Loading...
SR-301-005 ~, , - J 317/ ~ 005 II-C JAN 1 2 1988 --- C/ED: CNS: BS Council Meeting 1/12/88 Santa Monica, California TO: Mayor and city council FROM: city staff SUBJECT: Recommendation to Approve Agreement with the Santa Monica Neighborhood Support Center and to Approve Final Organizational criteria for Member Neighborhood Associations INTRODUCTION' This report transmits a proposed Agreement between the City and the Santa Monica Neighborhood Support Center for funding for the remainder of the 1987-88 fiscal year and presents final organization criteria used to determine eligibility of neighborhood associations seeking support from the Neighborhood support Center. The report reco2lU't\end5 approval of both documents. BACKGROUND On June 16, 1987, the City Council approved in concept the establishment of a new non-profit organization to provide staff support and other services to qualifying neighborhood associations in Santa Monica. Further, the council approved the appropriation of $90,356 from t.he City t S General Fund for the Suppor~ Center for the 1987-88 fiscal year to be awarded to the organization when it had incorporated and was legally eligible to receive city support. j\ --l, AN 1 2 1988 ...... .. - ~ - .~ Council approval was based on a report by City staff and the City Managerts Working Group on citizen Involvement which recommended a centralized model of support to neighborhood associations providing a range of services to qualifying groups including such functions as: citizen participation, neighborhood planning, crime prevention activities, direct services to neighborhood residents (information and referral, liaison activities and special proj ects) , leadership development, neighborhood communication, and volunteer coordination. As indicated in the June 16, 1987 report, the creation of a new non-profit Neighborhood support Center would address a number of issues including (1) the need for a "funding mechanism" that stressed both accountability to the City ahd the neighborhoods it supports, (2) the need for skilled staff that would be sensitive to both community-wide needs for citizen participation and also to neighborhood-specific issues, (3) the need for a support organization that was perceived by the community as an entity that could effectively and fairly administer funds and assess the ability of member associations to meet the approved organizational criteria, (4) the need to preserve the autonomy of neighborhood associations through the preservation of their own Board and leadership structures while providing aciministra ti ve support through the new organization, and (5) the need for a cost-effective structure that avoided duplication of administrative staffing and overhead costs. Pursuant to Council approval of this model and the appropriation of funding for the fiscal year, an Interim Board of Directors - 2 - began meeting to take all necessary steps for' incorporation, staffing, and organizational planning. since June of 1987, the Board has met on a continual basis and has completed the following: (1) developed and filed Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws for the Support Center; (2) filed all necessary documents for incorporation as a tax-exempt non-profit organization; (3) recruited and hired a full-time Administrative Director (contingent upon Council approval of the attached Agreement); (4) identified donated office space at the Madison School site and initiated lease negotiations with the Santa Monica/Malibu Unified School District; (5) developed refined organizational criteria for neighborhood associations, and (6) solicited input and comment, as appropriate, from interested neighborhood associations in the community. DISCUSSION proposed Agreement: The attached Agreement with the Neighborhood Support Center contains standard City Grantee contract language as well as specific provisions regarding the services to be provided by the Center. Section A (Program Services to be Performed by Contractor) and Exhibit A (Scope of Services) outline those services to be provided during the remainder of the 1987-88 fiscal year. Tasks include (1) administrative functions needed to establish the Support Center office, (2) program functions including establishing a two-year plan for the center, a method of evaluation, an implementation strategy for provision of support to neighborhood associations, development of procedures for dissemination of City information to - 3 - to neighborhoods, and a method for reporting activities of the Center and member neighborhood associations to the community. Exhibit C (Program Timeline) provides a timeline for each of these activities for the remainder of the fiscal year. The Program Budget (Exhibit B) provides for $86,759 in City funding for the remainder of the year under the proposed Agreement, as well as $3,597 under a professional services agreement with the city to provide for initial staffing and expenses during January prior to execution of the contract. The total amount of $90,356 is consistent with the initial budget approved by the Council in June of 1987. The budget provides for four full-time staff (Administrative Director, Office Manager, and 2 Community Outreach Staff), for operating expenses and start-up costs. Proposed Organizational criteria for Member Neighborhood Associations: Included as Attachment II-A are the refined "organizational criteria" to be used by the Neighborhood Support Center to assess whether a neighborhood association is eligible . to receive staff support and other services from the Support Center. While Council approved these criteria in concept in June of 1987 I there were several areas that still needed further refinement. The attached 'criteria are those proposed by the Support Center Board for final Council approval. Ho~ever, it is important to note that in several cases, e.g., the number of required memberships and the size of the required geographical area, are difficult measures to determine. Research into the criteria used by cities nationwide indicates extreme difficulty - 4 - in determinins such quantitative measures. The proposed measures will be evaluated by the Support Center Board during the course of the next year to determine if they are appropriate. Any changes would be proposed to Council for approval at a later date. The initial criteria, approved by Council in June of 1987, are also included in this rpoert (see Attachment II-B) for Council's information. Next steps: Upon Council approval- of the Agreement and criteria, the support Center Administrative Director and Board will begin implementation of the activities agreec: upon in the contract. Hiring of remaining full-time and part-time staff, and the immediate provision of services to neighborhood associations are seen as a top priority. In addition, as directed by Council in June of 1987, city staff will continue their assessment regarding the feasibility of including the pico Neighborhood Association (PNA) as an organization that would receive staffing and services from the Support Center. While the Council approved a fUll-year of direct funding for PNA in FY 1987-88, it further requested that, at such time as services are available through the Support Center, an evaluation be done by staff to determine whether or not PNA should be integrated into the new model. Given the timeline for service provision to neighborhoods, staff will provide the requested recommendation in the context of the FY 1988-89 Community Development Plan and City Budget to be transmitted to Council in May of 1988. - 5 - . . BUDGETARY/FINANCIAL IMPACT $90,356 from the City's General Fund was appropriated in the 1987-88 City Budget for the Neighborhood support Center. $3,597 has been encumbered through a Professional Services Agreemenc. with the Center's Administrative Director to provide for staff support and initial expenses through January of 1988; the remainder ($86,759) is included in the attached Agreement. No additional appropriations or budgetary actions are needed. Any appropriations recommended for FY 1988-89 will be included in the City Manager's Proposed Budget. RECOl1MENDATIONS city staff recommends that the City Council: (l) approve the attached Agreement between the city and the Santa Monica Neighborhood Support center; and (2) approve the attached final organizational criteria for member neighborhood associations. Prepared by: Barbara Stinchfield, Community Development Manager Department of community and Economic Development , Attachments: .I - Agreement with Neighborhood Support Center Exhibit A - Scope of Services Exhibit B - Program Budget Exhibit C - Grantee Project Timeline Exhibits D,E - Reporting Formats II-proposed Organizational Criteria for Member Neighborhood Associations nscsr - 6 - --1