Loading...
SR-101-003-02 (3) RM:TP:rc Santa Monica, City Council Meeting - January 27, 1987 ~ californ~ TO: Mayor and City Council 5-1:> FEB 2 4 1987 / ( //, !' ):"' FROM: City Staff SUBJECT: Recommendation to Implement a City Self-Administered Liability Claims Program INTRODUCTION This report requests that the City Council authorize the City Manager to proceed with implementation of a City self-administered liability claims program. This action will enable the City to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of liability claims administration, ensure the continued development of needed Risk Management programs, and directly involve the Risk Management Division in the resolution of liability issues facing the City. BACKGROUND Since the 1950's, when the City established self-insurance funds for auto, comprehensive and municipal bus line liability lOSS~S' ~jt> there has been a need to contract with an outside clalmsFEB 2 4 1 administrator (previously provided by an insurance carrier) to investigate, evaluate and negotiate claims which were filed against this entity. ~ - 1 - Yke JA'N 2~ From 1950 to 1977, these services were provided by Donald Barrett of Bay Cities Adjusting Company. From 1977 to January, 1981, Brown Brothers provided the City with claims administration services. Leonard J. Russo Insurance Services has administered the claims since January, 1981. Since the beginning of 1986, a number of service-related problems have occurred with Russo. In general these problems relate to the timeliness, accuracy and quality of both the investigation of claims and loss/financial information. Several meetings have been held with the firm concerning these issues, but the problems for the most part invariably effect the are continuing. Problems of this type abili ty of the City to defend claims or compromise claims where warranted. An appropriate solution is called for which will serve the long term interests of the City and provide the needed claims management support services to the City Attorney's office. For a number of years the City Attorney's office has been providing in-house litigation management services ln defending the City against various lawsuits. This program has proven successful in reducing potential outside defense costs as well as the ultimate payments necessary to dispose of these lawsuits. By implementing an in-house claims management program as well, staff - 2 - believes the City will enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of liability claims administration. This report recommends that the City implement a parallel program and initiate the in-house handling and adjustment of claims by City staff. PROPOSAL There are several municipalities throughout the State of California which currently administer their own liability claims and have successfully done so for a number of years. In preparing this analysis, staff visited two cities, Anaheim and Pasadena, which are operating effective in-house claims programs. In addition, Santa Monica I s current Risk Manager was directly responsible for developing such a claims program for the Orange County Transit District six years ago. That program continues to operate successfully to this day. The Risk Manager also spent a number of years working for an insurance company in a number of claims positions and is well versed in what is required to operate a professional claims management program. On an annual basis approximately 585 claims are filed against the City, based on a five year average. Currently there are 625 open claims pending some sort of disposition. Staff required to handle this workload volume would be as follows: - 3 - (1) Liability Claims Supervisor (1) Liability Claims Adjuster (1) Staff Assistant III The Supervisor would have overall responsibility for the day-to-day claims operation, supervise his or her support staff, develop appropriate administrative procedures and guidelines, maintain a case load of active claims, and ensure the overall quality and effectiveness of the claims program. An adjuster is required investigations (i.e., statements, claimant and adjust claims). to provide clerical in order to conduct the necessary field accident scene investigation, witness contact, prepare reports of investigation, A Staff Assistant III is required in order support to the claims staff (i.e., file set-up, prepare correspondence, E.D.P. input, phone calls, logs, forms etc.). The above support would enable the City to immediately take over both the handling of new claims and the existing pending claims currently managed by Russo. It would no longer be necessary for the City to use the position of Claims Supervisor in the City Attorney's office as a liaison with an outside administrator. In review with members of the City Attorney's staff, approximately 75% of the Supervisor's position has been dedicated to this function. - 4 - The claims management procedures to be established between the Risk Management Division and the City Attorney's Office would be similiar to those currently observed by Russo and the City. In general, the procedures would operate as follows: 1) All accident reports would be sent by departments to the Risk Management Division. 2) The City Clerk would forward a copy of all claims to the Risk Management Division and the City Attorney's Office. 3) Upon receipt of a claim for damage or an accident report, the Risk Management Division will investigate the loss and establish reserves as necessary. 4) The Risk Management Division would reject all claims in accordance with government code requirements. 5) The Risk Management Division will have $2,500 settlement authori ty per claim on non-litigated claims. Authori ty in excess of that amount will be requested from the City Attorney as appropriate. The Finance Department would issue checks on all approved settlements. 6) All subrogation efforts will be the responsibility of the Risk Management Division. Should a formal legal proceeding be required, the claim will be forwarded to the City Attorney's Office for further handling. - 5 - 7) The City Attorney I s Office will forward a copy of a Summons and Complaint to the Risk Management Division. At the point the Risk Management Division receives a Summons and Complaint, a report of investigation and case analysis will be prepared and forwarded along with all file material to the City Attorney for further handling. 8) The Risk Management Division will provide investigation support services on all litigated files at the request of the City Attorney's Office. 9) All recorded statements will be transcribed as required. 10) The Risk Management Division will claims bi-annually to ensure appropriateness of reserves. review all litigated the accuracy and 11) The field adjuster individual can be to major accidents damage. will be provided a pager so the immediately contacted and respond invol ving bodily injury or property 12) The Risk Management Division would assist the City Attorney's staff evaluations. as requested on litigated claim Data processing needs concerning claims, financial and loss analysis data would be provided by an outside service bureau. - 6 - Russo presently uses Corporate Systems for this service and staff has investigated contracting directly with this firm. This would allow the City to maintain its present data reports as the data is already stored by this firm and their system is both flexible and easy to use. Risk Management would input the data through HP150 terminals hooked up by a modem using existing telephone lines. Below is an outline of the present administrative costs the City incurs with Russo, and the proposed costs under a program of self-administration. Present Administrative Costs No. of Claims 586(Annually) x $197.00(per claim-Russo charge No. of Incidents 133(Annually) x $17.00(Russo charge =$115,442 Average Subrogation Fee(20% of Recovery) Supervisor of Claims%-75% of Salary/Fringe Benefits =$ 2,261 $117,703 $ 3,384 $ 34,912 $155,999 - 7 - Proposed Costs For In-House Self-Administration SALARY/FRINGES Liability Claims Supervisor Liability Claims Adjuster Staff Assistant III Fringe Benefits Factor(30%) SUPPLIES/EXPENSE/CAPITAL Ongoing (ANNUAL) Office Supplies/Expo $500 Util./Telephone $1,500 Mileage $2,500 Furn./Furnishings $500 Books & Pamphlets $250 Printed Forms $500 $5,750 (E-Step) $ 40,000 (Salary) $ 34,000 ( II II ) $ 25,644 ( II II ) $ 99,644 x 1.30 $129,537 Start Up Costs(ONE TIME ONLY) Recorders, Camera, Beeper $1,700 (2)CRT'S-HPDesk & HPWord $5,900 Modem, Desk & File Cabinets. $7,600 - 8 - ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING COSTS Ongoing{annual) Start Up Costs{one time only) Dial up-Asynchronous Phone Line $2,400 New Claims Files Software Lise. Fee $7,500 Personnel Training $2,550 Storage Fee Historical Claim Data Base Storage $975 $5,500 Main Frame Report Generator Report Printing $3,070 $500 $12,445 $10,050 COMBINED COSTS Salary/Fringe Benefits Supplies/Expense-Ongoing II II Start Up E.D.P.-Ongoing II II Start Up $129,537 $ 5,750 $ 7,600 $ 12,445 $ 10,050 $165,382 Because of non-reccurring expenses, second year savings of 7% or approximately $17,600 will result. If, in the third year, the - 9 - E.D.P. function is brought in-house, savings of 18% or $30,000 will result. The City Attorney's Office will, however, retain a position to coordinate its work with Risk Management and to handle small claims litigation, collection matters and to provide appropriate investigation and other assistance to the City Attorney's Office. The person performing these tasks wi thin the City Attorney 's Office will be classified as a Legal Secretary rather than Supervisor of Claims. ANALYSIS As an alternative to the operation of an in-house claims management system, the estimated costs of changing to a new outside administrator were also evaluated. Presently, the fee structure with Russo is on a flat fee-per-claim basis. Most other claims administrators will not consider a flat fee approach; rather they would enter into a contract on a time and expense basis. Hourly fees average about $32.00 per hour plus expenses (i.e.-telephone, mileage, photographs, photocopy, stenographic). Costs for data processing and start-up costs would be added to the flat hourly fee. At a minimum, the City could anticipate a fifty percent annual increase in costs over the current fees paid Russo. This would result in approximately $60,000 in additional administration fees per year. - 10 - However, the benefits of administering a claims program in-house should not be evaluated solely on the basis of potential administrative cost savings; such an operation offers numerous other benefits. 1) An improved level of claims service from both a qualitative and quantitative standpoint will be provided. Providing the City Attorney's Office with timely, comprehensive and reliable information would greatly enhance the City's ability to defend and dispose of claims on a compromised basis. 2) By allowing the Risk Management Division to be responsible for claims administration, the City Attorney's Office will be more fully able to dedicate their resources to the management and defense of litigated claims. 3) Some of the benefits experienced by other agencies which have implemented an in-house claims program include: a reduction in pending claims; earlier disposition of claims where warranted; and lowering of suits filed against those Agencies. 4) An in-house program will increase the Risk Management Division's involvement in determining the results resolution of liability issues, in of accident investigations and accident causes, and will serve to better coordinate and manage risk identification, analysis and control. - 11 - 5) Internal claims staff will develop a greatly increased knowledge of City policies, activities and operations which will provide more comprehensive insight in the investigation of accidents and the communication of potential safety hazards to appropriate City Staff. 6) By contracting directly for E. D. P. services, the City will have more complete control over the utilization of loss data for accident/loss analysis, financial and budget planning, and for evaluation of the claims function. 7) As the City has become much more self-reliant through self-insurance and pooling in recent months, the need for quality claims management has become much more critical. It is anticipated that approximately fifteen checks per month would be issued by the Finance Department for the payment of claims. At the same time, the City would be eliminating the account reconciliation function as well as the need for a separate checking account. It is estimated that six to eight months would be required to implement the proposed in-house function. It is recommended that the Liability Claims Supervisor be hired approximately three months prior to the program start date. This would allow that individual the necessary time to order equipment - 12 - and supplies, develop internal and external claims administration procedures, familiarize him/herself with City operations and procedures, hire the necessary support staff, contract with Corporate Systems and arrange for the communications hook-up and staff training, and develop and print required forms to be utilized. The remaining support staff should be hired and start work approximately two weeks prior to the City initiating its own claims handling. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Sufficient funding is available in the FY86-87 budget allocation for the Risk Management Division to cover any administrative costs incurred this fiscal year by the in-house liability claims program. Funding levels for FY87-88 will be proposed as a part of the annual budget submittal and allocated among various funds as is currently the practice. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council: 1) Authorize the City Manager to proceed with implementation of a City self-administered liability claims program. 2) Authorize the required staff positions as outlined in this report. These include the addition of a Liability Claims Supervisor: a Liabli ty Claims Adjuster: a Staff - 13 - ASsistant III; and reclassification of the Claims Supervisor in the City Attorney's Office to Legal Secretary. 3 ) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with Russo concerning the orderly transition of responsibilities from Russo to the City. PREPARED BY: John Jalili, City Manager Tom Phillips, Risk Manager Robert Myers, City Attorney Sandra Faithful, Chief Deputy civil Litigation - 14 -