SR-0 (9)
PL:JL~lk
:c~nc~: ~:~c: LJg~st q, 1983
Santa Mon~ca, Cal~forn~a
TO:
~~~or a~d Clt~- Counc~l
---....,.
.:: ;"\.v_~_:
CJ..ty Sta:f
C'''-= -=--I'T.
-'- -..... -"\.,....... .
Ap?eal, Inter~rr De~e:o?~e~~ Pe=~~t Ko. 1~6, 2222 L~ncolr.
Eo~lev~rd, C4, Mi~~-~a~t an~ Reta~: Store, T. W. Layman.
Introc.uctlon
~t~s lS an appeal from the Plannlng COffirnlSSlOn denlal 0: an appllcatlon
for an Interlrn Development Perm~t for constructlon of a convenlence
market at the northwest corner of Strand anc L1ncoln. Appeal 15 by
the app11ca~t.
eacksround
The a?pl~ca~t pro?cses to construct a 3,2~~ sS.ft. comme~clal bUlld-
~n~ ccntainlng a convenlence nar~et a~c retall store at the nortnwest
corner of Strand and Lincoln In the C4 Dlstrlct. The proposed
structure meets both the current zO~lng req~lrEme~ts and those
pr~Fosec by Resolutlon No. 6385 fer the area cf Llncoln Boulevarc
so~tn c= the Free~ay. The pa~k~ng and access~ays were approved by
the Tra=:~c Englneer. Follo~~ng p~~12c hcar2ng on May 16, 1983,
a~ \-~~ct ~he app12catlon ~as opposec by severa! ~elghbcrs, the
Plannlng Comrnlss~on unan~mously ce~~ec the ap?12ca~lcn or. the grounds
t~5t it ~oul~ ;re]UdlCe the Clty'S ac~l~ty
~t"'
'-~
adept a re~!l.sed
lane.
_;S~ E__E:L;",e::~.
':ne ap~::..cant
- - -
nas ~~pea~ec ~~lS
G.e't-errr,~na tl.on.
Sl~ce the Plannlng Comm~SSlon meet~ng of May 16, the appl~cant has
wet wlth residents of the nelghbor~ood ana ~as l~dlcateQ to staff
.....~-.....
,-_. c ~
"t~e~- ~a~"e ce",,"e:'cpec
a l:.st 0:: -..:,Ses ,-~~cl: '::'.- !r,...,t:...c.:
agree;:-.e~t
:~:a'~c=
-_....:::
Co.. ~
Clty CO'L.:ncll
-2-
Augt:.st
9, 1983
:-:ac:. "::"E:
- - -
.. ..... r-"' ......-,....
~.l...i,...-.l.......... '='-.
l:-i t.r::. s
~rcJect as It lS leased oecause of the
?c~e~~~al ~esat~ve effects or. t~e ne~qhborhooc.
(EXr.lb.l.t A)
C:. :: - C ~ J. r: c:.1 A ~ -:':1 c:r:.L t \.
~ ..
~~~e~ t~e ~=o~~s~o~s of Sect~or. 6 c= Orclnance No. 1251(CCS) the
c~ ty Cou:1cll may a =f .l.rrr., reverse or I"loc.lfy a::;y deterrrllnatlon of
tte P:a~~~~g CC~~~SSlO~ lD ~egard to a~ Interl~ Development Permlt
a~c the ceClS10r. of the C1t} Counell shall be flnal.
In approvlng
-'I"'
co.. .
a~p:~cation the COIT~lSSlOn or COUDCll must flnd that:
:n.:.y-;:;ose
~.:e De~e~o~~ent 15 CC~S.l.stent ~l~h the flnc~~gs and
0: Crcl~a~ce Ko. 125~(CCS).
2. ~he ~~c?osed plans corr-ply ~lth eXlstlng regulatlons conta.l.nec
~::E ~:,;:-_'::'c:';;.::..':" 2o::.e eXCEpt as notec.
3. ~~e eX.l.stlng and/or preposec rlgtts-of-~ay fcr Dott
peces~rla~ and automoblle tra=flc wlll be aGequa~e to accommocate
the ar.tlclpatec results of the proposed development ~nclualng off-
street parklng faclllt~es anc access thereto.
~. The ex~sting and/or proposed publlC ana/or prlvate health
C~C sc:e~y =ac~l~t~es (~~Cl~Glng, but not llr.~tec to, s6nltatlon,
se\-"e~s, stOlT' dra~ns, flre prctect~on cev~ces, protect~ve serVlces,
a~G publlC ut~:~t~ES) ~~~l ~e ace~uate to acconrr.odate the ant~c~-
patec results of the proposec development.
_. ~he proposed ceveloprneut ~.l.ll not preJuc~ce the ablllty of
~~e C~ty to acopt a revlsec land ~se element.
:- :-. E
reCO:T.r:le~ca tlons
.... -
presen...ec
~n
thlS report de not have
a budget/
:l~a~c~a~ l~pac~.
".. ~ -~~--~.-. -.-- ---
.. -::;. .... - - ~ - ........ -==-- .... -- --"-
:~ ~s res?ect=~~ly recD~~encec that thlS appeal be cen~ed wlthout
;re:~c~ce a~c ret~rnec to the P~an~~~g CO~~lSSlon for reconslderat~on.
:==;:~::::-ec... ~.
:~a:-~ 7lSar:., 0:.:--ec~c::- t CC1:L':-,.';'::1. t:" & Ecc.=--_or~c De\.elop!'1e~t
~c~es Lu~sforc, 0~rector, ?la~nlng anc Zcn~ng
;'.ttachrnent:
Letter from Developer's Attorney