SR-10A (14)
/()-It
CARS:CNS:SM:JR:cd94sr.cns.ced
Council Meeting: 6/22/93
JUN 2 2 1993
Santa Monica, California
TO: Mayor and City council
FROM: city staff
SUBJECT: Request to Hold a Public Hearing on the Proposed Two
Year Community Development Plan for FY 1993-94 and FY
1994-95 and to Approve a Resolution Authorizing
submission of the "proposed statement of Community
Development Objectives and projected Use of Funds" for
the Community Development Block Grant Program.
INTRODUCTION
This report requests that the City council hold a public hearing
and adopt the attached Resolution: (1) approving the final
Proposed Two-Year community Development (CD) Plan including all
recommended FY 1993-94 funding levels and the "Proposed statement
of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds"
for the COBG Program; (2) authorizing the city Manager to
negotiate contracts for FY 1993-94 with all grantees specified in
the CD Plan; and (3) authorizing the submittal of all documents
required for the implementation of the FY 1993-94 Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) program to the U.s. Department of
Housing and Urban Development (RUD).
BACKGROUND
On June 1, 1993, the draft Proposed Two-Year CD Plan including
all recommended FY 1993-94 funding levels, funding mechanisms and
program issues was transmitted to the City Council and released
to the public. A cO!llmunity review period of the draft CD Plan
took place through June 18, 1993. The final Proposed Two-Year CD
- 1 -
10-A-
JUN 2 2 1993
Plan attached to this report transmits all written comments
received during this period.
A resolution is also attached requesting adoption of the Proposed
CD plan and approval of the "Proposed statement of Community
Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" under Section
VII of the Proposed CD Plan. This document is required by HUD
and represents the City's application for receipt of its 1993-94
CDBG entitlement award of $1,420,857. The "Proposed statement of
Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" was
published in The Outlook on June 12, 1993, and has been made
available to the public for review and comment.
DISCUSSION
Given the significant budget deficit faced by the city, targeted
funding reductions are recommended in the FY 1993-94 Proposed CD
Plan. The recommended funding cuts have decreased the overall
annual Community Development Program funding from $5,925,690 in
FY 1992-93 to $5,638,866 in FY 1993-94, an effective $286,824
(General Fund) or a 5% grant funding reduction. This targeted
funding reduction does not include the one-time costs budgeted in
FY 1992-93.
Targeted funding reductions are recommended for 9 programs based
on several criteria including: 1) the program's limited impact on
meeting the needs of Santa Monica residents; 2) the program's
chronic and historic problems in serving an adequate proportion
of Santa Monica residents as compared to the level of Ci ty
funding; and 3) the program's ability to increase revenues by
- 2 -
generating fees or securing other types of financing. A small
technical
assistance
fund
providing
one-time
grants
to
City-funded agencies was also eliminated.
The following table
summarizes the recommended program funding reductions:
py 1992-93 py 1993-94 Tarqated
AqencY/Program pundinq Recommended savinqs
Business-Gov. Council $ 39,600 $ 10,000 $ 29,600
Latino Resource Organization $122,436 $ 50,000 $ NA
Latino Education Project (1) $ -0- $ 72,436 $ NA
Marine Park Child Care Center $269,391 $242,452 $ 26,939
opec - stepping stone (2) $ 58,087 $ 36,136 $ 21,951
SHPCC - Money Management $ 49,549 $ 39,088 $ 10,461
WISE - Olive stone Center $ 97,780 $ 75,721 $ 22,059
Neighborhood Support Ctr. $347,907 $257,906 $ 90,001
WLS - DV Program $ 47,295 $ 41,544 $ 5,751
Community Corporation (3) $436,550 $392,895 $ 43,655
Management Incentive Grants $ 36,407 $ -0- $ 36,407
TOTAL $286,824
(1) The City will prepare a special Request for Proposal (RFP) to
retarget the $72,436 reduced from the Latino Resource
Organization in order to plan and implement an educational
enrichment program targeting Latino students. Components of
the program will include tutorial, mentoring, and parenting
to enhance the educational opportunities of these young
people.
(2) The recommended FY 93-94 funding level for OPCC - Stepping
stone Program includes a 3-month one-time transition grant of
$7,307. The annualized FY 93-94 grant for this program will
be $28,829.
(3) The City will seek to further reduce the organization's
recommended FY 93-94 grant on a $1 for $1 basis based on the
organization's ability to generate new revenues through a
variety of options (further specified in the CD Plan).
For a detailed explanation providing the basis for making these
proposed funding recommendations, please refer to Section V:
Proposed Community Development Program Funding for FY 1993-94 in
the final Proposed CD Plan (pp. 7-13).
- 3 -
FINANCIAL/BUDGETARY IMPACT
The proposed FY 1993-94 funding recommendations set forth in the
final Proposed Two-Year CD Plan seeks to reduce total grant
allocations in FY 1992-93 by $286,824 (General Fund), or
approximately 5%, in order to address the City's budget deficit.
All recommended funding levels will be appropriated as part of
the City Budget for FY 1993-94.
RECOMMENDATION
city staff recommends that the City Council hold a public hearing
and adopt the attached Resolution: (1) approving the final
Proposed Two-Year CD Plan (CD Plan) including all recommended FY
1993-94 funding levels and the "Proposed statement of Community
Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" for the CDBG
Program; (2) authorizing the City Manager to negotiate contracts
for FY 1993-94 with all grantees specified in the final Proposed
Two-Year CD Plan; and (3) authorizing the submittal of all
documents required for the implementation of the FY 1993-94
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program to the U. S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HOD).
Prepared by: Susan McCarthy, Director
Julie Rusk, Acting Manager
Community and Neighborhood Services Division
Department of CUltural and Recreation Services
- 4 -
FY1993-94
FINAL TWQ- YEAR
C01\fMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
FY1994-95
June 22, 1993
1)I'(Op;;ln'd hy:
~ .
Cily of &mta ~follka" ~" . . ~ ~
(~mnmunit111na- NI.'ighbnrhood si'r~'lrt:~ I>h"i"iion.
)6~S.~'~i'~~'~!n:!iJ Rooin 212 .,~: ..~;
S~lRhi'1\folJi..~~. CA 9~Ol ' .
T .':i 1 .",~,:".. "'III... IlL-':" .- .. .~ .
I (3~IP)~JS8~70~, _OlJi~) ....::..: j' . ...
" (31'p'),~..)3~~].I,j\X)'" I . ~~~": . ~'. ~:r,\::,
. 1'(Ji'pi 45~869(fi~DDj , . ~~ ':~$ - .;."~~;f.~~~.,~ :" _~.
. .... ",.,:i... .-;. i-Ji-. ..... ...:, ~ -: .":.,......=r.........
"'~lo.-.A. . .... ~.,. . .' -.... oil ...... - I: 1 .
"
~
~
. . .
~
.
, .
'"
iill
',"1'
...0:;-
..
.'l.
~.~~;
PINAL TWO-YEAR COMMUNITY D~v~LOPKENT PLAN
Table of Contents
SECTION I:
Overview
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
SECTION II: City of Santa Monica's community Profile
SECTION III: Community Participation and Planning
SECTION IV: Community Development Program Impact
SECTION V:
Proposed community Development Program
Funding for FY 1993-94 . . . . . . . .
SECTION VI:
Community Development Program
Descriptions . . . . . . . . .
Page
1
3
4
5
7
14
SECTION VII: Proposed Statement of Community Development
Objectives and Projected Use of Funds . . . . 39
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment I: Community Review Period - Public Input
Attachment II: Funding History and Projected Level of
Cash Match by Program (FY 1992-93)
Attachment III: Recommended FY 1993-94 Funding Levels
:cdtable9
SECTION I: OVERVIEW
In response to the dramatic reduction in the role and resources
of the federal, state and county governments to address human
service and housing needs, Santa Monica, like many other cities
across the nation, has been faced with the challenge of
developing programs, policies and funding strategies for the
delivery of a broad range of community services on the local
leve 1.
The City'S Community Development Program currently provides
funding support of over $5 million annually to approximately 30
non-profit human service and housing development organizations
supporting over 50 different programs to meet the challenging
needs of a broad range of populations, including youth and
families, homeless and low-income people, people with
disabilities, people with HIV/AIDS, the elderly and frail
elderly, and people of color. Funding support for the community
Development Program draws from a variety of funding sources
including the City's General Fund and federal Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds.
Currently the City is facing a significant budget deficit in FY
1993-94 due to reductions from state and local revenue sources.
In order to address this budget def ici t, the Communi ty
Development Program funding must be reduced. On April 27, 1993,
the City Council held a public hearing to review and approve the
Funding Rationale providing the basis for developing the FY
1993-94 recommended funding levels for this proposed Two-Year
Community Development Plan. Given the City'S current fiscal
constraints, implementation of the approved Funding Rationale has
resulted in proposed targeted cuts to existing programs based on
criteria including program performance, level of service to Santa
Monica residents, level of service to low-income people, impact
of City funds on the agency and community, and the ability to
generate fees or financing to supplant City funds. In addition,
all programs were required to meet the minimum eligibility and
selection criteria as approved by city Council in April 1993.
In ordinary circumstances, FY 1993-94 would represent the
beginning of a new two-year funding cycle with agencies competing
for funding in a new Request for Proposal (RFP) process. In
light of the current fiscal constraints affecting both the City
and non-profit organizations, the approved Funding Rationale
recommended a streamlined process for currently funded
organizations to request renewed funding in FY 1993-94.
This proposed Two-Year Community Development Plan sets forth the
overall goals for the next two years and allocates City resources
to specific projects for the first year, FY 1993-94. The broad
goals for the Community Development Program were approved by the
city Council as part of the Funding Rationale in April, 1993.
These goals include:
- 1 -
o To provide support to a wide range of community and human
services in order to sustain or enhance the quality of life
for residents of the santa Monica community.
o To support important capital projects that benefit low- and
moderate-income residents and neighborhoods, prioritizing
the maintenance of support to affordable housing programs.
o To target a significant portion of these services and
projects to those most in need -- especially low-income and
minority residents and persons with disabilities.
o To remove any remaining obstacles to service for those
significant segments of the community that are
traditionally underserved including low-income and
minority residents and persons with disabilities.
o To provide funding stability to effective, proven agencies
that deliver these services.
o To foster innovati ve new programs and collaborative
programs that meet emerging or unmet critical needs.
o To continue to plan for future improvements in those
service areas where gaps in service still exist.
o To leverage city resources with funds from other sources
thus lending to a diversified funding base and increased
self sufficiency for City-funded service providers.
- 2 -
SECTION II: CITY OP SANTA XONICA'S COHMUNYTY PROFILB
The proposed Two-Year Community Development Plan described in
this report sets forth an ambitious but attainable plan to assist
those significant segments of the community who are traditionally
underserved or who have special needs. Santa Monica's profile
provides the context for the specific programs and funding levels
proposed in this report.
Santa Monica is characterized as being socially, economically,
racially and culturally diverse. According to 1990 u.s. Census
data figures, approximately 23% of the total households in Santa
Monica are considered very low-income. In addition,
approximately 17% of Santa Monica's population is from racial or
ethnic minority groups. For many of these residents, the
language and cultural barriers often experienced in community
institutions create a major barrier to overcome. These
challenges are compounded by subtle and overt forms of racism
which continue to pervade our society.
According to 1990 U. S. Census data figures, there were near ly
11,977 Santa Monica residents under the age of 18, comprising
approximately 14% of the City's population. In the fall of 1992,
45% of the students attending Santa Monica public schools were
from minority backgrounds.
Further, according to the 1990 U.S. Census, there are 40% more
preschoolers in California than in 1980. This second baby boom
has enormous consequences for schools and child care resources.
At the same time, longitudinal studies show that high quality
child care has long-term benefits and can make a significant
contribution to healthy development. The need for an increase in
child care supply and quality is immediate and clear.
Adding to this diversity is approximately 21,773 senior citizens
or approximately 25% of the total number of individuals residing
in Santa Monica. Many of these senior citizens enjoy active and
independent lives but also find themselves facing difficult
decisions regarding housing, health care, and alternatives to
institutionalization. The number and incidence of frail or
isolated elderly is also of critical significance.
The number of homeless people in Santa Monica is estimated to be
1,000-1,500 on any given night and 3,000-5,000, including persons
in shelters and on the streets, over the course of a year. The
numher of people requiring housing and services is greater than
the community's resources to assist them. A 3 o-ci ty survey
conducted by the U. s. Conference of Mayors (1990) indicated that
every responding City except one expected the demand for
emergency food and shelter for homeless people to increase during
the next year.
Other important segments of the comm1Jl1ity - women, disabled
persons, gays and lesbians - also face unique challenges. They
ask for services that are sensitive and responsive to their
common and unique needs.
- 3 -
SECTION III: COKHUNITY PARTICIPATION AND PLANNING
communi ty participation and planning plays an integral role in
the development of this proposed community Development Plan.
City Commissions including the Social services Commission, the
Commission on Older Americans, the commission on the status of
Women and the Housing commission, conduct community forums
annually to gain public input on significant concerns and
recommendations for better delivery and coordination of community
services. Many of the concerns identified through these forums
include issues around homelessness, child care, affordable
housing, employment, AIDS/HIV awareness and education,
paratransit services and counseling and case management.
Further, upon release of this document to applicant
organizations, city commissions and the general public, a
community review period was held ending June 18, 1993, during
which time written comments about the recommended funding levels
were accepted. For all written comments received durinq this
community review period, please refer to Attachment I. The city
Council will hold a public hearing on June 22, 19'3, at 6:30 p...
to hear public comments on the proposed funding levels and
program activities set forth in this proposed community
Development Plan.
ei ty staff have also worked closely with local non-profits and
communi ty members over the past several years to identify and
develop innovative and enhanced programs to respond to difficult
social problems. Further, the recommendations and priorities set
forth in the Task Force on Homelessness: A Call to Action, the
lO-Year Youth Action Plan, the child Care Master Plan and the
comI;rehensive Housing Affordability strategy (CHAS), provide a
pol1cy framework for developing and further ref~ning the programs
proposed through this Community Development Plan. Although many
of the recommended programs identified in these reports require
additional City resources, city staff have continued to seek out
new funding opportunities and innovative means to further these
critical planning areas. However, without a growth in the City'S
revenue base and supplemental funding from outside funding
sources including federal McKinney Act funds administered through
the Department of Housinq and Urban Development (BUD), it is
doubtful that all can be implemented.
For copies of these reports, please inquire with the City'S
Information Desk, located in the lobby of city Hall, by calling
(310) 393-9975 ext. 0, or (310) 458-8701 ext. O.
- 4: -
SECTION IV: COMMUNITY DEVELOPXENT PROGRAM IXPACT
The Community Development Program has provided funding support to
important and needed community services for the past 20 years.
The city has provided a stable source of funding to the majority
of the organizations proposed for continued funding in FY
1993-94. Through City support, most of these organizations have
been able to secure funding from outside funding resources to
strengthen the impact of city support in the community. On
average, for every $1 of City funding, another $4 has been
leveraged from outside funding sources.
Fundin9 History: The following table indicates the number of
years funding has been provided to each organization:
15 Years and Over: Family Service of Santa Monica, New
start, Ocean Park Community Center, Wests ide Ecumenical
Conference, and WISE senior Services.
10 to 14 Years: Catholic Charities, Center for the Partially
Sighted, CLARE Foundation, Community Corporation ot Santa
Monica, Connections for Children, Dispute Resolution
services, Jewish Family Service, Latino Resource
Organization, Radio KCRW, Senior Health and Peer counseling
Center, Venice Family Clinic, Wests ide Center for Independent
Living, westside Food Bank, and westside Legal Services.
5 to 9 Years: LIEU-CAP, Neighborhood Resource and
Development Corporation, Neighborhood support Center, st.
Joseph Center, Santa Monica-Westside Hotline, and step Up on
Second.
o to 4 Years: Business-Government Council to End
Homelessness, Computer Access, El Nida, Marine Park Child
Care center, and Santa Monica College's Women's Center.
For a more detailed overview of the number of years each program
has been funded and the extent to which each program provides
funding from outside funding sources, please refer to Attachment
II (based on FY 1992-93 data).
Community Impact: The Community Development Program has a direct
and significant impact on the health and well-being of people
residing in Santa Monica. Many people who would otherwise not be
able to access the services that they need to live independently,
to live in housing that they could afford and not in the streets,
to access affordable child care and health care, or to earn a
livable wage, are given a chance through programs of the
Community Development Program. All of these programs help to
maintain a compassionate and well-balanced community.
5 -
To obtain current information on how each program impacts the
Santa Monica communi ty , ci ty staff recently asked each
City-funded program to address the following questions:
(1) Identify and discuss the program's target population(s)
and indicate why the program services are needed. How
are these services meeting an urgent need?
{2} How does Santa Monica grant funding significantly impact
this target population?
(3) What are the major outcomes and goals of the program?
How are these measured and evaluated?
(4) As community needs and funding change, how does the
program(s) plan to refine or adjust to these changing
needs?
Copies of the organizations responses to these questions are
available upon request at (310) 458-8701 ext. o.
Other l"unding Sources: It is important to note that a number of
the organizations indicated that without city funding, their
programs would not be able to keep their doors open . Although
City funding continues to leverage resources from other sources
including private foundations and corporations, and federal,
state and county government entities, many of these sources have
dramatically reduced their funding. To highlight:
o In FY 1992-93, the united Way cut funding to
organizations up to 40% and an additional 15% is planned
for FY 1993-94.
o The County Department of Mental Health is seeking a
18%-28% funding reduction in FY 1993-94.
o The County's Drug and Alcohol Office is seeking a
35%-40% funding reduction in FY 1993-94.
o The County's Area Agency on Aging indicates plans to
reduce their funding by 6.7% with a probability of
another 6% cut in mid-year.
o On May 3, 1993, the State Senate Subcommittee on Budget
and Fiscal Review voted to eliminate a number of aging
programs including home-delivered meals, Long-term Care
Ombudsman and Alzheimer's day care funding.
- 6 -
SECTION V: PROPOSED COMMUNITY DEVBLOPMENT PROGRAK FUNDIBG FOR
FY 1993-9.
The FY 1993-94 funding recommendations contained in this report
reflect outcomes of a variety of community planning and
development efforts as well as the City's commitment to continue
as a stable source of income to effective ongoing programs.
Funding recommendations in this report are di vided into two
categories: Community Service Projects, and community and
Neighborhood Improvement Projects. Community service (CS)
Projects include funding for operating grants to programs
providing a broad range of community and human services.
Community and Neighborhood Improvement (CNI) Projects include
funding for capital projects benefiting low- and moderate-income
residents and neighborhoods with primary emphasis on affordable
housing and accessibility projects. section VI (Community
Development Program Descriptions) provides specific program
descriptions, recommended funding levels, and program issues for
each grant award recommended in this Proposed Communi ty
Development Plan.
The CD Program funding allocations reflect an increase to CDBG
funds, from $1,307,511 in FY 1992-93 to $1,420,857 in FY 1993-94.
The increase will be used to fund city accessibility projects to
remove architectural barriers for persons with disabilities and
to improve the park and facilities located at Virginia Avenue
Park. For an overview of how the community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) funds will be allocated in FY 1993-94, please refer
to the Proposed COBG statement of Objectives in section VII.
For a specific breakdown of the FY 1993-94 recommended funding
levels by source for all CS Projects and CNI Projects, please
refer to Attachment III.
~~~posed PY 1993-94 Community service Projects
Over 84% of the funding within this area comes from the City'S
General Fund. This substantial commitment of resources will
benefit infants to seniors by offering a wide range of services
including: emergency assistance and shelter, school and
neighborhood-based counseling and family advocacy, legal services
and mediation, independent living skills, health care, child care
assistance and employment.
It is the City's goal to provide community and human services
that are responsive and accessible (geographically, physically,
culturally) to the needs of those most likely to be underserved
including low-income people, people with disabilities, people of
color, bilingual and monolingual non-English speaking people,
women, and youth.
The overall
grants to
providing a
community.
result of these funding recommendations is to award
48 programs representing 28 different agencies
range of services to significant segments of the
- 7 -
The following will be achieved through this proposed allocation
of funds:
o Operating support is being maintained to 43 ongoing,
effective programs with a continued emphasis on
improvements in program design and operations;
o Implementation of a coordinated indoor meals program
newly established in FY 1992-93 offering hot meals 6
days a week by FAITH, Ocean Park Community center, the
Salvation Army and step Up on Second;
o Coordination, development and oversight of this indoor
meals program by the Wests ide Food Bank who will further
expand the meals program to be offered on sundays;
o Implementation of a homeless employment program using
funds approved and set aside by the city council
("Homeless Project Fund") to implement important Task
Force on Homelessness recommendations;
o Implementation of a new program at 505 Olympic Boulevard
offering up to 100 homeless persons access to lockers,
shower and laundry facilities 6 days per week to be
administered through the Salvation Army;
o Implementation of a Latino educational and parenting
support project, in conjunction with the Santa
Monica-Malibu Unified School District, through a
specialized proposal process to ensure the highest
quality program for the Latino community;
o Reduction in funding to 8 programs due to chronically
serving a low proportion of Santa Monica residents as
compared to the high level of City contribution over the
past several years, poor program performance, or the
ability to generate fees and other revenues that could
offset the City'S grant funding (for more discussion of
these proposed reductions, please see the "Proposed
Funding Reductions" section below);
o Increased emphasis on serving low-income and minority
Santa Monica residents through continued targeting of
funds to bilingual staffing and by including special
program requirements for those programs significantly
below target in FY 1992-93 in serving these segments of
the population; and
o
Elimination
designed to
and program
funds.
of the Management Incentive Grant fund
enhance agency management, service delivery,
effectiveness due to the lack of sufficient
~~oposed Funding Reductions - Community Service Projects
The fallowing Community Service Projects have been recommended
for reduced or eliminated fundinq in FY 1993-94:
- 8 -
Business-Government Council to End Bo..lassnesa
FY 1992-93 Punding Level: $39,600
FY 1993-9. Recommended PuDding Level: $10,000
This program has operated for over three years with primary
funding from the Ci ty of Santa Monica and the ci ty of Los
Angeles. The original goal of enlisting broad membership
including financial support from local governments and business
leaders has not occurred. The proqram has not met goals for
fundraising and continues to have difficulty in quantifying and
evaluating impact. A high level of diverse and consistent Board
participation has not been achieved. The recommended funding
level for FY 1993-94 of $10,000 is a more appropriate level to
support the limited activities provided by the organization.
These include monitoring relevant legislative activity,
co-sponsorship of a statewide bill to continue the Emergency Cold
Weather Shelter Program, limited lobbying and convening a
statewide conference on homelessness.
Latino Resource Organization (LRO)
FY 1992-93 Funding Level: $122,.36
FY 1993-94 Recom~~nded Funding Level: $50,000
The recommended FY 1993-94 funding level of $50,000 targets and
reduces funding to LRO. City funding has historically supported
the educational and parent support programs offered by LRO. In
FY 1992-93, LRO discontinued their school enrichment programs.
City staff have met several times with the Executive Director and
Board President to discuss the agency's direction and the need
for the agency to continue providing needed educational support
services to children and families. To date, a concrete and
definitive plan to continue these programs has not yet been
established.
The recommended FY 1993-94 funding level of $50,000 targets
funding for a full-time staff person to provide essential
information and referral assistance to Latino adults with
particular emphasis on the Pico Neighborhood. The grant award
allows for 80% direct program costs along with 20% for general
administrative costs associated with this activity.
The City staff will prepare a special Request for Proposals (RFP)
in the Summer of 1993 in order to implement an educational
enrichment program targeting Latino youth and parents in the
elementary and high schools. Components of the prograJI will
include a tutorial, mentoring, and parenting program to enhance
the educational opportunities of these youth. It will be
required that applicant organizations collaborate closely with
the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District. LRO along with
other interested organizations will be eligible to apply. The
funding amount will be for a minimum of $72,436 annually.
- 9 -
Marine Park Child Care Center
FY 1992-93 Pundinq Level: $26',391
FY 1993-94 Recommended Fundinq Level: $242,452
The City subsidizes the Santa Monica-Mailbu Unified School
District and provides a rent-free facility for the child care
services for Santa Monica City employees and residents through
the Marine Park Child Care Center. The 10% funding reduction is
recommended due to the current high level of city subsidy. The
City will continue to offer the facility at no cost.
Ocean Park community center - Steppinq stone
FY 1992-93 Funding Levell $58,087
FY 1993-94 aecommended Funding Level: $36,136
This funding reduction of $21,951 to the stepping stone Program
would eliminate City funding to the regional youth shelter
program and would target funds to stepping Stone's peer
counseling program. The city will continue to offer the facility
to stepping stone at no cost. The recommended FY 1993-94 of
$36,136 includes $7,307 which will allow the shelter three months
to make the necessary transition. The ongoing annual grant to
the stepping stone Peer Counseling program is recommended at
$28,829.
stepping stone shelter has primarily served as a regional
resource for teens throughout the Los Angeles area with limited
program impact on Santa Monica youth. For the past two years,
the City grant has supported a small peer counseling program
consisting of several youth staff to assist with the shelter and
hotline to provide public education and training to other youth
in Santa Monica. It is recommended that the City continue to
support and encourage this aspect of the program.
Senior Health and Peer Counseling center - Honey Management
FY 1992-93 Funding Level: $49,549
PY 1993-94 Recommended PuDding Level: $39,088
This funding reduction of $10,461 is recommended due to the
historically low proportion of Santa Monica residents served.
The recommended funding level has been determined upon review of
the actual proportion of Santa Monica residents served since
initial funding of this program in FY 1990-91. Funding at this
time was conditioned upon the program's ability to raise an
adequate level of cash match. By reducing the grant in FY
1993-94, the level of funding will be commensurate with the
proportional level of service to Santa Monica residents.
Additionally, this program will be required to serve 100% Santa
Monica residents with the Santa Monica grant and 25% cash match
until it has demonstrated a strengthened ability to generate
funding from outside sources.
- 10 -
WISB - Olive stone Center
PY 1992-93 Punding Level: $97,180
FY 1993-94 Recommended WUD4ing Levell $75,721
This funding reduction of $22,059 is recommended due to the
historically low proportion of Santa Monica residents and
lo\{- income persons served. The recommended funding level has
been determined upon review of the actual proportion of Santa
Monica residents served over the past three years. By reducing
the grant, the level of funding will be commensurate wi th the
level of service to Santa Monica residents. Additionally, this
program will be required to serve 100% Santa Monica residents
with the Santa Monica grant and 25%' cash match until it has
demonstrated a strengthened ability to generate funding from
outside sources.
It is further recommended that the revenues generated by fees
charged to Olive Stone Center participants be restricted for the
exclusive use of the Olive stone or WISE Care Center programs.
Neiqhborhood Support Center
FY 1992-93 PuDding Level: $347,907
FY 1993-94 Recommended Funding Level: $257,906
This reduction of $90,001 includes a one-time transition grant of
$20,001 provided to the agency in FY 1992-93 and an additional
$65,000 representing a 20' reduction to the annual FY 1992-93
funding base of $322,906. The organization was originally funded
to provide organizing support for neighborhood associations. In
the Spring of 1992, the City conducted a mid-point review of the
NSC to determine whether to continue the current model of
centralized funding to neighborhood associations. It was
concluded that the current model remains effective as'a means for
supporting neighborhood associations. In the course of this
review, however, it was discovered that there was a lack of
documentation and record-keeping making it difficult for the city
to monitor the agency's progress in reaching program goals. The
agency was required to develop a workplan with objectives to be
measured on a quarterly basis similar to other grantees funded by
the city. Based on these quarterly reports, the agency indicates
low levels of participation at community meetings. Participation
has ranged from 2 to 15 persons per meeting. Therefore,
increased and broader participation has not occurred. As a
result, the high level of staff ing from City funding is not
commensurate with the level of service provided by this
organization.
Westside Legal services - Do.es~ic violence Program
PY 1992-93 Funding Level: $47,295
FY 1993-94 Recommended PuDding Level: $41,544
This funding reduction of $5,571 is recommended due to the
historically low level of service to Santa Monica residents. The
recommended funding level has been determined upon review of the
actual service levels to Santa Monica residents over the past
three years. By reducing the grant, the level of funding will be
commensurate with the level of service to Santa Monica residents.
- 11 -
Additionally, this program will be required to serve 100% Santa
Monica residents with the Santa Monica grant and 25% cash match
until it has demonstrated a strenqthened ability to generate
funding from outside sources.
Management Incentive Grants
PY 1992-93 Punding Level: $36,407
FY 1993-94 Recommended Punding Level: $0
This small technical assistance fund was established to enhance
the effectiveness of agency management, service delivery, program
effectiveness and the ability to collaborate and provide
communi ty leadership. It is recommended that this technical
assistance fund be eliminated due to the lack of available city
funds.
pro~osed
Pro ects
FY
1993-94
co_unity
and
Neig'hborhood
Improvement
Over 17% of the funding within this area comes from the city's
General Fund and another 73% of the funding comes from the City'S
federal COBG entitlement award. Funding ~n this area will
benef it low- and moderate-income persons and neighborhoods by
offering a wide range of services.
The following will be achieved through this proposed allocation
of funds:
o Approximately 140 affordable housing units will be
rehabilitation and approximately 25 units will be
acquired and rehabilitated or newly constructed;
Assistance will be
needing assistance
repairs;
o Assistance for the removal of significant architectural
barriers limiting the mobility and access to facilities
in Santa Monica by persons with disabilities; and
provided to low-income
wi th streetlight and
residents
sidewalk
o
o Facility and park improvements to the Virginia Avenue
Park.
Proposed Funding Reductions
Improvement Projects
The following Community and Neighborhood Improvement Projects
have been recommended for reduced or eliminated funding in FY
1993-94:
communi ty and Neighborhood
- 12 -
community Corporation of Santa Monica
~y 1992-93 Pundinq Level: $436,550
PY 1993-'4 Recommended FuD4inq Levell $3'2,895
It is recommended that this organization receive a lot grant
reduction to the current FY 1992-93 funding level for a total
recommended FY 1993-94 funding level of $392,895. In the current
fiscal year (FY 1992-93), the state has reduced tax increment
funds to the Redevelopment Agency which currently contributes to
a portion of the organization's administrative grant. The
organization will consider and implement options to offset this
grant reduction by generating new revenues through management
fees and perhaps organizing as a community Housing Development
Organization (CHDO) to receive city HOME funds. It is
anticipated that the organization will successfully refinance
their property portfolio to substantially reduce their debt
service and property holdings.
The city will seek to further reduce the organization's grant on
a $1 for $1 basis using the financial savings from this
refinancing once the organization has successfully generated
additional revenues to offset the initial 101 grant cut.
- 13 -
SECTION VI: COKKUNITY DEVELOPMBNT PROGRAM DBSCRIPTIONS
The following community Development (CD) Program descriptions
provide a more detailed overview of each program purpose, the
recommended FY 1993-94 funding level, the funding mechanism, and
program issues that will need to be addressed in FY 1993-94. The
CD Program is divided according to Community service Projects and
the Communi ty and Neighborhood Improvement proj ects . The
Community Service Projects are further categorized by each
program primary target population area including: Homeless
Services, Child and Youth Services, Senior Services, Disability
and AIDS/HIV Services, and General community Services.
===========================___~~=--.====:::::__"" II "==============--===
COMX1JNITY SUVXCB PROJECTS
FY 1993-94 FUNDING RBCOMKENDATIONS
==============================~=====================~==:=========
HOMBLESS SERVICES
General program Issues ror Homeless Service providers: For all
homeless service providers, there will be several new reporting
requirements in FY 1993-94 as required by the City'S
Comprehensive Housing Affordability strategy (CRAS) and as
recommended by the Task Force on Homelessness.
(1) The following are to be included in quarterly program
reports:
o The numher of unduplicated homeless individuals and
families placed in temporary and permanent housing.
o For all homeless individuals or families placed in
temporary and permanent housing, the following
information must be provided (all numbers report shall
reflect an unduplicated count):
No. of homeless persons
No. of homeless families
No. of female-headed homeless families
No. of children (under 18 yrs.)
No. of Latinos
No. of African Americans
No. of Native Americans
No. of Asian and Pacific Islanders
No. of Caucasians
o The number of unduplicated homeless persons to secure
permanent employment.
o The number of unduplicated homeless persons to secure
government benefits.
- 14 -
(2) Involve homeless people in the ongoing evaluation of any
City-funded program including direct input on any program
changes or improvements deemed necessary.
(3) Incorporate Task Force on Homelessness Report recommendations
into program planning, operations and evaluation. Include
summary of recommendation implementation in quarterly reports
to the city. Please focus, in particular, on the following
sections of the Task Force on Homelessness Re.port: social
services (pp. 24-39), Program Design, Coordination and
Evaluation (pp. 62-63) and Community Participation in siting
Housing and services (pp. 66-67).
BUSINESS-GOVERNMENT COUBCIL TO BRD BOKELESSNESS
Recommended FY 1993-94 Funding Level:
$ 10,000 (General Fund)
Program Description: Organization works with local
governments and business community leaders in California on
issues of homelessness and poverty. Activities include
monitoring relevant legislation, co-sponsoring a statewide
bill to continue the Emergency Cold Weather Shelter Program,
some lobbying and an annual conference.
The FY 1993-94 recommended grant of $10,000, while reduced
from current year funding, represents an appropriate level of
ongoing city support given that the organization seeks to
have many local governments and businesses supporting its
effort.
FUnding MeChanism: One-Year Operating Grant
Program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) continue to submit regular Board minutes
with quarterly reports; and 2) work to implement
recommendation from "Advocacy and Partnerships" section of
the Task Force on Homelessness Report.
CLARE FOUNDATION - SOBER INK
Recommended FY 1993-94 Funding Level:
$ 96,322 (General Fund)
$ 2,040 (Prop. A TransportatioD Fund)
program Description: Program provides a range of emergency
services including the provision of hot meals, showers,
clothing, and shelter services to approximately 2,000
unduplicated homeless people in Santa Monica per year. A
saall transportation fund is administered to provide homeless
persons with bus tokens.
PuDding Kechanism: One-Year Program Grant
- 15 -
proqr.. Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) include "General Program Issues for
Homeless service Providers".
HOMELESS PROJECT FUND
Recommended PY 1993-94 Funding Level:
$132,830 (General Fund)
program Description: This Homeless Project Fund preserves
funding identified and set aside by the city council to
implement the Task Force on Homelessness recommendations.
Programs to be developed in FY 1993-94 include a new
supportive employment and placement center for persons who
are homeless or at-risk of becoming homeless and expansion of
the indoor meals program to Sundays.
Funding Kechanism: KIA
program Issues: N/A
OCBAH PARk COMMUNITY CENTER (OPCC) - DROP-IN/OUTREACH TEAM
Recommended FY 1993-94 Funding Level:
$220,364 (General Fund - Ongoing Program)
$ 13,380 (General Fund - Heals Program)
$ 11,800 (Prop_ A TransportatioD Fund)
proqru Description: Program provides a range of emergency
services including food, clothing, mail, telephone, shelter
referral/placement and assistance with attaining government
benefits to approximately 3,900 unduplicated homeless people
in Santa Monica per year. The Homeless Outreach Team
provides outreach contact and case management assistance for
approximately 800 homeless people annually. A small
transportation fund is administered to provide homeless
people with bus tokens. In addition, this program began an
indoor meals program in FY 1992-93 and will continue offering
this service in FY 1993-94.
Funding xechanism: One-Year Program Grant
Program Xssues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) to develop and report on a separate
program budget and workplan for the indoor meals program
component; 2) to significantly increase presence of Outreach
Team in downtown, parks and other public areas in order to
heighten communi ty awareness of services, to convene and
attend community meetings around homeless issues, and to
offer increased technical assistance in problem solving and
consensus building to residents, businesses and homeless
people; and 3) include "General Program Issues for Homeless
Service Providers".
- 16 -
oPCC - DAYBREAK DAY CENTER
Recommended PY 1993-94 Fundinq Level:
$119,720 (General Fund)
program Description: Program provides outreach, advocacy and
day services to approximately 500 unduplicated homeless
mentally ill women in Santa Monica per year.
Funding Mechanism: One-Year Program Grant
program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) include goals and objectives for the
OB/GYN clinic in the program workplan; and 2) include
UGeneral Program Issues for Homeless Service Providers".
opec - DAYBREAK SHELTER
Recommended PY 1993-94 Funding Level:
$ 29,700 (General Fund)
proqraa Description: Program provides a short-term 1S-bed
shelter to approximately 60 unduplicated homeless mentally
ill women in Santa Monica per year.
Funding Mechaniss: One-Year Program Grant
proqraa Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) include "General Program Issues for
Homeless Service Providers".
opec - SOJOURN SHELTER POR BATTERED WOXE.
Recommended py 1993-94 Funding Level:
$ 42,367 (General Fund)
prograa Description: Program provides 4-6 weeks of safe
shelter for battered women and their children, a 24-hour
crisis line, a follow-up program for previous shelter
residents and a community education and volunteer program.
The program serves approximately 1,640 unduplicated people in
Santa Monica per year.
PuDding Xechanis.: One-Year Program Grant
Program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) include "General Program Issues for
Homeless Service Providers".
- 17 -
opec - TURNING POINT SHELTER
Recommended PY 19'3-94 Punding Levell
$162,528 (General Pund)
$ 14,117 (Bomeless Developer Fund)
Program Description: Program provides a 35-bed shelter, food,
clothing, transportation, showers, advocacy, counseling and
budget management to approximately 280 homeless people in
Santa Monica per year.
Funding Xechanism: One-Year Program Grant
Program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) to continue to shelter homeless persons
at the Resthaven Motel who are physically disabled and unable
to access the Turning Point shelter; 2) to ensure lIaximum
utilization of the Resthaven Motel and Turning Point Shelter
by maintaining a low vacancy rate; and 3) include "General
Program Issues for Homeless Service Providers".
ST. JOSEPH CENTER - BREAD AND ROSES CAFB
Recommended PY 1993-94 FuDding Level:
$ 18,919 (General Fund)
Program Description: Program provides a restaurant and meals
program to 120 homeless people in addition to providing job
training and placement employment component to serve
approximately 15 unduplicated homeless people in Santa Monica
per year.
Funding Xechanism: One-Year Program Grant
program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) include "General Program Issues for
Homeless Service Providers".
ST. JOSEPH CENTER - BOMELESS DAY CBHTBR
Recommended FY 1'93-94 Funding Level:
$ 42,087 (General Pund)
$ 6,780 (Prop. A TransportatioD Fund)
program Description: Program provides a variety of emergency
and advocacy services that include the provision of
transportation, clothing, benef its assistance, shel ter
placement, showers and laundry facilities to approximately
905 unduplicated homeless people in Santa Monica per year. A
small transportation fund is administered to provide homeless
people with bus tokens.
Funding Hechanism: One-Year Program Grant
- 18 -
Program Issu..: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) include "General Program Issues for
Homeless Service Providers".
SALVATION ARKY
Recommended PY 1993-94 Funding Level:
$ 60,000 (General Fund - Lookers program)
$ 7,982 (General Fund - Heals program)
$ 1,000 (prop. A Transpor~ation Fund)
proqraa Description: Program will offer lockers, laundry and
shower facilities to approximately 100 homeless people daily
and will be located at city-owned 505 Olympic Boulevard site.
This new program implements an important recommendation of
the Task Force on Homelessness. This program will coordinate
with local homeless service providers to accept client
referrals. site improvements will be completed by the city
prior to program start-up. It is anticipated that the
program will begin September, 1993.
This program may be offered at this 51 te for up to 5 to 7
years, at which point the site will revert to the exclusive
use of the Transportation Department for expanded bus parking
(per Los Angeles County Transportation Commission funding
requirements).
,
A small transportation fund is administered to provide
homeless people with bus tokens. In addition, - this
organization began an indoor meals proqraa in FY 1992-93 and
will continue offering this service in FY 1993-94 at 1533 4th
street.
Funding Kechanis.: One-Year Program Grant
program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) to establish an advisory committee with
representation from participating local homeless service
providers, homeless persons and other community members; 2)
to review program procedures after 3 months of operation with
advisory co~mi ttee to determine if any program adjustments
are necessary; and 3) include "General Program Issues for
Homeless Service Providers".
STEP UP OB SECOND
Recommended PY 1993-94 Funding Level:
$ 48,220 (General Fund - Ongoing)
$ 13,526 (General Fund - Keals Program)
$ 2,600 (Prop. A Transportation program)
program Description: Organization provides a 7-day per week
drop-in program offering food, showers, job coaching,
employment placement, clothing and structured activities to
serve approximately 100 unduplicated mentally ill homeless
people. A small transportation fund is administered to
- 19 -
provide homeless persons with bus tokens. In addition, this
program began an indoor meals program in FY 1992-93 and will
continue offering this service in FY 1993-94.
Punding Meehanis.: One-Year Program Grant
prograa Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) to develop and report on a separate
program budget and workplan for the indoor meals program
component; 2) to prioritize maintaining program services on a
7 day per week basis; and 3) include "General Program Issues
for Homeless Service Providers".
WESTSIDB FOOD BANK
Recommended FY 1993-9. Funding Level:
$ 74,936 (General Fund - Ongoing)
$ 18,516 (General Fund - Heals Coordination)
Program Description: Organization provides a food bank
serving 21 agencies which provide services to homeless and
low-income Santa Monica residents. In addition, this
organization was awarded additional funds in FY 1992-93 to
provide oversight and coordination of Citywide indoor meals
program and food distribution.
Funding Mechanism: One-Year Operating Grant
Program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) to develop and report on a separate
program budget and workplan for oversight and coordination of
the indoor meals program; and 2) include "General Program
Issues for Homeless Service Providers".
CHILD AND YOUTH SERVICES
General Pro9ram Issues ror Child and Youth Service Providers:
All school-based child and youth service providers
required to participate in the Youth Evaluation
implemented by Jewish Family Service, funded by a
one-time grant provided by the City in FY 1992-93.
(2) In addition, all service providers will be required to report
on the total number of unduplicated Santa Monica residents
served through their program including:
will be
project
special
(1)
No. of unduplicated families
No. of unduplicated parents
No. of unduplicated children/youth
No. of unduplicated teachers or other school staff
- 20 -
CATHOLIC CHARITIBS (foraerly Catholia Youth Organization) - YOUTH
EMPLOYMENT , TRAINING:
Recomm4Dded 7Y 1993-94 FuD4iDq Level:
$ 28,802 (General Fund)
$ 51,357 (CDBG)
Proqram Description: Program provides an employment stipend
program for low-income and minority youth in the pico
Neighborhood serving approximately 64 unduplicated Santa
Monica youth per year.
Funding Mechanism: One-Year Program Grant
program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) dedication of a minimum of 80t of grant
funds for youth employment stipends with an allowable 20% for
program and administrative costs; 2) adherence to all funding
requirements as specified by the Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) fund entitlement regulations; 3) to continue to
explore options to expand the youth employment program by
seeking new program models and other funding sources; 4) to
work closely with other programs and community groups to
implement a youth employment program that is relevant to the
needs of Santa Monica youth; 5) to expand use of interns and
community volunteers; and 6) include "General Program Issues
for Child and Youth Service Providers".
COMPUTER ACCESS
Recomm.nded FY 1993-94 FuD4inq Level:
$ 25,615 (General Fund)
proqraa Description: Orqanization provides enhanced
opportunities for youth with disabilities through computer
technology, technical assistance and education to
approximately 383 unduplicated Santa Monica persons per year
including disabled and non-disabled youth, parents and
teachers.
Fundinq Mechanism: One-Year operatinq Grant
prograa Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) according to the FY 1992-93 program
quarterly reports, the proportion of disabled Santa Monica
youth served significantly dropped; as a result, the program
will be required to increase the proportion of disabled Santa
Monica youth and parents served to 55%; and 2) include
"General Program Issues for Child and Youth Service
Providers".
- 21 -
CONNECTIONS FOR CHILDREN - GENERAL PROGRAM
Recommended FY 1993-'4 Fundinq Level:
$160,693 (General Fund)
Program Description: Organization provides comprehensive
child care information and referral services, child care
scholarships for low-income parents and their children,
parent education and support workshops, and technical
assistance and training for child care providers serving
approximately 5,900 unduplicated Santa Monica persons per
year.
Funding Xechanism: One-Year Program Grant
program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) to provide better reporting on the ethnic
breakdown of those persons served through the Santa Monica
scholarship program; and 2) include "General Program Issues
for Child and youth Service Providers".
CONNECTIONS FOR CHILDREN - CHILD CARB CENTER SUPPORT
Recommended FY 1993-94 Funding Leve1:
$118,800 (General Fund)
Program Description: Organization administers a grant
program providing partial operating and start-up funding
support to approximately 18 licensed Santa Monica child care
providers.
Funding Xechanisa: One-Year Program Grant
Program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) flexibility within the grant program to
allow for use of grant funds for infant and preschool child
care centers; 2) use of the grant funds of $2,000 or less for
one-time expenditures only; 3) quarterly reporting on the
number of low-income and minority persons benefited by this
program (include ethnic breakdown of all persons served); and
4) include "General Program Issues for Child and Youth
Service Providers".
DISPUTB RESOLUTION SERVICES - SCHOOL KED7ATXON
Recomm9nded FY 19'3-94 Fundinq 1eve1:
$ 42,728 (Genera1 Fund)
proqram Description: Program provides a student peer
mediation service at John Adams and Lincoln Middle Schools to
provide cooperative conflict resolution classroom activities
and orientation and education activities for parents and
teachers serving a total of approximately 880 Santa Monica
persons per year.
Funding Mechania.: One-Year Program Grant
- 22 -
Program Issu..: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) due to the increase in the numbers served
in FV1992-93, to make modifications to the Program Workplan
that is reflective of this increase; and 2) include "General
Program Issues for Child and Youth Service Providers".
EL NIDO
Recommended FY 1993-9. Funding Level:
$ 97,614 (General Fund)
Program Description: Organization provides multi-cultural and
bilingual case management, family advocacy, and parenting
support services targeting will Rogers and Edison Elementary
Schools serving approximately 150 families per year.
Funding Mechanism: One-Year Program Grant
Program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) to maintain (at a minimum) 1 FTE
bilingual staff person at each elementary school; 2) to
review and refine the program as necessary in conjunction
with City staff and school principals and staff; 3) to expand
use of interns and community volunteers; and 4) include
"General Program Issues for Child and Youth Service
Providers".
FAMILY SERVICE OF SANTA MONICA
Recommended FY 1993-9. Fundinq Level:
$115,830 (General Fund)
pzograa Description: Organization provides transition groups
for elementary SChool-aged children, agency-based counseling
services for youth and their families and family
advocacy/case management services for teen parents at Santa
Monica High School and Santa Monica College, and McKinley
Elementary School serving approximately 1,000 Santa Monica
persons per year.
Funding Mechanism: One-Year Program Grant
Program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) maintenance of at least one fUll-time
bilingual program staff person for the SAPID and the On the
Move programs and at least one full-time bilingual program
staff person for the other agency and school-based services;
2) the provision of counseling, advocacy and case management
services on a 12-month basis for the SAPID, On The Move, and
school-based program participants; 3) to maintain (at a
minimum) . 5 FTE at McKinley Elementary and 1 FTE for the
SAPID and On the Move programs; 4) to expand use of interns
and community volunteers; and 5) include "General Program
Issues for Child and Youth Service Providers".
- 23 -
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
Recommended PY 1993-9. Funding Levelz
$ 23,1" (General Fund)
program Description: organization provides family advocacy,
case management and counseling services at Santa Monica High
School, Lincoln Middle School and at the agency serving
approximately 121 youth per year.
FUDding Mechanism: One-Year Program Grant
program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) to maintain at least one half-time
bilingual program staff person at Santa Monica High School to
provide case management and family advocacy services to
at-risk youth and their families; 2) to expand use of interns
and community volunteers; and 3) include "General proqram
Issues for Child and Youth Service Providers".
LATINO RESOURCE ORGANIZATION (LRO)
Recommended FY 1993-9. Funding Level:
$ 50,000 (General Fund)
Program Descriptionz The recommended funding level will
support a full-time staff person to provide needs assessment,
essential information, referral and case management
assistance to 1,200 Latino residents with particular emphasis
on serving the pico Neighborhood. The city will release a
special Request for Proposal (RFP) in the Summer of 1993 for
an educational enrichment program targeting Latino youth and
parents in the elementary and high schools. LRO will be
eligible to apply.
Funding Mechanism: One-Year Program Grant
Program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) to target City grant funds to the salary
of 1.0 FTE program staff person who will provide information,
referral and case management assistance to Latinos in Santa
Monica and who will be out-stationed a minimum of 3 days per
week at Virginia Avenue Park in the pico Neighborhood. and
will spend the remainder of time targeting activities to
Santa Monica residents only; 2) to target City-funded
administrative or operating costs directly to the function of
this Santa Monica program component; 3) to raise a minimum
25% direct cash match for this program purpose; 4) to spend
no more than 20% of the total program budget on
administrative costs, targeting the remaining 80% to direct
Santa Monica program expenses; 5) to submit copies of Board
minutes with each quarterly report; and 6) include "General
Program Issues for Child and Youth service Providers".
- 24 -
LATINO EDUCATION PROJECT
Recommended PY 1993-94 Funding Level:
$ 72,436 (General Fund)
proqraa Description: A special Request for Proposal (RFP)
for an educational enrichment program targeting Latino youth
and parents in the elementary and high schools. Components
of the program will include a tutorial mentoring and
parenting program to enhance educational opportunities of
these students. It will be required that applicant
organizations collaborate closely with the Santa
Monica-Malibu Unified School District. LRO along with other
interested organizations will be eligible to apply. The
funding amount will be for a minimum of $72,436 annually.
Funding Keehanism: RFP to be issued in Summer 1993.
XARINB PARlt CHILD CARB CENTER
Recommended PY 1993-94 Funding Level:
$242,452 (General Fund)
prograa Description: Ini tially funded by the ci ty in FY
1990-91, this program is designed to provide child care to 52
City of Santa Monica employees and residents. It is
recommended that the organization receive a lot grant
reduction to the current FY 1992-93 funding level for a total
recommended FY 1993-94 funding level of $242,452. The city
subsidizes the Santa Monica-Mailbu Unified school District
and provides free space for child care services. The funding
reduction is recommended due to the high level of subsidy
provided by the City for this child care center. The city
will continue to offer the facility at no cost.
Funding Xechanism: One-Year Program Grant
prograa Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) to offset funding reduction by reducing
the administrative indirect expenses by $22,688, to increase
the preschool enrollment figures to between 20%-22%, to
decrease the interest income by $1,562, and make appropriate
salary adjustments; and 2) to review fees including
exploration of a sliding scale fee system.
NEW START - YOUTH PROGRAM
Recommended FY 1993-94 Pun4inq Level:
$127,413 (General Pund)
proqraa Description: Organization provides specialized
substance abuse counseling, drug education and
prevention/early intervention outreach services to 180 youth
at John Adams and Lincoln Middle Schools, Santa Monica High
School, Virginia Park and at the agency.
- 25 -
Fundinq Mechanism: One-Year Program Grant
proqram Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) to maintain a minimum of one full-time
bilingual counselor in the schools; 2) the level of service
to Santa Monica youth is to remain commensurate with the
level of city funding; 3) to maintain (at a minimum) 1 FTE in
the middle schools, .5 FTE at Santa Monica High School and
.25 FTE at Olympic High School; 4) see New start - Adult
Program for requirements to the organization; 5) to expand
use of interns and community volunteers; and 6) include
"General Program Issues for Child and Youth Service
Providers".
OCEAN PARK COKMDNITY CENTER - STBPPING STONE
aecommended lY 1993-'. Funding Level:
$ 36,136 (General Fund)
proqraa Description: A reduction of $21,951 is recommended
based on the historically low proportion of Santa Monica
youth served through the youth runaway shelter. This would
eliminate city funding to the shelter. The recommended
funding level of $36,136 targets funding to the Santa Monica
Peer Counseling Program and provides a final 3-month grant to
the shelter. The Santa Monica Peer Counseling Program
consists of youth staff who assist with shelter, hotline,
public education and training to other youth.
Funding Mechani..: One-Year Program Grant
proqraa Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) to renegotiate a Program Workplan that is
reflective of all activities performed through the Santa
Monica Peer Counseling Program including the nlllllher of
unduplicated Santa Monica youth assisted through the
education and training, hotline, and shelter; 2) to hire, at
minimum, four new peer counselors annually to allow greater
opportunity for Santa Monica youth to become counselors; 3)
to submit a plan to the city specifying the long-term use of
the facility that will assure continued benefit to Santa
Monica residents with the second quarterly program report;
and 4) include "General Program Issues for Child and Youth
Service Providers".
SANTA MONICA COLLEGB - WOKEN'S CENTER (Oil THI MOVB PROGRAII)
Recommended py 19'3-94 Fun4inq Level:
$ 2',601 (General Pond)
Program Description: Organization provides a collaborative
teen parent program to 20 unduplicated teen parents that
includes integrated case management, child care and support
services which assist in the continuation of their education
at Santa Monica College. The recommended funding level is
for child care and other support services to be provided by
- 26 -
the Santa Monica College Women's Center, Connections for
Children and the Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District.
Case Management is provided by Family Service of Santa Monica
and is recommended for funding separately.
Fundinq Mecbanism: One-Year Program Grant
Program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) to improve the collaborative effort
between Family Service or Santa Monica, connections for
Children, the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District,
and the Santa Monica College Women's Center to assure a
well-coordinated program and to provide ongoing program
development to meet the changing needs of pregnant teens; 2)
to re-establish the Advisory Board for this program to meet
on a regular basis; 3) to expand use of interns and community
volunteers; and 4) include "General Program Issues for Child
and Youth Service Providers".
SENIOR SERVICES
SENIOR HEALTH AND PEER COUNSELING CENTER CSHPCC)
PROGRAH
GENERAL
Reco..ended FY 1993-94 Funding Level:
$ 77,431 (General Fund)
program Description: Organization provides a preventive
health care program for seniors including health screening,
health education, peer counseling and case management to
approximately 3,022 unduplicated Santa Monica seniors.
Fundinq Mechanis.: One-Year Operating Grant
Program Issues: city staff would like to acknowledge the
increased nnmber of low-income and minority Santa Monica
residents served in FY 1992-93 and recommends continued
emphasis in FY 1993-94.
SENIOR HEALTH AND PEER COUNSELING CENTER - HONBY IlANAGEKENT
PROGRAII
Recommended FY 1993-9. Fundinq Level:
$ 39,088 (General Fund)
program Description: Organization provides approximately 36
Santa Monica seniors with bill paying assistance and
representative payee services. The recommended funding level
has been adjusted to be commensurate with the proportion of
Santa Monica residents historically (past three years) served
by this program.
Funding Xechanism: One-Year Program Grant.
- 27 -
Program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) to serve 100% Santa Monica residents with
Santa Monica grant funds and cash match; and 2) to submit an
evaluation and plan to address sliding scale fees for
services with first quarter report.
WISE SENIOR SERVICES - CAS. MAHAGBKBNT
Recommended ~y 1993-94 Funding Level:
$118,232 (General Pund)
program Description: Program
services to approximately 400
seniors per year.
provides case management
unduplicated Santa Monica
Funding IIechanis.: One-Year Program Grant
Program Issues: city staff would like to acknowledge the
increased level of service to minority Santa Monica residents
served in FY 1992-93 and recommends continued emphasis on
serving minority Santa Monica seniors in FY 1993-94.
WISB - IN-BOllB SERVICES
Recommended PY 1993-94 Punding Level:
$ 34,37' (General Fund)
proq~.. Description I Program
serv1ces to approximately 36
seniors per year.
provides in-home support
unduplicated Santa Monica
~unding Mechanism: One-Year Program Grant
Program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) according to FY 1992-93 quarterly program
reports, the proportion of low-income and minority Santa
Monica residents served has dropped significantly; this
program will be required to develop an outreach plan to
increase the proportion of low-income and minority Santa
Monica residents in FY 1993-94 to be submitted to city staff
by the end of the first quarter.
WISE - WISB CARE CENTER
Recomm9nded FY 1993-94 Funding Level:
$ 33,185 (General Fund)
Program Description: Program provides day care services to
approximately 15 unduplicated persons suffering from
Alzheimer's Disease on a daily basis.
Funding Kechanism: One-Year Program Grant
- 28 -
program Issues: City staff would like to acknowledge the
increased level of service to Santa Monica residents in FY
1992-93 and encourage continued emphasis in FY 1993-94.
Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94 funding include: 1)
according to FY 1992-93 quarterly program reports, the
proportion of low-income Santa Monica residents have
significantly dropped; as a result, this program will be
required to develop an outreach plan to increase the
proportion of low-income Santa Monica residents in FY 1993-94
to be submi tted to ci ty staff by the end of the first
quarter; 2) the program viII be required to increase the
proportion of low- income Santa Monica residents served to
53\; and 3) fees generated from participants of this program
will be restricted for this program or WISE Olive stone
Center.
WISB - OLIVE STONB CENTER
Reco..ended FY 1993-94 Funding Level:
$ 75,721 (Genera1 Fund)
prograa Description: Program provides day-care service to
approximately 40 Santa Monica seniors who are cognitively
impaired and socially isolated. The recommended funding
level has been adjusted to be commensurate with the
proportion of Santa Monica residents historically served
(past three years) by this program.
Funding Mechani..: One-Year Program Grant
prograa Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) to serve 100% Santa Monica residents with
Santa Monica grant funds and cash match commensurate with the
level of city funding; 2) to develop a plan to be submitted
with the first quarter report, regarding methods to increase
the proportion of low-income Santa Monica clients while
increasing fees for those clients who may be able to pay for
services; 3) to submit a written evaluation by August 1, 1993
of the possible impact of City funding decreases in terms of
number of clients served, hours of operation and other
programmatic issues including plans to address the identified
impact; and 4) fees generated from participants of this
program will be restricted for this program or the WISE Care
Center.
WISB - RESOURCB AND REFERRAL
Recommended FY 1993-9. Funding Level:
$ 20,669 (General Fund)
Program Description: Program provides information, referral
and educational presentations on aging and long-term care to
approximately 1,715 unduplicated Santa Monica people per
year.
Punding Kechani..: One-Year Program Grant
- 29 -
Program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) to maintain a proportion of Santa Monica
residents served that is commensurate with the level of city
funding; and 2) the program will be required to develop an
outreach and marketing plan that will increase this program's
relevancy to low-income Santa Monica residents in FY 1993-94
to be submitted to City staff by the end of the first
quarter.
WISB - PARATRANSIT
Recommended Py 1"3-9. PuDding Level:
$384,369 (prop. A)
Program Descriptions Program provides door-to-door
transportation to approximately 988 unduplicated senior and
adult disabled people in santa Monica per year. Organization
will be subcontracting for paratransit services with DAVE
Transportation while maintaining the administrative and
fiscal oversight role.
Funding Xechanis.: One-Year Program Grant
Program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) upon implementation of the County of Los
Angeles's American with Disabilities Act paratransit Programl
WISE will evaluate how this program will impact its service
delivery and will make recommendations to City staff for any
program adjustments deemed necessary.
DISABILITY AND AXDS/HIV SERVICES
CENTER FOR THB PARTIALLY SIGHTBD
Recommended FY 1"3-9. Fundinq Level:
$ 11,737 (General FUnd)
program Description: Organization provides comprehensive low
vision services including optometric services, psychological
and peer counseling, independent living skills sessions and
public education services to approximately 65 unduplicated
Santa Monica people per year.
FUDdinq Xechanla.: One-Year Operating Grant that disburses
funds based on a unit rate for service that will target
low-income Santa Monica residents. Unit rate for service is
to be negotiated. Total grant award is not to exceed
$11,737.
Program Xssues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) city grants funds will be redirected to
target low-income Santa Monica residents only.
- 30 -
WESTS IDE CENTER POR INDEPENDENT LIVING (WCIL) - GENERAL PROGRAM
Recommended FY 1993-94 Punding Level:
$ 67,873 (General Fund)
Program De8c~iption: organization provides comprehensive
support serV1ces to approximately 150 unduplicated Santa
Monica people with disabilities in order to maintain or
increase their independence and to provide assisted
information and referral to Santa Monica residents.
pun4ing Xechanism: One-Year Operating Grant
Program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) due to chronic staff vacancies resultinq
in reduced targeted information and referral assistance to
Santa Monica residents, organization will be required to
develop a plan guaranteeing the consistent provision of
assisted information and referral services to Santa Monica
residents by the end of the first quarter; 2) to continue
allocating $35,000 of the city grant to support an
Information and Referral Coordinator to target assistance to
santa Monica residents; 3) to provide an evaluation and needs
assessment of issues raised by Santa Monica residents during
the past year and a half, to be submitted to the city with
the second quarterly report; 4) to continue to dedicate a
portion of the City'S grant ($5,000) as an emergency fund to
purchase equipment for persons with disabilities; 5) provide
separate and detailed reporting on the activities and
expenditures performed through this $5,000 emergency fund;
and 6) to assist city staff with training as it implements
the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
WESTSIDB BCUMENlCAL CONFERENCE - AIDS/KIV PROGRAM
Recommended PY 1993-94 Punding Level:
$ 90,486 (General FUnd)
proqram Description: Program provides preventive education
opportuni ties, outreach to special populations and support
services through the utilization of other community-based
agencies serving approximately 3,600 unduplicated Santa
Monica persons affected by AIDS/HIV per year.
Punding Xechanis.: One-year Program Grant
program Issues: proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) to ensure the availability of AIDS/HIV
testing to Santa Monica residents; 2) to provide update on
plans to incorporate as a non-profit organization with the
second quarterly program report; and 3) to report on efforts
to assess Santa Monica community needs for AIDS/HIV services
and resources by the end of the third quarter of FY 1993-94.
- 31 -
WESTS IDE BCUHENICAL CONFERENCB (WBC) - MEALS ON WHEELS
Recommended PY 1993-94 PUDding Levell
$ 22,891 (General Fund)
proqram Description: Program provides home delivered meals to
approximately 410 home-bound Santa Monica residents.
Funding Mechanism: One-Year Program Grant
Program Issues: N/A
COHMUNXTY SERVICES
DISPUTE RESOLUTION SERVICES - COHMUNXTY MEDIATION
Recommended FY 1993-9. Funding Level:
$ 49,781 (General Fund)
program Description: Program provides community and
tenant/landlord mediation program to approximately 920
unduplicated Santa Monica people per year.
Funding Mechanis.: One-Year Program Grant
program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) due to the increase in the numbers served
in FY 1992-93, to make modifications to the Program Workplan
that is reflective of this increase.
LIEU-CAP
Recommended FY 1993-9C Funding Level:
$102,412 (CDDG)
proqraa Description: Organization provides social service
advocacy and emergency food distribution in the pico
Neighborhood and socialization for seniors serving
approximately 925 unduplicated Santa Monica people per year.
Funding Mechanis.: One Year Operating Grant
prograa Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) to include more detail in the Program
Workplan to better reflect the activities performed by the
organization including the number of regular meetings held
wi th local seniors, the number and type of information and
referral calls received, and services provided through the
medical equipment loan program; and 2) adherence to all
funding requirements as specified by the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) fund entitlement regulations.
- 32 -
NEIGHBORHOOD SUPPORT CENTER (NBC)
Recommended 'Y 1993-94 Punding Levell
$257,906 (General Fund)
Program Description: Provides organizinq support to 5 Santa
Monica neighborhood associations with total membership of
2,000 and average neighborhood meeting attendance of 2 to 15
people. This organization is recommended for a funding
reduction due to the limited level of participation within
neighborhood associations. It has been determined that an
increased or broader range of participation has not occurred
since this organization was initially funded in FY 1987-88.
As a result, the level of staffing and city funding does not
remain commensurate with the level of service provided.
Funding Kechanismz One-Year Operating Grant
Program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) submittal of monthly Board minutes and
agendas; 2) submittal of monthly activity reports describing
neighborhood association activities and numbers of residents
participating; 3) quarterly meetings of all neighborhood
association board chairs with the NSC Board Chair and
Administrator of the NSC to maintain communication between
all boards; and 4) a mid-year evaluation by the NSC to report
on progress by the neighborhood associations in reaching
membership and participation goals.
NEW START - ADULT PROGR1UI
Recommended FY 1993-9' Funding Level:
$ 39,118 (General Fund)
Program Description: Program provides drug and alcohol abuse
counseling and support services to approximately 129 Santa
Monica residents per year.
Punding Xechanism: One-Year Program Grant
ProqraJll Issues: The organization's Executive Director
resigned at the end of FY 1991-92 resulting in the delegation
of administrative leadership to two existing positions, the
Clinical Director and the Fiscal Administrator. As of
February 1993, the Clinical Director resigned and a Program
Counselor was assigned with the responsibilities of the
Clinical Director. The result of this most recent change has
been to further decrease the level of direct service provided
by this organization. Additionally, since the elimination of
the Executive Director position over a year and a half ago,
the organization has lacked consistent administrative
accountability and oversight of agency functions. Therefore,
proposed program issues for FY 1993-94 funding include: 1) as
a condition of funding in FY 1993-94, the organization will
be required to hire an Executive Director by January 1, 1994
or the city will withhold additional grant funds.
- 33 -
RADIO iteR.
Recommended FY 1993-'4 PuDding Levell
$ 67,600 (General Fund)
Service Offered: Radio KCRW broadcasts the City of Santa
Monica's city Counci 1 meetings on the scheduled Tuesday of
each meeting from 8:00 p.m. up to midnight.
Fundinq Mechanism: Purchase Order Agreement
SANTA MONICA-WESTSIDB HOTLINB
Recommended PY 1993-'4 punding Level:
$ 1,158 (General Fund)
program Description: Organization provides a
crisis-intervention and referral hotline service.
24-hour
Funding Mechanism: Purchase Order Agreement
Proqram Issues: N/A
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC
Recommended FY 1993-94 Funding Level:
$ 59,360 (CDBG)
$ 5,780 (Prop. A Transportation Fund)
Program Description: organization provides free health care
delivery services to approximately 1,620 unduplicated low-
and no-income residents of Santa Monica per year. A small
transportation fund is administered to provide homeless
persons with bus tokens.
Punding Mechanism: One-Year Operating Grant
Program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) adherence to all funding requirements as
specified by the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
fund entitlement regulations.
WESTSIDB LEGAL SERVICES (WLS) - GENERAL PROGRAM
Recomm.nded FY 1993-94 Funding Level:
$184,094 (General Fund)
program Description: Organization provides legal assistance
to approximately 1,030 unduplicated low- and no-income
residents of Santa Monica per year.
Funding Mechanism: One-Year Program Grant
Program Zssues: Proposed program issues for 1993-94 funding
include: 1) the organization will be required to designate a
- 34 -
superv~s~ng attorney for ongoing case review and supervision;
2) regular monthly Board meetings will be required for the
first six months of FY 1993-94 and shall continue, at a
minimum, once every two months thereafter; 3) copies of all
Board minutes will be submitted to the city with quarterly
reports; 4) the organization will be required to conduct an
aggressive Board recruitment campaign with the goal of
reaching the maximum membership allowed in the agency By-Laws
while maintaining no fewer than 1 active Board members at all
times; 5) according to FY 1992-93 quarterly program reports,
the proportion of Santa Monica residents served has
significantly dropped; as a result, this program will be
required to develop an outreach plan to increase the
proportion of Santa Monica residents in FY 1993-94 to be
submitted to City staff by the end of the first quarter; and
6) to raise a level of cash match that is commensurate with
the proportion of Santa Monica residents served; city grant
funding shall provide funding support not to exceed 15% of
the Santa Monica portion of the Program Budget.
WESTsrDB LEGAL SERVrCES - DOMESTre VrOLENCB PROGRAM
Recommended FY 1993-94 Funding Level:
$ 41,544 (General Pond)
program Description: Organization provides self-help
restraining order assistance and full representation in
family law to approximately 550 unduplicated Santa Monica
people per year. The recommended funding level has been
adj usted to be commensurate wi th the proportion of Santa
Monica residents historically served (past three years) by
this program.
Funding Mechanisa: One-Year Program Grant
Program rssues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
funding include: 1) according to FY 1992-93 quarterly program
reports, the proportion of Santa Monica residents have
significantly dropped; as a result, this program will be
required to develop an outreach plan to increase the
proportion of Santa Monica residents served in FY 1993-94 to
be submitted to city staff by the end of the first quarter.
====================z====================~==========--==========
COMMUNrTY AND BEIGBBORBOOD IXPROVEllENT PROJECTS
py 1993-94 PUNDIBG RECOMMEHDATIOBS
==~======================================================~====~==
ACCESSIBrLITY PROJECTS
Recommended Py 1993-94 Funding Level:
$250,000 (eDna)
program Description: This City-administered program seeks to
eliminate architectural barriers to persons with disabilities
- 35 -
by conducting citywide curb cuts and performing site
improvements to city-owned facilities.
Funding Mechanism: N/A
proqraa Issues: N/A
COMMUNITY CORPORATION OF SANTA MONICA (CCSH)
Recommended FY 1993-94 Fundinq Level:
$248,395 (General Fund)
$144,500 (Redevelopment Funds)
Program Description: Organization provides housing
development and management activities benefiting low and
moderate income individuals and neighborhoods. It is
recommended that this organization receive a lot grant
reduction to the current FY 1992-93 funding level for a total
recommended FY 1993-94 funding level of $392,895. In the
current fiscal year (FY 1992-93), the state has reduced tax
increment funds to the Redevelopment Agency which currently
contributes to a portion of the organization's administrative
grant. Further reductions will be recommended as the
organization refinances a portion of their property
portfolio.
Funding Mechanism: One-Year Operating Grant
proqram Issues: Proposed program issues for 1993-94 funding
include: 1) quarterly financial statements submitted to city;
2) quarterly reconciliation of earnest money accounts
submi tted to city; 3) consider and implement options to
offset grant reduction by generating new revenues through
management fees and organizing as a community Housing
Development organization (CHDO) to receive City HOME funds;
and 4) to refinance property portfolio to SUbstantially
reduce debt service and property holdings to further reduce
the City's grant on a $1 for $1 basis once the organization
has successfully generated additional revenues to offset the
initial 10% grant reduction.
NEIGHBORHOOD RESOURCB AND DEVELOPHEHT CORPORATION (xaDC)
Recommended PY 1993-94 Funding Level:
$327,668 (CDBG)
prograa Deserip~ion: Organization provides a housing
rehabilitation grant program providing small grants for minor
repairs to approximately 79 eligible low income households in
the pica Neighborhood.
Fundinq Mechanism: One-Year Program Grant
Program Issues: Proposed program issues for 1993-94 funding
include: 1) administration staffing and overhead costs
limited to 15 percent of total grant; 2) adherence to all
- 36 -
funding requirements as specified by the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) fund entitlement regulations;
and 3) NRDC staff will ensure that 2 of the 4 moderate
rehabilitation projects will require a 50% matching cash
commitment by the owner.
PIca NEIGHBORHOOD DOUSING TRUST PUND (PNHTP)
Recommended PY 1993-94 punding Level:
$351,911 (CDBG)
Project Description: City-administered grant program designed
to preserve existing rental housing units through acquisition
and rehabilitation, and the development of new housing units
in the pico Neighborhood.
PUDding Kecbanisa: The PNHTF provides funds for deferred
loans to non-profit borrowers to support the development of
affordable rental housing in the Pico Neighborhood.
Applicants for the PNHTF must submit a PNHTF Deferred Loan
Application in accordance with PNHTF Guidelines to the city
of Santa Monica's Department of Resource Management.
PUBLIC WORKS ASSESSKSNT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
Recommended FY 1993-94 Funding Level:
$ 5,148 (CDBG)
proqraa Description: City-administered program that provides
public works assessment assistance to low- and moderate-
income residents.
?undinq Kechanism: Residents must submit an application to
receive assistance through this proqram. Applications are
reviewed on a case-by-case basis and approved if the
applicant meets the income eligibility standards.
program Issues: N/A
VIRGINIA AVENUE PARK IKPROVEMENTS
Recommended FY 1993-94 Punding Level:
$132,729 (CDBG)
program Description: This City-administered project will
seek to improve the community center and other park amenities
at Virginia Avenue Park to support greater access to the park
and its programs by neighborhood residents.
- 37 -
WESTSIDE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING (WelL) - HOME ACCESS
Recommended FY 1993-94 Funding Level:
$ 15,"" (CDDG)
Program Description: Program provides a citywide program to
assist approximately 36 unduplicated Santa Monica residents
with minor accessibility improvements per year. The program
will address the needs of residents with mobility impairments
around the home. The program may provide such items as:
grab bars, handrails, ramps, etc. Twenty households are
targeted for assistance.
Punding Mechanism: One-Year Program Grant
Program Issues: Proposed program issues for FY 1993-94
capital funding include: (1) to develop a program
implementation plan that will assure that City grant funds
are spent out fully and in a timely manner; and 2) adherence
to all funding requirements as specified by the Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) fund entitlement regulations.
- 38 -
SECTION VII: PROPOSED STATEKENT OJ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USB OJ' FUNDS
The following describes
funds planned for Fiscal
100% is being used for
objective of primarily
persons.
the proposed use of CDBG Entitlement
Year 1993-94. Of these expenditures,
activities which meet the national
benefiting low- and moderate-income
I. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES FOR FY 1993-94
o To maintain and improve affordable housing opportunities
for low and moderate income persons;
o To stabilize and enhance low and moderate income
neighborhoods through neighborhood revitalization and
other community development efforts; and
o To provide essential community services to residents
most in need of these services.
II. PROPOSED CDBG ACTIVITIES FOR 1993-94, THEIR LOCATION AND
ESTIMATED COST
Community & Neighborhood
Improvement Projects $1,082,900
Community Service Projects 213,129
Program Administration 124,828
Total CDBG Entitlement $1,420,857
Specific projects recommended for funding include:
Affordable Housinq (Acquisition, Rehabilitation)
$327,668 PICa NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION
PROGRAM - Residential Rehabilitation Grant Program
(Pico Neighborhood Area)
$ 15,444 RESIDENTIAL ACCESSIBILITY PROJECT Minor
accessibility improvements to residences of lower
income households (Citywide)
$351,911 PICa NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING TRUST FUND - Acquisition
and rehabilitation of affordable housing for low to
moderate income level persons (Pica Neighborhood
Area)
Neighborhood Revitalization
$ 5,148 PUBLIC WORKS ASSESSMENT ASSISTANCE - Assistance to
low-income homeowners and tenants for public works
improvement fees assessed by the City (Citywide)
- 39 -
$132,729
VIRGINIA AVENUE
improvements to
Neighborhood)
PARK IMPROVEMENT Capital
the park and facilities {Pico
Removal of Architectural Barriers
$250,000 ACCESSIBILITY PROJECTS To remove significant
architectural barriers prohibiting the mobility of
persons with disabilities including improvements to
public facilities and curb cuts (citywide)
Community Services
$213,129 HEALTH CARE, SOCIAL SERVICE ADVOCACY AND YOUTH
EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS - Primary health care services
and direct social service delivery including food
distribution, government benefits counseling and a
youth employment program (Citywide, Pico
Neighborhood)
Administration and Planninq
$124,828 PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION - General administration of
the overall CDBG Program.
III. PROPOSED AMOUNT OF FUNDS TO BENEFIT LOW/MODERATE INCOME
PERSONS
100% of the activities proposed for the 1993-94 CDBG Program
will primarily benefit low and moderate income persons.
Project funding for this purpose totals $1,296,029.
jj:\files\cdplan94
- 40 -
ATTACHMENT I:
COMl\1UNITY REVIEW PERIOD -
PUBLIC INPUT
Community Review Period -
City Commissions
SANTA
MONICA
---~~,
CommiSSion on the Status of Women
(213) 458-8246
June 15, 1993
Ms. Julie Rusk
Acting Manager
Community Neighborhood Services
Cultural and Recreational Services
1685 Main st
Santa Monica, CA 90401
1685 Mam Street
Santa Monica. CA 90401-3295
Re: community Development Plan
Community service Projects
Dear Ms. Rusk:
The Santa Monica Commission on the status of Women (SMCOSW) would
like to offer public support for the full funding of the Domestic
violence Project of Wests ide Legal Services.
The SMCOSW has actively worked with this program, from its
inception in 1988, through its struggles to deal with
overwhelming demand for services, reported problems with court
personnel and a critical need to raise funds.
Violence against women is widespread and growing. Pro Bono and
publicly funded legal services are extremely limited and tend to
focus on housing and senior issues. The Domestic Violence
Project uses paralegals and non-attorney volunteers to assist
battered women in obtaining Temporary Restraining Orders.
Approximately 55 percent of the Domestic Violence Project clients
are Santa Monica residents, minority and low income. These women
tend to be virtually homeless when driven from their residence by
the presence of a violent partner.
We ask that the City continue its commitment to the Domestic
Violence Project by restoring the $5571 cut from this program in
the 1993-1994 fiscal year budget. For too many years we have
ignored violence and abuse against women. We need to fund this
program and offer women an opportunity for a future without
violence and abuse.
sincerely,
~JwJ~
Laurie Newman
Chairperson
SANTA
MONICA
-~ --.. ----- ..>-
CommunIty and Neighborhood
Services DIvIsion
1685 Main Street, PO. Box 2200
Santa Monica, CA 90407-2200
(3101 458-8701
TOO: (3101 458-8696
FAX: (310) 458-3380
June 17, 1993
Laurie Newman
Chairperson
Commission on the status of Women
1685 Main street
Santa Monica, CA 90401-3295
Dear Laurie:
I am in receipt of your letter dated June 15, 1993, indicating
the Commission on the status Women's concern over the recommended
FY 1993-94 funding reduction to Wests ide Legal Services
Domestic Violence Program. I wanted to clarify that the decision
to reduce this program's funding level was based on the
relati vely low proportion of Santa Monica residents served as
compared to the high level of City funding. It is not a
reflection of the quality of services provided through the
Domestic Violence Program.
While this program provides an essential service to victims of
domestic violence, the City is facing an unprecedented budget
deficit and is in an unfortunate position to address this fiscal
crisis. As a result, all FY 1992-93 city-funded human service
and housing programs were evaluated to determine how each program
is meeting the selection criteria established in the Funding
Rationale approved by city Council on April 27, 1993. Emphasis
was placed on the programs' ability to serve a proportion of
Santa Monica residents that is commensurate with the proportion
of the programs' budget funded by the City of Santa Monica. The
City's policy is to fund no more than 75% of that portion of the
program's budget dedicated to serving Santa Monica residents.
The recommended funding reduction tor FY 1993-94 was adjusted to
reflect the program's current and historic level of service to
Santa Monica residents.
The City remains committed to supporting services to women and
other victims of domestic violence in Santa Monica and will
continue to work closely with program staff to develop a stronger
program in Santa Monica. I thank the Commission on the Status of
Women for their dedication and support to this program and for
taking the time to write expressing concern over the City's
recommended funding reduction.
Sincerely,
,/~?LlS1v
luJE RUSK
~:cting Manager
jj\files\cdcosw94
MEMORANDUH
DATE:
May 24, 1993
TO:
Ms. Julie Rusk
FROM:
commission on Older Americans
Proposed FY 1993-94
Community Development Program Funding
Even though this coming fiscal year will basically be an
extension of the present year, and accurate input from the Grants
committee of the COA is difficult because we have not been
receiving the quarterly status reports on the various agencies,
we feel that our input is essential to the grants process. (Let
it be noted that, effective immediately, we will be receiving
quarterly reports on all of the agencies listed below.)
SUBJECT:
There has been a great improvement in communications and
coordination between the agency providers, mainly because of the
effort by the Commission in getting the providers together at
least twice a year to implement this coordination process.
However, we still feel there is more room for improvement, to
eliminate costly duplication of services. Furthermore, we feel
very strongly that, in these difficult economic times, we cannot
afford the luxury of funding services provided to seniors who are
not residents of Santa Monica.
With these basic observations, we make the following
recommendations for individual agencies:
1. Center for the Partially Sighted - we recommend their grant
be continued to show improvement in outreach to the low in-
come and minority community. Furthermore, they have done an
excellent job of fundraising to keep their grant request
low.
2. LIEU-CAP - we recommend continuing their funding, but request
that staff monitor their actual usage to make sure these
funds are used in Santa Monica. It is also vital that the
City help LIEU-CAP to find a new, more adequate facility.
surely there is some space which can be made available to
them, so that they can more adequately service their clients.
The improvement in coordinating their activities with the
other agencies has been very rewarding. It continues to im-
prove each year.
3. Senior Health and Peer Counseling Center (SHPCC):
a) Healthcare for seniors program - SHPCC has been con-
sistent in responding to the needs of the community
developing a fundraising base independent of City funds,
and serving every segment of our senior population in-
cluding low income and ethnic minorities. City money is
a relatively small part of their budget, but is essential
if they are to continue their present level of service.
Santa Monica can take justifiable pride in being the home
of SHPCC - a role model for agencies allover the USA and
many parts of the world. We strongly recommend their
continued funding at the maximum possible.
b) Daily Money Management Program - this program, from its
inception, has exceeded the goals set by the city. It
continues to service the frail elderly population, and
performs an essential servi~e. This program has been so
outstanding that it is being emulated and copied by com-
munities allover the world. The Commission takes great
pride in their association with this program, and
strongly recommends it be fully funded for 1993-94.
Sometime in the future, with the development of paying
clients, and with its own independent fundraisinq, we
feel that City funding will become less essential, but
not yet.
4. Westside Center for Independent Living (WeIL) - without
~dequate information on the recent performance of this
agency, it is difficult for us to make proper recommen-
dations here. If they are properly servicing Santa Monica
seniors, and if they have implemented the program to pro-
vide at least 35 Santa Monica residents with Emergency
Response Systems, then they should be funded as before.
otherwise, their grant should be decreased proportionate
to the~r servicing of Santa Monica residents.
It would also be interesting to know what kind of actual
funds are being received by WCIL from the handicapped
parking violation fines.
5. Wests ide Ecumenical Conference Meals on Wheels (MOW) -
we wholeheartedly support this grant in full. Performance
by MOW has been exemplary.
6. WISE Senior Services (WISE) -
a) General Support Services - we have no definite feedback
from City staff on the concerns expressed in the past.
1. More aggressive fundraising.
2. More service to Santa Monica residents in the 2 day-
care programs.
3. More services in general to Santa Monica residents.
4. Better outreach to the minority population.
. 1
We do feel, however, that they should continue to be funded
as in the past, because their services to our senior com-
munity are vital.
b) Transportation Services - we recommend continuation of the
WISE transportation program which seems to be doing a more
effective job. (Complaints from users have gone down
dramatically in the last year).
We still feel strongly that Santa Monica needs a taxi
coupon program, which every other community around us has
in place. In view of the recent increase in the fee
scales of these programs, we feel that staff should re-
investigate the possibility of a Santa Monica program.
We also strongly suggest that you investigate the avail-
ability of Prop A funds for this program. If a taxi
coupon program is possible for Santa Monica, we recommend
it be administered independently from WISE transportation
services:
Respectfully submitted,
~~~~
Leonard Gross, CHAIR, GRANTS COMMITTEE
Florence Cardine, Rose Kaufman, COMMITTEE MEMBERS
cc: Mayor Judy Abdo
city Council Members
Kathy Kucharski, Senior Services Supervisor
Susan Mccarthy, Director. C.A.R.S.
APPROVED: COMMISSION ON OLDER AMERICANS
grossmem
5/93
ze . d ~lOJ.
MDORAHDOK
DAT. :
June 14, 1993
J\llie Rusk
Community and Re1qhhorhood serv1r;es Division
Leonard Gro.. and Florence C&rd11a
OOA Gran~a , Budgets Co~~4tt.e
SttaJECTI Senior Hea.lth , Peer Counselinq
Daily Koney MAnaq~nt Program jl
This ~rogrAm is now in it'. third year and has been completely
successful (.tory in Business Week last DO th). As a result,
eiqhty-tive cities throughout the uni~.d s tea h~ve asked tor
inforlllation on the Daily Honey Manaqem.en't oqram, AS it is
.anaqed in Santa Monica. The program la rentJ.y ..rv1nq
fortY-five Santa Monica residents, which i ahead of its
projected schedule. All Santa Monica ells ts are serviced tree
of charq., and non-residents pay a minimum ot $10.00 per nour.
Future objectives include concentrated ettirts on Santa MOnlca
reaidenta. We bave insisted for fiscal ye r 1994/9S the program
raise enough money, above the present tund nq level, to ena~l.
the City to raduce ita 9rant: by _bout $15'100. consequently, it
is absolut.ly vital that the $10,-461 remal in the budqet tor
this year.
I
!'OI
nOXa
d11mqross
6/93
20. d ~i..~to
OJ.
S3:I t ~ CD I H3S ~ \rCRl;! tz I L I ~l-rt-N1.f
SANTA
MONICA
...- -- -------~--
Community and Neighborhood
Services DIvIsion
1685 Main Street, P.O. Box 2200
Santa MOnica. CA 90407.2200
(310) 458.8701
TOO: (310) 458.8696
FAX: (310) 458-3380
June 17, 1993
Leonard Gross, Chair
Grants Committee
commission on Older Americans
1685 Main street
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Dear Leonard:
I thank the Commission on Older Americans for all their hard work
and critical analysis provided in the memo dated May 24, 1993,
transmitting the Commission's recommendations for funding in FY
1993-94. In addition, I am in receipt of your memo dated June
14, 1993, indicating concern regarding the City's recomended FY
1993-94 funding reduction to Senior Health and Peer Counseling
Center - Money Management Program. I recognize the valuable
service provided through this program and appreciate the efforts
that this program has made in increasing the number of persons
served.
Unfortunately, the city is facing an unprecedented budget deficit
and is in a position to address this fiscal crisis by reducing
the City's overall budget. As a result, all FY 1992-93
city-funded human service and housing programs were evaluated to
determine how each program is meeting the selection criteria
established in the Funding Rationale approved by City council on
April 27, 1993. Emphasis was placed on the programs' ability to
serve a proportion of Santa Monica residents that is commensurate
with the proportion of the programs' budget funded by the City of
Santa Monica. The City's policy is to fund no more than 75t of
that portion of the program's budget dedicated to serving Santa
Monica residents. The recommended funding reduction for FY
1993-94 for this program was adjusted to reflect the programts
current and historic level of service to Santa Monica residents.
The City remains committed to providing essential money
management services to Santa Monica seniors and will continue to
work closely with program staff to develop a stronger program in
Santa Monica. This will include identifying methods by which the
program can implement a revised sliding scale fee system that
will charge a rate for service based on the clients' ability to
pay.
I thank the Commission on Older Americans for their dedication to
the needs of seniors in Santa Monica and for taking the time to
write of their recommendations for future program development.
Sincerely,
~ f2w-(t--
~E RUSK
Acting Manager
jj\files\cdcoa94
Community Review Period -
City-Funded Agencies
S E
~/
Ni. 0 R
.:... '..:.l..'I.....II..lItllJ'....'IU..t..
B..N 01 Dlfwton
Offi-s
Kwt lCneser. Prestdent
Robert Fredndcs, .N 0
RoBff Hap
SIwoII Mel~
t&wrmce A. "-
J- Sept. Ph D
Ted Se,dmm
Doo1 ThaJU
Pnsalla VJene
~
Heat)' II.. ~Uf
Jafuy &lbakow
Margo 8ak<< Barbakow
John Beck, M D
Frances Cohen, R.N ·
Scan Oyer
R.Khard K. Earn<<
AAl"oo J F~MOft
Jonathan FtcldlOg, M D
Karin ~ fteldUlJ
Lmda GoIdk.n
Alben GrosslJWl, Esq
Oscu Kaa
Kn-.D V Kmal. Esq
Carl Ja, Lambet1:. Esq
Paul LeonI, Pbatm D
John H Lbby
DaYld Lyon, Ph.D
Maynard Qmo.
Saodta K. Post
Alfred Qwon, Ph.D
JuIJec L RamI
Hcrll ReICh
laun. RodcweU
I.ows A Ros.sem
Nanm SosUI. &q
Nu: Trnoes
G-.J Uman. Ph.D
I'mI Vollmer
Don.ld G W.-&:
Buben. Wilhams. Ph.D
H_..., BfMmi M""*n
Pfie oS! Susan Butett
Brad M P__
E'llelyn L r=man. Ph D
Ruth L Hafmao
Howard House, M D.
hm- Jphn-
R.obcn L Kane. M.D
Karl MAIden
SlSta' Mane MIoddaM
Harnett Nema-
Carl oS! Estelle Remer
Mr oS!Mrs.~Dsm-
Robm: Sepl
Mark Tap:t
An UImc, M..D
JOOse Joseph A. Wopnet
I!Jotadrw D.......
Ikl1lJa ll_
AIs<<wu D.-
Doc ca-
."...... ~
Ser_ HItIIdJ.-I ,,,,.
C.......",,-. --I"fiI
",...,..,,- --,.
-- -",.j"""',.
...... ,.,,..,rllJ t{ Itfr frr
....IIJzs*-P .
~f(-.I-
~1wb6.
June 11. 1993
1 ulie Rusk
City of Santa Monica
Community & Neighborhood Services Division
1685 Main St. P.O.Box 2200
Santa Monica, Ca. 90407-2200
3'J
CItt c.lt IS
Dear Julie. o,.c- S4t 40.:.t<
As you are aware, we are all deeply troubled at the proposed fun~;6tt1;lQ
our Daily Money Management Program. As we had discussed. we bave~4
been running a progmm costing in excess of $100.000 with City funding of
.$49.549. The schedule of program costs I presented last week gives a good
indication of the actual costs to run it Factoring in a small percentage of
time for our receptionist. the program conservatively costs over $100,000.
We are stilI of the belief that our success in attracting non Santa Monica
residents should bring with it some consideration from the City, as these
clients are necessuy {or US to receive matching program funds. This need
aside, our program costs still justify full and continued funding using your
funding fonnula and the 66% Santa Monica resident factor.
I hope you will reconsider your staff funding recommendation on this
important and highly successful program.
~
Don Cohen
Associ~tp- Director
..._._ : J... ~
._ t ~.. -: ..II - : ; -. .- F.~
"... <I ......,_
- -
- ~ ,
- .' ~-
.~. . ...- .-"-
- .. '..-..+
~
, .,
...... ' :II "'_' J.
";,' .....-.I.~J-r-#".:. ~-
- "_1 - --
..1.1 ,..--;.
- - -:..., ~
.'
'"' ~ I ,-
..-1< ; -... _ #_
.. .... '...
- . ,. .....
-. .-:!:. ....
'-
~-..; -
"
'.
,
H...'I__rIeIS
2125 Anzona AYe.
Safa Mana
CA 904lM-l_
13101128-1243
Fax 13101453-1485
r.. YdrII c.e.
1527 4th sn.
SanIa Monice
CA 9IN01.231.
13101 121-4715
Fax (310) 571-249t
SANTA
MONICA
Commumty and Neighborhood
Services DIvIsion
June 17, 1993
1685 Main Street, P Q. Box 2200
Santa Monica, CA 90407-2200
(310) 458-8701
TOO: (310) 458-8696
FAX: (310) 458-3380
Don Cohen
Associate Director
Senior Health and
2125 Arizona Ave.
Santa Monica, CA
Pee~ Counseling Center
90404-1398
Dear Don,
I am in receipt of your letter dated June 11,
concern regarding the city's recommended FY
reduction to the Money Management Program.
1993, indicating
1993-94 funding
As we discussed at our meeting on June 3, 1993, the City is
facing an unprecedented budget deficit and is in an unfortunate
position to address this fiscal crisis by reducing the city's
overall budget. As a result, all FY 1992-93 City-funded human
service and housing programs were evaluated to determine how each
program is meeting the selection criteria established in the
Funding Rationale approved by the city council on April 27, 1993.
Emphasis was placed on the programs' ability to serve a
proportion of Santa Monica residents that is commensurate with
the proportion of the programs' budget funded by the City of
Santa Monica. The City'S policy is to fund no more than 75% of
that portion of the program's budget dedicated to serving Santa
Monica residents. The recommended funding reduction for FY
1993-94 was adjusted to reflect the program's current and
historic level of service to Santa Monica residents.
The Ci ty remains coromi tted to providing essential money
management services to Santa Monica seniors and will continue to
work closely with program staff to develop a stronqer program in
Santa Monica. This will include identifying methods by which the
program can implement a revised sliding scale fee system that
will charge a rate for service based on the clients' ability to
pay.
Sincerely,
ca . " I,,"": .1/
. t..(...(.AC.#~ -1..'~ l....--'
IE RUSK
Acting Manager
jj\files\cdsh94
Westside Legal Services
612 COLORADO A VENUE. SUITE 107 . SANTA MONICA, CA 90401 . (310) 396-5456 . FAX (310) 314.2655
June 11, 1993
Julie Rusk
Community and Neighborhood Services Division
City of Santa Monica
1685 Main Street
Santa Monica, cA 90407
RE: Appeal of staff funding recommendations
"93 J.t114 A 9 :~5
Dear JUlie,
1 ~., ,,"'-4..
I would like to thank both you and Betty for meatfhTJ OSi1?h"\~~~....tit'...'"
earlier this week. I greatly appreciate the support and guidance
offered by both of you.
As we discussed, enclosed please find Wests ide Legal Services'
appeal to the City Counsel. I would like to underscore that it is
not my intention to create a adversarial climate with the staff by
submitting this document. Qui te the contrary, I rel ish the
cooperative relationship we currently enjoy and hope that my
disagreement with the staff analysis doesn't harm. that
relationship.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Thank
you for your assistance.
SF
Paul S. Tepper
Executive Director
-e.(r)
Westside Legal Services
612 COLORADO A VENUE. SUITE 107 . SANTA MONICA, CA 90401 . (310) 396-5456 · FAX (310) 314-2655
June 11, 1993
Members of the City Counsel
City of Santa Monica
1685 Main street
Santa Monica, CA 90407
RE: Appeal of the staff funding recoJDlllendation for
Westside Legal services t Domestic Violence/Family Law
Program
Honorable city Counselors,
Wests ide Legal Services respectfully appeals the staff
recommendation to reduce the city of Santa Monica's level of
support for the Domestic Violence/Family Law Program by $5,571.
This appeal is based on the following contentions:
1. Every Santa Monica resident who requires program services are
receiving those services.
2. The staff incorrectly determined that the program has failed
to meet its service targets. In fact, the program has
exceeded those targets.
3. The staff analysis is grounded upon fundamentally unsound
assumptions. This analysis yields a result which punishes
victims of domestic violence and penalizes Westside Legal
Services for assisting too many abused clients.
Proaram Backaround
- -
As you may be aware, WIS' Domestic violence/Family Law Program was
created in 1989 in response to the enormous gap in legal services
available to victims of domestic violence in Santa Monica and on
the Wests ide of Los Angeles County. While, in theory, battered
women could seek and obtain court ordered legal protection from
their abusers, the procedural and bureaucratic realities made this
remedy extremely difficult to access. A group of concerned
community members, including judges, the police and social service
agencies worked with WLS to develop a program that provided
effective and compassionate legal assistance to victims of domestic
violence. The product was WLS t Domestic ViOlence/Family Law
Program.
The Domestic Violence Walk In Clinic, which is located in the Los
Angeles Superior Court in Santa Monica, is the cornerstone of the
~@
project. Its staff and volunteers are dedicated to helping clients
obtain immediate nrotection from their abusers.
Primary services include: 1. intake and case evaluation; 2.
completion of court forms for restraining, stay away, residence
exclusion, counseling, child custody, child support and other
matters; 3. filing and service instructions; 4. preparation for
appearances in court; 5. accompaniment, as needed, to court
hearings or conciliation court proceedings; 6. referrals to law
enforcement agencies, shelters for battered women and other
community services; 7. evaluation and referral for full
representation in family law matters by staff or pro bono
attorneys.
The project maintains working and cordial relations with westside
law enforcement agencies, court representatives, domestic violence
shelter staff and other community service agencies. The result 1s
a cooperative and coordinated response to the needs of domestic
violence victims. Each year, hundreds of Santa Monica and non-
santa Monica residents are assisted.
ADneal
The Santa Monica staff is recommending a $5,571 reduction in City
support due to "the historical low level of service to Santa Monica
residents" over the last three years. This contention is not
based in fact. In reality. the Domestic Violence Proaram will
e~ceed the cumulative three year sant~ ~Qpica client taraets.
In fiscal year 1990-91, we contracted to serve 400 Santa Monica
residents and served 492. In fiscal year 91-92, we contracted to
serve 750 residents and served 715. As of the first three quarters
of the current fiscal year, we have served 430 Santa Monica clients
with a contract target of 550 and will certainly exceed our target.
CUmulatively, we will go beyond our three year target.
In the cur=ent fiscal year (as of the third quarter), 42% of our
clients were from Santa Monica and 36% of our budget was provided
by the City of Santa Monica. We project that we will serve a
similar number of Santa Monica residents in the coming year and are
seeking a similar percentage of our budget from the City.
The Domestic Violence Clinic does not turn awav any Santa Monica
residents. We assist virtually every victim of domestic violence
from Santa Monica who is seeking a restraining order, with the
obvious exception of those weal thy residents who can afford and who
retain their own lawyer. Victims of domestic violence are referred
to us by the Santa Monica Police Department, city staff, Sojourn
and other social service agencies, former clients and the court,
itself.
The project also assists hundreds of non-Santa Monica victims. As
with Santa Monica residents, these individuals are referred to us
by the police.. social services agencies and the court. The
Superior Court~ which donates an office and adjunct services to us,
relies on the project to ensure that applications for restraining
and other protective crders are properly prepared, that applicants
are advised of their r1ghts and offered the services necessary to
ensure that they can smoothly navigate through the legal system.
The Court requires us to serve all of the clients who are eligible
for our assistance.
We are the only legal assistance program for domestic violence
victims in the region. If WLS does not help these victims of
abuse, no one will.
Despite the above statistics, which unequivocally demonstrate that
we have met our Santa Monica targets.. the staff has noted a
"historically low level of service to Santa Monica residents." The
crux of the staff's analysis is not that we have failed to serve
Santa Monica residents but that in the past several years, we have
served more non-Santa Monica clients than projected.
Since more non-Santa Monica clients are coming to the clinic than
anticipated, the percentage of Santa Monica clients is smaller than
projected. T~is is the so called low level of service the staff is
referring to.
The real issue isn't whether Santa Monica residents are receiving
services, they are. The true problem is that domestic violence is
an epidemic in Los Angeles County and we are the only agency on the
westside serving these individuals.
The staff recommendation penalizes WLS for helping too many people.
Theoretically, we could reduce the number of non-Santa Monica
clients we help and thereby increase the percentage of Santa Monica
clients we serve. However, we are practically and ethically
precluded from pursuing this avenue. The clinic staff is simply
unable to withhold assistance from an abused domestic violence
victim, who is standing in front of them, asking for protection.
It would be morally reprehensible and the Superior Court would
likely deny us continued use of the clinic office if we arbitrarily
stopped serving non-Santa Monica residents. Yet the staff of the
City of Santa Monica is asking us to do just that.
Wests ide Legal Services is caught within a grotesque catch 22 and
the result is that we are being punished for helping too many
clients.
Let me reiterate, services are beina Drovided to everv Santa Monica
resident who needs the~. city sta~t notes that these services do
not represent a high enough percentage of our total client base to
warrant maintaininq current funding levels. To preserve our
current level of funding, we must either reduce the number of non-
Santa Monica clients we serve or.. perversely, increase the
incidence ot domestic violence in Santa Monica.
Both are untenable options. It is our duty and responsibility to
continue to serve victims of domestic violence in our community and
not playa "numbers game" to secure our funding.
While ordinarily the agency could absorb a small reduction from the
City of Santa Monica, there are special circumstances that make
even this small proposed cut very painful. Westside Legal
services, like many legal aid agencies in California, receives a
substantial portion of its budget from the state Bar of California.
Due to a downturn in interest rates, the state Bar has made an
across the board 33% cut in its support of legal services. This
means a loss of approximately $50,000 in core income to Westside
Legal Services and has resulted in staff reductions and substantial
belt tightening. Any additional cuts would place an extraordinary
burden on the agency.
I appeal to the city Counsel to restore the $5,571 to Westside
Legal Services.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
S !\~erelY ,
pJYl~pper------
Executive Director
SANTA
MONICA
....... -..J "'"" _ .... _~..-__ h-~..._ ________ ....- _"__ __
CommunitY' and Neighborhood
Services Division
1685 MalO Street, P O. Box 2200
Santa MOnica, CA 90407-2200
(310) 458-8701
TOO: 1310l 458-8696
FAX: {310l 458.3380
June 17, 1993
Paul Tepper
Executive Director
Wests ide Legal Services
612 Colorado Ave., suite 107
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Dear Paul,
I am in receipt of your letter dated June 11, 1993, transmitting
your written comments to the City Council regarding the City's
recommended FY 1993-94 funding reduction to the Domestic Violence
Program.
As we discussed in our meeting of June 9, 1993, the city's
recommended funding reduction was based on the historically low
proportion of Santa Monica residents served in relation to the
proportion of the program's budget funded by the city of Santa
Monica. I recognize that the number of persons served through
this program has increased including the number of Santa Monica
residents, however, the criteria for determining the funding
reduction is based on the proportion of Santa Monica residents
served served not the number.
The city's policy is to fund no more than 75% of that portion of
the program's budget dedicated to serving Santa Monica residents.
This policy is implemented to assure that city funds remain
targeted to meeting the needs of Santa Monica residents. The
recommended funding reduction for FY 1993-94, therefore, was
adjusted to reflect a funding level that is commensurate with the
proportion of Santa Monica residents served as compared to the
total number of persons served from the entire region.
The City remains committed to supporting services to women and
other victims of domestic violence in Santa Monica and will
continue to work closely with program staff to develop a stronger
program in Santa Monica. Please feel free to call me if you need
further clarification on how the recommended FY 1993-94 funding
reduction was developed.
Sincerely,
cyd~ QLU;l<----
--~IE RUSK
Acting Manager
jj\files\cdwls94
Community Review Period -
General Public
Edith Brandel
1228 Euclid Street
Santa Momca, Ca 90404
6/14/1993
Dear Julie Rusk,
As a voting resident of Santa Monica, I urge you to do everything you can to
fund DMM at its previous level.
This program is of vital importance to many Senior Citizen Residents of Santa
Momca, providing them With es.sentlal services which they cannot find anywhere else
Without it many of them would be forced to resort to the bleak misery of Old Age
Homes
Please use your influence to save DMM
Sincerely
Edith Brandel
(SHPS-DMM Volunteer)
U j 'Ii ,1) ill" ./ J
~ B!).)Jt -' VJ I! "vA ffP
0'
~
0'<
d.
.d
~
~
-,
*
~
.....
-
~1
J)
'c5
"..
t:;
D
r-
-
~
~1l) ulHLA WAY
LOS ~1"1_~l CALlE. 90064
WILSHIRE CENTER RADIOLOGY
Terry S Becker, M.D
Marvin S. Freilich. M D.
6200 WilshIre Blvd. Suite 101
Lo, Angeles. Ca1Jlomla 90048 (213) 933-9384
~ - /1--- "J
~04. (p -'&.l-o....t
~f'd ~AlS eO~~J"""
JI.,s ""'~!if. 'c+
~.J.., 1'h~'C4t:. J G:t..
\Q)<~ 1h. (?~-
~ 411 ...,." ~~ oj ~ rE t1-=-~-:! -I ~:.....s+I~ -; ~
S~'tN II~ Q....,( ~ a...-,-:X~l e4t~ 4.....M q ..,..,..-.-.&..r
~ ~ ~. ~ "1),~1r "",~~--. -..-1- V2.c,~- -" I 9- a--
1H--Ut~ ~~ ~.;tk o~-e.<"""" 01 ~ D~H.J1.
g .&.t.~ ...I&tt ~ C...v...--'4u,. 4." ~""f~ -I4.t..
~ fIJ. S......i-c 1'h--.:.c..... ~ ~ ~ (;b~ ~o -a~
~ ~ -t)./"':~ ~ ID ...RJ" J'-c-~..L.;..., "::tMl "1
& c,,~.
.-
/.(+-, gr ~-U ~e,~ ~Q..M??'.JkDVh:- ,I.
co Q G/ 1- ~_
~~a{ ~ ~I /0 ~orL..~ 0- - ~ l)~'
\0
- .z:
<C
V)
u...
o
>-
.....
G
~
~
~~J
p~ ~~. /'Jfi).
DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY. COMPlr1UJ TOMOGRAPHY. ULTRASOUND. MAMMOGRAPHY. MRI . ~ MEDICINE
June 15, 1993
Miss JUlie Rusk
Principal CNS Coordinator
1685 Main St., Rm. 212
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Dear Miss Rusk:
I have been attending classes at the Sr. Health andl
Peer Counseling Center and am concerned about
funding cuts for the program. I, as a single
widow, living on a very tight income would not
be able to afford any financial increases in any
area.
I hope this can be resolved in some other way.
Sincerely,
0
=t ~
-<
0
"T1 ~
V1
J>
7' -
- 0\
>
3- ::b
C \0
;r: N
c=:
l> Ul
fr~
Mrs. T. Friedman
1125 3d St., #314
Santa Monica, CA 90403
WILLIAM J. GLICK
10540 DRAPER AVENUE
LOS ANGELES, CA. 90064
June Il, 1993
Ms. Jul~e Rusk
Pr~nc1pal eNS Coordinator
1685 Ma~n Street-Room 212
Santa Monica, CA. 9040l
Dear Ms. Rusk:
I am a volunteer serving Senior Health & Peer Counseling,
in their Daily Money Management program, and have been connected
w1th the organization for about l~ years. I am very enthusiastic
about the service the Center provides, and am happy that I am
able to contribute my b1t to making it happen.
I am particularly sensit2ve to budget constraints, in that
I was an accountant for much of my business life; now that I
am ret1red, I am able to devote my t1me to volunteer work, thus
keeping the "cost" of the OMM endeavors as low as possible.
However, we NEED the continued support of the City of Santa
Monica to be able to continue and further these efforts, and
I ask that the City reinstate the funding level that afffects
the Da~ly Money Management program. Speaking for myself, and
I am sure a number of my OHM fellow-volunteers, we are ready
and more than w1111ng to serve more Santa Monica clients, in
need of the serv~ces we give! The funding is necessary to make
this possible. Thank you for your reconsideration of this request,
of what has been acknowledged as a successful Santa Monica service
to ~ts c1t1zens.
WJG/g
R~t
Will
SIM- PLEX
Slmplzfymg the Complex
16 Oakmllnt Dnw
Lvs Angeles. California 90049
Phone (310) 471-2004 Fax (310)471.0010
("') ..a
::::t
-< 'vol
0
-, ~
(.n
:r..
-~ -
June 13, 1993 .. 0\
::r-..
-. :J::>
-~
r: -.J
- i.JI
~
e-;, \0
J>
Julie Rusk, Principal eNS Coordinator
1685 Main st., Room 212
Santa Monica, CA 90401
RE: Senior Health and Peer Counseling
Daily Money Management Program
Dear Ms. Rusk,
This letter comes by way of urging the City of Santa Monica to not
curta.j.J. funding to the Sel'\ior lIealth and ~eer <;ounselinq Dailv
Money Manaaement PrOQram.
As a volunteer in the project I know first-hand the benefits
afforded to the needy elderly. We help our clients help
themselves manage their own affairs. This permits them self-
respect and independence. It diminishes the likelihood of
impoverishment to which they are so vulnerable in their later
years.
Please continue to support the Senior Health and Peer Counseling
Daily Money Management program; to empower older Americans with
worth instead of worthlessness.
Respectfully,
~~
Sandra Goodglick
CURT E. KRIESD
--4 .
141 W est Woodruff A \I8fIue ::g
Arcadia. California 9.6
(818) 446-5413 c...' S-
?~ ~
.." -
-
-
~
.....,
~
c
::.-:.
~
l>
~
'0
N
'0
Writing you is a bit difficult for me. I am a
volunteer of the D M H program of the S H pee and live quite far
from Santa Monica. Yet I found great satisfaction in watching the help
that we can provide.
The program is getting more people involved
and reaches rore people,- this growth depends on people that will
reach out for our help, we have little control of where they live. It is
sad that you can not help us to balance the residencial background so
the vast majority of our clients are from Santa M:::mica,we must
help whoever comes to our doors.
Recently I heard that the Ci ty of Santa M:lnica
,which has financial problems like every city in California is with-
drawing it help from the I:I+{ program ,which we understand except that
the fact that the residence of our clients is blamed for the with-
drawal.
The fact is that we have mny more Santa M:>nica
residents in the program than in previous years, and we therefore
need any help we can get from you. Our program has become well known
and will be used in other areas by other organisations to help
people keep controle of their financial and personal needs.
Unless your c!ituation forces you to cut expenses
no matter where and why, I hope you will find it possible to reinstate
our funding ,so we can continue to give help, advice and selfrespect
to our clients and many roore people that need~_
Nahed Guirguis will be able to arrange for our
visits to Santa r-bnica residents that you know need sare assistance.
Sincerely yours
. I
@(,~'rz- t{c:eJeL
June 15, 1993
Julie Rusk, Principal eNS Coordinator
1685 Main st. Room 212
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Dear Ms. Rusk,
I would like to urge the City staff to reinstate the
previous funding level for the Senior Health and Peer
Counseling Daily Money Management Program (OHM). This
program is so desperately needed in the community of Santa
Monica. A cut in funds could threaten its existence.
I have been a volunteer with SHPC for three years now.
I was trained by a OHM professional and have supervision
twice a month. The DMM professional is always there for us
if any questions arise.
My first OHM client whose failing health left
her very confused about bills, insurance, and medical bills
was so relieved when we started services for her. Her
husband was placed in a nursing home. My client had not
paid bills for 30 years. With my help she was able to write
out her checks, sign them, and keep up to date on all her
bills. My second client is legally blind. Both clients are
residents of santa Monica.
You can see the need is so great for this service. New
volunteers need to be trained to fill the needs of the
elderly in Santa Monica and this takes money to train new
volunteers coming In.
Prevention 1s the main thrust of SHPC. Unpaid bills
can put elderly people at risk of becoming homeless. Thank
you for considering this request ot reinstating funds back
to the original amount fQ( this very successful proqram.
N -..>
~ ~
cr .;: Sincerely,
~~~
",'"
\0 ..
-
- ""
~ ~
n
~
0
~ >-
t-
O
Charlene Lawrence
Ju1~e Rusk. Princ~pal eNS Coord~nator
1685 Ha~n Street. Room 212
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Dear Ms. Rusk:
It is my understand~ng that the City of Santa Monica
plans to cut the fundIng for the Daily Money Management
Program of Senior Health and Peer Counseling. I urge
you and the City not to do this.
As a volunteer at Senior Health for the past year for
this program. I know first-hand how devasting this fund-
ing cut would be. My current cl~ent. who is blind and
low income. would be unable to function independently
in his home without our help. This story is repeated
many times by DMM clients in a wide variety of situations.
Again. I wish to reiterate the need for full funding of
this program. This is a model program recognized through-
out the country. I know funds are tight allover. but
why should those who are least able to. be the ones to
suffer.
Thank you for your assistance.
~:e:{'/>r~
.....-/
Enid F. Reiser
Volunteer. DMM
Senior Health & Peer Counseling
('")
::::; ~
~
0
"'"n ;;
V?
):>
;z -
--' 0\
):.,
:r: :c-o
S. co
.. 0
r,
7> Cl
JIH e 15, 1993
Miss Julie Rusie
Principal CNS Coordinator
1685 Main St., Rm. 212
Sanata Monica, CA 90401
Dear Miss Rusk:
I am a 70 year old widow, who has been attending
classes at the Sr. Health and Peer Counseling
Center. They are extremely beneficial to my
health and emotional growth.
I am appalled to hear that your office is
recommending funding cuts to this greatlY needed
organization. I sincerely hope you will be
able to find other alternatives in this situation
and to continue this program without any changes.
Sincerely,
J p~ f(n~
V;lij~\Arjt'rr1S 10 Al~ Polly Rosen
1112 7th St., #1113
~z: 6\1 9L rlr t6. Santa Monica, CA 90403
.
oj
KATHY WEREMIUK
520 STRAJlD, '8
SUTA NO.lCA, CA. 90405
(310) 392-0tl97
9
-4
-<
o
."
(.f':I
~
-
,.,.
3:
~
n
>'
~
~
June It, 1993
Meabers of the City CouDcil
Ci~y of Santa MoD~ca
1685 Main Street
Santa NoDica, CA. 90407
Dear Members of the City Council,
I am writing to request that the City Council restore $5,571 to the
Domestic Violence/Family Law Program run by West Side Legal
Services.
'-
UI
~
00
J:k
J:;lJ.
I am currently a volunteer attorney at the Domestic Violence Walk
in Clinic at the Santa Konlca Superior Court. The victims of
domestic violence, lik.e the homeless I are in a state of acute
crisis, and tend to be an unorganized constituency. In sharing my
experience with the program, I hopefully can tell you what the
clients would say about the clinic if they had an organized voice.
* The clinic is a no-frills operation. It operates out of a
tiny donated office in the court house. It has only two paid
staff people, an attorney and a para-legal. On most days it
operates with two-to three volunteer lawyers or law students
assisting staff with the caseload. The program is so poor that
it lacks necessary equipment and doesn't have a computer or
work processor.
*The office is always busy, and it is well run. EVERYONE who
requests assistance is helped on the same day if they come in
before 11 AX. Host of the clients receive temporary protective
orders the same day they come to the clinic. Clients are
helped filling out the paperwork for temporary restraining
orders, stay away orders, and child custody orders. They are
also helped when they come back for permanent orders three
weeks later, and with custody matters. Santa Monica residents
are referred to West Side Legal Services for family law
matters if they are income eligible~
* The staff is friendly, courteous, and professional. The
staffs maintain a good relationship with the clients, the
court personnel and the judges. The clinic. is seen by the
court as providing a necessary service. . _ _ ~ _
.... _..... -... E,,_. ~... . _ _ _ ~. ....... _ -'" -. ...
* The Walk In Clinic provides an invaluable service. It
affords access~to the courts to victims of domestic violence
at the exact moment that they need protection. Without the
clinic services, most of the victims would no be able to get
protective orders because they would not know how to fill out
the paperwork, and would get discouraged and leave. This is
what happened before the clinic was created.
The staff recommendation to cut $5 f 571 from the programs
budget should be reversed for several reasons.
The Program is well run and is meeting its goals. It sees
every person that requests assistance, unless West Side Legal
Services has a conflict of interest. It has always met its Santa
Monica contract targets, and through the efforts of the volunteer
attorneys, it has also seen everyone else within the courts
jurisdiction. The Clinic cannot refuse help to domestic abuse
victims from West LA without loosing the good relationship with the
Superior Court personnel upon which its effectiveness depends.
This program affords more help to low income Santa Monica
Residents than most other social service programs funded by the
City. It has helped over 1715 low income women and children in the
last three years, and helped them at the exact moment they are in
crisis and need help.
The program cannot afford this cut. It is already too lean.
And West Side Legal Services as an agency can' t absorb the cut
because they have just lost 1/3 of the funding they get from the
State Bar of California, as has every other legal services
organization in the state. In fact, it is very hard for Legal
Service Organizations to raise matching funds at all, as all of
their traditional funding sources have been cutting back in recent
years.
I hope that the City Council will restore the $S,S7l to the
Domestic Violence/Family Law project run by West Side Legal
Services. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
'P~~-
Kathy Weremiuk
CC John Jalili, City Manager
CC Julie Rusk, Acting Manager, Community and Neighborhood Services
SANTA
MONICA
Community and Neighborhood
Services DIvision
1685 Main Street. P.O. Box 2200
Santa Monica. CA 90407-2200
(310) 458-8701
TOO: (310) 458-8696
FAX: {310J 458-3380
June 17, 1993
Edith Brandel
1228 Euclid street
Santa Monica, CA 90404
Dear Ms. Brandel:
I am in receipt of your letter dated June 14, 1993, requesting
the reinstatement of the recommended FY 1993-94 funding reduction
to Senior Health and Peer Counseling Center's Daily Money
Management Program. The city is facing an unprecedented budget
deficit and is in the unfortunate position to address this fiscal
crisis by reducing the City's overall budget~ As a result, City
staff have had to make some hard funding decisions for the
upcoming fiscal year.
The recommended funding reduction to the Money Management Program
was based on the program's historically low proportion of Santa
Monica residents served. To assure that Ci ty of Santa Monica
funds remain targeted to meeting the needs of its residents, the
City maintains a policy of funding programs at a level that is
commensurate with the level of service to Santa Monica residents.
In addition, the city requires programs to maintain a diverse
funding based from other non-City resources. Based on anaylsis
of these criteria, the recommended FY 1993-94 funding level for
the Daily Money Management Program was adjusted to reflect the
program's current as well as historic level of service to santa
Monica residents as compared to the total number of persons
served for the entire region.
The ci ty remains commi tted to providing- essential money
management services to Santa Bonica seniors and will continue to
work closely with program staff to develop a stronger program for
Santa Monica residents~
I thank you for taking the time to write of your concerns and
support for the Daily Money Management Program. Your letter will
be transmitted to City Council members to inform them of your
concerns.
sincerely,
Ort~ {2l.LS1u
&6LIE RUSK
Acting Manager
jj\files\cdshS94
SANTA
MONICA
Community and Neighborhood
Services DiviSion
1 685 Main Street. POBox 2200
Santa Monica. CA 90401-2200
(3101 458-8701
TOO: (310) 458-8696
FAX: (310) 458-3380
June 17, 1993
Robert Einstein, M.D.
Wilshire Center Radiology
6200 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 101
Los Angeles, CA 90048
Dear Mr. Einstein,
I am in receipt of your letter dated June 14, 1993, requesting
the reinstatement of the recommended FY 1993-94 funding reduction
to Senior Health and Peer Counseling Center's Daily Money
Management Program. The city is facing an unprecedented budget
deficit and is in the unfortunate position to address this fiscal
crisis by reducing the City's overall budget. As a result, City
staff have had to make some hard funding decisions for the
upcoming fiscal year.
The recommended funding reduction to the Money Management Program
was based on the program's historically low proportion of Santa
Monica residents served. To assure that City of Santa Monica
funds remain targeted to meeting the needs of its residents, the
City maintains a policy of funding programs at a level that is
commensurate with the level of service to Santa Monica residents.
In addition, the City requires programs to maintain a diverse
funding based from other non-City resources. Based on anaylsis
of these criteria, the recommended FY 1993-94 funding level for
the Daily Money Management Program was adjusted to reflect the
program's current as well as historic level of service to Santa
Monica res idents as compared to the total m1mher of persons
served for the entire region.
The city remains committed to providing essential money
management services to Santa Monica seniors and will continue to
work closely with program staff to develop a stronger program for
Santa Monica residents.
I thank you for taking the time to write of your concerns and
support for the Daily Money Management Program. Your letter will
be transmitted to city council members to inform them of your
concerns.
Sincerely,
ChLL~f2uS1v
luiIE RUSK
A6ting Manager
jj\files\cdsh194
SANTA
MONICA
Community and Neighborhood
Ser....lces DIVIsion
1685 Main Street, P.O. Box 2200
Santa MOnica, CA 90407-2200
(310) 458-8701
TOO: (310) 458-8696
FAX: {310' 458-3380
June 17, 1993
Mrs. T. Friedman
1125 3rd street, 1314
Santa Monica, CA 90402
Dear Mrs. Friedman:
I am in receipt of your letter dated June 15, 1993, expressing
concern regarding the the recommended FY 1993-94 funding
reduction to Senior Health and Peer Counselinq Center's Daily
Money Management Program. The City is facing an unprecedented
budget deficit and is in the unfortunate position to address this
fiscal crisis by reducing the city's overall budget. As a
result, city staff have had to make some hard funding decisions
for the upcoming fiscal year.
The recommended funding reduction to the Money Management program
was based on the program's historically low proportion of Santa
Monica residents served. To assure that City of Santa Monica
funds remain targeted to meeting the needs of its residents, the
ci ty maintains a policy of funding programs at a level that is
commensurate with the level of service to Santa Monica residents.
In addition, the City requires programs to maintain a diverse
funding based from other non-City resources. Based on anaylsis
of these criteria, the recommended FY 1993-94 funding level for
the Daily Money Management Program was adjusted to reflect the
program's current as well as historic level of service to Santa
Monica residents as compared to the total number of persons
served for the entire region.
The ci ty remains committed to providing essential money
management services to Santa Monica seniors and will continue to
work closely with program staff to develop a stronqer program for
Santa Monica residents.
I thank you for taking the time to write of your concerns and
support for the Daily Money Management Program. Your letter will
be transmitted to City Council members to inform them of your
concerns.
Sincerely,
~~(2~('1L/
hriJ IE RUSK
ctinq Manager
jj\files\cdsh294
SANTA
MONICA
Community and Neighborhood
Services DIvision
1685 Main Street, P.O. Box 2200
Santa Monica, CA 90407.2200
(310) 458.8701
TOO: (310) 458.8696
FAX: (310) 458-3380
June 17, 1993
William J. Glick
10540 Draper Avenue
Los Angeles, cA 90064
Dear Mr. Glick:
I am in receipt of your letter dated June 11, 1993, expressing
concern regarding the the recommended FY 1993-94 funding
reduction to Senior Health and Peer Counseling Center's Daily
Money Management Program. The city is facing an unprecedented
budget deficit and is in the unfortunate position to address this
fiscal crisis by reducing the City's overall budget. As a
result, City staff have had to make some hard funding decisions
for the upcoming fiscal year.
The recommended funding reduction to the Daily Money Management
Program was based on the program's historically low proportion of
Santa Monica residents served. To assure that City of Santa
Monica funds remain targeted to meeting the needs of its
residents, the city maintains a policy of funding programs at a
level that is cOlllDensurate with the level of service to Santa
Monica residents. In addition, the city requires programs to
maintain a diverse funding based from other non-City resources.
Based on anaylsis of these criteria, the recommended FY 1993-94
funding level for the Daily Money Management Program was adjusted
to reflect the program's current as well as historic level of
service to Santa Monica residents as compared to the total number
of persons served for the entire region.
The City remains committed to providing essential money
management services to Santa Monica seniors and will continue to
work closely with program staff to develop a stronger program for
Santa Monica residents.
I thank you for taking the time to write of your concerns and
support for the Daily Money Management Program. Your letter will
be transmitted to City Council members to inform them of your
concerns.
sincerely,
~~tAgz0
IE RUSK
ctinq Manager
jj\files\cdsh394
SANTA
MONICA
Community and NeIghborhood
ServIces DiVISion
1685 Main Street, P O. Box 2200
Santa MOnica, CA 90407-2200
(310.458-8701
TOD (310) 458-8696
FAX: (310J 458-3380
June 17, 1993
Sandra Goodlick
SIM-PLEX
26 Oakmont Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90049
Dear Ms. Goodlick:
I am in receipt of your letter dated June 13, 1993, expressing
concern regarding the the recommended FY 1993-94 funding
reduction to Senior Health and Peer counseling Center's Daily
Money Management Program. The city is facing an unprecedented
budget deficit and is in the unfortunate position to address this
fiscal crisis by reducing the City'S overall budget. As a
result, City staff have had to make some hard funding decisions
for the upcoming fiscal year.
The recommended funding reduction to the Daily Money Management
Program was based on the program's historically low proportion of
Santa Monica residents served. To assure that City of Santa
Monica funds remain targeted to meeting the needs of its
residents, the City maintains a policy of funding programs at a
level that is commensurate with the level of service to Santa
Monica residents. In addition, the City requires programs to
maintain a diverse funding based from other non-city resources.
Based on anaylsis of these criteria, the recommended FY 1993-94
funding level for the Daily Money Management Program was adjusted
to reflect the program's current as well as historic level of
service to Santa Monica residents as compared to the total number
of persons served for the entire region.
The City remains committed to providing essential money
management services to Santa Monica seniors and will continue to
work closely with program staff to develop a stronger program for
Santa Monica residents.
I thank you for taking the time to write of your concerns and
support for the Daily Money Management Program. Your letter will
be transmitted to City council members to inform them of your
concerns.
Sincerely,
C/}<-~ t;{ stu
-~~E RUSK
Acting Manager
jj\files\cdsh494
SANTA
MONICA
Community and Neighborhood
ServIces DIvIsion
1685 Main Street, P.O. Box 2200
Santa Monica, CA 90407-2200
(310l 458-8701
TOO: (310) 458-8696
FAX: (310) 458-3380
June 17, 1993
Curt E. Krieser
141 West Woodruff Avenue
Arcadia, CA 91006
Dear Mr. Krieser,
I am in receipt of your letter dated June 14, 1993, requesting
the reinstatement of the recommended FY 1993-94 funding reduction
to Senior Health and Peer Counseling Center's Daily Money
Management Program. The city is facing an unprecedented budget
deficit and is in the unfortunate position to address this fiscal
crisis by reducing the City's overall budget. As a result, City
staff have had to make some hard funding decisions for the
upcoming fiscal year.
The recommended funding reduction to the Money Management Program
was based on the program's historically low proportion ot Santa
Monica residents served. To assure that City of Santa Monica
funds remain targeted to meeting the needs of its residents, the
City maintains a policy of funding programs at a level that is
commensurate with the level of service to Santa Monica residents.
In addition, the city requires programs to maintain a diverse
funding based from other non-City resources. Based on anaylsis
of these criteria, the recommended FY 1993-94 funding level for
the Daily Money Management Program was adjusted to reflect the
program's current as well as historic level of service to Santa
Monica residents as compared to the total numher of persons
served for the entire region.
The City remains committed to providing essential money
management services to Santa Monica seniors and will continue to
work closely with program staff to develop a stronger proqram for
Santa Monica residents.
I thank you for taking the time to write of your concerns and
support for the Dally Money Management Program. Your letter will
be transmitted to City Council members to inform them of your
concerns.
sincerely,
~~~'610
~MIE RUSK
Acting Manager
jj\files\cdsh994
SANTA
MONICA
CommunitY and Neighborhood
Services Division
1 685 Main Street, POBox 2200
Santa MOOlca, CA 9040762200
{3101 458-8701
TOO: (3101 458-8696
FAX: (310) 458-3380
June 17, 1993
Charlene Lawrence
clo Senior Health and Peer Counseling Center
2125 Arizona AVe.
Santa Monica, CA 90404-1398
Dear Ms. Lawrence:
I am in receipt of your letter dated June 15, 1993, expressing
concern regarding the the recommended FY 1993-94 funding
reduction to senior Health and Peer Counselinq Center's Daily
Money Management Proqram. The city is facing an unprecedented
budget deficit and is in the unfortunate position to address this
fiscal crisis by reducing the city's overall budget. As a
result, City staff have had to make some bard funding decisions
for the upcoming fiscal year.
The recommended funding reduction to the Daily Money Management
Program was based on the program's historically low proportion of
Santa Monica residents served. To assure that City of Santa
Monica funds remain targeted to meeting the needs of its
residents, the City maintains a policy of funding programs at a
level that is commensurate with the level of service to Santa
Monica residents. In addition, the city requires programs to
maintain a diverse funding based from other non-City resources.
Based on anaylsis of these criteria, the recommended FY 1993-94
funding level for the Daily Money Management Program was adjusted
to reflect the program's current as well as historic level of
service to Santa Monica residents as compared to the total number
of persons served for the entire region.
The ci ty remains corom! tted to providing essential money
management services to Santa Monica seniors and will continue to
work closely with program staff to develop a stronger program for
Santa Monica residents.
I thank you for taking the time to write of your concerns and
support for the Daily Money Management Program. Your letter will
be transmitted to City Council members to inform them of your
concerns.
Sincerely,
QtJ!~ (2<< <ilL.-
PvLIE RUSK
Kbting Manager
jj\files\cdsh594
SANTA
MONICA
Community and NeIghborhood
Services DIvISion
1685 Main Street, POBox 2200
Santa MOnica, CA 90407-2200
(310.458-8701
TOO: (310) 458-8696
FAX: (3101 458-3380
June 17, 1993
Enid F. Reiser, Volunteer
Daily Money Management Program
c/o Senior Health and Peer Counseling Center
2125 Arizona Ave.
Santa Monica, CA 90404-1398
Dear Ms. Reiser:
I am in receipt of your letter expressing concern regarding the
the recommended FY 1993-94 funding reduction to Senior Health and
Peer Counseling Center's Daily Management Program. The city is
facing an unprecedented budget deficit and is in the unfortunate
position to address this fiscal crisis by reducing the City's
overall budget. As a result, City staff have had to make some
hard funding decisions for the upcoming fiscal year.
The recommended funding reduction to the Daily Money Management
Program was based on the program's historically low proportion of
Santa Monica residents served. To assure that City of Santa
Monica funds remain targeted to meeting the needs of its
residents, the City maintains a policy of funding programs at a
level that is commensurate with the level of service to Santa
Monica residents. In addition, the City requires programs to
maintain a diverse funding based from other non-City resources.
Based on anaylsis of these criteria, the recommended FY 1993-94
funding level for the Daily Money Management Program was adjusted
to reflect the program's current as well as historic level of
service to Santa Monica residents as compared to the total nn~ber
of persons served for the entire region.
The Ci ty remains committed to providing essential money
management services to Santa Monica seniors and will continue to
work closely with program staff to develop a stronger program for
Santa Monica residents.
I thank you for taking the time to write of your concerns and
support for the Daily Money Management Program. Your letter will
be transmitted to City council members to inform them ot your
concerns.
Sincerely,
~. /2o-~iG
E RUSK
ting Manager
jj\files\cdsh694
SANTA
MONICA
Community and NeIghborhood
Services DivIsion
1685 MaIO Street, POBox 2200
Santa MOnica, CA 90407-2200
(310) 458-8701
TOO' (310) 458-8696
FAX. 1310) 458-3380
June 17, 1993
Polly Rosen
1112 7th Street, 11113
Santa Monica, cA 90403
Dear Ms. Rosen:
I am in receipt of your letter dated June 13, 1993, expressing
concern regarding the the recommended FY 1993-94 funding
reduction to Senior Health and Peer Counseling Center's Daily
Money Management Program. The City is facing an unprecedented
budget deficit and is in the unfortunate position to address this
fiscal crisis by reducing the city's overall budget. As a
result, City staff have had to make some hard funding decisions
for the upcoming fiscal year.
The recommended funding reduction to the Daily Money Management
Program was based on the program's historically low proportion of
Santa Monica residents served. To assure that City of Santa
Monica funds remain targeted to meeting the needs of its
residents, the City maintains a policy of funding programs at a
level that is commensurate with the level of service to Santa
Monica residents. In addi tion, the City requires programs to
maintain a diverse funding based from other non-City resources.
Based on anaylsis of these criteria, the recommended FY 1993-94
funding level for the Daily Money Management Program was adjusted
to reflect the program's current as well as historic level of
service to Santa Monica residents as compared to the total number
of persons served for the entire region.
The Ci ty remains commi tted to providing essential money
management services to Santa Monica seniors and will continue to
work closely with program staff to develop a stronger program tor
Santa Monica residents.
I thank you for taking the time to write of your concerns and
support for the Daily Money Management Program. Your letter will
be transmitted to city council members to inform them of your
concerns.
Sincerely,
~(2t~1v
IE RUSK
cting Manager
jj\files\cdsh794
SANTA
MONICA
CommunIty and NeIghborhood
Services DIVIsion
June 17, 1993
1685 MaIn Street, P O. Box 2200
Santa MOOlca. CA 90407.2200
(310) 458-8701
TOO: (3101 458-8696
FAX: (3101 458.3380
Kathy Weremiuk
520 strand, #8
Santa Monica, CA
90405
Dear Kathy:
I am in receipt of your letter dated June 14, 1993, requesting
the reinstatement of the recommended FY 1993-94 funding reduction
to Wests ide Legal Service's Domestic Violence Program.
While this program provides an essential service to victims of
domestic violence, the ci ty is facing an unprecedented budget
deficit and is in an unfortunate position to address this fiscal
crisis by the reducing the city's overall budget. As a result,
all FY 1992-93 City-funded human service and housing programs
were evaluated to determine how each program is meetinq the
selection criteria established in the Funding Rationale approved
by City Council on April 27, 1993. Emphasis was placed on the
programs' ability to serve a proportion of Santa Monica residents
that is commensurate with the proportion of the programs' budget
funded by the City of Santa Monica.
The City'S recommended funding reduction was based on the
historically low proportion of Santa Monica residents served in
relation to the proportion of the program's budget funded by the
City of Santa Monica. I recognize that the number of persons
served through this program has increased including the nn~her of
Santa Monica residents, however, the criteria for determininq the
funding reduction is based on the proportion of Santa Monica
residents served not the number.
The City's policy is to fund no more than 75t of that portion of
the program's budget dedicated to servinq Santa Monica residents.
This policy is implemented to assure that city funds remain
targeted to meeting the needs of Santa Monica residents. The
recommended funding reduction for FY 1993-94, therefore, was
adjusted to reflect a funding level that is commensurate with the
proportion of Santa Monica residents served as compared to the
total number of persons served from the entire region.
The City remains committed to supporting services to women and
other victims of domestic violence in Santa Monica and will
continue to work closely with program staff to develop a stronger
program in Santa Monica.
I appreciate you taking the time to write of your support for the
Domestic Violence Program.
Sincerely,
~~c{l~
E RUSK
A inq Manager
jj\files\cdwls94a
l:l
j
u
S
-<
-
~
CI'\
~
~
-
~=
~~
8~
g:=
00
E-t-<
~~
~~
~~
Q~
I:
oE-t
uf!1
==
c
~
~
,
~ Q
i!>tlW> !
~~;!:: r"'I 0: N CO"I C ~ ... N C 100 CO"I ~ 0 N 0\ f"'l f- 100
>~~c.J .... .... - .... .... .... .... ....
1lIoc.:l ;..-
~-c~=
8 8 8 ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ 8 8 8 ~ 8 8 ~ 8
Q '<t 0 cO r-- QC) DO 0 ~. f"'l i ~ 0\ ~ f"'l 0\ M \rj r-:
11"I It'l 0 r"'I ~ 0\ "'" :g .... M II') III 100 \rj
t~ :: It'l M N "It'. r"'I \rj f"J.. \I') co 0\ \0 "l t"'I
~~~ 0\ ~ i 1 \rj f- .... M ~ 00 \0 .<J ~ 00- 00- \0 i
It'l 00 co N ! .... co II'l ~ In 0\ ..,.
.. "'" .... \rj .. .... .... "'" N "'" "'" 1: "'"
~g-<~ . "'" "'" "'" .. "'"
-
o8:u..- ..,.
f ~
i
I
::E
~~~
t.:Iu~ ~ \0 - ~ t"'I t"'I ~ f- g ~ ~ 0\ F.l M t"'I ~ QC) M
01'-" f- 0 ...,. N 11"I N M 100 ' 0\ 0\
f,:ao 0 ci 0 0 0 0 .... 0 0 ci ci 0 0 0 ci ci 0 0
5~E ;
.
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ ~ 8 8 8 ~ 8 ~ ~ $ 8
8 0\ r:--: ~ c::i vi ~ f"'l .... GO ..; d ~ \0 N .... 00 ~
~~&! 11"I r"'I 11"I - $ co N - (f'l I"'l - 0\ :8.
~ .... t;. 11"I Y) \0 f- f- 100 co - '<t ...,. (0"1
0\ :i .... r-: ..0 a 00 g ! ~ ~ ori fO'I ~ S 0\ ~ ~
....."!C I"'l .... 0\ (f"I .... .... N ~
~r:w:~ .. ..,. ..,. ..,. ~ .... - "'" - ..,. - .... C"l ('1'\
-(.:)~ "'" ..,. .. "'" .. "'" ..,. ..,.
~:s~
UJ
ClEo- 8 8 8 ~ 8 ~ 8 8 8 ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
etw ..; S '!j 0\ cO ff"I 8 & ~ \I"j ..; ~ - ~ - f"'l I"'l ~
VI VI f- .... 0\ VI to f- ! ('f')
~I.:~ - \rj ~ ~ ~ q 00 f"\ II'}. .... .... f"J.. N
&' ~ \I"j .... - f"'l <<i &f ~ to vi ~ 0\ N .... 00- ..; M
c-l.(3=- 11"I "It' ~ ... - .... f- f- \0 \0 I"'l f-
..,. - - .... - N - .... .... M - 11"I M t"'I
~r::t ..,. - ..,. .... ... .... ... .... ..,. ... ... ..,. ..,. ..,. .... ..,.
E~~ ..,. ..,.
e~
i ~ $
1 f I ~
~ 11. I 8
t' j t3 '0 8 ~ ~
:t I 1J .! S
.... u ~ ~ g j
~ U I I i ~
~ .... I I ~ 9 ::E fI) j l'
u oB .. Q ....
8 fI) ~ ~
~ ~ g j I i 0 ~ J
J 1 1 8 i 1::
c:l I t d to/) l g ~
..c 8 j 8 j .... :g
0 a
'D .2 .2 J j to/)
~ .s 8 ~ I ~
~ ~ j J ! l ~ 1
.g l1.o I J
J u ~ i
1 ~ I 1 ~ f il ~ ~ -~
i .i '8 -;
a 8 is Ci US ::E
t. l1.o .... Z Z
~
i
.-I
r:
-
:@
~
.c
~a
11
il
E"l:I
ti
!i
D'f.l~
.~ ;'!
~~':
8!l
a~~~
>Si~c.;
~t; >-
O...e IICII
III;:
I
c..
~.,e,
t:=o
Lr.l r.,:) ~ ~....
aou
=-=f -
Q"
9 N ~ 9 9 .1 ~
I I I I
8 8 8 8
..;. N M N
~ 8: b ~
rrl uj .; ,.:;; 0 .;
r-- an M M M 00 <
O~~M.-""-
...... .,.. ~..,. z
...
I I
8 8
g\ an
ClIO <<l
- -
r-- r--
o 0 0 0' M
..... ....-4 N ........
I I
~ ~.
~ VI
M -
In r;.
~ M
f'I"I lI'l
- ...
.,..
I I
~ 8 8 ~ 8
~. ~ ~ g &
lI'l 00 si M s::f
M M ,.. 0 ,..
... - .,.. - .,..
... ~
:E
~~~.
g e :8;Z 8 ~!~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.I~'
ct~~ . .'. I' . Z . . .
~P-o 0 010 00 0 000 010
~~g:
~
~s~
~~~ .
_t.:I~
r:S<
W)
I I
Q I- 8,
~w NI
~ ~ B ~~
~o(Q :!!
~ ~ ~ ;i'
t:28
~Ff
I
I I I I I I
8 8 8 8 g 8
f'I"I lIii ....: ..0 ..;. lI'i
to ~ ~ ~ 8 ~
fi sat i ti
... - ...-.- ... - ~ <
... ... Z
I
!
I I
8.8
,I .
~! ~
~ c-:
~ ~
... ...
>-
u
i5
u
-<
1i ~
, ~ij
1lIi\_>-';]
"IJ U It.
s: ~ Q
I I I "Q
e u u I
~I~I~I~I
I I I
888
00 r.: r.:
~ ~ :<
:: ! ;:
In M -
- .,.. ...
I I I I I
8 g.8 8 8
N ..0'0 g\ 0\
M ~;Ioo \0 \0
NMr-- M\O
00 ..; r: .; 0
_ fI'I 0. ClIO N
- ... .,.. ~ ..,.
... .,..
I I I I
~I ~ ~
VI' - :
V"I' 0. .
r--! 0
I r:! r-: ri
~' ::q 00 M
::: ... - ~
z
~ 1l.8
-; I 1 8
l.l _ ~ a ~
1 1 i I ~ .~
~8.(u.s6
~ t ......", ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~I~I~I ~I~I~I
I I
8 8
ICl ICl
r-- -
N \0
~ ~
;;:; ~
...
~ ~
o ci
I
8 8
vi ....:
~ ~
a ~
i
~! 8
~i g
N' \0
..0 ri
M V"I
- -
-
~
~
~
l B 8
~ ~ ~
- 1 a ~
J-, ! gj ~
~ ~ la
~ ~ ~ ~I
~ ~ ~ ~
I
-<
z
8
~
r--
a
~
"""
...
i
l
~
:z
8
~
~
t
~
I
i
i
-.J
8
III
S
~
"l.
ao
"""
iI')
~
S
i-I
..-..
M
~
VI
-
-
lD
;ij
.B
1
....
-
an
~
....
-
.
.0
..
! r
,..
...
...
.;
...
..
,...
...
...
oi
...
~
~ ~
o ....
....-1.1.1
wC:E
~zo
c2:J:
o
..
o
..
Q
<ll(Z
Q:::l
0::....
CD
...
H
H
H
H
Z
W
~
U
<
H
E-4
<
rl
10
10
lq
...
.
o
o
o
o
CO)
..
o
o
lD
N
-
o
CD
,..
ui
111-
o
CIO
,...
vi
...
o
o
~
...
...
...
.0
I~
N
.
<II(
a.
o
g:
f/)
I-
U
w
-,
o
a:
~
f/)
w
U
:;;
a:
w
VJ
>
!::
z
;:)
:!:
:!:
o
u
,..
u>>
CO)
..
...
u>>
..
e
IQ
C
U
0 ~ 00 0 ,...... ,...en ON 0 <D CS)(I)O NU>> (II) olCl) 'lt0<D
M NO to Ul... CO... oeo ~ N M...(D 0... en ON ...(II)Ul
CIO M """,",M(I) ... oen oen II) enu>> N CO 10 Ul CO,... <DID'"
N 0 Qlo! cnlC.jlN = N= 0": f1i c-i oiri r: fllilli 0 cON "':ui~
M c( ~ ::i~';': 'It, ...... CI. ... ... "'""'g NN lD ..."" en..
... Z ... .,. ~ </I> ... - 111-- .. .. .. ... * *...~
1/) 0 0 - ... . . ..
....
-0(0
f5z
~it
CJ
00000000
.~.***....
Q01
w2 ::I
...0....
wJ:1
Cu
11:;:)
c(OIi
",~e
o
1.1.1
Q
t~
~:i
CD:i
>0
u,u
1.1.1
0::
f/)
...J
W
~
...J
C)
Z
o
Z
::::)
u..
'It
~
C')
a')
a')
....
Nllo 0 'It 0!10 01\"'0 CIO 0 ,... Qlo 0 0 N 0 0 0 <D 0 CO <D ...
N'ltM lDNOClO<DNOClO...toOtogNONCIOM"~
MOC>> M","~""MMUlCIOOQlo","Ocn NlDUI,..Cl)UlC')
~INN OenQlo~NN~NflliClO":~flliNc-iui';fIIi...
ell ... M c( N "'IN ...'It lD "','It ... ... lD 111- -411- 'It -411- ... 1/) ,.. ... 'lit
1/) ... Z N ... 1/) ... ... ...,* ... <It 0, .. * .. * ...
6 HI 61 I ~
N!O ~ 0'...1010 ,... CIO 01"" OliO 0 0 0 0 lD ,..
~i~ N ~ ~I~ g ~ :if g g ;;l~ .. ~ ~ ~ :it It
~~~';o~cn NN~NCIO~ IDN 1I)'It 0
en1/).....N...N<""Ul..."".... c(c('It*c(-"'"c(""
.. ~ ~;-411-Z0;*1/)'" Z2* Z .z:
cnUlMOClO'ltOCl
It)...en ON..(I)IO
...lDlDlXI....CDCIO...
ouiocOti"':lli~
IIINCI...'ltCl)..N
.........**....
.- ..
OlUl(II) gClO'ltoCl
It)..en N"l't1O
"'IDIDCIO""IDCIO...
ouioflliti,...llic-i
IIINlD...'Iit~"'N
.............
- .
>
u.
o
w
a
z
w
:!:
~
o
u
w
a:
"'C
cnz
NO
cnz
)0;:)
1I.u.
E
l!!
l: ::I
. a.0
.- % e -~
CI) l- Ii
:::)
:a ~ e Iiu
d 4 1.1.1 O.
:E i
~ 9 ~
s: i
0 ~
. .u
.!! =.1
-c g .
.! ~I
u
0
:J. :I
. ~ S!
0 u
V)
t-
o
w
..,
o
a:
Q.,
(J)
w
o
;;:
a:
w
V)
>-
1::
z
;:,
::a:
::E
o
u
V)
...J
w
>
W
...J
Cl
Z
a
z
;:,
I.L
0It
en
,
C")
0')
en
...
>
LL
o
W
o
z
w
~
:i
o
u
w
a:
a:; CI)
~ ~
o -l
-'-w
wo:!
GiZe
O~%
~~l
wo~
t;J:~
00 lII!
a:;:)i
C(Or:
~w "
a:5!
fa
10
,i!i
CO)~
(l)::E
>0
"'u
w
a:
C')C
en2
~Q
>2
1L~
II
i I
e:
til
~~
C(IS
o
II( z I
0;:)
a:l.l,.
QI
...
c;(
CL
o
Sf
(!)
m
Q
(J
..J
ffi~
~~
o
I i
--::I!!i!'ll o!' ....
~1Cl1~'~ ,..
"Ill' "!t
~I~ ~:t!::
~L" .........~
...
Olii: 00
....,'ll 0*
I~ ~
I
I
en
U)
(II
i
(II
....
,CI) II)
; U) CIO
~G 'I"'"
1 " .
.OM
'NM
I.... ....
I
01000
0*_____
....r~ N ID 0 en en II) 0
I') M...."II:IIOCIOO
ot NlIJ."'C')ID~O
"':I~ iii ~ ~ tOM 0
:;;i~ ::..... ~ M ~ ~ ~
o ....
"-~Nu)C
f')~ (IJ....~
otMNC').
~ Cl ~;i.~
0<i:;;.....
fa
u
>
ffi
to
a:
o
!
to
enenIDO
ll)Q)CI00
I")Q)....O
';O(IJO
CON(lJN
(1100_
....
.. ;(
~ I ~
E iji-
; ~;;
~ a:.
i .: j....~
".:; ..lii<;
~IJ : E ~ ~ eo CI)
C) c ~11'~ ~ w .ti'
, u; Z::I!!
(J ~.E :a:~=
~ . en ' . . . . i
~ i :.
o en
o <CI
o (IJ
g g
o ."
.
Q
.....
~
N
~
a;
=
..
o
N
IQ
N
M
..
,..
....
o
~
o
ID
....
...
en
In
tA
CO)
co
....
-'
c(
~
o
l-
ID
~
a:
o
Z
w
40
,...<"1..../0,..
C')....encoCl)
....COCO"tln
....,.:NOri
....IDNenln
0........~....
II I"
o 0'0 0 0
~""""0""
....M..ID....
C'),..,enClllClO
""CI)motln
~":NON
....IDNcncn
<l)00to>....
'II>
,...1')....=,...
M,...enOllClO
,...CIOCIOoten
....,.:NQN
....ft)NcnCl)
_ .'0 0 ...
....
en
:IE
c(
a:
CJ
o
a:
a.
>
%
!
-<
.
~
:J
ii
c(
(/)
c
..J
i:!
o
l-
ID
:)
In
>
11 ~
1:3 ~
i-a.!!i:c
~i.lt!~
:;J~I.f~
-E..5c~~
a!oJ:1D
a. .-ce
-11)0
. . Ic-
'5B:E~Q
~t1o
. i w
8~~
o
<I)
o
<I)
o
....
N
....
...
N
o
...
...
~ I~ ~ii ~
~ I: ~ I~ :;;
..... !: 0[il
00
....0
o 0 00 01:': N
00.... * *1;:; le
ILC \0
I. lrl
..
o
~
cri
III
..
~~o
OIfN
!~ i
.. ...
... N~~:CO 0 CIO 0 0It I~ ti)
CD .... .- 0 UHO If) too
r-:,'It ",:<CI",,:C'!.~ OJ
If) N'" en ,.., ... In "'100: loJ
. 0 ~ p) lP .. III co I.. 10
..... ... * ..... 0 "'I~ to
... ..... ..
- NI~ co 0 0) 0 .; 11)
CO.... .-OUllPln fit
"':.~ "':~....C'!.C!. ~
en Nlr: en,...... en 'It,. I
..,. 0 I~ tit UI ... III CO .::!
.........,0' *- ........-
*1- ......
m
(,)
>
m
10
~
~
~
~
(,)
~~
I)
, g
I~
}8
. .
a: a.
ce
i~
-11,I
Q:J
e
III
_ r:
I~
i .
o ·
. . J
~ iiS
~ ;!Oll
~ ~ :I!il.!
j~i~i
!t~il
za!CI)>~
o
..
o
.
It
":
-
<CI
...
..
~
~
o
r
ar
::)
CoO
II
u
'>
IS
.
~
~
2
2
g
=
~
~
i
l:
i
o
A.
f4
1s.1 '~
Ii
I:
I~ ~ :::
o
I")
to
....
...
..
I~ ~ !
~ ! i
~
-
[i
o
,.
r-
::
...
.....
..
o 0
.. ..
~ i
!.
..
o
.....
I~
1=
N
""
:
~
..
!!
~
I~
...
:i
I")
..
~ ,;
C!t
a:: lilt
!folllt
oz:~
-'~IU
IU~~
i:i 0
o :c
o
o(Z
O~
Cal
p
U)
~
o
w
..,
o
a::
Q.
I-
Z
w
:E
w
>
o
a:
Q.
:1!
o
o
o
:c
a:
o
m
:c
t.'
W
Z
o
Z
<
~
Z
;:)
~
~
o
o
~o
a::Z
111:)
~II.
c:J
-
...
00
wz
""0
IU_
c:Jt
~:)
....0
w
a:
o
.w
0)0
.z
1')11I
m::E
>:E
11,.0
U
w
a:
en
~
w
>
w
~
C:I
Z
(5
Z
~
LL
.
C)
M
C)
en
o
z
o
z
:;,
II,.
I')
en
N
m
it
>
u.
o
w
o
z
w
~
:E
o
u
w
a:
en
b
III
~
o
_f
"" 1:-
,",,02
<I("=U
si
~!
~j
w-
"1'
c(_
...
0(
A.
o
f
CI
II)
o
(.)
OOal
0.....10
q ~
o ....
It) N
,... l'l
.. ..
~l~ ~ !~gij
...,...It)It)N
~I~ .. :; ~
-I..... ...
- ..
I~
i
~
I~
I;
I"
00
.... ..
o 0 0 OjO 0 010 0 II)
..... oft .,.. ..... ... .. ... ,<II' .. II)
CD
l'l
,,-
..
goocooo....enCO!1I)
O...lD..........N. en
OlDen........ ....
; 0 r.: ..: co.i It) II) II)
II) N II)M<II'r-....
N f') 1')-......
.......... ... ... ..:
.....
:i
:)
Z
Z
<I(
10110 0 CO 0 0 .... 0 CO . ...
<II'...lD...............,...
"!. Ol, -::"!:l"":.
.... ... U'lll)l()
N U'l il)r-M
M <') ...r-
iI) <It
w
::E
i=
w
z
o
0-
... ....
:;:
....
....
..
00
....0
f'o{O
....0
InClO
....M
.... ...
';
~
-
.. ~
_~ 0
-.. u
· cE .!:
II: . = '0
..! i~~ It
.l 00 ~
-:::I 'ii- .
I;;O~~. ~! ~i
1 9. ::I E
~~ Itu il:
dll;! 'il1i ~:8
.D-I ~ ~ .!.tc(:;
~::.. -... c: -ii
c1.$ ~ii I~~E
-. -00
oCl. .... >:>%
.1"1 ....1-.........
~: UOUt-c:J2-,
g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I:g ~
. 4;(uzoOa.ua....
o
...
~
3
...
..
o
...
II)
en
~
CO
~
..
...
...
~
....
N
M
iii
o
....
...
I~
liil
~ a
o ...I
-'-w
IIlO::e
[ZZo
o~:z:
U)
~
w
>
w
~
"
z
o
z
:;:)
LL
~
<
a:
"
o
a:
Q.
I-
Z
w
:e
Q.
9
w
>
w
o
>
I-
Z
;:)
~
:E
o
U
LL
o
)-
a:
<
~
~
;:)
(/)
01
wo
tit:
ou
~:)
C(O
I-W
C
o
CZ
o~
a:'"
CD
...
,... 0
... .,.
...
.;
...
.,.
o
-
C
A.
o
a:
A.
0)
CI
f')
~
...
..
G'I
N
...
o
CilI
o
u
f')
...
N
..
...I
Co
f5z
i5~
"
....
It)
~
...
o
It)
ci
..
G'I
(D
...
f')
,,-
N
...
o
w
o
...z
enw
cl>>::E
ID:::E
>0
u.u
w
a:
f')O
IDZ
NO
mz
>~
11.",
o
~
ti
o
.
.;
.,.
\.
RESOLu~ION NUMBER
8613
(CCS)
(city Council Series)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA MONICA
APPROVING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT(CDBG) FUNDING FOR
FY1993-94 AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF COBG STATEMENT OF
OBJECTIVES FOR FY1993-94
WHEREAS, the city of Santa Monica desires to undertake a
Two Year Community Development Program for fiscal year 1993-94
and 1994-95 to meet the community development needs of city
residents; and
WHEREAS, the Two Year Community Development Program for
fiscal year 1993-94 and 1994-95 was adopted on June 22, 1993; and
WHEREAS, in addition the Council has approved the CDOO
Statement of Community Development objectives and Projected Use
of Funds for fiscal year 1993-94; and
WHEREAS, public hearings have been held to receive comments
on community development and housing needs addressed in the Two
Year Community Development Program and CDBG Statement of
Objectives and Projected Use of Funds for fiscal year 1993-94 and
1994-95; and
WHEREAS, the proposed CDBG statement of Objectives and
Projected Use of Funds contains recommendations for specific
Communi ty Service Projects and Communi ty and Neighborhood
Improvement projects approved by the City Council prior to
implementation of the 1993-94 program,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA
- 1 -
MONICA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the city of Santa Monica
approves the community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding for
fiscal year 1993-94 on file with the city Clerk.
SECTION 2. The City Manager, as official representative, is
further authorized to submit to the United states Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD) the final statement of
Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds, all
understandings and assurances contained therein, and any
additional information as may be required.
SECTION 3. All City council approved CDBG-funded projects
shall be included in the fiscal year 1993-94 City Budget.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption
of this Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall
be in full force and effect.
ROVED AS TO FORM:
~
JO LAWRENCE
Acting City Attorney
:reso
- 2 -
.
Adopted and approved this 22nd day of June, 1993.
~lMfJ~'
I hereby cert1fy that the foreg01ng Resolution No. 8613{CCS)
was duly adopted by the City Counc~l of the C~ty of Santa Monica
at a meet1ng thereof held on June 22, 1993 by the following
Counc~l vote:
Ayes: Counc1lmembers: Abdo, Genser, Greenberg,
Holbrook, Olsen, Rosenstein,
Vazquez
Noes Councilmembers: None
Absta1n: Counc1lrnembers: None
Absent: Councilmembers: None
ATTEST:
~
/ t:/ /'
",0.J//# 6- J>1~
~ ~ ~ City Clerk !
,
'"
\
SUPPLEMENT TO ITEM
CC /RA/ ~ _i;./::-..A - L:
CC.LCB dvm
C~~y C~~nc~: ~tg 6/22/93
Santa Mon~ca, Ca~~:orc~a
TO
Mayor and City Ccunc~l
?R.OM.
Clty Staff
SUBJECT
ReV1Slon to Resolut~on Regardlng
Personnel Classlf~caclons
Attac~ed clease f~nd a ~evlsed Exhlbl~ D cc the budgec adoDclon
sta::f :!:'epo:n:
There were a few classlflcatlon changes cmlt~ed
:ron ~~e staff ~eDort. As lndlcated prevlously, each of =hese
lce~s 15 l~corDorated In the proposed :993 - 94 document
?:!:"epared c.y
Ly~~e 0 3arrette, Assls~ant Clty ~anage~
- 1 -
REVISED EXHIBIT D
RESOLGTION l~O.
..
(Clty Caunell SerleS)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~HE
CITY OF SANTA MONICA ADOPTING AND REVISING SALARY
RANGES FOR THE CLASSIFICATIONS OF AIRPORT ~~NAGER,
CONSERVATION COORDINATOR, ELECTRICAL AND PUBLIC
FACILITIES SUPERINTENDENT, ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR,
NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR, PARKING CHECKER SUPERVISOR,
PARKS MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT, PARK MAINTENANCE
SUPERVISOR, RECREATION CENTER ADMINISTRATOR,
SENIOR ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER, SENIOR SERVICES
MANAGER, SOLID WASTE BUSINESS ASSISTANT,
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS MANAGER, SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
SUPERVISOR, AND TECHNICAL SERVICES SUPERVISOR
THE Crrl
COUNCIL
. ~
~.
T:1:E
C:TY 8r 5ANT.; :10~JICA COES S,ESO:'::::: ;"S
?OL=-.OWS:
SECTION J...
~he :ollawlng 00nthly salary :evels are !ereby
establlshed for ~he lndlcated permanent clasSlflcatlons, ef:eC~lVe
.July 1, :993:
AIRPORT ~1ANAGER
S5,365jMonth S-Step
($6,276/Month ~lth PERS)
CONSERVATION COORDINATOR
S4,7~7/Month E-Step
(55,D79/Month wlth PERS)
ELECTRICAL AND PUBLIC
FACILITIES SCPERINTENDENT
55,569/Month E-Step
($5,959/Month wlth ?ERS)
ENVIRONMENTAL COORDINATOR
$4,747/Month E-Step
($5,079/Month wlth PERS)
$4,306jMonth E-Step
($4,607/Month wlth PERS)
NETWORK ADMINISTRATOR
PARKING CHECKER SUPERVISOR
$3,650/Month E-Step
($3,906/Month with PERS)
PARKS MAINTENANCE
SUPERINTENDENT
$4,593jMonth E-Step
($4,915/Month with PERS)
PARKS MAINTENANCE
SUPERVISOR
$4,063jMonth E-step
($4,347/Month wlth PERS)
$4,264/Month E-Step
($4,562/Month with PERS)
RECREATION CENTER
ADMINISTRATOR
SENIOR ANIMAL
CONTROL OFFICER
$3,238jMonth E-step
($3,465jMonth with PERS)
$4,747/Month E-Step
($5,079jMonth wlth PERS)
$3,844jMonth E-Step
($4,113/Month with PERS)
SENIOR SERVICES MANAGER
SOLID WASTE BUSINESS
ASSISTANT
SOLID WASTE OPERATIONS
MANAGER
$6,169/Month E-Step
($6,601/Month wlth PERS)
$5,551/Month E-Step
($5,94o/Month wlth PERS)
SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
SUPERVISOR
TECHNICAL SERVICES
SUPERVISOR
$5,551/Month E-Step
($5,940/Month wlth PERS)
SECTION 2. The Clty Clerk shall certlfy to the adoptlon of thlS
Resolution, and thenceforth and thereafter the same shall be In
full force and effect.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~~
Joseph Lawrence
Actlng City Attorney