Loading...
SR-200-006 e .- ~ City of Santa Monica" City Council Report City Council Meeting: April 11 , 2006 Agenda Item: ~ To: Mayor and City Council From: P. Lamont Ewell, City Manager Subject: Update on the City's Financial Status Recommended Action Council actions recommend in this report include: 1. Consider accepting the six Principles of Budgeting and Finance to guide the development of the FY2006/07 Budget and direct staff to prepare a formal resolution adopting these Principles during the adoption of the FY2006/07 Budget. 2. Defer appropriation of the $2.5 million in additional fund balance identified at mid- year until the adoption of the FY2006/07 budget when all needs can be considered equally. 3. Authorize a payment in the amount of $24,807 from the Council Contingency account to Meals on Wheels West for relocation expenses. 4. Direct City staff to continue to work with the 18th Street Arts Center organization to assist them in generating viable options in their efforts to develop their property; however, we seek your concurrence on affirming that becoming an "equity partner" with the organization is not something that the City will be pursuing. 1 Executive Summary At the City Council meeting of February 14th Council adopted updated broad Community Priorities to guide the budget preparation for FY 2006/07 and requested that the City Manager report back with findings from a review of the overall financial status of the City and respond to some issues raised during the Pubic Hearing. This report summarizes the findings to date. Although non-general funded activities are briefly touched upon, the primary focus of this report is on the General Fund. Discussion Backqround With three months in the position of City Manager, a preliminary review of the financial status of the City has been conducted. Santa Monica is a financially complex City that provides a diverse variety of services. A more complete understanding on my part will only be possible as we go through the budget process for FY2006/07. To date, I have reviewed the information presented in the Mid-Term staff report (2/14106), the working draft of the City's financial forecast of major funds, capital request from departments for FY2006/07, the Unfunded 1 Under-Funded Capital Improvements Projects list, and departmental preliminary budget increase requests for FY2006/07. I have also had the opportunity to meet with our outside financial advisors regarding our bond rating. And, we have received a great deal of feedback from the community regarding their priorities for directing City funds. 2 While I have concerns regarding the health of several enterprise and special revenue funds, for the purposes of this report, J would like to concentrate my comments on the General Fund since Council discussions largely focused on the use of these monies. Future reports will highlight recommendations for the enterprise and special revenue funds. Five Year Forecast As identified in the Mid-Term staff report, General Fund revenues are above adopted budget levels by $5.5 million and new appropriations increased by $3.0 million. The uncommitted $2.5 million are considered one-time funds. The projections for the General Fund over the next five years at current service levels show annual shortfalls beginning in FY08/09 as shown in the chart below. As we look at short-term funding potential, we need to always take a long-term view of the City's financial condition. General Fund 280.0 270.0 I 260.0 en 250.0 I ~ ~ .5 240.0 I!! .!! 8 230.0 220.0 210.0 200.0 FY05/06 FY06/07 FY07/08 FY08/09 FY09/10 ~. ..~. Expenditu~es I ...... Revenues -_.-"---- FY10/11 3 Overall, the growth in expenditures over time outpaces the growth in revenues. Because the City forecast takes a conservative approach to both revenues and expenditures, the potential future gap could be less than projected in the table above. Operational Assessment As part of my orientation to the City, I have been reviewing with the departments their operational constraints regarding services and programs. Consistent with many other municipalities during tight budget times reductions are made in a manner that has the least impact to the public. None the less, budget reductions were made during the past few years and programs continue to reflect the negative impact of those reductions decisions. For example, new facilities that came on-line during the economic downturn, were budgeted at reduced funding levels for such activities as additional Police personnel at Virginia Avenue Park, expanded operational hours at the Skate Park, additional jail staff for the new Public Safety Facility, additional custodial support and security support for several facilities, additional funds for the enhanced maintenance on the promenade and continued implementation of the Plan Check Counter and increased Library staff have not been added. This has necessitated a review of funding levels for these facilities during the up coming budget period. Another outstanding Issue is the need for additional space at City Hall. Many departments do not have adequate working space while other departments have 4 location issues that make efficiencies less than optimal. These and all other budget requests for increases to operating line items will be seriously considered for funding during the development of the Proposed Budget for FY2006/07 and an analysis of our facilities space needs and a comprehensive plan will be formulated over the coming months. Some issues, such as the removal of graffiti throughout our community cannot wait until budget to address. I have authorized staff to step up removal activities to offset the increase in graffiti incidences. While stop-gap funding is being made available this year, a more permanent solution will be required for next year. I have concerns that while the City shows available funds at year-end FY2004/05 and projected for FY2005/06, we have not considered all our basic service needs. Therefore, it is essential that a true base level of services be established so that the actual availability of General Fund monies is identified. Deferred Maintenance I Infrastructure Replacement The City has a mixed record on infrastructure replacement. Funding for computer replacement, vehicle replacement have been on-going for some time. However, during the lean years, replacement schedules were extended and a review of these schedules needs to be conducted to ensure that additional operating cost are not occurring due to slower replacement cycles. 5 As with the computer and vehicle replacement programs, street resurfacing is another capital program that is funded annually, but was also reduced during the economic downturn. A substantial infusion of one-time funding is needed to "catch-up" on our street resurfacing and reconstruction needs. Facility maintenance and routine building systems replacement appears to have been under funded for many years. Currently, repairs are done on an as-needed basis which is reactive, not proactive. A plan needs to be developed to identify immediate needs, but also provide ongoing maintenance and replacement schedule to ensure the long- term viability of our facilities. The goal of the plan would be to allocate adequate resources to properly maintain existing assets and plan for the replacement of assets at the end of their useful life in order to avoid the unplanned and often excessive operating expenses that occur when maintenance and replacement is deferred. Capital Improvement Proqram Requests CIP requests for funding FY2006/07 through FY2008/09 projects have been received and the requests exceed the levels of expenditures projected in the financial forecast. FY2006/07 General Fund requests total $30.5 million in Capital funding while planned funding levels are $15.0 - $18.0 million. FY2007/08 requests total $30.2 with programming levels at $14.0 - $17.0. As with the operating budget increase requests, these CIP requests will need to be weighed with all other requests. 6 Unfunded / Under-Funded CIP List Two years ago, Council was presented with a list of unfunded CIP projects. While some of these projects have received complete funding such as Airport Park, Virginia Avenue Park, Fisher Lumber site acquisition and the Civic Center Parking Structure, many others remain unfunded. The Breakwater, many Civic Center Specific Plan projects, Senior Recreation Center Renovation project, Crescent Bay Park Rehabilitation and a host of lower priority projects remain unfunded. In addition, we have two Fire Stations (Fire Station 1 and Fire Station 3) that the Fire Department is requesting structural evaluations of and depending on the findings, may be candidates for replacement - also unfunded. A complete list of the capital needs will be provided to you during the budget process. Needs of Other Funds The City maintains several enterprise funds that are subsidized annually: Cemetery, Pier and Civic Auditorium. Other funds such as the Beach Fund are Special Revenue Funds which will be impacted by decisions made regarding 415 PCH which could increase the need for General Fund support to the Beach fund. Regulatory requirements regarding water quality will most likely increase the demand for programs currently provided by the Stormwater Fund and unless non-General Fund monies can be identified, this fund also may require a subsidy. I am concerned that these funds are not truly self-supporting. Subsequently, dollars that could be used to enhance other critical services are used to subsidize these operating funds. 7 Many of our "true" enterprise funds are requiring further analysis including the Solid Waste Fund, presented in the study session on March 14th; the Water Fund, undergoing a rate study; the Wastewater Funds with a declining fund balance; and the Big Blue Bus fund which is experiencing declining subsidy revenues from the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. We will continue to address these fund issues during our presentations to Council with the FY2006/07 budget. However, it is important that you be aware of their declining fiscal health now. Community Priorities The interests of the Santa Monica community are diverse, from biodiesel to symphonies. The programs and projects expressed during the Community Priorities Public Hearings were many and funding needs varied from relatively small to quite large expenditures. I believe that the updated broad Community Priorities adopted by Council on February 14 for FY2005/06 continue to cover the overall needs of Santa Monica. These Community Priorities include: . Address the impacts of homelessness on the community . Enhance the quality of life, safety and community involvement of the residents of the Pico neighborhood . Ensure that the public receives timely and responsive service from all departments and that the City's regulatory processes are fairly, efficiently and 8 courteously administered with a high degree of predictability for customers moving through a process . Incorporate ways to achieve the goals of the sustainable City Plan into daily activities and special projects . Capitalize on Santa Monica's climate and community amenities to promote "Active Living" Two outstanding issues that Council asked staff to further explore following the close of the public comments at the February 14th Council Meeting were emergency funding for the Meals on Wheels Program and further study of the 18th Street Arts Complex proposal: Meals on Wheels West (MOWW) In April 2005, MOWW was served a notice to vacate the church at 609 Arizona from which they operated their meal delivery program. They have secured a new location with a 10 year lease, with two five year options at 1823 Michigan (1st AME Church), but the space required significant tenant improvements. The total cost of these improvements was $50,592.73, of this $25,785.53 was paid for by a Rotary Club International grant and in kind donations. MOWW seeking $24,807 re-pay their operating reserves, which was used for this project. The MOWW program provides a significant level of service to the residents of Santa Monica. As of December 31, 2005, MOWW had served 272 Santa Monica residents, eighty-five percent of the total program participation. In FY 2005-2006 City of Santa Monica Community Development Program Grants will provide MOWW $116,482, twenty-two percent of their annual budget. 9 Alternatives: 1) Council could consider this request with the FY2006-07 Budget, while considering request from other organizations. 2) Council could grant funds from its contingency account 01201.577850. Current available account balance is $73,400. This is staff's recommended approach. 18th Street Arts Center 18th Street Art Center is home to approximately 30% of the non-profit arts organizations in Santa Monica. The Center owns the 1.25 acre parcel at 18th and Olympic that was recently appraised for over $8 M. 18th Street currently faces two major problems, it has a note due to the Center's founder and original owner of the property in the amount of approximately $2M and its campus has substantial deferred maintenance needs. Over the past two years, the City of Santa Monica has provided funding totaling $20,000 to the Center to develop an organizational and site strategy. To date, $10,000 has been expended. On February 14th, in response to the Center's request, the City Council directed staff to work with the Center to explore ways to re-finance the debt and/or redevelop the property. A technical working group of city staff has been convened to review the Center's facilities planning work completed to date. As requested by the Council, the group developed a preliminary list of options. 10 In terms of process and policy and given the amount of funding that the Center originally requested, options must be considered in the context of (1) City goals and objectives; (2) capital project priorities; (3) operating budget considerations; and (4) the development of a cultural master plan, currently underway. The options, identified by the technical working group, vary in scope and scale. They include: (a) Increase the current operating support provided to the Center to cover increased interest on a refinanced loan. (b) Assign City staff to provide technical assistance to the Center in pursuing the appropriate development partner for the site (c) Provide a grant to pay the cost of retaining a private project manager to help them plan the redevelopment of the site. (d) Support the Center in the issuance of tax exempt bonds, as a non-profit entity, to assist the Center in developing the site. (e) Buy a portion of the property and consider it for a future development. (f) Partner with the Center to develop affordable housing on the site. (g) Provide 'bridge financing' to payoff the existing note and provide technical assistance to the organization in pursuing an appropriate development partner for the site. The short-term loan would be repaid once a development partner was in place. (h) In return for an investment of 2M, become an equity partner with 18th Street in the redevelopment of the entire site, jointly establish the nature of the mixed use development at the site, and retain ownership of a portion of the project. Although this is an option, I do not recommend that the City pursue it further since the funding requirement is large and 18th Street Arts Center has specific desires for the development of the site. This is a complex issue that will require additional discussion and consideration by both the City and the 18th Street Arts Center. 11 Principals of BudQetinQ and Finance Based on meetings with our Financial Advisors, during the upcoming Budget process, I will be introducing and seeking your adoption of a formal Resolution the following Budgeting and Finance principles that will assist in guiding the City in maintaining its financial health. They are: 1. Ongoing expenditures should be supported by ongoing revenues. Consequently, one-time revenues should not be used for ongoing expenditures on a continuous basis. . 2. General Fund reserves should be maintained at a minimum of 10% 3. When capital projects are considered, all associated costs should be identified in order to properly consider future financial impacts. 4. Each enterprise fund should reflect the true cost of operation, including direct and indirect costs of services provided by the General Fund. 5. As a goal, activities that are supported by the user fees should be fully cost recoverable. 6. Discretionary General Fund revenues should not be earmarked, thereby allowing maximum flexibility in funding decisions on an annual basis. While the City has included many of these Principles in its Adopted Budget document, the review and formal resolution adoption will present a stronger commitment to maintaining the City's financial health With many large unfunded capital projects, debt financing may be a way to fund with future dollars, today's projects. To determine the level of debt that the City can afford, our Financial Advisors are also recommending that we update our Debt Capacity Study as a tool for identification of financing options and presentation to bond rating agencies. We will be seriously considering funding this study in next year's budget. 12 Summary The City's current fiscal status is quite stable; however, on the horizon there are many issues that future budgets will need to address including: . Ongoing revenue increases not keeping pace with ongoing expenditure increases . Operational funding needs . Under funded capital replacement needs . Unfunded new capital projects . Increasing subsidies to "enterprise" funds and special revenue funds from the General Fund. . Financial policies and debt strategies With the above in mind, I believe it to be more prudent for all funding requests (community, Council and departmental) to be weighed against one another, since requests always exceed resources available. The best time to do this is during the budget process when reviewing the proposed budget for adoption. For this reason I would recommend against appropriating any of the $2.5 million projected excess revenue. It is more appropriate to consider its use as part of the upcoming budget process. This prescribed time also gives all groups seeking consideration for additional revenue the opportunity to be heard. Forwarded to Council: 13