Loading...
SR-301-004 (19) F:\HumanServices\Share\CD PROGRAM-PROGRAM AREAS\Homeless Programs\Staff Reports\Homeless Annual Review 2004.doc Council Meeting: January 11, 2005 Santa Monica, California TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Staff SUBJECT: Annual Review of the City’s Coordinated Plan for Homeless Services, and Recommendation to Accept the Report and Hold a Public Hearing Introduction This report reviews the City’s Coordinated Plan for Homeless Services in FY 2003-04 and recommends the City Council hold a public hearing on the Plan pursuant to Municipal Code Section 2.69.030. This report also provides a recommended Homelessness Action Plan for Fiscal Years 2004-2006 for Council review. Final direction on the Action Plan will be agendized for the January 25, 2005 City Council meeting. Background In 1991, City Council appointed community members to serve on a Task Force on Homelessness to study the issues and make recommendations to the City Council on strategies to address homelessness in Santa Monica. This effort resulted in a report, A Call to Action, that discussed 16 priorities related to homelessness and made a series of recommendations dealing with public health and safety, shelter and housing, funding possibilities and the need for regional advocacy. These strategies became a blueprint for the development of homeless services in the City for the last decade and continue to guide the City’s efforts. 1 In 1994, the City Council adopted the Public Safety Initiative (now Municipal Code Sections 2.69.010 through 2.69.030) calling for the City to adopt a Coordinated Plan for Homeless Services. This Plan is incorporated into the City’s FY 2003-06 Community Development Plan and in the Consolidated Plan for FY 2000-05 required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. It is designed to: Effectively assist the homeless in returning to a self-sufficient status; ? Monitor the progress of individual recipients; ? Eliminate unnecessary duplication of services; ? Emphasize long-term solutions to homelessness by combining housing, ? counseling and job training; Provide non-housing services for approximately the same number of ? homeless individuals as can be temporarily sheltered in the City; Prevent an increase, and wherever feasible, reduce, overall City ? expenditures relating to homeless services; and Impose reasonable time limits on the provision of services to the same ? individuals. The Plan included closure of public parks from 11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m., prohibiting abusive solicitation, and fast tracking the development of a 100-bed emergency shelter. With the opening of SAMOSHEL, at 505 Olympic Boulevard, and Council’s adoption of ordinances to close the public parks and prohibit aggressive panhandling, major elements of the plan were realized. The Public Safety Initiative also requires the City Council to conduct an annual review of the Coordinated Plan for Homeless Services and hold a public hearing to assess: the impact of the City’s homeless population on other residents of the City; ? the effectiveness of the delivery of services to the homeless by the City and ? various social service agencies; the cost of those services; and ? the changes which should be made in the Plan in order to carry out its primary ? goals and objectives. 2 Notice of a public hearing for January 11, 2005 was placed in the Santa Monica Daily Press, Santa Monica Mirror, Surfsantamonica.com, and posted on the City’s website. Discussion The City of Santa Monica funds a comprehensive range of homeless services that are geared toward helping homeless people transition from the streets to permanent housing and employment. This continuum of care model begins with outreach and emergency services, includes intake and assessment (which encompasses case management and supportive services), and leads to emergency shelter, transitional housing and permanent housing. The continuum concludes with aftercare services that build in the supports needed so that individuals can sustain the significant progress they have made. It has been recognized by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development as a model program. CONTINUUM OF CARE MODEL ?????? Outreach Emergency/ Intake & Emergency Transitional Permanent Aftercare Day Services Assessment Shelter Housing Housing Services ? Food |______________________________________________| |________| ? Clothing | | ??? Showers Coordinated Case Management Job Retention ??? Lockers Intake and Assessment Support Groups ??? Mailing Address Benefits Advocacy (e.g., GR, SSI) Counseling ??? Crisis Intervention Mental Health Services Mentoring ?? Information and Health Services ? Referrals Drug & Alcohol Intervention ? Money Management ? Job/Skills Training ? Employment Search Assistance ? Employment Placement ? Housing Search Assistance In FY 2003-04 the City supported nine agencies including Chrysalis, the CLARE Foundation, New Directions, Ocean Park Community Center, St. Joseph Center, Step Up on Second, The Salvation Army, Upward Bound House, and the Westside Food 3 Bank. As a condition of City funding, these agencies develop Grantee Program Plans that specify how delivered services will address the continuum and effectively assist homeless individuals to obtain greater self-sufficiency. The agencies are required to monitor the effectiveness of their services through progress reports from a computerized case management system and evaluation of client outcomes. City staff monitors the delivery of services and client progress toward self-sufficiency through site visits and regular review of reports. Effectiveness of the Service Delivery System Using a shared computerized data bank to track unduplicated participants and their outcomes, the agencies coordinate case management services and report service outcomes and levels to the City. In FY 2003-04, a total of 2,188 homeless persons in Santa Monica were provided with case management, temporary housing, addiction recovery and mental health services, and employment assistance. Of those who entered the system, slightly over half (54%) of homeless residents were men and 46% were women. While the supply of temporary, transitional and permanent affordable housing on the Westside is extremely limited, 626 (29%) homeless persons received temporary or transitional housing and 339 (15%) people transitioned into permanent housing during the course of the year. Through the support of the homeless services network, 589 (27%) people who were unemployed when entering the system found and maintained jobs leading to self- sufficiency. While the Plan is designed to “provide non-housing services for 4 approximately the same number of homeless people as can be temporarily sheltered in the City,” City-funded agencies continue to provide “non-housing” supportive services to more people than are sheltered within the City given the number of available year-round beds. Reasonable participation time limits for individuals, ranging from eight months to slightly over a year, are being observed by SAMOSHEL, Turning Point, Daybreak Shelter and Upward Bound House. Homeless Services Outcomes FY 2001-02 through FY 2003-04 FY 2003-04 FY 2002-03 FY 2001-02 No. No. No. Served % Placed Served % Placed Served % Placed Total SM-funded Program Participants 2,188 N/A 2,773 N/A2,566 N/A Placements in permanent housing 339 15% 433* 16%244 10% Placements in transitional housing 405 19% 413* 15%337 13% Placements in emergency shelter 626 29% 474* 17%436 17% Placements in permanent employment 397 18% 437* 16%230 9% Placements in temporary employment 210 10% 245* 9%208 8% *Revised data Permanent housing placements in FY 2003-04 were down 22% from the previous year’s figures (FY 2002-03: 433, FY 2003-04: 339), coinciding with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s funding cut to Section 8 certificates in the spring of 2004. These certificates generally guarantee that the federal government will pay approximately 70% of the rent for program participants. The impact of Santa Monica Section 8 funding cuts to City-funded homeless service providers was compounded by 5 similar cuts to these agencies by the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles (HACLA). Emergency housing placements were up 32% (FY 2002-03: 474, FY 2003- 04: 626). Transitional housing figures were virtually the same as last year (FY 2002-03: 413, FY 2003-04: 405). The impact of this range of services on homeless people who choose to participate can be significant. In December 2004, the United States Conference of Mayors released its annual “Status Report on Hunger and Homelessness in American Cities.” This 27-city survey reported that in 2004, 70% of the cities registered an increase in requests for emergency shelter. Demand for shelter exceeds available shelter beds in 81% of the survey cites. Further, 88% of the responding cities expect requests for emergency food and shelter assistance to increase in 2005. Impacts of Homelessness In spite of the significant achievements made by homeless persons availing themselves of Santa Monica’s network of services, the impact of homelessness in Santa Monica remains a top community concern. Balancing the availability of services to those most in need with the regulation of public open space for all to use is a key policy and operational challenge for the City. As in communities across the region and throughout the country, homeless people congregate in parks and other public spaces with their personal belongings. Charitable groups continue to come to Santa Monica from outside the community to distribute food outdoors and outside the continuum of care framework. Some homeless individuals do not abide by the laws and regulations that govern 6 behavior in public spaces. The behavior of homeless people with significant mental health and substance abuse problems continues to cause fear as well as concern for those less fortunate in the general population. The 1991 policy framework adopted by Council to guide homeless services and the impact of homelessness in the community called for food distribution to be linked with social services and occur indoors – because this is the most effective and humane approach to helping people in need. In 2002, the City Council passed an ordinance serving to notify all providers of food in public places that they need to receive permits from the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services. Staff conducted several meetings with food providers and county workers to review the requirements for providing safe and sanitary food. Park Rangers and the Santa Monica Police Department conducted outreach with food providers following these meetings. The City’s efforts to ask that providers voluntarily link their efforts with local service agencies have achieved some success -- one provider, Feed Your Soul, has linked with OPCC’s Access Center and now provides meals four times a week at the service center rather than as a “stand-alone” in Palisades Park. The number of food distribution locations in Santa Monica’s public spaces dropped from twenty-six in 2002 to four in 2004. The remaining distribution programs continue to draw large numbers. Complaints and calls for service related to homelessness are received and handled through multiple City offices in various locations. During FY 2003-04, the Santa Monica Police Department’s Homeless Liaison Project (HLP) Team received 674 calls for 7 service involving homeless persons and the Fire Department’s Paramedics responded to 1,258 calls involving homeless persons. Homeless-related complaints to the City Manager’s Office, City Council Office and the Human Services Division focused on persons gathering in the downtown area; people panhandling near restaurants; prolonged and heavy use of some parks by homeless people; people using public restrooms for bathing and washing clothes; people roaming alleys to gather cans and bottles from recycling containers; and people sleeping in public parks, parking structures and alleys. Concern about public parks - particularly Reed, Palisades and Memorial Parks - has focused on the inability of the broader community to access open space due to the significant monopolization of scarce open space by homeless people with their belongings. City staff is working on recommended changes to several ordinances intended to address this continuing issue. If every city in the region adopted and funded a continuum of care model and prioritized creation of affordable housing, Santa Monica’s burden would be more equitably shared. To further the City Council policy on strengthening regional responses to homelessness, the City played a sustained and active role in the “Bring LA Home” partnership during FY 2003-04. Bring LA Home is a focused countywide effort with the goal of ending homelessness in LA County by the year 2013. Convened by a panel of public officials, leaders from business, civic and faith-based organizations and people who have experienced homelessness in Los Angeles, the partnership strives to create and implement a comprehensive and realistic 10-year strategic plan to end homelessness. Council Member Richard Bloom, who was invited to be a member of the Bring LA Home 8 General Fund Blue Ribbon Panel during his term as Mayor, and City staff continue to participate in planning meetings and working groups to craft the goals and strategies for the plan. The City partnered with the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority (LAHSA) to host a Bring LA Home community meeting and discussion on January 26, 2004. Comments received at this community meeting have been incorporated in the development of the 10-year strategic plan. Cost of Services In FY 2003-04, the City budgeted $1,823,391 to fund homeless services. (This does not include a HUD Supportive Housing Program grant, as the City only acts as a pass- through agent for those funds.) This amount is $7,331 less than budgeted in FY 2002- 03. For every dollar allocated to homeless service providers from the City’s General Fund, these organizations leveraged an additional $2.69 in non-City funding to support the continuum of care. As shown in the following chart, City General Fund support for operating costs related to the continuum of care has not increased substantially over the past decade. HOMELESS CONTINUUM OF CARE FUNDING SINCE 1993 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 93-9494-9595-9696-9797-9898-9999-0000-0101-0202-0303-04 Fiscal Year 9 Current and Upcoming Strategies Providing the right balance of support to homeless people while maintaining the public health, safety and quality of life for all City residents and visitors continues to be a challenge. Some of the key strategies for the next two years to address homelessness are underway and include the following: ? Regional Solutions : Strong and effective regional planning to develop solutions to end homelessness are required to relieve the disproportionate burden in Santa Monica. The Bring LA Home Report, due to be released in March 2005, will set forth a blueprint for ending homelessness over the next ten years in Los Angeles County. This ambitious effort will require the active involvement of all 88 cities, the County, the private sector, religious community and community-based agencies to be effective. On the Westside, participation by the Council of Governments (COG) will be essential. In February 2005, COG member cities will consider a joint resolution calling for better use of the federal Veteran’s Administration property in West Los Angeles to serve homeless people. Examples of other important regional issues for the coming year include: advocating for allocation of Proposition 63 (Mental Health Services Act) funding to increase services for mentally ill homeless people; the planned creation of a new County 24/7 urgent care facility in West LA as an alternative to emergency room use for indigent and homeless people; participation in the January 2005 countywide homeless census; and creation of a year round shelter on the Westside. Sustained regional focus on these issues are critical. ? Review of Ordinances : Staff from various City departments, including the City Attorney’s Office, Police, Community and Cultural Services and Environmental and Public Works continue to review City ordinances for effectiveness and enforceability, consider revisions or new ordinances as appropriate, and assess application of ordinances to ensure public safety and the balanced use of public spaces. Key areas of focus include: the outdoor public distribution of food; intensive and exclusive use of some parks by homeless people; use of public restrooms; access to community facilities such as Miles Playhouse and the Senior Recreation Center; unattended property in parks and parkways; and camping in parks. ? Chronic Homeless Pilot : For the past six months, City staff (Human Services, Police, Fire, Housing), service providers (OPCC, CLARE, St. Joseph Center, Step Up on Second) and the County Department of Mental Health (Edelman Mental Health and Countywide staff) have worked to develop a pilot project to more effectively target services to and assist those chronic, most difficult to reach and “service resistant” homeless people who have been on Santa Monica’s streets for an extended period of time. The goal of the pilot is to reach these 10 chronic homeless people with a well coordinated, strategic, interdisciplinary and sustained effort - and get them off the streets permanently. For the initial phase of this pilot project, homeless people who have required a high level of Paramedic and Police intervention were identified. In the Fall of 2004, interdisciplinary teams of staff contacted eleven chronic homeless people to participate in this project. These people have been homeless for between five and 20 years. Of the initial target group of eleven people, eight are now off the streets – with three of those in permanent housing. The pilot program demonstrated clearly the essential role of interagency communication/ coordination and case management. The success of this effort has led all participants to agree to continue and expand the pilot in the coming year. ? Addressing Public Inebriation/”Sobering Center” Concept : Options for better addressing public inebriation must be part of addressing chronic homelessness in Santa Monica. Staff members are currently working with service providers and the County to determine the most effective options for expanding services – locally and on a regional basis – for this population. A status report on the feasibility and effectiveness of the “sobering center” concept is provided in a separate item on tonight’s City Council agenda. ? Year Round Shelter : The Westside (including Santa Monica) is one of the regions of LA County which does not have a year round County-funded shelter for homeless people. While operating funding is available, a location has not been identified and approved. Vacant buildings at the VA property have been used for winter shelter and are potentially available for the year round shelter. Securing a permanent year round location for this important shelter resource is a top priority. ? Increased Supportive Housing: Within the next three years, at least two new supportive housing developments should open in Santa Monica. The OPCC Cloverfield Boulevard project, approved by the Council in August 2003, is tentatively scheduled to open in March 2006, and will provide up to 55 beds for chronic mentally ill homeless people. In December 2004, Step Up on Second th acquired property at 1548 5 Street for a proposed residential development nd similar to their existing facility on 2 Street. Step Up on Second is currently proceeding with community outreach and development design. These new housing resources will help to address Santa Monica’s most chronic and disabled population of homeless people. ? Improved Access Center : By the middle of 2005, the OPCC Access Center now located on Colorado will relocate next to SAMOSHEL on Olympic Boulevard. The Access Center will combine with the SHWASHLOCK Program (showers, lockers, washers) to ensure a very well organized point of entry for homeless services. This new facility for existing services will enable OPCC to link to volunteer food distribution groups as well as provide space for mental 11 health and other County public services to “outstation” staff and more efficiently provide stabilizing services that will assist clients in getting off the streets. Budget/Financial Impact Reviewing the report and holding the public hearing does not have any budgetary or financial impact. Direction to staff at a subsequent Council Meeting may require identification of resources and staff will, in that event, return to Council with any required actions. Recommendation City staff recommends that the City Council 1) accept this report and hold a public hearing to gain input on the FY 2003-04 annual review of the City’s Coordinated Plan for Homeless Services and 2) raise questions and provide preliminary comment on the strategies to be discussed on January 25, 2005. Prepared by: Barbara Stinchfield, Director of Community and Cultural Services Julie Rusk, Human Services Manager Susan Lai, Senior Administrative Analyst Setareh Yavari, Administrative Analyst 12