% 33X 23R 25~ 26k 26X
~ A
DK/NA OX OX 11M 8X 9X 3X 3X 9k 7X 15X 14X 6X BX 11~ Bk
F E .] G
GLS RESEARCH (~99336)
a
c
'" >-
~~~
ON::E:
::E:_=>
<./)
<aw
.....-'"
~~,...c
<./)>-0
on
~
:z
~
""
>-
oJ
~
-'
w
""
o
::E:
i
~
V>
-...
W
""
o
::E:
:I:
U
::>
:0:
"-
o
:z
S
f--
U
UJ
-'
...
S
w
Cl!-I-_
........000
O:z:>_
o
n
;1
~.
0-.1
01
:z
o
w V")
~ "'~
Cl :z: l.&J .:E:
>_0.._
w
~-
~~;:!
II >-
I~~g
I
! >-
~ ~:;
,I w_
:z
o
i=....
02
~~
'"
o
w
u
:z
Nw
<>:
O'w
~
'"
0..
""
tj~=
"'w~
V>
V>
~ ~@
i
o
~
11:
'"
w
Cl
15
'"
o
w
f--~
oz
>~
<./)
~g
V> ~
Wll..
>- -
o..~
-... LU
:z~
'"
:::>
o..~
~8
o
::E:~
WU
o~
LU
~~
~~
UJ
-'-
~:5
--'
;::
~
""...
"'0
....S
"'...
"'0
....s
"'...
"'0
NS
"'...
",,0
S
-..
eno
o
....
"" ..
",,0
NS
=~
0...
""0
....s
<Xl ...
~~
N ..
~~
..... ..
.q-~
..... ..
~~
'" ..
""0
....0
v..
"'0
....S
"" ..
",,0
....0
-
0..
00
""S
-'
~
.. :z
""
.....
~o
..
'"
'"
..
'"
.....
.. ...,
'"
'"
.. :.:
""
'"
..
en
.....
..
""
""
.. w..
'"
:0
~'"
<0
..
N
.....
..
o
""
...
.....
'"
..
'"
""
..
""
""
- ..
0.....
"'-<:>
E"i
z
~
~
Cl
o
ffi
"-
'"
w
o
z
woo
f--f--
>< 0
w -'
-'
<<<is
.. :z
<Xl
.....
..0
~
~
~
.....
tri
.....
..
o
.....
..
-<:>
.....
..
<Xl
'"
..
'"
.....
~
.....
..
;z
~
<0
r:2
;;
.....
..
co
'"
M ..
....-
"'.....
>-
=>
o
2
~
'"
~
:I:
'"
..
en
.....
~
.....
~
~
~
ro
~
.....
.. :>::
'"
:0
.. ~
'"
'"
..
'"
.....
..
N
.....
..
0-.
.....
..
M
.....
R
..
.....
.....
..
'"
'"
'" ..
_M
"'.....
w
~
LU
V>
V>
LU
-'
o
w
<>:0 w
WW ....
w >I--'z_
~ ~~~~8
z
w w
~ a:63 ~
,~g~~5
Cl
~ oo:rC'\........
O:Z'~:::E:
:::00.........00.-
V> '"
~ ~ ~o-.
~I:~~:S;:!
~ ESO"I_
C::z: LJ...:::-,
:>-coo_
i ..-
en...,
"'-
w
'-"
<t
~
~
z
j':
w
i=:
~~~
"'z~
w
....
~g
f--I~c
:z '" ~
~ i
~I~~
V>
W
oo
:z
o
~
a:
>-
LU
~
-'
i
LU
'"
o
'"
i
~
~
LU
~
g
:0:
"-
o
",i
N::E:
-::>
V>
~N
{l....
>- 0'
-
- >-
'"
Ow
b
=>
...
'7'~
O~
en~
'"
v
jgg
~
cOm
-~
LU
on
o
o..~
o..ro
o~
!5
>~
~::s
~~
~~
S
... ..
LtlO
_0
ri
..... ..
.....0
S
'" ..
-<:>'"
S
..... ..
vO
S
0..
""'"
S
<Xl ..
O\~
<Xl ..
r--.~
<=> ..
~~
"" ..
NO
NS
'" ..
'"'0
....S
... ..
"'0
....0
-
0..
""0
....S
"" ..
vO
....0
.....
--'
;::
~
~
""
;;
.....
.. ""
v
.....
..
'"
""
.. :0:
v
Ltl
.. r
""'-"
en
.. '-"
'"
""
~~
;:;3
:0
~
..
.....
'"'
..
'"
'"
..
'"
-<:>
.. <t
CO
v
..'"
.....
<Xl
~
2
!5
J-
~
'"
s
'"
w
"-
o
LU
'"
:z
~~
... -'
-'
<<
<t ro
..
~
~
.....
..
'"
""
..
:e
..
~
~
..
;z
.. ""
g:
..
'"
""
.. --'
N
""
..
...
'"
.. r
'"
""
..
M
-<:>
&'i
""
~
.....
.. ...,
o
'"
..
[.::
..
<Xl
.....
t:'5
..
R
..
~
..
v
.....
...
;z
...
~
..
::g
...
~
..<<
M
en
..<
'"
en
.. '"
.....
:0
.. Cil
....
'"
~
~
'"
:::>
I-
'"
~
:I:
~
M
~
LU
;:;
~
i';'i
on
V>
LU
-'
r
~
V>
w
<>:
V>
--'
'"
Cil
Santa Momca City
Table 13-1
Q 12 MORE IX2 LESS LIKELY TO FAVOR ELECTIONS BY MAIL
A PEOPLE WOULD HAVE AN EXTENDED PERI00 TO TIiRN IN BALLDTS
~ 2 q 8 ELECTION Q 9 ABSENTEE p 10 ELEC7ION
NRF.FEitENCE INTENT ---- •~
GENDER PARiY Q 1 AWARENE55 - --- - -----------~ VOTE DIp
--- - - ---- ----- ---- -- WEEK BIG AB IN ND7
MALE FEMALE ~EMO REPl1B N/P YES NO TUES END EVERY ONLY SENTEE PERSON VOTED VOTE
TOTAL
------ (A)
--- - (B)
----- (C)
----- (D)
------ (E)
--- -- (F)
- --- (G)
----- (H)
-- -- (I) (J)
- - -- -- (K)
- - (L)
- -- (M)
- - - (N)
-- (D)
- -
TOTAI. 300 146 154 169 67 47 262 38 130 117 246 51 45 242 145 153
100x 100k 100Y 100X 100X 100X 100k iaax 100X 100X 100X 100X 100X 1DOX 100X 100X
MtlRE LIKELY 201 66k 68Y 67X 60X 72X 65X 62k 64k 75k 63k 82k 78k 66k 57~ 76X
67X G F K J 0 N
LESS LIKELY 49 16X 16X 18R 22X 9k 1$X 8X 19X 12X 18% lOX 9~ 18X 18X 14X
l6X E D
MUCH MORE L,IKELY 116 38X 40X 40R 34X 40~ 37~ 50X 30X SOX 34X 57k 47X 378 33% 44X
39X I H K J
SOMEWHAT MORE LIKELY 85 29X 26X 27X 25~ 32X 28X 32X 34X 26k 29~ 25X 31X 29k 24X 33X
28X
SOMEWIIAT LESS LIKELY 8 1X 4X 5X Ok OX 3X 3X 2~ 3~ 3k OX 2R 3X 4X 1X
3k ~E C C K J
MUCH LE55 LIKELY 41 15X 12X 13X 22~ 9X 15X 5k 18k 9k 15X lOX 7X 15X 14k 13X
14k E ~ G F I H
NO EFFECT 43 16X 13x 13k 18X 13X 1GX 5X 17X llX 17k 4k 9& 15k 23X 7~
74X G F K J 0 N
pK/NA 7 1X 3X 2X aX 6X 2X 5k OX 2X 2k hk 4X 1$ 2$ 3$
2X D C
GLS RESEARCH (#99336)
Santa Mom ca City
Table Z3~2
Q 12 MORE OR IFSS L1KFI..Y 7p FAVOk ELECT[ONS SY MATL
A PEOPLE WOUL~ H4VE AN EXTENDED PERIO~ TO TURN IN BALLOTS
FLAGS ABSENTEE
Q 11 EIHNICITY VOTED VOFE~ VOT[~ EVER NEVER
VOTE 8Y MAIL 04JN1RCNT - ---- AG[ IN IN IN VOTED VOTED
.°~ MI. - - - 8 OR 9 5-7 0 4 AB !IB-
FAVOR OPPOSE OWN RFNT WFIITE NOf2ITY 18-34 35 49 50 64 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SENTEE SENTEE
(A) (B)
- - - --- -- (C)
-- -- (D)
--- - (E)
--~ - (F)
- - - (G)
------ (H) (I)
-- -- - --- (JD
- - (K)
-- - (L}
- (M)
•• - {N)
- - - (0)
- -- -
TOTAL 143 130 124 169 223 40 78 98 60 47 69 77 154 &4 216
100k 100k 100k 100X 160X 100X 100X lUOX 100X lUOX 100X 100X 100X 100X 100X
MIX2E LIKELY 87k 48k 69% 66% 67~ 70~ 81X 71X 62X 53X 54X 65X 74X 70X 66R"
B A IJ J G GH M K
LE55 LIKELY 7X 28k 15% 17~ 15X 15X 1?.k 12X 17X 26Y 22X 19k 12X 14k 173
B A
MUCH MORE LIKELY 59X 20X 35X 40R' 36X 38% 51X 42k 35k 26k 32X 35k 44R 43% 37%
B A J J GH
SOMEWfNT MORE LIKELY 27X 28k 33k 25k 29X 33% 29X 39% 27% 28% 22X 30R' 31~ 27R 29R
S~MEWF4AT LESS LIKELY 1X 5~ 1R 4X 2X 8Y 3k 2k 2k 4k lX 4X 3X 1X 3%
e a
MUCH LESS LIKELY 6k 22~ 15k 12k 13% 8X 9% lOX 15% 21% 20X 16~ lOR 13% 14X
B A
NO EFFECT 4% 23X 14% 15X 16X lOk S& 14X 18X 17X 23X 13X 11X 12k 15X
B A M K
~K/NA 2R 1X 2X 2X 2k 5X OX 2X 3X 4X lk 3k 3k 4X 2.k
GLS RESEnRCH (#99336)
Santa Momca City
Table 14-1
Q 12 MORE OR LESS LIKELY TO FAYOR ELECTIONS 8Y MAIL
B 40TE BY MAIL ELECTIONS HAVE RESULlE~ IN HIGHER VOTER TURNIXIT
Q 2 Q 6 ELECTION Q 9 ABSENTEE q 10 ELEC(ION
PREFERENCE INTE NT -----•-•-~ -••----~- -_ __
GENDER PARTY p 1 AWARFNESS -- ---- --- UOTE DIU
- = WEEK- BIG AB IN NOT
MALE FF.MALE DEMD RFPUB N/P YES Na TUES EN~ EVERY ONLY SENTEE PERSON VO7E~ VOTE
TOIAL
•• •• (A)
•• • • (B)
•• .. (C)
... .. (~)
... . (E)
. ... (F)
.. .. (G)
. (H)
. .- - (I)
-- -- (J)
. . (K)
. .. (L)
- -- (M)
---- (N)
- - -- (0)
- - ---
TOTAL 300 146 154 169 67 47 262 38 130 117 246 51 45 242 145 153
1~Ok 100k 100k 100k 100% 100X 100k 100k 1~0~ 190X 100% l0U% 100X 100X 100X 100X
MORE LIKELY 213 68X 74X 73X 61R' 74R 70X 79k 68k 7fiX 70k 75X 71k 71$ 64X 78X
71% 0 N
LE55 LIKELY 29 lU% 9k llX 12k 6X 10% 8X lOX BX 9% 12X 7Y 11X lOX BX
tox
Ml1CH MORE LIKELY 13"i 42% 46X 49X 37X 40% 44X SOX 38k 52R' 41X 57k 36X 46X 40% 48X
44k I H K J
SOMEWFIAT MORE LIKELY 80 25X 28X 25X 24X 34X 26X 29X 29X 24X 28X 18k 36% 25X 24X 29Y
27%
SOMEWHAT LESS LIKELY 7 1R' 3Y 3M 1.X 2X 3k OX 2X 3% ZX 2~ OX 3X 3% 1X
2% G F M L
MUCH LESS LIKELY 22 9% 6Z BX lOX 4k 7X S% 8X 4X 7% lOX 7X 8X 7R' 7X
7X
NO EFFECT 47 20X 12X 13X 22X 13k 17k 8k 21% 11X 17X 12X 18k 15X 21X llk
16X I H 0 N
DK/NA 11 2X 5X 3X 4X 6X 3k 5X 2k 5X 4k 2% 4% 3k SX 3X
4k
GLS RESEARCH (#99336)
Santa Momca City
Table 14-2
p 12 MORE OR LESS LIKELY TO FAVOR ELECTIONS BY MAIL
B VOTE BY MAII. ELECTIONS HAVE RESULTE~ IN HIGHER VOTER 1i1RN0UT
FLAGS Af3SENTEE
Q 11 EfHNI ClIY V07E~ V9TF~ VOTEU EVER NEVER
VOTE BY MAIL OWN/RENT -- - AGE IN IN IN UpTEO YOTED
------ MI -- 8 OR 9 5•7 0 4 AB AB-
FAVOR OPPOSE OWN RENT WFIITE NORITY 18-34 35-49 50 64 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SFNTEE SENTEE
(A) (B)
• ••• --- (C)
-- - (~)
--- (E)
--- (F)
----- (G)
- -- (H) (I)
-- - ---- (J)
- -- (K)
--- (L)
-~ -- (M)
-- -~ (N)
--- (0)
--- -
TOTAL 143 130 124 169 223 40 78 98 60 47 69 77 154 84 216
Zoox Zoaz ioox ioox ioox ioa~ iaax ioox ioox ioox ioox iuux ioux ioox ioox
MORE LIKELY B7X 53% 68X 74k 72X 73X 77X 77X 63X 64X 62X 74X 73X 69X 72%
B A
LESS LTKELY 2X 19X lOX 8X 9k SX 5X 4k 15X 17X 14R 6X 9k 12X 9k
B A IJ H H
MUCH MORE LIKELY 66Y 22% 43Y 46X 43k 50X 45Z 51X 48~ 32X 38X 45X 47X 43X 45k
6 A J H
SIN7F.WHAT MORE LIKELY 21~ 31X 25X 28X 29X 23% 32x 26% 15~ 32X 25X 29X 27% 26% 27%
I GJ I
SOMEWHAT LESS LIKELY lk 4X 2X 2X 2X 5% 1X 1X 2X 6X 3X 1X 3X 2% 2X
MUCH LESS LIKF.LY 1X 15R' BX 6X 7X 0% 4X 3% 13% 11% 12X 5X 6% 10% 6%
B A F E I H
NO EFFECT 8% 25X 19X 14X 15k 18X 17X 17X 172 11X 19X 16X 14X 14X 16X
B A
~K/NA 3k 2X 3X 4X 4X 5k 1X 2k 5X 9k 4k 4X 3X SX 3X
GLS RESEARCH (#99336)
Santa Momca City
Table 15 1
Q 12 MORE OR LESS LIKELY TO FAVOR ELECTIONS BY MAIL
C HOL~ING AN ELECTION 8Y MAIL IS LESS EKPENSIVE AND SAVES TA1(PAYERS MONEY
Q 2 Q 8 ELECTION Q 9 ABSENTEE p 10 ELECTION
PREFERENCE 1NTL Nf =
GENDER PARTY Q 1 AWARENESS °-~-•°--- ----°- UOTE UID
~~ -- ---- ---- WEEK- B1G AI3 IN NOT
MAI.E FEMALE ~EMO REPIIB N/P YES N6 TUES EN~ EVERY ONLY SENTEE PERSON VOTED VOTE
TOTAL
- -- (A)
- - (B)
---- (C)
--- (D)
-- --- (E)
- - - (F)
• • - (G)
• -• - (H) (I) (J)
••• • • •• • •• ... (K)
. .. . (L)
.. .. (H) (Ny
. . . .. . (0)
. ... ..
TO7AL 300 lA6 154 169 fi7 47 262 38 130 111 24fi 51 45 242 145 153
100% 100X 100% 100% 100X 100$ 100~ 100X 100X 100X 100X lUOX 100k 100X 100% 100%
MORE LIKELY 218 69k 77k 70X 73X 79X 72X 76~ 69X 82% 71X 82k 78k 72k 71X 75X
73X I H
LESS LIKELY 35 12X 12X 14k lOX 11X 13X 5X 12% 9% 12X lOX 11% 12% 12X lOk
1zz
MUCH MORE LIKELY 163 52X 56X 54X 54X 60X 52X 68R 52X 61M 50k 76X 62X 54% 47% 61X
54X G F K .] 0 N
SOMEWHAT MORE LIKELY 55 16X 21R llX 19X 19k 20k 8k 18X 21M 21k 6X 16X 19X 24k 13k
18x G F K .7 0 N
SOMEWW~T LESS LIKELY 9 1X 5X 3$ 3k 4X 3X 0% 3k 3k 3k 2% 7% 2% 3k 3X
3k G F
MUCH LESS LIKELY 26 lOX 7% 11X 7X 6X 9% 5% 8X 6X 9~ 8% 4% lOX 9X 8k
9~
NO EFFECT 38 18k 8X ]2k 15X 6X 13~ 11X 17X 7X 14% 6X 9% 14~ }.4% 12X
13X R A I H K J
pK/NA 9 3X 3k 4k lk 4k 2k BY 2X 2X 3X 2X 2X 2X 3X 3X
3X
GLS RESEARCH (#99335)
Santa Momca City
Table 15 2
Q 12 MORE OR LESS LIKF.IY TO FAVOR ELECTIONS 84 MAiI..
C HOL~ING AN ELECTION 8Y MAIL IS LE55 EXPENSIVE AND SAVES TAXPAYERS MONEY
FLAGS ABSENIEE
Q 11 f;1HNlCI1Y VUTE~ VOTED VOTED EVFR NEVLR
VOTE 8Y MAIL 041N/RENT ~- AGE IN IN IN UOTEO VOTE~
- --- ----- MI- - 8 OR 9 5•7 0•4 AB• AB•
FAVOR OPPOSE OWN RENT WFIITE NORITY 18-34 35 49 50-6A 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SENTEE SENTEE
(A) (B)
- - - -- -- (C)
---- - (~)
-- -- (E)
---- (F)
-~ - - (G)
- -- (H) (I)
-- -- - - -- (J)
- - - (K)
--- - (L)
------ (M)
- - - (N)
--- - (0)
-----
TOTAL 143 130 124 169 223 40 78 98 6D 47 69 77 154 84 216
100k 100X 100X 100k 100~ lOQ~ lUOX lUUX lUOX 100% 100X 100X 100% 100% lUUX
MORE LIKELY 91X 52k 73k 73k 74k' 7QX 78k 80X 68% fi2X 62X 78X 75X 76X 71X
B A .1 H L K
LESS LIKELY 1% 25X I3k lOX 11R lOX 8X 8~ 13X 21X 20X 6X lOk 12X 12k
B A J J GH L K
MUCH MORE LIKELY 78X 31X 54X 54X 56k 50X 63X 57X 50X 45% 42X 58k 58X 57X 53k
B A J G I.M K K
SOMEWFWT MORE LIKELY 13k 21k 19X 19k 19k 20ffi 15A 22R 18.~ 17k 20k 19X 17X 19X 18X
SOMEWHAT LESS LIKELY Ok 7X 4k 2k 3X 5X 4X 3X OX 6X 4X Ok 4k 2X 3k
f3 A M L
MUCH LESS LIKELY lk 18k 9X SX 8X 5$ 4X Sk 13% 15k 16X 6k 6~ 10% BR"
B A
NO EFFECT 6% 21% 12X 14X 12X ]OX 13X 11% 12X llk' 14k 13X 12X 7X 15R
B A 0 N
~K/NA 2X 2X 2X 3$ 2R' lOX lk lk 7k 6X 3X 3X 3R 5X 2k
GLS RESEARCH (#99336)
WHEREAS, in response, Staff proposed an ordir~ance, and the Planning
Commission conducted a publfc heanng on the proposed ordmance on September 11,
1996, and
WHEREAS, the proposed ordinance, togetherwith modifications suggested by the
Plannmg Commission, came 6efore the C~ty CouncEl at its meeting of September 24,1996,
and the Councd conducted a pubhc heanng, and
WHEREAS, in the course of that h~aring, a significant number of City residents
expressed their concerns about permittmg the development of additional second units in
the R-1 district, and
WHEREAS, those concerns included increased noise, increased air pollution,
secunty risks, the creation and exacerbation of traffic and parking problems, inordinate
demand on th~ mfrastructure of older ne~ghborhoocis which were planned and built to be
R-1, and the lack of quiet, peaceful spaces En the community, and
WHEREAS, a much smaller nc~mber of speakers fa~ored allowing second ur~its in
the single famiiy distncts, and
WH~REAS, at the concfus~on of the hearing, the Councd deliberated on the
availab[e optians and directed staff to prepare an ordinance which would prohibit second
units m the R-1 and OP-1 districts (hereina~ter referred to in this section as the "R-1
Distnct") only; and
WHEREAS, at the October 8, 1996 City Counal meeting, the Council considered
an ordinance which clarified the allowance of second units in all mufti-family dEStncts, and
prohibited second units in the R-1 distnct sub~ect to a hmited "hardship exemptian," and
6
Santa Mom ca Ci ty
Table 16-2
q 13 FAVOR OR OPPOSE ELECTION HELD ENTIRELY BY MAIL
FLAGS ABSENTEE
q 11 ETHNICITY VOTE~ VDTEU YOitD EtlER NEYER
VO(E 13Y IMIL OWN/RENT -------- ----- AGE IN IN IN VOTFU VOTE~
-' •F•~..= ~ MI ~~.•••,~. -.,_,~ ~_,~= 8 OR 9 5-7 D-4 A6- AB
FAVOR OPPOSE OWN REKf WHITE NORITY 18-34 35-49 50 64 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SENIE:F. SENTFE
(A) (B)
• • ---- (C)
. .. {D)
. (E)
.. . (F)
..... (G)
. . (H) (I
. .. . )
. . (.])
. •. (K)
••• • (L)
• •• (M)
- --. (N)
. . . (0)
. . .
TOTAL 143 130 124 169 223 40 78 9A 60 47 69 77 1S4 84 216
100k 100% 100k 100k 100k 100X 100k 100X 100k 100X 100X iaox 100X 1UDk 160k
FAVOR 95X 39X 69R' fi9R 69R 73X 77X 73X 63X 60k 62k 73X 69k 75X 66k
B A ,] G
OPPOSE lX 51X 23% 23k 22% 23X 17X 21X 27X 30X 32X 19k 21k 19k 25X
B A
STRONGLY FAVOR 60X lOX 31X 37X 36% 25% 46X 38X 30X 26X 28X 36X 38X 30X 37X
B A ,] G
SOMEWHAT FAVQR 35X 29X 38R" 32X 32X 48X 31X 36X 33X 34X 35X 3GX 32X 45X 29X
0 N
SOMEWHAT OPPOSE lX llk 4k 7k 5X 8X 5X 8k Sk 2k 6k 4X 6k 5X 6%
Q A
STRONGLY OPPOSE 1% 40X 19% 17~ 17% 15X 12% 13X 22X 28X 2fi~ 16X 16X 14% 19%
B A J G
DK/NA 3X 10% BX 8~ 9X 5% 6~ 5k lOX 11X 6X 8X 9R fiX 9X
B A
GLS RESEARCH (#99336)
Santa Monica City
Table 17 1
Q 14 OWN/RENT
~ 2 Q 8 ELECTION Q 9 ABSENTEE Q 10 ELECTION
PREFERENCE iNTFNT -- -- -
~
GENDE'R PARTY Q 7 AWAkFNFS$ - - ~_~-• VOTE DID
_- _--,_. ~PV.~.. _~_~,__ -- - WEEK- ~IG AB IN NOT
MALE FEMALE UEMO REPUB N/P YES NU TUES END EVEi2Y ONLY SEN7EE PERSON VOTED VOTE
TOTAL
- -- (A)
---- - (B)
-- - (C)
-- (D)
-~ - - (E)
- - (F)
- (G)
- -- (H)
-- - - (I) (J)
- - -- - (K)
- - (L)
-- -~ (M)
- (N)
- -- (0)
- -- -
TOTAL 300 14G 254 169 67 47 262 38 130 117 246 51 45 242 145 153
100X 100% 100X 100X 100% 100X 100X 100% 100M 100X 100X 100X 100X 100X 100X 100X
OWN 124 41~ 42X 40X 49% 36X 43$ 29% 54% 29% 43X 35X 42X 42X 46X 37X
41X I H
04M HOME 106 37X 34% 36X 37X 30X 37X 24~ 47X 22k 37% 29X 33X 37X 41X 29X
35% I H 0 N
OWN CON~O 18 4ffi 8k 4X 12k Gk 6X 5X 7X 7X 6X 6X 9X 5X 4~ BX
6%
RENT 169 58k 55X 57k 48X 64X 55X 63X 45X 68X 54X 63k 56X 55~ 52R' 60R
55X I H
M06ILE HOME 0 OX OX 0% OY 0% a% OX OR 0% OX 0% OX OX OX OR
UX
REFUSED 7 1X 4k 3X 3X OX 2X 8.Y 2R 3k 2X 2k 2k 2k 2% 3X
2% E C
GLS RESEARCH (#~39336)
Santa Momca Ctty
Table 17-2
Q 14 OWN/RENT
TOTAL
OWN
OWN HOME
OWN CON~O
RENT
MOBILE HOME
REFUSED
FLAGS A85ENTEE
Q 11 F.lHNICI7Y V6TEU VOiED VO7ED EVER NEVER
VOTE BY hiAIL OWN/RFNT AGE IN IN IN VOTE~ VOTED
_ ~-- MI- -F 8 OR 9 5/ 0 4 AB AB
FAVOR OPPOSE OWN RENT IrHITE NORITY 18 34 35 49 50 64 65+ OF 9 DF 9 OF 9 SENTEF. SENfEE
(A) (8) (C) (~) (E) (F) (G) (H) {I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0)
.. . .. .• •• •• •• .•. • ••. • • • . ... . .. ... .. . .. . .. ... .. . . .• •-
143 130 124 169 223 40 78 98 60
iaax iaaz ioax ioax ioox ioox ioox ioox ioo~
41~ 39X 100X OX 41X 35X 19X 45X 62R'
D C HIJ GI GH3
33X 35% 85% OX 34X 33X 15X 39k 57k
D C HIJ GI GFIJ
8% 5X 15X OX 8% 3% 4% 6% 5%
~ C
56X 58X OX 100R 57X 60X 76X 55X 38X
~ C HIJ GI GH
DX OR Ok UX OX OX OX Ok 03'
3~ 2R' OX 0~ 1k 5X 5X OX OX
HI G G
47 69 77 154 84 2k6
100k 100k 100X 100X 100X 100k
43~ 55k 55X 29X 51k 38k
GI M M KL 0 N
32X 51k 49k 21$ 43X 32k
GI M M KL
11X 4X SX 7X SX Sk
55k 43X 45~ 68X 48X 60k
G M M KL
Ok 08 Ok 0& Ok OX
2X lk OX 4ffi lk 3k
M L
GLS RESEARCH (#993361
Santa Mom ca Ci ty
Table 18 1
Q 15 ETHNICITY
q 2 Q 8 ELECTION Q 9 ASSEN7EE Q 10 ELECTIDN
PREFERENCE INTE NT - --- - ----- -------
GENDER PAftTY Q 1 AWARENESS -_ - 401E ~ID
' --- --....- ----- -- --- WEEK BIG AB• IN NOT
MALE FEMALE DEMO REPUB N/P YES NO TUES fN0 EVERY ONLY SENTEE PERSON VOTEU IIOTE
TOTAL
•• ••- (A)
---- - (B?
- (C)
- (D)
- -- - (E) (F)
- - (G)
- - (H)
- - (I)
- - - (J)
- (K)
- (L)
- - - (M) (N)
- (0)
~ -
TOTAL 300 146 154 169 67 47 262 38 130 117 246 51 45 242 145 153
IOOX 100X 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100X 100% 100X 100% 100% 100% 100% 100X 100%
WHITE 223 75X /3X ]3X B1% 77% 75% 68% b9% 74X 75X 71% 89X 72% 82X 68%
74k M L 0 N
BLACK/AFRICAN-AMERICAN 5 2k 1X 3& Ok OX 2X 3X 2X 2X 2X 2k 7k lk 1R' 2R'
2z oE c c
HISPANIC/LATINO 22 5k 10% 9X 7X 2X 7X Sk lOk 7X 7k 8X O% 8X 3X 12X
7k E C M L 0 N
ASIAN 13 3X 6X 3~ 4% 9% 4% 8% 3% 6% 3% 12% 2Y 5% 1% 7X
4X 0 N
MIXED RACE 6 2X 2% 2% 3% 7.% 2X 3X 3% 2X 2% OX 2% 2% 1% 3X
2X K J
OTHER 7 3k 2~ 1X 1~ 6X 3X OX 3R 3k 2X 2X OX 2X 1X 3X
2X G F M L
REFUSED 24 20k 6k 9X 3~ AX fi~ 11~ lOk 7k 9~ 6X 0% lOR' 10% 5k
8X ~ C M L
GLS RESEARCH (#99336)
uJ
uJ
>-
Z
uJ
""
<:C
<[
uJ
",,0 uJ
~~ ~--
~~~trlS
""'
o ""'
"'''"' >-
WI-- 'Z'-"
Gjg~~~
~~ ~cn
'iOZ LI-:E:
;:::>_00_
;:
~I.~ ..."'~
4.~~~~t5:::!
1'1,. ~z~:~
:>1-1000........
uJ
~
r: ~
E: I' ..:. rg c;:
~1::E:::z.........
::!: uJ
>-, >-
w II ~g
>-
E5
~
z
'"
o
-'
....~
.... >-
<:C
0'""
b
;>
>,
..,
'--' ~
u '--'
~"'~
e.z
O<:C::!:
:z:.-<>-
uJ
"'OJ
..,~'"
eLl....
"''''
"">-0'
+~
"'....,
'"'~
.,.
'"'-
o~
"'~
'"
"'!"-
"'::!:
""~
;>;
~8
!z~
uJe>
"'~
~G
0-
u.J
VI
o
...~
...<:C
o~
'"
<::>
;>-
~5
~~
Cb~
:::;:
......,
Lt>'"
.-< <>
....
........
..... <>
<>
....
0> ...,
'"' <>
:::;:
........,
.,.'"
:::;:
0""
'"' <>
:::;:
"'...,
'" <>
<>
.....
"'".
~~
0'"
-=:t~
""...
'" C>
"':::;:
"'...,
~~
......
~~
0'"
"" C>
.-<:::;:
""".
~~
-'
g
>-
~:z
.....
...0
'"
'"
...,'"
""
..,
...
'"
...
...,:z:
.,.
'"
...~
<:1;iE
,. ...,
'"
...
...,..,
N
...
""...,
~
~""'
~U-
...
~
~
...
...
~
""
~
w
t::;
?i
""
.-<
...
...
... -'
M
...:z:
C>
,.
.....
...
C>
...
M
...
'"
~
,. ""'
:::l
;;"-
...
.....
...
'"
...
.....
..
M
~
'"
uJ
:z:
<f
:i
<->
if
::r.:
'"
:5
<:C
.. z
'"
.. 0
N
...'"
~
...
'"
...:Z:
M
...~
"''''
.......,
~
..
Lt>
,.....,
~
,.w
~
~LL
..
cO
..
'"
..
ex>
1;)
~
~
S::
z
1'1'
::l
::!:
~:z
~'"
...""
'"'
...
M
...:z:
....
...
N
...
M
..
'"'
...
.,.
"'uJ
M
M
~LL
...
'"
...
...
...
...
~
:s
VI
'"
~
,.
'"
..., -'
...""
...,:z:
C>
...,'"
C>
...,'"
C>
~~ ~:J:
<> 0
.. ..., ,...,
N .,.~
""....,
"'~
a
..
o
,.
N
...
.....
...
'"
..
M
~
o
w
~
:z:
...
M
..
'"
,.
.....
..
.....
,. ""
M
... -'
Lt>
...
M
...:Z:
M
.....
...'"
o
..
:::;:
...::!:
o
...,
N
~
...
'"
,.
M
""
'"
...
<>
a
...
'"
a
,.
N
,.
'"'
..
M
~
...
'"
..
ex>
..
M
...
'"'
'"
uJ
F
'"
e>
w
'"
::>
L...
w
'"
~
M
~
~
""
w
'"
""
-'
'"
Santa Momca Ctty
Table 19-1
4 16 AGE
TOTAL
1480 1974 (18-24)
1973 1969 (25-29)
1968 1964 (30 34)
1963 1959 (35 39)
]958 195A (40-44)
1453 1949 (45 49)
1948 1944 (50 54)
1943-1939 (55 59)
1938 1934 (60 64)
1933-1929 (65 59)
1928-1924 (7~ 74)
BEFOf2E 1923 (75+)
REFl15E~
Q 2 Q 8 FLECTION Q 9 ABSEHTEE Q 10 ELECTION
PREFERE~FCE INTENT - ----- ---
GENDER PARTY Q 1 AWAREN[SS ---- _------- VOTE ~ID
-_____ _--~,a..~,a~:~.. _: s...~,,,~s,~..ro.. WEEK BIG AB- FN NOT
MItLE FEMALE DEMO REPUB N/P YES NO TUES END @VERY ONLY SENTEE PERSON VOiED VOTE
TOTAL (A) (B) (C) (U) (E) (F7 (G) (H) (I) (,]) (K) (L) (M) (N) (D)
~ - -- - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - -
3U0 146 154 169 67 47 262 38 130 117 246 51 45 242 145 153
1DQX 100X 100% 100X 100% 100% 100X 100% 100Z 100X i00X 100% 100X 100X 100X kU0%
2S 7X 8% 7X 5% 9% 6X 18% 8X 9% 6X i8Z 11X /k 1X 14%
8X K J 0 N
21 8R 6X 5X 9X 9k 5X 21k 7X 9X 5X 16X 4X 7k 3X lOX
7X G F K J 0 N
34 12X lOX 9X lOX 17& 11X 16k 12X 15X 8R' 1.7X 9k 12X 6X 1GX
11X K .7 0 N
42 14X 14k 17k 12X 6X 14X 13X 15% 14% 16X 6k 18& 14k 12X 16k
14X E C K J
28 8X lOX 9X 9% 11% lOX 5% 7% lUX lOX 6X 7X lOX lOX 9X
9X
28 17.X 7X 10X 7X 13X }.OX 8X 11~ 7X 9X 8~ 9X lOX lOk 9k
9%
24 lOX 6X llX 3~ 9X 9~ 3k 8R 8X 9k 4~ 9X $X 12X 5X
SX D C 0 N
19 5X &~ 5$ 9~ 9$ 7~ 3k 7% 7$ 7X 4k 2X 7X 6$ 7x
6X
17 4X 7X 7X 4X 4x 6X Sk 6X 4X 6% 4Z 4X 6X 8X 3x
6X
12 5~ 3k 2X 12X Ok 4X 3X 5% 5X 4X 2X 2k 4k 6k 2X
4X DE CE CD
9 3% 3% 3X 6~ Ok 3X Ok 2R 2~ 3X ?Y 9k 2~ 6X 1X
3k E E C~ G F 0 N
26 8R lOX lOk 5X 4X IOX 0~ 5% 9R llk OX 13~ BX 16X 2X
9X G F K ,7 0 N
17 5k 6k 4X 6k 11X 6k Sk 6X 3X 6Z 4X 2R 6k 6X 6~
6X
GLS RESEARCH (#99336)
Santa Momca City
Table 19-2
Q 16 AGE
FLAGS ABSENTEE
q 11 ETHNICITY VOTEO 40TED VOTED EVER NEVER
VOTE SY MAIL OWN/RENi ------ ----- AGE IN IN IN VOTED VOTED
_.._..- -- - - MI- -s= 8 OR 9 5-7 0- 4 AB- AB-
FAVOR OPPOSE OWN RENT WHITE NORITY 18 34 35-49 50 b4 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SENTEE SENTEE
(A) (B)
• • •• ••••-• (C)
... (~)
..- - (E)
- - ~ (F)
- - (G)
-- - (H) (I
- -- )
- G]) (K)
-- - -
- (L) (M
- --- - )
- -- (N)
-- - - (0)
- - --
TOTAL 143 130 124 169 223 40 78 98 fi0 47 69 77 154 84 216
ioax ioax ioox loox Zoox ioax ioox ioox ioox ioox i aoz iaox Zoox Zooz ioox
1980-1974 (18 24) 8X 9X 4% 9% 7% 18X 29X OX 02 0% OX lk 14k 5R 9R
HIJ G G G M M KL
1973-1969 (25-24) 9X 6k 1X 11X 6% 5k 27X OX OX OX 0% 1X 13X 5R 8X
D C NIJ G G G M M KL
1968•1964 (30 34) 14k 9k 7R' 15X 13k SX 44X OX O.t Ok 0~ 12Y l6X llX 12X
~ C HI,1 G G 6 LM K K
1963-1959 (35-39) 16k 12X lOk 17X 14X 15X 0% 43X OX OZ 9X lOX ]8X 12k i5X
H GI,7 H H M K
1958-1954 (40-44) Sk 12X 10X 4R 9R' 8Y OX 29X OX OX 6X 14R 8X 7k lOX
H GI.] H H
1953-1949 (45-44) 8& lOk 15k 6X 9% lOX OX 29X flX 0% 9k 16k 6~ 7X 10X
D C H GIJ H H M L
1948-1944 (50-54) 9X BS 13X 5X 9% 5X OX Ok 40X OX lOk 12X 5X 6% 8X
~ C I I GH,] I
1943•1939 (55-59) 6k 6X 7X 6% 6~ 13% OX OX 32X OX 9% 5% 6% 7X 6X
I I GH.7 I
1938-1934 (60-64) 6k SX 10~" 3A' 5R lOX OX OX 28~ OX 9k 8X 3X lOk 4X
D C I I GN.1 I
1933 1929 (65-69) 4~ 3k 6k 3X 5k 3X OR Ok OX 26k 12k 1X 2k 7% 3X
J J .] GHI EM K K
1928-1924 (70-74) 1X 5X 3X 3X 4X OX OX OX Ok 19k 6X 4x 1X 6X 2k
F E J J .7 C~1I
BEFORE 1923 (75+) 7X 9X 7k 9X 11~ 3R' OX Ok OY 55X 23R' 10X 1X 11X 8k
F E J J J GHI LM KM KL
REFl1SED 3Y 6R' 6% 4X 3Y 5X 0$ Ok Ok 0~ 9X 5$ 5~ SX 5X
GLS RESFARCH (#99336)
Santa Momca City
Table 20-1
FLAGS
Q 2 Q 8 ELECTION Q 9 ABSENTEE Q 10 ELECTION
PREFERF.NCE INTENT = -- - ---- --
G[NOER PpRTY Q 1 AWARENESS --- ---- VOTE DIO
__~••_ _~ - -- WEEK BIG AB IN NOT
MAL~ FEMALE DEMO REPUB N/P YES NO TUES END EVERY ONLY SENTEE PERSON VOTE~ VOTE
TOTAL
- (A)
- (B)
- -- (C)
- - (Uy
- (E)
- -- (F)
- - (G)
- - (H) (I) (J)
-- - - - -~ - (K) (L)
- ~ ~ - (M) (N)
-~ ~ - -- (0)
-
TOTAI 300 146 154 169 67 47 262 38 130 117 246 51 45 242 145 153
100X 100X I00X 100X 100X 100X 100X 100% 100X 100~ 100X 100X 100X 100% 100X 100%
J/90 0 OX UX Ok 0~ 0~ Ok O% Ok Ok Ok Ok Ok Uk 0% UX
OX
N/90 1 1X OX OX 1X aX OX OX 1X OX OX OR OX OX 1X OX
OX
J/92 110 38X 35k 43X 37X 13X 39X 18X 38X 31X 41X 18X 31X 38X 53X 22X
37% E E CO G F K .7 0 N
N/92 176 fi0X 58% 62X 69X 36Y 63% 32X 64k 48k 64X 33k 56X 61X IOX 48X
59R E E CD G F I H K J 0 N
N/93 91 31X 30X 32X 42X 13k 34X 5X 32X 26k 35X 8X 27X 33X 47X 15X
30X E E C~ G F K .] 0 N
J/94 93 34X 28X 34X 37X 4% 35X 3X 33X 27& 36% 8X 33X 32X 47~ 16X
31k E E C~ G F K J 0 N
N/94 163 60~ 49~ 59X 66% 23% 59X 24X 62X 47k 61X 22% 56k 56X 70X 39k
54X B A E E CD G F I H K J 0 N
M/96 130 52X 35X 44X 51X 30X 47X 16k 51k 36k 50X 12X 42X 44X 62X 26k
43X B A E ~ G F I H K J 0 N
N/96 196 6fiX 64X 66X 75% 51% 69X 37% 74% 56% 73X 31% 62X 67% 78X 5hx
65k E D G F I H K ,] 0 N
J/98 157 55% 50X 56k' 61k 30X 56k' 13X 55X 44X 61X 14X 49k 53X 72X 34k
52R' E E CD G F K ,7 0 N
N/98 232 79R 76X 82X 78$ 62Y 81X 53X 85X 66k 87k 37X 73~ 79~ 92R 63~
77R E C G F I H K J 0 N
GLS RESEARCH (#94336)
Santa Momca City
Table 20•2
FLAGS
FLAGS ABSENTEE
Q 11 F1'HNICITY VOTEDc VOT[D VOTE~ EVER NEVER
VOIF 8Y MAIL 04JN/RENT - --__- AGE IN IN IN VOlEU VOTED
•-.- 3 ~,- MI~ -- - 8 OR 9 5-7 0-4 AB AB-
FAVOR OPPOSE OWN RENT WFIITE NORITY 18•34 35-49 50 64 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SENTEE SENTEE
(A) (e)
- • -- (C)
. (D)
.. (E)
. (F)
.. . • (G)
•••• • (H) (I)
•••• • •• • (J)
• • (K)
• •••• (L)
••••• (M)
..... (N)
.• • (01
• ••...
TOTAL 143 130 124 169 223 4D IS 98 60 47 fi9 77 154 84 216
100k 100k 100k 100k 100X 100k lOQR' 1DOX 100X 100k 100X 100X 100X 100X 100k
J/90 0~ Ok Uk OX 6X OY 6X OX OX OX OX OX OX OX OX
N/90 Ok ~X lX Ok OX OX 6X DX OX 2X 1X OX OX OM Ok
J/92 34k 38X 45X 31M 41% 15% 4% 36% 52X 64% 96% 51X 3X 50X 3I~
D C F E HIJ GIJ GH GH LM KM KL 0 N
N/92 63~ 52X 72X 49k 61X 48X 26Y 56k 77t 87X 100X 90~ 25.Y 7/X 51X
D C HIJ GIJ f~i GH LM KM KL 0 N
N/93 30% 28X 43k 21k 34% 10k 6k 26k 30k 77~ b7k 36R 2k 45R 25k
D C F E HIJ GJ GJ GFII LM KM KL 0 N
,]/9q 37X 29% 40X 25X 34X 20X 8~ 24Y 40k 68k 93X 32k 3k SOR 24k
D C HIJ GI.7 GHJ C~1I LM KM KL 0 N
N/94 57X 52X 65k 48X 58X 33X 27~ 55k 70k /9X 96~ 91X 18X 77k 45k
D C F E HIJ GJ G GH M M KL 0 N
M/96 39X 45k 59X 33k 47X 3~X 12X 44% 55X 83~ 97% 57% 12k 55X 39k
D C F E HIJ GJ GJ GFII LM KM KL 0 N
N/96 bl~ 67% 73k 61% 65k 60X 38X 66X 78k 87~ 97R 9DR 39k 82k 59X
D C HIJ GJ G GH M M KL 0 N
J/98 49X 54k 60k 47X SSx 43X 26X 50X 60X 89X 94X b6X 27X 68X 46X
D C HIJ G.] G.] C~iI LM KM KL 0 N
N/98 71k Blk 82X 73X 78~ 7(IX 56R 77~ 87X 94~ ].OOX 87X 62X 89k 73X
HIJ CxJ G GH LM KM KL 0 N
GLS RESEARCH (#99336)
Santa Momca City
Table 21-1
ABSENTEE
Q 2 Q B ELEC7ION Q 9 A65ENfEE Q 10 ELECTION
PREFERENCE INiENT ------- --- ------ ---
CEN~ER PAR1Y Q 1 AWIUiENESS ^^~----@----~ -~s- - VDTE ~I~
--- - WEEK• BiG AB IN NOT
MALE FEhtALE DEMO REPl1B N/P YES NO TllES END EVEI2Y ONLY SEN'fEE PERSON VDTE~ VOTE
TOTAL
-- -- (A)
- (B)
-~- (C)
--- - (D)
--- (E)
-- - (F)
-- - (G)
- - - (~)
- -~ (I)
- ~-- W)
----- (K)
---- - (L)
- -- - (M)
- - - (N)
- - -- (0)
----~-
TOTAL 300 146 154 169 67 47 262 38 13fl 117 246 51 45 242 145 153
100X 100~ 100~ IOGY ]00X 100~ 100X 100X 300~ 100X 100X 100X J008 100~ 100~ 100X
1 I1ME 46 15X 16~ 15X 19x 15~ lbk llk 18R 11R' l5$ 16k 27X 14% 20X lOX
15X 0 N
2 TIMES 17 3X 8% 8X 4X 28 6k SX 8k 3% 7X 2X 13% 3X SX 4X
6k
3 TIMES 7 1X 4X 2~ 3X 4X 2X 3X 1X 4X 2X 2R 7R 2X 3X 2X
2k
4 TIMES 2 1X 1X lk Ok 2X lk OX lk OX 1X Ox 2X OX 1X Ok
lk
5 OR MORE TIMES 12 4X 4~ 5Y 6X 0~ Sk UX 3% 3X 5k OX 24X Ok 6k 2~
4X E E C~ G F K J M L
NEVER VOTED ABSENTEE 216 76% 66X 70X 67X 77X 71X 82X 70R 79X 70X BOX 27k' 81k 62~ 82X
12X M L 0 N
GLS RESEARCH (~9933fi)
Santa Momca City
Table 21 2
ABSENTEE
FLAGS pBSENTEE
Q 11 E1'HNI CITY VOiED V01'E~ VOTE~ EVER NEVEft
VOTt BY MAIL OWN/RENT -- AfE 1N IN IN VOTED VOTED
- MI- --- ----- - 8 OR 9 5-7 0 4 AB- AB-
FAVOR OPPOSE OWN RENT WHITE NORITY 18 34 35 49 50•64 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SENTEE SENTEE
(A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (,]) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0)
TOTAL 143 130 124 169 223 40 78 98 60 47 69 77 154 84 216
100k 100X lOUX 100X 100X 100X 160X 10~$ 100~ 100X 10aX 100ffi 100X 100X 100X
1 TIME 17X 14X I&g 14X 16X 13X 13X 16k 18X 13k 20R 21X 1~% 55k OX
M l. 0 N
2 TIMES 4.8 7X 6X 5X 7X OX 6~ 4~ 5~ 11X 7k 5X 5X 20X ~X
F E 0 N
3 TIMES 1% 2% 2k 2X 2X 3X 1X Ok Sk 4k 4X lk 2k 8k Ok
0 N
4 TIMES 1% 0% 2X OX 1X OX OX 1X 2~ OX lk 1X OX 2X OX
5 OR MORE TIMES 7% 2X 6X ?.X Sk OY lk 1$ 5~ 15X 9k 8X OX 14k 0$
$ A F E J J GH M M KL 0 N
NEVER VOTED ABSENTEE 70X 75% 65% /6k 69X S5X 78X 78X 65X 57X 58X 64X 82X OX 100X
D C F E J J GH M M KL 0 N
GLS RESEARCH (~99336)
Santa Momca City
Table 22-1
GEN~ER
q2
PR[FERENC[
GENDER PAR7Y 4 1 AWAFiENESS -----
.,:-~ _ ---------------.__ ---------- WEEK-
MALE FEMALE DEMO REPUB N/P YES NO TUES EN~
TOTAL (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I)
- -- ~ -- . .. . . - - - -- -
Q 8 ELECTION Q 9 ABSENTEE Q lU ELECTIO~
I NTENT ----- - -- - --- --
- - VOTE ~I~
BIG AB 1N N6T
EVERY ONLY SENTEE PERSON VD7ED VQTE
fJ) (K) (L3 (M) (N) (6)
TOTAL 399 146 154 169 67 47 262 38 130 117 246 51 45 242 145 153
loOX lU0% 100% 100k 100X 100X 100k 100X 100% 100~ 100X 100X 100X 100X 100X 100X
MALE 146 100X O% 47% 52X 43ffi 49X 45k 50X 49X 48% 53k 40k SOK 52X 4Sk
49R B A
FEMdLE 154 OX 100X 53X 46X 57X 51X 55X 50X 51X 52X 47X 60k 50S 48X 55X
Slk B A
Table 22 2
GENDER
FLAGS ABSENTEE
Q 11 ETHNICITY VOiED VOTEO 40TFD EVER NEVER
VOiE 8Y MAIL OWNlRENT AGF IN IN IN VOTED VOTEO
---- MI• -- S OR 9 5•7 ~ 4 A6• AB-
FAVOR OPPOSE OWN RElff WFIITE NORITY 18-34 35 49 50 54 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SENTEE SENTEE
(A) (B) (C) (~) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K} (L) (M) (N) (0)
-- -- - -- ~-- - -- -- ~ -- - -~ ~ --- - --- -- --- - -- --- -- ----~ - - -- -
TOTAL 143 130 124 169 223 40 78 98 60 47 69 77 154 84 2i6
109X lOUX 100X 100X ].OOX 1DOR 100% 100X 100X 109X 1,OOX 100X 100X 700~ 100%
MALE 45X 52k 48~ 50k 49X 35X 50& 50k 45X 49X 54k 51k 45k 42X 5iX
FEMALE SSZ 48k 52k 50~ 51X fi5k 50k 50X 55X 51~ 46k 49k 55X 58~ 49k
GLS RESEAftCH (#99336)
Santa Monica City
Table 23-1
POLITICAL PARTY
Q 2 q 8 ELECTI6N Q 9 ABSENTEE Q 10 ELECTION
PREFERENCE INTE NT ~-~~~~ ----~ _---- -~_
f,ENOCR PpRTY Q 1 AWhItENESS ---°- -° -
~
^ VOTE DID
----- ---- --~ ---•-- -- - WEEK BIG AB- 1N NO7'
MALE FEMALE OEMO REPUB N/P YES NO TUES EN~ EVERY ONLY SENFEE PERSON VOTE~ VOTE
TOTAL
-- (A)
- - (B)
-- (C)
-- (D)
-- -- {E)
-- --- (F)
- --- (G)
------ (H)
- -- - (I)
------ (J)
----- (K)
- -- - (L)
------ (M)
-- -- {N)
---•• (0)
-•• --
TO7AL 300 146 154 169 67 47 262 38 130 117 246 51 45 242 145 153
100% 100k 200$ 100X 100X 100k 100X 100X 100X 100k 100k 100% 100k 100X lODk 100k
DEMOCRAT 169 54X 58% 100X OX Ok 56X 58~ 58k 52k 59k 45X 53X 57X 63% 49X
56X DE C C 0 N
REPUBLICAN 67 24X 21X 0% 100X OR' 24X 13% 24X 23X 23X 18.Y 20X 24X ?.3Y 22X
22k o CE ~
NON-PARTISAN 47 14X l8X OX OX 100X 15R 21~ 13R 17X 13R 27X 24X 13X lOX 21X
16k E E C~ K J 0 N
OlHfR 17 SX 3X OY OX OX 5% 8X 5~ 8k 5X lOX 2X 6X 3X BX
6k
Table 23-2
POLITICAL PARTY
FLAGS ABSENTEF
Q 11 ETHNICITY IIOTED IIO7ED VOTE~ EVER NEVER
VOTE 8Y MAIL OWN/RElJT --- -- AGE IN IN FN VOTE~ VOTE~
- - ~ MI- 8 OR 9 5 7 0-4 AB AB-
FAVOR OPPOSE OWN RENT WHITE NORITY 18•34 35-49 50-64 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SENTEE SENTEE
(A) (B}
---- --- •• (C)
• •• • (D)
••-• • (E)
- --.. (F)
. .. • (G?
- • - (H) (I)
-•--•• •• -- (J)
• • (K)
•-• •. (L)
... - (M)
- •-- (N)
-- - (0)
-----
TOTA1. 143 130 124 169 223 40 78 98 60 47 69 77 154 84 276
100k 100R 100X 100X 100X 100~ 100X 100X 10~X 100ffi 100X 100X 100X 10U~ 100k
DEMOCRAT 53R 62X 55X 57k 55X 63X 47X 61X fi5S 55X 62X 64X 50% 61X 55X
I G M L
REPUBLFCAN 22% 22X 27k 19k 24k 20X 22k 19$ 18% 34X 26X 22X 21& 26X 21X
NON-PARTISAN 17k 12k 14X 18k 16k 13X 21k 14$ 17X 4X 4X 9X 24X 13X 17X
.] ,] ,] GHI M M KL
OlHER SX 4X SX 7% 4% 5% lOX 5X 6k 6X 7X SX 5k oX ax
I I GH 0 N
GLS RESEARCH (#99336)
Santa Momca City
Table 24 1
Q 2 Q 8 ELECTION Q 9 ABSENTEE Q 10 ELECTION
PREFERENCE INTENT -
GENDFR PARTY Q 1 AWARENESS =_- - ---- - ---- VOTE DID
~= -v~-rt_. - -- -- WEEK BIG A6- IN NOT
MhLE FEMAEE ~EMO REPl18 N/P Y[S NO TUES ENU EVERY ONLY SENTEE PERSUN VOIEU VO~F
TOTAI.
. .. . (A)
. . tB)
. . . (C)
...... QD)
.. . (E)
. ... (F)
•••• • (G?
•-• -~ (H)
-- -- (I)
--~ (J)
---- - (K)
---- - (U
------ (M)
-- - (N)
--- - (0)
----
1'OfAL 300 146 154 169 67 47 262 38 130 117 Z46 51 45 242 145 153
iooz ioox ioox iooz ioox toox iooz iaox ioox ioox ioox ioox iaox iaoz iooz iaox
VOTE~ IN 8 OR 9 OF 9 69 25X 21% 25R 27X 6% 26X OX 25k 19$ 28X OX 18X 25X 4DX 7X
23X E E CD G F K J 0 N
VOTED IN 5-7 OF 9 77 27X 25X 29X 25% 15X 27X 16% 28k 21k 28k 16X 31Z 25X 28X 24k
26X E C K ,]
VDTED IN 0-4 OF 9 154 48X 55X M16X 48X 79X 47k 84X 46X 61X 44X 84X 51X 50% 32X 69R
51X E E CD G F I H K J 0 N
Table 24- 2
FU1G5 ABSENTEE
Q 11 ETHNICITY VOTED VDTED VO~ED EVER NEVER
VOiE 6Y MAIL OWN/RENT - AGE IN IN IN V~TE~ VOTE~
- - --- MI- ~~P- ~ 8 OR 9 5-7 6-4 h6- AB
FAVOR OPPOSE OWN RENi WHITE NORITY 18-34 35-49 50-64 65+ OF 9 OF 9 OF 9 SENTEE SENTEE
(A)
- -- - (B)
--- (C)
-. (~)
•• (E)
•• •• (F)
•• -- (G)
-- - - (H)
--- - (I)
------ W)
--- - (K)
- --- (I.)
-- - (M)
-- - (N)
--•- (0)
• -•
TOTAI. 143 130 124 169 223 40 78 98 b0 47 69 77 154 84 2i6
100X 100% lOUX 100X IOOX 100X 100X 100X 100% 100X 100X 100R' 100X 100~ 100X
VOTED IN 8 OR 9 QF 9 21X 22X 31R" 18~ 26X 10~ OR 16% 32X 60k 100R OR OR 35X 19X
D C F E HIJ GIJ GHJ GHI LM K K 0 N
VOTED IN 5•7 OF 9 29X 23X 34Y 21X 26X 18X 14~ 32k 32X 26X Ok 1DOX OX 33X 23X
~ C HI G G L KM l.
40TE~ IN 0-4 OF 9 50X 55X 35X 6PR 48~ 73X 8bX 52k 37X 15k 0~ 0$ 100X 32X 59X
D C F E HIJ GJ f,.] GFII M M KL 0 N
GLS RESEARCH 1#99336)