Loading...
SR-0 (7) . e 1(t72 - cOb e- PL:CW:nh Counc~l Mtg: January 10, 1984 Santa Mon~ca, California TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Staff SUBJECT: Appeal, Interim Development Permit No. 146, 2222 Lincoln Boulevard, C4, Min1-Mart and Retail Store, T. W. Layman. Introduct.l.on On August 9, 1983, the appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of DR 146 was presented to the C.l.ty Council. The applicant was not present and the appeal was denied. At the request of Councilmember David Epste.l.n, the Council agreed to recons.l.der the item with the applicant present. Background The proposed project is the same as was presented to the Council on August 9, 1983. The staff report prepared for that meet.l.ng is attached. Also attached is a letter from the applicant's attorney which reiterates the terms and conditions to which the applicant is w.l.lling to agree. This department has been unable to confirm support for this agreement from the Seventh and Strand neighborhood organization. The Planning Commission, in denY.l.ng the proJect indicated to the applicant that if he wished to pursue the matter further, he should meet with concerned residents of the area to address the issues raised and resubmit a rev.l.sed proJect to the Planning Cormniss1on. ~ e eo Mayor and City Council -2- January lO, 1984 The proJect has been modified to specify uses wh~ch will not be included, but revisions have not addressed planning questions of site design and conformance to the proposed Land Use Element policies, specifically the Land Use Element deslgn issue of the build-to line with parking in the rear, or the provision of a broad landscape buffer along Lincoln Boulevard. Budget/Financial Impact The recommendations presented in th.l.s report do not have a budget/ financial impact. Recommendation It is respectfully recommended that this appeal be denied and that the applicant be encouraged to submit a revised project to the Planning Commiss.l.on for consideration. Prepared by: Carol Waldrop, Associate Planner Attachment: August 9, 1983 Staff Report Letter from Developer's Attorney