SR-10-A (76)
':~ ....-
- ..-.-
/1)-4
CDD:PC:JR:jr:reql.cns.ced
City council Meeting 5/28/91
MAY
) C'
199f
Santa Monica, California
TO:
Mayor and City Council
FROM:
City Staff
SUBJECT:
Request to Hold a Public Hearing and to Hear Public
Comment on the Proposed Two Year Community
Development Plan for FY1991-92 and FY1992-93 and to
Approve a Resolution Authorizing Submission of the
"Proposed statement of Community Development
Objectives and Projected Use of Fundsll to the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Introduction
This report requests that the City Council hold a public hearing
and adopt the attached Resolution: (1) approving the Proposed Two
Year community Development Plan for FY1991-92 and FY1992-93i (2)
authorizing the City Manager to negotiate contracts for FY1991-92
with all grantees specified in the Plani and (3) authorizing the
submittal of all documents required for the implementation of the
1991-92 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program to the
u.s. Department of Housing and Urban Development (RUD). One of
these documents, the "Proposed statement of Community Development
Objectives and Projected Use of Funds," is also attached to this
report for Council review.
In addition, Section I of the
Proposed Two Year Community Development Plan for FY1991-92 and
FY1992-93 is attached for your approval. An expanded copy of the
Community
Development
Plan
including
recommended
program
descriptions, funding mechanisms, program issues and all public
/ 1)- A-
- 1 -
Mil- -
11I...f ~ (5 l~d
comments has been separately submitted to City council as an
Information Item on May 15, 1991.
Backqround
On April 14, 1991, the City council received the draft Proposed
Two Year Community Development Plan, containing staff
recommendations for all projects to be funded under the Community
Development Plan in Year 1, 1991-92. This Plan conforms to
required formats of the local CDBG Ordinance and of federal HOD
regulations. A fourteen day public review and comment period
followed the mid April release of the Community Development Plan.
All written comments received during this period have been
submitted with the Final Proposed Two Year community Development
Plan and transmitted to the council on May 15, 1991.
After hearing public comments on May 28, Council is scheduled to
adopt, through the approval of the attached resolution, the final
Two Year Community Development Plan and to authorize the City
Manager to begin contract negotiations with approved grantees.
In addition to approving the Plan, the attached resolution also
requests approval of the "proposed Statement of Communtiy
Development Objectives and projected Use of Funds. II This
document is required by BUD and represents the City's application
for receipt of its 1991-92 CDBG entitlement, along with a number
of standard certifications to be signed by the city Manager.
This document, as required by Federal regulations, has been
published in the Eveninq Outlook and has been made available to
the public for review and comment. It must be submitted to HUD
- 2 -
by June 1, 1991 and the recommended actions therefore must occur
prior to the City's budget adoption process.
Financial/Budgetary Impact
All
necessary
appropriations
for
recommended
community
Development proj ects have been included in the Ci ty Manager's
Proposed city Budget for FY1991-92.
Council must approve the
proposed CDBG funding levels included in the proposed CnBG
statement of Objectives on May 28, 1991. Any additional changes
to
funding
levels
from
other
sources
will
necessitate
corresponding changes in the city's budget prior to its adoption
in June of 1991.
Recommendations
city staff recommends that the Council hold the public hearing
and adopt the attached resolution regarding the approval
andsubmittal of the Two Year community Development Plan including
all attachments and the CDBG Proposed statement of objectives and
Projected Use of Funds.
Prepared by: Barbara Stinchfield, Community Development Manager
Julie Rusk, Human Services Coordinator
Julie Johnson, Human Services Analyst
Department of Community Development
Attachments
- 3 -
1991-1992
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM
1992-1993
. ~ffIl.l ~ IlI6IItl ~
PROPOSED COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Prepared by:
City of Santa Monica
Department of Community Development
Community and Neighborhood Services Division
May 15. 1991
CITY OF SANTA XOHICA
PROPOSED
COMMUNITY DEVELOPKEHT PLAIl
1991-92 and 1992-93
Santa Monica: The Context for the Community Development Plan
With many of the virtues and strengths of a smaller town along
with the dynamic and complex features of a major city, Santa
Monica is a vital and active community of 87,000. People who
live and work in Santa Monica enjoy a wide range of amenities and
services from the natural beauty of the beaches to arts and
cultural events and the full range of City services designed to
sustain and enhance the quality of life. In spite of such
community assets, many people in Santa Monica confront, on a
daily basis, the significant stress and challenge of difficult
economic social, health, mental health, economic and cultural
obstacles and problems.
The reality of Santa Monica is a city of social, economic, racial
and cultural diversity. According to the 1980 Census, 42.8% of
all Santa Monica residents are of low or moderate income.
Approximately 8,500 residents live below the poverty line. In
addition, not reflected in residency statistics is the high
number of homeless individuals living within Santa Monica's
boundaries, estimated to be between 500 and 1,000 persons. Those
very low, low and moderate income people in Santa Monica are
faced with juggling very limited resources for food, shelter,
child care, transportation, health care and other basic needs on
a daily basis.
According to preliminary 1990 Census data, approximately 25% of
Santa Monica's population is from racial or ethnic minority
groups, with over 9,000 of the community's residents speaking a
language other than English at home. For many of these
residents, the language and cultural barriers often experienced
in community institutions create a major hurdle to overcome.
These challenges are compounded by subtle and overt forms of
racism which continue to pervade society.
Adding to this diversity is approximately 19,000 senior citizens,
many of whom enjoy active and independent lives but also find
themselves facing difficult decisions regarding housing, health
care, and alternatives to institutionalization. Because of the
high percentage of seniors in our community, the incidence of
frail and isolated elderly is of critical significance.
Children and youth, a large segment of approximately 12,000
active residents, are growing up in Santa Monica with its
educational and recreational opportunities. However, a critical
- 1 -
number are in families living near or below the poverty level.
These youth, as well as those in families with greater economic
means, are looking for positive ways to be heard, to be involved,
and often times need additional support to get through those
difficult times where it seems no one is there to listen.
Many of Santa Monica's 24,000 families, especially single parent
and low-income families, struggle with the lack of housing,
childcare, and other domestic issues.
other important segments of the community - women, disabled
persons, gay men and lesbians -- also face unique challenges.
They ask for services that are sensitive and responsive to their
common and unique needs.
It is this broad range of target groups and social needs that the
City's Community Development Program addresses. By funding
approximately fifty programs or projects primarily through
non-profit human service and housing development organizations in
the community, the City's Community Development Program
contributes over $5 million annually to meet this challenge.
The Next Two Years
This proposed Community Development Plan sets forth the overall
goals for the next two years and allocates City resources to
specific projects for the first year (fiscal year 1991-92).
The broad goals for the Community Development Program were
approved in January 1991 by the City council as part of the
Funding Rationale, the document which outlined funding priorities
for the coming fiscal year 1991-92. These goals include:
o to provide support to a wide range of community and
human services in order to sustain or enhance the
quality of life for residents of the Santa Monica
community;
o
to support important
lower-income residents
the maintenance of
programs;
capital projects that benefit
and neighborhoods, prioritizing
support to affordable housing
o to target a significant portion of these services and
projects to those most in need -- especially low-income
persons;
o to remove any remaining obstacles to service for those
significant segments of the community that are
traditionally underserved -- including low-income and
minority residents and persons with disabilities;
o to provide funding stability to effective, proven
agencies that deliver these services;
- 2 -
o to foster innovative new programs and collaborative
programs that meet emerging or unmet critical needs:
o to continue to plan for future improvements in those
servlce areas where gaps in service still exist:
o to leverage City resources with funds from other sources
thus lending to a diversified funding base and increased
self sufficiency for City-funded service providers.
In order to continue to achieve these goals approximately $5
million in City resources is proposed to be allocated to two
major categories of projects in FY91-92:
Community Service Projects - operating and special proJect
funding for organizations providing a range of community
and human services.
Community and Neighborhood Improvement Projects - operating
and capital support for "brick and mortar" projects
benefiting low and moderate income residents and
neighborhoods with primary emphasis on affordable housing
programs.
Sources of funding for these projects include:
GEIIBItAL LA COtnrl'Y DBVBL. PtJlJD RBIIJljYIiL.
J'UlfD CDRa FED (HOMBLESS) PROP A AGBNCY TOTAL
COJDroB:E'1'Y
SBanCB
PROJECTS 3,168,077 158,764 50,000 14,260 430,809 -0- 3,821,910
COIOlOll:E'I'Y AIm
XlIGBBORBOOD
IKPROVBXBIITB 238,160 695,175 -0- 156,024 -0- 202,800 1,292,159
TO'l'AL 3,406,237 853,939 50,000 170,284 430,809 202,800 5,114,069
- 3 -
The Funding Process
In January 1991, the City Council approved the two year funding
rationale which outlined the funding priorities and selection
criteria for the community Development Program. The funding
priorities (Child Care and AIDS) and selection criteria were
established with input from community needs assessment and
planning efforts and general guidance and suggestions from
community members, agency executive directors and various City
Commissions.
Local non-profit agencies responded to the City's Request For
Proposals (RFP) by sUbmitting funding applications outlining
their programs, workplan and budgets. The funding rationale
served as the basis for selecting the projects proposed by the
City staff for funding in this document. The comments of two
City Co~~issions (Social Services and Commission on Older
Americans) were also incorporated into the proposed funding
recommendations.
Upon release of these recommendations to applicant organizations,
Commissions and the general public, there will be a two week
Community Review Period, during which time written comments about
the funding recommendations and the proposed Community
Development Plan will be accepted. Any written comments received
during the Community Review Period will be transmitted to the
City Council as Supplemental Information with the Final Community
Development Plan. This final Community Development Plan
including funding recommendations will be presented to the City
council for additional community input and for Council action on
May 28, 1991.
Community Service Proiects
In response to the dramatic reduction in the role and resources
of the federal, state and county governments to address human
service and housing needs, Santa Monica and many other city
governments across the country have been faced with the challenge
of developing programs, policies and funding strategies for local
human services. While the expectation may continue that it is
the obligation of the federal government to play the major role
in supporting the social needs of its citizens, in reality since
the early 1980' s, this obligation has decreased substantially.
Now that it has been over a decade since the erosion of federal
and state support for human services, this role has become much
more solidified and institutionalized in local communities such
as Santa Monica. What was once considered an extremely
non-traditional role for local government human service
planning and funding -- has become a necessary and essential city
government function.
Over 82% of the funding proposed for social services for the
people of Santa Monica comes from the City's General Fund. This
substantial commitment of resources will benefit infants to
seniors with a wide range of services including: emergency
- 4 -
assistance and shelter, school and neighborhood-based counseling
and family advocacy, legal services and mediation, independent
living, health care outreach and assistance, leadership and skill
building, child care assistance, and youth employment. It is
the goal of city funding to support a network of services which
is accessible (geographically, physically, cuI turally) I
responsive to new and emerging needs and effectively responds to
those most likely to be underserved including low income people;
people with disablities, including those with HIV infection and
AIDS; people of color, including bilingual and monolingual
non-English speaking people; and women.
The City has worked closely with local non-profits and community
members over the past few years to develop innovative and
enhanced programs to respond to difficult social problems. In
particular in the areas of child care, youth and family services;
services for people with disablities and homeless services, the
community has dedicated considerable time and energy to assess
needs, identify gaps in services and undertake program planning
efforts.
The funding recommendations contained in this report reflect
outcomes of several of those community planning and development
efforts as well as the City'S commitment to provide a stable
source of income to effective ongoing programs. There is often a
tendency to want to fund new and innovative programs at the
expense of the programs that have, for years, sought to provide
critical services. It is the attempt of these funding
recommendations to do some of both, while recognizing that absent
a major infusion of new funding, the vast majority of dollars
will be allocated to support ongoing programs. \
Use of funds for the first year of this two year cycle is
distributed according to the matrix on the following page:
/
Y
.../
- 5 -
, I 1 ';i
r. ,
~ "I ...
I i: . ~
!~ i ~ z ~ : I .
;; f ~ Ii
I!l .. ~
i ;:! lI\ ;;;
I! i .. i ~ i ~
~ i~ U :l i~ i l ~
<.i !B >l '" ~
~ i ;
h ; i i UI ~ I ~
~ a !5
;! ..
ORGANIZATIONS RECCMEN:lED AREAS OF SERVICE !TARGET GROUPS
FUNDING I ! , !
AIDS PFOJECT LOS ANGELES $61,400 i t I
CATHOUC YOUTH ORGANIZATION 80,969 ! ~ I ,
CENTER FOR PARTIALLY SIGHTED 11,856 ...._L ! I l i
CLARE - SOBER INN 97,2<;05 L i J
. .
COMPUTEfI ACCESS 25,0-4 ; I I
CONNECTIONS FOR CHILDREN - ONGOING 162,";'6 !
CONNECTiONS FOR CHILDREN - NEW 120, 'J'I'~ i !
DISPUTE RESOLUTION - COMMUNl1Y 50.284 !
DISPUTE RESOLUTKJN - SCHOOL 43.160 !
ELNIDO 98.600 I
FAMILY SERVICE OF SANTA MONICA 117,000 I I
HOMELESS SET ASIDE 388,483 1 !
JEWISH FAMilY SERVICE 23,400 I
LATINO RESOURCE ORGANIZATION 123,673
LIEU - CAP 103.446 .I
NEW START - ADULT 39,513 I
-
NEW START - YOUTH 128,700 I I
I . ,
OPCC - DAYBREAK DAY CENTER 120,929
. . --
oPCC - DAYBREAK SHELTER 30,000 =3 , ,
OPCC - DAOp.INtOUTREACH 222,590 , i ,
OPCC-SOJOURN 42,795 I
OPeC - STEPPING STONE 58,674 I
OPCC - TURNING POINT 164,170 . . I
PARATRANSIT SET ASIDE 20,000 :
ST JOSEPH - BREAD AND ROSES CAFE 19,110 J
ST JOSEPH - DAY CENTER 42,512
SANTA MONICAiWESTSIDE HOTLINE 1,170
SHPCC - GENERAL 78,213 ! !
SHPCC - MONEY MANt'GEMeIT 50,049 ,
STEP UP Q\I SECOND 48,707 . I
TRANSPORTATION FUND 15,000 I I
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC 59,960
WESTSIDE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING 68.559 I
WEC - MEALS ON WHEELS 23,122
WESTSIDE FOOD BANK 75.693 I i ,
WISE. GENERAL 307,315 I ;
WISE - PARATRANSIT 384,369 , I
I
WESTSIDE LEGAL SERVICES IWLSj - GENERAL 185,954
WLS - DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 47,773
WOMEN'S CENTER (8M C) - ON THE MOVE 29,900
MANAGEMENT rNCENTlVE GRANTS 49,377 I
TOTAL I 3,821.910
11
Proposals Received
Total 1991-92 Funding Requests
Total 1991-92 Funds Recommended
47
$4,140,946
$3,821,910
$3,499,713
Total 1990-91 Funding
- 6 -
The overall result of these funding recommendations is the award
of grants to 42 programs representing 25 different agencies
providing a range of services to significant segments of the
community. Of the total funding amount of $3,801,910, 86.9% of
the funds are targeted to sustain currently funded programs, 3.5%
for cost-of-living increases, 5.6% to expand services through new
program initiatives or program enhancements, and 1.3% for
one-time Management Incentive grants.
The following is being achieved through this proposed allocation
of funds:
o Operating support is being maintained to 39 ongoing,
effective programs with a continued emphasis on
improvements in program design and operations.
o cost-of-living increases are being recommended for all
continuing programs requesting one.
o A new AIDS Education and Support Program, to be located
in and serving residents of Santa Monica, focusing on
prevention, community education, outreach, increasing
accessiblity to existing services and raising awareness
of and involvement with the issue of AIDS in our
community.
o A new child care initiative will provide a "safe harbor"
for child care programs, particularly those which
provide full time child care for infants and low income
families by providing small to medium size grants to
child care centers, and family day care homes.
o Eleven one-time Management Incentive Grants will enhance
the effectiveness of agency management, service
delivery, program effectiveness or the ability of the
agency to collaborate and provide community leadership.
Examples of one-time projects include: long range Board
planning, extensive Board training, and acquisition of
computer equipment, software and training.
o Two one-time collaborative planning and development
efforts are proposed for funding. One will fund youth
serving agencies participating in the new School Based
Consortium to begin to develop an evaluation tool to
measure the outcomes of youth counseling and family
advocacy services. The second will fund a collaboration
led by Connections for Children, the Santa Monica Malibu
Unified School District and Santa Monica College working
to provide leadership to better coordinate, develop and
make accessible parent education and parenting resources
in Santa Monica.
o A small technical assistance fund has been set aside
through the Management Incentive Grants specifically to
assist organizations to increase their ability to create
- 7 -
effective and meaningful linkages with minority
communities. The need for local non-profits to create
truly multi-cultural agencies and programs becomes
increasingly essential for effective service delivery.
This fund can be utilized for staff and Board trainings,
development of more cUlturally-relevant outreach and
program design or other efforts proposed by an agency.
o A bus token transportation fund to be allocated and
disbursed to agencies providing services for homeless
people, so that they can more easily access public
transportation to get to public benefit offices,
shelter, health care, employment and other services.
o At the suggestion of the Commission on Older Americans,
agencies serving seniors and frail elderly will be asked
to work with each other to enhance the coordination of
service provision between agencies.
o At the urging of the Social service Commission, the city
will be working with all social service providers and
the new AIDS Education and Support Project to ensure
that all community agencies are actively making
available resources and information about AIDS and HIV
infection to their cl ients and program participants as
well as providing the necessary training for agency
staff on AIDS and HIV infection.
- 8 -
Community and Neiqhborhood Improvement proiects
Given the virtual elimination of COBG carryover funds from
completed prior years' projects which in the past has mitigated a
gradual decrease of the City's CDBG annual entitlement, the
allocation of resources for community and Neighborhood
Improvement Projects was extremely difficult. However, for
FY91-92, the City will receive a 10% increase in the entitlement
which is allowing a build up of small contingency fund. Consistent
with the strategy in prior years to prioritize support to ongoing
affordable housing programs, this support continues. An attempt
is also made, in a 1 imi ted way, to support other community
development activities.
Proposed s
:I I"
upport includes: 2 "
~ E & ~ 18
:; ...
..
w " Of 1': ..
~ ~ ~ :;
.. " OJ
::I .. .. :l S
" ; 8 .
" R
.. " ..
PROJECT/ORGANIZAnON RECOtABaD
FUNDING 11-92
COMMUNITY CORPORATION OF SANTA MONICA 440,960 E I
NEGHBOA-lOOO FIE9:lI.R;E.AND OEVB.OPMENT CORP 316.872
OPCC - TRANSITIONAL HOUSING 156,024 l]
PICO NElGI-EOAHOOO HOUSN3 TRUST RJNO 322.192 l J
PUBUC WOAKS ASSESSMENT ASSISTANCE 5.200 i
WCIL. HOME ACCESS 15.600
C08G COlTNG9ICY 35.311 :
i
TOTAL $1 292159 \
II i I
Proposals Received
Total 1991-92 Funding Requests
Total 1991-92 Funding Recommended
5
$1,603,094
$1,292,159
Total 1990-91 Funding
$l,098,485
The following is achieved through this proposed allocation of
funds:
o Support is maintained for ongoing programs, Neighborhood
Resource and Development Corporation (NRDC) and
Community Corporation of Santa Monica (CCSM) for housing
rehabilitation and development activities.
o Approximately 85 affordable housing units will be
rehabilitated and approximately 136 units will be
acquired and rehabilitated or newly-constructed as a
result of support from the Community Development
Program. A special residential accessibility program
will provide for minor accessibility modifications for
low-income residents with physical disabilities.
- 9 -
o
A small amount of assistance will be
low-income residents needing assistance
works assessments.
provided for
with public
o A project seeking to acquire a facility for transitional
housing for homeless women and men will be supported.
Homeless developer fees.
o The Home Access Project, providing essential home
improvements to increase self-sufficiency and
accessiblity for people with disablities, will continue
to be funded.
o A small amount of local developer funds will be
available to increase accessibility in the local
City-funded shelter, should that become feasible.
o lOOt of all COBG funds will substantially benefit lower
income individuals and neighborhoods, meeting local CDBG
requirements and exceeding Federal requirements.
o 96% of COBG funds available for CNI projects are
targeted to the Pico Neighborhood.
o For every dollar of city funding, other sources will
contribute approximately two dollars, thus effectively
leveraging limited local resources.
- 10 -
ATTACHMENT I
1991-92 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
community Service Projects
Selection criteria
Each eligible program will be assessed on the extent that:
(1) Addresses a need that is clearly documented.
(2) Provides effective and responsive services to clients most 1n
need.
(3) Meets the specific agency's program performance standards for
FY1990-91.
(4) Provides a high level of access to services including
appropriate geographic location and hours of operation,
physical accessibility, bilingual capacity, and cultural
relevance and sensitivity.
(5) Effectively serves minority, no- and low-income, and
residents with disabilities - including people with AIDS or
those at-risk for HIV infection.
(6) Demonstrates established linkages with minority communities
such as through program outreach, program design and Board
composition.
(7) Does not duplicate services, rather coordinates and
collaborates with other agencies, resulting in improved
direct services delivery and elimination of unnecessary
service duplications.
(8) Has a procedure for continually evaluating program
effectiveness and proposes program improvements as necessary.
(9) Provides a minimum of 25% of the total budget for the Santa
Monica program from non-City sources, thus lending to the
financial stability and the ability to sustain itself as part
of the community services network.
(10)Provides a cost-effective budget that is consistent with the
amount of service provided to Santa Monica residents.
(11) Demonstrates fiscal and administrative capacity which
supports and enhances program effectiveness and the ability
to meet program goals.
(12)Exhibits a high level of community support through its
ability to retain a broad-based Board of Directors and to
procure community resources (e.g., fundraising, use of
volunteers, donated services).
- 11 -
One-time xanaqement Incentive Grants
selection criteria
One-time expenses or proiects will be assessed on the extent
that:
(1) documentation to substantiate the amount of the proposed
expenditures;
(2) the organization has fully explored alternative means of
funding;
(3) the proposed expenditures will have a documented impact
upon improving the management and administrative
capability or service delivery of the agency, or
encourage collaborative efforts among agencies.
- 12 -
community and Neiqhborhood Improvements
selection criteria
Each eliqible project will be assessed according to the extent to
which:
o the project will result in long-term benefit to low and
moderate income residents:
o the project provides evidence that the proposed program or
project does not duplicate other programs or projects in
the community:
o the proposed funding structure leverages City funds with
non-City funds:
o the project shows long-term potential for a cash return on
the CDBG investment and does not require ongoing CDBG or
government support for maintenance;
o if the project is to be implemented by an outside or-
ganization, the proposal application includes documenta-
tion of current administrative capacity to implement com-
muni ty development proj ects and to sustain the proj ect
operations throughout the life of the project, as well as
experience with similar government-assisted programs:
o the implementing agency presents a program that includes
both administrative procedures and a viable implementation
plan for timely execution of the project;
o if a currently-funded project, the agency requesting fund-
ing fully justifies additional support based on timely
expenditure of currently appropriated funds;
o the project clearly identifies its Santa monica target
population and documents community need;
o the project will effectively outreach and serve minority,
low-income and residents with disabilities and other
groups most in need of services;
o the implementing agency is guided by an active, broad-
based Board of Directors with evidence of providing appro-
priate leadership to the organization;
o the implementing agency proposes a budget that reflects
cost-effective administrative and project activities.
- 13 -
ATTACIlKENT II
1991-92 COKMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Availability of community Development Block Grant Funds
Sources
1991-92 Entitlement
$1,067,424
Projected Program Income
-0-
Total
~1,067,424
Uses
FY91-92 Community Development Projects
$ 818,628
community and Neighborhood
Improvement Projects
o Neighborhood Resource &
Development Corp.
o Pico Neighborhood
Housing Trust Fund
o Public Works Assessment
Assistance
o WCIL - Home Access
$316,872
322,192
Subtotal
5,200
15,600
~659,864
Community Service Projects
o LIEU-CAP - Community
o venice Family Clinic
$103,446
55,318
Subtotal
$158,764
Project Contingencies
35,311
Program Administration
213,485
$1,067,424
:cdplan
- 14 -
1991 -92 COMMUNnY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
COMM UNITY SElMa: PRO.JECTS
ATTACf-lMENT III
PAGE 1 Of 3
USES I SOURCES ,
!
I COUNTYI DEVELOPER
: AGENC"r'iPROGRAM fY9O-81 FY91-92 fY91-92 fUN 0( GENERAL I SOURCES
i {by tame!: DODuI8IIOI'll fUNDING REQUEST RECOMMENDED FEMA HOMB.ESS CDBG PROP A FUND TOTAL
!
! AIDS OUTREACHlEDUCAll0N
I AIDS SelAslde 35,000 0 0
, APLA 0 60,000 6' ,400 6' ,400 61400
WEe 0 60,000
AIDS SUBTOTAl 35.000 120.000 61 400 0 0 0 0 61 400 61 400
CHILDREN. yourn &. FAMIUES
CHI LDCAREJP ARENTS SUPPORTS
Connecbons for Chlld",n
-Ongoing Progl1lm 156 112 162,316 162.316 162,3 '6 '62 3'6
- Ch,ldcare Center Support/
i Parenling Coot'd 0 2' 1 , '93 120,000 120 000 , 20,000
On The MovefSMC 28.750 29,900 29,900 29,90(1 29,900
PICS! 0 50,000 0
CHlLDCARE/P ARENTS SUBTOTAL 184,862 453,400 312,216 0 0 0 0 312,216 312,216
YOUlli
evo 77 ,855 84,070 60,969 80,969 80,969
Computer Access 25,000 25,874 25,874 25,874 25,874
CRS - School Mediation 41 500 43,160 43,160 43,160 43.160
EI N,do 90,000 98,600 98,600 98,600 98,600
FamIly SeMCe of Santa MonICa 112,500 117,000 1'7,000 1'7,000 "7,000
JewISh Famiy SeNlce 22,500 23,400 23,400 23,400 23,400
Latino Resource OrganlZBbon , 18,930 123,673 123,673 123,673 123 673
New Start - Youth '23,750 128,700 128,700 128,700 128 700
opec - Steppi1g Stone 56,417 58,674 58,674 58,674 58 674
Project Heavy West 4,260 0 0
YOUlli SUBTOTAl 872.112 703,151 700,050 0 0 0 0 700,050 , 700,050
DISABLED
ClI fOl the Partially Slghled 11,400 1',856 , 1 ,856 11,856 11856
West Clr for Independ Lnmg 65,922 68,559 68.559 68 559 68559
WEC - Meals on Wheels 22233 23,' 25 23.122 23,'22 23,122
DISABLED SUBTOTAL .,555 103,540 103,531 0 0 0 0 103,531 103,537
GENERAL
Clly landbrd Vou::hef Progl8lTl 2.000 0 0
DlSpl.ie ResoIl.tUIOf1 - Commumy 48.350 50,284 50,284 50,284 50,264
Legal Aid Foundllllon 11,090 0 0
UEU-CAP - COmmumy 99 487 109,587 103,448 103.446 103,446
New Start - Adult 37,993 39 513 39,513 39,513 39513
SMiWlil$ts.de Hotline 1,125 1,'70 ',170 1,170 1,170
VenICe FamIly C1nio 57,654 59,960 59.960 55,318 4,642 59,960
Westside Legal SeNlces
- Ganeml 178,802 185.954 185,954 185,954 185,954
- Domestic V~e 47,773 47.n3 47,773 47,773 47,n3
GENERAL SUBTOTAL 4&1.254 494,241 481,100 0 0 158.764 0 329,338 488,100
HOMB.ESS
CLARE - Sober Inn 93,589 97.295 97.295 97.295 97 295
Homeless Set AsIde 372,366 385,261 388,483 50.000 11.440 327,043 388,483
OPCC - Drop-lnfOulr8lllCh T8III11 214,029 222.590 222.590 222,590 222,590
- DaybrllBk Day Cer1ter 116,278 120.929 120,929 120,929 120 929
- Daybreak Sheller 0 35,793 30.000 30,000 30,000
- Sojoum 41,149 42,795 42,795 42.795 42 795
- TUmlng Poonl 144,144 149,910 164.170 14260 149.910 164,170
St Joseph - Day Certer 40,945 42,512 42,512 42.512 42512
St Joseph - Bread & Roses Cafe 18,375 19,110 19,110 19,110 19,110
SalvatIon Army 8,730 0 0
Step Up on Second 48,834 48.707 48,707 48,707 48,707
Transportation Fund 0 9,000 15000 15,000 15000
Wesbllde Food Bank 85.282 88,693 75.693 75,693 75 693
HOMB.ESS SUBTOTAl 1.181,121 1.282.585 1267.2114 50,000 14.2110 0 28,440 1,176,584 1,267.2114
1981-82 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ATTAalMENT III I
COUMUNITY SERVICE PROJECTS PAGE 2 Of' 3
USES SOURCES , !
.
DEVELOPER ;
AGENC'f{PROGRAM FY9O-91 FY91-1112 FY91-82 COUNTY} FUNDi GENERAL I SOURCES
(by target populllllOfl) FUNDING REQUEST RECOMMENDED FBIA HOMB..ESS CDBG PROP A FUND . TOTAl
SENIOR
; Ementus College 17,418 36,000 0
iSHPCC - General 75.204 78,213 78,213 78,213 78,213
- Money Management 48 124 50,049 50,049 50 049 50,049
WISE - Case Management 98,029 101,950 101,950 101 950 101,950
- In-Home 31 395 32.651 32.651 32,651 32,651
- 011V8 Slone 110,886 115,321 115,321 115,321 115321
- ParalJansl 369,586 384,369 384,369 384 369 384,369 ..
- Rll60Urce & Refenal 12,172 12,659 12,659 12,659 12,659
- WISE Que 43,013 44,734 44,734 44,734 44.734
PlIflIInu1sl Set -Asia, 5.414 20 000 20,000 20.000 20,000
SENIOR SUBTOTAL 811,241 875,946 839,948 0 0 0 404,369 435,ST1 839,946
i MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE GRANTS 30,368
CLARE 4,694 3,450 3,450 3,450
Connecbons '0<" Chlld",n 4,297 2,500 2,500 2,500
DRS - School 4,995 0 I
Family SeMee 600 500 500 600
Jewish Famly 5,000 3,000 3.000 3000
UEU-CAP 5,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
, New Start - Adult 5,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
OPCC - Drqlln 4,500 2,000 2,000 2,000
st JoIIeph 4,917 4,917 4,917 4,917
SHPCC - G_ral 4,600 2,600 2,600 2600
Step Up 4,580 2,180 2,160 2,160
Vemce Family ClnIC 5,888 0
WCIL 5,000 0
WEe - MOW 4,617 2,700 2,700 2,700
Youlh Eval. PllInnng 7,500 7.500 7500
Parenbng Plu1n1ng 7.500 7.500 7,500
Cult. [)f,Iersly - Capecity Bldg 5,450 5,450 5.450
MGT INCI;NT GRANTS SUBTOTAL 30,368 83,8. 48.371 0 0 0 0 49,371 49,377
OTHER
Turnabout ASAP 0 39,176 0
W,lshre West 0 25,000 0
OTHER SUBTOTAL 0 84,178 0
GRAND TOTAL 3,489,713 4,140,948 3,821,910 50,000 14.260 158,784 430,808 3,168,071 3,821,910
1.1-1_ COU.,UJnY OE'VElOPUENT PROGRAM ATTACHMENT III
COMMUNITY AHO NeIGH80AHOOO IJWROYBlENT PAO.ECTS PAGE 3 Of 3
I I USES SOURCES l
I
I DEVELOPER I
I PRQJECT - AGENCY fYDl)-i1 f'nI1-02 FY91 ~92 GeNERAl REDEVEL F=UNCV ; SOUF
I ;
FUNDING REQUEST RECOUMENUeo COOG FUND AGatCV HOMELESS i T01
i ]
! COM NUNIlY CORP U 424,000 44O!jI6(l 440,960 238 160 m.800 J 4<
iNAOC 304.68S 318,87" 318,872 316.872 I 3'
i
[ PleO NElGH HOUSING TRIJST FUND 309.800 804.660 322.192 322.192 j 3~
; PUB WORK$ ASSESS ASSIST (PW~ 5.000 0 5200 5,201) i
!WCll - HOME ACCESS 15.000 15.600 15.600 15.600 I
. SHEl.TER ACCESS CONTINGENCY 35.000 0 20,7-40 201-401
I COBo. CONTINGENCY 5.000 0 3!l.311 3S.311 I
I
! opec - TRAN$IT10NAl. 0 225,000 135.2&4 135.264 I 1:
I GRANO TOTAl. !
1.088._ 1,603.084 1.292.15t 615.11$ 238.180 202.110O . 156.0:24 i 1.29;
~. The re<:ommended amount aSIlUme& no adddionBl fundi woul4 be requelIled In IhI$ c:UIT8fll fl8cal V- (1\90191)
RESOLUTION NUMBER 8230
(CCS)
(Clty Councll Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA
APPROVING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG) FUNDING FOR
FYl991-92 AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF CDBG STATEMENT OF
OBJECTIVES FOR 1991-92
WHEREAS, the City of Santa Monica desires to undertake a
Two Year Community Development Program for fiscal year 1991-92
and 1992-93 to meet the community development needs of City
residents; and
WHEREAS, in addition the Council has approved the CDBG
statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for FY1991-92;
and
WHEREAS, public hearings have been held to receive comments
on community development and housing needs and on the Community
Development Plan and COBG Statement of Objectives and Projected
Use of Funds; and
WHEREAS, the proposed CDBG statement of objectives and
proj ected Use of Funds contained recommendations for specific
community and Neighborhood Improvement Projects and Community
Service proj ects approved by the City Council prior to
implementation of the 1991-92 program,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
MONICA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The city Council of the city of Santa Monica
approves the Two Year Community Development Plan for FY1991-92
- 1 -
and FY1992-93 and Communlty Development Block Grant (CDBG)
funding for FY1991-92 on file with the Clty Clerk.
SECTION 2. The city Manager is authorized on behalf of the
Clty Council to negotiate and execute contracts with all grantees
speclfled in the Community Development Plan.
SECTION 3. The City Manager, as official representative,
is further authorized to submit to the United States Department
of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) the final statement of
Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds, all
understandings and assurances contained therein,
and any
additional information as may be required.
SECTION 4.
All City council approved projects shall be
included in the 1991-92 City Budget.
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall
be in full force and effect.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
- 4"',,:/: _..~..,..~ ~.....;
....
.........""'--~J'-$'.... ~
ROBERT M. MYERS
City Attorney
:reso
- 2 -
City of Santa Monica
PROPOSED STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS
The followlng describes the proposed use of CDBG Entitlement
funds planned for Flscal Year 1991-92. Of these expenditures,
100% is being used for activlties which meet the national objec-
tive of primarily benefitting low and moderate-income persons.
I. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES FOR FY 1991-92
o To maintain and improve affordable housing opportunities
for low and moderate income persons.
o To stablilize and enhance low and moderate income neighbor
hoods through neighborhood revitalization and other com-
munity development efforts.
o To provide essential community services to residents most
in need of these services.
II. PROPOSED CDBG ACTIVITIES FOR 1991-92, THEIR LOCATION AND
ESTIMATED COST
Community & Neighborhood
Improvement Projects
Community Service Projects
659,864
158,764
Project Contingencies
35,311
Program Administration
213,485
1,067,424
- 1 -
}
Sources of funds in support of the above activ~ties lnclude:
Prlor Year Funds
- 0 -
1991-92 Entltlement
1,067,424
Projected Program Income
- 0 -
Housinq
SpeclflC projects recommended for funding include:
$1,067,424
$316,872
$ 15,600
$322,192
PICO NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM -
Residential Rehabilitation Grant Program (Pico Neigh-
borhood Area)
RESIDENTIAL ACCESSIBILITY PROJECT - Minor acces-
sibility improvements to residences of lower income
households (Citywide)
PICO NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING TRUST FUND - Purchase &
rehabilitation of affordable housing (Pico Neighbor-
hood Area)
$ 5,200
Neiqhborhood Revitalization
PUBLIC WORKS ASSESSMENT ASSISTANCE - Assistance to
low-income homeowners and tenants for public works
improvement fees assessed by the City (Citywide)
$158,764
Community Services
HEALTH CARE PROGRAMS & SOCIAL SERVICE ADVOCACY -
Primary health care services and direct social service
delivery (Citywide, Pi co Neighborhood)
Project Contingency
$ 35,311
COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
CONTINGENCY
$213,485
Administration and Planninq
PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION - General administration of the
overall CDBG Program.
- 2 -
.
III.PROPOSED AMOUNT ~ ?UNDS TO BENEFIT LOW/MODERATE INCOME
PERSONS
100% of the activ1t1es proposed for the 1991-92 CDBG program
will primarily benef1t low and moderate 1ncome persons.
ProJect funding for this purpose totals $853,939.
CLARICE JOHNSEN
City Clerk
Approved As To Form
-(- -
Robert M. Myers
City Attorney
:pscdopuf
- 3 -
Adopted and approved this 28th day of May, 1991.
!l /J;;' ~
;// Mayor
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 8230(CCS)
was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Santa Monica
at a meeting thereof held on May 28th, 1991 by the following
Council vote:
Ayes: Councilmembers: Genser, Holbrook, Ka t z , Olsen,
Vazquez, Zane, Mayor Abdo
Noes: Councilmembers: None
Abstain: Councilmembers: None
Absent: Councilmembers: None
ATTEST:
")
-// /
/'-t:M~;r~~
City clerf'