SR-202-001 (42)
..
TO
FROM'
SUBJECT
e
Santa Monica,
California, December 1, 1978
e
jZPZ'-OO/ II F
Mayor and City Council
City Staff
DEe 1 2 1978
Amendment to Administrative Services Budget
Introduction
This report requests an amendment to the Administrative
Services, Personnel budget section of an added Depart-
mental Administrative Assistant position, to be funded
for the balance of the current budget year.
Background
The inclusion this year of municipal employees under
unemployment insurance covera~e has led to the Personnel
Divisions reassignment of staff time to the monitoring
and control of seperated employee claims af,ainst the
City. ~~ere claims are assigned, the staff member has
defended the City against such awards
The successful
City challenge to unjustif~ed unemployment claims have
resulted in a saving of over $30,000 to date.
Concomittant with the above, the decision was made to
coordinate worker's compensation employee and adjuster
problems and queries through one staff member. This
provided a much more timely handling of compensation
needs
Time often being a strong factor in keeping
cases from escalating out of proDortion to actual injury.
Here again the results are rewardinR, and the resultant
savings considerable - in excess of S59,000 to date.
Loss of the reassigned staff time has had attendant costs
to the performance of other personnel services. At the
present time it has led to an increase in time required
to complete recruiting and replace~ent employees.
I/~
DEC 1 2 1978
Mayor and..ity Council
December.. 1978
Page Two
e
The point has been reached when the worker's cONpensation
and unemployment insurance functions should be assigned
to one employee. The job would also be able to carry
out a range of risk management tasks which should lead
to even greater savings. The savings a full time risk
manager can achieve for the City in either one of these
areas will pay for the positions and still retain significant
City funds intact for productive use.
RecoIIlI1lendation
It is recommended that the City Council approve the
attached resolution amending the Administrative Services
budget by the addition of an added Departmental Administrative
Assistant position for the balance of the current budget
year. The funds required, including fr~n~e costs, are
$10.470.00 through June 31, 1979
Prepared by:
fl / /~A .tt;< ,
II L--(t~4,(11 VMT ~,A,.~._
R. N. Aronoff, Di e tor ~)(~
Administrative Services
Dave P. Dolter, Acting
City Manager
e
e
RESOLUTION NO. 5160(CCS)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SANTA MONICA A}ffiNDING RESOLUTION 5030 vlliICH
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHED THE BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 1978 - 1979, AS A}mNDED.
The Clty Council of the City of Santa Monica does resolve
as follows'
The following added position and funds
are lncorporated into Resolution No. 5030.
Departmental Administrative Assistant
$10,470
~
/~-:Z.-:f:'/1/;r-:'~~-7<J- . J!-~-i~__
---- c/ L Mayor Pro Tempore
APPROVED AS TO FOR~:
S~e_St-GSLL
A&i~Cl ty Attorney -
Attest.
Q ~ {'
~ }d-7"'''''' r~. -L-~'o......-
(.... \ r~ ...~ .'
~I - City Clerk
e
e
ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS
12th
DAY
OF
Dece';lber
~ 1978.
___~Z:-fn~>>-....-a /-i.~
.- ~\)
r~lAYOR PRO TDIPORE
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION~
N 3160
O.
~ WAS DULY ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SANTA MONICA AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD ON
December 12 ~ 1978 BY THE FOllOWING COUNCIL VOTE:
AYES: COUNCIlMEMBERS: Bambrlck, Cohen, Reed, Scott,
Trlves, van den Steenhoven, SWlnk
NOES: COUNCIlMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIlMEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIlMEMBERS: ~one
ATTEST:
{~ '<;;"~~ '(
:j' ~J')
i. .... --:?-"_1 -
.--.f/ J;'~/~ ~- ~ ~ L-~
/ /
CITY CLERK
./
e
e
CITY OF SANTA MONICA
INTER-DEPARTMENT MEMO
DATE.
November 29, 1978
TO.
R. N. Aronoff, Director of Administrative Services
FROM.
Robert Seeds, Principal Personnel Analyst
SUBJECT:
Recruitment of Dept. Admin. Asst. for Risk Management Admin.
Problem
Two important events of the past half-year have led to
changes in organizational assignments of one of the Personnel
Specialist Trainees and the departments Personnel Analyst.
Firs~ the extension of State Unemployment Insurance
coverage to State and local governmental agencies, and
second, the geometric increase in worker's compensatlon
costs to employer in the past four years in this state.
Background
The departments only Personnel Analyst was given the
responsibility for monitoring worker's compensation cases
and claims with our outside claims administrator, Brown
Brothers. The set goals were to reduce the extensive
time (other than minor) cases tend to take before they
go from temporary disability to permanent disability and
a conclusion of permanent and stationary, with a consequent
award settlement, and closer control on the effective fact
gathering of the accident situations. This last is an----
important factor in the considerations of award size.
At the present time this responsibility has leveled off at
requiTing a quarter of the Personnel Analyst's budgeted
hours. Conversely, this has diminished his utility for
assignment to the more prosaic recruitment, selection, and
classification duties of his position.
On the positive side, though, a very conservative estimate
of savings resulting froID this control assignment is $59,000
in eleven months. The Personnel Analyst's report detailing
these savlngs is attached.
January 1, 1978, the City started to bear the unemployment
insurance costs seperated employees. To manage the growth
of such costs and keep them to the justified IDlnimum, Jill
Jones, Personnel Specialist Tralnee, was assigned responsibility
for monitoring all employment seperations. This requires her
close coordination with supervisory personnel in all depart-
ments whenever a seperation from City employment occurs.
Unjustified claims are challenged. She represents the
City in defending its claim before the appeal board.
e
e
Page Two
November 29, 1978
As a result of diligent action on the Personnel
Specialist Trainee's part, claims made by seperated
employees, but denied, resulted in a conservative
saving to the City of $11,704 00 between April and
August, 1978 Cases during the past two and a half
months (since her original report) have added potential
savings of another $18,928 00 for cases contested and
won before the appeal board.
I should add that the Personnel Specialist Trainee in
accepting, preparing herself for, and carrying out this
claims management assi~nment is functioning well above
the level of her classification.
Overall, the assignments to manage the cities costs
in these two areas have resulted in potential combined
savings of nearly $83,000, at a cost in personnel time
of under $7,000 A nice return on our investment in
such a labor intens~ve service functions as ours
Analysis
The interum partial assignment of a Personnel Analyst's
and a Personnel Specialist Trainees' time to manage and
control possible missuse of worker's compensation and
unemployment insurance claims has turned out to be even
more cost effective than expected. The conservative
documented savings from either one of these risk management
programs would have paid the full-time salary of a progra~
manager - and still left a cumulative saving well over
sixty-six thousand dollars.
This positive saving has not been without a hidden cost
elsewhere. The hours required to make this economy work
were taken from other personnel functions. The net
effect has been a reduction in the number of tasks which
can be handled concurrently in other areas. The situat~on
has reached a point where further extensions of turn-
around time in responding to critical department recruit-
ment and replacements needs can have adverse cost to
effective economic provision of services.
Recommendations
Request the approval of an added position in the existing
classification of Departmental Administrative Assistant.
The classification is broad enough to permit assignment
of the required functions to this position. As a full
t~me job the position can be given the full range of
responsibilities that go with true risk mana~ement. Eventually
an evaluation should be made of the position to assess the
feasibility of the City handling those functions presently
falling to the outside adjuster firm.
e
e
Departmental Administrative Assistant
(Risk Management Assignment)
Worker's Compensation
Monitor's all worker's compensation accident reports
and claims.
Investigates and/or coordinates investigations of
accidents with Industrial Safety Engineer, and City's
insurance adjuster
Reviews, checks, and mnintains control on developing
cases.
Coordinates review and evaluations of outside adjuster's
performance w~th the City Manager's office.
Reviews medical management ~ractices to insure early
return of employees to duty when apnlicable, or retirement
where ind~cated.
Serves as a resource/trainer for all management
personnel on worker's compensation regulations, rights,
responsibilities.
Analyzes accident data to note trends, patterns, etc. and
recommend remedial practices.
Monitors sick leave usage relative patterns, trends,
unusual usages
Prepares, presents reports and recommendations.
Unemployment Insurance
Monitors all employee seperations for verifications
of factual cause.
Coordinates closely with all City supervisory personnel
establishing the factual bases for seperations.
Responds to all claims made for UII, and challenges
unqualified claims
Represents City in hearings, conferences, and meetings.
Serves as a trainer/resource to all management personnel
on selections and seperations procedures and rights.
Prepares and presents reports and recommendations.
DATE
TO.
FROM:
SUBJECT:
~-
e-
e
- - -.. -...-.~-- ..-~-
-- ----~-~- ~--
... -""'---~---- ~
---~.....- -------.. ----~-- - -
________ ...-_v
--J-~--
___.;.. ~ 00--- ...-:.. ""-~~_
~ ~ -"'ir-...::.
-_JO_-~"f:~;_::~~
~Cir!-_ f':P-:SA-:-:'-;A MO~!CA
INTf~:D-fFi:-~R-TMfNT i\tfMtl . ~i:~-
- -~ - - - --
...-....~_...->- .~~- --
August 3D, 1978
R. R. Aronoff, Director of Alliilinistrative Services
Jim Leonard, Personnel Anal~.
Worker's Compensation
Attached is a list of eighteen "problem cases" I have
been involved with since receiving the worker's com-
pensation coordinator assignoent from you in October,
1977. I believe the first case I worked on was Ste-
phen Whitfield. and the earliest retirement I obtained
was that of Thomas Wanner. Several current cases are
also included in this sheet, although I have only shown
a potential savings for one of them, Sam Chance, whose
case is close enough to conclusion to justify an esti-
mate.
The chart shows each case by name and job title, and
classifies each by safety or miscellaneous. Next is
the date of injury or injuries, the type of injury, and
the non-medical cost to date. Non-medical costs include
payment of T.D., P.D., litigation, sub rosa, and a mis-
cellany of other expenses. I have chosen this figure to
work with since medical costs are almost unmanageable,
at least at the present ti~e.
Date and type of action refer to the final result of our
work on these, after gathering material, talking to the
department, the adjuster, and sometimes to the employee.
A majority of these cases ended in disability retirement,
primarily because that is our major management tool at
this point.
Potential savings is the last category, and is only listed
where I know that: A) the individual could have returned
to work, opening the opportunity ror further injury and
further costs on the City's part; and B) a tangible cost
estimate was available to use, without pulling a figure
"out of the air" to estimate savings. Most savings costs
were based on awards made for previous injuries (Arthur
Cavaness is a good example of this) or for reserves set
up by Brown Brothers for disability costs (as in the case
of Tom Young) or where a specific figure of potential liabil-
ity has been mentioned by SOw€one likely to know, e.g.,
Larry Fitzpatrick (Stephen Vnitfield is the only case of this
type). Some of the potential savings amounts are reduced by
the amount already paid, since a recurrence of injury would
probably not duplicate all costs entirely.
-~.-
e~
-e
:0
Page- Tv(o
....:::.. - - =-~ -- _::. -- -
- -.- - -~-=----~ - ~
--.;,.
All of-these-~trictures combine-to make the putential
savIngs --an exi:remeTi~conservative -es timat'-e.,:, --but--certainly
a more justifiable one. The total savings is $59.000.
Doubling it might be more realistic.
JSL/cm
_____.;=-...._ :to
-~----~-~ --
- ;
--- ~~i~~2~~i
- - --~ ~ - ~
,_---...- "io.,.,--- ~~ ~-.... -.. ~
e
e
R I
O~I
0 0 0 0 I
0 0 0 a
0 \,!) I I I 0 I I I C'J I I
~ ~ ~ ~
?:' ~ tJ") If)
.r"- I <f}-
-; m .
'M W
~.w >-..w >..w 0 .j..J O<JJ I ;>,.w .w :>-.w >>.w
.ws:;: ws:;: .w~ .w H ;:j ~ 'd .we: s::: ws:;: US::
'M (!) ..-l (!) QJ'M Q) Q <!.l QJ .r-! (1) <!.l 'M Q,) 'M CJ
Hf'i HS Hr-tS 't:lH r-t>, .w .-f~ (lJ S .--IS .-IS
-r! (\) -,4 (l) ..o'M <U (!}1lI.w .nW n:l . M (1) o G.l ,,....I <Ll 'M aJ
,cH ..01--4 C\j,c ~ I I UH-g m'M J-l'd .nl--l 'M l--l .oH .oH
{'j'M m'M ,.D m....... 00 .or-! {'j a.I c;j.,.-l >.r-/ tij-,-l c::h-l
(/).w cnw ocnt-J S,D -..-I O'M P<J-l t/l.w 1--4W cnW cn.I-J
'..-1 Q,I - M (!) H'M (ll (!)cdt-l H..o a.I"M ...-1 C) aJ 0 . r-l (!} -,....I (!)
Ap::, QP:: P-lAP:: A~"""'" p..,c;j UJ{x.. AP:: mSX; ~~ O~
co C1 t.O en t.I) 0::> co 0:) co co co 0::>
J"-. i:l s:: s:: s:: I"'-- s:: I"'-- Z- I"'-- r--. r-..
I 'M 'M 'r-! .r-/ I -r-/ I I I I I
0 '1:l '1:l -0 'tl C"1 '1:l r-- rl ..;t .--f \.0
('1'1 s:: i:l s:: s:: rl s:: N 0 C'J a .-I
I CJl CJl (l) Q) t (!,l I I I I I
'-0 ~ ~ P.t p... 00 j:4 \.0 co N 0::> r--
~
0 <:) -.:t 0 ~ N ..;t C"J 0.0
0 \.0 ..;t- o N ..... ..... M co
0 co li"'l N 0 .-( co I ...0 C") I I
- - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
0'\ N I.t') C'4 ~ r--- to r--- r-l
<I)- <I)- <I)- (f}o -en- <I)- .(J)- <f}- <I)-
m <lI
> :>
-..-I Q) 0 (].I .,..4
.w .--I .-( r-I ,IJ
d P. Po Po c;j
M 'M . ...-1 '.4 .--I
::j ~ ./J ~ ~ .u -tJ ~ (!) ::l
~L () b.O rl 0 0 r-I .--f 0.. 0 d S
CIj t1l :f. (1j ctl ;:l ;:l .,..4 {'j s::
U rQ H j:Q >Q ..,.., :::E: ::c: >Q ~ ()
t"-O
J.. I
;:j ,...... r--..co ..... ..... l""- I'"-- I' 00 r--.. 00 ,..., .;
p r--.. l' r-- ..... ..... l""- I'"-- f'-- -
-rl . .
H
<C
H (f}
f-i~
ZZ
r.ijH
f-i:>
o<r.:
p...cn
~
Oz
o
fr,:lH
P-<f-'
~~-
~
Oz
o
~H
f-iE-t
<f..v
Cl<G
f1.1
HE-l
<<
UA
H
.00
~f-I
If;
zOO
00
zu
fLr
0:>-'
r:r:
.~
. "J
>- -'::
E-' ~
e
e
f;r..,
oz
o
filH
~E4
.o::<:U
t:l<
0 0 0 0 0 0
0 a 0 0 0 0
N 0 0 0 0 0
- - - - - -
lI"l C',I U"'I C"l tn I'
<1)- r-I <:: <.rr <J)- <I)-
~^
J-t P
>..&J >.JJ (\l 0 :>'.&J :>,.JJ :>'+J
.:..IS:: .:..IS:::: t:: 'M .&J P .ws:::: J.J P
-..-I C!.I 'n @ o .w 'M @ '.-I @ -r! @
r-IE r-IE -..-l (\l .-113 rl~ rlS
'.-I (J) -.-I (ll .&J P 'M (!J 'N (jJ -r! <IJ
..a~ .QH (\l 'M .QJ-t .n~ ..o~
m..-1 qS"M .n S l"I;h-l Cil-r-l (!j-..-l
CIl.&J (l)JJ 0 l-i CIlU CIl+J C/l,U
-..-I QJ -..-I (!J J-t 1lJ OM (!J .rl QJ -r! Q)
OS:::::: AP:: P-i~ t:lP:: otx: ~p:::
l-iaJ
I 0::>-
co 00 00 00 ...... P.. '4-1 'M co
...... ...... ...... ...... ...... .0::<: .w.....
. I I I I "t:j U I
...... \0 l/'l co rl ' (jJ ClJr-l
0 r-I r-I r-I 0 .w'..-ItHO
I I . 1 1 QJ c---l tH I
...... -.:t M C"'1 N p:: Po ~ co
rl
N \0 0 ...::t C"\I -.:t
..... ..... 0 0"1 \.0 ..::t
..... ('f) ...... r-I \.0 ......
- - - - - -
N N ....... N lI"l ......
<f'J- <I)- <I)- <rr <.rr <I)-
al
r-I
P- .
'M
~ ~ 'U .j..J ~ ~
() 0 l\l r-I 0 c.J
cO m <l.I f cO Cd
pq l=Q ::d P:l j:Q
...... ..... ,.... ...... " .....
...... ...... " r-- " "
I I I I I I
("oJ ~n ...... ,.,.... .,.... ,.,....
H
<(
H (/)
E-it':"
Zz
f:L!H
f-l>
0<:
p...(/)
rz.c
OZ
o
r:LJH
p.,f-l
~U
E-t<
P4
~~
UA
H
AO
~E-t
If-!
ZOO
00
ZO
~
O~
w!5
P-ll'--)
~:z;
f-iH
~
a:>-t
~
W8
UJ
~
U) ~
~ ;>-f
H 0
j ,....l
P-i
U ~
~
tJ Cl
Z ~
;2 CI
~
:=:J r:LI
U} Z
Z I
H {/}
""
E--t
Z 0
~ z
?3 ""
0 E-l
,....l Z
P-< ~
fJ ~
~
I I e
U') Q) 13 H'~
E-I/:::~ H'rl ;:)14
;Z;~ Q)m~'d<JJ
~H ~r-!O P- O
Oz Us::::O 0 0- 0 0 0 0
~~ (J) LI"laJ 0 0 0 0- 0 .
~ . 'U" rn 0 . - . . ..:j"
...-1 '1j .~ V}- to 0 00 00 0 ..j- ..j- 0
....:lU) 4-!(i.l'O ,.0 . ..j- 0\ 0 " 0 r-
<r::~ (!J-r-! C 0 ('..I r--. \.0 V\ " ~
HH S:::::C'UHW; 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~< Q)Q)S::::m~ " r-! r-! N N N .-I
Z.....:l C:Q 'U ttl Q)-,4 -<Ir <f)- <f}- <I}- <f}- <f}- -(f)-
;ilU
E-I
O~ . . . . . - .
P-<O r-! N .-I N M .-I N
::s
0
~
~~
E--t
~<
>:ilO
~
(DO ...;t ...;t r-l 0
ZE-l r-! r-l
<t:;
Q
Ot:l
Z~
U)
E--t
HO
~~
WH N ('t') N r-
ZZ
~H.:l
p:q:=l
U)
E....q:::::)
H~
[x,E-;
Wz N '-0 C") N C"')
f;3~ r-t ..-I (Y)
;:CC;
cr.:
~
H
<r;
e
Santa Mom ca, Ca1.rma, June 8, 1978
;:!-oz--t'O /
TO' Mayor and City Council
i
FROM: City r1anager'.
SUBJECT: Proposed AdJustments to Recommended 1978-79 Budget
In order to comply with the requlrements of Proposition 13, a number of
adJustments to the 1978-79 budget are outllned 1n the attached me~orandum.
Whl1e there are serVlce cuts, it should be e~Dhasiled that the bas1c
services of the City including Police and Flre protect1on and water supply
remain essentially unmodlfied. This is not a "doomsday" budget. The
total reduction required by Proposition 13, assuming that a proportlonal
share oT property taxes will be returned to the City, is $3,460,502. The
staff wll1 make every effort to contlnue services with as little 1nterruptlon
as possible. While service reductlons must occur, it lS management's goal
to m1n1mize the impact of the reductions.
A total of 39.5 positions would be el1minated from the budget and reductions
would total $2,858,139. The remaining adJust~ents necessary to meet the
reauirements of PropOS1tion 13 would be balanced by an lncluslon of $602,363
from the Unappropriated Reserve. The attachment 1ncludes the closure of
the branch libraries in Ocean Park and on Montana Avenue, leavlna the
Fairview Branch open for serVlce to the southern part of the Clty. ThlS
results In budget reductions of approximately $160,000. Alternatlves would
lnclude an annual llbrary card fee of 55.00 for adults which would produce
revenue of between 5150,000 and 5200.000 oer year. Considerat1on could also
- TO:
Mayor and City C~Cil
-2-
e
June 8, 1978
be glven to reducing refuse collection to one day per week WhlCh would
reduce costs by $234,000 annually_ ThlS was not included in the attachment
S1nce it lnvolves public health and sanitation_
The proposed reductlons would requlre delay In the completlon of Clover
Park, until clarificatlon of State fundlng. Recreatlon and Parks serVlces
are also reduced by the elimination of personnel, supolies and expense
and caDital accounts and this impact could be reduced by provlding addltlonal
fees for recreation services.
It should be emphaslzed that if none of the property taxes collected in
Santa Monlca are returned to the City, additlonal cuts of approximately
52,340,000 wlll be required.
JDW-dar
Attachment
e
e
s: a (j t a
..
1'1':=, !-~ . C a ,
c c. ~ . I I~; t r"1 r ..
,
\) IJ.....: e '..
TO: Mayor and City Co~~cll
q~J~'1: Cl ty Staff
SUBJECT: PROPOSED tlDJUS n1ENTS TO RECO:'~"~ENDED 1978-79 BUDSET
CITY '~,':.r'U;SER
Pcge 33 - Capl~al Outlay - Delete Iteps ~1-4 (Sl,950)
Pe.ee 34 - 5213(12S and \':2.C2S - J21ete I~~,telY2dlate Clel~k ($10,::[,4)
~ a;ld ""CI".pOtc.fj ~17ploY2es (S3,660)
Totul Depurt~ent Reductions - 516,554
CITY CLERK - A0~INISTRATION
~
i-"'age
37 - Supplles and Expe~se Line F 9 - Cut (SLOG)
Llne ~17 - Cut ($21,426)
Capital Outlay - Delete Ite~s =1-3 ($10,827)
Total DiviSion ReducTions - 532,653
RECQRDS ~A\~GE~c~T
~Gge &5 Supplies and Expense - Llne ~ 9 - Cut ($100)
Capital Outlay - Delete ItellS ~1 & 2 (51,880)
Page ~6 - Salaries and !!ages - ~elete Recl?-sslflcatlOn (S2,OOO) opd
Teil;Joror"y Erc-plo}Ees ($12,000)
Total DIVlSlon Reductlors - 515,S30
FI~ANCE - ACCOUNTING/ADMINISTRATION
Page 49 - Supplies and Expense - Llne ~ 9 - Cut ($650)
Llne =17 - Cut (51,150)
Caoltal Outlay - Delete ltens ~2-4 (51,070)
?age 50 - Salaries and ~ages - Delete Mcco~nt Clerk II (511.477)*
and Bookl<eeplng I~achlr.e Op2ratol~ (Sl1 ,496)+- posltion
Total DlVlSl0n Reductlors - $25,843
=';";T/1 PPOCESSI\G
PagE 53 - Supplies and Expense - Llne ~ 9 - Cut (5450)
LIne F17 - Cut (51,150)
Capltal Outlay - Delete Items ~l & 2 (S2,550)
iotal Dlvislon Reductlon - sa,150
*- -~feaTth-Tnsm"ance, Ret 1 re::-i2nt and othel~ benefits are refl ected 1 n
tkn-Depai-t.'1\ental budget reduct,o'lS
_~ 0
e
e
Cl: ~."-"jJ( .:',;0 C,ty C:.1I"_ll
- 2 -
'~.-J~ e 7 19/""8
-CP:::,'""SURY
P~ge 57 - S~pplies and Expense - L~ne # 9 - Cut (5250)
L1ne i17 - Cut (51,150)
C~pital Outl2Y - Delete Ite~s ~1 & 2 ($2,725)
Total Dlvls10n Reduction - $4,125
LICE~SE ~J~I~IS7RATION
Page 61 - SJppl1~S and Expense - Ll~e *9 - Cut ($175)
Caoltal Outlay - Delete It2~S pI & 2 (53,243)
To~al D,vlslon Reduct10n - 53,418
CITY ,"\1 TCRNEY
Page 67 - Supplies and Expense - L1ne ~9 - Cut (54,000)
Cap1tal Outlay - Delete Items ~1-6 (511,425)
Total Departnent Reductlor.S - S15,~25
PiD~.' Ii'a 5TRA TI V E SE RV ICES - PERSO;,,:'iEL
Page 71 - Supplies and Expense - Line # 5 Cut ($3,000)
llne ~ 6 Cut ($5,000)
Llne ,9 Cut ($850)
Llne #17 - Cut ($2,000)
Line ~18 - Cut ($15,020)
Cap1tal Outlay - Delete Items ~l & 2 (54,350)
Page 72 - Salaries and ~aces - Delete Insufonce Coord10ator POSltion
(516,154)* ~
Total Dlvislon Reductions - $46,S74
?L~CHgSI\S ~ND STORES
?2ge 75 - Supplies and Experse - L1ne ~9 - Cut (5190)
Capltal Outlay - Delete Items 1 & 2 ($2,&15)
Total Divlslon Reductlons - 52,605
CITY ~ALL BUILDING
Page 79 - Supplies and Expense - L1ne ~14 - Cut (S5.020)
Capltal Outlay - Delete Items ~1-& 4, 7-9, 11 (528,417)
?age 80 - Salaries and t.:ages - Delete to.:o C'JS"LOdlan I PositlOns
($21,888)
Total Olvision Reductlons - $55,325
"* - H.:aYfh-Insurance, Ret1 reloent crod other ben2fl ts at'E t'efl eeted 1 n
Nor-Depcrt~ental tudget reductions
e
e
.~} r-
- .
- -,
.....--:1_= '-;(. 11
"I
.j
~ ~. ==
~ :J7Q
~:{\loJ::',''''-=~.,Ti~L S.;:::?VICES - AC,.'INISTRATIGN
;---:1.~e 93
~al]2 94
Ca~ltal Outlay - Delete Jter.s ~l & 2 ($800)
- Sal~rles a~d ~aaes - Delete ProJ2ct Coordlrator Posltlon
(~17,QJO)* ~
lotal Clvlslcr R'=0uctlons - 517,200
PL~ 1.~.~ I ~.JG
Page 105 - Supp1les and Expense - Line #9 - Cut (51,250)
Capital Outlay - Delete Ite~s #1-11 (S7,B11)
Pa;e 106 - Salar12s ard ~2g2S - Delete S2~lor Economic P1a1rer
Posltion (515,761)*
Total Dlvlslon Reductiors - $24,822
BUILDING REGULATION
Page 109 - Supplles 2rd ~x;2nse - LIne ~ 8 - Cut (5300)
LIne ~ 9 - Cut (5475)
Llne #17 - Cut ($5,000)
Capltal Outlay - Delete Ite~ ~1 (52,000)
Page 110 - Salaries and Wages - Delete BUlld1ng Inspector Tral~ee
Position (513,566)*
Total Dlvisicn RedJctlons - $21,8Ll
POLICE
----~
Pace 119 - Suppl,es and Expense - LIne ~9 - Cut (52,400)
Capital O~t1ay - Ce1ete Ite~s #3-8, 11-19, 21, 23, 25-55,
57-61 ($fO,311)
?age 122 - Salanes c'ld ',':::tgcs - :?lete O'1e Conrr'UnlCatlon Op2rator' Fosn-Ion
(SlO,992)*
Total Department ~eductlons $53,703
E!~~RSEr~cY SERVICES
Page 125 - Suppl~es and Expense - L~ne t9 - Cut (S450)
Capltal Outlay - Delete Ite~ #1 (S685)
Total Dlvlslcn Reduct10ns - $1,135
,.':\m;L CONTROL
Page 129 - Supplies 2~d Expense - Line ~9 (SlOO)
Capltal Outlay - Delete It2~s ~1-4 ($11,320)
Total D1VlSlon Reduct10ns - $11,&20
* ~ealf~Insurance, Retlre~~nt and other benefits are reflected 1n
\Dn-Depart~ental budget reduc~lons
e
e
;~: tfej:Jf ~r~ =~~j C~~i1Cll
- 11 _
~ v-; e 7, -=. S 7 8
FnE ?P.DI-t.CT!Ot~
Page 135 - Supplies o:Jd h;cr.se - tir:e ;; 9 - Cut (51,325)
Line ~11 - Cut (54,000)
Line ~14 - Cut ($3,780)
L1ne =15 - Cut ($6,840)
Li'le =17 - (,)t ($4,500)
L,ne ~38 - Cut (5900)
Capital Outlay - D21ete Ite~s ~3, 5-11, 13-16, 18,
20-39, 41-53 (567,546)
Page 138 - Salaries and ~ages - Je~ete C~ptain Posit1on (523,256)*,
T~f.lporat"y Errp10yees ($4,018), and cut OV2rti;-,e (59,508)
Total D2partffient Reductic~S - $125,673
REnEATION p,~m P,Il,RKS - pOmNISTRATION
Page 143 - Supplies and Expense - Line # 5 - Cut ($2,000)
Line ~ 9 - Cut ($325)
Line E15 - Cut ($660)
Line #17 - Cut (51,940)
Line #18 - Cut ($1,500)
Capital Outlay - Celete Iter-s #1-3 ($1,695)
Page lL4 - SalariEs and ~aoes - Cut overt1ne and Te~porarv E~ployees
(sa,lOO) v .-
Total Division Reductions - 512,220
PP.,R KS
Page 147 - Supplies and Expe~se - Ll~e # 7 - C~t (S500)
L,ne ~ Q - CJt ($lt5)
Llne ~11 - Cut (59)970)
Line ~13 - Cut (534,650)
Line ~14 - Cut (542,240)
Line F18 - Cut (55,050)
Capital Outlay - Delete all City fi~anced lte~s (Sdt,727)
Pege 250 - Salaries a~d Wages - Delete SiX (6) Gro~nds~eeper 0CSltlons
(574,664)*, one Equip~2nt-Operatcr position ($13,128)*,
two Custodlan I posltlons (S21,858)*, one Asslstant Nursery
Attendant (S 13,128) ~ Overti ~e ($16) 919) c. nd tempora ry
employees (528,922)
Total Division Reductlons - 5305,931
BE,4CH ~'r..I~nEt.;ANCE
Page 153 - Capital Outlay Delete Items =1-3. 5 (5154,680)
Total Dlvlslon Reductions - S16d.6S0
B~ACH PARKING LOTS
-~----- -~----~
Page 157 - Capltal Outlay - DeleTE Itews ~1 & 2 (S15,C90)
iotal Division Reductions - 515,490
"l< n~~Tth Insurance, Retire':12nt and ot~e-r" bEf1eflts are reflected in
:::In-S2pa~ trental budget reductions
e
e
i 0: lc~~~!(. f' C:~ld L I i..rjl CC~JI.-cll
~
"
,_.'le 7, 1978
H ~~). ~.rJR
Pcge ~61 - Suppl.es and Expense - Line 19 - Cut ($50)
Capital Outlay - Delete lteps ~1-4 ($6,606)
~ao2 162 - Salaries ard W2ges - D21ete Inter;~diate Clerk position
(S9,C:S9)*, b;a t2'llpOrary 2iTployees ($13,865)
Toial Dlvls1cn R~ductlGnS - $30,~20
RECREATION pqOGRAMS
Pase 167 - S!jpplles and F>V:r1se - Line :# 1 - Cut ($10,000)
Ll~e # 9 - Cut ($675)
Llne ~13 - Cut ($24,000)
Ll~e ~15 Cut (56,000)
Line ~18 - Cut (584,102)
Capital Outlay - Delete It€~s jl-20 ($6,619)
Page 168 - Salaries end ~aa2S - Delete or;e Senior ReCl'Eation Leader Dosltlon
($14,196)*, otle\abarer II posltlon (S13,128}*, cut b:::-;;;o;-a.r'y
enployees ($95,766)
Total D,vlslon Reductlons - S254,~36
LIB:';ARY
Page 173 - Supplles and Expense - Ll~e t9 - C~t (5817)
Servlces Deleted: S~~day :ervlce (526,276);
First ~otlces ($1,000); ?ha~agr2ph Record
Llstenipg Center ($3,132); Reduced Librdry
Inspectors' hours (54,500); RedJct,on in
Fll~s 2nd Record1ngs (58,200); ~ejJctlon In
rPT:=-'-'-"r-IL-"" <::'J,~<,;+,-l-,;te r"'\-"n,,~,p.l (C:c; '11'0)
__ .... - _ ~ _ L _ _.... v -'" :-'"....... _ ~ . 1,-- ..... -.J ~ ..... V "
K~ductlon In perlod,c31s accoJnt ($3,250); Close
Ocean Park and Montana Avenue Branches: S~p~lles
($48,086); Friday r;,ght Service (S12,027)~ ~lght
Telephone Servlce ($7,735).
Capital Outlay - Delete IteTs 1-8, 10-26 (5119,559)
Page 176 - Salarles and Wages - Delete two Branch Llbrarian posltlons
($38,376)*, one Chlldrensl Librarian positlon ($111,121)*,
four Inter~edlate Clerk pOSltl0~S ($41,328)*, one and a half
Custodlan posltlons (5111,812)*, a~d cut te~~orary esployees
(~;a 1L!1)
,,)- , ,-
Total DEpart'nent Reductions - $362,~,20
CIVIC AUDITORIUM
Page
179 - Supplies and Expense - Line ~ 9 - Cut (5625)
, Llr;e ~14 - Cut (51,000)
Capital Outlay - Del~te Ite~s ~7, 3/5 of 9,21, 22 (55,200)
"Total
Depart~e~t ~eductions - 56,825
T-H-e-a1th-Insur."nce,Retlrement e.rld other :;eneTlts are l~ef12C1.ed Hi
~cn-Depart~e~tal budget reductions
e
e
p.
~ .
F'3../C.f
. '-}
'-.,1
- 0 -
...;1';e 7, 1978
I~E>;P..".L sr=R'nCfS - '..:;>'~FnSTIl;T:ON
r?-~e
203 - Sj~plles ord [Y~2nSe - line =9 - Cut ($663)
C'1;:lltal 0:Jtlay - Celete Iter;] ~l (5362)
204 - Sa.laries and 1.-!2ig2S - Delete Intenredlate Clerk
pOSltlC~ (5;0,908)*, Po~tlon of Dlvlslon charged to
Enterprlse ru~ds (513,600)*
Page
Total ulvis'cn ~eduLtlcrs - 5;6,033
CIVIL ENGI~EERING
Page 207 - Supplies and Expense - l1ne 29 - Cut (5360)
Capital Outlay - Delete Ite;ns 1-4 ($10,650)
Cage 208 - Salaries ~0d ~as~s - Celete Archltectural DeSlon2r
(521,036)*, and-Civll Eng1neerlng ;Sslstant ($~O,4E4)*
Total DIvision Reductlon - $52,530
T~AFFIC F~GI~EERING
Page 211 - S~pplles and Expense - LiGe #9 - Cut ($325)
Capltal Outlay - Delete Items 1-2 (~1,470)
Total Divlsion Reductions - 51,795
T~qFFIC ceNTROl DEVICES
Pfge 219 - SJppl1eS ?nd Ex;erse - Ll~e ~9 - Cut (525)
Capltal Outlay - Celete Ite~s 1-3 ($151,900)
ThlS represents the net rsduct10n to the C1ty.
T~e balance would have been furded by other a9~nC1es.
Cage 220 - Salar1es ard Wages - Delete one Tra~fic Pa1nter ($12,060)*
To~al Div15ion ~eductlors - i163,985
STR~ETS
Page 225 - Suppl1es and Expense - Llr.e f 9 - Cut ($SO)
Llne fI8 - Cut (S81:120)
Capltal Outlay - Delete Itews 4, 5, 7-13 (S143,236)
Page 226 - Salar1es and Wages - ~21ete two Concrete Flnlsher posit1ons
($30,000)*
Total D1vlslon Reductions- $254,t06
~tFUSE COLLECTIDN
Page 231 - Supplles a~d Expense - L,~e
Capltal Outlay Delete 1/4
Total D1vislon Reductions - $31,550
~9 - Cut ($50)
or- I"'" 1 "31 ;:::no)
Lem l- _,-'U
-* - ~2a1th I 1~5LJ,anCe, Ret H27Jent e.rd other oelefi ts are refl ected In
~G~-D2part~ental budget reductions
e
It
. j ': i t Y C CC', ell
7
.. ~ == 7, :.9/8
~U3~IC F~CIlITIES
?aje 237 - S~p~l '2S 3nd Ex~ense - Llne ~9 - Cut (5282)
~0pltal Outlay - Delete 2-9 ($18,392)
Total Divis~on Reduct10ns - 518,674
~~~ECH ~1NI C/~L i.I:;~I t"{T ::~~/~.JCE
Page 241 - SU?plleS ~nd Eypense - Lire #9 - Cut ($16)
Capital Outlay - Delete Items 1-3 (S16,a70)
Total DlV~SlO~ Reductions 516,486
~~DIO ~AINTE~ANCE
Page 244 - Supplies and Expense - line #9 - Cut ($35)
Capltal Outlay - Delete Item 1 (S2,550)
Total D,vislon Reductlon - 52,585
CITY Y;RDS
Page 219 - Capital Outlay - Delete It2~S 1-7 ($37,800)
Total D1vislon Reduction - $37,800
CE'.'~ ~:::RY
r2ge 2S7 - Capital Outlay - Delete I~En ~4 (S70,000)
Fage 258 - Salar1es aDd ~ages - Delete Laborer I (510,496)*
Total J1V~S'on Reductions - $80,L96
~ ,=.~:<j[?[,~ !.'~c:r-rfAL - RETIRc::':ENT
P2;e 272 - Supplies and Eypense - L1ne #19 - Cut (578,270)
Total Clvlsion Reductions - $78,270
i.~QJ'~-QEEf3.:~i~t~J~L_ -_ _r'~SvE~>iCEL' EJ!PLO!/_lE_~QSJS
?,cse 277 - S!J~pl1eS 2nd bper.se - Llr'e ;;"12 Cut (S3':,546)
Line ~18 - Delete ~~nual ~eport
(57,500) and Seascape (54,000)
Total OlV1Sl0~ Reduction - S15~O~6
',C:~;-~T;:"~;:r,f1E'\-;-!\L - CIVIC ,":.\0 CC:<"U\lTY E\fE~HS
-- ~ - -- - ~-- ~-- -~ - - - ~ ~ --- ----- -- -- - - ---~----
Fage 281 - Celete entire total (5175,250)
lotal D,v1s,on ReductlOn - 5175,250
* Health InsiiJ'3nce, qetlr{:;n-2nt 61d other beneflts al'e reflected In
;Jor-Departrr,ental budget ((-'Ouetl ons 0
e
e
. ).
I~ . -,-+-- J :~.~ '~',cll
Ci
- :-,; -
c~r;e 7, 1978
';C'~ D-_~'::;~,.~-:;7:;L - cj1C!~,L S~-YdCES
- -
P2.~2 :85 - :=~c~ 2 -? itne tc-+al ($:195,615)
rotal DiViS1G1 ?Cductlon - 5195,615
i.'C/~ -:y_?...,q'..f:IHAL - ;ns,:r:-u::';'-(;US
- -- ~ - ~- --
~~/6r~jC-l-S :=-.::Ges in Li);~.jet - Jelete ~'=J.~.qi.r'nt to ~I.:ater ~EDc:rtm2nt for
~ater u52ge by City D2part~ents - (S45,OOO)
Total DlvlSlon Reductlon - $45,000
TOTAL PR.OPOSED ~DjLJSTt"ENTS TO RECOf.?,TNDED 1978-79 SlJeGET - 52,858,139
E,"CI_i\T f->:?J::; U\p,?PROPRUHED RESERVE
6J2.363
TOTAL EFFECT OF PROPOSITION 13
<:,".l ,I!""L'nl !-'02
--=-~~_..:::-