Loading...
SR-0 (45) Councl1 Offlce C~C Council Meetlng of September 25, 1984 sa~onica, Callfornia TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and Council Council Member Chrlstine Reed DiscuSSlon Regarding Posltlon Against 011 Drllllng in the Santa Monlca Bay Area Occldental Petroleum Corporatlon's appllcatlon for approval for oil drllling on Paclflc Coast Hlghway w1l1 be heard at the Los Angeles Planning CommlSSlon meeting on October 4, 1984. NO OIL lS request1ng that the Santa Monlca City Councl] reafflrm ltS positlon and transmit a letter to the Los Angeles Plann1ng Commisslon and the Los Angeles C1ty Councll . Attachment: Communlcation from John Murdock . JO"'FI"N B. ]\1-u.1UlOClK ATTORNEY AT LAW 225 SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD . SUITE 40'2 SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA \10401 . TELEPHONE 121:J 451~'7&'3 September l8, 1984 Ken Edwards, Mayor City Hall Santa Monica, CA 9040l Re: Occidental Petroleum Corp. Dear Mayor Edwards: This letter is written on behalf of No Oil, Inc., a non- prof1t corporation organized for the purpose of safeguarding the Pacific Palisades and Santa Monica Bay area from pollution and risks posed by oil drill1ng. As you know, Occidental Petroleum Corporation has applied for approval of oil drilling across from Will Rogers State Beach adjacent to the Sunspot Motel. The application was denied by the Los Angeles Plann1ng Commission in November 1982, but approved in principle by the City Council on Occidental's appeal in July, 1984. The Planning Commission will again vote on October 4, and the application will go back to the City Council shortly thereafter for final approval. Ten councilmembers have voted to approve the project. The City Council of Santa Monica has consistently gone on record at various public hear1ngs to register formal oppo- sition to t~s proposal, per the remarks most recently of Councilwoman Christine Reed at a Los Angeles Planning Department hearing on May 17th, 1983. No 01l, Inc. feels that the position taken by Santa Monica is extremely important in its reflection of the reg10nal issue of "gen€ral health, welfare and good zoning practice" which the City of Los Angeles 1S required to determine. We request an opportunity to speak before your honorable City Council at the meeting scheduled for September 25, 1984 and to present a suggested resolution for consideration and vote. The text of the resolution is enclosed herewith for your consideration. Please contact the undersigned to confirm whether this item will be placed on the agenda. We believe it is important to present this resolution, or one similar to it as drafted by your own members, to the Planning Commission before its vote on October 4, 1984. While we believe the Los Angeles City Council vote may be a foregone conclusion (due to extensive campaign contributions by Occidental, rather than the merits of the project (see enclosed)), we feel the Plann~ng Commission vote is critical because of its impact on the Mayor's veto power and any . . Ken Edwards, Mayor September 18, 1984 Page Two. eventual court challenge. We also feel it is necessary to have a clear adm~nistrative record on Santa Monica's final position, which has not been publicly stated since Occidental's presen- tation of a hydrauger drainage system as a "gift" to the City of Los Angeles. Thank you for your attention to this issue of i~portance to the many members of No Oil, Inc. rUl~o~&L. JBM: ch EncIs. cc: Joyce K. Chernick, Pres. No Oil, Inc. . . RESOLUTION Re: OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Santa Monica by its elected Council, restates and confirms its consistent opposition to approval of oil drilling operations at Pacific Coast Highway across from Will Rogers State Beach. The risks of upset, air pOllution and water pollution identified in the Environmental Impact Report, when weighed against the total potential gain from the drilling, demonstrate that the proJect continues to pose a danger to the health, safety, and welfare of the c~tizens of Santa Monica, notwithstanding any proposals to "stab~lize" the slide mass beh~nd the drill site. The clean air and recreational aspects of Santa Mon~ca Bay constitute the major assets of this City in terms of good health, psychological well-being, and economic impact to bus~ness. The imposition of an industrial use in this area, with the potential for blow-outs triggered by earthquake activ~ty and/or landslides, is un- acceptable and contrary to the best interests of the region as a whole. The City of Los Angeles is urged to deny this project outright in consideration of these regional interests, and in consideration of the potential impact on the Federal Government's decision whether to permit offshore drilling in the Bay. . . 1:06 Angd~6 <rimes WESTS IDE Sunday, Sep/ember 16, 1984 WPan IX Probe Sought Into Oxy Political Gifts Foes of Palisades Oil Drilling Oaim Donations Were Improperly Reported ~ By EL.o\Jl'oiE WOO 1\m-es Slat: W-nter Two Pa(;;dtl: Pausadas-based ~o counCIl "11ewoers ~03t of the g""'Oupa '!...1.a.t iaVI! tleen fight'ng fund! were glven La 'flel"'l.t>ers who Occlde-ntal Petroleum Corp- s pro. Ycted. last July '0 lentaU"'e~v a~- pos.ai t.Q drIll fat all III their -coaata.l prove Oc-cldem.aJ 9 ou-drt.llu1g Prol- corUmJIlIly have asked the !..oIl et:!L Angele.9 Ct:JUIlty dLslr.ct .IlIl1orney to As reqUIted D)" law OC:Cldem,,1 lfive:'!t1giillle \beu charges. that the reoorted tl}ose dQrlat.lOn.3 In 5tate~ JlJ company fillled to properly menlS !;.led wuh ~'1e orf'-::es oi ~i]e "'"e-por't more t.b.an .$45,i))() in ;lOlLU- secn:ltarY or Stale and the re,g15trar cai oo"l;[nbuuona to Loa Angeles Qf VCl12-rs l:l It-e city a"ld CJ1,;nly oi C.t}' CouncIl members Sa.'1 ;"anc1Sco .\t.oMey John B Murdock. 3a.Id !!owe..-er ilccord"ng :.0 ilubiJc he hiUF l!Ient a lett-eron be"'alf of ~Q record.!!l aVatliiOie at 'he Los Angel. C,; !nc and LM PaCIfIc Pa.:l1sades eJ Count" "eglstrar ~ o{fH:e OcCl 'l.es:ue'1t.3 A5.5n urg1n,g Dtet Atty dental haa rot. fIJea a "r.aJo" "::!or-or Roben H Pluilboatan to e.xa.rr;,me .:31atemenl with the t:oumy since ;.he ClrtUm.3WiDCe=I {)( OeciOeJ'lraJ.'s 1882 iille,ged. filJlurl! b file na,:or donor .-\ ilpokeSMan fOr Declde'lt.a! SaId campa.lgn natement.5i Wlt'rt the U..C the doc'.:ne"i.t:i 'Here ~-ot "'ed co~nly reglliuar-.ecorder :5 office w1th tJ"e count\" t~ca:.u!1! of a Murdoclc. sa.ld 1-e hDped tloe- d.ls~ cler~cal I!l"l"'or H~ s.<u,j ; r e :>auers trlCt an.orne)" w[)uJd we s"\\'m are ':1 tne prOCC.!oI8 lit beIng .3Uhm't. dctwn beCil.uae il declBlon on the oil led CO'l1palt):"s request fOr ~hree 011- Murdoek "aid u ;..as ''1Lcrest '!""]PlOg di~nc18 111 the ?al~sade-li 'a rrg that Dcclder-tal 'leg-Ieeted to pe"'wr'g In Ln-eC tv COUnC1J send a repon to ~ho;l CUUllt)' w"l.~re y;.,.der :it_to :vohucai reform .all the vot€1"3 ar~ wno rave il l.;Iw:!I. a C"orporatlol'! wahf'e.5 as a Sl.:lKe 'n ~"'-e ,Jlltc.on~ of ll[e 0'1 'lla,LQr donor cammlttee Ii It tJJrecuy CJmDa"l....:1 {:grt ta iI"'lti 10 tre o:::JI"""bute.:t S5 000 or'mor@ayeax lO P.l..L15~tit-5 ~t"J\' numt:.er ot cand.ldate6 or.,)lflce- F"a.tlure to f'le a l~mp41g'1 .s;;-,~e- !-o~i.d~rs The law T"tOl1il'a that nenL ''g a 'llls.d.-tmeanor D~nut/ "Ti.ajLi" donQr:9 1'lle campaJgJ' ..jj:tate- ~1iit. AtlY Deborah Kran:c:e iiatd meWB wr:.h mle or more gG-VIIfi1- V"oIato"s can be sertenced ta ,liL'f; rr~t!nt. ag~ncles InciuUirg..ne COO1\- Tonti's In -.dJl ..na iiT"~ $10.Ot'"'(J or ',':'lwruchli'eblti:lnes.!iIlSIoeated - ,-t'.ree ~.:nea the .lIT'ulU'Il of lr-e . ~CC;)nu"'g ~Q records 9uoplIea by urreported contnbUtlLlt"05. WhlCh- :::'ccldemal the 011 ::ompanv con- e:I.-er ~ greater sbe 'jaJd "r1b:.l~ed i65 400 iIJl:98J ar-d 157 25a When ro .eytdence O[ fl'dd ia:th.:r -n 'i;,e '1L'1I~ ~Lght 1r'on~..s at 1984 :0 ''ltemlOnaj dlsrella'""C. for ....he law 1;$ vanow;- State. county and cn, carn. l'owoa Kranze -:::a J, .he dl~trH.~ tJ.J.]g..~ au.omey me"eLy :lIeeY.S >:onoaaD{:e 7'l'e '"ec;:tdS 3how tl"'it $27lOO of WJ'h the 'aw r"ttt! $i35 -IoJ Occlde"'lt.<i1 j1.~bu.rsed .:!one Sdl": !l....e ;"{I,j I'-i)L ~een thO? L"st ....ear '~-"en to Lcs <tngel-es C.tv ie'l....r ~'~ma'Dml? :he ah~.gallon:; '--~i.Ji1c'l l.enOei"'5 Of he {::ontrJDil- :Iga.:.ns[ Occlden:.a~ ,,-d dec.:.me'l '0 '01":0:1 ma~"'" t~J:i year 125(()O We1'l1- ~LEASESEEOX'Y.rl.ie Ii . . OXY: Investigation Sought Into Company's Political Gifts Coatlnued l-rom Pace 1 COmm'i:!l'l on the case :n the lener Mu.tdock wd that t1e C-tv Council has been Influ- encea by the etten.!lve contnbu~ nons Occldenw 1.&1 mii.d.e but a-Ie-gedl)' nOl reported to oount)7 off1cJ.ai.s.. He also .saJd tt.e char-ga. t.....at the 011 company "as not l:om~ piled With "tttlJor donor campaign liWS .3hould be carefully exammed i"ld welg"l.<<i, in.13gbt of Ocadent.a.l'. I Da.n '11stary' of Lllegai or que.!- l'onabie ;xHit:cai donatl:one OecLce.,,[al Chalfr-a.n Armand na.mwer :::nade an j;legal 154.000 conLr"buuon [0 the 1972 reelection campaIgn of forme" P.l"e!lldent Richard M :ol1XOn He was fired Sj OOJ and sentenced La one- year's p-ooat'on In 1978, Qcc1denta.J -adr1.u.ted 'nakmg ill.e!,nl paymenu lOtalm, Sl2 millIOn to "{arlO-US pohtlca.i figures In :hu coun trv and olbroad beLween 1969 and 19'15 In 1980. [he- aU. co'l'1:pany was lh@ subject of an I::"Bl 'n~w.ry Ult.O paymet'),U1 totalmg 5120,000 ':rat alle.g-ecUy -were made on behalf of O-ecidentaJ. by Herber~ It.lun. a pnvate detecuve "";'.0 had ":Jeen involved ~ Queue cO~.I'Puon c.aaes According to ~e FBI -hoe moneY ililegedJ.y wu to he lO8ed. l.O- inf}:J- ence & City 'CauDell vote on Olj drillln'ln the Palisades.. Oc:c)dental denied t.l1e aUe.gilUOrl8 And W,a5 nQt oharged Qcclde-ntal', otl-dnllmg request os Ceinll reY"lew-ed ~y l.'ll! ::;Ly Ftanmng C0ITU1lJ38I00 which plcm:l t.O vote on 't Oct '1 The propolii.i wtil then go bac~ tQ the cou"";_'l I-or 31 'mal decta'on I ~ , ! [I i,: I '~ '.< j Ii I~ i! ~ . l~'.-'V I I ;, I ~ :~.t.'i~ : !f :'0- ~ ::~~ ~~ a-- ~ '" '" 3 ~~_ t;- mwmmmm :; ~ , ~ ~i . !J'iI1~ltifl!iI!t{!~ ~ iil!fl~i ii!!f Jj ... ~ " 1 2. Of ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~a H ;=. f i' ::l '= l" ... ~ > ~~.::=:-=-:r ::!~;;. :~~~ -in ii: ~a~ , . . ~~~ _c ~ E~~ :g~ ! ;!-;J * ~ i.; _e CI) ~ _e. - -- ::: ~ ..... Q.l r'l - to Wll! -. ~ ~ - (t) ~ -: o -t " -l~ -~ .f ~ ---~ o fm ~ 11.-...J ~ ~,.-,-, _e 5.~~.J. ~{~ ~~@ ~~ =~U f~'IK~- ;: ,~ :., - - -~~~ / ~ t#M!{' ~ ~ - := o M ... 'f ~~~:~~ ~ cd, '" "'0 ~ ~ "I:l .. 10 \ ' ~:!lj r .....' l _'/-;.' p , -, I